Ads will just be less targeted, that's all. They will still make money, just not as much. Paywalls are a dead-end for most things and they know that. They just don't like that the playing field is being tipped against them.
There's no legal requirements associated to the label - it's just a marketing gimmick. Maybe it's true to the connotation, maybe it isn't. As soon as it stops suiting their needs, they'll change it.
You should go hang out in places like Boulder, SF, Santa Fe, etc..., and watch how people spend their money there for a little while. Trust me, there's a market for things like this.
Is if they allowed apps to all share the same map and such (like roll20, FG, etc...) so the DM could have detailed maps with character positioning, etc... without them having to do all the busywork of drawing out rooms all the time. Anything that this app can do to cut down on busywork during a game is a win-win.
While what's happened at Uber is terrible, what the media thinks is popular, or social ratings, is suspect at best. In the end, how people vote with their money is what really matters for "popularity".
Depends on your business model. If you're big on data, having redundancy might not make economic sense. If it's mostly compute, then yeah, have a backup region.
The US after the world wars might have been an exception (since we were hardly touched), but when you have devastation from war, your infrastructure and systems get thrown out of whack, the "equal" after might be worse than the "poor" beforehand.
In other words, 6% - 15% of the people reading have a chance of being swayed. I think this result will only encourage people who want to get their side elected to continue to rant.
Sometimes I think it more has to do with what a jargon term doesn't mean in a technical sense, which might otherwise be implied to someone who has a vague idea of what it is, but isn't familiar with its actual and proper context. It's sort of a way of over-promising on a technology's capabilities without ever really promising those things.
That's not always the case, though. Some really are pretty cut and dry.
I'm smoking experience, friend. Note that I didn't imply the other direction was true. Also, there's more to a product than just the engineering aspect. There's customer support (are they just as uninformed and useless as the marketers?), there's the documentation (same thing), and the overall management of the company (who let these clowns out of the circus, and what's to make of the future direction of this technology I'm investing in today, should I be trusting them?). The list goes on.
...for an investor/customer perspective that actually knows what those words should mean and imply. You hear the buzz pitch, then you look at the actual technology, and see if they really used the buzz correctly. If they didn't, you can probably bet that the actual product is crap. Saves you having to go through wasting a few weeks trying the technology out and being disappointed.
Many MFA token apps don't like rooted/ASOP devices. Have to address this as well. If google tries to advocate hiding unrooted status from apps, then you might get friction between google and security app providers.
Is anyone else noticing how the headline has turned the conversation posts from what the actual news subject matter to what a provocative NY professor has said about the subject matter?
Slashdot Mirror
Top-left corner.
Largest-scale practical joke?
Ads will just be less targeted, that's all. They will still make money, just not as much. Paywalls are a dead-end for most things and they know that. They just don't like that the playing field is being tipped against them.
There's no legal requirements associated to the label - it's just a marketing gimmick. Maybe it's true to the connotation, maybe it isn't. As soon as it stops suiting their needs, they'll change it.
You should go hang out in places like Boulder, SF, Santa Fe, etc..., and watch how people spend their money there for a little while. Trust me, there's a market for things like this.
+1 to Deus Ex. Fallout is another one.
Mass effect, elder scrolls (morrowwind and skyrim mostly)
One of the great thing about our country is that they are allowed to voice their opinion, whether you care to hear it or not.
Pot
Sorry, don't like it? Leave.
Kettle
Well based on the reasoning from the article earlier today, they'll never get funded.
Use it a lot in that environment. Having smooth updates from previous versions, as well as network reliability.
Pretty hard to get many professors to change their ways otherwise.
Is if they allowed apps to all share the same map and such (like roll20, FG, etc...) so the DM could have detailed maps with character positioning, etc... without them having to do all the busywork of drawing out rooms all the time. Anything that this app can do to cut down on busywork during a game is a win-win.
While what's happened at Uber is terrible, what the media thinks is popular, or social ratings, is suspect at best. In the end, how people vote with their money is what really matters for "popularity".
Depends on your business model. If you're big on data, having redundancy might not make economic sense. If it's mostly compute, then yeah, have a backup region.
To make them fail gracefully with this sort of outage. These opportunities don't come by very often.
The US after the world wars might have been an exception (since we were hardly touched), but when you have devastation from war, your infrastructure and systems get thrown out of whack, the "equal" after might be worse than the "poor" beforehand.
...as some may call it.
In other words, 6% - 15% of the people reading have a chance of being swayed. I think this result will only encourage people who want to get their side elected to continue to rant.
Sometimes I think it more has to do with what a jargon term doesn't mean in a technical sense, which might otherwise be implied to someone who has a vague idea of what it is, but isn't familiar with its actual and proper context. It's sort of a way of over-promising on a technology's capabilities without ever really promising those things. That's not always the case, though. Some really are pretty cut and dry.
I'm smoking experience, friend. Note that I didn't imply the other direction was true. Also, there's more to a product than just the engineering aspect. There's customer support (are they just as uninformed and useless as the marketers?), there's the documentation (same thing), and the overall management of the company (who let these clowns out of the circus, and what's to make of the future direction of this technology I'm investing in today, should I be trusting them?). The list goes on.
...for an investor/customer perspective that actually knows what those words should mean and imply. You hear the buzz pitch, then you look at the actual technology, and see if they really used the buzz correctly. If they didn't, you can probably bet that the actual product is crap. Saves you having to go through wasting a few weeks trying the technology out and being disappointed.
Many MFA token apps don't like rooted/ASOP devices. Have to address this as well. If google tries to advocate hiding unrooted status from apps, then you might get friction between google and security app providers.
Dirtiest Jobs' newest episode: Microsoft support helpline *cringe*
Is anyone else noticing how the headline has turned the conversation posts from what the actual news subject matter to what a provocative NY professor has said about the subject matter?
I can't see Apple and Nintendo ever getting along. Both have a long history of being vicious with their partners.