Since that seems to be the paid shill argument de jour about it--the PR whores know they lost the battle against network neutrality, so now they want to convince net neutrality proponents that they were falling into the ISPs' trap all along in supporting it.. even though anyone with half a brain can see the opposite is true. Sad!
That's not true, there are plenty of made up things in how it is portrayed. For example, the notion that anyone is beinh radicalized over the internet. Everyone uses Syed Farook's wife as an example even though claims of her radicalization online were a hoax.
The idea that internet companies could do more than fuckall about any of this aside from cover their own asses is perhaps the biggest forgery about it.
"Get back to the herd"? Funny to hear that from someone who is scared of a variety of terrorism that has *never* occurred, only because TV told him he should be afraid.
Of course they don't want the Obama-era regulations, that's absurd. We know this because Ajit Pai, at their behest, wants to destroy those regulations. The premise of this article is how AT&T has spent money fighting NN, and yet you apparently think everyone else so dumb that it would bebsufficient to simply drop the same tired talking points in this article as you do every other net neutraloty one.
If you're going to take money to do PR, at the very least you could make your own prooaganda seem different from AT&T's. Instead, you're so predictable that I can spot your spiel without having to look at usernames.
So you losers lost the net neutrality fight, and now you're here to try to trick people into thinking that it was what your overlords wanted all along?
It sure is a good thing that you and Rockoon show up in every net neutrality article to tell us how the telecos love net neutralitt, after we've watched them obviously resist and fight it with paid shills for years
.. when they talk about liberals or "the left" interchangeably with "the democrats", as if amyone who calls their self a liberal is responsible for what the dem party does. I know such nuance isn't convenient for your all-encompassing strawman abstract, but try to be just a little less intellectually lazy.
There are only American government and corporate trolls on slashdot. Russia doesn't care about our tech forums, corporate trolling on the other hand has been here for years. No one who brings up so-called russian trolls has any idea about paid trolling--it's been in their face for years and they still can't recognize it.
Oh, you mean all those detaila about the DNC's collusion with hillary, not to mention numerous media outlets? Or hillary's cushy corporate ties and eager fundraising practices? You know, all the things that the dnc and hillary never denied were true.
So to you, the truth is disinformation?
Any government willing to spy on other countries would have even more incentive to do it on their own, ought that to happen as well then? You must be thrilled
1. You're holding all libs accountable to something one of them said about gay men?
2. Are there any handicapped people in this thread? Was I addressing them? If the answer to both of these was "yes" you'd have a point, otherwise it's just fake outrage.
Yeah, damn those progressives and their hatred of immigrants, unwillingness to deal with members of minority religions, hatred of homosexuals amd cripples, authoritarian leanings and appeals to religious authority... oh wait, that's a conservative I just described. Now are you going to complain to me about safe spaces and the war on christmas?
Slashdot Mirror
fuck dick tree
fuckface.
"Show some source with those assertions. It's only common courtesy." sure. Occupy https://www.youtube.com/result... DAPL https://www.youtube.com/watch?... G20 (2010) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... G8 (2007) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Bingo, agent provacateurs are a fact at large protests. Look at the documented cases during occupy or DAPL--there are videos.
Since that seems to be the paid shill argument de jour about it--the PR whores know they lost the battle against network neutrality, so now they want to convince net neutrality proponents that they were falling into the ISPs' trap all along in supporting it.. even though anyone with half a brain can see the opposite is true. Sad!
That's not true, there are plenty of made up things in how it is portrayed. For example, the notion that anyone is beinh radicalized over the internet. Everyone uses Syed Farook's wife as an example even though claims of her radicalization online were a hoax. The idea that internet companies could do more than fuckall about any of this aside from cover their own asses is perhaps the biggest forgery about it.
"Get back to the herd"? Funny to hear that from someone who is scared of a variety of terrorism that has *never* occurred, only because TV told him he should be afraid.
And by "they" you don't mean Soundcloud itself. I hope. And even then, do you punch out your mailman when you get junkmail?
Of course they don't want the Obama-era regulations, that's absurd. We know this because Ajit Pai, at their behest, wants to destroy those regulations. The premise of this article is how AT&T has spent money fighting NN, and yet you apparently think everyone else so dumb that it would bebsufficient to simply drop the same tired talking points in this article as you do every other net neutraloty one. If you're going to take money to do PR, at the very least you could make your own prooaganda seem different from AT&T's. Instead, you're so predictable that I can spot your spiel without having to look at usernames.
beyond that,you serioisly think the unpleasant spam accounts are from soundcloud?
Does the border patrol now pay for nonsense bulk trolling like other agencies do? It's seeming that way
Meant for this to be a reply to rockoon, not to AC, my bad.
So you losers lost the net neutrality fight, and now you're here to try to trick people into thinking that it was what your overlords wanted all along?
It sure is a good thing that you and Rockoon show up in every net neutrality article to tell us how the telecos love net neutralitt, after we've watched them obviously resist and fight it with paid shills for years
.. when they talk about liberals or "the left" interchangeably with "the democrats", as if amyone who calls their self a liberal is responsible for what the dem party does. I know such nuance isn't convenient for your all-encompassing strawman abstract, but try to be just a little less intellectually lazy.
Someone had better tell toyota, they've been making them over a decade now! how the heck are they not bankrupt?
There are only American government and corporate trolls on slashdot. Russia doesn't care about our tech forums, corporate trolling on the other hand has been here for years. No one who brings up so-called russian trolls has any idea about paid trolling--it's been in their face for years and they still can't recognize it.
Oh, you mean all those detaila about the DNC's collusion with hillary, not to mention numerous media outlets? Or hillary's cushy corporate ties and eager fundraising practices? You know, all the things that the dnc and hillary never denied were true. So to you, the truth is disinformation?
Any government willing to spy on other countries would have even more incentive to do it on their own, ought that to happen as well then? You must be thrilled
Hope it feels good knowing that you're performing for free the shilling that telecos pay losers to perform on sites like this.
1. You're holding all libs accountable to something one of them said about gay men? 2. Are there any handicapped people in this thread? Was I addressing them? If the answer to both of these was "yes" you'd have a point, otherwise it's just fake outrage.
Our political system is full of neocons and neoliberals. Progressives haven't been up to bat as a political power in this country since WWII.
Nixon's drug war particularly used weed to target blacks and hippies. This isn't opinion, it's a fact.
Yeah, damn those progressives and their hatred of immigrants, unwillingness to deal with members of minority religions, hatred of homosexuals amd cripples, authoritarian leanings and appeals to religious authority... oh wait, that's a conservative I just described. Now are you going to complain to me about safe spaces and the war on christmas?
...sure, our REAL economy, powered by REAL fraud.