From my understanding RICO has a really broad reach. If there is a conspiracy to break then law, then RICO applies.
There is collusion between the Mississippi AG and the MPAA. They are trying to interfere with Google's business. Google is involved in interstate commerce (duh). So there's a RICO case right there.
Anybody can initiate a RICO prosecution. The DOJ can always join the case if it wants to. Or not. In this situation there is a lot of disincentive for the DOJ to join: a large number of DOJ attorneys are planning on going to work for entities like the MPAA (lobbyists) and the recording/film industries when finish their relatively low paying stints with the government. Having the DOJ go after their future employers does not fit in with their personal plans.
Still, it would be highly amusing to watch Google go after the MPAA for conspiracy. That would make headlines outside of Slashdot. Ultimately I doubt it will happen. Even though they are more then willing to fight dirty, there is a higher level pact between big companies: don't do things that will reveal to the general population just how corrupt the system is. If people ever realize just how badly they are routinely screwed by the government/business complex, they might stop being sheep and start paying attention. That could be a disaster for big business. So it is really not likely to happen.
Because government grows on trees, like computers, flat screen TVs, hamburgers, cars, roads, safe drinking water, etc.
You hate the gubbment? They go someplace where there is no central authority. I suggest Somalia.
Otherwise, STFU. You are not just a freeloader, you are a damned parasite. You want all the perks, and none of the responsibility. If there was some way I could get you kicked out of the country I would. You don't deserve to be here.
And you probably think that the Bush administration was squeaky clean.
The only thing you have on your mind is you hate seeing a black guy, or as you are really thinking, a n-----r in the White House.
So I'm going to ask you my rhetorical question: Do you keep your KKK robes in the closet where they won't get wrinkled but someone might see them, or do you fold them up and put them in a drawer where they will get wrinkled but it's less likely that people will see them.
In a first for a major Canadian urban newspaper, Monsanto plans to spend over $400,000 (US) over the next year in an image building campaign at the Globe and Mail. Monsanto usually applies it's promotional spending in more specialized media outlets, and when it does outreach outside the agricultural sector it sponsors programming at non-profits like PBS.
Monsanto has a low profile among the general public, because very little of it's business is visible at the mass market consumer level. Although other B2B vendors, such as BASF, have tried to extend their brand awareness using national broadcast media, it is very unusual to see this level of activity in print advertising.
In off the record remarks by a person not authorized to talk to the press, the possibility was raised that this would not be the last media purchase of this kind. In part, it was stated that "If Monsanto can find the right kind of media partnerships, they would very much like to extend their brand awareness in a major US market, like New York, Los Angeles, or Texas." The key, according to the source, was not just selecting a major market, but "building long term relationships with print media organizations that can help Monsanto bring it's message to a wider audience."
I watched their promo video and it shows the airframe structure performing two tasks that seem to be mutually exclusive.
The airframe is a lifting body with a large flat undercarriage. This is the side that absorbs microwave energy, which is somehow transferred to the hydrogen fuel to provides thrust. After achieving orbit and delivering it's payload, the spacecraft deorbits and then the same lifting body surface that absorbed microwave radiation becomes the heat shield for reentry.
So how do you combine the ability to receive a large amount of microwave energy and then turn around and protect the airframe from reentry heat in the same structure? And in addition has the structural integrity to withstand launch and reentry stresses.
Microwaves are not invisible magic. They interact with the matter they encounter. Whatever heat shield material they use, it is going to absorb some of the microwaves that hit the vehicle. Can they keep this amount low enough and also fulfill the other requirements?
At this point there is so little technical detail, and so much marketing hype, that this has to go under the heading of geek fantasy daydreaming. I'm going to ignore this one until they show some real results or publish specific enough information that someone not on their payroll can say that it's feasible.
Drawing a distinction between cybersecurity in the Federal government and cybersecurity in other large organizations is meaningless. The only thing that does is make it easier for any large organization to avoid accountability for their failures.
The US business community has been completely successful in avoiding any regulations on cybersecurity. The US Chamber of Commerce has defeated all attempts to define laws or national standards for computer business security. Instead we have some Presidential decrees that have minimal real world impact.
Since there are no standards, it is impossible to assign any responsibility when data breaches occur. The response consists of cover ups, minimizing the impact of the event, denial of responsibility (the word "unprecedented" is common), rhetoric on helping the victims and not letting it happen in the future.
After the public outcry dies down nothing is ever heard about it again. It might as well not have happened. No one is ever fired. No follow ups are made available to anyone outside the organization.
Additionally, those effected by the data leaks are given no support and have no recourse. Being offered free credit monitoring for a year, or even two, is like offering someone with potential HIV exposure a band-aid. The level off effort involved is grossly inadequate. The potential repercussions can happen years later.
If the corporation responsible doesn't know how much effect the breach had, how can they decide to come up policies that balance cost and benefits? The reason they do no follow up is because it provides them with iron clad cover from having to pick up the real cost of their failure. It also makes it a certainty it will happen again.
What I just described is exactly happened with the Sony leak. But it could just as easily be the leak that occurred at UCLA in the last couple of weeks, or any leak that made the national headlines in the last 20 years. In fact UCLA was hacked in 2012, so nothing has really changed.
The non-government situation is identical to government cases. The failure modes and responses are identical. This is unsurprising because the organizational issues, technical requirements and talent involved are the same. It is nonsensical to expect that one side of an arbitrary line will have one kind of behavior and the other side will be different. It's just not going to happen.
The other elephant is the room is that a huge percent of the work is not done by the government, but is done by private contractors. That is what happened with the OPM breach. This was reported when the story first came to light, but is now erased from the narrative. That is a part of the cover up. In fact there were two contractor breaches, one at KeyPoint Government Solutions and the other at USIS.
So what is necessary to address the problem? Legislation and regulation that specifically defines standards for data security for both the government and private sector. This has to include severe criminal and financial penalties if data breaches occur. Individuals should be held personally accountable, specifically those at the highest level of the organization. The penalties for failure affecting national security should at the level of treason; life sentences and even the death penalty.
What will actually happen?Nothing. All you need to do is look at Wall Street to see what will happen. The same companies, and even the same people (Jamie Dimon) who were personally responsible for the 2008 crash are doing better then ever, and continue with out and out criminal behavior. So far no one has been charged, much less put on trial. If you assume that your will not be allowed to withhold your personal information from the "business-government complex", it will be leaked, and you will be left completely vulnerable then you understand what is going on.
Well little buddy, the reason that we need an anti-neutrino detector is because Iran is full of bad guys, and like the bad guys in the old westerns they wear bad guy colors, like wearing a black hat. If they were good guys like us they would be wearing a good guy color, like a white hat.
But neutrinos don't have colors since they are leptons. Colors are photonic, and photons are bosons and have different statistics then leptons. Since neutrinos can't have color, the equivalent for bad guy leptons is that they are anti-neutrinos. Good guys have neutrinos, and bad guys have anti-neutrinos. It makes perfect sense once you understand the quantum mechanics involved.
People on Slashdot are always nice and are happy to answer any question you ask. Any time you are confused just ask and people here will be glad to help out. Now fuck off.
You are factually incorrect. Some GMO crops use genetic material from Bacillus thuringiensis which as it's name implies is a bacteria, not a vascular plant.
Bacillus thuringiensis (or Bt) is a Gram-positive, soil-dwelling bacterium, commonly used as a biological pesticide. B. thuringiensis also occurs naturally in the gut of caterpillars of various types of moths and butterflies, as well on leaf surfaces, aquatic environments, animal feces, insect-rich environments, and flour mills and grain-storage facilities.
During sporulation, many Bt strains produce crystal proteins (proteinaceous inclusions), called delta-endotoxins, that have insecticidal action. This has led to their use as insecticides, and more recently to genetically modified crops using Bt genes.
It doesn't make any difference how many right wing propaganda sources you quote since they are all incorrect. When you (or they) state flatly "no GMO food that ever makes it to your plate ever has genes from one organism transplanted to another" it not even close to the truth. A simple Wikipedia search is all that it takes to get the facts.
All the cursing and name calling in you rant makes you appear unhinged and delusional. Given that you are spouting lies as well it's obvious that a rational reader would ignore everything you say.
This makes me wonder. Perhaps your family history is unique, but as far as the rest of humanity is concerned Bacillus thuringiensis is not an organism found normally living with other bacteria in our gut. If your assertion is true then maybe you do have Bt genes or are a host to that organism. If so, when did you find out about the moth/butterfly lineage in your family tree. Please share with us the story about how you ancestors interbreed with insects.
Note: In case my response was too well written for you to understand, I will restate it in terms more suited to your limited capabilities: I called you a damn liar, said that anyone with sense should ignore you, and someone in your family tree was a bug fucker. Is that simple enough for you?
You are a good well trained peasant. When the King posts that you are forbidden to tread on his land, you will not trespass even if you are starving. If someone takes your property or you life in the name of the King, you will submit without complaint.
You gave up viewing yourself as a citizen in a democracy a long time ago, and you don't even miss it.
He mistake was assuming that he did not live in a totalitarian society.
In a totalitarian system the common person is always subject to the whims of those in a position of power, no matter how lowly. The individual is supposed to submit to any authority at any time no matter what the circumstance and what the demand. The full power of the state is imposed no matter how minimal the infraction. The only acceptable attitude is abject fear and paranoia. Anything else, like talking back, is immediate grounds for arrest or worse.
This case is only a matter of degree, not a matter of kind. The "community police officer" is in the same business as the religious police in Saudi Arabia or Iran, or authorities in North Korea or Putin's Russia.
The fact that is was done under the guise of a private company shows that this is a fascist regime. If it was done directly because he was "abstracting electricity" from the people then it would be a left wing totalitarian regime. That is the only difference.
What wrong assumption are you making about your society?
I assume you have never been outside the US. We are the exception, not the rule. Generally everyone else in the entire world takes public transportation and lives in multi-unit dwellings.
And guess what: they are not all living miserable live because of that. At least in Europe, their day to day lives are nicer then they are in the US. Not having to get in a car and get stuck in traffic is a GOOD THING. If you don't feel that way, I suggest that you move to LA and get a job that is a three hour commute one way. On a good day.
I'm sure that Siemens/AirBus can drive Pipistrel out of business. I doubt that Pipistrel has deep enough pockets to survive the kind of legal mugging that the big boys could dish out. Plus, Siemens could just refuse to sell them any more motors and that would set them a long ways back.
Welcome to our post capitalistic society. The law and the courts exist primarily to enforce the continued dominance of the entrenched players. Innovation and actual risk/reward capitalism are de facto prohibited activities, and engaging in this behavior is punishable by economic destruction, and possible criminal prosecution.
This seemed amusing, so I thought I would go over and check out the hardware and see what it could do. I wondered if it had any sensors.
Turns out that any technical information is completely buried. They have a whole bunch of cool pix, and lots of stuff they want to sell you, but if you want to find out what it can do then they are silent.
This leads me to the conclusion that it is more likely then not hype and marketing. Anyone who is proud of what they build will make it easy to get the specs and API info. They must figure that they can move a lot of merchandize because ROBOTS!!!
Why are you posting on Slashdot when you clearly should be living off the grid in a mud hut in the middle of nowhere. Even better, if you were in a mud hut off the grid we wouldn't have to put up with your drivel.
So if you're such a genius, what have you done recently that's as creative as this? (Sound of crickets...)
Did you bother to look at the video and see how he worked out the gear ratios? With a relatively small number of gears he managed to have a one in the denominator of the ratio equation and at the same time he made the numerator be 11,373,076. A design with those properties doesn't leap off the page the first time you try it. It's really hard.
He said it was compact for the extreme ratio. I'll bet if you tried to do something similar it would be a lot bigger, need a lot more gears, and might not even work. Care to prove me wrong? (Hint: no combination of worm gears comes even close.)
You're just another Slashdot Pundit, living in your parents basement and sneering at people who get stuff done in order to make up for the fact that you're utterly useless. Anyone with a life would never make such a stupid comment.
The core memory in the IBM 7302 was heated/cooled to stabilize its operating characteristics. Early units immersed the core stack in heated/cooled oil, later units called the IBM 7302A, blew heated/cooled air through the core stack.
I once herd a story from a real old timer about fixing these memories. When they were new there was a problem with small metal particles left over from manufacturing floating around and shorting out the core stacks. In those days IBM field engineers always wore white shirts and a tie. When they had to fix these things, they would take off their tie, but just leave their shirts on and pull the core out with their hands, because they knew that they would get covered in oil no matter what they did.
Don't underestimate the institutional and personal corruption factor. When the government outsources to contractors, there is an automatic revolving door between the government insiders and the contracting firms. The government workers put in their time at the relatively lower pay scale, and when they get out they just end up sitting on the other side of the same table at a much higher salary. Everybody knows how it works, and as long as nobody rocks the boat they get to retire with both a government pension and a second income and retirement plan.
In some areas it moves even faster and nobody waits for retirement. If you want to work on Wall Street with an MBA/law degree and you can't get in, just go work for a government regulator. Four of five years of that under your belt and you end up being hired by the same firms you used to regulate. It's possible that this route will pay as well as going directly to the private sector.
It's not as obvious as working with on project Z in government and then directly going to a contractor who works on Z, although that often happens. It's more that the contractors know they need to hire a certain number of people who have previous government managerial experience if they are going to make a credible bid for the job.
I've seen this in person working for military contractors. To even get considered you need to have retired officers of a certain rank. When it comes to the corporate level, the requirement is having generals on you board of directors, or in management. In one case I saw a general who had a big part in the Iraq war get on the board of directors because the company wanted to go over the billion dollar mark in sales. They were starting to compete with the big boys, and without "contacts" they knew they would never get their. As far as I know it worked.
After Iran sent chemical casualties to several Western nations for treatment, the UN dispatched a team of specialists to the area in 1984, and again in 1986 and 1987, to verify the claims. The conclusion from all three trips was the same: Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iranian troops. In addition, the second mission stressed that Iraq’s use of chemical weapons appeared to be increasing. The reports indicated that mustard and tabun were the primary agents used, and that they were generally delivered in bombs dropped by airplane. The third mission (the only one allowed to enter Iraq) also reported the use of artillery shells and chemical rockets and the use of chemical weapons against civilian personnel.
As part of Project 922, German firms such as Karl Kolb helped build Iraqi chemical weapons facilities such as laboratories, bunkers, an administrative building, and first production buildings in the early 1980s under the cover of a pesticide plant. Other German firms sent 1,027 tons of precursors of mustard gas, sarin, tabun, and tear gasses in all. This work allowed Iraq to produce 150 tons of mustard agent and 60 tons of Tabun in 1983 and 1984 respectively, continuing throughout the decade. All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin. One of the contributions was a £14m chlorine plant known as "Falluja 2", built by Uhde Ltd, a UK subsidiary of a German company; the plant was given financial guarantees by the UK's Export Credits Guarantee Department despite official UK recognition of a "strong possibility" the plant would be used to make mustard gas. The guarantees led to UK government payment of £300,000 to Uhde in 1990 after completion of the plant was interrupted by the first Gulf War. In 1994 and 1996 three people were convicted in Germany of export offenses.
France also provided glass-lined reactors, tanks, vessels, and columns used for the production of chemical weapons. Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French. 75,000 shells and rockets designed for chemical weapon use also came from Italy. About 100 tons of mustard gas also came from Brazil. The United States exported $500 million of dual use exports to Iraq that were approved by the Commerce Department. Among them were advanced computers, some of which were used in Iraq’s nuclear program. Austria also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales. Singapore gave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq. The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq. Egypt gave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions. India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses. Luxembourg gave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors. Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales. China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare.
So given this history, is it irrational for Iran to want to get the biggest baddest weapon of mass destruction they can, no matter what the cost? A rational cost analysis is irrelevant under these circumstances.
People invariably think that they are much better at multitasking then they really are. Every time someone does a controlled study they find out that interruptions have a profound impact on most peoples ability to function. It doesn'tmake any difference if the interruption is when you are online trying to complete a task or in a car and driving. Attention switch has an intrinsic cost.
I've know a few military aircraft pilots and they are the only people I would trust to use a cell phone while driving a car. And they don't do it because they know it is too dangerous. It's just not worth the risk.,
According to many legal experts, the driving force behind this change is an increase in prosecutorial power. Through the use of mandatory minimums and other sentencing enhancements, the power to sentence convicted defendants is passing from judges to prosecutors as legislators continue to pass laws that remove judges’ sentencing discretion but allow prosecutors to decide whether to charge defendants under harsh or more lenient statutes. The effect of these changes has been to increase the risk exposure of defendants going to trial, which creates a greater coercive effect for them to agree to plea bargains.
“Judges have lost discretion, and that discretion has accumulated in the hands of prosecutors, who now have the ultimate ability to shape the outcome,” stated University of Utah law professor Paul Cassell, who was formerly a conservative federal judge and prosecutor. “With mandatory minimums and other sentencing enhancements out there, prosecutors can often dictate the sentence that will be imposed.”
“We now have an incredible concentration of power in the hands of prosecutors,” noted former Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard E. Myers II, an associate professor of law at the University of North Carolina. He added that the scales of justice have been tipped so heavily in the prosecution’s favor that, “in the wrong hands, the criminal justice system can be held hostage.”
According to some experts this has already occurred, resulting in a dramatic reduction in the percentage of cases being tried by a jury. Since 1977 the ratio of federal criminal defendants who opt for a jury trial has decreased from one in four cases (25%) to one in thirty-two (about 3%).
So how many innocent people do you think our existing system will protect under these circumstances? "Your honor, the officers observed the suspect and with the same chin profile as captured in the video of the person we think left the crime scene. Genetic evidence and face recognition software shows that the accused has an identical chin. This objective scientific evidence refutes the biased testimony of the family and co-workers who claimed that the suspect was either at home or work when the crime occurred. If you let them free then you or your children will be the next victim of this horrific predator. The least we can do is give then 20 years to life. If they had any sense of guilt or remorse they would have taken our offer of five years in jail."
Think I am exaggerating? From the article:
One example is that of Orville Wollard of Polk County, Florida, who fired a handgun into the wall of his house to scare his daughter’s boyfriend into leaving. Wollard claimed that he was merely protecting his family from the boyfriend, whom he said was a violent drug dealer who had repeatedly threatened them. He also denied any intent to hurt the boyfriend. Therefore, he refused a plea bargain for five years of probation, and demanded a jury trial.
In 2009, Wollard was convicted of aggravated assault. Because the crime involved the discharge of a firearm he received a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years. In a sentencing hearing statement, Wollard said he felt like he was living in “some banana republic.” The judge sympathized, saying that were if not for the mandatory minimum he would impose a different sentence, but that he was “duty bound” to impose 20 years in prison.
Once a company (Comcast) has a worse consumer rating then the IRS, it's just about impossible to recover anybody's trust.
They dug themselves that hole over a course of decades, so they have the reputation that they deserve. The fact that they became one of the remaining five ISPs shows that when the business environment is monopolistic, the worst will be the survivors
If someone could wave a magic wand and have immediate competition in the ISP market (with lots of new players) Comcast wouldn't last six months because of their bad reputation. That is the way the system is supposed to work.
Remember ISP stands for Internet Service Provider. Comcast forget that.
Yes. If you're fed up (pun intended) with safe food and other consumables I suggest that you order the cheapest possible products directly from China. Unlike the commies here in the US, manufacturers there are mostly unencumbered by effective regulation, so anything goes. It's unregulated capitalism at it's finest:
Soy sauce made from human hair.
Poisonous alcohol made from industrial alcohol.
Counterfeit drugs, including antibiotics with a disinfectant as an ingredient.
Tainted meat from all kinds of animals: pork, beef, lamb and chicken, but also cat meat sold as rabbit, poisoned snails, and goat urine treated duck.
And always a big favorite: cooking oil filtered from sewage.
When you strongly regulate something the effects are negative for the consumer!
I have a friend who is retired and he makes stuff in his shop. Instead of buying hinges, he makes them himself out of raw metal stock. He enjoys the challenge.
If he was coding instead of making stuff from wood and metal, he would be using C++.
RIGA, Latvia — In a significant move to deter possible Russian aggression in Europe, the Pentagon is poised to store battle tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and other heavy weapons for as many as 5,000 American troops in several Baltic and Eastern European countries, American and allied officials say.
The proposal, if approved, would represent the first time since the end of the Cold War that the United States has stationed heavy military equipment in the newer NATO member nations in Eastern Europe that had once been part of the Soviet sphere of influence. Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the war in eastern Ukraine have caused alarm and prompted new military planning in NATO capitals.
Slashdot Mirror
There is collusion between the Mississippi AG and the MPAA. They are trying to interfere with Google's business. Google is involved in interstate commerce (duh). So there's a RICO case right there.
Anybody can initiate a RICO prosecution. The DOJ can always join the case if it wants to. Or not. In this situation there is a lot of disincentive for the DOJ to join: a large number of DOJ attorneys are planning on going to work for entities like the MPAA (lobbyists) and the recording/film industries when finish their relatively low paying stints with the government. Having the DOJ go after their future employers does not fit in with their personal plans.
Still, it would be highly amusing to watch Google go after the MPAA for conspiracy. That would make headlines outside of Slashdot. Ultimately I doubt it will happen. Even though they are more then willing to fight dirty, there is a higher level pact between big companies: don't do things that will reveal to the general population just how corrupt the system is. If people ever realize just how badly they are routinely screwed by the government/business complex, they might stop being sheep and start paying attention. That could be a disaster for big business. So it is really not likely to happen.
You hate the gubbment? They go someplace where there is no central authority. I suggest Somalia.
Otherwise, STFU. You are not just a freeloader, you are a damned parasite. You want all the perks, and none of the responsibility. If there was some way I could get you kicked out of the country I would. You don't deserve to be here.
The only thing you have on your mind is you hate seeing a black guy, or as you are really thinking, a n-----r in the White House.
So I'm going to ask you my rhetorical question: Do you keep your KKK robes in the closet where they won't get wrinkled but someone might see them, or do you fold them up and put them in a drawer where they will get wrinkled but it's less likely that people will see them.
Monsanto has a low profile among the general public, because very little of it's business is visible at the mass market consumer level. Although other B2B vendors, such as BASF, have tried to extend their brand awareness using national broadcast media, it is very unusual to see this level of activity in print advertising.
In off the record remarks by a person not authorized to talk to the press, the possibility was raised that this would not be the last media purchase of this kind. In part, it was stated that "If Monsanto can find the right kind of media partnerships, they would very much like to extend their brand awareness in a major US market, like New York, Los Angeles, or Texas." The key, according to the source, was not just selecting a major market, but "building long term relationships with print media organizations that can help Monsanto bring it's message to a wider audience."
The airframe is a lifting body with a large flat undercarriage. This is the side that absorbs microwave energy, which is somehow transferred to the hydrogen fuel to provides thrust. After achieving orbit and delivering it's payload, the spacecraft deorbits and then the same lifting body surface that absorbed microwave radiation becomes the heat shield for reentry.
So how do you combine the ability to receive a large amount of microwave energy and then turn around and protect the airframe from reentry heat in the same structure? And in addition has the structural integrity to withstand launch and reentry stresses.
Microwaves are not invisible magic. They interact with the matter they encounter. Whatever heat shield material they use, it is going to absorb some of the microwaves that hit the vehicle. Can they keep this amount low enough and also fulfill the other requirements?
At this point there is so little technical detail, and so much marketing hype, that this has to go under the heading of geek fantasy daydreaming. I'm going to ignore this one until they show some real results or publish specific enough information that someone not on their payroll can say that it's feasible.
The US business community has been completely successful in avoiding any regulations on cybersecurity. The US Chamber of Commerce has defeated all attempts to define laws or national standards for computer business security. Instead we have some Presidential decrees that have minimal real world impact.
Since there are no standards, it is impossible to assign any responsibility when data breaches occur. The response consists of cover ups, minimizing the impact of the event, denial of responsibility (the word "unprecedented" is common), rhetoric on helping the victims and not letting it happen in the future. After the public outcry dies down nothing is ever heard about it again. It might as well not have happened. No one is ever fired. No follow ups are made available to anyone outside the organization.
Additionally, those effected by the data leaks are given no support and have no recourse. Being offered free credit monitoring for a year, or even two, is like offering someone with potential HIV exposure a band-aid. The level off effort involved is grossly inadequate. The potential repercussions can happen years later. If the corporation responsible doesn't know how much effect the breach had, how can they decide to come up policies that balance cost and benefits? The reason they do no follow up is because it provides them with iron clad cover from having to pick up the real cost of their failure. It also makes it a certainty it will happen again.
What I just described is exactly happened with the Sony leak. But it could just as easily be the leak that occurred at UCLA in the last couple of weeks, or any leak that made the national headlines in the last 20 years. In fact UCLA was hacked in 2012, so nothing has really changed.
The non-government situation is identical to government cases. The failure modes and responses are identical. This is unsurprising because the organizational issues, technical requirements and talent involved are the same. It is nonsensical to expect that one side of an arbitrary line will have one kind of behavior and the other side will be different. It's just not going to happen.
The other elephant is the room is that a huge percent of the work is not done by the government, but is done by private contractors. That is what happened with the OPM breach. This was reported when the story first came to light, but is now erased from the narrative. That is a part of the cover up. In fact there were two contractor breaches, one at KeyPoint Government Solutions and the other at USIS.
So what is necessary to address the problem? Legislation and regulation that specifically defines standards for data security for both the government and private sector. This has to include severe criminal and financial penalties if data breaches occur. Individuals should be held personally accountable, specifically those at the highest level of the organization. The penalties for failure affecting national security should at the level of treason; life sentences and even the death penalty.
What will actually happen?Nothing. All you need to do is look at Wall Street to see what will happen. The same companies, and even the same people (Jamie Dimon) who were personally responsible for the 2008 crash are doing better then ever, and continue with out and out criminal behavior. So far no one has been charged, much less put on trial. If you assume that your will not be allowed to withhold your personal information from the "business-government complex", it will be leaked, and you will be left completely vulnerable then you understand what is going on.
But neutrinos don't have colors since they are leptons. Colors are photonic, and photons are bosons and have different statistics then leptons. Since neutrinos can't have color, the equivalent for bad guy leptons is that they are anti-neutrinos. Good guys have neutrinos, and bad guys have anti-neutrinos. It makes perfect sense once you understand the quantum mechanics involved.
People on Slashdot are always nice and are happy to answer any question you ask. Any time you are confused just ask and people here will be glad to help out. Now fuck off.
It doesn't make any difference how many right wing propaganda sources you quote since they are all incorrect. When you (or they) state flatly "no GMO food that ever makes it to your plate ever has genes from one organism transplanted to another" it not even close to the truth. A simple Wikipedia search is all that it takes to get the facts.
All the cursing and name calling in you rant makes you appear unhinged and delusional. Given that you are spouting lies as well it's obvious that a rational reader would ignore everything you say.
This makes me wonder. Perhaps your family history is unique, but as far as the rest of humanity is concerned Bacillus thuringiensis is not an organism found normally living with other bacteria in our gut. If your assertion is true then maybe you do have Bt genes or are a host to that organism. If so, when did you find out about the moth/butterfly lineage in your family tree. Please share with us the story about how you ancestors interbreed with insects.
Note: In case my response was too well written for you to understand, I will restate it in terms more suited to your limited capabilities: I called you a damn liar, said that anyone with sense should ignore you, and someone in your family tree was a bug fucker. Is that simple enough for you?
You gave up viewing yourself as a citizen in a democracy a long time ago, and you don't even miss it.
In a totalitarian system the common person is always subject to the whims of those in a position of power, no matter how lowly. The individual is supposed to submit to any authority at any time no matter what the circumstance and what the demand. The full power of the state is imposed no matter how minimal the infraction. The only acceptable attitude is abject fear and paranoia. Anything else, like talking back, is immediate grounds for arrest or worse.
This case is only a matter of degree, not a matter of kind. The "community police officer" is in the same business as the religious police in Saudi Arabia or Iran, or authorities in North Korea or Putin's Russia.
The fact that is was done under the guise of a private company shows that this is a fascist regime. If it was done directly because he was "abstracting electricity" from the people then it would be a left wing totalitarian regime. That is the only difference.
What wrong assumption are you making about your society?
And guess what: they are not all living miserable live because of that. At least in Europe, their day to day lives are nicer then they are in the US. Not having to get in a car and get stuck in traffic is a GOOD THING. If you don't feel that way, I suggest that you move to LA and get a job that is a three hour commute one way. On a good day.
Welcome to our post capitalistic society. The law and the courts exist primarily to enforce the continued dominance of the entrenched players. Innovation and actual risk/reward capitalism are de facto prohibited activities, and engaging in this behavior is punishable by economic destruction, and possible criminal prosecution.
Turns out that any technical information is completely buried. They have a whole bunch of cool pix, and lots of stuff they want to sell you, but if you want to find out what it can do then they are silent.
This leads me to the conclusion that it is more likely then not hype and marketing. Anyone who is proud of what they build will make it easy to get the specs and API info. They must figure that they can move a lot of merchandize because ROBOTS!!!
1 Sell it to the parents.
2 Let it sit on the shelf.
3 Profit!
Don't waste you time of this.
Why are you posting on Slashdot when you clearly should be living off the grid in a mud hut in the middle of nowhere. Even better, if you were in a mud hut off the grid we wouldn't have to put up with your drivel.
Did you bother to look at the video and see how he worked out the gear ratios? With a relatively small number of gears he managed to have a one in the denominator of the ratio equation and at the same time he made the numerator be 11,373,076. A design with those properties doesn't leap off the page the first time you try it. It's really hard.
He said it was compact for the extreme ratio. I'll bet if you tried to do something similar it would be a lot bigger, need a lot more gears, and might not even work. Care to prove me wrong? (Hint: no combination of worm gears comes even close.)
You're just another Slashdot Pundit, living in your parents basement and sneering at people who get stuff done in order to make up for the fact that you're utterly useless. Anyone with a life would never make such a stupid comment.
I once herd a story from a real old timer about fixing these memories. When they were new there was a problem with small metal particles left over from manufacturing floating around and shorting out the core stacks. In those days IBM field engineers always wore white shirts and a tie. When they had to fix these things, they would take off their tie, but just leave their shirts on and pull the core out with their hands, because they knew that they would get covered in oil no matter what they did.
In some areas it moves even faster and nobody waits for retirement. If you want to work on Wall Street with an MBA/law degree and you can't get in, just go work for a government regulator. Four of five years of that under your belt and you end up being hired by the same firms you used to regulate. It's possible that this route will pay as well as going directly to the private sector.
It's not as obvious as working with on project Z in government and then directly going to a contractor who works on Z, although that often happens. It's more that the contractors know they need to hire a certain number of people who have previous government managerial experience if they are going to make a credible bid for the job.
I've seen this in person working for military contractors. To even get considered you need to have retired officers of a certain rank. When it comes to the corporate level, the requirement is having generals on you board of directors, or in management. In one case I saw a general who had a big part in the Iraq war get on the board of directors because the company wanted to go over the billion dollar mark in sales. They were starting to compete with the big boys, and without "contacts" they knew they would never get their. As far as I know it worked.
How did they get this capability? Countries from all over the world helped them, including the US, France, England, Germany and China.
So given this history, is it irrational for Iran to want to get the biggest baddest weapon of mass destruction they can, no matter what the cost? A rational cost analysis is irrelevant under these circumstances.
A significant number of the world's major powers
People invariably think that they are much better at multitasking then they really are. Every time someone does a controlled study they find out that interruptions have a profound impact on most peoples ability to function. It doesn'tmake any difference if the interruption is when you are online trying to complete a task or in a car and driving. Attention switch has an intrinsic cost.
I've know a few military aircraft pilots and they are the only people I would trust to use a cell phone while driving a car. And they don't do it because they know it is too dangerous. It's just not worth the risk.,
Just wondering.
So how many innocent people do you think our existing system will protect under these circumstances? "Your honor, the officers observed the suspect and with the same chin profile as captured in the video of the person we think left the crime scene. Genetic evidence and face recognition software shows that the accused has an identical chin. This objective scientific evidence refutes the biased testimony of the family and co-workers who claimed that the suspect was either at home or work when the crime occurred. If you let them free then you or your children will be the next victim of this horrific predator. The least we can do is give then 20 years to life. If they had any sense of guilt or remorse they would have taken our offer of five years in jail."
Think I am exaggerating? From the article:
They dug themselves that hole over a course of decades, so they have the reputation that they deserve. The fact that they became one of the remaining five ISPs shows that when the business environment is monopolistic, the worst will be the survivors
If someone could wave a magic wand and have immediate competition in the ISP market (with lots of new players) Comcast wouldn't last six months because of their bad reputation. That is the way the system is supposed to work.
Remember ISP stands for Internet Service Provider. Comcast forget that.
Soy sauce made from human hair.
Poisonous alcohol made from industrial alcohol.
Counterfeit drugs, including antibiotics with a disinfectant as an ingredient.
Tainted meat from all kinds of animals: pork, beef, lamb and chicken, but also cat meat sold as rabbit, poisoned snails, and goat urine treated duck.
And always a big favorite: cooking oil filtered from sewage.
When you strongly regulate something the effects are negative for the consumer!
If he was coding instead of making stuff from wood and metal, he would be using C++.
Right now Europe is far more scared of the US going out of control than they are of Russia
You're absolutely right. That's why Europeans are asking that Russia predeploy heavy weapons in their territory in case of military actions.
Uhh, something is backwards about this...