Slashdot Mirror


Techie Fight Clubs Springing Up

Browncoat writes "USAToday reports a new phenomenon hitting some of the cubicles of Silicon Valley. It seems that engineers and developers previously confined to sitting in front of their computers are getting their anger out the healthy way: by pummeling each other. From the article 'Inspired by the 1999 film Fight Club, starring Brad Pitt and Ed Norton, underground bare-knuckle brawling clubs have sprung up across the country as a way for desk jockeys and disgruntled youths to vent their frustrations and prove themselves. "This is as close as you can get to a real fight, even though I've never been in one," the soft-spoken Siou said.'"

648 comments

  1. Weenie Club by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Weird, I don't remember Fight Club being about a bunch of dorks in headgear smacking each other with sticks until one of them got a bloody nose while spouting poorly-paraphrased movie quotes at some bored reporter.

    Aside from which, I loved how they worked in this:

    Earlier this month in Arlington, Texas, a high school student who didn't want to participate was beaten so badly that he suffered a brain hemorrhage and broken vertebrae. Six teenagers were arrested after DVDs of the fight appeared for sale online.

    So exactly when did "getting your ass kicked by a bunch of jerks" turn into being "an unwilling Fight Club participant"? I suppose next we'll be hearing about how Ken Lay and company were actually just repeating what they learned by watching "Wall Street" at the executive team-building offsite? Or how the well-abused Zonk and ScuttleMonkey voodoo dolls on my desk are actually just a result of my having seen part of "The Craft" one time on HBO?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Weenie Club by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So exactly when did "getting your ass kicked by a bunch of jerks" turn into being "an unwilling Fight Club participant"?

      IIRC there was a rule in FC that said "if this is your first night, you have to fight"...

    2. Re:Weenie Club by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      So exactly when did "getting your ass kicked by a bunch of jerks" turn into being "an unwilling Fight Club participant"?

      There was apparently plenty of willing participants in this particular instance (or at least "unwilling to press charges"). The video in question portrayed a number of "consensual" fights. It came into public view when an unwilling participant was seriously injured.

    3. Re:Weenie Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.

      LMAO. You should get +5 Funny every time you post just for this sig.

    4. Re:Weenie Club by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      So exactly when did "getting your ass kicked by a bunch of jerks" turn into being "an unwilling Fight Club participant"?

      Maybe when they invited him to join the club, he declined, but then couldn't convince them that he wouldn't run to the authorities?? There are some offers you can't safely refuse...

    5. Re:Weenie Club by iced_773 · · Score: 1


      the well-abused Zonk and ScuttleMonkey voodoo dolls

      Just don't burn effigies unless you really, really, really mean it, and I mean really, even if you just think it would be funny. I learned that the hard way when michael went out.

    6. Re:Weenie Club by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't remember Fight Club being about a bunch of dorks in headgear smacking each other with sticks until one of them got a bloody nose while spouting poorly-paraphrased movie quotes at some bored reporter.
      Then again, Fight Club is not real. It's not fair to complain when real life falls short of fiction.
    7. Re:Weenie Club by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that years ago.

      http://24.251.127.62:8088/gallery/gfc4

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Weenie Club by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      The article was accurate, your ramblings are not.

      The incident in Arlington centered around a bunch of idiot teenagers who went around beating the hell out of random people while video taping it. Some of it was consenual, some of it wasn't. It was a fight club in the sense that these kids had formed a group centered around attacking strangers for fun. This kid happened to be one of their (many) victims.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    9. Re:Weenie Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The incident in Arlington centered around a bunch of idiot teenagers who went around beating the hell out of random people while video taping it.

      Which is exactly what the OP said, right?

    10. Re:Weenie Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to keeek your ahhhsss ahhhfter skoooool!

    11. Re:Weenie Club by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Weird, I don't remember Fight Club being about a bunch of dorks in headgear smacking each other with sticks until one of them got a bloody nose while spouting poorly-paraphrased movie quotes at some bored reporter.

      This is not fight club. Nobody talks about fight club. You do not hear about fight club. You will forget about fight club.

      --
      Qxe4
    12. Re:Weenie Club by whimmel · · Score: 1

      There's a song (electronic dance--listen to The System on XM :-) that features the rules of Fight Club (by Re-Create):

      Rule 1. You do not talk about Fight Club.
      Rule 2. You DO NOT talk about Fight Club.
      Rule 3. Only two men to a fight
      Rule 4. Only one fight at a time, fellas
      Rule 5. If someone calls stop, passes out, goes limp. The fight is over.
      Rule 6. If it's your first time at Fight Club.. you HAVE to fight.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    13. Re:Weenie Club by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Slow news day, I suppose.

      This shit's been going on for years; there's one in my area. The memebrs are - how shall I say - mostly adult kids. I just ignore them; I mean, what's the point. They think they're doing some kind of stree relief, I guess.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    14. Re:Weenie Club by whimmel · · Score: 1

      Rule 1. You do not talk about Fight Club.
      Rule 2. You DO NOT talk about Fight Club.
      Rule 3. If someone calls stop, passes out, goes limp. The fight is over.
      Rule 4. Only two men to a fight
      Rule 5. Only one fight at a time, fellas
      Rule 6. No shirts, no shoes
      Rule 7. Fights will go on as long as they have to
      Rule 8. If it's your first time at Fight Club.. you HAVE to fight.

      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  2. I'm sorry, but... by Kagura · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't this article violate the first and second rules of fight club?

    1. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Doesn't this article violate the first and second rules of fight club?

      It's geek fight club. There is no second rule; only a zeroth, first, and tenth rule.

      Rule #0: You start counting from zero.
      Rule #1: Do not talk about geek fight club.
      Rule #10: Do not talk about geek fight club.
      Rule #11: Only two bits to the rules.

    2. Re:I'm sorry, but... by FhnuZoag · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess we'll have to cut off Scuttlemonkey's testicles, then.

    3. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Henry+Bone · · Score: 0

      It does indeed. I was actually expecting a comment of that ilk to be first post.

    4. Re:I'm sorry, but... by mctk · · Score: 1

      Not unless you read it out loud.

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    5. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      I may be mistaken, but I thought there was no "Ten" in binary. I thought it was one zero. As I understood it, ten was a product of a base 10 system.

    6. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Pollardito · · Score: 5, Funny

      i suppose you've already answered my follow-up question :

      "what kind of two-bit fight club is this?"

    7. Re:I'm sorry, but... by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      This is true.

    8. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understood it, ten was a product of a base 10 system.

      Ten is a product of a base two system? No... I'm not following.

    9. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amusing, in a stupid way, when people start talking about "starting counting from 0"... I mean, there's no way in any language you count from zero.

      It's trying to make a joke through ignorance.

      It's not the "zeroth" item ... it's an offset/index... meaning "zero units from the starting point"... that joke always bugged me.

    10. Re:I'm sorry, but... by popeguilty · · Score: 1

      You, uh... you use computers, right?

    11. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Dhar · · Score: 1

      only a zeroth, first, and tenth rule
      Rule #0: ...
      Rule #1: ...
      Rule #10: ...
      Rule #11: ...

      So where's the counting rule?

      -g.

    12. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I may be mistaken, but I thought there was no "Ten" in binary. I thought it was one zero. As I understood it, ten was a product of a base 10 system.

      Of COURSE there is ten in binary, it's just represented as 1010. The word "ten" refers to the concept of the number ten ... which simply has different representations in different bases, 1010 in base 2, 31 in base 3, 10 in base 10, A in base 16, etc.

    13. Re:I'm sorry, but... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      31 in base 3

      I don't know if you realize this, but there is no 3 in trinary. The representation you seek is 101 base 3 == 10 base 10

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    14. Re:I'm sorry, but... by DerelictMan · · Score: 1

      Brilliant! And me without mod points... :)

    15. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Danga · · Score: 1

      You are correct if only a single bit were to be used. However, he said 2 bits which makes what he said possible since he mentioned only 3 different rules since 1-10 are the same, so the 2 bit binary equivalent would be:

      00 = You start counting from zero.
      01 = Do not talk about geek fight club.
      10 = Do not talk about geek fight club.
      11 = Only two bits to the rules.

      Oh, and there is a 2nd rule (10) so when he said "There is no second rule" he was incorrect.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    16. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of geek fight club: You do not talk about geek fight club.
      Second rule of geek fight club: ?????
      Third rule of geek fight club: Profit!

    17. Re:I'm sorry, but... by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      I hope you realise there's no tri in ternary... Especially when looking at your sig...

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    18. Re:I'm sorry, but... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Bases are for wusses that use Arabic numerals.

      Clearly you're not MCCCXXXVII.

    19. Re:I'm sorry, but... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Trinary is valid when referring to the number system. Ternary just means "three way", it's a more generic term.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    20. Re:I'm sorry, but... by iced_773 · · Score: 1


      Waitaminute - our system of naming bases is in base-ten. How the heck do we know that base-10 isn't really base-three, or base-seventeen? Why is it my head is hurting now??

    21. Re:I'm sorry, but... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      As Gigs said, so too shall I say, but with google's help.

      ternary: Ternary is the base numeral system. Ternary digits are known as trits (trinary digit), analogous to bit. This system is also known as trinary.

      I guess this means we are all right.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    22. Re:I'm sorry, but... by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      You need to stop thinking about it so much. Our number systems simply provide labels for amounts. There have been many different ways to represent numbers throughout history. We just happen to use, what is it called, Arabic decimal. There was also Sexagesimal used by the Sumerians (quick search for base 60 brings that up) as well as the octal and hexadecimal systems that are useful for decimal to binary and binary to decimal conversions as well as binary representations. If you're into *nix then you've probably become accustomed to octal, and have probably dealt with hexadecimal while programming with assembly.

      In other words, don't get too worried about how the numbers are represented. Two rocks on the ground is still 10 base 2 rocks on the ground.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    23. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, show an example where you would "start counting at zero"?

    24. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walk away.

      The first rule of how to win any fight as taught to me too many years ago.

    25. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0,1,2,3,4...

    26. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, zero starts count with you.

    27. Re:I'm sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In binary (base 2):

      0 = zero = 0 (base10)
      1 = one = 1 (base10)
      10 = one-zero (not ten) = 2 (base10)
      11 = one-one (not eleven) = 3 (base10)

      There are four distinct numbers listed above.

  3. There's no need for RL violence by UmberGryphon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The teams I've been on have always handled stress by Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc. deathmatching. What's the appeal of brawling? Same thrill of victory, longer-lasting agony of defeat.

    1. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you think you can get the same experience from a video game as real life, you need to get out in the big blue room a bit more. Quake, UT, etc. is nothing compared to even a low key sparring match - much less the brawls they're talking about here. It's like apples and lima beans.

    2. Re:There's no need for RL violence by bluelip · · Score: 1

      The teams I've been on have always handled stress by Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc. deathmatching. What's the appeal of brawling? Same thrill of victory, longer-lasting agony of defeat.

      That's probably because the only teams you have been on have been for "Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc". Life in the 'big blue room' still trumps gaming.

      I would suggest you try associating w/ others besides through a system where the limits are quite bounding.

      Over being able to say, "Hey, I can push this platic buttons faster than you!", I'll take the ability to kick your ass anyday.

      Stop hiding behind that mouse and keyboard and come try it. You'll see what the thrill of victory is all about. Very little beats and andrenaline rush. Such a rush can be had by knowing that if you aren't the best around and that if you don't win the match, pain is about to be felt.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    3. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While i will admit that a good multiplayer fragfest will vent some frustrations, there is nothing better than a good sparring match. You don't even have to get to heavy with it, some basic response and counter work is really exhilerating - especially between two equally skilled people who respect each other and are open to practicing variants.

      These guys sound like dickless morons who watch way too much UFC. The guy in the photo looks like an idiot using those Kali sticks. When using them you don't get within knee strike range, and you definitely dont try to graple in the manner he is.

      In my opinion these guys need to go to a real dojo, roll with some real experts, and learn that combat for the purpose of ego masturbation is fucking pointless.

    4. Re:There's no need for RL violence by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the appeal of brawling?

      Depends on how big an asshole you are.

      KFG

    5. Re:There's no need for RL violence by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      I think this is one of the first serious real life violence threat on slashdot. Get out your calendars and mark it down, folks.

      --
      -gjr
    6. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think apples and lima beans is a good enough comparison.

      More like playing D&D and having sex.

    7. Re:There's no need for RL violence by bluelip · · Score: 1

      Not a threat, just a 'taunt' to tease someone into seeing what a real life "woot" feels like.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    8. Re:There's no need for RL violence by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Brilliant. Suggesting to beat each other up in order to adjust your moods. But hey, what am I complaining, all this beating must have made your brains so kaputt that you can't even think of better ways of balancing your tempers anymore. I guess the next thing you're posting about is that people should use AV software to protect them from DDOS attacks.

      Yeah, you're definitely one of the smart ones. Oh, and don't miss tomorrow's backyard shooting, it's "just for balancing the moods"...

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    9. Re:There's no need for RL violence by misleb · · Score: 1

      More like playing D&D and having sex.

      Real men can combine the two.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    10. Re:There's no need for RL violence by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      handled stress by Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc.


      Or paintball.

      Takes care of the agression, and gets those involved off their asses for a while and gets 'em some exercise.

      And with much less chance at causing permanent damage than this goofy fight club lite.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    11. Re:There's no need for RL violence by scatters · · Score: 1

      I always find that a good day playing paintball helps relieve the stress. There's a tangible sense of sastisfaction when you tag someone, and enough of a sting when you get hit to make you want to avoid getting hit. Rec. ball is better than speed ball though (IMHO).

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    12. Re:There's no need for RL violence by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you get the same adrenaline rush from playing computer games as you do fighting, then either you're very easily excitable or you have problems distinguishing fantasy from reality.

    13. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hear there's no respawn in RL. Lame.

    14. Re:There's no need for RL violence by wdwillis · · Score: 1
      The teams I've been on have always handled stress by Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc. deathmatching. What's the appeal of brawling? Same thrill of victory, longer-lasting agony of defeat.

      spoken like someone who has never won a fist fight.
      the adrenaline rush you get from winning a video game brawl is about the same as taking aspirin compared to heroin.
      sincerely, the thrill fo victory is much larger, and the agony of defeat teaches you to be much better before the next round.
    15. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess Slashdot posting wins for you, then, but that tells us nothing about your actual -dimensions-. How big an asshole -are- you?

    16. Re:There's no need for RL violence by jakoz · · Score: 1

      Fighting is actually pretty fun.

      Not like these idiots of course, but something like boxing is actually very difficult and demands a huge amount of skill. You don't tend to get injured badly because proper training and supervision are there.

      And something like boxing is pretty much the ultimate player vs player match. You against another person... it doesn't get much tougher than that.

      I would recommend anyone giving it a go. It has this whole "fighting" thing attached, but it's good fun and gets you damn fit as well.

    17. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      Interesting. Reminds me of a passage from TFA:

      There is also a sadomasochistic thread running through underground fight clubs, said Michael Kimmel, a sociology professor at Stony Brook University in New York.

      "Real-life fight clubs are the male version of the girls who cut themselves," he said. "All day long these guys think they're the captains of the universe, technical wizards. They're brilliant but empty.

      "They want to feel differently. They want to get hit, they want to feel something real."


      So how does it feel to be like one of the girls who cut themselves?
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    18. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Tragek · · Score: 1

      I detect a hint of derision there, in reference to the girls. As a guy who deals with the emotions of girls every day, I don't think it's something to even joke about. It's a sad thing when you see a girl's self confidence down: I can't imagine how bad it would be if a girl were to be so bad off that cutting was her escape. I see the same sort of sadness in this fight club thing, in reference to that quote. I wonder sometimes why so many people we see now lack basic confidence in themselves. I wonder, is it different in develiping countries.

    19. Re:There's no need for RL violence by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Real-life fight clubs are the male version of the girls who cut themselves"

      Funny, I thought boys who cut themselves would be the male version of girls who cut themselves. Perhaps you meant to say "the girls who mud-wrestle to win"?

      The whole "sadomasochistic thread" thing is total pyco-babble. Young men have been beating the shit out of each other since the dawn of time, the reason is simple - strong/daring men attract women. It's the same thing that makes young men drive like maniacs.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    20. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The derision is because of the fact that in an attempt to be macho, these guys are actually covertly engaging in something quite different. It's ironic.

      On the other hand, I detect a hint of moral superiority in your post. Do you know what cutting is often a symptom of? If you can't imagine how bad that can be, then how can you judge it?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    21. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should RTFA, so you can tell the difference between what I wrote and what I quoted.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    22. Re:There's no need for RL violence by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      My bad, I misread your taunt at the bottom as an endorsement of the quote.

      I agree with your general sentiments about macho behaviour but it's not going away any day soon. To a great degree it's part of a young males instinctive mating behaviour (the "my genes are indestructable" factor). However, if a man is still doing the same thing at 35 then they have a problem and they are also passing the behaviour on to the young guys they seem to always hang out with. What is largely missing from our modern culture is the ubiquitous tribal idea of a "test of manhood/womanhood" for post pubecent teens. It doesn't solve the "problem" but it does drive the hormones in a predictable direction toward an achievable goal.

      Having said that, I'm sure I would have argued otherwise 30yrs ago.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    23. Re:There's no need for RL violence by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      More like playing D&D and having sex.

      Real men can combine the two.

      I think he was refering to intercourse, not masturbation.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    24. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      The teams I've been on have always handled stress by Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc. deathmatching. What's the appeal of brawling? Same thrill of victory, longer-lasting agony of defeat.

      No-one who has ever brawled (for fun) would say that. (yeah, I can understand being in a real life-or-death fight isn't fun.) But sparring/sport fighting is great.

      The same thrill of victory?
      Hardly.

      There's nothing like the thrill of a good fight. I like video games as much as the next guy, but there's no comparison. To paraphrase Fight Club, after fighting, it's like the rest of the world has the volume turned down.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    25. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dog Brothers would like a word with you.

    26. Re:There's no need for RL violence by JianTian13 · · Score: 1
      That's funny; I actually know Gints well enough that I recognized those shorts he's wearing in the article photo before I saw his name. And sparring, as you've noted, can be a good, even great thing -- for skills, for stress relief, even (don't laugh) a rite of passage.

      But I have to respond to what else you had to say. For the record, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about: Gints is neither dickless nor a moron. He's a good fighter, very polite and well spoken in person, and he's interested in testing and improving his fighting skills.

      Now that I'm done being rude...

      If you're worried about knee strikes in the context of sparring with eskrima/kali/arnis people, there's a number of things you can do that don't involve your knees getting shattered:

      1) You could elect to move your leg, and not leave it there for the other guy to hit. Morons who leave all their weight on their forward leg, immobilizing themselves, deserve what they get. Note that I include myself here: first time out with the sticks, full contact, the senior student left my entire right inner thigh black, blue, red and white. I counted at least nine separate slash marks among the bruises. Live and learn, I guess :)

      2) You could block or parry the attack. If you jumped right into sparring with the sticks with no training, and your knees (and everything else) got pummeled because you have no defensive skills, well, that's unsurprising.

      3) Are you at all familiar with Largo Mano? Try attacking the attacking limb -- smash their hands before they hit you. Low strikes (such as to the knees) tend to be pretty vulnerable to this.

      4) Finally, screw it. Let him hit your leg. Meanwhile, smash him in the head. That's usually a pretty good trade :)

      Yeah, that's all theory. I know that; that's why I practice. That's why Gints practices. That's why the Dog Brothers practice. That's why the Black Eagle people in Britain practice. That's why the people who go to the various stick tournaments practice. We're all practicing. Please don't go knocking whatever someone out there is doing to practice and test their skills, particularly where you clearly haven't ever met them.

    27. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      But I have to respond to what else you had to say. For the record, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about: Gints is neither dickless nor a moron. He's a good fighter, very polite and well spoken in person, and he's interested in testing and improving his fighting skills.

      Fair enough. In retrospect, this response may have been a little extreme and unwarranted. This may very well be a decent group of guys with legit skills, but you do have to admit the article presents them as a bunch of idiots.

      We're all practicing. Please don't go knocking whatever someone out there is doing to practice and test their skills, particularly where you clearly haven't ever met them.

      As I said above, they didn't present you as people who knew what they were doing, they made you sound like a bunch of yahoos. Also, the videos they have to offer aren't really flattering either. One of them has a guy with a toilet seat, that doesn't lend itself to any credibility.

      If you're worried about knee strikes in the context of sparring with eskrima/kali/arnis people, there's a number of things you can do that don't involve your knees getting shattered

      I wasn't so much worried about getting my knees knocked as much as letting someone get that close. I crouch real low, quite often I have had skinned knees after practicing, so it tends to not be an issue. I also tend to cross my body with staggered strikes, usually higher ones to open up targets for lower ones - an occasional sweep straight up at the jawline helps to ensure that I don't get rushed over the top.

      I know if someone were trying to knee me in the face while I still had sticks, they would be getting the butt end to the top of the thigh.

    28. Re:There's no need for RL violence by JianTian13 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for responding; I appreciate it. Yes, I willingly admit, as plenty of others have noted, that writer presented them pretty badly. It was poor, sensationlist writing, without any attempt to understand. And conflating what a bunch of consenting adults are doing with a gang assault, and then throwing unsupported pseudo-science references on top was just... ridiculous.

      I'm not part of Gints' group, but at least when I first talked with him about it, they had a rule that if it was your first night, you fought. You come, you don't watch: you participate. Maybe if he'd insisted on the same for this writer, and the writer had had the courage to test themselves, to give themselves an inside view -- well, maybe we'd have seen a different article.

      A couple of extra thoughts: Frying pans, toilet seats, and socks with soda cans may look and sound ridiculous -- but (and I'm speculating here) if you're a dude looking to develop both toughness as well as personal skills and strategies for dealing with unexpected assaults... well, like you said: stay open to variations. A story I heard 2nd hand last night had someone assaulting some other guy outside a bar with an ashtray -- not one of the little glass ones, but a concrete one. No kidding. Ask a bouncer for their war stories, or a police officer: People will hit others with whatever comes to hand, and having trained with a wide, even wacky variety of weapons could only be a good thing. Now, if you want to ask the question of risk vs. reward... well, I must admit I personally ain't gonna train with someone who proposes swinging a frying pan at me, but I think I understand at least a piece of the motivation.

      Funny you mention crouching low, BTW: that's one of the strategies some of us bigger guys (I'm 6'5") start to adopt to protect our legs in class. Crouch low enough (ever seen video of Master Jimmy Tacosa in action?), and everything's an angle 1, 2, 3, or 4. Some of your mobility goes away, but the low strikes are suddenly lots easier to deal with. Of course, now the other guy gets to spend more time hand- and head-hunting... :) And finally, yeah, if someone's stupid enough to grapple with you when the stick's still in your hands, by all means, bury that punyo in them :)

      Anyway, thanks again for responding. You don't by chance train around San Jose, do you?

    29. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Tragek · · Score: 1

      I follow better now, and in large a sense, agree. (My disagreement is semantic, and not worth mentioning.) We'll shake hands and go our different direction. We both managed communicate something that wasn't intended, quite possibly due to my lack of verbosity and writing skill, and also the lack of visual communication cues.

    30. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      No prob! Have a great day and all that.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    31. Re:There's no need for RL violence by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Jeeze. One wonders how many wars have been started through stuff like this. Of course, letter form is probably no better, so I suppose one ought to expand the query to include all correspondence since the dawn of the written word. Sumer wasn't it? :D And a good day to you too.

  4. well now by spune · · Score: 3, Funny

    No one saw this coming. No one.

  5. The Third Rule of Fight Club by seanmeister · · Score: 2

    DO NOT post stories about Fight Club to Slashdot.

    1. Re:The Third Rule of Fight Club by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually there's kind of an ambiguity of what the 3rd rule is. The original 3rd rule was:
       
        If someone says stop, goes limp, even if he's just faking it, the fight is over.

      But later on it was dropped, and this was the new third rule
       
        Only two guys to a fight.

      Wikipedia talks about it too

      .
  6. Uh oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is Cowboyneil Slashdot's equivelent to the charicter Meat Loaf plays in the movie?

    1. Re:Uh oh. by joe_adk · · Score: 1
      So is Cowboyneil Slashdot's equivelent to the charicter Meat Loaf plays in the movie?
      His name was Robert Paulson!
    2. Re:Uh oh. by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      Bah - I never have mod points when I need em :)

    3. Re:Uh oh. by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      man boobs, no balls... yep, cowboy neal!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. Check it out on diggnation by thelost · · Score: 1

    Check out this episode of diggnation and you can catch a bunch of guys really going for it. very amusing, they look like absolute idiots... do I want a go? Hell yes!

    Bring on that printer

    *sticks on "still" by the geto boys*

    --
    Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
  8. Unsupport claims by remembertomorrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Is this fact, or just poor reporting?

    --
    Registered Linux user #421033
    1. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

      Is this fact, or just poor reporting?


      It's neither. It would appear to be the opinion of the person quoted.

    2. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Clearly violence didn't exist before video games, cartoons, and movies.

    3. Re:Unsupport claims by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is probably a fact that "Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor".

      It is poor (though typical) reporting that these types of claims are reported simply as "so-and-so says", but it saves journalist from having to have any knowledge of or do any research in the field they are covering, they can simply find the nearest person with a degree or job in a superficially relevant field, and get a quote, and go home for the day. If they are particularly ambitious, they'll get two conflicting quotes from different experts, to show "balance".

    4. Re:Unsupport claims by feyhunde · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Poor reporting treats it as a fact.

      There was violence before TV and Games and Movies.

      There were farm boys who grew up in peaceful farms that never heard a shot fired in anger or had a punch thrown whom grew up to be Soldiers. There were gun deaths that had nothing to do with Grand Theft Auto.

      The reporter (or more likely editor) is a PC fool whom doesn't realize the simple basic truth. Violent Video games save us from wayyyyyy more random acts of violence then they do encourage them. Anyone whose actually played the things in a bad mood knows what I'm talking about. The simulation is a cathartic. The bad date or club cockteases have made plenty a man hate women, if only for a bit. Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being.

      I guess too many of these folks are naive and really believe everything is sunshine and lollypops and don't understand the dark sides we all have. The side that comes out when we get cut off in traffic, the side that wants to slap everyone with a stupid answer. The part of us deep down that wants to be a Viking and Rape, Pillage and Burn. Or they might know they have such a side, but their own morality is such that they can not admit such a side exists.

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    5. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I didn't need video games to teach me how to be violent. I learned my violent childhood impulses from the bullies that used to beat the crap out of me.

    6. Re:Unsupport claims by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

      "cartoons"
      Well I've always had an urge to drop an anvil on someones head.

    7. Re:Unsupport claims by DreamingReal · · Score: 1

      Strange, I always thought my violent impulses came from my bosses making ridiculous demands while constantly criticizing my performance, my company overworking me while cutting my hours to make sure our stock price doesn't drop 10 cents, my customers treating me like dirt because I have to quote prices they consider outrageous to fix the computers their little demons fucked up by downloading free music, and my SO bitching that I work too much but then complaining when I can't afford to take her out for dinner every third night.

      ... anyone know if there are Geek Fight Clubs in Chicago??

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    8. Re:Unsupport claims by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The suicide terrorists stole their idea from the roadrunner cartoons. How else can you explain that sombody uses that much explosives on himself to hurt the other person.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone know if there are Geek Fight Clubs in Chicago??

      Yeah. You head to the southside, find a busy corner, and then screm "I HATE BLACK PEOPLE!"

      Instant fight club.

    10. Re:Unsupport claims by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      really, cause I have always wanted to drop an anvil or piano on someones head.

    11. Re:Unsupport claims by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      Or the writer is effeminate, either by virtue of being female or being a male who falls on that end of the Bell curve. Women really do think everything is lollypops and sunshine. They don't understand that one of our basic needs is to choke the shit out of that driver in front of us who is going five miles an hour under the speed limit on a two lane road with no passing zone. So just turn to your girlfriend in the passenger seat and smile and say 'Gosh this really is inconvenient since we were already going to be ten minutes late.' And then memorize that SOB's license number and dream about what you're going to do to him after you find out where he lives!

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    12. Re:Unsupport claims by spicate · · Score: 1

      Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being.

      Which study says this? I don't see any more facts or sources cited in your response than in TFA.

      Now, I would never suggest that playing violent games unfailingly turns healthy young men into derranged killers. There's no evidence for it. Still, it looks like you'd agree that the media we consume most likely does have an effect on us; you believe it to be one of catharis and calming. But that's just an opinion. Mine happens to be that they tend to encourage passivity and inertia, and sap our will to make changes in our own lives and in the real world.

      I may be wrong, but the real effects are need to be explored scientifically, because the scope of video game playing and other immersive entertainment is increasing every year. Books and oral myths have shaped societies and changed the world (for better or worse), and these new kinds of media could very well have even more potent effects.

      Who knows what those effects will be? Maybe they're the perfect tool for priming a society for totalitarianism and oligarchy. Don't discount the possibility that gaming can negatively impact our behavior (or that of our kids and society) merely because you get satisfaction from it...

      I'm not advocating banning games, by the way. Just making damn sure we know what they're doing to our kids.

    13. Re:Unsupport claims by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      anyone know if there are Geek Fight Clubs in Chicago??

      I don't know about "fight clubs", but if you want some good real martial arts training in Chicago, let me suggest Thousand Waves Seido Karate. Good for self-defense, stress relief, physical fitness, and personal development; safer, more educational, more useful, and more challenging than a "fight club". I know several of the instructors there and they are skilled, tough, and very nice people.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Unsupport claims by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Anyone whose actually played the things in a bad mood knows what I'm talking about. The simulation is a cathartic. The bad date or club cockteases have made plenty a man hate women, if only for a bit. Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being.

      OK, regardless of whether this is in a game or not... the fact that you get that riled up and feel the need to kill a simulated woman at all is concerning to me.

      Combine that with the use of 'whore' as the way to describe the prostitutes (I've always thought that as a word, whore is particularly brutal) I feel you really have an issue with women. (They were leading me on... MAN they should have given it up).

      Come on.

      I completely agree with the cathartic nature of violent video games, First Person Shooters have a great calming effect on me... Getting out agression on the 'bad guys' or 'the aliens'... non descript enemies... but when it becomes an attack on a replacement for where your anger is directed, well that's just disturbing I'm afraid.

    15. Re:Unsupport claims by nsmike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

      Read:

      Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from jocks, jerks and bullies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor, who got the sh*t kicked out of him every day for wanting to be a gender studies professor.

    16. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is data correlating violent games/shows to violent behaviour. Furthur there was an experiment which showed reducing exposure to violent games/shows reduced incidents of violent behaviour. If interested search for 'killology' or read the book "On Killing" by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman.

      The data/experiment is there, only are we interested in heading it.

    17. Re:Unsupport claims by jaseparlo · · Score: 1

      'PS2 is the opiate of the masses', kind of thing? I like your thinking.

      --
      All available data suggest that regardless of any of this, the sun will still come up tomorrow.
    18. Re:Unsupport claims by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      As I've said before. We are all animals, some are just more civilized than others depending on whome you talk to.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:Unsupport claims by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      From TFA: Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

      Is this fact, or just poor reporting?

      Poor reporting treats it as a fact. There was violence before TV and Games and Movies.

      There were farm boys who grew up in peaceful farms that never heard a shot fired in anger or had a punch thrown whom grew up to be Soldiers.

      So what? The topic under discussion is interpersonal violence - not service in the Armed Forces. And the plain fact is that over the last forty-fifty odd years, such interpersonal and societal violence has increased - sharply.
      The reporter (or more likely editor) is a PC fool whom doesn't realize the simple basic truth. Violent Video games save us from wayyyyyy more random acts of violence then they do encourage them.
      An assumption unsupported by anything other than anecdotal evidence. Once doesn't have to be 'PC' to compare the number of school shootings in the 70's to the number in the 90's to see that something has changed radically in society.
      I guess too many of these folks are naive and really believe everything is sunshine and lollypops and don't understand the dark sides we all have. The side that comes out when we get cut off in traffic, the side that wants to slap everyone with a stupid answer. The part of us deep down that wants to be a Viking and Rape, Pillage and Burn.
      There are also many fools who won't look at an equal truth - we as a society have gotten more violent in recent decades. The controls of manners and self restraint that once held such things in check are slipping. It's unlikely that video games bear the whole burden - but it's a reasonable that either as a cause or a symptom, they are likely to be involved.
    20. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS5 that does porn.

    21. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The part of us deep down that wants to be a Viking and Rape, Pillage and Burn

      Sounds like you play too many video games!

    22. Re:Unsupport claims by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      There is a lurking presupposition to your claims. Mainly that killing is a cathartic and satisfactory experience. And therefore the simulation of killing is also cathartic and rewarding.

      There is a difference between fantasy and reality. In fantasy we can create a victimless crime. In such the person to kill is not human but an automaton without real human feelings and emotions. This makes simulated violence easy to partake in and to receive positive feelings from.

      However in reality, you kill actual human beings. These people have feelings and family members and through human interaction we empathize with them. This makes murder a somewhat empty experience. The murderer is often racked with guilt and shame.

      In war there is a dehumanizing effort by soldiers on their enemies. This becomes a self-defense mechanism in order to partake in murder without guilt. They almost create a fantasy like realm where they are not killing humans but automatons. This is not always a conscious effort but an unconscious one.

      The effects of war on the soldier can be devastating. When they rotate back into the world they tend to have problems readjusting. The damage done to many soldiers psyche can be debilitating. The idea that violence is somewhat natural to human beings is true. However is not true to say violence and murder can have no negative effects on the actors.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    23. Re:Unsupport claims by masdog · · Score: 1

      Funny. Since I saw Roadrunner cartoons, I've always wanted to strap rockets to my back, jump into a slingshot, and see what happens.

    24. Re:Unsupport claims by feyhunde · · Score: 1

      Yah, my use was inappropriate.

      I'm just currently pissed at a woman and using it as an example. And I'm actually spending most of my aggression on dragons atm.

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    25. Re:Unsupport claims by fufubag · · Score: 1
      "And the plain fact is that over the last forty-fifty odd years, such interpersonal and societal violence has increased - sharply."

      I'd like to see a source for this. Maybe the reporting of such violence, or the coverage of such violence has increased, or the total number of incidents has increased due to near exponential rise in population.

    26. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And let me say that, frankly, it pisses me off to see some goddamn motherfucking PENCILNECK professor from some goddamn pissant UC school whining with his LITTLE BITCH MOUTH about how men in my generation at TOO GODDAMN VIOLENT AND CAN'T CONTROL OUR FUCKING TEMPER! AAAAAAAHH!!! AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRHHHHHHHH!

      Mom?

    27. Re:Unsupport claims by jban4US · · Score: 1

      "An assumption unsupported by anything other than anecdotal evidence. Once doesn't have to be 'PC' to compare the number of school shootings in the 70's to the number in the 90's to see that something has changed radically in society."

      Perhaps you fail to take into consideration the massive increase in pressure put on students in recent years? Students are now feeling compelled to take college level courses in high school, participate in athletics, extracurricular activities are nearly jammed down their throats, and in addition they still have to keep their grades up, work a job, keep healthy relationships, all that has always been expected, and much more.
      We are no longer in a good 'ole days society where you simply take the same classes as everyone else, pass, graduate in a class of 150, and go to college and off to a great life. We live in an era of highly competitive cutthroat children told by parents, teachers, guidance counselors, etc. that they have to be at the top of their 1500 person class or they won't go to college and will fail at life. Where is the outlet for these kids if not video games? Some of them just crack. There are crazy people in the world. Put pressure on them, and maybe an unkind word by some teacher, and what do they do? They shoot up their school. And their isn't a whole lot that the schools can do. It is the parents responsibility to teach them morals, not the government, certainly not Hollywood, and no, it isn't video games fault either.

    28. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the article talks about blunt household objects, but never mentions whether the participants have learned to pull giant mallets out of hammerspace.

    29. Re:Unsupport claims by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      And once again, free speech is cowed by political correctness.

      A "whore" has sex for money. Perjorative or not, your usage was entirely appropriate.

    30. Re:Unsupport claims by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      It is poor (though typical) reporting that these types of claims are reported simply as "so-and-so says", but it saves journalist from having to have any knowledge of or do any research in the field they are covering, they can simply find the nearest person with a degree or job in a superficially relevant field, and get a quote, and go home for the day. If they are particularly ambitious, they'll get two conflicting quotes from different experts, to show "balance".
      I see. And so, in your opinion, not-poor reporting would presumably involve the reporter spending the next six years getting an advanced degree in psychiatry and then stating his own opinion?

      Or are you just one of those people who gets such a kick out of looking cool and cynical that you must instantly put down anyone who is cited as an expert at anything? (There is a scientific name for such people: "player haters.")

      Looking forward to reading your article on the topic.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    31. Re:Unsupport claims by timeOday · · Score: 1
      The reporter (or more likely editor) is a PC fool whom doesn't realize the simple basic truth.
      Actually, the quote is from a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor. Why don't you post your credentials next to his so we can objectively compare them.

      No, I'm not saying we have to believe every expert who comes along. But the reporter did the right thing in quoting an expert in a relevant fiel I

    32. Re:Unsupport claims by REB0RN · · Score: 1

      Men have been beating the crap out of each other for 10,000 years. I don't think cartoons & video games are to blame for male instinct.

    33. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bad date or club cockteases have made plenty a man hate women, if only for a bit. Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being

      Dude you have some issues there. Women have pissed me off before and I've never wanted to physically hurt them at all. Glad you've found a non-violent way to deal with the feelings you have but have you ever heard of not going on a second date with them and not going to nightclubs. Anyway there's always porn and jacking off - that's gotta be better than taking out your anger beating virtual whores.

      When I play video games it might be stress relief but I don't develop emotions for the characters and I don't really want to kill anyway when I fly a fighter in a flight sim. Hell I've dropped nuclear bombs in Combat Flight Sim 3 - I'd never want to do anything like that in real life. When I get pissed off at a game it's because I can't get the hang of a skill. When I'm thrilled I'm thrilled I've won.

    34. Re:Unsupport claims by deacon · · Score: 1
      There are also many fools who won't look at an equal truth - we as a society have gotten more violent in recent decades. The controls of manners and self restraint that once held such things in check are slipping. It's unlikely that video games bear the whole burden - but it's a reasonable that either as a cause or a symptom, they are likely to be involved.

      Yes. And the cause of the slippage is an increasing lack of consequences for the behaviour. If you misbehaved in class in 1942, you got your ass whipped. If you misbehave in class today, you are clearly a "victim of your environment" and people need to "understand" your problems and help you increase your self-esteem. It's all a load of PC bullshit, of course, but it is the result of trying to find a "common ground" or compromise with an evil-doer.

      The English have taken this trend to its absurd conclusion, by insisting that criminals engauged in the act of a crime have the same rights as the victim of the crime, with the predictable result that the honest are disarmed, random "fun" attacks against persons are rampant, and the UK Government has all the excuse it needs to place video cameras in every orfice, along with all the other usual constraints on privacy, liberty, and just being let alone to live in peace without Government interference.

      Back when you could get a revolver at Harrods, there was a lot less gun crime. Now that handguns are outlawed, only outlaws have handguns:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1440764.stm

      Citizens are advised to lock themselves into their bathrooms during home invasions. Who didn't see THAT coming.

    35. Re:Unsupport claims by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Either poor reporting, or accurate reporting of a misinformed or agenda-ridden professor's opinions.

      The violent impulses I learned in childhood didn't have diddley-squat to do with cartoons or movies (didn't have video games then) they had to do with a few brainless assholes with underdeveloped sex organs (most of whom were almost too stupid to breathe under their own power) trying repeatedly to beat me to a bloody pulp. So believe me when I say that if I have anything bottled up real people were responsible for it, not Foghorn Leghorn or Tom & Jerry. Any kid that can't tell cartoon violence from real violence needs to get the shit kicked out of him a few times ... I guarantee that will clear up any confusion, and relegate Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd to the graveyard of stupid scientific theories. If anything, watching bad guys get their asses kicked while watching Spiderman, Superman, Jonny Quest and a dozen other of the cool cartoons we had back in the mid-sixties had the opposite effect than what this PC professor is professing, and I suspect the same applies to video games. Of course, in the name of "protecting the children" they took all the fun cartoons away and replaced them with tripe like "Powerpuff Girls". It's all the rage to dump on cartoons and movies nowadays, rather than face facts and deal with the deeper socio-economic issues that are turning our youth to violence. I swear, there are times when I truly believe that our culture is so complacent, so politically correct, so blind to itself that it has become incapable of even acknowledging the problems that exist within it, much less actually attending to them.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    36. Re:Unsupport claims by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      "we as a society have gotten more violent in recent decades."

      False. The number of blacks and latinos has increased, resulting in more crime/violence. Europe is seeing the same thing due to an increased arab/muslim population. Society (ie, civilized people) has not gotten more violent.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    37. Re:Unsupport claims by slamb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article said: Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

      DragonWriter said: It is poor (though typical) reporting that these types of claims are reported simply as "so-and-so says", but it saves journalist from having to have any knowledge of or do any research in the field they are covering, they can simply find the nearest person with a degree or job in a superficially relevant field, and get a quote, and go home for the day. If they are particularly ambitious, they'll get two conflicting quotes from different experts, to show "balance".

      PCM2 said: I see. And so, in your opinion, not-poor reporting would presumably involve the reporter spending the next six years getting an advanced degree in psychiatry and then stating his own opinion?

      Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

      I can't speak for DragonWriter, but I'd like to see evidence for a wild claim like that. Perhaps a reference to a peer-reviewed study. I don't have much respect for sociologists or gender studies professors. I can't think off-hand how to perform a well-controlled experiment that would determine if what this guy said is true, so I bet he couldn't either.

    38. Re:Unsupport claims by sodul · · Score: 1

      That got to be the funniest thing I read today!

      Thanks :-)

    39. Re:Unsupport claims by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I mean come on.

      It's PILLAGE, *then* RAPE. Who wants to chase down a screaming farmgirl on an empty stomach?!

      The "BURN" of course, is my karma for this comment. ;)

    40. Re:Unsupport claims by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Actually, the quote is from a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor. Why don't you post your credentials next to his so we can objectively compare them.

      Why? His credentials themselves support GP's assertion.

    41. Re:Unsupport claims by Ugly+American · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, you could look at this long-term study on violent video games (Asheron's Call, FWIW) which found no causal connection between game play and increased aggression.

      Make sure to look at all the research, and not just what supports Grossman's thesis.

      --
      For sale: one sig space, gently used. Inquire for details.
    42. Re:Unsupport claims by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      On a more serious note...

      Suicide terrorists are told that the detonations are so quick and voilent, it's virtually painless. As the flesh rips from the bone before the brain has time to register it, that would be correct.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    43. Re:Unsupport claims by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      The concept of removing a word for a thing, and thereby attempting to remove the ability to describe or conceptualize it is not new.

      It may not work, but it is currently being tried... on us. When a word becomes "bad", we move on to a new word. When, for example, did "Gifted" come to mean retarded? I tried to sign my kid up for the gifted program (since he is testing 3 years ahead) and they told me that he wasn't the right sort. The right sort were the "type who weren't as able to adjust to classroom education as the other students". It was just for the "Special" kids... you know, the Down syndrome, the mentally retarded, etc.

      Totally freaked me out.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    44. Re:Unsupport claims by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      What planet did you grow up on? The world you describe never existed. Back when it was okay to coast and graduate in the middle of the pack, it was also okay to not go to college at all, but directly into a trade. The college-bound types always had pressure to perform academically, never simply "took the same classes as everyone else", and participated in extracirricular activities. That has always been the formula for getting into a good school.

      Actually, it's easier than ever now to get into college. It's expected. The market has expanded to accomodate the additional students. It's also dumbed down considerably, so that students who are unsuited to higher education don't flunk out in the first semester as a matter of course. We're at the point now where we're basically offering high-school level courses in college and calling them "remedial".

      Pressure? What pressure? There has rarely been less genuine academic pressure on American students than there is now.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    45. Re:Unsupport claims by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Very true, and I believe that what is now called "Gifted" used to be called "Special Ed". Apparently, at some point parents wised up to that one, and a new euphemism had to be found. I don't remember offhand, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that there was an even earlier misappellation. Below is an excerpt from a George Carlin routine that dealt with this very issue (click here for the full routine):

      I don't like words that hide the truth. I don't words that conceal reality. I don't like euphemisms, or euphemistic language. And American English is loaded with euphemisms. Cause Americans have a lot of trouble dealing with reality. Americans have trouble facing the truth, so they invented a kind of soft language to protect themselves from it, and it gets worse with every generation. For some reason, it just keeps getting worse. I'll give you an example of that. There's a condition in combat. Most people know about it. It's when a fighting person's nervous system has been stressed to it's absolute peak and maximum. Can't take anymore input. The nervous system has either (click) snapped or is about to snap. In the first world war, that condition was called shell shock. Simple, honest, direct language. Two syllables, shell shock. Almost sounds like the guns themselves. That was seventy years ago. Then a whole generation went by and the second world war came along and very same combat condition was called battle fatigue. Four syllables now. Takes a little longer to say. Doesn't seem to hurt as much. Fatigue is a nicer word than shock. Shell shock! Battle fatigue. Then we had the war in Korea, 1950. Madison avenue was riding high by that time, and the very same combat condition was called operational exhaustion. Hey, were up to eight syllables now! And the humanity has been squeezed completely out of the phrase. It's totally sterile now. Operational exhaustion. Sounds like something that might happen to your car. Then of course, came the war in Viet Nam, which has only been over for about sixteen or seventeen years, and thanks to the lies and deceits surrounding that war, I guess it's no surprise that the very same condition was called post-traumatic stress disorder. Still eight syllables, but we've added a hyphen! And the pain is completely buried under jargon. Post-traumatic stress disorder. I'll bet you if we'd of still been calling it shell shock, some of those Viet Nam veterans might have gotten the attention they needed at the time. I'll betcha. I'll betcha.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    46. Re:Unsupport claims by tajgenie · · Score: 1

      There were gun deaths that had nothing to do with Grand Theft Auto.

      Yes, but Hilary would like to remind you that the day after GTA3 was released, 2 billion people died, not of AIDS, but in gang wars on the streets of New York. She has not officially quoted the death tolls after the following two GTA3 sequels, since she felt (rightly so) that the 8 billion deaths in Florida and California were fairly self-explanatory.

    47. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stealing an idea from Jerry Seinfeld doesn't exactly qualify as original...

      The Jihadi Coyote...

    48. Re:Unsupport claims by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      "And the plain fact is that over the last forty-fifty odd years, such interpersonal and societal violence has increased - sharply."

      I'd like to see a source for this.

      Try reading your daily newspaper.
      Maybe the reporting of such violence, or the coverage of such violence has increased, or the total number of incidents has increased due to near exponential rise in population.
      Ah. The old head-in-the-sand approach - we can't possibly be getting more violent.
    49. Re:Unsupport claims by DreamingReal · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I've been considering this. I know nothing about competitve martial arts but I took enough martial arts in college to know it's out there and would probably be the stress relief I need at this point. Know of any good schools that have teams that perform competitively?

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    50. Re:Unsupport claims by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      "An assumption unsupported by anything other than anecdotal evidence. Once doesn't have to be 'PC' to compare the number of school shootings in the 70's to the number in the 90's to see that something has changed radically in society."

      Perhaps you fail to take into consideration the massive increase in pressure put on students in recent years? Students are now feeling compelled to take college level courses in high school, participate in athletics, extracurricular activities are nearly jammed down their throats, and in addition they still have to keep their grades up, work a job, keep healthy relationships, all that has always been expected, and much more.

      Ok, now explain away the other symptoms of increased violence - like eight year old shooting other eight year olds on a regular basis. Or road rage. Etc... Etc... (Or consider the fact that most of the shootings to date have been by the disaffected - not by the preppie set that experience most of this pressure.)
      We are no longer in a good 'ole days society where you simply take the same classes as everyone else, pass, graduate in a class of 150, and go to college and off to a great life.
      Anecdotally speaking, bullshit. Except for class size, I know plenty of folks who are doing, or have done, just that. The only difference between the "good 'ole days" and now is the number of idiots who confuse having "lots of the latest and expensive stuff" with "a great life".
      Where is the outlet for these kids if not video games?
      Sports, hobbies, etc... etc...
      It is the parents responsibility to teach them morals, not the government, certainly not Hollywood, and no, it isn't video games fault either.
      Ah yes, the same old chestnut - it's always the parents fault. Even when the kids are exposed to pressures by the larger changes in sociey.
    51. Re:Unsupport claims by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      "we as a society have gotten more violent in recent decades."

      False. The number of blacks and latinos has increased, resulting in more crime/violence. Europe is seeing the same thing due to an increased arab/muslim population. Society (ie, civilized people) has not gotten more violent.

      There's three words that describe you exactly: Ignorant bigoted asshole.
    52. Re:Unsupport claims by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The only sensible reply I recieved, thank you.

    53. Re:Unsupport claims by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe that or is it just sarcasm? I have to ask because sometimes others can't tell when I'm being sarcastic.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    54. Re:Unsupport claims by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Oh don't try to make anything like that about 'free speech'. I wasn't saying he couldn't say 'whore' I was just saying that it's one heavily loaded word. I suppose you talk about any black friends of yours as niggers, and asian friends as chinks etc... there's political correctness gone mad, and then there's just plain offensive words and usage of them.

    55. Re:Unsupport claims by Nicaboker · · Score: 1

      It's fact most reporters swing the story to sound interesting and try and relate it to something they THINK they know about. To me it seems most reporters don't know jack. If the claim about video games and TV was true, then at this point I should be a raging ceral killer with a rap sheet long enough to fill a couple good sized databases. Hell, i've grown up n violent video games and violent movies.

      --
      So many choices, so little tolerance.
    56. Re:Unsupport claims by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      there's political correctness gone mad, and then there's just plain offensive words and usage of them.

      Translated: "There's political correctness gone too far, and then there's political correctness done my way."

      No thanks. You're wrong for chiding him for it, plain and simple, and he's just as wrong for being chided. Equating the word with racial slang doesn't help you much either.

    57. Re:Unsupport claims by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      The bad date or club cockteases have made plenty a man hate women, if only for a bit. Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being.

      Don't get me wrong, I enjoy killing virtual whores as much as the next guy -- but it ain't personal.

    58. Re:Unsupport claims by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

      I submitted this story as an "ask Slashdot" focusing on exactly that line. It was rejected, and this turd was posted in its place. Slashdot would be so much cooler if I was in charge.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    59. Re:Unsupport claims by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      One of my favourites is Americans' use of the word 'bathroom'. Sure, we use it, but to mean we're going to a room that has a bath. You use it to mean you're taking a shit. This culminates with such hilarious lines as "I'm not going to the bathroom in the back yard!"; sure, because the bathroom is in the house! Thanks to The Simpsons for that one.

    60. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter what his credentials are -- I'm more likely to listen to the retarded kid selling pencils on the corner than I am to a "sociology and gender studies professor".

    61. Re:Unsupport claims by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      I see. And so, in your opinion, not-poor reporting would presumably involve the reporter spending the next six years getting an advanced degree in psychiatry and then stating his own opinion?


      Well, no, not-poor reporting would start with media outlets recruiting and assigning people to beats in which they have some understanding, and then would involve at least a brief survey and attempt to inform rather than presenting he-said/she-said all the time.

      Or are you just one of those people who gets such a kick out of looking cool and cynical that you must instantly put down anyone who is cited as an expert at anything?


      Nah, I think its just that you are one of those people that gets such a kick out of looking cool and post-cynical that you have to reflexively put down anyone who challenges the status quo without thinking.
    62. Re:Unsupport claims by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      There was violence before TV and Games and Movies. There were farm boys who grew up in peaceful farms that never heard a shot fired in anger or had a punch thrown whom grew up to be Soldiers.

      This is true, but I don't think any reasonable person can believe that people cannot be trained and conditioned to be more violent. The army's basic training was designed to address the fact that most soldiers, given a gun and sent to war, would intentionally miss their targets rather than shoot another human being. Since then, the rates of intentionally missing the enemy have dropped drastically.

      The reporter (or more likely editor) is a PC fool whom doesn't realize the simple basic truth. Violent Video games save us from wayyyyyy more random acts of violence then they do encourage them.

      I don't think it is foolish to believe that violent video games encourage more violence than they prevent. I think it is foolish to believe they do either without some real, objective scientific studies. From what I've seen I'd tend to say there is little or no proof to support the belief they encourage violence, but I'm open to evidence to the contrary

      Mind you, no matter the truth, I don't see any justification for banning or restricting them. Eating red meat probably encourages violence. Ditto for alcohol. That is what freedom is all about. Making choices for yourself and accepting responsibility for your actions. So you beat up a guy because you drank too much whiskey and played GTA. Great, it's still your fault, since you chose to do those things in the first place.

      I guess too many of these folks are naive and really believe everything is sunshine and lollypops and don't understand the dark sides we all have.

      I'd agree with this, but I think it is important to understand the nature of the human mind. We react in layers, to physical pain, emotions, and reasoned thinking. Violence is a possible reaction, but it is not "dark" per se, but rather survival oriented. We mostly act violently (or are driven to do so) when we are threatened, but violence is rarely the best solution to modern threats. The important thing is teaching people to recognize their violent emotions and the sources of them and to respond with the best solution to the underlying problem, rather than just reacting emotionally all the time. I think some of the problems exacerbated by video games and television is that they do often teach the lesson that it is appropriate to react emotively and try to make people idolize characters who basically act like large, violent, emotional infants.

      Thus, I mostly agree with you that people are violent by nature and I believe that video games and the like should be the choice of each individual. I disagree with you that video games are likely to reduce violent behavior or that there is any proof of that hypothesis.

    63. Re:Unsupport claims by binarstu · · Score: 1

      Another example of great reporting is how the article asserts that these "techie fight clubs" are springing up all over the place, but the only evidence we see is a single example of a handful of guys fighting periodically in someone's garage. Excellent.

    64. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is this fact, or just poor reporting?

      Neither, it's a sponsored message.

    65. Re:Unsupport claims by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      And the plain fact is that over the last forty-fifty odd years, such interpersonal and societal violence has increased - sharply.

      Er, where are you getting your information from? The FBI has been reporting a steadly decreasing violent crime rate for something like 30 years now.

      An assumption unsupported by anything other than anecdotal evidence.

      I think most people that play games would agree though. How many people does it take before its no longer anecdotal?

      Once doesn't have to be 'PC' to compare the number of school shootings in the 70's to the number in the 90's to see that something has changed radically in society.

      Yes, violent crime has decreased since the 70s. Focusing on one area of violent crime doesn't change that. School shootings weren't unheard of in the 70s either.

      There are also many fools who won't look at an equal truth - we as a society have gotten more violent in recent decades.

      Where's your proof? I'll restate; FBI statistics how violent crime has been decreasing steadly over the past 30 years.

      The controls of manners and self restraint that once held such things in check are slipping.

      I'll grant you that people are becoming more rude... but being rude and violent are hardly the same.

      It's unlikely that video games bear the whole burden - but it's a reasonable that either as a cause or a symptom, they are likely to be involved.

      Why are either of those reasonable? Sounds like you just have an axe to grind because you don't like popular video games, music, and movies.

    66. Re:Unsupport claims by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Try reading your daily newspaper.

      Perhaps you should take your own advice: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-09-09-cri me_x.htm

      Ah. The old head-in-the-sand approach - we can't possibly be getting more violent.

      Indeed. We coudln't possibly be getting LESS violent. After all, look at my evidence (anecdotal in nature, based on the number of stories).

    67. Re:Unsupport claims by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Ok, now explain away the other symptoms of increased violence - like eight year old shooting other eight year olds on a regular basis. Or road rage. Etc... Etc... (Or consider the fact that most of the shootings to date have been by the disaffected - not by the preppie set that experience most of this pressure.)

      I really wish you'd shut up about increased violence already:
      http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/viort.htm

      How do you have 'symptoms of increased violence' when violent crime is actually on the decline?? I'm not going to bother to respond to the rest of your drivel, if you can't even get your facts straight.

    68. Re:Unsupport claims by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the same old chestnut - it's always the parents fault. Even when the kids are exposed to pressures by the larger changes in sociey.

      Ugh.. ok I will respond to one more point in your idiotic post. Studies have shown time and again that parents are the single largest influence in a childs life. Much more so than their friends or society at large. So yes, it is always the parents fault.

      You keep acusing everyone of having their head in the sand, when you really don't know your facts at all.

    69. Re:Unsupport claims by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Wow, are you trolling, or really that racist?

      The parent poster is wrong, but so are you. The FACT is that violent crime in the US has been steadly declining for about 30 years now. Even with an increase in blacks and latinos.

      Of course you may be right; except that its whites who are less civilized.

    70. Re:Unsupport claims by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      But the reporter did the right thing in quoting an expert in a relevant fiel I

      I think the reporter did the wrong thing, since he picked one that supported his claim while ignoring other experts that claim otherwise.

    71. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of bull. It's called post-traumatic stress disorder because that's the psychological term for it, and it isn't limited to combat-derived trauma. Trust a pseudo-smart halfwit to go into a dumb rant about it and then make up, completely out of the blue, some half-assed totally unsupported conclusion just because he didn't like the US slowing down the process of turning Vietnam into a worker's paradise. What a moron. What a fucking tool.

    72. Re:Unsupport claims by jreedy21 · · Score: 1

      The bad date or club cockteases have made plenty a man hate women, if only for a bit. Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being.

      Right, and I'm sure it's not at all problematic to make a direct connection between being spurned by a woman at a club and simulating the murder of a woman on a video game. Get rejected by a woman? Kill some women on a video game, it's all good.

      For some reason, that doesn't seem like a valid response chain. How about: Get rejected by a woman? Reconsider getting smashed on Bud Light and hitting on girls who aren't interested in you.

    73. Re:Unsupport claims by ubrayj02 · · Score: 1

      Dude, give it up. It is not a "first amendment issue". This is a public forum, and that comment was not an act of censorship - it carried no authority or power over the person it was directed towards. The realtionship woman:whore::black:nigger does make sense, and is not unreasonable.

    74. Re:Unsupport claims by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      It is not a "first amendment issue". This is a public forum, and that comment was not an act of censorship

      I never used the words "first amendment." It's irrelevant here. However, I suggest you look up the word "censorship" because it did take place. Not at the government's hands and not with your little comment or crappy Psych-101+Lifetime TV psychoanalyis of the poster I originally responded to.

      He censored himself and apologized for what he said, despite the fact that it was wholly appropriate and did not warrant an apology.

      The realtionship woman:whore::black:nigger does make sense, and is not unreasonable.

      Err. No, it doesn't. A whore is a woman of a certain occupation.

      Valid analogies might include woman:whore::man:lawyer, woman:whore::man:congressman, etc. Or perhaps some other group:occupation ratio that is somewhat less than savory.
      woman:whore::italian:plumber (if you happen to dislike that particular subset).

      For your woman:whore::black:nigger analogy to fit, you'd have to be using Chris Rock's definition of the word or something similar(thus breaking your original emotive "argument").

    75. Re:Unsupport claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Make sure to look at all the research, and not just what supports Grossman's thesis.

      Says the guy who cites one isolated study as though it's the final word.

      Take your own advice. Even the article you linked to points out that this study contradicts "most previous research." You, not the grandparent, are the one who is cherry-picking.

    76. Re:Unsupport claims by Ugly+American · · Score: 1

      The article also notes that it's the first long-term study to be done on violent games and aggression.

      --
      For sale: one sig space, gently used. Inquire for details.
    77. Re:Unsupport claims by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure there are plenty of similar bits of hilarity in any language, but feel free to have some fun at our expense. In any event, what you're describing is something quite different from the discussion at hand. The deliberate redefinition of language to serve a political agenda to the detriment of the individual is not the same as words that are used out of long-standing habit to describe an unpleasant bodily function.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    78. Re:Unsupport claims by fufubag · · Score: 1
      I would say you're the one with your head in the sand. You need to dig it out and face the fact that humans have been violent since we became humans, even before. We don't need video games to help us.

      You are just reading about it, seeing it on TV, seeing it on the interent, and it seems like such a problem. In reality, it's just life, just like it has been for thousands of years.

      How much violence is there in the bible? I say kids are violent because they read about it in the bible!

      Imagine how many of these kids would be out causing trouble if they weren't glued to their TV's playing violent video games.

  9. Psh, that's nothing by ConfusedGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    This doesn't worry me much... yet. I mean, transgressional fiction was bound to come true at some point. People tend to break out of the cube. What worries me is that this might be a trend in fiction influencing reality. If Patrick Batemans start cropping up all over the place then we have a problem.

    1. Re:Psh, that's nothing by Time+Doctor · · Score: 1

      Try getting a reservation at Fry's now!

      --
      Check out ioquake3.org for a great, free, First-Person Shooter engine!
    2. Re:Psh, that's nothing by radl33t · · Score: 1

      Nice.

  10. The first thing about dork club... by reklusband · · Score: 2, Funny

    The problem with this is that these things is that these guys don't know how to fight and as such could really get hurt. And the thing is, if you accidentally kill someone in an illegal fighting event, it is still manslaughter. Course, a few dead dorks might mean that new positions open up in the fields they're in. HEY!!! That's a great idea. I need a job, I could get it Klingon battlecruiser style.

    1. Re:The first thing about dork club... by psychobyte · · Score: 1

      Actually, these guys are associated with "The Dog Brothers". It's a bunch of martial artists that fight each other to test each other. They do know what they are doing. This article is a little misleading. The dog brothers aren't all geeks. They are a pretty diverse crowd of people. teachers, programmers, engineers, trashmen, you name it. They just all like to test themselves physically. This clip says it all.... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2114276097 064116625

    2. Re:The first thing about dork club... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I challenged the entire QA department to a Bat Leth contest. They will trouble us no longer."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  11. Repetition Club by LunaticTippy · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I am sick to death of Fight Club. People talking about it, quoting it, watching it over and over.

    Now, I can simply point this practice out, and state without room for dissent that it is finally and completely over.

    It's sad, too, because if people would give it a rest I actually liked the book and the movie.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:Repetition Club by linvir · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's sad, too, because if people would give it a rest I actually liked the book and the movie.
      You know, you are allowed to like them despite a load of other people being dicks about it. Kind of like the internet.
    2. Re:Repetition Club by Morten+Hustveit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am sick to death of Fight Club. People talking about it, [...]

      I take it most people didn't pay attention when they were told the first and second rules.

    3. Re:Repetition Club by twistedsymphony · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd have to agree. Fight Club is easily one of my favorite movies and Chuck Palahniuk is one of my favorite authors. I liked the book/movie for a lot of reasons other then the actual "fight club". Even still when I was in college (RPI) as a freshmen one of my buddies told me one day that some guys in his dorm started a fight club... I didn't believe him till he took me down there and I watched two clumsy nerds slap each other for 5 minutes before getting tired and reaching for their inhalers. This was years ago now... 2000 I believe. Pretty stupid if you ask me, if you want to fight people take a boxing or martial arts class...

    4. Re:Repetition Club by Ucklak · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to like Star Trek until I read about the ladies that are into this: http://www.thyla.com/fan-art.html

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    5. Re:Repetition Club by linvir · · Score: 1
      My eyes! The goggles do nothing!.

      Oh, and I think you've violated the DMCA or something by even looking at the site.

    6. Re:Repetition Club by samkass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought engineers and geeks appreciated efficiency. They should just stay home and stick their hands in a waffle iron periodically, then go back to coding.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    7. Re:Repetition Club by iced_773 · · Score: 0


      if you want to fight people take a boxing or martial arts class...

      Exactly. I have been taking Tae Kwon Do for almost four years, and my biceps and triceps are HUGE, my thigh muscles are like tree trunks, and I can find my ribs. The funny thing is, I was kinda pudgy in the beginning. If you want a healthier body, you should really consider something like this - you won't regret it.

    8. Re:Repetition Club by Abreu · · Score: 1

      AAAAAAAAAHHH!!! [drops dead] plop!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:Repetition Club by Nutria · · Score: 0, Troll
      This was years ago now... 2000 I believe.

      ROTFLMAO

      Y2k is not "years ago". It's not even "years ago" to my 8yo...

      1970 is barely "years ago".

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    10. Re:Repetition Club by Nutria · · Score: 1
      I thought engineers and geeks appreciated efficiency. They should just stay home and stick their hands in a waffle iron periodically, then go back to coding.

      You can code with bruised ribs, you can code with a broken leg, you can even code, slowly, with a broken weak-side arm, but you can't code with your hands wrapped like mummies.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    11. Re:Repetition Club by Pii · · Score: 1

      Six years in Internet Time is an eternity.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    12. Re:Repetition Club by shawnce · · Score: 2, Funny

      ok ok... s/hands/penis/ ...better?

    13. Re:Repetition Club by TheMadWeaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      And also the Prime Directive!

    14. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious flamebait, mod that Karma-bonused loser parent down.

    15. Re:Repetition Club by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Years = more then one year.
      I was attempting to be literal not expressive.

      Even still something tells me your child would consider events that happened at age 2 a long time ago.

    16. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the year 2000 was more than one year ago, so I think it actually does constitute the plural.

    17. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's dead Jim.

    18. Re:Repetition Club by Skevin · · Score: 5, Funny

      > ok ok... s/hands/penis/ ...better?

      I took your advice and began coding with my penis instead of my hands. Everyone in my office is avoiding my cubicle now. On the plus side, I finally got other people to stop using my keyboard.

      Solomon

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    19. Re:Repetition Club by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2
      >This was years ago now... 2000 I believe.

      ROTFLMAO

      Y2k is not "years ago". It's not even "years ago" to my 8yo...

      Nooo fool. He means "this was years ago now... 2000 years ago I believe". It's in the bible, look it up, book of Nerds 3:18.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    20. Re:Repetition Club by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the prime rib directive.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    21. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to go with the denial, old man.

    22. Re:Repetition Club by deficite · · Score: 1

      OMFG, I'm still laughing at that

    23. Re:Repetition Club by 70Bang · · Score: 2, Interesting



      This is new to you? When some of the books which contained fan-written stories which came out, it was said they were supposed to support this type of relationship - this would have been in the 70s - the same timeframe Spock Must Die! [1], etc. came out. (

      I think this (The New Voyages) - fan written short stories is the one which started the buzz. I'd have to do some box digging in the garage. I've got all of the loose books which appeared on the shelves at that time (ca. '77-'80).

      I think the others at that time which were interpreted to push this lifestyle (perhaps more) were the Phoenix books[2].
      _________________________
      I'll resort to ROT13 spoilers for those who are going to track them down on Amazon for $1-$2 and read them. BTW, your shipping will cost more.

      [1] Gur Xyvatbaf ner trggvat bhg bs unaq naq vg gheaf bhg gurl'ir chg n sbepr svryq nebhaq Betnavn. Gur Ragrecevfr nggrzcgf gb fraq Fcbpx ivn irel ybat qvvfgnapr genafcbegre nf n gnpulba ornz juvpu vf obhaprq onpx, perngvat gjb Fcbpxf. Bar erny, gur bgure abg.
      [2]n qhcyvpngrq, qryvpngr, znfphyngrq Xvex jub vf frag gb uvqr va gur Ebzhyna Rzcver nf n "cevapr" bs fbzr glcr. Fcbpx vf pbasebagrq jvgu gur snpg ur pna'g gryy bar Xvex sebz gur bgure naq arvgure pna gur Xvexf.

    24. Re:Repetition Club by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Not been around 'nuff ladies lately? Slash is the new harlequin romance. If you can't discuss their facination for Harry Potter twincest, methink's you ought to either catch up on your reading or wonder how you've avoided it for so long.

    25. Re:Repetition Club by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is it me, or does your ROT13 look a lot like klingon?
      I think i know what the universal translator does now. Its just ROT13!!

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    26. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF!?!

    27. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's in the bible, look it up, book of Nerds 3:18.


      QFT!!
    28. Re:Repetition Club by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "If you steal from one source, that is plaigiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research."

      Uh, no. Stealing from any number of sources is plagerism. Using resources, quoting them and arranging the resultant conclusions into a well thought out paper is research.

    29. Re:Repetition Club by glindsey · · Score: 1

      You just learned about that? The whole Kirk/Spock pairing thing was essentially the basis for modern "slash" fan-fiction on the Internet. There are authors out there who will pair just about any two popular male leads together... I just shrug and figure it's the analogue of us straight males gawking over lesbians.

    30. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can justify all the porn on your work machine by saying you really do need it to work efficiently.

    31. Re:Repetition Club by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I just learned about it back in '82. I bought a non-fiction book about Trek and it mentioned KS ladies and I thought that it was made up. There was a convention that I went to (the only one I ever went to) in '85 and they had a 'special' exhibit on the top floor of the hotel. As a friend and I gained entrance, we were bombarded with images of Kirk and Spock in tight leather outfits and other similar oil paintings, water colors, sketches, etc... just like the link I provided earlier.

      My reaction at the time mirrored JudgeFurious' comment to me earlier.

      At the time, there was only the original series and the first 3 movies. There was no Borg or Ferengi or Next Generation.
      There was a costume contest and I remember that I was unimpressed but I admired the fan's devotion for creating this stuff. The one costume that stuck out that I think even won (I could be wrong) was some mesh-type sheets that were see-through and had spray painted spots of blue, yellow, pink, red, green to resemble the creature from Metamorphosis. Uh, yeah.

      There were episode and movie viewings in other rooms and we sat through some of ST:TMP when we just couldn't take it anymore. ST:TMP isn't 2001:ASO nor is it Star Wars. We snickered at some scenes that were funny to us, not out loud laugh, just a little snicker, and it was like we were blaspheming a sacred religious artifact in public.

      So we have a religious reverence for a lackluster film, obsessive costume contests, and to top it off, KS ladies. Kind of puts a bad taste on Star Trek for me. Star Trek is neat for what it represents and it's vision of the future, but it's not religion. It's fiction.

      So I sold/threw away my 'fan' stuff as I didn't really think I was a fan anymore nor did I want to be associated with people like that. That level of fandom just isn't for me.

      The only 'fan' stuff I still have is an unopened Spock Mego doll, the original first edition of Enterprise blueprints, and for the life of me - I don't know why I still have it - a Star Trek 3 3D poster.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    32. Re:Repetition Club by iced_773 · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
          100% Overrated

      It seems some Slashdotter out there can't bear the idea that there are people here that are actually in shape.

    33. Re:Repetition Club by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Its an old joke dude, chill out. Jesus, you need to get laid.

    34. Re:Repetition Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get laid? This is Slashdot. And he's posting about how to do research papers. What do you think the odds are?

  12. No weapons! by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFA:
    Kicking, punching and swinging every household object imaginable -- from frying pans and tennis rackets to pillowcases stuffed with soda cans -- they beat each other mercilessly in a garage in this bedroom community south of San Francisco.
    What the fuck?

    Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?

    Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.

    But using a blunt object? If you're anything other than a spaz, you'll crush a few ribs the first time you connect. Then the fights over.
    1. Re:No weapons! by mepex · · Score: 5, Informative
      Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.
      Being married to a health care professional and hearing the stories of the ER, I know (secondhand) how wrong this is. Broken orbital bones happen all the time. Broken hands can take years to heal, and hurt like hell (just ask Fernando Vargas). The one picture in TFA shows a guy trying to knee another guy in the head. You get lucky and land flush, you're talking brain bleed, easily fatal. Actually, in my limited time of martial arts sparring when I was young, I noticed that it was the novices and not the experts that seemed to hurt and get hurt more often than the experts. But this was sparring for points, not for damage.
    2. Re:No weapons! by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?


      The same fool, I suppose, that would say "I'm bored, let's find some other techies and start beating the crap out of each other."

      Or, I suppose, that would watch the fictional account of a character that went completely and destructively insane (but who may have, at the end of the story, "saved" himself by shooting himself in the head) and say "hey, let's imitate that."

      Fight Club is a good movie. Imitating because your life is boring is, well, a sign that you need serious help.

    3. Re:No weapons! by vux984 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, in my limited time of martial arts sparring when I was young, I noticed that it was the novices and not the experts that seemed to hurt and get hurt more often than the experts. But this was sparring for points, not for damage.

      The experts know how to both hit and be hit (and are better at avoiding the hits); they take a lot less damage than novices, and unless they INTEND to deal damage, they deal less damage too.

      On the flip side an expert INTENDING to deal damage will deal it a lot more effectively than a novice.

      The same is generally true in most sports.

    4. Re:No weapons! by linvir · · Score: 1
      The one picture in TFA shows a guy trying to knee another guy in the head. You get lucky and land flush, you're talking brain bleed, easily fatal.
      Get your priorities straight first. I mean, come one, he's confused underwear boxer shorts with real sports boxer sports. Gold!
    5. Re:No weapons! by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      Ya, these guys aren't too high on the intelligence scale. I think they're more of the backyard wrestling crowd that you hear about in the news all the time when some guy breaks a neck. I mean, a frying pan? Are they trying to knock each other out? (that head gear offers minimal protection).

    6. Re:No weapons! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low ...
      No, it's not.
    7. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but most computer guys have those fat stubby fingers, padded with years worth of cheese doodle by-products, and their computer guy victims have man boob padding for protection.

    8. Re:No weapons! by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?

      But using a blunt object? If you're anything other than a spaz, you'll crush a few ribs the first time you connect. Then the fights over.
      "

      We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old and their kids think WWF wrestlers are quality role models to be emulated.... It doesn't surprise me at all that people are smacking each other around with frying pans.

    9. Re:No weapons! by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, the one in the orange pants got hurt the most.

      --
      -gjr
    10. Re:No weapons! by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me this seems more like an extension of that backyard wrestling thing that was big a few years ago. And before that it was an extension of boys just beating each other up in the backyard.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    11. Re:No weapons! by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      "Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.

      But using a blunt object? If you're anything other than a spaz, you'll crush a few ribs the first time you connect. Then the fights over."

      That's the point, ending the fight before we get tired. These are IT people you're talking about - it's not like any of them have the cardiovascular training to make it to the end of the first round.

    12. Re:No weapons! by akharon · · Score: 1

      I love how the camera guy asks if they're ok and what's wrong. Apparently taking a 12 ft jump onto your butt is a great way to relieve hemhorroids and has no side effects until this freak incident they caught on camera.

    13. Re:No weapons! by value_added · · Score: 1

      We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old and their kids think WWF wrestlers are quality role models to be emulated.... It doesn't surprise me at all that people are smacking each other around with frying pans.

      Dunno about frying pans, but I'm eagerly waiting for Nacho Libre. And I can't stand wrestling, let along Mexican wrestling.

      The director was responsible for Napoleon Dynamite, so maybe there's a geek angle to the movie. Or this post, for that matter.

    14. Re:No weapons! by ajs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to spar with a friend when I was in high school. He was one of the young marines, or whatever they call them, and so he knew how to fight. I had no clue, but I put my heart into it. It was a lot of fun, and I had no hope of ever hurting him (though I did manage to flip him once, nearly by accident).

      Looking back, though, I think that if we had both been untrained it would have been uglier.

      Still, I wonder why we're all assuming these people are untrained. The majority may be, but it only takes one or two competent fighters to organize the rest and make it a realitvely reasonable thing to do. Sure, people are going to get hurt... if you want to avoid that, don't fight, but you can cut the odds down of there being anything particularly serious.

    15. Re:No weapons! by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      There are no WWF wrestlers anymore, unless they're wrestling pandas or something. The organization you're thinking of changed its name to World Wrestling Entertainment.

      But yeah, those stupid goddamn kids. Watching that video made me nauseated, and I don't know if it's from sympathetic pain or because I feel sick in the presence of all that stupid.

    16. Re:No weapons! by Roody+Blashes · · Score: 0, Troll
      You get lucky and land flush, you're talking brain bleed, easily fatal.

      I think your wife needs a new profession.

      The adult human skull, when healthy, is nearly impenetrable even when we're talking blunt objects swung under average human muscle power. The biggest concern in taking a knee to the head is eye damage, not brain damage. Eye damage can be extreme, permament, and can lead to far more serious complications. You may get jostled and become slightly disoriented, but if your skull lets a blow from a knee damage your brain permanently or severly, you either have some seriously shit luck or there's something fantastically wrong with your skull.

      Knees don't do piercing damage (for all you AD&D nerds), they do blunt shock damage. Any impact on the brain comes from sudden shock causing the fluids to fail in protecting against impact on the inside of the skull of the brain as it sits still while the surrounding bone moves (like you in a car when the brakes are slammed). This will almost never, if ever, cause internal hemorraghing during a normal fight. Concussions, disorientation, and short term memory loss, yes, Internal bleeding is very unlikely.

      I've been punched, kicked, and kneed in the head, I took a car door to the side of the head, fell off a mezzanine on my head, and been hit in the side of the head with a baseball bat. I may be damaged goods, but I've never once suffered even a concussion, much less any sort of hemorrahge. I've suffered short term memory loss, disorientation, temporary migraines, and blindness. Never bleeding into the brain.

      People give WAY to much credit to the ability of a fist to cause damage. Even an untrained nerdy tech can withstand a pummeling that leaves him blood-soaked and unable to move and not suffer any permanent damage. Individual beatings, unless truly severe, do not generally create much cause for alarm. It's the longterm buildup of individual pummelings over years or even decades that cause serious problems. In the short term, most people "lose" fights because they're not used to being hit and the pain is more serious than the actual injury, causing them to panic and run.
      --
      If you haven't foed me yet, what are you waiting for?
    17. Re:No weapons! by RKenshin1 · · Score: 0

      While I haven't participated in a "fight club" per se, I was heavily into martial arts... you may have seen my old instructor in UFC 2, taking one of the most memorable beatings in UFC history.

      He was very tought on us, and I really got to liking it because it made you feel like you were a part of something no one else was, and it gave you a sense of pride. Of course, this is true of any cult as well.... I guess the point is that it really did put more excitement into a network administrator's life.

      I really did enjoy anytime we practiced, but we never really used frying pans or the like. And yes, people do tell me I need help. Often.

    18. Re:No weapons! by goldspider · · Score: 1

      "We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old"

      No we don't.

      There, corrected that for ya.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    19. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.

      wow, you know nothing about what a untrained human can do.

      I can in 6 seconds rip both your ears off and show them to you without effort. I can easily break your fingers without even trying, break an arm, leg, foot without training and even really trying.

      Now, groin injuries, knee, elbow, throat, eyes, mouth, etc... Head trauma is so easy to inflict.

      Anyone doing a bare fisted fight with "rules" is a complete and utter idiot. These are the usual morons that roundhouse punch and aim for the head.

      And remember, these kind of thigs have "vetrans" that will kick the ass of the big strong muscle head in 30 seconds having him on the ground gasping for air or needing to go to the hospital because he will die soon.

      Anone that thinks bare fists are "The damage level is low" knows absolutely nothing about fights, fighting and the human body.

      You will be extremely suprised how easy it is to break a rib.

      Add in a slight amount of Karate training and most guys who thing they are big mean men will get their asses kicked so hard they will cry for their mommies.

      I know I have seen it and done it. broke one 260 pound bruisers knee so bad the bones were sticking out and the other guy had my fingers 3 knuckes deep in his nose while I was pounding his skull against the ground telling him how much a pussy he was.

      fighting = stupidity and is only used for defense and teaching some muscle head with an iq of 12 that he needs to not open his mouth or touch someone.

    20. Re:No weapons! by k2enemy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old

      No, we live in a nation where people can make shit up and get modded insightful.

    21. Re:No weapons! by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      See trained people at work. The dojo I go to has "break concrete cinderblock with one strike" as part of its black belt test. Suffice it to say, I'm no black belt (yet!), but I've seen some amazing things in this dojo.

      It's amazing what you can do if you train hard and long for it.

      As for the cinderblock, it's about getting your knuckles to move _very_ fast, and then getting them out before the cinderblock returns the energy. A bullet isn't very big or heavy, but it moves really quick. Also, quite a few blackbelt applicants may break a hand (or two! leaving elbows, wrists, and knees to try again!) while doing it.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    22. Re:No weapons! by dlZ · · Score: 1

      And I thought I needed a helmet for being klutzy!

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    23. Re:No weapons! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      such a lovely login page. Thank you.

    24. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Fight Club is a good movie. Imitating because your life is boring is, well, a sign that you need serious help."

      I haven't seen a single comment that gets the point of Fight Club. Since it's one of my fave films I think it deserves a remark. What is Fight Club about? It's got nothing much to do with fist-fighting that's for sure. It's about schizophenia, subversion and terrorism, not necessarily in that order.

      A psychologist, (it may have been Miller, but it was one of those old school peg twisting, mouse maze types) did an experiment with rats where he put enough of them in close proximity and slowly raised their stress levels until they turned on each other for comfort and relief.

      It may be a bit of harmless fun because these guys don't get out enough to play football, but imho you take a deeper look at the subconsious/ mental subtext and damn well ignore these symptoms at your peril.

    25. Re:No weapons! by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low

      That depends upon your class and level. I have five levels in the monk class with the shadow warrior prestige class, +3 brass knuckles of the whale, and 18/00 strength, so technically I would deal 3d6 + 3 hit points of damage and with my improved dodge feat you would not be fast enough to parry my attacks of opportunity.

    26. Re:No weapons! by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

      We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old

      How has being in the enlightened 55% group, and knowing how old the Earth really is, helped you in life?

    27. Re:No weapons! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. In Europe, they can make shit up and 500 years later, be a soverign nation with an area less than that of fscking Mayberry.

      We've got a long way to go.

    28. Re:No weapons! by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Watch out for the goddamn pandas. They're ferocious.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    29. Re:No weapons! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Funny

      What kind of whackass home rules do you guys use? Prestige Classes AND Percentile Strength!?!?!? Also, do you need another player? I've got this 5/2 Barbarian/Cleric Ilthilid I've been dying to try out.

      --
      Why not fork?
    30. Re:No weapons! by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 1
      We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old
      No, we live in a nation where people can make shit up and get modded insightful.
      That "fact" may be more a specific interpretation of existing polls than an outright lie. I couldn't find any polls or surveys that specifically referred to the age of the Earth... but there are quite a few that deal with creationism v. evolution. Creationism can fall into the Young Earth or Old Earth camps so it's not fair to say that "people who believe in creationism believe that the Earth is 6000 to 10,000 years old". However, it may be fair to say that a substantial number of them do.

      This page has a pretty good analysis of quite a few polls surrounding this issue: Reading the Polls on Evolution and Creationism. A choice quote:

      Surveys are also fairly consistent in their estimates of how many Americans believe in evolution or creationism. Approximately 40%-50% of the public accepts a biblical creationist account of the origins of life, while comparable numbers accept the idea that humans evolved over time. The wording of survey questions generally makes little systematic difference in this division of opinion
      If one assumes that Creationism == Young Earth, then the "45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old" may (accidently) be an accurate statement!
    31. Re:No weapons! by molarmass192 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      According to a 2001 Gallup poll on the origins of humans, they estimate that 72% of Americans believe in some form of creationism (as defined above). They also estimate that about 45% of Americans concurred with the statement that "God created man pretty much in his present form at one time within the last 10,000 years."

      Supporting link, link, and right from the horse's mouth link.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    32. Re:No weapons! by jhoffoss · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am simply amazed that this is the first actual AD&D reply to this story (at +2, at least...)

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    33. Re:No weapons! by rthille · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of when my friend came back from a year in japan. We used to mix it up a bit, friendly mostly. Anyway, he had a lot of judo instruction in Japan, so the first time we mixed it up after he came back I ended up flat on my back on the floor. HARD. That was the last time we mixed it up :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    34. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MEWBZ MEWBZ MEWBZ MOOBS man boobs man boobs MOOBZ

    35. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, we live in a nation where people can make shit up and get modded insightful."

      You just described the democratic political process.

    36. Re:No weapons! by chrismcdirty · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in who your old instructor was. I used to watch UFC when it first started out.

      But more to the point, I used to take Shaolin Wu-Shu Kung Fu, and the instructors were also very tough. Many times, we'd have to punch at pillars in order to learn control, or do crunches while an instructor punched our stomachs. Sometimes, our master would even run over us all in a line. But it was that type of training that made me feel like it was actually doing something.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    37. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's about getting your knuckles to move _very_ fast, and then getting them out before the cinderblock returns the energy.

      I don't recall any physics professor stating that Newton's "for every reaction, there is an equal but opposite reaction" had a clause that indicated that quick kung-fu guys were exempt from it. What a stooooge. No, it's about applying enough force to a small area to cause the solid to break.
    38. Re:No weapons! by grammar+fascist · · Score: 4, Funny

      The experts know how to both hit and be hit (and are better at avoiding the hits); they take a lot less damage than novices, and unless they INTEND to deal damage, they deal less damage too.

      On the flip side an expert INTENDING to deal damage will deal it a lot more effectively than a novice.

      The same is generally true in most sports.


      Yeah, I've noticed the same thing in golf. My father-in-law takes a whole lot less damage than my brother-in-law, in general.

      They play full-contact, though, which I'm told is uncommon.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    39. Re:No weapons! by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When growing up I used to wrestle with other kids. Frequently the match would end when someone scraped up an arm, or hit their head hard enough to make them dizzy, or one of the big guys rolled over the leg of one of the little guys. In college, we sparred quite a few times. I distinctly remember one match where a thai kickboxing friend kicked me in the thigh muscle lengthwise... I couldn't walk for about 4 days. Since graduating I've fought with friends who are a lot more experienced and controlled, and so clear winners could be declared without them necessarily breaking something. Or who didn't know anything, and I could take them down without issue.

      The two biggest injuries I've seen coming out of martial arts schools were a Tae Kwon Do instructor who hyperextended both of her knees and could never walk again, and a Iaido instructor who put her sword away a little too quickly and severed all of the nerves in her hand. Both wounds were functionally self-inflicted.

      In my particular circle martial arts have died down, but in others they go strong. The need for human beings to fight, and especially the need for men to fight, is strong. There is nothing unnatural about that. There is nothing wrong with that. Just be a little careful.

    40. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Fight Club about? It's got nothing much to do with fist-fighting that's for sure. It's about schizophenia, subversion and terrorism, not necessarily in that order.

      I thought it was anarchist propaganda. How long do y'all think it'll be until the imitators move on to the project mayham part?

    41. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      instructor who hyperextended both of her knees and could never walk again,

      holy shit

    42. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Most karate guys get their asses handed to them in real fights, black belts included."

      Depends on the dojo/sensei. The old (back in the 60s) hand-to-hand combat instructor for the army at Schoefield Barracks in Hawaii was an expert at 'combat Karate' (for lack of a better term), the purpose of which is to kill/maim your opponent as quickly as possible rather than to perfect graceful roundhouses. It didn't look pretty at all, actually. It was almost hard to tell apart from regular brawling except that he used his feet as adeptly as anyone would use his hands, and, if you paid enough attention, you'd notice that he aimed his blows carefully for maximum effect (he pulled them, of course.. no use in blinding/rupturing kidneys/crushing the larynx of your student unnecessarily :P).

      Most dojos now days teach an entirely different type of Karate, meant for self-discipline, confidence, and exercise rather than self-defense. The art has basically evolved away from its more 'savage' roots as it is not very productive to teach people 101 Ways to Kill and Cripple With Your Bare Hands(TM) in modern society.

      I almost lost a fight in elementary school because knowing some martial arts hindered me quite a bit, but not for the reason you suggest. Basically it hindered me because it was too effective. I forget what the fight was about, but I remember realizing that I didn't really want to break the guy's arm/put out his eye/hit (and possibly collapse) his voicebox etc. Now, given that I was quite a novice it's likely that my attempts would have failed even if I had had no reservations, but having those thoughts running through my mind at the time meant that I was trying to be careful to avoid seriously hurting the guy I was supposed to be fighting.

    43. Re:No weapons! by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      That's not surprising. He was carrying the most weight, and landed square on his tailbone. It must have hurt like hell. He'd be lucky to escape serious spinal injury after that. Maybe he didn't.

      The cameraman was no brain trust either. He actually has to ask, "Are you guys OK?" while they're writhing on the ground screaming in pain, and then goes in for a closeup instead of calling 911.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    44. Re:No weapons! by Codename.Juggernaut · · Score: 0, Troll

      We live in a nation where burned-out hippies grew up and decided that the words "Theory" and "Fact" have become so intertwined we should teach them as synonymous in every science class, and the letter "L" for litigation makes up 20% of any self-respecting yellow pages.

      Underground fight clubs are a thing of the new age where punching out the bully in class means a lawsuit and expulsion. 50 years ago, in a nation where 95% of eligible voters claimed to be "faithful churchgoers", litigation was not allowed in yellow pages, and the "Theory of Evolution" was still taught as a "Theory" - underground fight clubs didn't exist.

      Enough with your flamebait when the facts oh-so-clearly point against it. The fact of the matter is that healthy outlets of aggression are being demonized and harped on by ALL media and society to a point where adolescents and punk-geeks who never grew up knowing how to take a punch in school end up choosing one of their few (albeit stupid) available options. They end up hurting themselves.

    45. Re:No weapons! by dcam · · Score: 1
      Kicking, punching and swinging every household object imaginable -- from frying pans and tennis rackets to pillowcases stuffed with soda cans -- they beat each other mercilessly in a garage in this bedroom community south of San Francisco.
       
      ... The only protective equipment used is fencing and hockey masks. Several fighters have suffered broken noses, ribs and fingers.


      It really doesn't sound like no holds barred with weapons (frying pans). I can imagine that you would expect far more serious injuries than broken noses, ribs and fingers. I'd hardly call that mercilessly.
      --
      meh
    46. Re:No weapons! by tajgenie · · Score: 1

      No, we live in a nation where people can make shit up and get modded insightful.

      Well you have to remember, 45% of statistics are made up on the spot...

    47. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we don't.

      Yes, we do.

    48. Re:No weapons! by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      No, we live in a nation where people can make shit up and get modded insightful.

      Since I was simply curious, I did a quick search, and came up with this: http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm/

      One of the highlights is that, when asked if they believed "God created man pretty much in his present form at one time within the last 10,000 years" 47% of those polled (in 1991, it was 44 in '97) said YES.

      "Making shit up" indeed.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    49. Re:No weapons! by atokata · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never wasted a whole Sunday morning in supplication to an invisible man who lives in the sky, for one.

    50. Re:No weapons! by Skroggtar · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up. He definitely knows his stuff.

      As it is, a fist itself is easy to mess up: too many people position their thumb awkwardly, curl their fingers in, don't barce their wrists, etc. This kind of fighting will wreak havoc on everyone involved...fighting should be left to people of appropriate muscle mass and training.
      Besides, would you rather watch two skilled, experienced fighters maneuver their way throught their opponent's strikes and land some of their own, or two overweight nerds slap at each other in a garage?

    51. Re:No weapons! by Xeleema · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anyone else hate 3.x Edition of AD&D just a little more now because of posts like this?

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
    52. Re:No weapons! by DocOmega · · Score: 2, Informative
      Before suggesting that someone's wife needs a new profession, perhaps a lesson in anatomy is in order...

      The region of the skull known as the pterion is a junction of the sphenoid, temporal, frontal, and parietal bones. This area is found around your temple. Along this region runs the middle menengial artery, which gives branches to the interior of the skull.

      This area is succeptable to injury, as it is relativly thin. Haven't you ever seen baseball helmets that have a projection specifically to cover this region? Ever wonder why they are there? Damage to the pterion by a substantial blow is likely to cause tearing in these arteries, and subsequent hematoma and intracranial bleeding. This may lead to coma and death.

      There is some anatomical variation in the structure of the pterion - maybe that is the case with you and your lack of intracranial bleeding after your numerous traumas. Or maybe you are just hard headed.

      --
      Meh
    53. Re:No weapons! by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Broken hands can take years to heal, and hurt like hell (just ask Fernando Vargas).

      Martial arts insight here - Do not attack the human skull with a balled up fist. And whatever you do, don't ever attack a human skull with a fist with the intention of hitting anywhere near where the teeth are. Seriously. Look at the hand of a skeleton. Then look at a mandible. Then bite your knuckle and see how little force is required to make your hand hurt. It's a very bad idea. And this is coming from a Karate guy - it doesn't get much punch happier than we are.

    54. Re:No weapons! by Tragek · · Score: 1

      I've yet to see Napoleon Dynamite, but I do agree Nacho Libre looks really good.

    55. Re:No weapons! by LordVader717 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why was this modded Flaimbait? He is 100% correct.

      Desorientation, memory loss etc., they are the symptoms of concussion. The grandparent has no idea.

      People get killed all the time by golf balls, coconuts, and just simply falling backwards on their head from their normal hight.

    56. Re:No weapons! by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Probably after they learn to spell.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    57. Re:No weapons! by Gumph · · Score: 1
      It's helped me an ASTOUNDING amount - but then again I am a geophysicist!

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    58. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been punched, kicked, and kneed in the head, I took a car door to the side of the head, fell off a mezzanine on my head, and been hit in the side of the head with a baseball bat. I may be damaged goods, but I've never once suffered even a concussion, much less any sort of hemorrahge. I've suffered short term memory loss, disorientation, temporary migraines, and blindness. Never bleeding into the brain.

      All right, all right ... I predict that now comes that part when you reveal you are a member of $whatever_ethnic_group_thickheadness_stereotype$, and obligatory associated punchline: "Yes, but who is to guarantee that you'll always be so lucky to receive hits with your head only?"

      *ducks*
    59. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, no...

      Unarmed damage is 1d3 for medium size characters and 1d2 for small sized characters.

      And it's subdual damage, not real damage.

      Compare this to a dagger, 1d4 or a longsword, 1d8.

    60. Re:No weapons! by Skreems · · Score: 1, Informative

      > As for the cinderblock, it's about getting your knuckles to move _very_ fast, and then getting them out before the cinderblock returns the energy.

      Um... physics doesn't work that way...

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    61. Re:No weapons! by Shano · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everyone else here, but I'd sooner watch the overweight nerds, thanks.

      I'd bring popcorn as well. Hell, you could make a comedy act of it.

    62. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its worse than that.

      a person who knows how to throw a punch can cause fatal brain injuries. using your foot is ~ 3x stronger than you arm. even more at the knee. the picture also shows something very dangerous, holding someone's head while hitting them. this is very illegal in boxing, and for good reason. these people should be arrested for their own safety, and put on a lenghty probation, with a stict condition of NO unsupervised fights. if they want to get into a sport with professional monitoring, well thats very risky too, but not as bad as what they are doing.
      BTW there are a lot of boxers with broken hands, many of them try to hide it for obvious reasons, and many careers end in amateurs because of this.
      as far as experst vs novice sparring/fighting, that is regulated by the gov. pro fighters are usually licensed and are not allowed to fight with lower ranks. as for novices gettin hurt in sparring, that should not happen either, since a good martial arts philosophy dictates that the more skilled figher should teach, and protect the beginners, not kick their ass. martial arts is about learing, and getting better; you cant do that when you are injured.
      these guys are taking a dangerous shortcut to waht takes years of training to be able to do. a simple analogy is parachuting. experienced jumpers teach novices, and no shortcuts are allowed. this is no different.

    63. Re:No weapons! by 80+85+83+83+89+33 · · Score: 1

      speaking of elligible voters, it took only 11% of them to get clinton into office.

      --
      i disable sigs
    64. Re:No weapons! by isorox · · Score: 1

      pillowcases stuffed with soda cans

      Now a pillow fight, prferably involving many girls, I can see the point in that.

    65. Re:No weapons! by srpatterson · · Score: 1

      Nothing goes *spaaaang* like a frying pan :)

      --
      -- The Heineken Uncertainty Principle: You can never be sure how many bears you had last night.
    66. Re:No weapons! by k-sound · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?

      Someone who just drank a bottle of frying pan antidote

    67. Re:No weapons! by JakusMinimus · · Score: 1

      It may be a bit of harmless fun because these guys don't get out enough to play football, but imho you take a deeper look at the subconsious/ mental subtext and damn well ignore these symptoms at your peril.

      I don't know ... seems to me a few high velocity blunt objects colliding with the afflicted's head is an acceptable cure--you cannot be a danger to society if you're dead (or drooling mindlessly). And with our healthcare system today, I can appreciate this out-of-the-box thinking!

      --

      You can be an atheist and still not want to succumb to some weird cross-over sheep disease -- AC
    68. Re:No weapons! by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      >On the flip side an expert INTENDING to deal damage will deal it a lot more effectively than a novice.

      One other point to ponder also - if you *do* have any type of training that could be construed in a lawsuit as a "weapon", you may want to think twice before getting into the melee. Even if you sucked at karate, and only got through a couple ranks. Your ass would most likely be the proverbial grass as far as the court would see it.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    69. Re:No weapons! by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
      I think you are underestimating the amount of damage these guys can do. True, they can't match the effectiveness of someone with considerable training, but they have plenty of potential for hurting each other.

      Sidetrack: to qualify these statements, I will say that I am the sempai of my local dojo. If you have seen the episode of the office where it is revealed that Dwight is a purple belt, you understand the jokes I have been enduring lately. Suffice to say my position is between team captain and substitute teacher

      Fights *very* rarely go on for 12 minutes like in the movies. I have seen my fair share being a bouncer in college (go figure, eh?) and they often result in two or three misses (between the two) and the first solid connection brings a guy down. Training simply eliminates the misses on the front end (as well as eliminating the desire to be in the fight in the first place).

      Truth be told, this is no different than why most guys go and play backyard football... there is something very satisfying about contact sports. Unfortunatly, these guys seem as if they missed the boat all their lives and now are just going with a movie concept that amassed much cult popularity in their sector of work.

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    70. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever; the post was off-topic, unprompted, pointless religion-bashing. I doubt these 20-something computer geeks are in the 45% creationist camp. The only connection this post had to TFA is that these Fight Club geeks are evidence of Darwinism.

    71. Re:No weapons! by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.

      Fists are concussion weapons. Before man had complicated weapons (pointy sticks) he only had his fists. It is believe that even this early man was a predator of sorts which would fell animals by stunning them with crushing blows or wrestling them to the ground and sufficating them. Now, early man was much stronger than we are today (something like by the order of 3 times stronger) but our fists can do pretty much the same thing: break bones, stun, paralyse, choke, and ultimetly kill.

    72. Re:No weapons! by swarsron · · Score: 1

      Newbies don't know how to hit right. Most of them don't even know how to make a fist (the put their thumb under their other fingers). The most common way of hurting oneself as a martial arts newbie is by hitting something and hurting you hand/wrist.

      But i have to agree with the previous posts, hitting with objects or using you knees/elbows is really, really dangerous (even if you don't know how to inflict maximum damage)

    73. Re:No weapons! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      Way to get totally owned there, dumbass. I mean, thanks. It was amusing.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    74. Re:No weapons! by Maximilio · · Score: 1
      Actually, in my limited time of martial arts sparring when I was young, I noticed that it was the novices and not the experts that seemed to hurt and get hurt more often than the experts

      Additionally, it's more painful to spar a novice than a seasoned veteran . . . the novices can barely get out of their own way.

    75. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in a world that doesn't know/understand what the word "Theory" means in science.

    76. Re:No weapons! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I've been punched, kicked, and kneed in the head, I took a car door to the side of the head, fell off a mezzanine on my head, and been hit in the side of the head with a baseball bat.

      Is your name Homer Simpson?

    77. Re:No weapons! by operagost · · Score: 1

      As has been adequately pointed out, those who believe in a young earth are merely a subset of the entire set of people who "wasted a whole Sunday morning in supplication to an invisible man who lives in the sky." Apples and oranges.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    78. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1

      If physics does not work this way, then please explain why sound propogate through solid (and non-solid) objects at roughly 1 millionith the speed of light?

      --
      -Reid
    79. Re:No weapons! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      but who may have, at the end of the story, "saved" himself by shooting himself in the head

      Yeah, well that ending is retarded. He shoots himself with the gun pointed to the back of his throat. The best that would happen is he would seriously damage his spine and be crippled for life, or (very likely) rupture an artery and choke/bleed to death very quickly. The end of the film shows him choking a bit but recovering to virtually normal. Dumb. He should have actually died. Anyway, wasn't the point that the only way to relieve his insanity was to, well, die? Shooting and wounding himself wouldn't have done it.

    80. Re:No weapons! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's made you a more tolerant person, more able to derive their own morals than having to accept them from a 2000 year old book.

      Perhaps it's meant you have a lot more time because you're not regularly having to go praise a god you're not at all sure exists, at least in a form described by religions.

    81. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put on my wizard robe and hat...

    82. Re:No weapons! by fitten · · Score: 1

      Even then... punchs/kicks tend to leave bruises and cuts which heal and you move on. Joint locks/breaks can cause much longer lasting injury... Think about how long it takes to recover from a blown knee or a broken elbow... you'll never be the same.

      And, you're right about the expert/novice comparison. A novice has little/no control and will typically use too much uncontrolled power, particularly if they get mad (which will happen easily) and will have almost no defense to protect themselves. Someone trained (or just very experienced) a bit will use more appropriate amounts of power as well as being in control enough to not go too far with techniques and shouldn't get angry (lose control to emotions) as easily.

    83. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to re-read your source, friend.

    84. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If physics does not work this way then please explain the tensile strength of a can of tuna.

      wtf??

    85. Re:No weapons! by cuantar · · Score: 1

      Because sound is slower than light, and travels in a medium?

      You're mixing up mechanical and electromagnetic waves. I don't see the connection to cinderblocks at all.

      --
      Legalize it.
    86. Re:No weapons! by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      Most people don't seem to pick up the subtleties of the film, and usually either remark on the how people are forced to turn to physical violence to feel alive in our modern, soulless society, or how the movie advocates anarchy and living free.

      This is my #3 favorite movie of all time, but for a while, I focused on the anarchy aspect of it. Eventually I realized that if you really pay attention, there's a whole other layer. All the propaganda that Tyler spouts about liberating people, allowing them to live their own lives, escaping from the air-conditioned nightmare... it's all contradicted throughout the rest of the movie.

      The first rule of Project Mayhem is you do not ask questions. The whole "his name is Robert Paulson" chanting-thing. "Why was Tyler Durden building an army? In Tyler we trusted". The recurring theme of blind faith in Tyler's master plan seems to imply that it's really a changing of the shepard, rather than freeing the flock. One "mentally-ill" man discontent with his life starts a cult and resculpts the world to his liking.

      I think it's a brilliant movie, masterfully done. I lean towards Tyler's personal philosophy anyway, so perhaps I'm a bit biased, but that's my interpretation of the whole movie.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    87. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1

      No, you're the one who has mixed up mechanical and em waves. When he strikes the block he initiates a slow moving pressure (sound) wave, that's why he has time to move out of the way before the force hits him on the rebound.

      --
      -Reid
    88. Re:No weapons! by cuantar · · Score: 1

      Eh, no. Wrong.

      The instant he hits the block, the block hits back. The fact that sound travels through the block is irrelevant to whether or not his hand feels a force.

      --
      Legalize it.
    89. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say that particular fact has helped me much. But it's about the process - the critical thinking that lead me to understand that fact - and many others like it - has helped me enormously

    90. Re:No weapons! by Xonstantine · · Score: 0

      I think you mean that they wrap their thumb with their other fingrs...your thumb is actually supposed to be under your fingers positionally.

      Make a fist Says a karate fist, but that's the same fist you use in boxing as well.

    91. Re:No weapons! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      If you had read the article, you'll note that the police acknowledge that the fighters are there willingly, and thus didn't really have any legal reason to stop them.

      Seems to be it would be irrelevent if you knew karate or not.

    92. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is a force felt as soon as contact is made, but it is not equal to the force of his hand because the brick has give.

      The brick is a high-tension spring. Imagine karate guy is hitting a soft spring instead of a rigid object, then you'll probably understand what he meant when he talked about getting out of the way in time.

      --
      -Reid
    93. Re:No weapons! by Nesetril · · Score: 1

      it's not really "getting out in time" that breaks the board though. Imagine that there is a "measure" that determines whether an object breaks on impact. Depending on the strike and how you model it, the measure could be the maximum force, impulse, or transfer of energy, etc. So, the entire point is to strike the board in such a way that this "measure" is more favorable to the bones in your hand than the board. For example, it's a fact that you risk more injury if your hand slows down more during the impact.

      --
      Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
    94. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old

      I assume you mean the USA. If so, no way. Yes, we have way to many bible belt nut jobs, but no that many.

    95. Re:No weapons! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the misconception I'm talking about. If he does indeed start a wave propagating through the block, his fist has already taken the blow from the force required to start that wave (equal and opposite reaction, etc). The most the wave could do is hit him with the same force a second time, but that's assuming the block was being held in position quite firmly, and if that were true, the material it was being held by would absorb a lot of that wave energy. In addition, waves in solid objects are VERY fast... much too fast for a human to generate one and then pull their hand back before it returned.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    96. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1

      No, of course getting out in time doesn't break the brick, the force has already been applied. As long as you get your hand out of the way before the full force recoils, then the brick will break because it will contain a sound wave with too much energy to cope with.

      Stop thinking about it as a rigid board, but as a spring that accepts force and recoils gradually. If your hand slows down during the impact, then the spring will just bounce back and give you a really nasty punch in the hand. This is what you are avoiding when you move out of the way. Since all the force just went back into your hand, the brick will survive.

      --
      -Reid
    97. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that was a disturbing bastardized mix of AD&D and 3.x rules. In 3.x, STR doesn't do the whole 18/whatever thing, and in AD&D, there weren't prestige classes as he's using them.

    98. Re:No weapons! by Nesetril · · Score: 1

      dude... if the board "recoils" as you say, it has already failed to break. and a force, can't go "back into your hand". lol.

      --
      Jesus said to his disciples: "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" - Luke 22:36
    99. Re:No weapons! by Helter · · Score: 1

      Well, from the looks of the debris, on top of the idiocy of jumping off of a 12 foot height, they didn't prep the table either.

      Those folding tables have a metal frame screwed to their underside, which wrestlers remove in order to make the table break easily. It then is changed from a semi-solid object that hurts, to an energy sink that simply slows the body down before it hits the ground.

    100. Re:No weapons! by cuantar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I understand exactly why it works. It just doesn't have anything to do with sound. Sound is, rather, a consequence.

      It's the same reason why paintballs that bounce hurt a hell of a lot more than ones that break -- energy transfer.

      --
      Legalize it.
    101. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1
      dude... if the board "recoils" as you say, it has already failed to break.

      WRONG
      The board recoils with most of the energy you just gave it when you hit it.

      and a force, can't go "back into your hand". lol.

      News flash, forces transfer energy.
      --
      -Reid
    102. Re:No weapons! by cuantar · · Score: 1

      I realize it's bad form to reply to oneself, but I suppose I came across a little unclear in the above comment.

      The reason the brick breaks is because the breaker applies a large force in a small time. It doesn't have anything to do with avoiding the brick's recoil, because that happens the moment he applies a force to the brick. It's instantaneous -- there is no time between when his fist hits the brick and when the brick hits him back.

      Yes, he'll set up a compression wave (sound) in the brick. However, sound has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not he feels a force, or whether or not the brick breaks. If he strikes quickly, the block will break because his hand is in contact with it for a shorter time than if he hit it and didn't pull back, but he imparts the same force to it.

      --
      Legalize it.
    103. Re:No weapons! by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Cmon, laugh... The post is sooo outside any set of rules that its funny

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    104. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1

      So are you saying it's impossible to break a brick with your hand? Or that's it's impossible to break a brick without breaking your hand?

      The force is applied gradually, because with the right technique the brick will act as a spring that absorbs the energy from your hand. Once you've transferred lots of energy into the spring, all you have to do is get out of the way before the spring hits you back with most of the energy you just gave it. Leaving the brick broken, and your hand not.

      --
      -Reid
    105. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1

      I think I was being quite unclear before, recoil and opposite reaction force are not the same thing. The opposite force (F=kx) it put in gradually, over a span of about 5ms*. As the force is applied, the brick, as a spring, is being compressed and is gaining spring energy. (In the form E=kx^2). Now once the spring is fully loaded, the hand is either
      a) removed in time, and avoids getting any recoil energy. As a result the brick breaks and you're happy.
      b) not removed in time, the brick gives you back lots of energy, your hand hurts, brick is unphased.

      The link touches on some of this, might want to check it out.
      * ref: http://www.discover.com/issues/may-00/departments/ featphysics/

      --
      -Reid
    106. Re:No weapons! by subgrappler · · Score: 1

      i think some of these guys are trained... look at the pic.. the guy is using a high knee to his opponent... if you notice he is also controlling the guys head similar to what they do in muay thai kickboxing. sure, u can watch enough UFC tapes and pick up the moves, but just knowing that you need to pull the guys head into your knee (while your knee is hip driven) is a weapon enough.

    107. Re:No weapons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vargas is known for his back pain, not his hand pain. Are you sure you aren't thinking of Mayweather or Jones?

    108. Re:No weapons! by Locke03 · · Score: 1

      Full-contact golf....sweet. I should try this sometime, then I might be able to tolerate playing the game. Putter mayhem and five-iron frenzy!

      --
      I don't care what youre doing so much as the idiotic way you're doing it.
    109. Re:No weapons! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it's imposible, but your interpretation of the physics is wrong. The same force you're applying in a "positive" direction to the brick, the brick is also applying in a "negative" direction to your hand and arm, as part of the momentum transfer between the two. You don't just hit the brick and transfer all your kinetic energy without feeling it.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    110. Re:No weapons! by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Nah, those raised areas on the helmets are so the girls can wear their ponytails under the helmets during softball! If you are a guy you won't want to be caught wearing one of those girly helmets!

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    111. Re:No weapons! by cuantar · · Score: 1

      Huh, interesting. Hadn't thought of it like that. So we've been arguing about different ideas, eh? :p

      --
      Legalize it.
    112. Re:No weapons! by reidbold · · Score: 1
      Yes, I'm aware that a force is applied in the opposite direction, but that's not what I'm talking about.

      You don't just hit the brick and transfer all your kinetic energy without feeling it.


      Actually that's exactly the idea, you'll still feel it, but not as much as the brick will. When you're contacting the brick your charging a spring, so while there is a force pushing back on you, it's not doing work, it's having work done on it. Once you have given the spring lots of energy, you get out of the way so that it doesn't turn around and give that energy right back, in a painful way.

      Here's a link I found that explains the springy brick feature.
      http://www.discover.com/issues/may-00/departments/ featphysics/

      I just went back and read my earlier posts, I was using 'force' to mean 'force that transfers energy' a few times without realizing it, sorry for the confusion.

      --
      -Reid
    113. Re:No weapons! by Skreems · · Score: 1

      so while there is a force pushing back on you, it's not doing work, it's having work done on it

      Again, that's not how physics works. The brick is having positive work done on it, the fist is having negative work done, but they both have equal magnitude, which means the force on each is equivalent. You can't just magically impart force into the brick without having equal force react against your fist.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    114. Re:No weapons! by k2enemy · · Score: 1

      i guess i should eat crow and stop overestimating the intelligence of my fellow countrymen.

  13. Thats just wrong. by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 1

    Is this what it looks like when geeks fight?

    Face Masks! Pool Cues! Knee Sniffing!

    ugh.

  14. slashfark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    farkslash

    1. Re:slashfark by poopie · · Score: 1

      Article summary should read: 'What happens when you coworker steals your red swingline stapler? ...It's soap making time!"

      Tag should be: 'dumbass'

  15. I hate people by bigtangringo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Dear Michael Messner,

    Please accept this large steaming cup of shut the hell up.

    Sincerely,

    BigTanGringo

    --
    Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    1. Re:I hate people by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      Amen. I play mainly violent video games and I am totally against violence of any form (in real life), whether it be against a human or animal. I've been playing first person shooters since the original wolfenstein and doom. I played the original GTA 1 & 2, and I own GTA3, Vice City and San Andreas on my PS2 aswell as the PC version of GTA: San Andreas. It pisses me off when people blame violence on violent games. When did people stop becoming responsible for their own actions?

    2. Re:I hate people by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Please accept this large steaming cup of shut the hell up.

      Dear BigTanGringo -
      I sense a lot of bottled up violent impulses in you as demonstrated by the aggressive tone of your letter. Perhaps you played too many video games as a child.
      Sincerely,
      Dr. Messner

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re:I hate people by bsartist · · Score: 1

      I've been playing first person shooters since the original wolfenstein

      A stupid nit to pick, I know, but... the original Wolfenstein wasn't a FPS. It was a top-down shooter for the Apple ][. Gameplay was essentially Berzerk with powerups.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    4. Re:I hate people by AhtirTano · · Score: 1
      Let me get this straight.

      People watch violent movie, then re-enact it in real life. That is, they learned a particular violent behavior by watching a violent movie (and expanding on it).

      Sociologist says people have bottled-up violent impulses learned from watching violence.

      You get mad at the sociologist, as if the topic of the article isn't a concrete case of his general point.

      I think I see a potential definition of irony in here somewhere, but I can't quite put my finger on it.

  16. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    "Boys have these warrior fantasies picked up from popular culture, and schools sort of force that out of them," he said. In these fantasies, "The good guys always resort to violence, and they always get the glory and the women."

    Hmmm. Well I sit at a desk most of the day and play(ed) my fair share of violent video games. Yet I don't feel the need the fight another person to make myself feel better or get laid. The results of my hobbies, working on old cars, old motorcycles and playing in a band get me enough glory and sex.

  17. Rubber gloves...? by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ummm, Roger Tinkoff -- you might want to wear rubber gloves befor wiping up some random weirdo's blood...

    Anyway, my favorite part is the two professors eagerly spouting theories about "fight clubs" as though they'd ever heard of this before the USA Today reporter came calling.

    No, my real favorite part is:

    Five-year fight club veteran Dinesh Prasad, 32, a heavily tattooed Santa Clara engineer, said he once broke a rib in a match but never complained to his fellow combatants. He also recently skipped his first wedding anniversary to attend a fight rather than drive to Los Angeles, where his wife is finishing law school.
    Fast forward to Marital Fight Club...
    1. Re:Rubber gloves...? by Skyshadow · · Score: 2, Funny
      Fast forward to Marital Fight Club...

      The guy wanted to find out what it would feel like to have his ass kicked. I suspect he's about it find out.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:Rubber gloves...? by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      The guy wanted to find out what it would feel like to have his ass kicked. I suspect he's about it find out./blockquote. More like he was looking for the quickest way to get a divorce. Yeesh... I know I'm obsessvie but at least my activities are innocous like building robots.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  18. Well, if you really want to fight, by i+am+kman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's alot better to fight other nerds than get beat up in real life... At least that pocket protector will save you :)

    They should try a moshing. At least you get to beat people to music.

    1. Re:Well, if you really want to fight, by idonthack · · Score: 1
      They should try a moshing. At least you get to beat people to music.
      Personally, I find out how much fun I had at a concert by counting my bruises when I wake up.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    2. Re:Well, if you really want to fight, by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      "Fight Club" geek do not wear pocket protectors. They take their chances on getting ink on their shirts.

      They're badass like that.

  19. Utopian Nostalgia by GeekLife.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Hopefully we can someday return to the world where none of thoseexisted, and men never fought each other.

    1. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by linvir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, he's a university professor! Don't try to lecture him on common sense! He knows sociology! One day you're just walking along the street, whistling some new Eminem song, and BAM!!, he descends from the rafters, slices your head off with a 200-page dissertation on the causal relationship between videogames and violence, and gets like 6000 boners all at once. And that's what I call Real Ultimate Power!

    2. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alexander the Great . . .flower arranger.

      KFG

    3. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by Anthracks · · Score: 1

      The post wasn't that funny, but the fact that it got modded "Insightful" sure is :).

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    4. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by linvir · · Score: 1

      I know! I even pooed on this myself in a journal post.

    5. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fucking funny. The visuals in my head are still making me snort. "6000 boners at once" . Love it.

    6. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! That's enough boners to fill Paris Hilton!

    7. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It is funny, but not as funny as the geeks complaining about the sociology prof's comments in a story that proves (albeit anecdotally) the professor's point.

      TFA is about people that were inspired to engage in violent behavior by things they saw in a movie.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the "inspired by a movie" is bullshit. There were fight clubs before the movie fight club. . .but people didn't talk about it.

    9. Re:Utopian Nostalgia by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      TFA is about people that were inspired to engage in violent behavior by things they saw in a movie.

      That's a pretty baseless statement -- though TFA mentions the movie it actually doesn't state that any of these groups started because of the it. In the one example given, it seems to have just "happened" as an outgrowth of some (alleged) martial arts instructor sparring with students.

      I say "alleged" because having practiced martial arts for several years, I have a hard time taking seriously any instructor who would allow this to go on -- never mind encourage it.

  20. Shenanigans by poopie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, I call shenanigans. This just sounds too ridiculous to be real.

    How many times in the past have we see some tech story get reported on and posted on slashdot only to find out that it was all trumped up - like "toothing" - people in UK using bluetooth phones to look for sex partners? I say "nerd fight club" is the same thing.

    Everyone knows that real dorks adverse to physical fitness - I mean, hey why go outside when you can spend more time in front of the computer? I'll exercise next week after I rebuild my second desktop system and finish upgrading my asterisk pbx...

    Oh, and nerd *fighting*? Nerds are the last people who are going to want to blow off steam by real, painful, physical fighting... Everyone knows that. Nerds would invite others for a frag-fest, whomp on their mmorpg character, hack their coworker's/nemesis' home server, and fill their cubicle with styrofoam... but fight... and risk getting hurt?

    If we liked to fight, we probably wouldn't have followed the path that made us nerds in the first place.

    1. Re:Shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably advertised as a geek fight club. The people who actually show up are those who want to beat the snot out of a geek, not the geeks themselves.

    2. Re:Shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you not see the it's-a-joke "foot"... he's not in a fight club, he's a very naughty boy!

    3. Re:Shenanigans by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Very well spoken! At most, I would engage in wheely chair racing, although I always prefer a good old speed log-in contest to balance my tempers.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    4. Re:Shenanigans by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh, and nerd *fighting*? Nerds are the last people who are going to want to blow off steam by real, painful, physical fighting...

      Actually my sensei's dojo is full of geeks, nerds, and brainiacs. She's an EE, the senior student is a physician, and I'm one of several software guys.

      Many techies are budoka. A former boss of mine was an aikido instructor; I worked with one guy who was an early student of Ed Parker, and another who was a Shotokan karate instructor. The famous ESR is a black belt in "Moo Do", "an eclectic martial art based on Tae Kwon Do". As he mentions in the Jargon File,

      In 1997, for example, your humble editor recalls sitting down with five strangers at the first Perl conference and discovering that four of us were in active training in some sort of martial art -- and, what is more interesting, nobody at the table found this high perecentage at all odd.

      Many others are involed in SCA or similar live HTH combat similuation.

      I dunno, maybe you young'ns just aren't as tough as us older geeks who grew up before "frag-fests".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Shenanigans by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Apples and oranges.

      Perfecting a martial art is very geeky. It takes a lot of time and you really have to work for it.

      Kicking ten shades of shit out of someone takes nothing but getting the first good hit. Something us geeks tend to dodge and flee from.

      --
      I like muppets.
    6. Re:Shenanigans by pluther · · Score: 1
      it was all trumped up - like "toothing" - people in UK using bluetooth phones to look for sex partners

      Wait... that wasn't real?

      But... I just finally got my first bluetooth PDA and... and...

      Well, damn.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  21. But by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    There's nothing there about the winner getting the girl. Sounds kinda homoerotic to me in addition to sadomasochistic. Hey, whatever pops your cork.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:But by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      The rule that the winner is the one sodomizing the loser is strictly optional, according to the article.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  22. Steps to success in fight club by technoextreme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Step 1: Learn a martial art. See below. Step 2: Become a master Step 3: Step 3 depends on step one. See below. Akido-Laugh at people as they discover that their attacks are turned against them. Taekwondo- Laugh at people as you kick the living crap out of them. Wrestling- Laugh as you drop people on their head. Jui-Jitsu- Laugh as you break limbs. Judo- Laugh as you start throwing people over your hip. Kendo- Laugh as you teach those idiots in the article about how to use those sticks. In all seriousness, I've taken martial arts before and I think it's kind of pathetic. PS. Is this the first Slashdot article that actually mentions S&M .

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Steps to success in fight club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out the video, http://cbs5.com/watercooler/local_story_059005903. html

      their fighting is pretty decent, but they'd still get owned by non-geek street fighters

    2. Re:Steps to success in fight club by frying_fish · · Score: 1

      Look more closely at the sticks in use in the picture. They look a lot more like Kali sticks to me than kendo sticks. Jiu Jitsu / Ju Jutsu / Ju Jitsu / (whichever spelling you prefer) will include all of the other styles of techniques. You think martial arts are pathetic or this example of people in a "fight club" is pathetic, as martial arts aren't pathetic they are a good way to keep fit, train your mind and perhaps provide a viable means of self defence in a street attack.

    3. Re:Steps to success in fight club by jcr · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I've taken martial arts before and I think it's kind of pathetic.

      Sounds to me like you didn't find a decent dojo. When I played Judo as a kid, it was all about sportsmanship. If our Sensei though you were getting hot under the collar, or getting too aggressive, he stopped the randori and you sat on edge of the mat until you had yourself under control again. When I practiced Aikido many years later, it was all about learning to move as smoothly and easily as possible, whether you were uke or nage.

      I don't dispute that there's quite a lot of Bullshido being sold in the strip malls of America, but that doesn't mean that the entire field is a waste of time.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Steps to success in fight club by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      Sounds to me like you didn't find a decent dojo. When I played Judo as a kid, it was all about sportsmanship. If our Sensei though you were getting hot under the collar, or getting too aggressive, he stopped the randori and you sat on edge of the mat until you had yourself under control again. When I practiced Aikido many years later, it was all about learning to move as smoothly and easily as possible, whether you were uke or nage.

      Hey.. It was bad grammar. I like the Martial Arts. I was referring to the people just randomly beating the crap out of each other. PS. I like Akido. I have practiced Akido in Jui-Jitsu. I seriously suck at the flowing and moving smoothly but it certainly is a very nice form of martial arts.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    5. Re:Steps to success in fight club by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

      technoextreme (885694) writes: PS. Is this the first Slashdot article that actually mentions S&M .

      I thought every article was, at least indirectly, S&M!

      It's not just limited to the articles, and some days are just worse (or if you prefer: "better") than others.

      Am I the only one that noticed this? :)

      --
      This is not my sig.
  23. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USAToday reports a new phenomenon hitting some of the cubicles of Silicon Valley. It seems that engineers and developers previously confined to sitting in front of their computers are getting their anger out the healthy way: by pummeling each other.

    I am Slashdot's smirking indifference

  24. Obligatory. by mattpointblank · · Score: 5, Funny

    His name is Linus Torvalds.
    His name is Linus Torvalds.

    1. Re:Obligatory. by linvir · · Score: 2

      s/Obligatory/Voluntary
      s/Funny/Overrated

    2. Re:Obligatory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      syntax error,

      missing terminating /

    3. Re:Obligatory. by linvir · · Score: 1
      pacman -R vi
      pacman -Sy nano
      rm -rf /
    4. Re:Obligatory. by scaryjohn · · Score: 1

      Did you just compare Linus to Meat Loaf?

      And if so, which one were you trying to insult?

      --
      One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
    5. Re:Obligatory. by mjkjedi · · Score: 1

      And he pronounces "Linux" as "Linux".

    6. Re:Obligatory. by lon3st4r · · Score: 1
      d00d, when it comes 2 da fight club- there's the g00gle camp, the lihnux camp (linus) and the winbloz camp (bill, with sidekick ballmer). ballmer's favorite weapon is a chair which he throws when he hears about people defecting to g00gle

      * lon3st4r *

  25. how inane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fucking stupid and homoerotic way to relieve stress.

    1. Re:how inane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Personally I like the smart and Goatse way to relieve homoerotic stress.

      Give me a call big boy and we can do the sashay called Safety Dance, if you want to.

      Umm Umm Umm .... if you can't leave your friends behind :)

  26. Consumerism by oSand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    Yes, buy things like the Fight Club DVD, you sheep. Some people, if worried about excessive consumerism, would stop buying shit.

    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Videogames. Always videogames. I'm surprised he hasn't blamed myspace.
    1. Re:Consumerism by Copid · · Score: 1
      Yes, buy things like the Fight Club DVD, you sheep. Some people, if worried about excessive consumerism, would stop buying shit.
      I was thinking something similar last night. My wife and I saw something about celebrity excess on TV. They mentioned a successful music group in Europe burning the equivalent of $1.7M in cash. Literally burning it. They claimed it was some sort of social commentary on materialism. My thought: If you burn ALL of your cash so you have to go to work and worry about paying the rent like the rest of us, then I'll take your commitment to that idea seriously. Until then, you're just an asshole.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  27. Mac vs. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a fnatic from each side going at it. The clash of the ignorant! "Steve Jobs is a fagg!", Yells the MS guy. "Bill Gates is a wus!", yells the Mac guy. "I'm going delete your flowery ass", yells the MS guy. "Oh yeah, I'm dragging your bitch ass to the trash can PEE CEE BOY!"

  28. this is your life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't get any better than this...

    I already see a lot of stupid comments about how they should just play halo or some other random DM game. Ever played lasertag and compared it to even skirmish? Some of you make me laugh.

    If you're able to be satisfied by weak approximations of real life enough to judge on others seeking a thrill then you are probably the one that has it wrong.. not them.

  29. "Jack Thompson vs. Steve Ballmer" by theskipper · · Score: 1

    insert joke here

    1. Re:"Jack Thompson vs. Steve Ballmer" by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      I'd pay to see that

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  30. They can beat themselves to pulp all they want by zr-rifle · · Score: 1

    ... as long as nobody farts on my meringues. Thanks.

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
  31. Slap me and call me Shirley by Bill_Royle · · Score: 0, Troll

    Fight Club's message hinged around a somewhat homoerotic S&M theme.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that.

  32. And will the Space Monkeys by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

    start crashing server farms instead.

    --
    Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  33. "The freedom to do what we want to do" by MavEtJu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    And that is beating each other up? Idiots...

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:"The freedom to do what we want to do" by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We're constantly told to buy things we don't need,
      I'm trying to avoid pigeonholing these guys as impressionable fans trying to live out their Fight Club fantasy, but stuff like that is making it very difficult indeed.
    2. Re:"The freedom to do what we want to do" by killeena · · Score: 1

      And that is beating each other up? Idiots...

      Seriously, why don't they just go out and do drugs like everyone else. Geez.

      --
      Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    3. Re:"The freedom to do what we want to do" by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

      I'm constantly told I have to do the grocery shopping. I hate grocery shopping. I'ma go kick some ass now...
  34. why not just martial arts? by dokebi · · Score: 1

    There are many MA clubs where sparring with or without protective gear is allowed. There are also mixed-martial arts clubs where you can learn and practice (sparr) strikes, throws, grapple, and do submissions just like you see on Spike TV, or Ultimate Fighting. Why not go join them where the skill levels are high (so you dont get killed by accident), and competition is stiff?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    1. Re:why not just martial arts? by linvir · · Score: 1
      Why not go join them where the skill levels are high (so you dont get killed by accident), and competition is stiff?
      Because then you'll lose all your undergrounditude and all the groupies will delete your number from their cellphones.
    2. Re:why not just martial arts? by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      There are many MA clubs where sparring with or without protective gear is allowed. There are also mixed-martial arts clubs where you can learn and practice (sparr) strikes, throws, grapple, and do submissions just like you see on Spike TV, or Ultimate Fighting. Why not go join them where the skill levels are high (so you dont get killed by accident), and competition is stiff?

      Those places don't let you just show up and fight- you have to train hard, and I'd guess most of the people in these nerd-fight-clubs aren't willing/able to put in the hard physical work to become skilled in an actual combat sport.

      That, and they might not like it as much when they're actually getting hit hard by people who know what they're doing.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  35. The first rule of Fight Club by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    for (int i = 0; i 10; i++) println("The " + i + " rule of fight club is, you don't talk about Fight Club");

    (I know, I should use a static array of "first", "second", etc., but I left it out for brevity)

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:The first rule of Fight Club by conJunk · · Score: 1

      nah, write a sub that can returns text for an int... once you're up in four digit land, doing it programatically is way better than a static array

    2. Re:The first rule of Fight Club by dcam · · Score: 1

      for (int i = 0; i 10; i++) println("The " + i + " rule of fight club is, you don't talk about Fight Club");

      (I know, I should use a static array of "first", "second", etc., but I left it out for brevity)


      Actually you should have previewed:
      for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) println("The " + i + " rule of fight club is, you don't talk about Fight Club");

      --
      meh
    3. Re:The first rule of Fight Club by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it lost the "<". :-(

      Ain't HTML fun?

      Thx

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  36. Until an eye gets poked out... by packetmon · · Score: 1

    Strangely my brother in law and his coworkers have been doing this in NYC. They're not geeks though, they're all automechanics for Mercedes Benz. When I heard what they were doing I shrugged at their stupidity. There are more creative and energizing ways to vent frustrations, unload stress. What is going to happen when one co-worker goes overboard and really injures someone. By USA Today and other media outlets even giving these idiots the time of day, I can see where the younger crowds get the moronic ideas from. To each their own, but common sense dictactes that teens who see that article will likely take the "well if the adults can do it so can we...". What kind of example are those guys setting. As in the movie fight club, they shouldn't have talked about it. The least they could have done was some PPV "Geek Extreme Fighting... Microsoft Developers vs. Open Source Developers" ...

    1. Re:Until an eye gets poked out... by jonoid · · Score: 1

      The least they could have done was some PPV "Geek Extreme Fighting... Microsoft Developers vs. Open Source Developers"
      I'd put my money on Microsoft, their leader is trained in chair-jitsu.

    2. Re:Until an eye gets poked out... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Can Linus's wife fight for him? A Finalndish martial arts champ should be able to beat a chair throwing monkey.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  37. Rolled up magazine fight? by Invader02 · · Score: 0

    CBS has videos of these guys fighting.... I mean look at this: http://cbs5.com/video/?id=11369@kpix.dayport.com Who fights with magazines??? The most dangerous thing these people use are plastic knives...

  38. deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ, I'd kick my own ass if I was wearing shorts like the guy in the picture.

    wait... this sounds familiar...

  39. As soon as it gets infiltrated by a bully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they're all history.

    Good theme for a game, actually.

  40. Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are those the same people who defend brutal video games by claiming that young adults can tell fiction and reality apart? Seriously, that was a cool movie. A MOVIE!

  41. Ahhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the new geeks on the block have now learnt what that word, F E T I S H, means.

    So they like getting beating up.

    On a serious note, having a good run/swim/workout at the gym does wonders for the body, but there are few things that release whatever that stuff in the brain is that makes you feel alive. The two easiest things to do are 1. Get laid, 2. Be in a punch up.

    We can see what is happening here, there guys need get LAID!

    PS. I feel like punching someone right now....

  42. I'd say that picture was staged. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look at the position of the leg with regards to the arm.

    If it was a straight in kick, his leg would be tangled up with his opponent's hand.

    If it was a side kick, his leg would be connecting with his opponent's shoulder. Look how his kicking foot is outside of both their bodies.

    1. Re:I'd say that picture was staged. by surprise_audit · · Score: 2, Funny
      Look at the position of the leg with regards to the arm.

      Look at the position of his goolies with respect to the position of the blue-shirt guy's left fist... If blue-shirt is paying attention, red-shirt is going to be walking with a squint for a couple of days.

    2. Re:I'd say that picture was staged. by cp.tar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, red-shirts get killed anyway...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    3. Re:I'd say that picture was staged. by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      Is it a cornflower blue shirt?

    4. Re:I'd say that picture was staged. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me this looks like a pretty straight-foward knee strike. We learned this in Muay Thai. you grab your opponent around the back of his head & pull him into your thrusting knee. I admit the guy in the red shirt doesnt have a good grip, but between the struggling & the gloves it would be hard to pull off a perfect technique.

  43. if elif fi by packetmon · · Score: 4, Funny

    10 REM Nerd Fight Club
    20 REM packetmon
    30 FOR X=10 TO 1 STEP -1
    40 PRINT X;"Oh yea";
    50 IF X<>1 THEN PRINT "!";
    60 PRINT "take that,";X;"jackass";
    70 IF X<>1 THEN PRINT "!";
    80 PRINT "give in!"
    90 NEXT

    1. Re:if elif fi by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      All that without a single GOTO? You're not fooling anyone with your fancy line numbers, you know. You stink of a Pascal weenie.

  44. If we were meant to do real damage to each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we wouldn't have invented larping. Seriously, if you want to experience your "warrior fantasies", punching someone until their or your rib breaks just isn't the constructive answer... Though, these people sound less pansy than some larpers I know...

  45. Like Geeks haven't been doing this in SCA forever by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    Hmmm... Sounds like the "interesting" SCA fighting styles that were around LONG before I was in high school in the early 80's. Only difference is that it is santioned through a national organization and didn't need a relatively lame movie for people to imitate.

    That said I was really interested in the SCA until I actually learned how to fence, then the SCA wasn't interesting at all... Oh well, maybe I should have tried heavy weapons after all

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  46. Kill move by Lips · · Score: 1

    If they are true geeks, towards the end of the fight they would be wondering how to pull out the opponents still beating heart as part of their final kill combo.

  47. "Superhero for a night" by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Along the line of the parent:

    "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said.

    Superheros go out and fight wrongdoing in society.

    Beating up (or being beaten up by) other geeks is not being "a superhero for a night".

    1. Re:"Superhero for a night" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what MMORPGs, MUDs, and MUSHes are for.

      Your wrists get a little sore, true, but there's less blood, bone bits and teeth to mop up after you're done.

      Usually.

    2. Re:"Superhero for a night" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they really want to be superheroes, just what's stopping them from putting on an over the top costume, making or acquiring some strange devices, and doing some vigilanteish stuff? Hmmm, that kind of sort of sounds like a good idea.

    3. Re:"Superhero for a night" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Superheros go out and fight wrongdoing in society.
      Beating up (or being beaten up by) other geeks is not being "a superhero for a night".


      What if they were lawyers and polititians?

    4. Re:"Superhero for a night" by tajgenie · · Score: 1

      I don't know... at these guys intelligence levels, they just may be doing the world a favor. At least, they would be if they won some darwin awards.

  48. there are better ways by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    We have "fight clubs": boxing, martial arts, football, rugby, and lots of other sports. But, I suppose, that requires more dedication and skill than these people can muster.

    1. Re:there are better ways by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      Organised sports provide this sort of outlet for most people. The traditional geek/nerd stereotype is exactly the sort who would have been useless in normal sports, making this a potential outlet for their aggression. Skill? Discipline? Tactics? Not really necessary when you can go into berserker mode.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:there are better ways by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Skill? Discipline? Tactics? Not really necessary when you can go into berserker mode.

      Which is exactly why Boxing > UFC / K1. Granted, the level of skill has fallen so far in the heavyweight division (along with the rediculous number of belts and sanctioning bodies), Boxing is still much more interesting top me than OMG! THIS ONE GUY HIT THIS OTHER GUY AND THAN HE DID IT AGAIN AND AGAIN FTW!!!!!! Fewer rules don't really improve the quality of the fight. They just mean guys get knocked out more.

      Then there's the true passion; the hockey fight where the unwritten rule is king...

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    3. Re:there are better ways by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Those are too organised/expensive/regulated, defeating the whole point of these fight clubs.

  49. Who wrote this? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    I searched and searched and searched on the article for some way to contact the "journalist" who wrote this piece of garbage but was unable to find any contact info. Anybody have any luck? I'd love to Slashdot his mailbox with reasons why he needs to find another profession since he is disgracing this one.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  50. I was going to jump in and mention the SCA by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    ...but you beat me to it. A nice and fun way to get your crazies out without hurting anyone or getting hurt yourself.

    And yeah, you shoulda done heavy. It's a freeking blast. Especially melee.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I was going to jump in and mention the SCA by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It would be great if the member weren't a bunch of pompus assholes with egos large enough to fill the grand canyon.
      I mean, a large ego over inaccurate portrayal of a 'medeval' events?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I was going to jump in and mention the SCA by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Well, you do run into those from time to time. But you can find assholes anywhere - it's just that's how they express themselves in the SCA. Some people who have no influence in the real world will occasionally use a social club as the place to express that angst. I'll bet the Boy Scouts have people who take an unholy joy in pointing out you don't know how to tie all the knots an Eagle Scout is supposed to know. It's human nature.

      As for me personally, if anyone gives me any crap about my inaccurate portrayal, I gently remind them that on the battlefield we currently have phalanxes of Romans beside hordes of Vikings fighting units of Normans alongside hired units of Landsknechts. You justify that first, then we'll talk about me. =)

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
  51. Haha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monkey see, monkey do.

  52. Mexico City? by cniebla · · Score: 1

    Anybody up for a club in Mexico City? :) ***serius***

    1. Re:Mexico City? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You guys already have dog fighting in DF. And Lucha. Why do you need more?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  53. Summary of posts so far by linvir · · Score: 1
    I can summarise the comments so far with this time-honored phrase so beloved of grandmothers:
    It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye!
    I mean, what the fuck? I'm surprised you guys can even see over your belt buckles to type. Last I heard, boys will be boys and accidents will happen.
    1. Re:Summary of posts so far by TheArtfulPianist · · Score: 1

      It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye!

      After that it's just fun.

    2. Re:Summary of posts so far by __aalmrb3802 · · Score: 1

      And then it's fun with a pirate!

  54. Re:Who wrote this? answer by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    According to my Seattle PI version of this story, Jordan Robertson wrote the story about techie fight clubs. It could be an assumed name, but you could always Google for his home address.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  55. Sumo Wrestling by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

    Based on a lot of our techs at work, sumo wrestling would be a better pastime for some of these IT folks! They already have the correct physique... Put them in a diaper, point them towards the ring, and they're all ready to go!

    Slightly outside the realm of IT, but if you want some real serious sumo wrestling, I'd start a fight club with people who answer calls for a living! While some of my IT brethren may indeed be very overweight, at least they do get up on occasion to mess with computers. People who don't have to get up at all for a living tend to get very large...

    In fact, when I was a member of a call support team (previous to my illustrious IT career), I used to get tons of ads for everything from headsets to office furnishings. One of these direct mail advertisers hit the nail on the head though... One day I get this postcard advertising specialized chairs for phone representatives. The only difference between this chair and other copmpetitors office chairs was advertised in large letters, next to the product description: "Holds up to 400 lbs!!". They definately know their target audience!

    All kidding aside, the 1st poster had this right: This whole fight club sounds like a buncha nerds trying to make themselves into something they're not... Jocks!

    1. Re:Sumo Wrestling by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention that.

      That's kinda what we did in college. We didn't have a "fight club", but I invented a game.

      It was like Sumo except you had Pugil sticks (you know like american gladiators). Boxing headgear, cup if you wanted it, that's about it.

      Anyway, 10 foot diameter ring on the ground. Both hands have to stay on the stick. Don't hit the other guys hands with the hard part of your stick.

      First one to get pushed out of the ring 3 times or to fall 3 times loses. Falling means a knee or hand or more on the ground.

      That's all the rules. Other than that go wild beating the hell out of your opponent.

      Anyway we called the game "Toshi".. it means like "spirit of battle" or some shit, at least according to this japanese dictionary my friend had.

      It's much more strenuous than one would think.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  56. I actually like the martial arts by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    Look more closely at the sticks in use in the picture. They look a lot more like Kali sticks to me than kendo sticks. Jiu Jitsu / Ju Jutsu / Ju Jitsu / (whichever spelling you prefer) will include all of the other styles of techniques. You think martial arts are pathetic or this example of people in a "fight club" is pathetic, as martial arts aren't pathetic they are a good way to keep fit, train your mind and perhaps provide a viable means of self defence in a street attack.
    Who me? I like the martial arts and I took it for a while. I meant just the sensless fighting. You might as well do tournaments and become proficient at a martial art that useful/cool/interesting/neat. PS. I only chose Kendo because it's the only martial arts that I know uses a stick. Please forgive my ignorance.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:I actually like the martial arts by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

      "I only chose Kendo because it's the only martial arts that I know uses a stick. Please forgive my ignorance."

      Kendo uses a sword (a wooden one because people are soft and fragile, but still a sword). Try looking at Escrima if you're interested in stick, especially using two at once.

    2. Re:I actually like the martial arts by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      A stick may be a stick, but a well placed bokken will send anyone to the hospital.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    3. Re:I actually like the martial arts by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      Myamoto Musashi wandered the Japanese country for years beating the tar out of samurai and other challengers using only bokken. Never lost once so they say.

  57. Warrior fantasies by linvir · · Score: 1
    "Boys have these warrior fantasies picked up from popular culture, and schools sort of force that out of them," he said. In these fantasies, "The good guys always resort to violence, and they always get the glory and the women."
    From popular culture? Bullshit. Those fantasies come from the very darkest reaches of our stupid monkey brains. Ever watched a bunch of monkeys? The guys fight, and the winner gets the girl. That stretches back pretty much to as early as organisms became complex enough to fight each other. Fuck him and his pseudo-intellectual attempt at being counter-culture. And fuck USATODAY.com and their pseudo-technical attempt at DRM. I have all the time in the world to type out my blockquotes by hand if needs be.
  58. The stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    you are correct, the stats say

    "The rate of violent crime victimization in the United States declined by more than half between the years 1994 and 2001."

    so we could extrapolate from that the rise of the violent FPS Video games (circa 1994-2006) has contributed to a significant drop in the level of violent crime (as the DOJ doesnt say what is actually responsible for the large drop in numbers)

    of course we can prove anything with statistics but something is working, or they are all in jail (1 in 136 us citizens is in prison)

    Aj

  59. Re:Me thinks by symbolic · · Score: 1


    I'm tempted to believe that those doing this are the ones there to collect a paycheck, and that those who make up the genuine geek culture have more worthy goals.

  60. Re:Rubber gloves...? Mod this up by tooloftheoligarchy · · Score: 1

    This comment is really damn funny -- unfortunately, I don't have mod points. But yes, seriously, what a sad, pathetic article this is, in both content and execution, and Otter has pretty much summed up the lamest parts of the whole sorry exercise. Kudos to you, small aquatic mammal.

  61. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiots

  62. Hallelujah! I'm a moron! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

    Send them to Iraq. That should help them work through their repressed feelings. And pronto, no doubt.

    1. Re:Hallelujah! I'm a moron! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Send them to D.C. instead. There's quite a few people there who could only benefit from a good old-fashioned beating, and that one might actually return some tangible benefit.

  63. Re:Warrior fantasies versus Real evolution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Ever watched a bunch of monkeys? The guys fight, and the winner gets the girl.

    That's a nice theory.

    However, as any evolutionary biologist would tell you, the real truth is more complex.

    In real life, the "winner" turns out to have one of the successful reproductive strategies, but the other major ones are the "dad" and the "lonely outsider/milkman" strategy.

    A lot of birds that we think of as monogamous, for example, turn out on detailed genetic study not to be. The same for chimps, gorillas, etc.

    So, if you die in the fight, or get wounded, you may have lost your reproductive chances. Girls like the losers too - in fact, they do pretty darned well if one examines it scientifically.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. The Drought Must Be Over... by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

    If these morons can get jobs in computing, then the return of $10k signing bonuses can't be too far off; woo hoo! DotCom revisited!

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  65. Re:Warrior fantasies versus Real evolution by linvir · · Score: 1
    Good points, but surely the default desire is to enter and win the fight if possible? And if these guys are the Dads and Milkmen of the world, shouldn't their instincts still lead them to want to climb the social ladder by being one of the strong guys fighting each other? They're practically stating this much when they talk about how they're "forced to buy things" and being a "superhero for a night".

    IANAEB, but I hereby declare my point as still standing.

  66. Reading comprehension by Profound · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you got "the solution to our problems is kicking each other" from Fight Club the movie, then you must have only watched the 1st 1/2 of the movie.

    Extremists misinterpreting literature for ideology is hardly new, though. These people are hitting each other with heavy metal objects, they are probably addicted to the body's painkillers or the feeling their brain makes while it is being made retarded.

    1. Re:Reading comprehension by redleaf8 · · Score: 1

      Best comment of the article.

    2. Re:Reading comprehension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reporter is probably a Slashdot reg, and instead of actually watching the movie before relating the two he just read the title of the movie and then wrote his report from that.

    3. Re:Reading comprehension by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      These people are hitting each other with heavy metal objects, they are probably addicted to the body's painkillers or the feeling their brain makes while it is being made retarded.

      In that case they should read some corporate propaganda. I feel pain everytime I do and I'm pretty sure that drivel like the big Windows vs. Linux TCO debate is hazardous to brain cells.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Reading comprehension by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Does the fight club necessarly have to become a terrorist cell? I don't think so. It only did so in the movie because their leader had alot of influence over the participants. In reality, not all of the participants would be that easy to sway to terrorism, and would likely report what was going on now.

    5. Re:Reading comprehension by Profound · · Score: 1

      The narrator in Fight club was led down a path of escalating violence which led to terrorist acts, yes. This was because he found no meaning in his cultures philosophy (consumerism) and thus he lashed out and tried to tear down the world (nihilsm).

      At the end of the movie, symbolised by the murder of Tyler Durden, the narrator realised he had to find and create his own meaning in life (possibly with Marla), thus adopting an existential world view. I think his terrorist acts stop there.

      An intelligent reader wouldn't make the same mistakes as the guy in the book. These guys do.

  67. Confusing to say the least by ArchAngelQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, as someone who *has* been in more than my fair share of fights, studied martial arts, etc, I'm confused by this to a certain degree. Not by the fight clubs, just the news story. I haven't had to use my martial arts skills in anger or self defense, because my insturctor taught self respect and that first rule: the best way to not get hurt by a punch is to not get hit by it. That means he focused on avoiding blows, not blocking them, but it also means he focused on avoiding fights in the first place. Anyway.

    The reporter is making these folks out to sound like crazies.... They aren't. They are men frustrated by their daily lives. I can understand this desire to vent physical frustration in a very real way. I learned that I don't need to hit anyone in order to do that, just pratice the martial arts forms I have learned. That is either not something these guys have tried, or found to be satisfactory. That's fine, and as long as they all agree to what they are doing, have at.

    He focuses on one guy at the end who is making... questionable choices, certainly from how they where presented. Married later in life (than social norms, mind, for all that's worth), choosing to go to this fight club instead of taking the time out to be with his wife, on their first anniversary, for a very important event in her life. Talking about how tough it makes him feel... sounds like he's got other issues to me. Sounds like the writer is trying to focus on that.

    Oh, and the trying to link teen violence to this stuff, and childhood media exposure? That's just poor reporting, and poor taste.

    I'm modding this story -3 troll.

    1. Re:Confusing to say the least by DavidV · · Score: 1

      'That's fine, and as long as they all agree to what they are doing, have at.'

      huh?...THAT'S confusing to say the least.

      --
      !sig
  68. It's true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a fact since there was no violence before the airing of the classic ship-jacking thriller "Steamboat Willy".

  69. Re:I'm sorry, but... need to change rule 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rule #11: Only two bits to the rules.

    Should be:

    Rule #11: Only 10 bits to the rules.

  70. Why not the SCA? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    The Society for Creative Anachronism gives you a way to dress up in functional armor and slam similarly equipped people with rattan "swords". At major events you can practice infantry tactics with thousands on a side.

    The SCA does have safety standards and values a code of honor, so maybe that answers the "why not".

    1. Re:Why not the SCA? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Depends on the branch, but with proper armour, I know of many SCA groups that fight with proper steel swords.

      Me, I fence competitively.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Why not the SCA? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Another reason: there are these strange people there which some call "women". If you're willing to take an hour or three away from swinging rattan around and engage in strange rituals such as "dancing", you might even get to know a few of them.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Why not the SCA? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      More for the "Why not?" pile, from my experience.

      * Functional armor + wicker swords = 0.01% of injury. Maybe looking for something a bit more demanding.

      * Having looked into the SCA, it's not hard to see that it would be great if not for the people in it. Runs the gamut from pseudo-intellectual blowhards to crystal waving trailer trash.

      Honestly, 'fencing' with my kid brother on the lawn with cardboard packing tubes offered more return on time invested than that experience

    4. Re:Why not the SCA? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      So you're saying, don't join Fight Club. Rather, join Knight Club.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  71. oh god are we in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while indian tech workers continue to take i.t. jobs from the u.s., american i.t. workers are happily beating the fuck out of each other with frying pans and sticks.

  72. kh by Electrocru · · Score: 1

    where do I join?

  73. re: Nerd Fight Club by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    The first rule about Nerd Fight Club is - you don't blog about Nerd Fight Club.

    The second rule about Nerd Fight Club is - YOU - DON'T - BLOG - ABOUT NERD FIGHT CLUB.

  74. MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by tetsu96 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...is that the themes in the book / movie really hit home for a lot of people. Sitting back in your chair laughing at the idiots may be fun for the armchair warriors at large, but not everyone has really been tested and that was one of the core themes FC - how do you know what you've got if you never put it to the test? How do you know how you'll react to a fight when you've never been in one? How can you prove you've really pushed yourself to the limit without scars to show for it?

    And talk about a way to find out - if it's either kick some tail or get yours kicked in for you, I think that almost everyone would go into a full on a$$ kicking mode. At that point, it's the better man that wins but either way you're gonna push yourself harder than posting comments on a web site.

    For the office warrior who never got into a fight in his life, I can easily see this as thrilling beyond compare.

    I wouldn't recommend this to everyone, and there should probably be some safeguards put into this as even the UFC has rounds and referees to stop fights when it's clear that 1 person is taking too much of a beating, but I get it.

    1. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to push it to the limit, there's a guy on ebay that'll beat the shit out of you for a price. You won't know where or when, but you'll get those scars.

    2. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Not Now, Cato, you fool!

    3. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The theme of the movie was that in a consumerist society a man can get lost and begin wondering what his place is in the world.
      It isn't a new problem. Tyler Durden's solution to the problem was fight club, a place where men can feel alive.

      But that isn't the real solution to the problem, the real solution is to get a life. Haven't you seen the disclaimer at the beginning of the DVD?

      WARNING
      If you are reading this then this warning is for you. Every word you
      read of this useless fine print is another second off your life. Don't
      you have other things to do? Is your life so empty that you honestly
      can't think of a better way to spend these moments? Or are you so
      impressed with authority that you give respect and credence to all who
      claim it? Do you read everything you're supposed to read? Do you think
      everything you're supposed to think? Buy what you're told you should
      want? Get out of your apartment. Meet a member of the opposite sex.
      Stop the excessive shopping and masturbation. Quit your job. Start a
      fight. Prove you're alive. If you don't claim your humanity you will
      become a statistic. You have been warned...... Tyler

      Fight club works for Tyler. But none of us are Tyler Durden, all of us are like Edward Norton. For him fight club lost its appeal, fight club didn't make him feel complete, a girl did.

      And at the end of the movie Edward Norton ends up with Marla Singer and they're both happy.
    4. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by DerekLyons · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... is that the themes in the book / movie really hit home for a lot of people. Sitting back in your chair laughing at the idiots may be fun for the armchair warriors at large, but not everyone has really been tested and that was one of the core themes FC - how do you know what you've got if you never put it to the test?
      A pair of silver Dolphins and four SSBN patrols under the North Atlantic. I know *I've* got it. These sad little wannabees, don't. No matter how many nights they spend a fight club.
    5. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by exdnc · · Score: 1

      I used to do a lot of tournament sparring and I can sure understand why people are into this. The rush you get when someone is 5 feet in front of you trying to take your head off is amazing. You've heard off time slowing down, your heart beating in your ears, and all that exciting stuff? that's adrenaline and its an awesome feeling, and fighting seems to bring it out of you in floods, more than sports ever did. I've never done a sport where someone whacks you for making a mistake. Its hugely exhilarating to win a match too.

      But it takes a lot of training to learn how not to hurt yourself and your opponent. I can't speak to bashing people bloody with a frying pan. I was as into the form and self control bit as much as I was into the sparring and I always thought matches where you jack yourself up so bad you're out for weeks are pretty dumb. I did have a wierd thing where part of me enjoyed getting bruised. I never sat down to figure it out all out but it seemed to have something to do with not liking myself so much.

      After all that my backs a mess now but I discovered that martial arts footwork is real similar to dancing. The throwing and faking bits tend to upset my the women though.

    6. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've never done a sport where someone whacks you for making a mistake.

      Well, I'm not sure I'd call Catholic School a "sport"...

    7. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > that's adrenaline and its an awesome feeling

      Every meth addict in the midwest can't be wrong!

    8. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      that was one of the core themes FC - how do you know what you've got if you never put it to the test?

      But I DO know what I've got -- a complete lack of chronic pain.

      I plan to enjoy the second half of my life at least as much as the first, and part of that plan involves not stupidly putting my corporeal self into harm's way intentionally.

    9. Re:MAYBE the reason Fight Club is so copied... by Null537 · · Score: 1

      For him fight club lost its appeal, fight club didn't make him feel complete, a girl did.

      That makes complete sence! Geeks won't get the girl, so they will never be complete, therefore fightc lubs are their answer.

  75. lollipops and sunshine by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    I think you underestimate the primal aggression of women. Not surprising since the concept of the demur woman is ingrained in our culture. True, you will rarely see them attacking men (& you rarely see men attacking women outside of domestic events). But when it's chick on chick they can be pretty ruthless.

    1. Re:lollipops and sunshine by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Not surprising since the concept of the demur woman is ingrained in our culture.
      Much less so than in most other cultures. What less demur women are you comparing to?
    2. Re:lollipops and sunshine by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      I think you underestimate the primal aggression of women.

      Just as I mentioned that there are men who fall into the effeminate portion of the Bell curve there are women who fall on the masculine side, so I know that there are some who get into fist fights. There have even been a few who were serial killers. But for the most part, I think women tend to inflict emotional pain on each other rather than physical violence. Excluding someone from the group is one of the most hurtful things they can do.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  76. Re:Warrior fantasies versus Real evolution by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    One could easily argue the opposite - most in fact don't lead the lives of warriors, but in practice most humans have normally been farmers, or shepherds, and some hunter/gatherers. Most mythology speaks of warriors as a "breed apart".

    However, your arguments that the warrior class is a method to climb the social ladder are good arguments. Whether they're acting out of true imperitives or just an acquired mythology is the question, however, and most people who write articles tend to present either a strongly positive or strongly negative view of a group they spend time interviewing.

    Most genetic fathers turn out to be Dads or Milkmen or Outcasts, actually.

    I blame the media of course ... ;-)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  77. Slashdotters (& USA Today) don't listen to NPR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is basically the same story that National Public Radio broadcast almost a year ago. Some of the interviewees even seem to be the same.

    Sounds like
      1- USA Today wanted some filler, and recycled a year-old NPR concept & story
    or
      2- the Gentleman's Fight Club decided they needed more publicity

    Check the NPR archives. http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php? prgId=7&prgDate=30-Jul-05. "Making Something Out of the 'Fight Club' Trend"

    Nothing to see here, move along.

  78. Me! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0
    Sign me up!

    -----

    Sig saw.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  79. BWAHAHAHahaha by geekoid · · Score: 1

    hehe.. oh you were serious?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:BWAHAHAHahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, his mind is not for rent
      To any God or government.

      Bad command or file name.

  80. Re:Warrior fantasies versus Real evolution by linvir · · Score: 1
    Most genetic fathers turn out to be Dads or Milkmen or Outcasts, actually.
    That'll teach those foolhardy warriors to go out galavanting across the lands slaying dragons! While they tally, their wenches are back in the castle being courted by uncouth suitors!

    Ontopic though, my reason for my point is my very casual observations of humans (and animal friends) seemingly universally getting off from fighting each other. It's perfectly possible that my negative views of this make me exaggerate it.

  81. Re:If we were meant to do real damage to each othe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think anyone has ever worked out any mental issue by LARPing, then you have a healthy ignorance of the hobby.

  82. Pictures from the fight by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exclusive pictures from one of the fights.

    1. Re:Pictures from the fight by felix+rayman · · Score: 1

      And more exclusive video from a training session.

  83. Great.... by FooGoo · · Score: 1

    Now that there I geek fight clubs not only do I have to worry about being laid off I now need to worry about Kumar in the call center getting stressed out while hopped up on the energy drink du jour and rampaging through the QA department cutting down testers in his path. I don't get paid enough for this.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  84. Oh boy.... by xCROSSFIREx · · Score: 1

    "i did not thteal your effing code your thuch a dumbath" dear god...does anyone else think this should be on PPV??? i'll tivo that... it could be like in the WWE where there are weapons under the mat...like keyboards and IDE cables i'd pay to see that....

  85. In an attempt to be macho... by distantbody · · Score: 1

    ...their homoerotic sides are betrayed. Ouww! You hurt me! Lets make anal love. As heard at "club"//

  86. Re:Like Geeks haven't been doing this in SCA forev by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    SCA type fighting is pretty low impact and risk- a one in a thousand shot may hurt you if it happens to hit an eye. These fight clubs have the potential to do permanent damage.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  87. These are NERDS fighting... by raehl · · Score: 1

    but fight... and risk getting hurt?

    You understand that this is NERDS fighting nerds, right? Nerds can't hurt anybody.

  88. stop whining by fufubag · · Score: 1
    Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    Really? I'm free to do what I want (within the law and sometimes without) every minute of my life. What is with this bitching about (/voice cartoon baby): 'We're constantly told to buy things we don't need'. Jesus Christ, are you that feeble minded? If advertising hurts your life so much, you're gonna need more than this to help you.

  89. bong anyone? by seventhc · · Score: 0

    "They want to feel differently. They want to get hit, they want to feel something real." What ever happened to good old fashioned Bong Hits?

    --
    'sig' deleted due to the stupidity of it's 'nature'
  90. Let me guess... by thatseattleguy · · Score: 1

    I bet they've got a website...and its backend uses SOAP.

  91. Simple basic truth? by Petersko · · Score: 1

    "The reporter (or more likely editor) is a PC fool whom doesn't realize the simple basic truth. Violent Video games save us from wayyyyyy more random acts of violence then they do encourage them. Anyone whose actually played the things in a bad mood knows what I'm talking about."

    Nearly without exception, anybody claiming to be stating a "simple basic truth" is stating nothing of the sort.

    This claim is, I think, substantially more absurd than the counterclaim that violent video games spawn violence.

  92. Oh, that explains it... by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    ...has anybody else been getting belligerent e-mails recently from everybody on their Slashdot foes list?

  93. The zeroth rule of Fight Club by Megane · · Score: 1

    The zeroth rule of Fight Club is, you don't post about Fight Club on Slashdot.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  94. Will someone tell these guys... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    That a major premise of the story is that Tyler Durden is an imaginary / alternate personality of the narrator and that it's about somone having a major psychotic break?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  95. Is it just 1 on 1? by disserto · · Score: 1

    Because 10 90-pound weaklings is still 900 pounds.

  96. Yeah, it's all fun and games by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

    until someone gets hit with a power supply.

    1. Re:Yeah, it's all fun and games by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      ...Or an IBM keyboard. It can give pain and survive with ease.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:Yeah, it's all fun and games by xCROSSFIREx · · Score: 1

      maybe companies are going to make their newest laptops "geek fight club" worthy i.e. a laptop made of pure steel wrapped in barbed wire... its got built in wireless too!

  97. If you could fight any celebrity... by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1

    Gates. I'd fight Bill Gates.

    --
    In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
    1. Re:If you could fight any celebrity... by electr01nik · · Score: 1

      I'd fight Steve Jobs. For no good reason too.

  98. Mixed Martial Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been doing MMA (mixed martial arts) for the last 5 years or so. I'm a production artist at a videogame company, so I sit on my ass all day. When I get out I want to play, and I don't like team sports so MMA is where it's at.

    I think if you come up from inside it (rather than looking at it from the outside) it's surprisingly normal. Most of the time I do submission wrestling (brazilian juijitsu), but I'll box and do muai thai every other week. Havn't had any amature fights yet, but I've knocked a few willing participants out at parties (and the asshole who wants to "go hard" at a party play fight usually has no idea what he's doing).

    We, as a society, are largly out of touch with our bodies. You put yourself on the line and you learn what you can and can't do, what really works and what's movie magic (*cough*aikido*cough*). Getting choked doesn't instantly kill you (like in the movies), and kicking someone in the knee won't make it snap ala American Ninja 2 (it is, however, remarkably easy to twist and snap the acl and whatever else is in there). Also, for the love of god, eyepokes and groin pinching won't save you from a good boxer... I won't even get into how confused we are with other bodily things (sex).

    But, as the average bloke is too scared of this stuff (mostly on account of ignorance) - and the average bloke makes up the majority, I guess it will stay at the fringes.

  99. stick fighting = you go to hospital by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but anyone who is even partially capable of swinging a bat could put a lot of people either in the hospital or 6 feet under in this activity. I don't really see how it helps you release agression anymore than beating up on inanimate objects... it isn't about "feeling something" if you wake up in the hospital with a broken head!

    --
    stuff |
  100. Thats awsome. by schmity · · Score: 1

    In my opinion thats awsome.

  101. I suggest Rugby or Kendo by Neologic · · Score: 1
    Rugby is an absolutely brilliant game. To many people it looks a lot more unorganized and violent than it really it. It is most definitely not "american football without pads". The way you tackle is quite different and it avoids the sorts of injuries you get when you charge into someone full speed. In fact, I reckon that the lack of pads reduces some injuries- getting hit in the knee with a helmet seems more dangerous than most situations in rugby. In rugby, the vast majority of injuries are bruises and scrapes. Sometimes black eyes or bloody noses. But you get a wonderful release of aggression and energy in a manner that is much safer than hitting someone with a frying pan.

    On top of the contact, there is a lot of running and sprinting, teamwork and coordination is required for some positions. I could see why these might put off some nerds, but I think that these guys would benefit from something rigourous. I do not consider hitting someone for a few minutes with a pillowcase with a coke in it very rigourous. Most fights at these fight clubs is more just people flailing away without any control. Maybe that is carthartic, but I think if they were able to channel that energy into something more constructive, they would find it more theraputic. Just my opinion.

    One of the nice things about rugby is that there is a position for practically every conceivable body type (from the short fat guys to the tall skinny guys). Heck, I remember playing a match where the other team's hooker had a prosthetic leg. Frecked the crap out of us when he called for a minute before a scrum and sat down and removed his leg!

    And kendo seems like it might be another good exercise- hitting someone with a stick while shouting should be pretty enjoyable. It does require discipline and has a significant component that is spiritual, but I think that forces you to focus on improvement. It seems to me that after a year of fighting in a techie fight club, I would want to feel like I have improved and gotten fitter and stronger. I don't think that will necessarily happen unless I participate in something that is organized.

    Perhaps these techies are so fed up with corporate life that they are rejecting things that feel organized and by extension, restrictive. That is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. There is something rotten with corporate culture in many companies, but that doesn't mean that organizations are all rotten.

    Everytime I step onto a rugby pitch, I view it as another character test- will I play 100% without slacking off? Will I support my teammates to the best of my ability, in spite of how tired I feel?

    --

    "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

    1. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by drsquare · · Score: 1

      A fight club needs 2 people and a room. Rugby needs twenty-six players, a pitch, a set of goalposts, a referee and a change of clothes.

      One of the nice things about rugby is that there is a position for practically every conceivable body type (from the short fat guys to the tall skinny guys).

      There's no position for people who aren't bodybuilders.

      It seems to me that after a year of fighting in a techie fight club, I would want to feel like I have improved and gotten fitter and stronger.

      To quote fight club: "Self improvement is masturbation. Maybe self destruction is the answer."

    2. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by oSand · · Score: 1
      A fight club needs 2 people and a room. Rugby needs twenty-six players, a pitch, a set of goalposts, a referee and a change of clothes.
      And some linesmen and someone to sing the national anthems... Bollocks. Rugby needs a ball, an open space and 2+ players. Traditional rugby, BTW, has 30 players. None usually have the physique of body builders simply because they have to run about the field for 80 minutes.
    3. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by ksheff · · Score: 1

      a team hooker? was this the Duke rugby team? :)

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    4. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Rugby is an absolutely brilliant game.

      "Sports are gay, especially contact sports. Unless you are the only guy on both teams".

      (King Missile from 'gay not gay')

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a 135lb skinny geek who played scrum-half and wing, I can pretty much swear that you don't need to be a body-builder to play rugby. It can be a bit intimidating to know that many people out there are twice you're weight, but it isn't that bad. It's very cathartic.

      I don't do it now. Now, I do medieval fighting as a glaive-man. Yes, we wear full armor, but that's more because if we didn't, we'd probably end up breaking lots of bones or killing each other. What's great is you don't even need to turn in your geek-card to participate. (Though, once again, half the people out there are double my weight.)

      (P.S. Many of my friends do Kendo, but I recommend Aikido for a practical art that is also good fun and gives a good adrenaline rush.)

    6. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by Neologic · · Score: 1
      Heh. I actually did play with both Duke's undergrad and MBA rugby teams, usually they are a great group of guys.

      Hooker is a position in rugby whose main job is to hook the ball back with his feet for his team when they are in the scrum (that big pushing match they get into every few minutes). So it was even funnier seeing this guy hooking back with his good leg, balancing on his fake leg and the two props (whose job is to support the hooker, hence the rugby bumper sticker: "Support your local hooker").

      --

      "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

    7. Re:I suggest Rugby or Kendo by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Rugby with two players? I don't see how that would work. It would effectively just be wrestling whilst carrying a ball. You may as well just have a normal fight.

      Traditional rugby, BTW, has 30 players

      Only union, and that's just a kicking contest.

  102. What was the appeal of Fight Club to begin with? by Shimmer · · Score: 1

    I think we all agree that these guys are being idiots.

    The thing I don't understand is the popularity of The Fight Club in the first place. What's cool about a bunch of guys getting together to beat the shit out of each other in order to demonstrate their manliness?

    I never saw the movie (or read the book), so am I missing something?

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  103. Shouldn't by agendi · · Score: 1
    a geek fight club be about robots fighting each other or something?

    I can just see it now:

    "Gentlemen and eerr.. gentlemen...
    In the Vi Corner....
    In the Emacs Corner...
    "

    --
    I just can't be bothered.
  104. Not the way. by ivaldes3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did the same thing years ago when working at IBM on a death march project before they were called that. Joined a local boxing club. Got very in shape and good at beating people up which I fortunately never unleashed outside of the boxing ring. My anger only grew. In the end, I only found peace by understanding that I had a problem with anger and that love was the answer. I've never looked back. I do as best I can to avoid things that I don't need that make me angry: the media, angry people, excess. I try to do as many things that bring peace: family, church, wholesome movies, healthy exercise like running and books.

    -- Ignacio Valdes, MD, MS
    -- Editor: Linux Medical News
    -- http://www.linuxmednews.com/

    --
    http://www.LinuxMedNews.com Revolutionizing Medical Education and Practice.
  105. Re:Like Geeks haven't been doing this in SCA forev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but then you would be a SCA nerd. The kind to nerd other nerds look down on.

  106. The first rule of fight like a girl club is... by jheath314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you do not talk about fight-like-a-girl club. For obvious reasons.

    --
    Procrastination Man strikes again!
  107. Um, most martial arts won't help much by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry to say it but these days most of the martial arts you mentioned are now either sports with rules protecting the combatants or have bugger all to do with common ways of being attacked. This includes stuff like UFC which rule out attacks on "vital points" like eyes, throat, groin.

    Look, they generally start as powerful self defence techniques which can be used when attacked by untrained attackers but the instant you start competitions, add rules they become methods of fencing for points. The training and techniques change for the tournaments to the point that they are largely useless against the kind of wild untrained and violent attackers they were originally designed for.

    You do what you train and if you're training for head height roundhouse kicks , as good as it looks, you will end up on your arse when you try to use one on the street.

    So, if you're going to practice a martial art, make sure it's with a teacher who teaches the original self defence art, not watered down long distance tournament fencing techniques. This is the elusive "become a master" step. It has nothing to do with the particular art or style btw, they're all ways of manipulating the opponent through force. It's purely down to the instructor.

    p.s. you don't take or know a martial art, you have to practice it.

    --
    Deleted
  108. They could make it a lot easier on themselves by Sathias · · Score: 1

    1/ Select Opponent
    2/ Right click portrait
    3/ Click "duel"

    (how ironic, the word to confirm I'm not a bot is "brawler")

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  109. Odd Coincidence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After looking up this guy up, i realized he (if it's the right one) lived right next to a Kaiser Hospital

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=976+Kiely+Blvd,+Sant a+Clara,+CA+95051&ll=37.343277,-121.977789&spn=0.0 0737,0.013808&t=h&om=1/

    1. Re:Odd Coincidence.. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      What's more dangerous... being in this so called "Fight Club", or going to Kaiser?

      Ba-dum tish... I'll be here all week, try the veal.

  110. Fist to skull ... by willtsmith · · Score: 4, Informative


    You are right that fist to skull contact is more likely to result in a broken hand. But orbital bones can certainly break under contact with elbow (as sometimes happens in basketball games).

    The skull is NOT impenetrable. A properly swung baseball bat can easily penetrate it. More to the point, a properly swung staff or wooden sword can do the job as well. It can most certainly be accomplished with a hammer, but you'd have to be VERY skilled with a frying pan (though you could certainly kill with blunt force).

    http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/00 0060.htm

    For the record, one punch can CERTAINLY kill if the person is hit in the correct way. The fact that you have not perished yet does not constitute evidence.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Fist to skull ... by bhaberman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, haven't you read Billy Budd?

    2. Re:Fist to skull ... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "For the record, one punch can CERTAINLY kill if the person is hit in the correct way. The fact that you have not perished yet does not constitute evidence."

      And when you do perish, that's just Darwinism in action.

      I say, let them go at it. Supply them with chainsaws, even.

      To quote Doug Larson -- "YOU -- Out of the gene pool!"

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Fist to skull ... by olego · · Score: 1

      Garry Larson, even!

    4. Re:Fist to skull ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have perished! Is that evidence?

    5. Re:Fist to skull ... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      For the record, one punch can CERTAINLY kill if the person is hit in the correct way. ...especially if the one throwing the punch is a Russian boxer named Drago.

  111. Degeneration by oleop · · Score: 1

    Non-stoppable degeneration of "geeks". This field is more and more filleld with idiots.

  112. This is too funny! by qzulla · · Score: 1

    I liked this quote:

    "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    We are constantly told to buy things we don't want. Is this guy a fukin idiot?

    Customer: I DON'T want it.

    Best Buy: Then why are you here?

    C: They keep telling me I am told to!

    BB: Who keeps telling you?

    C: The ads do!

    BB: (to shirt mike) We have a 714 in aisle 6. Please send assistance.

    BB: Sir, what don't you want to do?

    C: I DON'T WANT TO BUY THIS (DVD | VIDEO GAME| CD | TV)

    BB: Then sir, don't buy it.

    C: You mean I don't have too?

    BB: No, you don't.

    C: Then I guess I can go?

    BB: Yes, sir. The door is to your left.

    BB: Cancel the 714 in aisle 6 but be on your toes. I see another 714 in aisle 13.

  113. Sorry ... by willtsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Sorry, "Fight Club" was about rebellion and self realization. Same thing with another movie of that time "American Beauty".

    The protaginist (he has no name) is a bitch office worker who subconsciously develops an aggressive persona that manifests itself when he "sleeps". There was no homo-sexuality in the film. The only person who got fucked was Marla. The fact that men were hugging in a testicle cancer support group is meant to be farscicle.

    Quit projecting.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Sorry ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a Calgary Sun article:

      http://www.edward-norton.org/fc/articles/fictionre al.html

      Palahniuk admits his novel contains homo-erotic overtones and adds that director David Fincher "purposely pushed that envelope.

      "He told me The Fight Club was going to be the most homo-erotic mainstream American film ever made. He said it's all part of the plan to make the audience as uncomfortable as possible so that all the shocks and twists-and-turns of the movie will take them by surprise."

    2. Re:Sorry ... by WesternActor · · Score: 1

      The entire film is meant to be satirical, an examination of the suppression of masculinity in contemporary culture. The narrator's "becoming" Tyler Durden, the ultimate man's man, is an expression of his own ability to live the "traditional" man's life he really wants. Everything else in the movie, from the support group (where men are having their very manhood stripped away from them at the biological level) through the creation of Fight Club and the eventual aftermath, is a reflection of this. That actual "fight clubs" are springing up only further illustrates the story's point, whether one agrees with it or not. But that the people involved are taking it seriously is highly problematic and more than a little scary; real men should know that there are other ways to solve problems. In the Fight Club book and movie, they aren't real men, they're fictional creations. Huge difference.

      --

      --Matthew
      "If the lights of Broadway blind me, I won't mind..."
    3. Re:Sorry ... by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      The protaginist (he has no name)
      In the credits he's listed as "Narrator". During production they referred to him as "Jack".

      The only person who got fucked was Marla.
      There are some who assert that Marla was also a figment of Jack's imagination. (But watching the movie again with this in mind, it becomes clear that this would require more people to be imaginary as well. Hell, maybe the whole club was imaginary. But then that'd make doing all the stuff he did a lot harder and practically impossible-er.) Even if she was a figment of his imagination though, this wouldn't make it homo-erotic, just mastabatory.

    4. Re:Sorry ... by krnpimpsta · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought the main character's name was Cornenlius.. (played by Edward Norton)

      --

      New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    5. Re:Sorry ... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought the main character's name was Cornenlius.

      That was one of the many fake names he used at one of his support groups. He didn't even have a name in the book.

    6. Re:Sorry ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she was imaginary, she wouldn't have gotten so pissed off by his confusing reactions to her in his 'narrator' personality.

    7. Re:Sorry ... by d_54321 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Jack didn't know that Tyler wasn't real. Marla didn't know that Jack didn't know he was Tyler. She could be imaginary and at the same time be pissed at Jack for not knowing who he is- this would just make her a complicated figment of imagination, like Tyler.

  114. Psychopaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five-year fight club veteran Dinesh Prasad, 32, a heavily tattooed Santa Clara engineer, said he once broke a rib in a match but never complained to his fellow combatants. He also recently skipped his first wedding anniversary to attend a fight rather than drive to Los Angeles, where his wife is finishing law school.

    "I came here to get over my fear of fighting, and it's working," he said. "I'm much tougher than I was five years ago. I'm not at the level of these other guys, but if things were to get tough, I can get tough, too."


    Let's see, a guy who treats his wife like shit and likes to hit people. Sounds like a wife beater to me.

    I had a semester of boxing in college and wasn't a big fan of it. My instructor said if I didn't perform in the final I would fail and retake the class. My shirt, shorts and shoes ended up being thoroughly splattered with my opponent's blood and I passed. I guess I needed the right motivation. Was I all happy because now I was "tough?" Sure, I had my little ego trip, but I've regretted what I did to my opponent ever since. People who like to hurt other people and get some sort of satisfaction from it have some major underlying issues that would be better addressed with a psychiatrist.
  115. It works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to do "fightclub" here in Denmark when i was younger. Most of the guys there had a major interest in martial arts, but the actual useability of what we knew? pff :/
    A 3-48 months in various things like karate, taekwondo, wing tsun etc, but mostly it didn't matter at all.

    It was fun, that's for sure. Altough it hurt at times, we had alot of great laughs, both from participaters and observers during a match.
    People would make "rules" before a match, like, no blows to head, no kicks, grappling only, etc.
    Nobody really got badly hurt (broken something, dislocated shoulder etc), but a guy or two would be humping back to busstop some times. With a smile.

    For me, and a couple of the other guys too, i know, it actually worked on getting the stress level down. You know, you've just been on a vacation, it's summer and 25C outside with a nice sun, and you just hummer around at work on a little cloud, going "humm humm...yeah, sure, sounds great" no matter what's happening to you. Nothing can rock you. People provoke you, you just go "Sure, whatever" with a distant smile and go on with whatever you were doing.

    What these guys do...dunno about it. If you need protection, you're doing something wrong. Using any kind of weapens is unnecessary. Satisfaction comes from having a great time, not seeing the other guy crawling home. The fun comes from being able to use all the force you want, not from seing that force make some guy cribbled or badly hurt. Instead of pulling punches and blocking kicks in a weak way, like you would usually do when hanging out and joking with your friends, you can just let go and follow through with your whole body in that big punch (probably won't hit right anyway), or block that incoming kick with a handchop to the knee/shin area. It's a completely different way of thinking.

    Also, it isn't like a real, _real_ fight, where you panicly hit and kick the fastest you can without any control, hoping to not be the one riding the ambulance from there afterwards.
    These guys are your friends, you can hit like you want to, and they won't hold it against you. It's friendship, fun and harmless.

    Everybody should try it at least once with a friend or two =)

  116. Evidently... by hausmaus · · Score: 1

    ... in these losers' supreme quest for the ultimate geek, they missed Geraldo and Jerry Springer. Now that's fighting - eyes getting poked out, blood everywhere, people screeching ...

    Wait, that's just my recollection of the last office party. Sorry about that.

    --
    Your email has been returned due to insufficent voltage.
  117. Re:What was the appeal of Fight Club to begin with by dido · · Score: 1

    You're missing a lot. I suggest you at least try to see the movie. The whole premise behind the story is a reaction against a society increasingly dominated by materialism and specifically today's consumerist culture. Fight Club was never about trying to "prove your manliness", it was about rebellion against a society where they are left as "God's middle children, with no special place in history and no special attention." And so the response becomes increasingly violent nihilism and the creation of mayhem and chaos... Read (or watch) and understand...

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  118. I'll only join if... by Frightening · · Score: 1

    they bring in MS developers.

    Or the guys behind the Oracle Form Builder.

    OR the guys who made Driver 3.

    or.. there's so many people out there I want to beat the shit out of, I'm just gonna join.

  119. I'm in one by deque_alpha · · Score: 1

    But we just play Soul Calibur 3.... :D

  120. Let em fight & improve the gene pool by whoppers · · Score: 1

    sweet! Too many stupid people out there, it's about time they start weeding themselves out. I hope they all fight to the finish.

    As George Carlin says, "Imagine the average person out there, then realize that half the people in this world are stupider than than! God Damn the're a lotta stupid people walking around out there"

  121. Re:What was the appeal of Fight Club to begin with by ArmyOfFun · · Score: 1
    The thing I don't understand is the popularity of The Fight Club in the first place.
    That's like saying "I don't get why people like Citizen Kane so much, of course, I haven't seen it..." Note, I'm not saying Fight Club is as good as Citizen Kane.

    Rent the movie (it'll only cost you a few bucks and a couple hours). The less you know about it before you see it, the better you'll find it. The actual fight club and fight scenes make up a very small part of the movie. The movie has a lot to say about modern society (most of it negative). It's also one of those rare movies where you pick up something new each time you watch it. It also has the best movie PHB outside of Office Space.

  122. Obviously not real fight clubs by lewp · · Score: 1

    After all, they're talking about them.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  123. Clarify, please? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >>We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old
    >No, we live in a nation where people can make shit up and get modded insightful.

    Who, exactly, are you referring to?

    It was Gallup who ran the 2001 poll that had 45% of respondents agreeing God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so.

    But Gallup did not get moderated insightful, so could you make explicit who is making things up and getting modded insightful?

    1. Re:Clarify, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man != the world. This only indicates that 45% of people believe that the human species is under 10,000 years old.

    2. Re:Clarify, please? by martinX · · Score: 1

      But since man was made on the sixth day, the age of the world = (however old man is) + 5 days.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    3. Re:Clarify, please? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      which means that the earth was created on July 25, 1979. Aha! I knew it! (okay, so I'm a dork, but you read this comment too, didn't you?)

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  124. BOOK by GenKreton · · Score: 1

    It was a book long before a movie. Why are we giving actors credit instead of the original author of the concept!?

  125. Sloppy Reporting: Fight Clubs vs. "Extreme" Fights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reporter is mixing up two distinct groups of people. The geek fight club folks that he profiles seem like people with limited to no martial arts experience who get together and have 1 on 1 fights. The pictures show guys in pads and gloves, each using sticks. From the descriptions these are fair "mutual combat" fights. Common sense tells you that these fights have at least some rules. Could one of the stick fighters use his weapon to thrust and take out his opponent's eye on purpose? I doubt it. I am sure that a player who is no longer able to defend himself or submits is spared from any further beatings.

    The other group he described that uses frying pans and beat up on someone is is a different group entirely. They are emulating the "Extreme" wrestling fad where people are thrown through tables, hit with boards, slammed on tacks and bludgened with all kinds of various objects. They are set up more like jackass style stunts than combat.

    And the 6 vs 1 wasn't a fight club, that was a beating.

  126. After 30 years of in depth study... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    After 30 years of in depth study, I can confirm that video games do not cause violent behavior. I'd be willing to bet that I have more experience in the subject than Michael Messner.

    This reminds me of the article posted at my kids pedeotricians office. The "Dr." that wrote it claimed as evidence, that when he brought video games into to house, he thought they were just fun for his 11 year old sone. But, over the next three years, his son became more withdrawn and argumentative. Obviously it was video games!

  127. I am Jack's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complete lack of surprise at human stupidity.

  128. Surrender by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Ok Ok! I love emacs and lisp. I give up! lisp wins! Parenthesis are sexy!

  129. IMHO... by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If the story is accurate, then these people have no medical backup (as they would in professional boxing) and, in fact, no idea of what medical consequences there might be. It's hard to tell, in the brain haemorrage case, what actually happened. We see a couple of lines that tell us exactly nothing. However, if people actually go to work on smashed ribs, they are likely to be going to work with far more serious (but less obvious) injuries.


    (The brain has no nerve endings, so I suspect you can suffer a lot of injuries there without being able to personally tell much. Actually, that WOULD explain why Silicon Valley has been turning out such crap recently - they're all brain-dead.)


    Yes, frustrations are understandable and evidence of a sick, unhealthy work environment. A healthy work environment should have ways of avoiding stress building up (such as by ensuring employees aren't treated as raw meat - frozen until fried). That should be when tech employees (who are supposedly intelligent - WAY above average intelligence) figure out better ways to do things - and do them. Y'know, given the choice of kicking someone half to death in a bout of frustration, or setting up a startup that has none of the stress issues, gets twice as much done, and has devoted employees because their brains are intact... I know which I'd call the smarter.


    These fight clubs are stupid and ultimately have to destroy their participants. The body can only absorb so much - it doesn't repair indefinitely and you don't get to regenerate. However, the corporate attitude that creates them is not merely stupid, inferior and inefficient, but as close to evil as a secular environment can get.


    This is the kind of attitude that was featured in the ORIGINAL "Rollerball" - the craving for more and more violent outlets, because of pressure. Hell, this is the kind of attitude which created historic figures like Nero and Calligula. Never mind the pop psychology, we have real-world examples of what happens to a society when senseless self-destruction becomes the only meaningful outlet.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:IMHO... by ArchAngelQ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't disagree, really. I'm not saying this is a healthy outlet, just that it's healthier than some of the alternatives, such as taking out these destructive tendancies on people who *didn't* ask to be involved. TFA didn't provide much detail.

      As for techies being smarter than the majority? Not really. They are more capable of more focused, dedicated tasks. They are able to expend all their energies concentrating on a singular task. This makes them ideal for jobs where this is required. Coding is one of them. Design in general, really. You've got to be completely dedicated to truely get something right. Or even half right. That doesn't, inherantly, make someone smarter. I've met some brick stupid techies.

      As far as the 'evil' bit? I agree. It's why I'm not involved in corporate americ (or any other nation's version of same) any longer, and why I personally find this rather needless, mindless, and sad. But I can't just step in and say 'that person is doing something stupid' without justification, because frankly, I tell people who do that to me off, and go on with my life. And I'm not really intrested in posting such justification on, ya know, slashdot. I mean, c'mon. Slashdot. The majority of the people reading this have already made up their minds anyway.

    2. Re:IMHO... by jd · · Score: 1
      I see what you're saying. I guess I take the line that there's a difference between saying "hey, that's stupid" and "hey, that's stupid and we should ban it". People have the right to do stupid things. Which is just as well, given some of the things I've done over the years. I guess my comment is actually even a third kind - "hey, that's stupid, it's a byproduct of a highly toxic corporate culture, let's focus on beating up evil ideas rather than each other".


      Startups are a dime a dozen, after allowing for inflation. Clearly creating one isn't outside the scope of human endeavour. Startups that are successful are generally copied and get turned into powerpoint presentations for sociologists. It should not be impossible to create a startup that is logically sound and non-toxic. If it were easy or obvious, it would probably already be done. Well, I guess bits and pieces have - HP's work on "Open Plan" seemed to be on the right lines, and Peoplesoft claimed to have overcome corporate cynicism for a while. I'm sure there are other examples out there, bits and pieces that actually worked, for whatever reason.


      (It's important to use what works - the "dot bomb" era showed us what happens when you copy things that don't work but score highly on buzzword bingo.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:IMHO... by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
      However, the corporate attitude that creates them is not merely stupid, inferior and inefficient, but as close to evil as a secular environment can get.

      I once heard someplace ( I think it was in some movie, but I remember it anyway ) that the Devil's greatest accomplishment was to convince the world that he doesn't exist. And after spending a few years as a defence contractor, I can tell you that Evil most definately still exists.

      The choice to sell your soul for fun and profit has been around since the beginning, in one form or another. And I'm sure that it will continue to be a choice/temptation for centuries to come. All you can really do is chose whatever form of redemption your particular belief perscribes. And keep choosing it, over and over. - Now, don't get me wrong... I'm not of the thumper variety. I just thought I'd mention that just because we live in a secular environment doesn't mean that we are out of the woods yet. We still must be responsible. Now, if these guys get seriously hurt to where they can't perform their role in society, that's different. Then they need to be stopped. I think RESPIONSIBILITY is at the heart of the matter here. Not video game rage, or even the constant struggle between good and evil.

      You don't have to start your own company in order to find a workplace that isn't evil. All you really need to do is be willing to chose it over the lure of it's compeditors. Personally I went from a company that was deploying weapons of war to a non-profit healthcare system. The money isn't as good, but I don't wake up ever morning trying to come up with an excuse as to why I shouldn't go to work that morning. That is, as MasterCard tells us, PRICELESS.

      So if these guys are covering their responsibilities, AND choosing to be total idiots once every two weeks... OK. I personally go into MY garage about that often and do things that I don't want people judging me about either(in my case it's building a HotRod. That doesn't make me a schit-head street racer, but some poeple seem to think so)

      - Robert

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
    4. Re:IMHO... by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree, I feels great to say to a client, (when they dont treat me with respect) that I dont have to tolerate any kind of abuse and am hence forth, ending this relationship. :)

      I will never again, subject myself to the corporate mentality that puts profit margins before the goodwill of the common people.

    5. Re:IMHO... by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      As for techies being smarter than the majority? Not really. They are more capable of more focused, dedicated tasks.

      My job as a software engineer convinces me I'm smart because I can't think of another job that requires you to multitask more or a job that requires you to constantly learn as many new things. Whatever you think of it, I certainly wouldn't call it focused. And stupid people certainly wouldn't be able to do it. I woudn't classify "stupid techies" as actual techies since they're not actually doing the job.

  130. Dude FUCK YOU for that link by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1, Flamebait


      You know I'm clicking anything tha "the ladies are into" just to see where that's going but I wasn't expecting that. You had to go put that link there and then I clicked it and now I can't ever get clean again. It's like a combination of that creepy embarrassed way you felt when you watched all those sad bastards in Trekkies with just a touch of homophobia I didn't even know I had.

      Fuck you so much man. Fuck you. I wish that page and those people had never touched my consciousness.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:Dude FUCK YOU for that link by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

      But it's all starting to make sense now, isn't it. The rivalry between Spock and McCoy for Kirk's affections. The older queen bitchiness of McCoy, who feels threatened by the younger Spock. (And now you start wondering about McCoy's nickname, "Bones".)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Dude FUCK YOU for that link by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Could have been worse; you should see the shit that comes out of the Harry Potter fandom. It's infinitely worse than almost anything that comes out of the Star Trek fandom. And it's not just because they're all minors....

  131. George Carlin by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Click on #15, Euphemisms.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:George Carlin by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Yeah - that bit is funny. I think I need to get that CD. Thanks for the link.

      Too frikkin true, too.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  132. dumbasses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to say it. Mod me down, I don't care, I'm an Anonymous Coward anyway... not like it will stick.

  133. What the......???? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    If they were real techies, wouldn't they be beating each other over the head with keyboards, trying to strangle each other with mouse cords, and slamming each other's heads into monitors.

    That said, it's still a stupid idea. "I'm close to getting fired so I'm going to go vent by getting my arms broken thus forcing me to take off large amounts of work; when I finally do return to work, my output will be even worse because of the excruciating pain I'll be feeling."

    I've never read/seen "fight club" so if someone could explain the "first two rules" everyone keeps mentioning, that'd be helpful.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  134. I cant believe they let people that mental out. by Unknown_monkey · · Score: 1
    "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    Um, where to begin? Well, I make my own decisions so even though "Thirst" wants me to drink Sprite, I'm drinking water at the moment. I still have control over my free time. And if I'm unhappy at work I can quit. These people need about 10 minutes with a real parent figure or William Shatner so they can move out of the basement and kiss a girl.
    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor. "Boys have these warrior fantasies picked up from popular culture, and schools sort of force that out of them," he said. In these fantasies, "The good guys always resort to violence, and they always get the glory and the women."

    Got a woman without resorting to violence. I'm surprised he didn't allude to the idea that if they weren't beating each other up, they'd be fighting crime in spandex trying to fly. I mean, when I look at the first picture, I keep hearing "lightning bolt, lightning bolt" in my head from the LARP video. Why don't they try paintball or LARPing or just maybe take a karate class?
    And why is it always the games/movies/cartoons? Most of my sci-fi has lots of violence in it and it's in books!
    "Real-life fight clubs are the male version of the girls who cut themselves," he said. "All day long these guys think they're the captains of the universe, technical wizards. They're brilliant but empty. "They want to feel differently. They want to get hit, they want to feel something real."

    Um. Ok, so now we know. These are mentally ill people that need help, and the fight club organizers are exploiting them. So what we need is dateline to go on a chatroom and pretend to be a mentally ill computer programmer that needs to feel "something real" and do a 4 hour special. (When you read "something real", did you hear the word "Breasts" in your head too? Because that's what I think they need to be feeling.)
    Five-year fight club veteran Dinesh Prasad, 32, a heavily tattooed Santa Clara engineer, said he once broke a rib in a match but never complained to his fellow combatants. He also recently skipped his first wedding anniversary to attend a fight rather than drive to Los Angeles, where his wife is finishing law school.

    Ok, see, he should be feeling breasts instead of some other dude. This guy is heading for a divorce on the grounds of mental illness.
    This further supports my research that what causes depression is a lack of healthy sex. Myself and every guy I know is happy when they're getting regular sex. The only really unhappy guys I know aren't getting laid regularly. So depression is caused by a lack of sex. I think it's the same for women, and if there are any attractive ladies that are depressed reading this, then let me show you the cure for your depression.
  135. Re:Sloppy Reporting: Fight Clubs vs. "Extreme" Fig by Mafiew · · Score: 1

    I agree, fighting with friends is extremely satisfying. Anything that puts strain on my body and makes me feel pain makes me feel alive. Everybody who scoffs at the idea is missing out on feeling human. People forget that we've only been out of the trees for a few thousand years.

  136. Quick! Buy Stock! by Petersko · · Score: 1

    What's the kind of tape nerds use to hold their glasses together in the centre? I see a rising star!

  137. because no one read the book... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    They did actually interview the people involved in this club. It's quite possible they expressed their influences, instead of having to guess at them.

    This headling is misleading, even the original article doesn't act like this is a trend, just one case.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  138. Bike Club by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

    I prefer my "techie" steam blowing method:
    Join Bike Club.
    There's only one rule to Bike Club, and that's to always bring your wallet. Mostly it involves getting on a bicycle and pedalling to either where you want to go, or to where you don't yet know you want to be.

    So far I'm the only official member, but membership is growing.

  139. caveman impulses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but I'll bite.

    The reason we are nerds is because we have mastered these primitive impulses. Remember why you didn't play sport in highschool? Because only idiotic jocks did... Remember why you didn't pick fights with weaker people and beat them up? Because that was for troglodytes. We can be better than this.

    1. Re:caveman impulses by OneoFamillion · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps the reason for not partaking in sports was low self esteem, fear or inferior physique, so to defend my ego my brain explained it away by creating an illusion of "being better than them"? Remember, I don't say that this is true for us all, just hinting that the true motives for our deeds might not always be as we'd like to remember them...

  140. Monkey see, monkey do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now how many of those same tech weenies would yell in protest about any attempts to curb violent video games or as any type of "entertainment". They are the perfect example of "violent media" leading to "violent behavior". This is clearly cause and effect. If that movie had not come out, this violence would not be happening.

    Violence like this is *not* funny, and I won't laugh.

  141. What would you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your co-worker was featured in this article?

  142. Take out your anger the old-fashoned way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where we work, if the customer doesn't come to pick up their computer, we fill out a customer abandon form, approve it, and then we crush it.

    Yes, crush it.

    There's nothing like the satisfying sound of a dell pc being turned into a toilet-paper roll sized hunk of metal and plastic.

  143. I have no need of Fight Clubs by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

    I already have a black belt in origami.

    --
    remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
  144. Only morons by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Only morons take blows to their body, or deal them out to others, when they don't have to. Boxers stand around and get hit; they don't last long and have a lot of problems later. REAL fighters use hard tools and leverage, and resort to hand work only when necessary. And a fighter does not take blows, he gives them out. If you're taking shots to the head, you've lost, even if you make it out of the fight.

    Tears in the rotator cuffs. Brain damage from sudden acceleration of the skull. Wrist damage. Bone compression. Arthritis, in the wrists, the jaw, the knees, the back, the neck. Muscle tears that never really heal. Tendons pulling out of sheaths. Damage to the stomach and intestines from gut shots. Eyesight loss. Dental damage. Broken blood vessels. Nerve damage in the striking surfaces. Cartilage damage, big time. Clicking jaws, with pain. Ear damage.

    Young jackasses who never believe they will get old think they will never have to pay for their stupidity. They will, oh yes, they will. The arthritis alone will be a warm feeling to nurse for the rest of their lives. I smacked my own wrists hard, once. I can't do pushups anymore without agony, and that's forever. Keep it up, kids.

    This is worse than people trying to live out comic book hero fantasies in spandex. These are numbnuts trying to emulate a movie where the hero is 1) violently insane (people forget that little part!) 2) able to take blows that would literally cripple a man and walk away laughing. Believe me, you don't.

    1. Re:Only morons by dbmasters · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is quite apparant you know literally nothing about fighting, and I am not saying that as a bad thing or good thing, just a fact. I am 39 years old and train mixed martial arts 4 times a week, hard-spar on a semi-regular basis and train with a few MMA cage fighters. One thing is certain in a fight, whether sparring or street fighting, you WILL take a couple shots to your body. Taking shots does not mean you lost the fight, it means you are in one. I have only seen one or two fights where one of the fighters literally took no hits. Yeah, bodily damage is possible, it happens, I take damage from time to time, but nothing horrible, nothing that doesn't heal, and it does no more long term damage than other people give themselves living off McDonalds and Coca Cola. I have found my training to be a great divertion from the rest of my life, for a few hours a week I can go take out frustration on a heavy bag, thai pads or a classmate. We punch, kick and grapple, shake hands afterwards and enjoy it very much. Nobody is trying to live up to Chuck Norris idolization, we just enjoy learning the martial arts. My wife trains, my kids train...it's all good.

      --
      dB Masters
    2. Re:Only morons by generic · · Score: 1

      Your a professional fighter though, they are not. I'd rather fight with a sane Black belt (yourself) than an insane programmer who is going to try to cause bodily harm. You'll hit me once, I'll go down we will shake hands done. Those guys will try an maul the other person. Crazy.

      --
      Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
    3. Re:Only morons by dbmasters · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess I can see your point there, much like NASCAR drivers feel safer on the track than on the streets where all the amatuers are...that said, however, it is highly unlikely that an unskilled Jerry Springer style fighter can do much real damage to anyone unless they get an extremely lucky shot... Look at the pic, they have face protection and headgear on, some small MMA style gloves...one thing they seem to have forgotten or overlooked is shinpads...as someone who has collided shins before, that hurts worse than a good shot to the noggin.

      --
      dB Masters
  145. Can someone explain the appeal of (a) fight club? by Offtopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's the premise as I understand it:

    A man find's his work and his life unsatisfying. He is unable to express his individuality and to have the sort of life he wants.

    His proposed solution: to spend his nights with other losers punching them and trying to hurt them while they try to do the same to him.

    How is this an improvement? To me it seems far worse.

  146. Am I the only one that missread? by TEMMiNK · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this headline as 'Trekie Fight Club'? There would be Shatner commando rolls and vulcan nerve pinches flying around... "Captain's Log, I kicked Spock's ass again today, he really has to lift his floor game.. rubbish."

    --
    "The stupider people think you are, the more surprised they will be when you kill them..."
  147. fighters != idiots by dbmasters · · Score: 1

    So many comments here imply that anyone who fights is an idiot. I take offense to this. As a martial artist who's wife and young daughters also train martial arts I find it offensive that people just assume we are all idiots. Learning to fight and defend yourself and your family is something I see as my responsiblity as a father. My girls need to have these tools, and they enjoy it very much. Unlike many of the bastardized, watered down martial arts training gyms (National Karate, ATA TKD, etc) would have you believe, in order to learn to fight/defend yourself you actually need to fight...my girls don't go in the ring and try to knock each others block off, it's light and fun, but some of us adults do and we shake hands afterwards. I also train with mixed martial arts cage fighters, myself and some of these people are far from idiots...IT guys, programmers, stock traders, real estate professionals, teachers, police officers. Granted, a few of them have a screw or two loose upstairs, but please, don't assume that we are all idiots, cuz we are not. But, whether idiots or not, we are all well conditioned, strong and healthy people.

    --
    dB Masters
    1. Re:fighters != idiots by Kalinago · · Score: 1

      I sense som anger within you. Remember: anger leads to suffering..the shortest way towards the dark side as master Yoda says.

    2. Re:fighters != idiots by tuxette · · Score: 1

      What style do you all train?

      My girls need to have these tools, and they enjoy it very much. Unlike many of the bastardized, watered down martial arts training gyms (National Karate, ATA TKD, etc) would have you believe, in order to learn to fight/defend yourself you actually need to fight...my girls don't go in the ring and try to knock each others block off, it's light and fun

      Yes, girls need to learn how to defend themselves, but real self defense is not light and fun. If you are unable to run away or talk/shout yourself out of a situation, real self defense is brutal and nasty and tough. You have to do damage to your attacker; your attacker is not going to be all nicey-nice to you! In a real self-defense situation, being able to knock an attacker's block off is a good thing...

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    3. Re:fighters != idiots by dbmasters · · Score: 1

      We all train in Kenpo, Brazilian (Gracie) JiuJitsu and Kickboxing... I agree about the light and fun sparring, that obviously isn't real world self defense, but, it is a slow, gentle way to teach kids how to use the skills they are learning, practicing technique rather than power...with young children, who don't have the power to take an adult, well, that's where the "run away" lessons come into play, cuz that should always be the first option for a kid... That said, the techniques and sparring they are learning at a young age is good, mix the previously learned technique as they age and gain power and muscle control and you have some seriously skilled young adults. Outside of the light and fun sparring they also practice (as much as realistically possible) eye gouges, groin kicks, throat punches, etc...and beyond the martial skill, they have also gained confidence, coordination, patience and more...which are even more skills that help in life in general. Besides, before bed the nightly ritual is letting the girls take punches at my stomach and thai kicks to my legs, and I have noticed substantial power improvement in the last 6 months or so :-)

      --
      dB Masters
    4. Re:fighters != idiots by dbmasters · · Score: 1

      The only anger I have is people that automatically assume if you fight recreationally in controlled environments that you are some sort of idiot...that has to be an "ism" or "phobia" of some sort...

      Fightism, perhaps...

      --
      dB Masters
    5. Re:fighters != idiots by tuxette · · Score: 1

      OK...maybe I should have asked for their ages first. I get the impression they're very young. At least they're learning the "good stuff" like the groin hits, eye gouges, etc. Dirty tricks. No need to play by the rules if their life depends on it...

      It's also good to hear they're working on coordination, strength, etc as opposed to sitting in front of the tv and getting fat, which seems to be rather popular for kids these days...

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    6. Re:fighters != idiots by dbmasters · · Score: 1

      They are ages 5 and 8, so yes, quite young to try to overpower an adult, but, learning good skills to build on as they grow...along with many good life skills in general. Heck, sitting and watching TV is why I started them about a year and a half ago...I remember that summer, looking around a seeing the number of overweight kids and adults and saw my belly growing and thought "nope, not letting that happen to me or my family"...and so far, it's been a blast. And you haven't lived until you have "sparred" with a 5 year old :-)

      As for the adults, well, we go quite a lot harder...great anger management, stress relief and just general workout.

      --
      dB Masters
  148. Fight Club by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

    I love FIGHT CLUB, but is there really a need for nerds to prove themselves? I mean, why not play that awful PS2 game version instead?

    --
    http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
  149. I thought they were using Quake3.... by woolio · · Score: 1

    When I heard about a "techie fight club" that involved pummeling, I just assumed that it was two nerds sitting in front of their computers, running Quake3, and having their characters stand still and pummel each other to see who wins....

    1. Re:I thought they were using Quake3.... by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      you would actually meet him at the agreed location? why not just sit somewhere and snipe him and then laugh your ass off while he came looking for you?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  150. Video Games Made Me Do It by sherriw · · Score: 1

    After 10+ years of playing intense video games... can someone explain to me why a bleeding paper cut still freaks me out? Yup, I'm desensitized all right. God I'm sick of the violent-pop-culture-makes-kids-violent crap. Maybe if parents tried actually raising their children, the kids wouldn't have so many issues.

    1. Re:Video Games Made Me Do It by dbmasters · · Score: 1

      "Maybe if parents tried actually raising their children, the kids wouldn't have so many issues."

      Amen, brutha!

      Those are the same parents that will look at each other (if they are still together) 10-20 years down the road and wonder where they went wrong...

      --
      dB Masters
  151. Some homoerotic themes with your defensiveness? by MisterSquid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Suggesting that Fight Club carries homoerotic themes is not to say the movie is about homosexuality. Many of the film's most important scenes involve half-naked, sweating men in close contact with each other. The contact is violent and a "legitimate" equivalent for the close contact men and women have in the film.

    A clear example of a homoerotic theme present in the movie is the subplot where the unnamed narrator ("Jack") becomes jealous of Tyler Durden's relationship with Angel Face. While beating Angel Face's face to a bloody pulp, the narrator confesses

    I felt like putting a bullet between the eyes of every Panda that wouldn't screw to save its species. I wanted to open the dump valves on oil tankers and smother all the French beaches I'd never see. I wanted to breathe smoke.

    These images are partially veiled sexual references, "Panda that wouldn't screw"; "open the [. . .] valves [. . .] and smother"; and "I wanted to breathe smoke". Of course these images mean other things, too: reckless abandon, species suicide, environmental destruction, etc. But they also can be read sexually. (You, willtsmith, might say "they are susceptible to sexual projection.")

    The final proof comes after Angel Face is carried away and Durden (lighting a cigarette) asks the narrator, "Where'd you go, psycho boy?" and the narrator explains "I felt like destroying something beautiful." In other words, the male narrator reacts to the blond man's beauty by beating the beautiful man up. This scene from the film directly links homoeroticism and male-on-male violence.

    My guess is that the idea of sexuality being present in this film gets your panties in a wad, which is reasonable considering the film is also about macho men who in no way would be gay. But, really, it's OK. Just because sexual themes are present in these scenes of hypermasculine violence doesn't mean your wrestling buddies want to bugger you, not all of them anyways.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Some homoerotic themes with your defensiveness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "macho men who in no way would be gay."

      A swaaah? Seriously, there's an assumption that needs to be questioned.

    2. Re:Some homoerotic themes with your defensiveness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are my modpoints when I need them?

  152. I have a picture in my mind... by joedoc · · Score: 1

    When I read this, I couldn't help thinking of a skit I saw performed on the old SCTV comedy show back in the early 1980s.

    The skit was a goof on the old "Battle of the TV Network Stars" shows ABC used to produce. This was called "Battle of the PBS Stars." The highlight of the show was a boxing match between Mr. Rogers (played by Martin Short) and Julia Child (played by John Candy).

    Mr. Rogers pretty much got his ass kicked by a 350-pound French woman.

    Why do I imagine this is the same thing?

    --
    Joe Dougherty, Florida, USA
    The words I thought I brought, I left behind. So, never mind.
  153. Because they play video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst part of that entire article was that they had to sneak in an "expert" to say that the desire to do this was caused by playing violent video games as a child.

    That is almost as appauling as reading "teens who played violent games..." to start headlines about the Columbine massacre. You know those 2 kids may have listened to Marilyn Manson and played Doom, but so did millions of other teens who did NOT go on a killing spree.

    When people do crazy things it is because they are crazy.

  154. Re:Can someone explain the appeal of (a) fight clu by pushf+popf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Here's the premise as I understand it: A man find's his work and his life unsatisfying. He is unable to express his individuality and to have the sort of life he wants. His proposed solution: to spend his nights with other losers punching them and trying to hurt them while they try to do the same to him. How is this an improvement? To me it seems far worse.
    It's great for the rest of us.

    When these losers want to "feel something", they beat each other. When I want to "feel something" I go get a massage.

    Want to guess which one of us gets the great job and the raise and which one gets his ass fired for calling sick all the time or coming to work beaten and stupid?
  155. that's not the quickest way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since it requires waiting until an anniversary date.

    Quicker and easier ways include:
    1) call your wife by her mother's name during an argument (I know a guy who does this deliberately -- what an idiot, it's like throwing water on a grease fire!)
    2) call out the name of your wife's best girlfriend (better yet, younger sister's name if she has one) during sex.

    1. Re:that's not the quickest way by scheme · · Score: 1
      2) call out the name of your wife's best girlfriend (better yet, younger sister's name if she has one) during sex.

      Does twin sister also work? If so, I'd be totally willing to try that.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  156. This is your (geek) life by Himring · · Score: 1

    This Is Your Computer

    And You Open The Door And You Look Inside.
    Were Inside Our Computers.
    Now Imagine Your Pain Is an overclocked Opteron 144.

    Thats Right !

    Your Pain - The Pain Himself - Is an overclocked Opteron 144.

    I Dont Think So !

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  157. Re:No weapons! (*book spoilers*) by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    In the book it's a little more gruesome. Earlier in the book, he'd developed a hole in his cheek from fighting that never healed. At one point after he's realized that he's mad, he tries to stop Tyler Durden by getting in a fight with everyone at a fight club. This results in his face getting torn from the hole to his lips on that side.

    Not much later, he tries to shoot himself to put an end to the whole mess. The bullet wound there slips and rips open the other half of his face leaving him with a permanent, jagged smile. In the movie, all that happens is that the bullet comes out of his cheek near the jawbone, with only a little hole left that he is covering at the end.

    I guess they couldn't figure out a good special effect to have Edward Norton's face torn in half for a good part of the movie.

    (**** Now for the book spoilers. I highly recommend the book. If you are affected by spoilers, stop reading now and go get the book. ****)

    His "suicide" is an attempt to kill Tyler and not himself as he explains to Marla and all the support group people that she calls to his aid. The building doesn't explode because Tyler (possibly deliberately) did not mix the explosives properly. He ends up in an insane asylum, delluded into thinking that it's Heaven, where he gets letters from Marla and where the bruised orderlies tell him that they miss him, that everything's going according to plan, and that they look forward to getting him back once they've broken up civilization. In the end, after his metaphorical death he still can't escape the monster he's created which is now far, far bigger than him.

    And no, the Pixies do not sing a happy song as civilization ends at the end.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  158. Re:No weapons! (*book spoilers*) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the movie, all that happens is that the bullet comes out of his cheek near the jawbone, with only a little hole left that he is covering at the end.

    I always figured that they were saying that Tyler was his complex (imaginary) component and therefore existed 90 degrees out of phase. It makes about as much sense as anything I guess...

  159. Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus, if Superman wanted to go out and beat people up for fun, he wouldn't return with broken ribs.

  160. fighting clubs in Brasil by Kalinago · · Score: 1

    well, though we in south america would certainly love to pummel each other from time to time to release some stress, a common choice is to rather rollick under the sheets and have some nice rough sex with our partner(s).

    If a partner is not available at a time, you can always purchase some warm time and company for a reasonable fee (still arguably better than punching someone in the face - for those moralists out there).

    If there is still an imperative need to cause harm, my collegues and I share the view that giving a headshot or slicing your project manager with a knife in CounterStrike (any flavour) does the trick in most cases, thus we adopted it as a weekly practice.

    1. Re:fighting clubs in Brasil by chawly · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. Rolling around under the sheets (or over them when it's too hot) with your favourite person is the best way to shake off a stressful day. Fighting be damned. Baby-making practise is the thing. Use the gym to keep supple and limber up for the next practise session. Fighting in the pub / bus queue - the hell with that fellows, I gotta go home. Somebody waiting for me. Booze makes me sleepy - might miss practise.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  161. I am Joe's Raging Bile Duct by Avalanche_Joe · · Score: 1

    The first rule of Fight Club is that you do not talk about Fight Club.

    The second rule of Fight Club is that you do not talk about Fight Club.

    ;~}

  162. Bubbles by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When growing up I used to wrestle with other kids. Frequently the match would end when someone scraped up an arm, or hit their head hard enough to make them dizzy, or one of the big guys rolled over the leg of one of the little guys. In college, we sparred quite a few times.

    I always hated this. The idea of someone pawing and walloping me was never very appealing. Nonetheless, many, perhaps well meaning, individuals attempted to get me to "join in the fun". That's my bubble you're encroaching on, in a very intimate fashion. It wasn't pleasant. Sweaty palms abounded, and most of the instigators smelled quite poorly. I don't think most people find this prospect very appealing either.

    Personally, I suspect that most of these people are closet homosexuals trying to cop a feel, then covering up by thumping the target of their affections. I think the rest are in some way trying to cop a feel too. And all that walking around naked in showers. Come on. Who are they trying to kid?

    We live in a free society, but, there are bubbles ok. Some people have bubbles. Please respect that.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Bubbles by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      If you don't enjoy wrestling, that's fine.

      But the adrenaline rush of fighting is fun in its own right. It doesn't matter if it is boxing, kickboxing, Tae Kwan Do, Tae Kwan Leap, or wrestling. The advantage of wrestling is the lower risk of injury. There's still a good chance of getting hurt, but it's lower than the risk of injury from exchanging punches and kicks with your adversary.

      For most people, homosexuality doesn't enter into it. Most guys don't box in order to put their hands on other men or play football in order to tackle other men. Wrestling is no different.

    2. Re:Bubbles by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Well, except for possibly Greco-Roman Wrestling, that sport is pretty gay. :)

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  163. You can get closer... by schlick · · Score: 1

    "This is as close as you can get to a real fight, even though I've never been in one," the soft-spoken Siou said.

    My second job is bouncing at a dive bar. Unlike those meat heads you saw in that documentary on HBO, real bouncers try to prevent fights, and when that is not possible stop them once they've started. Because the parties involved are usually drunk, it can take a fair amount of 'convincing' (read: put in headlock and drag outside). So I think you can get a bit closer to a real fight. Infact it's not all that hard to achieve in actuallity.

    --
    "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
  164. A better alternative... by uqbar · · Score: 1

    The Fight Club phenomenon existed before the book or the movie (ask the Author as he, like me, participated in some of these gatherings).

    But there is a far better alternative. Take up Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, or Boxing or Submission wrestling or any one of a zillion other MMA disciplines. The MMA world is flourishing thanks to the UFC, there are lots of places to study. You learn technique and you spar hard - and you do it in an environment that is safer. The fights are far more intense because everyone knows what they are doing - so they are more satisfying and you learn techniques that will help you hold your own should you ever need to.

    I study at the local Gracie Jiu Jitsu academy We still get the broken ribs and the bloody lips and noses and bruised ribs - or worse stuff like torn ligaments. These things happen in other sports as well (skiing anyone?) But you are actualy learning to fight and ultimately you are learning how to spar safely as well.

    The guys you spar with are far tougher - but you will learn to stand your own and that is far more rewarding that some of the silliness in these backyard battles.

    1. Re:A better alternative... by tuxette · · Score: 1

      Take up Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, or Boxing or Submission wrestling or any one of a zillion other MMA disciplines.

      Krav Maga is another good one. It's based on what one would encounter in a "real world" self-defense situation (choking attacks, knife attacks, etc). While you do learn a lot of techniques, Krav Maga is also very "anything goes" (i.e. dirty tricks), if that kind of thing appeals to you...

      At least in my class, training involves lots of things, including wrestling and boxing/kickboxing. We also do fun stuff like training outdoors, in street clothes, in a pub, etc. every now and then, to mimic "real life." Good fun... and a good outlet after a long, hard day at work :-)

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  165. Bah, martial arts are far better by mattstorer · · Score: 1

    I'm one of these geeks who sit behind a desk all day, writing code and working on servers. I've found that I build up massive, MASSIVE amounts of energy each day that has me fidgeting my brains out if I don't do something to release it. So what do I do? Damn near every day after work, I go and practice Taekwondo for a couple hours. I burn myself out in the first 20 minutes, and then push myself to the edge for the next hour. By the time I'm done, not only am I totally physically wasted, but I've been learning an awesome, practical skill with which to impress all those ladies I don't get.

    For real though, it's kept me sane for years. You train in a relatively safe environment (but of course accidents do happen, I've sprained toes, ankles, wrists, fingers, and almost broken quite a number of those as well), but you get to punch and kick the crap out of bags, boards, and bricks, and release massive amounts of stress at the same time.

    Additionally, no matter what art you do, it's bound to involve a degree of meditation. Now, I don't mean necessarily sitting there like a monk focusing on nothing, although we do that here and there, no - I mean the kind of medidation that takes place while doing patterns (kata, forms, etc.) - it's a great way to calm yourself and mentally reset.

    I strongly recommend it in favor of doing something as unregulated and, IMHO, stupid, as these fight clubs.

    Matt

  166. Re:Look again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're talking about the first picture at usatoday, red-shirt is pulling blue-shirt's head down and kneeing him; he's not executing a "kick" at all. It's a relatively simple and effective move if the opponent's guard is down. Of course, red-shirt would get more power if he pulled blue-shirt down a bit lower and used his left knee for power instead of stretching his ankle and foot way out like that. However, its sloppy execution suggests that it is genuine to me.

    The photo aside, it's unlikely that I'd be interested in participating in open brawls such as these. An expert fighter knows how not to succumb to emotion in the ring; untrained fighters often fight based on adrenaline, rage, and the techniques they have seen on television. The (admittedly few) street fights I've been in have shown me that brawlers generally have little respect for their own safety and even less for that of their opponents; submission techniques are of little use when the opponent doesn't care how far out-of-joint his shoulder is. I plan to continue practicing martial arts well into my 40's or 50's; I don't need some hotheaded desk jockey disregarding his injuries and coming in to ruin one of my joints.

  167. Forgot the rules by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    The article forgot one main thing:

    1) You do not talk about Fight Club.
    2) You *do not* talk about Fight Club.

  168. Fencing by charlesTheLurker · · Score: 1

    Foo. These people are so silly. They should fence: full contact, safe as houses, makes you the Baddest Cat at the Bus Stop, available in every major city and most minor ones. Check for a fencing club in your area, chances are good you'll find one.

    PLUS, it won't give you any silly illusions about prevailing in a brawl.

  169. Hey, Get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the invisible man who *Made* the sky.

  170. m0rt4l k0mb4t by lon3st4r · · Score: 1
    wonder when it will be discovered that techies disappearing for a few weeks are actually going to the annual mortal kombat festival..

    * lon3st4r*

  171. New goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys, we have just found a new Goatse, look at this.

  172. Unbelievable! by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    This is the scariest thing I've read in a long time...

  173. Rules by syrrys · · Score: 0

    "Says with gross lisp due to huge overbite" 1. Kicking only, we dont want to hurt our precious upper peripherals. 2. No hitting in the face; too close in proximity to our optical storage devices. 3. No kicking in the DB-9 connector, or dockable unit; we must ensure the furthering of our superior genes. 4. When someone starts crying, the match is over...we dont want to get into trouble or anything.

    --
    "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
  174. Sociologists are idiots by Optic7 · · Score: 1

    I've heard enough quotes from people in their profession to come to that conclusion. There's my unsupported claim. Anyway, this just reinforces my desire to stay away from any sociology classes. I'd much rather study psychology and social anthropology, thank you very much.

    Like someone else pointed out here, there was violence among humans way before video games, movies, or even any kind of fiction or art. Humans have inherent tendencies toward violence, which anyone should be able to see just from looking at the world around them.

  175. Fightboy Club by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    I didn't believe him till he took me down there and I watched two clumsy nerds slap each other for 5 minutes before getting tired and reaching for their inhalers.

    That's not difficult to get going.

    Just find an Intel fanboy and an AMD fanboy, put them in t-shirts with the respective company logos, give them lots of caffeine, then goad them on and set them at each other.

    The same can be accomplished with ATI/nVidia and PlayStation/Xbox.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  176. No weapons!? So true by sysadmintech · · Score: 1

    I find physical contact relieves stress. Many people get involved in pugilistic sports to calm themselves.
    The better trained you are, the more control you have and you should cause less injuries. When practicing Judo or Hap Ki Do, instructors demand control so that students are not injured. Someone who causes injury will find they have no one who will spar with them.
    When practicing Kendo, Arnis or Floro, we use 1/4" PVC covered in pipe insulation or flexible rubber. Even without head gear, a hit doesn't hurt even younger children.
    A black belt is defined by calm and confidence, and the theme of Hap Ki Do is by combining our strengths, we succeed.

  177. A poser by any other name is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...still a poser.

  178. It's BS by jeannie888 · · Score: 1

    this is BS, I live in SV and I've never heard of such place..

  179. Re: Stalking your hobby by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Everybody go read http://www.youaredumb.net
    Yesterday and today's columns (May 30&31) are part of the Be A Better Nerd series and are all about how to tell when it's time to euthanize.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  180. Re:Pedanti- Club by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    "Uh, no. Stealing from any number of sources is plagerism.'

    Uh, no. It's plagiarism. If you're going to be pedantic, you should be careful to spell everything correctly. Now go stalk your hobby.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  181. bullshit. by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Jeez the shite you hear on slashdot. Force equals energy OVER TIME. If you smack a cinder block hard but not quickly the energy delivered by the blow propogates through the material in a wave, and can come back and hurt your hand. If you do it quickly enough the amount of energy is the same, but delivered in a smaller amount of time, therefore is effectively a sharper blow. Bam. Exactly what every other poster in the thread needs.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  182. Mods need to get a sense of humor by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    I was kidding for crying out loud. "Flamebait"? Are you kidding me? You ain't seen me throw out Flamebait suckers. If you did you wouldn't be modding it down. You'd be too busy fighting in the flame war I started!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  183. MAD TV episode here by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    The video is here.

    Favorite lines are...

    Fighter1: I came for a new life.
    Fighter2: I make and sell soap.
    Fighter1: Thanks - my life has meaning now.

    I found the video scene on this Google cache.

    --
    without prejudice
  184. Why kick on another's Ass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing that hit me was why kick each other's ass? Go after the CIO, the CFO, the CEO... don't bother with the little guys...

  185. Praise the Lord for the Slashdot effect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't until after I tried to click the link did I read far enough to see that I really didn't want to!

  186. Re:No weapons? No intelligence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it.
    You live in a nation where fully ONE HALF the population is of BELOW AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE!

        What other nation could claim that?

      If you're in the top half, I suggest you move to Canada.
      If you're in the lower half, stay home and browse /.

  187. The difference .. by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    There is a difference between homo-erotic violence and just plain violence. In homo-erotic violence, the gay guys get an erection.

    There is a realization here that the innate desire to pummel in the back of every guys mind and letting it out helps one realize themselves cathartically.

    No, I'm pretty sure you are super-imposing your desires on the film. Who hasn't wanted to beat up some "pretty boy" at some point. I think you need to unwad your panties. I'll keep my briefs thank you.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!