Seriously. Don't they charge a lot for their services? Wouldn't advertisers be demanding accurate info or find another way to get it? Or are these industries totally ossified with denial?
Not sure what you mean by traditional values or old religions, but most of the things that ever made America great: meritocracy, egalitarianism, liberalism and thinking, are mostly in opposition to religious thinking.
So, I don't think anyone who makes decisions on a cost/benefit basis really disagrees.
The problem is, most of the people making the decisions these days--counting voters--are basing their decisions on morals. To them, drug use is immoral, and society can only be set right (balanced with justice) by punishing those who make immoral decisions. This what people mean when they say folks must "pay" for their crime. Reformation, in their view, comes from God, if at all.
Most people taking legally prescribed opioids according to their prescription don't die.
Trouble is, the legally prescribed dosage rate is generally a longer period than the active time of a particular dose, leading patients to take the drug more frequently than prescribed, leading them to run out, and then turn the nefarious dark web for relief . . .
>Failure is rewarded with yet even more money and power -- the exact opposite of what happens in the private sector.
Maybe true in some subsectors of the private sector, but I see lots of well-rewarded private sector failures reported in the news. Something about a golden parachute.
Also, there's plenty of well-punished successes in the private sector.
Relatedly, there's also plenty of things the private sector leaves undone altogether.
Without providing any evidence, their bare assertions are useless. They have at least as many reasons to misrepresent te truth as they do to provide accurate information. Remember the baseless justifications for invading Iraq?
I don't pirate these days, but many days i really want to.
The reason is that there is no legal way-at any price-to get content in an form where i can watch whatever, whenever, wherever.
Streaming services of course all require an internet connection. Downloadable content is tied to a platform. Physical media is not legally transferrable, and even if it were, takes time and other resources to get there.
Quite disappointing, really.
Note the above applies to video content only. Plenty of legal audio options.
This article and it's associate 'research' are annoyingly pointless. Of course the early adopters love them! When they cost half as much and a third of iphone users have bought them, let's repeat this survey (assuming it's subject selection methodology is sound) and see what results we get.
Slashdot Mirror
Still waiting for hitler on ice, too!
Seriously. Don't they charge a lot for their services? Wouldn't advertisers be demanding accurate info or find another way to get it? Or are these industries totally ossified with denial?
Not sure what you mean by traditional values or old religions, but most of the things that ever made America great: meritocracy, egalitarianism, liberalism and thinking, are mostly in opposition to religious thinking.
So, I don't think anyone who makes decisions on a cost/benefit basis really disagrees.
The problem is, most of the people making the decisions these days--counting voters--are basing their decisions on morals. To them, drug use is immoral, and society can only be set right (balanced with justice) by punishing those who make immoral decisions. This what people mean when they say folks must "pay" for their crime. Reformation, in their view, comes from God, if at all.
You're both right and wrong.
Most people taking legally prescribed opioids according to their prescription don't die.
Trouble is, the legally prescribed dosage rate is generally a longer period than the active time of a particular dose, leading patients to take the drug more frequently than prescribed, leading them to run out, and then turn the nefarious dark web for relief . . .
>Failure is rewarded with yet even more money and power -- the exact opposite of what happens in the private sector.
Maybe true in some subsectors of the private sector, but I see lots of well-rewarded private sector failures reported in the news. Something about a golden parachute.
Also, there's plenty of well-punished successes in the private sector.
Relatedly, there's also plenty of things the private sector leaves undone altogether.
>Offer people safe places to take the drugs
This may work for a few addicts, but many addicts are not just addicted to the drug, they are addicted to the lifestyle.
Now, decriminalizing the drugs may take away much of the lifestyle's appeal, so it's still probably a good idea.
Without providing any evidence, their bare assertions are useless. They have at least as many reasons to misrepresent te truth as they do to provide accurate information. Remember the baseless justifications for invading Iraq?
I don't pirate these days, but many days i really want to.
The reason is that there is no legal way-at any price-to get content in an form where i can watch whatever, whenever, wherever.
Streaming services of course all require an internet connection. Downloadable content is tied to a platform. Physical media is not legally transferrable, and even if it were, takes time and other resources to get there.
Quite disappointing, really.
Note the above applies to video content only. Plenty of legal audio options.
After all, it's mass inst of *technology*, not mass inst of *science*.
It could be that trump and brexit are objectively bad.
Witnesses are not called in to court to be viewed, they are called in to be cross-examined.
The interface really stinks, makes it hard to share posts. Speed increase not worth it.
Most sites have a web optimized version that's plenty fast.
Username checks out.
This article and it's associate 'research' are annoyingly pointless. Of course the early adopters love them! When they cost half as much and a third of iphone users have bought them, let's repeat this survey (assuming it's subject selection methodology is sound) and see what results we get.
Isn't it funny how so many iriginalists lose their principles when it comes to the fourth, fourteenth and first amendments?
What is this 'competition' of which you speak?
I thought i was going to be the only oldie on here. Loved my ti. Parsec ftw! Also, that thing had a 16 bit ensoniq sound chip.
You are a making assumptions about the definition of "unreasonable" and "search".
Whike i disagree, a reasonable mind could conclude that where you go on the internet has the same legal status of which stores you visit at the mall.
Where is athena when you need her?
Rukes for thee but not for me.
Vonnegut called it in what, 1955?
Coverage is only part of the equation. There's also thickness. And reflectivity.
The dac in the apple provided dongle is inferior to that in the iphone 6.
I lost count of the number I times I tried that until uncovering what AMP was and switching my mobile search provider to DDG.