apps can store resources like images and data on the sd card, it's only the executable code that needs to be on the internal flash, so it's not as bad as it looks (although I which google would sort it out)
If you like ironpython, check out Boo (http://boo.codehaus.org/) statically typed (or dynamic if you like) language which has borrowed most of the best features from from python.
yes, point taken. Would be better if android just included a way to root it for people who'd like to. Never really played with WebOS, looks quite nice though. Happy with my G1 as it is, next phone might be a maemo, we'll see!
Alas, IntelliJ does not support c/c++ AFAIK. community edition only supports JAva and groovy and their pay version supports these languages.
When it comes to c/c++ I only worked with various Borland IDEs, gcc + emacs and VS and I found VS being the best of these tools for c/c++, however, this is most likly because that has been the most modern toolset of them all.
IMHO, IntelliJ beats all other Java IDEs I tried, including eclipse (maybe not featurewise, but ease of use, just less in your way).
if you look in the link above you can see a full list of all their coding features. lots of shortcuts and navigation keystrokes that makes your everyday coding live easier.
IntelliJ not hold up to VS???? I worked extensively with IntelliJ and now with VS2008, IntelliJ beats the crap out of VS any day when it comes to refactoring and nice shortcuts in the editor, up to the point I paid for Jetbrains Resharper with my own money in order get VS behave more like intelliJ. Don't get me wrong VS is good, but it aint that good
hold your horses, Java aint *that* bad. With the ability to write c libs for your java code I think things should be ok. Personally I prefer to do the UI in java/xml and then any heavy number crunshing in c. that way you use the languages for what they are best for. At least until someone ports QT to android phones.;-) Also when they get the JIT to work for the Dalvik runtime things will also be a bit better
Indeed, the cool thing is that Activities can be shared between processes, My app, for example, can for example make use of Google's picture browsing or the google map activity , no need to write one myself. Activities are placed on a stack, so when the user hits the back button to leave the 3rd party activity they are returned to my activity
any proofs? WE all know that MS used BSD code for various things, and then there was the Stac SuperStor compression incident, but that' hardly worse than anyone else in the industry.
but mono has a value on it's own compatible with MS or not, frankly I don't care if my mono stuff runs on windows or not. it's the nicest way to do gtk apps at the moment, imho
Slashdot Mirror
indeed, have hit the app limit myself a few times on my G1, quite annoying.
from his blog
everybody: my dad got himself a N900, so there's one in the family. Don't worry about it, there's room for more than one Linux phone.
I like the Nexus One, maybe I'd like the N900 too. But I certainly don't like cellphones enough to have two.
apps can store resources like images and data on the sd card, it's only the executable code that needs to be on the internal flash, so it's not as bad as it looks (although I which google would sort it out)
If you like ironpython, check out Boo (http://boo.codehaus.org/) statically typed (or dynamic if you like) language which has borrowed most of the best features from from python.
Within a month the battery went from 90% to 3% and did an emergency hibernate.
1 month??? I want your battery...
yes, point taken. Would be better if android just included a way to root it for people who'd like to. Never really played with WebOS, looks quite nice though.
Happy with my G1 as it is, next phone might be a maemo, we'll see!
sorry, why the running shoes??
I thought Intel licenced AMD64 from AMD???
It's partially open source. Ever seen the source code for Android Google Maps or any of the other Google apps on Android?
those are applications, not the OS which is far more important IMHO to have as open source / free software.
hey, back in the day, Earth even have natural reactors running!
Alas, IntelliJ does not support c/c++ AFAIK. community edition only supports JAva and groovy and their pay version supports these languages.
When it comes to c/c++ I only worked with various Borland IDEs, gcc + emacs and VS and I found VS being the best of these tools for c/c++, however, this is most likly because that has been the most modern toolset of them all.
IMHO, IntelliJ beats all other Java IDEs I tried, including eclipse (maybe not featurewise, but ease of use, just less in your way).
if you look in the link above you can see a full list of all their coding features. lots of shortcuts and navigation keystrokes that makes your everyday coding live easier.
IntelliJ not hold up to VS???? I worked extensively with IntelliJ and now with VS2008, IntelliJ beats the crap out of VS any day when it comes to refactoring and nice shortcuts in the editor, up to the point I paid for Jetbrains Resharper with my own money in order get VS behave more like intelliJ.
Don't get me wrong VS is good, but it aint that good
according to this link, they still have some way to go..
well, that novelty have lasted since it's release in 2006, quite some novelty...
as they say: "It's not the size of the ship, its the motion of the ocean"
hold your horses, Java aint *that* bad. With the ability to write c libs for your java code I think things should be ok. Personally I prefer to do the UI in java/xml and then any heavy number crunshing in c. that way you use the languages for what they are best for. At least until someone ports QT to android phones. ;-)
Also when they get the JIT to work for the Dalvik runtime things will also be a bit better
Actually, It's up to the OS, the OS *might* keep it running, until it needs the resources held by the app.
See this:
http://www.anddev.org/lifecycle_of_an_activity-t81.html
Indeed, the cool thing is that Activities can be shared between processes, My app, for example, can for example make use of Google's picture browsing or the google map activity , no need to write one myself.
Activities are placed on a stack, so when the user hits the back button to leave the 3rd party activity they are returned to my activity
please stop, I'm going for a swim later today...
... we need to get someone like Steve Irwing!
"Crikey! Look at the size of that capsule!"
any proofs? WE all know that MS used BSD code for various things, and then there was the Stac SuperStor compression incident, but that' hardly worse than anyone else in the industry.
compromise? GPL rests totally on copyright law, without it, no GPL
but mono has a value on it's own compatible with MS or not, frankly I don't care if my mono stuff runs on windows or not. it's the nicest way to do gtk apps at the moment, imho
they are working on splitting the ecma part and the parts not covered, so avoiding the possible 'tainted parts' should be fairly simple.
what do you mean?? hindi/urdu is perfectly understandable for english speakers!