Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Tries a "Switch" Campaign

Twirlip of the Mists writes "There's a new page on Microsoft's web site that tells the first-person story of an unnamed 'freelance writer' who made the switch from the Mac to Windows XP. The author of the page -- who never identifies herself, and who could very easily be fictional or a composite sketch -- says 'Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility.' How, you ask? Why, through Microsoft Office, Internet Explorer, and modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user and easy access to the Internet, of course. Maybe somebody should email Microsoft and let them know that the Mac has had all of these things for years now ... nah. It'd just embarrass them. Anyway, it's an entertaining read that's good for a laugh." Update: 10/14 21:12 GMT by P : Apparently, Microsoft has taken the page down, but Google has it.

1,094 comments

  1. yeah right by sujan · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you can't beat'em, copy'em.

    1. Re:yeah right by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      No, it's if you can't beat 'em, buy 'em. If they won't sell, copy 'em.

    2. Re:yeah right by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny
      "If you can't beat'em, copy'em."

      So true...

    3. Re:yeah right by WildBeast · · Score: 5, Funny

      True, that's the reason why Apple switched to FreeBSD code.

    4. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple switched to FreeBSD because it was better and due to the license.

      Apple was whooping FreeBSD's ass in overall market share as well as desktop market share.

      They already had you beat. Same could be said of MS's campaign...why???

    5. Re:yeah right by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      *severe beating* :-)

    6. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The first Terminators were easy to spot, rubber skin, not very convincing..."
      -Kyle Reese, 'The Terminator' (1984)

    7. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I so wanted to laugh at that, but it was terribly unfunny. Don't take it personally.

    8. Re:yeah right by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I so wanted to laugh at that, but it was terribly unfunny. Don't take it personally."

      If you don't understand, "C Chicken: It crosses the road without looking both ways," then I forgive you :-)

    9. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's funny that I've never seen any /. posters offer any compelling reasons to switch to Linux.

      All I ever hear is petty examples of bitching like this.

      Old news.

    10. Re:yeah right by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      One thing that just occured to me is that this is a signal that Apple's very own switch campaign is working and people are actually switching from Windows to OS X.

      Microsoft is probably feeling the effects of this or predicting that they will feel the effects or this. Otherwise, they wouldn't be launching this counter-attack.

      WELL DONE APPLE!

    11. Re:yeah right by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Isn't it amazing that some people still fall for something like that?

      I mean, the Mac switcher ads are already pretty - well let's say "unlikely to have really happened that way".

      For Bill Gates not unlikely enough, it seems. How high is the chance that a Mac to PC convert writes down her confessions and includes:

      "See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information."

      Complete with link to the right Microsoft page?

      I find some UFO stories more believable.

    12. Re:yeah right by killmenow · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can hear it now...

      Apple: Stop copying us!

      Microsoft: Stop copying us!

      Apple: Bitch!

    13. Re:yeah right by ericdano · · Score: 2

      Dood, that is sooo funny!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    14. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS is a big copy cat. Look at C# which is a copy cat of Java.

    15. Re:yeah right by jcr · · Score: 2

      I mean, the Mac switcher ads are already pretty - well let's say "unlikely to have really happened that way".

      The mac switchers are chosen from people who send their stories into Apple. The stories are their own.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      It's not copying if they do it better.

      Macintosh "Switch" ads are simplistic, and easy to brush off as being superfluous and consumer-oriented. So what, someone saved Christmas. So what, some chick thinks that OS X is so much more wonderful than Windows 95 (Yes, it is. But has she tried XP?) because it doesn't make her feel like everything's her fault.

      This gives a real person, a real story, and real reasons--not just 20-30 seconds of fluff.

      I'm not saying that MS products are better than Apple products--just that the advertising is MUCH more intelligent.

      -Sara

    17. Re:yeah right by panaceaa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like Microsoft took down the page. (Here's the Google cached copy.)

      Maybe Microsoft just created this page for Slashdot to link to. Instead of their marketing team putting in time and effort to create a real campaign, they put together some generic arguments and to see how well they fly over on Slashdot. Now they'll take the Slashdot arguments and turn them into a real campaign. Maybe I'm being paranoid, but Microsoft isn't stupid, and this thread gives them a lot of valuable information.

    18. Re:yeah right by HowardTheDolphin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The great thing about Apple's ads are that they ARE simple and consumer oriented. They are the type of ads that DO get stuck in your head. Consumers don't care about features being rattled off, geeks like features, and the geeks are the ones that can look into it for themselves. Consumers do not want to devote their time doing reseach. Consumers like the switch ads, they speak in an easy to understand language and are done by real users that have switched from MS's overcomplicated, underperforming and out-of-date OS that they can relate to.

      --
      ---- "In capitalism, man exploits man. In socialism, it is exactly the opposite." -Ben Tucker
    19. Re:yeah right by susano_otter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You might want to read the article. It doesn't seem likely that it's a real story in any sense of the word ("real" or "story"). Massive chunks of it were obviously written by professional marketers, and much of the last few paragraphs appear to be the work of MS support personnel.

      Advertisements may be obvious, but they can still have a kind of life to them. Judging from the responses (both positive and negative), the Apple "Switch" campaign seems to be pretty lively.

      Even a cursory reading of the MS article shows that while they've downplayed the obviousness of the advertisement (and not very well, after all), they've also failed to imbue it with any sort of liveliness. It reads like a second-rate brochure for life insurance policies.

      I've been told it's a lot like my posts.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    20. Re:yeah right by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Macintosh "Switch" ads are simplistic, and easy to brush off as being superfluous and consumer-oriented.
      Something wrong with being consumer-oriented? The goal of marketing is to aquire consumers, isn't it?
      This gives a real person, a real story, and real reasons--not just 20-30 seconds of fluff.
      Too bad you've already been proved wrong on this one.
      -Sara
      If, in fact, that's your real name.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    21. Re:yeah right by KillerKane · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'm not saying that MS products are better than Apple products--just that the advertising is MUCH more intelligent."

      Oh, right. I forgot that XP will enable me to fly. Madonna told me so.

      Yeesh.

      --
      There is a thin line between genius and insanity. I have erased that line. -- Oscar Levant
    22. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah except the reasons are wrong on all fronts. None of her arguments hold any water whatsoever as everything she claims she can do on Windows XP can also be done on a mac. (In fact she mentions IE and Office both of which are put out by Microsoft FOR mac as two reasons to switch).
      So how is this advertising more intelligent?
      Yet again microsoft copies apple (and gets it wrong)

    23. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course "Sara" is my real name.

      -Glenda

    24. Re:yeah right by bergeron76 · · Score: 2

      If, in fact, that's your real name.

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who is paranoid around here (no disrepect). I can't help but think that MSFT has their Marketing team "shilling" on forums such as /. and the like. What better of shills to place in the geek community than "girls". I'm not knocking girls, what-so-ever, I'm simply saying that they tend to be more of a minority and most geeks have a soft-emphathetic-spot for them. I wouldn't put it past MSFT.

      Sorry if this is Offtopic. Mods, feel free to flag it as such, however, I was just replying directly to the parent post.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    25. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *laughs* Yeek. Please call me a guy before you call me a MS Shill. =]

      I don't think that my "higher ups" at Microsoft would look too kindly on the fact that I bash MS's security regularly, spend a significant amount of time in Linux, and generally think of MCSE as meaning Micky-mouse Certified Suckers, Etc. (Note I'm saying "generally", as in the majority, not as in all.)

      My "kind views" of MS are only when I compare them to Apple.

      Apple's selling the Mac-buying public a bridge, and virtual one at that. MS's claims, while quite often faulty and fabricated, at least have a bit more truth than the company that is trying to sell OS X as a finished product. I love the concept of OS X, but it is NOT a finished product. Apple is selling slower hardware at higher prices, running a version 1 operating system. Microsoft is selling an established OS that has more options than you can shake a stick at. Do I love them? No. But their sales literature doesn't smell quite as much like a red herring.

      -Sara

    26. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      1- Nothing wrong with being consumer-oriented, everything wrong with being deceptive. Apple touts their new OS as being easy to use (the old OS was), a finished polished wonderful product. It simply is not. Folders display improperly, files sort improperly, Anti-aliasing cannot be turned off--decreasing the readability of the text (Okay, it can be turned off, but have you done that and looked at your desktop? There is not an uglier site to see than a drop shadow around non-antialiased text.) Beyond the problems with the GUI, there are also a number of issues with all the apps that now run under OS X. Suffice to say, it's NOT a finished product, and very few apps that run under it ARE a finished product.

      2- "Proved wrong"? I was not proven wrong, someone merely disagreed with me on the idea of what constitutes a "real" person vs what constitutes a "fluff". "Proven wrong" would have been giving me the woman's resume as a professional model-for-hire, and proving that the entire story was fabricated bullshit. I was merely disagreed with.

      3- It is my real name, legally. On my birth certificate, SS-ID, and various other forms of ID. But thank you for calling my identity into question. Just because someone doesn't agree with your Rose-colored views of Apple doesn't make me a fake, a shill, or a boy-who-calls-himself-girl. And what are you, Mononoke?

      -Sara

    27. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      *laughs* I wasn't talking about ALL advertising done by MS and Apple, just the switch stories. Apples switch stories irritate the hell out of me, MS's switch stories don't.

      I loved "Think Different", and hated "People who flutter around in the sky looking terrified and out of control".

      -Sara

    28. Re:yeah right by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      The first thing that came to mind was:

      Linux Chicken(s): Engineer chickens who are sick of walking build themselves an overpass/slidewalk, and generously open it up to everyone.

      The next was:

      "Gee, I wish I could use the phrase 'Looks like a chicken, clucks like a chicken, actually a duck what forgot how to fly.'" Any ideas?

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    29. Re:yeah right by dirvish · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Sorry if this is Offtopic. Mods, feel free to flag it as such, however, I was just replying directly to the parent post.

      That would make a good sig.

    30. Re:yeah right by TriggerHappy · · Score: 1
      Anti-aliasing cannot be turned off--decreasing the readability of the text (Okay, it can be turned off, but have you done that and looked at your desktop? There is not an uglier site to see than a drop shadow around non-antialiased text.)

      Some people prefer antialiased text; others do not. Apple gives you the option to have it either way. Now, what was your point again?

      Beyond the problems with the GUI, there are also a number of issues with all the apps that now run under OS X.

      Bullshit. With MS Office, yes. As an MS guy on the newsgroup said, Mac Office X was rushed out the door unfinished. But with "all apps"?? Do you actually use any OS X apps?

    31. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS is a big copy cat. Look at C# which is a copy cat of Java.

      As much as Linux is a copy of AIX...

    32. Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm not saying that MS products are better than Apple products--just that the advertising is MUCH more intelligent.

      I'll agree the Apple ads are kind of dumb, they have no substance, but look at what MS had up:

      More Software Flexibility

      AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

      Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict. Searches are faster; the History feature makes it easier to find that site from last week; and I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want.

      They didn't mention that both MS Office and Internet Explorer are available for the Mac, and in fact IE is the only browser that comes preinstalled. Also almost every review of Office v.X said it was better than the Windows version. Same is true of IE for Mac.

      I wont even get into that Mozilla is every bit as fast as IE. ;)

      This "switch ad" was just bogus. I guess that's why they pulled it! I'd wager someone at MS wrote the story and the photo of the woman was is just a stock photo. This is the kind of thing they pulled sending letters to newspapers and congressmen!

      She also wrote:

      " I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing."

      Can't get much better than a PowerBook G4 if you ask me! Besides the fact that most best selling writers use Apple laptops.

      MS ads are not more intelligent, they are less fluffy, but also less factual.

      And Sara, we know OS X is better than XP! It does show more copying on MS' part... got to get that X in the name! :P

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    33. Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      *laughs* Yeek. Please call me a guy before you call me a MS Shill. =]

      He he he he! I'm going to vouch for Sara here, she does like XP but she's not a guy!

      She even owns a Mac.

      Sara, MS is also selling an OS that has more bugs than you can shake a stick at! OS X might be young (and it's not if you consider NeXTStep was around a lot longer than Windows NT/XP), but I know where its issues are, and I have more than enough fingers to count them. :)

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    34. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The AP already picked up this story, and tracked down the marketing company hired to create this fake ad. The woman, Valerie G. Mallinson of Shoreline, Wash works for a public relations firm, Wes Rataushk & Associates Inc. Microsoft hired Rataushk to produce fake testimonials when their own research turned up no usable customers. Yahoo peoplefinder lists: Steve and Valerie Mallinson, (206) 367-1953, 2203 N 106th St, Seattle, WA 98133, if you want to call and ask her about the ad in question.

      At 5foot3 and 200 lbs, I'm sure Valerie is not the woman in the stock photo.

    35. Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      I can hear it now...

      Apple: Stop copying us!

      Microsoft: Stop copying us!

      Apple: Bitch!

      Ha! Did you see the movie Pirates of Silicon Valley when Steve Jobs confronts Bill Gates with the fact that Gates ripped off the Mac?

      I'm sure in real life Jobs can yell a LOT louder then Gates!

      Let's put them on that celebrity boxing show!

      My money is on Jobs!

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    36. Re:yeah right by tabby · · Score: 1

      Someone should send them a story on how having all those MS-Tax copies of windows from bought PCs is great when company drops around cause you have lots of extra drink coasters.

      "Do you have an idea for a story? We'd love to hear from you. How have you used Microsoft software to make your home or work life easier, more fun, faster, or simpler? Submit your ideas, and you could get published on the Insider Web site! Submit Your Idea Today!"

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    37. Re:yeah right by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Yes. And we who are not on the inside of the advertising industry might not have realized what Apple was getting at. They have no doubt been fully aware what phonies MS are and may have been making an effort to demonstrate that they were not the same.

      I like your tag! How about...

      [C# release];

    38. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      1- My point was simply what I stated. Anti-aliasing, when turned off, renders the fonts unreadable and unusable on the desktop and in other areas of the GUI where Apple has placed a drop-shadow under the text. Windows gives you the choice of Antialiased "cleartype" text, or non-anti aliased text, and it's readable either way. (Although cleartype is too fuzzy for my tastes, but no fuzzier than OS X's anti-aliased settings.) My complaint isn't about the antialiasing, it's that if you turn it off, the OS looks like shit. On Windows you have the genuine option.

      2- Let's see.. The Apple apps look/work fine. The non-apple apps fall into three basic camps (some overlapping). Camp one: They look/work fine, the Aqua theme has been integrated seamlessly, and they are wonderful. (Think BBedit) Camp two: The aqua theme could not be integrated for a number of reasons, and the applications look/feel is altered in a damaging way, and the apps either have not yet compensated, or cannot compensate. (Think any 3D software that has elevational views--the drop shadows OS X adds to every window obstructs the view of other windows. Try turning off the drop shadow? The windows become 2D and you lose all sense of a "window". ) And 3- the "Just flat out DOES NOT WORK with the Aqua GUI" apps such as Office. Yep- Microsoft's product. Which is fine if you don't use Office apps, but if you do you'll run screaming with your sensibilities offended to the max. Then, in all the applications there are sets of bugs that didn't exist in previous versions.

      Yes, I use OS X apps. Cocoa, and Carbon alike. I misstated when I said "all apps"- I meant "All apps that I have used on the Mac for years, and have come to depend on".

      If I didn't have legitimate complaints, I wouldn't make them up. I can live with a shitty looking GUI-I wouldn't even mind using Luna all that much if it was my only option. I don't complain simply out of asthetic distaste, but out of genuine usability concerns, and out of my distaste for a lack of options. Apple claims OS X is configuration free--and it is. If you try to configure, you run into a lot of issues that can only be solved using third-party hacks (think haxies--how many people do you know that use OS X without?) or that cannot be solved-period.

      -Sara

    39. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say the Apple's ad is dumb and have no substance or at least you agree with this kind of statement; however I do not think you or the person who made the statement, understand the purpose of the ads.

      The Apple's "Switcher" ads are used to get the peoples attention, not to fill your head with details. No one wants to sit in front of a TV and be bombarded with facts and figures. Its the "switchers" story, they are not computer experts. These are everyday people. You might laugh at them or you could call them dummies, but these are your sisters, mothers, cousins and any other person in your life. (if you dont have these type of people in your life, you might just be a geek).
      But most importantly they are everyday people, with everyday computer problems that was fixed by switching to a Mac.

      Maybe you have a Mac to Window convert in your life. But you know what, differt strokes for different folks.

      So no, the Apple "Switcher" Ads are not dumb and simplistic, they are just true. And sometimes truth need to be simple and to the point.

    40. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      I won't yell at you, 'cuz I like you. :p But *AGH* people who like Office X are masochists. Loved Entourage on OS 9, moved over to Windows--HATED Outlook. Moved back to OS X temporarily, upgraded to Office X, and promptly uninstalled it and got a refund. Atrocious. IMAP did not work correctly--it did not allow folders to be dragged from the mailbox into the IMAP folder, etc. Office XP is MUCH more functional than Office v.X.

      As for Explorer on the Mac, yeah--it's visually pretty. It's also a crippled version of MSIE. It lacks the depth, bredth, and easy workflow of Win-MSIE. It also does not render things in the same way, so sites don't always appear the way they should (Which, granted, is the fault of the site admin for using barfungled HTML in the first place...)

      I'll take a Dell laptop over a Powerbook. More processor, less OS X. Although, granted--give me Linux on a Powerbook, and I'll fall over drooling. I like the extra kick of the Dell, but Titanium has sex appeal.

      Who knows, maybe the Ad was a fake. Maybe MS pulled it because it was getting slashdotted--haven't you noticed that seems to happen to MS pages that are slashdotted?

      As for the X in XP, it's the only thing about XP that copies OS X. XP's the most functional, crash-free OS I've ever met, and the Apps work/run the way they should. Sure, it doesn't have a pretty Aqua interface, but if that was all that mattered, I'd be on a Mac. ;)

      -Sara

    41. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      *A* Mac? I own a couple! =] Only own one PC, though.

      Windows has bugs that don't interfere with the work you're trying to get done. OS X has bugs that do interfere. Personally, I want to get my damned work done.

      NeXT was nice, Rhapsody was sweet, even if its GUI was a piecemeal. Stick a "Classic GUI" option into OS X, and I'll switch right back over, and not even complain when things don't work right. Hah- I worked on OS 9 and loved it. =]

      -Sara

    42. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      +1 only, mod this puppy up to +5, Informative

    43. Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      I won't yell at you, 'cuz I like you. :p

      I like you too.. now give us a kiss! :*

      Loved Entourage on OS 9, moved over to Windows--HATED Outlook. Moved back to OS X temporarily, upgraded to Office X, and promptly uninstalled it and got a refund. Atrocious. IMAP did not work correctly--it did not allow folders to be dragged from the mailbox into the IMAP folder, etc. Office XP is MUCH more functional than Office v.X.

      Yeah, but you are talking about email. I didn't like Outlook Express either, but I was using Eudora back then. Then I tried and liked Entourage, so I used that until I switched to OS X. Now I use Mail.app for mail. I think when most people think of MS Office, they think of Word, Excel and PowerPoint however. The Mac doesn't even have a real version of Outlook.

      I tried Entourage in OS X, had it do some dumb things, and switched back to Mail.

      About the only part of Office I use is Word, but a lot of the time I'll use AppleWorks because it's faster and after a while Word gives me a headache! I HATE all those buttons!

      I think MS pulled the ad because they were stretching the truth. Not that they don't do that every day, but this time is was a bit obvious! They implied two of their own products didn't exist! Maybe they will give Office away for free now...

      As far as what they copied from OS X? The X in the name. OS X = OS 10. Win XP = ??? (XPerience? I think not!)

      I've said this before, but I'm sure when OS X came out and started getting rave reviews, MS got nervous, and since OS X was out first wanted to add a little subterfuge.

      Scenario: Clueless provincial man walks into CompUSA. "I want me that newfangled X thang I read about in the paper!" The pimply faced sales geek says "Oh course! You want Microsoft Windows XP!" and leads him to a cheap store brand PC. Not wanting to look like the bumpkin he is, said clueless man buys the PC.

      Even the name "Luna" sounds like "Aqua," but makes no sense. And the whole general shiny blue rounded corner plastic look of the GUI, except of course MS has no taste! I know how much you hate Luna of course. :)

      They even copied a few of the desktop backgrounds.

      I'll admit that I haven't used XP yet, but I don't hate W2K all that much either.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    44. Re:yeah right by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Even better: I read the book.

    45. Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      *A* Mac? I own a couple! =] Only own one PC, though.
      Okay, okay. I own 12! :P If I tell everyone how cute you are am I forgiven? ;)
      Windows has bugs that don't interfere with the work you're trying to get done. OS X has bugs that do interfere. Personally, I want to get my damned work done.

      So I guess when I'm doing work in Windows, and it throws up some arcane error and tells me press any key to continue and then complains Windows Explorer committed a crime against humanity, and I just lost my work (all without dear sweet Ellen Feiss beeping at me) that's not a bug???

      (Throws up hands!!!)

      :P

      I worked on OS 9 and loved it. =]

      Except when it was crashing like a monkey on crack, right? OS X will get there. OS 9 evolved over time too. I'm sure Apple has plans to add all the missing features, but they also want to get the OS stable and faster.

      They've been doing a bunch of work in Core Audio, and have one of the best foundations in an OS for doing audio and midi there is!

      Popup Windows would be swell, but we went for years without them anyway. In the mean time I'll use a few shareware add-ons until Apple finishes the missing features. This is how many parts of Mac OS came about anyway. The menubar clock was a shareware app called SuperClock. The Apple Menu Options was shareware. The list goes on...

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    46. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey! you snuck in a "Dude, Where's My Car" joke and no one noticed@!

      huzzah!
      -compn

    47. Re:yeah right by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Never gotten an arcane error with Windows XP. Got them all the time in 95, 98, ME (horrors, please never subject me to that again) and 2K, but WinXP seems to have evolved out of them. The closest it comes is if there's a Javascript error in a page, it will harass me sometimes to the point of ctrl-alt-del'ing the particular instance of MSIE. But you can kill each instance(window) of MSIE seperately, so you only lose the offending window. I still prefer it over the antialiasing fiasco. Who the hell thought that putting DROP SHADOWS on text on the desktop was a good idea? Bloody hell.

      As for shareware apps. Fsck it. I'm not going to pay $130 two or three times for the OS, then pay $7 here and $12 there for shareware apps just to get it to work. The only thing that's missing in Windows that I want (need) is file/folder labling (colors), which I'm actually programming for myself in my spare time. THAT would be worth dropping $30 for. It's one missing functionality--OS X is missing too many. I'd go broke.

      No points given back to you for commenting on my cuteness. =] All that matters to me is that you recongize my devastating brilliance. (And overlook my spelling and grammatical errors.)

      And hey... Aren't we supposed to be having this argument in email? You're SUCH a guy- always arguing in public. =]

      -Sara

    48. Re:yeah right by hype7 · · Score: 2
      I can hear it now...

      Apple: Stop copying us!

      Microsoft: Stop copying us!

      Apple: Bitch!


      You forgot a line.

      Microsoft: Bitch!

      -- james
    49. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds to me like Microsoft hired you to say all this..........

      Wraith

      -try linux-

    50. Re:yeah right by tobyvoss · · Score: 3, Funny
      written by professional marketers
      I wouldn't neither call that professional writing nor marketing.

      the last few paragraphs
      ... sound like "MSIE/Outlook for Super-Dummies and wizard-wussies".

      Four more interesting little bits from the "Article":
      • A .jpg of the beautiful Apple(TM)-Command(TM)-Key(TM) symbol(TM) is used, no credits given. Sue' em, Apple!
      • Fictional "writer-"person offers Girl Scout's honor, then starts whoring cheaply and shamelessly. Would you want someone like that helping you cross the street? Stop poisoning cultural values, M$oft!
      • Fictional "writer-"person admits having to uninstall and reinstall Outlook on her PC without explaining why. What do we make of that in this advertising context? Is it a "feature" that you have to uninstall/reinstall ever so often?
      • The "Editor's Note" at the end sould read:
        Now that we've successfully converted our reader to a Windows PC
        instead of writer. HARHAR!

      Why am I helping these idiots improve? I must be hoping they don't read this...
    51. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when it was crashing like a monkey on crack, right? I've never had OS 9 crash since I've installed it. Neither have any of my friends complained about it crashing. I would seriously like to know how all these people found it so unstable, because I can't get it to crash unless I do something absolutely retarded, like running really old INITs, and they only crash it at boot time. I've actually seen OSX crash more than OS9.

    52. Re:yeah right by mbogosian · · Score: 2

      My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook. My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it. See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information.

      Last time I checked, real user testimonials rarely had hyperlinks to the product comparisons seamlessly stuck in the middle of their benefits touting....

    53. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could be the Lindows Chicken?

    54. Re:yeah right by langed · · Score: 1
      I heard on CNN/Headline News this morning that the site was taken down, because it hadn't gone well. Gee, where would they have gotten any feedback on it?

      CNN also said that the "freelance writer" was in a PR affiliate of M$, so we're not seeing anything new here. Just yet another M$ "embrace and extend."

    55. Re:yeah right by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      Never gotten an arcane error with Windows XP.

      They probably just hide them now! ;)

      The only thing that's missing in Windows that I want (need) is file/folder labling (colors), which I'm actually programming for myself in my spare time. THAT would be worth dropping $30 for. It's one missing functionality--OS X is missing too many. I'd go broke.

      I use Labels on OS 9 once in a blue moon, but I know a lot of people miss it.

      Labels X $7. (but of course MS is making you pay extra to play MP3s...)

      The rumor is Labels and Popup Windows are coming back in the near future.

      No points given back to you for commenting on my cuteness. =] All that matters to me is that you recongize my devastating brilliance. (And overlook my spelling and grammatical errors.)

      Can't blame a man for trying ;)

      And hey... Aren't we supposed to be having this argument in email? You're SUCH a guy- always arguing in public. =]

      Damn, you never take me anywhere! :(

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    56. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Massive chunks of it were obviously written by professional marketers, and much of the last few paragraphs appear to be the work of MS support personnel."

      Which is different from the Apple campaign in what way? Get a clue.

    57. Re:yeah right by Big+Ryan · · Score: 1
      DAMN! I used to live right next to that building. It is right next to I-5, across from Northgate Mall.

      Why do all the dipshits have to live in my neighborhood?!


    58. Re:yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which is different from the Apple campaign in what way? Get a clue.

      Here's a clue for you. Most of the Apple ads feature real consumers (they recently added a celebrity or two), who always identify themselves by name. They are people who were not hired off the street by Apple and asked to become "switchers," but are ordinary dorks who actually switched to Apple and sent Apple an e-mail in reply to Apple's "tell us why you switched" web site.

      In other words, the Apple stories, while slickly produced, are real testimonials of people who are happy with they Macs.

      Gapiche?

  2. to paraphrase by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes®, it's® true®. I® like® the® Microsoft® Windows® XP® operating® system® enough® to® change® my® whole® computing® world® around®.

    {Stuff deleted}
    © 2002 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me now... and be honest. How is this funny? Honestly. Who laughed after reading this?

    2. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it's definitely a caricature.

    3. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously people who got mod points from telling bad jokes.

    4. Re:to paraphrase by cicatrix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is all I could come up with, thanks to yourdictionary.com. I don't understand humor, either. By the way, I am a joyless tool.
      ------

      Main Entry: (1)hu.mor
      Pronunciation: 'hyü-m&r, 'yü-
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Middle English humour, from Middle French humeur, from Medieval Latin & Latin; Medieval Latin humor, from Latin humor, umor moisture; akin to Old Norse vokr damp, Latin humEre to be moist, and perhaps to Greek hygros wet
      Date: 14th century
      1 a : a normal functioning bodily semifluid or fluid (as the blood or lymph) b : a secretion (as a hormone) that is an excitant of activity
      2 a in medieval physiology : a fluid or juice of an animal or plant; specifically : one of the four fluids entering into the constitution of the body and determining by their relative proportions a person's health and temperament b : characteristic or habitual disposition or bent : TEMPERAMENT c : an often temporary state of mind imposed especially by circumstances d : a sudden, unpredictable, or unreasoning inclination : WHIM
      3 a : that quality which appeals to a sense of the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous b : the mental faculty of discovering, expressing, or appreciating the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous c : something that is or is designed to be comical or amusing synonym see WIT
      - out of humor : out of sorts

      Main Entry: (2)humor
      Function: transitive verb
      Date: 1588
      Inflected Form(s): hu.mored; hu.mor.ing
      /'hyUm-ri[ng], 'yUm-, 'hyU-m&-, 'yU-/ 1 : to soothe or content by indulgence
      2 : to adapt oneself to
      synonym see INDULGE

      Main Entry: sat.ire
      Pronunciation: 'sa-"tIr
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin satura, satira, perhaps from (lanx) satura dish of mixed ingredients, from feminine of satur well-fed; akin to Latin satis enough -- more at SAD
      Date: 1501
      1 : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn
      2 : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly
      synonym see WIT

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    5. Re:to paraphrase by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      I did, sir. Might I have some more gruel? My mother, she has the grippe, and we don't have enough to eat. Please don't hit me again sir.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    6. Re:to paraphrase by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think that the silliest part of all of this is that they actually believe that they're going to convert Macintosh users to Windows.

      Now don't get me wrong, I have never owed a Macintosh and, until a few years ago, used nothing but Microsoft operating systems.

      The thing is that Apple users have heard all the anti-Apple flack for years and know where their loyalties lie. The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists. It's easy to convert or at least influence a Windows user who hasn't developed any real loyalties.

      But Mac users, on the other hand, are hardcore about their loyalties and know what their OS is and why they like it. They have used PCs in public labs, at school, libraries, whatever for years and will be able to see through the the Microsoft FUD as they have been doing for years.

      I suspect that the marketing brass at Apple will be (or currently are) having a good hearty laugh over all of this.

    7. Re:to paraphrase by gordgekko · · Score: 0
      I think that the silliest part of all of this is that they actually believe that they're going to convert Macintosh users to Windows.

      Gosh, that would be silly right? Given that the market share that Apple used to enjoy, some Mac owners must have went somewhere...I guess they all became Amiga users right? or BeOS?

      For the record, I'm one of those Macintosh users that was converted. For me a computer is a tool, not a device to measure the length of my member nor an opportunity to show how cool I am.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    8. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting mac users to windows users? I don't think that's the point of this. It's more useful as a tool to get current windows users to embrace windows and forget about switching to anything else.

    9. Re:to paraphrase by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Well, he does have a point. If they stuck with Apple through the bad years, why would they switch now, when Apple is actually doing a lot of things right?

    10. Re:to paraphrase by Jhan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The thing is that Apple users have heard all the anti-Apple flack for years and know where their loyalties lie. The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists.

      Hear, hear. They can have some pretty absolute opinions about other OS's though, without ever having used them, or even seen them.

      I've been a pretty avid alternativist for the last two decades. I used to be (still am in some ways) an Amiga nut. I dived into BeOS when it was new. I was an early adopter of Linux, and have had one or two BSD machines.

      My father (without actually bothering to look at any of the machines for 10s) would always say "Give it up! There is no alternative! Windows has won! No-one will ever use anything else!"

      Well, the last time Pops came over, I showed him my new flat-panel iMac. I just did some basic demoing, like showing him the zooming dock at the bottom, window shadows, speach recognition, and of course the fish in the background (yes, any OpenGL screen saver can be run as a desktop background).

      Response? We'll, he looked a bit shocked. Then he looked a bit flabbergasted. The he looked stunned for a while. Then he said "I want that in my computer".

      At which point I explained "You can't have that in your computer. It's nigh impossible in Windows. But if you got a Mac..."

      May be one more convert for the Gray Side.

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    11. Re:to paraphrase by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing is that Apple users have heard all the anti-Apple flack for years and know where their loyalties lie. The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists. It's easy to convert or at least influence a Windows user who hasn't developed any real loyalties.

      You just missed the entire point of this article. Microsoft knows they're not going to convince hardcore Apple users to switch. This copy of Apple's switch campaing, is for MS users who might be tempted to switch. If a user is considering switching to Apple, then sees that some other people are switching from Apple to MS, the user might very well decide to stay right where he is. The theory of course, is that a user who is easily persuaded to try Apple could be easily persuaded not to try Apple; get it?

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    12. Re:to paraphrase by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "At which point I explained "You can't have that in your computer. It's nigh impossible in Windows. But if you got a Mac...""

      I know what you mean. Although I am a PC boy myself, I have used my friends' Macintosh products and test driven some in stores. My next machine will likely be a notebook and a powerbook is definitely high on the list of possibilities.

      The displays are so nice. And I want i(Tunes|Photo|Movie|Pod without the hassle). I want the space age ergonomics. Very few PC notebooks have keyboards as nice as the powerbook ones. (The toshiba tecra comes to mind.)

      And to think, Microsoft has gone proactively anti-apple and here I am reciting why I want a mac because of it.

    13. Re:to paraphrase by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "You just missed the entire point of this article. Microsoft knows they're not going to convince hardcore Apple users to switch. This copy of Apple's switch campaing, is for MS users who might be tempted to switch. If a user is considering switching to Apple, then sees that some other people are switching from Apple to MS, the user might very well decide to stay right where he is. The theory of course, is that a user who is easily persuaded to try Apple could be easily persuaded not to try Apple; get it?"

      You just proved my point.

      Microsoft realises that Apple's switch campaign is or will have a real effect, so they are launching a counterattack. Well done for apple!

    14. Re:to paraphrase by chopper749 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's true. I like the Microsoft® Windows® XP® operating system enough to change my whole computing world around. Here's the bottom line: Windows® XP® gives me more choices and flexibility, and better compatibility with the rest of the technology world. Windows® XP® relieved my fears about switching. I can read my files, import e-mail addresses from my Palm®* to the Microsoft® Outlook® messaging and collaboration client, and keep my Web favorites. All the Mac® hardware--including my printer, broadband cable, Zip® drive, and Palm® handheld--works perfectly with my Windows®-based PC®. To my surprise, the process of switching was as easy as the marketing hype had promised. I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's® honor.

    15. Re:to paraphrase by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      defaultValue

    16. Re:to paraphrase by scrote-ma-hote · · Score: 1

      But did anyone notice that only Microsoft® Products recieved a nice little ®. Does Palm / Netscape Navigator not have any trademarks??? Or is Microsoft® the only company that does?

    17. Re:to paraphrase by NortWind · · Score: 1
      I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's® honor.

      I figure you can do about 5 reboots an hour, for an 8 hour day, that's about 40 reboots to get it working. Sounds about right.

    18. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tool?

      -Maynard's dick

    19. Re:to paraphrase by FrenZon · · Score: 2

      "... I just did some basic demoing, like showing him the zooming dock at the bottom, window shadows, speach recognition, and of course the fish in the background (yes, any OpenGL screen saver can be run as a desktop background). ... "You can't have that in your computer. It's nigh impossible in Windows. But if you got a Mac..." FYI, it requires 3rd-party software, but the only thing windows can't do out of that list is the zooming dock.

    20. Re:to paraphrase by corey_lawson · · Score: 1

      The only people the MS ad campaign could hope to work on are naive Windows users, perhaps have just gotten a new Windows computer and are regretting it a little bit, when probably most of the people who are buying Macs now instead of Windows-based computers have already made up their minds, and seem to be very happy with their new Apples.

      The same people who drop $2000 on a "image editing workstation", who then deal with whatever gawky or limited-edition software was bundled with their computer, and doesn't want to plunk down another few C-notes for Photoshop, Illustrator or whatever other full-blown, "real" app that will Get To Where They Were Promised To Go By Microsoft(tm).

      As compared to those who have new Macs start off with about a Warp Factor 2 or so advantage over just about any PC-based solution for the same problem. The Mac user probably doesn't need Photoshop or Illustrator right away, because the built-in tools work good enough.

      It's right up there with the Gateway integrated PC commercial, the one that supposedly is more powerful and "Flexible" than a new iMac, etc.

    21. Re:to paraphrase by tauntalum · · Score: 1
      It was much better than Cats.

      I would watch it again and again...

    22. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When buying a "Integrated GUI" I shouldn't have to use TPS in order to do things with the OS I want.

      The OS should look at what TPS mods are popular and adopt those.

      Apple does that, MS gives you rebars.

      Case closed.

    23. Re:to paraphrase by goon+america · · Score: 1

      ...but his father doesn't know that. You just prove his point that if people don't know the alternatives exist they might as well not exist. Besides, I'd like to see how reliable a windows system is with all those 3rd party add-ins at the same time, really.

    24. Re:to paraphrase by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 0, Troll

      It always gets me when some idiot that doesn't know shit about computers rings some bells and whistles and says that converted someone to the mac. They don't realise that these bells and whistles have been on every fucking other platform for fucking years.

      some people are just idiots. It's called Mac users.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    25. Re:to paraphrase by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1, Troll

      You may say "well done apple" but in reality, every single thing that is said in their switch campaign is total and utter bullshit. Not only that, but its just ridiculous the situations these people were in. What, that girl that lost half her paper, she using some fucked up win95 machine thats 25 years old with a failing hard drive? Mac's don't prevent failed hard drives. Mac's crash, Mac's still have to deal with incompetant users. Every single commercial or ad i have seen involving apple's switch campaign is utter bullshit, and that is exactly the point. MS is copying it, and making apple look like the fools they really are.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    26. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2002 - 1995 != 25

    27. Re:to paraphrase by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1
      The average Windows user doesn't know that anything else exists.

      But Mac users, on the other hand, ... know what their OS is and why they like it.


      So you're saying that Windows users are ignorant while Macintosh users are well informed...

      [Mac users] have used PCs in public labs, at school, libraries, whatever for years and will be able to see through the the Microsoft FUD as they have been doing for years.


      And well experienced. Think again. I've used Macs in various settings (school, work, play, ex's), and I still can pick Windows over Mac. You're just spouting "Anyone who disagrees with my choice is underinformed." - not a valid debate tactic.

      Mac users need to get over themselves - the job that Apple's OS people face is much easier than faced by Redmond's.

      Neal Stephanson said it better than I ever could:
      It is hard enough to make an OS that works well on one specific piece of hardware, designed and tested by engineers who work down the hallway from you, in the same company. Making an OS to work on arbitrary pieces of hardware, cranked out by rabidly entrepeneurial clonemakers on the other side of the International Date Line, is very difficult, and accounts for much of the troubles people have using Windows.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    28. Re:to paraphrase by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      LOL - guess my mac showed me. I should run an AD - stuck with wierd post errors on slashdot using IE and Mac OS 9? Try XP :).

      Sometimes the mac makes it hard. I was going to say that I support the Mac over the telephone for a large company. Its hard sometimes - some days you want to kill whoever invented the Mac. Others its nice that it worked okay.

      Simple fact - and Guy Kawasaki used to agree. When its working your on top of the work, but when its not the Mac can really be a bitch to troubleshoot.

      I have seen people leave the mac because of this. I mean lets face it - the System 7 years were not apples proudest.

    29. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2002 - 1995 != 25

      computer hardware != operating system

    30. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're rebooting every 12 minutes, either PEBCAK, or get hardware suited to your application(s).

    31. Re:to paraphrase by pediddle · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the actual number of Mac users back then is still smaller than the number today. I can't back this up, but if you think about it, how many millions more computer users are there today than then? Microsoft picked up the new ones, and Apple kept the loyal ones.

    32. Re:to paraphrase by hype7 · · Score: 2
      You may say "well done apple" but in reality, every single thing that is said in their switch campaign is total and utter bullshit. Not only that, but its just ridiculous the situations these people were in. What, that girl that lost half her paper, she using some fucked up win95 machine thats 25 years old with a failing hard drive?


      That's not just some girl, that's Ellen Feiss! Don't talk about Ellen like that!

      Mac's don't prevent failed hard drives. Mac's crash, Mac's still have to deal with incompetant users.


      Only when on a Windows network :P


      Every single commercial or ad i have seen involving apple's switch campaign is utter bullshit, and that is exactly the point. MS is copying it, and making apple look like the fools they really are.


      MS copying it, making Apple look like fools?

      Oooh, I like your logic. Apple makes ads. Microsoft makes ads exactly like Apple. Apple looks like fools?

      Uh uh buddy, it's the other way around. MS are the fools... unoriginal fools too!

      -- james
    33. Re:to paraphrase by Qaseem · · Score: 1

      They are not looking at the mac users, they want to make sure no -new- users go to the mac.

      --
      /-\ |-|
    34. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think the pb keyboard is really better than, say, a thinkpad keyboard? I am getting myself psyched to drop CDN$4000 on a powerbook and part of the process is rationalizing away the inferior arrow keys. I've seen three demo iBooks with busted flimsy keyboards (in the store!) so the iBook is not an option.

    35. Re:to paraphrase by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      You did not refute anything I said about the adds being BS, so you agree with that part? (your little ":P" implies so)

      You don't agree with apple looking like fools for the simple fact that MS copied it. MS's copy is like a parody of it, if anything.

      Weather or not it was an intentional parody, most people will agree (and has already been said in this discussion) that it was obvius that this is not a real case study, but Apple's is supposed to be one.. So, for all intents and purposes, its parody, and making apple look foolish

      If apple's add's are actual case studies, that just goes to show what kind of idiots have switched to Mac and think its better for them. You forgot to back up your paper, so you lost half of it in a program crash (or HDD failure)? So you blame the OS/hardwareplatform for your incompetance, and then switch to Mac and think its all better?

      Hate to tell you this, but a Mac will lose your paper just as quickly as a PC, wether the program crashes, or your HDD fails, or bad memory, or faulty motherboard, or faulty IDE cables, or faulty USER module.

      Point? Mac's dont prevent, fix, or reduce the problems these incompetant users in the Adds are having. To them, its like they went to the doctor and say "my arm hurts when i do this" and the doctor says.. "inject yourself with this each day and itl go away" and hands them a vial of water.

      It's in their minds, they are idiots, and you know they are, just won't admit it.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    36. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Well, the last time Pops came over, I showed him my new flat-panel iMac. I just did some basic demoing, like showing him the zooming dock at the bottom, window shadows, speach recognition, and of course the fish in the background [serenescreen.com] (yes, any OpenGL screen saver can be run as a desktop background).

      "Response? We'll, he looked a bit shocked. Then he looked a bit flabbergasted. The he looked stunned for a while. Then he said 'I want that in my computer'.

      "At which point I explained 'You can't have that in your computer. It's nigh impossible in Windows. But if you got a Mac...'"

      On the other hand, Windows has what they call "spell checking".

      Unfortunately, you're on your own with improper punctuation ("We'll, he looked a bit shocked.") or typos ("The he looked stunned for a while.") if your mistakes happen to form legitimate English words. In that case, I'm afraid you'll need a brain.

    37. Re:to paraphrase by hype7 · · Score: 2
      You did not refute anything I said about the adds being BS, so you agree with that part? (your little ":P" implies so)


      You're entitled to your opinion.

      However, I say to you the word "Switch" - what do you think of, immediately? The damn word is about to enter the common vernacular, and every time it's used - people will think of Apple.

      I argue they're effective... do a search on google for Ellen Feiss!


      You don't agree with apple looking like fools for the simple fact that MS copied it. MS's copy is like a parody of it, if anything.


      MS's looks like a parody because their behaviour is so stupid - a direct copy of a competitor's ad? The thing is, parodies aren't written in MS-market droid happy-speak. This one is. There's nothing intentionally funny about it; all that's funny is the fact that MS - with a marketing budget how many times bigger than that of Apple - could only come up with a cheap copy, written by somebody on their payroll. We're not laughing with them, we're laughing at them.


      Weather or not it was an intentional parody, most people will agree (and has already been said in this discussion) that it was obvius that this is not a real case study, but Apple's is supposed to be one.. So, for all intents and purposes, its parody, and making apple look foolish


      It's funny how that MS regrets posting the ad. There's three pages worth of /. users laughing at how dumb MS are, and here's you saying it's a great parody.

      I think you might be able to get a job at the same place the MS "freelance writer" works.

      If apple's add's are actual case studies, that just goes to show what kind of idiots have switched to Mac and think its better for them. You forgot to back up your paper, so you lost half of it in a program crash (or HDD failure)? So you blame the OS/hardwareplatform for your incompetance, and then switch to Mac and think its all better?


      They're not idiots, they're ordinary people. That's the whole point. They don't post on /. with spelling mistakes (like you) - they simply want to use the computer as a tool. They find that macs are a better tool than PCs are, and I say there is a lot of truth in that. You may find Windows suits you better. That doesn't make these people's experiences less relevant, and doesn't mean that a lot of people won't be able to relate to what is said.


      Hate to tell you this, but a Mac will lose your paper just as quickly as a PC, wether the program crashes, or your HDD fails, or bad memory, or faulty motherboard, or faulty IDE cables, or faulty USER module.


      Well, I have administered and supported both macs and pcs (not linux) for quite some time, and let me say this - the only time I've ever needed to format a HD on a mac was when the computer was being sold. The same could not be said for a PC; Windows would die at a prodigious rate.


      Point? Mac's dont prevent, fix, or reduce the problems these incompetant users in the Adds are having. To them, its like they went to the doctor and say "my arm hurts when i do this" and the doctor says.. "inject yourself with this each day and itl go away" and hands them a vial of water.


      funny how Apple repeatedly comes out on top in user satisfaction surveys and lowest TCO. If what you say is true, and the mac is nothing more than a placebo, how do you explain these reports?


      It's in their minds, they are idiots, and you know they are, just won't admit it.


      No, in your mind, they are idiots. In my mind, they are ordinary people just trying to go about their lives. They had a positive experience with a computer, and wanted to share it.

      You're the idiot for just passing it off.

      -- james
    38. Re:to paraphrase by Jhan · · Score: 2

      Yes, I did make a few mistakes in that text. "Speach" is one I keep doing, despite reminders. "We'll" must have been a temporary neural short-circuit. "The" was just my keyboard failing to register the 'n'.

      On the other hand, I guess my English is a whole lot better than your Swedish (or? Type something devastating in Swedish :-). Of course, you noted from my URL that I was from a non-English-Language-Region. If not, I'm afraid you'll need a brain.

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    39. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree with you more.

      Why else the stock photo? Gotta feed MS users' egos, make them continue to think they're beautiful, professional-looking people who can fly. Why the polished, adman copy? Gotta make MS users believe that rich, influential people who know just what to say -- not those "run-of-the-mill," stammering common folk from the great unwashed that you see on the Apple ads -- only choose X-P. Why even bother with an inverse switch campaign? Gotta give MS users SOMETHING to counter the uncertainty or embarassment their users might feel when they see Apple's switch ads.

      You are quite right. This ad was an epistle to the Church of MicroSoft, a sermon to a choir who just heard a few bars of "Stairway to Heaven."

    40. Re:to paraphrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The iBook and TiBook keyboards are awesome, and yes, better than the Thinkpad's.

      The reason you see so many broken keys in the CompUSA displays is because the people at CompUSA leave them sitting out, unattended, with the restraining screw undone, so every jackass that walks by lifts out the keyboard to see the RAM slots and whatever else might be under there (an Airport slot, which no store display is likely to have filled). Then they clumsilly cram the keyboard back into place, busting off a key or two, and CompUSA never bothers to fix it, because they get better margins on the shitty Compaqs anyway, so they love it when people like you look at broken keyboards and walk over to the PC displays.

      This is why Apple started their own retail chain.

  3. Wait one damned minute! by RatBastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey! She's not funny looking! Can't those twits at MicroSoft do anything right?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Wait one damned minute! by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

      No, she's actually hot!
      Just like the rest of the Windows users.
      Not like those damn ugly *nix users.

    2. Re:Wait one damned minute! by CoolVibe · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah indeed... What have we *nix users got?

      Old people with large beards?

      Hmm.... That Ritchie guy sure is sexy. Donchathink? ;-)

    3. Re:Wait one damned minute! by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Funny

      He may not look like much, but his stays up longer.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Wait one damned minute! by lpontiac · · Score: 2
      Yeah indeed... What have we *nix users got?

      Old people with large beards?

      And the daemonette.

    5. Re:Wait one damned minute! by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      Wow! :)

      Heck, I already run FreeBSD all over the place here. Now I'm sticking to it. Hubba hubba.

      :)

    6. Re:Wait one damned minute! by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

      We've got the Linux underwear girls!

  4. I'm sticking with MS by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their users are much better looking that the Apple ones.

    1. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      I don't know I think she is what someone would look like if a committee got together and voted how a person should look. The Apple users seem to have a little charater to them.

    2. Re:I'm sticking with MS by peterdaly · · Score: 2

      Their users are much better looking that the Apple ones.
      ------
      Of course they do! MS picked the model out of a catalog. Apple uses "real" people who really made the switch.

      Reminds me of a lot of stuff MS does.

      -Pete

    3. Re:I'm sticking with MS by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      You mean, you actually think the lady in the picture is the author of the article? And that conclusion would be based on...what?

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    4. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see Linux users. Try not to stare directly at them for too long.

    5. Re:I'm sticking with MS by moniker_21 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, that 'I saved X-mas' chick was sorta hot.

      --
      I posted to /. and all I got was this stupid sig
    6. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from the picture I'd say it took half a day and a team of 6 people to get that shot.

    7. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but she's a retard. "I mean, who wants to sit and download Windows drivers on Christmas?" Nobody, you dope, that's why they give you a CD with the camera. Stick that in your drinkholder and you're good to go.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    8. Re:I'm sticking with MS by cioxx · · Score: 2

      Yes. This man speaks the truth.

      Janie Porche saved my Christmas!

      I also came to the realization that no one has time to sit on the X-Mas afternoon to download Windows drivers. Jesus does not approve.

    9. Re:I'm sticking with MS by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      Who wants to spend Christmas afternoon installing Windows drivers from a CD?

      "Windows has finished installing your drivers, click yes to restart your computer."

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    10. Re:I'm sticking with MS by troc · · Score: 1

      Hmm

      I boght a camera and it came with a cd.... never even tried the thing in my computer. I connect camera. I download images.

      Even better the MemoryStick in the camera mounts like a HD when I connect it .

      Yes it's a mac but then I am fairly certain that XP etc doesn't need drivers these days to do the same thing

      troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    11. Re:I'm sticking with MS by dissy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Their clipart people you mean?

      Check out Here

      Whee

    12. Re:I'm sticking with MS by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      That's because Apple's campaign featured actual people, while Microsoft's "writer" is clearly an composite photograph tacked on to a marketing-department-written spiel.

    13. Re:I'm sticking with MS by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      LOL, I should have known better.

      Too bad though, she was hot.

      So, how good looking are the Linux girls? ;)

    14. Re:I'm sticking with MS by clmensch · · Score: 1

      HAH! She is so stock-image it's not even funny. Just like that awful copy. SOOOOOOOOOOOOO Microsoft to put out soulless PR crap like this.

      --
      There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    15. Re:I'm sticking with MS by grub · · Score: 1



      I dunno, that 'I saved X-mas' chick was sorta hot.

      Hot? I'll say, I would eat the corn out of her poo!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    16. Re:I'm sticking with MS by mustangdavis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their users are much better looking that the Apple ones.


      I don't know about that one ...

      Do you remember Ms. Niceass ... you know, that student teacher you had when you were in middle/high school??? Don't all teachers use Macs??? :)

      Hmmmm ... the score:
      • good looking and smart for Mac
      • one card board cut out for MS

      I think we all know who the winner is here ... especially if she'll let you "raise your grade" .... *hmmm* .... oh, excuse me!!!

      :)

    17. Re:I'm sticking with MS by peaworth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, at least the didn't use someone who is already dead like in their letter writing campaign to the states' attorneys general.

    18. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For once, something worthwhile modding up as informative or interesting... Silly mods.

    19. Re:I'm sticking with MS by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Judging from the picture [microsoft.com] I'd say it took half a day and a team of 6 people to get that shot.
      As a media professional, I find the composition amusing. It is a down-angle, making the subject look more downtrodden and small. The half grin could almost be seen as a grimace. Even the way she holds the cup -- as if she was handcuffed with it -- seems to suggest more of a prisoner than someone empowered.

      What are the odds that they went to a Mac-using ad agency to get this done, and this is secret code to the smart people?

    20. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you kick ass.

    21. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the M$ switch campaign is going full steam in colleges. See this add on a school ACM joint. Imagine that, they have inflitrated ACM joints too ;)

    22. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please send resumes to Julie Purdy at v-jpurdy@microsoft.com or call (800) 253-9605 Toll-Free

      Taking bets... Is this M$ representative real or ficitional? Please send money (real) to Tux-Against-War@linux.org

    23. Re:I'm sticking with MS by MikeAR303 · · Score: 0

      And to top it off, that is a ROYALTY FREE image. After all, a small struggling legitimate business such as Microsoft can't afford all those expensive images that aren't public domain.

      --
      This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
    24. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ew, that chick is NOT hot. Mr. gumson? Is your screen reader software acting up again? Telling you its a beautiful woman? SUE M$

    25. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Jens · · Score: 2
      Well, let's just ASSUME (happened dozens of times in my neighborhood) that the drivers on the CD

      • don't work with your version of Windows (XP vs. 2000 vs 98)
      • don't work with your language version (US vs international, see scanner drivers)
      • etc

      There's a HELL of a lot of hardware out there that doesn't even have decent Windows 2000 drivers nowadays, not even in the Internet.

    26. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to find one! Woe is me!

    27. Re:I'm sticking with MS by marhar · · Score: 2

      which unfortunately now leads to a blank page...

    28. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Royalty free images are not public domain.

    29. Re:I'm sticking with MS by LostSinner · · Score: 1
      o god yes.

      that's incredible

      i can't stop laughing

    30. Re:I'm sticking with MS by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it doesn't. Scroll down.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    31. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are some pretty nice Linux women here.

    32. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Gee, I wonder if Caroline Woodham, the model in the picture, knows she switched to XP or that she is now a Microsoft editor.

      Whether she does or not, it looks like Microsoft just pulled the page (or it got slashdotted). It seems they can no longer find it.

      I guess Caroline Woodham (or her make believe twin) just got "fired". Or maybe her PC self destructed. Anyway, it has got to be one of the shortest Microsoft careers ever.

      I feel sorry for the model in the picture, though. She signed a release that people could use the photo in general artwork, not that someone can make up stories about her personally. The price of a 72 dpi picture (assuming someone didn't just take it off their web site and cut off the top part with the light table and the company name) just doesn't cover something like that.

      As for a company that feels it needs to hire fictional clip art switchers/editors, that's pretty sad. At least Apple uses (and hopefully pays) real people.

      My favorite switchers tale is still the 1993 "Godzilla vs. MechaGodzilla II". Man, when he switches, he switches big time. Just look at all them Macs. ;)

      "His return is near..." Godzilla 2000 trailer
      G Countdown: 15 days (www.godzillaoncube.com)

    33. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you consider yourself one of "the smart people" who are easily influenced by subliminal cues in advertizing?

    34. Re:I'm sticking with MS by cascadefx · · Score: 2
      Someone should get a copy of the picture (buy a license... whatever) and make up a similar picture for BSD, Linux, BeOS and every other alternative operating system. That would be just classic in by book. Follow the same style as the Microsoft copy (I am sure someone has a copy of the copy) and give instructions for the same things in every other OS.

      Maybe even get the Model's opinion on the whole thing.

      Funny, funny stuff.

    35. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Valrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, but that doesn't really mean that you will be if you use Microsoft instead. In fact, I think it's a pretty good bet that you'll look exactly the same.

      -the valrus

    36. Re:I'm sticking with MS by cscx · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is correct, my digital camera automatically mounts as a disk volume when I connect it, under WinXP. It even pops up a comic balloon thingee with the Make/Model of my camera. No CD required.

    37. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      That's impressive you found that :)

      Well done.

    38. Re:I'm sticking with MS by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      This looks legitimate based on the URL root:

      http://www.siu.edu/~acm/
      ... and here's a classic "If you want to make a positive impact at your school ...". Nice, make a positive impact by manipulating your colleagues into using our products such as to ensure the continuation of our illegal monopoly. Just reading the job description makes me want to puke. Somebody mod this up.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    39. Re:I'm sticking with MS by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Yeah, but she's a retard. "I mean, who wants to sit and download Windows drivers on Christmas?" Nobody, you dope, that's why they give you a CD with the camera. Stick that in your drinkholder and you're good to go.

      If it needs a driver to work, I'd rather download the latest driver than install the one that might've been sitting in the box for a few months. (As for digital cameras, all I did was plug in my Nikon Coolpix 995 and it showed up as another disk drive...no driver needed. I suspect other cameras are similar.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    40. Re:I'm sticking with MS by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Gee, I wonder if Caroline Woodham, the model in the picture, knows she switched to XP or that she is now a Microsoft editor.

      The name under the picture is usually that of the photographer, not the subject/model/etc.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    41. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post like this should be moderated 6!

    42. Re:I'm sticking with MS by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

      HAH good job!

      This definately needs added as a comment on the main story.

      --
      -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    43. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This girl here is a Linux user click.

    44. Re:I'm sticking with MS by ReadParse · · Score: 2

      You so friggin' rock. That was the first thing I thought of, and I wanted to go swimming through stock photo sites until I found this one, but I have a life to live. You, on the other hand, were clearly more devoted to uncovering this very critical piece of evidence. My hat is off to you. Now I don't have to go through the trouble :)

      RP

    45. Re:I'm sticking with MS by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      The president of the Tokyo Linux User Group doesn't look too bad either.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    46. Re:I'm sticking with MS by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      If it were possible to mod you to a "10," I would.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    47. Re:I'm sticking with MS by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
      Gee, I wonder if Caroline Woodham, the model in the picture, knows she switched to XP or that she is now a Microsoft editor

      Except Caroline Woodham is the photographer not the model. Try hovering over the link on that page. The model (who isn't hot btw ;) doesn't seem to be named, surprise surprise.

    48. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, the alternative - that the drivers on the cd are a buggy beta that got rushed onto the presses. Everybody knows the "real" drivers are to be downloaded from the internet.

    49. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Archive of the site is still here:

    50. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... my web URL was deleted by the parser... I'll try it without the usual stuff to see if it survives.

      Again... here is the GOOGLE archive of the offending MS web page:

      www.google.ca/search?q=cache:JmwQcVoG-ucJ:www.mi cr osoft.com/insider/opsystems/windowsxp_setup.asp

    51. Re:I'm sticking with MS by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      I think Caroline Woodham is actually the photographer. Click on the link with her name.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    52. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Dunno, I wouldn't kick her out of bed for eatin' crackers. Then again, I am an equal-opportunity lecher.

      : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    53. Re:I'm sticking with MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      do you consider yourself "smart" for missing the point?

      The parent poster was not subliminally influenced, but saw through it, and speculated that this was the designer's intention... Kind of like slipping a "PHB" reference in a comment line of C code; only those with the capacity to get the joke are likely to perceive it.

  5. Welcome to Capitalism by Illuminati+Member · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Being a Marketing Director, I can tell you that there is nothing surprising (or news worthy) in this story.

    Its simple. Competitor explains why there product is better than yours. You can either
    A.) Do nothing
    B.) Fight Back

    Its like Ford saying their trucks are better than Chevy, and Chevy saying their trucks are better than Ford.

    This strategy has existed for decades and I find it not funny nor worth getting your panties in a bunch about.

    --
    Yeah, I'm a Republican AND a geek. It is possible.
    1. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's newsworthy-- in the Slashdot sense of "news," of course-- because it's funny. Microsoft's response to the Switchers campaign is so lame and so fake that it's funny.

      Nobody has their "panties in a bunch." We're just kicking back on a Monday morning and enjoying a good joke. The fact that Microsoft made the joke-- inadvertently, at that-- just makes it that much more enjoyable.

    2. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This strategy has existed for decades and I find it not funny nor worth getting your panties in a bunch about.

      I think you're missing the point. It's not the strategy that's amusing, it's the fact that it's such a poor effort. Microsoft doesn't offer one reason to use XP that doesn't also exist in Mac OS X. Microsoft Office? They have that for OS X. Multi-user? Yeah, OS X has that. Etc, etc.

      it's like an ad from Iraq's tourism industry trying to lure beach-goers away from Florida:

      Sun? We have that. Sand? We have lots of that too!

      This is almost as silly as Microsoft hosting the "we have the way out" anti-unix site on freebsd. but i digress...

    3. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is scraping the bottom of the "news for nerds" barrel. It's not funny. It's boring.

      --
      There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Microsoft doesn't offer one reason to use XP that doesn't also exist in Mac OS X. Microsoft Office?

      From the botom of the article:

      Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

      I'm pretty sure that what's going on here is that Microsoft found a freelance writer to write glowingly about XP in exchange for free hardwaree and OS. Similar to the old tactic of giving aluminum siding to a family for free so the neighbors can see it in action. 10 bucks says she's on the MS payroll. Also, in response to the posters above who remarked that she is so much better looking than the women in the Mac ads: I'll bet the picture shown is not the writer of the article.

      Could be totally wrong on both counts, but that's my impression

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    5. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Incongruity · · Score: 5, Funny
      Being a Marketing Director, I can tell you that there is nothing surprising (or news worthy) in this story. Its simple. Competitor explains why there product is better than yours. You can either A.) Do nothing B.) Fight Back

      See, the great part is that Microsoft tried doing A and B *together*! Now that's novelty.

    6. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's newsworthy in the sense that it'd be if Chevy's all-new campaign against Ford were to have the MD of GM chatting to the camera about how his granddad, Thomas Edison, and "whoever the President was at the time", would go to Yellowstone Park in their Suburbans.

      That's the amusing bit. That MS is copying Apple's campaign. It's doubly amusing because it's a well known MS-bash that, supposedly, MS copies everything Apple does anyway.

      [I dunno. Windows 1 through 3 weren't remotely Mac like. Even Win95 and up has no meta data yet. But the point has been made]

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      And yet you read this far, to reply to my comment? Man, if this is boring to you, then the rest of your life must suck.

    8. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by cioxx · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This is almost as silly as Microsoft hosting the "we have the way out" anti-unix site on freebsd. but i digress...

      I know of a similar page you speak about. They compare linux servers to WindowsNT based OS's and provide bunch of examples which absolutely make no sense.

      I have friends who are Microsoft zealots. They code in asp, use windowsXP and dismiss *nix as hobbyist's OS. I've had some pretty heated arguments with them on many different occasions, and they come up with the lamest excuses and examples why Windows based servers and IIS in particular are far more superior to *nix and apache based solutions. One notable point they try to make is that IIS is supported by a multi-billion dollar corporation and can be set up by pointing and clicking, as opposed to modifying .htaccess and getting down and dirty into the apache's configuration files. Truly pathetic.

      Don't get me wrong, I use Windows 2000 on 3 of my computers because frankly they get the job done on the desktop level. But when it comes to servers, Windows/IIS is a FisherPrice toy compared to BSD/apache. Believe me, I've tried to like IIS... It never clicked.
    9. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Overt+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The newsworthy part of the story is that a market leader apparently thinks it has to produce an ill-disguised clone of a market follower's ad.

      You're right in that Microsoft had the choice of doing nothing or doing something. But doing something this stupid is to lend credence to your competition rather than building interest or confidence in your own product.

      The Ford/Chevy analogy does not work because they have reasonably equivalent market share. The better anaolgy would be if there were ads for a Yugo featuring former Ford owners, which Ford countered with an ad featuring former Yugo owners. That would have been a massively stupid move for Ford, because all they are doing is equating the two makes in peoples' minds.

      (The Yugo/Ford analogy is not intended to imply any correlation between quality of produts, just strength of market share...)

    10. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      But you make money doing this "j00 suck, I'm better fag" game, right?

      *This is not intended as a flame.* Read the rest of my comment.

      I suppose I'm just curious to pick the brain of a marketing guy who browses slashdot. This is stereotypical, but the lead marketing guy for my company, for instance, gets paid more than twice what I do and he's a retard. I'm assuming one that browses Slashdot is a more intelligent person than those I know.

      Why do you do what you do, or do you take another spin on it that most folks don't? (e.g. not the "j00 sux0r" approach, but more like "We own you because of this and this and this and this", stating real facts.)

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    11. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the More Power for Less Dough point was made. Can't argue that.

    12. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by dirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      think you're missing the point. It's not the strategy that's amusing, it's the fact that it's such a poor effort. Microsoft doesn't offer one reason to use XP that doesn't also exist in Mac OS X. Microsoft Office? They have that for OS X. Multi-user? Yeah, OS X has that. Etc, etc.

      But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have. You can burn cds and dvds, which you can do on WinXP. You can make movies, whihc you can do on WinXP. Neither sides has any really good arguements, because people wouldn't respond to the good arguements (things like the cariety of software on Windows vs Mac or the better usage of the power of a Mac vs WinXP). Neither side really will convince someone to switch, it will just hopefully make them check out both and make a decision after looking at both of them.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    13. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by angelo · · Score: 1

      WTH, there are several women that I'd not kick out of bed in the Apple 'switch' ads. And one I'd sm0x a bowl with, too.

    14. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from all of the Mac commercials I have seen, Apple doesn't offer one reason to use Mac OS X over Windows.

      So what's your point?

    15. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's a laptop, and apple laptops are equal if not lesser priced than the PC counter parts, not to mention I have *never* seen a PC laptop that was half as duarble/well designed as all of apples offerings.

      You notice they gave very few features required, one of those being RAM the other being a CD burner, had the had a feature to feature match apple to pc laptop it would have been even.

      Prove me wrong. Go configure a dell and an iBook identically except for cpu speed (and use the 700mhz cpu from apple and a 1g from dell, thats about fair). Compare price, I guarntee it won't be equal.

    16. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by kimgh · · Score: 1
      Multi-user? Yeah, OS X has that.

      Not only that, but, unless you pay $$ to get the server version of XP, only one user can be logged in at a time. I can log into a Mac as many times as I need to. So on top of everything else M$ lies about "Multi-User." It does just mean you can have more than one user account, it means they can all be logged in at once.

    17. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      I'm not the guy you're replying to, but I work in the Marketing team of a fairly popular web hosting company (which I'm not going to name unless someone asks, lest I be seen as advertising). Being a fairly stereotypical Slashdot geek, I might be able to shed some light on why some people go into marketing.

      (For what it's worth, I'm probably not the typical Marketing person either - I code in Perl and PHP, am very familiar with MySQL, know my way around a command line, etc)

      I don't know about most Marketing people, but I view Marketing kind of like a game in a way. When you're in a big company with instant name recognition you can count on people knowing about you - it's all about building an image.

      When you're in a small company like ours, though, the challenge is more likely to be to simply let people know you exist. Being a smaller company gives you some room to do technical stuff that the big guys are too slow to do quickly, but you still need to get the word out.

      It's a challenge, like anything else, and it's fun. It's satisfying to watch sign-up numbers go up, see someone give you a good review on a host rating site, or watch as small communities of people doing Cool Stuff(TM) declare your product and/or service to be to their liking.

      I suspect it's different working for a big, bloated company ... I'll be the first to admit that in those cases usually the hype far outweighs the real contribution. But remember this: Most companies (in this country at least) are small, and are working just to stay alive and profitable. Most of them have something unique to add to the mix, and without a Marketing person to let the world know about it there really isn't a point. What use is offering a cool product or service if nobody knows about it?

      Where was I? Oh yeah... It's a game, kind of. It's fun to see what ads work, what PR efforts pay off, etc. As long as you do it ethically and don't overdose on your own hype, it's not a bad job to be in... At least in a smaller company.

      (Another thing to consider: I'm planning on starting my own software company soon. No matter how well you code or manage a development project, experience in marketing and sales will help you keep your mind on the big picture - even if you hire a full-time marketing guy. At least, that's the theory I'm going on...)

      --

      - Jeff
    18. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Milalwi · · Score: 2


      You can either A.) Do nothing B.) Fight Back

      See, the great part is that Microsoft tried doing A and B *together*! Now that's novelty.

      No... that's innovation! :-)

      Milalwi
    19. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Gropo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have.
      Many of the ads aren't touting
      "all the things you can do on a Mac"
      so much as they state:
      "Damn! What a royal pain in the ass it is to do X, Y and Z under Windows! I got a Mac and got it running with hardly any effort... Now I can concentrate on doing stuff instead of preparing to do stuff..."
      Sure, Alot of that is also platform-redundant, but I surely consider the Macintosh to be the "less tweaking required" platform overall...
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    20. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony here is just too perfect and leads me to believe you're telling the truth regarding your profession. Only a Marketing Director wouldn't consider a third choice: improve your product.

    21. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither sides has any really good arguements,

      But Apple does have a good argument. All of their ads focus on how Windows is hard to use (well), which you've got to admit is true (compared to MacOS).

    22. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Ok. Here's a concrete place that IIS spanks unix+apache.

      You have 100 vdomains. Each of them gets to run {cgi|perl|php}.

      You want them to run as separate user credentials, so nobody pees in anybody elses pond.

      Whats your answer ?

      Hint: It's su-exec. Which requires you compiled php as standalone. Which negates any perf benefits of php. Which has its own security consequences and other "gotchas".

      On IIS ? Right click "app properties", change the security credential used for "anonymous access".

      (You can also script against the IIS metabase, iirc, if you dont want to use the GUI method)

      If you're writing an app that uses ASP.NET, its even easier, just specify the impersonation crednetials in the Web.Config file of the aspx project.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    23. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the "and whoever happened to be president at the time" struck a nice plutocratic tone. Kinda sets up Jeff Ford's legitimacy as a rich-ass-bastard that he considers the President of the United States to be little people.

    24. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by VValdo · · Score: 2

      Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have. You can burn cds and dvds, which you can do on WinXP. You can make movies, whihc you can do on WinXP.

      The big difference is that Apple's ads are fighting a perception that these things CAN'T be done on a Mac. The Apple campaign is +1 informative, saying, "that stuff you do on Windows, you can do on a Mac too. And you can do it in a stable environment with a better, easier interface and STILL be compatible with those Windows losers."

      The Windows ad has little/nothing to say, unless you somehow didn't know PC hardware is generally cheaper than macs. Duh.

      The ad says can use Windows for stuff you can do on Mac... but WHY ON EARTH would you want to?

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    25. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Its like Ford saying their trucks are better than Chevy, and Chevy saying their trucks are better than Ford.
      This strategy has existed for decades and I find it not funny nor worth getting your panties in a bunch about.


      My panties are most certainly not in a bunch, but I can definitely see the humor in this new MS ad. Not because both Apple and MS are both saying that their product is superior to the other, but because MS has specifically copied Apple's current ad campaign in an obvious way.

      A similar example would be if Discover copied Mastercard's "priceless" campaign.

      Little Timmy's first baseball glove: 40 dollars.
      New batting glove: 25 dollars.
      Looking into dad's eyes after his first home-run: Beyond price.
      Discover.

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    26. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Also, in response to the posters above who remarked that she is so much better looking than the women in the Mac ads: I'll bet the picture shown is not the writer of the article.

      I'll second that bet. Here at Comcast, we've got all sorts of pictures on our intranet sites of people, who seem to look like models trying to look like regular employees. It's funny though, that I've never seen one of these people in person.

      So the other day I was walking on the ground floor of the building, and I could see inside of the First Union bank we've got here also. What do I see but some random FU ad, showing the same old bitch I keep seeing on the entrance to our intranet site!

      These lazy companies can't even get original clip art.

    27. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your analogy works better if you replace 'Yugo' with 'BMW'.

    28. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by winterdrm · · Score: 1

      looks like they decided to "embrace and extend" advertising techniques.

    29. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Zoop · · Score: 2

      And at least Apple doesn't put "Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook, but all was not lost" in their ads.

      I mean, not only is it Outlook, but they admit a novice user has to "uninstall and reinstall," in what is clearly a fictional article!

    30. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, besides the *fact* the apple people are really people (note this is plural) and the MS one (note this is singular) for all intents and purposes is fictional?

    31. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. XP Professional allows up to 10 simultaneous logins, just like Win2K Professional.

    32. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by MikeAR303 · · Score: 0

      So you are one of the people trying to cram unnecessary products down the throats of "consumers", probably spamming all of us like crazy as well. "Hey guys, I have an ultra-original idea... lets send e-mail with "Hi, I like be your friend!" in the subject line and advertise viagra in the message body!!!" capitalism indeed.

      --
      This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
    33. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by MacGod · · Score: 1

      I think, though, the only worrying thing about this is that some joe-schmoe computer users may not realise that doing all of that on a Mac is just as easy, if not more so (not that I'm biased or anything).

      I still get people who ask me if Macs "Have the internet" or "Have Windows".

      Some people just don't quite get it.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    34. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by koh · · Score: 2

      Have you considered the odds that this article has not been written by a corrupted freelance writer, but by a corrupted squadron of MS marketroids ?

      I almost felt like reading the good old MS splash screens during setups... It must have taken a whole documentation team to write this crap.

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    35. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2

      See, the great part is that Microsoft tried doing A and B *together*! Now that's novelty.

      If you think M$ trying to do two things that are mutually exclusive is a novelty, just wait till someone tells you that M$ tried to combine Windows with stability or security.

    36. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by LostSinner · · Score: 1
      hey hey hey... can we set the record straight here?

      most slashdotters (most, not all) seem to have this perception that capitalism is some kind of economic guerrilla warfare where multiple parties try to stiff each other to prove they're the best, all in the name of the holy green. not quite so.

      at the heart of it, capitalism has nothing to do with money as a goal. it's an end, but not the highest/noblest/coolest pursuit of capitalism. capitalism is all about creation, connection, and solution. a capitalist is not a man/woman who loves money. a capitalist is a person who loves creation and ingenuity, and many times can make money at it.

      that being said, what microsoft is doing is not considered to be capitalism. where is the creation? where is the origninality and ingenuity? it's not there. check your assumptions before you go slamming your head against the wall. you just look like a fool.

    37. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Trelane · · Score: 1

      'Scuse my naiivite, but why not have them in different virtual roots? Then nobody pees in anyone else's pond, because they simply can't access the other ponds.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    38. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by scrote-ma-hote · · Score: 1

      WTF Are you on about, you can have multiple users logged on to XP Home at the same time. Get your facts straight.

    39. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Dalcius · · Score: 2


      *Shock*

      I could read that without stopping to think, "Doh! Buzzword!"

      And you can code?

      =)
      </joking>

      Thanks for the feedback. =) I just need a pat on the back to assure me that there are smart marketing folks out there. I suppose it's like CEOs: the dumb ones always seem to be the ones you notice.

      I suppose it's like anything else for that matter. Well, except that all of the marketing I see save a very small 1% is just unfounded hype stating how kewl a company is but not comparing anything.

      "We have color movies!"

      Well, yeah, and so does everyone else... for the last handful of decades, too.

      I never listen to commercials when I actually sit down to watch TV now simply because, generally speaking, they all piss me off.

      <tangent>
      It's related to the shallow material that qualifies as entertainment these days.

      Steps to a sitcom joke:
      1) Tell a joke that anyone can understand (and one that we often laughed at in cartoons when we were 7).
      2) Laugh about it for at least 30 seconds.
      3) Embed a description of the joke in the plot so that those of us in comas can understand the joke.
      </tangent>

      I just need a reassuring pat on the back letting me know that not everyone watches "Temptation Island" and believes that .NET is the kewlest thing since sliced bread.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    40. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Funny

      If that's the true definition of "capitalism", why is it kept so quiet that even bringing it up makes you sound like some sort of fringe nutjob?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    41. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by tonekids · · Score: 1

      Mod this one down -1 Overrated

    42. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Jan+Derk · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that what's going on here is that Microsoft found a freelance writer to write glowingly about XP [..] 10 bucks says she's on the MS payroll.

      10 more bucks says she wrote it on her Mac.

    43. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by goon+america · · Score: 1

      there's a post above where somebody found the original pic and made a joke about the "writer" posing for clip art after she's done.

    44. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Razzak · · Score: 1

      Have you even seen them? Most of them focus on:

      A) True plug-n-play "I saved Christmas" technology.
      B) Free (with OS/Comp I guess), easyily used apps (iPhoto)
      C) "Just Working"

      I don't think Windows offers any of those 3 things.

    45. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by kimgh · · Score: 1
      Not working at the same time, though. I think I do have my facts straight. But if you disagree, please tell me how I can log in from another machine (remote desktop) while someone else is working at the console, without spending $$ on XP server, I'll be grateful. I haven't figured out how to do that yet. As far as I can tell, only one login at a time can be active.

      I can do that with a Mac, though, without buying the server version of OS X.

    46. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that what's going on here is that Microsoft found a freelance writer to write glowingly about XP in exchange for free hardwaree and OS.

      I have to admit, I'd probably write a nice glowing article for them, too, if they offered me a copy of Windows XP Professional to write it. I'm too cheap to spend $200 for a copy of the software, but a couple hundred words? Okay!

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    47. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun? We have that. Sand? We have lots of that too!

      It's a bit more like:

      "You know, I used to think Florida was nice, until I came to Afghanistan! It really takes the cake! Hot sun, warm sand, beautiful women... only Afghanistan promises these things."

    48. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      Microsoft found a freelance writer to write glowingly about XP

      Do you really think there is a "writer" at all? The whole story is so full of marketing gloss that even if there actually were the words of a writer that converted to Windows XP in there, nobody would believe it. If that's the case, then why not just make up a person? Well, that's apparently just what they did.

      10 bucks says she's on the MS payroll

      Whoa there, do you really think so? Man, if you're willing to bet 10 whole dollars, you might be right - wow, way to read between the lines, dude. You're pretty smart.

      Nice troll, by the way.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    49. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by dohcvtec · · Score: 2

      I took a couple of marketing classes in college and one of the things I remember most, which applies less to marketing than philosophy or martial arts, is to never push, but rather pull. Apple is pulling people in with their switcher stories. In response, Microsoft is pushing, both on Apple and potential customers, and in doing so has effectively lost to Apple, at least in this battle.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    50. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      > But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have. You can burn cds and dvds, which you can do on WinXP. You can make movies, whihc you can do on WinXP.

      You're right. But the Apple ads primarily tout ease of use, not feature sets.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    51. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by dirvish · · Score: 2

      Twenty bucks says she doesn't even exist.

    52. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the sound of the cluestick echoed through the valleys: A market director is supposed to market the product he is handed, he does not make the product.

    53. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by bmajik · · Score: 2

      uh, because they all run with the same unix security credentials. (because they all run with the prives of the apache server process)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    54. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the anonymous posting.

      I realized that the scripts themselves could stomp on each other unless otherwise restricted, although the server *itself* wouldn't allow access beyond the fake root, it's not a chroot, and the scripts don't use apache to access the filesystem.

      See my second posting for a more intelligent idea. :)

    55. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a Marketing Director, I can tell you that there is nothing surprising (or news worthy) in this story.

      Its simple. Competitor explains why there product is better than yours.


      Just make sure you spell check your ads before they go to print, will ya?

    56. Re:Welcome to Capitalism by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      > I could read that without stopping to think,
      > "Doh! Buzzword!"

      Well, I can sling buzzwords like anyone. I just know when it won't be appreciated. ;>

      > And you can code?

      I like to think I can, but those who are inflicted with - er, enjoy - my code may have an alternative opinion. I'm mostly limited to Perl and PHP for my major project, though I've dabbled in Objective C and C++ (I've made some beautiful, albeit worthless, GUI-fied dice simulators for BeOS and Mac OS X). :>

      > Thanks for the feedback. =) I just need a pat on
      > the back to assure me that there are smart
      > marketing folks out there. I suppose it's like
      > CEOs: the dumb ones always seem to be the ones you
      > notice.

      I don't think that the problem is marketing people lacking intelligence, the problem is that a lot of people in the field lack a strong sense of ethics (and again, this is almost certainly just a handful spoiling the general impression).

      Sometimes though, it's the managers. Just like a coder who is asked to release buggy code or lose his job, sometimes marketing people have those same kind of pressures from upstairs (this isn't the case with my employer, but I suspect I'm in a relatively unique company).

      The fact is that most products ARE very much alike. As are most services. If everyone made claims based entirely on actual value then the balance would be about the same, 'cept some joker would use the hype to steal away customers. Say what you will about mindless hype, but it does work. People are very susceptible to that sort of thing, and companies know it.

      --

      - Jeff
  6. Just another ploy by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just another story designed to make you buy Microsoft's worthless junk. Who really cares? Sure, XP is one of the most bloated fully functional systems out there. It comes with all the junk you could want. Some of us would rather find the good stuff and not have it all come as part of the operating system though. In that way, XP is a Mac users dream. Everything is built in and proprietary. Wonderful right? HAHAHA

  7. Choices and Flexibility? by rocjoe71 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Choices: You can select which security flaw to patch first.

    Flexibility: Your choice of anti-virus program.

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    1. Re:Choices and Flexibility? by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Choices: I chose to use Windows 2000, only for the OS. For applications I use non-MS stuff (Eudora/Mozilla/OpenOffice/CygWin) The best of the two worlds (Oh, and nowadays I use a Mac more than my diverse W2k Machines...I just like it more even if it is slower)

      Flexibility: How long until Microsoft actually builds a Antivirus program in the OS? Add to this a nice little subscription (ala Symantec) for the updates. This is one of the things that I think is very probably to happen with their new all-improved-but-paying security policy.

      Yeah, I know you meant it funny...but in every joke there is a hint of truth.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Choices and Flexibility? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      I have the opposite opinion - I wouldn't mind using application programs from Microsoft, like Word and Excell, if doing so didn't require me to be booted into the terrible OS known as Windows. Because MS is both an OS and an Application company, and given that linux almost always is used on the same archetecture as Windows, it is not in MS's best interest to produce a port of their application software to Linux. Doing so would hurt the sales of Windows (not much, granted, but a little). Microsoft knows that their application suite is the biggest sticking point that's keeping people who would otherwise want to migrate from Windows to Linux from doing so. In many businesses around the world, sending documents as .doc and .xls files has become a de-facto standard and you can't get by without the ability to do that.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    3. Re:Choices and Flexibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually *love* Office X.

      It is the first MS app I would buy again if given the need. I may not be the typical computer user, but if MS released more products like Office X they might not be hated as much as they are.

    4. Re:Choices and Flexibility? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      What is this "Office X". I'm not familiar with that version.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  8. Mac versions? by lpret · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aren't there Mac versions of Office and Internet Explorer? Wait, that means they're just boasting about the "wonderful" OS. Oh well...

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:Mac versions? by CyberSnyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm wondering if this is a sign that MS might be planning on dropping support for OS X?

      Just a conspiracy theory....

    2. Re:Mac versions? by dissy · · Score: 1

      Actually IE is the default browser in OS X.
      So one of the main reasons to switch to one is identical on the other. Cute trick.

    3. Re:Mac versions? by filmsmith · · Score: 1

      "I started with Outlook Express for e-mail, because it's included with Windows XP. "

      Yeah. Me, too. Only I use OE on a Mac.

    4. Re:Mac versions? by pimpinmonk · · Score: 4, Insightful
      AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict. Searches are faster; the History feature makes it easier to find that site from last week; and I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want.
      (Just incase M$ deletes the site)

      I find it more amusing that despite AppleWorks being a little less feature-rich than Office XP, it is about $300 cheaper (as in $0 for Apple to $300 for Office).

      And of course there's the fact that M$ sells Office X for Mac, and Internet Explorer is the default browser for OS X. I can guarantee that the entire M$ advertising team that proofed that page isn't even aware of this fact.

      The point? I dunno about everyone else, but every day I'm getting closer and closer to wanting a Mac as my main PC (and by PC I mean PC, not Server ;))
    5. Re:Mac versions? by Fafnir_b · · Score: 1
      So one of the main reasons to switch to one is identical on the other.
      That's not true at all. Actually, IE for mac is (at least almost) fully CSS 1 and 2 compliant, whereas IE for Win even lacks a lot of basic css 1 things. Therefore, one of the huge benefits of switching over to win ist that you will no longer have to see correctly displayed versions of well programmed websites created (probably) by anti-microsoft guys (check this mozilla demo as an example).
    6. Re:Mac versions? by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      There is a prety large market for a word processor there, someone else would step up almost imediatly.

      You would be suprized how simple Word et. all really are, a staff capable of releasing a first tier game could easilly beat office (to explain the number of coders required). You have to remember the average MS coder is about 26yrs old, they would be a Jr. Coder anywhere else, throw some experienced guys at it to come up with competition would leave them scrambling for a few months..

      If MS takes off from the apple market, they may never get that market back. It would be a huge blow to them as apple is doing nothing but gaining marketshare at the present.

      Removing IE dosen't even cause steve to flinch anymore, Chimenera with a little help from Apple/AOL easily beats IE. The most recent version of AOL for mac uses Gecko itself (no not the beta version, it's gold). IE only has it's marketshare" on windows anymore, and that isn't as iron hard as it has been for the past two years either.

      MS has tough times ahead, I wonder how bill will handle them.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    7. Re:Mac versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, IE for Win is far faster at rendering than IE for Mac. I suspect that one of the reasons that Chimera has taken off so quickly among Mac power users is that it's so much faster than IE for Mac.

    8. Re:Mac versions? by cappadocius · · Score: 1
      Aren't there Mac versions of Office and Internet Explorer?

      The writer even assumes you are using IE when explaining how to migrate to Windows:

      To copy Web Favorites: [...] 2. On the Mac, start Internet Explorer. From the Window menu, click Favorites.

      So much for Netscape.

      --

      omnia tua castra sunt nobis

    9. Re:Mac versions? by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has been strong in marketing and weak in technology since, oh, the early MS-DOS days. Doesn't seem to have harmed them yet, worse luck.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    10. Re:Mac versions? by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      aye, I was just saying if they droped support for Apple that would perhaps be the nail in the coffin that starts their downfall.

      It has to come sometime, I just hope it's sooner rather than later.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    11. Re:Mac versions? by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      > I'm wondering if this is a sign that MS might be planning on dropping support for OS X?

      You know, I don't think so. If I'm M$, I'm looking out five or ten years and seeing Mac at no more than 20% of market share. That would be a huge increase from its current position--but what do I care? I'm still the big gorilla, and if I market smart, substantial numbers of Mac users are also Office customers. Makes no never mind to me if I take their money for an OS license or applications, and it sure keeps DOJ off my ass.

      What DOES give me cold sweats at night is the number of governments migrating to Linux. I know the Linux on the Desktop obit has been written a million times, but the likes of Germany, China, and India flirting with the Penguin mean BIG customers going away forever. And I have no Linux applications to sell them.

      So I swallow my Redmond pride, try to ignore Apple's cheeky "Switch" ads, and cozy up to Mac OS X. It's converting a lot of Linux folks, and I'm already on the ground with great OS X products. Every Mac user is one less Linux desktop, and one more opportunity to make money.

      "You're killing us, Steve," I chuckle when I see another quirky Switcher in my favorite TV show. Then I smile, and light up a really nice cigar. God bless Ellen Feiss.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    12. Re:Mac versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i bought a mac and downloaded a copy of Office X from alt.binaries.mac.applications and its just as crap as any other version

  9. Reload. by echophase · · Score: 1

    Seems like the MS site is crawling... I just have to keep hitting reload and it'll eventually show up, right?

    1. Re:Reload. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no that just means you have a shitty connection

    2. Re:Reload. by echophase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey now, i'm using IntelliSpeed(TM) technology.

    3. Re:Reload. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are... it's not MS, it's you baby.

    4. Re:Reload. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest opening 10 tabs in your browser and hitting reload on all simultaneously. By simple math, that should load up at least 10 times faster.

      A.

  10. Hysterical! by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This person claims to be a "freelance writer." It's a riot! Don't you get it?

    Don't you figure that he/she might just be the freelance writer ... that Microsoft hired to write this advertising copy?

    I love it!

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Hysterical! by Capt+Dan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like the how the technical bit about how to set up XP is prefaced by "here's the skinny".

      --
      Sig:
      Barbeque is a noun. Not a verb.
    2. Re:Hysterical! by Tofuhead · · Score: 5, Funny

      I also found that little tidbit, well, precious. It's like, "Hey, slick. I'm a cool cat and I'd like to rap with you about this smooth new deal. Now here's the skinny, man. Outta sight."

      For various other reasons, I also liked "Girl Scout's honor," "Less Dough," "And Now for the How," "accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet," and "I discover more treats daily."

      < tofuhead >

      --
      It is still the dark of night.
  11. Microsoft at it again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy do those guys love to copy the best ideas from Apple.. though admittedly the 'switch' campain was total ass.

  12. It Must Suck... by naNoox · · Score: 4, Funny

    It must suck to be a "freelance writer" and to not even get a credit on your "submission" to Microsoft's site...

    Nanoox

    1. Re:It Must Suck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse yet is to be a "freelance writer" and have your work stolen by JonKatz off some webboard!

    2. Re:It Must Suck... by taniwha · · Score: 5, Funny

      but 'her' name is on there - look at the dialoig box - she's really 'Don Funk' (donfu@microsoft.com) .... and as has been pointed out below Don chose his photo from some publically available stock photos so that he could show a little more of his feminine side

  13. As says Janie Porche by User+956 · · Score: 0, Troll
    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:As says Janie Porche by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2

      You mean if it isn't standards compliant it requires proprietary drivers? Who would have thought!

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    2. Re:As says Janie Porche by MissMyNewton · · Score: 1
      You guessed it, Mac owners!

      Nice troll.

      But downloading drivers beats compiling kernels and kernelmods *any* day of the week! Especially Christmas. ;-)

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    3. Re:As says Janie Porche by User+956 · · Score: 1, Troll

      You mean if it isn't standards compliant it requires proprietary drivers? Who would have thought!

      A lot of the time, it doesn't even work with standards-compliant hardware.

      Maybe Apple should change their slogan to "it just works (with a fraction of the hardware on the market)".

      Is it fair to hold Apple responsible for third-party drivers? Yes, if they're the one trumpeting interoperability as their main marketing point.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:As says Janie Porche by User+956 · · Score: 2

      Nice troll.

      You call it a troll, I call it the truth. I provided links and documentation. You provided... well.. nothing.

      Great refutation! You're a prime example of a mac-lover.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    5. Re:As says Janie Porche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      janie porsche is hot. i went to school with her.

    6. Re:As says Janie Porche by anti-drew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right on! In point of fact, there are TONS of things their computers don't do. Just the other day I opened up the case of a friend's Mac, put in a roll of undeveloped film, and waited ... but nothing happened. I mean, isn't it marketed like it's supposed to make digital photography easier?

      I'm sure that if I had shelled out the bucks for Windows XP, I would have had 5x7 prints spitting out of that little slot thingy in the front in no time!

      (Or better yet, as the unknown author suggests, Windows XP Pro... I really didn't need that extra $110 anyway. Knowing me, I'd only spend it on hookers and booze.)

    7. Re:As says Janie Porche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you really went to school with her, then post the nude pix that you must surely have. otherwise, stfu.

    8. Re:As says Janie Porche by User+956 · · Score: 2

      (Or better yet, as the unknown author [gettyimages.com] suggests, Windows XP Pro... I really didn't need that extra $110 anyway. Knowing me, I'd only spend it on hookers and booze.)

      Windows? What are you talking about? With your propensity to waste absurd amounts of money on the extraneous, you're CLEARLY an Apple customer.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    9. Re:As says Janie Porche by MissMyNewton · · Score: 2

      User 956, meet Joke. Joke, this is User 956. What's that you say Joke? You've never met User 956 before? You say he hangs out with your cousin Bee In My Bonnet all the time?

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    10. Re:As says Janie Porche by xtremex · · Score: 1

      Hmm..when I installed Suse, I didnt have to compile my kernel..detected my scanner, cdrecorder and dvd player on install..Can Windows XP do that?

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    11. Re:As says Janie Porche by dalamcd · · Score: 1
      Dude, you've posted this three times.

      Who's the zealot?

      dalamcd

      --
      moer liek CELtroid prime!!@1!
    12. Re:As says Janie Porche by nmg · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    13. Re:As says Janie Porche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm..when I installed Suse, I didnt have to compile my kernel..detected my scanner, cdrecorder and dvd player on install..Can Windows XP do that?

      Another biased Linux user that never installed XP but is ready to slam it??

      XP detected my scanner/burner/printer/video/sound/network/etc Everything I have.

  14. Here is the reverse, sort of: by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Interesting
  15. To all MS employees trolling today... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will all MS employees trolling here today please (virtually) stand up and identify yourselves so that we can mod your posts down to -1: Troll

    Thank you for your cooperation.

    1. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You must mean anyone who doesn't own a set of the Linux (tm) kneepads. Does the word hypocrisy mean anything at all around here?

      You are a rube.

    2. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Windows and I like it because it's better than anything else in its category. When linux is even in the same league, then we'll talk.

    3. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, I was expecting a +1 Funny, not a -1: Troll.

    4. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper attribution is "Linux(R) kneepads." Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.

    5. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm sure lots of Microsoft employees (or any self-respecting computer scientist, for that matter) read this site. Keep trying, chief.

    6. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Windows and I like it because it's better than anything else in its category.

      I agree 100%! Windows is the best commercial operating system for x86 hardware! By far!

      Although it seems like both you and Microsoft would be more pleased with the victory if the competition had been stiffer....

    7. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Excuse me. They should ba called GNU/Linux Kneepads. Thank you. If you really want to be Free, you should be using GNUpads.

      -RMS

    8. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, you posted a link to Google with Microsoft and astroturf in the search field. Your point is what? Fucktard.

    10. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. I long for the day when I can install Linux because it's all what I get with Windows now - fun & work machine.

    11. Re:To all MS employees trolling today... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I'm sure lots of Microsoft employees (or any self-respecting computer scientist, for that matter) read this site.

      Oddly enough (and the dude in the middle is admittedly odd), the technology section in
      today's Times would beg to differ with you.

  16. Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    So what? It's a stupid campaign no matter who runs it.

    Though the first point in the article is hard to debate:

    "More Hardware Options, for Less Dough ...
    My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook."

    It's just fighting fire with fire. Good for them. Too many people are confused into thinking Mac's are better because, as the commercial says, they 'just work'.

    In the context, the word "just" = "barely".

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you can't choose to have a 1" thick PC laptop with a built-in DVD/CD-RW and 4 hours of usable battery life no matter HOW much you're willing to pay, but, hey, look at all the stuff you can choose NOT to have.

      You can choose NOT to have firewire
      You can choose NOT to have DVD-ROM
      You can choose NOT to have built-in 100BT Ethernet
      You can choose NOT to have top-quality LCD panels
      You can choose NOT to have slot loading combo-drives

      And you can save hundreds of dollars choosing all these things NOT to have.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    2. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      Since when is it better to have a 15" monitor in 1024x768 than a 12.1" with the same resolution if you are talking laptops ? It is wasted weight and space.
      I would not buy a larger monitor for 1024x768. 15" is great for 1400x1200 though

      Want a Dell laptop with 12.1" ? and the cheapest you can get is $1700.

      Just checked Toshiba. Protege is the cheapest you can get there w/ 12.1" in 1024x786. $2049.

      Compaq starts at $1799, and I could not find any HP with a small screen.

    3. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by Jobe_br · · Score: 2

      Depends on what you define as "a comparable iBook" ... I priced out a Dell Inspiron 2600 (the "basic" laptop) w/ 512MB RAM and a 14.1" iBook w/ 640MB RAM, each w/ DVD/CD-RW, 30GB drive, etc. This is the closest config I could come up with and the price difference is $163. Dell Inspiron: $1676, Apple iBook: $1839.

      This is all, of course, assuming that the 1.2GHz Mobile Celeron is comparable to the 700MHz G3 in the iBook. I have my doubts, but I'll let it go at that.

      Personally, the ability to run Linux OR Mac OS X, both better operating systems than WinXP Home Edition is more than worth the $163 cost difference!

      Cheers.

    4. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      You can choose NOT to have built-in 100BT Ethernet

      You meant 1000BASE-T, right? All the PowerBooks come with built-in gigabit. It's also MDX autosensing, which is a nice perk. No more crossover cables.

      --

      I write in my journal
    5. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by guest · · Score: 1

      If you take the Dell laptop down to the 1 year warranty that Apple uses it saves you $180. I'd personally rather have the 3 year rather than 1 year warranty, but that option exists if you want to compare apples to Apples.

      If you buy your memory from crucial.com rather than through apple you save an additional $240. You can do that same trick with the iBook but Apple's running a promotion for 640mb memory so $1839 is actually cheaper than what it would be if you bought a 512mb dimm somewhere else. So now it's $1839 vs $1300.

      Just fyi

      --
      pw:secret
    6. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook.

      It think she bought the following:

      *A walmart desktop PC with WinXP
      *Some RAM
      *A LCD screen
      *A DVD-drive
      *Some batteries
      *And ofcourse some stickers saying: This is a Laptop(TM)!

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
    7. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 2

      The Apple campaign is funny, smart, and rooted in truth. The Microsoft campaign is insulting (read through it: the bullet points decided upon by the P.R. firm committee practically recite themselves in order), bland (the "freelance writer" exhibits no dimension of character. Even the photograph is devoid of shadows or wrinkles), and rooted in fiction.

      Apple, at least, is trying intellectually to woo the dollars out of my pocket. Microsoft's just trying to con them out.

    8. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 4, Funny

      The fact that every component in a mac laptop except the CPU is superior to my windows laptop, DOES NOT MATTER!

      The fact that the networking makes Windows XP look like it's from the 80's DOES NOT MATTER!

      The fact that apple has had a connection faster than USB2.0 for the past three years, DOES NOT MATTER!

      The fact the LCD is clearly better, and the fonts on a mac are arguably better, DOES NOT MATTER!

      The fact the OS seamlessly supports every component on the laptop with no quirks, DOES NOT MATTER!

      The fact the laptops are silent except for the hard drive, DOES NOT MATTER!

      When will you apple dorks realize the only important possession a man has is the MHZ of his CPU. Everything else comes second, even when the CPU speed causes me to sacrafice something from every other component on the system.

      CPU MHZ IS GOD!!!!~~~~

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    9. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by Jobe_br · · Score: 2

      I actually did select the 1yr instead of 3 yr warranty .. hmmmm. However, an "entry level notebook" wouldn't necessarily be the 14.1" custom built iBook with DVD/CD-RW. Something like the base $1199 model would probably be just spiffy as an entry level model.

      PCs can certainly be cheaper than Macs. No question. I find it strange that they decided to compare laptops, though ... those are pretty expensive any way you cut the cheese.

    10. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that Quake 3 is not available for MAC. DOES NOT MATTER! ....oh wait hmmm...

    11. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by TriggerHappy · · Score: 1
      "More Hardware Options, for Less Dough ... My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook."

      Apart from the lying^H^H^H^Hcreative use of "comparable" here, she forgot to add: "Yuh, and it has, like, a whole two minutes of battery life!"

    12. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      I just made a dell laptop and an iBook with all the options listed, making sure to add all the software WindowsXP doesn't have.

      I added Office v.X to the apple, other options were untouched.

      I was unable to get a similar CPU, so I have to sacrafice battery life to a fan with my Dell.

      I recieve a "Free" lexmark printer with my Dell, as this printer appears to be worth about the cost of a ink cartridge, I worry not.

      I chose Windows Professional Plus! as that is the most similar operating system to OS X microsoft offers (not to mention she supports getting it in her article).

      I upgraded to 256MB ram (one stick) as that compares to the iBook.

      I upgraded to a 30GB hard drive as that compares to the iBook.

      I added Office XP to the Dell, to compare to my Office v.X on my Mac (which I also added).

      I had to get 6 moths of AOL service with the Dell, no way out of it.

      I upgraded to " 24X CD-RW/DVD Combo Drive with Roxio's Easy CD Creator® [add $179]" to compare to the iBook.

      I added norton AntiVirus because your average windows user will get that. A subscription to .Mac gives you a free AntiVirus program I should mention.

      I upgraded the Dell to USB2.0, it's inexcusable that that wasn't the default.

      I added Dell Jukebox (some garbage) to compare to Apples iTunes.

      I now have a dell at $2272.00 and an iBook at $1998.00. I should mention your average Apple user will probably get a .Mac subscription, so you can add 99$ to that cost.

      Clearly in the world of "portable computers" the best of the best still comes from apple, both price wise and performance wise.

      Dell laptop is still missing several things in comparison to the Apple laptop, which I would personally value at over $300, but no money can provide me with those things from Dell(read the other comments on why to get an apple laptop if you don't know what I'm talking about).

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    13. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell, do people not know what troll means anymore?

      This was a direct parody of other posts in this thread, it made fun of the mindset some have. It is so obviously a parody that no one in thier right mind would start a flame war over it.

      To specify, a troll is either a crap flooder or someone trying to start a pointless flame war. Had I posted "APPLES ONLY HAVE ONE MOUSE BUTTON!!!" that would have been a troll. I insted made a parody of some of the other people (most of whom I can only assume are trolls or idoits) who say thier Dell laptop (trust me I've *never* seen a quality dell laptop) is better than an iBook.

      You might say this is OT, I think the topic of the discussion has the ability to change, and this one has done so. My post was decently relevant to the discussion it was in reply to. Looking at the topic starter it is slightly OT though. Overrated, if you think so, that is a valid moderation.

      To rate this troll is absurd, please learn what a troll is and only use it on trolling posts. My other post "how microsoftonian" *is* a troll (unfortunatly a very funny one, so it got moded up), this is not. Thank you have a nice day.

    14. Re:Which monopolistic corporation do we love? by frawaradaR · · Score: 1
      The fact that the networking makes Windows XP look like it's from the 80's DOES NOT MATTER!

      That's funny. So when my Jagwire equipped boxen, connected to a cable modem and a hub, communicate with each other -- thru the ISP! -- at 56k modem speed or less, this means that the competetition does even worse?

      --
      frawaradaR anahaha islaginaR!
  17. I should submit by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    my story about how Microsoft Lindows has made my life easier after switching from Windows 2000. That oughta make someone explode at M$.

    XD
    --j

    1. Re:I should submit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, Microsoft would probably shut down operations upon learning that one of the asexual Slashdot malcontents has chosen another product. In fact, such a bombshell may just bring about the implosion of the entire west coast.

    2. Re:I should submit by br0ck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do it! Use the oh-so-easy instructions for submitting your own story. Make sure you use 5 Mb attachments.

      Show Off Your Skills
      Posted: March 01, 2002 Are you a whiz at using a Microsoft product at home or in the office? Are you the one everyone comes to when they need to know how to do something? If so, we'd love to see what you can do. We're collecting ideas for articles on the Microsoft Insider Web site. Some of your work or submissions may be included in a gallery on the site, featured in press releases, or developed into how-to articles. Note: We will not feature any of your work without first receiving your permission.
      To participate, please send us:
      Your first and last name
      Name of your company or organization (if applicable)
      Brief description of your company or organization, including industry and size
      Brief description of which Microsoft product you use and how you use it
      Personal contact information, including address, phone number and e-mail address
      Samples of your work--either hard copies of your marketing materials or a Web site address where we can view your work. Please be sure to include any user names or passwords that might be needed.
      You can submit your sample(s) one of two ways:
      1. For online materials, send an e-mail message with the subject line Microsoft Publisher Customer Stories to insider@microsoft.com. (Note: Please do not send any attachments over 1 megabyte in size.)
      2. For printed materials, send hard copies to:
      Microsoft Insider Customer Stories
      Microsoft Corporation
      9931 Willows Road
      Redmond, WA 98052
      Note: We are unable to return submitted materials. Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law.

  18. Story: (-1; Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility.' How, you ask? Why, through Microsoft Office, Internet Explorer, and modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user and easy access to the Internet, of course. Maybe somebody should email Microsoft and let them know that the Mac has had all of these things for years now

    Oh, right. I forgot that in WindowsXP was the first OS by Microsoft to have multiple logins, IE, and Office. Oh, wait, it wasn't. But MacOS had preemptive multitasking first. Oh wait, no, Windows had it before MacOS.

    Um, exactly what did MacOS do first besides give us rounded corners on everything?

    1. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by pmz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget that Microsoft was first in brain-washing their customers to actually enjoy being raped daily.

    2. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by FooBarWidget · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seperate accounts for each user? Didn't Unix had that since the late '60s?

    3. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 2

      Everyone rips off everyone else in the interface world. As soon as an interesting feature surfaces in one of the major ones, all of the others jump all over it.

      MS: Sticky Menus in Win95 -> Macintosh: Sticky Menus in System 7.5, for instance. Also, Ctrl-Click on items for an item specific menu (first seen in System 8, I believe) - same as right clicking on Windows. Then there's the whole .Net and .Mac thing.

      And, of course, MS just went ahead and copied nearly the entire Mac interface into Windows 95. There was that, too.

      This is in no way specific to OS's either. Look at laundry detergent, for example. Some brand or another came out with an "ultra" version at one point, which was supposedly more concentrated and therefore came in a smaller package. Then, suddenly, all of the brands had that. And extra value meals at restaurants. They weren't always around, and yet now everyone has them!

      Nothing really all that wrong with it, when you think about it - you almost need to copy your competition in order to stay relevant.

    4. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it did.... but did it have easy access to the internet? I think the only one with easy access to the internet back then was Al Gore...

    5. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

      Of course it had easy access to the Internet. Everybody knows that the Internet was made for Unix!

    6. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by pz · · Score: 2

      Early 60s. It was, at that point, called ITS. ITS begat Multics, which begat Unix.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    7. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but the ad compares Windows and Mac Os remember ? I doubt that the silly (fake?) person in the silly (fake?) story was considering installing a Unix on her desktop.

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    8. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by koh · · Score: 2

      I do agree, but hasn't MS been boasting about being "innovative" for ages ? Or has someone messed with my mind again ?

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    9. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      I do agree, but hasn't MS been boasting about being "innovative" for ages?

      MS says a lot of things...

    10. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      If you're talking about DSL and Cablemodems, Linux had easy access to the internet before Microsoft even bothered to include TCP/IP (and run Trumpet & friends out of business).

      It's only the lowend PPP stuff that's ever been difficult in Linux.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  19. Linux Switch by anonymous+coword · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux gives me more choices and flexibility.' How, you ask? Why, through OpenOffice, Mozilla, and modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user and easy access to the Internet, of course.

    1. Re:Linux Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad that Mozilla doesn't have close to the amount of success that IE does w/the web (including speed of loading tables, program, and support), OpenOffice doesn't support what I need it to (WP8 for Linux), and the fact that Linux doesn't support my USB camera like Windows does.

      Don't be fucking stupid.

    2. Re:Linux Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the real comedy: Linux doesn't actually offer any of those things! Enjoy your positive moderation from outrightly lying.

    3. Re:Linux Switch by cioxx · · Score: 4, Informative
      Here's the real comedy: Linux doesn't actually offer any of those things! Enjoy your positive moderation from outrightly lying.

      The moderation is on target. You sir, are mistaken.

      Red Hat 8 has separate account creation for each user right from the control center. And guess what? It's all GUI point-and-click. It's more intuitive and useful than WindowsXP scheme.

      You lose. Play again.
    4. Re:Linux Switch by cioxx · · Score: 3, Insightful
      too bad that Mozilla doesn't have close to the amount of success that IE does w/the web (including speed of loading tables, program, and support)

      That's such Bullshit.

      Phoenix 0.x is 40% faster than IE, even on Windows. I know because I'm typing this out in Phoenix 0.3 running on Windows 2000 as the default browser. I could never imagine myself running Moz or Opera on Windows. I simply hated them. But Phoenix came and changed all that.
    5. Re:Linux Switch by Dalcius · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "too bad that Mozilla doesn't have close to the amount of success that IE does w/the web"

      Well, we all know that the number of users using a tool is directly proportional to the quality of the tool, right?

      ---
      "including speed of loading tables, program"

      IE loads faster in a sense because it's integrated into the OS; the libraries are loaded when you boot your system. That can be seen as a good thing or a bad thing.

      While I admit that Mozilla doesn't have the spunk at rendering as some other browsers do, you should try Phoenix.

      ---
      "support"

      For what? Bad HTML standards?

      Name something Mozilla doesn't support that I'm going to miss on the web.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    6. Re:Linux Switch by garcia · · Score: 2

      off the bat integration of movies.

    7. Re:Linux Switch by slagdogg · · Score: 5, Funny

      and easy access to the Internet, of course.

      With Windows, I had to go through ... like ... three ... or like ... four menus to find the "automatically configure my network" button. With Linux, it's like ... I just need to add 'iface eth0 inet dhcp' in /etc/network/interfaces and a couple of ifconfig commands later, I'm up and running ... like, it's so easy!

      --
      (Score:-1, Wrong)
    8. Re:Linux Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >IE loads faster in a sense because it's integrated into the OS; the libraries are loaded when you boot your system. That can be seen as a good thing or a bad thing.


      Spoken like someone who really understands NT internals. Yup. I love it when people break out the vague "it's integrated into the OS" argument, especially with interesting modifiers like "the libraries are loaded when you boot your system".

      IE's page rendering is faster because there isn't all the garbage that's in Mozilla slowing it down. I'll concede that Phoenix is definitely faster, but has very few features ATM.

    9. Re:Linux Switch by geekee · · Score: 1

      Easy access to the internet? If you call editing host, nsswitch.conf, etc. easy, then I guess so.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    10. Re:Linux Switch by Aanallein · · Score: 1

      With Mandrake 9, I had to install Mandrake 9 to get my internet connection to work. The only option I had to manually set (choosing from two) was that I was on a LAN. The ethernet card and network were automatically detected, and the option for automatically getting an ip assiged from the dhcp-server was preselected. Next, next, next and my internet connection was working.

      With windows, I spent hours on hours checking and unchecking vague checkboxes that didn't tell me anything, trying something, rebooting, trying somethign else, rebooting again, installing 'clients', 'adapters' and 'protocols' and never a source for help in sight.
      Linux might not be perfect. The amount of drivers out there for old Taiwanese scanners is abysmal, and if you wander too far off the beaten path you will quickly need to start doing 'scary' things through the commandline, but for basic functionality, it far outpasses windows in ease of use.

    11. Re:Linux Switch by sludg-o · · Score: 1

      haha, good one! Seriously though, I had an easier time getting my network card to work in linux. I just checked "Enable DHCP" during the install and DHCP works just fine. Windows 2K needed a driver installed before the card would work. I thought it was pretty funny that I had to boot to Linux to get the software to make windows work!

      Anyway, for those of you who tried redhat back in the 6.x days and couldn't get anything to work, try 8.0. You will be pleasently suprised

    12. Re:Linux Switch by Glytch · · Score: 2

      (hands plastered to cheeks in horror) Oh dear god! Not intergration of movies! That's going to utterly destroy one's ability to see 99.99999% of the sites on the web!

      Use a goddamn movie player to view movies. I can't think of any browsers for any platform that don't have at least basic support for MIME types.

      Care to have another stab at it?

    13. Re:Linux Switch by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      I won't claim to be a Windows API developer, but everything I've read and seen on my Windows partition fits perfectly. Please prove me wrong as I'm too lazy to get a link to back myself up. I'm just your typical troll. =)

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    14. Re:Linux Switch by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Well, it's a bit of a trick question because it's asking about *my* preferences.

      That said, I prefer to not have it integrated. I like to be able to save it without having to load a player first. I also like to be able to choose what player I want to use.

      In all fairness, I will conceed that your point is a valid one, just not for me.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    15. Re:Linux Switch by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Why the HELL would you edit EITHER of those?

      If you're going to whine about something, at least don't bring up grossly unrelated things like Sun's Name Directory service.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:Linux Switch by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

      With RedHat Linux 7.2, I had to... like... tell the setup program to use DHCP, fill in some DNS addresses, and... when Linux booted... Internet just works!

    17. Re:Linux Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dns servers are provided by the dhcp server, so you
      don't even need to do anything other than tell it
      to use dhcp.

    18. Re:Linux Switch by geekee · · Score: 1

      It was a joke (and not a very good one apparently).

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    19. Re:Linux Switch by bcaulf · · Score: 1

      You sound like a person who knows what he's talking about, until you use a phrase like "Phoenix 0.x is 40% faster than IE". That is a meaningless statement and I'm sure you know it. Benchmarking of anything can never be reduced to one ratio.

      I use Opera myself, more for the configurability and keyboard control than for the speed, although it rarely makes me wait. I will try Phoenix although I'm not in a hurry. IE is such a piss poor browser that I am continually amazed it is so dominant.

    20. Re:Linux Switch by cioxx · · Score: 2
      You sound like a person who knows what he's talking about, until you use a phrase like "Phoenix 0.x is 40% faster than IE". That is a meaningless statement and I'm sure you know it.

      Well, you get the idea. I could have said "much faster", or "insanely fast" but that would not be enough incentive for others on Windows-based computers to give it a try. 40% sounds official and commanding. If it makes you feel any better, I benchmarked this in my parents' basement with supermodified space age technology, directly stolen from NASA.

      Cheers.
  20. End Note by prsabc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    So does this mean that they converted "the microsoft writer to M$" Wow they got their own employee to use their product after how many years, hmmm I am guessing at home she is still a MAC user....

    1. Re:End Note by j-beda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, the use of "our" in a piece such as this often signifies "the person this piece is about". When a writer says "our hero", she usually is not claiming ownership.

    2. Re:End Note by poisti · · Score: 1

      English is not my native language, but to me, "our writer" seems to mean "the writer about which you just read"

    3. Re:End Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC

      Just like the Borg to take an average writer and make a household appliance out of her/him...

  21. The Mold of Microsoft by jamie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This "person" is obviously an invention of Microsoft marketing... no name. (Apple made a great move to have everyone in their "switch" ads identify themselves at the end. Microsoft didn't even try.)

    The added touches of this "person" being 5-foot-3 and her husband six feet, and the "Lexus we rented once," was predicted by Philip K. Dick in his short story The Mold of Yancy. If you've read it, go read the Microsoft ad with an eye toward the similarity. It's creepy.

    1. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This "person" is obviously an invention of Microsoft marketing... no name. (Apple made a great move to have everyone in their "switch" ads identify themselves at the end

      Is there any verification that the apple switchers aren't just made up names? If they aren't, its scary people would give that kinda stuff out (have you seen some of the websites where people are obsessed over the 'switchers'?).

      Honestly, I take them both as fakes. Sure, apple did a better job with it, but the whole deal isn't anything special. Look at any industry, you'll see people market that there product is better than the competition for reasons A and C, but the competition markets that there product is better than the original for reasons B and D. Marketing is a load, and most slashdotters can see through the sludge.

      This isn't anything special. Why is everyone up in arms about it? Just a story to insult the MS?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by phil+reed · · Score: 2
      This "person" is obviously an invention of Microsoft marketing..


      Remember "Betty Crocker" ??

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    3. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by dair · · Score: 1

      One of them at least, Damon Wright, has a weblog.

      -dair

    4. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by SeanWithoutPants · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fyi, the Apple switchers are real and some of them post in the macrumors.com forums.

      http://forums.macrumors.com/member.php?s=da33c2d0b 91e364ddc7af1005353836d&action=getinfo&userid=5444

      Scroll down to Aaron Adam's post or Pgant's on the 2nd page.

    5. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by b-baggins · · Score: 0

      http://www.ellenfeiss.net

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    6. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by j-beda · · Score: 2
      Is there any verification that the apple switchers aren't just made up names?

      At least a few of the people are slightly "famous" such as local DJ's or artists. There have also been a few stories of how they were selected (from solicited letters of recent buyers I think) and how some of the film shots went - people being flown in from their home towns, etc.

      I think there would be some very bad PR is the Apple people were found to be fakes, and I have seen no reports that anyone has claimed that they are fakes.

      I also think it would have been real stupit for MS to have faked their switcher. And MS never does stupid stuff, eh?

    7. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by broohaha · · Score: 1

      The DJ Liza Richardson is a real DJ. (It looks like they've removed her video from the Apple site, but her letter of endorsement's still there.) She does a weekly radio show Satuday nights on KCRW called "The Drop". 7-9pm Pacific.

      More info can be found on KCRW's website. Including live streaming broadcast of the shows. Here's her bio from that site.

      DJ Qbert's real, too.

    8. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by mshomphe · · Score: 1

      One of my coworks was in an ad:
      Gautem

      I think they are quite real.

      --
      She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
    9. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People would be shocked that an idealistic[*] counterculture corporation such as Apple would stoop to faking such ads!

      If MicroSoft got caught doing such inept, guileless astroturfing, people would yawn and say "well of course they would do that". They surely wouldn't be outraged.

      [*]irony alert -- yeah, "idealistic" and "counter culture" as in "Not THE MAN, just aspires to be him"(tm)

      "Not THE MAN, just aspires to be him"(tm) THE MAN

    10. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by nougatmachine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jesus H Christ. I'm not sure if this is a troll or an honest question, but does nobody read BoingBoing besides me? Mark Frauenfelder, who was featured in the first run of ads (which are no longer available on Apple's web site) has been mainting BoingBoing with Cory Doctorow for quite a while now. I was reading his blog long before the switch ads started appearing. The cynicism of some people amazes me. Yes, the men and women featured in Apple's commercials are real people telling their real stories.

    11. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

      Well Dj. Q-bert and Tony Hawk definatly aern't fabricated. If they are thats one big huge media conspiracy!!!

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    12. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I see your coworker's commercial, I always think he's saying his last name is "Goatse"

      That would be a most unfortunate last name, especially if he "earned" it.

    13. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by dumbArtMajor · · Score: 1
      Is there any verification that the apple switchers aren't just made up names?
      I'm pretty sure Tony Hawk, Kelly Slater, and DJ Qbert are real people...
      ;)
    14. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the famous ones are real (Kelly Slater, Will Ferrel, Tony Hawk, QBert, etc.) and I'm pretty sure the other ones are too. I know two people who have sent stuff in to switchers@apple and been called back by apple for more info, etc., with the possibility of being in adverts or on the site.

    15. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1
      "Yes, the men and women featured in Apple's commercials are real people telling their real stories."

      So Ellen Feiss' PC really did go "bleep bleep bleep bleep bleep" when it ate her "really good paper"? Her unofficial fansite (www.ellenfeiss.net) has some (admittedly unsubstantiated) allegations that the story was made-up in a Benadryl-fueled haze. I'll admit that's not exactly concrete proof, but I wouldn't be surprised if some people said what Apple was looking for in an effort to get on TV.

    16. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the Alamo!

      (or, more apropos to the current adminstration in the Whitehouse "Remember the Maine!")

    17. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by sineltor · · Score: 1

      Cool.

      Its probably been posted somewhere else in this discussion but i haven't seen the link to the quicktime movies of apple's campaign for all us who haven't seen them on tv

      --
      'No publisher will ever pay you enough to successfully sue them' - Dave Sim
    18. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jamie, consider for a moment that there is a difference between the common practice of inventing people and characters for the purpose of marketing (ala betty crocker, the pillsbury dough boy, mr clean, and chef boyardee (sp)) and the practice of inventing a politician/demogouge with the intent of manipulating public opinion to brainwash minds and homogenize personalities. is this fictional microsoft personality a media star? to people attempt to emulate her? more importantly, are you accusing microsoft of attempting to practice mind control on an entire planet with this web page?

      after you've considered this for a while, smack yourself around. then think about it again.

    19. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by jimbolaya · · Score: 2

      I keep hearing about this Will Ferrel ad, but I've never seen it, and it is not on Apple's site. Can ya help a brotha out?

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    20. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by jimbolaya · · Score: 2

      Okay, I'm a big boy; I suppose I should have been able to Google myself before asking a silly question. Here is is!

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    21. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fyi, the Apple switchers are real and some of them post in the macrumors.com forums
      Shyeah, right. You're telling me there's someone named "Tony Hawk" out there, and there's such an occupation as "professional skateboarder"? Pull the other one!
    22. Re:The Mold of Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It's right up there with the politician described in "Radio Free Albemuth".

      It seemed to be an unsubtle jab at Joe McCarthy, but these days such fine patriotic Americans as John Ashcroft come to mind and their bogus witch hunts and powergrabs just as easily.

      It's not a War on Terrorism, it is a War on every pet boogeyman imagined by the Political Right that the Political Left in the US harbors.

  22. For years? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    MacOS hasn't even had real multitasking or (shipped with) two-button mice "for years" so I think MS has a point here.

    1. Re:For years? by HeghmoH · · Score: 2

      Nobody's understanding. It doesn't matter how long they've had it. The point is that they have it *now*. (No two-button mice; go buy one for ten bucks. Everything else, they have now.)

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:For years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA Thats' funny. No two button mouse, so what. I've never had a problem with the one button one, and if I did, I'd buy a two-button mouse.

    3. Re:For years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, all Apple OSs had cooperative multitasking and unprotected memory until OS X
      Just like the 10 year old Windows 3.11

    4. Re:For years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, no two button mice available from apple. two button mice at all. Oh wait, those are (or were, if that url is session encoded) links to microsoft mice, with multiple buttons and scroll wheels and everything.

      (this AC is posting from an old blue and white, running jaguar, using a two button logitech optical mouse)

    5. Re:For years? by anti-drew · · Score: 1
      MacOS hasn't even had real multitasking or (shipped with) two-button mice "for years" so I think MS has a point here.
      Your comment about shipped with is correct, but feeble. Two-button mice (as well as three-button mice, four-button mice, etc, with and without scroll wheels) have been available and worked great ... "for years". Specifically all multibutton USB mice have worked fine on Macs - with full software support - since the introduction of USB in the iMac in 1997. Not "for years", how about "five years"?

      Preemptive threading has been available on Macs since MacOS 8.6. The marketing name for it back then was Multiprocessing Services 2.0. Yes, a real preemptive thread scheduler - read the technote. For compatibility's sake, most of the rest of the machine still ran as cooperative threads inside a single preemptive task, but the preemptive threading was available even on uniprocessor machines. The release date for that was May 10, 1999. So, not "for years", perhaps merely "three and a half years".

      These features weren't marketed heavily, nor were they widely used before OS8/9 was abandoned ... so your ignorance is understandable and forgiven. But it's just false to say that these simple things weren't available back then.

    6. Re:For years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that point would be what, exactly? That Windows XP is superior to Mac OS 8? Boy, you're right. Microsoft really embarrassed us on that one. Let's all pitch our Macs and head to CompUSA right now!

    7. Re:For years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >your ignorance is understandable and forgiven.

      Yours, I'm sorry to say, is not. YHBT. YHL. HAND.

      Props to PhysicsGenius for being the best troll on slashdot - too bad everyone's so busy being trolled that they don't see the beauty.

    8. Re:For years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Specifically all multibutton USB mice have worked fine on Macs - with full software support - since the introduction of USB in the iMac in 1997.


      1998 actually. (Introduced May, shipped August.)


      Multibutton mice were fully supported long before that. USB mice just pretended to be ADB mice. The Cursor device manager supported 8 buttons since probably the Plus (1996?). See the technote "Space Aliens Ate My Mouse" http://developer.apple.com/technotes/hw/hw_01.html .

  23. No really, it's a feature! by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 4, Funny

    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

    Nooo! Not the hidey menu thingy! That thing drove me insane! And here it's listed as a plus? I'm sorry, what?

    All the Mac hardware--including my printer, broadband cable, Zip drive, and Palm handheld--works perfectly with my Windows-based PC.

    Really? You don't say? What about your internal hard drive? And your old applications?

    Well, really. From a company with a huge marketing budget, I expect something that isn't (1) a cheap copy of your competitor's and (2) can't be picked into little bits in 15.32 seconds.

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
    1. Re:No really, it's a feature! by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2, Funny

      Im sorry, but due to slashdot rules, you cannot pick apart an argument in less than 20 seconds!

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    2. Re:No really, it's a feature! by thinmac · · Score: 2

      From a company with a huge marketing budget, I expect something that isn't (1) a cheap copy of your competitor's and (2) can't be picked into little bits in 15.32 seconds.

      You do realize you just described their product.

    3. Re:No really, it's a feature! by jtshaw · · Score: 1

      Yes.. All the Mac hardware...

      So when did Windows XP come out for the PPC?

    4. Re:No really, it's a feature! by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP.
      No 5h17, given that one's an Office suite, and the other's a Works package. But hey, Appleworks costs $79.00, Office XP costs $239 (Std. Edn.). Someone do a bang-for-buck analysis?

      BTW My favourite way to annoy Apple reps/salespeople/visiting developers: refer to "Mac os X" as "OpenSTep v5.0"...

    5. Re:No really, it's a feature! by Francis+Avila · · Score: 1

      menus customize themselves to the way I work. Nooo! Not the hidey menu thingy! That thing drove me insane! And here it's listed as a plus? I'm sorry, what?

      I must admit, I really did like that feature. I don't like clutter in my menus, yet if there's a rarely used feature that I want I don't want to have to go digging to find it.

      One of the things that bothers me about OSS is this tendancy to just put every single feature out there on a bloated menu (especially right-click menus!). I freaking hate clutter.

      The solution is, of course, let me customize menus. Happily, OSS software lets me do that. But Word 2000 did it for me! I didn't have to waste time thinking about what features I used and didn't use. I didn't have to worry about digging deep to get back the use of some rarely-used feature--the menu items were always there, just not immediately visible.

      And if I someone doesn't like it, he can turn it off: Tools->customize->options (IIRC).

      Thus I got some of the benefits of customization without nearly half the hassle, and I can focus on customizing other things, like writing templates and changing toolbars and keyboard shortcuts. I left Word because of proprietary formats, the lousy OS it runs on, the impotent large-document features, and the moronic handling of styles. But I certainly didn't leave because of the auto-menu hiding or the organized presentation. I miss that.

      I suppose it's just part of our geekdom: we don't want a software tool, we want a relationship! Something we can tweak and caress to perfect harmony with us for the rest of our lives. Something we know the ins-and-outs of. Something intensely personal. How many sane people are ready for such a commitment? I mean, no wonder the FSF goes off the deep end all the time: they think software is people! I don't develop personal relationships with circular saws, so why should I do so with software?

      I'm sorry man, but software is my slave. It should do what I want without my even asking nicely, and preferably without my having to ask. And like it.

    6. Re:No really, it's a feature! by bo-eric · · Score: 1

      It's obvious - she's running Virtual PC! That's why all of her Mac hardware - including the CPU - works perfectly. It also explains why it's cheap. Virtual PC is only $200 on amazon!

      --

      -- Free speech is only free if your time is worth nothing.
    7. Re:No really, it's a feature! by ruiner13 · · Score: 2
      AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP.

      AppleWorks: $79 on apple.com
      Office XP "Standard": $479 on microsoft.com.

      Yep, sure does pale in comparison! It must be 6 times better!

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    8. Re:No really, it's a feature! by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

      Not only that but Appleworks comes with your machine for free. Office on the other hand....well, some OEM's force you to buy it so it's almost the same thing...almost.

    9. Re:No really, it's a feature! by Qrlx · · Score: 2
      At one point, the "switcher" says
      My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook.


      Then, "she" says
      My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it.


      AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP.


      So, the Upgrade from XP Home to Pro costs $200, and the lowest price I've seen for Office XP Standard (though I'm sure the extra features of Pro are a must for a freelance tech writer) is about $300.

      Looks like that $450 "savings" will pay for most of the $500 of Microsoft software you will need to get your laptop up an running!

      This "article" is so obviously the work of marketroids. Even the little steps for copying your bookmarks are written in the standard Microsoft command formatting, where the things you have to click are in bold type.

      By the way, they forgot to mention that you need to use a PC-formatted zip disk or your new Windows XP laptop won't be able to read it.
    10. Re:No really, it's a feature! by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      No kidding. There is no money saved here, and what's even more ironic is the MS page discussing "Which Edition is Right for You?" proceeds to tell you basically "Why You Should Buy XP Pro"; are there *any* benefits to using XP Home Edition?

      Truth be told, XP Home is fairly useless from a Windows network perspective. While it will let you experience the full force of ICMP, lack of Windows network integration make it entirely braindead. This is the one feature MS should not have skimped on, every edition of Windows should be able to join the Windows Active Directory DC. Meanwhile, it reads like XP Home will only perform data backups that endangers your files.

      This is all marketing bunk, from the product to the product description to the testimonial about how much better XP is. The ultimate irony here is that the most vaunted products here (Office and IE) are available for Mac OS X anyway, so the whole reason she switched is entirely moot.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    11. Re:No really, it's a feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU sir, need modding up to +5, Classic.

    12. Re:No really, it's a feature! by griff199 · · Score: 0

      "There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®."

      Yes, all bow before Excel's revolutionary SEVEN layers of function nesting, how unlucky is that? Of course, I'm quite sure there can't be any open-source thingy that beats it, hell it's Office, it's remarkably versatile...there's "no equivalent".

    13. Re:No really, it's a feature! by griff199 · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I just checked, apparently Appleworks (formerly Clarisworks, which makes it sound like a true piece of garbage) has no such limit.

      =NUMTOBASE(INT(AVERAGE(ACOS(SIN(ATAN((SIGN(ABS(A SI N(A4*A2/PI()))))))),DEGREES(A4))),16)

      It works fine. And I found no help on "function nesting"
      On the other hand, let's see what Excel help says on the topic:

      Nesting level limits A formula can contain up to seven levels of nested functions. When Function B is used as an argument in Function A, Function B is a second-level function. For instance, the AVERAGE function and the SUM function in Figure 1 are both second-level functions because they are arguments of the IF function. A function nested within the AVERAGE function would be a third-level function, and so on.

      so cool, there's just no equivalent to the versatility of arbitrary limits on my productivity.

      I will quit venting now.

    14. Re:No really, it's a feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he can turn it off

      Sure, but why is this option turned on in the first place? MS is constantly shoving down new, sometimes brilliant, features and options which perhaps 1-5% of the users might actually use more often than once a year, but in the meantime they switch the locations of older commonly used functions somewhere else forcing users to re-learn how to use them.

      Give me the option of customizing the menus: great, but turn this option on by default.

      It should do what I want without my even asking nicely

      Hrumph. THIS from a MS user....

  24. Must be composite/fake by azaroth42 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    No one talks like that apart from marketdroids. I mean really:

    I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing. ...
    See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information.


    Who talks in Hyperlinks?

    At least the Mac ads are believable.

    --Azaroth
    1. Re:Must be composite/fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac ads are believeable because they all boil down to:

      "I don't know computers from my anus so I like macs because they match my drapes. My name is Hemos and I have my head up my ass"

    2. Re:Must be composite/fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.

      As the IT support geek for an office of writers, this statement is a complete joke. Writers need a word processor they're not doing anything that requires loads of processing power. In fact, the best freelancers that we work with are using ancient machines (think 68040 or older Macs -- that's pre-PowerPC to the x86 crowd), and the best writer that we work with still sends in copy that has been typed (and the boss thought I was God Almighty when I came onboard and introduced her editorial assistant to a scanner and OCR). And while I'm being an old curmudgeon, how about those folks out there still using those old indestructible Tandy laptops that run on three "C" batteries? All writers need is a something that lets them bang keys. Case in point -- I just retired a PowerBook 150 with 4 MB of RAM, a 40 MB hard drive, and a grayscale screen and it ran WordPerfect 3.5 for Mac like a champ, which was all we needed it for. End of story.

      -30-

    3. Re:Must be composite/fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dennis Leary does. So why don't you just www.shutthehellup.com?

    4. Re:Must be composite/fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who talks in Hyperlinks?

      Weblog writers.

    5. Re:Must be composite/fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Penny-Arcade talks in hyperlinks!!! Are you telling me they don't exist?!

  25. IE6 is rather good by dazdaz · · Score: 1

    I would like to see Microsoft Open Source IE6 and port it to Linux and then compare "what works" with Mozilla.

    1. Re:IE6 is rather good by anonymous+coword · · Score: 1

      Tabbed IE? I don't think so.

    2. Re:IE6 is rather good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the amazing speed and heightened rendering speed of IE would beat tabs anyday.
      No sarcasm, either.

    3. Re:IE6 is rather good by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Right... You know what'd they pull.

      They'd just input a humongous binary stub in c source.

  26. Soooo Fake... by vex24 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Part of her "testimony" is this classic line:

    My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it. See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information.

    Hilarious... like an actual customer would go hunt down links to recommend people buy the most expensive workstation OS they sell. God Microsoft, keep 'em coming, soon you'll be as funny as the Onion!

    --

    People shape laws. Not the other way around.

    1. Re:Soooo Fake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mostly use a Windows machine and know just a little about Macs, but there is no way windows laptops are better than Apple notebooks for mobile users - network configuration, auto-sensing whatever, all that stuff is awesome on the mac and hopefully will come to Windows soon.

    2. Re:Soooo Fake... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      You're right, this would make a great Onion piece. I'm sure one of their writers could compose an MS commecial that has the overt appearance of somebody trying to talk "street style" while it's totally obvious that they're just reading a marketoid script. Actually, we could probably write such an article.

      I propose the protagonist would be Mr. T. Oh, how I miss Mr. T!

    3. Re:Soooo Fake... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Actually, win2k pro costs $319, and winXP pro costs "only" $299. I find that rather odd.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:Soooo Fake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, her laptop only came with XP Home Edition, and she never mentions that she switched to Professional or why she did even if we assume that she just left that part of the story out. Just that she recommends we switch.

      Can someone get me a copy of VS .Net?

  27. Crappy Job by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    MS has how many billions in the bank to pay an ad firm and that's the best they can do?

    Pretty pathetic.

    1. Re:Crappy Job by WildBeast · · Score: 2

      I rarely ever see an MS ad. People consider them good at marketing though.

    2. Re:Crappy Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rarely ever see an MS ad. People consider them good at marketing though.

      Turn off your ad-blocking software when visiting slashdot. Plenty of Visual Studio ads here.

  28. shocking. by 3prong · · Score: 5, Funny

    This makes Ellen Feiss and baby jesus cry.

    1. Re:shocking. by meeotch · · Score: 1
      This makes Ellen Feiss and baby jesus cry.

      No, this does.

      mitch

      p.s. - so does this.

  29. Odd move for Microsoft... by forau · · Score: 1

    First they steal the software, now they're stealing the marketing. O well, at least they make some improvements after the theft. O wait....

    1. Re:Odd move for Microsoft... by malraid · · Score: 1

      They did make some improvements like two button mice and .... err, well two button mice. Of course Linux is way ahead with three!

      --
      please excuse my apathy
  30. errr by SeanWithoutPants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hrmm. A freelance writer gets an article posted on Microsoft's web site and doesn't give a name. You'd think that if somebody would take the time to write such a thing the person would use the free publicity to his or her advantage.

    Just like the author of the topic said, something smells fishy.

    (obligatory beep beep beep)
    Regards,
    Sean

  31. *Could* be fictional? by sophits · · Score: 4, Funny

    Real people don't say things like:

    I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.

    That just wreaks of marketing monkey dung.

    1. Re:*Could* be fictional? by sean23007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it reeks of marketing monkey dung; it wreaks havoc on the olfactory glands that have to smell such dung.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    2. Re:*Could* be fictional? by shren · · Score: 2

      Right! Most of the freelance writers I know are demanding food.

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  32. Missing the point by Mr+Krinkle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the most interesting point isn't that someone switched, but that this is a MICROSOFT writer that was using a Macintosh for 8 years. They just got her to convert.
    "*Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"
    I think the better story would be "Bill forces last Mac user to switch!"

    --
    I am 31337 or something.
    1. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you missed the point that its a FAKE ARTICLE made by the marketing goons at microsoft

  33. dear microsoft by Guipo · · Score: 0

    I started out as a dos 5.0 user. I then moved up to the flexability of windows 95. After that, it just seemed to me that all windows were the same. So I moved over the Linux. Oh, linux was great, No GPF's to worry about, and I mean, it was just so reliable. But Now I'm back Microsoft. Windows XP for me. I missed those blue screens, and the random rebooting. And now that your tracking where I go on the internet, and what I'm doing every second, I feel safer than ever. Thank you microsft. Another convert. Guipo

    --
    Theonlyuse of monkeys is to testthings onthem.Some peoplemay say"Hey That'scruel!"and myresponse is"I don't like monkeys
    1. Re:dear microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How your mom's basement doing?

  34. Seems Microsoft hate their own products by ravemax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a few quotes:
    "AppleWorks (...) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP." - isn't there Office X ?

    "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did" - I wonder what happens when I start my IE on my Mac ... (Mozilla is better anyway).

    "The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers" - to be honest: i never installed drivers on my Mac - it just worked out of the box.

    1. Re:Seems Microsoft hate their own products by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 1

      i never installed drivers on my Mac - it just worked out of the box.

      So did my PC. However, I don't think either of us can expect to buy the latest and greatest whatchamacallit and expect either machine to recognize it without that little magical CD that comes with said item and contains the bits the computers need to figure out how the whatzit works.

    2. Re:Seems Microsoft hate their own products by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
      "AppleWorks (...) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP." - isn't there Office X ?

      Yes, there is. It's very much like Office XP, but without the pee that comes with with the Windows version...

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    3. Re:Seems Microsoft hate their own products by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why even bother touting Office over AppleWorks. You just don't get Office for free when you buy XP.

      All you get is "notepad", and "Write".

      It doesn't seem fair. Also, IE6 can't do more than Netscape, Netscape has it's mail, news and etc built in.(Navigator is dead btw... duh M$).

      The point is M$'s arguments are flawed all around. Multi User? They were the last to add that. When Unix was multi-user, well there was DOS, but in 3.1xxx you needed to install Windows in seperate directories for any type of multi-user environment. It's just silly!

      Windows really doesn't come with much out of the box at all. Even the things they integrate suck, that is why there are billions of shareware apps for PC's.

      Not sticking up for Apple/Mac, just saying MS sucks again.

    4. Re:Seems Microsoft hate their own products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "AppleWorks (...) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP."

      Yeah....so does the price:

      AppleWorks 6.2: $79
      Office XP: $570

    5. Re:Seems Microsoft hate their own products by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      SURE WE CAN!

      What's the point of letting a particular robber baron control the market otherwise. This simply should be a convenience feature that Microsoft offers it's "novice end users".

      No OEM version of WinDOS should ever ship without a current, complete set of drivers that exist at that time. The lag between when a PC is shipped an when new hardware is released should be handled by a Microsoft ftp/web site, or affiliate mirrors if appropriate.

      One of the great things about Linux is the accelerated release cycle. This ensures that a recent Linux distro will represent the leading edge in driver support. Either the current kernel will support the device, or it won't.

      Plus, I would like to take this opportunity to complain about a gaping hole in the WinDOS hardware configuration UI. Why the hell don't they have an equivalent of /proc/pci? The OS should at least tell the user what is in the box (if a driver hasn't been installed). All product id's may not be available, but certainly all of the vendor id's are available.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  35. What's next? by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

    [sarcasm]
    What's next? Microsoft broadcasting ads about Linux users switching to Windows XP?

    Oh wait, people already do that without Microsoft's help!
    [/sarcasm]

    1. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remove the [sarcasm] tags, and you're 100% right!

    2. Re:What's next? by tomzyk · · Score: 1
      What's next? Microsoft broadcasting ads about Linux users switching to Windows XP? Oh wait, people already do that without Microsoft's help!
      Yeah, no kidding. I get Microsoft advertisements everyday, all day long. They constantly bombard my webserver:

      CodeRed

      W32.Nimda.A@mm

      W32/Myparty.a@MM etc...

      --
      Karma: NaN
  36. What! Microsoft staff members use Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"

    Hmm..does this mean that she is a Microsoft employee (well, I'm sure she got a big payoff for doing the advertisement, but I mean before she completely sold herself to Bill and his empire of evil)?

  37. Wow, the switcher ads must actually be working by b-baggins · · Score: 0

    People here may not be taking Apple's Switch ads seriously, but apparently, MS is.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  38. Embrace and Extend by kasparov · · Score: 1

    Apparently, Microsoft's FUD... er Advertising Department also adheres to the "Embrace and Extend" ideal. Of course, the Apple Switch commercials are much sexier...

    --
    There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    1. Re:Embrace and Extend by macguiguru · · Score: 1

      I got ya 'embrace and extend' right here Billy boy.
      (grasp/wiggle)

  39. FUD by Ashish+Kulkarni · · Score: 1
    Such FUD is pure nonsense, but does Joe User know of it? He looks at XP, says it looks better than 98/ME/2000, and hey everything's easy for me. He will not look much further for other choices, as his needs are met by it.

    remeber, it's not the geeks microsoft is tring to attract, but the people who are not familiar with PCs -- particularly the older generation, which will be happy to use it.

    1. Re:FUD by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      He will not look much further for other choices, as his needs are met by it.

      If his needs are met, why should he look any further?

    2. Re:FUD by nevershower · · Score: 1

      Because he spreds viruses with his buggy operating system.

      Because his buggy operating system is used to launch DDoS attacks.

      --
      Look, ma! I'm a karma whore
  40. Switch to M$? by Twintop · · Score: 2

    Who in their right frame of mind would willingly say that they switched TO Microsoft?!?

    1. Re:Switch to M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of, say, those who have switched back after spending an entire weekend making linux do anything?

    2. Re:Switch to M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least not publicly. Guess thats why she didn't use her name in the ad.

      Oh look mommy, there goes the looney XP lady!

    3. Re:Switch to M$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, after you install Linux, what you supposed do? Ok, after I edit all the config files and totally secure everything by turning off all useful services, what do I do? I can play chess? Sweet.

  41. question by quigonn · · Score: 1

    Who will be Microsoft's Ellen Feiss? :-)
    And what drug will she/he be on? Maybe the same drugs Steve "Developers!" Ballmer takes?

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    1. Re:question by suman28 · · Score: 1

      I have heard that it was not drugs. She had taken some benadryl and then was asked to do a commercial on the spot.

    2. Re:question by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      Oh, so the microsoft one should be on cough syrup with codeine then?

      That should be fun to watch :P

  42. Switching... by br0ken2o0o · · Score: 1, Interesting

    apple.com/switch
    microsoft.com/switch

    Hmmm.....

    --
    This post was generated by a Team of Elite Monkeys for br0ken2o0o (569914).
    1. Re:Switching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple.com/switch
      microsoft.com/switch
      abilityhub.com/switch

  43. It's just not appealing by futuresheep · · Score: 2
    It looks more like a brochure than a testimonial.

    The thing that make the Apple ads so appealing is that you can see that these are real people. It's not as much of a construct. I'm much more convinced that Mac's are easy to use by watching stoned out her gourd Ellen Feiss tell go beep! beep! beep! beep! beep! beep! than by reading an anonymous page.

    1. Re:It's just not appealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't mind using an OS that's too complex for a chimpanzee, myself...

    2. Re:It's just not appealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of person finds any of those commericals appealing? Geeeeez, you must be hard up for some entertainment.

  44. Tell me you're kidding by jfedor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a question to the guy who submitted this story: do you honestly believe that the people featured in Apple's Switch campaign are real? I mean, I know Tony Hawk is a real person. Ellen Feiss could be real, too. But when they speak about how cool macs are and how uncool PCs are, they do so because they got money from Apple. Their confessions are just about as real as those of the "fictional" and "composite" person from Microsoft.

    The difference is that Apple paid someone to lie on TV and Microsoft put their story in the mouth of an imaginary person. Now who's more honest?

    -jfedor

    1. Re:Tell me you're kidding by banky · · Score: 5, Informative

      While they certainly may be lying, every switcher with an internet presence denies recieving a single dollar from Apple (although they did get lunch).

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    2. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jfedor · · Score: 2

      Hmm...

      OK, if they really didn't get any money then that makes them a bit more real. But nowadays people will do anything to get on TV. Do you have Big Brother (the TV show) in the US?

      But OK, I guess I agree that the Apple switchers do seem a little bit more real. Even if it's just Apple covering their tracks really well.

      -jfedor

    3. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

      The difference is that Apple paid someone to lie on TV and Microsoft put their story in the mouth of an imaginary person. Now who's more honest?

      How do you know they paid people to lie? Maybe they paid people to tell the truth?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Tell me you're kidding by MrAl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Take a look here:
      http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=173 7

      Looks to me like it's a real person. And looks to me like it was a real interview.

    5. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Arkham · · Score: 2

      Boy, you don't know much about Apple users, do you? If you went into any Apple store in America and asked if anyone would like to do a free testimonial about how they love their Macs, you'd have 30 people clamoring to be first in line.

      You think Linux advocates are loyal, but you have no idea how fiercely loyal Apple users are.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    6. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm the guy who submitted the story, and I'll be happy to answer your question. Apple did something that most people aren't aware of. They actively solicited, on their web site, write-in testimonials about switching from Windows to Mac OS X for almost a year before running the first "Switchers" ad. Also, Apple paid for the Switchers airfare and accommodations when they shot their TV spots, but they themselves received no money at all.

      Finally, the TV spots are just a small part of the Switchers campaign. Check out apple.com/switch/stories sometime. You'll find dozens of emailed testimonials from real people identified only by their initials.

      The answer to your question is yes. I believe the people featured in Apple's Switchers campaign are real. While I concede that it's possible that the whole thing campaign a big hoax, I think it would have been a lot harder for Apple to fabricate it than it would have been to simply find a couple dozen people who were willing to talk about their Macs on camera. The preponderance of evidence points to the conclusion that Apple is just letting people tell their own stories, while the preponderance of evidence is that Microsoft, in this case, isn't.

      So to answer your last question: Apple is more honest.

      Thanks for asking. ;-)

      --

      I write in my journal
    7. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Shagg · · Score: 2

      The difference is that Apple paid someone to lie on TV and Microsoft put their story in the mouth of an imaginary person. Now who's more honest?

      How do you know they paid people to lie? Maybe they paid people to tell the truth?


      They probably paid people to read a script. That's how commercials usually work, even endorcements.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    8. Re:Tell me you're kidding by edwdig · · Score: 2

      Do you think the average person who posts on slashdot would require money to do a commercial like that for their favorite Linux distribution? I don't.

      I doubt you'd have trouble finding people for any non-Windows OS who would instantly jump at the chance to do it. I would think Windows users would be more likely to want money for it, but I'm sure you'd find enough people that would be happy enough to get the chance to be on tv/print.

    9. Re:Tell me you're kidding by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How did this get modded 'insightful'? Where's your proof that Apple paid anyone to lie, or that they're even lying? Apple solicited write-in testimonials on their website for customers to explain why they switched to Macs. Microsoft put up a story from some unnamed person. Looks like Apple is the more honest company here. So before you go spouting off about people lying, make sure you know what the fuck you're talking about.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    10. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you have Big Brother (the TV show) in the US?

      Unfortunately we do.
    11. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're the "guy" who wrote the article. Did you read it? Say hi to your husband for me...

    12. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I'm the ac who mocked you about your husband. I thought you were claiming to be the guy who submitted the article to MS. ;-)

    13. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Lunkwill_Fook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Okay, trained actors can sniff out trained actors. All my actor friends, even those that love Macs themselves, know without even a glimmer of a doubt, that most if not all of those "switchers" on the Mac commericials are fellow actors. Voice inflections, presence, all the little nuances that go into actor: they're all there. So, YES, they are actors. Perhaps they are acting out real testimonials, that can be debated, but they are actors.

    14. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make if they're real or not? So Apple found a dozen people willing to get their 15 seconds of fame gushing over how much they love their Mac. I bet I can find 15 people who love XP, OS/2, AmigaDOS, ColecoVision, Mincemeat pie, sweaty gym shorts, beastiality, etc, etc. Testimonials are meaningless.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    15. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took "over a year" to find any happy campers. I'd buy me a new G4 too if I was filthy rich. For now I'll stick 2 Windoze and the ususal slackware. Apple is the plaform for the Nietzsche elite.

    16. Re:Tell me you're kidding by clmensch · · Score: 1

      If you go to apple.com/switch, you'll notice that each Switcher's story is accompanied by the email they sent to Apple for consideration in their new advertising campaign.

      --
      There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    17. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      But when they speak about how cool macs are and how uncool PCs are, they do so because they got money from Apple.

      I have never gotten more than a few marketing pamphlets and a bottle of water from Apple.

      I think Apples are far "cooler" than PCs, and I'd trade the beige box I've got at home for a Mac in the short time it'd take me to transfer the files & pics & ROMS & MP3s over.

    18. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Redline · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But when they speak about how cool macs are and how uncool PCs are, they do so because they got money from Apple. Their confessions are just about as real as those of the "fictional" and "composite" person from Microsoft.

      Whatever. I will gush all day about the great and powerful Linux to anyone who wants to hear it. For free. On TV, on the radio, on slashdot, and in print. I will confess my love of Mozilla, KDE, and the unstoppable gcc toolchain. Especially if Linus or RMS asked me to do so.
      I am sure that the Mac fans of the world would do the same. Especially if Jobs asked them to do it.

    19. Re:Tell me you're kidding by wilson_c · · Score: 1
      The problem is that it wouldn't be allowed. Between the agencies wanting to avoid litigation (a contract without consideration by both parties isn't binding)and whatever union requirements exist for an appearance in a commercial (scale payment for the appearance plus royalties would be required, regardless of whether the individual desired them or not.


      Those requirements might not exist for other advertising media, but then again they're not as powerful.

    20. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Where's your proof that Apple paid anyone to lie, or that they're even lying?"

      Well, for one thing, the "It took my dad an hour to download Windows Drivers" is FUD. You'd think he'd just pop in the CD that came with the camera.

    21. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not according to contacts at Chiat Day in Las Angeles. They sifted through real emails, contacted people, flew 'em to LA, and parked 'em in front of a camera.

      No conspiracies here folks.

    22. Re:Tell me you're kidding by elemental23 · · Score: 2

      Really?

      Including Tony Hawk?
      Including Liza Richardson?
      Including DJ Qbert?
      Including Damon Wright?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    23. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Migelikor1 · · Score: 2

      Riiiiiggghhhhttt....DJ Q*Bert, who I've seen live twice sure is an actor. He's playing a bunch of shows in Boston in the next week or so. Must be character research. Ane Ellen Feiss, the notorious EF, was an actor too. I've met her a couple times, since she lived next to a friend of mine at Exeter, a big boarding school, and she sure was acting. I hate trolls.

      --
      My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    24. Re:Tell me you're kidding by suman28 · · Score: 1

      No, you got it all wrong you bonehead. As are most people, I have been around computers long enough to see/use a Mac and I have to say, if I had a choice between, Linux, Mac and PC, I would never pick a PC. The only reason, the PCs are used so much is because of the applications. Now with the emulators on Linux, there is no need to have Windows. As for Macs, there truly is no need to have any drivers installed just get your display to run on 16-bit colors. Linux crashes, Macs crash, but not as often as Windows does.

    25. Re:Tell me you're kidding by pi+radians · · Score: 2

      I bet I can find 15 people who love XP, OS/2, AmigaDOS, ColecoVision, Mincemeat pie, sweaty gym shorts, beastiality, etc, etc.

      I think I could only find one guy who loves sweaty gym shorts enough to testify about it.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    26. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if they featured DJ Quebert, then it should be real...right?

    27. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh... looks like a real retard if you ask me.

    28. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it more likley that these folks were simply coached before and during the filming?

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    29. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jfedor · · Score: 2

      Look, I've seen interviews with Lara Croft and interviews with God on the Net.

      This one was probably done via e-mail. Even Eugenia doesn't know who she really talked to. It might have been an Apple employee. It probably wasn't, but you'll never know.

      -jfedor

    30. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jfedor · · Score: 2

      OK, and what makes you so sure that these e-mails weren't written by Apple?

      -jfedor

    31. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jfedor · · Score: 2

      Maybe. Maybe they didn't pay them at all. I don't know. Do you?

      -jfedor

    32. Re:Tell me you're kidding by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      A lot of the time, the drivers included on the CD are usualy out of date and often broken by some obscure feature in the latest OS attachment. Happened with my Logitech Optical Mouse, both the PC and the Mac drivers that came with the mouse were outdated and the newest OS updates had broken them. Eventualy, I just used the default OS drivers since I decided the additional features the Logitech drivers gave me were a waste, but the point remains the same.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    33. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Apple is the more honest company here.

      You are obviously a MAC user.

      Better wording would be "less deceitfull company". When it comes to marketing, honesty is last on the list.

      Sit down and actually watch commercials on TV and decipher what they are saying. Beer will give you great parties with hot chicks. Perfume/Cologne is a "sure fuck" solution when dating. Shampoo gives you orgasms. Driving a nice car gets you all the chicks you can handle. All childrens toys are not as fun as they appear on TV. Talking ducks (Aflac), geckos (Geico), and chihuahua's (Taco Bell) are main spokes-icons.

      LIGHTEN UP! ITS CAPITALISM AT ITS BEST.

      Oh yeah, I almost forgot about penguins and red devils ;)

    34. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Okay, trained actors can sniff out trained actors. All my actor friends, even those that love Macs themselves, know without even a glimmer of a doubt, that most if not all of those "switchers" on the Mac commericials are fellow actors. Voice inflections, presence, all the little nuances that go into actor: they're all there. So, YES, they are actors. Perhaps they are acting out real testimonials, that can be debated, but they are actors.

      Isn't acting the art of not looking like you're acting? You're faking it so well? So if you look like you're acting, you're probably not an actor. OTOH, if you look natural, you may be real, or a good actor.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    35. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jcr · · Score: 2

      the people featured in Apple's Switchers campaign are real.

      I would hope that the FTC would speak up if they weren't...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    36. Re:Tell me you're kidding by jcr · · Score: 2

      So, YES, they are actors.

      Wanna bet?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    37. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warm and toasty under your tinfoil hat? Sheesh.

    38. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have e-mailed at least one of the Apple "Switchers" (the Windows LAN admin) and he does seem to be a real person; many of the people in the ads have a web presence, and some of them, like Tony Hawk (a professional skateboarder), are well known in their respective circles.

    39. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm 100% sure they got paid, but I don't know if they were actors reading a script (very likely) or actual people who were more than happy to get paid to be in a national ad just to tell people about how much they like their new computer (less likely, but we don't know for sure).

      That microsoft page is clearly a pure marketing construct, on the other hand. Nobody outside of marketing offices speaks like that. And no one would be dumb enough not to notice the Explorer browser that's been included on every new mac for years. Its set as the default browser and every thing.

      So, I don't know that the people in the mac ads are "real", I think they most probably aren't, but they very well could be.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    40. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er...consideration is the payment - it only passes one way

    41. Re:Tell me you're kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC!=Windows sumb ass. For Fucks Sake! Cant people get the frigging names of shit correct. Macs are personal computers (some people use them as servers as well) Windows can run on PCs or Servers, and Linux can run on PC or Servers.

  45. You know what MS calls it, right? by Timex · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Innovation"....
    ...at least that seems to be their trend-- copying what someone else has been doing, then claiming that their version is "innovative".

    <shrug>Whatever, Microsoft. Whatever.

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
  46. hahaha! by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor.
    Translation: It took me most of a day, i.e. many grueling hours, just to get up and running.

    Sure, "more hardware is available for less dough", but you get what you pay for...
    1. Re:hahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if we find out she's not a Girl Scout hmmm? Doesn't that just negate the entire article? Logic, it exists in more than just computers.

    2. Re:hahaha! by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      Now, I think these ads are as dumb as the next guy does, however, with one exception (damned HP piece of crap) it's never taken me longer than two hours to get a Windows install running, be it Windows 3.x, 9x, or 2000/XP. (The HP in question was being downgraded from XP to 98SE and the drivers did not exist in 98SE and HP wouldn't tell me what was in the damned computer.)

      Calling MS on the carpet for copying Apple's ads is fine and dandy, but let's not make shit up just to make our position seem stronger.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:hahaha! by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Now, I think these ads are as dumb as the next guy does, however, with one exception [...] it's never taken me longer than two hours to get a Windows install running,

      The point is not about how long it took you to get Windows running. It's not really about how it took her to get Windows running. To _brag_ that "I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor." is just awful; if it took her two hours, then they should say two hours, because "less than one day" implies 4-6 hours to me, and most people don't want to spend that long working on it.

    4. Re:hahaha! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Sure, "more hardware is available for less dough", but you get what you pay for..."

      I'm running a Dual Atlhon 1.4 gig with 4 UW SCSI drives, a Firewire drive, CD burner, DVD-RAM, dual monitors, a tablet, two network cards, a gig of RAM, and Windows 2000. I have no stability issues.

      What's the price tag for an equivalent Mac system?

    5. Re:hahaha! by xtremex · · Score: 2

      I can install Linux in about 20 minutes. Useable and running. Pop a Mandrake or Suse Cd in, come back in 20 minutes, and you're listening to MP3s, burning CDs and browsing the web. (However, DVD video support isn't installed by default...)

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    6. Re:hahaha! by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      A PowerMac with dual 867Mhz G4, 4x72gb Ultra160 SCSI drives, a gig of RAM, Superdrive, and dual 17" flat-screen studio displays comes out to about $8000. A fair comparison would be really difficult without more information. However, I'll wager that your machine wasn't particuarly cheap either.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    7. Re:hahaha! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately, I don't know how much the drives cost. However, I'm pretty sure that I'm under half that.

      The plus side being that Windows has shitloads more stuff on it than Mac. I can run LW on a Mac, but I'd forfeit a TON of plugins I need that were compiled for Intel.

    8. Re:hahaha! by RatBastard · · Score: 2

      And I've had Windows installs that were done as soon as SETUP.EXE rebooted for the last time. So what? Very few Windows installs are problematic and we shouldn't be claiming otherwise if we want people to take us seriously.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    9. Re:hahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be nice to have broadband. It took me roughly 9 hours on windows update over a modem to download all of the patches to my last install of XP.

    10. Re:hahaha! by xmnemonic · · Score: 1

      If he was quoting and mocking a Mac user, he'd probably get modded -1 Troll in a hearbeat.

  47. the ad campaign that they really need by AssFace · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Which users are better in bed?

    I'd guess PC users, but I'm biased since I see Mac users as bumbling morons from those ads that they run.
    But damn they sure have some sexy looking computers.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:the ad campaign that they really need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have personal knowledge on this. Chicks who use Windows gag and spit, while chicks who use Macs swallow like pros. Give me a Mac-using chick any day of the week. Hell, for that matter, give me a Mac-using chick every day of the week!

  48. Yeah I laughed a lot to this post by i_luv_linux · · Score: 1
    I laughed a lot to this Slashdot post when I read it, the guy is right, because this is not a switch campaign at all. It is a one page article, nothing serious and you post it as if it is something like Apple's switch.

    Later on I may find posts on SlashDot which put different words on Microsoft's site on different pages together and claim that Microsoft is saying whatever you want them to say. This is funny.

    1. Re:Yeah I laughed a lot to this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting comment history. Shill.

    2. Re:Yeah I laughed a lot to this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then even later I go back to bill gates to get my
      money... AHHH bill, can't we just cuddle... funny.

  49. Lockin is fun by steveha · · Score: 2

    Word Converters are helping me transfer old document files, Microsoft Works files, and even AppleWorks files.

    Now nothing but Word can ever open these files again! Hooray!

    For some reason, the above reminded me of an old Star Trek episode. Inside my head, I heard an echoing voice saying

    You will be absorbed into the body

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Lockin is fun by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Peace, brother. Peace and tranquility.

      Such is the will of Landru.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  50. "fictional or a composite sketch" by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Informative
    "The author of the page -- who never identifies herself, and who could very easily be fictional or a composite sketch"

    IIRC, Microsoft targeted such an ad campaign at Mac people a couple years ago, albeit to get them to use IE & Office for Mac, not switch altogether. The campaign featured what were purported to be testimonials from satisfied customers, but M$ tipped its hand when it launched the ads too quickly, and had "customers" discussing their experience with the latest versions of M$ wares a few days before said versions actually shipped.

  51. In the publishing industry by ebuck · · Score: 1

    In the publishing industry, Mac has a long and fruitful reign. With well refined tools like Quark Express, and top of the line graphics toolkits available for so long, the only Mac to Windows transitions I have seen came from corporate mandate to consolidate the desktop OS. Never have I seen a transition based on better tools being available for Windows.

    Campaings like this have surfaced in the past, and usually they fail to crack the market. Remember, to switch over, you have to dump all of that expensive software, the nice hardware, and retrain your department just to buy new hardware and software so they can be just as productive as before. Give the extremely tight budgets of most newspapers and small-run publishers, don't expect a mass migrations, they probably can't afford it.

    That said I've been out of the industry for three years, but I'd be suprised if this wasn't spotted for what it is, an attempt to make publishing in Windows look a lot better than it is.

  52. not anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's julia roberts

  53. "Better Virus Protection" too by Dejohn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft has had this report potsted on their Exchange website for a while. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/outlook /FerrisOutlook.asp.

    Some research company with "evidence" suggests that you're less vulnerable to getting hit by email viruses if you use Outlook rather than anything else. This report is shoddy, even for Microsoft. I'm amazed they would even post this!

    1. Re:"Better Virus Protection" too by Dejohn · · Score: 1

      Sorry, link above didn't work: Click here instead

    2. Re:"Better Virus Protection" too by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course there's better virus protection for Windows.

      They've got way more practice writing and updating signatures.

    3. Re:"Better Virus Protection" too by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Some research company with "evidence" suggests that you're less vulnerable to getting hit by email viruses if you use Outlook rather than anything else.

      That's because newer versions of Outlook aren't able to receive executable attachments by default... if you can't open the attachment, you can't get infected.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:"Better Virus Protection" too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's because newer versions of Outlook aren't able to receive executable attachments by default... if you can't open the attachment, you can't get infected.
      That removes one path of infection. Take a look through the list of Outlook vulnerabilities; plenty allow code to be executed without opening an attachment.
  54. At the end of all the switch campaigns... by bsdparasite · · Score: 1

    Imagine someone actually going through these switch campaigns, and getting poorer by 3000 bucks. "Suckers!!" yell Apple and Microsoft, and end up high fiving each other..

    1. Re:At the end of all the switch campaigns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh thats right, they are working together, and apple and microsoft are owned by disney warner hbo GE Dow Coca Cola Sony Chevy Ford BMW Mercedes inc.

  55. Bloatware with nothing to show. by daveed · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about! MS Bloatware comes with nothing. you get notepad and that's about it. If you did get everything like most GNU/Linux distro's then wayhay. But for all the gig's of space Windows (anyversion) takes up, you get surprisingly little.

    1. Re:Bloatware with nothing to show. by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever actually learned how to write an operating system? Studied kernel architecture? I didn't think so. What do you know. I am not talking about applications silly! I am talking about the internal structure of the system. Go bash someone worth bashing. There is a lot more to Microsoft's seemingly wasteful space than you think.

    2. Re:Bloatware with nothing to show. by daveed · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm just talking about applications. What's the point in having a massive fancy do it all kernel when you get no software with it. None at all. That's one of my biggest problems about Windows, you get nothing. Yes a kernel is a difficult thing to write, nothing to be excited about though, with a kernel, you can't do much, its the app's you use that's the important bit. But that is just my oppinion, a bit of a chicken and the egg argument really. My point is, there are lots of OS's out there, MS produce one and give you nothing to run on it, well relatively little. Sorry for the missunderstanding :)

  56. Less Dough? by Cutriss · · Score: 2

    More Hardware Options, for Less Dough

    I think it'd be more accurate to say:

    More Hardware Options, for More "D'oh!"

    Not to replace one monopoly with another, but there is something to be said about having tight restrictions on the hardware platform...

    That said...now that OS X is running on the Mach/BSD/whatever kernel, let's hope that better hardware abstraction starts coming into play, such that Mac hardware compatibility becomes less of an issue...

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Less Dough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MORON! APPLE IS NOT A MONOPOLY! That is like saying Ford has a monopoly on Mustangs. Think before you speak...PLEASE!

  57. She's Also a Photodisc Model! by obidonn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not only is she a freelance writer, but she also models for stock photography - check it out. Or maybe they just threw in a stock image of a person...

    1. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! How the hell did you find that?

    2. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by cetan · · Score: 1

      Great catch! How did you know that? :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    3. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

      HEY! Thats the same chick I met on IRC last night!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by obidonn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just had a hunch. I'm surprised that Microsoft uses Photodisc/Getty images instead of images from Corbis, which they own.

    5. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by LordNimon · · Score: 2

      Very slick, dude! I knew the image came from stock photography (it has that "look"), but I didn't think I'd find proof. This is just like those fake video tapes that MS showed during their trial.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    6. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's the same size as the sample, cropped to miss out on the watermark. Did MS even pay for this image, or did they just download/crop the sample??

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    7. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      Thats great.. how did you find that?

    8. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by rixster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      OMG. How did you find that !!? Moderators - this is worth a +5. Funny, interesting, very relevant.

      --
      Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....
    9. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Long ago I worked for a company that did a great deal of Microsoft's print & online propaganda. Photodisc material was used very frequently in proofs and final product. More than once an employee from our company posed for a photo to run in some brochure or other direct marketing crap. Stroll through the MS site and you'll see a number of stock photos. The stock images are not usually used in such a blatantly dishonest and misrepresentative manner. That they do not have the photo of the 'real' person who switched tells me that the whole thing is bogus. We'll have to modify Mark Twain to read: "lies, damn lies, statistics, and Microsoft marketing materials."

    10. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Petronius · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're awesome!

      --
      there's no place like ~
    11. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Holy shit man, I was just on the photodisc page and I was just going to post the same thing. Great minds think alike.

      It sure looked like a photographer took the picture, didn't it? Notice the warmer fill light on one side of her face, no way that was just some snapshot.

      Photodisc has a great search feature .. just type in words like "content young woman sitting looking at camera" and you'll find it.

      Most of those goofy pictures you see of people talking or using their computer or something are stock photos.

      Good ol' microsoft!

    12. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Wow, I think I'd go crazy if I had to work in Microsoft's marketing department. How can they be so stupid!? Windows is truely marketed to idiots.
      Do you believe everything you here? Are you an idiot? Do you love gay Marketing terms? If you can answer "yes" to these questions try Windows XP!

    13. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Cajal · · Score: 1

      > Do you love gay Marketing terms?

      Please don't use "gay" to mean "stupid." It doesn't.

    14. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by bmf033069 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better...On what seems to be the remnants of Caroline Woodham's (photographer's name just below picture):

      www.svidaho.net/~cw/index/ GIF's/Apple%20Logo.gif

      "Designed and Maintained on a Mac!"

    15. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 2

      I'd bet the artists just use whatever is best. Probably the philosophical quality of thier images is no big deal to them.

    16. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Corbis kept falling over?

      No uptime is currently available for corbis.com.

      OS, Web Server and Hosting History for corbis.com
      OS Server Last changed IP address Netblock Owner
      Windows 2000 Microsoft-IIS/5.0 6-Feb-2001 205.142.245.224 Corbis Inc.
      NT4/Windows 98 Microsoft-IIS/4.0 14-Nov-2000 205.142.245.224 Corbis Inc

    17. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Please don't use "gay" to mean "stupid." It doesn't.

      Sure it does, get an enema and dump the political correctness.
      Uptight people are gay.

    18. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, so it was a happy marketting term, then.

      the parent to this, however, is stupid.

    19. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vernacular would indicate it does.

    20. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      How in the crap did you come up with that link?!?!
    21. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Java+Pimp · · Score: 2

      That particular image is royalty free according to their web site.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    22. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn, she is hottie! could you imagine a beowulf cluster of these wome?

    23. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Royalty free" doesn't mean "free". You still have to purchase the image. The image shown in the link is a comping image for creating, well, comps to test whether a design idea works before actually purchasing the image.

      "Royalty-free pricing is based solely on the size of the product you need, not the specific use. You don't have to pay any additional fees on a use-by-use. Once you purchase a royalty-free product, you may use it multiple times for multiple projects without paying additional fees." <-- from their faq

      The actual purchased images come in larger sizes than the comping image, and without the watermark.

    24. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by jimm · · Score: 1

      They don't have to. Bill Gates owns the Getty collection, doesn't he?

      --
      Transcript show: self sigs atRandom.
    25. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by DancesWithBulls · · Score: 1

      Great find dude! This is freakin hilarious....:^)

    26. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by obidonn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bill Gates owns Corbis. Getty Images is owned by Mark Getty and the Getty Foundation. They're in direct competition with each other, both in sales and acquisitions.

    27. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is awesome! Here is a fake article about a Mac user that purportedly switched to Windows, talking about its "advantages" over the Mac; yet, the picture was apparently processed on-- guess where-- a Mac. It doesn't get any more ironic than this! Oh, the hypocrisy. I love it.

    28. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Java+Pimp · · Score: 2

      "Royalty free" doesn't mean "free". You still have to purchase the image. The image shown in the link is a comping image for creating, well, comps to test whether a design idea works before actually purchasing the image.

      "Royalty-free pricing is based solely on the size of the product you need, not the specific use. You don't have to pay any additional fees on a use-by-use. Once you purchase a royalty-free product, you may use it multiple times for multiple projects without paying additional fees."...

      The actual purchased images come in larger sizes than the comping image, and without the watermark.


      Yes, you are correct. I probably spoke too soon.

      However, that still doesn't seem to be the case here. Pure speculation of course :-) but, it really looks like they copied the image and ran it through photoshop for about 5 minutes. All they really did was crop it and mirror it, maybe darken it a little, but that's about it. They didn't even change the size. If you mirror the original, it will overlay perfectly on MS's version.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    29. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably found her using Sherlock.

    30. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      if the philosophy didnt matter, then why advertise it?

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    31. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by jimbolaya · · Score: 2

      Even with a hunch...how ever did you find that out?

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    32. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly Bill Gates or Paul Allen own shares in Getty Images.
      Naturally, they M$ is bound help Getty out.

    33. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Phonemically, perhaps you're thinking of the Bettman Archives?

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    34. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by spoon42 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't surprise me at all.

      A while back I read something about Microsoft having used some shareware program to create the spinning e/earth logo for Internet Explorer. And said shareware tacked a big CREATED WITH UNPAID TRIAL VERSION OF FOOGIF3K message in the gif comment. Which stayed in releases of IE for quite a while. I'm guessing it stopped after a while, possibly after MS just bought the company. ;)

      Damn shame I can't find it now. (Try searching for "shareware gif ie logo" or so, and feel the pain. :p )

      Really, though, it's just the same old crap. Business as usual for Microsoft. Hell, they started out by selling someone else's software to IBM.

      --
      --- this comment is presented in WIDE SCREEN STEREO!!!
    35. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't use "gay" to mean "stupid." It doesn't.

      Users define the language.

    36. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great minds think alike.

      And so do yours...

    37. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Alystair · · Score: 1

      Why would Microsoft want to use something which is more defective then anything else around? It makes you think if they actually create their webpages in Frontpage...

    38. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It sure looked like a photographer took the picture, didn't it?

      As opposed to one of them new-fangled robot cameras? Pretty much all photos are taken by photographers... If you study it closely, you can even see a connection between the word "photograph" and the word "photographer".

    39. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by petesahooligan · · Score: 1

      Photodisc is based in the northwest, so there's a good chance of employee cross-pollination. More likely, Microsoft tends to go out-of-house for many of their graphic design needs. For example, for years Landor did their packaging while a smaller Seattle outfit called The Leonhardt Group did lots of the Microsoft Press materials. If available images weren't suitable for the design, these outfits could easily acquire images elsewhere that supported the message that they were hired to convey. Graphic designers rarely think that anyone besides graphic designers know how they do things. Asses, all.

    40. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by peatbakke · · Score: 2

      ... strange. Mr. Bill owns Corbis Images .. I'm surprised he's using Photodisc and Getty. Heh.

    41. Re:She's Also a Photodisc Model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Users define the language.

      Bullshit. In a geographically diverse culture, dialects do form. But there is a standard accepted language otherwise we wouldn't be able to communicate, CNN's new use of urban colloquialisms aside.

  58. OT: Tabbed IE by futuresheep · · Score: 2
    I've been usign this:

    CrazyBrowser

    Tabbed IE and a pop-up stopper. Sweet.

  59. Hardware vs. Software by m11533 · · Score: 1

    The problem as I see it is that the PC hardware platform is significantly less expensive. Thus, if the same software is available for both platforms short of the OS, this argument could actually appeal to businesses. That is not to buy into the Microsoft claims. It is simply the same argument as the Linux argument, short of the free OS... the hardware platform is a significant savings, so shouldn't we take advantage of that AND reduce the number of platforms we need to support?

    1. Re:Hardware vs. Software by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Although the hardware for the PC is less expensive, there are other costs to consider.

      Publishers purchase fonts. Publishers purchase specialize applications. Publishers purchase high quality printers which they then network to reduce costs. They purchase large monitors with high resolutions and good color rendering. They purchase file servers and implement backup systems so they don't lose their revenue stream in an outage.

      By the time you get down to buying the hardware, the high-OS-cost on the PC side coupled with the low-hardware-cost hardly makes the $1000 dollar difference of the high-hardware-cost Mac coupled with the low-OS-cost difference matter. Either way it's not going to make up for the costs of retraining employees, nor will it repay the lost productivity in a low margin industry.

  60. details by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1

    It isn't flamebait, it is the truth. Having internet explorer tied into the registry and all sorts of pieces of the os is terrible. If you can break IE, then you can crack into the system remotely, as a result of all the functionality tied into IE. First off, the shell system should be altertable like the linux window managing systems, not be built into the os. And what of the emulation layer? XP emulates many of the older systems itself, because otherwise stuff wouldn't run. XP is Windows 2k, filled in which 5000 hacks to run stuff that you shouldn't because it is a security risk and is liable to mess up your machine.

    1. Re:details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having internet explorer tied into the registry and all sorts of pieces of the os is terrible.

      I'd rather have it in a registry than dotted around in countless config files.

      If you can break IE, then you can crack into the system remotely

      As per sendmail, bind, etc. etc.

      First off, the shell system should be altertable like the linux window managing systems

      It is. Check your facts.
      Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\IniFileMapping\system.ini\boot\ shell

      XP emulates many of the older systems itself, because otherwise stuff wouldn't run.

      It has to. Most users aren't able to recompile their applications. That's what happens when you sell a commercial operating system.

      and is liable to mess up your machine.
      Any evidence, or just anecdote?

    2. Re:details by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1

      The shell can be changed? Oh really now? Yeah, if you have all the specs to create a shell, that CORRECTLY interfaces with the system... which you can probably get some of, but none of the ones that are actually useful...

      As if I care about Linux? Linux is a piece of junk too, I was just saying it is easier to configure. Personally I am writing my own operating system, replete with its own new mixed language script compiler... which is actually a topic in and of itself I won't get into here...

  61. Multiple Users Simultaneously by breadbot · · Score: 2, Informative
    Seriously, there is one XP feature that really itches my back right where I like it: multiple-users-logged-in-simultaneously. Does OS X also offer anything like it? Instead of logging my wife off our PC, I switch users (one keystroke: windows-L), click on my own login icon, type my password, and wait about five seconds for my desktop to come up, complete with an unclosed session -- usually something like emacs, PuTTY, WinCVS, Outlook, IE :p

    I know, of course that OS X allows multiple users, and its support for multimedia is much better, but does it allow them simultaneously?

    1. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by homb · · Score: 1

      No, OSX does not allow simultaneous users yet.
      That is, as you pointed out, a great feature of XP.

      Hopefully soon that will be a reality in OSX. This "bug" has been on the wishlist for some time now in the developer area of Apple, as well as the remote connectivity a la XWindows.

    2. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      I know, of course that OS X allows multiple users, and its support for multimedia is much better, but does it allow them simultaneously?

      Yes, but not the way you describe. Mac OS X, with its unix guts, allows for many folks to be logged in at one time... remotely. But only one person can be logged in at the graphical console at once. A quick check shows 4 (idle) folks ssh'ed into our Mac OS X server (an xServe running 10.2).

      That's one are where Microsoft has the Mac (and Linux/Unix) world beat. But it shouldn't be too hard to hack in a rough equivalant. Sucks a lot of ram, though... but I guess that can be paged, considering the session is pretty much frozen.

    3. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Definitely something I'd like to see on OSX, even though it doesn't affect me directly (I'm the only user on my box).

      I wonder if part of the problem is related to the fact that apps are handled differently between Windows and Macs. Under Windows, if you want another instance of a program you just double-click the exe or select it again from the Start menu.

      On the Mac, you have to duplicate the entire program file to launch a separate instance of the application. This isn't really a problem OSX since the program's specified memory doesn't have to be all allocated at launch, but it does raise the question of how multiple "higher level" Mac programs (as opposed to "lower level" unix programs like pine, bash, etc) would be handled under simultaneous GUI login sessions.

    4. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 1

      For Linux, I will occasionally start a new X server to login without logging somebody else out. Should be possible to do the same on OS X. Hard on the RAM, though.

    5. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by xtremex · · Score: 1

      Don't know much about XP, but how is that different from Linux? or typing su?

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    6. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      MS may have Apple beat (I don't know about OSX, never used it), but it certainly doesn't have Linux beat here. You can have multiple users logged in simultaneously from the console, each with a separate X session if you prefer, each on a separate virtual terminal. Switching between them is as simple as ctrl-alt-F1, F2, etc. (ctrl-alt-F7, F8 etc. for X sessions). Much faster than switching users in XP.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    7. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by mabinogi · · Score: 2

      Except that it arbitarily doesn't work if your computer is a member of a domain....you pay the extra money for Professional, so you can take advantage of the better networking, and you can't use the best feature of XP.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    8. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      in windows xp when you switch users any processes that the old user was running stop until you log back in as that user. it writes out a ram dump to the hard drive and loads that back in when you switch back to that user. it is not "true" simultaneous users.

    9. Re:Multiple Users Simultaneously by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      Well I have not seen the source codes for this part of the OS but AFAIK, when I start WinAMP and some downloading under my user and leave, and my roommate comes over to frag someone in Q3A, he bitches that he has to listen to the music and that the line is slow... Sounds like you are pulling our leg a bit ;]

  62. a freelance writer that can take a screenshot? by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    If this was written by a normal human who actually likes the product (ala the apple switch campaign) then my niece is a monkey.

    Does microsoft not realize that there is nothing higher than being "number 1!" why do they have to trash those that have 1-5% market share? People with whom they are partners or have been in the past. don't they ever get that things like this just make them look mean? There are some of us that actually do buy things based on whether or not we feel the people running the company are "good people". Microsoft stopped seeming to be "good people" decades ago.

    sorry. it just always bugs the crap out of me.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    1. Re:a freelance writer that can take a screenshot? by banky · · Score: 2

      >why do they have to trash those that have 1-5% market share?

      Because a 2% loss of marketshare can amount of millions of dollars of lost revenue. Remember that Microsoft is in the worst place to be: it is #1 and cannot afford to lose ground. A loss of 2-3% on the desktop to Apple, with a similar loss on the server side to Linux, would go a LONG way to showing that perhaps the IT world can exist without Bill.

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    2. Re:a freelance writer that can take a screenshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Image for second you are a popular incumbent politician and your opponent put out commercials of people who have personal situationaly gripes about you and support your oppenent. Would you or your PR just sit there and do nothing while your character is being impugned ??

      i dont think so.
      what bugs me is how Slashdot has become a site for biased news reporting... Apple has always made the OS choice into something religious. People giving their testimonies, this is just pure PR and personal points of view. Who cares what OS you use, will one make your life more perferct for couple grand more ? How we have MS bashing plus Apple devotion. Something not right about that.

  63. What I'd like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see all these users switch out of my line of sight and hearing. Who are these morons and what are they doing using a computer?

  64. hmm.. by greenskyx · · Score: 1

    Something here seems fishy... Maybe it is that this writer tells how she switched over to XP and then starts to write a full page technical manual complete with screenshots, downloadable files and tons of marketing jargon. Stop lying to us ... Two words for Microsoft : "Trustworthy Computing"

  65. I was blind but now I GUI! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Hey why's my screen all blue ...

  66. Apple started it, methinks by nugneant · · Score: 1

    There are advertisements running in several trade magazines that say something to the effect of, "I got tired of requiring an office full of people to help me keep my PC stable - so I bought a Mac" or "At home, I don't have a tech support department to keep my PC running. So I bought a Mac". Just who the hell is Apple trying to target with this ridiculous advertising? The coveted "60 year old" crowd? Somehow I doubt Grandpa will enjoy all the cutesy worthless shareware as much the Mac's current audience - 20-24 year olds desperate to look "cool" and "edgy" and "eXtreme" in between trips to the local coffeehouse, and 14-18 year old caucasian girls who squeal "kawaii" at anything Japanese - do.

  67. my name is by americanFatCat · · Score: 1

    they forgot the end...

    My name is Ficty Null, and I don't exist.

  68. Uhh... by scot4875 · · Score: 1

    Anyway, it's an entertaining read that's good for a laugh.

    And this is different from the Apple 'switch' ads ... how?

    --Jeremy

    --
    Jesus was a liberal
    1. Re:Uhh... by mabinogi · · Score: 2

      Because they haven't even attempted to make it look authentic.

      However, I'm not sure they meant to. It didn't look to me to be so much of a "switch" ad, as a tutorial with a pleasant face on it....

      Though even there it kind of failed...she mentions having to find the right drivers for your hardware, and the fact that she had to reinstall outlook.
      I find it scary that Microsoft don't see the problem with that.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  69. observation by GunFodder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't have any formal training in marketing besides having watched maybe 10000 hours of TV :) In many categories the market leader does not mention the competition. For instance, you don't see commercials where MacDonalds even mentions Burger King or their other competitors. Nike and Budweiser do the same thing. Up until now Microsoft has only compared their newest OS to previous versions of Windows.

    If I was an Apple user I would be encouraged by this bit of marketing. It implies that Microsoft is concerned about their image compared with Apple and is willing to violate this empirical rule.

    1. Re:observation by leroybrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, a burger king ad did explicitly mention mcdonalds in a commercial back in 1982 starring sarah michelle gellar. mcdonalds was so pissed that they sued not only burger king, but 5 year old sarah as well. now due to truth in advertising laws, she can only enter a mcdonalds in disguise.

      the imdb story

      --
      Founder, Americans Allied Against Alliteration
    2. Re:observation by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 2, Funny

      she can only enter a mcdonalds in disguise.

      What would that be, a fat suit?

      --
      Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    3. Re:observation by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

      Bullshit! It appears to me that MS is flopping about trying to explicitly name a company that they could claim is competing with them. The best they could come up with was Apple. Gimme a break! Apple are MS's bitches. Of course MS are thrilled with opinions like those expressed above: some people really are stupid enough to think that there is still real competition on the desktop, and it's people like that which will get the acquitted.

    4. Re:observation by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Burger King have had campaigns that explicitly mentioned MaccyDs.

      Two I remember are:
      a) x% more meat in a whopper than a big-mac.
      b) y% of people said they prefered whoppers to big macs.
      (dunno what x or y were tho' - not small IIRC)

      These were in the UK, both between 5 and 2 years ago (I remember where I was living, but not exactly when it was).

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    5. Re:observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't have any formal training in marketing besides having watched maybe 10000 hours of TV :)

      That only means you can be sold, not sell.

    6. Re:observation by alue · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not an interesting observation, but didn't you notice that the whole point of Apple's "Switch" campaign is to convince everybody that Macs are just easier to use / friendlier / more powerful / prettier / slicker / superior to pc's that run Windows?

    7. Re:observation by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is a classical no-no learned through hard experience. That experiences? Coke versus Pepsi. Pepsi wouldn't have stood a chance if coke wasn't so stupid as to run their "taste test" ads which mentioned Pepsi in every one of them. This is why Intel has never ever mentioned AMD by name in any of its advertisement.

  70. You know they are lying! by StarTux · · Score: 1

    "I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor."

    As soon as someone says that you know they are doing so with their fingers crossed behind their backs!

    StarTux

    1. Re:You know they are lying! by goon+america · · Score: 1

      "I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor." No, she's telling the truth. It just took 23 hours and 45 minutes. That's pretty good for a windows box.

  71. My lord! by aengblom · · Score: 2, Redundant
    "There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®."
    Except.. Microsoft Word (Mac), Microsoft Excel (Mac) and Microsoft PowerPoint (Mac)...

    It's not the blatant market-speak that gets me. It's that they tout non-existent points for stupid reasons, when there ARE legitimate positives to using XP over OS X. (There are the reverse too)
    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  72. Ahh... what gems by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    and keep my Web favorites.

    Later she says she switched from Netscape. Doesn't she mean 'bookmarks'?

    the process of switching was as easy as the marketing hype had promised.

    There's something so creepy about that statement withen the context of the peice that... oh I don't know.

    I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.

    I am too. But I can't see how a DVD player or oodles of ram have anything to do being a writer. If I wasn't also a computer geek, I'd probably find a mac to be much more accomidating a platform.

    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks)

    I went to my bookshelf to dust off some of the old floppies from the old //e days. My office suite was called appleworks back in mid 80s. Am I missing something here?

    you'll need to know your ISP's name (e.g., MSN®), of course! Not that anyone would need a different ISP. your user name (the part of your e-mail address before the @ symbol), Yes. Of course. Everyone always uses their ISP's e-mail service. Espically credible freelance writing Lexus renters.

    There are more... but boy, this really borders between silly and absurd.

    There are lots of good reasons to have Macs. There are lots of good reasons to have Windows. At least Apple does a good job in trying convince people to switch.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Ahh... what gems by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      I went to my bookshelf to dust off some of the old floppies from the old //e days. My office suite was called appleworks back in mid 80s. Am I missing something here?

      Apple brought Claris back in house, I think about a year and a half ago. The current suite is named AppleWorks As an aside, wasn't it still brackets for the ][e (vs //e)(. I think The Apple //c and Apple //gs are where the slashy stuff started. Hmm, maybe they can sue Slasshdot for trademark infringement?

  73. LOL, what a joke by dh003i · · Score: 2

    The only real advantage listed here was hardware options and the affordability of the hardware which XP can run on compared to that which OSX can run on.

    But all these features they listed are also in Mac OSX, and more. I'm a Debian GNU/Linux user myself, and all these features are in Debian GNU/Linux too; and it can run on much cheaper hardware with more functionality than WinXP.

    Office, Internet Explorer, e-mail are all in OSX. You can also get them in Linux using cross-over office. There are also equivalents in Linux just as functional, as well as equivalents in OSX that are just as functional.

    I'm someone who has used OSX, Debian GNU/Linux, and WinXP. I'll tell you right now that for every feature in XP, there's an equivalent feature in OSX. I can also tell you that all of these features were in OSX from the beginning, and were in previous versions of Apple's OS before MS ever had them. And these features have been in GNU/Linux since the beginning of GNU/Linux.

    So where exactly is the software benefit of XP over OSX? There isn't one. Except in games, but XP isn't great for games; for a windows gaming system, stick with Win98 or WinME (Win98 better because supports real-mode DOS). I have a minimal install of WinME on my computer for Descent 1 - 3 and Tomb Raider 1-6.

    And the hardware benefit. Yes, hardware for the PC is generally cheaper than Apple hardware, and it gives you the same functionality. But lets remember that GNU/Linux can make more of the same hardware than can any Windows OS. GNU/Linux distributions such as Debian and Slackware can still run on 486's; and they can run with acceptable performance with a WM (i.e., WindowMaker) on a much slower computer with less RAM than can XP.

    I realize that this is advertising and that a company never says anything bad about their products. However, these are outright lies, and just silly nonsense. It would be like Ford claiming that their Mustang (a decent car) is faster than a McLaren LM (which can go from 0 - 100 - 0 in ~11s, and can achieve top speeds of around 220mph). Such a claim would in short be pure bullshit.

  74. Look at "How to steps" and compare by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    They even basically ripped off Apple's How To Switch steps, basically just swaping the words "Mac" with "PC".

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  75. What a comparison! by Tinfoil · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one that finds it amusing that they didn't compare OfficeXP to OfficeX? Or IE 6 to IE5.x? Comparing OfficeXP to Appleworks is like comparing OfficeX to MS Works, totally apples to oranges. Both OfficeXP and X are comparably priced and neither come free with a laptop. Entourage kicks Outlook, as far as I am concerned too.

    1. Re:What a comparison! by EricWright · · Score: 2

      You should buy a Mac now, then... OfficeX is only $199 for now. Of course, if you do it right, you can get WordPerfect2k for free with a Windoze laptop, like my wife did. She was adamant about needing Office (cause she uses it at work), but after about an hour, she decided that WP2k did what she needed for much less money (read $0).

      If only I could have convinced her to get an iBook instead...

    2. Re:What a comparison! by Tinfoil · · Score: 2

      Actually, I am a recent switchee, but not so recent that I was exempt from spending 130 for Jaguar or a few hundred for Office X.

    3. Re:What a comparison! by EricWright · · Score: 2

      I'm in the same boat as you with the X.2, but I really don't need an Office suite... I can use that on my work PC. If I get really desparate, I'll buy a copy of VirtualPC/DOS, load it with old copies of win98 and office97... but I'll have to get *really* desparate!

  76. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't it Microsoft who recently was angry at Apple for not marketing OSX enough? Oh wait that was only suposed to be mentioned to the court.

  77. HW cost part rings true by verch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article as a whole is as funny as any of the mac switch parodies I've seen. A thousand times funnier actually because it's real. There is one point that I don't think you can argue with however. There are many more choices for hardware, and at the risk of making a sweeping generalization, PC hardware is cheaper. This is the only reason I haven't made the switch already. I can't afford to invest $2k right now for a decent mac system, plus however much to gather the suite of software that I rely on on my PC.

    PS. Someone should mention to the MS marketing dept that they also produce Office for OSX.

    1. Re:HW cost part rings true by clmensch · · Score: 1

      There's a concept called "Total Cost of Ownership" that goes beyond the initial outlay for the system. Macs have a much lower TCO in lost productivity time, frustration, etc.

      --
      There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
    2. Re:HW cost part rings true by verch · · Score: 2

      Yes and no. Although I don't doubt Macs are easier, I really think you have to be a moron not to be able to get a PC to work for you. I'm fine with my PC now, and the Mac would be to play, so for $2k, I can think of other toys.. Down the road when Ineed to upgrade my PC anyway, maybe a mac, but I suspect it will still be more expensive than upgrading or getting a whole new PC.

    3. Re:HW cost part rings true by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      Macs have a much lower TCO in lost productivity time, frustration, etc.

      Hear, hear. I'm a system integrator who specializes in Macs, and I've been happily (i.e., it feels fast enough to me) using the same Power Mac 7600 for the last 6 years. Three years ago I upgraded the CPU to a G3/400, and I've added RAM, and IDE and USB PCI cards over the years, but for such an old computer it still works fine and does everything I need it to do, which is quite a bit.

      I just bought a used G4/733, and I expect it to get several years out of it as well. My 7600 will eventually be listed on eBay, and will bring in significantly more money than a PC of the same vintage.

      Macs cost more up front, but their longevity beats that of PCs (remember Gateway's 'trade this in after 2 years' program?), and Macs have a much higher resale value-- don't believe me? Check eBay for PCs with late-1996 specs, and then look at what Power Mac 8600 and 9600 machines go for.

      I wouldn't be surprised at all if the "swap out the guts of my whitebox every 2 years" crowd actually ended up spending more over the life of their machine than your average Mac "power user."

      ~Philly

    4. Re:HW cost part rings true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...at the risk of making a sweeping generalization, PC hardware is cheaper.

      At the risk of being non-P.C., Hitler was a nice guy.

  78. No Name because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if she gave her name then all the Mac Zealots would email her like angry betrayed spouses.
    MS users don't care if MS users switch to whatever. Why would they ? Apple devotees are jealously dedicated to the point of nausea.

  79. Everyone has a price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There is no mystery here. This is clearly a plot by the evil empire to try and mess with your minds. Fortunatley, the legal drama that has been unfolding over the past couple of years has made the M$ legal department a little gun-shy. They have covered their collective asses with the following "editor's note"
    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!
    This campaign clearly has no integrity. Weather you like or dislike Apple, you have to applaude the willingness of the installed user base to step up and speak up. M$ didn't have the creativeness to invent a name for said freelance writer.
    She forgot to add "...and although the PC hardware is cheaper, Microsoft gave me all this new stuff for free, so it really was a no brainer.:). My soul doesn't cost that much..."

    ~~~~~~
    Move along, move along, nothing to see here.
  80. Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now for the How eh?

    Gimme a break. All of those detailed instructions on How? On an anonymouse post?

    Why would an anonymous post, post such detailed instructions?

    MS, I think you're scared.

    Gimme a break.

  81. tee hee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I switched to Windows! it makes my nipples perky! tee hee! buy me something!

  82. MOD PARENT UP PLEASE! by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    good job! you have a discerning eye i'm surpised they didn't use this woman, she shows up EVERYWHERE nowadays
    i bet MS never guessed someone would find the stock image they used, hehe, very funny

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She used to work there. I guess she might still, but there have been a lot of layoffs over the past year.

  83. Love the part about installing drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The switcher writes:

    The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware. Windows XP or your computer manufacturer will pre-install most of them. If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.

    This seems to defeat the entire purpose of the campaign.

    Anyone who knows what the heck she's talking about and can correctly find, download, and install drivers has good reason for being on the OS that they're on and will not fall for this homegrown "I'm happy switching" rhetoric.

    Everyone who can't do that -- 98+ percent, probably -- fall exactly into Apple's target market: people who know their computer went "bleep bleep bleep" and want to go somewhere where they won't HAVE to know how to find, download and install drivers.

    1. Re:Love the part about installing drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everyone who can't do that -- 98+ percent, probably -- fall exactly into Apple's target market..."

      Ah! So this explains why only 4% of the computer-using public is on a Mac!

      Ohwaitaminnit...

  84. No, it's her twin sister! by mekkab · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its odd and eerie, like they are twins who are 180 degrees different, almost a mirror image...

    Hey, Mekka, ever heard of the rotate tool?

    Oh, uhm, never mind.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:No, it's her twin sister! by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      But then she'd be umop apisdn (upside down).

  85. Bill Gates switch a while back.... by StarbuckZero · · Score: 1

    Look at this apple switch ad

    http://www.macboy.com/cartoons/switch/gates/inde x. html

    --
    From Zero to Hero... Starbuck Zero
  86. And Now for the How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a very detailed set of procedures that she kindly provided -- I wonder how many times she had to install the OS to get all that info straight?

  87. Microsoft Ad by terbor · · Score: 1

    I just think it's great that there was an ad for Microsoft Visual Studio .Net when I took a look at this Slashdot article. (Yes, Slashdot, not the MS page.)

  88. Funny, it lists one of the major headaches... by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MS Wrote: "The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware."


    I'd argue that it is not only the key, but the biggest headaches of Windows. Sadly, I have used a lot of Windows in my life (and Linux). Sp when my mom bough an iBook, it was a revelation. I mean, so many digital cameras functioning on it without ANY drivers? Amazing. Also, it seems that the drivers made for OSX is more stable in the long haul than the Windows drivers.

    1. Re:Funny, it lists one of the major headaches... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      I agree. That's one of the benefits of Linux over Windows. Instead of downloading drivers on Christmas day you can write them yourself!

      I think the drivers for OS X are more stable because OS X is fairly new. Windows drivers have to support a legacy-laden beast of an OS. Of course, I use XP at home and love it, but you get the point...

    2. Re:Funny, it lists one of the major headaches... by dbirchall · · Score: 2
      Adding new hardware without needing a driver disk isn't an experience unique to MacOS X - rather, needing the driver disk is an experience unique to Windows, as far as I can see.

      I've used Linux for several years and MacOS X for almost a year. With Linux, it was always just a matter of sticking in the hardware (PCMCIA network cards, modems, Compact Flash adaptors) and listening to the laptop beep a couple times. MacOS X has a pretty similar approach to whatever USB gizmos I've found for it.

      Windows, on the other hand, throws fits over anything more complex than swapping floppies (and sometimes over that, too). My Windows-using colleagues are doomed to an eternity of worrying about drivers.

  89. That's some freelance writer by starforce_chipster · · Score: 1
    That freelance writer seems to know a lot about networking....I don't think many PC users understand how to get past the Licensing Agreement window that pops up.

    Hey, if you look at the botton line of the site, it says:

    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully
    • converted
    our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    Gee...is this same writer going to give us the breakdown of wireless networking also??!!
  90. Didn't sony try this already? by cetan · · Score: 1

    So the case is not exactly similar, but remember when Sony invented a film critic. They were dumb enough to say the person worked for a real paper but when caught they got quite the lashing over it (you remember all the congressional investigations right? oh, you don't? me neither...)

    Why can't marketing people do something better with their lives like help save real people or act as paving material or something...

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  91. her husband has 6 feet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like a Lexus we rented once; when you pushed a button, the driver's seat and mirrors all moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet.

    Would a freelance writer write something ambiguous like this? Probably not.

    Would someone in marketing? Of course.

  92. I love Office XP too! by Blacklotuz · · Score: 1

    AppleWorks DOES pale in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. I wouldn't know how to function without that wonderfully useful animated paperclip! *It looks like you are writing a resume, would you like to run the resume wizard?* No, wait! Im not writing a resume! Im posting on slashdot! Go Away!! Ahhh!! kghklarj thgos34289n

    1. Re:I love Office XP too! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      Of course, the Microsoft campaign conveniently ignores the fact that on a Mac, if you don't like Appleworks, you can always buy Microsoft Office v.X, which I've heard is rather spiffy. TeXShop is even better... If you don't like Netscape, you can always run Omniweb, or even Microsoft Internet Explorer.

  93. my favorite piece of irony... by JoeGrind · · Score: 1

    While no one can argue that PC hardware is cheaper than Apple, the discussion of the marvel of MS Office is quite amusing. The seem to have overlooked that MS has made OSX it's flagship platform for Office. That means that everything gets developed for the mac first.

  94. does not sound real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QUOTE The first time I turned on my PC, Windows XP prompted me to set up User Accounts. I set up one for me and one for my husband. I love that we can define completely different user experiences without messing with each other's settings. It's like a Lexus we rented once; when you pushed a button, the driver's seat and mirrors all moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet. UNQUOTE

    I am not sure why but this sounds like some spam
    I got once (or twice) - real phony sounding.

  95. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is still not nearly as amusing as watching the ridiculous Apple commercials.

  96. Oh, I'm gonna have fun with this one. by JoshWurzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Qualifiers: I switched to mac 3 years ago. Things have changed on both sides.

    "Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility"

    -Yes, as long as your choices are Microsoft for your browser, email client, media player, and office suite. Any color as long as its white. Granted, you do have a much larger selection of peripherals to work with. The software choices I find lacking.

    "I can read my files, import e-mail addresses from my Palm* to the Microsoft Outlook® messaging and collaboration client, and keep my Web favorites"

    -Which one of these was she having trouble with on her mac?

    "I was up and running in less than one day"

    -Bah! I was up and running in 12 minutes after a quick SCSI connection to my friend's powerbook (I admit it, I wanted M$ office 8-))

    "I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing"

    -Obviously not. Nothing beats a sexy, ridiculously expensive titanium powerbook.

    "My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook"

    - I'm very curious to see exactly which model this was and compare it on a spec by spec basis. Did it have firewire? Video out? Video mirroring/extended desktop? Does it weigh less than 5 pounds? Does it get 5 hours of battery life? (all of these features apply to my iBook, btw).

    "AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP"

    -Gee, 90% of the features for 20% of the price...seem like a fair trade to anyone else?

    "There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®"

    -You mean like...Microsoft Office v.X, which is widely touted (even by the MacBU) as more feature/rich and less buggy than Office XP?

    "I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word"

    -I'd recommend the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. v.X.

    "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did"

    -Did you try any of the other 5 popular browsers for Mac? Like IE 5.2, perhaps?

    "Searches are faster"

    -This I can't attack. Everyone with XP I know swears that their connection is magically faster.

    " I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want"

    -I can't do that!? I'd better tell myself that I've been delusional the past 3 years.

    "I love that we can define completely different user experiences without messing with each other's settings"

    - Two Words: OS X

    "moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet"

    -This just sounds dirty.

    "New Connection Wizard then guided me through the setup of my Internet connection for browsing the Web"

    - You mean like the setup at the beginning of the Mac OS X install? Or the internet connection assistant in the Utilities folder?

    "I started with Outlook Express for e-mail, because it's included with Windows XP"

    -Yeah, those bastards at Apple only ship three email clients with their machines (Netscape, Mail, Outlook). And what happened to choice/flexibility?

    "The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers"

    -That's funny, over here the key to getting hardware to work with my computer is making sure it has a little blue X on the box it ships in and plugging into the correct port.

    1. Re:Oh, I'm gonna have fun with this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qualifiers: I switched to mac 3 years ago. Things have changed on both sides.

      "Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility"

      -Yes, as long as your choices are Microsoft for your browser, email client, media player, and office suite. Any color as long as its white. Granted, you do have a much larger selection of peripherals to work with. The software choices I find lacking.
      --NO. Choices include shareware ,freeware,etc from non MS sources. This would exceed any and all apple shareware freeware.

      "I can read my files, import e-mail addresses from my Palm* to the Microsoft Outlook® messaging and collaboration client, and keep my Web favorites"

      -Which one of these was she having trouble with on her mac?
      --She wasnt having trouble with it. She's describing the transitioning process. In other words how she got her stuff from her old computer to her new one.

      "I was up and running in less than one day"

      -Bah! I was up and running in 12 minutes after a quick SCSI connection to my friend's powerbook (I admit it, I wanted M$ office 8-))
      --Talking about 2 different thigns here. We have no idea what your "up and running" entails.

      "I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing"

      -Obviously not. Nothing beats a sexy, ridiculously expensive titanium powerbook.
      --Personal Opinion from both of you. Unless if she means to quantify it by including facts of wireless broadband services (or having the choice for such services within her respective residence which i doubt your powerbook has limited choices and functionality between all contemporary or legacy wireless broadband offerings).

      "My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook"

      - I'm very curious to see exactly which model this was and compare it on a spec by spec basis. Did it have firewire? Video out? Video mirroring/extended desktop? Does it weigh less than 5 pounds? Does it get 5 hours of battery life? (all of these features apply to my iBook, btw).
      -- Have you or do you purchase an equivalent PC laptop with firewire / video out etc. We do. We have a sony laptop and I've had dell laptops, that have lasted all day on battery. I've had no issues with these points on a PC laptop.

      "AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP"

      -Gee, 90% of the features for 20% of the price...seem like a fair trade to anyone else?
      -- It's difficult to respond to this because there are different versions of office XP ranging in values and features. You are wrong on this but because you choose to be ambiguous to spread your personal MS hatred, you cant see your blindness.

      "There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®"

      -You mean like...Microsoft Office v.X, which is widely touted (even by the MacBU) as more feature/rich and less buggy than Office XP?
      --blah blah blah

      "I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word"

      -I'd recommend the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. v.X.
      --i had enough of responding to these pointless points.

      "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did"

      -Did you try any of the other 5 popular browsers for Mac? Like IE 5.2, perhaps?

      "Searches are faster"

      -This I can't attack. Everyone with XP I know swears that their connection is magically faster.

      " I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want"

      -I can't do that!? I'd better tell myself that I've been delusional the past 3 years.

      "I love that we can define completely different user experiences without messing with each other's settings"

      - Two Words: OS X
      -- Two more words: So what?

      "moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet"

      -This just sounds dirty.

      "New Connection Wizard then guided me through the setup of my Internet connection for browsing the Web"

      - You mean like the setup at the beginning of the Mac OS X install? Or the internet connection assistant in the Utilities folder?

      "I started with Outlook Express for e-mail, because it's included with Windows XP"

      -Yeah, those bastards at Apple only ship three email clients with their machines (Netscape, Mail, Outlook). And what happened to choice/flexibility?

      "The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers"

      -That's funny, over here the key to getting hardware to work with my computer is making sure it has a little blue X on the box it ships in and plugging into the correct port

  97. Tony Hawk and that Surfer guy who screwed Pamela.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anderson are in Apple ads. They at least are real. Two of the kids (stoner girl and some kid with a disturbingly deep voice) were at the Macworld keynote audience. So I figure they are real too. As for the rest I don't know.

  98. Mac hardware? by cschmidt · · Score: 1

    All the Mac hardware--including my printer, broadband cable, Zip drive, and Palm handheld--works perfectly with my Windows-based PC

    Since when is a Palm handheld Mac hardware?

    --

    Who am I to blow against the wind? -- Paul Simon
    1. Re:Mac hardware? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      "Since when is a Palm handheld Mac hardware?"

      That's pretty much the point. Once you get past the CPU and MB, there really is no such thing as "Mac hardware", its the exact same hardware you use on a PC (drives, scanners, printers, cameras...).

  99. Haw Haw Haw! by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
    Here's some more comedy -- I'm willing to bet that this embarassing display of marketing prowess will prove to be exponentially more valuable and successful than the "ridicule you until you join us" Linux rallying cry.

    How do you think Microsoft has maintained such a complete stranglehold on desktop computing? They spew what people want to hear, while the Linux camp keeps on embarassing itself. Laugh all you want, but also try to learn something.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  100. mac users should pay some respect.... :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs has a lot to thank Microsoft for. After all, if it weren't for Gates helping Apple get out of a financial black hole not one of you MAC hugging people would have a MAC to comfort you at night when your tired of playing your modded quake games. :-)

  101. On her career by Bouncings · · Score: 5, Funny
    No, she clearly is a free-lance writer.
    • Windows XP gives me more choices and
    • flexibility, and better compatibility with the rest of the technology world.

      ...

      I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.

      There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work.
    Mobile computing? Versatility? I could swear she was the free-lance writer who wrote the mission statements of a dozen busted dot-coms. No wonder she's looking for cheaper hardware!

    I wonder if the switch helps her utilize her verticle portals too!

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    1. Re:On her career by Xformer · · Score: 1

      I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing.
      Well, she isn't going to get THAT with something as bloated as XP.

      Did anyone happen to notice the "fine print" at the bottom of the page? The words "our writer" should be cause for some suspicion. If they didn't hire her in the first place, then I guess they own her (cute) arse now.
      --
      All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  102. Reality by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reality is there really are many Mac users who would happily appear on TV and say the same things. I know I'm one...

    Don't you think there are people as similarily pleased with Linux that would appear in ads if given half a chance? Is it so hard to believe these people could be real?

    I think there would even be such a group that would happily go up and proclaim the wonders of MS, why MS has chosen to craft a person instead is beyond me. I guess it's the need for total control.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Reality by vex24 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you think there are people as similarily pleased with Linux that would appear in ads if given half a chance?

      Would seeing CowboyNeal on your tv make you want to switch?

      --

      People shape laws. Not the other way around.

    2. Re:Reality by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Switch channels, yes.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    3. Re:Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you Funny but I posted the parent. :)

  103. Drivers by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2

    From the article:

    The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware. Windows XP or your computer manufacturer will pre-install most of them. If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.

    Wow, switching to Windows XP must be so much fun! You get to spend all that time hunting for drivers!

  104. STEP 4 : by painehope · · Score: 1

    bend over and prepare for the script-kiddie-and-virus gang bang that is about to happen...

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  105. WARNING: spurious reasoning ahead!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "More hardware options for less dough?"!!!

    Doesn't MicroSoft know that Mac OS X is based on BSD? !!! Hell, there aren't many things that BSD doesn't run on! Hell, my router runs BSD! Hence, I can run Mac OS X on my 386lx that I scrounged from the company's dumpster!

    Those people at MicroSoft should get out more often and see what other people have been doing. I suspect they haven't done so since 1984!

  106. Tony Hawk is a real person by SethJohnson · · Score: 2




    I know for true dat Tony Hawk is real. So is DJ Qbert. I don't know those other people, though.

    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    Isn't this a little big-brother-ish as well? If not cultish. It's like they took this perfectly happy party-girl and said, "No you must wear your church clothes on Sunday and kneel." This line is gloating over having crushed her independence.
    1. Re:Tony Hawk is a real person by alphaseven · · Score: 2
      Funny, I thought for a second you were referring to my Tony Hawk is a real person post. (And I just noticed I misspelled "person" in the original post.)

      Sadly there are still people who think Tony Hawk is a virtual video game character.

  107. Snippet from Revision 1... by iphayd · · Score: 1



    It's like a Lexus we rented once; when you pushed a button, the driver's seat and mirrors all moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches (with a 38DD by the way) instead of his 6 feet.

  108. MOD PARTENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (+1, Insightful)

  109. another warezing of mac by microsoft by pmineiro · · Score: 1

    geez peets. its not enough that they stole every innovation mac made in their product ... now they have to steal their marketing too?

    -- p

  110. Writer? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Yes, it's true. I like the Microsoft® Windows® XP operating system enough to change my whole computing world around."

    She's a freelance writer who begins her "story" by ending a sentence with a preposition. I wonder if she writes for anyone other than M$?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Writer? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

      She's a freelance writer, she never mentioned if she has ever been published. In fact, she probably doesn't make enought money to afford the mac :)

    2. Re:Writer? by glenebob · · Score: 2

      Read any good books lately? They're full of naughty little pieces of bad grammar. It's what your english teacher forgot to tell you: Perfect grammer is boring!

    3. Re:Writer? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      That's not a preposition. It's a particle.

      There is a difference.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    4. Re:Writer? by qengho · · Score: 2

      begins her "story" by ending a sentence with a preposition

      This is the sort of English up with which I will not put. --Winston Churchill

    5. Re:Writer? by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put. --Winston Churchill"

      This is the sort of Galactic Standard put up with which I will not. --Yoda

  111. They'd be embarassed? by sfeinstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised by all the "Company Blah has been doing this for years" messages. I could have sworn that the slashdot crowd was savy to Microsoft's techniques and strengths as well as weaknesses by now.

    Far from being shamed by having someone point out to MS that "someone else did it first", they'd be very proud. And rightfully so! The "embrace and extend" business strategy is pure genius and they have executed on it to a T. They have no need to innovate...their entire model is based on version 3 crushing the competition.

    Even if you don't like MS you have to grant them a significant strength in that area. Also, it leads to some good (if not original) software!

    Millions of people wouldn't use Windows and Office if they sucked. It just wouldn't make any sense. Entire industries have MS software as their foundation of doing business...to the same degree has using phones and copiers!

    The irony here is that they can even "embrace and extend" the marketing campaigns of their competitors! Brilliance.

    I'm amazed. MS will be here long after the cockroaches.

    -SF

    --
    "Whether or not you believe me, I'm right" -RWF
  112. She's right...but that's only half the story by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the fact she's a stock photo model, everything she said is true.

    Of course, she's certainly referring to MacOS 9, which lived way beyond its prime. If you pit Mac OS 9, Claris Works, and NN against Windows XP, Office XP, and IE, of course XP is going to win.

    On the other hand, if you compare the XP configuration to OS X, Office v. X, and IE it's going to be very close. XP has more apps and open hardware, OS X has that Unix core. Either way, if it helps you get your work done then it's the right solution.

  113. Wait wait wait! by deadhammer · · Score: 1
    Millions of dollars in advertising cashola, and we get "It's about more and better..."

    BWAHAHAHAHA!

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  114. Entertaining??? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ``Anyway, it's an entertaining read that's good for a laugh.''
    You think this is fun? This is FUD. Lies. Crap. Misinformation. Cheating. BAD BAD BAD.

    I mean, advertising is one thing. Advertising the things you stole from others is quite another. XP is more multiuser than OS X? You'll make me laugh. Office XP has more features then Claris? Yes, it's called bloat and decreases usability. Besides, office runs on Mac, too.

    MicroSoft Internet Exploiter faster does more for her than Netscape ever did? Yeah, popping up ads, loading up the borked MSN ActiveX control, loading Word documents inline so that people get the idea that they are a replacement for webpages. Searches go faster? Maybe if you are looking for the crap that M$ search comes up with...give me Google any day! And it's not like Netscape doesn't have history, either.

    Connection Wizard - yes an old pal of mine. It's always the first program I removed. Not that removing is easy, you have to actually delete the directory it's in, or iexplore.exe will run it for you. WTF? I asked for _Internet Explorer_ not _Connection Wizard_. Why I get rid of it? Because setting up access to any provider I've used is easier without it, and because sometimes I just want to satrt a browser, without having to click away a bunch ow wizards first.

    `` I started with Outlook Express for e-mail, because it's included with Windows XP.'' Here we have the fatal flaw that got us all those lovely email virii. I understand that the vulnerabilities have *finally* been fixed in the XP version, but God, did that take a long time.

    ``I copied hundreds of Web Favorites from the Mac onto a Zip disk, then into the Favorites folder on the PC. Internet Explorer has an Import/Export Wizard that you can use to import Netscape bookmarks, but I found it faster to do it this way.''
    ROFL. Copied them to a Zip disk? Hilarious. It's called Linux. It can mount _your_ filesystem. You don't even have to buy a new computer to run it! And the OS is Free, as is most of the software you will want to use!

    ``Both Outlook Express and Outlook will import contacts and messages from other programs.''
    Yes, and I trust that M$ have taken care that they are then saved in a proprietary format so that others can't pull the same trick on them...

    ``Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook''
    Yes, welcome to Windows...

    ``The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers''
    Indeed. And M$ have been so good as to make the XP driver interface incompatible with previous versions of Windows, so that if you install it on older hardware, you may not be able to get drivers for your components. A problem that Macs don't seem to have, but I might be rong.

    ``If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.''
    And download a 10+ MB file from their site that loads a lot of visual violence, advertisements, bells and whistles, and then tells me that I downloaded the wrong driver, even though the name of my device is almost exactly like the one the driver is for? Or worse, not being able to find out where to go for the driver, because all Windows has to say about it is ``PCI Multimedia Device''? Where is lspci -vv when you need it??

    Pfff...it's been a while since I've been able to blow off so much steam...

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Entertaining??? by BollocksToThis · · Score: 1

      As an alternative to the much-overused 'Internet Exploiter' pseudonym, I propose we grow up and use it's given name.

      MS AIIEEEE

      I was never all that fond of growing up.

      --
      This sig is part of your complete breakfast.
  115. Godfather Bill by Mignon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Scene 1: Godfather Bill is sitting with his trusted goons.

    Godfather Bill: What's this I hear about one of our freelance writers using a Mac? Make her an offer she can't refuse.

    Scene 2: Anonymous writer's bedroom.

    (The anonymous writer tosses and turns in bed, and rolls over, waking up. She notices something in the bed next to her and pulls back the sheet to reveal the severed LCD screen from her beloved iMac.)

    Anonymous Writer: Aaaaah! Aaaaaah! OK, I'll switch!

    1. Re:Godfather Bill by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to play the classic soundtrack in your head and match the brilliant camera work that was in the original as you imagine the parent post. (I believe the Simpson's episode where Lisa gets a pony (as opposed to Bart getting the pony.... jeeze, the show HAS been on too long, hasn't it?) lampoons that scene.)

  116. MS should of said.... by ToasterTester · · Score: 2

    Time to grow up and stop using a computer with training wheels. Mac, oh I'll do that for you, and I'll do that too, and that. You never have to think. You can think differently. But I know what I'm doing. Mac, no I do it for you dam it! I'M A GOD MAC AND I IT FOR YOU WHETHER YOU LIKE OR NOT!!!!

    Just check OS X. Oh I now have a /etc, oh boy. Buzzzz!! Those files except one file is for looks only, the OS is only one who can modify them. But I will let you edit /etc/hosts, aren't I nice to you.

  117. A freelance writer needs all that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, I thought they just needed an Apple ][ with a text editor.

  118. funny by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    look at the part about the palm at the bottom

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  119. Hillarious...... by sharph · · Score: 1

    I wonder when they will make something like "why I switched from Linux to FreeBSD." (or vice versa if that suits you... I'm a linux person.)

  120. 6 feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like this woman has bigger problems: her husband has 6 feet!

  121. lmfao by sub_pop_culture · · Score: 1

    indeed, i'm sitting in my databases class right now, and we're learning how to make asp pages with micro$oft visual studio interdev. check out this awesome language in action! http://bizlab.scu.edu/dupont/ aren't my asp pages bad-ass! but lmfao indeed. i can't even begin to critique this...

  122. Mac Switchers... by tsmit · · Score: 2

    I actually know two of the switchers, and, can verify, they are in fact real. They tell me they got no money from apple, aside from lunch and publicity.

    I also know, that of the two i know, both of them do have Macs, but one of them also has a PC running windows.

    --
    Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
  123. One legitimate point... by numbski · · Score: 0

    One feature that Windows XP has that OS X 10.2 does not is the way it sets up terminal sessions for logins. I'm not sure if I'm saying that right...rather than having a single console session when you log in, you can "Switch Users" and get a second console for the other user, while leaving your users logged in and programs running.

    Sort of like typing screen in unix, but doing it for the GUI, and with a different userid.

    I really wish Apple would pick up on that one. OSX is still better though. :P

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  124. Reasons to switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The two reasons they give for Windows over Mac is Office and Internet Explorer. Ummm, maybe I'm missing something but both of those are avalible for the Mac as well.

  125. Windows is the best solution for many. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate Microsoft and I haven't liked any of their OS's yet. I own a Mac Powerbook and I love it. I run Linux on my desktop at home. But the bottom line is that there is an enormous crowd of people who want to use a PC and all they give a crap about is that it looks the same as the one they have at work.

    My parents recently bought a new PC. I encouraged them to at least look into a Mac, but my dad refused. He's an accountant! He's got to be able to do stuff with work. I explained that he could easily with a Mac but he has a very valid point: when something doesn't work, he can't call his IT guys and ask about it because they won't know. He doesn't have the time or inclination to learn a new OS. Neither does my mother, it took her 3 years to learn Windows 98.

    So they got a new PC with Windows XP and it's mostly the same and they're getting used to it. The MAJORITY of PC users are NOT JUST LIKE YOU. They don't give a flying shit about your personal crusade against the Evil Empire, about the open source movement, or about whether or not MS is capturing a market share with sketchville business tactics. My dad's a really smart guy but when he sits down at his computer, he wants to do what he has to do with it, and not fuck around with it.

    I don't care how much "better" Linux has gotten, he'd NEVER be able to figure out how to do the kind of stuff he needs to do. The Mac would be better, but then he has to learn how to use his Windows PC at work, his Windows laptop that company gave him, and then a Mac at home. He doesn't want to do that. He wants to read stock quotes, check email, and look at the score for the Rams game.

    Most people are like this. Windows is their best choice right now. Maybe it got there by seedy marketing techniques, but tough titties. Most people pick their products based on what is the most economical product for them. You people with your lips wrapped constantly around Torvald's schlong need to figure out that the world outside of your isolted window of reality is full of very intelligence people who don't give a shit about computers.

    A line from High Fidelity comes to mind here. You guys are snobs. You feel like the unappreciated scholars so you shit on the people who know less than you. Which is everybody. It's just sad, that's all...

  126. Fake as fake gets by bobbv · · Score: 1

    And, in fact, the sensitive photo of the unnamed freelance writer is a stock photo. Specifically, it's photo number 120084 from the Getty Images collection.

  127. Why Apple is like Communism! by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Flame note, this is intended to be humor. I haven't gotten a chance to play with OS X, but it looks pretty cool.

    Top 10 reasons Apple is a bit like Communism

    10) Lots of cool intellectuals and artsy types seem to like it.

    9) Fun to stick it to "Evil Abusive Capitalistic Monopolies".

    8) Ton of zealots constantly proclaiming the beauty of the new revolution.

    7) Everything seems to work together easily. However, you have to give up some choice.

    6) Stores on the other side always seem better stocked and have better selections.

    5) Goal is to make life as easy and fair as possible.

    4) Hides much of the inner workings of the system so the people don't have to worry about them.

    3) Although they do not admit it, most of their competitors have used at least some of their ideas.

    2) While it looks like they were beaten in the 80's, may just be making a comeback.

    1) Given history of past practices for the "greater good", scared to death of what the world would look like if they actually took over.

  128. Importing Files from your mac by LucianTheMad · · Score: 1

    "To copy Web Favorites: 1. Connect the Zip drive to your Macintosh, and insert a Zip disk with plenty of room." They forgot to mention that it has to be a PC formatted zip disk, which many mac users might not have, because PC's can't read them unless their PC formatted. Silly Free-lance Writer Person!

  129. "A Dog Year" ruined my life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2002 OSDN. "

  130. It's not aimed at Mac users by aengblom · · Score: 2

    [Since there are already so many comments, probably no one will read this, but...]

    This article is in the wrong section. This is obviously not aimed at Mac users, because they know better. It's aimed at low-knowledge Windows users who hear about all their friends "switching." It's so windows users (many of *us* who have bought windows because "everyone else does" for years), don't start thinking there is another "legitamate" platform

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:It's not aimed at Mac users by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

      hey, I read it. ^_^
      And that is a good idea, who else would dig so deep into M$ website? Probably looking for drivers...

  131. Problem for M$ and Apple... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

    Assuming that both the Apple campaign to switch (here) and the microsoft campaign to switch (here)
    target the same people are are equally effective, won't this create an infinite loop amoung their customers?

    Person1: I just switched to Apple because my PC kept crashing.
    Person2: I just switched to Windows because it's flexible and easy.
    Person1: I just switched to Windows because it's flexible and easy.
    Person2: I just switched to Apple because my PC kept crashing.
    Person1: I just switched to Apple because my PC kept crashing!!
    Person2: I just switched to Windows because it's flexible and easy!!
    ...

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  132. OH MY GOD this is funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And it's funny on so many levels...

    First, look at this

    http://cache.gettyimages.com/thumb/AA046139.GIF? x= x&a=AA046139&b=PDI&t=1

    A stock photograph from Getty images, whe I used to work. Getty images is a chief rival of Corbis, which is owned my Bill Gates. This tell us many things, among them...

    1. The 'Writer' is indeed a marketing fake.
    2. They didn't even use an image from thier own collection.

    no thanks, MS, I'm just fine thanks...
    jason wiley

    1. Re:OH MY GOD this is funny... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      Maybe it was easier to crop out the watermark from Getty. They sure don't want to mess with Corbis (and risk a BSA audit)! Then again, maybe Getty just has better-looking women.

    2. Re:OH MY GOD this is funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they paid for the image, but I can't believe they didn't know what a bunch of Mac geeks we were at Getty! I knew that was a PhotoDisc image the second I saw it.

      P.S., if anyone doubts the authenticity of Apple's 'Switch' people, I have verified at least one of them is real...

  133. Not first fictional person to support Microsoft by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    Well. This is certainly not the first time Microsoft resorts to dubious marketing. Last time, it was signatures of deceased people, this time around, it's fake witness testimonial with a flipped image from a clipart gallery. Sadly, this is so usual it's hardly newsworthy anymore.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  134. Fake by bytesmythe · · Score: 2
    There is no way this is real. One phrase gives it away:

    the Microsoft Outlook® messaging and collaboration client

    collaboration client?? Who in the hell calls it that? This is marketroid speak, pure and simple.
    There's more idiocy:

    I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word.

    You need to run Windows XP to get this functionality?

    Anyway, for the record, I hadn't ever used OS X until last week. I loved it. The graphics on the GUI are gorgeous and crystal clear. Besides, I've known lots of hardcore Mac users. Every single last one of them would gladly part with an extra few hundred dollars (or more!) to keep using a Mac.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  135. Cheese by yanbusa · · Score: 1

    This is absolute cheese; Microsoft is becoming more and more Disney everyday.

    --
    What's in a sig?
  136. It's not capitalism, it's promotion by sg3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work in marketing too, and I think it is newsworthy because it shows that Apple's campaign is a success.

    Since one can't generally can't make a correlation between an advertising campaign and increased sales (too much of a lag and too many factors), there are a few milestones for promotions that indicate success:

    1. A coined term being adopted by the industry. In this case, "Switcher" is being used in all sorts of contexts, albeit in articles talking about Apple. But if someone in the computer industry uses the term "Switcher", most people in the know will think "Apple". I guarantee you someone in Intel's marketing department grins whenever an analyst talks soberly about "Moore's Law".

    2. Grass roots movement/fan clubs: Exhibit A is Ellen Feiss. I doubt if anybody outside of Dell' marketing department builds fan sites for that annoying geek they're using

    3. The competition is forced to respond to you. Pepsi constantly mentions Coke, but Coke never mentions Pepsi. But Pepsi's marketing department would love to see that happen. If anything, it's free advertising, because your product is being mentioned without you having to pay for it.

    4. Finally, some sort of parody exists. I've seen a few on the web, but Apple would hit pay dirt if Saturday Night Live or someone painfully mainstream would do a parody. That would show that Apple's Switchers campaign has become a small zeitgeist, like the Mastercard "Priceless" ads.

    The Microsoft ad was so bad because it was so easily dismissed. All the talking points could be dismissed just as easily as they are brought up. Make no mistake, someone in Apple's promotions department saw that pathetic Microsoft ad and grinned from ear to ear.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by sg3000 · · Score: 2

      whoops:

      > if Saturday Night Live or someone painfully
      > mainstream would do a parody

      That is, someone *else* painfully mainstream. Note you don't get points if the parody is done by someone hip, but relatively obscure. Thus, Jon Stewart can make a joke with the word "jingoism", so he doesn't count. Leno, Letterman, et al do count.

      Thus, in terms of creating a "buzz", a successful marketing promoter is indistinguishable from a troll: it doesn't matter what people are saying, as long as they're talking about you.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    2. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With regards to #4.

      Apparently you've never seen the "I'm Will Farrel and I'm a porn star" switch ad...

    3. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      the Will Farrell SNL ad can be found here.

    4. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by MamasGun · · Score: 0
      I doubt if anybody outside of Dell' marketing department builds fan sites for that annoying geek they're using

      Forget that annoying geek...I want to see a fan site for Ned, the annoying geek in the Ditech commercials.

      "You won't call Ditech too, will you?" -- Ned to his Teddy Bear

      --
      "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
      -- Jack Valenti
    5. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the Will Farrel ad has never appeared on TV. It was made by Apple to show exclusively at MacWorld. So, its self-parody and doesn't really say anything about the influence of their commercials. Still funny as hell though...

    6. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by slantyyz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you prove that Apple's campaign is a success?

      There are multiple facets to success in advertising, and ultimately it comes down to Apple's marketing goals (which nobody here is talking about). If the goal is awareness and to win awards, then yes, their campaign is arguably successful.

      A lot of advertising is about reducing cognitive dissonance-- i.e., making existing customers feel better about their purchase. I think that's what the Switch campaign is all about -- and they're probably successful here.

      But the name of the campaign is "Switch", so perhaps the true acid test should be about conversion of Windows users to Mac users, can it be declared a success? I wonder how much they spend per conversion (formula: total ad dollars divided by total converts attributing switch to the campaign).

      Seeing newer, faster x86 hardware with more available software and cheaper expansion options being released monthly for the x86 platform is bound to make a few people jealous. A typical Mac user's response is "Well, Apple's new chip at the end of next year is going to kick your PC's ass!" Duh. As a former Mac user, saying that never made me feel much better about waiting 3 quarters for a faster chip that came in a machine that I couldn't afford to switch to. I upgrade my x86 hardware every year for a fraction of what Mac upgrades used to cost me.

      With the progress that the Linux world has made in usability, I just happily "switched" my notebook from Win2K to Red Hat 8. I don't know how much longer OSX users can brag about their switch campaign, because guess what? My switching cost to the Mac platform would cost me $3000 more because I have to buy new hardware. Switching to Red Hat cost me nothing but a few hours of download and installation time.

    7. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Perhaps the Apple ads are intended to increase cognitive dissonance--make people feel more uncomfortable about using Windows, thus driving them to make the "Switch" for peace of mind.

      This would actually be more compatible with my own experience of advertising: that it's intended to make you more and more unhappy, until you give in and buy product foo just so you can sleep at night.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    8. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      Creating cognitive dissonance is an interesting perspective on the Switch advertisments, but I've encountered more Mac users who experienced cognitive dissonance (myself included) than Windoze users.

      Granted, the Mac does things well and easily, but it's hard to beat the jealosy of seeing your PC friends being able to buy the latest 3D card or gadget/peripheral whenever they want, inexpensively. While Mac support is much better than it used to be, it will never be up there with Windows.

      In fact, I know people who are happier with their Windows PCs after switching from Mac (not just myself either). The main reason is the higher availability of the software and hardware they want to play with. They'll never switch back to Mac. [On a personal note, I'd consider using OSX if it ran on x86 hardware, but I will never buy proprietary Apple hardware ever again.]

      I don't know many Windows users who are jealous of Mac owners for anything other than having nice looking systems, much less anyone who loses sleep over it.

    9. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by sg3000 · · Score: 2

      > Can you prove that Apple's campaign is a success?

      Not to be glib, but that's what I did.

      Advertising can rarely be translated directly into sales, since there are so many factors involved in making a sale. A campaign can be a success if it brings more people into the store, even if they don't buy (that's a promotion success, but a sales failure). Thus, the direct goal of the advertisement is to get people to think about your product and act (hopefully buy, but not necessarily) upon it. From the example criteria I listed in my first message, I'd say Apple's campaign has been a success.

      Note, you used the term "switch" even though you didn't buy a Mac. That meets criterion 1. If the ad prompted you at any time to go to Apple's web site and price out a new G4, then the campaign worked. (If you didn't do that, then I call into question your claim that the Mac would be $3,000 more)

      To give you another example, the company I work for made Business 2.0's list of top 100 stupidest business decisions of 2001. Although most people wouldn't be happy about that, our promotions people responded with, "Great! There's no such thing as bad publicity!"

      I'd say that your one lost sale hardly calls Apple's products into question. The buzz has been strong since Apple released Mac OS X about how there's finally a desktop Unix. Several respected Unix forums are now paying attention to Apple's products in a way that never would have happened with Mac OS 9: Slashdot's created its own Apple section, O'reilly has an entire series of books on Mac OS X, and former Linux users are gravitating to Apple's new offerings. For example, in a recent Byte article, the author talks about how he saw at a recent Linux conference, he saw "maybe 20 or 25 people running Mac OS X". Plus, in that article, the word "switch" was used three times in the context of someone moving from one computer platform to another. So the former is a sales/product success and the latter is an ad campaign success.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    10. Re:It's not capitalism, it's promotion by Iainuki · · Score: 1

      "Since one can't generally can't make a correlation between an advertising campaign and increased sales. . ." Sentences like this (from a marketer, no less) make me think that the only real work in marketing was done about 70 years ago, in convincing companies that their product is worth something. Hats off to the great marketing job there!

  137. BLABLABLABLABLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As i walk into a lab on campus that has both *nix stations, windows boxes, and macs and i notice some common stereotypes. Windows users are the loud annoying ones probably undeclared taking gen. ed courses untill they flunk out talking about how much beer they drank last weekend (your common college student). *nix User'...all of them either CS or CEng, they either don't speak english or they have something about them like either piercings, or long hair, or purple hair, or something like that. And then we have mac users, they just look funny, or smell.

  138. Slashdot Effect by davidstrauss · · Score: 2

    A lot of people at Microsoft are going to be very confused about the ridiculously large number of hits this page is getting.

  139. switch campaign lame to begin with by Malcreant · · Score: 1

    Apple just makes their users look like a bunch of inept dolts. My computer-phobic in-laws just bought an XP machine, set it up, connected it to the internet, connected a printer and started using it immediately. No big deal. If they can do it anyone can.

  140. Re:(flawed)observation by Schart · · Score: 2, Informative

    For instance, you don't see commercials where MacDonalds even mentions Burger King or their other competitors

    I too have no training in marketing (but I think I have your paltry 10,000 hours beaten soundly ;) and, of course, exceptions and rules go hand in hand so this is probably nit-picking, but what about the ones that go something like:

    Twice as much beef as the Big Mac!

    I can think of MANY ads in MANY market categories where The Competition is quite intentionally mentioned but it's probably not worth the bandwidth or time.

    Also, I am an Apple user, and I just think it's funny (and Bullshit).

  141. Strange instructions on migrating links by joeflies · · Score: 2

    The instructions talk about switching from Netscape Navigtor on Mac to a PC, but I don't quite understand these directions because it says to load Internet Explorer up on the Mac and copy the links to the zip disk. Step 2: Importing Favorites I copied hundreds of Web Favorites from the Mac onto a Zip disk, then into the Favorites folder on the PC. Internet Explorer has an Import/Export Wizard that you can use to import Netscape bookmarks, but I found it faster to do it this way. To copy Web Favorites: 1. Connect the Zip drive to your Macintosh, and insert a Zip disk with plenty of room. 2. On the Mac, start Internet Explorer. From the Window menu, click Favorites.

  142. She USED to own, now she's owned by crovira · · Score: 2

    The phrase "After eight years as a Macintosh owner, I switched to a PC with Windows XP and Office XP. Why? It's about more and better..." is a bit suspicious in itself.

    It doesn't say she bought the box herself, that she owns it.Maybe its just some box supplied by her employer.

    I don't even bother debating anymore. I just ask people to put their own money where their mouthes are. NOBODY wants the same box that they're stuck with at work.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  143. Ahhhhh, phooey by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

    That just means that moles post to /. too. :)
    GMFTatsujin

  144. Makes me a better author by jlazzaro74 · · Score: 1

    MS products make me a better author, by the time I finish a document without crashing, I've written it like six times, so there's plenty of time for polish. Mmmm... Delicious tripe...

  145. Something else fishy about this by CreepyNinja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did anyone else notice that the stock photo of the girl over on gettyimages.com was a Royalty Free photo? So that means that Microsoft, eternal foe of free software, is more than happy to go to a photo house and only take their free images rather than actually help support the photo house by purchasing rights to a different picture...

    1. Re:Something else fishy about this by WM_NCDESTROY · · Score: 1

      Homer: I reluctantly accept your proposal!
      Bill Gates: Well everyone always does. Buy 'em out, boys!
      [Gates' lackeys trash the room.]
      Homer: Hey, what the hell's going on!
      Bill Gates: Oh, I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks!

      --
      posted via satellite
  146. Separate accounts for each user? by Lonath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, that's quite an innovation. I wonder how they thought of that. I get a little tired of having to use this "root" account that came with my Linux package. It's kind of a stupid name and I wish I could change it to my name. Maybe someday Linux will have separate accounts for each user.

  147. Sounds familiar by glenebob · · Score: 2
    Maybe somebody should email Microsoft and let them know that the Mac has had all of these things for years now

    Sounds a little like all those slashdotters going around saying Linux has preemptive multi-tasking and memory protection and Windows doesn't... Maybe somebody should have emailed them and told them there is a little thing called NT? Ah well, too late I guess.

    Anyhow, the article is pretty lame. At least the Apple commercials have a hint of originality and some of them even make me snicker. Look at the computer geek! He's even geekier than me! Microsoft's web page is the same old boring copy-cat unbelievable drivel. Just like the Linux myths ones... blah blah blah! I wonder what the Bill Gates lap dogs will come up with next.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      The only problem is NT sucked. It had those features, they just didn't work too well. So one could say the OS still lacked them at that point.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  148. But, why switch when I already run XP on OS X? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    Ya, Connectix's Virtual PC x86/FAT32 emulation, let's me run a fully licensed version of WinXP Professional right here on OS 10.2.1, damn cool, it runs on top of OS X so I can test my HTML/Flash output from PHP/Perl code running on OS X's install of Apache, MySQL and Postgres, without requiring a "dual boot"

    Can WinXP or any other flavor of Windows run OS X on top of itself? Hell no!

    An as far as M$ software, I have IE, Office and Windows Media Player right here on my Mac as OS X native apps... so what's their point?

    I switched 3 weeks ago, and I've loved the Mac, all the multimedia tools of the PC world, but on a real OS! And to be quite honest, I haven't even bothered to boot my old PC since, mainly because I haven't missed a damn thing on my Mac vs the PC.

  149. Internet Explorer/Netscape Navigator - which one? by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

    I like this section:
    I copied hundreds of Web Favorites from the Mac onto a Zip disk, then into the Favorites folder on the PC. Internet Explorer has an Import/Export Wizard that you can use to import Netscape bookmarks, but I found it faster to do it this way.

    To copy Web Favorites:

    1. Connect the Zip drive to your Macintosh, and insert a Zip disk with plenty of room.
    2. On the Mac, start Internet Explorer. From the Window menu, click Favorites.
    3. Press COMMAND+A (open apple symbol+A) to select them all, and drag them to copy them onto your Zip disk.
    4. Connect the Zip drive to your PC, and insert the disk on which you just saved your Favorites.
    5. On the PC, click Start, then My Computer, and then double-click Local Disk (C:). Open the Documents and Settings folder, then the folder with your user account name, and then your Favorites folder.
    6. On the Zip disk, press CTRL+A to select all the files, and then drag them into the Favorites folder. They'll all be there the next time you open Favorites in Internet Explorer.


    Now, wait just a minute. Since when did doing select all in Internet Explorer's bookmarks copy my Netscape ones as well?

    Well, at least Microsoft was honest about the "freelance writer" part - well, maybe the writer was an employee, but there's a very good chance that she was a contractor.

  150. They can't even get s/IE/Netscape/g to work! by Masque · · Score: 1
    From the M$ propaganda:
    Step 2: Importing Favorites

    I copied hundreds of Web Favorites from the Mac onto a Zip disk, then into the Favorites folder on the PC. Internet Explorer has an Import/Export Wizard that you can use to import Netscape bookmarks , but I found it faster to do it this way.

    To copy Web Favorites:

    1. Connect the Zip drive to your Macintosh, and insert a Zip disk with plenty of room.

    2. On the Mac, start Internet Explorer. From the Window menu, click Favorites.

    Emphasis mine. I also think it's very cute that you must have a Zip drive to do this, in their eyes, and make sure it has PLENTY of room!

    Mind boggling.

  151. *single tear* by xingix · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor.

    * Insert warm fuzzy feeling here *

    --

    Confucious says: Man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

    // jeku.com

  152. This is a totally stupid game--see through it! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I can't believe you guys are taking this thing at face value. Are you nuts? Do you really think that MS has a fertile source of new money inside the Mac crowd? I've seen figures (can't attest to their reliability) that an Apple customer pays more money to MS than the average x86 customer. I'm sure this figure isn't far off. I mean, MS Office is on just about every Mac, it's much harder to find pirated copies, and it costs more to buy at the store.

    This whole thing is a charade that Apple is a willing participant of. The whole point of the "switch" campaigns is to give the appearance of competition in an industry that effectively has none. Microsoft must be thrilled, because a totally leashed, client company (Apple) is making it look like competition is nipping at Microsoft's heels. Last week they tried the "Windows and Mac users can get along" campaign, which was spooky but not surprising, given the antitrust battles going on now.

    Remember that the allegation made against MS is that they don't compete fairly with their real competiton. There are boxes of evidence to support this. On the other hand, there is the supposed couterexample of Apple: A high profile, low danger company that gives MS absolutely nothing to worry about. MS is in fact crying: "see, we are running a fair race! Look at Apple! We're not bullying them at all! We're really, really competing with them using--fair methods like advertising. And oooh, we're soooo scared that they would eat into our market share, so we find it imperative to run ads which prevent this! Our position on the desktop is soooo vulnerable!"

    Well, I hoped that at least the slashdot crowd could see through this. I mean, we know that once Microsoft aputates both of your legs, they are perfectly willing to run a fair race against you. Witness that Internet Explorer is now finally uninstallable. However, suddently the Windows Media Player isn't. That's because RealMedia still (sort of) has its legs. Once they're off, the uninstallability problem will suddently disappear. My point is that Apple lies somewhere between Netscape and OS2 in terms of being a threat to Microsoft. However, there is much good PR to be gained by making it appear that the two companies are locked in fierce competition. So MS are milking it. The only surprise is that nobody is calling them on it!

    1. Re:This is a totally stupid game--see through it! by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

      Partially, I could agree with you on this. This ad is to stupid for the majority of us here. But we all have to remember that we are a little more experienced than the rest of the crowd. I know lots of people who would fell like flies into this gluepaper. Who? Secretaries, models, office clerks with daddy or uncle in a president chair and even housewifes. Just pick up some Cosmopolitan an try to read it. Doesn't this look the same? It the same manners, the same tone and the those same "intime" counsels.

      And how about TV ads? I don't know presently what commercials go in the US, but in Europe we have this crap of showing shirts "before" and "after". They lock them in safes, call testimonies, wash the thing in front of the camera. However, everyone can perfectly see that they use new clothes in the end. Sometimes, they don't even care to check if the shirt is of the same fabric. And who sells this piece of crap? Two major corporations of Europe. And you know? Some people do believe that "Shushy-Muffy-Puffy" cleans all stains...

    2. Re:This is a totally stupid game--see through it! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm not saying that this sort of advertising is bad or ineffective (although I happen to think it's both). What I was saying is that it's disingenuous, that the agenda is not really to make ads that are most likely to result in an increase of MS sales.

      If all Apple users switched to Windows, MS would hardly notice. Again--remember how much Apple users already pay for Microsoft products. Would they really pay that much more if they also ran Windows? So I'm saying that there is no way that Microsoft's real intention could be to draw users away from Apple. It's just not worth it! Their real intention is to give the appearance of competition, to look like fair players. Apple is a good patsy for this purpose, because everybody knows them, they still have vivid memories of the old "competitive" days, but the Apple of today poses no threat at all. They are (as I tried to write earlier but but made a typo) an amputated company, one that marches as MS whistles (they exist by permission of Microsoft). Still, it's very much in MS's interest to project the appearance that Apple is a threat to them, and making "competition" commecials is a perfect vehicle for this. We know who the real audience is! They wear robes to work.

    3. Re:This is a totally stupid game--see through it! by Qrlx · · Score: 2
      Witness that Internet Explorer is now finally uninstallable.

      Actually, that's not true at all. From the Microsoft KB aritcle Q293907
      NOTE: Internet Explorer 6 is preinstalled by default in all versions of Windows XP. To provide computer manufacturers greater flexibility in configuring desktop versions of Windows XP, Microsoft has made it possible for OEMs, administrators, and users to remove user access to Internet Explorer while leaving the Internet Explorer code intact and fully functional to ensure the functionality of programs and operating system functions that rely on it.

      In Windows XP, Internet Explorer is integrated into the operating system so completely that you can't remove it. If that language sounds familiar, it's because that's what Microsoft was claiming in that whole Antitrust thing back in the 90s. Back then you actually could run Win98 without IE if you ran that 98Lite thing, but now forget about it.

      You can hide the IE icon from the desktop but IE is still installed. For example, even if you remove IE from the desktop, the Windows Update link from the Start menu will still use IE to connect to the mothership.

      All your points are completely valid, Dr. Spork. But IE can't be uninstalled, it can only be "hidden."
  153. Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I upgraded to Outlook when I installed Office XP...

    LOL!!!

  154. Re:(flawed)observation by trcooper · · Score: 2

    #2 frequently mentions #1. Pepsi mentions Coke, Burger King mentions McDonalds. #1 chooses to ignore #2 in most instances.

  155. This is a joke... by seamus_waldron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article looks as though it was written by somebody who has never, ever, touched a MAC.

    Frankly, I'd like to see a MAC formatted ZIP disk work instantly on a PC. I'd also like to see why the writer didn't compare Microsoft Office to Microsdoft Office v.X. I'll tell you why, v.X is in my opinion the best Office implementation at the moment. Also, why not compare IE 6 PC to IE on the MAC?

    The whole thing is just laughable.

  156. In the name that is all good, moderate parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliant searching man.

  157. Why is this flamebait?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this flamebait? The photograph has already been identified as one on gettyimages.com. Is it completely out of the realm of possibility that it actually is the actress Molly Culver?

    It sure looks like her.

  158. My favorite quote: by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    Next week: MS Borg Implants: Do they really feel as though a thousand shards of poison dipped glass have just been shoved in your eye?

    Also, see the result of our torture tests! Can an Apple user resist Microsoft's best "Information Modification Specialists"? Watch how our newest 'convert' bows to our will ^W^W^W^W loves all MS products!

    All this and a Windows 98 user converts to Windows IP, and loses all rights to anything they create while using our new EULA!

    Great fun! Don't be late or we'll kick this dog and beat your kids!

  159. first they ignore you.. by matt4077 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    first they ignore you then they make fun of you then they fight you and then you win gandhi

    1. Re:first they ignore you.. by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      then you start to use punction then you start to overuse a quote then ...

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    2. Re:first they ignore you.. by chriskenrick · · Score: 1

      first they ignore you then they make fun of you then they fight you and then you win gandhi

      But what if I don't want to win Gandhi?

  160. Gotcha by iamacat · · Score: 1

    I think it's pretty obvious that this article is a parody and a resonably good one at that. Someone at technically literate as the author appears would know there is office on Mac and would already have a religios preference on which platform to use. Also, I doubt Microsoft really cares about miniscule market share of Apple. Besides they can still sell office which must be 10 times more expensive than OEM'ed XP.

    1. Re:Gotcha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's a parody, but it's not an intentional one.

  161. You talk to me about GUIs?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucking sighted people make me sick!
    Who cares about freakin' stinky menus (whatever the hell that is) when you can't see a damn screen!

    I may have lost my sight killing commies for Chevron in Vietnam, but I still know a bum horse when I blunder into it!

  162. Did you know you can run X11 apps on OS-X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't, until I saw it demoed by an Apple salesperson.

    I always thought that the Mac OS-X GUI was completely different to X11, and it is, but you can run X11, and have the applications run alongside Coco, Carbon, and Classic applications on the desktop. It was very cool to see Gimp running on the OS-X desktop!

    I know this is slightly off-topic, but I think that there are a lot of people who think that the *nix compatibility is just for text applications, but it isn't. You can choose a window manager, the demo I saw used TWM, but you can run FVWM2, or whatever you like. You can even get a window manager that has the 'look' of OS-X's native applications.

    I'm a 100% GNU/Linux person myself, but every time I see OS-X demonstrated, I am more and more convinced that I will recommend it to non-technical friends who ask me for advice about computers. In the past, I would have had no choice but to recommend Windows to people who I didn't think would be able to get their work done with Linux. The last time I used a Mac for more than a few minutes was over ten years ago, and that was a Mac Classic! Until recently, I still had that image in my mind, but Apple has done an excellent job now, and I would no longer recommend a Windows box to anyone.

    Just about every time I am asked, "What computer should I buy", I suggest that people use GNU/Linux, with KDE, or, if that isn't appropriate for them, buy a Mac with OS-X. The migration to Linux from that is quite simple anyway, and they can use practically all GNU software if they want to.

    OS-X is a very nice OS. I'm not interested in using it myself, because I use free software exclusively, but I totally recommend it to anybody who isn't ready for GNU/Linux yet, especially as there is such an easy migration path.

    Plus, of course, you can always replace OS-X with a Linux installation on the Mac anyway. Nice...

  163. So reply to the 'real' writer ... by taniwha · · Score: 5, Informative

    Look at the article 'she' shows an example of a file open box .... obviously her real name is 'Don Funk' and quick google search shows 'her' email address is 'donfu@microsoft.com'

    1. Re:So reply to the 'real' writer ... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wrote her, expressed my sympathies at her unfortunate un-feminine name, and congratulated her on the apparent success of her modeling career. I hope she writes back...I'd like to enhance her user experience even more...

    2. Re:So reply to the 'real' writer ... by kahn · · Score: 0
      A quick search on Google also turns up that Mrs. Don Funk work in the marketing dept.

      http://www.tburke.net/info/suptools/topics/repadmi n_examples.htm

    3. Re:So reply to the 'real' writer ... by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      Mmmm... someone must be watching, the image you refer to appears to be gone. Anyone have a snapshot they can post?

    4. Re:So reply to the 'real' writer ... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gone, but not forgotten Wow, she's cool despite her name. She's got a memory stick and a dvd drive!

  164. On Markets and Market Leaders by Zech+Harvey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it surprising that Microsoft feels the need to use this style of marketing campaign. Not for the fact that is blatently copying Apple's Switch campaign, my surprise for MS copying other people's work ran out years ago.

    What surprises me is that it has been found that market leaders need not identify themselves in their campaigns -- it is implicit that most consumers will choose said market-leader. For example: Campbell's doesn't need a campaign that says "Buy Campbell's" It just needs to say "Buy Soup" and most consumers will choose their soup. This marketing push of their OS by name in a popular style, at least to me, says that Microsoft is really getting worried over any change in market-share. Enough so to nitpick over a few percentage points and retaliate with a campaign like this. (Tell me, at the height of the pre-bundled, defacto-standard Windows Empire -- How often did you see their OS advertised?)

    (by the by, how do tactics like this by Microsoft strain their relationship with Apple? I would think Jobs, being an artist at heart, would hate a blatent copy like this.)

    --
    Zech Harvey, MCSE, MCDBA, CCNA
  165. Other submissions you haven't seen yet by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    Joe, an IT specialist

    Ever since we've made the switch to Windows XP, boxes have been crashing left and right and now I'm busier than I ever have been. When we were running Unix boxes, I rarely had anything to do, and that looked bad to upper management.

    Selma, a tech support team member

    You know, ever since we've replaced our Macs, we've been bombarded with user interface questions and how to get rid of that annoying Clippy. Upper management has been noticing how busy we've been lately and now we're getting more money for our department. Sweet!

  166. Ha ha! by cybercuzco · · Score: 2
    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    What are they odds that they successfully get "her" to try a pocket PC? Its written like theyre trying really hard just to convert this one person.

    --

  167. funny... by LinuxWoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    how the "convert" keeps speaking using microsoft marketing jargon.... like the average user automatically thinks in terms of "oooo visit this handy tool at microsoft.com"

  168. dude, I think that *is* Molly Culver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from VIP. IMDB says she was a model prior to joining the VIP cast.

    1. Re:dude, I think that *is* Molly Culver by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

      Google Image Search has some nice headshots of her.

      Looks like a match to me!

  169. font size by pjrc · · Score: 2

    Microsoft's "switch" story web page uses a font spec that appears nicely in MSIE, but renders too small on non-windows platforms.

    1. Re:font size by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

      That's strange. I can honestly say that I could read it just fine, better than the text on many other sites. And I'm using Mozilla 1.1 on Mandrake 9.0.

  170. Alternate stock models by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1
  171. Nice... by Izang · · Score: 1

    Wow, marketing is easy. Let me try. "One can't fornicate with creativity on anything with less than 512mb of ram and without Microsoft Windows XP." "My typing rate improved by over twenty words per minute once I switched to Microsoft Windows XP." "My Japanese oriented small furry animal intestine sex fiction wasn't taken seriously until I switched to Microsoft Windows XP."

  172. How you know she's not a real person by catfood · · Score: 2
    "I love that we can define completely different user experiences..."

    Only Microsoft's ad copywriters and marketers ever say "user experience."

  173. You missed the point by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    It doesn't matter if a Burger King (2nd place) ad mentions McDonalds (first place).

    McDonalds doesn't mention any of it's competitors. It doesn't have to.

  174. Well, DJ Qbert is real... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    Cuz I have some of his tunes on CD. He's also done stuff with Invisibl Skratch Piklz I used to have a CD of.

    I've an interview with him where he goes on about how handy it is to carry a Mac laptop with Pro Tools on it and listen to stuff. In fact I think this interview as on the Pro Tools web site. He's making the rounds for product endoresements I guess. :-)

  175. Microsoft more faster New Technology is! by dubious9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Man, first Mac users, then I hear that Microsoft deploys newer technology too! Zowie!

    Keeps Pace with New Technology

    The open-source nature of Linux means that the company lacks a centralized strategy for keeping pace with emerging technologies and hardware. And that means Linux is typically much slower than Microsoft and Microsoft partners to consistently deliver the tools needed to stay current with new hardware requirements and new technologies.


    I wondered in high school whether bullshitting could be a full time job. Perhaps I should work for Microsoft. Oh, just for fun type Unix or linux into Microsofts search engine to see what it comes up with.

    --
    Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
  176. switcher@winaddict.com by WinAddict · · Score: 1

    I don't work for Microsoft, and I've been seeking stories from people who have switched from other operating systems to Windows. Those who attack Windows or Microsoft will say that no or few such people exist. I theorize that they exist plenty but are hard to find because they don't advertise themselves or indulge in advocacy. The principle of social proof from social psychology (read Cialdini) applies well here: a person invests more in a belief the more other people believe it. Hence, groups holding minority positions--eg cults, radical activists, proponents of new scientific theories, Apples or Linux users, proponents of unorthodox diets, etc--will bolster their own belief by converting others to their system. The flipside is that the average person in the majority position, let's call it the orthodoxy, doesn't feel compelled to convert anybody. Why? Plenty of people already believe the idea. They don't need to feel any better about their choice. Rather than acknowledge the possibility that Microsoft could actually find a real person who converted to Windows, it's much easier for those in the alternative systems to discredit it as falsehood to protect their reality tunnels. Likewise, you'll attack me and WinAddict as Microsoft shills. Whatever. Send your switch stories to this current Windows and Linux; and past and perhaps future Mac user. switcher@winaddict.com

    1. Re:switcher@winaddict.com by tjones2 · · Score: 1

      Of course the fact that the photo at the top of the page is intended to make you think that this is the writer in question when it has been demonstrated to be a bit of commercially available clip-art might have influenced some people's expressions here more than any psychobabble never entered your mind.

      I think it's obvious who is feeling threatened by this story, and it doesn't appear to be the people with facts on thier side.

      Which means it's just you. Have you considered professional help?

      --
      I've been good, Rob, can I have my old account back?
  177. Parodies of the switch commercial... by f97tosc · · Score: 2
  178. HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Anonymous Coward, I deselect YOU!"

    I have added YOU to my foes list!


    Hey Taco! Howcomes AC doesn't get a user profile page?!! Come on, he's the most prolific and erudite poster on slashdot!

  179. Reasons I like this ad by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    • The woman in the picture looks like she's in the middle of a commercial for a yeast-infection or genital-herpes remedy. "With Windows, I don't have to be afraid to tell people what operating system I use. And that's a weight off my shoulders, so I can spend more time enjoying life."
    • "It's about more and better." Wow. That's substantial and profound. I thought she said she was a "professional writer."
    • Most of the page is devoted to explaining how to use wizards. If you need to explain how to use your wizards, your need to fire your usability team.
    • She finishes her pitch by talking about installing drivers and finding more programs to convert her Mac documents every day: "I discover more treats daily. For example, Word Converters are helping me transfer old document files, Microsoft Works files, and even AppleWorks files. It will be an ongoing process, but I'm thrilled so far." In other words, she still hasn't been able to convert all her documents, and she expects it to be a long, ongoing process... and this is why Windows is "better?"
    Personally, I don't think Microsoft wrote this. I think someone from Saturday Night Live broke into the MS server room and uploaded this.
    1. Re:Reasons I like this ad by maxentius · · Score: 1

      " Personally, I don't think Microsoft wrote this. I think someone from Saturday Night Live broke into the MS server room and uploaded this."

      Sounds about right. :^>

      Anyone else notice the page is giving a 404 now?

      --
      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of neurons.
    2. Re:Reasons I like this ad by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't think Microsoft wrote this. I think someone from Saturday Night Live broke into the MS server room and uploaded this.

      ...with the message you have been 0wn3d, /\/\$. All your bases belong to us.

      Really, microsoft are masters at marketing, and to have such poor FUD makes them look very bad and unprofessional(from a marketing standpoint). Was Don Funk Drunk when he wrote the freelance article? I won't be suprised if Microsoft pulls down the web-page in the coming days. I mean it's so full of shit, that even Bob The Computer Guy will have a good chuckle at this article.

  180. Moronic no matter who uses it by kakos · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but these types of ads are absolutely moronic no matter who uses them. They are both arrogant and condescending. Personally, I've never been swayed by commercials to buy something, but the Apple commercials DID sway me NOT to buy an Apple. Here I was on the verge of buying an iBook and then I saw those commercials and I chose not to buy it. My friends have expressed similar disgust. This is so true.

  181. Even a dumb girl can run XP ! by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    OMFG, that was hilarious! The underlying message was "Microsoft makes switching from bad ol' expensive Macintosh to their happy, puppy friendly technologically superior Windows XP platform so easy, even a dumb girl like me can do it. Tee-hee."

    How low can you get? Does anyone really BELIEVE this story? I sure hope not.

    But at the end of the article, there are forms in PDF and Word (natch) where you can send in YOUR experiences with Windows. Come on Slashdotters, fill them out and send them in! PDF and Word

    Here is the text of the document. It gets better...

    Show Off Your Skills

    Are you a whiz at using a Microsoft product at home or in the office? Are you the one everyone comes to when they need to know how to do something? If so, we'd love to see what you can do.

    A whiz? ha ahaha I think they mean wiz. Oh brother.

    We're collecting ideas for articles on the Microsoft Insider Web site. Some of your work or submissions may be included in a gallery on the site, featured in press releases, or developed into how-to articles.

    This just in: Microsoft invents user-friendly HOWTO documents.

    Note: We will not feature any of your work without first receiving your permission.

    And having you sign away the rights to any experience you may have, or have had in the past to the sole ownership of Microsoft.

    To participate, please send us:
    Your first and last name
    Name of your company or organization (if applicable)
    Brief description of your company or organization, including industry and size
    Brief description of which Microsoft product you use and how you use it
    Personal contact information, including address, phone number and e-mail address
    Samples of your work--either hard copies of your marketing materials or a Web site address where we can view your work. Please be sure to include any user names or passwords that might be needed.

    WTF???

    You can submit your sample(s) one of two ways:
    1. For online materials, send an e-mail message with the subject line Microsoft Publisher Customer Stories to insider@microsoft.com. (Note: Please do not send any attachments over 1 megabyte in size.)

    Or with any malicious VBscripts attached


    2. For printed materials, send hard copies to:
    Microsoft Insider Customer Stories Microsoft Corporation 9931 Willows Road Redmond, WA 98052 Microsoft will not share the information you provide with third parties without your permission except where necessary to complete the services or transactions you have requested, or as required by law.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Even a dumb girl can run XP ! by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1
      You can submit your sample(s) one of two ways:
      1. For online materials, send an e-mail message with the subject line Microsoft Publisher Customer Stories to insider@microsoft.com. (Note: Please do not send any attachments over 1 megabyte in size.)

      Or with any malicious VBscripts attached


      That's a great idea!
  182. The problem is... by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    The problem with criticism is that thye have a point. If you DONT think that "More Hardware Options, for Less Dough" and "more software flexibility" are valid reasons, you're fooling yourself.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  183. guilty? by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

    Since the picture is faked for "switch", is MS guilty of truth in advertisting??

    1. Re:guilty? by braddeicide · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but have you got the money to drag them through the courts for 10 years? If Bill Gates turned up at a press conference holding a servered head it'd be at least 10 years before the case was over, and he'd probably be found innocent.

  184. Why yes, there are by burgburgburg · · Score: 2

    Office v.X (which most reviewers say is superior to the Windows version) and IE 5.2.2 .

  185. Please stop being hypocrites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been tons of switch ads from apple, yet slashdot and the ./ readers have not banded togther in picking apart each thing the apple converts have said . Or ridiculing their perspectives or switch details.
    This is ridiculous the level of criticism this post has developed. What is the point of picking at the mac to pc instruction she provides. Did anyone here do that with the apple switch campaign ??

  186. Are There No Microsoft Zealots? by roboneal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I have just read scores of anti-Microsoft messages, most of which could be plugged quite nicely into Apple's continuing marketing campaign. I assumed most aren't on Apple's payroll.

    Therefore, isn't it possible that there might be one person out there who tows the Microsoft party line without being on the payroll of Microsoft?

    It amazes me how my $700 PC running Win2K managed to not crash long enough to write this message.
    .
    .
    .
    OK I'm done, now where's my check Bill?

    1. Re:Are There No Microsoft Zealots? by penguin341 · · Score: 0

      It amazes me too.

      --
      No sig. Never.
    2. Re:Are There No Microsoft Zealots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the point is in this case its not, M$ could ahve found a real person like apple did, but they didnt. this is an obvious LIE. when the maret monoploist has to LIE to convince you its product is worthy, there is a problem.

  187. A brilliant campaign! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Becuase most "users"[*] don't know computers from their anus. Hence, they should use a computer without a registry so they can't fuck things up too much.


    [*]computer, not drug, although that might explain a lot of this...

  188. She's Real !!! by Kommet · · Score: 1

    I've seen the author before, so I know she must be real. Her name was S1m0ne, or something...

  189. More "Innovation" by hammarlund · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, another example of innovation, from the company that specializes in it [not].

  190. what else is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another normal day for the BIG Pigopolist from Redmond...

  191. It's not the choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I know this will get modded down as a troll, because anyone not kissing Apple's ass here gets modded down by the iDiot iModerators, but here goes:

    I was a Mac user for ten years. Then I switched to a PC with Windows 2000. It's not about choice; I'm running more or less the same programs I used to run in the Macs: Photoshop, Word, Freehand, etc. It's about performance. Now I click on "Print", and the thing actually prints (as opposed to making strange noises for 15 minutes and then printing at a depressingly slow speed).

    I buy a new printer or a new scanner, I plug it in and voilá, it works!! People who go on an on about how Macs have had plug and play since the stone age clearly never had to connect a printer whose driver was not included with MacOS.

    And then there's the games. I'm not much of a gamer, but now I see what I've been missing. They look great, they run smoothly, and there are lots of them.

    Over the years, I've spent enough money on Apple products to pay for Steve Jobs' yacht. And what I got in return were some fancy cases with a crap computer on the inside. I'm not going back, ever. Sorry, Steve, you'll have to find someone else to pay for your next boat.

  192. There's no one home on slashdot by (void*) · · Score: 2

    Why? When they said "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, and then you win", it refers to YOU, not MS.

  193. Have any Slashdotters switched from Mac to Win? by MrCaseyB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cant imagine anyone here would be switching now considering how popular OSX is around here. BUT, in the past, have any of you ever switched from Mac to Windows? I personally have not. I can see situations where it would be much much better to use Windows. One case would be 3d animation. Most of the good software traditionally has run on windows and Irix. Please do not bring up Maya OSX, that is the exception, not the rule. Windows can run on many different hardware configs that are far more afordable. Has this been enough for anyone here to switch in the past?

    1. Re:Have any Slashdotters switched from Mac to Win? by Zed2K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes I have. Well 4 years ago. I got tired of how slow the mac would web browse (among other things) and that if I wanted to play any computer games at all I either had to wait 1-2 years and hope it came out on the mac or just not play it at all. Also the price of hardware is horrible. I built my own to of the line PC for $1200 (it was 4 years ago). I could go cheaper these days. I'd love to have a G4 Powerbook, but no way at those prices considering I can get a P4 laptop from dell for about $1600.

      I still use my old wallstreet powerbook for just internet usage in my living room and an old power computing clone for my linux server (for web and ftp use).

      I would love to run OSX on a G4 titanium powerbook, but until I can buy a souped up one for around $1600 or less I won't ever buy another Mac.

    2. Re:Have any Slashdotters switched from Mac to Win? by Squozen · · Score: 1

      Just compare the experience using the G4 laptop to the Dell though. Much lighter, quieter, cooler (you can actually rest it on your lap!), thinner, and man, does it attract the women...

    3. Re:Have any Slashdotters switched from Mac to Win? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Hahaha...yup, its gets many points for style, but its not 3 grand cool.

  194. She's not Real. Here's the URL of her photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://creative.gettyimages.com/source/search/deta il.asp?source=searchResults&imageIndex=10&hdnSync= %22One+Woman+Only%3AOnly+Women%22+and+%22Coffee%3A Hot+Drink%22~0%2C12%2C449%2C3%2C15%2C1%2C0%2C0%2C0 %2C12287%2C0%2C1%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2Cen- us%2C1%2C%22One+Woman+Only%3AOnly+Women%22+and+%22 Coffee%3AHot+Drink%22%2C389%2C257%2C1%2C&hdnCurrPa ge=4

  195. Now that we know she's just a model... by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...someone has to track her down and discover that she is also a Mac user in real life-- she probably has a CRT iMac or an iBook or something, if she's like the models I know.

    It always cracked me up that the Blue Man Group shill for Intel but run their shows with Macs.

    ~Philly

  196. As in . . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    I fu'ed you, I fu'ed you?

    (And anybody who can accurately identify my comedic reference wins a prize)

    KFG

    1. Re:As in . . . by Petronius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      as in... The Big Lebowski? the nihilist guy?
      my all time fave.

      --
      there's no place like ~
    2. Re:As in . . . by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      man! they pissed on your rug? Shit. And that really pulled the room together, ya know?

    3. Re:As in . . . by kfg · · Score: 1

      Actually I was refering to something a bit more obscure. It's from a Stan Freeberg satire of the recording session of "Rock Island Line."

      KFG

  197. Who is by sirsampson · · Score: 1

    the true target audience? I'm sure this is really marketing towards the people with ageing 95/98 boxes looking at the MAC switch ads going hmm. Honestly, how many MAC people would believe MS marketing?

    1. Re:Who is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your right. i have no reason to visit M$ web site and never have. Mac users knwo why they like macs, and M$ has always been years behind the curve.

  198. Separate accounts for each user? by msblack · · Score: 1

    Microsoft still fails to provide this feature. You can't protect the O/S from hostile users. One husband can easily delete the WinNT/System directory thereby interfering with Don Funk's ability to use the system.

    Unix, et al, has protected O/S files against accidental or malicous deletion for over 30 years. Can't say the same thing about Windows. Not in M/S DOS, not Windows 3.1, not Windows NT, not Windows 2000, not Windows XP. When will they ever get that part right?

    matthew

    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
  199. Another Outlooker... by Ektanoor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Importing Messages. I upgraded to Outlook when I installed Office XP. I chose Yes when Outlook asked whether I wanted to import messages from Outlook Express. Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook, but all was not lost.

    Hmmm. In the way she writes her excitement on using this piece of crap, it looks she is another outlooker that says yes, Yes, YES to every Klez juicy flavour and every LOVE YOU letter... Probably the new, fresh and exciting BugBears will make her dreams sweet... I imagine the ride of joy she'll have when some Barby/Trojan will salute her in one more of these exciting [censured] M$ gifts...

  200. A prime example of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of a abuser/abused relationship. The abuser's so charismatic that they assume that they're responsible for anything that's wrong!

  201. Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free OS by MamasGun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Freedom.
    Freedom from DRM.
    Freedom to use the OS however you want to.
    Freedom to tweak and change, even at code-level.
    Freedom to install the OS on any machine you want to without asking "Mother May I?"
    Freedom from bullshit licenses and other nightmares.
    Freedom from the vast majority of viruses and exploits.
    I'd say that's a REAL compelling reason.

    --
    "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
    -- Jack Valenti
  202. Let's submit stories! by Lethyos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's what I submitted as my XP switch story. :-)

    You can use my personal photo from this web page:

    http://delivery.gettyimages.com/comp/AA046139.JP G? x=x&dasite=GETTYIMAGES&dareq=1A0C1F181E0
    80314025 D2337394D32324055454243585F414E

    My name is Linda Lee and here's my story!

    "WindowsXP is great!"

    OKay, I admit it! I've been a Linux user for years! You know, one of
    those communists who thinks that everything should be free and forgets
    to use deoderant. Recently, I was reading a totally unbiased
    technical article in a magazine that informed me that the competition
    just cannot stand up to Microsoft's (r) Windows (r) XP operating
    system.

    Let me tell you how lost I have been all these years, using free,
    open-source software! What a waste of my life! As soon as I read
    about all the great features, I threw some clothes on (shoes too!) and
    ran out to my nearest CompUSA to buy a copy of Microsoft (r) Windows
    (r) XP Professional for about 400$US. I got home, ripped the
    shrink-wrap off, read over the draconian EULA (I don't mind giving up
    some freedoms, Windows (r) is just too great), and immediately got to
    installing.

    After installation, I was unable to activate my copy of Microsoft (r)
    Windows (r) XP. Sure, there was a little hic-up here, but after all,
    you sometimes have to make sacrifices for quality! After about a
    month of not being able to use my computer, customer support finally
    just said I could use a "back-door" activation code. How wonderful
    that Microsoft are helping me out at their own peril!

    It only took me about three months to get me up and running! Girl
    Scout's honor!

    More Crashes, Less Work

    Microsoft (r) Windows (r) XP lets me relax more through my busy work
    day. With continuous crashes and reboots, I can spend more time
    sipping coffee than doing my job! Microsoft (r) Windows (r) XP also
    ensures that the work I do manage to get done is of the highest
    possible quality. I demand that I be empowered to rewrite a document
    I lost four times so I can be certain that it is very refined.

    More Software Flexibility

    Previously, I had access to hundreds of thousands of free software
    products. But they were free, and we all know that anything that's
    free is worth nothing! Now I can go out and spend anywhere from 50$US
    to 5000$US dollars on a box with a CD-ROM disc in it! With a cost
    like that, it ought to be some really good software!

    Final Comments

    If it wasn't for Microsoft (r) Windows (r) XP, I wouldn't bathe, use
    deoderant, or wear clothes all day. I would just sit around and
    stink, rotting in my house, getting fat! Thanks to my switch to
    Windows (r), I'm healthy and have a great life! Thanks Microsoft (r)!

    --
    Why bother.
  203. Cute girls using XP? Yeah right! by moenispiekni · · Score: 1

    I always wonder why the "anonymous user" has to be a nice looking woman. :-)

  204. ROFLMAO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    l337 observation, dude...you r0x!

    Micro$oft is teh suq.

  205. But she's a guy by taniwha · · Score: 2

    as many other have pointed she's really a guy .... in clipart drag .... look down further at her open dialog .... her real name seems to be 'Don Funk' (donfu@microsoft.com)

    1. Re:But she's a guy by taniwha · · Score: 3, Funny

      I should add that not only is she a guy .... but also he has obviously managed to make it through the Girl Scouts .... obviously his teenage years were either a lot of fun .... or seriously confused .... I'm just waiting for the GSA suit against M$ for either misusing their trademark .... or sneaking a boy into a troop

    2. Re:But she's a guy by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      The person in question works for MS so, this whole thing is bunk (MS's page that is)

      However, don't be sure that Don couldn't be a girl or possibly a TS of some sort.

  206. A Lexus? by RailGunner · · Score: 2
    "It's like a Lexus we rented once; when you pushed a button, the driver's seat and mirrors all moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet."

    She should have bought the Lexus, the TCO would have been less then Windows XP and Office XP.

    To their credit, at least the woman *looks* smarter then that stoner chick Apple has. (*beep beep duh... like it beeped and then I was all like you know, worried about my paper dude.)

  207. Oh this is RICH! by psychopracter · · Score: 1

    I liked the part about it was $450 cheaper than an iBook, and then it tells you to go upgrade to WXP Pro ... which is what, about $130? So, after you got a fully functional version of XP on the box, that's more like $320 cheaper. ....oooookayyyyy....

    --
    OS X:*nix for the real world.
  208. Palm??!!?? by Pyrosophy · · Score: 1

    Never mind the contradiction that she is a freelance writer who works for Microsoft, showing something is awry...

    Can't you just see the marketing meeting?
    "We should mention Palm just to make it seem believeable."
    "And give our competitor free advertising, no way!"
    "Well what if we plug PocketPC at the end in an 'editor's note'?"
    "All right, all right, but women don't use words like 'features' use... 'treats' instead."

    The point is moot that Apple is doing the same kind of careful marketing, but that they seem to be able to actually pull it off!

  209. Link not working by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 5, Informative


    If the linked to site doesnt work for you (it doesnt for me under mozilla 1.0), get the image directly from here

    Compare it to MS's image

    1. Re:Link not working by cetan · · Score: 1

      It works perfectly fine in mozilla, you just have to scroll down. the javascript menues getty is using for some reason want to roll UP the page, so by default the page gives them enough headroom to appear.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:Link not working by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Waitaminnut! In the M$ image, she's done a 180!! ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  210. I thought this was hilareous... by bhsx · · Score: 2

    Do you have an idea for a story? We'd love to hear from you. How have you used Microsoft software to make your home or work life easier, more fun, faster, or simpler?
    For years Microsoft made me look really important while really not doing anything useful at my job besides hunting down virii and rebooting servers. It was great job security, because everytime I was almost done, I could be sure that the whole process would start again. Plus it felt really good to spend all that money on software that would otherwise have gone to things that I have no interest in: things like new gym equipment, math books (i hate math) and instruments for the music department (none of those kids can play anyway).

    Once, while using Internet Explorer, I read about this group of people called the Free Software Foundation. I couldn't believe the things I was reading, but there it was, right there in Internet Explorer. After further reading and examining my options, all in Windows 98 mind you, I actually used Internet Explorer to download Linux. Now when I reboot my system Internet Explorer has been replaced with programs that make me feel better about myself. Microsoft ROCKS! If it weren't for Internet Explorer I would never have found Linux.
    Thank you Bill, for giving me the tools to learn that I was using the wrong tools.

    --
    put the what in the where?
  211. You take wrong by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    Interesting little bit of Microsloth mind-games: they're "switcher" is so patently false (and her tale so deeply pathetic), that they spread the rumor that the Apple switchers are fakes too, to muddy the waters. "See, everyone's dirty. Stop staring at us."

    Everyone of the Apple switchers ads are real people. Some (Tony Hawk, DJ Qbert) are famous. Most are just real people. With names.

    1. Re:You take wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what's funny is that if the roles were reversed, you'd still be on the side of apple.
      The mere FACT that you call it 'microsloth' makes me think you are some kid that has no idea what you are talking about, just following the crowd...
      And if you AREN'T a kid, I wouldn't own up to it, because you must be some poor, lowly, pathetic person.

  212. I should add .... by taniwha · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fact that Don made it all the way through the Girl Scouts with his 'honor' intact is pretty amazing ....

  213. When are they going to try the... by Uttles · · Score: 3, Funny

    "resistance is futile" campaign?

    --

    ~ now you know
  214. "our writer" can also mean... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The writer that we hired; she works for us."

    But it gets even more interesting. Maybe she is really a he (and perhaps not even a freelance writer at all), since it is "Don Funk" whose user folder appears to be used in the screenshot.

    After they stopped laughing, our IT staff predicted that this page would be gone in 24 hours.

  215. Truth in advertising??!!! by asscroft · · Score: 1

    this probably isn't a "real person" as author, and the picture has been proven to be a stock image.

    When the lawyer ads and health product ads have testimonials they are required by law to have fine print that says "re-enactment" or "actor impression of actual event, your results may vary" or some other disclaimer which says "hey, I'
    m lying, it's an ad".

    Where is the fine print on Microsoft's page???

    Write to your attorney general...if you give enough of a shit. I don't. But I know that some class action lawsuits are why you see the fine print on those ads, and those lawsuits make people $$$. hmm, maybe I do care.

    it's too bad, I was hoping we could see a chick fight between this girl and the stoner chick for apple. the winer get a date with the dell dude.
    Ha, maybe on the celebrity death match.

    sweet!

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  216. Feels like a Knowledge Base article by parnasus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is probably redundant because I didn't wade through 500+ responses, BUT:

    I got the strangest feeling I was reading a Knowledge Base article when I looked at this page. The fact that "she" went into how to setup your ISP information step by step instead of saying, "... and setting up my email was as simple as falling down a flight of stairs..." decided it for me that this was a hoax.

    I've read about M$ doing some sketchy stuff before, but this takes the taco.

    --
    --If you code for the exceptions, the rules fall into place
  217. Re:yeah right (cheap shot) by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 3, Funny
    Speaking of which...

    I saw an ad on TV last night for some PC maker who's got some sort of PC with a long neck and a flat panel, just like an Apple and comparing the two.

    The funny thing was, they never showed the PC turned on. I guess they had to do something to keep it from crashing during the filming of the ad.

    --

    The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

  218. gay marketing terms by psamuels · · Score: 1
    Please don't use "gay" to mean "stupid." It doesn't.

    Didn't used to, you mean. As in, five years ago "gay" didn't mean "stupid". But then, twenty years ago, "gay" didn't mean "lesbian". Fifty years ago, "gay" didn't even mean "male homosexual".

    But perhaps I mistake you. Perhaps your point is that "gay" can only mean "happy" or "lighthearted". In that case, while we disagree about the nature of language evolution, I take back my implication that your position is two-faced.

    --
    "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    1. Re:gay marketing terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wrong. The majority of the populace doesn't abuse "gay" to mean "stupid." If it was disparaging a race, like say "black", you wouldn't jump so quickly to defend yourself.


      The only reason self-righteous twenty-something wannabe-hipsters use "gay" to describe something pejoratively is because "gay" has a negative connotation to those that irrationally hate homosexuals (homosexual: where "gay" is a commonly accepted slang term, check a dictionary). It's not like the 80s when "bad" meant "cool", this is a slur, plain and simple. Everyone I know that uses "gay" to mean "stupid" is homophobic (don't feed me that "homophobia" isn't a real world bullshit, check a dictionary) to varying degrees. They would not use it at all if they didn't have such a problem with homosexuals. Don't marginalize such petty behavior, say "lame" instead.


      Side note: sticking feathers up your ass does not make you a chicken. If you say "I'm not homophobic" it doesn't magically make it true. Especially if you follow it up with harsh invectives like "fag(got)".

    2. Re:gay marketing terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny



      If you say "I'm not homophobic" it doesn't magically make it true. Especially if you follow it up with harsh invectives like "fag(got)".

      shuddup ya choad-smoking, butt-banging, cum-slurping fruitcake.

    3. Re:gay marketing terms by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      Language evolves. And terms for downtrodden groups often acquire negative meanings. The English word "villain" originally meant a peasant, a poor uneducated country person. Now it means a bad person and has utterly lost its earlier association.

      So while using "gay" to mean "stupid" may be offensive to gay people, it's nothing new. And if it continues to be used in this way, people will probably find a new slang word to refer to homosexuals...

      Just my $0.02 as a linguist...

    4. Re:gay marketing terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gay people are SO gay! sheesh...

    5. Re:gay marketing terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:
      "Don't marginalize such petty behavior, say "lame" instead."

      You just shoot yourself out of the water here, bud. YOu take offence because the word "gay" is used in a manner you don't like, but why is it okay to mock the lame?

      That comes from a history of disparagment of the infirm and disabled, as do the words "idiot" and "imbecile", as it happens...

      "Gay" was being used to mean a male homosexual before the second world war, albeit it may only have had currency amongst homosexuals [e.g. it is used in that context in Kenneth William's "Diaries", which were published posthumously].

      I don't care for the way "gay" was being used here either, as I do think it was used pejoratively, but I'd prefer to see a word like "stupid" used when "stupid" is meant. I also regret that "gay" has strayed from its original meaning, but only because it has never been truly replaced by a suitable synonym.

    6. Re:gay marketing terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but lame has several accepted meanings that don't specifically target people with disabilities. It can mean "weak and ineffectual" or "unsatisfactory", as in "That was a lame argument." In fact, I believe the etymology of "lame" as a description of disability actually stems from the other meanings, as opposed to vice-versa.

    7. Re:gay marketing terms by psamuels · · Score: 1
      In fact, I believe the etymology of "lame" as a description of disability actually stems from the other meanings, as opposed to vice-versa.

      Go ahead and believe that, then. It doesn't appear to be true, according to Merriam-Webster. Their convention is to sort their definitions by age. And their first definition is indeed "disabled".)

      But as long as you are arguing for what a word originally meant ... then I would put forth that when I use the term gay to mean "stupid", I am actually just making fun of the Gay Nineties.[*] Can you prove or demonstrate otherwise?

      By the way, posting as an AC is gay. (:

      [*] For you cultural illiterates out there, the Gay Nineties refers to the last decade of the 1800s, when "gay" still meant "merry".

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  219. Carrot and stick approach... by MamasGun · · Score: 0
    Ok, that's the stick...here's the carrot.

    The plot thickens....

    --
    "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
    -- Jack Valenti
  220. Great, just what I need... by Wah · · Score: 2

    ...pictures of Calvin pissing on an Apple.

    --
    +&x
  221. Are they totally incapable of original thought ? by oreilco · · Score: 1

    Just asking.

  222. She's not the only one... by nuclearmoose · · Score: 5, Informative
    Check out some of Microsoft's other "Insider" stories: href=http://www.microsoft.com/insider/reference/en cartareferencelbrary2003_researchpaper.asp
    This kid is probably one of the best 13 year old writers I've ever seen! Encarta must save him so much time that he doesn't have to go to school anymore. He can continue with his modeling/freelance writer career.
    Hey, there's a new encyclopedia - it's called "Google"!

    And what about these people?
    http://www.microsoft.com/insider/printhelp/
    They're all smiling 'cause their #!@%ing XP printer driver finally installed. (sorry, couldn't find this in the stock photo archive. I'm sure it's there though)

    This girl is obviously smiling because her Windows PC didn't crash and lose her History paper last night: href=http://www.microsoft.com/insider/homeoffice/ Stock Photo

    Now here's a good one: http://www.microsoft.com/insider/productivity/
    Stock Photo
    Here dad is helping figure out what "fatal error in krnl32.dll means". Say, isn't that a mac they're using?

    What the hell are these two looking at? http://www.microsoft.com/insider/finance/

    Ah well, I think the whole site is just one big stock art catalog. Once again Microsoft doesn't create anything original...

    1. Re:She's not the only one... by jamie · · Score: 5, Informative
      Your URL for the 13-year-old "best homework project ever" didn't work for me; here's one that does...

      Microsoft testimonial
      stock photo

    2. Re:She's not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oi... the 13 year old story was good for at least a 2 minute laugh. At least they could try not to sound like they hadn't graduated from college.

    3. Re:She's not the only one... by Traicovn · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like the fact that if you look even closer at the link to the fourth image down, you'll notice that that actually ISN'T a blue screen of death. It's either an old dos edit terminal, but upon closer inspection, I think it actually may be Word Perfect 5.1... I guarantee you it's not Microsoft Works Suite 2003.. :)

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    4. Re:She's not the only one... by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here dad is helping figure out what "fatal error in krnl32.dll means". Say, isn't that a mac they're using?

      Ha! It is indeed. It looks like an LC. The keyboard is an Apple Extended Keyboard. That's too funny... You'd think with a budget like Microsoft's, they could at least avoid promoting the competition in their ads...

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    5. Re:She's not the only one... by Traicovn · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not sure that isn't a UNIX terminal.... look at it VERY closely.... What would be classic is if somebody proved that it was something like an old mac, It might actually be an old LC or Quadra or something.... now wouldn't THAT be funny...

      --

      [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
      {Traicovn}
    6. Re:She's not the only one... by the_real_tigga · · Score: 1

      credit where it's due, the extended keyboard was awful IBM and compatibles _did_ have better "typing experience" at that time.

      --
      my .sig is better than yours.
    7. Re:She's not the only one... by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 2

      The computer is a Power Macintosh 6100-class, probably a 6115CD because the 6100 didn't come with a CD-ROM drive.

      There's a slim possibility that the computer could be a Power Macintosh 6100/66 DOS Compatible with a 486/66 card inside it, running Windows 95, but that only matches the photo if they added an internal CD-ROM drive to the stock machine.

    8. Re:She's not the only one... by longml · · Score: 1

      Can you even read a tale of two cities in a weekend?? Ive never read it and after reading the reviews on amazon.com it seems pretty hefty for a 13 year old....

    9. Re:She's not the only one... by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      They're all smiling 'cause their #!@%ing XP printer driver finally installed. (sorry, couldn't find this in the stock photo archive. I'm sure it's there though)

      Geez, it's a PIA to try to come up with working links on that Getty site! Here's this image though: go to the image search page and enter 168025a in the "Keyword(s) or image number(s)" field.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    10. Re:She's not the only one... by j1mmy · · Score: 1

      Stock art isn't the problem. Stock art is very cost-effective compared to finding models and a photographer. The problem is that they use such art for testimonials.

    11. Re:She's not the only one... by sinserve · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tale of two WAH!! I had that for a reading assignment, back in college
      and I couldn't paraphrase a friken paragraph in it, so I red the Cliff Notes.

    12. Re:She's not the only one... by penguin_punk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm finally having fun browsing the MS site!!

      btw, here's another Mac shot

      --
      HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
    13. Re:She's not the only one... by Enahs · · Score: 2
      Bah, it's a Mac, and an ancient one at that. An LC of some sort, perhaps?

      We have a few of these at my office collecting dust. They were remarkably good for doing word-processing and little else. Running older versions of Photoshop on them was . . . shall we say . . . painful. One of the classes I took in college was filled with LCs, and we were supposed to be doing dead-tree page layout, using Photoshop and QuarkXPress. *shudder* I have qualms about doing that sort of thing on less than a G4 nowadays . . . but I'm spoiled.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    14. Re:She's not the only one... by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and if all the bad press fails, we can always bring the Microsoft marketing machine to a complete standstill by slashdotting getty images.

    15. Re:She's not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were as big of an expert as you think you are you would have mentioned the Quadra/Centris/Performa 610-series.

    16. Re:She's not the only one... by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 2

      Okay, granted. I forgot that the Centris 610 and the Quadra 610 were available with internal CD-ROM's.

      But it's not an LC.

    17. Re:She's not the only one... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      well, not to be reasonable or anything, but m$ IS a software company, not a hardware company, so they WOULD show both macs and PCs.

      Kinda like the blues brothers (well, not really, but I like the quote): "we have both kinds [of music]: Country AND Western!"

    18. Re:She's not the only one... by Poochie_2001 · · Score: 1

      I think now is as good a time as any to pledge my love for microsoft, and the complete idiots they hire. Oh, blessed MS, you never sease to make us laugh. You blue screen of death is ever-so-pleasant. And your buisness tactics are so nice and friendly... Thank you Billy boy, for once again cracking me up

    19. Re:She's not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He not only read the novel over the weekend, but he also researched the book and wrote an essay on it. I'll bet it took the Micros~1 PR department a lot longer than a weekend to come up with that load of ....

    20. Re:She's not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could also be an Apple Centris 610 with a blazin' fast 19.82 Mhz 68LC040!!! :)

    21. Re:She's not the only one... by abiogenesis · · Score: 1

      print help:
      http://delivery.gettyimages.com/comp/dv1680 25a.jpg ?x=x&dasite=GETTYIMAGES&dareq=1F0B1E1F1B0F1A034C25 255F1417424548514146114D414D

      --

      Donate free food to the hungry at The Hunger site.
    22. Re:She's not the only one... by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

      What the hell are these two looking at? http://www.microsoft.com/insider/finance/ [microsoft.com]

      Either a porn movie still, or he's helping her with her golf swing.

    23. Re:She's not the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, my 6100 came with a CD-ROM drive.

  223. oh the similarities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    when i read the mac-addicts rant on this page, it just reminds me of all the republican bomb-iraq propaganda. the similarities are overwhelming.

  224. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by MoneyT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While those are indeed reasons to switch, they aren't quite compelling.

    Freedom from DRM.
    So far, there is no DRM in Mac OS, and untill there is, that isn't a reason to switch.

    Freedom to use the OS however you want to. I want to use my OS to get my daily work done. There isn't much beyond that that the OS has to do. This isn't really a clear argument, can you be more specific?

    Freedom to tweak and change, even at code-level.
    I rarely have the desire to do this. Most programs work perfectly fine for me, and for those that dont, I get an alternative program. Even still, this argument is only compelling for a minority of computer users, I believe the original poster's intent was compelling reasons for other people to switch.

    Freedom to install the OS on any machine you want to without asking "Mother May I?"
    Not quite. I can install it on any machine I want to, assuming that the machine is compatable with the OS hardware support. The main issue of course being that there are still seperate distros of Linux (PPC, x86, SPARC). When will we see a distro with all the nessesary code in one package, and a universal install?

    Freedom from bullshit licenses and other nightmares.
    I'll give you that one. But again, the argument could still be made that for most intents and purposes, Apple provides the same freedom to it's users.

    Freedom from the vast majority of viruses and exploits.
    Seems to me that that's a better argument to switch to mac than to linux.

    Like I said, they're all very good reasons, but none of them are compelling to most users.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  225. MacOS wasn't all that great by geekee · · Score: 1

    "Why, through Microsoft Office, Internet Explorer, and modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user and easy access to the Internet, of course. Maybe somebody should email Microsoft and let them know that the Mac has had all of these things for years now" Too bad they didn't have preemptive multitasking, memory management, or memory protection before MacOS X, which is when I was forced to use Macs. Switching to Windows was a no-brainer back then. Now with MacOS X, however, Apple is back in the game.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  226. Switch To Linux/BSD Campaign by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If someone could come up with a idiot proof, truly business distro, and couple that with some sort of similar ad campaign. "it just works, and doesnt break our budget"

    Give users *2* choices during install, server or workstation.. and NOT 15 versions of every tool under the sun.. Just what a business NEEDS.. nothing more .. nothing less. ( like my hacked up personal distro )

    Couple that with really simple admin tools that do 99% of the work for them.. So that any department head could manage their simple network with out an IT department. ( the majority of the market out there )

    And no i dont know how to fund such a proposal, its part of the problem of being 'free'.. no capital to spend either..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  227. i hoped she used that $450 towards her XP pro by Alcimedes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    actually, my favorite part after her crowing about purchasing a laptop for $450 less, is that she then had to turn around and purchas winXP pro in order to have her laptop work properly with energy saving features.

    lol.

    yeah, we'll sell you this laptop for cheap, but battery life is gonna cost ya!

  228. whaa? by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    Is there any verification that FortKnox isn't just a made up name? If it isn't, it's scary people would confuse real media personalities with fake personas (have you turned your television on lately)?

    Honestly, I take him as a fake. Sure, Microsoft did a better job faking people, but it's not that special. Look at Max Headroom, he revolutionized the fake person gig.

    --
    --- What
  229. Re:Are they totally incapable of original thought by merbywerby · · Score: 0

    I agree I was just looking at the similarities on apple.com . for a while now apple has had the "yes I was a PC guy switched to Mac" add up. when I say Micro$ofts ripp off I had to laugh out loud.

  230. Check the screenshot in the ad! by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

    I could be wrong about this, but I'm having a tough time believing that "Don Funk" is/was a Girl Scout, or resembles the woman with the coffee cup.

  231. Re:Internet Explorer/Netscape Navigator - which on by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    Whats even better is since when does Windows read Mac formatted disks of any kind? (without some help). It doesn't say insert a windows formatted zip disk into the mac (which would work just fine).

  232. Yes, Writer. by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

    She never claimed to be an EDITOR.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  233. So... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    ... no interesting news today? Just an (-1, Troll) article designed for everybody to come out and laugh at MS? Anybody else tired of it?

    1. Re:So... by BeeShoo · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not in the least. Keep 'em coming!

    2. Re:So... by molywi · · Score: 0

      DEFINETELY.

      Thanks for this post.

  234. Why does her husband have 6 feet? by BassettHound · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's weird...

  235. Excuse me? by waltc · · Score: 1

    It's hard to see what one has to do with the other. Macs are great paperweights and conversation pieces for yuppies (who don't know a disk drive from a ram chip) to brag on when they say, "Oh, yea, I've got a computer at home, too!" Mac is all about the "how you look" crowd versus the "what you are" crowd. That's all true.

    But...what's that got to do with making a parking lot out of Iraq? You can't honestly say the idea isn't appealing. "Tundra to Tarmac, Tomorrow"--what a great slogan. Either political party could run well with that one, seems like.

  236. It took her *how* long? by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    "*Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"

    I can only imagine how great a product must be that it takes them 8 years to convince their own writers to use their products in house! I'm betting we'll see her convert by 2034. Who's in?

    --
    --- What
  237. Re:Story: (-1; Flamebait) [Off-Topic] by Lifewolf · · Score: 2, Informative
    Seperate accounts for each user? Didn't Unix had that since the late '60s?

    Yes, but marketing/sales people don't know this, and it's fun to watch.

    The university for which I work has a support contract with a big Apple-approved sales & support company. I'm not part of desktop support, so I don't know the details on the company or the contract, but in the Summer of 1999 two of their reps came in to update IT folks on the latest Mac offerings.

    The first rep had a sales title and was upfront about not having any technical skills. She was fine, but we were all eager to talk with the second rep, who the sales lady played up all morning. He bore the title of "Systems Engineer" and, according to the sales lady, formerly worked for Apple on core portions of the Mac operating system. Even better, he'd just been visiting at Apple, and he'd learned inside information on Mac OS X.

    I'm sure you can see where I'm headed with this. After all the buildup, the guy wound up looking like an idiot. He might have been a good sales person, but he should never have been paraded out as a brilliant systems engineer.

    Some of his more interesting contentions:

    • His shiny, new G3 was faster than any PC. Not equivalently clocked, uni-processor desktop or something along those lines, but any.
    • Apple was revolutionizing the computer industry and university computer science programs by being the first to release the source code to a Unix operating system for free.
    • Apple was the only company to provide Apache for free with their operating system. For any other OS you have to purchase Apache separately for $10,000 or more.
    • Apple was blazing new ground with technologies that allow a lab of computers to boot from a central server. Never before have computers been able to pull their very operating system across the network. Also, for the first time, client machines in computer labs could function without local hard drives.
    • Steven Spielberg cast his vote in favor of QuickTime as the best streaming format with his QuickTime-exclusive release of the trailer for his new Star Wars film, "The Menace."

    Please note that I'm not bashing Apple here. Apple does a lot of neat things, and Mac OS X is quite nifty. This was just another case of a glorified sales guy who took bad notes at a (semi-)technical sales briefing. Now, Microsoft paid this same sort of person to write an "I switched!" web page. As another Slashdot topic says, "It's funny. Laugh."

    --
    "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
  238. HUH?!? by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Can somebody please explain to me how running a search on Google through IE6 is faster than running a search on Google through Navigator, much less ANY browser on the market? What the hell is wrong with MS? How can you take them seriously when this is the level that their marketing department is at? Come on.

    According to the "person" that wrote the article you should just get the Professional version of Windows XP even though "she" says that her laptop came with the Home version of XP pre-installed. "My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it." How would she know when she has never used it? It's not as if she upgraded to Professional when her laptop came with the Home version. She didn't spend the extra money so why should you?

    Poor excuse for an attempt to steal more ideas from Apple. This time though, they're stealing marketing concepts rather than stealing GUI concepts.

  239. While this certainly is funny... by uradu · · Score: 2

    ...all the Macophiles here automatically assume that everyone has the same warm fuzzy feelings towards Apple as them, which is certainly not the case. Apple and Microsoft are just two sides of the same coin, platform lock-in--except that with Apple the platform is not just software but also hardware. Of course, Microsoft is working hard on Palladium to reach parity with Apple in that respect.

  240. Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, in all fairness, basically every single Apple switch commercial attacks "missing features" on PCs that have been pretty much standard features for quite some time. They're comparing 6 year old PCs to today's Macs. So, should it be unacceptable for Microsoft to compare today's PCs with 6 year old Macs?

  241. Know what's funny? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Linux isn't living up to any of the claims that MS or Apple are making. So why does Slashdot care? Heh.

    *Flame Shields Activated*

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Know what's funny? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Linux isn't living up to any of the claims that MS or Apple are making."

      LOL!!

      I can see the Linux ads now:

      "So.. like, I bought this Firewire Video camera, and I like shot some footage of my dog and stuff... and like when I plugged the camera into my Linux laptop.. uh.. well it didn't work. So first I went to find a firewire driver. And uh.. well I couldn't find one of those, but I find a kernel update that had firewire support. So I downloaded and recompiled and typed this in and that in and that kind of worked. Then.. then I had to find a free-app that'd do DV-capture and editing. After a few days of posting news groups, I eventually did find one that sort of worked. Of course, I had to fix a bug or two for it to be useful. But hey! It's free!! Isn't that the great thing about Open Source? Fixes happen like really really fast. Anyway, so I sort of got that running... and uh now I can get video from my camera to my laptop. It only took a few weeks! So like there's no way I'm going back to Windows now because I put all this damn effort into this and finally got it working.

      My name is Ronald and I'm a Linux Zealot."


      It's a joke, laugh.

  242. It's for pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm. Why do they even need this advertising campaign? sure it might try to lure away sophisticated users(?), but I think it's more an issue of of pride here. M$ can't just let someone insult them, but they don't need a good defense because apple doesn't represent a significant threat to MS $$ flow.

    I wish that that XP (short for eXtra Problems) didn't have all the compatibility problems it did, and I hate the fact that it treats the user like an idiot.

    1. Re:It's for pride by fuali · · Score: 0

      Maybe your are an idoit for not shutting those features off.

      98% users 2% OS - Breakdown of Peoples Problems with any OS.

  243. ZIP disk really? by oolon · · Score: 2

    Its strange how the piece talks about using a ZIP drive when the file explorer window shows the D drive is infact a Sony memory Stick, and now zip at all....

    James

  244. Anyone wanna Narc MS out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who wants the honor of letting Photodisc know about this alleged copyright violation... If only there were some hardware protection to keep such (alleged) things from happening...

    1. Re:Anyone wanna Narc MS out? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2

      let he who is without sin cast the first stone.



      I'll be waiting over there, in the shadows.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    2. Re:Anyone wanna Narc MS out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or phone MS and pretend to be them asking for conformation of purchase :)

  245. More supported warez? by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Off Topic: Maybe it's more flexible is because there are more software that you can pirate that will run on XP than on Mac OSX. At least the last time I looked, I didn't see many people making a big deal about how they got the 0day version of PhotoShop for MacOS. Just a thought though.

  246. Ad campaigns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's no less ridiculous than the idiotic Apple commercials.

    ARgh...when will they realize that most Ad money is thrown into the toilet, because people could give a shit about the ads?

  247. Dueling Redirects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Here's what I want to see:

    On the M$ site, any link to Apple
    (such as "that other OS") is detected
    by Apple, and then bounced back to
    some page on the M$ site (like BSOD
    patch #76734). And vice versa...

    btw, I think the Apple users (Janie
    Porche, I love you!) are real. The
    M$ ones will be little better than AI
    constructs.

  248. More Software Flexibility by webdev · · Score: 1

    On the mac I can choose AppleWorks or Office? I'm going to switch to a mac then.

  249. Webpage got pulled... by *xpenguin* · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like they deleted it out of shame.

    1. Re:Webpage got pulled... by derubergeek · · Score: 1
      Looks like they deleted it out of shame.

      As if MS has any...

      --
      Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
    2. Re:Webpage got pulled... by jsse · · Score: 1

      Oh no, now Don is in real trouble. In retrospective, Mr. Don Funk (donfu@microsoft.com) shouldn't have used a female picture to put the entire Microsoft into a gay organization. :)

  250. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by facelessnumber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Freedom to install the OS on any machine you want to without asking "Mother May I?"
    Not quite. I can install it on any machine I want to, assuming that the machine is compatable with the OS hardware support. The main issue of course being that there are still seperate distros of Linux (PPC, x86, SPARC). When will we see a distro with all the nessesary code in one package, and a universal install?"

    ...I'm pretty sure he meant legally. I can, have, and still do shamelessly install whatever flavor of Windows onto whatever machines I want to. It's not permitted in the EULA though. Although Linux completely takes the fun out of this concept for me, I can take Redhat 8 Professional, (yes, the retail version - Ironically the only OS I've ever paid for) and install it on a couple of new servers and a few workstations, in a commercial environment where even I don't have the balls to use something without a license, and it's cool. Encouraged, even. Yes, you have the same option with MacOS as I do with Windows, but with Linux neither of us are getting fired or paying fines. And most Linux distributions do have a universal installer - FTP.

  251. Page is down now by miltimj · · Score: 1

    It seems M$ pulled the site -- maybe from being slashdotted?....

    --
    "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  252. whoops page now 404s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm they seem to have just pulled the article

  253. Page Not Found? by jonesvery · · Score: 2

    As of 5:03PM EST, I'm getting a "page not found" when using the link in the original posting. Is the original link bad, or was the page just pulled from the site?

    --

    * * *
    It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

  254. In other words... the same thing as Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is this different than the Apple switch stories? -- other than it is a mockery of them, so not really meant to be taken seriously.

  255. Actually this is not the real story by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    She actually was trying to write a Mac switch story but the little paper clip guy in Office wasn't letting her

    I see you're writing a story that goes against Microsoft, please cease and decist or I'll shutdown your computer. Come on we can pay you to write a Mac to PC story...

  256. switch? by thriver · · Score: 1

    I ain't seein' it there no more... switch off?

  257. Microsoft Took Down The Page? by YahoKa · · Score: 0

    I guess they figured out how amazingly stupid it was. The link no longer works; it just sends me to a generic M$ page saying "The page could not be found... or no longer exists."

  258. M$ Needs U!!!! by Glanz · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes indeed!! XP is more interesting too! You get to use software that cannot be deleted, no matter how hard you try! That's an advantage if you have mean little kids who like to delete stuff. And you get to use soft that you would never see on a secure system, like snortin' Norton Anti-creepy-crawlies, and McLaughee laughware. You get to download patches every week too! What fun, especially on a 56K connection. And the best of all is that you get to contribute to a monopoly owned by a megalomanic wimp and presided over by a balding red-neck, lying, rather Ballmy type who loves to dance on stage and lie about Open Source, spread FUD and crush the competition illegally! Yes indeed, M$ is more fun.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  259. It's gone :( by AstroPup · · Score: 2, Interesting


    URL doesn't work anymore. Anyone have a mirror?

    1. Re:It's gone :( by Squashee · · Score: 1

      True, true... Accidentally closed the window and tried to reload 10 after first req. It's gone!

      Damn Microsoft - always taking the fun out of things...

      --
      When in doubt, act determined. Business 101
    2. Re:It's gone :( by moenispiekni · · Score: 1

      They probably found out she actually switched from XP to MacOSX and you can't lie to the public if you're from M$, can you? My God, do they?? I never knew that! :-)

  260. Page Removed by Xandu · · Score: 1

    The Page in question was removed by Microsoft.

    Does anybody have a copy (mirror)?
    Microsoft was probably "testing the waters" and realized that a fake just doesn't cut it.

    --


    --Xandu
  261. "Bill, we're on slashdot again!" "Shit!" by iMacGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS just pulled that ad, and it's not in the Google cache.
    Anyone got a copy they can upload somewhere (or email it to me, i'll handle it)?

    --
    Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
  262. Damn! Anyone Have a Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, there is no Microsoft.com web page matching your request. It is possible you typed the address incorrectly, or that the page no longer exists.

  263. Looks like they thought better of it by Merls · · Score: 1

    The page is nolonger there, so either we have managed to slashdot microsoft.com or they have thought better of this artice!

    Either way heh heh heh!

  264. HAVE THEY PULLED IT? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 2

    I went there OK;
    I read here;
    I saw the post which indicated that the photo was a stock image from an agency, and that the popup box has a man's name in it;
    I pointed my gf to the story;
    She went there;
    It 404'd.
    I went there;
    It 404'd.

    Have they pulled the page?

    Anyone got a cached copy, so we can check to see what they change if they put it up again?

    THL.

    --
    Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    1. Re:HAVE THEY PULLED IT? by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Stupid question - goog's got a cache.
      "Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility"
      found it uniquely.

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
    2. Re:HAVE THEY PULLED IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google, like the wonderful beast it is, has a cached copy, I searched using just the file name and got it.

      www.google.com

      Search for "windowsxp_setup.asp"

      And look in the cache :)

      -pj

    3. Re:HAVE THEY PULLED IT? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Hey, I tried, and "Windows XP gives me more" finds it uniquely. Quite telling that there is no webpage saying "Windows XP gives me more" of anything.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  265. Karma whoring in the Google cache by untulis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since MS took the page down, take a look at Google's cache here

    1. Re:Karma whoring in the Google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will want to turn off JavaScript, as Microsoft will try to redirect you to their site.

  266. Still got it here. by aedan · · Score: 1

    I still had it open in an Omniweb window when it was pulled so I saved it as a PDF (on Mac OS X). If someone with big bandwidth wants it reply here, I don't want my iTools account slashdotted.

    aedan

    1. Re:Still got it here. by geekjive · · Score: 1

      ooh ooh i'd like to see that!

    2. Re:Still got it here. by aedan · · Score: 1



      OK, it's here:

      http://www.aedanmcg.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/winswitch /win_switcher.html

      Try not to slashdot it!

      aedan

    3. Re:Still got it here. by geekjive · · Score: 1

      thanks. that kicks ass. i will post it on my site to defer traffic!

  267. Future Onion article... by jaysones · · Score: 2, Funny

    NEWSFLASH: Slashdot readers not persuaded by Microsoft advertising. In other news, pigs remain wingless.

  268. Freelance Writer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freelance writers....got to love them...they have to double as models.... ;-)

    http://creative.gettyimages.com/source/search/de ta il.asp?source=searchResults&imageIndex=10&hdnSync= %22One+Woman+Only%3AOnly+Women%22+and+%22Coffee%3A Hot+Drink%22~0%2C12%2C449%2C3%2C15%2C1%2C0%2C0%2C0 %2C12287%2C0%2C1%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2Cen- us%2C1%2C%22One+Woman+Only%3AOnly+Women%22+and+%22 Coffee%3AHot+Drink%22%2C389%2C257%2C1%2C&hdnCurrPa ge=4

    Reminds me of a dumb ass I use to work with named BOlander.... You can't do that on a Mac I know cause I used one in 1984....oh well...at least M$ is trying to put fingers in the dike...check the recent slashdot poll....

    http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=863

  269. Link Is Gone; Use This by Myopic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know if this has been posted elsewhere, but here is google's cache of that page. I had to frob the url but it works.

    peace

  270. And now the MS page is gone... by softsign · · Score: 2
    Ha! Microsoft has taken down the page in question. It now leads to a Sorry, there is no Microsoft webpage matching your request page.

    I guess astro-turf (see the link to Getty Royalty-Free photography elsewhere in the comments) switch campaigns aren't as good as the real thing once they're discovered... Can't blame them for trying though.

  271. Sorry, there is no Microsoft.com web page match... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They took the page down! Haha!!! This is funny as hell!

  272. No-Talent-Ass-Clowns! by holmbrew · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that they used a piece of stock photography for the chick with the coffee. What a bunch of No-Talent-Ass-Clowns!

  273. Page removed! LOL by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

    Ok, maybe it's just me, but now I'm getting page not found on MS's site. It just worked 5 minutes ago! Looks like their campaign was shorter than ever! LOL

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  274. uh, Duh. by smblion · · Score: 1

    And I'd like to point out to the submitter, that Windows has also had these things for years now. While I'm no fan of Microsoft, don't make yourself look ignorant in an attempt to catch the big M in the act of evil. We all know they're evil, you don't have to prove it :)

  275. Mirror by Giraf_DK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saved a copy (screenshot) showing the take image, but you can still see some of the text: http://e4a.dk/linux/index.php?p=fun&id=26

  276. MySwitchToLinux.Com... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..is still available (@ 2:20 PDT)

    Parody site anyone? :-)

    "I, like, hate Bill Gates AND Steve Jobs, so I switched to Revered Penguin Software. Now my life is beautiful again! Friggen Scouts Honor, man!

  277. Apple Mainframe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think my head might explode if I hear something more about PC vs. Mac.

    Is your MacIntosh a mainframe? Perhaps it is a handheld device?

    ATTENTION: Your Apple MacIntosh is a personal computer. Yes, it is a PC. Please adjust your lexicon accordingly.

    --Me

  278. Any google cache copies? by htrn · · Score: 1

    The page is gone now. Does anyeone have a good google cache copy that I can view it from? I'd really like to see what Microsoft is trying to do.

  279. Re:Welcome to Consumer Satisfaction by mcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have.

    And you've completely missed the exact same thing that Microsoft missed about the Switch campaign.

    The point isn't to show these people talking about all the things they can do with their macintoshes. The point is to show how happy that all these people are about all these things that they can do with their macintoshes. The point is demonstrate to all those disgruntled windows users in the Great Unwashed, using real people, that computing can actually be a pleasurable experience.

    Apple doesn't want you to pay attention to what any of those people in the Switch ads are saying. What they want you to pay attention to is the quiet, joyful glow in Ellen Feiss' eyes as she talks about how happy she is that she doesn't have to worry anymore about the computer going all, like, BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP and deleting, like, half her paper. (And it was a really *good* paper.)

    They want people to see these Switch ads and go, "Wow. These people all seem to actually enjoy using their computers. I don't enjoy using my computer at all. Maybe if I bought an apple, I'd enjoy using my computer too."

    (Of course, usually the ACTUAL effect is that people see that quiet glow and they go "Wow. Maybe if I started smoking pot, I'd be happy too". Or they start stalking Ellen Fiess. But the point is the intent of the whole thing.)

    This is why the switchy-PR thing on MS's website is such a joke. [S]he's describing how "great" her experience with WinXP has been, but the experience that she describes sounds about as fun as a trip to the DMV in which the line was short and you managed to get in and out and get everything you needed done without particularly any hassle. Meanwhile, any emotion that there is in the article feels about as real as Anne Coulter.

  280. Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was halfway through making a parody site featuring trailer-park girl and they pulled the page. Bastards!!!

  281. GoogleCache! by civik · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gotta love it!

    Original Microsoft page in all it's glory:
    here it is

    --
    Make it a malt liquor. I want to be as clever and handsome as possible.
    1. Re:GoogleCache! by civik · · Score: 1
      --
      Make it a malt liquor. I want to be as clever and handsome as possible.
  282. Copy From Google's Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/re fs/Mozilla_Scrapbook/Microsoft_switch.html

  283. Original Article & Girl still available by DanLake · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Microsoft "Switch" page that was removed earlier today can be found in the Google cache at: Article at Google Cache The picture of the woman is not the author of the article, but just a clip art from: Girl Clipart For Sale That fact was posted in one of the Slashdot comments. ~Dan Lake

  284. PLS POST MIRROR THX!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLS POST MIRROR THX!!!

  285. It's not about features, but convenience by zenyu · · Score: 2

    But then again, the Apple switch ads don't offer a single reason to use a Mac that WinXP doesn't have.

    I think the point of the Apple ads isn't that you can't do things in Windows, just that it's easier with a Mac. I'm not really a Mac expert but I know I get frustrated when I set down on a fresh Windows machine and click on the web browser and instead of just popping up some window where I can type google in, I get asked 20 questions where the defaults are always wrong. When I sit down on a fresh Mandrake box I just launch Mozilla and boom, I'm on the web. Same with terminals, you have to install TweakUI before you can even get tab completion in Windows. Also when it comes to video you have to install a bunch of drivers to get Windows to recognize video, with Mandrake it plops a little XawtTV on your desktop and gives you broadcast2000 in the menu, drivers are just there.

    You can do lots of things with Windows but it's always a major pain in the arse. I recently lost a Windows 2000 partition to safe only mode. Funny thing is I only have Microsoft software installed, something you think they could test on major brand hardware like a Vaio laptop. It's a month old partition that I had just finished configuring to be usable. Then I installed a security patch. I'm not a sysadmin, but I'm pretty computer aware as a programmer, and well a security patch killing a machine isn't unheard of, but a machine with no outside vendor programs or unapproved drivers? that's just wrong.

  286. Google Cache by entrylevel · · Score: 1

    Google's got the dope yo!

    Google doesn't retain the images, so check it out before MS pulls those too.

    --
    Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
  287. I Can Confirm by Llywelyn · · Score: 2

    Second Hand, but its something.

    The Faculty Advisor for our Mac Users Group on campus actually knew the DJ they had up in their last batch of switch ads. He hadn't seen her since 1989 and was mildly shocked when she appeared on the television in a commercial.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  288. 2:38 PM PST by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

    The page has been taken down. I repeat the page has been taken down.

  289. Copy of the article by prostoalex · · Score: 2

    I tried to post it nicely formatted, but send your /. editors a postcard for lameness filter. Anyway, here's a copy.

    Mac to PC: Mission Accomplished, Convert Thrilled

    October 9, 2002

    Yes, it's true. I like the Microsoft® Windows® XP operating system enough to change my whole computing world around. Here's the bottom line: Windows XP gives me more choices and flexibility, and better compatibility with the rest of the technology world.

    Windows XP relieved my fears about switching. I can read my files, import e-mail addresses from my Palm* to the Microsoft Outlook® messaging and collaboration client, and keep my Web favorites. All the Mac hardware--including my printer, broadband cable, Zip drive, and Palm handheld--works perfectly with my Windows-based PC.

    To my surprise, the process of switching was as easy as the marketing hype had promised. I was up and running in less than one day, Girl Scout's honor. First, let me tell you more about why I converted.

    More Hardware Options, for Less Dough

    I am a freelance writer; I demand the best in mobile computing. There's a much greater choice of portable computers and features, for less money, on the Windows platform. My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook. My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it. See Which Edition is Right for You? for more information.

    More Software Flexibility

    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

    Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict. Searches are faster; the History feature makes it easier to find that site from last week; and I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want.

    And Now for the How

    Now that I've given you the reasons why I converted, here's the skinny on the how.

    Step 1: Internet and E-Mail
    The first time I turned on my PC, Windows XP prompted me to set up User Accounts. I set up one for me and one for my husband. I love that we can define completely different user experiences without messing with each other's settings. It's like a Lexus we rented once; when you pushed a button, the driver's seat and mirrors all moved to accommodate my 5 foot 3 inches instead of his 6 feet.

    The New Connection Wizard then guided me through the setup of my Internet connection for browsing the Web. If you use a dial-up connection with an Internet service provider (ISP), you'll need to know your ISP's name (e.g., MSN®), your user name (the part of your e-mail address before the @ symbol), your password, and the phone number for your ISP connection.

    To make a new connection:
    From the Start menu, select All Programs, and then select Accessories, Communications, and New Connection Wizard.
    Work your way through the wizard, clicking Next after each step and then Finish when you reach the end of the wizard.
    To access your new account, click Start, point to Connect To, and then click the connection you set up in step 2.
    I started with Outlook Express for e-mail, because it's included with Windows XP. You'll need to know a few things from your ISP or administrator:
    Type of e-mail server: POP3, IMAP, or HTTP (like Hotmail® or Yahoo)
    Your name, e-mail address, user name, and password
    Incoming and outgoing mail servers:often the same--for example, email.contoso.com
    To setup a new e-mail account in Outlook Express:
    From the Tools menu, click Accounts.
    Click Add, and then select Mail.
    Work your way through the wizard.

    Step 2: Importing Favorites
    I copied hundreds of Web Favorites from the Mac onto a Zip disk, then into the Favorites folder on the PC. Internet Explorer has an Import/Export Wizard that you can use to import Netscape bookmarks, but I found it faster to do it this way.

    To copy Web Favorites:
    Connect the Zip drive to your Macintosh, and insert a Zip disk with plenty of room.
    On the Mac, start Internet Explorer. From the Window menu, click Favorites.
    Press COMMAND+A (+A) to select them all, and drag them to copy them onto your Zip disk.
    Connect the Zip drive to your PC, and insert the disk on which you just saved your Favorites.
    On the PC, click Start, then My Computer, and then double-click Local Disk (C:). Open the Documents and Settings folder, then the folder with your user account name, and then your Favorites folder.
    On the Zip disk, press CTRL+A to select all the files, and then drag them into the Favorites folder. They'll all be there the next time you open Favorites in Internet Explorer.

    Step 3: Importing Contacts and E-Mail Messages
    Both Outlook Express and Outlook will import contacts and messages from other programs. Use the Import/Export Wizard, which you'll find on the File menu.

    Importing Messages. I upgraded to Outlook when I installed Office XP. I chose Yes when Outlook asked whether I wanted to import messages from Outlook Express. Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook, but all was not lost. All you have to do is point Outlook to where the messages are saved:
    From the File menu, click Open, and then Outlook Data File. Select Outlook, and then click OK.

    (click on image for larger view)

    Importing Contacts. All of my most current contact information was located in my Palm. I used the Conduit Manager in Outlook to download e-mail addresses from my Palm to the notebook PC, as well as my Calendar, Tasks (to-do lists), and Notes. To start the Conduit Manager, click the button with the picture of a handheld on the far right of the Outlook Standard toolbar (also under the Tools menu).

    A Final Note about Hardware

    The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware. Windows XP or your computer manufacturer will pre-install most of them. If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.

    I discover more treats daily. For example, Word Converters are helping me transfer old document files, Microsoft Works files, and even AppleWorks files. It will be an ongoing process, but I'm thrilled so far.

    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    Do you have an idea for a story? We'd love to hear from you. How have you used Microsoft software to make your home or work life easier, more fun, faster, or simpler? Submit your ideas, and you could get published on the Insider Web site! Submit Your Idea Today!
    Download the submission form in Adobe PDF format (ShowOffYourSkills.pdf, 64kb)
    Download the submission form in Word format (ShowOffYourSkills.doc, 27kb)

  290. cached copy on google @ by BrodieBruce · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:JmwQcVoG-ucJ: www.microsoft.com/insider/opsystems/windowsxp_setu p.asp+Windows+XP+gives+me+more+choices+and+flexibi lity&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

  291. What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What honestly is so bad about MS... (prepares for flaming) Well, not the corporation exactly, but the OS? I mean, maybe its not as secure or as efficient as some other operating systems out there, but who's really going to try to hack Joe User's computer with something other than a virus which he can get software to stop? Doesn't a PC running some variation of Windows offer the easiest, most cost effective way for average people to enjoy the widest variety of (especially game) software? May the lord have mercy on my soul...

  292. Fabricated article... and stated as such: by Hyped01 · · Score: 1
    This is directly from the MS Page - emphasis added by me:

    *Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!

    Do you have an idea for a story? We'd love to hear from you. How have you used Microsoft software to make your home or work life easier, more fun, faster, or simpler? Submit your ideas, and you could get published on the Insider Web site! Submit Your Idea Today!

    Note that it says an IDEA for a story... give 'em an idea... they'll write a story.

    Note that it also clearly states that "Miss Freelance Writer" is one of "their writers" - not very unbiased.

    - Rob

    --

    WebMaster:
    BinFeeds
    XXX Thumbnailed Image Newsgroups but

    1. Re:Fabricated article... and stated as such: by moenispiekni · · Score: 1

      It's quite funny to see that they "admit" that ppl working for them have been using MAC for the last 9 years.

    2. Re:Fabricated article... and stated as such: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite possible that "our writer" was simply used as a reference to the person writing the article and not an "admittance of supreme guilt that the person works at Microsoft" that some of you seem to think it is.

    3. Re:Fabricated article... and stated as such: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you have been following along but...

      1 - she admitted it
      2 - MS admitted it and later added it wasnt one of their brightest moves (check BBC News)
      3 - she seems to have written or submitted all of these new "Insider Stories"

      Other than the glaring facts and ADMISSIONS of guilt, I'd say you're right!

      Oh, wait, you cant be right thanks to those facts and admissions of guilt... or perhaps they are lying when they said they did do it?

  293. Stephen Hawking recommends Windows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in, noted gansta rapper Stephen "M.C." Hawking has been found recommending windows! You may not have understood "A Brief History of Time", but still he had an enourmous effect on the British Gansta rap scene. Truly an English icon.

  294. Why bother? by DaveOMatic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the Apple switch campaign was the best advertising they could have gotten. Every time I see one of those smug, smarmy bastards talking about why they switched, it just makes me cling to my cvrappy Windows box more, out of spite. It's like those "The Truth" anti-smoking ads, that make you want to start going at a pack a day, just to shut the little punks up.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Malcreant · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      My disdain for Macs (and their elitists) has fermented ever since the day I made the mistake of going into a Mac store in Harvard Square. They had a little bit of PC software around so I asked them when the next version of Metawhatever's Paintbrush would be available on the PC. I got this condescending "Paintbrush will NEVER be available for a PC. It's too graphically intense to be supported on something like Windows 3.1." I just shrugged and went home to play with my older version of Paintbrush on my Windows PC and waited for the next release.

      Obviously, this doesn't represent ALL Mac users but it really summed up the snotty attitude associated with Apple and their fervent supporters.

      I have no "love" for MS, but all I can say is Windows and PC's were there when I needed them. They were affordable and they worked. Once the graphics and sound capabilities of Windows/PC caught up to the Macs I quit wishing I had one and focused on creating stuff instead.

  295. I agree with this post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir, are having teh funny!

  296. Re:Choices and Flexibility? Nah! Hung if say No!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the latest download patches to XP require that they be done in a certain order. Plus, stopping half way through the series, say after reading a frighteningly unacceptable EULA, causes failure of the update, and hangs the web driven update process in perpetuity.

  297. Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, there is no Microsoft.com web page matching your request.

    I also got this response when I looked up the following pages:

    Security
    Stability
    Intergrated Software
    Digital Rights Managment
    Freedom of Choice
    Affordable Software
    and of course, Open Source.

    Where will we let you go today?

  298. Missing Step by Transcendent · · Score: 2

    Importing the favorites from the Mac to the PC seemed easy... but they forgot a step...

    ...

    4)Connect the Zip drive to your PC, and insert the disk on which you just saved your Favorites.

    5)On the PC, click Start, then My Computer, and then double-click Local Disk (C:). Open the Documents and Settings folder, then the folder with your user account name, and then your Favorites folder.
    ...


    4 1/2) Restart computer 5 times. Download most recent, "authenticated" XP drivers, restart again. Restart yet another time after computer freezes. Reset BIOS because parallel or serial port was misconfigured. Reconfigure hardware because of faults in IRQ sharing. Call some computer technician. Pay money to them to fix the computer. Once fixed, continue...

  299. Don Funk by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look at the article 'she' shows an example of a file open box .... obviously her real name is 'Don Funk' and quick google search shows 'her' email address is 'donfu@microsoft.com'

    Even more interesting..."Don Funk" is used in microsoft examples(i.e. msdn code snippets). Here is one showing Microsoft's repadmin.exe(diagnoses replication problems between Windows 2000 domain controllers):

    repadmin /showmeta "cn=Don Dunk,ou=Marketing,dc=microsoft,dc=com" server1.microsoft.com

    Funny, isn't it? Make your own conclusions!

  300. Ooo, /. aqua-ized ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    Anyway to make /. look "aqua-ized" all the time? It only does for the Mac stories.

    Getting back on topic -- funny that MS pulled it so quick. Ticks me off that they do the same with other pages. i.e. IE, Media Player. I need to be able to test on OLDER versions.

    1. Re:Ooo, /. aqua-ized ... by NullProg · · Score: 1

      Getting back on topic -- funny that MS pulled it so quick. Ticks me off that they do the same with other pages. i.e. IE, Media Player. I need to be able to test on OLDER versions.

      I don't find it all surprising that they pulled it so fast. I think they have several trolls here (Former members of team windows), keeping an eye on linux happenings. One of them read the comments, recognized the PR fiasco, and had a marketroid pull the page.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
  301. Researching this further... by Trelane · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I found a thread at http://www.php.net/manual/en/security.apache.php
    which seems to validate your claim. However, one of the writes that one can use apache2's perchild mpm module. This seems like a pretty good solution to me. There's also mention of open_basedir.

    Sound better to you?

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  302. Mirror: Two Words "Google Cache" by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

    Search for this in google "opsystems/windowsxp_setup.asp"
    then click on the cache link.

    1. Re:Mirror: Two Words "Google Cache" by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if this is persistent, but also here is a direct link to the cache. The Google Cache Link for the Ad

  303. no doubt about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come on, you've never come home late at night unable to hold a conversation and just told your parents you were on "benedryl"? jeez

  304. Microsoft's "ShowYourSkills" form by cascadefx · · Score: 2
    If you want to be like the freelance writer, you just have to fill out this pdf and send it in to Microsoft.

    http://www.microsoft.com/insider/downloads/ShowOff YourSkills.pdf

  305. Linux Loving Sluts by cscx · · Score: 1

    ROFL, mod parent up.

  306. *poof* by mstra · · Score: 1

    And then like.. Slashdot posters were like... uhh... post post...and the website was gone.

    They were really good posts, too.

    And then I was in a hurry, and had to, like, put up something quickly, and since I was in a rush, it wasn't as good. And the picture wasn't even a real picture.

    --
    Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
  307. D00d, she's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She made me cum my pants almost as hard as Linux does!

  308. there can not be enough money in the world to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... get me working for M$.

    I am at a point where i ignore _every_ technology and idea from M$.
    I do not even look at them and everyday i try to convince some people of doing the same.
    America is lost, europe will withstand the crowd of this salesmans of crap.

    Bill Gates go home!

  309. Another "Cache" by Squidgee · · Score: 1
    One of the users on SpyMac took a screenie of the page. You can find it Here.

    Wait, lemme guess: MS's next big product is...The new WinXP Agua interface? The Holmes built in search engine? eTools?

    Hahahahahhahahaha.

    1. Re:Another "Cache" by Squidgee · · Score: 1
      Haha, here's a good one from the article:
      >"And I was up and running in less than one day, girl scout's honor"

      Anyone want to know how long it took me to get my iBook working? Well, mind you, this is without and expierience with Macs, but it took me less than 5mins. MS is a wee bit unclear on concept, no?

  310. Oh, that's just BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look at that page: What freelance writer is going to try to write a convincing "switch like I did" article, and turn it into an Internet Connection Wizard (tm) howto midstream? And what? She doesn't know there is a Word for Mac? IE for Mac? Hello!?!?!

    Get real. This is imaginary drivel.

    Besides, it sounds like she (I'm guessing the babe at the top is the author, which is also questionable) is spending all of her time converting over. Wait until she tries to actually use that POS.

    I'll be looking for her mug on the Apple Switch site RSN. :)

  311. Explanation by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Update: 10/14 21:12 GMT by P: Apparently,
    > Microsoft has taken the page down, but Google
    > has it.

    She must have switched back

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  312. This is really terrible! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    How could Microsoft so shitty that they can't find a real MS-using freelance writer to take a picture of? They should be pretty damn embarassed by this. I mean, this is a real low! Sure, they pulled the "freelance writer" page now, but these other pages are still up. What an egg in the face!

    1. Re:This is really terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where in God's name did you get the idea that Microsoft had any originality? Why did they pull this stunt? Because they consider their users to be a bunch of ignorant saps, fit only to feed their coffers. You might hate Steve Jobs, and you might hate Apple and their prices, but you'd be a fool not to admit that Apple is Microsofts's R&D department. What's truly pathetic is Mr. Gates's not caring that people uncover their charade, as if they wouldn't (See "Because they consider...", above.)

      But I can't say this, because that would make me a Mac Zealot. And you can't say this, because you're on Slashdot and therefore, they'll say, a frustrated adolescent nerd without a girlfriend.

      But it's true; Mircrosoft hates their userbase. It's their money, and only their money, which they covet.

  313. All I have to say is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good artists copy, great artists steal.

  314. In Other News by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    The web site often touted as Geek Heavan, http://www.slashdot.org/ , was sent a cease and desist order for the aqua theme it uses on mac-subjected stories.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  315. So, is Office XP included in that price? by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®. Toolbars and menus customize themselves to the way I work. I wouldn't know how to function without the Track Changes and Comments features of Word. I adore the Office Clipboard, which copies multiple elements from one file and pastes them into another.

    So a laptop with 512 MB of ram, Office XP, Windows XP pro, and all the other features this thing is talking about was $450.00 cheaper than an iBook? Sorry, but that is very unlikely. If you're comparing a Windows computer to a Mac, and you're saying that Office XP is better than AppleWorks, you'd better be including the $500 for Office XP in that comparison, or you're going to get burned by legal.

    1. Re:So, is Office XP included in that price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's probably correct. See http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid= 40&threadid=882451

      for an a compaq running an xp2000+, 15", CDRW, XP Pro, office XP, 512, CDRW, wifi, blah blah...for about $1650. Compare that to an equivilant ibook (and really, you'd be better off comparing it to a powerbook except for the weight of the compaq) which costs $1938.

      You can regularly get slightly lesser equipped laptops for $1000-$1200 if you are a smart shopper.

  316. *snort* by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    But Micros...hehehehehe...they're jus....hooohehehe... you know, the....bwa hehehe hehe
    they
    BWAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA HAHAH
    HOOOOHA HAHAHAHAHAH ohgood ohgodohgod
    BWAAAAAAA HA HAHAHAHA!! .......

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  317. Re:Apple at it again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy do those guys love to copy the best ideas from Pepsi.. though admittedly the 'switch' campain was total ass.

  318. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by goon+america · · Score: 2, Informative
    MacOS installs have never had license codes, serial numbers, or any of that. Technically you're not supposed to install the same copy in more than one place, but Apple has never added even rudimentary copy protection to its OS's, or sued anybody over such behavior.

    Now Final Cut Pro on the other hand...

  319. Whoa... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2
    From the linked imdb story:

    Was offered the role of Juliet in Romeo + Juliet (1996) but had to turn it down because of scheduling conflicts with "All My Children" (1970).

    That's what I call production over-run.
    1. Re:Whoa... by leroybrown · · Score: 1

      That's what I call production over-run.

      yeah, i guess they had a scene that couldn't be done without her since she was born seven years into post-production!

      --
      Founder, Americans Allied Against Alliteration
    2. Re:Whoa... by toriver · · Score: 2

      Mind you, "All My Children" (1970) just means that the TV series All My Children started in 1970; there is no problem with a (soap) series lasting for 26+ years, though uncommon. And soaps have people joining and leaving the cast a lot.

      According to IMDb, S. M. Gellar was in the series from 1993 to 1995, which would have conflicted with a production released in 1996.

    3. Re:Whoa... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

      Sure. Take the fun out of everything...

  320. A web page = a campaign? by geekee · · Score: 1

    ok. One MS marketing type probably spent about half a day on it. That's probably about the extent of their concern regarding Apple. Remember, they invested millions in Apple to keep them alive. They're more worried about the govt. than Apple.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  321. They got it all wrong... by onyxcide · · Score: 1

    Who cares about Office XP?

    As any Mac to PC convert can tell you, Counterstrike is the only reason we ever made the switch.

  322. M$ is remarkably clueless as to who uses and why by crovira · · Score: 2

    I don't know who uses M$ OS who actually _wants_ to(and I work for a bank with tens of thousands of desk tops.)

    They use it because that's they were told to by the office. (The ones who have been told to use Citrix Clients to communicate with the office and own Macs at home can and likely do use the Mac OS X app.)

    Windows is something the office sticks you with when they're too dumb to use Linux.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  323. MOD HIM UP! by jcr · · Score: 2

    Good job spotting the fake, dude. You rule.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  324. Wow... by superdan2k · · Score: 2

    Where do they find these people?

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Wow... by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Well, that is just TOO funny, no wonder MS pulled that "article" down so fast...

      Well that and the fact that is' just so much marketing hype it's not even funny.

      Not to say that Apple's "switch" campaign isn't either, but at least thiers has a bit of flair.

  325. The identity of the writer has been revealed by Ethelred+Unraed · · Score: 2
    The real writer of this blurb has been revealed. It was none other than...

    *drumroll*

    Gerald Holmes.

    Well, maybe it wasn't him. He would have done a better job.

    Cheers,

    Ethelres

    --
    Everyone wants to be Ethelred. Even I want to be Ethelred.
  326. The obvious by nyseal · · Score: 1

    Let's see.... * Up and running in less than a day (a day?!) * The key for software / hardware communication is DRIVERS... * An on-going process for the transfer of files Aren't these the points that Apple is advertising AGAINST?

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  327. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1
    The main issue of course being that there are still seperate distros of Linux (PPC, x86, SPARC).

    When will we see a distro with all the nessesary code in one package, and a universal install?


    *boggle*. You do realize this will triple the size of the distro for ALL users, not just those who are installing across multiple architechtures?

    In fact, I'm not even sure it's possible to write a "universal install"...
    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  328. What I love by rikkards · · Score: 1

    is they say how easy it is to import into Outlook and Outlook Express from other programs. One thing that is funny is how uneasy it is to import from a previous version of Outlook Express if you haven't already exported. I had a situation that a machine running 98SE had died and the user wanted XP. Well we copied all of the files off his hard drive and tried to import Outlook Express files into Outlook. Nope no option for that.

    Also notice how I said it wasn't easy not impossible.

  329. Did Microsoft forget that they sell Mac Office? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 3, Informative

    What a horrid little article.

    Wow, that was bad. I personally loved when that fictional woman was bragging about Office having more features then Appleworks. Well, all I have to say is "duh." AppleWorks was designed to be a simple office productivity suite, not the huge beast that is MS Office.

    Moreover, did Microsoft forget that they sell Microsoft Office for MacOS? And did they also forget that the Mac versions of Office (at least 98, 2001, and Office X) have typically had cooler features and a better interface then their Windows counter parts?

    And, hey don't get me started on all of the free Open Source Productivity suites that have tons of features and read DOC and XLS files for free. I think Microsoft forgot about those as well.

    Other things that Microsoft seems to have forgotten about include:
    Microsoft develops a version of Internet Explorer for Mac OS complete with tons of Mac specific features.
    Mozilla(netscape) has more features, and -actually- does more then IE has ever done.
    Every browser on the face of the earth comes with a history and organizable favorites, bookmarks, etc
    A lowend iBook will remain functional a hell of a lot longer then a lowend notebook running windows.
    Wizards are horrible little things that should rot in a firry pit of hell. Users should never 'need' to look for a wizard for simple setup procedure. They are a crutch for poor interface design.

    God I hate Windows.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  330. Beaten to death by derubergeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Okay - I know this has already been hammered on endlessly, but - after reading the switch story - I just couldn't resist...

    My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook. My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it.

    First off, I noticed that she chose not to include the extra $250-$300 for XP professional upgrade in the cost...

    AppleWorks (previously called ClarisWorks) pales in comparison to Microsoft Office XP. There's no equivalent for the versatility of Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint®.

    It's also $75 and free on certain models (iMac/iBook, e.g.) - and MS Office is also available for the Mac .

    Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did

    Finally, IE is the default browser on the Mac. And, being a daily user of IE5/OSX & IE6/Win2k, I can attest to the fact that IE5 on the Mac is more feature rich (auction tracking, autofill button, font+- as examples). Of course, IE5 on the Mac doesn't pop a window up everytime I pause over an image...but I'm thinking that's a plus.

    About the only thing she forgot to put in there was And my Windows XP machine wasn't created using child labor plus it's dolphin and spotted owl friendly.

    I can just see the new XP boxes: "Contains no harmful asbestos or cyanide laced CDs. Can your OS say that?"

    Build a quality OS or crush the competition. Pick one.

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
  331. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1
    MacOS installs have never had license codes, serial numbers, or any of that.


    Possibly because Apple makes money on the hardware anyway?
    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  332. yeah, but by cygnusx197 · · Score: 1

    "modern operating-system features like separate accounts for each user". I've worked in several mac only environments, and none of the users even knew that they had multiuser capability. Even when shown that it existed, they didn't think they needed it, or whined and complained about the extra hastle and step of logging in, even though they complained about how people were stealing their files, and reading their email. Yeah, microsoft....Mac users are going come in droves over user accounts.

  333. Submitting Story Ideas by VB · · Score: 2, Funny


    I realize M$ took the article down, but is the preferred method of submitting insider article ideas still via the following document links:

    - or -

    Would they prefer you just take over one of Micro$oft's IIS servers and replace the c:\wwwroot\ with your story content? Is there a code-redify wizard available to automate the process of taking 0wn3r5h1p of an IIS server, or does this have to be done manually? Thanks if someone knows...

    --
    www.dedserius.com
    VB != VisualBasic
  334. Oh and of course Apple's confessors must be real by xmnemonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The author of the page -- who never identifies herself, and who could very easily be fictional or a composite sketch"

    Oh and I suppose if they gave a name and showed a more "natural" looking person, there's no way it could be fake?

  335. Stock image in MS PC switcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.eyewire.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/View.woa /wa/viewProduct?product=437485

  336. you guys suck, its so obvious what they're doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops, a story got leaked by an obscure source, dang how could we here at microsoft be so stupid as to let that url slip out?!??

    they wouldnt do this by accident you simpletons.. notice the word 'setup' in the url.. and file names.. its a setup to get you punks buzzing about it

  337. more likely by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    their marketing team found a way to get the page slashdotted so they can say to the boss, look how many hits our "switch" page is getting. the campaign is working!

  338. Mirrored.. just in case.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MIRROR
    enjoy... if you need to.

  339. It's all hot air! by twitter · · Score: 2
    The key to getting hardware to work with your computer is to have the correct drivers, the software that enables your PC to communicate with your hardware. Windows XP or your computer manufacturer will pre-install most of them. If not, go to the Web site of the company that makes the peripheral you want to attach to find the most current drivers.

    OK , I just don't get it. How can I get my imac to run all that great software she's talking about? My personal computer has all the specs on the XP box, but it just does not seem to work. What am I doing wrong? Like, it just sits there.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  340. Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I guess they had to do something to keep it from crashing during the filming of the ad.

    Well, one does wonder... the advertiser may have been worried about whether the thing actually died in the saddle or not, but the original Microsoft page that this SlashDot story is about says (used to say):

    Later, I had to uninstall and reinstall Outlook

    ...which to me looks like she'd probably have to uninstall XP to stop it from crashing.

    So... if this is Microsoft's new, fantastic, reliable, easy-to-use replacement for OS/X, why did our anonymous but very pretty switcher have to spend time sysadminning her brand new toy? And why did Microsoft publish that point? They're basically confirming every Windows user's constant nightmare: that the system might suddenly and without obvious cause irretrievably screw itself.

    When was the last time you had to remove and reinstall KMail to get it working?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      that the system might suddenly and without obvious cause irretrievably screw itself.

      I've never had to do this. The people I know who TRUELY know what they are doing have never had to do this.

      I don't fear my XP system crashing, because it doesn't.

      I refuse to believe my copy is special, and I refuse to believe that I'm superior to other users.

      Maybe other users, even the ones who THINK they know what they are doing, are just inferior to me?

      Or, maybe, most users just don't know what they are doing? I think I'll buy that one.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

      The bottom line is that XP is better than 9X, but not as long-term stable as any of the Unices, including OS/X and BeOS. Microsoft are stil fixing things by piling on the bandaids instead of doing it right the first time.

      AND do have a bit of a think about the implications of the Microsoft-hired ad agency regarding the removak and reinstallation your email client as such a routine event that they left it in an ad promoting Microsoft!

      --
      Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    3. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The thing is -- I've never had to add or remove my e-mail client, either.

      I think that was a joke or something, though I haven't seen it.

      Outlook does kind of blow for some things, but for sucking so bad it still doesn't really give me any problems, unless you count it being totally fucking worthless for newsgroups. I don't even bother using it for that.

      Incidently, I still have the majority of my e-mail since about 97 on this system. It's been brought forward upgrade after upgrade.

      Maybe I'm just lucky.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    4. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by dadragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never had to do this. The people I know who TRUELY know what they are doing have never had to do this.

      I don't fear my XP system crashing, because it doesn't.


      Dude, how many people do you know who both run XP Home and know what they're doing? I can't think of any.

      I was just at my uncle's house. His computer runs XP, he and his wife are the only ones who use it. One of the user accounts was so fscked up as to be unusable, so they switched to just using one of them. His e-mail didn't work, but that was because Sasktel changed their POP3 authentication method. And it was slow and somewhat unstable. I fixed these things quite easily, but I know what I'm doing with computers and my uncle didn't.

      My 2K server box and my XP box are sable like packed dirt (pretty stable, month long uptimes with no slowdown), while my FreeBSD box is like a rock (multi-month runtimes -- pretty much solid between releases -- with no slowdown). I know what I'm doing, so Windows and FreeBSD work. For the average home user, Windows won't work because it's too easy to fuck up. ...and I refuse to believe that I'm superior to other users.

      But that's exactly what it is. You're a better user than most of the "XP sucks" crowd. It [XP] ain't bad, but it can be fucked up just like anything else.

      Or, maybe, most users just don't know what they are doing? I think I'll buy that one.

      You just hit the nail on the head. People assume that they know everything or that they'll figure it out (which they probably can, but they'll end up installing it a few times before they do)

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    5. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Maybe other users, even the ones who THINK they know what they are doing, are just inferior to me?

      There's another possibility; perhaps they are neither inferior to you, nor superior to you, but rather just different from you.

      With two decades of programming experience I don't consider myself to be any sort of a "clueless newbie". I've worked on (and programmed for) everything from embedded controllers to goverment mainframe supercomputers. I don't have a problem understanding technology, but every time I work on an MS-Windows based system I have the same kinds of problems that some other people (apparently not you) describe having, regarding crashing apps, BSOD's, etc. I've reached the conclusion that Windows is fine for most of the people in the country, but that most of the people in the country just don't think like I do. I can't get my head around Windows; it seems to be designed for different kind of thinker. (Not that I'm complaining, I like being one of the minority who can think like I do.)

      And I have no quarrel with anyone who chooses to use Windows (although I encourage them to try other operating systems just to make sure they know about all the alternatives so they can pick the best one for themselves) but I will complain whenever and Windows user tries to make the argument that Windows must be the best because a lot of people use it. And my position leaves me strategically opposed to Microsoft, as a corporation, because they have a financial interest in getting rid of people like me.

      Go ahead a use whatever you feel like using, and don't feel like you have to defend your decision to me. But by the same token, don't hate me just because I choose to Think Different.

      --

      The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

    6. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Jace of Fuse, you would then be in line with what Bill Gates thinks about his customers. Here are some quotes:

      "Well, to create a new standard, it takes something that's not just a little
      bit different. It takes something that's really new and really captures
      people's imagination. And the Macintosh, of all the machines I've ever seen,
      is the only one that meets that standard."
      -BILL GATES

      "The next generation of interesting software will be made on a Macintosh,
      not an IBM PC."
      -BILL GATES, 1984

      "Interviewer: Is studying computer science the best way to prepare to be a
      programmer?
      Gates: No, the best way to prepare is to write programs, and to study great
      programs that other people have written. In my case, I went to the garbage
      cans at the Computer Science Center and I fished out listings of their
      operating system."
      -PROGRAMMERS AT WORK, Microsoft Press

      "Focus: 'But there are bugs in any version which people would really like to
      have fixed.'
      Gates: 'No! There are no significant bugs in our released software that any
      significant number of users want fixed. ... Maybe you're not using it
      properly.'"
      -Focus Magazine, 10/23/95
      "If you can't make it good, make it look good."
      -BILL GATES, 1995

      "The idea that people know what they want is wrong. They need to be pulled
      through the Web."
      -LAURA JENNINGS, VP, Microsoft Network

      "We get a million calls a month saying, 'hey, this product is confusing.'"
      -BILL GATES

      "imagine the disincentive to software development if after months of work
      another company could come along and copy your work and market it under its
      own name ... without legal restraints to such copying, companies like Apple
      could not afford to advance the state of the art"
      -BILL GATES, 1983

      He's a unimaginative slog from a family of corporate lawyers. He thinks his customers are dumbasses for not figuring out how to use his very confusing software. he freely admits that he is a copy-cat without an original bone in his body and that Apple is the forefront of innovation in the computer industry.

      There many more quotes like these that show he cares nothing about the product his company produces or the effect it has on the end user. He doesn't care about me, so i don't give him my money...

    7. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only reply, "Who knows what goes on in the mind of a Windows user?!?"

    8. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep win2k pro can be BSODed only slightly faster than XP. M$ had the perfect opportunity to fix their problems with the NT kernel and spawned OSes, unfortunately they just can't seem to ever get it quite right, but I suppose that is because they are too busy figuring out how to modify ("extend") technologies such that the consumer it permanently tied to M$'s purse strings.

      and to the topmost post, if you can't copy it after trying to buy it, just steal it: Stac Technologies anyone? Oh, and don't forget to say that all the competition's products are bug riddled, unstable, and wholly unusable.

    9. Re:Sorry, is that page for or against Microsoft? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      although I encourage them to try other operating systems

      Actually, as I've mentioned many times in the past...

      My FreeBSD machine rocks, too. That's why --I-- get annoyed. People sling mud at me for actually liking Windows XP and tell me to try some form of Unix, without even knowing that I've been running FreeBSD for quite some time and love it, too!

      If I had the space/time/money I would probably also run a MAC.

      I have no problems being multi-platform, even if one of those platforms happens to be Windows.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  341. How Microsoft has made my life easier by hansroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At the bottom of the MS page is a link to submit your own story about how MS software has made your life complete. I'm going to send the story about Windows XP activation puking last week while I was writing my last paper for college graduation. I'd love to let MS know how I stayed up all night trying to reactivate, then installing Windows 2000, and reinstalling Windows XP (only to find out that hey, I can reactivate now that I've reinstalled).

    And before any of your even think about saying "That's what you get for pirating," I'll have you know this was a legal copy. I didn't pay full retail for it, but that's the benefit of going to a school owned by Microsoft. XP is worth the $10 I paid for it, but not much more.

    1. Re:How Microsoft has made my life easier by bugiled · · Score: 1
      I can simply account my experiences this evening, as my PC (for no apparent reason) decided to freeze up no less than six times.

      Then my boyfriend could write some stories. He hates our computer more than I do, and has far, far less patience with it.

  342. Free market research? by theBrownfury · · Score: 1

    Why do I get this feeling that Microsoft just got a whole lot of free market research done just cruising the Slashot forum for this story at +2?

    --

    "Unlike most of you, I am not a nut." - Homer J. Simpson
  343. shocking! by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That someone might use stock photographs as design elements on a web page!

    Sure, the 'testamonial' picture would lead you to belive that the person pictured actualy wrote the artical, but most of those pictures are just headings to pages with lots of links.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:shocking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing you know, Apple users might actually stop believing their "switch" actors aren't really actors.

    2. Re:shocking! by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Have you SEEN the Ellen one? The one they can't air because she was loaded when they shot it?

    3. Re:shocking! by zipoff · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's been airing in the Minnesota market for weeks now.

      When I saw it I was shocked with all the rumors that Apple wasn't going to allow it to air.

    4. Re:shocking! by aqua · · Score: 1

      That hardly stopped them airing The Brady Bunch. I'd have thought use of drugs and Apple products hardly disjoint. They could do passably running targets specifically intended to appeal to recreational drug users.

    5. Re:shocking! by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      hehehe Yeah, "Next time you toke up, do it in front of a Mac!"

      Surprised they're airing the Ellen ad. It is a funny one though. (She's hot in a disturbing drugged out freak kind of way.)

  344. Re:Why'd MS hire all those AppleWorks programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Microsoft thinks so poorly of Appleworks that back in 96 or so, Microsoft tried to hire every one of the engineers that worked on ClarisWorks (now AppleWorks). Some went, some didn't. Shortly after that, Microsoft products for the Apple platform started getting really good, starting with IE.

  345. To be fair... by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

    I know someone who switched from OS X to XP and liked it. It wasn't any particular feature they liked in XP or disliked in OS X, it was just what he felt was the incongruous mix of Mac and Unix, and what he felt was the excessively raw nature of OS X (he did use 10.1, but not 10.2 - but then, I've not used 10.2).

    I can't say I understand his position, much less agree, but there it is. He's a a bit of a Unix geek and does most of his work on Macs (as dictated to him - he's a grad student), so it's not like he was planning on liking it.

    OTOH, his TiBook was stolen, and his current laptop is in much less danger of being the target of thievery - it's just so danged ugly. Maybe that's what he prefers? :-P

    --
    --Matthew
  346. another few C-notes for Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Windows home user with two neurons to rub together would pay for Photoshop. They copy it. Anyone who is too stupid to figure out how to copy Photoshop for free probably can't drive to Circuit City to buy the computer in the first place. Only professionals buy Photoshop. Same for every other full-blown app in the world.

    1. Re:another few C-notes for Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother!

  347. Ha ha ha ha! Microsoft ownership! by twitter · · Score: 2
    To be fair, the use of "our" in a piece such as this often signifies "the person this piece is about". When a writer says "our hero", she usually is not claiming ownership.

    Trust me, when M$ says "our man", "our software", "our platform", and "our partners" they are claiming ownership, total complete and absolute. The mechanisms of ownership may elude honest people, but everyone feels it. M$ motto, "What's ours is ours and what's yours is ours too." What's not fair about that?

    Oh, your heartplug? Everyone has one of those here.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  348. The biggest crock.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 does more for me than Netscape Navigator ever did, and I am a surfing addict. Searches are faster; the History feature makes it easier to find that site from last week; and I can name and organize my Favorites any way I want."

    Yeah. IE has introduced me to more security problems and buffer overflows than I can shake a stick at. Although, I progressed far beyond Netscape Navigator (Communicator has been around for years now) and went with Mozilla.
    Last time I recall, Netscape & Mozilla both had search features, history features, and organizing bookmarks? Geez. Been there for years.

    If anybody actually wrote something like that, it's someone that has never really bothered to read the help files of their web browser.

  349. Network effects by driptray · · Score: 1

    Well, we all know that the number of users using a tool is directly proportional to the quality of the tool, right?

    Actually, this is often true. It's because of network effects.

    If web developers are creating IE-only sites because 95% of people are using IE, then IE is in fact "better" for most people, regardless of any other measure of "quality" you might want to use.

  350. ObSimpsonsMisquote by kubrick · · Score: 1

    Oh my God... The dead have risen and they're advocating Windows!

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  351. specific by twitter · · Score: 2
    Freedom to use the OS however you want to. I want to use my OS to get my daily work done. There isn't much beyond that that the OS has to do. This isn't really a clear argument, can you be more specific?

    How about the freedom to study what your company's daily needs really are, roll up a custom distro that includes all the applications needed then roll it out over 1,000 machines? No, I suppose it's much better to pay M$ or Apple per seat for the GENERIC_DISTRO that imperfectly fits everyone from a blind grandmother to reactor enginners. Shesh! What is your work and what tools would you really like? Is M$ Internet Exploder and the Office really all anyone needs? OEM's have to beg permision to change the wallpaper! How flexible is that?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:specific by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Did an internship for a large name power and electronics company a while back. They had a very simple way of setting up a "custom distro" for their machines. They took a machine, installed and configured it the way they wanted and then made a ghost of the HDD. Any computer that needed to be installed simply had the ghost installed to it. All the programs and configs that were needed installed right over the network in one swell foop. This same company also obtains licences to modify code for their own internal use.

      That being said, this company does not see a compelling reason to switch to an open source OS and find new programs (or new versions of the programs), recode programs for their needs, reinstall the entire system and reteach their employees how to use the new system.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  352. Dude - check this out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hah, and I've heard it said that Mac users don't want to go on camera. Here you go...

    This guy even made his own "Switcher" movie!

  353. 1000th post? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

    had to take a shot

  354. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the OS and it's programs were written in the optimal way, that is, as highly portable as possible, wouldn't it simply be a matter of including seperate versions of the machine specific code and then having everythig else just recompile to the appropriate version during install? Granted this leads to the problem of extreamly long install times, but then again, OSS developers love a challenge right?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  355. It's an LC I by amemily · · Score: 1

    I've seen far too many of those old beasts at work.

    It also looks like Word Perfect on the screen. I seem to recall that WordPerfect Corp used to have a version of WP for Macs.

  356. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

    MacOS installs have never had license codes, serial numbers, or any of that.

    ...Nice of them to make it easy on us by not using code to "enforce" their license agreement, but the license or lack of it is still there.

  357. right by twitter · · Score: 2
    If you are refering to SMS, save it. I worked for a couple of years at _fortune_500_mess_ that had an extensive in house software develpment. The suff they made was awsome, but the SMS set up sucked eggs. It had to completely install the software almost everytime, and was plauged with issues of whole computer restart shortcuts being invalidated and other maddening problems. In the end, there was nothing custom about it. The company canned it's IT people and are spending more than ever on less useful than ever tools that don't fit their needs. All the M$ way.

    The more you use M$ the more you lose.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  358. Laptop Keyboard Prevents Me From Switching to Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.

    I am a long-time Unix user. That means I need to have the Ctrl key to the left of the A key. This is a genuine need, not merely a want; it is based upon ergonomics. The Ctrl key is heavily used in unix, and it must be easily accessable. It cannot be off in the lower left corner of the keyboard where it is difficult to get at, and where it distorts the position of your left hand such that you can't easily type other keys while holding the Ctrl key down.

    Apple desktop keyboards are now all USB. They are all OK. The CapsLock key can be re-mapped into a Ctrl key.

    Unfortunately, even in this modern age, all Apple laptops have built-in ADB keyboards. The ADB keyboard is broken-by-design. It is, in general, not possible to remap the CapsLock key into a Ctrl key.

    There are some exceptions, but they are horrible kludges. They are horrible kludges because the original design of the ADB keyboard was a horrible kludge. The correct solution would be for Apple to re-design their laptop motherboards to use built-in USB keyboards. This hasn't happened yet. If you run Linux, use Debian's solution. For Mac OS X users, uControl works. There are no solutions (that I know of) for either NetBSD or OpenBSD. Please note once again that the "solutions" above are in fact kludges, because of the original bad design of the ADB keyboard.

    Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part. In an on-going email exchange I am having with an Apple employee (whom I won't name) in their marketing department, the Apple marketing person directly stated to me that Apple was catering to their historic Mac customers, and is purposely ignoring the Unix market. He also claimed that Apple would soon start paying more attention to the Unix market. I won't hold my breath. Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 12 years. I expect that trend to continue. (Also note that my Apple contact indicated that Macs would never ship with a 3-button mouse, even though Apple intended to port almost all X-window software and deliver it either on a CD/DVD or installed directly on each Mac's hard drive. How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X programs that often require 3 buttons?)

    Apple has now lost two opportunities to sell me hardware. I really wanted an Apple laptop for their superior battery life, and for the PowerPC with Altivec CPU. (The Altivec is vastly superior to the x86 line for DSP.) Because I can't live with the broken-by-design built-in ADB keyboard in all Apple laptops, Sony and IBM sold me laptops instead. If Apple fixes this problem, they will sell me a PowerBook next year; if they don't, I'll still be running OpenBSD on x86 hardware, and wishing I could use a Mac.

  359. Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.

    I am a long-time Unix user. That means I need to have the Ctrl key to the left of the A key. This is a genuine need, not merely a want; it is based upon ergonomics. The Ctrl key is heavily used in unix, and it must be easily accessable. It cannot be off in the lower left corner of the keyboard where it is difficult to get at, and where it distorts the position of your left hand such that you can't easily type other keys while holding the Ctrl key down.

    Apple desktop keyboards are now all USB. They are all OK. The CapsLock key can be re-mapped into a Ctrl key.

    Unfortunately, even in this modern age, all Apple laptops have built-in ADB keyboards. The ADB keyboard is broken-by-design. It is, in general, not possible to remap the CapsLock key into a Ctrl key.

    There are some exceptions, but they are horrible kludges. They are horrible kludges because the original design of the ADB keyboard was a horrible kludge. The correct solution would be for Apple to re-design their laptop motherboards to use built-in USB keyboards. This hasn't happened yet. If you run Linux, use Debian's solution. For Mac OS X users, uControl works. There are no solutions (that I know of) for either NetBSD or OpenBSD. Please note once again that the "solutions" above are in fact kludges, because of the original bad design of the ADB keyboard.

    Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part. In an on-going email exchange I am having with an Apple employee (whom I won't name) in their marketing department, the Apple marketing person directly stated to me that Apple was catering to their historic Mac customers, and is purposely ignoring the Unix market. He also claimed that Apple would soon start paying more attention to the Unix market. I won't hold my breath. Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 12 years. I expect that trend to continue. (Also note that my Apple contact indicated that Macs would never ship with a 3-button mouse, even though Apple intended to port almost all X-window software and deliver it either on a CD/DVD or installed directly on each Mac's hard drive. How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X programs that often require 3 buttons?)

    Apple has now lost two opportunities to sell me hardware. I really wanted an Apple laptop for their superior battery life, and for the PowerPC with Altivec CPU. (The Altivec is vastly superior to the x86 line for DSP.) Because I can't live with the broken-by-design built-in ADB keyboard in all Apple laptops, Sony and IBM sold me laptops instead. If Apple fixes this problem, they will sell me a PowerBook next year; if they don't, I'll still be running OpenBSD on x86 hardware, and wishing I could use a Mac.

  360. Right... by bugiled · · Score: 1
    I don't want to have to work to get my computer to do things. I just want to turn it on and have it work for me.

    I have a PC right now, and I can't wait to switch to Mac. Job problems are the only thing holding me back right now. By this time next year, hell in six months, I will have a Mac.

  361. List of PCI bus vendor ID's / Device ID's by Hobart · · Score: 2

    > Where is lspci -vv when you need it??
    Actually, that info is in the registry, under
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Enum\P CI\
    if you're really curious.
    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  362. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find the fact that ctrl is not at the bottom left EXTREMELY annoying, as the fact that "delete" key isn't full-sized.

    An iBook is shipping to me as I type, which I bought at full price.

  363. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1
    programs were written in the optimal way, that is, as highly portable as possible


    I disagree that optimal == portable, but...

    wouldn't it simply be a matter of including seperate versions of the machine specific code and then having everything else just recompile to the appropriate version during install


    a) There's no such thing as "machine specific code" and then an "everything else". At the ASM level, EVERYTHING is architechture specific.

    b) And what architechture do we write this magical installer for?

    You see the problem, I hope. Personally, I think IHBT by the parent. :P
    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  364. How many times have i seen this before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen this same post before. Nothing more than a troll.

  365. Talk about stubborn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've already been over this in excruciating detail, but this guy has a HUGE axe to grind against Apple, and a little tiny wheel to grind it against.

    1. Re:Talk about stubborn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that makes Apple a "little tiny wheel" ;-)

    2. Re:Talk about stubborn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh heh! You know what I mean.

      I'm just saying this guy has a serious maladjustment, like "Hey everybody! Apple marketing is lying to us!! Let's all hate Apple, EVERYBODY C'MON!!!"

      "Dammit, I'll MAKE you care!!!" :)

    3. Re:Talk about stubborn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ask me, he has a valid complaint. Steve and his ilk are well known for their marketing hype. Remember the "supercomputer" ads? Technically they were (by 1950's standards) but practically, they were nothing out of the ordinary.

  366. Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, when Apple makes switch ads about problems that haven't existed in Windows for years it's OK, but when MS acts the same way it's bad. That's strange.

    Oh, that's right, the /. editors are idiots with 0 journalistic integrity. I had forgotten.

  367. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the switch helps her utilize her verticle portals too!

    Heh, I'll help her utilize her verticle portals.

  368. Nationwide News by Joe+Jordan · · Score: 2

    This article was published by the associated press shortly after this slashdot story went live. Kudos to poster for injecting /. into the mainstream press, and to dissy for uncovering the stock picture. Both are mentioned in the article.

  369. punch drunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this just confirms it

    the former heavy-weight world champion is on the ropes, punch-drunk and unable to score a hit

    how long till microsoft goes down for the count?

  370. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by iankerickson · · Score: 2
    Not quite. I can install it on any machine I want to, assuming that the machine is compatable with the OS hardware support. The main issue of course being that there are still seperate distros of Linux (PPC, x86, SPARC). When will we see a distro with all the nessesary code in one package, and a universal install?


    Yes. http://www.netbsd.org/.

    --
    Democracy. Whiskey. Sexy. Pick any two.
  371. Yeah. me too. with Mozilla by Dave_bsr · · Score: 2

    My emails from years ago are available too. Via Mozilla. on my hard drive, not the net. And originally from outlook.

    Three installs of windows (at least) Outlook in 98, to outlook in 98, to outlook in 98, outlook 5.5, outlook 6, saved to disk, and now in ~/backup/correspondence/*.eml, look at them all. They open just fine. That's comforting - glad that they aren't gone forever...

    And I do believe their import utility is good for outlook as well - although i've only tried it once, with success, and that was ~ moz .9.8...of course it can't read from my hotmail account directly...but that's for other reasons. And yes, mozilla _does_ rule. : D

    --


    Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  372. Re:Compelling reason to switch to Linux/other Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore this fucking idiot "moneyt" aka king crapple zealot - he wouldnt know how to get netbsd running if he tried. he is a l-user Mac zealot with no programming skills and he likes to promote this mediocre state of existence. he has never felt inclined to program or fix something suboptimal on his little Mac because he CANT, so that must mean the rest of us dont want to.

  373. Only one person? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, it's a massive event when one single person switches from a Mac to a PC?

    If you think about it, it's ironic. It's like the Slashdot article a few months ago about, one person switching back from Linux to Windows.

    I'm not suprised - of course, if you use one OS for a number of years, and hear everybody else claiming that theirs' is better, you'll eventually see all of the downsides of the OS you're using, and all of the upsides of the ones you're not.

    If you switch back, though, within a couple of weeks you'll realise exactly that - I mean, it's like when you are on a diet, everybody else is eating chocolate bars, and pizzas, etc, etc, and you think you're missing out.

  374. I really like my XP... by forgoil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but the multiuser part of Windows sucks worse than NFS in Linux. The separation of users settings works as long as it is Microsoft's software, but many 3rd party software sucks ass big time (for instance ICQ).

    Multi-user works a hell of a lot better in different unixes, even though it is very basic and cumbersom (I can't spell today) at times.

    1. Re:I really like my XP... by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

      If you get OS X, you get instant spell check in all apps that support the cocoa framework! No more worrying about cmbersum (woops! cumbersome! YAY!) recall of all the nasty rules of English! Here's another exclamation point, just for fun!

    2. Re:I really like my XP... by tempfile · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, NT has all the facilities for perfect user separation, ranging from private registry areas over home directories to group policies. It's the 3rd party software that's to blame here, and not Windows.

  375. Well, errrm, yea... by kernelistic · · Score: 1

    Ahhhh... Nothing like getting caught with your pants down!

  376. http://www.ibike.org/bikeafrica/malawi/ by Wookye · · Score: 1

    The Microsoft page in question ends: "*Editor's Note: Now that we've successfully converted our writer to a Windows PC, we will be working on getting her to try a Pocket PC. Stay tuned for more developments!"

    This is blatant even for Microsoft in light of:

    "Global Computing with Windows CE - A Handheld PC and Microsoft Windows CE meet the challenge of computing and communicating across continents." http://www.ibike.org/bikeafrica/malawi/
    "...The computer, on the other hand, was one problem solving exercise after another--though I must also add that when everything is going right the Handheld (H/PC) never stops impressing me and I am tickled pink to have it. I also didn't have to do most of the problem solving and troubleshooting by myself. Val Mallinson, of Wes Rataushk and Associates, was a great help discussing solutions, getting equipment and finding resources with answers prior to my departure...."

  377. Shes hot! by muffen · · Score: 2

    She's not fictonal. She does exist. If she'd kept her MAC, I'd shag her :)

  378. (ClarisWorks) vs. Office XP by djtripp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparing AppleWorks to Office XP is like comparing Photoshop Elements to Photoshop Retail.
    Hmmm... They didn't say anything about MS Works. About the same price point, about same features, except AppleWorks does.

    --
    "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
  379. Assail of Two Titties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's why you're posting on slashdot, and the kid works for MS.

  380. Stop putting Bill Gates as Borg by anandcp · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Borg are known for their perfection and adaptive systems! Depicting Gates as Borg is downright insulting to the Borg Collective.

    --
    -------- Cluster bombing from B-52s is very, very accurate -- the bombs always hit the ground.
  381. OK, nevermind by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 1

    I was reading the google cache, it's all garbled again.

  382. A thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's cache only contains links to the original site from where the page was cached from... Isnt it a thought that *only* the page has been pulled off and all the pictures referred to in that are still on the Web server ;)

  383. terminal by Nomad37 · · Score: 1

    not graphically, but you can always launch terminal su username and away you go...

    --
    Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will! - Antonio Gramsci.
  384. Regarding Model Releases by kvn299 · · Score: 1

    I did some professional photography a while back. I used a standard boilerplate model release form which basically said that the images could be used for just about anything--even inventing stories about people in the image. The model, if s/he signed it, basically had absolutlely no say over how the image was used.

    Of course, that was a long time ago, and things might have changed.

  385. Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I actually switched from the Macintosh to Windows XP and I will not go back to Mac, I like the way I have a whole lot more Applications than on the Mac and I got tired of being a public beta tester. Mac OS X 10.2 did not fix any of the problems I had with the system, but with Windows it works fine and I dont have blue screens or any freezes. I also find the PC to be much faster than the Mac despite Apples claims.

  386. Microsoft apps on the Mac by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2

    Here's my view on the MS apps for MacOS X. I'm not a computer god, nor have I used all of these products for extensive periods of time, but on the other hand, I'm not an Apple PR agent either.

    Office X: great application suite, costs too much money. I use Appleworks, which is not as easy to use as Office. However, it does come preinstalled, and it lacks a certain Clippy and a million auto-incorrect features (most of which I just turn off anyway). Not to mention it's smaller. Any assignment that requires technical typesetting, I use TeX, which is much easier to install/use under MacOS X than Windows. It's nice having a command line to type latex whatever.tex into :-)

    MSIE: The best browser I can find on OS X. Faster than Mozilla, better plug-in support than Chimera. It's funny how Moz renders as fast as MSIE, if not faster, but you have typing lag in the Address bar if other stuff is running, and that's just not acceptable. MSIE is buggy, but of course you have the same problem with Chimera and Moz.

    Entourage: Never used it. My mail client is Mail, which has just about everything I ever wanted in a mail client: dock status icons (without being annoying), a good junk filter (although I rarely get junk mail), fast interface, and supported by PGP 8.0. Entourage is, too, but not as well: you can't use PGP/MIME or automatic decryption (with a password of course). I live Apple's silly iCal for scheduling, because I keep most of my scheduling info on a dead-tree calendar.

    Various other comments about MacOS X vs Windows: I haven't broken it yet. Fink (beta under Jag) is buggy, and has screwed up some UNIX installs (crash while patching config files, etc), but that hasn't screwed up any native apps and the UNIX ones mostly work right (GIMP runs great). It's not that surprising either when installing unstable packages with a package manager in beta.

    Non-UNIX stuff installs much more easily than in Windows. I hate the Windows install wizards. It's also easier to uninstall most programs (trash the app's folders in applications and Library; use Locate to clean up any additional files from poorly written apps; often they put stuff in app support too).

    And perhaps the best thing is, I can ssh into my computer from across campus! Not to mention run Apache...

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  387. Ms. MoXie - a REAL Microsoft Lady by superflippy · · Score: 1

    On a related note, Microsoft is running a "Ms. M.o.X.i.e." contest for women who use Office X for MacOS X. As an example on the contest page, they profile fashion designer and Seinfeld-ex Shoshanna Lowenstein. The winner of the Ms. MoXie contest gets $10,000 and a new iMac.

    Just goes to show, sometimes MS's truth is stranger than its fiction.

    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  388. pot == kettle == black? by why-is-it · · Score: 2

    Apple is selling slower hardware at higher prices

    Did you know that the PowerPC chips that Apple uses cannot be compared to Intel/AMD chips purely on mHz? As for the higher prices, Apple just does not sell the volumes that Intel does. Apple does not benefit from the same economy of scale.

    If anything, it would be more correct to say that Apple is selling better harware at higher prices!

    I love the concept of OS X, but it is NOT a finished product.

    Meaning what? I am not sure that I accept your claim. But even if you are correct, it would hardly the first time software was ever shipped before it was ready. There is a reason why it is advised to wait for version 3 of any m$ product after all...

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    1. Re:pot == kettle == black? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      1- Take a 1.25 Dual G4, put it next to a single processor Athlon 1900+ (which costs a fraction of the price) put Maya, or ElectricImage, or anything that is not a Photoshop filter next to it, and let'er'rip. Sorry, but time-to-render does count as a slightly accurate test of hardware. Yes, Mhz is a myth, particularly when it comes to Pentiums. (heh) But look at the bus speeds, look at the DDR memory that is able to be fully utilized, and look at the video cards. Sure, this is all changing in the near future with Apple getting better, but what they have for sale now is insufficient.

      2- As for "finished", ok. Maybe OS X is finished, in which case it's one hell of a shoddy piece of work. OS 9 was finished, but pretty soon no computer sold by Apple will be able to boot into it. I can still install the older versions of Windows on my machines and boot up without issue if I so please. But WinXP IS a finished product, so why would I bother?

      It's all about the manner in which things are introduced. I dislike being forced to something that is only partially finished, told that it's finished, and then have it rubbed in my face constantly that it's so perfect, so sleek, so powerful, so next-generation. It's simply not.

      OSX is really cool, and if it's simply left at that, I'll smile- joke around, talk about the pros and cons, speculate about where it's going... Just can the hype- hype cries out to be debunked. Apple is moving in the right direction, I'm happy Apple is moving in the right direction. I'm thrilled, excited... And in the meantime (until they get a bit closer) I'm building my own Athlon-based machines, saving my money, and happily anticipating it all from a more stable, more complete platform with my G3 sitting on the desk next to me for me to play with when I feel so inclined.

      -Sara

    2. Re:pot == kettle == black? by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      1- Take a 1.25 Dual G4, put it next to a single processor Athlon 1900+ (which costs a fraction of the price) put Maya, or ElectricImage, or anything that is not a Photoshop filter next to it, and let'er'rip. Sorry, but time-to-render does count as a slightly accurate test of hardware. Yes, Mhz is a myth, particularly when it comes to Pentiums. (heh) But look at the bus speeds, look at the DDR memory that is able to be fully utilized, and look at the video cards. Sure, this is all changing in the near future with Apple getting better, but what they have for sale now is insufficient.

      Yet if you run Photoshop on the same two systems, the Athlon gets smoked. I guess the moral of the story is that the Mac will be faster at some things, and slower at others. In that case, the decision as to which is "better" is entirely dependant on what the computer will be used for. When my parents expressed an interest in a computer for email and surfing. An m$ operating system was totally out of the question, it is not secure and there are too many viruses and trojans that prey on windows. Linux was also not a option, because they are total newbies. A Mac was a perfect fit and they haven't looked back. Perhaps the initial purchase price was a bit higher, but the cost in terms of time for support has been almost nil. I would not be able to say that about windows or Linux.

      2- As for "finished", ok. Maybe OS X is finished, in which case it's one hell of a shoddy piece of work. OS 9 was finished, but pretty soon no computer sold by Apple will be able to boot into it. I can still install the older versions of Windows on my machines and boot up without issue if I so please. But WinXP IS a finished product, so why would I bother?

      a) I don't know if I could get an older version of windows to install on my new(er) system. There aren't any drivers for most of my peripherals.
      b) If Windows XP is "finished", why do I need to keep applying bug fixes and service packs? Could it be that no piece of non-trivial software is ever finished? In that case, I don't see why OS X should be held to a different standard.

      It's all about the manner in which things are introduced. I dislike being forced to something that is only partially finished, told that it's finished, and then have it rubbed in my face constantly that it's so perfect, so sleek, so powerful, so next-generation. It's simply not.

      I felt the same way when I read those interviews with John Romero when he was promoting Daikatana...

      Given that the look and feel of OS X was blatantly copied by XP, someone at m$ must have thought it was sleek, powerful and next-gen.

      Just can the hype- hype cries out to be debunked.

      I agree 100% with the sentiment, and I appreciate the irony of the situation. You are defending m$ against Apple in a thread which describes how m$ posted a false testimonial about how much better life is with XP compared to the Mac alternative.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    3. Re:pot == kettle == black? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      1- Photoshop isn't faster. Certain photoshop filters that have been optomized for the Altivec are faster. There's a difference. Photoshop filters non-optimized for the Altivec are not faster on the G4 than on the Athlon. Most things are not optimized for the Altivec.

      2- I've never gotten a virus, neither have my parents (who are total morons when it comes to computers) It's called Norton Antivirus, and it's dirt cheap. There will be viruses for the Mac now that it's on BSD and Apple will be pissing people off left and right by touting its security. Trust me on this.

      3- Windows is NOT finished. No OS *IS* finished. Windows is CLOSER to finished, and it behaves like a finished product from the user's standpoint. Besides, every time I boot up my G3 I have a new bug fix, security update, or SOMETHING that needs to be updaed in OS X. Not that fixes and patches are a bad thing. In fact, I like them. It means the OS is getting better.

      3- I can't install any of the Windows 3.x series on my computer, but 95, 98, 2k, and ME would happily install if I needed them to. In fact, my computer is a quad boot, with one of the OSes being Windows 98. (I use it for testing)

      4- Heh. How can you say Luna is a copy of Aqua? Luna is an atrocious ugly SOB. And it's hardly a copy of Aqua--there were skins that looked like Aqua and Luna far before either Luna or Aqua existed. I don't deny that MS tried to copy, though. I just deny that it was a good idea. I like the Win98 skin in XP. It's functionally beautiful.

      5- I think MS was stupid to have a false Ad. Like I said, I could provide them with a LONG list of real people in real occupations including education and graphics who used to be Mac-based but that have moved over.

      -Sara

    4. Re:pot == kettle == black? by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      1- Photoshop isn't faster. Certain photoshop filters that have been optomized for the Altivec are faster. There's a difference. Photoshop filters non-optimized for the Altivec are not faster on the G4 than on the Athlon. Most things are not optimized for the Altivec.

      I am not familiar with Photoshop, so I can't really comment on that. I do know a lot of people in the lithographic industry, and they all swear by Macs for design and layout.

      2- I've never gotten a virus, neither have my parents (who are total morons when it comes to computers) It's called Norton Antivirus, and it's dirt cheap. There will be viruses for the Mac now that it's on BSD and Apple will be pissing people off left and right by touting its security. Trust me on this.

      I've never gotten a virus either. But my office recently abandoned Lotus Notes in favour of the obviously inferior outlook. We all run anti-virus software, but we have a lot more viruses to deal with. The thing about anti-virus software is that it is totally reactive. If a trojan is active out in the wild, it can propagate freely until there is a signature to detect and remove it. Perhaps there will be a virus that targets Macs, but I would bet my bottom dollar that it will pale in comparison to the damage that was caused by Love virus, Melissa, SirCam, CodeRed, and so on.

      Trustworthy computing? Bah!

      3- Windows is NOT finished. No OS *IS* finished. Windows is CLOSER to finished, and it behaves like a finished product from the user's standpoint. Besides, every time I boot up my G3 I have a new bug fix, security update, or SOMETHING that needs to be updaed in OS X.

      Strangely enough, XP tells me that there are new patches / fixes to download almost as often...

      3- I can't install any of the Windows 3.x series on my computer, but 95, 98, 2k, and ME would happily install if I needed them to. In fact, my computer is a quad boot, with one of the OSes being Windows 98.

      I tolerated 98. When I bought a new PC, I tried to install 98 but the install was more trouble than it was worth. Whenever I switched from the windows CD to a driver CD, the installer always forgot where to find the next file in the directory tree on the windows CD, and I had to find the file for it to jumpstart the install.

      4- Heh. How can you say Luna is a copy of Aqua? Luna is an atrocious ugly SOB. And it's hardly a copy of Aqua--there were skins that looked like Aqua and Luna far before either Luna or Aqua existed. I don't deny that MS tried to copy, though. I just deny that it was a good idea. I like the Win98 skin in XP. It's functionally beautiful.

      Really? I am used to the interface, but I would never refer to it as a good UI. It could only be considered beautiful when contrasted with the Lotus Notes interface. What moron thought that it would make sense to require users to go to the start bar to turn off their computer!

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    5. Re:pot == kettle == black? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with Photoshop, both on Mac OS X (and Mac OS 8/9), and on Windows. Photoshop "Feels" nicer on Mac OS9 (Hate it on X), but there is very little functional difference once you get past the 'feel'. Macs are historically better for print work because they had more accurate color, but PCs can easily be calibrated nowdays. Photoshop can easily be handled by either processor, so there is little performance gain on either platform, leaving it largely to preference. Most of the performance gain you see using an x86 computer is in processor-intensive apps, or apps that require a higher-end video card than Apple supports. (ie: 3D.) Windows is also generally faster for day-to-day things because the GUI is snappier, and apps launch faster.

      I've never gotten a virus. I update my software regularly, and I use an "intelligent" antivirus software that is able to prevent boot sector modification, and a number of other things that viruses like to do. It also scans incoming email, outgoing email, etc. I have disabled automatic scripting, and a few other preventive measures. Generally, I find it to be very reliable-there is no software of this caliber on the Macintosh. I've found that NAV on the Mac is quite horrid, and often does not launch.

      I never said 98 was good, or that the install was easy (although I didn't have any of the problems you describe.) Just that it will install, and be relatively problem-free on a computer I purchase today. Some would say this is a bad thing, but personally I like the choice.

      The Windows GUI has some kludgyness, but generally it is functional and gets things done. This is opposed to the OS X GUI, which is "beautiful" (I happen not to like it.) but doesn't get things done in an appropriate or time-considerate manner. OS X also has more kludgies than Windows does at this point. (By "Windows", I mean XP. I'd rather use OS X than WinME.) I didn't say Windows was "beautiful"- I said it was functionally beatiful--meaning it doesn't interfere with my work, it fades into the background and lets me do what I need to do, and doesn't use up large amounts of resources that could be better dedicated to other tasks.

      -Sara

    6. Re:pot == kettle == black? by Kplusplus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps to you, but Photoshop in general "feels" and performs alot nicer in 9 then on a PC, add that to the fact that it also performs better in X than in XP and I really can't see why anyone would use a PC. Also as to color accuracy, no it can not be easily done on a PC. On the Mac you have SYSTEM-WIDE color management ensuring that not only are your colors on your monitor calibrated, but also your Scanner and Printer so that they all have the same color profile. That cannot be easily done on Windows, it never has been so on windows and that is the major reason why the print and design fields use macs in the first place. The Mac OS GUI is plenty snappy, Its major advantage is that it loses no speed while multitasking on processor intensive tasks. So while its rendering your humongous image in photoshop, you cna feel free to go start a rendering process or just use dreamweaver to design a site for said image and you would have no perceptible speed difference then if Dreamweaver was the only open app. Then open a browser surf the web to see if your page is rendering correctly and finally return to see if the filters have been rendered and guess what, everything felt as if it was the only thing using the processor all the while your PS was chugging along in the bg. HA! Virus software for macs is pitiful for one reason. Macs have no viruses. There are all of three viruses and none of theme are even remotely harmful. All they do is propagate themselves over and over. You can't satisy a market that doesn't exist so why would you expect Mac Virus Software to be useful? I completely and totally doubt 98 would function on a computer you buy today, since hardware comes with seperate drivers for each windows and nowadays they no longer bundle 98 drivers for thier devices. The awful windows GUI has gotten no better in XP, as a matter of fact it has taken several steps back in useability, but what's worse is that the old "classic" GUI is just as bad. That wasn't up to par with OS 9 and yet you'll settle for that instead of X's Aqua which is a functional GUI designed with the intent that it be functional and easy to use, which it is. the resources BS is jsut that BS. The Mac OS X GUI takes almost no resources in Jaguar since it makes use of your Graphics card, I keep top running and the majority of the time the system(Finder, loginwindow, Dock, etc. ) are taking up about 2% of my CPU unless im using the Finder in which case obviously it is given more resources so it can do its work. Really I don't see how you can say the Windows GUI is more fucntional then that of any Mac OS.

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
    7. Re:pot == kettle == black? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Windows is easy to calibrate these days. I say this from experience, while you just repeat Macintosh-hype. My experience with this is more valuable than your opinion. Is a Mac EASIER to calibrate than Windows? Absolutely. Significantly so? Not anymore.

      The "Major Advantages" you talk of apply to the PC as well. I can be rendering a 3D scene, surfing the web, burning a CD at 32x (my burner speed), playing a DVD, and futzing around in Photoshop while Norton Antivirus is scanning my HDD in the background. Without noticeable performance decrease. Now, this is on my 900 Duron with 640MB of PC100 memory. Hardly a workhorse of a computer.

      The statement that Macintosh Viruses don't exist is true, however with OS X making the market more appealing to geeks, and with the BSD back-end, the system is now more vulnurable to a wide variety of security attacks. Just because it's based on BSD doesn't mean it's got BSD's security. Mac users who believe otherwise are doing themselves a great disservice.

      As for the GUI taking up no resources... It definitely takes up resources. There is a minimum amount of RAM needed for computer operation, and if you have less than 400MB of RAM, the GUI often will not function properly. 128 is okay for consumer use, but anything beyond that and you need a lot more. It takes up HDD resources with a basic install of OS X filling up half of a 6GB HDD. It takes up video card resources, pulling them away from the purpose they should be serving--for example, 3D artists will see degraded performance, particularly since there is no professional 3D graphics card for the Mac in the first place. (Granted, Windows takes up a couple of GB of space, as well... Will not be very friendly without at least 256MB of RAM, and if you leave Luna on--as well as being a masochist, you'll lose some of your video card performance. However, Windows uses up less resources across the board.) The Mac, no matter how many or how little resources it uses up, it wastes time on the "polish" and the animation. Windows- you click something and it happens before you're done clicking. The Mac, you click something--it pauses a beat, then it happens in an animated manner. The result? You're more likely to know what you just did, but you're also going to have a slower workflow.

      As for functionality... Perhaps you're perfectly happy in OS X, in which case--great for you. As for me, I demand more out of a GUI than OS X can offer me, and Windows satisfies nearly every need.

      I'm not telling you to switch. I'm just saying that Apple's claims, to a large degree, are a load of bullshit, I'm not going to switch to them, and I'd happily do an advertisement for Microsoft saying why my G3 and G4 are gathering dust while my PC is in constant use.

      I'm never going to get rid of my Mac, it's mine until it's ready for the garbage heap. I love it, and it's wonderful, and it does do some things better than the PC. I just can't use it for too long at a time without being frustrated. Just simple things like surfing the web... Much faster on an old PII running Win95.

      Now that I've gotten so far off topic, if you wish to continue the debate, feel free to email me. Although I don't really see the point. Neither of us is going to switch.

      -Sara

  389. Oops, there goe's the savings by galego · · Score: 1
    My laptop came with 512 MB of RAM, a 15" screen, a DVD player, and Windows XP Home Edition preinstalled, for $450 less than a comparable iBook. My recommendation is to go straight to Windows XP Professional; the extra features for mobile users are worth it.

    But won't having to pay for the user licenses on the Professional edition for you or whoever else 'may use' the computer break that $450 in no time?

    --

    Que Deus te de em dobro o que me desejas

    [May God give you double that which you wish for me]

  390. "I'm sticking with MS" will return later today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John_Morgan (forgot my password)

    The "I'm sticking with MS" campaign will return to microsoft.com shortly. The campaign, in fact, has been rebooted 5 or 6 times.

    There was a fatal error, almost certainly caused by third-party software. The drive is being reformatted. After the IT people are finished getting the O/S installed they will be able to install Caroline Woodham again and the campaign will be operational.

    Please restart your life and call us if there are any additional problems. Thank you for calling Microsoft.

  391. CNN story by gerardrj · · Score: 2
    At 19:15 on Oct 15th I saw a story on CNN Headline News about this. The "Headline" was :
    Fighting back: with fraud?

    It seems the non Microsoft media outlets are starting to fire on MS more intensely when they screw up. Perhaps Apple's campaign is starting to pay off? Perhaps Microsoft's policies of abusive licensing and forced upgrades are finally paying off?
    In either case, it was interesting to see a major media outlet poke fun at MS, and present a fair and unbiased (though only 20 second) piece on the competition.
    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  392. A sincere regard for truth by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 1

    "Yes, it's true." That's the very first sentence in Valerie Mallinson's "Convert Thrilled" story. The whole piece stresses it's just her own plain, honest story--"Here's the skinny!", "Girl Scout's honor", all those homely details about her husband and renting a Lexus. Funny she knows so little about Macs, though, after using one for eight years. Funny that other SlashDotters have tracked down her name on the web, troubleshooting M$ products last year and writing M$ instructions as far back as 1998. Funny too, when reporters find her, she still claims it's all true, telling AP "I guess I can tell the truth." Isn't it nice that someone so interested in truth is working for Microsoft?

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  393. NPR has a blurb by NewSodEnt · · Score: 1

    The Market Place morning program made a short mention about M$ new and pathetic campain attemp. So it hasn't gone compleatly unoticed by the more mainstream press.

  394. Boring! by mynameisnobody · · Score: 1

    Switch on and on. Hey... I have them all... there is always something missing that I have to program it on my own or get it from those who refuse to walk between the lines.... However speaking of the worst, I have synonym for that: Microsoft.
    Switching to MS? You've got to be kidding!? Hah.
    Think, Decide, Create... for the world.

    --
    "When your work speaks for itself, don't interrupt."Henry J.Kaiser(1882-1967)
  395. Also very funny: Migrate from Unix to Windows by theevil · · Score: 1

    This site is still available at: http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/migrate/unix/ Why you should change to Windows XP? Read yourself, plenty of Word Documents which are very large (gt 1 Meg). If you have a slow connection, you can download compressed files with selfextracting exes. Sure, Unix users will be pleased with windows-exes and m$-word files (which actually no one is able to open and read) I see it: Lots of Unix/LInux gurus will change to Windows XP, for sure.

  396. Here's a copy of the fake "ad" by KWIJIB0 · · Score: 1

    http://www.scripting.com/misc/msSwitchAd/ad/window sxp_setup.asp.html

    1. Re:Here's a copy of the fake "ad" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link still good, but close that space between window and sxp...