Slashdot Mirror


User: Coren22

Coren22's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,163
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,163

  1. Re:CRIA? same as RIAA: they're WESU ! on CRIA Faces $60 Billion Lawsuit · · Score: 1

    Amen

  2. Re:Bandwidth can be hogged - I've seen it on Hunting the Mythical "Bandwidth Hog" · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm not an asshat to your definition then. You don't need to upload anything to use Bittorrent and Netflix, and game, and all the other stuff we all do. I just happen to expect to be able to use my connection. The only upload I do is when I connect to my home server from other locations, but that is not even statistically significant.

    I do however saturate my download link at times, and I expect to be able to do that as I have paid for a connection that was advertised as unlimited at a specific rate.

  3. Re:Small ISP on Hunting the Mythical "Bandwidth Hog" · · Score: 1

    Same experience here from FiOS, but I pay the same for 24 Mbps.

  4. Re:Bandwidth can be hogged - I've seen it on Hunting the Mythical "Bandwidth Hog" · · Score: 1

    I assume you weren't working for a BIG ISP, the ratios quoted in the article relating to the big guys is 40:1 - 100:1. I think it is absolutely absurd to oversell to this point, but that is what many of the big guys do. I will make an exception for Verizon FiOS however, as from personal experience, I have never seen less then my advertised 25 Mbps, so they must not be overselling to this level.

  5. Re:Bandwidth can be hogged - I've seen it on Hunting the Mythical "Bandwidth Hog" · · Score: 1

    The article even quotes numbers on this. In your example it works out to the ISP having one 5 Mbps connection for 40-100 users, this is where the whole claim of unlimited totally falls apart.

  6. Re:this is brave on Danish DRM Breaker Turns Himself In To Test Backup Law · · Score: 1

    Most MD cops are also not jerks, being from MD, I can't personally say this, but the observation has been made by out of staters to me.

  7. Re:Surf's up on STEREO Satellites Spot Solar Flare Tsunami · · Score: 1

    Wow, a post commenting about moderation that is moderated Redundant, that is rather funny.

  8. Re:Surf's up on STEREO Satellites Spot Solar Flare Tsunami · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lately? I think this has always been an issue with /.

  9. Re:Pagers were working? on Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 Pager Messages · · Score: 1

    no, pagers are MUCH older then cell phones.

  10. Re:Police Responsibility on Police Arrest Man For Refusing To Tweet · · Score: 1

    My guess is I am a federal law enforcement officer, as LEO is law enforcement officer.

  11. Re:It doesn't go both ways on Google Accused of Violating Copyright In China · · Score: 1

    Frankly I think being forced to use Yahoo or Bing would be a appropriate punishment.

  12. Re:Not illegal at all on Response To California's Large-Screen TV Regulation · · Score: 1

    Every car I have bought has had 50 state emissions controls. I don't know if this is true anymore. Perhaps you were thinking of cars imported from other countries?

  13. Re:Why all that straw? on Federal Judge Says Corps of Engineers Liable For Katrina Damage · · Score: 1

    The army corps is not responsible for the levees, there are state agencies for this. The state agencies decided it wasn't worth spending money on. It is not the president's job to hover over the states to make sure they get their jobs done, it is his job to run the entire country, not Louisiana.

  14. Re:What? on Federal Judge Says Corps of Engineers Liable For Katrina Damage · · Score: 3, Informative

    The army corps warned the state and local government in the 1960s that the levees were inadequate. The state and local governments ignored them.

  15. Re:missing the point on Bomb-Proof Wallpaper Developed · · Score: 1

    Maryland doesn't have most of those, Blizzards and Ice Storms being the only ones on your list I can think of. Those however are handled pretty efficiently.

  16. Re:Surprised? on AT&T Loses First Legal Battle Against Verizon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe that ATT themselves consider Edge to be 2.5G, that is what they advertise it as. I would personally say that the speed is more then enough on Verizon, but I'm not goofy about my phone usage and trying to turn it into a TV, so I could be unusual.

  17. Re:Can you hear us now? on AT&T Loses First Legal Battle Against Verizon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, when Bell was split up it became Verizon, so I guess you have two monopolies beating their heads against each other there.

  18. Re:Nvidia on AMD Radeon HD 5970 Dual-GPU Card Sweeps Benchmarks · · Score: 1

    Thank you for your grammar mistakes in calling me an idiot.

  19. Re:9mm? on The Jet Fighter Laser Cannon · · Score: 1

    Nice job.

  20. Re:Nvidia on AMD Radeon HD 5970 Dual-GPU Card Sweeps Benchmarks · · Score: 2, Informative

    But it supports DX10, and that is the big deal.

  21. Re:I'm not sure why PCpro is whining... on AMD Radeon HD 5970 Dual-GPU Card Sweeps Benchmarks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very true. I have had to deal with some of these max length cards, it is definitely not a AMD or NVIDIA problem, it is a case manufacturer problem.

  22. Re:games? on AMD Radeon HD 5970 Dual-GPU Card Sweeps Benchmarks · · Score: 1

    Agreed on the Windows comment. I have had no end of trouble with ATI hardware under Windows. I refuse to buy from them anymore.

  23. Re: It's either that are buy an expensive... on Making Old Games Look Good On Modern LCDs? · · Score: 1

    I play many games on my IPS screen. Are you speaking from experience or just making it up?

  24. Re:What has changed? on Apple Patents "Enforceable" Ad Viewing On Devices · · Score: 1

    The difference is in the summary. The mainstream media is picking the story up finally. No wonder traditional media is having so many problems.

  25. Re:And why are websites still keeping this info? on Justice Dept. Asked For Broad Swath of IndyMedia's Visitor Records · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, you then post anonymously expecting that they don't know exactly who posted it?