Do you dispute that shills exist? That corporations and governments are actively paying people to pollute public forums? If I find out that a poster is a shill, does it not somewhat become a helpful, healthy goal to inform others?
I get what you're saying about wanting to cease the logical fallacies. But the evidence (government manuals, testimonials) that people are being paid to divert discussion exists. So, what do you think should be done about it?
It's a light on the firmament, it's not a real place we can travel to. They knew this in the late 50s when they banned travel to Antarctica (it's "the edge"), and also did "Operation Fishbowl" where the US and Russia launched many nuclear bombs into the sky -- to test the firmament.
Some will mock and downvote this. Others know that during the end times there will be a great deception -- and the shape of the world we're standing on is a part of it.
For those interested in the truth, Dr. Samuel Rowbotham wrote about this more than a century ago, so his writing is available online for free (nothing after 1923 will ever enter the public domain, thanks to Disney): http://www.sacred-texts.com/ea...
I'm not sure how to interpret this, but here goes: I see no evidence that the AC was being aggressive or moronic, so I'm fairly certain that you are in agreement with me, that circletimessquare is overly rude and demeaning to others, when it loftily decides that others require rude and demeaning treatment.
Are you not aware of the Iranian diplomat's daughter who pretended to be someone else and pretended to have knowledge of babies being ripped out of incubators and left on the floor to die? Her words started a war in which people died. Children of diplomats have been used for evil purposes. The AC suggested this might be happening in this case, and you feel that is deserving of disrespect?
And, the fact that they Photoshopped Disney's Pluto into the Photoshopped image of the fake planet, also accounts for their budget excesses, as now they not only need to pay Adobe, they also need to pay royalties to Disney.
Between that and the "SEX" in the clouds in the latest image of the round Earth (which must be a lie, since Neil deGrasse Tyson now says the Earth is "pear-shaped" in an attempt to account for the extra land found in the southern regions -- it can't be both pear-shaped, and round in past images!), I am really surprised that NASA continues to fool millions.
If not, then they have no say over your non-harming actions -- just as Walmart cannot fine me for violating their internal policies, but they can fine their workers. If you harm someone, then you're going to face consequences, whether through Common Law, or through vigilantism.
But, they don't want anybody to understand that their rules only apply to their employees. Which is why they crack down on people distributing FIJA fliers (from http://fija.org/ -- note that they take Bitcoin donations now!) outside of courthouses.
The Constitution guarantees a freedom of expression in the first amendment. It does not say, "This amendment is inferior to NSA letters"; it says, and I quote, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The existence of "government classified information" precisely indicates the existence of "government conspiracies." A conspiracy is when two or more people work together, when one or more other people don't know about it. A surprise party is a benign form of conspiracy. Malicious forms include the mafia, the Patriot Act, etc.
Now, were I in his position, would I speak freely? That's a difficult one; I like my freedom, but then again I'm a shard of light and I'll return to the Creator so it doesn't really matter what happens to this corpse. Still, I avoid pain.
So I doubt we'll ever detect life "up there". Which is only in one direction, up; see my signature. I have tested moonlight and it makes things colder (i.e., it was warmer in the shade of the moonlight), so it's definitely not reflected sunlight. If it's not reflected sunlight? Well, then, we need to recognize our preconceptions and test and verify them.
Windows 10's "telemetry" will send everything you type to Microsoft-controlled servers. Jim Stone speculates that "the tribe" is using this as a method to obtain everything everyone writes, to use for their purposes.
To now see a story about a "Fat Jew" who is stealing other people's jokes -- he could have saved a lot of his time and effort if he just subscribed to Microsoft's offering to the tribe.
Strange. How do you account for the rapid increase in autism? Your appeal to military alert systems is quaint, but irrelevant. Facts fight quacks, and you provided none, just ad-hominem attacks.
We require the sun's rays in order to produce vitamin D (which isn't a vitamin), which has healing properties inside our bodies. Too little vitamin D and the body goes into "hibernation" mode, where it doesn't adequately fix damage; it does a quick job, and then does a better repair job when summer comes.
If one is wearing sunscreen, then "summer will never come" and the body will remain in a state of disrepair. Which benefits the health insurance industry (it's not a "health care" industry).
See "Zetetic Astronomy", which contains a number of proofs that it's not a globe.
"They"[1] have their work cut out for them, but of course, they placed one in the first classroom we were ever in, thus indoctrinating us before our critical thinking skills kicked in.
[1] -- They talk a lot, don't they. -- Pulp Fiction
Okay -- but it's still, now, less than "6 million" due to simple math (or, are you arguing that the entire reduction was solely from "non-Jewish deaths"? That'd be a new one to me). They tried to show 6 million died during WWI as well. They have a prophecy in their Talmud saying Israel won't fully be restored to the Jews until 6 million of them die in a fire -- which is why they so needed those delousing showers to be killing ovens. They want to jump the gun on their own prophecy! It's no wonder there are so many anecdotes about them being greedy.
The logic behind my words: that AC post has an IP address associated with it in Slashdot's database. If "jcr" decides to sue, his attorney will be able to obtain that IP address. From the IP address they can determine the ISP, and can then legally obtain the customer who had the IP address on 2015-08-29 17:39.
I agree the AC's words are worth little and are dishonest. I disagree that interacting with fools is a useless endeavor, in other words, I won't ignore ACs merely because they refuse to identify themselves. There is no true anonymity, anyway, as I described above.
Again, the comparison to the Bible is apt. Do you think that "context is important" with respect to the Bible, and that the government should enforce its sale only if it includes said government-approved contextually-added comments? (Analogies are important, even if this one isn't car-related.)
The swastika is not a "Nazi symbol" any more than a pyramid or eye is a "US symbol". It is one of many similar symbols used in religions throughout the world. In India, for instance (a coworker from there informed me), they use it both "forwards" and "backwards", e.g. "SS" and "ZZ", as power symbols.
It's amusing that "Mein Kampf" is legal to be sold only if it contains revisionist remarks! That'd be like the US government making the Bible illegal to sell, if it didn't contain the US government's "explanatory remarks" -- laughable and ridiculous. Definitely not amusing for those forced to live under such restrictions, though.
Those who throw the "racist" accusation around have already been mind-controlled by the Tribe. Preferentially associating with those who share your characteristics is not racism, it's just nature.
Um, I think he's talking about the printing press (now "printing key") and how it's devaluing the currency, and how China is stepping up to be host to the new world reserve currency.
Cleveland Rocks!
Do you dispute that shills exist? That corporations and governments are actively paying people to pollute public forums? If I find out that a poster is a shill, does it not somewhat become a helpful, healthy goal to inform others?
I get what you're saying about wanting to cease the logical fallacies. But the evidence (government manuals, testimonials) that people are being paid to divert discussion exists. So, what do you think should be done about it?
It's a light on the firmament, it's not a real place we can travel to. They knew this in the late 50s when they banned travel to Antarctica (it's "the edge"), and also did "Operation Fishbowl" where the US and Russia launched many nuclear bombs into the sky -- to test the firmament.
Some will mock and downvote this. Others know that during the end times there will be a great deception -- and the shape of the world we're standing on is a part of it.
For those interested in the truth, Dr. Samuel Rowbotham wrote about this more than a century ago, so his writing is available online for free (nothing after 1923 will ever enter the public domain, thanks to Disney): http://www.sacred-texts.com/ea...
I'm not sure how to interpret this, but here goes: I see no evidence that the AC was being aggressive or moronic, so I'm fairly certain that you are in agreement with me, that circletimessquare is overly rude and demeaning to others, when it loftily decides that others require rude and demeaning treatment.
Does every textual input to you provide all the bases for finding all suggestions plausible?
Of course not.
It's up to you to determine how you treat people. And that is orthogonal to the information that they present.
Are you not aware of the Iranian diplomat's daughter who pretended to be someone else and pretended to have knowledge of babies being ripped out of incubators and left on the floor to die? Her words started a war in which people died. Children of diplomats have been used for evil purposes. The AC suggested this might be happening in this case, and you feel that is deserving of disrespect?
We must have differing definitions of "respect".
There are at least two better approaches. First, say nothing. Second, say something kinder.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonsai_Kitten
I remember animal rights groups getting up in arms about this a decade and a half ago.
And you treat people with disrespect. I consider that worse.
And, the fact that they Photoshopped Disney's Pluto into the Photoshopped image of the fake planet, also accounts for their budget excesses, as now they not only need to pay Adobe, they also need to pay royalties to Disney.
Between that and the "SEX" in the clouds in the latest image of the round Earth (which must be a lie, since Neil deGrasse Tyson now says the Earth is "pear-shaped" in an attempt to account for the extra land found in the southern regions -- it can't be both pear-shaped, and round in past images!), I am really surprised that NASA continues to fool millions.
If not, then they have no say over your non-harming actions -- just as Walmart cannot fine me for violating their internal policies, but they can fine their workers. If you harm someone, then you're going to face consequences, whether through Common Law, or through vigilantism.
But, they don't want anybody to understand that their rules only apply to their employees. Which is why they crack down on people distributing FIJA fliers (from http://fija.org/ -- note that they take Bitcoin donations now!) outside of courthouses.
The Constitution guarantees a freedom of expression in the first amendment. It does not say, "This amendment is inferior to NSA letters"; it says, and I quote, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The existence of "government classified information" precisely indicates the existence of "government conspiracies." A conspiracy is when two or more people work together, when one or more other people don't know about it. A surprise party is a benign form of conspiracy. Malicious forms include the mafia, the Patriot Act, etc.
Now, were I in his position, would I speak freely? That's a difficult one; I like my freedom, but then again I'm a shard of light and I'll return to the Creator so it doesn't really matter what happens to this corpse. Still, I avoid pain.
So I doubt we'll ever detect life "up there". Which is only in one direction, up; see my signature. I have tested moonlight and it makes things colder (i.e., it was warmer in the shade of the moonlight), so it's definitely not reflected sunlight. If it's not reflected sunlight? Well, then, we need to recognize our preconceptions and test and verify them.
NASA knows there is a boundary; we can't get into space. Everything NASA produces is "generated", it's virtual reality, nothing is real.
Or, do we have to rely on the "high priest" named NASA for the images (e.g,. interpretation) they graciously provide to us?
Windows 10's "telemetry" will send everything you type to Microsoft-controlled servers. Jim Stone speculates that "the tribe" is using this as a method to obtain everything everyone writes, to use for their purposes.
To now see a story about a "Fat Jew" who is stealing other people's jokes -- he could have saved a lot of his time and effort if he just subscribed to Microsoft's offering to the tribe.
Strange. How do you account for the rapid increase in autism? Your appeal to military alert systems is quaint, but irrelevant. Facts fight quacks, and you provided none, just ad-hominem attacks.
We require the sun's rays in order to produce vitamin D (which isn't a vitamin), which has healing properties inside our bodies. Too little vitamin D and the body goes into "hibernation" mode, where it doesn't adequately fix damage; it does a quick job, and then does a better repair job when summer comes.
If one is wearing sunscreen, then "summer will never come" and the body will remain in a state of disrepair. Which benefits the health insurance industry (it's not a "health care" industry).
That's my answer to "global warming".
See "Zetetic Astronomy", which contains a number of proofs that it's not a globe.
"They"[1] have their work cut out for them, but of course, they placed one in the first classroom we were ever in, thus indoctrinating us before our critical thinking skills kicked in.
[1] -- They talk a lot, don't they. -- Pulp Fiction
Okay -- but it's still, now, less than "6 million" due to simple math (or, are you arguing that the entire reduction was solely from "non-Jewish deaths"? That'd be a new one to me). They tried to show 6 million died during WWI as well. They have a prophecy in their Talmud saying Israel won't fully be restored to the Jews until 6 million of them die in a fire -- which is why they so needed those delousing showers to be killing ovens. They want to jump the gun on their own prophecy! It's no wonder there are so many anecdotes about them being greedy.
The logic behind my words: that AC post has an IP address associated with it in Slashdot's database. If "jcr" decides to sue, his attorney will be able to obtain that IP address. From the IP address they can determine the ISP, and can then legally obtain the customer who had the IP address on 2015-08-29 17:39.
I agree the AC's words are worth little and are dishonest. I disagree that interacting with fools is a useless endeavor, in other words, I won't ignore ACs merely because they refuse to identify themselves. There is no true anonymity, anyway, as I described above.
Again, the comparison to the Bible is apt. Do you think that "context is important" with respect to the Bible, and that the government should enforce its sale only if it includes said government-approved contextually-added comments? (Analogies are important, even if this one isn't car-related.)
The swastika is not a "Nazi symbol" any more than a pyramid or eye is a "US symbol". It is one of many similar symbols used in religions throughout the world. In India, for instance (a coworker from there informed me), they use it both "forwards" and "backwards", e.g. "SS" and "ZZ", as power symbols.
It's amusing that "Mein Kampf" is legal to be sold only if it contains revisionist remarks! That'd be like the US government making the Bible illegal to sell, if it didn't contain the US government's "explanatory remarks" -- laughable and ridiculous. Definitely not amusing for those forced to live under such restrictions, though.
Way to receive a slander lawsuit, AC!
Those who throw the "racist" accusation around have already been mind-controlled by the Tribe. Preferentially associating with those who share your characteristics is not racism, it's just nature.
Um, I think he's talking about the printing press (now "printing key") and how it's devaluing the currency, and how China is stepping up to be host to the new world reserve currency.