It is already true that if a player requires medical treatment, the player will be taken off the field. And there are rules for when they can get back on, which is not usually a long time.
While there are increased delays, there were already delays. An extra 30ish seconds after the goal already went into the net, to see if it should be cancelled is not appreciably different than the arguing that is normal when a controversial call or non-call happens. At least now a ref can say shut up and I am going to look at the video with my own eyes.
As for real game stopping delays for reviewing general non-calls, they do not stop play for that. Rather the video is reviewed an the ref on the field is consulted once the next throw in or whatever break happens.
They only lacked the modern technology. The Stasi had plenty of intention, cleverness, and effort.
The Stasi created 'effing scent records on problematic people, just in case they might want to track you down with hounds some day. I am not kidding. You might sit on a bus seat one day. When you left the bus, a cloth would be place where it might absorb just a tiny tiny bit of that perspiration that leaked through your shirt. The cloth is popped into a sealed jar and carefully heat treated to stabilize the scent, labelled, filed on a shelf. Then two years later, when you run for it out of fear of arrest, your stored scent is pulled off the shelf to prime the tracking dogs.
Of course, the movie The Circle shows us how actual canines are probably no longer necessary.
Some people are willing to pay a modest premium to do less IT work -- that may be a sound strategy for getting more value for their hard-earned dollars, even if the end cost is slightly higher. Applied judiciously, that is what smart and rich people do.
I do not doubt some people do pick their consumer electronics for fashion reasons, but jumping to that conclusion is a very superficial way of thinking.
The claim is just marketing, and the literal details are no more important that the implied promises that the right beer will get gorgeous bikini-clad women to dance with you.
What Apple sells are computers that are less difficult for non-techies to feel comfortable on, while messaging it as a luxury item for the common man. Clever that.
Mind you, that does not mean techies do not like Apple products for good (or bad) reasons, too.
The basic issue is that 2001 is "an art movie", meaning you are supposed to pay close attention, think pretty hard about what you are seeing, and maybe you love it, maybe you hate, not likely to be anywhere in between. That is how it is.
And, no, I am not trying to insinuate there is anything wrong with you if you hated it. Art movies are often underplot, and that is arduous for some people, who are perfectly right to say that is not how they want to spend their free time. I personally like many art movies, but, for example, turned off both Glengarry Glen Ross and Monsters Ball, because I had no interest in spending my free time with such horribly unpleasant people.
I guess the problem was this was seriously groundbreaking, so Kubrick was speaking a totally new language. I first saw it 10 years after its release, so it was probably less challenging by then.
"New language" is the right way to think of it. Sometimes a particular message needs a new set of symbology to describe it within the medium.
A kooky example would be of such would be Moulin Rouge! . That movie hurt my head for the first 10-15 minutes, then something clicked in place and got it -- it is really an ingenious and innovation melodrama (that is perhaps not for everyone). The movie successfully established a kind of "new language" where the story could be told. Another kooky example where the director fell flat was Xanadu; IMNSHO, it could have been a successful surreal/melodrama but utterly flopped (at points) because the storytelling techniques were too conventional to carry an abstract theme.
I do not consider gmail particularly groundbreaking. It is only an evolutionary change in what came before. Outlook and Yahoo mail did cover this space pretty effectively. Google gave us something similar and a little easier to use for free. A lot of people do not use the search function much at all -- we delete old mail.
Phones were only well understood in terms of making phone calls, not anything else. Which is why Palm got caught with its pants down. iPhones were innovative for making your phone very very good at things other than phone calls, being a simple music player, and a bad calendar.
I suspect the value for ridesharing will tend to be greater in households. Maybe they do not give up having a car, but do give up on having a second (or third) vehicle.
You gave you straw man "can only harm the economy" a shellacking it will never forget.
But real people are skeptical for good reasons. A little trade war is vastly more likely to cause harm in both the short and medium terms overall, and the theoretical advantages over the long term could easily fail to ever measurably materialize other than is some small economic silos whose gains will be outweighed by the negatives.
As for the economy, a lot of people woke up in January 2017 to discover the economy was pretty good, the moment they could see the color of the president's skin did not give them the willies.
There is a bias in the data based on shifts in expectations. When the economy was roaring back in the 50s and 60s, nobody cared if principals pushed out some young people who were performing poorly, because most 16 year old men could find work and many women chose to get married at a young age.
It sure sounds bad if you say "20% of our HS graduates do not know crap" . But if you said "30% of our 18 years olds did not know crap in academic subjects back in 1960, and it is pretty much the same now" conclusions people jump to would be rather different. Sure, giving someone a diploma who does not know crap is not exactly a good thing, but why it is bad is a more nuanced topic then pretending that schools decided to be lousier than ever for fun.
Of course, those stats I just made up. Making the apples to apples comparison is difficult. The PISA scores are evidence, at least that strong negative conclusions are not supported.
There was a time circa 2014 that the protocol bounty dropped too low relative to real world prices, and you could not get a transaction processed in a timely manner without ponying up a bounty out of your own wallet. This is a factual scenario that already happened. Big miners did not go away, they just became pickier.
This scenario will happen again, but the big run up in Bitcoin prices pushed it into the future.
Of course, it is possible that Bitcoin value collapses in the future, which might drive away all miners. But that would not be the kind of accomplishment in democracy I think you are thinking of.
No, the big miners move to greener pastures to build up their crypto muscle with more and newer rigs. Then someone figures out that their old rigs may no longer be economically viable to run in the big leagues, but they are powerful enough to rape and pillage these hobbyist networks run by many individuals.
In the USA, it is not difficult to set up a homeschool and avoid vaccinations, although the details vary state to state. So, in fact, the reality you are proposing already exists, for those who choose to partake in your better world.
No one is complaining about people with identified specific medical risks avoiding the vaccines. That is a red herring.
In fact, it is because of such people that it is very important for almost all of us to get vaccinated. There are a few people for whom vaccinations are too risky. There are a few people for whom the vaccines just do not work. Getting vaccinated protects them.
From a purely self-centered selfish point of view, it is not necessarily a big win for the individual to get, say, a flu vaccine. But if it so happens that you have any family or friends you care about, the chance that you not getting sick multiplied by the number of people you may have avoiding passing the disease to is a very big win. You are not an island, especially if you have children.
Chicken pox vaccine did not seem so important to mandate because very very few school aged children die or get seriously ill from it. However mandatory chicken pox vaccinations have significantly decreased the overall mortality rate of 0-4 year olds. It is not necessarily about you, but about who you get sick after you catch something.
I can see both sides. There may be classes/training that is necessary to achieve a promotion that comes with a raise; if so, perhaps such is fair. But, yes, in general, I do not see it as appropriate to shackle an employee with fake debt to keep his or her job -- I can see how that could be horrendously gamed.
It takes some serious expertise backed by a boatload of work to sell something that would pass muster with the FDA and not draw the wrath of the AMA to kill it. It can be done, but it takes more than a flashy publicity stunt. You have to start with some means of helping doctor do what they already are doing better. IBM does not know health care, so that is a lot of expertise that would need to be built up.
Yes, it is like Agile insofar as a new perspective gives you useful tools for getting out of your rut. But if you love your rut, both Agile and meditation will not prevent you from recreating your old dysfunctional habits. (Where "you" perhaps is really "your company".)
As a practical matter, consultants can bring some value. But the cynical might guess that the advantage is, with enough money thrown at the problem, actual managers responsible for making key bad decisions in the past might show up to a class and accidentally learn something.
The alleged perp claims he is a whistleblower, and that is a plausible though not necessarily to be trusted story. Even if that is sincere, Musk cannot assume there is truth in such assertions. It is likely at this point the Musk has sufficient evidence that lots of data have been sent...somewhere.
Is the intended or actual destination something "innocent" like some investigative journalists? Is the alleged perp getting paid for that? Are there other third parties willing pay? Are there any deals in the works to get a little sugar from shortsellers with timely trades when the news is about to hit the street?
Musk does not know and should not be satisfied by assertions of the alleged perp. The reasonable answer is, in fact, to use the full force of the employee NDA and legal system to get a look at all the personal electronic devices of this person.
I am not going to jump to any to conclusions. But Musk should not either. Lawyering up is a reasonable way to find out the truth here. What should even a non-evil CEO do?
Which makes sense because individual components may (or may not) need careful climate control for manufacture, but if the assembly of the whole vehicle is so fussy that cleanish non-wet conditions can be a problem, then those components probably have no business in a car that must survive weather.
Which is why a "discount" for being willing to wait makes for sense for Uber. "The same fast service costs you a premium charge" will cause anger while "discount off the usual already fair price, if you wait a bit" will gain kudos.
I agree it is amazing overthinking here. All this study shows it that bees can be trained to understand negative correlations, e.g. fewer of these symbols is good. Until the bees demonstrate that they know zero is more than negative one, I think it is a big joke.
Yes, that is why we need a reasonable and practical concept of fair use.
While it sometimes does negatively impact the copyrights owners, the actual net for fair use is often positive because all publicity is good publicity in the world of entertainment.
Slashdot Mirror
It is already true that if a player requires medical treatment, the player will be taken off the field. And there are rules for when they can get back on, which is not usually a long time.
While there are increased delays, there were already delays. An extra 30ish seconds after the goal already went into the net, to see if it should be cancelled is not appreciably different than the arguing that is normal when a controversial call or non-call happens. At least now a ref can say shut up and I am going to look at the video with my own eyes.
As for real game stopping delays for reviewing general non-calls, they do not stop play for that. Rather the video is reviewed an the ref on the field is consulted once the next throw in or whatever break happens.
They only lacked the modern technology. The Stasi had plenty of intention, cleverness, and effort.
The Stasi created 'effing scent records on problematic people, just in case they might want to track you down with hounds some day. I am not kidding. You might sit on a bus seat one day. When you left the bus, a cloth would be place where it might absorb just a tiny tiny bit of that perspiration that leaked through your shirt. The cloth is popped into a sealed jar and carefully heat treated to stabilize the scent, labelled, filed on a shelf. Then two years later, when you run for it out of fear of arrest, your stored scent is pulled off the shelf to prime the tracking dogs.
Of course, the movie The Circle shows us how actual canines are probably no longer necessary.
No worry -- based on what you said, it sounds like you saw the same movie I did . ;)
An opera built on pop music is not for everyone. An opera built on a frenetic hodgepodge of pop music is definitely not for everyone.
Some people are willing to pay a modest premium to do less IT work -- that may be a sound strategy for getting more value for their hard-earned dollars, even if the end cost is slightly higher. Applied judiciously, that is what smart and rich people do.
I do not doubt some people do pick their consumer electronics for fashion reasons, but jumping to that conclusion is a very superficial way of thinking.
The claim is just marketing, and the literal details are no more important that the implied promises that the right beer will get gorgeous bikini-clad women to dance with you.
What Apple sells are computers that are less difficult for non-techies to feel comfortable on, while messaging it as a luxury item for the common man. Clever that.
Mind you, that does not mean techies do not like Apple products for good (or bad) reasons, too.
The basic issue is that 2001 is "an art movie", meaning you are supposed to pay close attention, think pretty hard about what you are seeing, and maybe you love it, maybe you hate, not likely to be anywhere in between. That is how it is.
And, no, I am not trying to insinuate there is anything wrong with you if you hated it. Art movies are often underplot, and that is arduous for some people, who are perfectly right to say that is not how they want to spend their free time. I personally like many art movies, but, for example, turned off both Glengarry Glen Ross and Monsters Ball, because I had no interest in spending my free time with such horribly unpleasant people.
I guess the problem was this was seriously groundbreaking, so Kubrick was speaking a totally new language. I first saw it 10 years after its release, so it was probably less challenging by then.
"New language" is the right way to think of it. Sometimes a particular message needs a new set of symbology to describe it within the medium.
A kooky example would be of such would be Moulin Rouge! . That movie hurt my head for the first 10-15 minutes, then something clicked in place and got it -- it is really an ingenious and innovation melodrama (that is perhaps not for everyone). The movie successfully established a kind of "new language" where the story could be told. Another kooky example where the director fell flat was Xanadu; IMNSHO, it could have been a successful surreal/melodrama but utterly flopped (at points) because the storytelling techniques were too conventional to carry an abstract theme.
Yet Kubrick's explanation is 99% exactly what I expected, so I understood the movie as intended the first time through.
That does not make the people who do not see the clothes as dumb, of course.
I disagree.
I do not consider gmail particularly groundbreaking. It is only an evolutionary change in what came before. Outlook and Yahoo mail did cover this space pretty effectively. Google gave us something similar and a little easier to use for free. A lot of people do not use the search function much at all -- we delete old mail.
Phones were only well understood in terms of making phone calls, not anything else. Which is why Palm got caught with its pants down. iPhones were innovative for making your phone very very good at things other than phone calls, being a simple music player, and a bad calendar.
Is FB still a thing? I do not care. ;)
I suspect the value for ridesharing will tend to be greater in households. Maybe they do not give up having a car, but do give up on having a second (or third) vehicle.
You gave you straw man "can only harm the economy" a shellacking it will never forget.
But real people are skeptical for good reasons. A little trade war is vastly more likely to cause harm in both the short and medium terms overall, and the theoretical advantages over the long term could easily fail to ever measurably materialize other than is some small economic silos whose gains will be outweighed by the negatives.
As for the economy, a lot of people woke up in January 2017 to discover the economy was pretty good, the moment they could see the color of the president's skin did not give them the willies.
There is a bias in the data based on shifts in expectations. When the economy was roaring back in the 50s and 60s, nobody cared if principals pushed out some young people who were performing poorly, because most 16 year old men could find work and many women chose to get married at a young age.
It sure sounds bad if you say "20% of our HS graduates do not know crap" . But if you said "30% of our 18 years olds did not know crap in academic subjects back in 1960, and it is pretty much the same now" conclusions people jump to would be rather different. Sure, giving someone a diploma who does not know crap is not exactly a good thing, but why it is bad is a more nuanced topic then pretending that schools decided to be lousier than ever for fun.
Of course, those stats I just made up. Making the apples to apples comparison is difficult. The PISA scores are evidence, at least that strong negative conclusions are not supported.
There was a time circa 2014 that the protocol bounty dropped too low relative to real world prices, and you could not get a transaction processed in a timely manner without ponying up a bounty out of your own wallet. This is a factual scenario that already happened. Big miners did not go away, they just became pickier.
This scenario will happen again, but the big run up in Bitcoin prices pushed it into the future.
Of course, it is possible that Bitcoin value collapses in the future, which might drive away all miners. But that would not be the kind of accomplishment in democracy I think you are thinking of.
No, the big miners move to greener pastures to build up their crypto muscle with more and newer rigs. Then someone figures out that their old rigs may no longer be economically viable to run in the big leagues, but they are powerful enough to rape and pillage these hobbyist networks run by many individuals.
In the USA, it is not difficult to set up a homeschool and avoid vaccinations, although the details vary state to state. So, in fact, the reality you are proposing already exists, for those who choose to partake in your better world.
No one is complaining about people with identified specific medical risks avoiding the vaccines. That is a red herring.
In fact, it is because of such people that it is very important for almost all of us to get vaccinated. There are a few people for whom vaccinations are too risky. There are a few people for whom the vaccines just do not work. Getting vaccinated protects them.
From a purely self-centered selfish point of view, it is not necessarily a big win for the individual to get, say, a flu vaccine. But if it so happens that you have any family or friends you care about, the chance that you not getting sick multiplied by the number of people you may have avoiding passing the disease to is a very big win. You are not an island, especially if you have children.
Chicken pox vaccine did not seem so important to mandate because very very few school aged children die or get seriously ill from it. However mandatory chicken pox vaccinations have significantly decreased the overall mortality rate of 0-4 year olds. It is not necessarily about you, but about who you get sick after you catch something.
I can see both sides. There may be classes/training that is necessary to achieve a promotion that comes with a raise; if so, perhaps such is fair. But, yes, in general, I do not see it as appropriate to shackle an employee with fake debt to keep his or her job -- I can see how that could be horrendously gamed.
It takes some serious expertise backed by a boatload of work to sell something that would pass muster with the FDA and not draw the wrath of the AMA to kill it. It can be done, but it takes more than a flashy publicity stunt. You have to start with some means of helping doctor do what they already are doing better. IBM does not know health care, so that is a lot of expertise that would need to be built up.
LOL
Yes, it is like Agile insofar as a new perspective gives you useful tools for getting out of your rut. But if you love your rut, both Agile and meditation will not prevent you from recreating your old dysfunctional habits. (Where "you" perhaps is really "your company".)
As a practical matter, consultants can bring some value. But the cynical might guess that the advantage is, with enough money thrown at the problem, actual managers responsible for making key bad decisions in the past might show up to a class and accidentally learn something.
The alleged perp claims he is a whistleblower, and that is a plausible though not necessarily to be trusted story. Even if that is sincere, Musk cannot assume there is truth in such assertions. It is likely at this point the Musk has sufficient evidence that lots of data have been sent...somewhere.
Is the intended or actual destination something "innocent" like some investigative journalists? Is the alleged perp getting paid for that? Are there other third parties willing pay? Are there any deals in the works to get a little sugar from shortsellers with timely trades when the news is about to hit the street?
Musk does not know and should not be satisfied by assertions of the alleged perp. The reasonable answer is, in fact, to use the full force of the employee NDA and legal system to get a look at all the personal electronic devices of this person.
I am not going to jump to any to conclusions. But Musk should not either. Lawyering up is a reasonable way to find out the truth here. What should even a non-evil CEO do?
Which makes sense because individual components may (or may not) need careful climate control for manufacture, but if the assembly of the whole vehicle is so fussy that cleanish non-wet conditions can be a problem, then those components probably have no business in a car that must survive weather.
Which is why a "discount" for being willing to wait makes for sense for Uber. "The same fast service costs you a premium charge" will cause anger while "discount off the usual already fair price, if you wait a bit" will gain kudos.
I agree it is amazing overthinking here. All this study shows it that bees can be trained to understand negative correlations, e.g. fewer of these symbols is good. Until the bees demonstrate that they know zero is more than negative one, I think it is a big joke.
Yes, that is why we need a reasonable and practical concept of fair use.
While it sometimes does negatively impact the copyrights owners, the actual net for fair use is often positive because all publicity is good publicity in the world of entertainment.