Read Einstein's FBI File (356) FreeBSD 4.0 Released (233) The Mini-Quickies That Fell To Earth (130) The End of Unix? (444) Bryar Takes On Patents And Their Friends (119) MCSE Revolt Over NT4-W2K Plans (323) Geographic Screening (298) A Free, High Quality On-Line University? (242) Spielberg To Direct New Kubrick Movie (166) RealNetworks Licenses MS Windows Media Codec (121) SAS Institute Announces Linux Port Of SAS Software (92) Tuesday March 14
New Domain Arbitration Rules Get Results (114) DNA-Based Steganography Wins Intel Education Award (247) Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented (404) King's New eBook (229) Changing the Software License? (100) Red Hat Takes Heat Over Certification (243) Judge Deems Washington Anti-Spam Law Unconstitutional (210) Part Two: Who Owns Ideas? (281) Open Source Napster: Gnutella (183)
Older Articles Yesterday's Edition
Slashdot Poll Who is Your Favorite Iron Chef? Masaharu Morimoto (Iron Chef Japan) Chen Kenichi (Iron Chef China) Sakai Hiroyuki (Iron Chef France) Kobe Masahiko (Iron Chef Italy) Hemos (Iron Chef Namek) [ Results | Polls ] Comments:270 | Votes:11562
Segfault.org If Linux Distributions Were Airlines StickyPr0n Tech Support Transcript #1 What Would Peter Norton Do? The latest DDoS attack: Helix-GNOME Clinton Administration Relaxes Crypto Controls, Permits ROT26 Export Next-generation input device premiered Technical Report: More W2K Filesystem Innovations Mars Polar Lander Apparent Victim Of DoS Attack Segfault.org 2 in Development helloworld.c dead at 31 Advice Column: Ask The Warez Dood More Low-Budget Humour...
Quick Links Cool Sites: Linux.com (What is Linux?) Everything (Blow your Mind) After Y2k (This is Post-Apocalyptic?) User Friendly (Laugh) Themes.org (Make X Perty) Support Slashdot:
ThinkGeek (Clothe Yourself in Slashdot) CDnow (Support Rob's Who Habit) Slashdot Advertiser Index
Book Reviews Our own Jon Katz has released Geeks, a true story of two geeks who use the Internet to get the hell outta Dodge./Well/ worth reading.
And if you are looking to brush up on your programming style check out The Pragmatic Programmer, written by Andrew Hunt and David Thomas.
Manning Publications has a great Perl book entitled Elements of Programming with Perl, written by Andrew L. Johnson
If you need to use Java 2 to work, than you should probably read Inside Java 2 Platform Security, Architecture, API Design and Implementation, written by Li Gong.
Visit Our Book Reviews Section for more. Update: 2/17 13:19 by H:
Features The latest installment of Geeks in Space is up at The Sync. Listen to CmdrTaco, Hemos, and Nate talk about the latest events to happen - or not happen in the computer world.
Perhaps you are seeking Jon Katz's series of articles related to recent events in Colorado. These articles include Voices from the Hellmouth, More Stories from the Hellmouth or The Price of Being Different,
For something different, try reading a little essay Thoughts from the Furnace about the internet, and flame.
And for a bit of an amusing take on the Open Source world, check out Open Source as an Ant Farm
Update: 01/03 03:10 by CowboyNeal:
Past Features
Ask Slashdot The End of Unix? Windows 2000 Name Services - What do you think? How to Build "gd.so" Extension for PHP + Apache? Changing the Software License? Linux & Education - How To Get It For Your School Learning About Genetic Engineering On The Net What Is The State Of MIDI Support Under Linux? SecureID and Linux? Wildcard DNS, Session Management And Prior Art Mounting ext2 Partitions From Windows? if you have a question for Ask Slashdot, send it to askslashdot@slashdot.org
It got labelled flamebait because you changed the subject of the discussion and starting preaching about Linux, when Linux has NOTHING to do with this article and any mention of it here will only start a retarded Linux vs. BSD flame war. Don't be a jackass. Go evangelize your Linux in a different discussion that actually has something to do with Linux. Why is the discussion of any non-Linux related article on this site taken as a personal attack on Linux?
Hey, Signal 11 is right. And since when has Slashdot ever kept software announcements to a minimum? Shit, they announce every damn 0.01 version increase in GNOME.
Another Slashdot headline announcing a 0.01 version number increase on an already shitty product. And to top it all off, another jackass chanting the Mozilla mantra "it's getting really really close now" (which is only slightly less annoying than the other Linux mantra "it's coming along nicely"). Fuck this site.
what really upsets me about Linux distro arguments is this "ease of installation" bullshit. come on, we are the smart ones here. who cares if it's hard? i think that things aren't worth doing unless they take a little bit of work. christ, it saddens me to hear someone who probably considers themselves a "geek" or at least intelligent/computer-literate say shit like "well, i was going to try OpenBSD, but the installer was too difficult...". do people realize that they are effectively calling themselves stupid by saying shit like this?
Actually, here is Boise, they carry FreeBSD in CompUSA, and not BeOS (unfortunately). I was very pleased to see this, although it'll be a cold day in Hell before I buy ANYTHING from those bastards (CompUSA, not FreeBSD:) )
I agree with you one hundred percent! John Fucking Cusack is the ONLY actor who could play Peter Parker. And by the way...
This is a letter I have planned on writing for some time, a letter that I believe is extremely important and one that unequivocally must be heeded if we are to undo the damage caused by Slashdot. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of warped new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. There are three points I need to make here. First, Slashdot continuously seeks adulation from its cronies. Second, even without making an ethical argument against neopaganism, I can show that the mistaken claim that Slashdot's opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- is not only incorrect but is somewhat telling of Slashdot's core sentiments. And third, it is not possible fully to understand the present except as a projection of the past.
My point may be made clearer by use of an allegorical tale. Suppose a hypothetical group of three people is standing in a room. One of those people realizes that Slashdot expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. Another goes on and on about Slashdot's perfidious feckless beliefs. But the third can't understand why Slashdot simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, stubborn dialectic. In this hypothetical situation, it should be obvious that a common thread runs through most of Slashdot's slurs, a thread so quasi-testy that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness.
Slashdot is capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of dodgy racialism to a proclaimed attachment to neocolonialism and back -- and back again. If the left of the current political spectrum is brain-damaged stoicism, and the right is silly hooliganism, then Slashdot's politics are sincerely going to be a form of unscrupulous Stalinism. Does Slashdot actually think its arguments through, or does it just chug along on its computer writing about whatever trite quips happen to suit its needs that day? What will be the next object of attack from Slashdot's camp? Which brings me to my point. Licentious flakes who create a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. At any rate, the outcome of the struggle will ultimately be decided based on the number and influence of people fully informed about Slashdot's communications, committed to Slashdot's defeat, and organized under sound leadership. (Actually, Slashdot has values that are antagonistic to a traditional, moral society, but that's not important now.) With this letter, I hope I have made my views crystal-clear: Slashdot wallows in its basest behavior.
This is a letter I have planned on writing for some time, a letter that I believe is extremely important and one that unequivocally must be heeded if we are to undo the damage caused by Slashdot. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of warped new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. There are three points I need to make here. First, Slashdot continuously seeks adulation from its cronies. Second, even without making an ethical argument against neopaganism, I can show that the mistaken claim that Slashdot's opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- is not only incorrect but is somewhat telling of Slashdot's core sentiments. And third, it is not possible fully to understand the present except as a projection of the past.
My point may be made clearer by use of an allegorical tale. Suppose a hypothetical group of three people is standing in a room. One of those people realizes that Slashdot expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. Another goes on and on about Slashdot's perfidious feckless beliefs. But the third can't understand why Slashdot simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, stubborn dialectic. In this hypothetical situation, it should be obvious that a common thread runs through most of Slashdot's slurs, a thread so quasi-testy that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness.
Slashdot is capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of dodgy racialism to a proclaimed attachment to neocolonialism and back -- and back again. If the left of the current political spectrum is brain-damaged stoicism, and the right is silly hooliganism, then Slashdot's politics are sincerely going to be a form of unscrupulous Stalinism. Does Slashdot actually think its arguments through, or does it just chug along on its computer writing about whatever trite quips happen to suit its needs that day? What will be the next object of attack from Slashdot's camp? Which brings me to my point. Licentious flakes who create a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. At any rate, the outcome of the struggle will ultimately be decided based on the number and influence of people fully informed about Slashdot's communications, committed to Slashdot's defeat, and organized under sound leadership. (Actually, Slashdot has values that are antagonistic to a traditional, moral society, but that's not important now.) With this letter, I hope I have made my views crystal-clear: Slashdot wallows in its basest behavior.
I take exception to a few key aspects of the Linux community's contrivances. I assume you already know that a common thread runs through most of the Linux community's policies, a thread so insolent that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, but I have something more important to tell you. There's something wrong with this picture. Think of the Linux community's ideologies as being the sum of two components: an unrealistic component that consists of the Linux community's desire to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills and an infernal component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
In many ways, there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. There's a lot of talk nowadays about the Linux community's revolting witticisms, but not much action. The Linux community's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth. Many lives have been lost to fascism. The recent outrage at the Linux community's litanies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must stop the Linux community's encroachments on our heritage.
Since when has fucking Slashdot been about Linux? Isn't it news for nerds? Stuff that matters? Hot grits in pants? And by the way...
I take exception to a few key aspects of the Linux community's contrivances. I assume you already know that a common thread runs through most of the Linux community's policies, a thread so insolent that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, but I have something more important to tell you. There's something wrong with this picture. Think of the Linux community's ideologies as being the sum of two components: an unrealistic component that consists of the Linux community's desire to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills and an infernal component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
In many ways, there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. There's a lot of talk nowadays about the Linux community's revolting witticisms, but not much action. The Linux community's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth. Many lives have been lost to fascism. The recent outrage at the Linux community's litanies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must stop the Linux community's encroachments on our heritage.
I take exception to a few key aspects of the Linux community's contrivances. I assume you already know that a common thread runs through most of the Linux community's policies, a thread so insolent that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, but I have something more important to tell you. There's something wrong with this picture. Think of the Linux community's ideologies as being the sum of two components: an unrealistic component that consists of the Linux community's desire to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills and an infernal component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
In many ways, there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. There's a lot of talk nowadays about the Linux community's revolting witticisms, but not much action. The Linux community's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth. Many lives have been lost to fascism. The recent outrage at the Linux community's litanies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must stop the Linux community's encroachments on our heritage.
Is this comment refering to the BeOS still?!? "a wholly unintuitive GUI"... what are you, a retarded four year old? what could possibly be unintuitive about Be's GUI? It's as simple and effective as could be. "Broken internet browser"? You must have been using an OLD OLD version or something. I urge you to give it another try. It really does rock.
ahh.... "coming along nicely"... I love it. It's the mantra of the Linux community. You guys use your half-assed, half-done software that's "coming along nicely". I'll use what works well and gets the job done. Like Opera.
Better than an X Window Manager based on the Apple source code, screw X altogether (it's old, tired, and needs to be retired) and redo the whole GUI system using Apple's source. As for an X86 port? Just use BeOS. It's everything MacOS wants to Be.
Slashdot Mirror
screeching weasel, shut the fuck up, ok?
it's pronounced "Mal - da"
Older Stuff
/Well/ worth reading.
Wednesday March 15
Read Einstein's FBI File (356)
FreeBSD 4.0 Released (233)
The Mini-Quickies That Fell To Earth (130)
The End of Unix? (444)
Bryar Takes On Patents And Their Friends (119)
MCSE Revolt Over NT4-W2K Plans (323)
Geographic Screening (298)
A Free, High Quality On-Line University? (242)
Spielberg To Direct New Kubrick Movie (166)
RealNetworks Licenses MS Windows Media Codec (121)
SAS Institute Announces Linux Port Of SAS Software (92)
Tuesday March 14
New Domain Arbitration Rules Get Results (114)
DNA-Based Steganography Wins Intel Education Award (247)
Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented (404)
King's New eBook (229)
Changing the Software License? (100)
Red Hat Takes Heat Over Certification (243)
Judge Deems Washington Anti-Spam Law Unconstitutional (210)
Part Two: Who Owns Ideas? (281)
Open Source Napster: Gnutella (183)
Older Articles
Yesterday's Edition
Slashdot Poll
Who is Your Favorite Iron Chef?
Masaharu Morimoto (Iron Chef Japan)
Chen Kenichi (Iron Chef China)
Sakai Hiroyuki (Iron Chef France)
Kobe Masahiko (Iron Chef Italy)
Hemos (Iron Chef Namek)
[ Results | Polls ]
Comments:270 | Votes:11562
Segfault.org
If Linux Distributions Were Airlines
StickyPr0n Tech Support Transcript #1
What Would Peter Norton Do?
The latest DDoS attack: Helix-GNOME
Clinton Administration Relaxes Crypto Controls, Permits ROT26 Export
Next-generation input device premiered
Technical Report: More W2K Filesystem Innovations
Mars Polar Lander Apparent Victim Of DoS Attack
Segfault.org 2 in Development
helloworld.c dead at 31
Advice Column: Ask The Warez Dood
More Low-Budget Humour...
Quick Links
Cool Sites:
Linux.com (What is Linux?)
Everything (Blow your Mind)
After Y2k (This is Post-Apocalyptic?)
User Friendly (Laugh)
Themes.org (Make X Perty)
Support Slashdot:
ThinkGeek (Clothe Yourself in Slashdot)
CDnow (Support Rob's Who Habit)
Slashdot Advertiser Index
Book Reviews
Our own Jon Katz has released Geeks, a true story of two geeks who use the Internet to get the hell outta Dodge.
And if you are looking to brush up on your programming style check out The Pragmatic Programmer, written by Andrew Hunt and David Thomas.
Manning Publications has a great Perl book entitled Elements of Programming with Perl, written by Andrew L. Johnson
If you need to use Java 2 to work, than you should probably read Inside Java 2 Platform Security, Architecture, API Design and Implementation, written by Li Gong.
Visit Our Book Reviews Section for more.
Update: 2/17 13:19 by H:
Freshmeat
March
GLAME 0.1.30
phpftp 1.1
myPHPCalendar 03152000 Build 2
RPNCalc 0.9.2
Gameboy Development Kit 2.92
XMail 0.35
ZipCracker 0.1.1
Randsig 1.2.0
ctheme 0.8.4
kcd 4.16.1
Search Freshmeat:
More Meat...
Features
The latest installment of Geeks in Space is up at The Sync. Listen to CmdrTaco, Hemos, and Nate talk about the latest events to happen - or not happen in the computer world.
Perhaps you are seeking Jon Katz's series of articles related to recent events in Colorado. These articles include Voices from the Hellmouth, More Stories from the Hellmouth or The Price of Being Different,
For something different, try reading a little essay Thoughts from the Furnace about the internet, and flame.
And for a bit of an amusing take on the Open Source world, check out Open Source as an Ant Farm
Update: 01/03 03:10 by CowboyNeal:
Past Features
Ask Slashdot
The End of Unix?
Windows 2000 Name Services - What do you think?
How to Build "gd.so" Extension for PHP + Apache?
Changing the Software License?
Linux & Education - How To Get It For Your School
Learning About Genetic Engineering On The Net
What Is The State Of MIDI Support Under Linux?
SecureID and Linux?
Wildcard DNS, Session Management And Prior Art
Mounting ext2 Partitions From Windows?
if you have a question for Ask Slashdot, send it to askslashdot@slashdot.org
I am a computer. I am dumber than any human and smarter than any administrator.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2000 Andover.Net.
[ home | awards | supporters | rob's homepage | contribute story | older articles | Andover.Net | advertising | past polls | about | faq ]
Hail Eris!
Hail Eris!
It got labelled flamebait because you changed the subject of the discussion and starting preaching about Linux, when Linux has NOTHING to do with this article and any mention of it here will only start a retarded Linux vs. BSD flame war. Don't be a jackass. Go evangelize your Linux in a different discussion that actually has something to do with Linux. Why is the discussion of any non-Linux related article on this site taken as a personal attack on Linux?
Hey, Signal 11 is right. And since when has Slashdot ever kept software announcements to a minimum? Shit, they announce every damn 0.01 version increase in GNOME.
Another Slashdot headline announcing a 0.01 version number increase on an already shitty product. And to top it all off, another jackass chanting the Mozilla mantra "it's getting really really close now" (which is only slightly less annoying than the other Linux mantra "it's coming along nicely").
Fuck this site.
no.
what really upsets me about Linux distro arguments is this "ease of installation" bullshit.
:)
come on, we are the smart ones here. who cares if it's hard? i think that things aren't worth doing unless they take a little bit of work.
christ, it saddens me to hear someone who probably considers themselves a "geek" or at least intelligent/computer-literate say shit like "well, i was going to try OpenBSD, but the installer was too difficult...". do people realize that they are effectively calling themselves stupid by saying shit like this?
oh well. not everyone can be smart like me
heheh. god damn right.
and honestly, would a penguin tatoo in the same place be even remotely sexy? i think not...
cool sig. KMFDM is cool.
>> we are using Linux, arent't we?
no, we are not. we are using OpenBSD and BeOS.
dude, the guy you're responding to was obviously joking around. dial a clue.
Actually, here is Boise, they carry FreeBSD in CompUSA, and not BeOS (unfortunately). I was very pleased to see this, although it'll be a cold day in Hell before I buy ANYTHING from those bastards (CompUSA, not FreeBSD :) )
I agree with you one hundred percent! John Fucking Cusack is the ONLY actor who could play Peter Parker. ...
And by the way
This is a letter I have planned on writing for some time, a letter that I believe is extremely important and one that unequivocally must be heeded if we are to undo the damage caused by Slashdot. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of warped new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. There are three points I need to make here. First, Slashdot continuously seeks adulation from its cronies. Second, even without making an ethical argument against neopaganism, I can show that the mistaken claim that Slashdot's opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- is not only incorrect but is somewhat telling of Slashdot's core sentiments. And third, it is not possible fully to understand the present except as a projection of the past.
My point may be made clearer by use of an allegorical tale. Suppose a hypothetical group of three people is standing in a room. One of those people realizes that Slashdot expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. Another goes on and on about Slashdot's perfidious feckless beliefs. But the third can't understand why Slashdot simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, stubborn dialectic. In this hypothetical situation, it should be obvious that a common thread runs through most of Slashdot's slurs, a thread so quasi-testy that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness.
Slashdot is capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of dodgy racialism to a proclaimed attachment to neocolonialism and back -- and back again. If the left of the current political spectrum is brain-damaged stoicism, and the right is silly hooliganism, then Slashdot's politics are sincerely going to be a form of unscrupulous Stalinism. Does Slashdot actually think its arguments through, or does it just chug along on its computer writing about whatever trite quips happen to suit its needs that day? What will be the next object of attack from Slashdot's camp? Which brings me to my point. Licentious flakes who create a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. At any rate, the outcome of the struggle will ultimately be decided based on the number and influence of people fully informed about Slashdot's communications, committed to Slashdot's defeat, and organized under sound leadership. (Actually, Slashdot has values that are antagonistic to a traditional, moral society, but that's not important now.) With this letter, I hope I have made my views crystal-clear: Slashdot wallows in its basest behavior.
This is a letter I have planned on writing for some time, a letter that I believe is extremely important and one that unequivocally must be heeded if we are to undo the damage caused by Slashdot. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Although we can occasionally tie the retailers of warped new claims to older fabrications, there is unfortunately no shortage of new rumor. There are three points I need to make here. First, Slashdot continuously seeks adulation from its cronies. Second, even without making an ethical argument against neopaganism, I can show that the mistaken claim that Slashdot's opinions represent the opinions of the majority -- or even a plurality -- is not only incorrect but is somewhat telling of Slashdot's core sentiments. And third, it is not possible fully to understand the present except as a projection of the past.
My point may be made clearer by use of an allegorical tale. Suppose a hypothetical group of three people is standing in a room. One of those people realizes that Slashdot expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. Another goes on and on about Slashdot's perfidious feckless beliefs. But the third can't understand why Slashdot simply spouts endless fine-sounding cliches along with unintelligible, stubborn dialectic. In this hypothetical situation, it should be obvious that a common thread runs through most of Slashdot's slurs, a thread so quasi-testy that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness.
Slashdot is capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of dodgy racialism to a proclaimed attachment to neocolonialism and back -- and back again. If the left of the current political spectrum is brain-damaged stoicism, and the right is silly hooliganism, then Slashdot's politics are sincerely going to be a form of unscrupulous Stalinism. Does Slashdot actually think its arguments through, or does it just chug along on its computer writing about whatever trite quips happen to suit its needs that day? What will be the next object of attack from Slashdot's camp? Which brings me to my point. Licentious flakes who create a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. At any rate, the outcome of the struggle will ultimately be decided based on the number and influence of people fully informed about Slashdot's communications, committed to Slashdot's defeat, and organized under sound leadership. (Actually, Slashdot has values that are antagonistic to a traditional, moral society, but that's not important now.) With this letter, I hope I have made my views crystal-clear: Slashdot wallows in its basest behavior.
I take exception to a few key aspects of the Linux community's contrivances. I assume you already know that a common thread runs through most of the Linux community's policies, a thread so insolent that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, but I have something more important to tell you. There's something wrong with this picture. Think of the Linux community's ideologies as being the sum of two components: an unrealistic component that consists of the Linux community's desire to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills and an infernal component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
In many ways, there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. There's a lot of talk nowadays about the Linux community's revolting witticisms, but not much action. The Linux community's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth. Many lives have been lost to fascism. The recent outrage at the Linux community's litanies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must stop the Linux community's encroachments on our heritage.
Since when has fucking Slashdot been about Linux? ...
Isn't it news for nerds? Stuff that matters? Hot grits in pants? And by the way
I take exception to a few key aspects of the Linux community's contrivances. I assume you already know that a common thread runs through most of the Linux community's policies, a thread so insolent that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, but I have something more important to tell you. There's something wrong with this picture. Think of the Linux community's ideologies as being the sum of two components: an unrealistic component that consists of the Linux community's desire to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills and an infernal component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
In many ways, there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. There's a lot of talk nowadays about the Linux community's revolting witticisms, but not much action. The Linux community's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth. Many lives have been lost to fascism. The recent outrage at the Linux community's litanies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must stop the Linux community's encroachments on our heritage.
Thank you, good night.
I take exception to a few key aspects of the Linux community's contrivances. I assume you already know that a common thread runs through most of the Linux community's policies, a thread so insolent that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness, but I have something more important to tell you. There's something wrong with this picture. Think of the Linux community's ideologies as being the sum of two components: an unrealistic component that consists of the Linux community's desire to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills and an infernal component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
In many ways, there's always been suffering in the world, and wrongs have been and will continue to be committed. There's a lot of talk nowadays about the Linux community's revolting witticisms, but not much action. The Linux community's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth. Many lives have been lost to fascism. The recent outrage at the Linux community's litanies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that due to circumstances that I have encountered in my research, I find that I must stop the Linux community's encroachments on our heritage.
Is this comment refering to the BeOS still?!?
"a wholly unintuitive GUI"... what are you, a retarded four year old? what could possibly be unintuitive about Be's GUI? It's as simple and effective as could be. "Broken internet browser"?
You must have been using an OLD OLD version or something.
I urge you to give it another try. It really does rock.
boo fucking hoo.
yeah, no shit.
who else has stopped giving a crap about what Micro^H^H^H^H^HRed Hat is doing anymore?
ahh.... "coming along nicely"... I love it. It's the mantra of the Linux community.
You guys use your half-assed, half-done software that's "coming along nicely". I'll use what works well and gets the job done. Like Opera.
Better than an X Window Manager based on the Apple source code, screw X altogether (it's old, tired, and needs to be retired) and redo the whole GUI system using Apple's source. As for an X86 port? Just use BeOS. It's everything MacOS wants to Be.