Slashdot Mirror


Worldwide WarDrive Aftermath

wardriver writes "The event took place on August 31st 2002, people from around the world took part in the effort to document and make known wireless access points as a group. Some people go WarDriving everyday, so this was just like an normal day for many who attended any of the world wide events as documented on the results page. Hardware ranged from laptops, to car mounted computer systems, to handhelds all equipped with GPS devices to accurately map the spots. Cars were marked with )(WarDriver stickers and people were sporting their wardriving is not a crime t-shirts. All in all the event went well and with enough pressure and requests to chris it may happen again." And in a related story, Dr_Marvin_Monroe writes "Wardrivers be warned---- A Practical Approach to Identifying and Tracking Unauthorized 802.11 Cards and Access Points includes information on locating rogue access points and intruders."

227 comments

  1. Yawn by shadow303 · · Score: 1, Troll

    This just goes to show that there are far too many people with too much time on there hands. Reminds me of the people in my home town who would drive around on Friday night clogging up traffic for no reason.

    --
    I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of the people in my home town who would drive around on Friday night clogging up traffic for no reason.

      They were engaged in a primitive mating ritual. Which is a pretty good thing to do on a Friday night!

    2. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah ppl drive around on friday for they can cruise and be cool

      Mikeock.net

    3. Re:Yawn by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      This just goes to show that there are far too many people with too much time on there hands

      Ya, it's called un-employment.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  2. Cisco by Beatbyte · · Score: 4, Informative

    It should be known that there are cards that can "just listen" without letting themselves be known.

    Cisco makes the AIR-LMC350 which would be a good choice for wardrivers.

    Or, not being an idiot administrator and leaving everything open helps too ;)

  3. It is called Promiscuous mode by AndyMcL · · Score: 0

    It is called Promiscuous mode.

    Other vendors can do this as well.

    Andy

    1. Re:It is called Promiscuous mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called Promiscuous mode.

      no, it's not
      promiscuous mode allows you to change the address of your card so you can intercept packets meant for other NICs

  4. low tech variant of this event... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I went for a low-tech version of this event.
    Knock knock
    "Anybody home?"
    Try door.
    "This one's locked, next house!"

    Nicky nicky nine doors is fun...except for the old codger sitting on his front porch on a rocker with a shotgun full of rock salt...

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:low tech variant of this event... by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Bleah...

      You aren't sending any packets out to knock. You are simply driving down the street looking for ssids, or house numbers. Looking for packets is like seeing if houses exist in the city.

      Sending ping packets would be knocking on the doors. But you are just passively driving down the street looking at the countryside for life.

  5. Typically North American attitude by RebelTycoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    World Series (2 teams from Canada, rest from States).

    WarDriving... Cities from only the western part of North America...

    Don't call it "World" if its just North America, and especially don't if its just a region of North America.

    1. Re:Typically North American attitude by Golias · · Score: 1
      With the World Series it's different, because when Major League Baseball first introduced the World Series, nobody outside of the US had professional baseball teams, so the winner of the game between the American League and the National League was the legitimate world champion.

      Now that baseball is played all over Central America and Japan, calling it the World Series sounds a little arrogant, perhaps, but it remains called that because of tradition.

      It's still not entirely incorrect, because most of the very best Latino and Japanese baseball players come to America or Canada to make the big money and play against the best competition, so the winner of the "World Series" on any given year probably is, in fact, the world's best baseball team.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Typically North American attitude by twistedcubic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And before someone claims the "World" in "World Series" refers to a newspaper, let me be the first to say that this is not true.

    3. Re:Typically North American attitude by spinlocked · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...calling it the World Series sounds a little arrogant, perhaps, but it remains called that because of tradition...

      Nothing wrong with tradition. I'm told (by a genuine American no less) that the first World Series was so named because it was originally sponsored by a newspaper called the 'World News' or some such name.

      Being an Anglophile Xenophobe, my maxim has always been 'If it annoys foreigners, keep doing it'. Well done America.

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    4. Re:Typically North American attitude by swb · · Score: 2

      World Series (2 teams from Canada, rest from States).

      I'd imagine that non-Americans probably don't have this attitude towards the "world champions" in sports that they dominate, like cricket or something that's not played here.

      I think when it comes to baseball it'd be hard to see that the team that wins the World Series isn't the best team in the world.

      The same is true in basketball as has been amply demonstrated in the Olympics since the inclusion of professional players -- the US easily trounces the competition, despite the presence of a handfull of professional players on other national teams.

      I'd like to see more international play in baseball, maybe a world-cup style competition where US World Series champions took on Japanese, Philipine and Central/South American and Carribean teams. I think the results would be pretty dominated by the Americans.

    5. Re:Typically North American attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You (someone from outside North America) assume that we care about you. Unless you're from the UK, we don't. Especially if you're from France.

    6. Re:Typically North American attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we publicizied the event, there was a team in Cologne Germany, and due to the fact that we planned for a month, on the internet, we certainly did NOT exclude anyone...

    7. Re:Typically North American attitude by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i don't think that just english, wales and scotlands teams attend to cricket world championships. it's not about who wins it, but if people attend to it, or even know about it, that makes world championships meaningful. they should've called it 'wardriving North America' or similar. this clearly was _NOT_ a worldwide event. btw, usa's people aren't usually intrested in rest of the world enough to show them where the duck pisses, instead of sending pro's they send farm(&like) players to world championships... oh well, at least we have the wife carrying world championships here in Finland.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Typically North American attitude by SecHor · · Score: 1

      That's not actually correct... There are teams in Europe who's findings have not come in yet. Also more drives this weekend that werent organized in time for last weekend.

    9. Re:Typically North American attitude by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Um, wasn't this announced on the Internet? Isn't the Internet world-wide?

      So how is it the fault of the organizers (to use the term somewhat loosely) if people in other parts of the world ignored the event or decided not to take part?

      Of course, in parts of the world, people don't have pickup trucks loaded with electronics. But where were the folks in Europe, Japan and Australia?

      Maybe next time, it just needs a bit more publicity, and we can get an idea of how wireless is coming along in the rest of the world.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    10. Re:Typically North American attitude by Golias · · Score: 1
      Except the US World Series champion will almost always have a couple Central/South American players, and might have a Japanese pitcher in their bullpen. Those guys would probably want to play representing their own countries, which would mean breaking the US team up, and juggling the rosters of every other team to shoe-horn their expatriot superstars back into the line-up. It would be a mess.

      What would be awesome to see, now that Mexico has cleaned up a lot of their government corruption, is a Major League Baseball team in Mexico City. Think of the great sports rivalries it could create with the various Texas and Southern California teams. Mexico City is a huge and populous place, so ticket sales alone would be massive. They would probably also become a favorite team for many Central American nations, so the potential TV revenue would also be impressive. I would not be at all surprised to see it happen within the next couple decades.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Typically North American attitude by swb · · Score: 2

      Except the US World Series champion will almost always have a couple Central/South American players, and might have a Japanese pitcher in their bullpen. Those guys would probably want to play representing their own countries, which would mean breaking the US team up, and juggling the rosters of every other team to shoe-horn their expatriot superstars back into the line-up. It would be a mess.

      It would mean some juggling, but they manage to do it in World Cup soccer without too many problems. Maybe it would mean dropping players or making a "USA" team comprised of the best American baseball players, but it would still be worthwhile.

      Don't many Japanese teams have a bunch of US players who weren't good enough for the US major leagues? I seem to recall 60 Minutes episode or something where they followed one American who's huge in Japan but relatively unknown in the US.

    12. Re:Typically North American attitude by Golias · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the parent post was suggesting having the major league champion team face the champions from the leagues in other countries. In other words, having the New York Yankees face champion teams from Japan, Central America, etc.

      Yes. Some American players end up in Japan. Usually they are players who are both unable to play at the US major league level, and unlikely to develop into major league ballplayers. If you are a AAA-quality left fielder, who is probably never going to get that fat MLB contract, you could spend your career in the minor league system making a few thousand dollars a year (while being bounced around to make room for rookies the majors are trying to develop), or you can go to Japan and maybe make a couple million. Pretty easy call for most guys in that position. Tom Selick made a mildly amusing "B" movie about it called "Mr. Baseball" in the 90's.

      Also, a lot of border-line NBA players find they can get more playing time and more money in European leagues, while most of the best European players join the NBA (except for Sabonis, who stayed in Europe until he was well past his prime... some say he was the best European basketball player ever, but he was slow and old by the time he got here).

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:Typically North American attitude by ollywompus · · Score: 1

      it's interesting to me to see that you are talkin' shit and stereotyping at the same time. it is easy to stereotype a country into oblivion... it would be easy for me to say 'the English are arrogant' or 'Norwegians are all alcoholics' or something similarly ignorant. it would also be easy for me to say that the only thing even semi-worthwhile that has come out of finland is Nokia. but i have enough respect for people to not judge them based solely on their national identity

      why don't you drop the stereotypes and respect people's individual opinions. look at it this way... just because George W. Bush is a fu#kin' assmonkey doesn't mean I am.

      --Stupidity should be as painful as ignorance.

      --
      -- "We're only gonna die from our own arrogance, that's why we might as well take our time..." -Bad Religion
    14. Re:Typically North American attitude by ollywompus · · Score: 1

      Messed up my sig, it should have read
      Stupidity should be as painful as Windows...

      not that displacing the word 'Windows' with 'ignorance' is that big of screw up.

      --
      -- "We're only gonna die from our own arrogance, that's why we might as well take our time..." -Bad Religion
    15. Re:Typically North American attitude by ollywompus · · Score: 1

      I believe the word that we are looking for here is 'Anyways...'

      BUT WE DIGRESS...

      --Stupidity should be as painful as Windows

      --
      -- "We're only gonna die from our own arrogance, that's why we might as well take our time..." -Bad Religion
  6. NPR story by micromoog · · Score: 3, Funny
    NPR had a story on wardriving this morning. While they didn't use the term, they covered the topic pretty accurately (as usual).

    They interviewed a couple of guys that regularly drive around in a "pickup truck full of gear" and document access points. Apparently one of them has documented more than 400.

    The best part was when they said they do it at night, so people in "affluent neighborhoods" won't mistake the cylidrical antenna for a shotgun.

    1. Re:NPR story by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      thanks dude. i live on the west coast. just turned on the radio to hear that they're about to do the story.

    2. Re:NPR story by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      my favorite quote: On describing Don and Brian's apperance (the two dudes in the truck), "Brian has a hair cut like Forrest Gump."

  7. worldwide wardrive by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

    If by "worldwide" they mean "a few counties in California, Canada, and bits of the midwest," then the project was an amazing success. :)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    1. Re:worldwide wardrive by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I think the idea was to promote a world-wide response, maybe not this time but the next time.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:worldwide wardrive by Golias · · Score: 1
      Well, obviously. My point (actually, it was more of a smart-assed joke than a point) was that they utterly failed to reach the objective of world-wide participation, at least this time.

      Who knows, though... maybe it will build up steam. Personally, I don't really see why one would need an "event" like this. It seems that WarDriving would be a pastime that would be better supported by an ongoing blog or slashcode site, where people could submit time-stamped maps of wireless nodes.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:worldwide wardrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was open to anyone who wanted to go out, and cross-tabulate the results.

      If people from other countries don't pay ATTENTION to public websites, or newswire feeds, it AIN'T our fault.

    4. Re:worldwide wardrive by SecHor · · Score: 1

      The European results are being converted to MapPoint Europe now. To be honest, I don't see why there was so much interest in this effort. It was completely accidental and only started because we decided to have the war driving thing at DefCon. Then folks started talking together on the NetStumbler and DefCon forums and decided to all drive in their local areas at the same time. To say this was an "organized event" is a total mistake. But yes, there are results from other parts of the world that have been translated or mapped yet. Plus other drive activities are taking place this weekend.

  8. Promiscuous NICs are in stealth mode by AndyMcL · · Score: 0

    It is called Promiscuous mode.

    Other vendors can do this as well. Remember that Cisco does not make their own NICs. They contract out just about everything that they sell except for the IOS. They are basically just a software and marketing company.

    Andy

  9. Not just for bored amateurs... by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ... wardriving is a fun hobby for real security professionals with big name consulting firms. Its a great way to demonstrate the importance of good practices and how pervasive bad security is. Its a pretty quick way to justify the expense for security, otherwise it can be pretty hard to quantify the benefits of vigilance to the penny counters.

    An ounce of prevention shows up in the ledgers, but they never see the cost of the avoided pound of cure.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  10. already slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already slashdotted.
    Anyone got a google cache?

    1. Re:already slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try (don't Slashdot) here... http://www.dis.org/wl/score.txt

    2. Re:already slashdotted by sharph · · Score: 1

      Its too early to find a google cache. Google updates once a month.

  11. "wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "wardriving is not a crime t-shirts...


    You got to admit that people aren't doing themselves any favours by choosing a real positive expression like "wardriving"....


    I can see this must win real friends when you are explaining to companies what you are doing outside their offices. Especially in countries where vigilante groups /gangsters like cruising round in their autos. Great PR, guys :-)


    (Yeah yeah I know the origin of the term but I still think it sucks.. maybe try cruising round New York on 11th September and explain to a cop that you're war driving...)

    1. Re:"wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by mmoncur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they should call it 'theft of service'.

      Or the T-shirt could be more clear: "Wardriving is not a crime. Or a war."

      --

      It's Slashdot's evil twin... SlashNOT
    2. Re:"wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

      i think the term stems from "wardialing"

      the practice of dialing up a shizenload of phone numbers in seacrh for numbers where modems pick up, then dail into those and poke around.
      i myself wasent all that knowledgeable about things back when that actualy yielded results, being about 11 years old...

      course, i dont know why they called it wardialing...
      maby the programs started out repeatedly dialing one number to piss someone off, then were modified a bit to dial every number in an exchange...
      would explain things...

      or it could be completely unrelated and was coined cos it sounded cool =P

      --
      ...I got nothing.
    3. Re:"wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wardriving is not a crime.
      Nor a drive in the country."

    4. Re:"wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      course, i dont know why they called it wardialing...

      The term wardialing came about because the practice was popularized by the movie WarGames.

  12. Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While white hat hacking can be argued to be ethical (like Adrian Lamo type people), I don't see how wardriving does _not_ lead to unethical practices. It may be interesting how many people have open networks, but really what "good" does war driving accomplish? Do war drivers stop at the house and tell the people "Hey, you're network is open, and this is how you fix it"? What "good" comes out of knowing where wireless service is available?

    I understand that some people invite others onto their network. This is very generous (but in my opinion insane because YOU are responsible for what comes out of YOUR router), but shouldn't these people advertise that their network is open instead of people driving around trying to discover these access points? I think the concept of wardriving is interesting, but the practical ethical results of wardriving efforts seem very very few. Maybe there is some application I am missing. Feel free to enlighten me

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      Why is birdwatching interesting?

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    2. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wi-Fi piggy-backing is kind of analogous to riding freight trains.

      A rail line needs to protect themselves against being held responsible for the hobo population, so they hire screws to kick the bums off the trains. Likewise, most people are advised to encrypt their Wi-Fi signal for the same reason. However, beyond that, most people don't view either type of trespass as a particularly serious crime. Odds are, the user of this WarDrive data is just some warez kid who is using your broadband to swap DivX files or something. Someday they will turn 18, and the fear of a permanent criminal record will disuade them from continuing. (At least that's what happened with all the hacker kids I grew up with.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by mrobinso · · Score: 0, Insightful

      > I don't see how wardriving does _not_ lead
      > to unethical practices

      Wardriving is theft, plain and simple.
      Perps should be jailed, plain and simple.

      --
      -- Karma whore? You betcha. --
    4. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ****(but in my opinion insane because YOU are responsible for what comes out of YOUR router)****

      intresting, so 'free' dialup isp's are responsible for their users too? MSN's resposible if some user of theirs hacks white house?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I personally don't stop at houses. However we DO contact businesses and tell them how wide open they are, what they can do to fix things.

      And then, we contact the media, to raise awareness. At the Alberta event we had two radio interviews the day prior, and during the event we had a local TV camera crew drive with us.

    6. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      I think the concept of wardriving is interesting, but the practical ethical results of wardriving efforts seem very very few

      I think a lot of people are missing the point. These projects have very little to do with security, and a lot to do with providing a telecommunications service that actually works for a change.

      The state of braodband in the US is miserable, most of us can't even get a connection, and our elected officials couldn't care less.

      In a time of general apathy and dispair over the state of the telecom industy in this country, a people's alternative to broadband is a very refreshing concept. For instance...maybe some guy has a T1 at his home shop, and when he locks up at night he just leaves his AP open because hey...he's not using it why not help some people out? This is how it starts.

      Naturally we're just making baby steps with projects like these...but everything great starts small.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    7. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 2
      Of course they are. You think the feds aren't going to be like "Hey, Microsoft, that hacker came from msn. If you don't help us find him, you're fuct." Then MS is of course going to respond with "Sure Mr. Feds. The person who did it is John Smith at ...". What do you think they are going to do? Protect their users?? Please. Only when it gets to your end of the chain, what are you going to say "Uhhh... it was some wireless guy passing by. Sorry, I can't help you"? That will go over well.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    8. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by rworne · · Score: 2
      Funny, since I "wardrove" for about a month picking up experimental data for a report I presented in a grad school class about the lack of WiFi security.

      I followed basic precautions:
      Never entered private property
      Configured the notebook to not route any packets
      Placed the contraption in the back seat so it wasn't a driving distraction
      Performed no "follow-up" actions such as attempting to connect to unsecured networks

      I came up with interesting data too, the overall percentage of encrypted AP's was 28%, that is a mix of residential, schools and businesses.

      For grins, I chose a more localized area with just Fortune 500 companies, high-rises and strictly commercial areas and got a rate of... 28%. Scary. It makes me curious to see how many of these are behind the company firewalls, but I actually know better than to try and find that out.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    9. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 2
      I'm not missing the point though. If "joe bob nice guy" wants to set up a wireless AP for people to use out of the kindness of his heart, great. What a swell person. However, if this is what he is offering, he should post a sign outside of his house saying "Free wireless access" or put an ad in the paper.

      On the other hand, wardriving to me is "let's see who's wireless network is open" regardless if it's "joe bob nice guy" or "joe dude I just use what Linksys gave me". Wardriving is not about sharing a connection, it's about "let me see who leaves their door unlocked in the neighboorhood". While not illegal, what are the legal, ethical benefits? I don't see any. It's not that it should be illegal, and more people should be aware of what they are setting up, but there is no benefit other than academic to going around and seeing who's door is unlocked.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    10. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Ya, but nature doesn't pay much attention to protestant ethics. This is about the efficient use of resources for the benefit of a technological system. For good or bad, the system right now is clogged...and it's trying to branch out into new areas in order to grow and thrive.

      This is just like any other ecology. In nature single-celled organsims find ways of adapting and develop survival mechanisms to improve thier chance of survival. Single cells join and form multi-cellular "networks" in order to increase thier chance of survival.

      None of us really care how our data moves...if our packets move by wire, or photon, or smoke signals...it doesn't matter in the least. The principle behind the entire evolution is to find the system that is the most reliable, most efficient, most secure(and before you start...there's a reason why the physicial and transport layers in IP are separate and distinct.), and most widespread in terms of usage.

      As the guy from Jurassic Park put it..."nature finds a way". It always has.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    11. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This lot have taken it one step further and done some warflying. they reckon one of their aims was to identify risks. http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/3q02/warflying-1 .html i think it warsearching propabaly serves the same interest as pirate security groups such as http://www.astalavista.com do in developing some kind of dialogue between security manufacturers and users of wireless enabled networks.

    12. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a *perfectly* logical scenario that will account for all the wardriving that goes on... ... ..dude, stop bogarting my joint! Spread the love and pass the ganga!

    13. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      of course they aren't. but there's dialup providers who obviously DON'T have logs about their users names anyways, only phone numbers. well, say, a local cafe offers wlan access to net, what are they going to say other than it was some guy? what is the kiosk style gsm number seller going to say other than that(when used to call dialup kiosk isp)?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by tcr · · Score: 2

      I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle....

      If SSID's are being broadcast, I don't think it's wrong to wander past and list them.

      If someone tries to connect to a private network without permission, or examine traffic, I think a line has been crossed.

      Unauthorised access to systems carries criminal charges here in the UK, IIRC.

      I think the manufacturers bear a much of the blame here, as they should supply a simple security checklist so that the non-techie users can understand the issues, and secure their gear as part of the installation process.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  13. That's funny by Night+Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Wardriving is not a crime..."


    Unless you think of THEFT OF SERVICE!

    Sometimes I have to wonder about the real-world intelligence of these people. Sure, they probably are really bright when it comes to technology, but evolution should have taken care of the guys wearing these t-shirts long ago.

    1. Re:That's funny by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      How is it theft of service to listen to the chatter of an access point? That would be like saying figuring out where the phones are by listening to the ringing sounds was theft of service.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    2. Re:That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Down.

    3. Re:That's funny by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent Down.

      Slashdot won't mod parent down because thier business model depends on the scarcity of client bandwidth.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  14. troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll you lika? perhaps anally retentive people might make that association.

    I'm going round NY with a big CUBA flag and an Osama is a matter T-Shirt on the 11th of September,and a tank. this will weed out all the fuck heads, i'll lead them out into the winderness like the pied-piper and blow the fuckers up.

  15. Don't they have anything better to do? by JimPooley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some people go WarDriving everyday...

    ...and really need to get a life.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
    1. Re:Don't they have anything better to do? by hratch · · Score: 1

      My job has me travelling thousands of miles every year over the roads of the world. This is a computer related hobby that i can take on the road with me. Of the many computer hobbies you can take part in, this one actually gets you out of the house, apt, cubicle, or cell. Better things to do? Exploring the world outside? I have documented over 7000 APs in the last two months. Do I steal services? no. It is a friendly competition only. I have my own DSL. Don't they have anything better to do? yeah...like sit in front of my computer reading posts from people like you. much better.

    2. Re:Don't they have anything better to do? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      "I have documented over 7000 APs in the last two months"
      Whoop-de-doo! I'm sure trainspotters boast to each other about how many train numbers they have in their little notebooks, but they're still strange sad bastards.

      You could actually do something that doesn't involve computers. Heresy on Slashdot, I know, but there are more things in life than computing. You could take in the scenery, for a start. Stop and smell the roses.

      By the way, if you're doing your own driving, you really ought to be concentrating on the road rather than how many networks you can find.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:Don't they have anything better to do? by hratch · · Score: 1

      "By the way, if you're doing your own driving, you really ought to be concentrating on the road rather than how many networks you can find." I don't drive myself, slick. There isn't much scenery at nighttime in the dark. Next suggestion please or simply "NEXT!!!"

  16. Wardriving Results by drewzhrodague · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also, people have been uploading their scans to http://mapserver.zhrodague.net -- a web-based mapping package for the entire planet, and http://www.wigle.net - a java-based mapping client. Check 'em out when you get a chance.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  17. 'theft of service'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or pollution.
    Go-on don't think american for one day/

  18. So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by FreeUser · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    WarDriving... Cities from only the western part of North America...

    Don't call it "World" if its just North America, and especially don't if its just a region of North America.


    So get off your ass and do some war driving. Nothing is stopping you, or anyone else in the world, from participating. Indeed, I suspect the organizers would be happier if more countries participated.

    Perhaps it will become an annual event, with gradually more countries taking part.

    BTW - Where do you draw the line for 'world.' 1 country per continent, x countries per hemisphere? Most 'world' events in Europe and Asia are similarly limited ... only a tiny fraction of the world community takes part. If 10 people take part in a 'world' event and they happen to be scattered all over the globe, does that somehow add legitimacy over 10,000 people taking part, who happen to be scatterd over just one corner of it?

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by radish · · Score: 2

      'world' events in Europe and Asia are similarly limited ...

      Got any examples? And don't say the World Cup, it has hundreds of countries including the USA.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      Got any examples? And don't say the World Cup, it has hundreds of countries including the USA.

      You are absolutely correct about the World Cup. Indeed, that is why soccer (football) is the one sport I enjoy watching. Football (soccer) is one of the few areas that is truly worldwide, with Africa as well represented as, say, Asia or Europe.

      I'm trying to recall some of the 'world' events I saw while I was living in Germany (mostly art and music events) that represented perhaps 10 countries, out of how many hundred? In any event, a tiny slice of the world, even if the 10 countries in question were widely scattered. If you look around, I'm sure you'll see what I mean.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    3. Re:So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i know i know! ice hockey! oh wait.. that's limited to europe/NA ;)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  19. Why "WarDriving"? by TonyZahn · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know the origin of the term WarDriving? I mean, on the one hand you have the Slashdot group that's trying to end the myth that all "hackers" are malicious sociopaths with laptops, but then they go around reffering to something like documenting wireless access points as "WarDriving". Not exactly good marketing.

    This isn't intended as a flame or a troll or whatever, I'm just curious as to why it's called that.

    --
    - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    1. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by yebb · · Score: 1

      It originated from when people would "War Dial" with modems looking for remote modems by brute force dialing a block of phone numbers. eg: phone all numbers between 836-0000 and 836-9999, get your computer to log which numbers connected to another modem, then later go back and see if they are hackable.

      "War Driving is not a crime" intruding on someone's network is not a crime? I dunno about that.

    2. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by SynKKnyS · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was named after "War Dialing." http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_dialing

    3. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      To expand on the above - Wardialing was so called because it was a technique used in the movie "Wargames"

    4. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by autocracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Comes from War Dialing - dialing every phone number in a block in an attempt to find modems. This was typically done in order to find a weak point in an organization. War Driving is a similar art.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    5. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Does anyone know the origin of the term WarDriving?

      In the BBS days of yore (when most people and companies did not have an Internet connection), randomly dialing phone numbers to find tty signals used to be refered to as "war dialing". Once you had a list of numbers where you found signals, you would go back and hack around to see what the systems were.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because "electronic voyeurism" doesn't have the penis enhancement factor that "wardriving" does.

    7. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is it comes from World War II when people used to walk around with radio's to gather news. 'War Walking' happened much sooner than 'war dialing', 'war driving', 'war flying'.

  20. How about... by setzman · · Score: 2, Funny

    /.'ing a server so quickly should be a crime.

    --
    C:\>
  21. Useless ? by CresentCityRon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem to me that if someone wanted you on their system they would register on one of the various websites for free wireless access.

    If they didn't want you then you're becoming a bother. I guess you could tell them that they were open and be helpful. I don't see anything of that angle though.

    So its just "Lets see who screwed up their technology. Tee Hee." Nothing useful here.

    1. Re:Useless ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are utilizing public spectrum, and doing it poorly.

      If they want to share, fine join Boingo, if they don't... TURN ON YOUR FUCKING SECURITY.

      I guess the recent round of journalistic testing of airport security last weekend (smuggling dangerous items onboard...) just amounted to "tee hee, lets see who screwed up with their security checks..." Nothing useful there, eh?

    2. Re:Useless ? by CresentCityRon · · Score: 1

      I don't see your point of view anywhere on their pages. Its more like "lets see what we can do since we have nothing constructive to do".

      The public spectrum angle is a weak last stab at trying to find any sort of value in this. It failed.

  22. War...Driving by g0bshiTe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Last I heard it was not a crime to putt around anyones neighborhood, whether you lived there or not. So what, if you just happen to have a laptop and a wireless network device. I haven`t heard of anyone bieng arrested for posessing network gear. Unless it was stolen! Is a cop really gonna bust you for wardriving? I think not. It`ll be the old skateboarding thing, where your told that even though it is public property, and you technically can be there that what your doing is potentially damaging and/or disruptive. Who cares!

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:War...Driving by Wiseazz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Legal or not, there is certainly an ethical question here... not so with skateboarding. Don't sniff around other folks' networks, regardless of your intentions. No good will come of it.

      --
      My sig sucks.
    2. Re:War...Driving by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      g0bshiTe wrote:

      > Last I heard it was not a crime to putt around
      > anyones neighborhood, whether you lived there or
      > not. So what, if you just happen to have a laptop
      > and a wireless network device. I haven`t heard of
      > anyone bieng arrested for posessing network gear.
      > Unless it was stolen! Is a cop really gonna bust
      > you for wardriving? I think not.

      If you "putt around" the neighborhood of a single woman, living alone, especially at night, she will most likely be giving her local police department a call about a "suspicious vehicle" which appears to be canvasing the neighborhood. And when you explain to Mr. Policeman that you are "scanning for access points", you are going to be seeing some bars from the inside very shortly.

      And if Mr. Policeman sees your WarDriving Tshirt, no doubt he will think you are part of a gang.

      > It`ll be the old skateboarding thing, where your
      > told that even though it is public property, and
      > you technically can be there that what your
      > doing is potentially damaging and/or disruptive.
      > Who cares!

      My guess is the rest of the general public who don't want to be damaged or disrupted. Well, except for the bigger skateboarding dude that runs into you and puts you in the hospital. Chances are, he won't care.

      To be a responsible member of a civilized society, you have to think (and care) about the impact of your actions on others.

      "What do you think Mothra would do?" - Moll, "Mosura" 1996

  23. or more accurate by pompomtom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...and say "Wardriving is a crime"

    --

    Buckets,

    pompomtom

    "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
  24. How is it intruding if it's left wide open? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Seriously the analogy of if your front door is unlocked doesn't apply. It's more like comparing the kid next door getting a free peep show by looking in your living room window from his house because you're too stupid to close the blinds (I've told my wife 1000x). So is it really that kids job to come over, knock on the door and say ma'am could you close the door because I sure hate seeing your tits? Not really.

    1. Re:How is it intruding if it's left wide open? by Strog · · Score: 1

      Seeing their access point wide open is like looking through the windows. You browse the network then you just walked through the open door. It's tresspassing locked, unlocked, open or no door at all.

    2. Re:How is it intruding if it's left wide open? by afxgrin · · Score: 2

      No one said anything about browsing the network. They're just looking for networks ... that's all. :-)

    3. Re:How is it intruding if it's left wide open? by Strog · · Score: 1

      True, no one said anything about it. You can be sure that some people are doing more than that to see if they could though. ;-)

      I was really commenting on the original poster's comment about the open window/door analogy.

  25. Not a crime by Strog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Port scanning also is not a crime(for now at least) but a lot of crimes are started with it. I don't blame people for getting a little paranoid.

    It's like a guy swinging a baseball bat all over the place. Sure it's not illegal but he could start clobbering people whether on purpose or not. I'd probably tell him to stop swinging too.

    My brother-in-law lives in California and has had all kinds of trouble since this event. Conicidence?? You start stealing service and disrupting other people's service and you just crossed the line.

    The people that are just scanning and mapping could be considered accesories to the crime when other people use their info to "steal bandwidth".

    1. Re:Not a crime by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      Yes it is, well under UK law.
      It's spelled out in fact :

      Gaining or attempting to gain anauthorised access to a computer.

      Like all good laws no methodology is mentioned or proscribed. In this way the burden of proof is on the prosecution and the interpretation of the law is for the courts.

      Incidentally I had a friend who was a phreaker. He was arrested for it before the Computer Misuse Act was put on the statute. The cops had a print out of phone company logs for all the phone calls he'd made through them. He had to sit there while they asked him if he'd made *every* individual call. It took them 10 hours.

      In the end all he was prosecuted for was "theft of electricity" and walked with a £70 fine.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Not a crime by DrSkwid · · Score: 2
      It's like a guy swinging a baseball bat all over the place.

      Any UK officer could pick one of (but not limited to) :
      • Threatening behaviour.
      • Posession of an offensive weapon.
      • Breach of the Peace.
      • Behaviour likely to occasion a breach of the peace.
      • Behaviour contrary to section 5 of the public order act (1986 i think).


      I found a url for the other comment

      Which, I think (IANAL) lays out in pretty straight terms that wardriving and portscanning is illegal in the UK.

      Computer Misuse Act 1990

      1. (1) A person is guilty of an offence if--

      (a) he causes a computer to perform any function with intent to secure access to any program or data held in any computer;

      (b) the access he intends to secure is unauthorised; and

      (c) he knows at the time when he causes the computer to perform the function that that is the case.

      (2) The intent a person has to have to commit an offence under this section need not be directed at--

      (a) any particular program or data;

      (b) a program or data of any particular kind; or

      (c) a program or data held in any particular computer.

      (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or to both.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:Not a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go read the 802.11 standards moron. The whole design of wireless is based around Access Point/Station discovery.

      Netstumbler does nothing more than Windows XP, it simply sends "probe" requests and other 802.11 devices respond. It sends them a little faster than Windows XP, but otherwise it does nothing illegal.

      You disable your TCP/IP stack, and you have NOT connected to any computer, authorized or not.

      Man, you'd think all the 'nix people on /. would have a clue...

    4. Re:Not a crime by Strog · · Score: 1

      Of course it's not illegal to "see" other networks. I said when you start accessing someone's network then you crossed the line.

      A crowbar is a fine tool until I whack you with it. Netstumbler is a great troubleshooting tool and so is nmap for that matter. I use them all the time. They are tools also used by crackers so it makes people a little edgy.

      I'm very familiar with the way wireless networking works. I spent 6 months at a job doing point to point wireless connections and access points in businesses for clients. We were working within a coverged data/voice environment so I can assure you I spent a lot of time reading specifications for *many* networking protocols/rfc's/etc.

      At least you know your limitations and post as an AC. Too bad you have to resort to name calling when you reading comprhension isn't up to snuff.

  26. Crime? by andyring · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't see it as a crime to simply find open networks. While that point is likely debatable, I've got a couple access points set up, and quite frankly it doesn't matter to me if anyone were to jump on and use the connection. Granted, if someone is constantly sucking up all my bandwidth, that's a different story. But, while I don't publicly flaunt these access points, it doesn't bother me if they're used. It's sort of a "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" mentality. MY ISP is quite open when it comes to the types of traffic, so that's not a concern to me. Yeah, some idiot could download kiddie porn or something and it's probably muddy waters legally, but I treat people in general with trust, I don't look at everyone as a criminal because they're not.

    1. Re:Crime? by Eyecannon · · Score: 1

      I do the same exact thing with my AP's :) See, I have something called "security", therefore I don't care if people use my connection. I agree that if someone was sitting outside my home sucking up all my bandwidth, I wouldn't like it, but if that problem did occur, I would just install a traffic shaper to limit my WAN bandwidth to the router... not too difficult really.

  27. Is this symbol )( from higher power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The symbol for Wardriving )( resembles a shape formation in the latest hubble image (check out the Hubble Site module in Slashdot). Waow!
    This is a sign...

    W

    1. Re:Is this symbol )( from higher power? by phorm · · Score: 1

      It also somewhat resembles a buttcrack. Or maybe hubble is peering into a great cosmic buttcrack as well?

      Maybe because, he who hacks another's wireless makes an ass of himself (scanning doesn't count)?
      We need real online comedians, so we can all get some more *lol*'s...

    2. Re:Is this symbol )( from higher power? by hratch · · Score: 1

      Have you guys researched at all before you go and post your opinions? Obviously not. )( is part of war chalking. Now go do your homework. I know that isn't as fun as making stupid comments on a message board.

    3. Re:Is this symbol )( from higher power? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Could you consider getting a sense of humour before posting a flame. On your your second overall post, even! It wasn't opinion, it was humour, as was I believe the parent post.

      Or maybe you're just a troll?

      For this humourless flame, I award you, my little troll, the title of )( - phorm

  28. They need to advertise on /. by anticypher · · Score: 2

    If they were smart, they would get their site posted to slashdot after first making sure their 56k modem was up to withstanding a slashdot effect.

    Oh, wait. Nevermind.

    The many war{driving|storming|floating|biking|hiking} groups here in Europe would likely participate next time.

    I just got a new laptop and I'll be getting netstumbler up and running RSN. Part two of my driving around Europe vacation is about to begin. That should provide a nice map of a few dozen cities by the end of the month.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  29. why have an event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing to stop people Wardriving whenever they want, but who's going to notice little old me WarDriving, even if they do notice, they'll probably think I the one putting up all the graffete and forget about it hte next day.

    Now if 100 people go Wardriving at the same time the awaireness of WarDriving and Wireless networks etc.. will go up, even if only a small amount. It's hard to forget seeing 100 freeks WarDriving but it's easy to miss one.

    1. Re:why have an event by Golias · · Score: 1
      Now if 100 people go Wardriving at the same time the awaireness of WarDriving and Wireless networks etc.. will go up, even if only a small amount.

      Yes, but wouldn't 1000 people wardriving on an ongoing basis get even more attention? That's why I think a loose-knit organization with a blog site would probably be the better way to go, if one wanted to do such a thing.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:why have an event by bons · · Score: 2

      Probably not. No one ever takes the black helicopters seriously. Why would they take wardrivers seriously?

  30. Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most cards have Linux drivers that allow them to be put into "RF Monitor" mode, which is completely passive. This is the default mode of operation for Kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/)

    Supported cards include:
    Prism2 with the linux-wlan-ng drivers
    Orinoco cards with a slightly patched driver from http://airsnort.shmoo.net/
    SOME Cisco cards. While they all happily go into RF Monitor mode when asked, SOME OF THEM KEEP BROADCASTING.

    So all in all, if you *absolutely* don't want to be detected, Cisco is the least safe choice for wardriving. Orinoco is probably the best bet, even though you will have to downgrade your Orinoco firmware for compatibility (8.10 is severely broken for RFMon usage). Prism2s have the best compatibility, but are generally known for crappy receivers and most don't allow external antennas. Almost all Orinoco-based cards have much better receivers and support external antennas. The Cisco hardware is the best (100 mW transmit, not like that matters if you're trying to stay silent, some have dual MMCX jacks for diversity antennas), but you can't trust it to stay silent in RF Monitor mode.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ZoomAir Model 4105 is a prism2 card that allows for external antennas and of course works very well with Kismet.

    2. Re:Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      Very true. I just figured if a lot of people are being told about how WarDriving is great fun, it would be better for them to stick to RFMon so half the people I know don't go to jail after someone starts calling cops. ( yes i know war driving is not illegal but people have been arrested for less )

      I like the Cisco because of the -95dBM sensitivity, dual antenna jacks, and 100mW transmit.

    3. Re:Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Agree. The Ciscos are VERY nice, as long as you're careful to get one that doesn't decide to peep anyway in RFMon mode.

      Dunno how Orinocos compare to the Ciscos sensitivity-wise. They're definately much better than Prisms (We have 3 Prism2-based cards in my house and one Orinoco, the Orinoco gets much better range.)

      100 mW transmit isn't much of an advantage for wardriving. Is very nice otherwise though. :)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    4. Re:Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      I already knew you had those cards, and I know what your access point is. I'm sending messages to your refrigerator to never turn off the ice-maker. ;)

      j/k

      WarParking - in your driveway.

  31. Not really. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Not really because if they are brodcasting it and it conflicts with my 2.4GHz phone or my 802.11 network, then why shouldn't I be able to get on it? I didn't ask my neighbor to brodcast an internet connection to my house, so they are intruding on my usage of 2.4GHz.

    1. Re:Not really. by ericman31 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, you can't justify your crime because they did something wrong. If you use someone's wireless network, whether they secured it or not, without their permission, it is illegal. Whether their signal is interfering with your phone or not. If their wireless equipment is FCC certified and they have it set to factory defaults they aren't doing anything wrong. If that causes interference on your wireless phone, you need to complain to the FCC and the manufacturer, not try to justify illegally using your neighbor's network.

      --
      In my universe I'm perfectly normal, it's not my fault you don't live in my universe.
    2. Re:Not really. by Strog · · Score: 1

      Quite a few neighbor feuds have started over such petty issues. When it all blows up and go to court, it all boils back to you tresspassing and trying to justify it. The judge will bring it all back to that.

  32. don't know about warDriving, but warchalking was.. by perky · · Score: 2
    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  33. Simple. Curiosity. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    In many cases, these people go wardriving just out of curiosity.

    I find it very interesting that in a short drive around my area I found 45 networks (I was NOT expecting that many, esp. since I wasn't using an external antenna), and over a third of them were factory default. (Not just unencrypted, but completely unchanged factory default units.)

    I haven't actually DONE anything with those APs though.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  34. Typical "other" country attitude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...assumes everyone the United States thinks the US is the center of the world. Get off your butt and do something to help your country instead of just sitting back like a lazy slacker and bitching about the US.

  35. War Driving != Network intrusion by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Note that Kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/ is purely passive - You NEVER associate with the AP or broadcast it to any way.

    So how is that intrusion?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:War Driving != Network intrusion by mwjlewis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So

      Wireless
      Access
      Recon
      DRIVING
      does NOT? Mean anything. Man, And to think that I thought of that on my own, cause it was all that made sence.

      --
      www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
  36. getting into things that are not your concern by CresentCityRon · · Score: 1

    birdwatching is about understanding what is out there and to a degree the world around you.

    Wardriving is snooping and peeking into someone's electronic window. And they might not know you can see in.

    Be ashamed for not knowing the difference!

    1. Re:getting into things that are not your concern by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Wardriving as peeking in someone's window is only if you are running a program to capture packets at the same time. You can run ethereal and airsnort at the same time to view the webpages people see. That would be snooping.

      Looking at ssid's like like looking at housenumbers as you drive down the street. Wardriving is like seeing if there are houses in the city. Its like looking at the development of the neighborhoods. Do these people plan properly?

    2. Re:getting into things that are not your concern by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      birdwatching is about understanding what is out there and to a degree the world around you.


      When I scan for networks, I am doing just that. I can see in real time how my neighborhoods are evolving - where the technical people are, where businesses are popping up, even cafes. There's a cafe near my office whose access point is named 'Good Day Cafe'. They apparently leave it open on purpose. I first saw it from a taxi in Omotesando. For them, it's a form of cheap advertising I guess.

      Lots of people (myself included) leave their access open for web browsing.

      Often times, my iBook will automatically log me on to the strongest network I am near. I've noticed that I sometimes get a low IP like 192.168.0.2, which would seem to indicate that it's just me and the router - no servers to 'snoop'. Most home users seem to just use these things to get online.

      Be ashamed for not knowing the difference!

      Don't be such a pill.

      There's a big difference between logging networks and breaking into them. At least awareness is being raised and more people that want to are securing their nets.

      Cheers,
      Jim

      --
      -- My Weblog.
  37. Amen. Wardriving != using the APs by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    As I mentioned in a previous post - Many people just do it out of curiosity to see what's out there. They never DO anything with the information except for plot it, and in mant cases, laugh at the morons who leave their APs wide-open factory-default.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  38. FUCK.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one fucking cares about this stupid War* crap! The name doesn't even make SENSE! WarDiving? WarFlying? WarDriving? What the FUCK is that supposed to mean? FUCK, WHO CARES!

    1. Re:FUCK.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow !!! Look gabe from penny arcade posts here!!!

      Look at his elegant prose!

  39. Theft of Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, stop going to poor ole securitytribe.com. Chris is probably pulling his hair out by now.

  40. Idiot Administrators by hillct · · Score: 2

    It boggles the mind that so many administrators unintentionally leave their wireless networks open and available to anyone willing to make a little effort (and some cases, no effort at all). Certainly, wardrivers who spend time attempting to access secured networks need to consider their actions carefully, but what constitutes a secured network? There are plenty of foolish administrators out there who take no measures at all to secure their networks but of those who do, and have their networks authorized by 'unauthorized' persons; what truly constitutes security? Certainly there is a level of incompetence in network security where the person gaining unauthorised access can simply claim(when acused of accessing a secured network illegally) "The network was not secured". There has to be some remedial security standard below which (assumin it would otherwise be a crime to access a particular secured network) no crime would have been committed.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:Idiot Administrators by drsoran · · Score: 1

      Certainly there is a level of incompetence in network security where the person gaining unauthorised access can simply claim(when acused of accessing a secured network illegally) "The network was not secured". There has to be some remedial security standard below which (assumin it would otherwise be a crime to access a particular secured network) no crime would have been committed.

      Crimes are determined on intent though. By your logic if I don't leave my doors locked 24 hours a day with an guard dog at my door then I deserve to be robbed? Unauthorised access of any network is akin to walking into someone's house. At the very least you are trespassing, at the very most I am going to shoot you. This is the kind of logic many pirates use to steal music. Just because you can do something doesn't give you the right to and certainly doesn't make it any less illegal.

    2. Re:Idiot Administrators by I.AM.BLORT · · Score: 0

      but by the very same logic, if you left a network terminal on the sidewalk in front of your home and shot someone for using it, guess who is going to jail......

    3. Re:Idiot Administrators by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hillct wrote:

      > It boggles the mind that so many administrators
      > unintentionally leave their wireless networks open
      > and available

      It doesn't boggle anything when you get off you geeky high horse and realize that most people buying and installing wireless network equipment are not "administrators" of any sort. They are ordinary people who don't know a thing about network security, but just need a net to work. The only thing that boggles the mind is that you would rationalize preying upon their ignorance.

      The manufacturers hold one key to solving this. If they would make the configuration of these networks secure by default, and give people easy to understand instructions for enabling security: "Yes, I want to make my network safe from invading hordes of young hoodlums.", it would help.

      "Godzilla and Jaguar: Punch! Punch! Punch! Hit! Hit! Hit!
      We die if they stop fighting for us."
      Jet Jaguar Song, "Godzilla vs. Megalon"

    4. Re:Idiot Administrators by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I take offense at this. I am one of those "idiot administrators" of whom you speak--I run an unsecured wireless access point (two, actually). I do so by choice--my home network is for my use, and that of my guests; setting up individual permissions for every guest is a pain. Additionally, I'm happy to share the bandwidth with my neighbors. I keep an eye on my logs, and so far (1.5 years), I've not seen anything that concerns me. My other network is also open to the public. I follow the same security procedures as the wired network to which it connects: if you can plug in, you can get access. With the abundance of public ports, and unsupervised ports, my wireless hub does not affect security in any way. It does, however, add convenience. If you're ever in the pilot lounge at Westheimer Airport (Norman, OK), and notice you have 802.11b connectivity, stop by my office and say hi--that's my hub you're using, and I hope you enjoy it. Idiot sysadmin? No, try generous--there are no security concerns for me, so I share, try to do everybody a favor. I'll shut down the open access when it becomes a problem; until then, enjoy the bandwidth.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    5. Re:Idiot Administrators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then by definition you are not an "idiot administrator" because you chose to open your access point. What the original poster was talking about are people who unwittingly (due to ignorance of the technology they choose to use) have become administrators.

    6. Re:Idiot Administrators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, yes, they ARE administrators (they don't realize it yet). And no, they DON'T need a wireless access point to have a network.

    7. Re:Idiot Administrators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't boggle anything when you get off you geeky high horse and realize that most people buying and installing wireless network equipment are not "administrators" of any sort. They are ordinary people who don't know a thing about network security, but just need a net to work.
      Look, even if someone doesn't know how they work and just gets one because they know that it can get them to work somehow, when they get a automobile, get in, turn the key, and it starts moving, they are, in fact, a driver. They may suck at it, but they are one, simple as that.

      They may think that they can get to work in a car without a set of skills for operating that device, but in thinking such, they are being ridiculously stupid. Willful negligence is thin protection for ignorance.

    8. Re:Idiot Administrators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we are on the subject of Idiot Administrators, I would like to thank my neighbor down the street for sharing his or her high speed cable modem. High speed net access is the best! My neighbor certainly qualifies as an Idiot Administrator because the userid/password for his wireless network is Administrator/admin (my first guess).

    9. Re:Idiot Administrators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't boggle anything when you get off you geeky high horse and realize that most people buying and installing wireless network equipment are not "administrators" of any sort.

      Well put.
      It was fashionable at one time to make fun of people who couldn't set the time on their VCRs. The problem wasn't that they were stupid, but that they'd learned, and learned well, a different interface for clock-setting. The instructions, often poorly written in some kind of pigeon-English, usually assumed knowledge that the average person doesn't have.

      Well-trained people sometimes forget that awkward stage when they were first learning, and sometimes forget that there was a time when their technical bag-of-tricks wasn't "self-evident" to them either. But now that they've been well-trained -- and I'm deliberately distinguishing training from intelligence -- it's other people that are stupid.

      It's not just geeks though. Just another of the many charms of petty humanity.

    10. Re:Idiot Administrators by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      An AC wrote:

      > Sorry, yes, they ARE administrators (they don't
      > realize it yet).

      Wait, does that mean that if I buy a scalpel at a hobby store that I am a brain surgeon? Woohoo, I'm on my way to fame, fortune and golf courses!

      Sorry, but no, picking up some network gear at CompUSA does not make Joe Sixpack a net admin anymore than a scalpel makes me a brain surgeon. There are some years of college and on the job training missing here.

      But Joe Sixpack still needs his home network. He doesn't know to, or have the money to, hire a consultant to do a professional job of installation, let alone to keep the network once set up secure from intruders. Unlike with my scapel (I'm guessing that pretending to be a doctor and hacking into people with my hypothetical scalpel would be a no-no), there aren't laws to keep him from setting up his network himself.

      Unless poor Joe has a friend or relative that has training that will help him, he's just going to have to follow the instructions and hope it works. Having it actually work will be a real accomplishment for him.

      If someone sneaks on his wireless network, he'll probably assume it is like a cordless phone, which is also wireless, and think there is some accidental interference. Unless there is some kind of channel button to press, he won't know how to stop it or if it can be stopped.

      "Hm, must be like one of those old timey party lines that my dad used to go on about. You'd think that by now they'd have the technology to give a guy his own private network!"

      "Really, gentlemen, if that's the case, let's see the power of attorney given to you by Mothra."
      Torahata "Mothra vs. Godzilla"

  41. ongoing basis by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Well yes and no, yes people would notice general oddities but wouldn't pay much attention it's just peripheral oddness. The people would be aware of 'something'.

    If you saw someone in a white pointy hat now and then they'd just be a bit odd.

    If you saw 100 people in white pointy hats then you might ask yourself what there upto.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  42. n/s by U+R+TEH+SUX · · Score: 0

    n/m

  43. what's four? by on+Wednesday+Septemb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Catch up with Larry from 'Three's Company'
    Three's a charm

    By Kara Spak
    PEOPLE

    (PEOPLE) --From 1977 through 1984, viewers tuning in to "Three's Company" watched the unctuous Larry Dallas brag about his way with the ladies to Jack, Janet and Chrissy (and, later, to Cindy and Terri), his neighbors in apartment 201.

    When Larry was around, the sleaze factor was sure to skyrocket. He was "the classic horny next-door neighbor," says Richard Kline, now 51, the native New Yorker who made the role famous. But even without the help of his TV neighbors, Kline has worked successfully and steadily on the stage and screen and behind the scenes since the show's end.

    "Three's Company" is just a small note in a long resume of Kline's performances. Most recently, he guest-starred on "Judging Amy," "Gilmore Girls," and "NYPD Blue," as well as Nickelodeon's "Noah Knows Best." Yet his return to another full-time sitcom role, playing Gene Schwartz, father to title character Adam Schwartz on the now-canceled 2001 sitcom "Inside Schwartz," was brief.

    Yet it was just a pit stop on the journey Kline's been taking since 1971, when he started his acting career onstage at New York's Lincoln Center, as part of its esteemed repertory company. He debuted on Broadway 20 years later in "City of Angels" and also played Jeeves in the 1996 American premiere of Andrew Lloyd Webber's "By Jeeves."

    Kline has also found success directing stage and screen productions. In 1990 he won the L.A. Drama Critics' Award for directing Noel Coward's "Present Laughter," and later directed a number of episodes of the CBS comedy "Evening Shade," which starred Burt Reynolds. Kline also directed the 1997 award-winning one-man show by Los Angeles NBC weatherman Fritz Coleman, "It's Me! Dad!," for both television and stage.

    "I just consider myself a working actor," Kline says of his journeyman status. "I'll do theater, sitcoms, TV or film. As long as I don't have to eat bugs -- I wouldn't do 'Fear Factor.'" Kline has also been teaching comedy workshops in Los Angeles, "with an emphasis on, go figure, sitcoms," he says. He is currently preparing to star in the comedy "Caught in the Act," slated for a regional theater in Kansas City.

    On the personal front, he also recently married the former Beverley Osgoode, a masseuse from Montreal. "The third time is the charm," Kline says of his new marriage. "This time is forever." It just might be: After all, he's already had success with the number three. And though Kline has fond memories of his "Three's Company" days, his favorite project is daughter Colby, who will be starting her freshman year at her dad's alma mater, Northwestern University, in the fall -- and following in his footsteps as a musical-theater major.

  44. Time for a little honesty by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, Slashdotters. Time to fess up and be honest Wardriving, though harmless in and of itself, is shady business. It's the electronic equivalent of casing a store or residence in order to rob it later. I realize the vast majority of wardrivers do nothing with the info they find, and right now it's more of a fad than anything (especially for kids that fantasize about being Mad Haxorz with Big Skillz, or whatever they hell they're calling it this week), but deep down, face it. You KNOW you're up to no good. The very essence of Wardriving is LOOKING FOR VULNERABILITIES. Only two kinds of people really give a damn about this kind of information. Serious security researchers, and net scum looking to break into networks. Now, like everyone else, I'm getting damn tired of seeing my liberties slip away in new laws and regulations. But if there was half an ounce of honesty here, we'd all admit to each other that by doing stupid shit like Wardriving, we're begging the government and public to be alarmed and put further restrictions on what we do. So to you people that deface webpages, spread virii, and wardrive looking networks to break into, why don't you do us a favor and go fuck yourselves. You are why the word "hacker" evokes fear and loathing.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Time for a little honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dickwad. We organized the fuckin event to raise awareness. Hell, we put out press releases, we contacted authorities, we prepared well in advance.... Why?

      We WANT to RAISE AWARENESS, and get people to FIX their FUCKING Access Points before your lovely, "freedom-loving" administration legislates otherwise.

      If people are irresponsible, it's been proven time and time again, the government will "help" them out.

    2. Re:Time for a little honesty by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      So far as I know, virii is not a word. Try "viruses"
      And, yes, I tell people about their vulnerabilities, and no, I don't put them on the internet.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  45. Re:So Get off your butt and... NOW OT by mwjlewis · · Score: 1
    'world' events I saw while I was living in Germany (mostly art and music events)

    You are from what I am reading.... Saying that Afluence is what is the determining factor for something that is 'World' based, (as long as there is more then two(2) countries.)

    Depending on how you look at it, the people with money rule the world.
    Bill Gates (grr) has marketshare majority control of Computers.
    Corporations are controling the US government, with their "campain" contributions (HAH).

    People say that money can't buy happiness - True
    However, Money can by people, and geed is a feeding factor of the 'world'.

    this is more geared towards the USA.

    --
    www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
  46. Education is Bad by rczyzewski · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of schools with security problems. They don't have the money or resources to get a truly secure wireless network, but want one either because a. it's the new thing to do and will "enhance learning" or b. some grant calls for wireless networks and the understaffed/overworked Network Admin (often they are the only IT staff) has to put it together. I'm a firm believer on "if you can't do it right, don't do it" when it comes to security.

  47. Lies. All lies. by BTO · · Score: 0, Troll
    Cisco's marketing material is all a pack of lies. The next time someone tells you that information can be moved from one place to another without any medium carrying it, do the world a favor and punch them in the gut.

    These so-called "wireless cards" all function with small wires, too small for the human eye to see.

    --

    Banach-Tarski Overdrive
    1. Re:Lies. All lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I triped over one of these small wires and I knocked my head on concrete.

  48. Re:Simple. Curiosity. by siphoncolder · · Score: 1

    what might less ethical people than yourself do with those APs?

    that's the problem i have with wardriving - i don't mind that someone goes around snooping, because it's genuinely part of what makes us human - our propensity for curiosity. however, most wardrivers tend to mark with chalk the direction of insecure wireless networks. really, what's the purpose of that? in my mind, that's the equivalent of people going around with a basket of eggs looking for folks with their fly open.

    --
    i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
  49. Network Administrators? by InnovATIONS · · Score: 1
    Some folks are talking about 'stupid network administrators' while many of the articles and quotations talk about driving about affluent neighborhoods.

    So, in large part, quite possibly the majority, we are not talking about careless security professionals but people who bought a wireless access point at their local computer store because it seemed to be an easy way to get the computers in their house to be able to share the internet connection and play games or share the printer. These are not security professionals or network administrators in any reasonable definition.

    The people that should really have the mud thrown at them are the companies selling these home wireless access points to unsuspecting customers with security set to wide open by default and next to no instructions about how to turn it on (since that would confuse the customer and result in more calls to customer support and/or returns). They are the ones being truly negligent. If they were being honest the boxes would have "Share your internet connection and all the data on your computers with all of your neighbors!" in big bold letters.

  50. who f-ing cares?!? by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Why have an event ... indeed! What is the goal here? Awareness? Big deal! In the grand scheme of things, are unsecure wireless networks going to mean anything real to humankind? Is this Wardriving 'event' going to draw attention to a subject that will make someone think twice about something that might save the lives of themselves and/or others?

    To put this in perspective, consider that for years cellphones were 100% open to eavesdropping. In one case this vulnerability was exploited to expose a scandalous affair Prince Charles was having. Did people take notice and say, "Damn. I better get some encryption going on!" No.

    Even if every wireless AP owner knew people might be accessing their networks surrepititiously, would they really care enough to do something about it? Probably not.
    1. Re:who f-ing cares?!? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of people are missing the point. These projects have very little to do with security, and a lot to do with providing a telecommunications service that actually works for a change.

      The state of braodband in the US is miserable, most of us can't even get a connection, and our elected officials couldn't care less.

      In a time of general apathy and dispair over the state of the telecom industy in this country, a people's alternative to broadband is a very refreshing concept. For instance...maybe some guy has a T1 at his home shop, and when he locks up at night he just leaves his AP open because hey...he's not using it why not help some people out? This is how it starts.

      Naturally we're just making baby steps with projects like these...but everything great starts small.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:who f-ing cares?!? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I agree wardriving is 'social' not political. You need to make people awire that there is something inb the air that they can just grab and use.

      'You mean I just plug this in the back of my laptop and I can read my email from the park! kwel. When's the next wardrive?'

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  51. So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    WarDriving... Cities from only the western part of North America...

    Don't call it "World" if its just North America, and especially don't if its just a region of North America.


    So get off your butt and go do some wardriving. Nothing is stopping you, or anyone else in the world, from participating. Indeed, I suspect the organizers would be happier if more countries participated.

    Perhaps it will become an annual event, with gradually more countries taking part.

    BTW - Where do you draw the line for 'world?' 1 country per continent, x countries per hemisphere? Most 'world' events in Europe and Asia are similarly limited ... only a tiny fraction of the world community takes part (e.g. "world" art exhibitions, with all of 4 countries on 4 continents represented out of hundreds is arguably as small a slice of the world as it would be if those 4 countries were on one continent, to cite an example I witnessed more than once while living in Germany).

    If 10 people take part in a 'world' event and they happen to be scattered all over the globe, does that somehow add legitimacy over 10,000 people taking part, who happen to be scatterd over just one corner of it? I agree the term is often abused, but your kneejerk reaction is more than a little silly itself.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  52. Link to Story by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

    When the story goes live on the website, here's the link

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  53. There seems to be a disjoint. by bons · · Score: 2

    If I can see you having sex as I ride by in a car is that my fault or yours?
    If I can see you having sex as I ride by in a car provided I'm using glasses is that my fault or yours?
    How about if I use a pair of binoculars?
    How about a telescope?

    Why wardriving are listening to telephones with a ham radio are probably both socially repugnant the flip side is that one group of people are BROADCASTING on public airwaves. If they don't want people listening to those broadcasts, maybe they shouldn't be broadcasting on a public frequency.

    If you want privacy, pull the digital shades.

    1. Re:There seems to be a disjoint. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
      If I can see you having sex as I ride by in a car is that my fault or yours?

      For many of us, it would simply be a miracle.

    2. Re:There seems to be a disjoint. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how precisely does one broadcast on a non-public frequency? what with the whole "laws of physics" thing to contend with

    3. Re:There seems to be a disjoint. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      yes, but you are entering into there computer system, which is not public, unlesss explicitly dedicated for public use.
      Inevitable this will require you to access there Hard lines, which is NOT public.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. is there a list of MAC addresses used by APs? by carlhirsch · · Score: 2

    I'm hoping to write some scripts of my own to scan the various MAC addresses that show up on the network I manage for 802.11 access points.

    So far I haven't been able to find a list of the prefixes used by various manufacturers for their access points. I asked about this on usenet but the only replies I got were the IEEE lists of ALL MAC address prefixes, with no distinction between NICs, APs, switches, etc.

    I'm sure various vendors must have compiled such a thing for their auditing tools... but it doesn't seem like there's anything available through Google just yet.

    Thanks for any help you can give!

    -carl

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
  55. oops by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    damn, didn't realize I'd already posted this (and had it modded down below my browsing level as "flaimbait," go figure[1])

    [1] I'd apologize more profously if the moderation system weren't being abused by regional bigots to promote their POV here. Look, I (and a huge chunk of the American public) hate Bush and his "let's fight daddy's war all over again/let's use the American military to avenge the attempt on daddy's life" nonsense as much as everyone else does, but that is no excuse for the sort of region and nation bashing going on in this thread.

    You really want to bash someone, bash the corporations who run the baseball league who abuse the term 'world' for their own marketing persons, and while your at it, bash the European art show organizers who do the same to promote their events. But don't bash a bunch of amateur war drivers who tried to organize a world event and came up short. Instead, grab your laptop, get into your car, and add a map of your city and country to the list.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  56. so how do I keep secure? by happyclam · · Score: 2

    I have read a lot of snickering about idiotic network managers and know-nothing, affluent homeowners. I guess I fall into the latter category. It would be really nice if one--just one--person posting criticism might also offer a link or word of advice on how to actually secure my spiffy new wireless access point.

    My router offers WEP, but a quick Google search makes me wonder if even that's enough. What can the know-nothing, affluent homeowner do that does not take six weeks of intensive reading on network security?

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:so how do I keep secure? by zoward · · Score: 2

      Most routers (including my Netgear wireless) allow you to restrict wireless acess by the MAC address of the connecting wireless card. Just restrict your router to the MAC addresses of the wirelss cards in your laptop(s) and/or wireless desktop(s) and you should be all set.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    2. Re:so how do I keep secure? by Junta · · Score: 2

      From a practical perspective, as a non-sysadmin about the best you can easily do is WEP. Though weak, it is better than nothing and is certainly sufficient to keep all but the most determined attackers at bay.

      When having to settle for WEP, you should regularly change keys. Since this is a home situation, manually changing it every couple of days or so should suffice. In a corporate enviornment, some sort of automatic rekeying should be implemented to complement WEP. If you do not rekey, and you have a persistant attacker sniffing your packets constantly, your traffic could be compromised in less than a week (I've managed overnight in my tests when constantly saturating the wireless bandwidth with data). Some equipment is better about the weak points of WEP than others, but assume you have the weakest and change every day or two. Chances are slim that a house would have a person trying hard to crack when so many open APs can be found.

      Personally, I back up my wireless configuration with IPSec in addition to WEP. With WEP alone, all they can do is get a dhcp response, talk to other wireless systems, and hit the router on udp port 500 and esp (for ipsec). Once in IPSec, they get access to the wired network and the outside world. Still not the perfect solution (plan to force traffic through routing table when I get around it), but still serves to protect some of the more important stuff pretty reliably.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:so how do I keep secure? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I think the original poster would also like to know how. I have not yet gone beyond WEP with my linksys setup, and would also like to see instructions on how to designate allowable MAC addresses. I know, a google search should produce the instructions, but this seems like it would be good info for many in the slashdot crowd.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    4. Re:so how do I keep secure? by tcr · · Score: 2

      Here you go.

      I've been asking the same kind of thing on Usenet...

      I gather that setting allowable MAC addresses adds a little bit of security, but sadly, the "authorised" wireless clients broadcast them as identification to the access point. So they're ultimately detectable and spoofable...

      Dunno which Linksys you have, but some very helpful guys have responded to me with good suggestions for the Linksys BEFW11S4 v2 (1.42.7 firmware), which are :

      Change the default admin password for your router

      Change the default SSID from 'Linksys'

      Don't broadcast the SSID (set "Allow "Broadcast" SSID to associate?" to No)

      Change the default broadcast channel

      Follow the link above, and set allowable MAC addresses to be your machines

      If you use DHCP, limit the max number of DHCP leases to be the number of machines you have

      Also, change the default DHCP starting address - 192.168.1.100/101/102 are guessable

      Similarly, change the default IP address of your router

      Enable WEP (this might decrease performance, tho')

      As the chap (who kindly advised me) said, none of these measures guarantees security. Even all of them in combination... But you make it more likely that the potential intruder will get fed up and move on to a different target.

      (With thanks to Dane)

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  57. +1 funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "MSN's resposible if some user of theirs hacks white house?"

    An MSN user hacking? HAHAHA! much less the white house!

  58. why open WAP's are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a nomadic guy like me. I drive around the country in a converted school bus / RV. I need internet access. Clueless people generously provide it for me. War drivers give me a map of where I am likely to find access, I park in a shopping center and point the YAGI in the right direction, and whammo I'm on the 'net.

    I'm happy, the WAP owner is probably clueless that any sharing ever happened, and we both go on with our lives. I don't do anything bad with my access. I do all my email offline so there is a quick send/recieve session and it is done. Web surfing is the only thing I do online and I don't do a heck of a lot of that.

    This is a good service to people like me. I'd like to thank the war drivers for helping me to stay in touch with my family and friends on the road.

    1. Re:why open WAP's are good by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 2
      I don't do anything bad with my access.

      Um, getting the access is the bad thing. Criminal tresspass and all that.

      --

      - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

  59. How about War "Flying" ? by Kyrka · · Score: 1

    Looks to me like leakage from your AP might be even easier to get a look at from above.

    http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/3q02/warflying-1 .html

    My next assumption is that anyone silly enough to be using wireless without decent encryption at the network layer will soon be getting sniffed at the satellite layer! Cheers.

  60. Wardriving anti-FUD by PureFiction · · Score: 2

    I am seeing a lot of confused comments in this thread, so I will throw in my $0.02.

    Disclosure: I wardrive on occasion. I keep a list of access points that I find while driving. Currently in excess of 1,000 for the Portland, OR area.

    1. Why wardriving? Everyone has their reasons. Mine are security related. Myself and a small group of other local wifi enthusiasts enjoy passive monitoring to identify security weaknesses. We also inform insecure node operators of the fact that their networks are wide open.

    We have found a number of extremely sensitive, wide open access points operated by city and state governments, corporations, and home users. By this I mean networks that are obviously not intended to be public.

    If your government has weak security on sensitive information, this can affect you directly (which means Us, the wardrivers too). So we like to notify them of the vulnerabilities and give them information on fixing the holes. Sometimes we get paid to do this.

    [You will notice the results page is missing GPS coordinates. This is intentional, as there are those out there who would take advantage of unsecured networks]

    This is also usefull for identifying trends and generating usefull statistics.

    2. How do you really secure a wireless network? You have a few options: Basic security and high security.

    Basic Security: Enable MAC ID restrictions, allowing only those cards with a specific MAC id to connect to the network. Also turn on 128bit WEP encryption. You can switch to a lesser used channel, like 1 or 11 if you wish.

    Please note that this is still easily circumvented with the right tools, like AirSnort and MAC ID spoofing. Despite this, most people will find a network in this state and move on. It significantly raises the barrier to entry.

    High Security: Install a VPN with very good passwords or preferably something like SecureID cryptographic tokens. This is the only way to be truly secure, where truly secure is as good as the firewall VPN combo you use at work.

  61. Re:How about War "Flying" ? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

    try War flying: San Diego covered on slashdot previously.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  62. More fud by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

    Well, it seems that some just don't care about figuring out what's it is all about, just as long as there is a cool story, like this. So how is the average reader supposed to get a open view/opinion of the subject. Of course when people read stories like this the public view of it all will crawl towards the dark side.

    --
    my sig
    1. Re:More fud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd personally suggest learning how to generate good p.r. for yourselves, educate the public (yes, this might mean dumbing material down. If you wanna be an obtuse bastard, go into government work.), and help the clueless general public before you start screaming "FUD" in a crowded theater.

      Unless, of course, you're just wardriving because you want some phr33 133t g00dz.

  63. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you ever think that some of us want the government to remove more liberties so the general public becomes so pissed that they revolt? :-)

    Oh - what kind of person would even think this way...? Probably someone who doesn't want a government.

  64. Aftermath ??? by papason · · Score: 0

    Well look at http://www.kismetwireless.net and tell me how rfmon will let you anyone see them using kismet ?

  65. Typical Non-North American attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    jealousy

  66. Where is it a crime? I'd bet they are in violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of their contract with their provider more than I would be a criminal.

  67. erf by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

    okay, so i read a bit further down and someone already explained it...

    ignore me .

    --
    ...I got nothing.
  68. Well i like to call it by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    pollution/

    Why think of you feet when you can think in your head.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  69. Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by azav · · Score: 1

    If so, I have something for you.

    Paste this script into Applescript's script editor, open the event log, make sure speech is enabled and your volume is up. Check show events and the show results toggles. Now drive around town. Whenever you encounter an 802.11 access point, the computer will speak to you with the name of the network. The network's specifics will be listed in the event log. Enjoy, Zav

    Email me at zavpublic (AT) mac.com

    The code will not make it through /.'s filters. :P

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  70. Wardriving speed. by azav · · Score: 1

    With my powerbook g3 500, no external antenna and that scanning script I have, we can drive at 60 to 65 miles an hour and still pick up networks. We tested this from Napa to San Francisco in my buddy's Blazer. Tests in my Beemer at 138 mph have been less successful.

    So I leave it to the reader to further refine the "pickup speed" if he/she so desires.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Wardriving speed. by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      I find that the most important factor of my XPpro Vaio laptop/Taurus wagon combination is whether or not the wireless adapter is sitting horizontal on the seat or held up closer to window level. On the seat, I pick up a few spots from the frontage road at 45 - 50mph. With it held up, I get lots of hits a 65 - 75 mph from the elevated highway. Hold the adapter vertically seems to improve performance. Guess the frame acts as a dampening field.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  71. Wardriving may be illegal but it's not unethical by Exocet · · Score: 1

    See my comment from the other day here on this topic.

    An analogy I used, which is still applicable here, is: "If I walk by your house in the middle of the night and knock on your door and you, sleep-muddled and confused, let me in, then I'll assume I can walk around, sleep on the couch, etc." It should be noted that simply being invited into the house/network does not give you permission to steal physical objects/intellectual property/etc. Using bandwidth isn't stealing in this analogy because it's what a WLAN/Wifi is. Access.

    Note that "sleep-muddled and confused" may be used in some legal wrangling in some court, but that isn't the point here. The point is that someone asked for something (dhcp assigned IP) and got what they asked for.

    I also noted that a local group here, Personal Telco operates several free and un-restricted nodes in the Portland area. To that, someone replied with: and how is a novice user supposed to know when they've roamed (e.g. the user is walking around) from this 100% open and public node to a private node? Especially when the private node happily gave you the IP you requested?

    It's not as b&w as some "Wardriving is theft, plain and simple." would have you think.

    Whether wardriving is illegal is up to the courts. I'm not a judge, nor am I a lawyer. But I have a bit of common sense and know that if I set up this magical wireless internet access that works even from my back porch, then I'll also assume the neighbors can get access through me, too. If I leave a "EVERYONE is WELCOME!" sign on my wide-open door, I'll expect people to come in side and wander around. Closing the door and removing the sign is easy. If someone is too damn novice to figure out how, they need to shut down their wireless setup until they figure out or pay someone to figure out how.

    --
    Exocet Industries - Taking over the world, one computer at a
  72. Article in New Scientist by tflash · · Score: 1

    There is an article about this on the New Scientists's website: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 92760

  73. Re:Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by shumacher · · Score: 1

    I would love to try it! If you can put it somewhere we can get at, I'd appreciate it.

  74. Why the World Series is called the WORLD series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the World Series argument is one that is often made, and one I've made myself, until I found out the truth. The reason the World Series is called the World Series isn't because its supposed to be an international event. There used to be a newspaper called "The World", and the newspaper used to fund the championship series, hence the name "World Series". Its in reference to the newspaper, not to the Earth.

    1. Re:Why the World Series is called the WORLD series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trolling, or just stupid and nearly illiterate? That myth was debunked hours ago in this very thread.

  75. Lame Calgary Sun article by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT, but this made me laugh:

    http://www.calgarywireless.net/images/content/ch al kwalk.jpg

    They act like it's a crime against humanity, perpetrated with a "secret" $150 device purchased over the internet (a wireless card, maybe?)

  76. How could this be illegal? by rongage · · Score: 1

    Let me see if I get this straight...

    Some would have you believe that the operation of a Radio Frequency Receiving Device is somehow illegal when said receiver operates on a public, unlicensed band? Exactly what is the logic here? I don't get it.

    Even the transmission of a signal to interact with the other transmitter isn't necessarily illegal. It is quite common for a radio to identify itself (indeed, some FCC regs could be interpreted to say that such identification is required).

    The fact that the signal on that radio frequency is computer generated and meant for another computer is irrelevent. It is still an open, unlicensed, public channel. With the exception of transmission power rules and the usual FCC Part 15 stuff (doesn't cause radio interference, etc...), there are no regulations on the use of the band in question.

    Now, rules about driving a car with an open laptop in your lap may be a bit more compelling. Then again, if you are stupid enough to do this, then you deserve the brick wall you are about to collide with...

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
  77. Just FYI... Re:NPR story by don_bailey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note that the 400 access points we discovered were just during THAT evening's war-drive.

    I war-drive for one reason--to guage the growth of wi-fi in the Northern Virginia area. It's been fascinating. Driving last year I'd pick up 20-40 access point within a few miles of my home. Now, I pick up several hundred on an hour long cruise around my town. That phenomenon keeps me going out on a monthly basis.

    We visited Old Town Alexandria for this NPR event. We combined it with a "war-walk" and it's a shame they edited out that portion of the adventure. The inebriated queries regarding our yagis were an amusing portion of the un-edited mini-discs.

    If you would like to see the setup that was used, visit:

    http://ruff.cs.jmu.edu/~beetle/wardrive/index.html

    We used this same setup for a similar war-driving demo for the Baltimore Sun a few months back.

    Beetle

    --
    Beetle

    http://ruff.cs.jmu.edu/~beetle/
  78. why? by roofingfelt · · Score: 1

    why why why?

    1. Re:why? by Eyecannon · · Score: 1

      Some people play golf, some people go to the opera... we wardrive! It's just as valid a pasttime as anything else... it is fun. If you don't think it's fun, go play some golf ;)

    2. Re:why? by roofingfelt · · Score: 1

      It sure is valid, and I'm sure people find it fun! I listened to the NPR piece, and was disappointed by the inability of the guys interviewed or the journalist to offer any kind of insight into the motivations of the wardrivers. It kinda reminded me of trainspotting (which I was [embarassingly] into for a while in my teens) - the collecting element. Blah blah. Anyway - is the appeal that it has the feel of being slightly on the edge legally, or what? What happens to these lists of access points? What proportion of wardrivers peek at stuff on the nets they find?

    3. Re:why? by Eyecannon · · Score: 1

      I am just intrigued by a) plucking out radiowaves from the ether and b) plucking out signals and information out of this mess of radiowaves. I don't get off on it because it borders on legality, but admittedly, I get a kick out of people who know nothing about wireless and computers believing it to be some sort of voodoo :p All I am going to say about getting online is that the vast majority of people who do get on someone's connection are NOT up to any mischief. If you would like to know about lists of access points, feel free to IM me sometime... I don't want to slashdot already overloaded servers ;)

  79. Hmm... by libertarian · · Score: 1

    I keep reading this argument about theft of service.
    I'm not saying these are perfect analogies (they're not) but just think:

    If I walk by a house or business (on the sidewalk) and they have a widescreen TV in view, with the windows open, and they are playing a pay-per-view movie, and I watch it, am I a criminal?

    If someone leaves a table with donuts on it in the middle of a park, with no signs or anything and I take one, am I a criminal?

    Just some thoughts.
    If I just look at your house from the street and see that the door is open (AP identification) without going inside, am I a criminal--NO.

    Lee

    1. Re:Hmm... by Maserati · · Score: 1
      In the first case, the MPAA does think that you've committed a crime.

      In the second case, you're nuts if you eat some random donut sitting in a box in the park.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:Hmm... by tcr · · Score: 2

      If I walk by a house or business (on the sidewalk) and they have a widescreen TV in view, with the windows open, and they are playing a pay-per-view movie, and I watch it, am I a criminal?


      In that scenario, you're not affecting their enjoyment of/use of/benefit-derived-from the service they are paying for.

      If your neighbour is paying for a 512/1Mb/2Mb connection, and you connect to it and start downloading ISO's, then you are limiting their use of a service they're paying for.

      IANAL, but I seem to remember that theft is the act of depriving the rightful owner of the use of/rights to/benefits of their property.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  80. We live in an insecured world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most people that I know, I do not care if people get on my wireless network. THere is nothing on my system that they don't have already. If they want to read my personal boring life go ahead or documents I have written that are gramattically incorrect or the viruses on my computers.

    I wish those people do a net send when they get on so to say Hi to me and maybe play multiplayer game against me.

    if you don't care, open up your wireless so I could use it too.

    Later

    1. Re:We live in an insecured world by Eyecannon · · Score: 1

      You can't play games well over wireless... too much lag ;)

  81. Re:Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by ekalb · · Score: 1

    macstumbler is a program for OS X that does just this as well. This is pretty much the only option for wardriving on OS X, the airport card can't be controlled through applescript like it can in OS 9.

  82. Re:Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by azav · · Score: 1

    Did I say EMAIL me or what??

    Someone needs to leasn how to follow directions. :P

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  83. Americans - they love their wars and driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's no wonder wardriving is so popular in the USA. Yanks love their cars and driving, and they don't mind a bit of war (get Saddam), so the term 'wardriving' apeals to their collective psyche immensely.

  84. typical lazy non-north american stupidity by geekoid · · Score: 2

    If you bothered to check, its called the World Series, because it was started by the World newspaper, hence the World series. If it was started by the times, it would be called the Times series.

    Normally I'd say someone was ignorant but since you know about google, clearly you made no effort to confirm your assumption, so your stupid.

    BTW it(wardriving) was a world event, the fact that you didn't participate is hardly the fault on North America.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  85. Re: uneducated Administrators by Zygo · · Score: 1

    No, manufacturers hold one key to solving this: if they would print in bold letters on a bright red label on the outside of the box, "WARNING: THIS PRODUCT BROADCASTS YOUR NETWORK (INCLUDING PR0N SURFING) TO ANYONE WITHIN ONE QUARTER OF A MILE", it would help.

    --
    -- I avoid spam by accepting only OpenPGP encrypted or signed email at this address. Clear-signed, RFC2015, heck, even
  86. War Driver shirts by libertynews · · Score: 2
    I've just discovered this new hobby, using Linux, kismet and gpsdrive. So I put together a t-shirt for War Drivers - www.cafepress.com/wardriver. All profits (every check from cafepress) goes to the eff.


    Brian

    --
    Remember Lexington Green!
    1. Re:War Driver shirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least this guy makes shirts in XXL, unlike the link in the article....

    2. Re:War Driver shirts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* http://www.wardrivingisnotacrime.com/

    3. Re:War Driver shirts by libertynews · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but those shirts are ugly. And by saying that it isn't a crime you are encouraging the perception that it is a crime by being defensive about it.

      --
      Remember Lexington Green!
  87. Re:Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by shumacher · · Score: 1

    I read the email... I was making a suggestion. I'd not want the slashdot effect in my inbox.

    I'll send the email.

  88. Cricket is completely different. by hayden · · Score: 2
    Unlike the baseball "World" Series, Cricket's World Cup can actually claim more than two competeing countries. There are the top teams, England, Australia, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, South Africa, New Zealand and also some newer, not quite so good teams, Kenya, Bandladesh (sp?) Zimbabwe (actual New Zealand probably should be put in the second list :)

    A better example would be Aussie Rules Football except that there has never been a "World" anything and it's called "Aussie" rules.

    And for the poster above, neither Ireland or Scotland have world class cricket teams. Not sure what they play in Scotland but Ireland play a game called Curling I believe. It's sort of an unusual cross between field hockey, soccer, rugby and war.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  89. Stop Breathing My Air! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using "service" from someone who is- not deprived of use of the service themselves, and is not permitted to sell that service themselves anyway, does not sound like theft.
    At worst, I suppose its like staring at your neighbor's shapely wife. Rude maybe, but theft?

  90. War is cool! by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Yeah glad you stuck in the emoticon, I think a lot of people do get a buzz out of the 'war' association, kind of macho big dick stuff. Me, I got mugged a week ago, kicked to the ground and kicked in the head multiple times by several teenagers trying to get my bike and wallet. Ouch, not nice. More to the point if this was not nice then the whole idea of war, people trying to shoot me with guns would probably be even less pleasant. So I think I'll skip the war=cool thing... (Sort of happy ending: a woman in a house across the road came out and shouted at the kids from her window, called the police and the kids ran off. I gave chase, well limped, and a biker dood gave me a lift and we caught up with the kids and got my bike back off them. Goes to prove there are good and bad people in the world).

  91. get a life? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Or a job?

    See for many of us it isn't that easy. Look at the unemployment numbers for this month and you'll see why.

  92. Re:Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by tcr · · Score: 2

    Now drive around town. Whenever you encounter an 802.11 access point, the computer will speak to you with the name of the network.

    Cool...

    I must remember to change my SSID to "This is the police. Pull over."

    :-)

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  93. Re:Amen. Wardriving != using the APs by Night+Goat · · Score: 2

    I've been reading all these replies to my post, and felt that I should clarify. (Maybe it's not a good idea right now, I've been up all night from insomnia) I sort of assumed that people would be eventually using these unsecured access points to get a free internet connection. I imagine there are people out there who just record where the open WAPs are. However, from what I've read in the newspapers, magazines, web, etc., I have noticed that people have been marking these spots like hoboes used to do or maybe still do. Or maybe there's a web site out there that catalogs them all. Now there's no point in doing that besides letting others know where the free access is. That results in eventual theft of service. So while just cataloging the open wireless transmissions isn't theft of service, making these spots widely known seems to me to be a bit unscrupulous, like a locksmith publishing his book of lock backdoors to the Internet. Hopefully you understand what I was getting at.