Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft PR Rep is the Switcher

Here's a followup to our earlier story about Microsoft's "inverse switch" campaign. The AP tracked down the switcher and spoke with her: she's an employee at a Microsoft public relations firm but says she actually did switch from Mac to Windows. Microsoft's page is still 404 (but Google's cache still works). The interesting part to me is that the AP "tracked Mallinson by examining personal data hidden within documents that Microsoft had published with its controversial ad." Hmmmmmm. (Kudos to obidonn, the first to demonstrate the use of a stock photo, which piqued interest in this story. As of noon EDT Oct. 15, other stock photos are still being used in anonymous Microsoft "testimonials.")

737 comments

  1. Google cache still works? by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe Microsoft will follow the Church of Scientology and try to get them to remove the page from their cache. They certainly have the resources to enforce any threat they could make.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    1. Re:Google cache still works? by timster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, this case would be Microsoft asking google to remove a _Microsoft-owned_ page from the cache, and has no correlation to the Scientology effort to remove other people's pages.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    2. Re:Google cache still works? by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Microsoft just wants to ignore this until it goes away. Further actions that would end up in the news would not be in their best interest. By tomorrow most people will have forgotten about it, except the thousands of slashdot users that will make references to it anytime a MS article is posted for the next 2 years.

    3. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't think of cache as copyright infringement, think of cache as using a time machine and probing a web server *in the past* and returning the result. As far as I know using a time machine isn't illegal.

    4. Re:Google cache still works? by Duckz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wouldn't it be funny if they did ask/sue google.com for having that cache link and google responded by not caching or indexing any of microsoft.com's pages?

    5. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but what about the cache i saved on my computer. rofl

    6. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, but isn't it a testimonial from an independent person? She must own the copyright, not Microsoft, right?

    7. Re:Google cache still works? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2

      Would anyone really miss that?
      I guess I wouldn't know since everytime I search at Google, I never see anything from Microsoft.
      Must be that one keyword I always use.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    8. Re:Google cache still works? by neuroticia · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      *laughs* Why did MS do something this dumb? I know TONS of people who would do the ad, put their name and face on the damned thing, and have it be real.

      "I always wanted to build my own computer." "I wanted a professional quality video card, something Apple just hasn't offered us." "My eyes are very important to me, so the blue-white schema of OS X just had to go."

      I'd do it, but I'm originally a PC user who switched to a Mac for a couple of years loved it, upgraded to OS X, then switched back. =]

      -Sara

    9. Re:Google cache still works? by buck_wild · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ignoring it must work, 'cause gee, who remembers Microsoft 'Bob'?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    10. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      lol. Mod parent up!

    11. Re:Google cache still works? by br0ck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First they'll have to remove the story from their own site! It's always great when MSNBC mentions Slashdot. The story is currently number nine on the Yahoo! most viewed news page. A lot of people are going to be reading this story tomorrow.</grin>

    12. Re:Google cache still works? by buck_wild · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoa. I'd get that checked out, buddy!

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    13. Re:Google cache still works? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      google is the only way to actually _find_ something you happen to _need_ from the microsoft.com. their own system is a b*tch and constantly changing anyways.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:Google cache still works? by mirko · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mentionthat, a few weeks ago, entering go.to.hell in Google.com would give you Microsoft and AOL among the firsts...
      But now, well.... Seems that Google has modified something.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    15. Re:Google cache still works? by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      I'd do it, but I'm originally a PC user who switched to a Mac for a couple of years loved it, upgraded to OS X, then switched back. =]

      ALERT Waagner Egstrom (the company that does PR work for Microsoft): Here is someone looking for work from you! ;o)

      OK. I have noticied that your comments seem to be somewhat pro-Microsoft so I am saying that in jest ;o)

      But hey. what do I know-- I switched my parents to Linux in the days of Red Hat 6.1 ;)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    16. Re:Google cache still works? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      I'd switch my mom to Linux, but after the whole "I deleted my modem" fiasco with her and my sister a year or two ago, I've sworn off tech support for family members. =]That, and the whole concept of "Downloading it to my computer" "Oh, you downloaded it off the internet?" "No, I typed it in from the article I saw in the newspaper" "Err. Mom, that's not downloading."

      It's not so much that I'm pro-microsoft (I'll laugh until I cry if someone suggests using it as a server--which should be interesting, seeing as I'm scheduled for more MCSE training sometime this fall. :p) It's more that I'm not Pro-Apple anymore. ::shrugs::

      Put me on a Linux box with a non-Redhat-modified-KDE, and I'm a happy girl. Otherwise gimme WinXP on a fast Athlon.

      -Sara

    17. Re:Google cache still works? by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Off topic but just a reply to the parent post.

      I respect your opinions but understand this--

      My parents had a Windows 95 system which would break at least once a month, and my parents would need additional tech support at least another time every month. So every couple weeks, I would have to drive over to my parents' house and fix their system or help them over the phone. This was fine when I was studying for my A+ cert, but when I started going on to the MCSE and LPIC exams it became a problem.

      So I built them a new computer and put RedHat 6.1 on it. I carefully placed icons on the desktop so they could get to Netscape, KMail, KPPP, and StarOffice, and gave them a 5 min. tour of GNOME. Now they are on RedHat 7.2, but are using KDE because GNOME crashed. They still call me for tech support when something actually breaks, but hey, they don't know what root is for, so that doesn't happen very often ;) In fact the last two times were due to hardware failure.

      And as much as I love RH8, the homogeneity of KDE and GNOME is a bit of an issue I admit :P Looks good on paper until you think you are in one and are in the other, and there is some little tiny difference that is preventing you from getting something done...

      But regarding MCSE, I still consider it to have been very helpful in my technical development (because I only used braindumps on one exam). If you study for it well, you CAN get something out of it (aside from the Network Infrastructure exam, where some of the networks look like they were designed by a 5-year old). In fact I think it is an excelent compliment to the LPIC exams (I am MCSE and LPIC-2 certified).

      Good Luck!

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    18. Re:Google cache still works? by Misch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No! Scientology would never doctor photos to make people appear that really weren't there!

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    19. Re:Google cache still works? by cscx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, the "amateur sleuths" from Slashdot are right on top of it! Get your detectives' caps and your magnifying glasses, gentlemen!

      Kinda makes you feel like the Hardy Boys, doesn't it?

    20. Re:Google cache still works? by rjung2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why did MS do something this dumb?

      Because Microsoft leadership is a bunch of arrogant pricks who think that they're oh-so-brilliantly superior to the rest of the world, and thus believe they can pull a stunt like this and get away with it.

      Remember the doctored MS videotape in the antitrust trial that "proved" removing IE from Windows would seriously impact its peerformance? Same thing -- Microsoft figures, "hey, you're all morons, you'll believe whatever we tell you," and they get caught with their shorts down when a thinking audience shreds their efforts.

      Of course, it must work to some degree -- those Winlot zombies trolling the boards aren't being created out of thin air...

    21. Re:Google cache still works? by hype7 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I think Microsoft just wants to ignore this until it goes away. Further actions that would end up in the news would not be in their best interest.


      Yeah, I can just see tomorrow's version of this story:
      ""The AP tracked down the switcher and spoke with her: she's an employee at a Microsoft public relations firm, but she says she actually did switch from Mac to Windows after MS offered her free hardware, and threatened the PR firm with loss of contract in the event she contradicted their fake story.

      After threats of termination of job, and physical harm against her family, Mallison relented and agreed to corroborate the article."


      -- james
    22. Re:Google cache still works? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So we've simply got to prove to them that you're not ignoring it to run salt into their wounds.

      They do have a website feedback page, and they promise a response within 24 hours.
      It's been 12 hours so far since they received this from me:
      {{{
      Why did you remove the "switch" testimonial?

      The story about that female writer (with the unfortunate name Don Funk according to that dialog box demonstrating how easy it was for her to do things in XP) who switched from Mac to XP was most interesting, but magically disappeared when I was half-way through reading it (I was going 'back' and 'forward' in the browser, which seemed to cause the page to reload)?
      }}}

      If they do reply, I'll post it here, and if they don't I'll write another one, asking why they also break promises about reply times.

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    23. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You mean comments similar to "Is it Real or is it Microsoft?" ?

      Like that?

      Heh.

      SB

    24. Re:Google cache still works? by DJPenguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually... the Temporal Billenium Timeline Act of 2533 _does_ make time travel illegal for the purposes of copyright :)

    25. Re:Google cache still works? by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
      No kidding... this is pretty clumsy of Microsoft.

      What I'm wondering is if anyone put this much effort into debunking Apple's Switch ads, or if the parodies mockeries were viewed as enough?

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    26. Re:Google cache still works? by Arcturax · · Score: 2

      This is why Microsoft is smarter than the "Church" of $cientology.

      The Co$ would find that if they ignored their detractors, they would still find just as many dumb fools to con and save a lot in legal costs.

      Hell, its certainly working for M$, they ignore bad press and get fools who switch from Unix to Windows all the time.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    27. Re:Google cache still works? by neuroticia · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Heh. One guy pointed out that iPhoto (Or whatever the name of the software was) wasn't released until after Christmas, so that lady who saved Christmas couldn't possibly have used THAT to save Christmas, but then admitted that there were some other options around at the time, so he wasn't necessarily calling her a fake.

      It was the same guy that said the Switch ads were doing network admins a *great* disservice by saying that hooking up several Macs was "networking" and it was "easy", because it devalues the profession, and he'd like to see that person plan out a larger LAN, or a WAN with multiple OSes, email, dns servers, etc. etc.

      I think the fact that the Apple ads are fluff, and that no one who knows anything about each individual topic will take them as more than "consumer" is enough.

      -Sara

    28. Re:Google cache still works? by BBI+Capslock · · Score: 1

      Don't count on any reply at all. I asked them why their new redesign still isn't valid HTML (seemed a valid question, considering they're part of the group that *defines* valid html.

      It's going on a week now without a reply (beyond the automated "we got your message and we're going to read it Real Soon Now").

    29. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that ad reminds me of the ultra-slow Mac network that my high school were using (well, that's about 10 years back), it literally felt like running a 2400bps modem for networking.

      AFAIK, isn't the easiest way to share is to open up everything for everyone to see. Hummm... I guess I'll try using my W2K machine to print to my neighbor's cable modem attached printers. :)

      Personally, I really dislike Apple for its GUI (OS/2's OOGUI is better, much better) and the price, and dislike MS for instability and the attitude. For those people who appears on Apple's ad and complaining about digital camera not working with PC... One really simple and useful suggestion. BUY A CARD READER, it makes everyone's life simpler, even if you don't have a problem with digicams connecting to PC.

    30. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "with the unfortunate name Don Funk "

      He there are lot of Funk's!

      I am one! hehehe

      Jen Funk

    31. Re:Google cache still works? by yusing · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      In what sense does Microsoft "own" a copy of page published publicly?

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    32. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but isn't it a testimonial from an independent person? She must own the copyright, not Microsoft, right?

      Not likely... being a freelance writer I can only imagine she sold those rights to MS.

    33. Re:Google cache still works? by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      Too late...
      All her articles are belong to Micro$oft!

    34. Re:Google cache still works? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Indeed. No reply. Lying scumbags.

      Hands up who's surprised...

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    35. Re:Google cache still works? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with Funk. It's the "Don" I find odd for a female. All the Donnas I've known have not felt teh need to shorten their name to Don, for example.

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    36. Re:Google cache still works? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Ooooh!

      Looks like to fuckwits don't know the difference between a web form and an email. It also appears as if it takes 40 hours to propagate a single IP packet's worth of data from one part of their network to the other.

      But notice that they process it within 2 minutes of receiving it, that's how efficient they are!

      Not. Bunch of lamers.

      <<<

      Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:48:11 -0700
      From: PSS Support <support@microsoft.com>
      To: "pc@adsf.org" <pc@adsf.org>
      Subject: RE:{RTCProd#001-249-845}CST88364812ID - MSCOM Support

      Thank you for your inquiry to Support@Micrososft.com.

      Your e-mail was received on Oct 16 2002 8:46AMand will be handled personally by one
      of our Customer Service Representatives within 24 hours. Our Customer Service
      Representatives can answer general policy questions, validate your support
      eligibility, or refer you to the appropriate phone, e-mail, or Web resource.
      To explore online support options, please visit
      http://support.microsoft.com/directory/defa ult.asp .

      Thank you,
      Microsoft Product Support Services

      -----Original Message-----
      From: pc@adsf.org [pc@adsf.org]
      Sent: Wednesday, Oct 16 2002 8:03AM
      To: Support@microsoft.com [Support@microsoft.com]
      Subject: CST88364812ID - MSCOM Support

      >>>

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    37. Re:Google cache still works? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Bunch of fucking muppets:

      <<<
      To: "pc@adsf.org" <pc@adsf.org>
      Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:21:19 -0700
      From: PSS Support <support@microsoft.com>
      To: "pc@adsf.org" <pc@adsf.org>
      Subject: RE:{RTCProd#001-249-845}CST88364812ID - MSCOM Support

      Hello,

      Thank you for contacting Microsoft.

      I appreciate that you have taken the time to write to us. However, I did not
      understand your original request. Please assist us in discerning the nature of your
      issue by providing some additional information.

      First and last name:
      Exact name of the Microsoft Web site, product, or service that you are having issues
      with:
      Specifics of the issue:

      The more details that you include, the better our chances will be of understanding
      your issue. In addition, please include any previous communication with Microsoft in
      your reply.

      I appreciate you taking the time to write to Microsoft. Should you have any other
      questions please feel free to write us back. Have a great day.

      Regards,

      David
      Microsoft Online Customer Service Representative

      >>>

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    38. Re:Google cache still works? by timster · · Score: 1

      Good point. I'm sorry.

      The page is not owned by Microsoft, rather it's _copyrighted_ by Microsoft. Must always remember the difference.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    39. Re:Google cache still works? by qiaoshun · · Score: 1

      I remember Microsoft Bob! It's the one example I can think of when MS bigwigs boast about the company's commitment to "innovation." It's the one thing I can think of that they didn't copy from elsewhere.

    40. Re:Google cache still works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i *despise* male geeks who try and pass themselves off as women in order to have something "valuable to say".

  2. Hoax? by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 5, Funny


    How do we know the Anonymous Poster isn't an employee of Linux and is just trying to discredit their biggest competitor?

    1. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How do we know the Anonymous Poster isn't an employee of Linux

      Employee of linux?

    2. Re:Hoax? by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because the 13 year old script kiddie crowd wouldn't stoop that low.

    3. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employee of linux?

      Grandparent means "Employee of a Linux system vendor"

    4. Re:Hoax? by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      How do we know the Anonymous Poster isn't an employee of Linux?

      Maybe because Linux isn't a company? Perhaps you meant to say "...an employee of a Linux company", but it just irks me to see Linux reduced to a mere corporate product in the minds of many. It's much more than that.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    5. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Maybe because Linux isn't a company?

      That's the joke.

    6. Re:Hoax? by rehannan · · Score: 1

      (Score: -1, Clueless)

    7. Re:Hoax? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Last time I check, AI wasn't integrated into the kernel. So, it's unlikely that "Linux" went out and hired someone.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employee of Linux??? Can you send me the URL for this company. I hope they still have some job openings ;)

    9. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The author of the original Hoax post has no frickin idea what he is talking about.

      I don't know how it got modded up to +5 funny, but I think the guy is out to lunch. Refer to his post on how a 64 bit processor means you can have a max 64 MB of RAM.

    10. Re:Hoax? by dodobh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thats what Linux wants *you* to think. Take the red pill

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    11. Re:Hoax? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I think you wanted to put the emphasis on 'wants'... I don't think Linux went out of it's way just so *I* wouldn't know.

      Ummm.... "There is no kernel".

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. Good grief, where does it end? by Lethyos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lies, FUD, bad software (let's not get started), breaking the law... Where does it end!?

    Microsoft have so much egg on their face that this they're starting to look like that nasty chick in a cheap porno!

    People still trust these assholes?

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People still trust these assholes?


      No they dont... but unfortunately.. most people still dont know there is something else out there.

      90% of the populace still think that Microsoft Windows is the only thing out there and there is nothing else available.

      which makes me think... Why doesn't redhat advertise on tv? ad space on tech TV is horribly dirt cheap, as well as almost every cable channel (USA, TNN, SCI-FI, MTV... etc...)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by chris_mahan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want them to advertise on MSNBC...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    3. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by everyplace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Keep in mind though that people with a mind to watch Tech TV and the like already know about alternate operating systems.

      I highly doubt that the average person flipping between stations is going to stop at a station about computers when there's better things on like the Home Shopping Network, TNN, or even C-SPAN 2. Too many choices!

    4. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about a Slashdot contribution fund to set up a commercial on Sci-Fi or thirty commercials on UPN?

      *snicker*

      I'm actually being serious, it's get my $10.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    5. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      That's it!

      C-SPAN! All we need to do is get the C-SPAN crowd aware of Linux and you can count on a bunch of over-zealous rioters marching on Capital Hill and the steps of Redmond within a week!

      This isn't a flame, I like C-SPAN personally. =P

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    6. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No they dont... but unfortunately.. most people still dont know there is something else out there.

      I don't know how true that is. I'm a student (again), but I still do consulting on the side and in the small to medium size business arena, at least in my experience, people just love the MS solution. They're usually already familiar with Outlook and Office and are ready to pay for a few Dells and an 2K server or two running Exchange and MS SQL.

      Frankly, the last thing I'm going to do is try to push an OSS solution for a small LAN when their primary needs are Outlook-like shared calendering, Office, and a few of the gazillion MS-only apps out there.

      Some of these people are pretty shrewd. They might have both an Apple and a PC at home. They might even know what linux is, but they also know their needs, prefer MS products, and don't mind paying. If a client wants MS and wants to pay for it, its fine and with the proper administration (proper permissions, quick to patch, antivirus scanning and attachment blocking on the email server, etc) it can be just as secure as anything else in corporate America.

      The question that geeks are expecting business to ask is, "How cheaply can we do this by using a no-name product?" Lets face it, linux has no brand, its more of a movement than a product. This is like assuming that cab companies are going to migrate over to the Kia Spectra (its a nice car at a nice price with a nice warranty) to save money. They're going to stick with the Caprice or Crown Victoria workhorse even if it costs a premium and if they continue to believe its worth it. Considering all their mechanics know the Crown Vic and the Caprice inside out and their drivers and customers expect a large American car, I doubt Kia will be getting any cab contracts anytime soon.

      Of course things change drastically when you're dealing with larger medium sized companies and large companies, but most of these companies start small or small-ish and if BillG is already in the door they will be very skittish about kicking him out too soon.

      Don't get me wrong, I would love it if a client wanted to do something from the ground up as cheap as possible and using OSS. A Moz/OpenOffice solution running on Mandrake would really be nice, but no one wants to jump into that pool unless they have to. In the meantime, unless price becomes a major factor then business will continue using MS. Its no wonder that Linux has more potential for market penetration in academia, the public sector, and in embedded devices. MS has the office environment locked and many end-users wouldn't have it any other way.

    7. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Why doesn't redhat advertise on tv? ad space on tech TV is horribly dirt cheap, as well as almost every cable channel (USA, TNN, SCI-FI, MTV... etc...)"

      Okay, I know I'm not going to be in the popular view here, but it's gotta be said: Redhat cannot do everything that Windows does.

      Do this: Go buy any old digital camera and try to download the pics on a RedHat system.

      Go buy a DVD-R and try to burn a disc.

      Go to any old website showing media (RealPlayer, QuickTime, Windows Media) and see how successful you are at viewing content.

      Buy a Firewire DV Video Camera and see how successful you are in getting the video off and editing it.

      Try to visit a site that's made for IE.

      Go to the store and buy a game.

      Buy a PDA and get it to synch up.

      Your network card doesn't work, find somebody you know willing to come over and fix it.

      A good chunk of these problems have been solved on Linux, and if you're willing to do some insane bs to get them running, you're fine. The steps to do any of the above in Windows are very easy, especially in comparison to Linux.

      Some of these challenges are a result of MS's monopoly + it's just plain a de-facto standard. Despite popular belief, there is some good for this. You can't go wrong with having a Windows machine. You're compatible with the internet, and you're compatible with nearly every game and piece of hardware available for PC's.

      The problem isn't that people are unaware of it, the problem is that Windows does the best job of being friendly to the user. Sure Linux has technical superiorities in some ways, that alone does not make a good OS.

      For that 90% of the people you mentioned, Windows is by far the best choice for them. Linux is a distant 3rd with OSX in 2nd place.

      If you want a simple internet machine, Linux does a wonderful job for that. But the moment you start getting peripherals involved, Linux has a huge uphill battle. It just doesn't make sense for that 90 percentile to run Linux today.

      You know what though? That can't be true forever. I do feel that Linux can overtake Windows. The first step is to get millions of people running the OS. That's slowly but surely starting to happen. Every time MS makes a misstep (like their SP 3 licensing BS), Linux has an opportunity to make an inroads. When a DVD-Burner manufacturer is swamped with "Uhh where's the Linux Drivers?" questions, they'll eventually realize "oh.. people use Linux too, we should support it...." When that starts to happen, Linux then can become a viable alternative to Windows.

      MS didn't get big by bullying people around, it got big because it made computers into something average people can make really good use of. That is why people are buying Windows machines, it's not because they're unaware of Linux's existence. Today, it is not ready.

    8. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh... a very good post but you won't get mod ups on this board.

    9. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about prefering "Lou Dobbs MoneyLine", CNN, or perhaps "The West Wing"? These had high business people ratings.

    10. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      >MS didn't get big by bullying people around, it got big because it made computers into something average people can make really good use of. That is why people are buying Windows machines, it's not because they're unaware of Linux's existence. Today, it is not ready.


      Uh, no. the finding of fact differs with you. MS become big in the dos days. They did it be using their monopoly. They recently paid .5 billion to ray norda's lineo becuase they illegaly screwed over Dr. Dos. They included MS office for free for a number of years with Windows (starting with MS Windows 2.0) . Win 3.0 beat OS/2 becuase they paid a number of companies to do Windows and specifically not OS/2.
      Becuase they make easy to use software??? not a chance. It ha actually only become easy to use in the last 2 years. In another 2 years, Linux will be as easy or easier to use than MS.

    11. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [...] Redhat cannot do everything that Windows does [... amd more along thous lines]

      GNU/Linux is cool... but...
      Sounds like you want a Mac... a OS where everything just works, without the OS or the company getting in the way or beeing obtrusive. And the Mac-s does not feed the MS-sphere like (Intel, and all the junk-PC).

      hmm... You know that Linux drives sales of IBM PC compatibles. Ot's ok if Linux converted old boxes to *nix boxes, but people are actually buying new PX boxes to tun Linux..and mybe some wines along the side. Just strenghtens the power-block.

    12. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they made money because they saw that Apple made computers easy for people to use, and then they copied it.

    13. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
      Uh, no. the finding of fact differs with you. MS become big in the dos days. They did it be using their monopoly. They recently paid .5 billion to ray norda's lineo becuase they illegaly screwed over Dr. Dos.

      How on earth could they have USED THEIR MONOPOLY to get big enough to BE A MONOPOLY? Microsoft wasn't a government sanctioned monopoly like AT&T. Even if you're a die-hard Linux zealot, you have to admit that they somehow managed to get to the top by some other method than abusing their monopoly (since they didn't have a monopoly until they were well entrenched at the top, duh.)

      Failing to accept that maybe Microsoft did something right (even if it was marketing more than technology) and hasn't always relied on its monopoly to get ahead is just stupid.

    14. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "I highly doubt that the average person flipping between stations is going to stop at a station about computers when there's better things on like the Home Shopping Network, TNN, or even C-SPAN 2. Too many choices!"

      Heh, sometimes I stop by the home shopping network channel whenever they are selling a computer for the same reason that I pay close attention to toilet paper ads:

      It's for the sole purpose of laughing at them.

    15. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "No, they made money because they saw that Apple made computers easy for people to use, and then they copied it."

      And then, spontaneously people just started buying it.

    16. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by fitten · · Score: 1

      Go check on your history... I believe Apple was the first thief in the chain of events (from when Jobs visited Xerox-PARC and saw the GUI they had there). For some reason, people always conveniently forget that part. Of course, then Microsoft stole it after that... but Mr. Pot meet Mr. Kettle.

    17. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      s/Monopoly/OS cash cow/

      Happy now?

      To say that Microsoft didn't use the considerable amount of income the result of the DOS days to prop up crap software is ignoring history too. They just continued on the scheme with Windows. That's why they made sure Win 3.x would crap out on DR-DOS. It's too bad that something like DR-DOS or FreeDOS didn't become widely available in the mid to late 80s.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    18. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "For some reason, people always conveniently forget that part."

      When did I say that Microsoft invented the GUI? It's not a matter of 'conveniently forgetting', it's a matter of relevance.

      MS made a useful product, grow up and accept that. Usability ways, they're lightyears ahead of Linux.

      Funny thing is, if Mac hadn't been so anal about running on Mac hardware, OSX might be a contender for the OS crown. Linux definitely would not be.

    19. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      No, they had a lock on the mainstream PC market that was given to them by IBM. The concept of "it's like a Mac, but I can run my DOS stuff on it too" is what made people buy it. I knew many people that thought mice and GUIs were for pussies when they were only available on Macs or Amigas. However, when MS came out with Windows, they bought it because they could run their DOS stuff when they wanted to show they were manly man geeks.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    20. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some of these challenges are a result of MS's monopoly + it's just plain a de-facto standard.

      Some? Huh? I'm sorry, but almost all--ALL--of the examples you listed are examples of cases where a third party supports Windows because it is the de facto standard.

      If MS didn't have their monopoly, and weren't a de facto standard, those companies would be supporting other systems as well, or better yet, SOME STANDARD that can be applied across systems.

      Despite popular belief, there is some good for this.

      I can't believe this--the benevolent monopoly is a ridiculous argument. There is no good in monopoly. There is good in standards, but that is different from a monopoly. The argument of standards through monopoly is an argument for laziness and complacency.

      You're compatible with the internet

      Fucking right--MS should be compatible with the internet. That's because, at least so far, the internet is largely based on open protocols that anyone can use.

      MS didn't get big by bullying people around, it got big because it made computers into something average people can make really good use of.

      I'm sorry, but this is too much. MS DID get big by bullying people around--thus their conviction on antitrust charges.

      The argument about usablity for the average person is a joke. If that were all that were driving things, we'd all be using Apples.

      Look, I'm not going to say that MS doesn't do some things well. I still maintain that their office suite is probably the best around, and has been for some time.

      Linux does have its problems. But Linux having problems in no way justifies MS. The fact that Linux isn't the best at all things doesn't mean that I would choose MS if MS weren't a monopoly.

      I am flabbergasted when I see individuals who fail to see certain things:

      (1) MS is a convicted monopoly. This means they coerced themselves into the marketplace. This is something that would be apparent to many even if MS weren't convicted.

      (2) Being a monopoly is wrong for any number of reasons: it means the monopoly has an unfair advantage with regard to a cash safety reserve, time to screw up and then try and try again until you get it right, customer "choice", and any number of other things.

      The bottom line as far as I'm concerned is that I don't know whether or not MS does make the best product, because there was never any chance for real competition. The truth is, the way things are, WE WILL NEVER TRULY KNOW if MS was the best available.

      I think it's time we all stepped back and really took a look at what's going on: MS's only competition is from a bunch of people who are developing systems in their spare time and, through copyright, made it impossible for MS to do anything but really compete.

      And MS has had competition? Fucking ridiculous. It's going up against fucking activists. Linux is a fucking activist OS that is being used because there's no way to get anything any other way.

      Cripes--the whole GPL might as well say "By the way: MS, and any other corporation that wants to take away my freedom, fuck off. I made this thing myself. It's mine. I say everyone can use it, not just you. Go fuck your monopolistic self."

      Do you really think we would have the GPL if it weren't for MS? The fact the GPL EXISTS is a testament to the problems with MS and Windows.

      MS has had competition? It's like saying that a dictator was elected because there are rebels banging on the door that the people could conceivably support if the dictator's guards weren't doing everything possible to kill the rebels in the first place.

      Damn, I'm mad about this. I have to go do something else now.

    21. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question, have you *used* 10.2 for more than a few minuites?

      To claim Windows is better than OS X is dubious as best.

    22. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I didn't bother reading all this.

      You're so out for MS blood that you won't accept anything positive about them. I don't have time for irrational debates.

      Good day.

    23. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      I believe i read somewhere that Apple did pay some licensing fees to xerox (woah, just noticed...Xerox-PARC....XP, eerie) or that they had some type of licensing / use agreement. And its not like Xerox ever complained about it.

    24. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "To claim Windows is better than OS X is dubious as best."

      Didn't say that. Heh.

      I don't think anybody who's 'argued' with me about this has actually put any thought into what I said.

      Gee, I'm sorry I didn't sing the praises of Linux. Either go make Linux better or grow up. I don't care which, just don't argue with me for the sake of getting pokes at MS in.

    25. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know what? I'd rather have all the glitter, all the flexibility, all the compatibility of MS windows than the hard to install/hell to configure Linux any day. Once Linux is as easy to install, and as easy to use as MS windows, THEN I'll switch.

      So what if they're a monopoly, as long as there are Linux folks out there to drive them to make their product better? That's all you're good for.

    26. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was talking about Mac OS X version 10.2, which really has nothing to do with linux. So telling him to make linux better or shut up seems to be missing the point. Maybe you should have put some thought into what he said before replying.

    27. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by intermodal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MS didn't get big by bullying people around, it got big because it made computers into something average people can make really good use of. That is why people are buying Windows machines, it's not because they're unaware of Linux's existence. Today, it is not ready.

      Sorry, I'm afraid you contradict yourself in that statement. Microsoft bullied its way into the position int the beginning of GUI clones with Win95. Recall the version that was used as an example running win95 ontop of DRdos? Microsoft clawed its way deeper into the pit of monopoly that it calls home, and as a result hardware manufacturers can't find it profittable to make linux versions of their software when such a small percecntage of the people use linux compared to windows. So don't go resting on microsoft's laurels...they're fraught with lawyers and thorns from the past. The difference is that now they own the thorns they haven't destroyed, except for linux and apple. people could do the same things Windows can do for quite a while before Windows on a mac. (note: i am not a mac user)

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    28. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by evilviper · · Score: 5, Informative
      it can be just as secure as anything else in corporate America.

      You've got to be absolutely kidding. I was with you up to that point, but nobody with an ounce of sense believes that for a second.

      Even "Microsoft VP Jim Allchin [...] stated, under oath, that there were flaws in Windows so great that they would threaten national security if the Windows source code were to be disclosed." (http://security.tombom.co.uk/shatter.html)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    29. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Maybe you should have put some thought into what he said before replying."

      Actually, you're the one guilty of not putting thought into what he said before typing. He said that I claimed Windows was a better OS than OSX. I never said that.

      The Linux comment was directed at everybody who jumped my butt over this thread. You might have noticed that if you read the part where I said "I don't think anybody who's 'argued' with me about this..."

      If it seemed odd to you, you should have re-read what I said until it made sense, or at least asked me what I meant by it. Oh well, you're anonymous, nobody will know how ill-informed you were.

    30. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First of all, with Rh8, almost all of the examples you mentioned are not only possible in Linux, but quite simple. The print driver for my HP photosmart 1215 does not hang the machine like the windows version does, just to cite one example.

      Second of all, if you think MS has won because of ease of use, you've already bought into the propganda. Ever since MSDOS was ripped off of CP/M, Microsoft has consistently been technically inferior to all of its competitors. From the GUI to groupware, every one of Microsoft's product efforts has been a poor copy of someone else's work. If you call Windows the easy to use solution, you have to say that BSODs and the regular cycle of format and reinstall are easy.

      I was a CNE in a past life, and I saw first hand how MS got their market share. They send a representative to the CTO, and suggest that a license audit of all their windows workstations might be less difficult than converting their servers to NT. If this fails, they bribe the CIO/CEO, or engage in character assasination. Poof. Instant market share. The company's history is a prime example of bully tactics and practiced world domination.

      You can argue this if you want to, but you would be opposing observation with opinion. I know. I was there.

    31. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I honestly did not see any valid reasoning in your post.

      "Sorry, I'm afraid you contradict yourself in that statement."

      When did I contradict myself?

      "Microsoft bullied its way into the position int the beginning of GUI clones with Win95."

      So did Mac bully it's way into Xerox's work, or did they just come up with a product that people wanted?

      "Microsoft clawed its way deeper into the pit of monopoly that it calls home, and as a result hardware manufacturers can't find it profittable to make linux versions of their software when such a small percecntage of the people use linux compared to windows."

      And how did MS start this monopoly? It didn't always have money. As for hardware manufacturers not finding it profitable to make Linux versions, it's called "Nobody is using Linux". That's not MS's fault, that's 100% Linux's fault. It's not ready for prime time, and yeah you can blame MS for that. MS made a product that Linux has to live up to. Until it does that, it won't reach the saturation point that Windows has.

      Sorry. MS has done unethical things, no denying that. However, it could not possibly have gotten anywhere without a product that people actually wanted. A lot of people just don't want Linux right now.

    32. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Too... lazy.. to... link...

      IIRC, they licensed the ability to view Xerox code and designs for their GUI, but they had already had a GUI project underway and they didn't rip source.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    33. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Dalcius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I won't take this point by point, but I will give general commentary. Please correct me if I read something wrong.

      1) Microsoft gained some of their position through monopoly. This would include the browser, etc. IIRC, they did put in incompatibilities with other systems in the early days of Windows (read: 90-95), but I wouldn't say they were big enough to be called a monopoly -- Apple had a good chunk of the market until the AOLers (read: typical users) came onto the scene.

      2) Microsoft isn't *all* bad. Forced standards are at least standards. They suck, but it's better than outright chaos, at least in the short term.

      3) Settle down, Jimmy! I completely agree with most of what you posted. I'm a Microsoft and tech history buff, and what you speak is true for the most part. However, Microsoft is not as evil as certain other corporations (pharmaceuticals, maybe?). They're very, very stupid (read: the article this thread is in reply to), and they'll lie and cheat to sell their mother's eyes. And it boggles my mind. But it's not the end of the world, OSS will eventually win out. Why? Because it's a small niche right now and it can actually compete. But that's another thread...

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    34. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Xerox was the first thief. They stole the gui concept from Atari. Macintosh then made it better and Microsoft did it best..Well, they had a better marketing scheme.

    35. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by 4minus0 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you haven't watched Call for Help lately.
      "No, Bobby from Missouri, you cannot use the mouse as a microphone... Yes I realize you have a new Dell and Windows XP Home Edition... Yes it is a lovely shade of Blue. Yep, just like a 1997 Geocities site."
      "Next on Call for Help Kat's going to show you how to change your screen resolution under XP!!!
      Stick around geeks."
      What a moronic show.

      --
      You've got an easy breezy wind at your back...most of the time.
    36. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here goes. I have used Linux for around five years now, many distros, from SMP servers to laptops. My preference is for RH and Debian, though I do not only stick to Linux, I use various BSD systems as well. I always keep a Win32 system around, just for playing around with mostly. I have installed and used pretty much every remotely popular linux distro in existance. My latest install was RH 8.0 and I must say that it is definitly easier to setup than win2K on the same system. Much faster, much more flexible, and when I am finished I have a complete, usable system for the most part. Now for the kicker...I just fragged the laptop and installed win2K on it! Boo, hiss, traitor, whatever. Win2K took a *long* time to configure properly, many patches, SPs, drivers and reboots just to get is sane. As far as usage goes, I mainly do web development and I am having trouble finding reasonable substitutes for many of my Linux apps. FTP clients suck in general on win32, nothing is close to gFTP so far. Editors are decent, TSW Web Coder is very decent, similar to Quanta or Bluefish in capability. I also have the use of all of the Macromedia Flash, Fireworks, and Dreamweaver tools which I dislike in general, especially Dreamweaver. Overall, I am more productive on a nice RH ( not 8.0! ) or Deb laptop and will more than likely be switching back soon. I suppose that my point is win32 is a doable solution, but once you become acustomed to the incredible flexibility of Linux, it is difficult to stomache windows.

    37. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by po8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Go buy any old digital camera and try to download the pics on a RedHat system. Do it every day, works fine.

      Go buy a DVD-R and try to burn a disc. Can't afford a DVD-R, but I'll bet it works great. I know every CD burner I ever tried does.

      Go to any old website showing media (RealPlayer, QuickTime, Windows Media) and see how successful you are at viewing content. View RealPlayer and Windows Media regularly. Can do any kind of QuickTime except Sorenson, and could do that with either Crossover Plugin or a pirate solution if I actually cared.

      Buy a Firewire DV Video Camera and see how successful you are in getting the video off and editing it. Hey, how rich do you think I am? But I have software that claims to do this job fine, and I have no reason to disbelieve it.

      Try to visit a site that's made for IE. I can think of one site I've visited in the last 6 months that I needed IE to view. I can think of far more that could only be viewed with Mozilla, actually. Pop-ups, you know.

      Go to the store and buy a game. Did it yesterday. They sell Linux games at Fry's now, you know.

      Buy a PDA and get it to synch up. I've never synced with anything but my Linux box.

      Your network card doesn't work, find somebody you know willing to come over and fix it. OK, you've got me there. All my network cards have worked :-). But seriously, I've helped a bunch of my friends with card problems under Linux: they don't seem any worse than with Windows to me. At least they don't ship outdated broken driver CDs for Linux: saves being suckered into installing them.

      Overall, I think you've made a pretty good case that Linux is ready for the consumer.

    38. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I suppose that my point is win32 is a doable solution, but once you become acustomed to the incredible flexibility of Linux, it is difficult to stomache windows."

      Just wanted to let you know that I read your post I respect you making the decision that way. I'm no fan of Linux, but I don't have a problem with somebody who's happy using it.

    39. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is it an imperative to accept "positive comments" that one happens to disagree with? To him, your comments were just as loaded with horseshit as you think his were.

      It's fun to write off people as irrational zealots, isn't it? Makes you look smug, more sophisticated, that you listen only to reason. Well, I'd put forth, based on this comment, that you're one of the sort that only accepts arguments that you agree with as being reasonable. Which makes you just as biased as anyone else.

      Way to go, dude.

    40. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how parent post got modded up even though he skipped over a bunch of them.

      Praise Linux! Karma for all!

    41. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a waste of whitespace. Say something you pussy.

    42. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Since when is it an imperative to accept "positive comments" that one happens to disagree with?"

      Why do you think it's that? I just don't want to do with extremist bullshit. You want me to listen to you, be rational. Not too hard to ask.

      Let me put it another way: You wouldn't give me the time of day if I said "Linux 100% blows, here's a long detailed list of reasons why."

      Hypocrite.

    43. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "what a waste of whitespace. Say something you pussy."

      What do you want me to say? Speaking of 'saying something', why don't you speak in complete sentences so that what you say is understood. Otherwise, you're just no saying anything 'you pussy'.

    44. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know what though? That can't be true forever. I do feel that Linux can overtake Windows. The first step is to get millions of people running the OS. That's slowly but surely starting to happen.

      It's starting to happen. Just tonight, I was exchanging a faulty printer at the local Walmart. The gal behind the counter said that there'd been alot of printers coming back. I asked her why, and she said something like "They didn't have a Linux, or something like that".

      She had no idea what they were talking about, so I explained it to her a bit - that Linux is sort of like another "Windows", like Mac, only it works on normal PCs. She nodded blankly, pushed the barcode gun, and handed me my receipt.

      Maybe you don't remember the days when Apple "had the desktop" and PCs were "Hard to use" and "good for business and serious number crunching".

      Maybe you don't see the parallels here, but I sure do. Linux is "hard to use" but "good for business and serious number crunching".

      As I see it, Linux won't go bankrupt, won't just "go away" and gets better and better every year. Word of mouth is increasing, and people will make "free" work for them, eventually.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    45. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Postulate: If you build a system that any idiot can use, only an idiot will want to use it.

    46. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by dbirchall · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "I still do consulting on the side and in the small to medium size business arena, at least in my experience, people just love the MS solution. They're usually already familiar with Outlook and Office and are ready to pay for a few Dells and an 2K server or two running Exchange and MS SQL."

      I do consulting too, in roughly the same segment. (Don't worry, we live in different towns. ;)

      In my experience, that's not love you're seeing; it's resignation. I have yet to meet any end-user who is passionate about Microsoft applications. People just don't go on about how great those things are. They're commodities.

      And the unlucky "in house" folks who really aren't qualified to fix stuff (read: can't tell a SCSI card from a parallel port card) yet get asked to do it anyway are definitely no fans of Microsoft. I enjoy nodding sagely at cluebies ranting about how if they turn their PC off, disconnect and reconnect the monitor, and boot back up, it gives them some sort of message about wanting a Windows disk...

      Do they upgrade? Sure! Not because there's some great new feature or capability, but because they keep hoping that maybe this time, unlike last time and the time before it, things will suck less.

      "Good grief, where does it end?" indeed!

    47. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Xoid629 · · Score: 1

      Um.. wasn't the GPL designed before MS became anything near a monopoly, more to do with the UNIX issues? (Of course, I could be totaly wrong about that.)

    48. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by electroniceric · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well spoken! You've put your finger on something I've been trying to explain here for a long time. And in fact Microsoft prices their products at exactly such a price point as to keep them from being expensive in the individual. My most recent experience with this was when I looked at using MySQL vs MS SQL server. Since this place is already Windows shop, the cost for MSSQL would have been $2000 + CALS or something like that, with minimal training costs. The $2K or so they'd save by installing MySQl (even on Windows) is just not enough for them to bother with. If it was $10K, then more eyebrows would be raised. But it's not. And I do believe MS on this part of their TCO claims: it's cheaper to stay with MS than to switch. As to whether it's cheaper if you start with MS vs. Sun vs. OSS, I'd bet it's a pretty mixed bag.

      In the aggregate, however, MS products can get expensive, often based on the way they're bundled. Building an Access database is cheap and fast, until you have to buy Office pro for 20 members of your staff, 3 times in 8 years. And there are many situations where you need just one little bit of functionality contained in some other product, and then off you go again. This is where Open Source starts to pay off. Want your dev to do something semi-custom (a la Access)? The dev has his/her choice of 50000 libraries, all of which cost $0 as long as you're willing to accept the terms of OSS, so you can cobble together little bits from each of them without any incremental cost. All that's needed is some clever packaging of those bits so that they can be glued together quickly. Mozilla has a decent chance of doing just this.

      Another place where dealing with MS gets particularly onerous is dealing with licenses. Even in the place I worked, where everyone was just fine with Microsoft because it let them not think too much about IT, people resented having to waste time screwing around with licenses.

      Overall, I think your predictions for where you'll see Linux penetrate are pretty spot on, though I think once these public sector OSS projects start showing fruit, some slick boxed OSS solutions for smaller businesses will not be that far off, which will stir up the mix a bit.

      We live in interesting times...

    49. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! Back when, the Macs were seen as the most usable, stable, fastest machines around. No one even considered using PCs for graphics, audio, desktop publishing, any kind of multimedia application. PCs were for 'business users' (word processing, spreadsheets, etc.). After all the effort invested in MS systems to make them more usuable, they became ... DUN DUN DUN ... the _cheaper_alterative_to_Macs !! Sound familiar??

    50. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by rjw57 · · Score: 2

      > Do this: Go buy any old digital camera and
      > try to download the pics on a RedHat system. /me opens konqueror using gphoto2, pictures appear (along with nice thumbnails). Drag and drop to folder on my HD.

      > Go buy a DVD-R and try to burn a disc.

      check. No problems here.

      > Go to any old website showing media
      > (RealPlayer, QuickTime, Windows Media) and
      > see how successful you are at viewing content.

      I can listen to the BBC radio programs via RealPlayer, watch trailers from apple.com and even view embedded WM[VA] files -- the crossover plugin rocks.

      > Buy a Firewire DV Video Camera and see how
      > successful you are in getting the video off
      > and editing it.

      Er... plug-in, record via cinerella, edit.

      > Try to visit a site that's made for IE. /me types http://www.microsoft.com into Mozilla ... all works here.

      > Go to the store and buy a game. /me looks at his shiny new Quake III and UT 2003 boxes -- oh and I'll be getting NWN soon.

      > Buy a PDA and get it to synch up.

      Heck, I can even FTP to my Zaurus. I can sync my g/f's Handsprint Treo too.

      > Your network card doesn't work, find somebody
      > you know willing to come over and fix it.

      I've never had a network card that wont work (and I've had many network cards). Besides all the cards I've ever bought in the last two years have had Linux modules on the floppy that comes with it.

      --
      Rich
    51. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic : There IS a decent ftp client available for Win32. The BEST client on Windows, by FAR, is FlashFXP! No other comes close ... Queueing, resuming of incomplete files, just perfect. google search it! nuff said

    52. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      MS didn't get big by bullying people around, it got big because it made computers into something average people can make really good use of.

      You might not have noticed this recent court case where some smart judges decided that you're wrong. Microsoft got big by bullying people around. It's no secret.

      That is why people are buying Windows machines, it's not because they're unaware of Linux's existence. Today, it is not ready.

      I agree Linux isn't ready, but GEOS and OS/2 and DRDOS and MacOS and BeOS were ready and they still didn't survive. They aren't around anymore because Microsoft played dirty. End of story.

    53. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      do you make sure they know about the perils of licensing? have you offered to do a license audit for them so that they dont get giged with a $25,000.00 per problem fine from the BSA? do they know that any disgruntled employee can turn them in for no reason and the BSA will not leave without a fine? and do they know that running an alternative OS is currently the only defense against this?

      do they know that running linux will eliminate users installing elf-bowling, and animated screen savers and websshots which all either hurt stability or increase internet bandwidth costs?

      If you are a consultant and you do not educate your clients in these problems with microsoft products, you are not acting in their best interests.

      RH 8.0 out of the box fit's their bill perfectly.

      groupware calendaring, outlook type clone, office.
      plus they no longer need to waste money and processing power on a virus scanner. and you can cut the costs even further by utilizing a terminal server instead of running everything on seperate machines... imagine installing OO.o once and every workstation is updated.... do THAT with microsoft.

    54. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Arker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gah, calm down, take a breath.

      And, btw, the GPL doesn't have anything to do with Microsoft. Microsoft was a two-bit outfit that made software for toys when GNU started - the big bad evil monopolist of the time was SUN.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    55. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do this: Go buy any old digital camera and try to download the pics on a RedHat system.

      DID IT... KODAK DC120

      Go buy a DVD-R and try to burn a disc.

      Do IT EVERY DAY.

      Go to any old website showing media (RealPlayer, QuickTime, Windows Media) and see how successful you are at viewing content.

      Ok you GOT ME THERE.

      Buy a Firewire DV Video Camera and see how successful you are in getting the video off and editing it.

      DO IT EVERY DAY. Texas instruments firewire card and a JVC camera. now EDIT that video... there's where linux dies. nothing remotely useable yet.

      Try to visit a site that's made for IE.

      DO IT EVERY DAY... My Banking sites. I use mozilla that lies to the server.

      Go to the store and buy a game.

      I've got 5 on my shelf from the EB store. play them regularly.

      Buy a PDA and get it to synch up.

      I have 2! PALM PILOT and a Windows CE device... the WinCE device can synch.. but not to evolution... yet... the palm OS devices can synch to evolution or 10 other groupware programs for linux.

      Your network card doesn't work, find somebody you know willing to come over and fix it.

      I have yet to find a network card that isnt detected by redhat automatically. please tell me a chipset that doesn;t work.

      the whole point here is simple... microsoft windows does this same things you say here.. I fought for 2 weeks to get a Windows CE PDA to reliabily synch with a W2K workstation.. I had to download a 3rd party patch (NOT MICROSOFT) to get it to reliably talk every time the user drops it in the cradle. (BTW: corperate now forbids any PDA other than a Palm Os device to be connected to corperate PC's. due to the poor design of the windows CE and pocket windows connectivity software.. Palm just works, every time. and we can support it easily over the phone.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    56. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by thing12 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Postulate: If you build a system that any idiot can use, only an idiot will want to use it.

      I'd have to disagree. First off Windows is not that easy that an idiot can use it. Try putting a person who's never touched a computer in front of Windows or X Windows(running KDE/Gnome/etc). Either one would take time and patience - but the X Windows solution would take *more* time and patience to get to the same level of comfort with the operating system and say for example a browser and office suite. And it's not because people are idiots. 90% of what you do with a computer is auto-pilot. You probably don't think about using the mouse, typing, scrolling a window --- completely basic operations of a GUI interface that you don't ever think about. All you think about is the result you want, not how to accomplish it. With X Windows and the various window managers and gui toolkits you end up with a vast array of applications that all behave differently. Some are so different they actually require thinking about just how to use the interface itself.

      Microsoft and Apple have spent billions developing a user interface that is clean, consistent, and easy to use. And unless OSS clones those interfaces down to the pixel - or spends the billions themselves - the interfaces are going to continue to suck. And that doesn't even count all the applications that need to be altered just to get a semblance of order. A standard user interface is a good thing! It helps a user immediately sit down with a new app and be as productive as possible. If you not only have to learn a new application but also a new interface you're going to be slowed down.

      Anyway... my point is that anyone can use Windows, MacOS, or X Windows with enough time and practice. But, at least with Windows and MacOS you have a head start as soon as you learn the interface.

    57. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling that was, at least partially, a politically driven statement.

      Jeremy

    58. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the gpl isn't a result of ms. rather of big iron unix, going closed source. get your history right.

      good post though...

    59. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      No, they weren't a U.S. government sponsored monopoly, they were an IBM sponsored monopoly, and that was all they needed at the time.

      DRDOS tried to break into the market almost a decade after MS had already been entrenched as the standard, and the reason for the death of DRDOS was certainly not technical superiority of MSDOS. In fact, DRDOS was so much better than DRDOS, all the magazines and "pundits" were hailing it as the greatest thing since sliced bread. It did things that MSDOS should have been doing for years, and is what forced MS to make the horrible version 4 and then version 5. Vaporware announcements and the warning from the Windows 3.0 beta all helped deter people from buying DRDOS.

      I'm afraid MS was a monopoly long before the 90's, and having the backing of IBM for the first few crucial years is what did it. They were actually a monopoly from the get-go since you couldn't buy an IBM PC without it.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    60. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by gfxguy · · Score: 1
      And how did MS start this monopoly? It didn't always have money.


      By lying to IBM about their operating system product, and then having IBM sell a copy with every system. It wasn't until Compaq that there was even a market for competition, but by then it was already too late.
      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    61. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, there were choices before the PC became popular. We had Apple, Commodore 64/128, Amiga, Atari (400, 800, etc. etc.) and a host of other computers (like Timex Sinclair, TRS-80 Color Computer, etc.). The compatibility stickers on software boxes were HUGE listing all the computers the software works on: "For use with Apple II, IIe, GS. Commodore 64/128 with 5 1/4" floppy blah blah". Do you really think the software companies made a ton of money writing for that many different platforms? I think not. Was the product of equal quality on each? Sometimes.

      When the IBM PC (which was the standard for big businesses and everyone knew that) started getting cloned and cheaper PC-compatible machines hit the market: people wanted them. If people wanted choice, why did such great GUI machines like the Amigas or Atari ST's never take off in America (which sold really well and are still being used in Europe)? The PC was a standard, plain and simple. Now, after what, 7 or 10 years (maybe more, depends how much you like DOS) people are screaming for desktop choices? And the most blatent reason why (what I read anyway) is that "Microsoft is an evil monopoly and stifles innovation".

      Folks, if you really want Linux (or Mac even) to grow in popularity, vote with your dollars. Don't just download the free stuff, DONATE your money to the authors. I read how people were ticked when Sun decided to sell their Star Office product (the "oh, I'm gonna go download OpenOffice instead cause it's still free). Stuff like that makes other big companies that might want to expand into Linux reconsider because to them it looks like the OSS group is a bunch of freeloaders. Pay for what you download, start a petition SHOWING what you and others pay. Show the companies like Adobe, Corel, Intuit, and others that hey there IS a market for Linux stuff. Same thing for you Mac people: other than a Best Buy or perhaps a good computer store, you can't get Mac software anywhere else (Sears stopped selling Mac software a while before dropping PC software due to lack of sales, for example). Put your money where your mouth (well at least your fingers for when you post to /. ) is and SUPPORT YOUR PLATFORM. THEN you'll truely get the right to bitch.

    62. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by jpvlsmv · · Score: 1

      The big bad evil monopolist of the time was AT&T.

      GNU predated both Microsoft and SUN.

      --Joe

    63. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Call for help is crap, but the Screen Savers is rather more upscale, often mentions Linux (although it's Windows focused), and has hot babes to boot.

    64. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by erik1474 · · Score: 1

      Fine, but understand you are the *exception* - not the rule...

    65. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun was founded in '82 GNU was founded in '83

    66. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by freeze128 · · Score: 1
      Do they upgrade? Sure! Not because there's some great new feature or capability, but because they keep hoping that maybe this time, unlike last time and the time before it, things will suck less.
      This is one of the things that Microsoft has tried to instill in its users: The belief that upgrading fixes things.
      You can also blame it on lazy tech support people. "Your computer locks up randomly? Try upgrading the BIOS."
      You should only upgrade if the newer features warrant it, and/or the actual problem is fixed in the newer release.
    67. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf do you mean "...normal PCs"? that's just *EXACTLY* what's *WRONG* with this whole monopoly thing

    68. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a CNE in a past life, and I saw first hand how MS got their market share. They send a representative to the CTO, and suggest that a license audit of all their windows workstations might be less difficult than converting their servers to NT. If this fails, they bribe the CIO/CEO, or engage in character assasination. Poof. Instant market share. The company's history is a prime example of bully tactics and practiced world domination.

      You can argue this if you want to, but you would be opposing observation with opinion. I know. I was there.

      This is 100% true. cI work at a major midwestern university known for its engineering. Thanks to a deal with Microsoft, students and staff "enjoy" a $5 deal on Microsoft software from Windows XP to Office.

      We also run Novell on campus.

      This year, I know there was some heavy negotiations going on with the university and Microsoft. We had been told that the $5 deal was going away at the end of the year.

      However, near the end of last year, we announced that we were dropping Novell in favor of an all Microsoft solution. This just happened to be the same time of the announcement that the $5 deal was extended another year. Coincidence? Now we're scrambling to transfer everything over to this new system. Is it better? No. Not really worse, either. But why change, why go through all of the trouble if there was no valid business reason?

      They could be totally unrelated events. Somehow, though, I don't think so.
    69. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by LostSinner · · Score: 1
      when is this fucking country going to get it through it's head that it's not the government that has the power to break a monopoly... IT'S THE CONSUMERS. this country was not founded on the basis that the government would be there to fix all our problems. at some point a nanny government has to be an insult to your self-respect. sweet jesus, people. go cry and whine and whatnot, but don't hire the government as your henchman to do your dirty work. you don't like a product or company? don't buy the shit. convince your friends not to buy the shit. it's common sense.

      and for those of you who get what i'm saying, let's secede!

    70. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      What about Symbian devices such as the Mako & Nokia phones?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    71. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      here's what I read:

      "Oversimplify, oversimplify, oversimplify, end of story."

    72. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Yeah, real scientific.

      "I visited one site, and it works."

      "I bought 1 (one) game."

      "I can synch up my linux based zaurus."

      Hardly devastating.

    73. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Allchin would say anything to ensure that the source code to Windows isn't opened up. Or did you suddently decide that Microsoft executives wouldn't lie under oath?

      Yes, Windows has security flaws, but so does everything. A well-administered NT/2K/XP network is probably less-likely to get hacked than a poorly-administered Linux network.

    74. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Why don't you check my source for that quote...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    75. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Take a guess at how expensive West Wing ads are.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    76. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

      DO IT EVERY DAY. Texas instruments firewire card and a JVC camera. now EDIT that video... there's where linux dies. nothing remotely useable yet.

      I haven't tried this yet, but just wanted you to know a version 1.0 video editing system is available:

      Heroine Virtual Ltd. presents an advanced compositing and editing system for native Linux at no cost to users.

    77. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looking pretty weak. I thought you were done posting.

    78. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defend your positions. You look like a fool.

    79. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Defend your positions. You look like a fool."

      Why? Who (besides you, and yes I know you posted the other comment too) is even paying attention?

      I don't care if I look like a fool or not. If I'm a fool, then RedHat's in a better position than I thought and maybe I can finally switch.

    80. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      There is no good in monopoly.

      Sure there is. Application software and device drivers are now easier and cheaper to write and test because they cater only to Windows. Compare this to having five mutually incompatible operating systems, each with 20% market share. This clearly benefits consumers.

      Note that I'm not saying that the other problems caused by a specific monopoly cannot outweigh its benefits. That's why there are laws against certain behaviors.

      MS is a convicted monopoly. This means they coerced themselves into the marketplace. This is something that would be apparent to many even if MS weren't convicted.

      You're wrong. MS was determined to be a monopoly (they argued that they were not) for legal purposes. This allows the anti-trust suit to continue, because only monopolies (which are legal) are subject to anti-trust laws. MS was subsequently convicted of violating these laws, not for just being a monopoly.

      Being a monopoly is wrong for any number of reasons: it means the monopoly has an unfair advantage with regard to a cash safety reserve, time to screw up and then try and try again until you get it right, customer "choice", and any number of other things.

      Nonsense. How does a company, even if it wanted to, avoid becoming a monopoly? What if all your competitors ship crappy products that nobody wants to buy? Do you have to buy them?

      Yes, they have an unfair advantage, but business isn't about fair. Some companies have more cash, some have more talents, some have good reputation and connections, and some are just plain luckier.

    81. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by bbqBrain · · Score: 1

      Heh heh, I *loved* GEOS on our C64! My family went from a Vic-20 to a C-64, and then to a Mac LCII (4MB RAM, 40MB HDD). Seriously, though, I thought GEOS was absolutely revolutionary.

      --

      One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
    82. Re: Good grief, where does it end? by pjrc · · Score: 2
      Do you really think we would have the GPL if it weren't for MS? The fact the GPL EXISTS is a testament to the problems with MS and Windows.

      Hell YES, since the GPL was written in the mid 80's, before Windows existed, before Microsoft was a monopoly, and in fact, before PC computers had displaced Apple 2's, C-64's, Amiga, etc, and even before the majority of PCs ran MS-DOS instead of IBM's PC-DOS.

      IBM was a giant then, and Microsoft was tiny.

    83. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing that you purchase software at fry's, you live in the same general geographic area I live in. So I have a question for you.

      Where is the good crack??????

    84. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      "Oversimplify, oversimplify, oversimplify, end of story."

      My point was best made concisely but it was difficult to reduce the history of Microsoft into less than 50 words, so I didn't bother. If you're still unconvinced then here's the long version.

      Microsoft has played dirty with all of the competition I listed. For example:

      • BeOS: vendors pressured into not selling BeOS in competition with Windows.
      • DRDOS: Microsoft applications rewritten to detect DRDOS and give false error messages.
      • OS/2: Microsoft lied to IBM over the purpose of Windows and reneged on agreements.

      Those are just the confirmed and indisputable nasties. There are plenty of vicious rumors about other nasties they've pulled.

      Now you could argue that there were multiple contributing reasons why each OS failed. I would not disagree. That doesn't invalidate my point which is that Microsoft got where they are with illegal and dishonest behaviour. The judges came to the same conclusion. However the judges had to write over 170 pages of text to say that without "oversimplifying". It's silly for you to expect the same level of detail from a throwaway comment on slashdot. My best guess it that you just want to discount anybody who disagrees with you, and you'll use any excuse to do it.

    85. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      " My best guess it that you just want to discount anybody who disagrees with you, and you'll use any excuse to do it."

      You're close. I'm going to discount anybody who's view who turns a convo about MS into a "MS SHOULD BURN IN HELL!" debate. You're worried I won't listen to you because you disagree. I'm worried you won't even hear my PoV because *I* disagree with the common view. *I* am the one with the uphill battle. *I* have to fight against everybody's emotions against MS just to make my point. All you have to do is say "MS is absolutely evil, end of story!" and you'll get cheered. Funny thing is, I'm not pro MS. I'm not trying to convince you that MS is great and we should all be grateful. I only wish to convince people that they cannot act like childish brats over topics that involve MS. Not only is lotsa FUD getting spread around, but they don't realize that their behaviour will discredit them. Is the DoJ going to take Slashdot seriously regarding a complaint about MS? "Oh please, you all hate MS anyway, we can't get a reasonable response from you." Treat them more rationally, and not only will people believe you when you have a legit complaint, but you'll also know what to do right. (as opposed to only being aware of what's wrong.)

      So here's my side of it, take it or leave it:

      You need to understand that even with all of the bs MS did to mess with the competition, they still had a product ppl wanted.

      MS may have lined their pockets with more money, but there's still the question of "Where did MS's money come from?".

      Most extremist theories I hear are like this:

      1.) MS gets their OS Sold with machines
      2.) MS supresses competitors from selling competing OS's
      3.) ????
      4.) Profit!

      Notice that little gap there? They seem to think that MS can just magically extort money from people's pockets. They don't seem to understand that MS's monopoly, though definitely a monopoly, was not the same type of monopoly the Bells had. Few people needed to have a computer when MS started to get really big. They certainly didn't necessarily need a Windows machine. In the phone company example, you *had* to have a phone. You *had* to pay money somewhere. MS may have been able to surpress competitors, but there was little they could do to convince outlets to say "don't sell Macs".

      There was a huge boom in PC's sold starting circa 1995... which, conincidentally, is when Windows 95 was released. There were all kinds of problems with Windows 95, stability in particular. Yet, people didn't exactly flock to Mac did they? Macs were available and proven long before 95 was released, and were arguably better machines in most respects, yet they flocked to PC's anyway. With lots of money, you can overpower your competitors, but you cannot force somebody to buy your product. An explosion of people said "I want a Windows based computer." (Hint: Mac should have advertised more.)

      If MS hadn't bullied other companies, there may actually be a competitor around. I doubt that, though. I certainly doubt that they would be a signficant competitor. Look at Mac, they arguably have superior systems and UI's to Windows, yet they've hardly got a percentage of the market. Think about the mountain they'd have to climb. First they'd have to develop a reasonable UI, not an easy task. Even today, there isn't a UI near as good as Apple's or MS's. KDE and Gnome inch their way closer every release, but there's still a lot to be desired. It's functional, but not complete. Second, driver support. Windows has a huuuuuuuuuge set of built-in drivers. Linux is at the point now where it will more or less run on any machine initially, but it only recently got to that point. Heck, I remember trying to get Redhat 6 running on my laptop. Despite having a 'supported video card', it insisted on running at 640 by 480 anyway. Ive heard a number of other stories about vid cards and other various hardware failing to run. Heck, even on Redhat 7.3 I couldn't get sound to work in KDE. Third, there needs to be a set of apps ready to run on this OS so the user can get to work. That is a HUGE development effort and few companies are up to the task. MS did it, Apple did it, and Linux did it thanks to the large community developing apps for it. The only company that immediately comes to mind that could handle a chore like that is IBM. (I'd say Sun, but I honestly am not that familiar with them.)

      I am no fan of MS. They've pulled stuff that's personally made my life harder (particularly involving IE) and hurt my company. However, I'm going to maintain level-headedness when discussing their existence. I firmly believe that MS would be nearly as big as they are today if they didn't pull their monopolistic practices. They created the right product at the right time, and they continue to support their products in exciting ways. They would be a virtual monopoly either way. If they got that big, even legitimately, it would be nearly impossible for somebody else to swoop in and make a huge dent in the marketplace.

      Heck, right now I'm running Windows 2000. My machine is relatively complex for a desktop PC. It has 5 hard drives (4 scsi, 1 firewire), dual processors, dual monitors, gig of RAM, a CDRW,a DVD RAM drive, and a few other odds and ends. I run mission critical apps on my machine. I do 3D Rendering. I cannot afford to have my machine crash in the middle of a weekend render. It never has. It was easy to install, it was easy to install new hardware and get it running. I have not had any OS related problems in months. My laptop runs Win2k, it performs admirably. My desktop at home, similiarly equipped but only one processor works just as well. My company adopted Windows 2000 and is not regretting it. Everybody here has similar experience with it performing well. It is definitely a product worth buying. I don't like MS, but they solved my mission critical problem. I could have gone to Linux, I could have gone to Mac, but Win2k was the best choice here. There's no monopoly leveraging in that decision.

      As I've said before, at some point MS had to make a good product to get where they are. Like it or hate it, it's hard to dispute. If you'd like to educate me on some of their practices, I'm all ears. But don't expect me to listen to "MS only got big by gouging people" crap. If you want to have a less heated and more objective discussion about it, I'm all ears. I may even admit that I'm wrong. Just don't put me in an defensive mode. (Hey at least Im honest about it.)

      Btw, if you've read this far, I really appreciate it. I may disagree with you but at least you listened. And for that, I say thank you, and I respect you for that.

      Good day.

    86. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      No, I'm not kidding. If you think the average network in corporate America is more secure than a well administered NT/2k based network then I have to disagree based on my experience.

      Of course it doesn't help matters that most of c.America is NT/2k based, but its fairly obvious that a poorly administered network determines how secure it is regardless of platform.

    87. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhmm...i just use what works! I don't care what OS I'm on, all I need is a Word Processor, FTP Client, Web Browser (Mozilla's fine), and an NVidia Accelerator (Cuz that's all they have on a Mac)...I don't care if it's windows, linux, or mac! As long as it's digital and plays Quake III, I'm all for it! There's my 2 cents
      Peace
      -Phil
      "Got Rice"

    88. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Btw, if you've read this far, I really appreciate it. I may disagree with you but at least you listened. And for that, I say thank you, and I respect you for that.

      I did read it all but I don't agree with it. Microsoft didn't play fair so there's no way of knowing if their products won because people wanted them. Nobody had the choice. There was never a chance to find out.

      What we do know is that Microsoft killed competitors with dirty tricks and illegal behaviour. That's not conjecture. It's not hypothesis. It's established fact!

      You might claim that I'm speaking "crap" and being a "childish brat" and spreading "FUD". But I've just got to point at the court records to justify my opinion. What do you have to justify yours? That you think Windows 2000 is the "best choice"? Colour me unimpressed. It's easy to be the best when you've killed all your competition.

    89. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      An updated Windows box is more secure against script kiddies than a machine that isn't updated, but that's about it. Although, if you have a decent system adinistrator, several methods of sandboxing can make a Unix box with known exploits impervious to attack... but a good sys admin is very rare, and a company that is security consciois is rare as well.

      most of c.America is NT/2k based
      If you mean workstations. fine... If you are talking about servers, I'd say you haven't been around.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    90. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Thank you for reading my post.

      "What do you have to justify yours?"

      How about the fact that Linux, being a collaborative effort, cannot be shut down by any action MS takes. Despite that, Windows is still far ahead of Linux in terms of the end-user experience. MS and Apple are both innovative when they release a new OS. Arguably, OSX to OS9 was a huge change, as is Win2k to Windows XP. (The overall value of the changes is subjective..) Meanwhile, Linux is still playing catchup. It's clear that the UI is the weakest link for Linux. Linux has had what.. nearly 10 years to grow, and it's still lacking a modern UI. If it's that hard to solve that problem, it would appear that MS did do something radical with the introduction of Win95, and later on to 98 and so forth.

      Microsoft marketed the hell out of Windows 95. Even old Dilbert cartoons reflect that. Nothing illegal about that. I remember more Amiga commercials than I do Mac commercials. That's pretty sad. It is not wrong for Microsoft to advertise. That can make a huge difference. "Hey, buy a computer at Gateway, and you'll be cruising the web."

      You should also consider that anybody carrying MS products would have to agree to it in the first place. MS didn't suddenly conjure up billions of dollars and go telling people what to sell and what not to sell.

      I fully concede that MS was a monopoly. I never denied) that MS did shitty stuff. But you're going to have a hard time convincing me that sliminess alone made the what they are today. There's just too much to all the Windows OS's that show that lots of design-work went into it that never made it to other OS's. Their code's not so good for it, but at least thought went into it. Turn a computer into something useful (like Windows 95 did) and suddenly you have a hot product. Even iMacs became popular for that.

    91. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      But you're going to have a hard time convincing me that sliminess alone made the what they are today.

      And you'll have a long time waiting for me to do this, because I never claimed it, and I never will. You're not the only person that understands that there is never a single reason for anything. I even spelt this out in a previous post I wrote in this thread. But this is irrelevant because I only argued against this specific claim of yours:

      ... Microsoft didn't get powerful by bullying.

      I pointed out that the courts disagreed with you. You took 3 posts to complain about how I'm completely wrong and unfair but you still can't see the blindingly obvious. You even say

      I never denied) that MS did shitty stuff.

      You wax on about other positive benefits of Microsoft software - most of them benefits from monopoly power - but you can't seem to make the connection that their "shitty stuff" and their success are entwined. I couldn't care less about the benefits that you perceive - those are just your opinions and not everybody will share your views - but it's a fact, established by the judiciary, that Microsoft's success is due to "bullying". I don't understand why you continue to deny it.

    92. Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      No, it's a 'fact' that MS did bully the other companies. You cannot prove that if MS hadn't done the monopolostic stuff that they wouldn't be near as powerful as they are today. The problem is that there isn't anybody on the horizon that could have created a competing product. Linux alone is proof that it's a humungous task and few companies are up to it.

      MS got big because it had the right product at the right time. You can squash the competition, but you cannot magically force people to buy Windows machines.

  4. And this is helpful how? by 403Forbidden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All this info found will be of no use unless it can surface to mainstream media.

    I doubt any national TV stations other than TechTV read slashdot, this can be seen pretty obviously. Time Magazine just published an article on the music companies using glue to seal in unrelased songs for publications to read... I was in awe because it finally made mainstream about a month after it was on Slashdot!

    Excuse my rant, but it seems that Microsoft has done a pretty good job tucking this firmly under the proverbial carpet and I really doubt it will see the light of day again...

    1. Re:And this is helpful how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little typo on my part, the music companies aren't using glue to seal unrelased songs for publications to read it should be listen to.

      sorry for making myself look like an idiot.

    2. Re:And this is helpful how? by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I doubt any national TV stations other than TechTV read slashdot,...
      I was just watching CNN Headline News on TV, and the woman reading the story on the guy busted for pirating AotC actually quoted and attributed the Slashdot story.

      Crispin
      ----
      Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
      Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
      Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
      Available for purchase

    3. Re:And this is helpful how? by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Informative

      except of course that it's at scripting.com and that dave is widely read by media types. Heck, even the new york times (don't they have a baseball game to cover--go Angels) did a blurb on /. recently...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    4. Re:And this is helpful how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this info found will be of no use unless it can surface to mainstream media.

      This is one of the most insightful comments I've ever seen on slashdot. Now if we could only get the AP to do a writeup on this story!

    5. Re:And this is helpful how? by selan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny you mention that on the same day that the New York Times does an article about Slashdot. Gotta admit, /. is becoming more mainstream everyday.

    6. Re:And this is helpful how? by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Move over folks. The demons from Hell need to share the bathroom, it's getting a bit too cold down there.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    7. Re:And this is helpful how? by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The AP article actually attributed slashdot for finding the stock photo of the person.

      This story is the type of stuff Consumer Reports Magazine publishes in their "Selling It" column. Things like the same person in the exact same pose promoting two completely different products, with different names of themselves. Or (I like this better) the company that advertised the same thing in two different magazines about a few months apart with "Steve Johnson Uses X", but two different people were "Steve Johnson." I liked the CR headling the best - "Would the real Steve Johnson please stand up?"

      CR would be in best position to publish this if MS published this as an ad in a magazine or newspaper, as they typically stick to glorifying published ads or physical products.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    8. Re:And this is helpful how? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Why did she mention /.? Wired had it posted hours earlier. I'm sure it just a rueters or AP article anyway. It's not like /. actually broke the story.

    9. Re:And this is helpful how? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Actually, the NY Times just ran an article about Slashdot itself today. They're no TV station, but they are pretty mainstream.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    10. Re:And this is helpful how? by asv108 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      All this info found will be of no use unless it can surface to mainstream media.

      Considering /. was featured in the New York Times Today I'm sure the word will get out. /. is more well known and "mainstream" than you think. There are lots of normal people who read /. but don't post and don't read the comments.

    11. Re:And this is helpful how? by rixstep · · Score: 1

      That's the great thing about /.: news found here are NOT ignored by the rest of the world, by the mainstream. I just found this thread because someone sent me a link to a Yahoo! News! Story! Now if Yahoo! News! is carrying it already, how many other media will have it by morning? No, I disagree: thank heavens for /.!

    12. Re:And this is helpful how? by Aldurn · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want that job!
      Boss: Johnson! What are you doing?
      Jonhson: Reading Slashdot, sir!
      Boss: Good! I want your report on it by 5:00 tonight. And for the love of god, stop trolling those newbies!

      --
      char sig[120] = "\0"
    13. Re:And this is helpful how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...are you a Ph.D.?

    14. Re:And this is helpful how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt any national TV stations other than TechTV read slashdot, this can be seen pretty obviously.

      I think the Mtv people do. I catch a lot of phrases which are dredged up on /. granted some are media phrases but I find it hard to believe that a guy with a mohawk would just come up with "Has Christina Aguilera jumped the shark?"

    15. Re:And this is helpful how? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      He's not lying, I saw it too. It was right around 8:30 pm EST.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    16. Re:And this is helpful how? by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess because the CNN editors thought the line "Apparently, Jedi mind tricks didn't work" was cute enought to put on the air, and the AP article helpfully pointed to /.

      Crispin
      ----
      Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
      Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
      Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
      Available for purchase

    17. Re:And this is helpful how? by Wirr · · Score: 1
      I doubt any national TV stations other than TechTV read slashdot, this can be seen pretty obviously. Time Magazine just published an article on the music companies using glue to seal in unrelased songs for publications to read...


      The German magazine "Der Spiegel" definitly does read slashdot. The more interesting articles from slashdot go on their newsticker a few days after they're published here. With some additional text which I identified more than once to be from the commentary of the article (without attribution of course).

      I guess quite a lot of magazines skim newssites like slashdot for their own articles.

    18. Re:And this is helpful how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's this for mainstream?

    19. Re:And this is helpful how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it is mainstream (ish) news now...check out http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2329519.stm

    20. Re:And this is helpful how? by winse · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot is the best site in the world for techies that want to know," said Daniel Hedblom, a reader in Sweden.

      O great. That will bring the troll fodder to us.

      --
      this sig is deprecated
  5. Misdirected marketing on both parts... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I fail to see how is EASIER than any other OS. A basic install of any operating system on any decent set of hardware is going to be equally easy to use. I use two Apple iBook's for music, not because I think the hardware is superior, but because my software isn't available for Windows yet. Most people that use Apple computers don't use them for what they are best at (multimedia, audio, video, etc) so they've basically spent anywhere from $500-$1500 more than a better equipped PC for absolutely no reason, they aren't benefitting from "ease of use," they aren't benefitting from the power.

    And getting people to switch from their Mac to Windows? Why even spend money on that effort? Windows machines may have been more difficult to use 15 years ago, but they've caught up... anyone who still thinks they are more difficult to use hasn't tried one.

    In my experience as the "computer guy" in my circle of friends I find that 95% of their problems come from using crappy software (and stuff that installs spyware) or using crappy hardware (e-machines).

    If you can't figure out the "start" button good luck trying to interface with OSX... (how is clicking start -> programs -> microsoft word harder than clicking Macintosh HD then searching around for your software? hm...)

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm...Macs are still easier to use. XP is incredibly horrible - things are still in random places, the layout is very bad, and don't get me started on the consistency (or lack thereof).

      Unlike MS, Apple actually pays some attention to usability.

    2. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by bnenning · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Most people that use Apple computers don't use them for what they are best at (multimedia, audio, video, etc) so they've basically spent anywhere from $500-$1500 more than a better equipped PC for absolutely no reason, they aren't benefitting from "ease of use," they aren't benefitting from the power.


      The combination of Unix with a great UI and mainstream applications can be a benefit to just about everyone. If you don't think it's worth the cost, that's fine, but don't try to claim there's "absolutely no reason".


      (how is clicking start -> programs -> microsoft word harder than clicking Macintosh HD then searching around for your software? hm...)


      It probably isn't. On the other hand, you can "uninstall" an app by dragging it to the trash, without worrying about what DLLs will remain strewn about. And you can copy an app from one Mac to another by dragging and dropping (or "cp -r" if you like), rather than hunting for the install CD.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    3. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by namespan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows machines may have been more difficult to use 15 years ago, but they've caught up... anyone who still thinks they are more difficult to use hasn't tried one.

      It's not that XP is hard to use.. since Win 95, none of the Windowses has really been hard to use... although administration and installation of certain options hasn't been easy.

      The thing is the way that Apple tends to think of the little things. I configured dialup connections for my sister and my mother recently. They use XP and OS X respectively. The XP connection wasn't hard per se, but the Apple stuff was easy-breezy: orthogonal seeming, conceptually accesible, easy to find the appropriate controls, etc.

      Between these finishing touches and the hardware/software integration, I think it's likely I'll prefer using Apple stuff at home for some time to come.

      I've played with XP. Win 2k and XP do not suck. My opinion is that they're not as easy to use as OS X. And when things go south (they do on all computers), they're harder to fix...

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    4. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by _Knots · · Score: 2

      Actually... to the best of my knowledge that uninstall method has issues.

      For instance the MacOS's file-type registry (you know, the thing that links the file type stored in the resource fork to the application that's supposed to open it?) would be inconsistant after such a delete, while a proper uninstall *should* restore the settings to what they were prior to the program being installed.

      There are other things, like extensions being left around... and we all know that extensions NEVER, EVER, EVER cause system conflicts. Basically it's the DLL hell all over again, just renamed.

      Does this still apply to MacOSX? I know it's valid for 9.2 on down, and would imagine that there must be relics of applications dragged to the trash left elsewhere even in MacOSX.

      --Knots;

      --
      Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
    5. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, fuck off. Microsoft has one of the most prestigious HCI laboratories in the world. Jakob Nielsen confirms this.

    6. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by More+Trouble · · Score: 1
      (how is clicking start -> programs -> microsoft word harder than clicking Macintosh HD then searching around for your software? hm...)


      How about pressing the big colorful button marked "Applications"? That's hard. You use an iBook?

      :w

    7. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really...

      Would you care to give some examples? "Very bad" is quite a claim".

      "...and don't get me started on the consistency"
      Oh, no, I insist. Start, and maybe even finish. I would really like to hear this.

      I use WindowsXP and I am happy with it. I really can not think of any way that the OS could contribute to make me more productive.

      I don't recall having XP crash (needing a reboot) in about a year now (I usually turn it off when I am gone for the weekends however).

      If you are really desperate, you can skin XP to make it look like Aqua.

    8. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

      with MacOS 9.2.2... like I said before... my software doesn't support OSX yet.

      --
      sig.
    9. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by bdesham · · Score: 1
      resource fork
      Resource fork? We don't need no stinkin' resource fork. (Not on Mac OS X, anyway.)
      There are other things, like extensions being left around... and we all know that extensions NEVER, EVER, EVER cause system conflicts. Basically it's the DLL hell all over again, just renamed.
      OS X did away with extensions, too :-)
      --
      Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
    10. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by bnenning · · Score: 3, Interesting
      For instance the MacOS's file-type registry (you know, the thing that links the file type stored in the resource fork to the application that's supposed to open it?) would be inconsistant after such a delete


      I don't believe that was the case in 9, and I'm sure it's not in X.


      There are other things, like extensions being left around... and we all know that extensions NEVER, EVER, EVER cause system conflicts. Basically it's the DLL hell all over again, just renamed.


      Nope. Mac OS X uses "file wrappers", which essentially allow a folder to appear as a single file at the UI level. This lets you include localized resources, graphics, supporting libraries, etc. in (from the user's perspective) a single file. Drag it to the trash, and it's really all gone. The worst that happens is that you're left with a stray prefs file in ~/Library/Preferences, which is harmless. And Mac OS 9-style extensions are thankfully gone in X.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    11. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by More+Trouble · · Score: 1
      Maybe I didn't quote enough:

      If you can't figure out the "start" button good luck trying to interface with OSX... (how is clicking start -> programs -> microsoft word harder than clicking Macintosh HD then searching around for your software? hm...)

      I guess you just don't know what you're talking about.

      :w

    12. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your either a troll or that chick who wrote the "switch" to MS story earlier today.

      Please go away. Thank you.

    13. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

      If you think my points are invalid argue against them. A troll is a troll because they say things that are illogical, unrelated, untrue, or unsupported. You're "argument" is unsupported... please back yourself up, I'd like to read it!

      --
      sig.
    14. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me the MS HIG that a TPS developer can follow.

      Show me the one for every version of windows since Windows 95.

      Oh wait, they don't exist. You fail. Shut up and sit down.

    15. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Refrag · · Score: 3, Interesting
      And getting people to switch from their Mac to Windows? Why even spend money on that effort? Windows machines may have been more difficult to use 15 years ago, but they've caught up... anyone who still thinks they are more difficult to use hasn't tried one.

      They are easier to use. Try doing a drag & drop install or un-install on a Windows box for most of your software. ...and I'm a recent Windows defector. I was a MS OS user since MS-DOS and MS Word 2.0.

      Oh, btw, I keep my Applications folder in my Dock which means I get a context-menu for launching applications just like the Windows Start Menu and it even speeds up my drag & drop installs because all I have to do is drop them on that folder in the Dock.
      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    16. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      For file types, usualy what would happen is Mac OS would search for the parent program, if that wasn't found, it would then search for a similar program, if it couldn't decide on a good one, it would ask you to choose, giving a recomended and an all programs list, with an option to have all similar files open with teh same program.

      As for extensions, yeah, they did tend to get left behind. Most of the time they didn't cause problems.the main difference between them and .dlls is that *most* of the time, extensions were named appropriately giving you some idea as to whether you needed it or not (i.e. people on broad band did not need "Modem Dialer"). Most .dlls on the other hand have cryptic names

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    17. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Fished · · Score: 5, Interesting
      And getting people to switch from their Mac to Windows? Why even spend money on that effort? Windows machines may have been more difficult to use 15 years ago, but they've caught up... anyone who still thinks they are more difficult to use hasn't tried one.
      Buzz!

      The emphasis is no longer really on "easy to use." It is on "easy to setup and maintain." Windows installations (I don't care the flavor, it's true of XP, 2000 and 98) tend to slowly degrade, becoming more and more flaky until you're left with no choice but to reload.

      Drivers are also a bloody pain in the you-know-what. Every time I have to reload Windows, I spend hours hunting around the net for drivers, then updating drivers, the downdating drivers, all to get everything to work together. (Good example: ati video drivers require directx 8, which you have to download running at 640x480 before you can install the driver.) Yes, I could keep the driver disks on-hand, but that's truly a pain in the but. A pain that i don't have to endure with my Macs.

      The point being this: 10 years ago, the focus of ease of use was menus, mouses, and drag & drop. Today, the focus is on configuration and maintainability. And here the Mac clearly has MS beat. And yes, this IS because Apple owns the hardware - but I don't care so long as it works.

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    18. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Josuah · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are other things, like extensions being left around... and we all know that extensions NEVER, EVER, EVER cause system conflicts. Basically it's the DLL hell all over again, just renamed.

      Some people argue that Mac OS X doesn't do extensions anymore because everything is in Bundles. That's not true. An application may install what is called a kext which is very much like extensions were in the previous Mac OS releases. This kext will be included as part of the system when a user logs in.

      Actually... to the best of my knowledge that uninstall method has issues.

      Yes, this is true. However the drag-and-delete uninstall method will not mess up your system and really does everything except remove files which may never be used again or those kext files which will still be used. Except for kext files, anything which an application may install in */Library or ~/Library/Preferences will never be used again once you delete the application that installed it. Unfortunate to have this type of hard disk clutter, but that's the way it is right now. I think keeping preferences around is a good thing since they don't use up much space and will let a user get their preferences back if they ever reinstall a program.

      There should be an uninstall equivalent to the installer for those packages which are installed that way (yucky sentence). If you installed it with drag-and-drop you can delete it with drag-and-delete. But if it was installed with the installer, you should be able to launch an uninstaller to clean up. Still, drag-and-delete works for both types of installed applications is better than Windows where the only drag-and-delete applications are those written for DOS.

    19. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by namespan · · Score: 1

      I've played with XP. Win 2k and XP do not suck. My opinion is that they're not as easy to use as OS X. And when things go south (they do on all computers), they're harder to fix...

      Anyone think this is a non-sequitor? You're right... I should have hit preview... this is stuff from when I started to compose my thoughts. Sigh. Naked brain barf.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    20. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The telling point of your comment is that you had to do the configuring for them.

    21. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Sigh+Phi · · Score: 1

      httpamphibio.us wrote:

      And getting people to switch from their Mac to Windows? Why even spend money on that effort? Windows machines may have been more difficult to use 15 years ago, but they've caught up... anyone who still thinks they are more difficult to use hasn't tried one.

      There's crappy software on the Mac, and there's crappy software on the PC. The difference is that crappy software on the Mac fades away, while crappy software on the PC becomes standard.

      This is totally subjective. I've used both for many years side-by-side. In my opinion, Windows is superficially easy to use, and it looks a lot like a Mac, but it suffers from many boneheaded design decisions. I could name a lot of things (MDI, tiny unclickable scroll thumbs, a task bar which is useless beyond a few open windows, the hierarchical menu as primary interface to everything on your computer spring immediately to mind) that make day-to-day interaction with Windows less than a happy experience for someone who has played with more coherent interfaces (BeOS, Mac OS, Mac OS X, and I daresay bash all qualify).

      To maintain its marketshare, Microsoft doesn't have to concentrate so much on interface, though. They know that the bulk of their sales are to people who have "done the numbers" and determined the cheapest way they can get a word processor and spreadsheet into the hands of their accountants, secretaries, wives, and schoolchildren. There's quite a lot to be said about this very egalitarian "everyone can have a PC" approach, but it doesn't necessarily buy you a great UI.

      IMO, in the last two years, Apple has made great strides towards making a great geek platform that is easy to use. Ever since I was accessing shell accounts with Microphone, I've liked the idea of the Mac as a front-end to Unix. Now it's all here in one box. Excuse me while I wipe drool off my chin.

    22. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually... to the best of my knowledge that uninstall method has issues.

      I think those issues pale in comparison to the OS X meta-data and directory separator travesties.

      Talk about kludgey...
    23. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

      I use two Apple iBook's for music, not because I think the hardware is superior, but because my software [cycling74.com] isn't available for Windows yet

      I was always under the impression musicians used to use Apples BECAUSE the OS was so bad. Before I'm marked a troll, what I mean is that the "cooperative multitasking" OS9 and earlier used meant a single app could keep 100% CPU all to itself, which is an advantage when low-latency is a factor.

      I used to use sequencer software on my old Amiga 500 + green monochrome monitor up until about 5 years ago, and never really saw the need to switch until I got into Reason in a big way on PC. That app alone is worth the switch I think - if you haven't tried it - DO!

    24. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      tend to slowly degrade, becoming more and more flaky until you're left with no choice but to reload.

      Yeah, and isn't that great news when your only choice of re-installation is this "recovery disk" which came with your computer?

      Unless of course you shell out 400$ extra for the retail version.

      This was one of my major incentives to switch to Linux almost completely in 1999.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    25. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Arker · · Score: 2

      Oh, btw, I keep my Applications folder in my Dock

      That's a very neat trick. To be fair, though, I must say that it's a bit unintuitive the way you have to drag the folder to the section of the dock that normally holds minimised apps, rather than the 'quickstart' section up top, it took me a minute to figure that out... I guess there is probably some approved mac lingo for that but I'm a new Mac user myself. It's not perfect, but it's quite good... hella better than windows xp, with the added bonus of having an almost-unix system accessible underneat too. Quite happy with my TiBook, quite happy...

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    26. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'orthogonal seeming'? Sheesh. Stop wasting our time.

    27. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by TriggerHappy · · Score: 1
      I used to use sequencer software on my old Amiga 500 + green monochrome monitor up until about 5 years ago, and never really saw the need to switch until I got into Reason in a big way on PC. That app alone is worth the switch I think

      Yes, it is worth the switch - to an Apple machine, since it's available for both OS 9 and X. ;-)

    28. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by namespan · · Score: 2

      'orthogonal seeming'? Sheesh. Stop wasting our time.

      I'm serious. When it came to sets of network configurations, I didn't have to even think about how things were organized under OS X. You selected from a list of network setups (or created a new one) under a network control panel. Then, under each one of those, there were all the settings you needed to make dialup or ethernet or whatever kind of connectivity work (in tandem or seperately, I might add). Under XP, I visited three different control panels, and it wasn't clear to me how to make "sets" of settings for dialing, dialup, and TCP/IP settings. Nor was it clear how to get to each of these panels -- not all of them were easily found in the setting area. I had to use the "Find" command at one point. Which means I had to know what I was looking for. That's why my sister even needed help. My mom just needs help because she's afraid to try anything at all.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    29. Re:Misdirected marketing on both parts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows, is the most inhuman software ever developed, just go end shut down you machine, what you have to press START to turn off that?

  6. That's it!!! by crumbz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All microsoft products are gone from my machine! Oh wait, I want to play Fallout one more time.....

  7. Re:+1 BUKKAKE REFERENCE by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

    Not on Limewire......And come to think of it, Office vX / XP is free too......

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  8. Dead people? by evilviper · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember this same thing happening with the antitrust trial. Soon dead people are going to be writing in to say that they switched from Mac to Windows.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Dead people? by bugg_superstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they were the same ones who happened to vote for LBJ?

    2. Re:Dead people? by RelliK · · Score: 5, Funny
      Soon dead people are going to be writing in to say that they switched from Mac to Windows.

      ... and died?

      --
      ___
      If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    3. Re:Dead people? by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 5, Funny
      Soon dead people are going to be writing in to say that they switched from Mac to Windows.

      Of course they are ... what do you think they run in hell?

      I'd just hate to be the SysAdmin of hell ... running Exchange and IIS ... just think of all the hacking going on there ...

      :)

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
    4. Re:Dead people? by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Hehe.

      "I had a friend that switched from Mac to Windows... He's dead now."

      Sincerely,
      Evilviper
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Dead people? by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny
      Bruce Willis attempting to help a terrified 10 year old boy...
      The boy finally whispers "I see dead people using Windows".
      <gasp of horror!>
      -
      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Dead people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon dead people are going to be writing

      I doubt it, there's an election coming up in Florida, you know...

    7. Re:Dead people? by silverhalide · · Score: 2

      ...After they voted in a Florida election.

    8. Re:Dead people? by Gooberball · · Score: 2, Funny
      Of course they are ... what do you think they run in hell?

      I'd just hate to be the SysAdmin of hell ... running Exchange and IIS ... just think of all the hacking going on there ...

      :)

      Not to mention the total lack of system resources from the hordes of daemons.

      Yeah yeah yeah...I know...I know...

      -I am the Grinning God of Chaos.

    9. Re:Dead people? by Myco · · Score: 2
      No problem -- that software makes it easy to guarantee five 9's...

      ...of downtime.

    10. Re:Dead people? by swankypimp · · Score: 3, Funny
      No problem -- that software makes it easy to guarantee five 9's... ...of downtime.

      Actually, it's three nines... upside down.

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    11. Re:Dead people? by theNeophile · · Score: 1

      "Oh no, the dead have risen and are voting republican!"

    12. Re:Dead people? by gowen · · Score: 1

      Was it not JFK that half the cemeteries of Chicago turned out for?

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    13. Re:Dead people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know of at least two people who switched from Macs to WIndows. Both Went to Dartmouth college (which requires all students to have Macs). One of the students was hired by Microsoft, and the other was my friend. He switch to PC using windows, and he was surprised that it wasn't as hard as Apple says.

    14. Re:Dead people? by sv0f · · Score: 2

      Soon dead people are going to be writing in to say that they switched from Mac to Windows.

      Only in Chicago and Utah.

    15. Re:Dead people? by pankajsethi · · Score: 0

      You mean to say the hackers go to hell???? Duh!!!

  9. Ironic... by CoolVibe · · Score: 5, Funny
    That I see the Visual Studio ad here...

    But on topic, if they tracked her down, how 'bout a real photo of this person? Just for comparison's sake.

    It looks like MS is trying to do a "save my face" operation here by spinning the story by (of course) a MS PR person.

    1. Re:Ironic... by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      That I see the Visual Studio ad here...

      Actually for the past week or so I have seen Microsoft-related stories posted on slashdot as having a Visual Studio .NET ad in the comment page.

    2. Re:Ironic... by MR_Flaimbait · · Score: 1

      Alot of the ads I see on slashdot are Visual Studio .net. Microsoft's other "Convert" Ad campaign I guess!

    3. Re:Ironic... by CoolVibe · · Score: 4, Funny
      The irony is that Slashdot gets paid by microsoft to display that ad on slashdot through doubleclick.

      Man, I clicked that ad until I was blue in the face. I loved the irony of it. Hey malda! I just made you some more cash! Woohoo! Billy is paying for it :)

      *big grin*

  10. Man do I feel dumb. by nooboob · · Score: 4, Funny

    I went and immediately threw my g4 into a dumpster and bought an e-machine with xp after I saw that ad.........it was so powerful and convincing.

    1. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

      I went and immediately threw my g4 into a dumpster and bought an e-machine with xp after I saw that ad.........it was so powerful and convincing.

      Can I have your G4, then?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by spickus · · Score: 1

      emachine and XP? You are a masochist.

      --
      Indecision is the key to flexibility.
    3. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by MyHair · · Score: 2

      But at least you can now use Office XP and Internet Explorer 6.

    4. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Can I have your G4, then?

      It's in a dumpster - finders keepers, now.

      So, go ahead, grab it - before I do.

      I want those koosh balls, too, so keep your grubby paws off them.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    5. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by jnana · · Score: 4, Funny

      And don't forget about the 'History' feature that Internet Explorer has. Has anybody ever heard of such a revolutionary concept in a web browser?

    6. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by qengho · · Score: 2

      the 'History' feature that Internet Explorer has. Has anybody ever heard of such a revolutionary concept...?

      Well, it was revolutionary when it first came out. That's the main reason I switched from NN4 to IE 4 (Mac). I can't believe it took Netscape so long to implement it.

    7. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by jnana · · Score: 1

      Ummm, i remember netscape having a 'history' or whatever it was called before nn4 -- netscape 'gold' (3.0) had a history, though it may have been just a session history.

    8. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by iankerickson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why ask? All you have to do to restore his Mac is drag it out of the trashcan.

      --
      Democracy. Whiskey. Sexy. Pick any two.
    9. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Proud founder of the Church of Bog. In Bog we trust!

      This isn't as funny as you think it is. "Bog" is the Russian word for "God."

      --

      I write in my journal
    10. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 2
      Proud founder of the Church of Bog. In Bog we trust!

      This isn't as funny as you think it is. "Bog" is the Russian word for "God."

      ...and Polish ... and Slovak ... and Ukrainian...(with an allowance for g / h differences...)

      --
      mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
    11. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by jnana · · Score: 1

      Shit, shit, shit. I had the English meaning in mind -- slang for 'toilet' -- and thought it was just a nice Anglo-Saxon sounding word that means toilet, and also sounds like god. God damn, i hate thinking of new sigs. Thanks for the info.

    12. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by qengho · · Score: 2

      i remember netscape having a 'history' or whatever it was called before nn4

      Really? I remember scouring the menus trying to find it when IE4 came out. If it was there, it was buried so deep that no reasonable user could be expected to locate it. Yet another reason NN4 should die a horrible death (speaking as a web designer).

    13. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by jnana · · Score: 1

      Okay, just to make sure, I did a search. It's kind of hard to find anything that talks about browsers that old, but this link seems to be from 1995 -- way before netscape 4 -- and it says that netscape does have a history feature. Search for this text: "Browsers also track the recent history of documents viewed."

    14. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That's the main reason I switched from NN4 to IE 4 (Mac).

      IIRC, the history feature started with Navigator 2. It would autocomplete addresses as you typed them in.

    15. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      (Netscape 4 definitely had History, and it was more sortable than IE's.)

      IE's

      * Isn't accurate, it loses pages
      * Displays stuff sorted by server title, which will often be some low-level content server rather than the site title.

      It's a nuisance.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    16. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by KH · · Score: 1

      It was always under bookmark menu(s). On some platform, you could press Command+H or Alt+H to invoke the command. I'd think the feature was already in Mosaic.

      Was it so hard to find? Or do you mean the history feature exactly like IE?

    17. Re:Man do I feel dumb. by qengho · · Score: 2

      Right, I should have said NN4 has no persistent History. Yeah, it kept track of where you'd been in your current session, but flushed it when you quit. IE4 saved the history so you could look up a site you'd been to several days previously.

  11. Please consider/remember by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft spends big when it comes to it's PR and marekting firms. More than on any other single item in the budget.

    These firms have a mandate from MS to spread out and hit hard. They lurk here and on ZDNet, as an example, just waiting for opportunities to impersonate Joe/Jane Average user.

    They pump out hourly press releases that all have the same theme..."MS is best and who can fault a leader?...Join us in the fun and we will do all the thinking for you."

    It is all too clear what they think of their customers...brain-dead sheep, begging to be sheared.

    To understand the mechanics, it may help to first study a long standing 'marketing' ploy known as 'the big lie'. I don't normally use references like this, but the best manual I know is titled 'Rise and Fall of the Third Reich'.

    1. Re:Please consider/remember by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
      Microsoft spends big when it comes to it's PR and marekting firms. More than on any other single item in the budget.

      ... Except lawyers, of course.

    2. Re:Please consider/remember by djupedal · · Score: 2

      The lawyers are in-house...already on the payroll. Not exactly an 'expense' (budget item), perhaps. But you're correct...legal fees are no where near trivial.

      But in terms of cost, I'd say upper management first, then counsel, then PR, then operating expense.

    3. Re:Please consider/remember by nsayer · · Score: 2

      but the best manual I know is titled 'Rise and Fall of the Third Reich'.

      Which means that Val must certainly play the part of Vidkun Quisling.

      (When the Nazis rolled into Norway, Quisling was the stooge they appointed to run the place for them. His name has become the word used to describe such a person)

    4. Re:Please consider/remember by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Microsoft spends big when it comes to it's PR and marekting firms. More than on any other single item in the budget.

      care to substantiate this ? it would be news to me.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    5. Re:Please consider/remember by djupedal · · Score: 2

      You're the one that works for MS...you tell me

      Ok, I'll help you out....every large corporation (non 'small business') spends heavily on PR and marketing. It's the nature of the breed. MS simply doesn't have any other weapon....after all, how much does it cost to produce another copy of the same thing, over and over. The packaging costs more than the content. And we know how much MS relies on image...what did they pay the Stones for that tag line a few years back?

      You know those tens of thousands of copies of software MS offered to give away to schools in an effort to get off light for being busted by the Governement? Marketing expense. You know that software Bill promised China? Marketing expense. Do you recall all those handhelds they gave away at that developer workshop held just for Palm devotees? Marketing expense. Need more? I didn't think so.

      I took the easy side of the debate, and simply pointed out the obvious. Since you can't prove otherwise (and you know it), you elected to challange me on the slim hope I'd crack and back off.

      Nice try to get me to argue down, but I'm not biting. Try again. This time try page 6 in your shill handbook, where it says 'maximize the opportunity to engage sympathy from the audience by characterizing the accused as being decent and honorable...avoid statements that may be disputed, and work to earn debate points by endearing yourself to the panel instead.'

      Remember though...the panel here is a hard sell. Not like those preppies you grilled when you got your MBA in marketing. And this time what you say goes into the public record.

    6. Re:Please consider/remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Microsoft spends big when it comes to it's PR and marekting firms

      And this is what they get for their money? Considering what they get for their money for their software, I guess it isn't real surprising....

      > It is all too clear what they think of their customers...brain-dead sheep, begging to be sheared

      And this is different than any other company using a "PR and marketing firm' how? In fact, this is different from the 6 (or is it 5?) major media/'news' outlets how?

      -- 'those who don't study history are doomed to repeat it'

    7. Re:Please consider/remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you may have been a little hard on the previous poster. Maybe he's a shill, maybe not... but either way, think of the impact it'd have if something like the Halloween memo turned up showing that Microsoft was paying people to strafe forums with FUD or "XP is GREAT!" slogans.

      That'd be an ostrich-sized egg on Microsoft's face. Does anyone on Slashdot have a lead on some hard evidence here?

      [BTW, I'm disappointed that the AP was able to track down the "real" anonymous user before Slashdot. C'mon, it's pretty common knowledge that DOC files frequently carry baggage that identifies its origin. Let's dig harder!]

    8. Re:Please consider/remember by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

      Microsoft spends big when it comes to it's PR and marekting firms. More than on any other single item in the budget.

      I dunno, that "Balmer's PCP/cocaine/amphetamine" budget must be pretty big too...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Please consider/remember by bmajik · · Score: 2

      The microsoft balance sheet is a matter of public record. I asked you where your data was because i know you're making it up.

      Your statement that MS spends more on marketing than _anything_ else is ridiculous. Paying those employees has to cost something, dont you think ?

      Here's an example. The entire world made a huge deal when they found out that the XBox marketing budget was going to be 500m dollars. 500m is a drop in the bucket, budget wise. And it's been one of the most aggressive advertising campaigns ever.

      Your bit about including items in other budget "buckets" that are really marketing type moves (i.e. writing off stuff you give away) is moderately insightful, but comes out to a rounding error in the overall microsoft budget.

      Nothing about what you said is "obvious". And given how much money we throw at lab hardware on my team, (and how little we spend on marketing), im pretty inclined to say you're full of it.

      Your entire original post is 100% presumption. And your follow up is worse. I don't have (or want) an MBA, nor do i care about marketing. If i found out that MS spent more on marketing than anything else, I'd be more upset about it than you'd be, beleive me.

      In any case, i can only conclude that you want to be known for your baseless statements which evolve into presumptuous insults, as you've presented nothing else in this discussion.

      Here's some data for you, though:
      http://www.microsoft.com/msft/sec/FY02/10 k2002.htm

      or, to spell it right out:

      Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue was 18.0% in 2000, 19.3% in 2001, and 19.1% in 2002.

      Thats _all sales and marketing expenses_
      19.1% of 28b is a hair under $5b.

      I happen to know that MS spends significantly more than $5b on R&D, for example. Much more so than any "free stuff writeoffs" could possibly make up for.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  12. Why Are You Guys So Obsessed Over This? by Pave+Low · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I mean, this is a fairly insignificant story, and you guys post this article with chock full of links so that Microsoft can look bad.

    I mean, jeez, get some priorities or something. Nobody outside of maybe slashdotters or other MS-haters really would care, you people are frothing out the mouths over their godamn PR campaign! Is there nothing about Microsoft you won't bitch about?

    Maybe if you guys focused your time on making Linux better, you people wouldn't be so jealous.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    1. Re:Why Are You Guys So Obsessed Over This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this a troll? It's SO true!

    2. Re:Why Are You Guys So Obsessed Over This? by Dalcius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone find it ironic that the parent came right after a post talking about Microsoft trolls?

      On topic, I think it's very relevant. Complaining and laughing at a company as stupid as Microsoft is relaxing. =)

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    3. Re:Why Are You Guys So Obsessed Over This? by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What's funny is that my earlier post today Was modded down as a troll, and sparked a series of arguments that MS wouldn't be trolling/Astroturfing /.
      (Can somebody give me back the points I lost for Troloing please? ;-)

    4. Re:Why Are You Guys So Obsessed Over This? by fitten · · Score: 1

      People get fixated on the big-bad-wolf and must live/breath it. For some, computers aren't just tools, they are religions and these people behave about their religi^H^H^H^H^H^HOS just as the Christians do about their religion... which includes shouting on streetcorners for all to hear and drawing as much attention to Sata^H^H^H^HMicrosoft as they can in bad light.

    5. Re:Why Are You Guys So Obsessed Over This? by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

      Haha! And you got modded as 'flaimbait' LOL...

      This web site is like an AA meeting where you come hang out with others that have the same 'problem'.

  13. Microsoft? Be dishonest??? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    Is this story suggesting that Microsoft would be dishonest? I'm shocked... Not.

    More Microsoft issues: Windows XP shows the Direction Microsoft is Going.

    1. Re:Microsoft? Be dishonest??? by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

      That is a *REALLY* good page. Just bookmarked it and emailed links to friends.

      Excellent work. Excellent.

      BlackBolt

  14. I've got a story for them by Gordy · · Score: 0
    To quote from the article:
    Do you have an idea for a story? We'd love to hear from you. How have you used Microsoft software to make your home or work life easier, more fun, faster, or simpler? Submit your ideas, and you could get published on the Insider Web site! Submit Your Idea Today!

    Some how I don't think they'll publish a story on returning Windows for a refund and installing Linux. 8P

    -Gordy

    1. Re:I've got a story for them by dacarr · · Score: 2

      Sure, if you don't mind dealing with a PDF or .DOC of the submission form. =p

      --
      This sig no verb.
    2. Re:I've got a story for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would this be a problem, most major alt productive software can product .doc files, hell even Java can product a word document!
      And if, for what ever reason you are still stuck, then rename a .rtf to .doc :)
      Then you have .pdf, GoBe Productive is free, open source and produces PDF files, Adobe have an Online creater which supports text (which if you can't create there is something very wrong) and bitmap (.bmp), GIF (.gif), JPEG (.jpg), PCX (.pcx), PNG (.png), RLE (.rle), TIFF (.tif), .ps and Office.

  15. "astroturf" and "microsoft" by dpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly not a candidate for googlewhacking. The combination gives about 1300 hits.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  16. Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not get on that bike again, where someone says /. is the hard news site of the century. If you read it here first, it's because you're not looking elsewhere, that's all. Get out on the net and look around for yourself before you hand this place an Emmy.

  17. What surprises me... by Powercntrl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...is not that Microsoft has done this, but that they're so shocked and shaken over Apple's switch campaign that they felt this was necessary.

    Without getting too offtopic, I owned a Mac for awhile and wasn't too thrilled with it. Yes, it was usable, but the thought that kept repeating in my mind was "I can sell this on eBay and use the money to buy MUCH better hardware for my PC." - so I did. Do I regret no longer being "biplatform"? Nope...

    It wasn't so much that I had anything against the Mac platform... I just didn't NEED it. My PC didn't give me any trouble and all the apps I use for doing what I like to do work fine on the PC. I guess if I felt the same way about the Macintosh to begin with, I wouldn't want to switch either and no amount of Microsoft fluff could change my mind. In the end, it just comes down to using what it is you like to use...

    As a side note, I think some of you Slashdotters agree that you'd be more than willing to go "biplatform" if Macs weren't so expensive... There's a $199 Wal-Mart PC for the curious Mac users, where's the $199 Mac for curious PC users?

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:What surprises me... by Slur · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a side note, I think some of you Slashdotters agree that you'd be more than willing to go "biplatform" if Macs weren't so expensive... There's a $199 Wal-Mart PC for the curious Mac users, where's the $199 Mac for curious PC users?

      Same place they sell the $12,000 Mercedes Benz.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    2. Re:What surprises me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's pretty funny. Except that a Mercedes isn't made out of the same commodity parts (except for a non-standard CPU) as a Hyundai.

      ~~~

    3. Re:What surprises me... by WCMI92 · · Score: 2

      "As a side note, I think some of you Slashdotters agree that you'd be more than willing to go "biplatform" if Macs weren't so expensive... There's a $199 Wal-Mart PC for the curious Mac users, where's the $199 Mac for curious PC users?"

      This is an excellent point.

      I'd like nothing better than to replace my three PC's with Macs. I like the OS, I like the system better. But I can't afford the 2x cost.

      My three PC's are: Athlon 1.2 that is a server, Athlon 1.33 that is my workstation, and an old Celeron notebook.

      My server runs 2K Server (only because I'm stydying for the MCSE, . but I've got to pay the bills... My notebook runs only Mandrake 9. My workstation has Manadrake 9 and 2K Pro (2K is only for games).

      The most striking thing is how much more stable my PC's have been with Linux than they were with the relatively stable Win 2K. With a good OS, the PC platform is just as stable as the Apple platform.

      Thing is, I have less money in my three computers than it would cost to buy ONE Mac that would be equivalent to my workstation.

      Until Apple makes a decent $600 machine, they will never penetrate the mass market. I'm thinking awful serious about a used G4 iMac,just to have an OSX machine, but I expect to pay $7-800 for that even...

      That is just too expensive.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    4. Re:What surprises me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they might after they get the Power4 chip. The main problem is right now a 600$ pc with a PPC would suck horribly, and probably turn the user off from all future mac purchases.

    5. Re:What surprises me... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      There's a $199 Wal-Mart PC for the curious Mac users, where's the $199 Mac for curious PC users?

      Funny you should ask that. I just bought an old PowerMac 8500 on eBay ($60), because I've been reading in mac newsgroups about super-cheap G3 and G4 upgrade cards. I'm going to buy a G3/500 Mhz card for $149, 256M RAM for about $50 (the box is expandable to 1G), and install Jaguar. So, for a little over $300 (if I get a discount on OS X), I'm going to have a new Mac that's almost as fast as this summer's iBooks.

      Look, the reason there's so many hardware options available for x86-based PCs is because people have been hacking it for so long. It seems that sort of thing's beginning to happen with Apple hardware; give it a few years, and I think you'll see similar pricing.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    6. Re:What surprises me... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Look, the reason there's so many hardware options available for x86-based PCs is because people have been hacking it for so long.

      Nope. Here's the reasons:

      Mac started its life with a proprietary bus (NuBus). The PC industry has shown what happens to proprietary busses -- remember MCA, or MFM, or RLL?

      Apple then decided 5 Volts was the one and only true voltage. Both for DIMMs and their advanced-but-silly RS-422 ports.

      And then there's localtalk and serial printers, and SCSI (proprietary, slow, and expensive for a personal computer, in that order). I almost forgot 3.5" disks...

      Yes, I know Macs use PCI and IDE now, and have for a long time. The damage was done by then, though. Same thing for printers and modems.

      But wait -- Apple decided to continue their proprietary-is-as-proprietary-does lunacy even after they (halfheartedly) realised being different isn't always the best thing. Firewire comes to mind. Lets confuse consumers by making sure every company uses a different name.

      Gahh... even though I know that Macs aren't like this anymore, I can't look at one without remembering these silly Macisms.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:What surprises me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez this is dumb.

    8. Re:What surprises me... by neonstz · · Score: 2
      As a side note, I think some of you Slashdotters agree that you'd be more than willing to go "biplatform" if Macs weren't so expensive... There's a $199 Wal-Mart PC for the curious Mac users, where's the $199 Mac for curious PC users?

      I think the guy in the van with the engine running have some cheap macs "with no warranty" for sale.

    9. Re:What surprises me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MFM and RLL are not busses. They are respectively Multi Frequency Modulation and Run Length Limited. They were used in early hard drive technologies, MFM then RLL replaced it, then there was ESDI, finally we got IDE (SCSI AFAIK was with us the whole time).

    10. Re:What surprises me... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >MFM and RLL are not busses.

      Yes and no. Yes, they are the type of encoding used on the drive. No because they were also the common lingo (at the time) for the overly complicated name "Seagate Technology model 506 controller bus". You'd have a hard time getting a drive from a store if you said "I want a ST-506 bus drive"... But if you said "MFM drive" they would help you.

      This is inline with a 5-pin mini-DIN port being called a PS/2 port, a 50-pin HD Sub-D connector being called a SCSI-2 connector, and other little fun quirks, like calling the BIOS menu in new motherboards the CMOS.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:What surprises me... by Cap'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      here:
      http://www.powermax.com/cgi-global/generate .cgi?p= C-U53200

      It's not a great computer, but the PC isn't either.

  18. Associated Press & Yahoo! News Aren't Mainstre by Carnage4Life · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This isn't mainstream?. Considering they broke this a few hours after it ran on Slashdot I'm not sure what else you expect. A CNN <blink>breaking news</blink> flash?

  19. Microsoft saved my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, my name is Valerie G. Mallinson and I work for a Microsoft PR firm.

    One day I asked my boss for a new video camera for my Mac. He said "Remember, your paycheck comes from Microsoft, let's switch you for our new marketing campaign!"

    So I switched.

    And then my boss said "Hey, Microsoft wants to tell the world that you switched, but you're no prettier than those people Apple used. We wish you looked BETTER than Apple people."

    And so they used some stock photos to give me a make over.

    1. Re:Microsoft saved my job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you've all been blessed in the fact that you've never had to work with marketing people. The use of stock photos and made-up consumer testimonials is not the exception... it's the rule. This is not a practise underhanded marketeers use... all marketeers are underhanded.

  20. People have switched by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's been plenty of people that switched from Apple to Windows, they're just too embarrassed to publicly admit their mistake.

    1. Re:People have switched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft shouldn't find it that hard to collect testimonies of Mac-to-PC switching from the guys running this website.

      Can't wait for the resulting ads (preferably featuring some redneck ranting on and on about how he hates Macs...)

  21. the sick thing is.... by sharph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    all the dishonesty.... its legal.

    they never made any connection from the woman to the article, they just placed it on the same page and hinted that she was writing it.

    (of course, i'm not a lawyer. so i could be 100% wrong.)

    1. Re:the sick thing is.... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      Lying is not illegal.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:the sick thing is.... by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 1

      How do I know you're not lying?

  22. Good thing ... by bizitch · · Score: 3, Funny

    No one is claiming the intelecual property rights on stupidity ....

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
    1. Re:Good thing ... by Quixote · · Score: 2

      ... but Microsoft does have a monopoly there.

    2. Re:Good thing ... by bizitch · · Score: 1

      Jesus! - Take your meds, anonymous pussy

      I'm sure you thought M$ was really briliant when it decided to come up with advertising campaign retorting Apple's ads featuring its own flunkies and stock pictures...yes, now that I think about it was truely brilliant.

      Also - how exactly is bashing a monopoly "communistic"?

      --
      ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  23. But Why Did She Switch? by Spencerian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two things get me about this:

    1) The woman works at a PR firm--a business where Macintosh systems are fairly strong, albeit not quite as much as advertising and the graphic arts. So, what kind of Mac did she switch from? A crappy 6-year old Mac or something ancient? Hell, anything would make you switch from that.

    2) By being a contractual employee of Microsoft, this ad really doesn't give MS a lot of credit for their product. Can't they simply find a relatively honest person to endorse? I mean, really! Not everyone hates Microsoft, and I'm sure there are enough people to say, "Sure, it works for me."

    This can't be a good thing, and it only creates more alienation in a business where getting along still means a little something, if only to make friends before you merge your companies.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:But Why Did She Switch? by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not everyone hates Microsoft, and I'm sure there are enough people to say, "Sure, it works for me."

      Apparently not.

      It's telling that they couldn't find one single person that would give a testimonial.

      Have you ever thought that possibly every one of the "MS supporters" you see online are actually paid to astroturf?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:But Why Did She Switch? by Slur · · Score: 2

      Have you ever thought that possibly every one of the "MS supporters" you see online are actually paid to astroturf?

      Actually, when Apple released Mac OS X 10.2 and a zillion people popped up on SlashDot and various Mac sites to bitch and whine about the $130 price tag I became dead certain of it.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    3. Re:But Why Did She Switch? by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Have you ever thought that possibly every one of the "MS supporters" you see online are actually paid to astroturf?"

      Yes.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    4. Re:But Why Did She Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, I just marked that joker as foe earlier today. It really is hard to tell the trolls from the astroturfers though lately. I see the decline in quality trolling as a primary cause of this.

      Recently though, PhysicsGenius has had some really slick trolls, so maybe there is a mini-revival of actual clever trolling.

  24. There are lots of switchers like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you may be horrified by the enormous amount of mac users which turn out to be actually windows users. Methinks all of them deserve what they get.

  25. Re:All I can say is... by sharph · · Score: 1

    Thats what watching 50 hours of UHF over and over again will do to you.

  26. Marketing 101 by zentec · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Microsoft is living proof that with enough creative marketing, you truly can wrap a turd in colored foil and call it candy!

    Some people may see this as insignificant in light of all the other corporate scandals in the world. However, it's just one more instance of Microsoft treating their customers and/or prospective customers as bafoons.

    Many companies have fallen on hard times because they failed to respect the intelligence of their customers. The *only* thing keeping people from ditching Microsoft like a bad habit is the lack of anything comparable. That day will come, and Microsoft will surely rue it.

    1. Re:Marketing 101 by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

      That's good. that's just greeeeeaaaat! And how about secret information hidden in Excel files, but which was supposed to be deleted? And how about one Word file that carried data from every computer the damn document passed through? And how about all those GUIDs and other IDs that end in M$ Office documents? And why some Word files manage to carry spurious information from deleted data? And, for God's sake I saw several times how certain Windows machines (and NOT ONLY the ill-famed Win98) send small little packets to one address that occurs to belong to M$?

      Who fails to respect the intelligence of their customers?

    2. Re:Marketing 101 by Alsee · · Score: 2

      with enough creative marketing, you truly can wrap a turd in colored foil and call it candy!

      And in Marketing 102 they teach you how to sell an empty peice of colored foil

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Marketing 101 by techstar25 · · Score: 2

      "Many companies have fallen on hard times because they failed to respect the intelligence of their customers."

      "Intelligence of their customers". Hmmmmm. Their customers are using Windows after all. Actually I think they are very familiar with their customers intelligence, and that's why they think they can get away with stuff like this. ;)

    4. Re:Marketing 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh, I've already switched my really important stuff, my finances (from Quicken to GnuCash 1.6.7), my documents (from Word to OpenOffice), and my OS (from Windows 2000 to Mandrake Linux 9.0).

      Only thing left for me is to get the really really important stuff (Civilization 3 and Half-Life/Counter Strike) on Linux.

  27. WineX and Fallout by willpost · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How well it works in WineX: 4 out of 5
    User Comments: Fallout works really fine; Haven't
    experienced any glitches while testing
    the game.

    http://www.transgaming.com/gamepage.php?gameid=173

    1. Re:WineX and Fallout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe Fallout uses SafeDisc copy protection. Just use the CVS of winex for the game and don't pay transgaming a cent.

  28. Valerie G. Mallinson in 20 Years by Twintop · · Score: 5, Funny

    Daughter: "Mommy, did you have your 15 minutes of fame?"
    Valerie: "Yes, honey."
    Daughter: "Did you like it, mommy?"
    Valerie: "No, honey."
    Daughter: "Why?"
    Valerie: "It was for Microsoft."

  29. It goes to show you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Windows 2000 user, I'm not at all surprised that Microsoft had to fabricate the story of someone who switched from a Mac OS X to Windows XP.

  30. Boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime I think how these guys are stupid, I get surprised as they go a step lower!

    Then I remember these guys are the richest ones on this world... :-/

    And some folks, who I wont name out of compassion and because I also say my share of bs, call them "geniuses"... *sigh*

    Cest la vie, I guess...

  31. How they got the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They downloaded the word doc. Looked at the properties of the doc. Saw that the url "valmalgal.com" was in it. Did a WHOIS on valmalgal.com, came up with her name.

  32. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 54 by sujan · · Score: 1

    hahahahahaahahah...argghaaaaaggarrraa....(coughs). ..i can't breathe.....i can't breathe

  33. "A spokeswoman from Apple would not comment" by bobdotorg · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best part of the article:
    "A spokeswoman from Apple would not comment"

    Yeah - because she was still cleaning up all of the millk that she laughed through her nose.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:"A spokeswoman from Apple would not comment" by MaxwellsSilverHammer · · Score: 1

      Or maybe because it like DEVOURED her paper, and she was like "hunhhh??". And it was a really good paper too. And then she had to write it again really fast so it wasn't as good.

  34. Truth in Advertising, Breaking News on Slashdot by Hoarse+Whisperer · · Score: 4, Funny

    The ramifications of this are astounding, imagine if this sort of thing is going on in other industries. You know those housewives who give testimonials about the effectiveness of washing powder? The fast cars that are guaranteed to improve your sex appeal? How can we trust anything we see in advertising anymore?

    1. Re:Truth in Advertising, Breaking News on Slashdot by swankypimp · · Score: 4, Funny
      How can we trust anything we see in advertising anymore?

      That's why I only buy products endorsed by people who e-mail me "special deals". If it weren't for these fine gentlemen, I never would have found out about Cock-Enlarging Herbal Viagra (guaranteed to make her scream), nor would have believed that Nubile Webcam Wenches would be Sucking and Fondling just for me. I'm not sure what spirit of benevolence caused you to mail me this amazing offer, but thank you, Friend. I mean, if you can't trust getabiggerdick@hotmail.com, who can you trust?

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  35. Ed Wood ad agency? by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Using stock photos in "testimonials" is something low-budget spammers do. Did Microsoft really think we wouldn't notice? They could do some TV commercials with stock footage. Do they use the Ed Wood ad agency?

    Advertisers don't "get it" why Gen X isn't buying their crap. We have figured out that marketing and lying have become synonyms, and we don't like it. Anybody remember the movie, Crazy People? Dudley Moore wanted to use honesty in advertising, and they locked him up in the nuthouse. The ads worked, though.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    1. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      Advertisers don't "get it" why Gen X isn't buying their crap. We have figured out that marketing and lying have become synonyms, and we don't like it.

      Damn, and here I thought it was because we're all unemployed or in fear of losing our jobs. Man, I wish I was joking . . .

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    2. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by x136 · · Score: 5, Funny
      They could do some TV commercials with stock footage.

      I can see it now...

      Quick fade into rocket taking off. Cut to two 70's crash test sedans in a head-on collision. Horizontal wipe to atomic bomb detonating. Crossfade to fat guy taking a cannonball in the stomach. Star wipe to garish orange screen with Microsoft logo and "Where do you want to go today?" tagline. All done to the tune of cheap, generic classical music.

      In a strangely Microsoftian twist, this'd all be done with iMovie, which would be revealed on Slashdot a few weeks later. The ad would be immediately pulled.
      --
      SIGFEH
    3. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Honest advertising would be nice to see. But what do you expect Microsoft to say about XP?

      "Look at the pretty colors"

      "It doesn't lock up as much as previous versions."

      "Look at the pretty colors"

    4. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by el_mex · · Score: 1
      "Look at the pretty colors"

      "It doesn't lock up as much as previous versions."

      "Look at the pretty colors"


      If you think pretty colors and a step up in stability makes people buy products, you are in another planet.

      My company spends tons of money on MS products just because of improvements with new versions, specially in O/S stability.

    5. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er wait.

      you just agreed with him.

      ???

    6. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by rmull · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that people buy products because of "a step up in stability."

      Oooh! Shiny! *poing*

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
    7. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the same thing Apple says about OS X?

    8. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company didn't spends tons of money on MS products just because of improvements with new versions, specially in O/S stability.

      My company spent tons of money 'cause MS changed their licensing policy to really milk us - we're locked in.

      That's why XP is so good. If it wasn't, then I guess our IT executives really fucked up. And that's impossible, because they're so talented and they make so much money.

    9. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Doesn't it just get ya right here *thumps chest* when you've gotta shell out more money for something you should have had years ago?

      I love that feeling.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    10. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2
      But what do you expect Microsoft to say about XP?

      (I have never recieved anything from MS, aside from a "thank you letter" for them sending me a free copy of XP.)

      How about:
      • New Luna interface*
      • "Customize the Start Menu"
      • Smooth* multi-user environment
      • Stable*
      • NT kernal finally designed for the home user
      • Runs all** new games, natively
      • RUNS ON COMMODITY HARDWARE


      There is enough new about XP to fill a "switch" campaign; MS just doesn't have the cojones to pull it off, nor the respect for their users.

      ------------------
      *: These are, of course, relative to previous MS versions / the extant consumer PC market.

      **: If there is a game on the shelves today that doesn't have a windows version, I'm not aware of it.
    11. Re:Ed Wood ad agency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the weenie gen-x'ers don't get it that nobody gives a fuck?

  36. Best statement by ehiris · · Score: 2

    Is the one about how much of a surfing addict she is and how nice IE6 is. How can a good looking women become a surfing addict? It's not like she has to have her porn every day....

  37. personal website? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Hrm, the AP says that they found the writer's personal website. Anyone out there have the URL?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:personal website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:personal website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From http://www.microsoft.com/insider/downloads/ShowOff YourSkills.doc, it's valmalgal.com.

    3. Re:personal website? by MyHair · · Score: 1

      The two respondents as of this posting say valmalgal.com, but at 9:28pm EST (Indiana) it's a default "Coming Soon..." page by register.com.

      Was it something else before? I checked Google but didn't find a cache.

    4. Re:personal website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fucking thing attempted to set my default home page to partner14.firehunt.com. Welcome to my firewall's permanent block list, firehunt.com.

    5. Re:personal website? by grub · · Score: 2



      Created on..............: Tue, Apr 02, 2002
      Expires on..............: Wed, Apr 02, 2003
      Record last updated on..: Tue, Apr 02, 2002


      "Coming Soon" and she bought the domain > 6 months ago? Hey Val, you could get past the "Coming Soon.." page if you kept your Mac and used Claris Homepage!

      :PP

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    6. Re:personal website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. Re:All I can say is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <i>STOOOPAD! YOU SOO STOOOPAD!</i>

    ROFLMAO! I love a good UHF reference.

  39. Busted! by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's favorite song must be "Oops, I Did It Again." After the MSNBC article about Ebay fraud (riddled with ads for uBid, hmmm), this looks to be the latest in what could become a series of goofs by MS.

    Where do you want to find us tooting our own horn today?

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  40. The submission .doc is still available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My questions is, why did they ask that you include any user names or passwords that might be needed to view your work? Shouldn't they already have them?

    Show Off Your Skills

    Are you a whiz at using a Microsoft product at home or in the office? Are you the one everyone comes to when they need to know how to do something? If so, we'd love to see what you can do.

    We're collecting ideas for articles on the Microsoft Insider Web site. Some of your work or submissions may be included in a gallery on the site, featured in press releases, or developed into how-to articles.

    Note: We will not feature any of your work without first receiving your permission.

    To participate, please send us:

    Your first and last name

    Name of your company or organization (if applicable)

    Brief description of your company or organization, including industry and size

    Brief description of which Microsoft product you use and how you use it

    Personal contact information, including address, phone number and e-mail address

    Samples of your work--either hard copies of your marketing materials or a Web site address where we can view your work. Please be sure to include any user names or passwords that might be needed.

    You can submit your sample(s) one of two ways:
    1. For online materials, send an e-mail message with the subject line Microsoft Publisher Customer Stories to insider@microsoft.com. (Note: Please do not send any attachments over 1 megabyte in size.)
    2. For printed materials, send hard copies to: Microsoft Insider Customer Stories
    Microsoft Corporation
    9931 Willows Road
    Redmond, WA 98052
    Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law.

  41. Bigger players are forced to switch to MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The more outrageous news is that Microsoft has forced the some of the largest multinational ad agencies to get rid of competitors products (Novell, IBM, etc.) if they wanted to see any Microsoft$ in their books.
    I spoke with sysadmins, who told me that Microsoft audited their IS department on a regular basis to make sure that whatever Microsoft police decided to die is dead indeed.
    Compared to that this documented switch is just the tip of the iceberg.
    I really wonder that these incidents should also be included in the Microsoft anti-trust trial.

  42. How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Download "ShowOffYourSkills.doc" from the web page.

    $ strings ShowOffYourSkills.doc | less
    /* truncated... */
    Show Off Your Skills
    Normal.dot
    Katherine L. Trunkey
    Microsoft Word 10.0
    valmalgal.com
    Show Off Your SkillsTitle
    _PID_HLINKS
    _AdHocReviewCycleID
    _Em ailSubject
    _AuthorEmailDisplayName
    _ReviewingToo lsShownOnce
    Comments
    Valerie Mallinson (Wes Rataushk & Assc Inc)
    Microsoft Word Document
    MSWordDoc
    Word.Document.8

    This "switcher" had her privacy compromised by Microsoft software. Her web site is not yet active but you can look up the "Wes Rataushk" firm to find that it is in Redmond. The following blog belongs to a coworker of hers, perhaps you could ask him more:

    http://216.239.53.100/search?q=cache:ncxQ S-5T-OQC:www.pamkeesey.com/+Wes+Rataushk&hl=en&ie= UTF-8

    -s.

    1. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There is no escape from the nerd patrol. Taking down your web site won't help (even though google didn't cache it, damnit) :

      Organization:
      Valerie G Mallinson
      Valerie Mallinson
      820 NE 180th St
      Shoreline, WA 98155
      US
      Phone: (206) 612-9084
      Email: valmalgal@attbi.com

      Registrar Name....: Register.com
      Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
      Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

      Domain Name: VALMALGAL.COM

      Created on..............: Tue, Apr 02, 2002
      Expires on..............: Wed, Apr 02, 2003
      Record last updated on..: Tue, Apr 02, 2002

      Administrative Contact:
      Valerie G Mallinson
      Valerie Mallinson
      820 NE 180th St
      Shoreline, WA 98155
      US
      Phone: (206) 612-9084
      Email: valmalgal@attbi.com

      Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
      Register.Com
      Domain Registrar
      575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor
      New York, NY 10018
      US
      Phone: 902-749-2701
      Fax..: 902-749-5429
      Email: domain-registrar@register.com

      Domain servers in listed order:

      DNS15.REGISTER.COM 216.21.234.78
      DNS16.REGISTER.COM 209.67.50.246

    2. Re:How they traced her down by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well gee, buddy, thanks a lot for violating her online rights. It's not every day that the government lets a select few take over on spying on people and violating their Constitutional right to privacy. Before you know it, they will be tracking her in a big government database and steal her organs while she is sleeping and then match up all her data and assume her identity!

      I hope you can't sleep at night, because I know I don't!

      --

      --sdem
    3. Re:How they traced her down by coolfrood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just wondering... Isn't MS Word 10.0 the MS Word that runs on Mac OS X and not Office XP? If she already had Word on Mac, why did she have to switch to XP for it, like she claims she did?

    4. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you, a freakin' numb fuck? The poster simply re-posted here something that was publicly available. I repeat, PUBLICLY AVAILABLE. I'm all for personal privacy and all, but something that's already LEGITIMATELY available? If she didn't want this information made available, she should have never had it published in that way. Whether or not she knew that this information would be publicly available is an entirely different problem, and none of our business.

    5. Re:How they traced her down by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

      So not only did Microsoft use one of their contracted workers for a pseudo-Switch campaign, they actually used a worker who was working on the campaign itself!! That's X-TRA LAME(tm)!

      "My name is Steve Jobs, and I'm the CEO of a large fruit company."

    6. Re:How they traced her down by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 2

      No. MS Word 10.0 is Word 2002, the version which ships with Office XP.

    7. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft word 10.0? Hmm that sounds like Office for MacOS X. Heh ooops...

    8. Re:How they traced her down by grub · · Score: 2


      It's not just MS software that spies on you!

      bash$ vi hello.txt

      (type "hello" and save)

      bash$ strings hello.txt
      hello
      hello.txt
      Normal.dot
      Grub L. McGrub
      vi 1.023
      OpenBSD 3.1-CURRENT
      Grub L. McGrub (grub.net LLC)
      vi text document
      vi.document.1.023

      Yes, it's a joke.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    9. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone *please* explain to me what the advantage of entering that information into a .doc that you create is? I don't use Word so I don't know if it's something that's just siphoned out of other Windows programs or you have to do it deliberately... is it a company thing or what?

    10. Re:How they traced her down by kahn · · Score: 0

      Yup, not only is this public info, but Microsoft will even try to keep it safe!

      A quote from the .doc;
      Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law.

    11. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah crap! I fell for your joke, and now I'm stuck in vi! How do I exit? Help! Heeelllppp! Remember...you can't spell evil without 'vi'.

    12. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, I'm the only other one who laughed. :Q!

    13. Re:How they traced her down by Nerull · · Score: 1

      When you install Office, you tell it your name, etc. Word puts that inside all .doc files.

    14. Re:How they traced her down by frozenray · · Score: 1


      $ strings ShowOffYourSkills.doc | less /* truncated... */
      Show Off Your Skills
      Normal.dot
      Katherine L. Trunkey


      BTW, a Katherine Trunkey works for Redmond-based Ignia LLC, a company which seems to be quite heavily involved with Microsoft.

      WARNING: The site mentioned above contains copious amounts of PHB babble ("provide advanced skill sets based on our core focuses") as well as ActiveX controls. Clicking on the links above may damage your sanity, your system stability, or both.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    15. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit! I walk past her house on the way to
      the bus stop every day.

    16. Re:How they traced her down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumb ass question...

      hmm.. how to run a "string on a word file" ?
      pls advice

  43. Re:Associated Press & Yahoo! News Aren't Mains by fwankypoo · · Score: 1
    breaking news


    Thank god slashdot doesn't permit the "" tag.
    --
    The time of day is 29:33.
  44. From the FUDwerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this be-otch went from an 8 year Mac "owner" to Windows XP and she's already mastered device drivers and MS Office... RRRRIIIIIIIIIIIGHT

  45. Behind the Lines by pyrrho · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Fire another round, corporal."

    "But sir... we're running out of feet."

    --

    -pyrrho

  46. All Will Be Forgiven *IF*... by portege00 · · Score: 2

    ...she's as hot as that chick that M$ used in the ad. Otherwise, someone must pay.

    --
    Trolls make great pets. Adopt one today!
  47. What is all this slashdot traffic? by AELinuxGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you think that M$ gets pissed that 95% of their traffic for web marketing programs comes from slashdot?

  48. Spokeswomen of Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, don't let Microsoft ask Google to remove the page. That's a damn goodlooking woman, and we all know that sells your products and services. Remember the Aimster girl? How about Voicestream's Jamie Lee Curtis? I could go on and on. How about someone putting together a calendar of the spokeswomen of industry, or something like that!

    1. Re:Spokeswomen of Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about Voicestream's Jamie Lee Curtis?

      Are you trying to say Voicestream suffered from those ads? Jamie Lee Curtis is an old hag.

  49. Yum yum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sound of M$ sheep eating astroturf!

  50. This is just sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are like drug addicts, and each time I think they have hit rock bottom, they plumb new depths.
    What's next? Are they going to take hostages until the victim's family members buy Microsoft products?

  51. Honesty??? by Glanz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This proves once again that Microsoft cannot do a single thing honestly. Their corporate culture is so imbibed in lies, illegalities, borderline and otherwise, outrageous affronts to the intelligence of the Windows user base, that they keep stuffing their corporate asses into their own mouths. What surprises me after all these years of abuse on all levels from lies about security, deliberate sabotage of third party soft, stealing of code, is that they actually have a "following" of users, BinLaden included right alongside of Bush and Grandma down the street willing to defend them and kiss Billy"s ass just because he is rich enough to be their god or they find it an absolute necessity to play a few games. This doesn't say much for either the intelligence or the courage of the "average" user.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  52. The real question is.... by ethank · · Score: 1

    Who is the asian man with black glasses and headphones? He's always in print ads.

    And on the same note as stock photography, the David Byrne book "Your Action World: Winners Are Losers With a New Attitude" features a hilarious comic strip done entirely with bad stock photography and thought bubbles.

  53. Some switch by Kostya · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to this site, she was helping this guy put together PocketPC solutions for use on his Africa biking trip. Sounds like she was a little more in the MS fold than the article said. I'm surprised she even still used Macs, being a PocketPC "solutions troubleshooter" and all!

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
    1. Re:Some switch by corby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wha wha wha? The yanked Microsoft article includes this cliffhanger ending:

      *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

      Gosh, do you think they'll be able to get Valerie to 'try' a Pocket PC? After she's been a FREAKING PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT on the device? Too bad we'll never find out!

  54. legal? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Since when is lying illegal? I mean, other then in court and to the police lying is and has always been legal. There can be civil penalties if you disparage someone, like if I said you raped children you could sue me. But you would have to prove that I knew what I was saying was false.

    they never made any connection from the woman to the article, they just placed it on the same page and hinted that she was writing it.

    And if they had... so what? It still wouldn't be a crime.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:legal? by sharph · · Score: 1

      i stand corrected. wow. come to think of it, that assumption was really stupid.

    2. Re:legal? by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      Mostly true.

      There is also something known as false advertising which can get a company a hefty fine.

      Knowing MS, they'd just pay it as chump change.

  55. Re:All I can say is... by Quirk · · Score: 2

    Have you considered speech therapy?

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  56. Secret Tool AP used to find Valerie's name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here it is...

    are you ready...????

    [anon] less /Volumes/Users/anon/Downloads/ShowOffYourSkills.do c

    or you could use Properties... in MS Word if you have time to wait for word to launch and open

    She has a domain name registered, valmalgal.com, but nothing on it yet.

  57. Microsoft in military software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The end of the world will happen when Microsoft enters the military software market. Then we will see wars started and sponsored by Microsoft - as just an other PR gem.

    1. Re:Microsoft in military software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and Bill Gates gets the Peace Nobel Prize, when the war stops - shortly after the defeated party signs an upgrade deal with Microsoft.

  58. Congrats! by crandall · · Score: 1

    You've discovered that what was probably a joke, was faked! Congratulations!

    Make fun of Apple's Switch ads all day, but when Microsoft joins in, quick, better find a reason to bash them.

    Better hurry and mod this post down too, before someone sees it and ruins your 'victory'.

    1. Re:Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really?!?! a joke?! then why did M$ PULL THE PAGE? big joke huh? dumbass.....

    2. Re:Congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. And is anyone stupid enough to think all the Apple 'switch' people are real? Including that drugged-out woman? Of course if Apple does something like this it's "brilliant", Micrsofot does the same thing and it's "terrible". That Salashdot article a few days back was right on the money, geeks have become totally unoriginal lemmings parroting the same opinions endlessly.

  59. Just doing her job... by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    As a PR rep wouldn't this just be doing her job in promoting Microsoft? :)

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Just doing her job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You know, "ethics" has become such a buzzword these days. Maybe someone should send her a copy of the memo.

      I guess the heads of Enron and Worldcom were jsut doing their jobs too. Hey, the MAJOR shareholders did maximize there return, after all. Isn't that how it is supposed to work?

    2. Re:Just doing her job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Promoting Microsoft is not her job. I work in the PR field and promoting is not what PR is for. Promoting is part of a marketing companies work. Her job is more along the lines of making sure that people hear what MS wants them to hear and dont hear what they dont want them to. It would be her job to try and make this whole story disappear. Just like it was her job to get the switch story out in the first place.

  60. "Hidden" Personal Data by Captain+Chad · · Score: 5, Informative
    In the MS Word document" (still available on the MS site), under properties, under the "Custom" tab, the
    1. _AuthorEmailDisplayName
    property is set to
    1. Valerie Mallinson (Wes Rataushk & Assc Inc)
    I guess that's hidden if you don't know much about computers.
    --
    Check out Chad's News
  61. The truth be told by CaptTrips · · Score: 1

    Who cares which OS is more stable or looks prettier? In truth, command line platforms are the most stable (DOS, *nix, etc). As for User Interfaces Apple and Microsoft have upgraded their User Interfaces considerably, but they need to give due credit to Amiga for pioneering UI-based operating systems, from which they obviously ripped off.

    Apple OSX = Amiga
    Microsoft Windows XP = Amiga

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
    1. Re:The truth be told by realmolo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Huh?

      I loved the Amiga too, but the UI of the Amiga wasn't all that cool. POTENTIALLY cool, but in practice it sucked. The Macintosh had it beat as far as usability goes.

    2. Re:The truth be told by SparkyMartin · · Score: 3, Informative

      As for User Interfaces Apple and Microsoft have upgraded their User Interfaces considerably, but they need to give due credit to Amiga for pioneering UI-based operating systems, from which they obviously ripped off.

      Considering that the Mac came out a year earlier than the Amiga, and the Apple Lisa came out a year before the Mac, unless Apple had a time machine in the early 80's I don't see how they could have ripped off the Amiga UI.

      It's possible they could have used McFly's Flux Capacitor though...

    3. Re:The truth be told by SparkyMartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, but back then, ANYTHING with a GUI expecially one that allowed you to use a mouse was cool.

      Remember GEOS for the Commodore 64? Very cool if you didn't mind waiting 4 minutes for the thing to load, then another 2 minutes for it to load GEOS-Write or whatever it was called. A perfect example of being POTENTIALLY cool, but in practice it sucked"

    4. Re:The truth be told by AlbertSiegel · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Apple stole the GUI from Xerox back in the late 70's. As I remember it, Xerox invented the GUI and the mouse. Or at least all this was first used in a Xerox computer. Note that the Xerox computer was not for sale to the public. It was used only at Xerox.

      --
      If only Bill Gates had a penny for every time Windows crashed... oh wait.. he does!
    5. Re:The truth be told by foo12 · · Score: 1

      No, Apple licensed the concept from Xerox for a large outlay of Apple stock. There was no "stealing"

    6. Re:The truth be told by Viadd · · Score: 2
      Apple stole the GUI from Xerox
      No, Apple bought the GUI from Xerox, then improved it.
    7. Re:The truth be told by OneFix · · Score: 2

      Agreed...I remembered an interesting story about M$ paying off a C= developer for access to AmigaOS 2.0 because they had already dropped Amiga Basic...which let them have the source to all AmigaOS versions up to 1.2?/1.3?...

      Of course, look at WorkBench 2.0 and tell me that 95's "3D" interface isn't based on it...

      But, credit has to be given to Xerox for being the REAL first, but it's also worth mentioning that the Amiga's OS was exteremely advanced for it's time...there are actually "Modern OS's" that haven't implimented the features in 3.0...(DataTypes kick a$$!!!)...and when will I be able to have a mouse pointer that's more than just "Black & White" again??? (this is supposed to be slated for XF86 5.0)

    8. Re:The truth be told by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Windows 95's 3D interface, color scheme, etc, was most closely ripped from OS/2 2.0, which was in development around the time WorkBench 2.0 was, so i doubt there was any conspiracy there.

      Hell, the default blue-green background of Windows 95 was ripped from OS/2. IBM actually did a case study on which color induced the most focused relaxation and focused on that blue-green.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  62. The Sink Thanks of Security by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

    Soooooooo, is this the company that promises us a full-fletched Terminator 1001B termed "Palladin" to protect our privacy and safeguard our security? Is this that same company that recently promised to solve privacy concerns for its bullet-holed Passport in front of the Government? Is this that same company that cries foul of seeing holes, bugs, trojans roaming all its platforms and claims there should be some order on publishing such things on Inet? It seems so...

    Only M$ could publish an article signed by an anonymous writer. And show who she is in front of hundreds of millions of Internet users...

    That's a lot of privacy... I like it! How long it will take to see M$ MUD - Where BG went today?

  63. Did Microsoft hint at it? by jeremyacole · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Did anyone notice this: up above:
    Windows XP relieved my fears about switching. I can read my files, import e-mail addresses from my Palm* to the Microsoft Outlook® messaging and collaboration client, and keep my Web favorites.
    and then down below:
    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!
    "our writer" ? A small hint that it's a Microsoft employee?
    1. Re:Did Microsoft hint at it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just meant that she's the one who "wrote in"... like saying "valerie, my boy!"

      they are just liars... i fully expect them to come out with MS GOD, which would be a program that your run from microsoft, that when you run it you get to go to heaven... and if you don't? Well, that's YOUR risk... Buy It Now!

    2. Re:Did Microsoft hint at it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "our writer" ? A small hint that it's a Microsoft employee?

      No, it's just that saying "our writer" is more polite than saying "that bitch."

    3. Re:Did Microsoft hint at it? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      "our writer" ? A small hint that it's a Microsoft employee?

      Not really. It's grammatically correct when speaking about a subject to refer to "ours."

      Imagine a pair of biologist watching a lion, and saying "now that she's given birth, our lion will have to tend to these cubs."

      For all the factual errors in that article ("Hey, look, Windows XP is better than my old Mac II!"), they at least got the grammar sorta right (AFAIK.)

  64. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pave Low is actually employed by Microsoft...or does he just like being lied to?

    1. Re:This just in by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      -1 Offtopic... yeah

      Go back and read this guy's past comments. If this guy doesn't work for Microsoft in a direct or indirect way, I'd be surprised.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    2. Re:This just in by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Let me quote a previous post of his to demonstrate:

      Regarding the good review on Linux in the NYT:
      " a left leaning newspaper (which has more and more blurred the line between news and commentary with their liberal bias) endorses a communist's OS.

      Who's next, the People's Daily?"

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    3. Re:This just in by TurdFurgeson · · Score: 0

      Dude, you need to take a pill and relax. Holy cow!

      "If he doesn't think like me he must be related to Microsoft!"

      no... He just doesn't think like you... damn..

    4. Re:This just in by Pave+Low · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, because there's just no way anybody can disagree on slashdot and not work for Microsoft!

      what incredibly shallow and mind-numbing logic.

      And seeing how my legitimate comment gets modded -1, it's pretty obvious what a circle jerk this place is now.

      --
      SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    5. Re:This just in by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      While I understand your point that I shouldn't be biased towards someone who disagrees with me, there is a difference between stating an opinion, and flaming anyone who dislikes Microsoft while in the same breath calling Linux a communist operating system (while this is true as in Marxist Communism [to a degree IMO, anyway], it has a large negative connotation and that's the way I took it).

      I'll respect someone's opinion if it's half-way informed and refrains from seriously flaming others.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    6. Re:This just in by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Go back and read some of your previous comments.

      Better yet, I'll help you.

      Quoth the troll:
      ---------------
      today's activities notwithstanding, VA Linux is headed for the tubes.
      Once this POS hits bankruptcy, the Linux as Microsoft-beater movement will be over.

      (This ia a real prediction, not a troll).


      Calling VA Software a POS, or am I mis-reading? That's not a way to make friends on a VA Software website... gee, ya think?
      ---------------

      " [by running Linux] you also get less than have the features and productivity you'd get from running windows."

      While some would call this an opinion, and in a very general sense it can be, this is just a plain retarded statement. Features? Start naming things Linux can't do that Windows can and stop once you hit the half-way mark.

      And how about productivity? Well, name something that I can't do on Linux that I need to do to become productive in a "normal environment."

      ---------------

      " [the] left leaning [New York Times] (which has more and more blurred the line between news and commentary with their liberal bias) endorses a communist's OS.

      Who's next, the People's Daily?"


      There's plenty more in his message history. Prosecution rests.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  65. Apple is easier to install and configure by El · · Score: 2

    ...if for not other reason than because the set of hardware on which it must run is much more restricted. Microsoft is attempting to do the impossible -- support every PC and PC peripheral that has ever been shipped. This is the source of many M$ software headaches -- especially during installation.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by megaduck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Microsoft is attempting to do the impossible -- support every PC and PC peripheral that has ever been shipped.

      That's not true, actually. Windows has native support for a very small percentage of PC hardware and peripherals. They leave the majority of driver writing and device support to the hardware manufacturers, just like Apple does. Windows XP needs extra drivers for my scanner, just like OS X.

      Even when MS does support hardware, it's not as easy as a Mac. For example, both Windows and OS X include drivers for my HP Deskjet. In order to setup the printer on Windows I have to:

      1. Plug the printer in.
      2. Click "Next" a few times.
      3. Select my printer model.
      4. Tell Windows that I want it to be my default printer.
      5. Tell it I don't want to print a test page.
      6. Click "Finish".

      To set up the same printer on a Mac you:
      1. Plug it in.

      Macs aren't easier to configure because they support a more limited range of hardware. They're easier to configure because the OS behaves in a much more sensible fashion.

      --
      This .sig for rent.
    2. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by spoon42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft is attempting to do the impossible -- support every PC and PC peripheral that has ever been shipped

      Nice try, idiot. Maybe every peripheral shipped in the last three years. And even then, maybe. They don't even come close to supporting every product they've ever shipped. Arg. Got a 5+ year old NIC lying around? Even if it uses the same chipset as one you could go out and buy? Good luck finding a driver. Meanwhile, on linux: modprobe, ifconfig, ...there is no step three. :-p Linux actually comes close to your supposed universal support-- and it runs on a dozen other architectures, with all kinds of devices. Funny that. And without a multi-billion dollar marketing^Wengineering budget.

      Really, that's one of the dumbest things I've read today. Fucking crack monkeys.

      --
      --- this comment is presented in WIDE SCREEN STEREO!!!
    3. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by thechink · · Score: 1

      If Windows XP supports your printer then all you have to do is:

      1. Plug it in.

    4. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by medscaper · · Score: 1
      Funny. I just bought an Epson printer. Brand new, state of the art. To set up the printer in Windows, I had to do the above. Took all of...ohhhhh...30 seconds, start to finish.

      In order to set it up on my wife's IBook, it took about 20 minutes of dragging files here and navigating through folders and generally fucking around, THEN it took a reinstall of OSX to fix whatever the hell caused the nasty crash that wouldn't let any of her drivers load for anything...network, mouse, video, sound...all dead.

      So, yeah. Native support is awesome for those two HP printers and the Apple printers that the Macs support.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    5. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      To set up the same printer on a Mac you:

      1. Plug it in.


      Yeah, I know. I can't wait to get one of the new wireless-equipped and Rendezvous-savvy printers so we can simplify the install process a bit.

      Won't that be a beautiful thing? A zero-step installation processes for a printer. Sweeeet.

      --

      I write in my journal
    6. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by Tokerat · · Score: 1

      Espon never does it right for Mac. Dont' judge Apple for Espon re-inventing the wheel.

      Why didn't you use their installer program? At least they provide one...

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    7. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1
      That's funny, my experience was the exact opposite. Setting up an 820c on a Win98se machine - 2 hours, with one of those being on hold with tech support.

      iBook with OS X - Almost instantaneous.

      And I wish it was just that one printer I had problems with on the Windows machine...
      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    8. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by shepd · · Score: 2

      What happens when you have more than one printer on a Mac?

      It doesn't sound like there's a way to combat the question of which printer gets chosen by what programs to me.

      Not to mention I'm having trouble finding the centronics interface on a Mac (especially one running OS X)...

      Oh, right. I forgot. Macs use USB because it's slower for printing.

      Yay. Chalk another one up for the costs for simplicity of design.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by macalmaclan · · Score: 1

      This actually confused me the first time I installed a printer on OS X. Being so used to the Windoze "Next, next, next... Finish" I plugged the HP into my Mac - nothing happened, it was just working. Apple have actually made it too simple. Now all I need is one of those Bluetooth printers to really foncuse me :)

    10. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Simple. The most recently plugged in one becomes the default printer. All applications you print from offer you a drop down menu allowing you to pick what printer you want to print to. If you aren't content with the most recently plugged in one being the default, you simply launch the Print Center utility, click on one of your other printers, and click the "Make Default" toolbar button.

    11. Re:Apple is easier to install and configure by El · · Score: 2

      Read the post, moron. I was comparing Windows to Mac, not Windows to Linux. Yes, Linux has much better support for obsolete hardware than Windows. I know, having installed both Mandrake and Win2K on serveral old boxes. Way to demonstrate your ignorance, and in the most obnoxious manner possible.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  66. AP == Associated Press by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    How do we know the Anonymous Poster isn't an employee of Linux

    I don't see "Anonymous Poster" capitalized that way anywhere in the blurb or the article.

    If you're trying to draw a parallel between "AP" in the blurb and "AC" as a common abbreviation for Slashdot's Anonymous Coward, you're mistaken, but I forgive you: AP == Associated Press.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  67. M$ is now the old IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    M$ has now become their worst nightmare. They are where IBM was in the 80's and 90's. While IBM has learned to let go of their old legacies and monopolies, M$ holds on to a largely irrelevant position of protecting what once was. I feel sorry for the young programmers that went to work for M$ hoping to change the world. They now work for a company that has as management several old geezers living in the past and very afraid to realize the implications of a book like "The Innovators Dilemma."

    Innovation has become an oft oft-used and little heeded word at M$. When the wealth of the status quo out weighs the gains of the revolutionary, old men clutch at straws and young men are wasted.

    billg led them to where they are, but now he is dragging them down.

  68. logic? by djupedal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, you'd also buy a Mercedes bulletproof limo and Gulfstream personal jet if they were closer to your budget as well?

    What kind of logic is that? We would be crazy to argue with that. It's a debater's tactic that puts the respondent in a no-win position, regardless of their answer. Would you do drugs if there was no risk? Would you stop ageing if you could? Would you fly if someone gave you wings?

    1. Re:logic? by G-funk · · Score: 2

      So, you'd also buy a Mercedes bulletproof limo and Gulfstream personal jet if they were closer to your budget as well?

      You know, if mac hardware was any better than PC hardware at half the price, that argument might hold water. But it's not. It's commodity hardware, 90% of which is the exact same thing you buy for your intel box. The only thing macs have going for them hardware-wise is the limited choice you have, which gives apple greater control.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:logic? by jnana · · Score: 2

      commodity hardware like Gigabit Ethernet? Oh, yeah, I forgot, that comes standard on every PC.

  69. How's the weather in Redmond today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You toady you.

    This is a huge corporation that is claiming things that aren't true. They (you) should be hung up by their balls.

    Kudos to /. for shining the light on this dirty dirty company.

  70. Spot the similarities by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Have you ever noticed how much of the spam that fills your mailbox every day comes littered with testimonials from happy customers?

    "I was skeptical that FatAway(tm) would work but I've dropped 47 dress sizes in two weeks -- George from New York"

    Since I purchased my FastCash(tm) Work at Home Kit, I've earned over twelve trillion dollars in just one month -- Dick from Arkasas

    etc, etc.

    The interesting similarity between such testimonials and Microsoft's little works of fiction are:
    1. they're all effectively anonymous
    2. they all make outrageous claims which are at best gross overstatement and more likely to be downright lies
    3. they're all from unscrupulous marketers who e-thics are stupid people that use the Net.

    Like most consumers, I only have so much money to spend -- so will I buy the breast enlargement cream or Windows XP? Hmmmm...
    1. Re:Spot the similarities by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      "so will I buy the breast enlargement cream or Windows XP?"

      I guess that depends on whether you're female or uh..uh...

  71. Typical by Micah · · Score: 2

    Sucky as it is, scaring up "testimonials" from people who are involved in a company seems pretty common.

    I once wrote a fairly awesome tool for finding expired domains, for a company I once worked for. The company president sent off an e-mail telling all employees of the company to write up a testimonial about how great this new product was, and how it gave so much more useful results than the "e-crap.com" that other search engines suggested. He mentioned in the e-mail "even Micah, if he's willing" -- which I took to mean he thought I'd be above writing a fake testimonial (which is true, I WOULD have a problem doing that).

    Funny thing is, I actually had a true testimonial. I used the thing to find some very good domains for a project I was working on. So the company put up a "testimonial" page with about 6 completely BS testimonials and my true one. :-)

    Ironically, my tool has been taken down for some reason which I'm still not sure of (I think they were ticking off the WHOIS people), and now it has degraded to one that suggests things like "e-crap.com".

  72. Properties by ryanspage · · Score: 1

    By viewing the document's properties, under the "custom" tab, one can find the following, "Valerie Mallinson (Wes Rataushk & Assc Inc)."

  73. For how long? by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Redundant
    For how long are the teeming masses going to beat this dead horse? Microsoft's "PR" campaing is no different from what any other company does day in and day out. Does anyone really think that a company like Microsoft (this is Microsoft, fer fucks sake) would cower in fear as half a million giggling nerds say "hah! got you! u sux!!"?

    And while I'm at it, let's not forget that people who appear in the Apple switch ads are real people, located by the company through god-knows-what mechanism and invited to offer "testimonials" gratis. Yeah, sure.

    1. Re:For how long? by Silverhammer · · Score: 1

      Blockquoth the poster:

      located by the company through god-knows-what mechanism

      Ooo, the tests all said I was gifted, but I didn't know I was actually God... (Apple's "Tell Us" Page)

    2. Re:For how long? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Interesting. So what makes someone go to Apple's web site and look for that page? Perhaps the ads.

      Thought so. Chiken and egg thing, hmmmm?

    3. Re:For how long? by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Interesting. So what makes someone go to Apple's web site and look for that page? Perhaps the ads.

      No, Apple started asking for testimonials last year, after the release of OS X 10.1, and the user community responded. It's really that simple.

      Thought so. Chiken and egg thing, hmmmm?

      Why is it so hard for you to believe that these testimonials are genuine?

    4. Re:For how long? by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

      Microsoft's "PR" campaing is no different from what any other company does day in and day out.

      I've seen quite a few posts along these lines: "This is a common marketing practice, so what's the big deal?"

      Fact is, it IS common for companies to "dramatize" testimonials, but the significance to those here on Slashdot is that Microsoft apparently can't come up with an actual person who voluntarily gave up Mac in favor of Microsoft. When faced with a successful campaign by Apple, featuring real people with realistic stories, the best Microsoft can do is an airbrushed model beaming "My colors are brighter and my whites stay whiter...erm...I mean, I switched to Windows!"

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    5. Re:For how long? by NetFu · · Score: 2

      No, I've used Macs for more than 8 years and they started this crap *years* ago. That doesn't make it any more genuine.

      Why is it so hard to believe they're genuine? Because most people tend to believe that BIG companies and other big organizations (i.e. government) are corrupted to some extent by their power. Also, it doesn't hurt that so many of these "testimonials" have turned out to be B.S. over the years, too (Sony did it not too long ago when they used Sony employees to give "testimonials" in one of their commercials).

      Another thing -- what else would you expect from a company (Apple) that has sued companies out of existence (I worked for one) and otherwise screwed corporate "partners" (I worked for one, knew many, and bought from many more -- all gone now) for their own gain?

      I, for one, don't expect Apple (or most other big companies) to be HONEST, that's for damn sure...

  74. Be a Super-Sleuth! by corby · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey kids!

    Want to engage in real-life Kompooter Forensics just like AP does? Follow these easy steps!

    1) Go to Google's cache of the article, since it has now been pulled by Microsoft.

    2) Now click on the link at the bottom of the cache page, which reads "Download the submission form in Word format." Whoops! Looks like those kid whizzes at Microsoft didn't actually remove everything!

    3) Haven't made the switch to Microsoft yet? Word still new to you? No prob. Go to the 'File' Menu and select Properties while you are viewing the Microsoft Word document. Don't worry! No chmod here!

    4) Peruse the tabs to uncover all of AP's 'personal data', including Valerie's zany new website. You go, girl!

    1. Re:Be a Super-Sleuth! by SurfsUp · · Score: 3

      1) wget http://www.microsoft.com/insider/downloads/ShowOff YourSkills.pdf

      2) strings ShowOffYourSkills.pdf

      --
      Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
    2. Re:Be a Super-Sleuth! by Yekrats · · Score: 1

      She hasn't done much with her website, has she? Registered on April 2, 2002.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
    3. Re:Be a Super-Sleuth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep, it says:

      /CreationDate (D:20020619144524-07'00')
      /ModDate (D:20020619144524-07'00')
      /Producer (Acrobat Distiller 5.0.5 \(Windows\))
      /Author (v-melih)

      Busted!

  75. She switched back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    either the ps managers changed their mind or she (the freelance writer) switched back to mac :P

  76. So how's the weather in Redmond today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it was probably a "joke". How long did you and the boys take to think up that explanation, Bill? Sad, sad effort.

    1. Re:So how's the weather in Redmond today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is really sad how everyone jumped on this... its not like no one else has made a switch ad -_- the ogn one comes to mind where the guy calls photoshop a game. just get outta your hole. Worse shit happens every day. ie. thousands of people die in africa.. we should worry about them not every fucking detail on ms's site.

  77. Simple Test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, she's a contract model for freelance photography stock photo pages, *and* she's a technical writer who switched from a Mac to XP? Let's get her in the lab and watch her fumble around with some Nvidia drivers and see how proficient she is. Wonder how much she's getting paid to keep quiet. Ha ha, good work /.

  78. MSNBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSNBC might actually pay you to advertise on Donahue, with his 3 viewers.

  79. Reboot after Windows Update by yerricde · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Start, and maybe even finish

    That's part of the problem. You click the Start button to Stop the computer.

    I really can not think of any way that the OS could contribute to make me more productive.

    How about being compiled specifically for your processor's microarchitecture? Public-source operating systems (such as GNU/Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD, and Darwin) can provide this, and operating systems designed to run only on one or two microarchitectures (i.e. Mac OS X, which runs on PowerPC G3 and G4) can provide this. Can Windows?

    I don't recall having XP crash (needing a reboot) in about a year now

    What about when it goes and downloads a patch to its networking stack, IE, the J?v? VM, or Outlook Express? Granted, that's not a crash, but it still needs a reboot.

    If you are really desperate, you can skin XP to make it look like Aqua.

    Go to jail, go directly to jail, do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  80. How do you know that it is MS owned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off hand, I would guess that MS does not produce even there own web pages. No innovative software(actually, I susect that they own the worms going on Unix/Linux/Apple). No real MS customers. What else is fake about them?

    1. Re:How do you know that it is MS owned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it man. Shit.

  81. Confessions of a Windows to MenuetOS Convert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Windows to MenuetOS: Mission Accomplished, Convert Thrilled

    Yes, it's true. I like the Menuet Operating System enough to change my whole computing world around.* Here's the bottom line: Menuet gives me more opportunities to write 32-bit assembly code. It's about more and better...

    I can read my files, I can write my files, I can even write to video memory. To my surpise, the process of switching was as easy as all the Menuet OS marketing hype had promised. I was up and running as fast as I could format the floppy, Girl's Scouts Honor taken. First, let me tell you more about why I converted...

    I'm an assembler geek. All those high-level abstractions found in other operating systems are for pansy-assed sissies. I want an OS that required that I coded my own TCP/IP stack before I coded a web browser. In assembler. Menuet delivered.

    I discover more treats daily. For example, I have to reverse engineer Microsoft's .doc file format if I want to implement a word processor whose data files can be infected with viruses. It will be an ongoing process, but I'm thrilled so far.

    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to using Menuet OS, we will be working on getting her to try writing a Befunge interpreter for it! Stay tuned for more developments!

  82. Waiting for the obvious PR counter-punch by Harv · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope they'll do it, I really do. Apple I mean. It's obvious:

    "Microsoft? Hell, they can't even find enough real people to do their ads, they had to dredge up an employee!"

  83. hiring by asv108 · · Score: 2

    You know microsoft got a lot of their intial development talent in 80's by recruiting a bunch of people from Xerox PARC. You think they would use the same stragey and offer to double all the salaries of the Apple marketing people.

  84. A freelance writer huh? by Trogre · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:
    "I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing."

    But if you work for Microsoft PR, you can't be freelance now, can you?

    Perhaps she was misquoted:
    "I am writing promotion materials for Freelancer, a game which will demand the best in computing hardware"

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  85. Then rebuild the desktop database by yerricde · · Score: 2

    For instance the MacOS's file-type registry (you know, the thing that links the file type stored in the resource fork to the application that's supposed to open it?) would be inconsistant after such a delete

    On Mac OS 6.x through 9.x, you can rebuild the desktop database by holding Command+Option while you mount the drive (for fixed media, usually when Finder starts). It scans all the apps on your hard disk, looking for "bundle" bits that tell whether a program has some sort of association, then it looks for BNDL, FREF, open, and kind resources to determine which file types to associate to an app.

    Can you rebuild the Windows Registry that easily?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Then rebuild the desktop database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .NET apps don't use the registry anymore. They use something called a gac and use versioning and stuff. It's much better than before. Also, apps use xml files for configuration parameters (basically, an EXE will look in the directory in which it resides for an .config file and load it automagically and you can then access this information programatically from within your program. This is supposed to provide the added benefit of "xcopy-deployment" which is basically you can copy the app from one machine to another by drag-n-drop and it is supposed to work because no registry setup/etc is required. I've just started using it and it was trivial to use and it actually works quite well.

  86. Who cares? by sheldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually chances are this person at the ad agency decided to throw this together as a trial to see how it would take.

    Then someone in marketing found out about it and called the ad agency asking them to pull it because it's a completely worthless ad campaign. Apple's switch commercials have generated a lot of bad press for the company, mostly with parodies and spoofs, and have done nothing to convince non-current Mac owners to buy a new Mac. To copy this bad campaign from the Microsoft side would just look pathetic.

    Apple unfortunately has a long history of this... their commercials target the Mac faithful. I guess you could call this the innovator's dilemna, because if Apple started targetting the Macintosh towards the Windows market they would alienate the "Think Different" people who only buy Mac's because they aren't mainstream.

    In the end, the rest of the world doesn't give a shit anyway. Well except maybe slashdot, but they try to make headlines out of anything that can be twisted in an anti-Microsoft way.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down with the ship.

  87. why apple will never succeed... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, look at the difference:

    Apple: spends the better part of a year looking for interesting, off-beat, photogenic people. Then they read hundreds of emails. They hand-pick a bunch of folks and pay money to fly them out, coach them, then tape them. They put the ads on nationwide TV.

    Microsoft: Somebody at Microsoft's PR firm picks up the phone and says "Hey, remember that writer, Valerie? And remember how the screen on her Mac Centris 610 finally died and she got that Windows laptop? .. What's that? .. Yeah that was funny.. though I probably I did the same thing the first time I used a CD-ROM .. But anyway, track her down and give her $500 to finish some copy for our new campaign. I've already got most of it written.. .. what?.. No, just put a stock photo like usual .. okay .. bye!"

    How easy! That's why Apple will always be a "niche" player. They give a shit about stuff like this. Like the guy in college who actually wrote all his lab reports while everybody else just copied one from last year.

    1. Re:why apple will never succeed... by el_mex · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Like the guy in college who actually wrote all his lab reports while everybody else just copied one from last year.


      If you think MS does not do research you are greatly, sadly mistaken. Go to http://research.microsoft.com/ to have a look. They have a great many very intelligent people in all areas of computing. I myself know several CompSci PhDs that have gone over there to work.


      This exemplifies the problem with open source zealots^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hadvocates: They consider MS the enemy and then proceed to underestimate it so badly that they fall flat on their ass when argumenting.

      MS is a formidable enemy: They hire extremely intelligent people. They make pinpointed, coordinated efforts to get what they want.

      OSS advocates have loosely-banded groups of volunteers of whom only a hardcore few are consistent contributors. Then when those few dedicated people have disagreements, they split into a few groups doing the same thing instead of coming to a consensus and sticking with it. Perfect examples: The many distros out here (they never agreed on a single distro, did they?), the ridiculous desktop wars (gnome vs this vs that), the even more ridiculous GNU/Linux issue, and whetever else you can think of.


      Then of course OSS advocates have a field day with a messed up PR document, all while MS gets more and more control over the desktop and people's privacy wihtout repercussion... (they are getting repercussion over the stupid ad issue, no?? yeah, right...)

    2. Re:why apple will never succeed... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Apple: spends the better part of a year looking for interesting, off-beat, photogenic people. Then they read hundreds of emails. They hand-pick a bunch of folks and pay money to fly them out, coach them, then tape them. They put the ads on nationwide TV.

      Great post, but you left out one more telling fact. Apple hired acclaimed documentary filmmaker Errol Morris to direct these little 30-second spots. That's right up there with-- I hear many people don't know this-- getting Ridley Scott to direct the now-famous "1984" commercial.

      --

      I write in my journal
    3. Re:why apple will never succeed... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      Apple hired acclaimed documentary filmmaker Errol Morris to direct these little 30-second spots.

      So does that mean Bill Gates is Mr. Death or that MS PR hacks are Fast Cheap and out of Control?

    4. Re:why apple will never succeed... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Dude, you missed the obvious! He's Bill Gates of Heaven, of course!

      --

      I write in my journal
  88. Incorrect. by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    Harass her and I'm sure Micro$oft will back her up with $$$$ of dollars and sue you.

    Also, that home address information and telephone number is either wrong or outdated or the address info I found is outdated. However, as of APRIL 2002, her address is NOT what you said.

    Her e-mail is valmalgal@attbi.com. Use that if you really NEED to contact her. The bright will figure out how I found out that you are wrong.

    1. Re:Incorrect. by Doctor+Beavis · · Score: 0
      #1) I've seen the verisign information - it's probably more up to date.

      #2) I'm not going to harass her - that wouldn't accomplish anything.

      #3) The bright will figure out how I found out that you are wrong.

      you mean by reading all the other posts like you did? :-)

  89. Too Good by rixstep · · Score: 1

    This is just too good. Thanks for a great sleuthing job for all around. MS can be so pathetic. Getty is one of Bill's acquisitions too. Adolf Hitler ought to come back from the dead and bring the good Doctor G. with him. Bill could teach them a thing or two. But really, it's so pathetic. Great thanks for /. figuring this one out and putting MS up against the wall.

    1. Re:Too Good by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1
      Getty is one of Bill's acquisitions too.
      It gets even funnier.Bill went out and paid untold mega-$ for Corbis. Getty Images, where this photo is from, is their competitor.
      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  90. Isn't M$ breakin the law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gravning confirmed Microsoft hired Rataushk for the ad.

    Sorry, but isn't it illegal to be the spoksemodel for something and you don't use the product. Magic Johnson got in trouble a few years back for this. If they hired the woman, how can they possibly try to run that off as a REAL PERSON SWITCHING FROM MAC TO M$. It just sounds like more and more M$ lies and treachery

  91. Microsoft Word 10.0 by angst7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This may have been pointed out already, but Microsoft Word 10.0 (the version stamped in the ShowOffYourSkills.doc file), is the Mac OS X version. So, apparently, she wrote this piece on a Mac.

    I love this world.

    --
    StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    1. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Isn't Word XP version 10? I have Word 2000 here and it says 9.0 so I'm just assumming that XP would be 10, I could be wrong though.

    2. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by InnovATIONS · · Score: 5, Informative

      Office XP, aka Word 2002 is listed as version 10 as well.

    3. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by nolife · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe Office XP is 10.0 also. What would really be interesting is compare the metadata or actual file raw data (strings, hex view etc..) between the Apple and the Windows versions. I do not have access to an Mac but I doubt that the two versions of Office would create the exact same file, meaning there is probably a trackable difference between the two.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    4. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by TummyX · · Score: 1

      wtf kind of logic is that?

      Office XP is ver 10

    5. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      No she didn't, dumbass. Word 10.0 is from WinXP.

      Why not jump off a bridge, instead of jumping to conclusions. You'll make the more enjoyable that way.

      Christ, at least do your homework first.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    6. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

      Sooo... Here is a woman who has supposedly "switched" to PC, but she still is using her Mac?

      Another thing: my copy has creator/type code of MSWD/WDBN ... yet another evidence this file was indeed created on a Macintosh.

      talk about hypocrisy.

      simon

    7. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

      Hmm... No, after a few experiments I think that Chimera is adding this when I download it.

    8. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the two versions of Office would create the exact same file, meaning there is probably a trackable difference between the two.

      Hmm... interesting thought.

      Can macs write to FAT32? Or is there some other way to compensate for the differneces in the OS file system...

      Darn, now I really want a Mac.

    9. Re:Microsoft Word 10.0 by CdotZinger · · Score: 1

      "Original Type: WinWord 97/2000" according to my de-.doc-ifying program. I think that mean's it's not Made With Macintosh(TM), but not with XP either, which is what it's said in the ad she switched to (Word 2000 doesn't work on XP, does it?--I don't know; I've never used Windows (ever (really (I hate blue)))).

      --
      Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
  92. microsoft fabricating news? by crm114 · · Score: 1, Funny

    microsoft fabricating their news? I'm shocked. SHOCKED!

  93. I am happy this happened....... by micaiah · · Score: 1

    As Micro$oft keeps making stupid mistakes like this it hurts them. Yeaaaaaah!!!!!! My hats off to the people here who exposed this lie.

    From Yahoo News, "Trouble erupted after amateur sleuths at a popular technology Web site, Slashdot.org, noticed that a photograph showing the woman with a cup of coffee was a stock image available for purchase elsewhere on the Internet."

    I can't wait until they start their new subscription licensing scheme. People are really going to get fed up with stupid Micro$oft.

    1. Re:I am happy this happened....... by piznut · · Score: 0

      "As Micro$oft keeps making stupid mistakes like this it hurts them. Yeaaaaaah!!!!!! My hats off to the people here who exposed this lie."

      The only people that this "hurts" Microsoft with are /. readers. Don't 99.9% of you guys already hate Microsoft anyway?

      This pretty much has zero affect on the Real World (tm).

  94. You can trust me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have always provided the movie-going public with the best in-depth critical analysis of the latest films, no matter which studio provides them.

    Sincerely,

    David Manning

  95. Get some perspective dudes by InnovATIONS · · Score: 1, Troll

    It was not that great an ad in the first place, but beyond that, come on, it was advertizing, and a pretty fluff piece at that. Do we expect some big shocking expose here that shows how Albert Einstien, despite his prominet appearance in Apple ads, never in fact owned a Macintosh! Oh the shame! Oh the horror! How low will they stoop just to sell computers! I mean, with the life-and-death issues going on in the world we are supposed to get upset that it wasn't the real picture of the person and that she had ties to the ad agency that created the ad. Oh the horror! I bet she was even paid to write that ad! How incredibly mercenary it was of her!

    1. Re:Get some perspective dudes by NullProg · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to start a flame war here but allow me to help you see the bigger picture.

      This is but another example of MS FUD (tm) at work. They have done this in the past to DR DOS, IBM's OS/2, Novell, 3Com, GEOS, Borland, and the list goes on. This advertising flub made it to the AP Newswire. Most misinformation MS spreads doesn't and viewers don't realize they are not seeing the whole truth. I agree that other companies do this as well, but no one does it better than Microsoft.

      Secondly, the Einstein advertisement had nothing to do with owning a Mac. You didn't seen the big bold caption at the bottom of the page that said "Think Different"?

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
  96. Performance of .NET? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    .NET apps don't use the registry anymore.

    I can't even get past the clickwrap EULA in the installer. It keeps hanging up on the part of the .NET Framework EULA that states that I can't disclose benchmark results to a third party: "You may not disclose results of a benchmark test of the .NET Framework without the prior written permission of Microsoft." (Here's what microsoft may have meant by that: "Installing .NET will slow your Windows computer to a crawl, and we'll sue you into the ground if you go to a web board and warn others.") Because I do not agree with that policy, the installer stops right there. Therefore, the only .NET performance figure that's legal to report is .ZERO mips.

    I never had that problem with my Mac. I guess the Power Macintosh G4 computer does run twice as fast.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Performance of .NET? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never divide by zero. you should know better by now!

    2. Re:Performance of .NET? by fitten · · Score: 1

      I'm also developing using .NET. My app is database driven and mostly waits on user input or data returned from the database... I guess your G4 waits twice as fast as mine does on my type of app /shrug. I haven't really written any truly performance demanding apps, but I did play around and wrote a version of Sieve in both C# and (unmanaged) C++ just for kicks. The C# version was actually slightly faster but that was because of the memory allocation schemes of the two languages from what I could tell. The C# program allocated the array (8M) all at once... bascially in one update of TaskManager the memory size of the C# went from X to X+8M or so. The C++ program seemed to be only allocating pages in the 8M as it needed them... the program started at size Y and grew steadily in relatively small increments until it was Y+8M or so in size. I believe the seemingly allocation-on-demand allocation scheme of the C++ library caused the program to run slower. I guess I should pull up an old VC++6 compiler from somewhere to compare. I'll go into some ramblings I guess: As far as speed in developing apps, C# w/ .NET is pretty fast. I was able to throw together my sieve in about 10 minutes (full windows with input/output text boxes, labels, go buttons and such) from start to finish. My console app C++ was done in similar time. I wrote a time-sheet style calculator using C# the other day in about 10 minutes from start to finish (windows app with textboxes, labels buttons, etc.) It was faster to write than search/download one I figured. So far, I've been fairly pleased with the development environment except there are a few things that get annoying about it but they are either trivial to work around or come from doing stuff you shouldn't be doing anyway. The ADO stuff has changed a bit from previous versions and looks a bit more like Java libs now (which weren't too far off the previous version of ADO). DataSets and such are very useful as you can just plop em in data grids and such and gets lots of default functionality out of simply that. One thing is for sure... the IDE is orders of magnitude better than JBuilder (which I had to use on a previous project) and the .NET framework is far, far easier to use than the convoluted and incredibly manual labor intensive JBuilder/JBoss/etc. J2EE platform we used earlier this year for that software. I'd rather be sentenced to slam my fingers repeatedly in a car door for several weeks than go back to that stuff. I can only hope and pray that there is a better environment for Java and enterprise solutions out there than that nastiness. Good ideas... extremely poor implementation (I hope it is just the implementation that has the problems). So yeah, Windows does have some junk about it and makes me want to pull out my hair sometimes but as a development environment, I can crank out good code faster in C# and .NET than most of the other platforms that I've used in the past... sometimes by several factors faster.

  97. For god's sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is only a web page, nothing like Apple's switch campaign. Peoplare are talking like as if it is a big marketing effort. Nobody noticed this page until a person posted here for amusement, and everybody seems to entertain the Microsoft people.

  98. Earlier Ad - Steve "Monkey Man" Balmer Switch Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Steve "Monkey Man" Balmer makes a very compelling argument. I'm switching.

    http://homepages.nyu.edu/~jgg221/

    See Balmer like never seen before.

  99. They are finished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like this Slashdot expose together with proof of using clipart photos will totally discredit Microsoft and ruin their business.

  100. more privacy invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how much more can i dig up on this woman?

    she and her husband helped produce a play featuring ugly, naked people at a local seattle theatre house. he was the lighting manager.

    here's all his contact information, including his seattle based theatrical lighting equipment company, PNTA

    and yes folks, his web site is powered by Apache.

    Valerie's husband is an Open Source Software user. looks like she has her work cut out for her.

    -s.

    1. Re:more privacy invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original title of the play was "Suck my Clock."

  101. Ken & Barbie Switch by johnrpenner · · Score: 2


    hi - i'm ken.

    and i'm barbie,

    and we like windows better... really really.

    everyone else uses it,

    so should you.

    --

    ignore that man behind the curtain
    (the wizard of oz)

    1. Re:Ken & Barbie Switch by ebbomega · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean Clint and Brandy? I mean... we are talking computers here....

      (apologies to Neal Stephenson)

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
  102. water held by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Was Firewire a commodity item when it showed up on Yosemite? Was the crush zone car body a commodity when Mercedes introduced it to the world?

    Just because these items eventually show up everywhere, doesn't mean that at one time they weren't exclusive to one manufacturer...and costly as well. That's the way it works. If you want the best when it first comes out, you have to pay for it. Ask anyone with a 60" LCD TV...or a home elevator, etc. Expensive now...commodity later.

    1. Re:water held by G-funk · · Score: 2

      Yeah, there's _HEAPS_ of things you get in an apple you buy today that you can't get in an intel pc (apart from the cpu+m/b). Like ddr ram... oh wait... IDE harddisks... no, that's not it.... AH-HA! Geforce 4!... no, wait... Firewire?... nope, you can get that...

      Yup heaps.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:water held by djupedal · · Score: 2

      IDE...now that's an interesting spin.

      Macs came with SCSI originally...and everyone knows that IDE is the low-cost replacement for SCSI. So what does that have to do with Mac vs. PC and commoditized componentry...

      ...what was your point, again? C'mon...make a point...any point..I know you can do it.

    3. Re:water held by G-funk · · Score: 2

      My point is fairly simple... You don't get what you pay for when you buy mac hardware. Comparing pcs to fords and macs to benzes is a stupid analogy.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  103. Re:Earlier Ad - Steve "Monkey Man" Balmer Switch A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on -1 offtopic. It's not the the Balmer "Monkey Man" video, but a claymation monkey switch ad parody. Pretty funny.

  104. Re:no its not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um...yes they are real....dumbass.....

  105. Re:Be a Super-Sleuth! - Her email addr. by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

    You missed getting her email address from the properties. Humm interesting.

  106. not the first time a .doc has betrayed its creator by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 5, Informative
  107. Does anyone actually believe them NOW? by ruiner13 · · Score: 2

    Ok, they looked really bad. But do they actually expect us to believe that this "new" person is any more real? The PR firm probably got a call from his billness himself, and in a panic they hired some chick who fit the description to play along. Just my 2 cents.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. * Breaking News * by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft releases MS Mac User Converter®
    Monday October 9, 2:04 pm ET

    REDMOND, WA, Oct. 9 /PropagandaNewswire/ -- Microsoft has revelead their latest innovation,
    MS Mac User Converter®. MS Mac User Converter® is a product that converts a Macintosh® user
    to MS Windows XP® user. "Our internal tests has been more successful than we had expected," said
    Steve Ballmer, the CEO of Microsoft®. "If we can successfully convert all Macintosh® users to MS
    Windows XP®, we're going to dominate 96% of the desktop market." Ballmer said. "Next step is to
    convert all the Linux® users, but we still have some problems that needs to be solved. Linux® users
    tend to be tougher to convert." Ballmer said.

    Microsoft® can now add MS Mac User Converter® to their already successful list of innovations,
    such as:
    • MS Windows®
    • MS Excel®
    • MS Word®
    • MS Powerpoint®
    • MS DOS®
    Microsoft® clearly shows the world that they're ahead of their competitors. "None of the competitors
    have been able to launch a product like MS Mac User Converter®. This strengthens Microsoft®'s
    position on the market" said Blackie Lawless, industry analyst for Gartner Dataquest's Software
    Industry Research group®.
  110. I have three questions... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (1) Ms. Mallinson may be the "switcher", but did she actually write the article? If so, who is "Don Funk" and why is it his folder that is shown in the screenshot?

    (2) Did she actually buy XP Pro and Office XP, or did she get that for free as an M$ contractor? That's some pricey software; she must be one hell of a freelance writer to afford it.

    (3) Was the "switch" voluntary or was it part of a requirement for the campaign?

    1. Re:I have three questions... by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I am a little confused as well. I believe Mallinson's name is on the document at the bottom of the page, which is a solicitation for more submissions. In that context, it is completely okay that it's a MS employee that wrote the document.

      It seems more likely that Don Funk wrote the article, though I'm not entirely clear on who Don Funk is -- donfu@microsoft.com? OTOH, searching Google his name shows up lots of places -- is it a name turned into a standard filler (like "foobar")? Or does he write lots of documentation, and uses his own name in example sometimes?

      Now I suspect Don Funk wrote the article, and Mallinson is taking credit for it because the entire article is obviously a complete lie if Funk wrote it. The other possibility is that Funk wrote parts of it as documentation, and Mallinson used that content to produce the "letter".

      The other thing that links Mallinson to the editing of the content, not the content itself, is the italicized comment on the bottom talking about converting the author to Pocket PC. Someone else referenced this site where this same Mallinson is referred to as an expert with Pocket PCs. Though, when I think of the possibilities, it again becomes likely that she already had all the content for a second article ready, and was setting it up for a followup.

      The whole Pocket PC thing makes it seem very likely that Mallinson is simply lying about converting from Mac (at least to XP). But it would offend people more if a man wrote an article, and then was turned into a woman in a cynical attempt to make XP seem more soft and accessible. Probably several people wrote the article, and then one person put it together -- Dun Funk seems like his name is attached to technical things, so I would imagine he would not have put the article together, but would have written some of the more technical material in the article.

    2. Re:I have three questions... by nachoboy · · Score: 1

      (2) Did she actually buy XP Pro and Office XP, or did she get that for free as an M$ contractor? That's some pricey software; she must be one hell of a freelance writer to afford it.

      Info from a former Microserf: MS Employees (and contractors) are entitled to make purchases at the MS Company Store [physical store on Microsoft campus] or the Online Store at heavy discounts. Full retail packaged copies of all current Microsoft software products are available at substantial discounts. Most software is 90-95% off (yes, that's a 90-95% discount) normal published prices. Makes most of the software worth buying considering you get the media, manuals, and support as there is NO difference between the copies sold at your favorite computer retailer, except that the software has a giant sticker on it "Microsoft Company Store Purchase, Not to be Sold" along with your employee ID number (written when you purchase it). There's also a limit for software purchases... $1000 a year for full-time employees IIRC.

      Hardware and books are also available for about 50% off. I'm guessing everything comes out to about cost as is standard for most corporate benefits programs.

      Of course, if she was at work, every single Microsoft product ever published, most that haven't, and most works-in-progress are available for free, instant download from network servers.

    3. Re:I have three questions... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      OK, she had an 8 year old Mac, and discovered that her status as an M$ contractor made her eligible for a discounted laptop and software at near-Linux prices.

      That explains how her laptop was pre-loaded with XP Home Edition and yet she upgraded to XP Pro. At full sticker price, this isn't going to happen very often. I figured it was either a corporate giveaway or perhaps she made a trip to China.

      I'm not an Apple fan, but I can't wait for a "Switch the switcher" counteroffensive. I predict that when Ms. Mallinson has outlived her usefulness at M$, she will write a series of articles for Apple about her misguided adventure behind enemy lines.

    4. Re:I have three questions... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      I can easily believe "Don Funk" as a generic name for all kinds of examples. However, if you think about the context in which it was used for this article, someone would have to log on to a computer as "Don Funk" in order to have that folder show up in "Documents and Settings". Maybe that's exactly what was done.

      I don't think it's a total lie, but it's not a story about someone who voluntarily decided to switch, paid full street price for everything, figured out the details on her own, and enjoyed the process. As the truth leaks out, it looks more and more like an "Astroturf" campaign. Someone should send her a set of Red Hat 8.0 CDs for that laptop of hers. RH 8 works great on my IBM Thinkpad.

      I think the "switch" was heavily subsidized by M$, and someone other than Ms. Mallinson may have assisted with the technical details of "switching". I don't mean to belittle her technical skills, but the article was a bit more detailed that I would expect from a freelance writer who is supposed to be an XP newbie.

    5. Re:I have three questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      From some research I've done, it appears that Don Funk is a real person over at Microsoft, employed in the software testing area, probably accessibility testing. Accessibility testers apparently get all the newest GUI's, and marketing weenies love to show the newest stuff.

      Anyway, apparently Microsoft's tech writers work closely with the test people to write the KB articles, and will take snips of code and/or screenshots from the tester's workstation to include in the KB entry.

      So it looks like Don Funk is real people, not just a fake name.

  111. Re:All I can say is... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2
    STOOOPAD! YOU SOO STOOOPAD!

    ROFLMAO! I love a good UHF reference.


    Yeah, leave it to slashdot to not get it and mark it a troll.
    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  112. Name Change? by Twintop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe M$ should become B$?

  113. AOL did the same thing by destinyland · · Score: 5, Informative
    In 1994 AOL published a slick 30-page promotional brochure profiling four new members. They also made them up -- prompting much derision in alt.aol-sucks.

    ---
    Destiny-land.

    The happiest blog on earth.

    1. Re:AOL did the same thing by destinyland · · Score: 1
      I forgot to mention. AOL also mistakenly recycled the photo from their "New Member Guide" in a later brochure.

      ---
      Destiny-land.

      The happiest blog on earth.

  114. M$ needs to rethink their policy by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the .doc on M$'s site:
    Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law.

    Yeah, and they most definitely won't distribute a Word document to a half million geeks on Slashdot that shows among other things your name, your email address, your website (for which the whois provides all your information), and the fact that you wrote the article about switching to Windows using Office X on Mac OS X.

  115. Try This... by mrkurt · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Try this for ad copy

    "*Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"Should be:

    "Now that we've successfully converted our writer to crack cocaine, we will be working on getting her to try crank. Stay tuned for more developments!"

    --
    Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
  116. irony by jnana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is it just me, or does anybody else find it hilariously funny that the woman was tracked down because her name was hidden deep in the Word file ShowOffYourSkills.doc, even though she had 'deleted' it (she thought). When will people stop trusting Microsoft with anything of importance?

    1. Re:irony by Seclusion · · Score: 1

      It isn't hidden, view the doc file to see it for yourself. View the properties for the file and all of it is as plain as day. As a previous poster said, if that's hidden, you don't know much about computers.
      I'll go one step further, if you search the help file for word xp for personal information you get a handy help file for things that might give away info about yourself without you knowing. The file suggests checking the remove personal info box in the security tab in options as an easy way to clean out your doc files.
      Back on topic though. The properties and formating for the document makes me doubt she's new to word xp.

    2. Re:irony by jnana · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information. I don't use Word much and don't recall ever using the Properties feature. I just checked a few Word docs of mine, and it seems that they all have my bogus information in them (Tyler Durden, etc.). Yet again my paranoia pays off.

  117. Valerie Mallinson is all these people? by Hyped01 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Valerie admits to being the secret MAC person... but is she also admitting to being the rest of the people?

    Valerie Mallinson (Wes Rataushk & Assc Inc) is also apparently the author of:

    MS EnCarta FUD Paper

    ... meaning she's a black male 7th grader. Or a white female married adult... or perhaps she is a group of 4 older people of varied ethnicities. Cant print? You're probably running MS Windoze XP and are pretty screwed!

    Either Valerie has multiple diverse personalities or all or most of these "submissions" are penned by her and falsly attributed to others.

    -Rob

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

    1. Re:Valerie Mallinson is all these people? by handsomepete · · Score: 2

      This feeds the likely possiblility that this PR person just took the fall for something that was probably just a composite PR release. It's funny that she got tracked down by a submission form (a Microsoft info form no less) which should've been completely and totally unrelated to the 'Switch' ad - they never claim that the 'Switcher' wrote the form for you to submit. I imagine she just jumped the gun after someone checked the .doc info and said, "Yep, I did it" to cover their asses.

      Besides, at the bottom of both the Encarta FUD paper and the Switch ad, it says, "Do you have an idea for a story?" which is all these are; stories, not testimonials. No testimonial in the world will you give you step-by-step directions on how to set up dial-up networking. I failed to see anything that claims that these are real testimonials from real people (unless someone wants to correct me).

      Not that I don't think this is real real funny, I'm just sayin'...

    2. Re:Valerie Mallinson is all these people? by KH · · Score: 2
      From the link you quoted:


      It Is a Far, Far Better Paper Than I Have Ever Written


      This is hilarious. Good that his PC didn't start ``beep beep beep''
    3. Re:Valerie Mallinson is all these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops - looks lite they pulled this off their
      site as well....

  118. More about Val Mallinson by Slur · · Score: 5, Interesting

    She helped David Mozer to acquire, configure, and troubleshoot a PocketPC for his bicycle trip in Malawi, Africa "in October." (Last year?)

    http://www.ibike.org/bikeafrica/malawi/

    Frankly the Microsoft Switcher article was embarrassing for a host of reasons besides the use of clip-art and a hired PR professional who is obviously an experienced user of Windows.

    It's abundantly clear that Val has never used Mac OS X. All her raves about Windows XP were about features which exist - and are much easier to use - in Mac OS X.

    For example, her excitement about being able to get Windows installed and configured "in under a day" is laughable. In 90% of cases Mac OS X can be installed and configured in under an hour.

    Bringing up Netscape as if it was the default browser on Mac OS was likewise a foolish gaffe. Most Mac OS users (9 and X) use Internet Explorer 5 as their web browser. Why would Val have chosen Netscape? Could it be she had only used Mac OS 8/9 at work where Netscape was pre-installed?

    Comparing the FREE AppleWorks to the $300-$500 Microsoft Office is a staggering faux pas - especially since Office v.X is generally considered superior to Office for Windows. (And who in the world likes Office's annoying hide-and-seek menus? I like my menus to stay consistent, and keep that feature turned off on my Windows box.)

    Finally, all the step-by-step instructions for migrating documents and Favorites were a glaring exposure of the complexity of Windows XP. The instructions for the same migrations to Mac OS X are only half as long.

    Alas, this was an amateurish article by an uninformed PR-lackey. Microsoft should know better than to try to pull the wool over our ever-watchful eyes.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
    1. Re:More about Val Mallinson by skubalon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She has been associated with MS since at least '98.

      Although this isn't all that surprising.

    2. Re:More about Val Mallinson by rworne · · Score: 1
      For example, her excitement about being able to get Windows installed and configured "in under a day" is laughable. In 90% of cases Mac OS X can be installed and configured in under an hour.
      I'm not slamming OS X here, but I have installed Jaguar on several different Macs, and I can say that while it may take less than an hour, it's only slightly less. Add the fact that its easier than spit to configure networking, and you just might squeak by. As for a 2001 Dual-USB iBook, it took nearly an hour and 45 minutes.

      To be fair, the 98SE, and Win2k installations aren't exactly speedy either. OS/2 was long as well. But NeXT v3.3 install off of optical disk was the piece 'o cake: 3-4 hours.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    3. Re:More about Val Mallinson by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

      Everybody assumes she was using X. I'm not convinced. Either that or the article was deliberately giving the impression that X doesn't have those features.

      Even if she was using 8/9 Netscape is not the default browser. Nor ahs it been since the deal with Gates in '97. She would actually have to seek out the program to use Netscape.

      I'm sure the whole thing is modus operandi for any company nowadays.

    4. Re:More about Val Mallinson by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      Val: Do you think MS will like this copy I wrote for their anti-switch campaicn??

      Boss: Throw in a jab at Netscape's expense. That always gets his Billness cooing.

      Is microsoft really this threatened by the switch campaign?? (that made me decide not to buy a Mac thank god...)

      IF MS really wants some converts:

      -Fix the user and gdi problems. Get a working virtual memory subsystem.
      -Stop designing OS'es to phone home. 18 ways your WinXP box connects to Microsoft out of the box. Geez, leave me some bandwidth for porn...
      -Implement actual local permissions. Secure the admin password, stop local shatter attacks, improve SMB security.
      -Charge reasonable prices. Upgrade for $49, new install $99. Other OS companies manage this pricing over 1% of the market. MS should be able to do it with 95% of the market. Oh, wait, I never pay for Microsoft software anyway....

      Val: How do I create a PDF on my PC??

      Boss: Just use the Mac over in the corner.

      ~Hammy

  119. Apple: "No (guffaw) comment!" by mgessner · · Score: 1

    The end of the article said, "A spokeswoman from Apple Computer would not comment."

    That's probably because she hasn't been able to stop laughing! :)

    --
    "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
  120. leave M$ alone by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Funny

    you know, with all their troubles with security, patches, linux, anti-trust trials, and everything, they just don't have the time to find people who have benefitted using their products. i mean, come on, there must be one.

    surely, you can cut them some slack. ballmer is up late at night thinking of more ways he can attack linux/open source. with 40 billion in the bank, they just can't aford to do the necessary research and investigation. give them a break will you.

    i'm sure there are plenty of people who'll testify that they learned how to program using "Learn Visual Basic" and are now working at a major software company.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  121. Re:Earlier Ad - Steve "Monkey Man" Balmer Switch A by Zyrmfxl · · Score: 1

    jesus christ, Apple needs to start running that monkey-switch ad. That's too damn genius. Seriously!

    --
    "Oh, well I'm sorry if you don't appreciate my random murders!" - Crow T. Robot,
  122. What keyword is that?? by systemaster · · Score: 1

    I wonder what keyword it is that you use....I'm guessing its 'Linux' ...unfortunatly that doesn't work, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF -8&q=site%3Amicrosoft.com+linux I cant think of any word that you'd be using besides linux.

    --
    LinuxWorx
    Spelling errors are intentional as are gramatical error
    1. Re:What keyword is that?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, "breasts"

  123. IE on the Mac. by coolfrood · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict.
    And then later
    2. On the Mac, start Internet Explorer. From the Window menu, click Favorites.
    Hmmmm!!

  124. Re:not the first time a .doc has betrayed its crea by uhoreg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, a slashdotter pointed it out to him.

    --

    To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

  125. Heh, just think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All us slashdot users are using Privoxy, or such.

    Imagine, not only are we sucking down all their bandwidth, but keeping armys of marketing droids busy. All feverishly seeking meaning behind a click stream of falsified static noise.

    I wonder what they see?

  126. Broadband cable dialup? by coolfrood · · Score: 2, Funny

    "All the Mac hardware--including my printer, broadband cable, Zip drive, and Palm handheld--works perfectly with my Windows-based PC."
    blah blah blah....

    "The New Connection Wizard then guided me through the setup of my Internet connection for browsing the Web."
    Hey!! I want to dial into my cable provider too. Does XP actually let me do that???

  127. OT Re:Dead people? by Tokerat · · Score: 1

    I just had to tell you that was the first thing I've read on Slashdot in about 4 months that made me burst out laughing uncontrollably in the middle of the night while my roomates try to sleep. Of course, the alcohol might have something to do wi th it...

    Anyways, *CHEERS*

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:OT Re:Dead people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The alcohol might have something to do with it, or the fact that you have no life.

  128. You are so right my friend by codepunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But then again my company does not manufacture software and thus it is a expense of doing business. We do however produce a durable good and since I can get the job done with linux I will price your ass right out of the market with the money I saved.

    You see just how simple that plays out.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:You are so right my friend by Boxxeronfly · · Score: 1

      I couldn't even get the small company I work for to switch from MS Office to OO. The cost of having to learn all the quirks of a new Office can be expensive. There is more to the cost of implementation then just software expense.

      Though I am a happy user of it.

  129. Why switch? Well let me tell you... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    She was probably using Mac OS 8 or 9. That thing was well beyond its useful life. XP is actually pretty good, and certainly much better than Mac OS 9. Making that switch makes perfect sense.

    Had she been using OS X, well, that's a different story. That OS rocks and it would truly be suspicious if she jumped from OS X to XP.

  130. Ummm... i know all those switchers by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

    I know all those "i switched to apple" folks in the ads..."my pc was like Zap and there goes my files! no i didn't back anything up, cause i'm a doofus!"

    They're the same morons who come and say "my computer hates me" or "my computer is possessed." i want to rip their eyes out and say, "well, i hate you too so buzz off!", so maybe it's best if those idiots switch to mac and never talk to me again...

  131. My mom's about to make the switch... by pdpTrojan · · Score: 0

    From WinXP to MacOSX.. and my mom's really stupid!
    DIE MICROSOFT DIE!

  132. MS blood Re:Good grief, where does it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I'm out for MS blood... and all windows users that helped to make MS into what it is. Their blood to!

    Tabula Rasa

  133. it looks like... by luap2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you're trying to lie. Would you like some help? ;)

  134. the cache has stopped working! by squarefish · · Score: 2

    it only refreshes to the page not found on M$'s site now!

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  135. 2 Years? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I can't imagine it lasting that long, however, the bumbling way they continue to handle such faux pas is indeed timeless. It's like Microsoft needs to hire a few cynics to review what they're up to and weigh their gripes.

    I mean, Coca Cola is a popular drink, but you don't see them claiming it builds muscle or makes your penis/breats grow. Such a claim, besides immediately inviting scrutiny, would be so out of character with their product it would make people stop and question why they actually do drink it.

    The best marketing machine Microsoft has is dingbat leader types in public and private sectors who shove Office down the throats of companies, because everyone else is doing it (wow, such leadership!) Microsoft needs to cultivate these people (Repeat after me, "Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft") and less draw attentions to what they really are doing. For such a successful company, they sure can act foolishly and that doesn't help them any.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:2 Years? by jovlinger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know what you mean, but eventually, people DID get fired for buying IBM. IIRC, it was compaq that finally falsified that truism.

    2. Re:2 Years? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      An executive decision, where I work, has us adopting .NET Geez. Talk about an utter copy of Java. Worse, I can't see many other people jumping on this bandwagon, because the .NET framework isn't anywhere near as distributed as the JVM, i.e. you have to download it (20Meg) or have XP (or 2000?) with the framework already installed for it to be of much use. Java's got such a leg up, it would suffice to say there are already Java Legacy shops.

      It'll probably work ok for internal applications, but books and such are still so new that few are of much help (since many books are written prior to the release and may pertain to Beta features and lack later enhancements.)

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:2 Years? by Stapler · · Score: 0

      I kinda like your "hire critics" tactic. Ala hiring ex-hackers to test security. Seems reasonable.

      When Coca-Cola first came out they DID make such claims as outrageous as the ones you list. But I digress.

      --
      Kickin' it self-righteous school.
    4. Re:2 Years? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I kinda like your "hire critics" tactic. Ala hiring ex-hackers to test security. Seems reasonable.

      It prevents the Bay-of-Pigs or Yes-men mentality from taking over, wherein bad ideas are applauded for lack of any critical analysis.

      When Coca-Cola first came out they DID make such claims as outrageous as the ones you list. But I digress.

      Sure, it's fun to listen to old radio tapes, like Amos and Andy, and listen to the preposterous claims made in commercials back then. Now it's all sex and style. Drinking abc-cola makes you sexy while you're doing your extreme thing.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:2 Years? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Are you fuckin' kidding, man? What people have on their machines now has nothing to do with what they have tomorrow. What stands in they way of .NET's ascendance? 20MB? That's nothing in the world today. People will scoff at that barrier to entry. Hell: Microsoft has already won if that's the difference; Windows doesn't come with a Java VM. Want it? You have to download it. Want .NET? You have to download it. They're starting from the same place, which means Microsoft wins. We lose. Game over! They're the person in motion, not Java. Java is old, .NET is new, sexy, and as far away as the hoary old technology. We lose! Game over!

      Shit, it makes me just want to go to bed and forget about what I've been working on all day.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    6. Re:2 Years? by Wdomburg · · Score: 2

      >I mean, Coca Cola is a popular drink, but you
      >don't see them claiming it builds muscle or makes
      >your penis/breats grow.

      Three words. Coke. Adds. Life. :)

      Matt

    7. Re:2 Years? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I mean, Coca Cola is a popular drink, but you don't see them claiming it builds muscle or makes your penis/breats grow

      I couldn't say for sure about my penis, but my breats are definitely twice the size they were before I started drinking coke.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    8. Re:2 Years? by AMNESIACX · · Score: 0

      What in god's name are you harping on about, man?

      --
      "It's not just what you say, no it's mostly how you feel it." - Tim Buckley.
    9. Re:2 Years? by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Any time our datacenter does a major change, we convene a change management board consisting of sysadmins who will be doing or supervising the work, and our customer entities who will be affected by the work. Before the board meets, we hold a pre-board that is open to all sysadmins only, where those sysadmins who are not involved in the work hand out a brutal technical beating to the sysadmins who are involved.

      In this way, we ensure that the guys doing the work have already fielded all the hard questions the customers are likely to ask; we have all our ducks in a row, all our research done, and we sound prepared, competent, and damn smoov, if I say so myself, in front of our customers. It sounds like MS marketing could stand to try something similar.

      Unless, of course, they're using Slashdot for this purpose, in which case my suggestion is redundant.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    10. Re:2 Years? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      I was _really_ drunk, so I'll cut through the ranting. He said that .NET will never catch on because you have to download the environment. The cleverness of Microsoft's move makes me smile even this morning: They removed the built-in Java VM from Windows, so you have to download it, too. That puts precisely the same barrier of inconvenience between .NET and Java. Sly, ain't it?

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    11. Re:2 Years? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Yea, but Pepsi brings your ancestors back from the grave. The choice is obvious: The Choice of the New Generation©®.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    12. Re:2 Years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bite the wax tadpole!

  136. Truth or dare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't doubt the PR Agent did, indeed switch from Mac to PC. The question is, did she do it voluntarily, without coercion?

    It's amazing what some companies will do to get a share of the billion dollars a year MS spends on advertising and PC... including kicking out all Macs for the occasions when the MS Execs come by.

  137. Re:And by khuber · · Score: 1
    nobody older than 4

    the switch "backlash" was old before it started. ads are lies. get over it

  138. I'll bet... by mtec · · Score: 1

    The coffee was instant.
    The girl had a boob job.
    And that's not her real hair color

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  139. Google cache does not work in China by grainofsand · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not really on-topic but, despite the recent move by the Chinese government to "unblock" access to Google, all cache functions are still inaccessible for those of us living on the mainland.

    --
    A dream is good. A plan is better.
  140. Switcher? I think not by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

    Although microsoft.com seems to no longer have the Greetings 99 page up, some guy back in 1998 was interested in it and posted a comment on microsoft.public.inetexplorer.ie4.outlookexpress.s tationery. In his post he included what looks to be a blurb about the product written by none other than our now infamous Val Mallinson.

    Smile Val ... you're on candid camera.

    --
    "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  141. Re:not the first time a .doc has betrayed its crea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say, did Bruce ever right up that article on the Reg? I wouldn't mind reading it since I haven't heard about it.

  142. Perhaps she didnt switch... by Hyped01 · · Score: 1
    I am seriously doubting that "Valerie" switched after all...

    Check the .doc files (text editor, not in Office) and you may notice that it lacks the path info and the ".doc" extension that WinWord of any version put in the bottom of the document. If she were using WinWord the bottom should have something akin to:

    C : \ M y D o c u m e n t s \ F o r m s \S h o w O f f Y o u r S k i l l s . d o c

    Instead, it has S h o w O f f Y o u r S k i l l s and references to MAC paths in MAC fashion.

    Ooops... they couldnt even get their paid for writer to switch as she claimed...

    -Rob

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

    1. Re:Perhaps she didnt switch... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

      Oh, that would be just way too unbearably funny if that campaign was Made on a Mac (tm) ;)

  143. The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Because the 13 year old script kiddie crowd wouldn't stoop that low."

    The "13 year old script kiddies" are smart enough to remove not only the web page, but the files to which it links. Not Microsoft. You can still download the original files, using the original links, which I copied from the source of the original page (my italics):

    Do you have an idea for a story? We'd love to hear from you. How have you used Microsoft software to make your home or work life easier, more fun, faster, or simpler? Submit your ideas, and you could get published on the Insider Web site! Submit Your Idea Today! Note that, if you look at the binary of the .DOC file, you can see this:

    Comments To Valerie Mallinson (Wes Rataushk & Assc Inc)

    A google search says Wes Rataushk & Associates, Inc is located at 5904 105th Ave NE, Kirkland, Washington. If you are in the area, stop by to joke with them about their business ethics.

    It seems likely that someone downloading and submitting the form would have no chance of getting their story published because Wes Rataushk & Associates is paid to write them.

    I try to help people have a balanced view of Microsoft: http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft.htm.
  144. Microsoft and Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is from the bottom of the word doc put up in microsoft website

    "Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law."

    Isnt it ironic ?

  145. How AP found her by mooneyd · · Score: 1

    The interesting part to me is that the AP "tracked Mallinson by examining personal data hidden within documents that Microsoft had published with its controversial ad." Hmmmmmm.

    Not so interesting. There is a word doc linked from the bottom of the 404'd page. File > Properties > Custom shows her name and PR firm.

    What's interesting is AP figured this out first, and not /.

  146. who's that AP guy, anyway? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm posting this so late, it's unlikely that anybody will read it. But I thought you guys might be interested to know just who, exactly, wrote this article for the AP.

    His name is Ted Bridis. I'll quote him here.
    I work in our Washington bureau, along with about 60 other reporters and
    about 30 photographers, and have been covering Microsoft as a technology
    writer since 1998 (I worked for the Wall Street Journal as a tech
    reporter here in DC from 2000-2001 then came back to AP). I was the only
    reporter to interview Gates during the antitrust trial, and I broke the
    story about Oracle hiring private detectives to dig through the trash of
    Microsoft's allies.

    I decide which stories to cover based on what's newsworthy, in my
    judgment and in the judgment of our editors. Ideally, a story we latch
    onto will end up on the front page of many of the world's newspapers.
    (In this case, although I anticipate the story will get pretty
    reasonable "play," it's doubtful it would end up on p1 anyplace).
    So this guy, who's evidently been around the block a few times, thought this story was worth covering. That's saying something, I think.

    He also says that the story could contine developing in the morning. He asks us to stay tuned.
    --

    I write in my journal
  147. Google/MS switcher page reveals "smoking gun" lie by KH2002 · · Score: 1

    If you read the cached Google page, the MS switcher story ends with these lines:

    "*Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we
    will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"

    *But* - if you go to the site mentioned by Kostya, you can read a biker's thanks to Ms. Mallinson for helping him set up his handheld PC. (http://www.ibike.org/bikeafrica/malawi/)

    "The computer, on the other hand, was one problem solving exercise after another--
    though I must also add that when everything is going right the Handheld (H/PC) never
    stops impressing me and I am tickled pink to have it. I also didn't have to do most of
    the problem solving and troubleshooting by myself. Val Mallinson, of Wes Rataushk
    and Associates, was a great help discussing solutions, getting equipment and finding
    resources with answers prior to my departure."

    Get her to "try a Pocket PC?" - she's already providing Pocket PC consulting services!

    No wonder MS yanked this- it could only get uglier for them...

  148. Mamma Mia My Karma by hackus · · Score: 2

    Honestly..

    If Microsoft doesn't stop this sort of crap I am going to loose all my Microsoft ANTI Karma which people regularly give me a 5 or plus on...

    I mean...why read ANY of Hackus's posts when Microsoft keeps putting fodder like this in the Web Machine that is Slashdot to turn out absolutely positively A PLUS quality entertainment.

    More than a poor match for Hackus and his rants!! :-)

    Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  149. Egads, Boy Wonder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They found the bat cave.

  150. Even on MSNBC by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    Hell even go here MSNBC and /. is on the news as:
    "Trouble erupted after amateur sleuths at a popular technology Web site, Slashdot.org, noticed that a photograph showing the woman with a cup of coffee was a stock image available for purchase elsewhere on the Internet."

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  151. PR Mania by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Funny

    From what I have seen of Microsoft's PR mania I would actually be surprised if they could find someone in Western Washington that wasn't a Microsoft PR person.

  152. Totally off topic, but... by jmarca · · Score: 1

    I once configured a dialup modem on slackware the extremely hard way, including AT commands. Now it is pretty easy, but I am running a DSL line, which required me to compile a new kernel and read some HOWTOs. Then my harddrive crashed, oh disaster, lost many photos of my daughter, and my Slackware DSL gateway...but I had been itching to install LEAF Bering rc2 and see how it worked. It was a breeze, as it was designed to work with DSL gateways---some guy (Jaques Nilo, if I remember right) thought of all the little things! Now I have a DSL gateway that boots and runs, firewall and all, from a floppy that isn't even mounted at runtime so I can just press power whenever and reboot nice and clean.

    Linux is hard, sure. But it runs my laptop, my webserver, and my hard-drive free firewall.

    Try to get that flexible and useful with os-x or win-xp!

  153. MS Doesn't Get To Let This One "go away"... by Omega · · Score: 5, Insightful
    By tomorrow most people will have forgotten about it,
    No, actually I think the mainstream media will pick up on this one tomorrow. C-Net and Ziff-Davis are a little slow on the uptake. Give 'em a day, it'll be smeared all over the print and online mags. Give the New York Times and the Washington Post a little bit more time on this one. They'll get around to it (incidently, did anyone see the slashdot article in the NY Times today?). But no, Microsoft doesn't get to let this one "disappear." They tried to be clever (though it was pretty suspect from the beginning) and they found themselves caught in a lie. I think this is just the sort of thing that everyone needs to know.
    except the thousands of slashdot users that will make references to it anytime a MS article is posted for the next 2 years.
    Damn straight. Just like the bit about the USS Yorktown. It's called upfront disclosure. Microsoft calls it the price they pay for being #1. Don't think slashdot will let them skip out on the check.
    1. Re:MS Doesn't Get To Let This One "go away"... by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      Stac it to 'em!
      (I considered "Stac it to The MAN!", but that gives MicroSoft too much credit.)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  154. Slashdot sleuths... by mjpsj · · Score: 1
    Is that what we are? Amateur sleuths? From the Boston Globe:

    Trouble erupted after amateur sleuths at a popular technology Web site, Slashdot.org, noticed that a photograph showing the woman with a cup of coffee was a stock image available for purchase elsewhere on the Internet.

    I thought I was just a geek. Cool.

  155. simple...yes, of course..foolish me by djupedal · · Score: 2

    Why didn't you just come out and say that in the first place :)

    I guess as a beleagured PC user, you felt diminished and needed a bit of prodding, which is normal, and completely understandable, so don't feel too bad. If you would have just come out and said how you felt at the beginning, I wouldn't have gone this long before I elected to ignore the Honorable Dunce from PC Ville...heheheh.

    You're awfully hard on yourself, arguing against an analogy you brought into the conversation. Might that PC you're using be causing a bit of stress? ...heheheh...choke...sorry.

    LOL...you've actually made my day, thanks!

    1. Re:simple...yes, of course..foolish me by G-funk · · Score: 2

      You're awfully hard on yourself, arguing against an analogy you brought into the conversation. Might that PC you're using be causing a bit of stress? ...heheheh...choke...sorry.

      Hmmm, perhaps you should brush up on your comprehension skills and read the thread again?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  156. How is this tool an authority on anything? by douglasq · · Score: 1

    I am so tired of hearing about Jakob Nielson being an authority on usability. Napolean presided over his own coronation and Nielson really no different. How many broken links are at useit.com today? How many menu items don't lead where they say?

    --
    "Form should follow function...unless it's just plain ugly."
  157. old guard - new guard by dcobbler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate to get all deep and philosophical but this is so deliciously "old guard" vs. "new guard". The old guard PR hacks who put this together must be struck dumb by how this has played out. Think about it for a second. Their esoteric tricks that they've been using for years have turned around and bitten them to the core. They put together what they thought was some appropriately stylized words with an appropriate picture from a stock agency. In the old days, stock agencies were the province of specialists and now, some smart person is able to find the *exact same picture* and link to it alongside their little piece of PR trickery.

    It gets worse. In the old days, once a piece of their work was published, it was cast in stone, so to speak. The public only saw what the PR folks wanted them to see and didn't see anything that might have been held back. But today, another smart person is able to delve into that sacrosanct PR document and find out all sorts of names and addresses that should have been (from the perspective of the PR hacks) forever kept secret!

    It really is a new world, don't you think?

    dcobbler
    www.digitalcobbler.com

  158. Making the switch to the UnixPC... by SuperJ · · Score: 2

    October 14, 2002

    Yes, it's true. I like obsolete technology enough to change my whole computing world around. Here's the bottom line: the UnixPC gives me more choices and flexibility, and better compatibility with the rest of the technology world.

    More Hardware Options, for Less Benjamins (or free)

    I am a computer engineer. I demand the best in desktop computers. There are many features for the UnixPC platform. My UnixPC came with 1 Megabyte of RAM, a 12" screen, a 20 Megabyte hard drive, a 360 Kilobyte disk drive, a 1200 baud modem for lightning fast connections over a phone line, and a Voice Power board, which allows me to record sounds on the computer. Entirely free. And the UnixPC runs UnixPC OS 3.51, based on AT&T's System V Release 4.

    More Software Flexibility

    Microsoft Word pales in comparison to vi. There's no equivalent to the versatility of typing with vi and formatting with troff. It does ASCII text formatting for maximum standards compliance. My AT&T dot-matrix printer prints all my code listings with stunning clarity.

    The additional "Ethernet" board allows the UnixPC to connect to other computers on your network, or even to the "Internet," a new and growing global network of computers. Telnet does more for me than Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 ever did, allowing me to directly connect and enter commands into remote computers.

    How Now Brown Cow?

    Now that I've given you the reasons why I converted, here's the 411 on the how, dig it.

    Step 1: Operating System Install
    The first time I turned on my UnixPC, the UnixPC prompted me to insert the install media. I sat for only an hour, putting floppy after floppy into the computer, while the system copied them to disk. It's like that time I owned a Pinto, and I kept feeding it more and more parts and spending more and more money until it eventually worked.

    Step 2: Setting up Accounts
    After I installed the operating system and rebooted, my UnixPC asked me to login. I logged in with the installation account, and I was brought into the UnixPC's "Windowing" environment. I easily created myself an account and set the root password.

    Step 3: Setting up "E-Mail"
    Once I installed the Voice Power board and its driver software, I also installed the Voice E-mail package. E-mail (or Electronic Mail) is a way for people to send each other messages over the Internet. The Voice E-mail package allows you to use your UnixPC as an answering machine, once the answering machine software is installed. When a message is recorded, an envelope icon shows up at the top right of the screen. Clicking on this icon brings you to your Inbox, where the new message will appear as a new E-mail. In the Inbox, you can also compose and send messages to other users, all you need to know is their UUCP bang path.

    The AT&T UnixPC has all the features a 17 year old computer should have.

    AT&T's UnixPC: The Computer With The Future Built In.

    --

    Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

    1. Re:Making the switch to the UnixPC... by shepd · · Score: 1

      Dear God that was funny.

      I think I'll hook up my old Tandy DWP 220 for some good old wakin' up the neighbours nostalgia right about now...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  159. This story was on the news! by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

    Here in WASHINGTON on Q13 reports @ 10 they covered the story and got it right. Somebody is paying attention, and it's not just us geeks! Yay!

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  160. Re: nip the tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put a little ice on it, it'll be fine!

  161. Ok, I'll switch from Apple to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but if and only if I get to sleep with that "freelance writer"! I'd like to discuss her perky "prose style" with her, say, or other aspects of the "life of the mind" -- once we're both slathered head to toe in each other's saliva! Wooooo-eee! And if we do it on the Microsoft campus, she can even deduct the rubber toys as a business expense!

  162. point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you're not anti-mac....you're just cheap, is that it?

    I'd complain to, if I had to buy junk. Fortunately, I don't.

    Technology is like money...you know you have enough when you don't have to think about it.

  163. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those people you see in commercials are just actors pretending to be actual customers! Shocking!

  164. More switchers than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is funny, but more so because Microsoft stooped down to Apple's level... especially since it wasn't necessary. The fact is that a LOT of people have switched from Apple to Microsoft. Just look at the numbers.

  165. I'm Bored by shepd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Waiting for a DVD to rip.

    So:

    Go buy any old digital camera and try to download the pics on a RedHat system.

    Go buy a DVD-R and try to burn a disc.

    Go to any old website showing media (RealPlayer, QuickTime, Windows Media) and see how successful you are at viewing content.

    Buy a Firewire DV Video Camera and see how successful you are in getting the video off and editing it.

    Try to visit a site that's made for IE.
    Go to the store and buy a game. (I'll give you these -- VmWare and other solutions are a serious bitch to setup, and don't work well except in certain Distros)

    Buy a PDA and get it to synch up.

    Your network card doesn't work, find somebody you know willing to come over and fix it. (Huh? If the card is broken, even your God(s) ain't/aren't gonna fix it.)

    >The steps to do any of the above in Windows are very easy

    Uhhh, sure... I mean, I mean, if you want to have every two or three DVDs come out as coasters (happens with Prassi Primo DVD for me) sure. Or if you want to use crappy outdated camera software that just lets you easily download one picture at a time through a slow ass serial connection, great (Fuji MX-1200). I've never done DV, but Kino doesn't look too hard. Or you can try Cinerella, which seems more full featured and easier.

    >When a DVD-Burner manufacturer is swamped with "Uhh where's the Linux Drivers?"

    DVD-R in linux doesn't use "drivers", unless you count the built in generic SCSI support built in linux (since well before DVD was available for most PCs) as a "driver". Try saying that about windows. Especially windows 9x...

    HTH. And take it from me, there's NO software in windows that lets you use a Celeron 300 to burn DVD-R at 2x and surf the 'net at the same time.

    Linux's motto should be "Spend some time now -- Then do more, quicker".

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:I'm Bored by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      any old digital camera and try to download the pics

      The web page says "Note that I have only tested this software with the MX-700 digital camera and Linux 2.0.27 with libc5. I'd like to know whether you can make it work, or not, with other cameras and other Unices." It also mentions that the "disk full" and "parity error" checking routines are not tested.

      DVD-R and try to burn a disc.

      This link goes to an FTP page with dozens of files. I hope you're not expecting a newbie to figure this one out.

      Windows Media

      The web page says, "It seems that pre7 was the most buggier pre-release ever... So time to release a bugfix/hotfix one now."

      Firewire DV Video Camera

      The web page says, "here is an additional list of required software, which are not yet widely available on CDROM distributions, you have to download and maybe compile them yourself."

      PDA

      The page you linked to is quite old, and discusses Red Hat 6.0 and KDE 1.1. Newer PDAs tend to sync via the USB, not the serial port.

      I'm not trying to put down these projects at all. I just think you've proven the original poster's point by enumerating these alpha or beta software. Linux is not ready yet.

      And really, Linux advocates (I am one) need to be more critical than "I've never done DV, but Kino doesn't look too hard" or just admit that you don't know.

    2. Re:I'm Bored by shepd · · Score: 1

      >The web page says "Note that I have only tested this software with the MX-700 digital camera and Linux 2.0.27 with libc5.

      You can be assured the software compiles and works like a charm on any new Linux system -- I own the MX-1200 camera, which uses the same interface, and it works great with this software (which is amazingly well written, IMHO). Maybe I should email the author and tell him to update that page...

      >This link goes to an FTP page with dozens of files

      True. But the README file describes what you need to do... Not to mention that anyone who is a Linux user should know which file to download, just like a Windows user knows to avoid downloading source distributions.

      >The web page says, "It seems that pre7 was the most buggier pre-release ever... So time to release a bugfix/hotfix one now."

      Again, be assured that mplayer is one of the higher quality pieces of software I have seen in quite a while -- in comparison to both linux and windows software. Microsoft has made far more serious errors in their web-browser that still aren't fixed.

      >The web page says, "here is an additional list of required software, which are not yet widely available on CDROM distributions, you have to download and maybe compile them yourself."

      Again, being able to do "./configure; make; make install" is part of being a linux user, just as being able to use "Add/Remove components" or the "System" control panel in windows is part of being a windows user. I don't think this is an unfair thing to ask people to do.

      >The page you linked to is quite old, and discusses Red Hat 6.0 and KDE 1.1. Newer PDAs tend to sync via the USB, not the serial port.

      There is newer software, some of it updated this month I'll best. I just got lazy. Freshmeat has an amazing amount of palm pilot software if you just search for it.

      >I'm not trying to put down these projects at all. I just think you've proven the original poster's point by enumerating these alpha or beta software.

      Unlike Microsoft, Linux applications do not use the User.Devel.Sub release numbering (or the now popular year release numbering). A program usually remains in beta until 100% of the expected functionality is added in Linuxland. If Microsoft were to do this, windows 3.1 would, infact, be windows 1.0, since all previous versions were really just beta versions that lacked the full functionality of a proper GUI. And how about NT? Where are the 0.x versions, not to mention 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0?

      Numbers don't really matter. What really matters is: Does the software do the job intended properly?

      In the case of most all the software I linked, I think the answer is yes.

      >And really, Linux advocates (I am one) need to be more critical than "I've never done DV, but Kino doesn't look too hard" or just admit that you don't know.

      I thought that's what I did... admit I don't know much about DV. Maybe I need to be more clear than "I've never done DV" when I admit I don't know all that much about it. Although, considering the amount of reviews I've seen of various DV software, and how much Kino and Cinerela/Broadcast 2k get mentioned, I figured they deserved an honourable mention.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:I'm Bored by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I really have no doubt that many of them work well. The problem is that they don't look finished, which sows doubt. By "look finished", I'm not just talking about a GUI front-end, but a stable set of basic features, a clear list of supported (and unsupported!) hardware, and other user- oriented (rather than developer-oriented) information.
      Linux advocates need to be more critical than "I've never done DV, but Kino doesn't look too hard" or just admit that you don't know.
      I thought that's what I did... admit I don't know much about DV.

      Sorry, I didn't mean what you think it meant. The "need to be critical" comment refers to "Kino doesn't look too hard". There are many many open source projects out there, and we need to be clear about which are ready to compete with commercial equivalents (Linux, gcc) and which are still works in progress. The alternative is a newbie downloading something you heard good things about and finding out that it's not even finished. Newbie is just not going to believe you again.

  166. Theft of Trust Should Be a Crime by serutan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Trustworthy Computing is the highest priority for all the work we are doing."
    Bill Gates, Jan 15, 2002.

    Really, Bill? Is that why you are disguising advertising as customer feedback? To promote trust? Or is it that customers trust each other more than they trust you, so you'll just pretend to be customers and steal some of that trust?

    "Theft of trust" - that has a nice ring to it, don't you think? Or how about trust infringement, or trust piracy?

    This isn't just a Microsoft thing, it's a good illustration of the absolute contempt people with a lot of money often have for the rest of the world. We are nothing, and lying to us means nothing. If you own enough of the law, getting caught doesn't even mean much.

    Corporate America is cutting its own throat day after day. Whether it's inventing demographic data or telling accountants what to make 2 and 2 add up to, every crooked move blackens another tooth in the shining smile. Trustworthy Computing isn't going to be a commercial product, Bill, because you guys just can't be trusted.

  167. "Damn it I knew I should've installed SP!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://delivery.gettyimages.com/comp/ca33501.jpg?x =x&dasite=GETTYIMAGES&dareq=151314034C2723345C0212 40435443425C534D

  168. read it again by djupedal · · Score: 2

    My reference was to something that didn't previously exist, and only later became an industry standard.

    You, then, proceeded to change the subject...

    Your's was to compare expensive auto's with less costly means of transportation (don't get what you pay for, etc.), and then to proceed to trash Macs. Since I didn't make that analogy, your argument was with yourself.

    PC owner: anti-mac and cheap... I get it. I wonder how many are just cheap.

    Would you own a Mac is someone gave it to you?

    1. Re:read it again by G-funk · · Score: 2

      Of course I would. I'd like a mac. Not because I think they're cool, because they run OSX. If they cost the same I'd have a mac right now. However I have too many other meat-space expenses to justify doubling the price of my computer simply to run OSX. I'm not cheap, I'm just not particularly rich atm. If I had 10grand to spend on a computer I'd spend it on my car.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:read it again by dhall · · Score: 1

      Right now I can get a top of the line Vaio (with Firewire, DVD-ROM and CD-RW drive, AND memory stick reader) for nearly half the cost of an OSX capable Mac of comparable performance.

      Even if Apple decides to use a lot of the POWER technology which is currently in use with the Pseries of computing, they won't see most of the benefits from the technology unless you want to pay for a $30k mac. Only then can I see the "price" worthwhile.

      Steve Jobs will ALWAYS retain a tight reign on what Apple will support. I liken them more to a cheap SGI then an expensive PC. The problem is the niche market isn't that robust, and Apple isn't as good as they think they are...

      Give me a stripped down Mac that only costs $300-500 on a high performance processor. I'll supply the rest, the video card, keyboard, mouse, monitor, etc...

  169. I hate the NYT. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Thankfully so do a lot of other people, so I was able to use a nice random-login generator to retrieve it:

    Site for the Truly Geeky Makes a Few Bucks
    By JOHN SCHWARTZ

    The front door to the office of Slashdot bears a nerdy little joke. A computer key is glued to the door: "Enter." The other side of the door has an old "Return" key.

    That's the geeky essence of Slashdot.org, an online publication with a fanatical community of millions of readers that combines a rich view of technology with quick, off-kilter wit.

    Could it be that this is the 21st-century model for Internet publishing?

    The highest-flying print publications of the dot-com bubble burbled about technology and the businesses that it fertilized. But now they and their glossy paper have fallen to earth. Just last week, Forbes ASAP and Upside joined the once-fat Industry Standard in the glossies' graveyard. "There is no market for a dedicated new-economy publication," said Monie Begley, a spokeswoman for Forbes.

    But far away from the buzz and the glamour, Slashdot survives and thrives. Run out of a basement office in a suburb of Ann Arbor, Mich., Slashdot has remained true to the slogan: "News for nerds. Stuff that matters."

    The secret to the online publication's moderate success? "They didn't buy a Super Bowl ad," joked Sean Bergeron, a fan from Virginia.

    It's a little more complicated than that, but not much. The company keeps its expenses low. Its creators write about what interests them. And -- here's where the business model may not be everyone's cup of Bawls Guarana energy drink -- they don't seem to care if the operation actually makes any money.

    Publishing without paper is cheap and cheap is good, said Richard Seltzer, an Internet entrepreneur and author of "Web Business Boot Camp: Hands-on Internet Lessons for Managers, Entrepreneurs and Professionals" (Wiley, 2002). He said online publications like Slashdot could flourish "in a down market, and especially when the market for online advertising is in disastrous shape."

    Slashdot persists as a must-read publication for the wizardly set, and especially those within the community of developers and fans of "open source" software like Linux, which is created and improved by legions of volunteers. The Web site provides the technically inclined a place to keep up with news, submit articles on their own, and discuss it all at length that can make a neophyte's head throb. The 25-year-old creators of the site, Rob Malda and Jeff Bates, estimate that in their five years online they have published 30,000 articles, served 500 million pages and amassed an audience estimated at 2 million people -- including some 50,000 who regularly enter the continuing conversation at least once a month.

    "Slashdot is the best site in the world for techies that want to know," said Daniel Hedblom, a reader in Sweden.

    The site's editors look for news and interesting sites, and cull hundreds of daily free submissions from readers and then edit and post a dozen or so articles each day. Those pieces are short, rarely more than 200 words, and offer links to other Web sites or news reports. The discussions then can go on for hundreds and even thousands of postings by readers, offering comment, argument and further research. Those who want to post without using their names are allowed to, but the system automatically gives them the user name "anonymous coward."

    And, of course, there is the goofy stuff. Along with arcane discussions of software technology and licensing schemes, the editors post gleeful critiques of Microsoft and its wares, and approving commentary on pop/nerd culture, including Natalie Portman, Aibo robot dogs, Lego projects and fun science projects.

    The creators also let pictures substitute for a thousand words. Small icons are attached to each item, including a much-used image of Bill Gates made up to look like a Star Trek Borg -- a race of half-man, half-machine beings that spreads across the universe and whose members drone: "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated." It conveys everything that the geekerati think about the software mogul Mr. Gates.

    "They have this fun combination of total geek cred and a good editor's eye for the weird and interesting and compelling," said Michael Hirschorn, senior vice president of news and production at the cable channel VH1, and co-founder of the late Inside.com, which was an online report on the world of media.

    Mr. Hirschorn applauded Slashdot's "very smart balancing act," which he characterized as "appealing in a very intimate, direct way with its core audience and figuring out a way to branch out into other topics, like intellectual property, that would appeal to a broader audience."

    He suggested, however, that any comparison between large business efforts like his Inside site and Slashdot were misleading. Slashdot's creators don't really "measure themselves as a business. They can meaure themselves as a cause," he said. "The fact that it's turned out to be a modest business is a happy surprise."

    Does Slashdot, in fact, make money? Its owners say, yes, sort of. The site is owned by Open Source Development Network Inc., a subsidiary of the VA Software Corporation. Open Source runs a number of technology-related Web sites and an online store, ThinkGeek.

    Richard French, senior vice president and general manager for Open Source, declined to break out the income of any one component of the company, except to say, "Slashdot works from a cost point of view and from a revenue perspective."

    In fact, he acknowledged, "If you took any one of them on their own, probably none of them would be profitable," he said of Open Source's various Web sites.

    But because many of the sites use the same hardy, low-maintenance software developed by Mr. Malda and his team, and because the Internet resources are pooled, the company says it is able to squeeze out a profit from the cluster, and makes further profits from sites that it sets up for businesses.

    The sites have a combined audience of some six million people, Mr. French said, and a sizable number of those visitors go to ThinkGeek. The store offers a range of goods that techies love, including T-shirts with the logos of Slashdot and other affiliated sites, like Freshmeat and SourceForge, as well as shirts and caps that bear representations of the chemical structure of caffeine; caffeine-spiked candies; and even caffeine-saturated soap.

    "Apparently, our readers need caffeinated soap," Mr. Malda said.

    The arrangement works, Mr. French said, because the corporate owners do not interfere in the editorial decisions of the Slashdotters. "I don't go down and say, `Rob I want you to write about this,' " he said. "Rob understands his community."

    Mr. Malda added: "I still think of it as my personal soapbox. If I decide next Thursday that `It's all about Windows!' I don't know if Slashdot would follow that -- but I would keep posting it and posting it until they fire me."

    Mr. Malda and Mr. Bates met in high school in Holland, Mich., and went on to attend the local Hope College, where Mr. Malda created the site. He was soon joined in the effort by Mr. Bates, the way that kids in the old Judy Garland-Mickey Rooney movies put on a show with friends. They were stunned by the site's popularity, and even more stunned when it actually made money.

    They once had visions of dot-com wealth of their own, and had immense paper profits when their site was bought in 1999 by the Open Source Development Network, then known as Andover.net. Open Source was then sold the next year to VA Linux (which later changed its name to VA Software). The 2000 transaction was, for a heady moment, valued at $975 million. That's when the company's stock was worth nearly $250 a share. These days, VA Software's stock trades for around 75 cents a share.

    Mr. Bates said his stock did not make him rich, but he was able to sell some shares.

    "Not as many as I would have liked," he said, "but that's the nature of lockup" -- the clauses that restrict a corporate insider's ability to sell newly acquired stock. "At the end of the day, I was able to buy a house, and hey, I'm not going to complain about that."

    Fans of the site are ready, even impatient, for more.

    One of the messages posted to the discussion of passing the five-year mark last month was a simple three words: "O.K., now what?"

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:I hate the NYT. by ellboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just because you hate them doesn't give you the right to republish their articles. The NYT doesn't HAVE to provide free, online versions of their articles, but they do, so have some decency, and do the free reg. if you want to read their stuff.

  170. Re:+1 BUKKAKE REFERENCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forgive my ignorance, but what is bukkake?

  171. this is just weird... by His+Nastiness · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I write this there are about 538 responses to this post or to the responses to this post. At this point reading them is not feasible but things seem to be breaking down into two areas: 1) The windows vs. OSX/Mac vs. linux arguments that are common curency around here 2) The "Oh my GOD! Microsoft used a model in an add and quoted someone who might not be entirely objective in their opinion!?!?!?" To those who fall in the first camp I'm glad to see that you are all alive and well and its like a breath of fresh air everytime I see M$, Windoze or Microsuck. It's sort of like when the guy at the office says "Ohhhh BEHAVE!" as if it were still funny. To those that fall in the second camp I'd like you to sit down for a second. There is no Santa Claus, your mom may not have loved you best and Wilford Brimley didn't do the goddam oatmeal commercials becuase he loved oatmeal. They paid him. Yup, it's true. The Abe Lincoln you see in the car adds around President's Day? Not the real president. It's not a lie its advertising. I can't believe this is a story to the /. crowd. -Nasty

    1. Re:this is just weird... by torgosan · · Score: 2

      Got to give you points for the insight but...

      "It's not a lie its advertising."

      Maybe it's just me but what's the difference?

      --
      "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
    2. Re:this is just weird... by His+Nastiness · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have been more clear, but I needed sleep. Advertising is a lie. Flat out. It's deception, but one of many deceptions that allow us to live as a society with all of us going collectively postal. When I tell someone I'll be with them in a minute, it's a lie, a polite one, but a lie. But they accept it as truth, to my face, even though they know it's a lie. WE walk through are days with a finely crafted willing-suspension-of-disbelief or a cynical acceptance of the way things are but they're what allow us to have a civilization in the first place. Politicians lie, actors lie, slaesman lie and we pay all these people to lie, either explicitly or implicitly. If everyone lies all of the time it seems that at some point it's not really lying anymore. At some point it seems that if lying is necessary for our modern-technocratic-whatever-you-want-to-call-it society to survive then it's not really lying anymore. We used to just call air, "air" it was one of the elements but when we found out about oxygen it wasn't really the same "air" anymore. Lying, from a societal and economic point of view, is oxygen. Or something like that.

  172. PC's make you psycho.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right man...you made the cost analogy, and then you said it was stupid... You are arguing with yourself.

  173. the big story is that.... by hashish · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's PR company's employee used MAC only until recently. I wonder if she is a long standing employee of their?

    My bet is that she is lying about switching, but should be hard for her to prove unless she obtains a MAC real quick.

  174. not original by kscd · · Score: 3, Funny

    I knew MS was bad at designing software, but it looks like they can't even be orginal at designing an ad campaign...

  175. best line by puddytat · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A spokeswoman from Apple Computer would not comment"

    the mental image I get is from someone laughing so hard she CAN not comment.

  176. Re:I Won't Switch Until Laptop Keyboard Is Fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You beat that dead horse into the ground!

  177. I like this one... by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1

    "There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint."

    So what about MS Office v.X for the Mac? Or is that too good to be considered as merely equivalent? ;-)

  178. actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that makes it way funnier than he thought it was.

  179. Double-tricks by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
    Microsoft really missed a trick here. The fact is, millions upon millions of people switched from the Mac to Windows, around the time Win95 came out. I think the Mac once had, what, 40% market share? Now it's 4% (barely, only 0.4% if you only count OSX machines)

    Ohh, but that was years ago you say, Macs don't suck anymore. OK, fair point, but why should this stop MS Marketing? Bear in mind the Apple ads talk about stuff like blue screens (i think they have a whole ad devoted to them) despite the fact that if you go out and buy a brand name PC with XP preloaded (so you don't have dodgy hardware combos) you will never see a blue screen. I have XP at work, using it now, and have not seen a blue screen on it ever. That's a solved problem, yet Apple keep harping on about it.

    Why? Because it's got a reputation. Marketing is about perceptions, and the perception is Windows == BSODs. Yet for many, many users, "Mac" reminds them of the POS that was System 8 or whatever it was called, and they "switched" to Windows for very good reasons.

    Anyway, it's worth remembering the post in the earlier story by Dr Spork - Apple is not serious competition to Microsoft. I think something like 80% of computers are in business? Don't recall where I read that statistic, but Apple have practically zero business presence. Lockin is too strong, and Apple are on MS life support anyway - and even with Microsoft helping them to fix bugs in OS X they still need help from the open source movement too! If Apple were to become a threat, you are guaranteed Microsoft would not be pissing about with ridiculous web pages (not even a tv ad). They'd do something about it, like they did back in the days.

  180. Umm, this is what they do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Legal or not, msft doesn't care. Whether it hurts people or not, msft doesn't care. Linux? It's a non issue on the first part, get around legal hassles with liscense like you just passed a bowl around and drinking frappucino. Problem is, too much frappucino and pot makes you SICK. On the second one it's overuse of GPL. It can and does hurt some people, but not microsoft or apple.

    And, msft has their own legal dept nursury, they call it "the legal dept".
    And, msft has their own PR dept. they call "paid liars"-- btw, PR dept is not the same as advertising dept, so I have to ask for a WTF upmod.

    Be Inc had "kindler, gentler" down pat. It was their way. A way all to easily destroyed by people calling themselves "friendly competion".

    but like their(msft, apple, and linux to a trite degree) collective PR and Adv. wings, they are all abv for this

    BS.

    I hope Be wins in court against Microsoft, I really truly do. I hope they win, I hope sun wins, and the other 133+ plaintiffs in court charging them.

  181. You can VOTE for this story. by VValdo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Check out the bottom of the story--

    Would you recommend this story?
    Not at all 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5


    Yahoo members, you can mod this one up!!!

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  182. Yahoo! got another lie. by dackroyd · · Score: 2


    "It was an actual customer," spokeswoman Charmaine Gravning said. "We kind of figured out that really isn't the best way to go about communicating. "

    Oops, no it's not....btw is there an advertising standards agency in the US ? In the UK there's a government body set up to slap companies for exactly this behaviour.

    --
    "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
    1. Re:Yahoo! got another lie. by sh00z · · Score: 2, Informative
      is there an advertising standards agency in the US ?
      No, each state has its own deceptive trade practices laws (generally enforced by the State Attorney General). Connecticut nailed Sony for very similar behavior to what MS is up to here.
  183. Article removed... by taernim · · Score: 1

    It's worth noting that the article was pulled, thanks to this thread.

    Check out the article on that here.

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  184. That was -too- funny by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, I that artical made me laugh -so- hard. Does Microsoft have ANY shame?

    It's as if Microsoft's shamelessness was so huge that I can't single out a witty smart-a** comment to toss up here. My brain doesn't quite know which was funnier, the stock Getty Images, the 8 year old kid that can write at a college level, the woman who works for MS PR, the fact that anyone would find a Windows box easier to use.

    I'm going to archive that google cache and print it up for my "Wall of Shame" at work. The *nix geeks will love it ;)

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  185. Reminds me of another company ... by le_banni · · Score: 1

    ... that had this kind of fake "user testimonials". Only, they got caught and exposed in an even more ridiculous way. The company was french-based wappup.com (now www.wappup.it), and they had each month a new made-up user story to promote their crap service. But some people recognised where the "models" used for illustrating the articlescame from : They were cropped porn photographs taken from magazines. See this snapshot of the web page : http://www.vakooler.com/docs/interview-sandrine.gi f And see the original (uncropped) picture : http://www.vakooler.com/docs/0103.jpg They removed the pages, but too late :p

  186. All that (R) and (C) by lunatech3007 · · Score: 1

    All the proper use of (C) and (TM) and (R) was a giveaway that this was not drafted by some indivual user. Remebering to putting those (C)s and (R)s and (TM)s at ooh so trim and proper places was a dead giveaway that it was drafted by some professional. They have even been appended at the end of "Outlook Express" as in OutLook Express (R).

  187. MacOS and Linux are closing in on M$. by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Redundant

    I've allways seen it come. I have no doubt that by now M$ has serious problems appearing on their horizon if they really want to keep up the inhouse software only strategy.
    People don't by PCs a dime a dozen anymore, and to all sides those who professionally deal with computers are switching to Mac or Linux so to use their older Hardware and have all software for intercomputer work in one package rather than shelling out bundles of bucks for M$ software addons. Just the other day a friend of mine got feed up and ditched XP for SuSE Linux Pro.

    All you'll ever need in one box.
    No license issues.
    High performant and cheap.
    No need to ever learn to handle yet another new OS.

    And for design jobs?
    Well of course you take a Mac.
    M$ will either buy RedHat some day or move to appliances and an AOL like 'community' - but they're not gonna sustain a serious Software buisness - not this way at least.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  188. Larger than you think by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

    This is just a devious trick. Microsoft's PR team is obviously smarter than this. Could it be possible that they knew from the beginning that this would come out pretty soon? Seems to me it's gives them a lot of publicity, not necessarily publicity that's not gonna have people move away from MS products. Microsoft appears to be doing too much of this sort of thing, which is more than a little suspicious. It could just as well be a planned effort.

  189. I can see the *next* ad now. . . by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Switch to Windows, more Microsoft employees chose it than any other brand!

    KFG

  190. I don't get pay-per-click ads ... by bockman · · Score: 1
    how much difficult would be to make an automated program that clicks on ads hundreds (or thousands) of times per day?

    I hope (for them) they at least checks client IPs to filter repetitions.

    --
    Ciao

    ----

    FB

    1. Re:I don't get pay-per-click ads ... by winse · · Score: 1

      actually it is even easier to just roll some perl (or other language of choice) to automagically send requests with the proper "referer" tag in the header. over and over.....very simple

      #!/usr/bin/perl -w
      use IO::Socket;
      use IO::File;
      $remote_host = shift;
      $remote_port = "80";

      $socket = IO::Socket::INET->new(PeerAddr => $remote_host,PeerPort => $remote_port, Proto => "tcp",Type => SOCK_STREAM) or die "Couldn't connect to $remote_host:$remote_port : $@\n";
      print $socket "GET http://sniffed.url.here HTTP/1.0\n";
      print $socket "Accept: */*\n";
      print $socket "Accept-Language: en-us\n";
      print $socket "User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)\n";
      print $socket "referer: http://slashdot.org/\n\n";
      $answer = ;
      print $answer;
      close($socket);

      --
      this sig is deprecated
  191. Re:not the first time a .doc has betrayed its crea by Des+Herriott · · Score: 3, Informative

    Reminds me of a small company I used to work for, where most everyone insisted on using MS-Word format for email, much to the annoyance of us Unix operational types. Still, strings worked pretty well to get the gist of the text (this was quite some time before Openoffice etc.)

    One day, we received a fairly innoccuous memo from our CEO. However, running strings on the document showed an interesting little "hidden" addendum: details of annual pay increases for pretty much the whole company.

    My boss pointed this out to him in private. A few minutes later, a decree was issued: plain text is the standard email format, and thou shalt not use Word. A good day, that was.

  192. Getty stock pics are funny since BillG ownz Corbis by dizzy8578 · · Score: 1

    I noticed the images used are from Getty images, the largest stock photo house in the world I have been told. Their closest competitor is Bill Gates former non-profit digital art acquisition foundation turned stock photo house.

    http://www.corbis.com

    Lots of images in the royalty free area but the search results are pretty entertaining if you don't use IE..

    --
    *"Cogito Ergo Liberalis"*
  193. Synopsis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK. Beaten to death, but maybe missed by some...
    The article claimes AP tracked down the 'convert' by personal info embedded in the .doc
    Now, the ShowUsYourSkills.doc is at the bottom of the page and is an invitation to write down your own 'conversion' story. If you open it in Word, go to File/Properties and select the custom tab. There you see the name of the Microsoft employed author (Valerie Mallison). AP contacted this person.
    Wonder above wonder, the conversion story is her personal story and, of course, has nothing to do with the fact that MS is paying her to write for them.
    So what do we have? Obviuously, this is a pale imitation (yet again) of an Apple commercial, brought without any soul. They put in a picture right next to 'Confessions of a ...convert' implying that this is the person in question. Fat chance. Just a stock picture....( Now had the picture been next to a heading like 'Conversion Stories' or so, no problem). Next, the writeup turns out to be done by a professional in MS's paid service.

    I won't say this pisses me off, just that this is (yet another) element of proof of the total lack of scruples on Microsoft ( not that we weren't aware of that already of course)
    MICROSOFT IN ITS PRESENT FORM MUST DIE

  194. What Small Businesses are YOU talking About by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I too do a bit of consulting for small businesses. The ones I generally deal with want absolutely NOTHING to do with the technology. They just want the damn thing to work.

    My clients are generally sole proprieterships who are getting on the web. Very few have the $60k to dump into "An Exchange Server, a MSSQL server, and a Dell Rack Mount running Win 2k." Their budget is a white-box athlon running RedHat and MySQL.

    They will pay for hardware, because you generally purchase it once and it has a clear ROI. Most small business owners I deal with are delighted to find they don't have to pay for the software, beyond my time to customize it. Very few if any actually have any IT staff, so training is less of an issue than "can this machine run unattended for months at a time?"

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  195. The story has made it to the BBC by deepstephen · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's appeared on BBC News now, and there's a link back to /. too. Is this a first? Are they trying to give Slashdot a taste of its own Slashdotting medicine? :-)

    --

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (you come and go)
  196. Microsoft Public Relations� by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

    "We kind of figured out that really isn't the best way to go about communicating. We decided it was best to point customers to the Windows XP home page." says spokeswoman Charmaine Gravning.

    No shit Charmaine!

    --
    "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  197. Windows Twerps Wanted!!! by Glanz · · Score: 1

    NOTICE: MS Corp is looking for spineless, ignorant, sell-outs to lie about why they just love Windows XP. We will only use people who have no clue as to what Open Source is. Applicants must have no ethical standards at all, in other words, they must reflect the total lack of morality and justice demonstrated by Microsoft Corp. for the last 15 years. If accepted, the "user" will be presented with one of Bill Gates' shoes to lick and a photo of his ass to kiss. Monetary compensation is also possible, depending on the quality of the lies.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  198. Complain to MS by Gothmolly · · Score: 2

    I did. I sent them a detailed letter why their page was technically flawed as well as underhanded marketing. Let them know that they're suffering for this kind of FUD.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  199. wtf is wrong with you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all I ask the question, "HOW CAN THIS POSSIBLY BE NEWS". Now that that's out of the way, WHO CARES!? You think Microsoft is the only one to do this? And besides that, what did they do. If they find somebody within their company that wants to give her story who cares? You think that Linux affiliated companies have never done something like this before? Or apple for that matter? What bothers me is that Microsoft can't do anything without you guys complaining and that makes you all look like tattling little kids. And yes that does represent all of the Linux community if a large site like Slashdot which is representative of the Linux community posts it. Believe me, this does not hurt Microsoft's image at all, it only hurts yours for trying to sling it as dirt when it isn't even close.

  200. Mallinson's name is in Many Docs on the Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look around, she's all over the place.

    They might have been brighter if she denied being the switcher and simply said many documents go through her before being posted.

  201. BBC by Spunk · · Score: 2

    The BBC is also covering this story, with credit given to Slashdot.

  202. Caveat Spector by Grackle · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised any Slashdot readers would expect a "customer testimonial" in an advertisement to have any basis in fact. Ads are a form of propaganda designed to generate brand awareness and to sell products -- they aren't intended to present facts or to educate potential buyers.

  203. "not a real person"? by jon_eccleston · · Score: 3, Funny

    This BBC News report claims:

    "...the picture of the woman used to illustrate the story was a stock image from the Getty Library and unlikely to be that of a real person." (emphasis mine)

    I hope she doesn't have an inferiority complex already, because this kind of talk really won't help...

  204. Ask Val? by Quixote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What we need is an 'Ask Slashdot' on this topic. Collect your questions, and then ask Val what the real deal is.

  205. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

    Send her a note, her website, valmalgal.com (open the file, look under File/Properties/Summary/Company) has been registered but has no content. Maybe she's having computer problems, but I digress...

  206. Free Mac for Val Campaign by Popocatepetl · · Score: 1

    Apple should offer a free Mac to her.

  207. pedophilia search tool? by Rader · · Score: 2

    Anyone notice that microsoft has keywords next to the boy from the stock pictures?

    Words like "Pre-Adolescent Child" , "One Boy Only"

    Kind of weird.

  208. What do you expect when they work for M$? by suman28 · · Score: 1

    I expect nothing more from someone that works for Microsoft PR dept.

  209. Language level of the Encarta kid is 11th grade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran the Smog Readability Formula test against the "7th grade kid" and he writes like an 11th grader. This was a poor attempt at deception. C'mon Microsoft, if you are going to lie, cheat and steal at least have some style!

    http://www.med.utah.edu/pated/authors/readabilit y. html

  210. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by misterhaan · · Score: 1
    from the submission form:
    Are you the one everyone comes to when they need to know how to do something? If so, we'd love to see what you can do.
    well of course they need to have someone write these stories for them instead of taking submissions!

    problem everyone keeps asking me: "why does ms office/windows keep crashing? fix it!"
    what i can do: wipe hard drive, install linux.

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  211. In another fake add somewhere on the web by tuxliner · · Score: 1

    I read about a bearded guy's testimony. He was talking about switching from Linux to GNU/Linux. Honestly, who could believe that?

  212. Oh my god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    forgive my ignorance, but what is bukkake?


    Trust me--you don't want to know.


    Especially if you are having a vanilla shake right now. . .

  213. The power of slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this article speaks for itself:

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/821269.asp?0dm=N18LT

    Slashdot 1, Microsoft 0.

  214. Stern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, this story just got picked up on Howard Stern.

    Robin referred to us as "cyber geeks" but she didn't mention slashdot by name.

  215. Too bad... by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

    ...apparently even Microsoft isn't aware that people like you *actually* exist.

  216. Another nice Word privacy feature by kelzer · · Score: 1
    $ strings ShowOffYourSkills.doc | less
    /* truncated... */
    Show Off Your Skills
    Normal.dot
    Katherine L. Trunkey
    Microsoft Word 10.0

    Notice the bold name. It appears that Katherine downloaded the Word document, opened it up, and then saved it to her hard drive. Little did she know that Word would stick her name in the document. This anonymous coward isn't so anonymous any more!

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  217. We made Howard Stern? by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    Hey, Robin just said that "a bunch of cyber geeks" figured out that it was a stock photo and tracked down the real woman, is she talking about SlashDot?

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  218. Made it to Stern show by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    Just made it to Robin's news on the Stern show. They called us "Cyber Geeks". Howard says that Wendy also made the switch, from a Mac to a Toaster (perhaps the video Toaster?)

  219. What is Bukkake? I'll tell you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you'll find the answers you're looking for right here. You may also find a few other sites are useful for describing bukkake.

  220. AP citing Slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...oh hevans, chicken-little. I do beleve, indeed, the sky is falling.

  221. Pfft by Myopic · · Score: 1

    the link in the story is to the microsoft testimonial of a "seventh grade" kid. not the kid pictured, mind you, but aparently to a real life seventh grader.

    um. then the testimonial says this:

    Our first assignment this year was to read a historical novel. I chose Charles Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities. I read the book over the weekend. The guide for A Tale of Two Cities helped me to consider some things about the book that I might not have noticed just reading it once, like asking me to look for thematic images and foreshadowing like the red sunset falling on the French palace.

    i see two possibilities: (1) it's all fake; (2) this is the most brillian seventh grader in the history of formal education. shit, in seventh grade i was hardly reading Dickens, much less doing presentations about thematic images and foreshadowing. and what kind of genius reads A Tale of Two Cities "over the weekend"? i think microsoft would do well to employ this golden child.

  222. Just look in the properties for the file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to do anything difficult! Just open file in Word. Go file>properties and choose the 'custom' tab.

  223. +1, Informative!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thnx for the nfo!! now if only i could stop masterbating!!! *beat-beat-beat-beat...*

  224. Actually, James Gosling Motivated the GPL by Chris-S · · Score: 2, Informative

    Richard Stallman wrote the GPL to protect himself (and others) after James Goslings's shenannigans with Gosling Emacs. See the history here

    I don't know when Gosling started working at SUN, but I don't think SUN had anything to do with the original creation of the GPL.

    BTW, Sun was growing fast, but IBM was the big monopolist of the time (and hadn't yet realized the monster they created in Microsoft).

  225. I think we're ready to take over the world by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2

    Can we become our own nation? We're now on our way to world domination!

    you have no chance to survive make your time!

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:I think we're ready to take over the world by KH2002 · · Score: 1

      At this point, there's no reason not to declare statehood.

    2. Re:I think we're ready to take over the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's gonna be one giant sausage party!

  226. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I try to help people have a balanced view of Microsoft: http://www.hevanet.com/peace/microsoft.htm [hevanet.com]."

    I went to this page. I'm still trying to find the "balanced view". This is one of the most unbalanced views I've seen - it's bordering on delusional. Now, I'm not saying what you say is wrong (although I do disagree with much of it), but suggesting this is a balanced view is, well, maybe not even bordering on delusional - it's just delusional.

  227. Que Ballmer by Superpaz · · Score: 1

    Lies! Lies! Lies!

  228. It also says it was last saved by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Katherine L. Trunkey

    welcome to the Microsoft (e)Paper Trail.

  229. Consumer protection? Truth in advertising? ... by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 2

    ... not to mention violation of Valerie Mallinson's privacy.

    Has M$ broken a law or two here?

  230. Switcher preference is for applications, not OS by flash41 · · Score: 1

    I acknowledge that the "switcher" saved $500 on hardware by buying a Windows laptop instead of an iBook. But to me, the main point of the switcher's testimonial is she felt that Microsoft Office was superior to Appleworks, and Internet Explorer to Netscape. Well, OK, so why hasn't she been using these Microsoft applications on the **Macintosh**? Why buy new hardware AND new software, when new software would have been sufficient? This should have been a testimonial for Microsoft application software, not a "platform" switch.

  231. Certification... by doodleboy · · Score: 1
    But regarding MCSE, I still consider it to have been very helpful in my technical development (because I only used braindumps on one exam). If you study for it well, you CAN get something out of it (aside from the Network Infrastructure exam, where some of the networks look like they were designed by a 5-year old). In fact I think it is an excelent compliment to the LPIC exams (I am MCSE and LPIC-2 certified).
    I have a friend who taught an MCSE training course for a while and said he could get me into it for cost, about half price. At the time I said something snotty like, "yeah, but then I'd have to work with NT." So now I'm between jobs and the headhunter I just spoke to said I should get an MCSE if I want to be sure to get a decent job quickly. But I still don't want to work with NT. And while I can understand that there are useful things to be learned from studying for it, and like your typical /. geek I am hesitant to support MS in any way.

    Nevertheless, I have started collecting certifications. First was the LPIC-1, which I comfortably passed but found surprisingly difficult given that it was an entry-level exam. Next was the A+, which was a TOTAL joke. A monkey could pass the A+

    I bought a study guide for the Network+ exam, but I'm a little hesitant given how ridiculous the A+ was. And I can't help but notice that CompTIA is pimping for Microsoft with its so-called Institute for Software Choice. Do I really want to give more money to these people?

    I will almost certainly do the LPIC-2 exams sometime this fall. Not sure what else after that. It should be obvious by now that I'm something of an idealist, and really don't want to support corporations that engage in what I consider to be morally repugnant activities. Obviously with the collapse of the .coms the job market is really tight. I did decide on non-vendor specific, non-retireable certifications as a way of padding the resume, but not if it means paying a bunch of (increasingly scarce) money only to have the certification retired when $GREEDY_VENDOR decides to wring more cash out of its past graduates.

    I know this is an old thread, but if anyone happens to read this post and has any suggestions, feel free to chime in.
    1. Re:Certification... by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think honestly that pursuing the certification is still worth it. And although I will be going for the Windows 2000 MCSE, it is for an entirely different reason. The NT Server in the Enterprise exam taught me how inadequate NT4 was for the enterprise ;) But with Windows 2000, I can learn strategies for deploying LDAP-based directory services in general. My point is that I pursue certification not for that piece of paper but rather for the learning opportunity.

      And lest you think I am supporting Microsoft consider this-- my organization has made the decision to build its network infrastructure entirely on RedHat 8. This includes the desktop computers, but I can still apply what I have learned in both the NT4 and Windows 2000 MCSE exams to this environment. I just have to make sure they are the right lessons. ;-)

      This is getting sort of off-topic. Please write me if you want to continue this conversation.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:Certification... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you sure about that? did YOU pass the A+? something seems fishy here. when was the last time monkey were trained to pass the A+?

  232. Obvious hoax by yardbird · · Score: 1

    Are you telling me I'm the only one who noticed her coffee cup is backwards?

    --
    Free, legal music for iTunes users.
  233. regarding monopolies by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    Being a monopoly is wrong for any number of reasons: it means the monopoly has an unfair advantage with regard to a cash safety reserve, time to screw up and then try and try again until you get it right, customer "choice", and any number of other things.
    I see this presumption again and again and it annoys me to no end. This presumption is blatantly wrong.

    There is nothing illegal or immoral about holding a monopoly. That said, a company can (1) acquire a monopoly by illegal and/or immoral means; and/or (2) illegally and/or immorally abuse their monopoly status.

    Many have alleged that Microsoft is guilty of the first of these. IIRC, Microsoft was convicted of the second.

  234. and in the background, the trombone player plays by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Microsoft goofed this one up!

    wa-wa-waaa...

    Despite yet another blunder, Microsoft consoles itself with the bazillion dollars it made today.

    wa-wa-waaaaaa...

  235. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

    Listen retard, you challenged people by saying that Rh can't do what Windows does, and many people countered it. You weren't very specific when you made your broad claim.

    BTW, I've had more trouble with NICs in windows than I ever had in Linux, but again, that's not very scientific...

  236. Sorry, it was written in haste. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Sorry, it was written in haste. Everyone knows the positives about MS; most Slashdot readers use MS software. What people don't know, really know, is the negatives that might make an executive change his mind in small ways. Most executives do not have the option to change in big ways; Microsoft has a virtual monopoly.

  237. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    My claim was really clear, 'retard'. For the 90% of the people out there RedHat's not ready today.

    Countering with "I made it work with one example, therefore you're wrong" is not a definitive blow.

    I still don't think it's ready. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. The worst case scenario is that RedHat got some badly needed publicity.

    For the record, I used Redhat 7.2. It was not near as easy to install as people claimed. It was a bitch finding anything in it (everything starts in K for some reason), and getting it on the net was painful. The only thing I didn't have trouble with was installing Opera.

    It's going to be a couple of versions before I try switching again. Others will feel the same.

  238. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Microsoft used STOCK Photos just like everyone else?

    Oh the humanity!

  239. Microsoft's secret "switcher ad" identity blown by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shows enough proof that Microsoft copied the Mac OS and lied to the Supreme Court on Netscape and Explorer matters. You can't get any lower than that at Microsoft. Besides, if Microsoft invested into brain transplant technology...do you think you want to "upgrade"? Hell no!!!

  240. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Balanced? My ass. You're just a freaking stalker waiting for the spotlight to shine on him.

    To publish information about a group, especially a singular employee, is obscene. Perhaps we should track you down and publish your address and phone number?

  241. Re:Associated Press & Yahoo! News Aren't Mains by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    C'mon, man. That's the reason I switched to a PC in 1997. I got IE with the blink tag. You should see how much more productive I was! All my memos got read! The secretaries all gave me head!

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  242. short answer: they're real you fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long answer: enough already, get a clue, they're F'ing REAL. Sorry to be the one to break it to you.

    1. Re:short answer: they're real you fool by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

      A small collection of average cluebies switching to MacOS is hardly inspiring. I'd rather see a collection of smart people, at least I'd trust their opinions.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    2. Re:short answer: they're real you fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what smart people think? These ads aren't really targeting the build-your-own-kernel crowd.

      The message is SUCCESSFUL people switch. Don't you want to be like them?

  243. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

    For the record, I used Redhat 7.2. It was not near as easy to install as people claimed. It was a bitch finding anything in it (everything starts in K for some reason), and getting it on the net was painful. The only thing I didn't have trouble with was installing Opera.

    Hardly scientific.... let's both agree that we're full of shit, and have only single user stories to back up our claims.

  244. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    That's fair. I'd like to drop this topic anyway. I think ppl feel that I'm anti-Linux, I'm not. Im just annoyed that both my attempts to switch were failures. (not intended as another poke at Linux, but a reflection of why this topic bugs me. Im not a fan of MS, but it's the best for me today.)

  245. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by seanb · · Score: 2

    That's right on my way home. I think I'll stop by there and see if they are giving away any Mac hardware, now that she's "switched".

  246. Re: nip the tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It'll grow back, won't it?" -- Homer, with his arm stuck in the soda machine
    (Sorry, I couldn't find the appropriate reference on snpp.)

  247. Don't be upset. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Don't be upset. The information about how to find the name was printed in the Yahoo article.

    The address is of her company, not her. She's a contractor. She doesn't work there.

    She, and the public relations company, participated in a lie about Microsoft. News articles were written about her. That makes her, in a limited way, a public figure.

  248. FUD Too funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody is going to a hell of a lot of trouble to hide this FUD. I think they figured out we are on to them. It's great that somebody noticed all of this. Gives a whole new meaning to trustworthy computing. Even their ads are a pack of lies.

  249. So, it's Okay for Apple, but not MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear god, another /. FUD attack. Apple is guilty for three counts of the same thing in their little lame campaign. And who cares that the rest switched... honestly, if you are so dumb that you can't find out what cable connects your expensive DV camera to your expensive PC by reading the manuals or what not, you shouldn't have the equipment in the first place.

    It's funny how there will never be an ad campaign like this for linux. Linux folks are so 'proud' (fanatical and insane) of their OS and it's magical properties (yeah, right) that they would never resort to lies and FUD (yeah, right)... the biggest problem is finding anyone in the real world who has switched; they don't exist.

  250. She also switched to atari... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't she make up her mind?? Here is the switch info from Mac to Atari.

  251. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Stephen+King · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not.

    --
    Karma: Undead.
  252. Legal Ramifications for MS under FTC act? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone know if MS could be investigated for this ad under the truth-in-advertising rules in the FTC act?

    http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/ad-f aq s.htm

    I guess the question would be whether it's considered an "ad" -- it's misleading and material by the act's definitions.

  253. windows user since 98? by fava · · Score: 2

    I wonder if this is the same Val Mallinson referenced in this usenet post.

    If she is she has clearly been using windows since 98.

  254. I switched from Apple to MS. by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

    I didn't even consider using Linux. Even though it would allow me to keep ALL of my Mac hardware, even my old laptop.

    I have really complex requirements and Linux just isn't up to the task, I think, I mean never bothered to look, but that's what I am hearing from my friends to work in the marketing department at MS.

    My requirements include things like, connecting my Palm organizer, reading word documents, shelling out $250 for an operating system. None of these things are possible with Linux.

    Using my postscript based Apple printer, connecting to the Entirenet through my cable modem, hooking up my zip drive. None of these things can be done with Linux. Well maybe some of them but I would need a degree in CompSci to even begin to contemplate the task. And the cable modem is just not possible, I even asked my provider and they said, "Linux?, what's that?, no it won't work!"

    And now I get to use XP, that allows me and my hubby to have slightly different desktop appearances, even though we both have to operate as root all the time. Too bad the other OS provider can't figure out how to allow superficial changes to the windowing theme. Its kind of like a shitty rent-a-wreck car that my husband and I rented one day. My hubby is tall and he couldn't really fit comfortably in the sub-compact, but we were still able to cram him in and he could move enough to drive. Boy was he stiff, after the 100 miles to Redmond.

    By far, my favorite feature of XP is how, I got the computer system and OS for free and, on top of that, I even got paid to write this article. With a deal like that how could I even consider something like Linux?

    And no, I don't actually look like the girl in the picture, but I wish I did, only I would probably change the hair a bit.

  255. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod me down now, asshats.

  256. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by NeverNow · · Score: 1

    The .doc binary also reveals this name: Katherine L. Trunkey... This Katherine Trunkey? Not that I know who she is...

  257. I just want to see by seismic · · Score: 1


    A picture of the real marketing lady holding a coffee cup in her hand trying to act good looking.

  258. Re:The 13 year old script kiddie crowd is smarter. by Tpenta · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone at M$ reads slashdot. The files appear to be gone.

  259. I am very interested... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    I am very interested to know what they say. I think they might be approached in a friendly way. Then you could tell us all at Slashdot.

  260. Actually, they yes they do by HuguesT · · Score: 1
    I see this rant all the time, it is false.

    Yes, the NYT has to provide at least some of their content for free over the internet. Lots of other papers do it, CNN does it, here where I live the Sydney Morning Herald is all for free on the web with no registration. You can google search for all sorts of news on the web, not to mention weblogs of all kinds. As you know you can listen for news on the radio for free and you can watch them on TV, too.

    The price of the paper version is just for the convenience of having your own copy to take away wherever you want to and to use as garden mulch when you are finished. If the NYT wants to survive as a prime source of news that people read, they just have to provide their content. Their registration step is annoying and couterproductive (people will write whatever they want in these little boxes, and they do) so they should get rid of it.

    BTW, the providing of news is nothing, this is not the business of the NYT in spite of all apparences. Their real business is the manufacturing of consent in the interest of bigger businesses and the economy in general. Simple, really.

  261. Curious quesiton. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does it seem MS gets caught doing sneaky things when it comes to PR all the time? Things that would be EASY to avoid getting caught doing, even on a budget that is a fraction of theirs.

    I have to wonder if they are not so blinded by their own success that they really don't see how the world outside microsoft operates?

    I'm thinking of obviously faked videos used in trials, outright obvious lies about technology (as opposed to sneaky mis-truths)... stuff like this... fake grass-roots campaigns...

    Weak dude, weak.

    1. Re:Curious quesiton. by MacDaffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most galling thing about Microsoft is that their dominance could be understood if they were THE BEST at something other than the raw business-end of computing. They've out-maneuvered Apple, DEC, IBM, DrDOS, Netscape, Sun--you all know the list--and they've become the richest, most powerful company in computing.

      But they're RUINING the Internet experience for anyone other than those on the platforms they favor. They've "embraced and extended" critical standards for their own advantage (i.e. screwed them up beyond all recognition). As anyone who has worked with SMB will attest, they leave out important technological facts in the specifications that make the term "Common Internet Filing System" (CIFS) a bitter joke. They've coerced the world's computer makers into including their software on most of the new machines sold. They're thriving on technology that they've "adopted." Their security? Laughable, if it weren't so serious. To adapt a line from Peter Bogdanovich's "Paper Moon": "If they've got something cool, you can bet it belonged to somebody else." The majority of their products reek of "The Microsoft Touch" Their products are like a sexually attractive person with a bad dose of the clap.

      Again, if they were the best at ANYTHING technological--besides Exploder and their mice, I guess--it would be different. But their work is consistently bloated, shoddy and oversold. They have no problem polishing a turd to make a buck. They just seem to don't know a turd when they see one.

      "...No taste," as someone said.

      They deserve to be slapped by the federal antitrust court and slapped HARD. They are a drag on the industry as far as innovation is concerned and now they're applying the Microsoft Touch to "The Big Lie." What's next?

      Bravo to Slashdot for catching them. Shows the power of thinking for yourself.

  262. It doesn't matter by md27 · · Score: 1

    Apple lies about customers switching, hell if linux companies had the money they'd lie about customers switching too. Every company lies. Every company has "customers" in their commercials. Get over the fact that it's Microsoft and get on with your lives. Your personal geek crusade to get your Aunt Suzzie to stop using Windows isn't gonna hurt Bill Gates pockets.

  263. Story now carried by the BBC by horza · · Score: 2

    You can see the BBC coverage here.

    Phillip.

  264. Cache for the african american kid MS site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Noticed MS had 404'ed it. Yay google!

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:HCFG1sG-FIM J: www.microsoft.com/insider/reference/encartareferen celbrary2003_researchpaper.asp+encartareferencelbr ary2003_researchpaper.asp+microsoft&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    1. Re:Cache for the african american kid MS site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, please remove the spaces before using the link. Not sure why they got added... oh well.

  265. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suggestion:

    Switching to Linux is kind of difficult to manage all at once, so rather than moving (and then being frustrated), just keep a linux box around and switch it on when you have a little time to play. Switching (like trying to quit an addiction in one shot) is pretty difficult on the nerves :-)

    Oh, and plus there are linux boxes around for very little cash - you can do a nice little firewall/music system/whatever on a 133mhz if you're so inclined - making it easy to treat it as an optional extra.

    Linux is frustrating for a long time - part of the difficulty that everybody goes through, and subsequently forgets, is the immense learning curve associated with Yet Another Unix, designed by committee. I think it is worth persevering - but then, I would.

  266. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain .. by rotwhylr · · Score: 1
    M$FT PR rule #1: It's okay to manufacture the truth.

    Anyone remember the doctored videotape that M$FT had the balls to submit as ***EVIDENCE*** during the antitrust trial?

    This is ad snafu is just the latest example to surface, and hardly the worst yet.

    Sigh.

    --
    -- Windows is not simply installed on a computer; it is inflicted.
  267. Re:Wouldn't be cool if he died by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Im considering a slightly different solution: VM-Ware. There's a spare copy floating around the office, I intend to give that a go and at least see if I can get used to the environment.

    Thanks for the suggestion. :) *Taking it into consideration*

  268. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    If you rap your knuckles against a window jamb or door, if you
    brush your leg against a bed or desk, if you catch your foot in a curled-
    up corner of a rug, or strike a toe against a desk or chair, go back and
    repeat the sequence.
    You will find yourself surprised how far off course you were to
    hit that window jamb, that door, that chair. Get back on course and do it
    again. How can you pilot a spacecraft if you can't find your way around
    your own apartment?
    -- William S. Burroughs

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...