I consider myself pretty good with computer security. I even have a honeypot installed on my computer. To lure the crackers in, you must make it very easy to get into the honeypot. This all seems too easy...
I don't think its a good idea for anybody to be jumping to conclusions about what his e-mail gets. That webmail account may have been created for the purpose of luring in crackers working for the US government. They may just forward all the junk and non-secret mail there.
If you resize the image, you get a different hash, but with this, you still get the authentication. And then when you have portions of the image changed you can tell what portions are changed... From what I can tell this is just a special "image hashing" and not Steganography at all.
There's already a freeware version called smbclient. You can get it from samba.org. Why pay $700? Knowing this, you can see that spammers can get a hold of a tool like this for little money.
I'm also suprised somebody hasn't thought of this yet... With all those spammers trying to get by all the filters and everything...
I wonder when they will make something like "why I switched from Linux to FreeBSD." (or vice versa if that suits you... I'm a linux person.)
Re:Blender would be better accepted with a better
on
Blender Is GPL
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
This is redundant, but....
Blender has a pretty easy GUI compared to some of the other ones out there. Once you get the basics down its very easy. It *is* a one hand on keyboard, one hand on mouse kinda deal, but its just as complicated as say...maya.
I too was once in a position of confusion... But then I went out to my local library and actually got a book on blender. The first chapter gave me a boost and I figuered out the rest on my own. Try it.
blender.org not really slashdotted
on
Blender Is GPL
·
· Score: 0
I was trying to view it before it was on slashdot and I got "too many connections" errors.
Yeah, this is pretty cool, but could it be adopted for CB or ham radio? Also, as things start to get digital, would you start getting copy protection, etc? That would be bad.
As long as I have my non-commercially corrupt Debian, I'm fine.
Actually, I do have respect for Red Hat. They have by far the easiest distribution to set up, (my opinion, not a diss off) and I guess growing into a big company would worry people, and I think there should be some concern for making sure RedHat stays geeky and pure, but so far they have not forced you to use anything of theirs, for example you have choice between Tux and Apache.
Slashdot Mirror
look
What are those for and are we allowed to play with them?
Doesn't Alicebot already have an option in its java GUI where you can make it talk to it self?
I remember doing this...why would I need a perl script?
We all know Lindows stinks like dead rotten fish, so how about one running Red Hat or maybe Debian, or another good linux distro... but Lindows?!?
The question is....
Did they rename another web browser to Galeon like they did with the word processor, or is it really Galeon?
Or is microsoft focusing on UI only.
I don't see any new features that are not GUI. Just new looks...
I consider myself pretty good with computer security. I even have a honeypot installed on my computer. To lure the crackers in, you must make it very easy to get into the honeypot. This all seems too easy...
I don't think its a good idea for anybody to be jumping to conclusions about what his e-mail gets. That webmail account may have been created for the purpose of luring in crackers working for the US government. They may just forward all the junk and non-secret mail there.
Of course I could be completely wrong...but...
If you resize the image, you get a different hash, but with this, you still get the authentication. And then when you have portions of the image changed you can tell what portions are changed... From what I can tell this is just a special "image hashing" and not Steganography at all.
Of course, I could be completely wrong.
This is a JavaScript (or maybe a VBScript.)
The window says its coming from Internet Explorer.
There's already a freeware version called smbclient. You can get it from samba.org. Why pay $700? Knowing this, you can see that spammers can get a hold of a tool like this for little money.
I'm also suprised somebody hasn't thought of this yet... With all those spammers trying to get by all the filters and everything...
i stand corrected. wow. come to think of it, that assumption was really stupid.
Thats what watching 50 hours of UHF over and over again will do to you.
all the dishonesty.... its legal.
they never made any connection from the woman to the article, they just placed it on the same page and hinted that she was writing it.
(of course, i'm not a lawyer. so i could be 100% wrong.)
I wonder when they will make something like "why I switched from Linux to FreeBSD." (or vice versa if that suits you... I'm a linux person.)
This is redundant, but....
Blender has a pretty easy GUI compared to some of the other ones out there. Once you get the basics down its very easy. It *is* a one hand on keyboard, one hand on mouse kinda deal, but its just as complicated as say...maya.
I too was once in a position of confusion... But then I went out to my local library and actually got a book on blender. The first chapter gave me a boost and I figuered out the rest on my own. Try it.
I was trying to view it before it was on slashdot and I got "too many connections" errors.
Yeah, this is pretty cool, but could it be adopted for CB or ham radio? Also, as things start to get digital, would you start getting copy protection, etc? That would be bad.
first post
thats the anthem, get your score not up!
xscreensaver and the bsod screensaver comes standred on most linux distros. :)
2nd post
Its too early to find a google cache. Google updates once a month.
O contrare, capi-tan!
I think this is a great opprotunity for the good OGGs we all love and cherish.
You weren't using your thumbs were you?
Hold the Zaurus with both hands, then use your thumbs like its a gameboy.
Works really nicely.
nuff said
Red Hat, bahhh...
UnitedLinux, bahhh...
As long as I have my non-commercially corrupt Debian, I'm fine.
Actually, I do have respect for Red Hat. They have by far the easiest distribution to set up, (my opinion, not a diss off) and I guess growing into a big company would worry people, and I think there should be some concern for making sure RedHat stays geeky and pure, but so far they have not forced you to use anything of theirs, for example you have choice between Tux and Apache.