ESPN charges cable and satellite operators an average of $3.65 a month per subscriber, the most in television, according to SNL Kagan, a research organization. Multiply that by 98 million subscribers, over 12 months a year, and ESPNs financial armor adds up to $4.3 billion.
Google has a lot of articles. It's interesting to see that the price has more than doubled in five years and is up from $1.28 in 2000. It's no wonder they want to do the same with 360.
Because YOU will find your bill increased based on the drunken sportsmorons who WILL probably phone the ISP because they must have "sports" 24/7 injected directly into their veins or they will die of the realization of what sad, pathetic wastes of oxygen they really are.
Unlike how I am already subsidizing those pillars of society who need porn, movies, music, and WoW 24/7? Gosh, that'll suck.
I am glad my ISP doesn't pay to access espn360.com. If they did, they would be passing the charge through to all their customers, and I would be subsidizing their customers who want to watch espn360.com.
You realize, of course, that this is the ESPN business model. Basic cable customers already subsidize the customers who want to watch ESPN, which has the highest per-subscriber fee for a non-premium channel.
What many people are saying is that the system does not show a friendly attitude, combine that with the horrendous reception you have when arriving to US airports (I have seen things that really make me puke) and you have a recipe for disenfranchisement.
Foreigners aren't enfranchised in the first place, otherwise they'd be called "citizens".
This option will allow you access through doors between theatres... Please select... 1. BLUE 2. BLACK 3. PINK 4. SILVER 5. LIFE 6. CAT 7. YELLOW 8. HOBART
The other day an American tied with the Chinese on the uneven parallel and instead of both getting a gold medal, the "computer" automatically ranked the American second.
Okay, I can only ride the conspiracy train so far. This is my stop.
The tiebreak procedure was not made up on the spot by the computer or the IOC, nor is it some black box mechanism. The IOC forced FIG to create a tiebreaker system for the Olympics almost ten years ago, and it is understood by all international coaches, including Team USA coordinator Marta Karolyi. You can't blame the tiebreak procedure for who was denied a gold medal. Blame the judges for not awarding Liukin another.001 point if you like--blame Australian Helen Colagiuri in particular, who has a record of lowballing Liukin and whose scores were ultimately responsible for giving He the medal--but leave the poor, misguided tiebreaker out of it.
The last time I remember being there I went in to buy an HP financial calculator and the only salesperson in the whole place that I could find ignored me over some couple that wound up not buying the computer they were asking about.
I have yet to enter a BestBuy without being accosted by at least three salepersons. I think they are like cats, which invariably desire to sleep on the lap of the one person in the room with alergies. People like you who actually want to hold the pretty kitty are completely ignored.
A bag for holding coins is a change purse. If the change purse is of sufficient size or is used to carry standard female paraphernalia, then the change is dropped.
We use purse, handbag, and pocketbook pretty much interchangably to mean "that thing in which women keep their lipstick." By we, of course, I mean men. Women have all sorts of words for handbag, like Eskimos for snow. We don't understand these words.
The thing a man carries in his back pocket may be called a wallet, billfold, or pocketbook.
Indeed, they is hardly any more confusing than the second-person pronoun you, which is both singular and plural. The singular they is already an accepted usage in informal settings, and I have little doubt that it will eventually become legitimate for even scholarly usage in America.
Of course, this means that here in the South we will begin using they as strictly singular with the prefered third-person plural being th'all.
Perl DBI just works and doesn't corrupt my data. CGI (and Apache::Request in mod_perl) just works and doesn't corrupt my data. Namespaces just work. Strict coding can be enforced and works. Global variables just work. It works! And it doesn't annoy me all the time!
I agree. Unlike the grandparent, my nine or ten years of Perl use have led me to the conclusion that Perl works for you while PHP works against you. It's easier and faster to build robust HTML::Mason apps than PHP apps.
Incidentally, I don't have experience with PEAR::DB, but adodb has done alright by me when I've had to use PHP.
Perl can do everything that CLI PHP can, but it's far less cryptic to those that are new to it which means far less training time and far less debugging on my part after someone new to the language drops syntactic money wrenches into our code or logical errors.
I agree. Perl is far less cryptic.
By the way, you seem to have dropped a syntactic monkey wrench or two into your logical errors.
What is so spectacular about the animation of Hoshi no Koe? It's very good to have been produced by one person on a Mac, but he also took a lot of well-known shortcuts--like hiding the mouth of the speaker so it doesn't have to be animated.
I don't find it boring. Neither do I find it to be one of the greatest anime ever. Regardless, it's an impressive independent effort, for sure.
It's not hard for email services such as hotmail and yahoo to protect the privacy of its users to filter out the cookie-cut inline image.
So easy, in fact, that they already do it. When I heard the ridiculous claims from the didtheyreadit.com spokesman on NPR's Talk of the Nation last week, I immediately signed up and sent a test email to a new Yahoo account. Yahoo mail blocked the image by default.
I can't believe that anyone in their right mind would attempt to turn a spammers' trick into a legitimate business. Considering that even Outlook now has methods for defeating web bugs in email, this is obviously a dead end.
It's the same thing with pickup trucks. They are a status symbol. Most people don't ever carry anything with them. It's easy to verify this. The next time you're out on the road, look at all the trucks around you and count on one hand how many are actually carrying something.
I hate to break this to you, but here in the South the vast majority of trucks on the road are actually used to tow and haul things on a regular basis.
I don't know. Some AC was just lambasted for not demonstrating proper empathy regarding the dangers of living on the creaky ISS. I think people tend to value emotional displays far more than the actual emotions behind them.
He said,
"This is simply an indication that 95% of the population is scientifically illiterate."
instead of 'are'!
And he is correct. Percent can take a singular or plural verb. Population is singular, so 95% of the population is a singular subject. Note that he also writes, "1% of congress men ever elected have any scientific background," because congressmen is plural.
Slashdot Mirror
The judge can suspend the sentence.
No problem:
Google has a lot of articles. It's interesting to see that the price has more than doubled in five years and is up from $1.28 in 2000. It's no wonder they want to do the same with 360.
Unlike how I am already subsidizing those pillars of society who need porn, movies, music, and WoW 24/7? Gosh, that'll suck.
You realize, of course, that this is the ESPN business model. Basic cable customers already subsidize the customers who want to watch ESPN, which has the highest per-subscriber fee for a non-premium channel.
Foreigners aren't enfranchised in the first place, otherwise they'd be called "citizens".
This option will allow you access through doors between theatres...
Please select...
1. BLUE
2. BLACK
3. PINK
4. SILVER
5. LIFE
6. CAT
7. YELLOW
8. HOBART
Okay, I can only ride the conspiracy train so far. This is my stop.
The tiebreak procedure was not made up on the spot by the computer or the IOC, nor is it some black box mechanism. The IOC forced FIG to create a tiebreaker system for the Olympics almost ten years ago, and it is understood by all international coaches, including Team USA coordinator Marta Karolyi. You can't blame the tiebreak procedure for who was denied a gold medal. Blame the judges for not awarding Liukin another .001 point if you like--blame Australian Helen Colagiuri in particular, who has a record of lowballing Liukin and whose scores were ultimately responsible for giving He the medal--but leave the poor, misguided tiebreaker out of it.
A bag for holding coins is a change purse. If the change purse is of sufficient size or is used to carry standard female paraphernalia, then the change is dropped.
We use purse, handbag, and pocketbook pretty much interchangably to mean "that thing in which women keep their lipstick." By we, of course, I mean men. Women have all sorts of words for handbag, like Eskimos for snow. We don't understand these words.
The thing a man carries in his back pocket may be called a wallet, billfold, or pocketbook.
My "Don't Panic!" button is still pinned to my guitar strap. Alas, it is the only bit of swag I kept.
Those of us with tinnitus welcome low-level white noise.
Indeed, they is hardly any more confusing than the second-person pronoun you, which is both singular and plural. The singular they is already an accepted usage in informal settings, and I have little doubt that it will eventually become legitimate for even scholarly usage in America.
Of course, this means that here in the South we will begin using they as strictly singular with the prefered third-person plural being th'all.
Perl DBI just works and doesn't corrupt my data. CGI (and Apache::Request in mod_perl) just works and doesn't corrupt my data. Namespaces just work. Strict coding can be enforced and works. Global variables just work. It works! And it doesn't annoy me all the time!
I agree. Unlike the grandparent, my nine or ten years of Perl use have led me to the conclusion that Perl works for you while PHP works against you. It's easier and faster to build robust HTML::Mason apps than PHP apps.
Incidentally, I don't have experience with PEAR::DB, but adodb has done alright by me when I've had to use PHP.
Perl can do everything that CLI PHP can, but it's far less cryptic to those that are new to it which means far less training time and far less debugging on my part after someone new to the language drops syntactic money wrenches into our code or logical errors.
I agree. Perl is far less cryptic.
By the way, you seem to have dropped a syntactic monkey wrench or two into your logical errors.
Kathy Bates is at least three fine pieces of ass.
Shoot him somewhere not fatal. What can he do, call the cops and press charges?
He can shoot you somewhere fatal.
What is so spectacular about the animation of Hoshi no Koe? It's very good to have been produced by one person on a Mac, but he also took a lot of well-known shortcuts--like hiding the mouth of the speaker so it doesn't have to be animated.
I don't find it boring. Neither do I find it to be one of the greatest anime ever. Regardless, it's an impressive independent effort, for sure.
It's not hard for email services such as hotmail and yahoo to protect the privacy of its users to filter out the cookie-cut inline image.
So easy, in fact, that they already do it. When I heard the ridiculous claims from the didtheyreadit.com spokesman on NPR's Talk of the Nation last week, I immediately signed up and sent a test email to a new Yahoo account. Yahoo mail blocked the image by default.
I can't believe that anyone in their right mind would attempt to turn a spammers' trick into a legitimate business. Considering that even Outlook now has methods for defeating web bugs in email, this is obviously a dead end.
It's the same thing with pickup trucks. They are a status symbol. Most people don't ever carry anything with them. It's easy to verify this. The next time you're out on the road, look at all the trucks around you and count on one hand how many are actually carrying something.
I hate to break this to you, but here in the South the vast majority of trucks on the road are actually used to tow and haul things on a regular basis.
I don't know. Some AC was just lambasted for not demonstrating proper empathy regarding the dangers of living on the creaky ISS. I think people tend to value emotional displays far more than the actual emotions behind them.
However, I've found that people don't shop in Wal-Mart like they drive, and don't stay in the right lane except for passing...
I should think that means they shop exactly like they drive. Watch out for buggy rage.
Bah. Why would I want a transcoded copy when I can run the original through a frameserver like AviSynth to crop out the banner in real time?
He said, "This is simply an indication that 95% of the population is scientifically illiterate." instead of 'are'!
And he is correct. Percent can take a singular or plural verb. Population is singular, so 95% of the population is a singular subject. Note that he also writes, "1% of congress men ever elected have any scientific background," because congressmen is plural.