Slashdot Mirror


Telly MC2100, a Linux-based PVR/Media Center

An anonymous reader writes "LinuxDevices has published an article about the Telly MC1200, a new convergent PVR/mediaplayer made by Interact-TV. The Linux-based device supports up to three internal hard drives on which it can store and manage libraries of digital music, photos, and DVDs/video. It can also burn CDs and save DVDs to local mpeg (DivX?) files, and it can pause and record live TV in TiVO-like fashion. The device is based on a 1.2GHz VIA C3 processor and has 256MB of PC2100 DDR SDRAM memory, expandable to 1GB."

120 comments

  1. You may also want to see this.... by questforme · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:You may also want to see this.... by saden1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it just me or is this device is lacking in CPU horse power? Is anything under 2GHz going to cut it as far is encoding/decoding? It's in the right direction as far as capability although not in price.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    2. Re:You may also want to see this.... by maharg · · Score: 4, Informative

      As long as it's just encoding, it should be fine. MPEG-2 hardware version is on the way - see http://www.interact-tv.com/itvfaq/index.php?sid=92 60&aktion=artikel&rubrik=007&id=81&lang=en /

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    3. Re:You may also want to see this.... by maharg · · Score: 1

      Huh ? The slashdot url tag managed the url !
      It shouldn't have a trailing slash -

      http://www.interact-tv.com/itvfaq/index.php?sid= 92 60&aktion=artikel&rubrik=007&id=81&lang=en

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    4. Re:You may also want to see this.... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      The first generation TiVo was only like a 33mhz RISC processor... and it can encode and decode video fine because of dedicated hardware based encoder and decoder chip(s) (as opposed to doing it on the fly in software which would require more hefty cpu)

      Same principle applies here.

      Heck I've got a VIA 1ghz PVR sitting right next to me... I've got a hardware based encoder card (hauppauge 350 - which also has a hardware decoder) and has a marginal mpeg hardware decoder "accelerator" built in that helps the somewhat anemic processor playback DVD's, full screen high bit rate MPEGS without too much strain.

      *shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    5. Re:You may also want to see this.... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      doh! I can't believe they are using a software based encoder on an 800 dollar box... an oem hardware based encoder is really cheap, and can provide excellent quality, with lower CPU requirements.

      I *ASSumed* they were using hardware encoding...

      They might be asking a lot of that little VIA cpu.

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    6. Re:You may also want to see this.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Is anything under 2GHz going to cut it as far is encoding/decoding?

      I do that every day on a Pentium III-866 without any problems.

      In fact I can easily record 2 shows and playback 1 at the same time without trouble.

      Hell, I have a P1-233 that will play a mpeg2 at full resolution with only 5% processor load.

      It's called getting the right hardware. PVR-250 or other hardware encode cards, and a video card with hardware decode.

      only fools try to do it in software only.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:You may also want to see this.... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      No kidding. My $70 Tivo has more features than this thing.

      Then again, these articles seem to be for Linux zealots who can't afford the $4.99/mo for Tivo. :P

    8. Re:You may also want to see this.... by saden1 · · Score: 1

      Can TIVo play dvix over the network? If the answer is no, Tivo is useless!!!!!!

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    9. Re:You may also want to see this.... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      So I can sit at my PC to watch television? You have got to be kidding. Do you really want to archive a bunch of tv shows which will be broadcast over and over for the next 10-15 years? Go ahead, but it is a waste of resources. Get a Tivo and just record them whenever they come on again. Trust me, after the first 1-2 views you'll be tired of them and want 'em gone.

      Anyway, there is no need to stream. I bought a 35 hour Tivo for $70, pulled a spare 120 gig drive out of my file server, and after a few hours of reading and tinkering I've got about 120 hours record time. I could care less about any of this being accessible from my PC. The only reason I could imagine wanting to do such a thing would be to pirate television programming. No thanks. Its just television.

      Anyway, my Xbox streams DiVX and many other formats through XBMP off my server upstairs.

      I'm telling ya, a PC is a waste of money when being used as PVR. The small, closed systems are so much cheaper and easier to use. These two things go a long ways when your idea of living life does not entail a dirty little dark room with a bunch of junk computers laying around.

  2. I bought one for kicks... by zoloto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    from the more-money-than-brains dept.

    I bought one. My money, nahh, company money for R&D.
    Buy one here and rip it to shreds so you can learn all about it!
    http://store.interact-tv.com/store/product_info.ph p?products_id=72

    I'll post my review sometime.

  3. Starts at 800$US! by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For that much money, I'd rather build one myself.

    +210$ for 250GB instead of 80GB
    +76$ for WiFi
    +60$ for a CD burner

    ouch!

    1. Re:Starts at 800$US! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How much is YOUR time worth?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Starts at 800$US! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he likes do things like that or he has nothing better to do.

      Not everything has to be broken down into a USD based number ;->

    3. Re:Starts at 800$US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much is YOUR time worth?

      How much are you paid to post on Slashdot?

    4. Re:Starts at 800$US! by gabebear · · Score: 1
      I think it's a very decent price, you added a wifi card which is silly, and they say you can stick your own HDs in it(with 2 spare spaces yet). For the time and money that goes into building a MythTV box I'd say this is a great price.

      As far as I know it's the only commercial PVR that uses MPEG4 so you get several times the video per meg vs. any other commercial PVR. I'd buy one if I didn't already have my MythTV box.

    5. Re:Starts at 800$US! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Let me quote his post

      For that much money, I'd rather build one myself.

      He specifically named the money as his issue.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Starts at 800$US! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I telecommute, so while the database is performing updates I get paid my normal hourly rate.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:Starts at 800$US! by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      >>>
      For that much money, I'd rather build one myself.

      +210$ for 250GB instead of 80GB
      +76$ for WiFi
      +60$ for a CD burner

      ouch!
      >by Lord Kano
      How much is YOUR time worth?

      Well, believe it or not some people LIKE putting together PC components, compiling kernels/drivers/etc, fiddling with software, soldering, etc... (note: soldering not usually required for a diy pvr project...)

      This place is still news for nerds, right? I mean, if his or your time was worth *anything* would you really be posting here =)

      *Shrug*

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    8. Re:Starts at 800$US! by ill_conditioned · · Score: 1

      Drop the CD Burner, add another $10 and go all the way: http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproductdesc.asp?desc ription=27-152-021&DEPA=0

    9. Re:Starts at 800$US! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If he said that he wanted to build one for the fun of it or if he said that he wanted to build one for the experience, that would have been different; but he made the cost of the item an issue.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  4. Can I download the source? by wifitek · · Score: 0

    I would rather build this myself Can I?

    --
    Sig: BEEeeeP,,Please press pound, so I can get on with my fucking life!
    1. Re:Can I download the source? by alephnull42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can build something like it using MythTV, see various links in this story http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/09/004 7207&tid=186&tid=137&tid=106.

      --
      Not confused enough? http://translate.google.com/translate?u=www.slashdot.jp&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=ja&tl=en
  5. Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But obviously for someone who already assembles their own mini-ITX systems the price point isn't going to perk much interest.
    Naturally not everyone puts together their own systems, but a hell of a lot of those who don't know someone who will do so for a bong hit, a few beers or a bat of the eyelash or whatever.
    So it's cool to see people out there trying and saying it's time for this kind of device, but I bet most people on /. would be more likely to be interested in good prices on mini-ATX boards.

  6. In a word: WOW! by dmayle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Talk about PVR done right. I've been a big fan of Tivo, and if I hadn't moved out of Tivo land (USA), you wouldn't be able to pry mine from my cold, dead hands, but this is very tantalizing. It doesn't put restrictions on you, instead trusting you to do what you should. You can put your DVDs to the hard drive so you have a DVD jukebox, it's based on open source, and there's a developer version. (Though I must admit, I wish their program was OS, I think there's room for both types of software.) Hell, if nothing else, just buying the device and installing MythTV on it would work, if you wished. The whole built-in webserver, CD-ripping capabilities, and it starts at $800! I'm going to send them an email to see if it works with PAL tuners...

    1. Re:In a word: WOW! by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      can you tell me how they respond please?

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    2. Re:In a word: WOW! by MatSimpsk · · Score: 1
      No PAL support yet, it seems.

      From their support forums:

      We are working on a PAL version, the hardware configuration we have supports PAL. We have small modifications to do in screen layout for the increased resolution of PAL.

    3. Re:In a word: WOW! by dmayle · · Score: 1

      Answer: no This is quite redundant, it's just so that you get a reply message so you know the topic has been updated...

    4. Re:In a word: WOW! by Cato · · Score: 1

      They should also support SCART connections for the European market, as well as PAL. Also, I couldn't work out why you had to select Composite Video vs. 5.1 sound at order time - these are orthogonal options (Composite Video doesn't include sound, I believe) and are normally configurable.

    5. Re:In a word: WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coughSHILLcough!

  7. IR keyboard by monkeyfamily · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ewww.. it comes with an infared keyboard - these suck in my experience. They skip keypresses often enough to make them useless for typing anything of length. I use mine as a remote control because I haven't bothered to get a LIRC remote yet, but it seems like you'd need one or the other. If you want wireless typing, you've gotta go with rf.

    1. Re:IR keyboard by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      depends on the environment and on the keyboard model/maker obviously.

      it's possible to get it working pretty well.

      but true, rf is the king(but needs pairing, while being a short process it still takes time).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:IR keyboard by Stevyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but the obvious alternative is wired, which is going to be a messy pain in the ass in the family room. Maybe there is an RF alternative, but that would most likely be more expensive and not worth the added cost.

    3. Re:IR keyboard by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      There are a couple alternatives to IR keyboards (which have to be in line of sight of the receiver, which is why they tend to miss keystrokes). You could get a bluetooth keyboard if their system supported it, or even the wireless keyboards and mice from Logitech, which use a radio to transmit the information. I have one of the logitech keyboards, and I can go around the corner of the room and I can still type without problems (except for the problem of not seeing the screen :).

      They aren't that expensive either.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    4. Re:IR keyboard by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I use an RF keyboard for my HTPC setup. It workes reasonably well, range could use about another 5' but overall, I have very few problems. (logitech keyboard/mouse wireless combo)

  8. Opensorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where's the source code for public download then? (or at least, some parts of it)

    1. Re:Opensorce? by October_30th · · Score: 1

      Why should they publish it?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Opensorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if it uses or links to GPL'd components?

      For instance, the OS is said to be based on Linux - so at least the linux kernel should be there (along with the modifications done to it).

      IANAL though, but isn't this what GPL is for? If you modify the GPL'd code you've gotten and SELL it along with the modifications - you need to give back to the community?

    3. Re:Opensorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because its in the T&C of the GPL?

    4. Re:Opensorce? by October_30th · · Score: 4, Informative
      Sure, if the kernel has been modified, then GPL dictates that the modifications must be released.

      However, if you don't modify the kernel or any of the tools you don't have to release the source code of your application. My bet is that they went the NVidia road: a binary module.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    5. Re:Opensorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.interact-tv.com/itvfaq/index.php?sid=92 52&aktion=artikel&rubrik=007&id=128&lang=e n

      "We had to customize the kernel --"

    6. Re:Opensorce? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Sure, if the kernel has been modified, then GPL dictates that the modifications must be released.

        However, if you don't modify the kernel or any of the tools you don't have to release the source code of your application. My bet is that they went the NVidia road: a binary module.

      While that's the way it is commonly done, it's not true in important edge cases.

      The GPL focuses on offering source if binaries are distributed -- so that the binary can be built from source with any new modifications 3rd parties may want to make. That this implicitly covers modifications is intentional but a side effect.

      Example of an edge case: Say I create something and licence it under the GPL and turn around and sell it to my one and only customer. Nobody else has the source for that program. My customer resells or even gives away the binary, not caring about the source and never asking me for it. You get that binary and, knowing it has a GPL licence, ask my customer for the source.

      Who is responsible to provide the source? It's not me...it's the distributor; my customer.

      That said, *being the nice guy that I am*, I'd probably not irk my customer over this and would probably handle any requests for the source for them.

      Second edge case: Same situation as above, but I modify a GPLed program I didn't originally create.

      In that case, if I ship only the diffs, and the original source that I modified gets lost, my diffs are not useful; the diffs don't represent code that can be used to reasonably recreate the original binary.

      Also, keep in mind that if I never distributed the binary to anyone else, or my customer does not distribute it to others, there is no obligation to anyone who did not get the distribution of that binary intentionally. (If it's stolen...the GPL does not give the thief or anyone who gets the binary from the thief any additional rights!)

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    7. Re:Opensorce? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Example of an edge case:

      There is only one "edge case", and it immediately dead ends.

      If you do not use anyone else's code at all then *you* are not bound by the GPL. You could play games and supposedly distribute it under a GPL licence without compling with the GPL yourself, but the GPL licence effectively terminates itself. You may as well have handed it out with no licence attached at all. No one except you can ever distribute it. Claiming that it is GPL'd is a joke.

      No, presuming you are either bound by the GPL because you are using someone else's code, or that you have chosen to do a genuine GPL release, then there is no "edge case".

      In order to distribute in compliance with the GPL anyone must do one of the following three things:
      (A) Include the source; or
      (B) include an offer to provide - at cost - a physical copy of the source to ANYONE who asks for it, valid for at least three years; or
      (C) *if* you received an executable with a written offer you may (non-commercially) pass on that unmodified executable along with a copy of the source code offer you received.

      Say I create something and licence it under the GPL and turn around and sell it to my one and only customer.

      Ok, if you are in compliance with the GPL you either gave him the source or a written offer to give the source to ANYONE who asks for it.

      Nobody else has the source for that program. My customer resells or even gives away the binary, not caring about the source and never asking me for it.

      Ok, if he doesn't have the source then he CANNOT do that unless he includes a written offer for the source that he got from you.

      If you didn't give him a written offer for the source then he cannot to that at all.

      You get that binary and, knowing it has a GPL licence, ask my customer for the source.
      Who is responsible to provide the source? It's not me...it's the distributor; my customer.


      If he included YOUR written offer for the source, then yes, YOU are responsible for giving me and anyone else a copy.

      If he wrote and included his own written offer for the source then he is responsible. If he does not manage to cough up a copy of the source then he is in violation of the GPL and liable for copyright infringment.

      If he does not have the source and you did not give him a written offer to provide the source to anyone and everyone, then he is in violation of the GPL and liable for copyright infringment.

      Second edge case: Same situation as above, but I modify a GPLed program I didn't originally create.

      That's simple. You are bound by the GPL. If you did not give him the source or a written offer to provide the source to anyone and everyone, then you are in violation of the GPL and you are liable for copyright infringment.

      if I ship only the diffs

      Then you are in violation of the GPL and you are liable for copyright infringment. You are responsible for providing the entire source code.

      If you receive anyone else's GPL code there are no "edge cases" where you can pass that code on without including the source or a written offer for *anyone* to get the source.

      The only "loophole" is if you give someone an EXE with a 3-year offer for the source, and then wait for the 3-year offer to expire before passing it on. However then you have 3-year-old non-modifiable code, and you are forbidden from commercial distribution.

      Oh, actually there is one other way to escape the GPL. You could always wait for the copyright to expire. Chuckle.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Opensorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nvidia gets away with this becuase they DO NOT distribute the linux kernel.

      This company does.

    9. Re:Opensorce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if I ship only the diffs

      Then you are in violation of the GPL and you are liable for copyright infringment. You are responsible for providing the entire source code.

      Do you have a legal theory to back this up beyond "in a perfect world..."?

      He obtained the GPLed source legally, he can modify the GPL source legally, and he has NOT redistributed the GPLed program.

      You are going to have an ENORMOUSLY difficult time claiming that the GPL covers the diff. You can claim that the diff is covered as a derivative work, but until you can point to something that was actually copied, good luck getting a jury to understand it.

    10. Re:Opensorce? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Do you have a legal theory to back this up beyond "in a perfect world..."?

      Yes. And we are talking about the real world and the facts of the case he described.

      You are going to have an ENORMOUSLY difficult time claiming that the GPL covers the diff. You can claim that the diff is covered as a derivative work

      It does not matter whether the the diffs are a "derivative work" or not. He could not have legally distributed the full EXE product unless the entire project is covered by the GPL. He could not have legally distributed the full EXE product unless he chose to place his diff under the GPL.

      until you can point to something that was actually copied, good luck getting a jury to understand it.

      Sure, the original GPL code in the EXE that he said he was distributing. Any non-diff protion is a derivative work within that EXE, and it was actually copied.

      He claimed he was going to ship an EXE and just his diffs. That is a violation of the GPL. As I said, he is legally responsible for providing the entire source code.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  9. copying DVDs by bjpirt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would imagine that the saving DVDs to local files feature would just keep the streams as MPEG 2 otherwise, on this CPU, the rip to divx would take quite some time. Of course from there you could convert it in the background.

    1. Re:copying DVDs by gabebear · · Score: 2, Informative

      MythTV actually handles this gracefully with a background transcoder, it eats basically only eats CPU time that would be idle and on these kind of machines that can be a lot.

  10. Which EPG do they use? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    I can't find it in the article or on Interact's website. I hope they use XMLTV (because then at last, there'd be a PVR I'd consider buying).

  11. Augh! Fans in a living room device? by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That blows. Considering the fact that this thing will be on 24/7, it should be absolutely silent rather than 'quiet'. Can I use the software on this machine, instead?

    1. Re:Augh! Fans in a living room device? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      For a lot of people, I don't think it matters that much. For one, the device will be at least ten feet away. I bet the road noise of passing cars is higher. The noise of children, the noise of the refrigerator, furnace, etc are probably all louder.

    2. Re:Augh! Fans in a living room device? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      I agree. Passive cooling is hell, but they should do like apple and put a shitload of slow moving(silent) fans in there. My G5 (also my PVR/TV/DVD) is 100% silent and it makes a whole lot more heat than this thing.

    3. Re:Augh! Fans in a living room device? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does matter. Recently, my central heating furnace was replaced. The old one contained a fan that was on 24/7. It's 10 m away, and it certainly wasn't loud, but it did get annoying, esp. in the evening when all else was quiet. The new CH switches its fan off when it's not needed, and I'm surprised by the difference it makes. Finally I can have absolute silence if I want it.
      I've noticed this in other situations as well. The AC at the office, for example. It's quiet enough that you don't even register it consciously, but it's a relief when the thing is shut down.

    4. Re:Augh! Fans in a living room device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fans in a living room device? ... That blows.

      Ha! I geddit!

    5. Re:Augh! Fans in a living room device? by takshaka · · Score: 1

      Those of us with tinnitus welcome low-level white noise.

  12. Processor info is wrong/misleading. by Kujah · · Score: 3, Informative
    There is no such thing as a 1.2ghz via c3 processor. However, there is such a thing as a VIA Cyrix 1.2 GigaPRO. It is clocked at 800mhz. Here's the info on it (I just so happen to be running a box with one of these):
    shorty dev # cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : CentaurHauls
    cpu family : 6
    model : 7
    model name : VIA Samuel 2
    stepping : 3
    cpu MHz : 800.148
    cache size : 64 KB
    fdiv_bug : no
    hlt_bug : no
    f00f_bug : no
    coma_bug : no
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 1
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de tsc msr cx8 mtrr pge mmx 3dnow
    bogomips : 1572.86
    1. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bummer, maybe not in your contry. They've been around for a few months where I live on new EPIA models, and the 1ghz version of C3 is available about anywhere i've checked.

    2. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative

      WTF?? The C3 can be clocked up to 1.4 GHz, according to the specs page.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by iive · · Score: 1

      There is something else that looks fishy to me. Everybody that have tried such ITX mini boards with these C3 processors know that they are just plain slow.

      I mean that 1000GHz Nehemiah (with SEE) decodes an normal DVD (MPEG-2) with about 90% CPU in MPlayer. Where 80% are for the software decoder and 10% for XVideo and audio decoding.
      As it is written in all manuals, an Pentium 500MHz processor can decode DVD resolution with proper XVideo acceleration.

      What's the problem? Everybody knows that encoding is slower than decoding! The encoder should try quite some possible combinations for every 16x16 block before finding the optimal one. (You cannot do Motion Estamination without comparing hell a lot of a blocks. The Motion Estamination is the process that removes temporal redundancy and the main reason for MPEG superiority).
      Without hardware encoder this box just don't have the power for high quality encoding.

      So it is going to make an ugly quality capture or to waste quite a lot of HDD space.

    4. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by SuperCal · · Score: 1

      Some of the Via boards have built in hardware mpeg encoders and decoders. I wonder if they used one of those.

      --
      Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    5. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Via chipsets since the 1Ghz have onboard hardware MPEG2 acceleration. Playing or encoding MPEG2 takes very little CPU time, as it is farmed out to the chipset. Unless of course you are using software that doesn't use this hardware. Mplayer has this now btw.

    6. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by iive · · Score: 1

      I doubt.

      I looked closer at the latest models.
      The TV encoders actually are TV-out. They encode analog signal.

      VIA have anounced DSP encoder chips, but I don't think they made their way into the normal ITX boards.

    7. Re:Processor info is wrong/misleading. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something else that looks fishy to me. Everybody that have tried such ITX mini boards with these C3 processors know that they are just plain slow.

      The problem is noise. Centaur, the company that makes the cpus for via, deliberatly made design decisions to reduce complexity, hence performance, for the sake of lower heat output, hence quieter(silent) cooling.

      Comprende?

      Its their niche market they can compete in with out sounding like the fucking jet engines that AMD & Intel are.

  13. IANAL, but IMHO, WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BBQ ASAP! BYOBB

  14. Saving DVDs.... by Airw0lf · · Score: 4, Informative

    It can also burn CDs and save DVDs to local mpeg (DivX?) files

    Having skimmed through the article, I can't find any mention of exactly how this PVR backs up DVDs. However, I would almost certainly rule out DivX backups for a couple of reasons:

    1. Encode time - You don't want users sitting around waiting for encoding to complete. Even if this is done in the background it will likely degrade the PVR's performance and reduce the picture quality of the DVD being backed up.
    2. DeCSS - converting to another format will require circumventing protection on the disc. This will create some iffy legal issues, as it makes it easier (in theory) to exchange DVD content.
    3. The DivX codec itself requires a license does it not? It might be free for personal use, but certainly not for a commercial app. If any compression is going on, it will probably be to an open format such as XviD.

    I think that the VOB files on the DVD are simply saved to hard disk, or maybe the player makes an image of the whole DVD. The PVR can then easily playback the DVD as per normal, except that it is now running off the hard disk.

    1. Re:Saving DVDs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can just copy files from a DVD and have them work.

      DVDcss is aviable if you pay the fees.

      The Libavcodec from ffmepg is superior (faster + better results) to any version of dvix or xivd, I would use that instead.

      All of this is very simple, I've done it myself using command line and scripts using mencoder. However I've moved on to the more sophisticated setup provided by Mythtv.

      All in all the limitations you expressed are easily overcome by the most basic Linux setup.

      The Via proccessor seems slow, but with hardware based encoders and stuff like that it's very easy to get very good results. That's why the thing is somewhat expensive.

      That's what Tivo does. It's just a normal PC, don't ya know? With some propriatory hardware to encode streams. Stuff like Divx is only slow because it's software based. Everything needs to be ran in software (high cpu dependance, but very good results are possible)

      Newer Via mini-itx setups come with a mpeg4 accelerator for playing stuff buy default. That way playback of compressed files is very low cpu usage affair.

      Hardware-based mpeg4 encoders are aviable and would be wicked fast compared to a purely software solution (Divx, Xvid, libavcodec). Of course all this costs more and would help to explain it's price.

      If you can afford it, get it. If you can't afford it use your skills at Linux to setup a fast proccessor and a couple Win PVR-250/350 cards (Like I have. It's very nice and conveinent). If you can't do that then buy a Tivo.

      But I suppose if you want to waste your money you can always get the HTPC version of WinXP on a Dell or HP machine.

    2. Re:Saving DVDs.... by iive · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think that the VOB files on the DVD are simply saved to hard disk, or maybe the player makes an image of the whole DVD. The PVR can then easily playback the DVD as per normal, except that it is now running off the hard disk.
      If you know the answer why do you ask? ;) About the rest of the questions. 1. Encode time - The CPU is just horribly slow. It will take ages to recompress it. And there is no sense to do it. The quality will degradete. 2. DeCSS - Probably you have missed that MPlayer can play VOB's that are copied unencrypted. DeCCS on the fly:) 3. DivX codec - There is no need for license if the country (EU) doesn't have patents. Don't forget that license is permision to do/use something that is otherwise forbiden. You may not be allowed to use DivX trademark logos, but as long as it works who cares!
    3. Re:Saving DVDs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libavcodec from ffmpeg is better then Divx anyways.

      However the real solution is going to be hardware encoders.

      It's actually realy simple.

    4. Re:Saving DVDs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't say what the rate of encoding to DivX is. The box uses hardware to encode TV to the hard disk, right? This is done in real time. May be, just may be (I don't know but it seems neither does anyone else here), they feed the video from a DVD to the hardware encoder to encode in real time. Why rely on a slow VIA processor?

    5. Re:Saving DVDs.... by geckofiend · · Score: 1

      1. That's why you do it as a background process. After the data is pulled from the disc, you can convert to MPEG4 in the background. (ala MythTV)

      2. Not all disk require it.

      3. Use xvid. it looks better anyway

    6. Re:Saving DVDs.... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      IIRC, MPAA approved codecs won't play encrypted images and if they use an OSS player, they're already violating the DMCA, so why not go all the way and re-encode to XviD (except for the time problem, of course).

    7. Re:Saving DVDs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um...
      mplayer dvd:// -dumpstream ?

      of course getting it to rip in english, the subtitles for non english bits, and rear channels for surround sound is right PITA.

    8. Re:Saving DVDs.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " Even if this is done in the background it will likely degrade the PVR's performance and reduce the picture quality of the DVD being backed up."

      Um, no, it won't reduce the picture quality of the DVD being backed up. You might be thinking of video the thing might be trying to capture and encode in real time. That could be affected, but that's more of a prioritization issue really. Pause or slow the encode and the capture will go just fine.

      I'm not arguing with your whole post, just wanted to clarify this point you made. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Saving DVDs.... by caudron · · Score: 1

      The DivX codec itself requires a license does it not? [...] If any compression is going on, it will probably be to an open format such as XviD.

      Saving a DVD to disk requires one as well. Currently there is only one product on the market that is legally allowed to do so.

      http://www.kaleidescape.com/

      The Kaleidescape is an enormously overpriced beast ($20k+ for the lowest end model). It's so controversial that the DVD consortium (those diefied few who deign to control such lofty things as DVD technology licensing) still won't even publicly admit they granted Kaleidescape a license.

      I serioulsy doubt that this other company is legally allowed to save DVDs to disk.

      That said, maybe they think they can get away with disregarding the legality...in which case, not paying for a legal DivX license isn't so terribly unlikely.

      --
      -Tom
  15. $5 an hour after taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  16. INDEED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    One only has to witness the superiority of British automobiles to see why!

    1. Re:INDEED! by maidhc · · Score: 1

      Brits make cars that are fun to drive? So there is a british car industry then?!?!?! ... Maybe you meant Germans, or Japanese

    2. Re:INDEED! by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      MG Rover is British-owned. So are companies like Caterham, Westfield and Noble. Also, Jaguar, Aston Martin and Ford Europe may be owned by Americans, but their products are still designed by Brits, making them fundamentally different from the made-in-Detroit products from the same company.

    3. Re:INDEED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wel stop here pleeeeeeze!

      Jaguar and Aston Martin are not quality cars, they stil need expensive maintenace to keep them running, even the new models. So their quality just sucks for the price you pay for them.

      German, French and Japanese build cars are just the best!

      Always those stif assed brits with their crappy expensive Dinky Toys.

  17. Re:Uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You seem to forgot that even if the code is released under the GPL it is still copyrighted by the author(s), and possibly some IP laws might also influence on the issue.

    Remember: Copyright laws have, will be and most certainly will always be proven in a court of law of civilized countries.

    Now here comes the dilemma: Let's think like the Real World here - assume that GPL hasn't been proven, and possibly it'll never be proven:

    1) If GPL isn't a legally binding contract - we're infringing on the copyright of the original author by modifying the code and selling it over and over again - "we" as the Company who sells the code lose. (See Copyright laws on "derivative work").

    2) If the GPL is valid, we are violating it by not giving the modifications back as source code - "we" lose again.

    The GPL is pretty well designed so that either way, the original author and the OSS-community wins.

    IANAL again, but few insights offered here..

  18. Um.. right.. by Xyl3ne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article at Linux Devices http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4917820524.html says it uses a 1200mhz (1.2ghz) VIA C3 CPU, yet the offical site says "VIA C3 933MHz x86 Processor". If thats not dodgy, I don't know what is.

  19. Yes, if you buy a unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I download the source?

    They aren't obliged to give you the GPL'd source if they haven't sold you the binaries, ie. if you're not a customer for this unit.

    1. Re:Yes, if you buy a unit by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      So the first person to buy one gets the source and throws it on the web. Heck, I bet someone could raise the funds from donations if s/he promised to do that. Come to think of it, that'd be a nice workaround for that scumbag that's charging for GPL'd software and using "perpetual private beta" as a loophole.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  20. wtf?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy was not offtopic. informative at the very least. come on mods, think!

    1. Re:wtf?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He provides nothing informative in his post, and almost looks like he is just some company employee just trying to hype this product up. If he really did buy one, then how about posting some information on it. According to their website, the product has been around since June, so he should already have it. But even if he just bought one so he could post on slashdot how cool he is, it still goes back to his main goal of being a karma whore, and thus is being modded down accordingly.

  21. mod parent -1, speaking from my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U can't just copy encrypted VOB files to HD and play from there - all you get is garbage.

    Go ahead, try it yourself before posting such crap.
    Fucking idiot!

    1. Re:mod parent -1, speaking from my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's speaking from YOUR ass? What's he doing in it?

    2. Re:mod parent -1, speaking from my ass by Balthisar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Huh? I do this regularly on my Mac using DiskCopy (part of the OS) or Toast. Now I'm not the type of Mac user that thinks this can ONLY be done on a Mac, so, well, I guess I logically assume it can be done on other OS's with no problem.

      --
      --Jim (me)
  22. MC1000 Was Still A Work In Progress by verrol · · Score: 3, Informative

    The guys at Interact-TV are great. Their device has a lot of potential. Not only that, but when I had issues, they were more than happy to address them.

    I bought the MC1000 last year November. I was so excited to get it. I am not surprised that the Wired article said the Telly was buggy. I eventually had to return mine. I really wanted this to work, and it kind of. But it crashed so often and didn't do what it was suppose to well. At first, it didn't record, rip CDs, didn't play DVDs as it should, tune in some channels, and a few other minor things. I returned it for some work and they fixed many of those problems. When I got it back, it still didn't rip cds properly. There were gaps in the audio, the names for album and song title were corrupt.

    There were several minor annoyances that I just got tired of this thing not working as it should. I didn't mind that it wasn't super quiet, I knew it was computer and not the best. I think the price was fair for no monthly fee and basically having an open platform and open source. I think they will or could make a really good device if they just make it work without crashing and simply do what it is suppose to. If it is going to rip CDs, well I want to know when I put a CD in it will rip.

    Even thought I returned the one I bought last year, I am still monitoring their product releases to see when they might have something solid for me.

  23. Expansion by MrNonchalant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's most interesting to me is the single PCI expansion slot and open source OS. Means this thing is open to some serious customization. For instance, I could potentially hook this up to my wifi network.

    1. Re:Expansion by MrNonchalant · · Score: 1

      On RTFAing an 802.11b adapter is optional. Ignore me.

    2. Re:Expansion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Mini-ITX motherboard has one PCI slot. From the photo, this thing has a PCI expansion card, plus a free slot, so it looks like they plugged a PCI riser card backplane into the one PCI slot, and the backplane gives you (at least) two slots. They use one for some kind of hardware video capture board, from the look of the photo.

  24. Divx... by dj245 · · Score: 1
    ...isn't everything. Sure, they're trying to attempt to be a standard now, but I find the non-adware/spyware open-source Xvid to be far superior in nearly every way. And it plays Divx now so you don't have to have to sign your soul away to Claria in order to watch Divx.

    Sorry to go slightly offtopic but although Divx is probably more well-known and more downloaded, Xvid seems to me to be the better codec (especially if your privacy matters to you).

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Divx... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right. Xvid is the best codec I've ever seen. If used properly, you can get a dvd down to 700 mb at pretty good quality. Put that video on a television and you'll have trouble noticing the difference. A lot of other codecs are way to artifacted when compressed to 700 mb.

  25. XUL? by berkut7 · · Score: 1

    The article mentions XUL (XML user-interface language), is that anything like Mozilla's XUL? Mozilla Foundation seems to be quite protective of its acronyms...

  26. Pedant time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MC2100 or MC1200? Headline and article are kinda incongruent.

  27. NTSC by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    No PAL yet? I thought NTSC and PAL were easily provided for no extra cost on new TV/Video boxes these days. Its only a decoder, right?

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  28. No Digital Coax Out?? by tlh1005 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At first I thought it didn't have one but i read more and found out it's optional. How in the hell do you have digital audio out as an "Option", especially when the thing costs $800? I know these units serve more purpose than Tivo but the Cable/Sat industry wins here if you can rent from them. I pay $7 a month for PVR/DVR. Let's say they upgrade the boxes every 2 years. It would take 11 years for the cost of renting to equal the cost of buying this thing. I will have traded for updated boxes 5 times by then, while I'd be stuck with 11 year old technology if I had bought this $800 toilet, I mean PVR. Optional digital out, WTF?

    1. Re:No Digital Coax Out?? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I can't see where it says optional digital out...

      But on most via m10k series mobo's, which I believe they are using here... you can EITHER have composite video out via the RCA jack OR SPDIF digital audio out. hence they used the term "optional" as they must set the jumper at the factory for you =)

      regarding the cost of ownership... not sure what to tell you. The Telly MC2100 might not be the answer (if they'd even out their software a little from what I understand they could have a solid hight end boutique market, I guess)...

      If you are happy with your cable company supplied DVR, enjoy! You are getting pvr/dvr functionality that makes TV viewing so much more enjoyable without a lot of upfront costs of TiVo or DIY... but other people like choices, and expandability, or tinker-ability...

      *Shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:No Digital Coax Out?? by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarrifying. It is SPDIF. I saw "optional" on the order form. Whenever I see this word it instantly leads me to believe more $$. I like expandability and tinkering myself but the amount of that provided by this deviceisn't worth $800 (for me). I can see people buying into it but I think there are much better options and devices currently available. If I didn't like any of those I'd build my own before paying $800 for this.

    3. Re:No Digital Coax Out?? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      heh, I agree whole heartedly... unless there software is a knock out (in this case better than mythtv/freevo)...

      I've built a comprable system for much cheaper. So the value must be in that it works out of the box, or the software is awesome... (I guess 1 out of 2 aint bad?)...

      *shrug* maybe this is something more for the guys on MTV "Cribs"... i.e. "there's my x-box, playstation 2, and my Telly MC21000..."

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  29. Save your Money! They are just selling a prototype by siasl · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a good trick if you can do it. But at least the MC1000 (which I have) is not a finished product. 3.0 version of OS is still not available. Was due in Feb/04 1. ) Non selectable recording resolution. Default is poor and pixilated. 2 No Live TV pause function. Minimal expectation in anything calling itself a DVR/PVR. 3 Incomplete Web Interface. Web interface does not allow selecting programs to record. Why bother with a Web interface if you have to go to the Telly app to actually program the thing. 4.)No way to use Firewire input for DV. All this hardware, and no software to control it. At least it is not documented 5.) Have to drop into linux to rename video files input from external sources. Can\'t rename files in video library easily. 6.) Awkward input of audio MP3 files. Many won't load into library since they do not meet some "undocumented" metadata standard. 7.) Video recordings over 2G in size can't be downloaded from the Web interface. Get Permission denied error. 8. Currently Zap2It Data Direct Service listings service is limited to the most basic functionality, and you have to "renew" every 3 months. But at least it's free.... Telly is a prototype that is not even 50% there yet. At least not with the current OS (2.8x). Anyway I went and build one myself with dual boot Myth/Sage and am using the MC1000 pretty much as a firewall/DNS/Wins server now. At least at that job it is meeting expectations.

  30. Oh and did I mention.... by siasl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The support is basically limited to emailing you that. "That problem will be fixed in 3.0"......

  31. Re:Save your Money! They are just selling a protot by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

    It sounds like all of the problems with this computer are in the software. Could you buy it, add a hauppage 350, and then just put myth TV on it and use that?

    --
    I do security
  32. OT: Speaking of MPEG hardware by swb · · Score: 1

    ...when are we going to see inexpensive MPEG encoder chips becoming standard on PCs? I'd love to have hardware encoding in my PC that would let me turn an hour of DV-AVI into MPEG2 in 20 minutes, but I could live with something that did it even in real time.

    The hardware can't be that expensive given that it shows up in $300 set-top boxes. You can buy cards that do this (and usually a bunch of other things), but they're almost always really expensive.

    Is it a licensing thing? Even that doesn't add up given set-top DVD recorders that make essentially unlimited MPEG2 encodings.

  33. Not a serious box... by cayle+clark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...for home-theater buffs. No component video; while S-video is a step up from composite, anyone with (or wanting) an HD monitor wants component. No support for 1080i -- which means that even my little $800 samsung TV can't be used at its full resolution, let alone my brother-in-law's fancy 40-in LCD. Nor can you play DVDs at their full resolution and rectangular format.

    Although it claims 5.1 audio out, there's no telling what the audio quality is like, compared to a decent receiver. And none of the sound-processing options of a receiver, or Dolby or THx movie encodings, etc. And no hi-end audio inputs, so it can't be used as a receiver, to switch between and record from other audio sources.

    Compared to DirecTivo, it has only a single tuner, not two, so it can't record two simultaneous shows while playing back a recording, or record one while watching another. It doesn't have the season pass -- seek out and record every, or every new, episode of a series regardless of schedule changes -- or wish lists -- find and record every program whose title matches a search string. It has a "favorites" feature but does it auto-record "suggestions" based on your viewing patterns?

    Compared to Tivo media management, there's no indication it will work with OS X, and definitely no connection to iPhoto or iTunes libraries. If you've already got gigabytes of music a/o photos stored in those (or other) apps, you don't want to either move them all to a new media management solution, or duplicate them in two unrelated and uncoordinated systems.

  34. problems by wmeyer · · Score: 1
    No mention is made of anything technical about the signal handling (bitrates, encoding parameters, etc.)


    Interesting how much excitement can be generated over a so minimal product description, merely because it's Linux under the hood. I doubt that people here would be giving that announcement much positive response -- or even grudging acceptance -- if it were running Windows.


    The point should be whether the box does a good job of its primary function: video record and replay.

    --
    --- Bill
    1. Re:problems by waferhead · · Score: 1

      Anyone with $600 and ANY Linux experience can have a decent dual tuner (PVR250) HW mpeg Athlon box built from retail parts running in 2 hours, recording shows in mythtv, on a 250G drive. Suggest Nvidia 440 MX w/svideo+dvi out.

      Install Mandrake 10, and google for "easy urpmi", "thacs" and "PLF" add the sources (including main and contrib) , and "urpmi mythtv-suite".

      I highly suggest a broadband connection, and avoiding ALSA on NForce2 hardware.

      I also suggest an Antec Sonata or Overture case, as they have 120mm fans, which are quieter AND move more air.

  35. no component & coax/optical out & no lcd by dindi · · Score: 1

    I am kinda missing the component video output ...
    and you know what ... I can live with that maybe ... but no digital optical audio ? even no digital coax ??? (I prefer it over optical, as you can extend it more easily, and cables are cheaper ... of course for close connections i choose optical ... just like the hum of that red light that sneaks out as my rottveiler tends to get behind the TV ...):)

    so no hdtv connection, no chance to enjoy DTS .. (or anything that travels in an only digital way to your amp ....)

    5.1 hookup is there, but hey .. i did not buy an amp for TV+my game consoles to hook an other 5 speakers up into my living room ...

    where is the display ? not that I like to stare at the LCD (i actually dim it to minimum (nice feature on sony amp & dvd) but I expect to play mp3's and Do not want to have a TV on just for OSD ...

    sorry for the strong critics , but instead of that I would shove a digital receiver card in a mini ATX mobo with a 2gig celeron and a sb live for digi out ... 2 laptop drives for silent storage and a 100buck DVD/CD reader/burner ... buy an lcd for usb port ... and use mplayer for avi, ogle for DVD ... ....

    of course there are people who roll their own cigarettes ... and the ones that don't ... i don't smoke :)

  36. Are you telling me... by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    Are you telling me there's a penguin on the telly?

    -- MarkusQ

  37. But can anyone find an alternative?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been looking for a box like this for a while now, and while mythTv seems to satisfy my every need I really can't be bothered with the hassle of learning linux, buying components and putting the whole thing together... so unless anyone can point out someone selling silent livingroom mythtv boxes that are already built...

  38. Wired Magazine by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 1

    According to Wired magazine this PVR is "Pricey. Crashes frequently. Lackluster, awkward operating system."