Slashdot Mirror


No Star Wars TPM on DVD

Troed pointed us to final, official word that Lucas has opted not to release TPM on DVD. This is a poor move for many reasons: SW fans are gonna often be techies with DVD players. Besides that, nearly every movie released these days comes out on DVD and VHS. I can think of only 2 reasons: He might be afraid of piracy, but lets be honest, but I think he really is doing this so he can wait a year and release the DVD and sell it all again. I have stopped by VHS, and I'm pretty bummed: I would have bought this DVD the day it was released. I feel like I'm being extorted: I've been a pretty loyal fan both in terms of time, and buying SW Stuff (I even have a Darth Maul Lightsaber!) but this really hurts.

389 comments

  1. so don't buy the VHS. by frknfrk · · Score: 4

    Since I am waiting a few years to see the next movie anyway, I will just wait until next year and simply buy the DVD if/when it is released. I simply will not purchase any movie on VHS anymore, and even a movie I very much want to own will not make an exception to that rule. So if you are serious about wanting more DVD releases, do not buy this VHS. Or stop whining :)

    --
    The REAL sam_at_caveman_dot_org is user ID 13833.
    1. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Edward+Kmett · · Score: 1
      At this point, its not even an OPTION for me to buy a movie on VHS any more. I own 3 dvd players (2 in computers, 1 standalone) but I do not own a (working) VCR any more.

      This is a shame though, TPM is one of the few movies I was looking forward to picking up. Yeah I know it sucked, but lightsabres are cool.

      --
      Sanity is a sandbox. I prefer the swings.
    2. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I find it quite amusing watching everyone crying because they can't get SW on DVD until next year.. I doubt many(maybe just a few) remember when the original star wars came out in 1977. It didn't get release on video tape till(if memory serves) about 1984-5.. Hmm... 7-8 years of waiting. The funny thing is I remember people bitching back then because star wars wasn't out on video tape... So look on the bright side at least you don't have to wait 7 to 8 years for it to come out...

    3. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by sdelk · · Score: 1

      "Oh, Lucas just wants to make us buy the movie twice! Once on VHS, once on DVD!"

      Excuse me, why do you have to buy it on VHS if you don't want it on VHS? Do you just HAVE to have it as soon as its available? Is the pain of NOT having it too much to bear?

      Jesus. Relax.

    4. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by pheonix · · Score: 1

      I must agree. More customers need to use the 'vote with your feet' concept. Sometimes, it causes some level of difficulty or annoyance on our part as a customer, but it's about the only feasible way to get the changes we want. When a company utilizes a business practice that I disapprove of, I simply don't utilize products from that company anymore. If we all did this, we'd soon find that companies would start performing the way WE want them to. Without customers, a company cannot thrive, vote with your feet.

    5. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by barleyguy · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. I have 2 DVD players, but my VCR is broken, and I do not have immediate plans to fix it. I probably won't buy too many VHS tapes anytime in the future. Every movie I have bought or rented in the last few months is on DVD.
      Basically what it comes down to is - any chance that I would have gotten this is now zero. I thought the character development sucked bad, but my three year old nephew is a Darth Maul freak, and I might have bought it just for the surround sound.

      --
      --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
    6. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by chryptic · · Score: 1

      Of course I won't buy the VHS, I don't have a VCR!

      --
      The two most common things in the Universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison
    7. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Pont · · Score: 0

      Who needs Star Wars on DVD when you could be watching City of Lost Children on DVD!

    8. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by orcus · · Score: 1

      Has it occurred to you that a major difference between now and 1977 is that VCR's (actually most were VTR's) were insanely expensive?

      How many people do you know who had a VCR before 1980?

      --
      First they burn books, then they burn people.
    9. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by luminos · · Score: 1

      There is no way I am going to buy it on VHS. They make me sick. If they ever get off their high horse and release on DVD then maybe. But this was the final straw for lucus arts for me.

    10. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Xciton · · Score: 1
      Exactly.

      It's quite easy, just don't play HIS game at marketing. I for one will not buy the VHS and purhaps wait for it on DVD. However, after all is said and done, I may not buy the DVD after all. I am quite disapointed with the marketing BS behind this VHS/DVD situation.

      Just say NO to VHS.

      Unfortunatly, the masses will probably fall for this trick and buy the VHS and DVD in the end.

    11. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, first of all, Lucas said he won't release TPM on DVD until all three prequels are complete and he will release a 6-DVD set. That probably means we won't see a DVD release of TPM for close to 10 years. At that point, DVD will be probably be obsolete, so he will have skipped one whole technology cycle. Besides, even if he did release it next year, it is still too long. Am I supposed to praise him for only taking 2 or 3 years this time instead of 7 or 8? No, I don't think so... I say fuck Lucas. I'm not going to give him another dime (either in theatres, rentals, or buying VHS) until he starts releasing DVDs.

    12. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, deserve a Nobel Prize. On Slashdot your idea probably comes as a stroke of wild genius, but this is called capitalism. If you buy things you don't want to, pay too much, whatever, then you are the problem, not capitalism. Capitalism dictates that whoever makes the best product (the definition of best includes every facet of a product including its prtice not just raw performance numbers) wins. If we lived in an Open Source world, we wouldn't have the best of all things available, we would have the people like Lucas who make good movies (I think due to his history he can be forgiven for Jar Jar Retard) simply not producing. If there is no reward for producing the best thing, no one will do it.

      E.

    13. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by TheKing · · Score: 1

      And hey, guess what? The amout of people with DVD's now is still quite small! 97% of Americans have VCR's, while the amout with DVD is probably closer to the 10-20% range. And many consider $300-$400 for a DVD player to be rather expensive when a decent VCR (which allows TV recording which DVD of course doesn't) can be had for less that $100. Why pay 3 times as much for something that does *less*? That's the same logic used for HDTV's. Why should people trash perfectly good TV's for the new ones? Better picture and sound? Most people couldn't care less. If they can see and hear it's all good.

    14. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by TheKing · · Score: 1

      And for the 80-90% of the population without DVD players? What should we say? I don't have DVD yet. When I get it, I want to do it right and not settle for a crappy $99 drive in my computer. I want the total package and I can't afford that right now. I can however afford a VHS version. And again, this is not about making everyone buy two copies! He said a year ago you wouldn't see *any* Star Wars DVD's til after Episode 3 is released! The way I see it is that I'm buying the tape for the next 6 years before the DVD versions of all 6 come out. If you can't handle that, then wait til 2006. And quit yer whining.

    15. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      I have several friends who have laserdisc/DVD players, and they are nice and all that, but to not have a vcr is your own choice. To all those who say they own 3 DVD players and no VCR, I guess it serves you right for spending $1000 or more on DVD and not wanting to spend the extra $50 for a vcr. or maybe $200 for a top of the line model, if you are extremely concerned about quality. Admittedly, the tapes can wear out, but not before something like a thousand viewings...

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    16. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      so there is no incentive for say linux or freebsd to be the best possible os?

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    17. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Tiedtamov · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't he release it on dvd? Some say so he can release it with episode 2? Even so, he could still make more by releasing it on its own and then releasing it with 2 as part of the triliogy. I mean it worked with star trek. Even though they new they had new movies coming out every 2 years or so they still re-released each new movie as an addition to the box set and on it's own. It can't be bad since star trek nets paramount about $1 billion a year. Maybe he's scared those new cd's are gonna take over sooner than we though.

    18. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a). DVD does more than VHS. It just doesn't record. Don't bother asking me how, look it up yourself (lazyass).

      b). DVD players are NOT $300-$400 US. I saw some in a local Canadian Price Club for $350 CAN. That's about $200 or $225 US. This is the same cost as a 1/2 decent VCR that won't break in 2 years. Even a cheapo DVD player will generally last as long as a home CD player. About 10 years.

    19. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only do you not have to buy the vhs, you can also by a pirated dvd. They are out their already, and are not all that expensive. The quality aint great, but they are cheap, so you can get one of those to tide you over.

    20. Re:so don't buy the VHS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said if we lived in an open source world, which we obviously don't.

  2. Not that good a movie anyway by Reid · · Score: 1

    IMHO, there are lots of other much better movies that are higher on my DVD to-buy list.

    1. Re:Not that good a movie anyway by martial · · Score: 1

      I share this feeling ... plus they should first decide to release the old ones on DVD in somewhat the same way they did for the THX LD box ... the audio commentaries during the movies are very good ... those are 3 DVDs I would buy ... TFM, I am afraid not ...

      --
      -- Martial MICHEL
    2. Re:Not that good a movie anyway by tsherril · · Score: 1

      i've waited this long to see it, even was tempted to order it up in a hotel room bored out of my skull one night...but a voice inside my head said "use the force, tim.." maybe i can borrow the much aligned but eventually hoped for dvd to see how bad it really is/was

  3. Really though... by Quaternion · · Score: 1

    Honestly: who expected Lucas to act in any way except the way that will make him the most money?

    People expected integrity from a rich filmmaker? Heh.

    --

    "The horse leech's daughter is a closed system. Her quantum of wantum does not vary."

    1. Re:Really though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's rich for a reason, brat.

      E.

  4. He wants to wait and do the collection... by Pulver · · Score: 4

    It seems to me that I read an interview with Lucas a while back in which he stated that he wouldn't do any DVD until all 6 movies were released. At that point he wanted to put out the ultimate Star Wars DVD collection...

    1. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just going to respond and say the same thing. About a year ago I read an interview with Lucas and it said that he did want to release the whole set of 6 on DVD when they were done, and add commentary and such. That would be worth waiting for, IMHO. Of course, when episode 3 is done, DVD may no longer be the format of choice.

    2. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anybody but me remember the day when we were promised 9 movies, a trilogy of trilogies?

    3. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I expect he will release the VHS this year. Then, as pre-hype to Episode 2, he will release Episode 1 on DVD. Then, when each episode has been released individually on VHS and DVD, he will release a super box set of all episodes, with puffy stickers of Boba Fett included.

      And you will buy every iteration of it.

    4. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by belgin · · Score: 5
      It seems to me that I read an interview with Lucas a while back in which he stated that he wouldn't do any DVD until all 6 movies were released. At that point he wanted to put out the ultimate Star Wars DVD collection...

      I read the same interview as I was paging through some archives about two weeks ago. What he said was actually more complicated and should make any serious fan happy in the long run.

      Lucas said that he would not release any of the six films that are finished or in the works until he finished making Episode Three. The reason for this is that he will only put them on DVD if the proper time is taken and it can really be an amazing product. He intends to package "making of" for each movie with the DVD of that movie and just about every extra and special bit of info available. He intends the DVDs to be THE format for the movies, but he doesn't have time to do them right now. He explained to the reporter that doing the DVDs properly will be almost as much work as making a movie. He balanced it out and decided that fans would be happier if the DVDs were delayed than if Episodes 2 and 3 were delayed a couple of years...

      This is a paraphrase of what he said, because I could not find the exact link again after 5 minutes of looking. The interview should be on any serious Star Wars info center in their archives for sometime between July and November. (I reviewed a lot of articles...)

      B. Elgin

      --

      B. Elgin
      "Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
    5. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's okay to shovel the movie onto a VHS tape without any kind of commentary, I wish they'd do the same thing with DVD. At least then the picture would be nice and sharp, the sound would be awesome, and I'd fork over $30. Eh, it's Lucas' loss and BlockBuster's gain.

    6. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by buysse · · Score: 1

      OK. That's fine. You want it done right. But Jesus -- that doesn't mean that you have to do it yourself! Can you say micro-management? I thought so.

      Ah, dammit, he'll change his mind about it in time to make a DVD release for Xmas shopping next year. Probably the day after thanksgiving it'll be available.

      Greedy weasel.

      --
      -30-
    7. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by bonehead · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd like to see a basic DVD released alongside the VHS version, then go ahead and do the bells-and-whistles version when all six are ready. Given the time frame for completion of the series, I'm pretty sure I'd have time to save up enough money to repurchase the set when it was finished. Plus, I'd be able to watch it in the meantime.

      Of course, as someone stated earlier, TPM is not a movie worth owning on it's own merit, but if the next two are good, it's still nice to have the complete storyline.

    8. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by jakeylow · · Score: 1

      They announced it at the San Diego Comic Con also. And you don't annouce there unless you mean it so...

    9. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by jkauth · · Score: 1

      micromanagement my ass. i used to work for a DVD production company and there is a LOT of things that can (and DO) go wrong in the DVD production process.

    10. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by lambchop · · Score: 1

      I heard something a couple of years ago about Lucas never releasing anything on DVD format because he had a big chip on his shoulder 'cause Laser Disc never took off. I can't guarentee the validity of this statement beyond the shadow of a doubt. However... let's look at this logically... In today's market, it makes more sense right now to put an elevator in an outhouse than not to release a HUGE hollywood blockbuster on DVD. All the bs about Lucas not wanting to release TPM on DVD unless it was an "amazing product" is just bs if he is releasing it on VHS. DVD fans aren't asking for the Mona Lisa of all DVDs... we just want it to be released in a decent format.

      --
      "...[treat] every man after his desert, and who should 'scape whipping?"
    11. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time all 6 movies are released, DVD will be an obsolete format.

    12. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares, TPM is an awful movie, Lucas is past it and I couldn't care less if eps 2 and 3 are never released. Lucas is past it and just a puppet of the merchandisers.

    13. Re:He wants to wait and do the collection... by Hieronymus+Coward · · Score: 1
      What a load of sh*t. Just have one of the transfer houses do a decent transfer to DVD, every fan will buy it. Then, after finishing all the other flicks, do a 'Special Edition' with additional materials, outtakes, behind-the-scenes, etc. Personally, I couldn't care less about the extra fluff, but there are many fans who would also buy the Special Edition.

      I think he is trying to take advantage of the buzz that will be generated with the release of the next movie. I fully expect TPM to be released on DVD when Episode II is released theatrically.

  5. it sucked anyway by lubricated · · Score: 1

    The star wars Episode 1 movie sucked. It's not worth buying. What I would like to see is the original 3 on DVD, but that won't happen either.

    --
    It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    1. Re:it sucked anyway by atlan · · Score: 1

      Got it.

  6. two things... by AugstWest · · Score: 4

    1) Lucas doesn't owe you anything for being a devoted fan.

    2) He's got a known level of greediness.

    This isn't entirely surprising. VHS tapes can be much more readily copied than DVDs can, so I seriously doubt that piracy is the issue.

    There is also a third possibility, which I think is pretty likely -- the extra content being put together for the DVD will take quite some time to get together and polish, and maybe he's planning on doing something special with it, which will take extra time.

    The Christmas special notwithstanding, Lucas' past releases have all been very well-polished, classy affairs. Maybe they're just taking the time to make sure that the DVD release will be something very cool.

    1. Re:two things... by mmakunas · · Score: 2

      There is also a third possibility, which I think is pretty likely -- the extra content being put together for the DVD will take quite some time to get together and polish, and maybe he's planning on doing something special with it, which will take extra time.

      It's also possible that some of the extra content that he wants to put in would end up being spoilers for the rest of the prequels. He may want to put in a running comentary that said things like: "Here we see charachter X who is a very minor character now, but you can see that his actions foreshadow his importance in Episode 3."


    2. Re:two things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Without us Lucas wouldn't have *anything* He wouldn't have all his money or his almostbestmoviesofalltime. 2) LOL I agree with that, everything I've ever heard him say in interviews have to do with how much money he'll make, how he'll wait so that eventually he can release everything together so he can make *much* more money. He was charging more money at theatres. He only let BIG theatres run his movie. (all this shows me he doesn't care about the fan, as you say... he only cares about his money) 3) Piracy.. I don't think that's the reason... I saw TPM on vhs tape the first time I watched it. I've seen people have it offered online for anyone who wants to download it. It's already out there, not making a dvd version wouldn't make it any better.

    3. Re:two things... by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1
      There is also a third possibility, which I think is pretty likely -- the extra content being put together for the DVD will take quite some time to get together and polish, and maybe he's planning on doing something special with it, which will take extra time.

      Let us not forget what happened the last time someone tried to make a DVD special, we got the screw up with The Matrix. But at least most of the movie was enjoyable :-)

      Btw: I still haven't heard a damn thing about a fix for any DVD players...

      --
      How do you keep an idiot in suspense?
      Tell him the next version of Windows will be faster, more reliable, and easier to use!

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    4. Re:two things... by jCaT · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that they are waiting to release it on dvd. Rule number one in public relations is to not piss off your audience... if Lucas really wanted to make it a phenomenal DVD, he would say "we will release the dvd, but later." As it stands, I think he's a friggin lunatic... DVD has really come into its own in the past year, and for a movie like TPM to not be released on DVD is a total step backwards at this point.

    5. Re:two things... by jidar · · Score: 1

      This is not entirely true. My understanding is that they copying process of VHS is much more complicated and costly than the process for DVD once the initial investment is overcome. IE, its more costly to get started but cheaper in bulk.. and we all know this is gonna be BULK.

      --
      Sigs are awesome huh?
    6. Re:two things... by gwalla · · Score: 1

      God, I hope not. The Special Editions screwed with continuity enough already.
      ---

      --
      Oper on the Nightstar
  7. Weird. by TheKodiak · · Score: 2

    I guess I can see the point about piracy, kind of...

    Then again, I'm more of a George Clinton mind about things like that - it's better be ripped off and well known than to be well known for being a prick about being ripped off. Or something like that.

    Or maybe it's just an admission that the movie sucked, and is suitable for viewing only by 5 year olds.

    --
    -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
  8. Nothing New by MISplice · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new, George said in the beginning he wasn't going to release any of the Star Wars movies on DVD until they were all out. Then it was going to be released as a Box Set only.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Nothing New by Tower · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I heard that too - he better hurry up! Since I left college this May, I don't even have *access* to a VHS player, but I've got DVD for my home theater and one on my computer. THe hell with TPM, I want Leia in a bikini ;-)

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  9. Lucas the despot by MoNsTeR · · Score: 1

    Remember those scorching articles on Lucas and TPM by David Brin? Remember how he said that Lucas favors dictatorship over democracy? That's what's at work here, I believe. Lucas is playing dictator. For some bizarre, surely wacked-out reason, he doesn't want to put TPM on DVD alongside the VHS release. He doesn't CARE that the fans want it, cuz he's the dictator and he doesn't have to listen to "the people".

    MoNsTeR

  10. Lucas's rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they can't realise it on DVD. People without SDDS sound systems would be able to play it, which if you don't remember would be a direct attack on Lucas's rules. This alone would ruin the movie.

    1. Re:Lucas's rules by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Episode one was also mixed into DTS and Dolby Digital, 2 formats that are easily put onto DVD.

      It's a cryin' shame he had to do this. I think he's making a HUGE mistake.

      --Bernie

  11. teach them a lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lamers... it feels like worse than being extorted. maybe we should just all teach them a lesson and not buy it, da? :)

  12. 3rd episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wasnt there a quote when lucas said he was going to release a collectors set after the 3rd episode was released?

  13. I just don't get it.... by Patman · · Score: 2


    Lucas is a major proponent of digital filmmaking - getting away from actual film, and turning to movies stored as data.

    Which makes me wonder - why is he such a big hater of DVD, when it is the realization of his goals?

    1. Re:I just don't get it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he hates DVD, he just knows that if he releases the VHS now and the DVD later, you will buy both of them.

    2. Re:I just don't get it.... by bogeskov · · Score: 1
      Mr. Lucas has said before, that episode 4-6 wouldn't come on DVD, because of the poor quality. And looking at the early DVD's I can see his point of no migrating from one media to another with so little gain in picture quality. However he has always been promoting LaserDiscs. And in my oppinion (and there is nothing humble about it :-) having seen The Matrix on both LaserDisc and DVD, the DVD still has a long way to go. I'm very sorry if I offend anybody by this remark, however this is my true belive. But for the record I do own a DVD, since Clerks & Chasing Amy is impossible to get on LD.

      Yours.
      Bogeskov

      --

    3. Re:I just don't get it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do rememer that in a magazine that came out before the movie did, Wired I think, he said that he was against DVD because it uses compressed data, using the example, "Would you want your Artwork compressed?" Well, I believe he's still pissed about the fact that LaserDisc is pretty much dead in the U.S. And remember that there was Starwars: Special edition which came out on VHS and LD only, he could have made a ton on it selling it for DVD. But he does have a point about compression. I've seen lots of DVD's and some are done well and other and *REALLY* bad.

  14. It breaks my heart by imta11 · · Score: 1

    As much as this hurts me, there are plenty of other hi-resolution readily avaiable pr0n movies witch to occupy your time. TPM wasn't that good anyway. Messa-Jar-Jar bang. No more cookies.

    1. Re:It breaks my heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, can you direct me to some? I've been on the lookout for some good digital pr0n for a while now. It's hard to put your finger on it.

  15. all 6 on DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard rumor awhile back that he was waiting until all 6 movies were complete and them he would release them asa box set on DVD. Not sure how much truth there is to that though.

  16. Christams 2005 by Stevis · · Score: 1

    I do recall seeing a Lucas interview in which (in discussing that he would not make a sequel trilogy) he made an offhand comment of "This will be the six DVD set you buy for Christmas 2005." I'm quoting from memory here, so I could be off by a year . Unfortunately I don't have a source; does anyone else remember seeing this?

    It could be--but I doubt it--that' you'll have to wait and buy the whole set till then...I doubt they'll be that patient in waiting for the money though.

    Stevis

    --
    We've got two lives, one we're given, and the other one we make. --Mary Chapin Carpenter
  17. Oh no! by jbell · · Score: 1

    This makes my DVD not worth the money I paid for it.


    --Jason Bell

    --


    --Jason Bell
    Faster than the light of speed!
  18. Another theory (rumor) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could also be that Lucas is a little bitter about THX-Sound not being included in the DVD standard. I haven't seen any of the other Star Wars movies on DVD either, so maybe none of them will be released on DVD. Given Lucas track record for waiting for re-releases, he may just be waiting for the Hi-Def equivalent of DVD to come out in a few years. At least that's a rumor I've heard floating around. Any substantiation or refutation out there?

    1. Re:Another theory (rumor) by Munky_v2 · · Score: 1

      OK, lets get technical here real quick. Lucas cannot be bitter about THX not being included in the DVD standared, because THX cannot be included. Let me explain:
      DTS - Digital Theater Sound, is an audio encoding method. It specifies channel breakdown, frequency, volume level, etc.
      THX - Is a hardware decoding and distribution specification. It is a standard for actual audio equipment. DTS is played through a THX amp to get 7 point surrond.
      Besides everyone knows that AC3 beats DTS anyway ;)


      Munky_v2

      --
      Jay
  19. No DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon--Star Wars TPM on clay tablets. Reserve your copy now!

    1. Re:No DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a fool!

      Wait for the paper tape release.

  20. Business tactic by pulski · · Score: 1

    It may be greed but it works. I know a few people that are so obsessed with Star Wars that they would probably get the VHS and the DVD just to say that they did and so that they can watch i no matter where they go.

    Here's an example. A friend of mine, who also happens to be a Star Wars nut, has 3 copies of Close Encounters of the Third Kind because they came out with different editions of it. Seems pretty sad to me but it's people like him that are going to give Lucas a lot of money.

    -----

  21. Waiting for technology... then ignoring it by jbaratz · · Score: 1

    So one of the reasons given for waiting so long between movies was for technology to catch up to the director's vision. Yet now that there is a technology capable of delivering his grand works to the home populace, he ignores it. hrm.

    -JB

    1. Re:Waiting for technology... then ignoring it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of his problem is that DVDs have not yet managed to deliver a picture as good as laserdiscs. DVDs are much better than VHS but those of us who make our livings by working in film see some real problems when watching DVDs, especially during scenes with rapidly changing elements. We can only hope that advances in hardware can make DVDs less painful to watch.

  22. Who cares about TPM? by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 1
    The movie sucked anyway. What I want to know is when the Indiana Jones trilogy is going to be released on DVD! *That* one I would snap up in a heartbeat!

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    1. Re:Who cares about TPM? by Maxwell_E · · Score: 2

      Or How I learned to loathe the bomb...

      Let's face it, the Star Wars we knew and loved, has been clouded by the golden lens of nostalgia and memory. People cry, "But it's the same now as it was in '77!' Of course it was, but we were kids and didn't care. Now we're older, wiser and wanting to see more quality material. Like Galaxy Quest.

      Ok. Maybe not.

  23. No DVD in foreseeable future by NullGrey · · Score: 1

    This story is akin to FUD. Lucas has stated that he wishes for the trilogy of Prequels to be complete, and then release them on DVD. It will be realeased, just not this year.

    --
    +-- (Score:-1, Moderator on Power Trip)
    1. Re:No DVD in foreseeable future by Keeper · · Score: 1

      So lesse, we will see the trilogy of prequals complete when?

      Okay, we have one done.
      Give him one year to write the script. 3 years to shoot/edit. Take one year to rake the money in, rinse and repeat.

      So we have to wait until 2010?

      Is this the same reason he isn't release special edition on DVD? "gotta wait for the prequals"

      Yeah right.

      He's got something stuck up his butt about the DVD format. Prolly because he wasn't included when it came time to figure out the specifications or something. I'm pretty certain we won't see any Lucas on DVD until VHS is dead (as in, VCRs are out of production for 5 years). I also have a sneaking suspicion that he's working on a THX-ish DVD format, which will (of course) require expensive, specific hardware to show the movie with nominal (if any) quality gain.

      My 2 bits.

    2. Re:No DVD in foreseeable future by TheKodiak · · Score: 1

      Well, IMDB has them listed at 2002 and 2005.

      Just in case anyone was curious.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
  24. News Flash: Sound Track only avail on LP and 8trac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, Lucas announced that the Sound track will not be on CD, to prevent piracy.
    That will stop em.

  25. It may be to prevent piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not releasing on DVD may be to prevent VHS piracy. If you purchase a mass manufactured video, the quality is pretty good. But diehard fans may want better, and the only way to get this is to get your video feed directly form the digital DVD.

  26. Fear of piracy...me arse by pcurran · · Score: 1

    I love the Star Wars movies as much as the next guy, but there is no escaping the fact that George Lucas is a money-grubber. (Sorry, but it's true...for further evidence see the release of the box-set of the first three movies immediately prior to the "enhanced" versions) Of /course/ he wants to sell copies on both VHS and DVD. It doesn't detract from the quality of any of the movies, but it might give us a little insight as to how Colonel Sanders wound up wielding a light saber in a TV ad. Hell, he wasn't even a real Colonel...I'll _never_ believe that he was a Jedi!

    1. Re:Fear of piracy...me arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the Pizza Hut chick from those ads was hot!!

    2. Re:Fear of piracy...me arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooo yes, nice belly button. The dog wasn't bad either!

  27. Its Simple: I only buy DVDs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he wants my money, he needs to print the movie in DVD format. And if he waits, then the money I was going to spend on his movie will go to another one. On DVD

  28. I don't buy VHS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't buy VHS any more. I don't even have a VCR any more. Therefore, I won't be buying any of the Star Wars. That's OK, though. Almost every other movie I want is already on DVD. I'll spend my money there. If Lucas doesn't want to sell me his movies, fine!

  29. Slashdot!!! You said this before! by Travoltus · · Score: 1


    Guys, please check your previous stories before you put up articles. The new article says TPM won't be released on DVD in 2000 "or in the foreseeable future". That isn't much of a change from what was said back on December 23rd.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Slashdot!!! You said this before! by pulski · · Score: 1

      This is a change. That article was reporting that Newsaskew was well, askew. They said that there would be a DVD release and then they took it back. That was the report. This article is saying that LucasFilm is confirming that there will be no DVD release. Two very different stories.

      -----

  30. StarWars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree. Regardless of my loyalty to the StarWars franchise I couldn't help but realize over the past 2 years that a lot of what motivates Lucas appears to be money. What does this mean? To be honest, I really don't care. If he wants to do this then fine, but I guarantee he's lost one supporter. Capitalism corrupts absolutely -- its damn near impossible to avoid. -DaveC

  31. $$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by drudd · · Score: 5

    I have always loved the first three Star Wars movies. They will always be classics in my mind. Great story, simple, yet effective plot and exciting action.

    TPM lost the magic that was in the first 3. Not only was it over hyped and poorly written, but I was quite put off by the amount of sheer marketing put into it. This was simply a moneymaking venture by Lucas, nothing more. I went to see TPM the first day... no matter how good the next one is, I refuse to see it the first day, my confidence in Lucas as a filmmaker has been irrevocably shattered.

    Because of this, I doubt I will EVER buy TPM on VHS -or- DVD, simply because that will only encourage Lucas to make more terrible movies. The man has far too much money as it is, without subsidizing his toy market.

    Before TPM came out, I remarked to a friend that Lucas would be insane not to release the first three on DVD. I would go out and buy a player simply to watch those movies! I would also be willing to spend well more for those three than I would for any other DVDs.

    Besides... DVD is the perfect format for Lucas, who has championed superior graphics and sound in movies.

    I know I'm jumping all over the place with this post, so I will summarize.

    We in the geek community have showed intense loyalty and devotion to Lucas and his creations. He stabbed us in the back and showed himself to be more interested in money rather than in art. My only response can be to use what little power I have, the power of the almighty-$ in order to demonstrate my disapproval. I hope others will follow my example.

    Doug

    --
    Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    1. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by drudd · · Score: 2

      Obviously Lucas can, has, and will do whatever he wants with the Star Wars series, that's his prerogative.

      As a consumer, I can do one of two things, accept shit, as most people do, eat it up and love it. Or I can decide not to accept poor quality, be it in workmanship, customer service, or design. In a free market, the consumer has the ultimate power, if they choose to exercise it. If every single person sees TPM in the theaters, buys the VHS (then the DVD when it is released), buys the toys, and the little happy meals, then Lucas wins. He can release whatever he wants, and make huge amounts of money.

      If you have any displeasure, as I do, in the quality of TPM, and the apparent desire of Lucas not to make a worthy prequel to the Star Wars trilogy, but to make another billion, then you must tell Lucas in the only way he will listen.

      If you would rather to continue eating shit, be my guest, but I for one will not stand for it!

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    2. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell him! I won't see it on the first day either! Also, I won't buy the DVD on the first day its out. That will really stick it to him!

    3. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by drix · · Score: 1

      Idyllic but pathetically futile. Lucas has lost more money under his couch cushions than you will see in your lifetime. You have no power over him, especially, especially with money, so wake up and smell the Folger's: he can and is doing whatever the fuck he wants to with the series. He doesn't owe you a damn thing. This is one of those facets about Slashdot that really bothers me sometimes - when people hold Lucas to a higher standard than they would hold themselves. Everyone bitched about him "selling out" to KFC and Taco Bell and everything else in sight. Right - as if you would actually say no if someone offered you hundreds of millions of dollars to put your art on cups and taco wrappers. Also, when people come to the ridiculous conclusion that just because they have spent half their adult life obsessed with his films, that suddenly he owes us everything. "He owes us TPM on DVD; we've been so loyal over all these years." Guess what - I've spent half my adult life obsessed with Cindy Crawford. Do I think she owes me sex? No. Show me someone who actually denies that they wouldn't do the exact same thing to prevent the illegal piracy of their work and make millions and millions of more dollars and I'll show you an outright liar.

      So Lucas doesn't it owe it to anyone to release it on DVD. And by the way, let's put things in perspective. Confining TPM to VHS is not "stabbing us in the back" by a longshot. Being a mere mortal, I have often been forced to watch my movies using that horrid contraption known as a VCR, and, believe it or not, it still works amazingly well. I think another billion or two people in the world might agree with me.

      --

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    4. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by mochaone · · Score: 1

      thanks for stating it so nicely. it's nice to know there are other sane people here.

      --
      Hates people who have stupid little sigs
    5. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by deanc · · Score: 1

      Actually, if it wasn't for our sense of consumer entitlement, we would be corporate drones beholding to the whims of eccentric control-freaks like Lucas. So unless you want to _become_ one of these slaves to consumerism, I suggest you get with the program.

      -Dean

    6. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by blackwizard · · Score: 1

      Everyone bitched about him "selling out" to KFC and Taco Bell and everything else in sight. Right - as if you would actually say no if someone offered you hundreds of millions of dollars to put your art on cups and taco wrappers.

      You're wrong.
      Personally, money does not drive me. I use enough of it to get by and live pretty simply.
      If someone offered *me* millions to put *my* art on cups and taco wrappers (hah, people would go
      "what? what does 'int main(void)' mean?") I would politely refuse. Actually, it would go against the very fiber of my being to sell my artwork to the marketing departments' of fast food.
      Lucas has made some pretty good movies; I will give him that, but he is definitley a big ideological loser in my book.

    7. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank God your book doesn't mean diddly squat in the big scheme of things.

    8. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk is cheap. It sure sounds nice on paper, but when the check was waved in your face I doubt if the decision would be that easy.

    9. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God is a supporter of mass-marketing? Where in the bible exactly does it say that?

    10. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by blackwizard · · Score: 1

      Well, I never said I was speaking for anyone else, but that decision would be quite easy for me. Personally, I think fast food is one of the most wasteful ventures in our culture, and I would never be willing to support their industry by giving them a nice, effective marketing scheme.

    11. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by gwalla · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, Lucas gave up on "art" after "Tucker" failed so miserably. ("Huh? Tucker? Whazzat?") Besides, most of what Lucas has done definitely falls in the category of Commercial Entertainment rather than High Art (not saying they're mutually exclusive). This is hardly a new development.

      And frankly, I'm not that disturbed that TPM won't be on DVD. I wouldn't buy it on VHS. The effects were cool, but it was a little kids' movie...like "The Ewok Adventure" with a budget.

      I've got Ghostbusters and Dark Crystal on DVD. I'm happy.


      ---
      --
      Oper on the Nightstar
    12. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      > This was simply a moneymaking venture by Lucas, nothing more.

      Gee, and I suppose that wasn't the case when he made the other 3 movies? How about the special editions?

    13. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Fizgig · · Score: 1

      I also got The Dark Crystal on DVD, and it made me unhappy. I've been spelling Fizzgig wrong the whole time!!!. Argh.

    14. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by coaxial · · Score: 2

      I was quite put off by the amount of sheer marketing put into it. This was simply a moneymaking venture by Lucas, nothing more.

      I've heard people say this many times about TPM, and this pisses me off to no end? Why? It's revisionist history. Let's take a joy ride
      in Mr. Peabody's Wayback Machine...

      "Back in the day" we had action figures, posters, costumes, bookbags, lunchboxes, books, games (both computer and board), vitamins, shoes, you name it it had the logo on it. And this scene was repeated everytime a movie came out. So don't go around telling that bullshit that somehow TPM was merchandized more than the originals, that's just damn lie.

    15. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah.. but Jesus Christ is his VP in charge of marketing.

    16. Re:$$$ is all Star Wars is About now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have fond memories of my Star Wars lunch box.

  32. its probably out there already... by chrischow · · Score: 1

    i wonder if its on pirate DVD out in HK yet? the original 3 were last autumn...

  33. piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can piracy really be that big of a concern? DVD's are too cheap to buy to justify a pirated copy. I'd really like to know why they feel that is such a threat. What are the typical reasons a studio decides against release on DVD? I'd really like to know why I can't buy the Godfather movies on DVD.

    1. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asia can provide em on DVd

      1. DVDs are the same res as LIVE TV, so you could get the TV copy from the station which is on BETACAM-SP, and would be equal to DVD quality and then using a SHIT ASS good capture card, record it to a 35gig HD, and then make your own, which im sure this HK people do.

      Its TOOOOO EASY!!!!!!!!

      Tho you wont see DVD authoring software forlinux, nahh no way...

    2. Re:piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Lucas' piracy concern is not one of people creating pirate DVDs to compete with a legal one; rather that a DVD is a high quality, non-dgrading digital medium, and so provides a far superior source for mastering any pirate copy from in comparison to any other format. As mentioned above, copying a DVD to an SVHS tape using a simple home machine with the macrovision disabled ($50 worth of region chipping will commonly remove macrovision as well) will result in a copy that will beat a bought one. You're not going to beat the professional pirate, but Lucas is concerned about people making copies for their friends. Now, you probably know as well as I do that DVD also qualifies as a far superior, non-degrading digital source for actually plain _watching_ the thing, but apparently that is of less concern to him. iain, the lazy non-account owning winjer

  34. waitaminit by Travoltus · · Score: 1


    Why not make a DVD player that can play THX Sound? A DVD is basically a huge repository of 1's and 0's, encode THX into the digital media and stick it on the disk, the player will decode it, right?

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:waitaminit by stoney · · Score: 1

      THX ain't a standard like stereo or Dolby Digital. THX is a specially approved room, the theatres have mostly normal DTS-equipment and _pay_ to lucasfilm to get the THX-badge.

    2. Re:waitaminit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why not make a DVD player that can play THX Sound? A DVD is basically a huge repository of 1's and 0's, encode THX into the digital media and stick it on the disk, the player will decode it, right?

      So you build your DVD player that can play THX sound. Why is anyone going to bother to make THX DVDs? They don't dare make them THX only, since the majority of players won't be THX-capable. And since the THX-capable players will almost certainly be able to handle standard DVD sound (otherwise, who would buy one?), little benefit will be gained by producing a DVD with THX sound in addition to the standard stuff - a marginal improvement in sound quality for a small subset of your potential customers.

      Young as it is, DVD is already an entrenched standard. Trying to compete with it with a system that isn't a drastic improvement is hopeless.

    3. Re:waitaminit by n3rd · · Score: 1

      Ack, I can't beleive I have to do this once again. Please check out http://www.thx.com before you post. Put simply, THX devices are just normal devices that are "certified". You can buy almost anything you want that is THX certified (check out http://www.thx.com/consumer_products/av_equip.html for a list of ceritifed home entertainment equipment).

    4. Re:waitaminit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beleive that THX is a quality certification, not a separate sound format or standard, such as dts or sdds, AC-3 (Dolby 5.1) and on and on and on... You can buy THX certified speakers, amps, and so forth...the difference is the quality of the sound...and the price. Being extremely high-quality, they are quite expensive. However, Clipsh (sp?) sells a 4.1 system for the PC that retails at about 250-270 or something like that...these speakers are also shipped with the high-end Compaq desktops...prolly the best PC system around...wake the neighbors with a Q3A frag fest.

  35. Why Lucas why? by Juggle · · Score: 2

    Personally I won't even rent VHS tapes anymore because I end up getting too distracted by the poor video and sound quality to enjoy the movie.

    For someone who claims to have his viewers best interest in mind at all times (Go read some THX crap to see what I mean) this is a slap in the face. Lucas is way to concerned about getting every penny he can out of the THX name to worry about quality at all anymore.

    Note that there is nothing in that article that suggests the VHS will even be letterboxed. So not only do we only get a low quality video image with low quality not even surround sound but we don't even get the full frame of the movie! And this mastered in THX crap isn't worth anything sure it may be nice if you have a THX compatable home system (Major $$$$) which can create it's pseudo-surround effects but I'd much rather see plain old pro-logic surround than the sorry excuse of a remaster THX does for home video.

    I'm sorry but if half of what that press release said was accurate they'd only be releasing on DVD with a full widescreen image, Dolby Digital or DTS soundtrack. If they did that I woulden't even care if they included any extra features or not. But as it is I won't even bother to rent the damn thing.

    --
    --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    1. Re:Why Lucas why? by TheKodiak · · Score: 1

      Huh. It looks to me like they are offering pan&scan and widescreen... That would be fine with me if I used a VCR for anything but staving off the need to buy Tivo.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    2. Re:Why Lucas why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THX on a videotape... hehehehe that sounds awesome ;-)

  36. When is the next SW film coming out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to demonstrate my ignorance, but I was just curious. I'm still hopeful that they'll manage to do a better job than they did with TPM, you understand.

  37. That kinda sucks, but... by EricWright · · Score: 2

    ...it's nice to get "official" word denying the release of SW:TPM on DVD, rather than all the unfounded rumors floating around. Now, if only we could get a similar "official denial" about the whole China/Linux crap!!!

    Eric

  38. Re:You suck, Lucas by pulski · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to waste any more of my money on a defunct standard?

    VHS insn't really a defunct standard. Look at how cassette tapes have survived despite the release of CD's. Some people still have 8-track players. The point is that if the technology has existed, it will stay around in some manner. I don't know many people that will throw away their movies and buy them on DVD just because it seems to be better. They are going to keep good old Mr. VCR around and save money on movies that they are not obscessed with buy getting VHS instead of DVD.

    -----

  39. OPEN SOURCE RELEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

    open source man: george lucas, only you could be so bold. the marketing department of lucasfilm won't sit still for this! when they hear you've sabotaged a lucrative money-making scheme....

    george lucas: don't act so surprised, you fanatical nut! you're not on any mercy mission this time! several illegal copies of tpm were beamed to this site by pirate hackers! i want to know what happened to the data they sent you!

    open source man: i don't know what you're talking about! i'm a regular troller of slashdot on a mission to open source natalie portman!

    george lucas: you are part of a grand pirating network and a criminal... take him away!


    thank you.


    the fat-time charlie online serial!! no macromedia shockwave content!! lynx friendly!! rms approved (no gifs)!! dvd player not required!! bookmark it and hit reload!!

    1. Re:OPEN SOURCE RELEASE by TheKodiak · · Score: 1

      I swear to god, this is the funniest thing I have ever read on or near /.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    2. Re:OPEN SOURCE RELEASE by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1

      What the hell does this guy smoke? Everything he writes is funny as hell! I know everything he posts is usually offtopic, but damn it's funny!

      Sorry, I just keep seeing his posts and I had to comment....

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    3. Re:OPEN SOURCE RELEASE by doctorbob · · Score: 1

      I swear this has to beat even Jon Katz' articles (and the response to them) in terms of humour value ;)

    4. Re:OPEN SOURCE RELEASE by Hecubas · · Score: 1
      off topic part:
      Slashdot needs a Slashbox for the fat-time serial!

      on topic part:
      I've been waiting years for Episode I, so a couple more won't kill me to wait for it on DVD or whatever the media de jour is.


      -------

      --
      Hecubas
  40. No VCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't own a VCR...so if it dosen't come on LD or DVD they can kiss my $25 goodby.

  41. haha by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't pay a damn dime for that piece of shit movie. It was nothing but hype and marketing. I could make a better movie since 90% of it is CGI special effects. All lucas cares about is how much money and royalties he gets. What the hell was with jar jar? He looked like a fucking cartoon, my 386 could have done a better rendering job.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:haha by Powers · · Score: 1
      Of course you could... it'd take about 250 years on a 386 to fully render 24 frames per second of Jar Jar Binks for however long he was on screen, but hey, the point is you *could*. Sheesh. Grow up.

      --

      Powers&8^]

  42. Like VHS has any security to stop duping by fr0g · · Score: 0

    Come on now.


    Atleast the pirated version is everywhere on the net.

    1. Re:Like VHS has any security to stop duping by TheKodiak · · Score: 1

      But it does - if you copy a VHS tape, you are incapable of getting anything of better quality than a VHS tape, rendering your copy virtually useless. Unless you digitally enhance some Ewoks and slap a "Special Edition" label on it, I guess.

      (Which reminds me - am I the only one who really, really _enjoyed_ the duality of the original ending of Return of the Jedi? The way it left open the door that most of the people in the universe actually quite liked the Empire? I know this was purely unintentional, considering that the whole thing was a "pure good defeats pure evil" epic, but it sure made it a whole lot more enjoyable being able to fantasize.)

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    2. Re:Like VHS has any security to stop duping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm, if you copy a DVD you don't get any better quality than the DVD either.

      What's more, I have copies of VHS, all legal I might point out, that are far more than useless. I watch them all the time.

      I'm not sure of your point here.

      Most people in the Universe would have liked the Empire just fine, just as most Russians liked living in the "Evil Empire" just fine. That's the way people are.

      By the way, do you think the above comparison is just a coincidence? I think not.

    3. Re:Like VHS has any security to stop duping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of Macrovision? It's an anti-copying feature found on many VHS movies; it works by putting voltage pulses into a part of the signal that VCRs (but not TVs) use to determine the brightness of the picture. The result is that a copy of a Macrovisioned tape will slowly fade from normal brightness to almost black, then back. Also pretty easy to disable, if you know where the AGC circuit is on your VCR.

      Info here: http://www.repairfaq.org/filipg/LINK/F_MacroVision .html

    4. Re:Like VHS has any security to stop duping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if your source material is VHS, then you are limited to VHS quality for any bootlegs you make from it. But this is not the case; I think several TPM film copies have already been stolen by bootleggers. And since when did most people involved in bootlegging care about *quality*? We're talking about people who sometimes get their copies by sneaking a camera into the theater and pointing it at the screen! In any case, *even if* the quality is limited to VHS, a lot of people would rather have a DVD version that doesn't wear out and has instant access to any point on the disc. People who *would* have bought the legitimate copy as their default option might check out bootleggers once they hear the rumors that the film is "unofficially" available on DVD, even if they're not already in the bootlegging scene. The decision to not release TPM on DVD is a stupid one because it will encourage, not reduce, bootlegging.

  43. Boxed set? Unlikely... by fastpage · · Score: 1

    Waiting for 2 more movies to release a boxed set is unlikely. Its obvious they'd make more money if they released each movie seperately. How many people are going to buy a pricey boxed set? And by the time all 3 movies are out we'll have some other technology. This is more like Lucas doesn't want to support DVD for some reason. Perhaps later on to promote his own technology.

  44. why Lucas has done this... by iamiuru · · Score: 1
    about siz months ago i was tracking down info on the star wars trilogy on dvd for a couple big ecommerce sites. the biggest reason in lucas's mind (which no longer holds true), is that he never liked the way dvd movies looked and sounded. he complained that there were to many artifacts, audio had a weird way of sounding, and some problems with audio syncing.

    now this was true of a lot of earlier releases on dvd (a big disappointment was 2001). but there are brand spankin' new dvds on the market that have glitches in them (most of the problems i've been seeing and hearing now - are do to rushing the production of the dvd phase)

    as for piracy, you can dupe copy protected tapes anyway (for a small one time fee). but he never really clarified himself on what he was going to do with his 'baby' on dvd.

    personally, ill take a dvd that is less then perfect (to him), then a herpes-infected vhs tape that people have watched 20 times.

    doesnt matter to me though, its not that high on my priority list to pick it up on dvd or vhs... but i guess it would make a good stocking stuffer from someone...

    whatevers anyway...

    --
    That is your ass, and this over here is your elbow, and NO they ARE NOT the same thing.
  45. Hooray! by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3
    I for one am thrilled that Star Wars, The Phantom Menace, is not being released on DVD; precisely because this helps the boycott of DVD technology, in response to the lawsuit by DVD-CAA against members of the Linux development community. Lest we forget what we had to go through:
  46. Lucas' responsibility by lrund · · Score: 5
    A couple of points on why Lucas is in a different position than most Hollywood movie-moguls:

    • Every major studio is a public entity (i.e. their stock is publically traded), and they have the legal duty to their stockholders to maximize their profits. If they don't, they can be sued by their stockholders.

      Except George Lucas. LucasFilm Limited is privately-held. It's accountable to George Lucas and nobody else.

      This is important because it means he can pursue "non-standard" ways of doing things, right or wrong, profitable or otherwise. When you've got your billions, you get to indulge your Messaihanic ideas. When I get my billions, I know I will!

    • There is a traditional big-big surge in video sales just before Christmas every year (how many of you gave or received movies as a gift?. Lucas knows this. What are the odds he will "change his mind" and TPM will be available around 1 December 2000?

    • Lucas is by no means the first to have a rigidly-controlled home video release schedule. Disney is the "best" example... they periodically pull their videos from the market for years at a time, then rekindle interest with a "limited time release" (look at what they're doing with DVDs, now that DIVX (which they co-founded) is dead. 60 days only on each DVD Disney animated film. If you're a Disney fan, you've only got a few weeks left to get the first batch... can you say "feeding frenzy"?). So, while Lucas is taking the "dark side" on this, he is certainly not the first.
    It certainly sucks, but Lucas well within his rights, and isn't answerable to anyone except you, when you decide whether to reach for your wallet.

    1. Re:Lucas' responsibility by Powers · · Score: 1
      For the record, Disney will no longer be doing this. All but ten of their animated features will be available permanently from now on; the other 10 are part of their platinum collection and will be available for one year each on a ten-year cycle.

      --

      Powers&8^]

    2. Re:Lucas' responsibility by mikemulvaney · · Score: 1

      >What are the odds he will "change his mind" and
      >TPM will be available around 1 December 2000?

      That is exactly what everyone has said about the first three movies for the last two christmases. And we didn't get those, either.

      So I would say, the odds are zero.

      As far as I'm concerned, screw TPM. The Matrix was a better movie anyway, and I would rather support a movie that adds a lot of extra features to the DVD and then charges less than $20 for it.

      Mike

    3. Re:Lucas' responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. Matrix was fantastic, and only charging $16 for the DVD was a pretty damned nice thing of them to do.

      I'm sure that the 6 DVD set of Star Wars will run upwards of $200. Screw that. God-damned Ewoks and Gungans...

    4. Re:Lucas' responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just gurantees lots of ventures for pirates (big time) or home pirates, and friends copying of friends.

  47. Indiana Jones by siberian · · Score: 1

    Spekaing of Lucas, what the hell is up with the Indiana Jones movies? I'd pay through the nose for a 3 DVD collectors edition with additional footage, directors commentary etc. Its angering in a way, I know, they are his movies etc but in a way these movies are part of our cultural heritage and not releasing them / not taking advantag of the formats capabilities does a disservice to us all. Just my thoughts, I want Indy on DVD with commentary, behind the scenes footage and bloopers :)

    1. Re:Indiana Jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree!! There is a boxed VHS set of all three Indy movies + A Young Indiana Jones movie that was released just before Christmas. I was hoping to see that come to DVD also. I've only been able to find the Temple of Doom on Laserdisc. I found it at www.kencranes.com. but they don't have any of the others. Also, what about the Back to the Future series??? I want to give them my money, but I'm sure not paying for VHS tapes that will eventually wear out!

  48. I mean, really, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of all the thousands of really great movies one could choose to have on DVD, what does the loss of one really crappy one mean?

    Come on now - The Phantom Menace stunk like the biodegradable knappies bin outside an old folks home. We're talking _putrid_ here folks. Pure, unadulterated crapola.

    Hell, TPM made _Titanic_ seem edgy and avant guarde.

    Take the money you saved NOT buying TPM, and instead go get a GOOD movie.

    Hey, people, chime in here with movies you think deserve a DVD purpose.

    My vote for Best Movie Not Likely to Have Been Seen by Geeks, but That Really Rocked, and Is Worth Owning on DVD:

    Shakespere In Love - which I thought was going to be raw Chick Flick, but turned out to be a hell of a good time, and very intelligent.

    What other movies should Malda go see?

    1. Re:I mean, really, so what? by dsaxena · · Score: 1
      The best three movies in the last year IMHO:
      • Being John Malkovich
      • Run Lola, Run
      • The Red Violin

      --
      Deepak Saxena
      --
      Deepak Saxena
      "Computers are useless, they can only give you answers" - Picasso
    2. Re:I mean, really, so what? by TheKodiak · · Score: 1

      Most of my favorites either aren't out on DVD, are really BAD on DVD (I hope to GOD someone does a better Metropolis DVD. It is a crime.), are really obvious (The Professional - Natalie Portman comes to DVD, and in a GOOD movie!), or aren't out on DVD (Throne of Blood springs to mind.) So the only one I can really recommend is The Seven Samurai. 207 minute movies are exactly why the DVD format rules.

      --
      -=Best Viewed Using [INLINE]=-
    3. Re:I mean, really, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to mention that Shakespeare in Love featured one of the few ladies with the screen presence to carry off Queen Elizabeth I: Dame Judi Densch.

      Granted, most readers here recognize her as 'M' from the last few Bond flicks, but she has an undeniable presence.

    4. Re:I mean, really, so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that scene totally blew me away!

      She had like maybe 5 min of screen time, and stole the show.

      That was an Oscar that was _deserved_!

  49. Piracy by NYC · · Score: 1
    This isn't entirely surprising. VHS tapes can be much more readily copied than DVDs can, so I seriously doubt that piracy is the issue.

    Piracy is most definitely an issue. DVDs can be copied without any loss of quality since it is all digital. So a 100th generation copy of a DVD is just as pristine as the master copy.

    Ever try to copy a videotape? Even a copy from a master copy is visually inferior. A real pirate (one that makes profit from illegal movies) does not need to worry about losing quality and can provide a product that is identical to the original.

    Also due to its digital nature, DVDs can be distributed via the Internet. It is now possible to download TPM in MPEG format from some warez (I hate that word) site. With cable modems and DSL access becoming more accessible, DVD trading will soon become a reality.


    --Ivan, weenie NT4 user: bite me!

    --
    --weenie NT4 user: bite me!
    "Computers are nothing but a perfect illusion of order" -- Iggy Pop
    1. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wished to pirate VHS on a large scale here's what I would do.

      First, digitize the tape. Second make all my copies from the digitized master.

      Yes, there is some loss of image quality in this, but not as much as tape to tape copying. You'd have to run the original side by side with the copy to notice. Tape degrades to this point after a few plays anyway.

      This would also reduce my overhead. The digital master wouldn't wear out. The handling of tape would be reduced. My personel requirments would be lower.

      I don't know how they actually do it, but this is how I would think to do it, turning out reasonable quality product with minimum expense.

    2. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which brings us back to the original problem - you now have a thousand perfect copies of a VHS tape.

    3. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you were a real quality freak, you could even digitize several different VHS tapes, then average the data to reduce the noise.

    4. Re:piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you didn't know people with Star Wars VCDs? What planet are you living on?

    5. Re:piracy by sydj · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, if hardly anyone pirated TPM then his paranoia worked.

      Personally, I fail to see the point in video piracy. OK, I haven't seen any VCD pirates, but pretty much all the VHS pirates I've seen have been lousy

    6. Re:piracy by MillMan · · Score: 1

      I saw a few, they weren't too bad. The quality isn't that great of course since you have to take a camcorder into a theatre and record it. The real threat is several years down the road when we have star wars on DVD (if Lucas gets his shit in order) and cheap DVD-RAM drives/media. But even then sales won't drop by much.

  50. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    You are comparing apples and oranges. Lucas has an army of people who could bring the world to him and us, whereas CmdrTaco has himself and two other people, which is extremely small for developing something like Slash, and trying to make regular releases.

    So, Ppppphhhhhhhttttt to you.

    --
    Ungh
  51. AC3 is better than THX anyways. by cyanoacrylate · · Score: 1

    And you don't need a damn proprietary (translate overpriced) amp to play it.

    Cyano

    --
    Don't like my sig? I don't either.
  52. Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I felt ripped off leaving the theater, if it were available on DVD I surely wouldn't buy it (not that I've ever bought a movie on DVD or tape.)

  53. Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if it wasn't perfectly clear that George Lucas is a great big marketing whore by now anyway. He should set up a deal to let Taco Bell exclusively distribute the DVD.

  54. Face it Lucas is a Weenie by THX113895 · · Score: 2

    Ok kids lets face the facts. Lucas is a dictator, no matter how many people tell him that Jar Jar was a bad idea he is going to keep him in anyway, probably just to spite those who mocked him. Lucas is probably not in it for the money, he has too much as it is, he is just making the movie that HE always wanted to make with out a care for anyone else. The DVD WILL NOT be released until all movies are out, that is probably another one of Lucas' wet dreams.

    But it doesn't matter you and i will both be in line to by the box set when it comes out come hell or high water.

    "I AM THE TERROR THAT FLAPS IN THE NIGHT!!"

    tHx

  55. Just start boycott of Lucasfilm products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want TPM on DVD. I can build one for myself from a VHS tape, but probably that would be illegal? So I must say that this decision is not against piracy. It is against our money - now we must buy VHS, and then we will have to buy DVD. But anyway - express your opinion on it. Don't buy Lucasfilm products. Trash your video in front of Lucasfilm office. Do something unusual to express your opinion (so that it appear on ABC ;-)

    1. Re:Just start boycott of Lucasfilm products. by THX113895 · · Score: 1

      Would it be illegal? That is the question to ask, if you make copies of a game but do not give to anyone is it illegal? If you can build a DVD from VHS i don't see how Lucasfilm could do anything about it. All your doing is changing the media type just as if you were to take what's on a disk and put it on a CD-R.

      tHx

  56. Burn your own DVD or buy DVD from *.sg or *.tw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LUCAS isn't going to release a DVD to he can GOUGE consumers by selling them the same movie TWICE. And while DVD burners are expensive now... within a year, who knows? ([1X] CDR burners once cost over $10K) And the grey market distributors in Singapore or HK will get a DVD put together (Remember the TPM 70mm film theft?). Buy it from them (for less too). Send Lucas a copy to get the message into that tiny brain of his!

    1. Re:Burn your own DVD or buy DVD from *.sg or *.tw by father_guido · · Score: 1

      And the quality (as I've pointed out before when someone mentioned this) will follow suit. A DVD burned off a VHS master is much like a CD dubbed off an original LP. Worthless.

    2. Re:Burn your own DVD or buy DVD from *.sg or *.tw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is Hong Kong. But that title HAS indeed been passed off to India now that so many frontline HK filmmaking talent has gone stateside.

    3. Re:Burn your own DVD or buy DVD from *.sg or *.tw by axolotl · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, that with the right player LP quality is way better than CD quality. Moron.

      axolotl

  57. He said this is in an interview a long time ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George Lucas mentioned that he isn't going to release any of the new movies on dvd in an article he did way back when the movie was just released. It's not that he wants to make more money off the whole deal, he just wants to sell the whole set together. He doesn't want to do a piecemeal sort of thing. XB XB@black9.com

  58. You can't ruin a bad movie by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    So much for his 'rules'.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  59. big rumour about DVD leak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am sure I remember a rumour circulating that a DVD of TPM had got leaked (and that was why it was appearing pirated on the internet for download)..

    Maybe I was imagining it?

  60. Re:Excuse me by jovlinger · · Score: 1

    cvs servers are good for this sort of thing. A "Here ya go. The current source. Use at your own risk" sort of deal. Hey it works for the E people.

  61. he's not very smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he often calls his movies new myths, but even that mythology guy, I forget his name... joseph campbell? Well, when Lucas gave him a private screening of the first 3, The guy said they stunk and were not myths at all.

    I never thought lucas was any kind of a smart guy. Does he write the movies? It seems like he comes up with a story along the lines of "Luke leaves the planet then he kills darth vader" (as the plot for the first 3) and then somebody else fleshes it out. Then lucas puts up millions and millions of dollars so that other people can make nice effects. Oh, I was far more impressed with the effects in the first 3 movies than anything in the 4th one, including the much overhyped, crappy pod race.

    His stupidity already evident, why would he be expected to make an intelligent decision?

  62. [OT]What's the holdup with Back to the Future DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike, SW, there aren't any more (se/pre)quels still coming? And unlike SW again, they've probably sold about as many VHS tapes as they're going to. And unlike SW, the BttF DVD was mysteriously absent well before CSS was even cracked? WTF is the problem here?

  63. Re:You suck, Lucas by treat · · Score: 1
    VHS insn't really a defunct standard. Look at how cassette tapes have survived despite the release of CD's.

    Tapes are pretty much dead. I havn't bought or seen someone buy a pre-recorded audio tape in years. In the time that I've seen 100 people's CD collections, I havn't seen one tape collection. In recent memory, I've only listened to tapes in cars that didn't have CD players - and those tapes were recorded off of CDs.

    People still buy them because they're writable with cheap hardware. But that's about the only common reason.

  64. this is nothing new. by ywwg · · Score: 2

    Lucas has repeatedly said that that he wants DVD to be the "ultimate repository" (or something) for Star Wars. Meaning, he says, that he doesn't want to release _any_ of the movies on DVD until they are ALL DONE. Yes, that's half a decade away.

    Everyone knows this is stupid. Everyone knows this is greedy. Everyone knows that there will be HDDVD by then. Everyone doesn't like it. And there's nothing we can do about it. Lucas is a greedy asshole, pure and simple.

    Just look at the Special Editions. They suck complete ass. All of the additional effects stand out like badly computer-generated sore thumbs. Not only that, but he changed some key plot points, including Han Solo's now-justified killing of Greedo, and several eight-frame cuts of violence.

    What can I do besides complain? Well, I have decided to boycott lucasfilm completely. This includes:
    1. All Star Wars, VHS or otherwise
    2. All cute star wars toys. If you have 'em, burn 'em.
    3. Anything produced by Lucas, including Indiana Jones.
    4. tell other people to do the same.
    5. Encourage people to not buy the bootlegs.

    As much as you may like Star Wars, you should not allow one individual to control the distribution of his most popular films. I would think that the mostly Libertarian /. readers would agree with me here. Interviewer after interviewer has asked Lucas (or is it £ua$?) why he won't release the films on DVD. He always says, "well, I'd like to wait." Who cares about what you want, you selfish asshole! I can just imagine the studio execs pleading with him, trying to get him to relent.

    But no. Push has come to shove, and we must shove hard.

    1. Re:this is nothing new. by fcd · · Score: 1

      A couple of points...

      1. Wouldn't Lucas make more money bye releasing the movie now and then releasing a DVD version? Kinda like releasing the THX version of the originals right before releasing Special Edition?

      2. Don't Libertarian's believe in laissez faire? Wouldn't that mean let Lucas do whatever he wants?

    2. Re:this is nothing new. by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      You can shove all you want. The fact of the matter is that Lucas created SW, he owns SW, and he can do whatever he likes with SW. If you don't like what he's doing then I'm afraid that's just tough luck. He's not in it for the personal popularity. He's not in it for your approval, love, or worship. He's in it for the money.

      The sad fact of the matter is that if every geek who read /. decided to join the Lucas boycott, and convinced every one of their relatives and friends to join too, it would put only the tiniest of dents into the Lucas profit machine.

      It's also not true to say that 'Everyone doesn't like it'. The truth of the matter is that 99% of his purchasing public really couldn't give a crap about it. They'll continue to buy SW merchandise whether the DVD's are released now, in ten years, or if Georgie boy decides to forget the whole thing and cram the film masters up his ass.

      --

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    3. Re:this is nothing new. by Pug · · Score: 1

      2. Don't Libertarian's believe in laissez faire? Wouldn't that mean let Lucas do whatever he wants?

      Sorry, but no. laissez faire only applies to government intervention. One of the major points of Capitalism is that if a business does something consumers don't like, the consumers don't buy anything from them and the company looses many. As an example, to refer to some FDA article posted here a few days back, a Libertarian view would be that the government should allow companies to sell whatever drugs they want, but very few Libertarians would probably say that consumers are morally obliged to BUY just anything on the market

    4. Re:this is nothing new. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      you should not allow one individual to control the distribution of his most popular
      films. I would think that the mostly Libertarian /. readers would agree with me here.

      The actual Libertaians would tell you to get bent, because he owns those movies and he can do anything he wants with them. I don't know of any Libertarians who would support depriving someone of their private property simply because someone else wants it. Socialists and other collectivists, yes, but not Libertarians.
      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  65. Why is this news? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    They clearly stated, even before SW:TPM was in the theater, that NO STAR WARS movies would be released on DVD until the first 3 were done. Why is this rehashed all the time? It's no surpsise...
    it's not news...
    I bet we'll hear about it AGAIN when they release the episode 2 on VHS... the slashdot title will be 'Lucas refuses to release Episode 2 on DVD..'
    then there will be several hundred comments of speculation as to why this is the case.. then someone will point out that this was always the plan.
    Feh.

  66. Better no DVD than a bad DVD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On one hand, this is a disappointment, but on the other hand, it probably means we will get a better DVD when it does actually come out a year later.

    My reasoning? If a VHS & DVD came out at the same time, the DVD would have few "extras" like actor/directory/sfx commentary, "The making of TPM", DVD-ROM extras, etc. They would hold off on those until later, so they could realease the "Special Edition DVD" and trick all superfans into buying two copies.

    Now, I'm hoping that by waiting a year: 1) They're hoping to trick all superfans into buying a VHS & a DVD copy (instead of two DVD copies). and 2) The standard for DVD extras will be higher, so they'll have to do a better job, and include more stuff.

    I hate bad DVDs. For example, I won't buy Pulp Fiction because the DVD has nothing more than the VHS tape. Come on, Tarantino, get with the program and release a special edition.

    In fact, DVDs have been getting better and better. The Matrix raised the bar, and some recent DVDs I've bought are packed with cool stuff. Personally, I'm looking forward to the Fight Club DVD, which looks to be pretty slick.

  67. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    cvs pservers take time to set up and administer properly. It's more work than you realize.

    --
    Ungh
  68. But then why he hasn't put TPM on hold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then why he hasn't put TPM on hold? Why not wait untill all movies be ready an only after that show them?

    1. Re:But then why he hasn't put TPM on hold? by TheKing · · Score: 1

      Because the Original trilogy is on VHS already. There is no reason to stop the VHS release of TPM cuz it's not exclusive. Also, you have to remember, the demand is out there, regardless of how many of you think it sucked, people (including myself) still want to own it. He said there would be no DVD til 2006 for *any* Star Wars film, so this isn't anything new.

  69. Some things to consider: by imac.usr · · Score: 3

    1. Lucas isn't necessarily afraid of DVD. IIRC, he redid a scene from "American Graffiti" in the beginning where the sun is setting; the new version features a digitally-redone sky which apparently makes it look much better than the VHS version.

    2. A friend of mine received a VideoCD version of TPM for Christmas. I haven't seen it, but the point is clear: illegal copies already are out there.

    3. How hard is it to hook up a DV-converter to your VCR and digitally copy the TPM VHS tape? Apple sells just such a converter (from Sony) on their web site for turning your old movies into stuff you can edit with iMovie or Final Cut Pro. Maybe the VHS tape is copy-protected somehow with Macrovision or some other quality-degrading format.

    4. Having said this, the only way I would watch a pirated copy of TPM is on an Apple Cinema Display or something of that nature; anything else will be smaller than my 27" TV set (which is barely big enough for most DVDs anyway). Then there's the sound issue. My computer doesn't output AC-3 Dolby Digital sound, ergo I'm losing out on much of the joy of watching a DVD movie to begin with.

    5. Forget TPM. I want my Buckaroo Banzai DVD!


    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
    1. Re:Some things to consider: by rizzo · · Score: 2

      What kind of present is a bootleg CD? Unless I suppose that person really wanted TPM.

      I'd considered giving my brother bootleg games, but thought it to be a little tacky. I dunno. If it's a present I usually go and buy it.

      And burning a CD doesn't really qualify as "making" a gift, like woodworking or anything.

      --

      "More organs means more human." - Zim

    2. Re:Some things to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey, don't be mean. Remember, no matter where you go, there you are!"

  70. Lucas the Hutt by cgcra · · Score: 1

    I for one have come to grips with the vile greed of George Lucas. I just wired him all the cash in my checking account and begged his forgiveness for my miserly ways.

    -Chris

  71. You can't have SDDS on VHS anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I bet the widescreen edition is 16:9, not 2.35:1. Obviously the VHS tape doesn't fill the requirements.

  72. So what? by phong3d · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I have better things to do that pine over an Episode 1 DVD. Admittedly, I'll happily pick up a super-duper special edition Star Wars DVD (or whatever technology has stolen the DVD spotlight in another 6 or 7 years) since they were such an integral part of my childhood. However, if Lucas doesn't want to put out a definitive digital collection until the next two are done, more power to him, I'd prefer a cohesive, finished product any day.

  73. interview w/ Lucas about star wars and dvd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    saw an interview w/ Lucas around the time of the release of TPM and it sounded like he was waiting to finish the next 2 movies to release a (2) 3 dvd box set (TPM,#2,#3 and #4,#5,#6) and probably a 6 dvd box set of all the movies... Lucas is gonna do whatever makes him the most money...

  74. piracy by MillMan · · Score: 3

    It has been pointed out (true or not I dont know) that Lucas is considering a 6 DVD set, or that it wasn't going to come out in 2000 anyway. I still think he's mainly afraid of piracy. Reemmber back before the movie came out? I remember this quote from him that I read on wired.com ( a bit butchered probably): "if this movie gets pirated by a lot of people there won't be another movie". Remember how he got the FBI involved as well? Almost everyone I knew had a VCD of The Matrix but almost no one had Star Wars TPM because of all the threats he made. I don't particularly support movie pirating but I think he got much too paranoid.

    I love the star wars series of course, but I think all the money he's made has given him a serious lack of perspective. It seems that he just can't get enough money. If there is any movie people really want on DVD, it's the star wars series. He could have easily got the first 3 episodes (or 4 to 6) out by now on DVD no problem. He'd be raking in the money. I think it's all due to the threat (imagined or not) of piracy. I think he's waiting to see what happens in the digital world, particularly the current DVD situation. He doesn't really have much to worry about. We've been over the DVD issue many times.

    For someone who has pushed the technological envelope in the medium of movies, he has really fumbled the ball in the consumer market.

  75. Legalese Bullsh*t by _jthm · · Score: 1

    from the site: is not being released on the DVD format in 2000 or for the foreseeable future

    the 'forseeable' future? why use such a vague term? so next year they can? or at their leisure they can say "oh, we didn't see this far into the future, here's your DVD"

    or, do they really mean NO dvd for star wars ?

  76. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 1

    oh, so now you're making excuses for CmdrTaco. how fucking convenient. I guess it makes it easier to defend your argument that way.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  77. VCD? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    Ok no DVD but what about VCD?

    I'm sure that even if its not going on DVD someone will convert the widescreen and slap it on a DVD. Either that or the pan/scan on a VCD.



    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  78. Duh, He's just planning on selling it to you twice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He figures he can gouge us more for his 'masterpiece' if he can fool us into buying it twice, some stupid people will buy it twice, I'll buy it once, on DVD, or I won't buy it. Screw Lucas David

  79. Damn straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd consider buying the first (or is that second) trilogy on DVD because "Star Wars" and "Empire Strikes Back" were so good. I'll even tolerate those damn made for selling dolls Ewoks in "Return of the Jedi" just to have the complete set and story line.

    But "The Phantom Menace"? No. I don't think so.

    George Lucas can blame bad internet press all he wants, but "The Phantom Menace" just plain sucked. And if you are more than 10 years old, it sucked a lot. It's exactly the sort of film directors make when they've run out of original ideas but know they have a loyal fan base so they don't have to try very hard anyways and can concentrate solely on selling toys. The only reason I could see in buying it by itself is using Anakin and Jar-Jar "Meesa Gonna Sella Lotta Action Figures" Binx as suction cup dart targets on my TV screen.

    If the next two films (assuming they bother making them) are back to the standards set by "Star Wars" and "Empire", I might include "The Phantom Menace" in my DVD collection just to have the complete set. But the next two films will have to be abso-freaking-lutely amazing for me to tolerate "Phantom Menace" like I tolerate "Return of the Jedi". Given Lucas' recent track record, somehow I don't think they will be.

  80. You would? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before TPM came out, I remarked to a friend that Lucas would be insane not to release the first three on DVD. I would go out and buy a player simply to watch those movies! I would also be willing to spend well more for those three than I would for any other DVDs.

    If you really mean what you say about the first 3 movies, go get a laserdisc player. All 3 of them are available on laserdisc. You can probably get them pretty cheap on eBay or some other auction site.

  81. Mabye he's waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Lucas is waiting for HDTV? Why make an NTSC DVD when people will want a HDTV version in 3 years?

  82. thanks n3rd by Travoltus · · Score: 1


    for the schoolage without all the spankage :)

    I wish all 'corrections' were dealt out with that kind of patience and class.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  83. whine whine whine by screeching+weasel · · Score: 1

    boo fucking hoo.




  84. Alternative release formats... by Raetsel · · Score: 3
    Released on VHS: That's nice. At least it's available at Blockbuster.

    No DVD: You've caved to industry pressure you craven little coward! (I'm venting here.)

    What about LaserDisc? Nobody is crying about unencrypted LDs, or that they (now or ever) contribute to piracy and destroy the profits of movie studios!

    I, and I expect many others, own a laserdisc player. It has provided me many hours of enjoyment. In fact, I purchased it and the Star Wars Remastered Limited Edition (not the redone movies) together back in '95.

    Yes, I'm the sort that likes to have a big screen and big sound.

    Yes, I know it's not nearly as convenient as DVD. You can't watch one on your laptop. Or at work. Or on a plane.

    Perhaps Lucas is afraid that DVD will be subject to piracy. What's he feeling when there are people selling copies of TPM -- complete with New Line Video(!!!) security stickers -- within a week of it's cinema release?

    I have heard reports that Lucas is expected to rake in $1 Billion USD from all things related to TPM; Box office receipts, merchandising, other tie-ins, etc. Is the fact that DVD can now be played without Windows threatening his profits THAT much? I think not.

    The fact that there is neither a LD or DVD (read: durable format that doesn't wear out) release tells me that Lucas is going to come up with a "Limited Edition Collectors Set" or some such nonsense as soon as we set some sales records for his videotape. Thanks, Lucas. Your fans are watching you!

    --

    "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
    1. Re:Alternative release formats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, considering how fast the movie was bootlegged, I think it will be on DVD without Chineese on the bottom fairly quick. No worries here and Im more then happy to buy it from a bootlegger rather then that money hungry bastard. Lucus hi-tech, yeah right.

  85. The *REAL* reason Lucas has no DVD plans.... by Trinity-Infinity · · Score: 2

    From what I know, piracy is not a major concern for Lucasfilm right now. No matter how they release the movie and other materials, other entities have been responsible for copyright enforcement (such as the RIAA pursuing anyone who served the duel of the fates mp3).

    As far as *REAL* reasons are concerned, Rick McCallum has said himself at the Fan Celebration in Denver last year that they were waiting to release them all in one set... yet this again seems kinda far off for any sensible marketing plan, don't you think?

    However... back in the day when the plans for releasing Ep1 were being made... Divx was still in existence. Divx a large share owned by Dreamworks SKG.. a company headed by Mr. S... Steven Speilburg - a good friend and collaborator of Lucas on many projects.

    So Lucas was probably just waiting things out the way I see it... he's no dummy when it comes to technology (we all knew divx wouldn't work) but he didn't want to deliver the death blow by releasing one of the most popular movies ever on a competing format.

    And Colonel Mustard did it in the Conservatory with the candlestick!

  86. Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by daVinci1980 · · Score: 2

    There's a reason you don't see pirated DVDs. Its not because the piracy in and of itself is impossible, either.

    Its due to the fact that DVD copying equipment is prohibitively expensive! And not even good enough quality to pirate with!!

    The media for sale is $25 a disc! And that's for 4.75 GB, One-sided, single-layer media. Nevermind the fact that DVDs you purchase are 19 GB two-sided double-layered DVDs... So in other words, it would take you two RAMs for each side of a ROM. Hmm... Lemme think. $25 for a real version or $100 for one that I'm going to have to swap in the middle of the movie (Remember LaserDisc?).

    This is not actually a dificult choice!

    One other thing (about trading DVDs online): DVD Quality Video/Audio is approximately 1 meg per second. Most Cable rates don't even come CLOSE to touching half of this. And even still, if you were to download one side of a DVD movie, it would cost you 9 GIGS of HDD space, And 9 Gigs of download time! (At 250K a second this would take approximately 8 hours)
    --
    "A mind is a horrible thing to waste. But a mime...
    It feels wonderful wasting those fsckers."

    --
    I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    1. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by Smack · · Score: 1

      While I don't disagree w/ your point, you are slightly inaccurate. "The DVDs you purchase" are NOT double-sided, double-layered in general. They are usually either double-sided OR double-layered, with the latter being much more popular. Only a couple of the 19 GB have even come out at this point, The Stand being the most notable of them.

      So basically, that 9 gig download would probably get you 1 whole movie.

    2. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you looked at the content of DVD's? Most movies are 4-5 GB, many don't even cross the layer change. True, many have two copies of the movie, one on each side (widescreen and pan and scan), but if you're pirating it you probably only care about one version of the movie, you don't need both copies. Now, 5 gig /will/ fit on a DVD-RAM, abliet IIRC that would require flipping the disc at 2.6 GB.

    3. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by Troed · · Score: 2
      (moderate this up if you want to educate some people in here)

      SW 1,3,4,5 are all available on DVD.

      TPM is the same film-rip as the one seen on the VCD scene. Widescreen, surround, malaysian subtitles. Ep 3,4,5 are from the Laserdiscs.

      Nicely pressed pirate-DVDs. Yes, they exist.

    4. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean, 1,4,5,6? Ep. 3 won't be filmed for another 3-4 years...

    5. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by Troed · · Score: 1
      Uh .. correct. It's late in my timezone ;)

    6. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by Uller-RM · · Score: 1

      The original three movies (SW, ESB, ROTJ) are episodes 4, 5, and 6. TPM is episode 1. The forthcoming prequels are 2 and 3.

      There were scripts for 7, 8, and 9, but at this rate Lucas will knock off before he finishes them.

    7. Re:Why DVD Piracy isn't *Actually* feasible... by DeekGeek · · Score: 1
      Actually, Lucas changed his mind and said he isn't going to make 7, 8, and 9. After he makes episode 3, that's it.

      --

      How can the eyes be the Windows of the soul when they never blue screen?

  87. Top 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are 10 reasons not to buy a DVD player...
    (with many of the greatest films not available on DVD why bother)

    1. Star Wars
    2. Empire Strikes Back
    3. Return of the Jedi
    4. The Phantom Menance
    5. Jaws
    6. Raiders of the Lost Ark
    7. Close Encounters of the Third Kind
    8. E.T.
    9. North by Northwest
    10. I'm Gonna Git You Sucka

  88. Why WOULD he? by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

    He knows that he can get everybody to buy the initial VHS release, the digitally re-mastered VHS release, the special edition VHS release with the extra 30 seconds of film cut from the original movie, and the five year anniversary boxed set VHS release before he gives us the DVD version.

    I'm waiting for the "George Lucas' bank account is now bigger than Bill Gates'" Super-Duper-$-$-$-Box-Set release myself.

    --

    --
    The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
  89. the phantom meanace release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the phantom meanace dvd release will be delayed one extra hour for every person who asks lucas when it will be released.

    word on when lucas may release an updated tpm tarball was not clear at press time.

    1. Re:the phantom meanace release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahah! see the irony, Cmdr Taco...you fucking whining bitch.

    2. Re:the phantom meanace release... by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      You planning on paying Rob for that source code?

      Seems to me that some metaphors just don't stack up...

      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
  90. Geeks around the world cry and cry and cry... by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Who gives a hoot? The movie sucked. What's the big deal? Why do we continue to see articles about Star Wars? Enough. I couldn't care less. Please.

  91. And comments about high-capactity DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been some references made to comments by Rick McCallum, producer for the SW prequels, about waiting for high-capacity (blue laser) DVDs to become feasible. Here's a link to the comments. Of course, these aren't exactly Associated Press-verified comments, but it certain seems like something Lucas would do. Of course, you could argue it's either for the sake of quality or for the sake of money. Lucas has claimed in many interviews that it took 15 years for movie technology to get to the point where he felt he could finally make the prequels, so he may be convincied it will take another 6 years for DVD technology to reach the point where he can do the types of things he'd like to do. Let's face it, up 'till now most DVDs have lived up to only the improved picture and sound promises, not the interactive, multi-angle, personallized experience it was hyped to be.

    And, just to catch you up with the latest on blue laser DVDs, check out this article at E-Town.

    Finally, there isn't any rule that says you have to buy the VHS. And like someone else commented, it took 8 years before the original trilogy appeared on VHS...

  92. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    Well, as long as you are making excuses for George Lucas....

    --
    Ungh
  93. Re:You suck, Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, don't be dissing cassettes.

    I recently acquired four Apple II cassettes (original software from Apple) here at work that were being thrown out.

    I should sell them on E-bay, I guess.

    They won't bring in as much as my SYM-1 single board computers, though.

  94. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 1

    I'm making excuses for George Lucas by pointing out CmdrTaco's hypocrisy? Yeah, ok...that's very logical.

    I personally don't care what Lucas does with his property, I just can't stand when whiners like CmdrTaco bitches about being pissed on when he's doing the same thing.

    Come back when you start to make sense.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  95. Re:You suck, Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have. I've already chucked my VHS tapes and replaced them all with DVD. VHS is a joke, now.

  96. You are so right! by Jeckle · · Score: 1

    I have always thought of Lucas as thus: A wonderful sci-fi storyteller, a good director, but a piss-poor public figure.

    Here he has the most technologically advanced movie of its time and he is content on releasing it on the worst available format?

    Someone else pointed out that Lucas goes where the money is. I got a joke email awhile back written by a friend of a friend in which Jar Jar started out as a well-spoken and intelligent character. After 2 lines Lucas realizes The movie will make tons of money, but needs kid appeal to really rake it in, like Ewoks, so Jar Jar instantly becomes annoying, stupid, and a chore for fans to stomach.

    Another interesting point about Lucas is the appearance that he holds this saga so close to his own heart and doesn't want anyone or thing to spoil or tarnish it. You see where I'm going with this? I went to Taco Bell today, and they STILL have those damn Anakin pod racer cups! There should be some kind of award for him to win for the most marketed movie in history. All the fast food crap, convenience store crap, drug store crap, re-releasing the original toys, the list goes on longer than for any movie I can think of. I am mildly suprised I haven't seen the Star Wars hour on Home Shopping Network.

    I see tons of people in this discussion saying, "the REAL reason is [this or that]", but you know what? Lucas as a person has always struck me as someone who's just not quite on the same page as everyone else. I don't mean this as a bad thing, but I personally think Lucas did this because he could. No other reason. Lucas works in control. He would not have made TPM without total control of all aspects, which he got. Call it childish, call it flexing muscles, but I don't think there wasn't any political-, business-, or profit-motivated reason for this move. If he was going to re-release it as DVD, then release it once along with the VHS and make a ton of money, then release the "Collector's Edition tm" wherein the great chinless wonder along with the cast of the movie will make a little documentary about the making of, what Star Wars means, what Lucas is trying to do with it, etc., etc., etc... He'll make a lot more money on that as well. And aftewr all that, a long long time from now in a place far far away, he can release all the boxed sets he wants and make even more money.

    But, he won't do that because he's George Lucas, and Star Wars is his his his... all his.

    --
    /Sig/
  97. show me the pirate DVD by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Where do I buy it, where do I sent the check, and how much?

    I've got two versions of IV-VI on LD, and two on tape. One of the tape versions purchased before the advent of 'sell-through' pricing. Saw TPM twice. Have a ton of licensed toys.

    Mr. Lucas, I have three copies of American Graffitti. You have enough of my money. Time for some of those hard working pirates to get one.

    Seriously, somebody please tell me where to get a copy.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  98. Wow. did CmdrTaco pee in your wheaties? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you sound awfully mad for some reason. Did he steal your sister or something? Such naughty language for such a silly request. Let's be serious. Releasing the source code for this sight and putting a movie on DVD are not exactly the same things, philosophically or realistically. Now, if you are asking Lucus to release all the raw, unedited footage complete with time stamp so you could edit your own masterpiece, go ahead. All we are asking is why the delay when DVD is such a superior format. And here it looks like you just can't cuss CmdrTaco enough. Jeepers. You'd think he stood you up or something.

  99. This is true.. for NOW. CDR burners were once $10K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    with blank media at $30/CDR. And there were 1X CDR burners the size of old top-loading VCRs. Stuff gets cheaper. It'll happen with DVDs, too. Remember when blank CDRW media was $25? That was 2 years ago? Now it is what, $1.50/disc.

    Your argument is a fleeting one.

  100. You are so right! by Jeckle · · Score: 1
    I have always thought of Lucas as thus: A wonderful sci-fi storyteller, a good director, but a piss-poor public figure.

    Here he has the most technologically advanced movie of its time and he is content on releasing it on the worst available format?

    Someone else pointed out that Lucas goes where the money is. I got a joke email awhile back written by a friend of a friend in which Jar Jar started out as a well-spoken and intelligent character. After 2 lines Lucas realizes The movie will make tons of money, but needs kid appeal to really rake it in, like Ewoks, so Jar Jar instantly becomes annoying, stupid, and a chore for older fans to stomach.

    Another interesting point about Lucas is the appearance that he holds this saga so close to his own heart and doesn't want anyone or thing to spoil or tarnish it. You see where I'm going with this? I went to Taco Bell today, and they STILL have those damn Anakin pod racer cups! There should be some kind of award for him to win for the most marketed movie in history. All the fast food crap, convenience store crap, drug store crap, re-releasing the original toys, the list goes on longer than for any movie I can think of. I am mildly suprised I haven't seen the Star Wars hour on Home Shopping Network pedaling even more Star Wars-related sh*t!

    I see tons of people in this discussion saying, "the REAL reason is [this or that]", but you know what? Lucas as a person has always struck me as someone who's just not quite on the same page as everyone else. I don't mean this as a bad thing, but I personally think Lucas did this because he could. No other reason. Lucas works in control. He would not have made TPM without total control of all aspects, which he got. Call it childish, call it flexing muscles, but I don't think there was any political-, business-, or profit-motivated reason for this move. If he was going to re-release it as DVD, then release it once along with the VHS and make a ton of money, then release the "Collector's Edition tm" wherein the great His Holiness, along with the cast of the movie, will make a little documentary about the making of, what Star Wars means, what Lucas is trying to do with it, etc., etc., etc... He'll make a lot more money on that as well. And after all that, a long long time from now in a place far far away, he can re-re-release all the boxed sets he wants and make even more money.

    But, he won't do that because he's George Lucas, and Star Wars is his his his... all his.

    --
    /Sig/
  101. Re:Top 10 Reasons to Buy a DVD by StoryMan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, right, and here's 10 reasons to buy a DVD player:

    1) The Passion of Joan of Arc (w/Richard Einhorn's score -- the best film of all time -- better than Citizen Kane, Magnificent Ambersons, you name it. And it's from 1928!)
    2) The Last Temptation of Christ (w/Scorsese commentary, 16:9, etc.)
    3) The Nights of Cabiria (remastered by Criterion -- it's superb)
    4) Seven Samuarai (with excellent commentary by Michael Jeck)
    5) Fellini's And the Ship Sails On
    6) Criterion's soon-to-be-released Cocteau box-set
    7) Truffaut's films on Fox/Lorber (and the oop Criterion 400 blows)
    8) Peeping Tom (a guilty pleasure -- includes the documentary "A Very British Psycho")
    9) Chaplin's Mutuals (great transfer)
    10) Pink Floyd's The Wall (fantastic disc)

    Works both ways. The Phantom Menace sucked, hands down. Yeah, I'd love to see Star Wars and Empire (Jedi sucked because of the fucking Ewoks) but Lucas is gonna do what Lucas is gonna do.

    And frankly: who cares? There are better films available on DVD than the big blockbusters that we've all come to think of as "great films". (After all, Spielberg's E.T. was an odd remake [or so it seems] of Satyajit Ray's 'The Alien'. How many people here have seen Ray's films? Hmmm? I thought so. Try "Pater Panchali" for a real visual and dramatic treat. Only on VHS, unfortunately -- but much better than any of the crappy film "blockbusters"! Although, I'll admit, yeah, "Close Encounters" is a bloody brilliant film. My question is: how did a film like that ever get made? It's fucking odd -- but brilliant.)

    Oh yeah, I'm just watching Fritz Lang's "M" now. Wow, that's a cool film. I might have to think about it a while and add it as #11 to the list above.

  102. Here is a reasonable explanation.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. He wants to wait for Digital TV's to become popular enough so the next generation of home 'video' player will be out.
    DVD can NOT play high qualty to a digital TV. There just isn't enough room on a dvd player.
    the math: (1200*1600)*30*60*90
    1200*1600 for the amount of 'dots' on the screen, 30 for the MINIMUM frames per second(some are going higher), 60 for the number of seconds in a minute and 90 for the number of minutes in an AVERAGE move.In the case of TPM more like 120.
    Answer: 311,040,000,000 bit. 310 gigs(approx)
    PLUS all the how this and that was down, behind the seens and so on, and so on.
    If he wanted to rake you for cash he would release TPM vhs, DVD. Then re-release again in 5 years when DVD is replaced.
    On a side note: didn't the dialog of TPM seem week compared to the other three? I mean, I can't think of a single good quote from TPM but I was slinging quotes around from any of the other three as soon as I was done watching them. Please that is not a flame just and observation.

  103. Just get the VCD version... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    ... if an Asian based company makes it. Your DVD player should play this format and its all legal (Royalties are paid).

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  104. Digital Sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a Diamond MX300 for like 40 bucks if its an OEM. it does AC-3. I just got mine and a DVD drive.. It is nice. Just a suggetsion

  105. Interview with Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    year 2006...
    President Rob Malda: Mr. Lucas your fans (and you know I am a big one) are very excited about the pending release of your six-dvd Star Wars Hex-ology.
    George Lucas: LucasFilm has worked very hard to make it the very best that it can be.
    PRM: I am sure you have. Why the $400 price tag? Why not two seperate releases: i-iii and iv-vi?
    GL: Whoa there mister president...one question at a time please. First, the price tag reflects the quality and content of the dvd's. Each one is a master piece in-and-of-itself. We feel this is a small price to ask our customers to pay for the greatest story ever told.
    PRM: you arrogant...
    GL: Please let me finish. We refuse to seperate the two halves of the story because they have, since day one, been part of a whole. We want consumers to pass along the whole story, not little bits and pieces.
    PRM: Some would suggest you've had this planned since TPM because you knew people would pay almost anything for iv-vi. But a trilogy box dvd set could only be marked up so high since it was incomplete. Some would even go so far as to say the "suckage" of episodes i-iii can be attributed to you only wanting to be able to milk the public for as muchh money as possible. Admit it: they sucked because you just wanted to hurry up and get to the six dvd set that you could charge $400+ dollars for it and people would still buy it because of how great iv-vi were.
    GL: You are absolutely incorrect. I did it because its one story and should be distributed as such.
    PRM: Bullshit.
    ...end of interview...

  106. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the fact that you can't get your very own copy of the latest version of Slash, write your own.

    --
    Ungh
  107. THX and DVD by Kalak451 · · Score: 1

    How often do you see THX certified dvds? i have seen very few, there is a reason, THX will not certify anamorphic widescreen transfers for some reason, this is one of the great things about DVD video, if you have a widescreen television you can use it, if you don't, you can watch the movie leterboxed, you can even watch it in pan-scan mode if you have some sick desire to. if lucas releases TPM without an anamorphic transfer, the DVD comunity will go nuts, if he does, he completly underminds the THX

  108. Piracy Threat by macks · · Score: 2

    The true piracy threat are those ASCII films. All we have to do is purchase one VHS of Starwars, have someone with lots of time on their hands convert it to ASCII. Say goodbye to your vhs player as well as that dvd player! For the future is here, and no one can stop us ASCII film pirates.

    macks
    -----
    Surrender, enjoy the abduction.

  109. Re:You suck, Lucas by C.Lee · · Score: 0

    >Tapes are pretty much dead. I havn't bought or seen someone buy a
    >pre-recorded audio tape in years. In the time that I've seen 100

    You're an idoit and a techno-snob. Strange isn't it how the two seem to go hand-in-hand. Go to Wal-mart and see just how fast a shipment of those $79.00 4-head stereo VCR's vanish from the sales floor. Movies released on VHS tapes aren't going to disapear anytime soon, no matter how losers like yourself scream,moan and bitch about it.

  110. A Six DVD set Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am being serious. I heard that he was trying to get Harrison Ford to do some more Indiana Jones movies. So, you guessed it, he'll probably wait until after three more movies to release The Greatest Indiana Jones Movie Set in history. Its all about being able to charge a hell of a lot more money for a 6 dvd set than a 3.If you can get a 3 dvd set for $100 bucks you can bet a 6 dvd set will run $250. The Star Wars one will be more like $350. Its all about demand. And he has a monopoly as far as Star Wars goes...yep it is price-gouging.

  111. speaking about fans by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1
    just some random stuff I have:
    1. Qui-Gon Ginn lightsaber
    2. Obi-Wan Kenobi lightsaber
    3. Darth Maul lightsaber
    4. homemade jedi outfit in the style of Obi-Wan Kenobi
    5. I use only star wars toothbrushes
    6. all of the Star Wars Pez candy dispensers
    7. Darth Maul personal CD player

    and other stuff. and I know there's cooler stuff out there, and more devoted fans, but.. I wanted to enter myself in the wad.


    --

    Insert mind here.
    1. Re:speaking about fans by caferace · · Score: 1
      Feh. I work with a guy that has at *least* 200 collectible figurines, spaceship models from tiny to 3 ft. plus AND a full size, electrified Darth Vader replica. All in his cube.

      Course, he's a FREEK.

      Hi, Sam!

    2. Re:speaking about fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever kissed a woman?

  112. I hate Lucas by markd00 · · Score: 1
    God damn. What is wrong with Lucas. He has to start paying attention to DVD. For years he has said it's not big enough. How big does he want it.

    Screw you Lucas. I'm not buying shit!

  113. Vote with my wallet by Chirik · · Score: 1

    Well, I plan to vote with my wallet. I don't buy VHS movies anymore, simple as that. I've been buying about 5 DVDs or so a month, on average. Not a large sum, but when you figured the average DVD sells for $24 or so, that adds up to almost $1500 a year. If a company doesn't want my business, that's fine with me - I'll take it elsewhere.

    And if/when TPM comes out on DVD? I'll buy it. But not before then.

  114. Why support Lucas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TPM was horrible, Apparently all Lucas cared about was making money, not a good movie. Look at JarJar an awful attempt to draw in the kiddie crowd (who of course would bring their parents). I am not surprised Lucas is doing this to yet again reap whatever financial gains he may reap. I think it will backfire on him like JarJar did. DO NOT BUY THE TAPE! You are only encouraging such an action. The best way to stop these money grubbers is to hit them were it hurts. Stop buying all those star wars products. I know you really have to have that Queen Amidala doll, but come on find a real woman. I am so sick of Trekies/SW fans they make geeks look like total losers. At least SW fans dont speak Klingon. You know its sad when someones only other language is not something usefull like spanish or german, but Klingon. Go rent some good foriegn flicks or something. Excedrin Rules

  115. CmdrTaco, you dissapoint me. by Ricardo+Casals · · Score: 1

    If you would have thought about it, you would thought about the fact that VHS can be pirated 100x times faster than DVD? All you have to do is have a TVin card, and play the movie and record it into whatever format you want. Maybe, just maybe, it's not piracy at all. ;-)

    --
    yeah ... i'm going to have to go ahead and not put a .sig here, alright?
  116. NEWS! Other Lucasfilm announcements! by XJoshX · · Score: 3

    Apparently everybody seems to be focusing on only the TPM not on DVD issue and ignoring other new lucasfilm announcements of the day:
    1) Soundtracks now only offered on Reel to Reel.
    2) Other films will be re-released in beta for "prime home viewing"
    3) Action figures will now be made exclusively of led.
    4) SW:TPM RPG for the Atari 2600!!!
    5) SW: The Desktop office for OS/2 and WinCE.

    And finally, the most disturbing announcement:
    6) All Special Effects for the Episodes 2 & 3 will be done on enhanced windows 2000 workstations.

    Be afraid, be very affraid....

  117. We should petition by MrBowman · · Score: 1

    George has always listened to his fans... Let's petition George to please release a DVD edition.

    Lucasfilm could use some good fortune... Notice how many damn Jar jar dolls are available at K-Mart, marked down 50%?

    --
    Streaming Classic Rock mp3's 24/7 on 9412 - The Rock Station www.listen.to/9412
    1. Re:We should petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the poor sales of Jar Jar dolls has GL and crowd worried. If my understanding of the situation is correct, the licencee (the maker of the doll or whatever) pays LucasFilm a royalty fee for the right to crank out the item in question (depending on the contract details, it could be either a flat fee or a per-unit commission). Then the manufacturer sells to wholesalers, who resell it to the retailers, who sell it to the consumer. Since it's sitting on the shelf at K-Mart, the only one hurting is K-Mart; LucasArts got their money when the manufacturer cranked them out, and the manufacturer and/or wholesaler got their money when they sold them to K-Mart.

    2. Re:We should petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, but the more that K-mart sells, the more that can be manufactured, and the more royalties LucasFilm makes.

    3. Re:We should petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but the "k-marts" out there wont be buying any more of those dolls they already have are sold...companies dont want to sell once...they want to keep selling...

    4. Re:We should petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      George has always listened to his fans...


      Since when? Lucas has never listened to his fans. Consider the lateness of VHS releases of SW and Raiders for example. Lately, Lucas has been especially defiant of the criticism from his fans.
  118. Between this and /. by El+Volio · · Score: 2

    I feel betrayed. Yes, we knew this was coming, just like we knew Rob would be a hypocrite regarding slash 0.4, but between these two things, I've come to realize that two of the things I enjoy most are really just becoming major disappointments.

    Damn, this is making me cynical.

    --

    "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

  119. This is just what the DVD industry needs... by _marshall · · Score: 1
    With all the recent craziness going on in the DVD industry, a move like this can only fuel the fire of the angry lawyers and help ruin the DVD industry we've all come to know and love.

    Not to mention that, Lucasfilm (one of the movie giants in new on-screen technology) is the company behind all of it..

    I hate to say it (as I love Star Wars myself..) but, maybe a boycott of the VHS in order? Or perhaps a few --polite-- emails sent Lucasfilm's way would help convince them otherwise?(doubtful).

    I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens

    --

    Homer: "No beer, No TV make Homer something something";
    Marge: "Go crazy?";
    Homer: "Don't mind if I do!"

  120. I've given up on Lucas and SW in general by netwiz · · Score: 1

    Seriously, with Jedi, George learned that there's a hell of a lot of money to be made targeting the story to kids. Meaning three things: crap story (i.e., no real character development, no remotely adult situations like Leia & Han's romance in Empire), lots of commercialization, and more cheap plastic crap from the likes of Kenner, etc. bent on ripping you off under the guise of "collectibles"

    yah, the text wanders and the grammer's messed up, but I dont' care...

  121. Wake Up by BrianShaver · · Score: 1

    If piracy is the point of not releasing TPM on DVD, George Lucas needs to wake up. 1. VHS tapes are much easier to copy than DVDs 2. The day after TPM was released, there were bootleg copies of the movie all over the internet, he has already failed to stop piracy of the movie. Lucas is not releasing the DVDs so that he can make more money, by waiting until DVD hits mainstream, and more people own DVD Players instead of VHS players, so that more people will purchase the DVDs, even when they already own the VHSs.

  122. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 1

    razzmataz trolled:

    If you don't like the fact that you can't get your very own copy of the latest version of Slash, write your own.

    This is too easy but I'll take your bait and pull the old switcheroo on you. Try this on for size:

    If CmdrTaco doesn't like the fact that he can't get a copy of TPM on DVD, let him film his own version and create his own DVD of that version.


    Do you see how stupid you are?

    I personally don't give a rat's ass about Slash. The code to duplicate this rathole would be trivial. I'm speaking about CmdrTaco's hypocrisy on denigrating people who make demands on him to release Slash, when he turns around and makes demands on Lucas.


    I'll be waiting for the next of your moronic comments.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  123. from the all-over-the-road dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the last months you all have been whining about how you want to boycott the DVD format because you can't view movies on your Linux boxes. Now, you're going to whine because someone is deciding it's not in his business interests to release his products on DVD. So WTF do you want? Guess that's why they call you Slashholes!

  124. Oh Damn! by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Now I won't be able to see Jar-Jar Binks in all his CG Glory! That makes me VERY ANGRY! ARGH! BRUCE SMASH! SMAAASH!

    Oh wait, I don't have a DVD player.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  125. Slightly Offtopic by karnal · · Score: 1

    Actually, I have a copy of Clerks on DVD... I haven't gotten Chasing Amy yet, but hey, if DVD is the only way, DVD it will be... I am glad, however, that the general prices of DVDs are a little more acceptable than laserdiscs.

    --
    Karnal
  126. Petition Lucasfilm! by MrBowman · · Score: 1

    George has always listened to his fans... Let's petition George to please release a DVD edition. Lucasfilm could use some good fortune... Notice how many damn Jar jar dolls are available at K-Mart, marked down 50%?

    --
    Streaming Classic Rock mp3's 24/7 on 9412 - The Rock Station www.listen.to/9412
  127. The forgotten reason: THX-EX by drag-po · · Score: 1

    It was stated by Lucas and Rick McCallum (Episode I Producer) in a spring issue of Starwars Insider that the reason that Episodes IV-VI were not yet released on DVD (and were not going to be in the near future) was that they wanted to release them with the sound in THX-EX format. THX-EX is of course the new sound system developed for Episode I which contains a center rear dialogue speaker. It was first implemented in theatres last spring prior to the release of Episode I. McCallum stated that before the release of any of the Star Wars movies on DVD Lucasfilm would first develop a THX-EX Home-Theater line of amplifiers, and allow for these to enter the market, thereby making the release of Star Wars DVD's in the format usefull.

    It was of course put forward that Lucas was adhering to such a stategy because:

    • he wanted us to experience the movies in their full glory
    • he didn't want to be percieved as opportunistic by releasing different versions of the DVDs

    Ha!

    --
    Its 192000 and I feel fine.
  128. Redundancy department by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    My god...this must be like the 5th article about stupid TPM on DVD. Does anybody really give a damn? I don't...

    Besides that TPM was just eyecandy and a ridiculously hokey plot, DVD hasn't caught on and probably won't because FMDROM (or whatever that Flourescent technology is called) is already feasible.

    Jazilla.org - the Java Mozilla

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  129. obviously... by god_of_the_machine · · Score: 1

    ... he is just trying to make more money (it is his job, after all).

    He knows that people will go out and buy TPM on VHS, and then later he can release the collectors edition and re-sell to the same people.

    It seemed obvious that he would do this... it's the same thing as before: I bought a "THX remastered" special edition box set that was released 6 mo. before the re-edited trilogy. They just want more of our money, and that is his right as a businessman. If you don't like it, don't buy it... it certainly won't kill you!

    --

    -rt-
    ** Evil Canadians are taking over the world. Learn about the conspiracy
  130. Didn't he say that about E.T? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Didn't he say the same thing about releasing E.T. on VHS? It took a while but his "masterpeice" eventually came out on tape.

    (Or do I have my directors mixed up?)

    1. Re:Didn't he say that about E.T? by fReNeTiK · · Score: 1

      Link

      ET was directed by Steven Spielberg...

      --
      I strongly believe that trying to be clever is detrimental to your health. -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Didn't he say that about E.T? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Thanks.

      Is there any reason we should trust George Lucas more than Steven Spielburg?

      It will come out as soon as all the hype is dead.

    3. Re:Didn't he say that about E.T? by fReNeTiK · · Score: 1

      None that I could think of ;). There HAS to be something wrong with a guy who can do Jurassic Park and then go on to Schindlers List...

      BTW (offtopic): The sixth sense just came out in Switzerland, now THAT's what I call a real good movie!

      --
      I strongly believe that trying to be clever is detrimental to your health. -- Linus Torvalds
  131. saved $20 on the DVD, have to spend $2 on 2 CD-Rs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This move fully solidifies my inclination to actively seek the VCD warezed release of the original video tape version, over and above any other format. Too bad, as I would love to own each episode on DVD. Come to think of it, I can't remember any movie after TPM that I didn't see on VCD format...

    --"Swallow Gracefully Skimming Calm Lakes Surface" Lau C Fu

  132. Lucas Is a Purist by gyges · · Score: 1

    Lucas has always been a film purist. He is one of the primary reasons you see the warning on films that are not letter boxed or have been "edited for time and content". He even has a whole company (THX) devoted to certifying the purity of sound in a viewing environment.

    Piracy drives him insane because movies are almost always presented in a degraded manner as anyone who has bought bootleg can attest. He resents that some one is deliberately spoiling the experience he is attempting to create.

    Lucas is distrustful of new video related technology based on his bad experience with Laser disks and has spent the past few years saying the format was not proven or mature enough. Now I think he just wants to wait and take the extra time to produce good DVD, that take advantage of ALL the features DVD can offer to enhance the viewing experience, and not just be satisfied with the enhancement that digital format makes possible .

    I may be naive but I think its about the experience not the money.

  133. My take, and prediction... by kaphka · · Score: 2

    What Lucas expects: Mainstream folks will buy TPM on VHS because they don't care about format. Star Wars geeks will buy it on VHS because they have no other choice. Then, when it finally comes out on DVD, Star Wars geeks will buy it again, because, well, they're Star Wars geeks. (And as a bonus, that DVD will probably be more effectively copy-protected than today's discs.)

    What will happen: Most mainstream folks will still buy TPM on VHS, although probably not quite as many as Lucas expects. Very few Star Wars geeks will buy it, because they're insulted by Lucas' position on DVD. (And for that matter, a lot of them didn't like the movie very much.)

    The video release will bomb. (By that I mean, it will fail to completely shatter all sales records, as a Star Wars movie is expected to do.) Lucas will still make a lot of money off of it in the short term, but the embaressment will severely damage his future prospects.

    Keep in mind, George Lucas is a pretty dense fellow. This is the guy who came up with Jar Jar Binks.

    --

    MSK

  134. Lucas and DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard through the grapevine, that Lucas and Spielberg were big time backers of Divix. When Divix didnt do as well as expected, they lot quite a bit of the money that they invested and also now have a grudge towards dvd.

  135. Don't buy VHS by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    If Lucas doesn't want to release Star Wars on DVD that is too bad. It really doesn't matter how many people refuse to buy it-- Lucas won't be affected. But I would strongly suggest against wasting your money on a crappy VHS version of a movie that wasn't all that good anyway. I would actually buy it if it was coming out on DVD, but if VHS is going to be the only release format, forget it.

  136. Not for a while by Andrey · · Score: 1

    Like I've mentioned in the past, Lucas in a previous interview said that he will not release any SW movies on DVD until all three prequels are out so that that the full 6 episode arc can be enjoyed by the fans. For once, I think it's a right decision - by that time the DVD technology will have matured and of course, people who buy VHS now will want to get DVDs when VHS becomes obsolete.

    --
    -Andrei
  137. how is this so evil? by BenHmm · · Score: 1

    ermmmm, how is this extorting anyone? I mean, you're upset because someone has decided not to sell you something that you wanted to buy - but didn't actually need to - and it's now extortion and a betrayal and utterly sickening.

    how so? it's only a movie - and much as I love the trilogy - not a very good one.

    the day the worse thing that can happen to me is the non-release of a film on dvd is the day I finally reach nirvana.

  138. What ever happened to stolen 70mm TPM film reels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    These could make for a QUALITY DVD transfer by the right pirate film house abroad.

    BTW, is mass piracy would SUPPOSEDLY cause movie houses to quit making movies, how is it that Hong Kong, still a pirate haven, has the largest movie industry 2nd only to Hollywood?

  139. Re:Excuse me by Darchmare · · Score: 2

    That's your reply?

    He gave a valid reason, and this is the best you come up with?

    BTW - What you are askin Taco for, is free. There is nothing resembling extortion here. Source code is NOT a right.

    - Jeff A. Campbell
    - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

    --

    - Jeff
  140. Re:Excuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF is up with you? Must you rip on everyone you respond to? I'm sure I'm next, but...

    Rob - I don't care if you're a code-facist or whatever the zealots insist on, could you please implement a twit filter? Please?

  141. Um, you can get Macrovision eliminator for $15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ever hear of Macrovision? It's an anti-copying feature found on many VHS movies; it works by putting voltage pulses into a part of the signal that VCRs (but not TVs) use to determine the brightness of the picture. The result is that a copy of a Macrovisioned tape will slowly fade from normal brightness to almost black, then back. Also pretty easy to disable, if you know where the AGC circuit is on your VCR.

    I make copies of DISNEY movies (I bought) for my kids to watch which have macrovision up the wazoo. I have to. Kids wear the tapes out fast rewatching them over and over and over and ...

  142. Lucas is the reason all current movies suck. by souless · · Score: 1

    I know that this is a pretty general statement, but I will give a little support. When Lucas went to Fox for the money to do Star Wars (as I am sure everybody has heard) the Head of the studio was Alan Ladd, Jr. Lucas didn't ask for a lot of money to do the picture, just the rights to merchandise it. Previous to SW the most a movie had made off of merchandising was in the 10k range. Ladd, Jr. said something to the effect of knock yourself out. We all know what happened after that. But one of the side effects of that financial success of Lucas's we have only really been seeing in the last decade as movies are no longer sold on things like plot and character development and good story, but they are merely one piece of a vastly bigger product that includes: soundtrack, video rental and sales, fast food tie-ins, toys, etc. Who cares if the movie sucks or does badly now cause it was poorly made and stinks? Not the studios, they'll make it all up with the peripheral products. Look at the recent "Blair Witch Project". These guys are the true scions of all that Lucas has taught. I long for the days when movies were not the giant commercials that they have become and were actually about telling a story and not just to sell some piece of crap at Burger King. It is unfortunate, but there is only one way to make it stop. Don't buy any of it! Don't go see the movies, don't buy the stupid trinkets, don't buy the soundtrack albums. It is the only way...
    On a side note, Lucas can't be concerned about the piracy thing, since before TPM was even out there were pirated Video CDs of it all over the European piracy community (the dutch goverment instigated a huge crackdown in Amsterdam at the request of Luca$ and many people went to jail).
    All TPM showed us was what Lucas was truly concerned about and the fact that he got lucky twenty-three years ago because he can't direct or write worth a damn (he didn't even direct or write the second two!).
    Well, that is the end of my rant. I was so disappointed with the whole way SW turned out, cause I wanted to be a Jedi too...
    BTW Darth Vader is secretly a good guy and Obi Wan is evil. Think about it...the Empire all spoke with British accents and the rebels all spoke with American accents. Except for...think about it.

    1. Re:Lucas is the reason all current movies suck. by TheKing · · Score: 1

      I know that this is a pretty general statement, but I will give a little support.

      Not only general, but also false.

      When Lucas went to Fox for the money to do Star Wars (as I am sure everybody has heard) the Head of the studio was Alan Ladd, Jr. Lucas didn't ask for a lot of money to do the picture, just the rights to merchandise it. Previous to SW the most a movie had made off of merchandising was in the 10k range.

      This is not true. While Star Wars set new standards in this department, it certainly wasn't the first. Remember a certain film series called Planet Of The Apes? 5 films, A TV series, a cartoon series, action figures, lunch boxes, coloring books, etc. etc. etc. So in essence, you could say Charlton Heston and his "damn dirty apes" are the reason movies suck today.

      Ladd, Jr. said something to the effect of knock yourself out. We all know what happened after that. But one of the side effects of that financial success of Lucas's we have only really been seeing in the last decade as movies are no longer sold on things like plot and character development and good story, but they are merely one piece of a vastly bigger product that includes: soundtrack, video rental and sales, fast food tie-ins, toys, etc. Who cares if the movie sucks or does badly now cause it was poorly made and stinks? Not the studios, they'll make it all up with the peripheral products.

      Movies have been like this for decades. Again, Star Wars brought it to new levels, but didn't create it. Critics bombed Gone With The Wind when it was released, but look how many people went and saw that movie. It was a marketing machine before the machine existed.

      Look at the recent "Blair Witch Project". These guys are the true scions of all that Lucas has taught.

      This movie defies all logic. I mean C'mon, forget the fact that it was horrible filming, but I better not get started on that.

      I long for the days when movies were not the giant commercials that they have become and were actually about telling a story and not just to sell some piece of crap at Burger King. It is unfortunate, but there is only one way to make it stop. Don't buy any of it! Don't go see the movies, don't buy the stupid trinkets, and don't buy the soundtrack albums. It is the only way...

      In my opinion, the worst thing in film is product placement. At least Obi-Wan and the gang didn't stop at Taco Bell during TPM. That's what I see as the worst thing in film these days. And you can say TPM was nothing but a marketing ploy, but c'mon, how many people begged Lucas to make it? Of course it's going to be a marketing machine. It has to be. Personally, I liked the film. No way did it compare to the originals, (though it was close to Jedi) but it's unfair to judge it in and of itself. The true judgment of Episode I will come when 2 and 3 are completed. SW in and of itself is a great film. But as the beginning of the Trilogy, it's legendary. In time, TPM will probably come to be better understood and enjoyed after the new trilogy is complete.

      All TPM showed us was what Lucas was truly concerned about and the fact that he got lucky twenty-three years ago because he can't direct or write worth a damn (he didn't even direct or write the second two!).

      So he was lucky with American Graffiti? He happened to write and direct that movie too, and from what I've heard it did pretty well.

      The bottom line is that George Lucas isn't to blame for the decline in quality film today. He only cleared the path that the makers of "Apes" had already done.

    2. Re:Lucas is the reason all current movies suck. by souless · · Score: 1
      Okay, it is true that there was lots of merchandising of movie products before Star Wars, (take the kiddie afternoon movies of the fifties for example with the Lone ranger gear, etc.) but the point was that Lucas was the first one to make it work on such a tremendous scale. Perhaps you have heard of the phrase "nodal point"? When a quantitative change produces a qualitative change? Like when water is slowly raised by one degree at a time until it becomes a gas? This was what Lucas did to film marketing.
      Sure they marketed Planet of the Apes stuff, but, even though the movies were quite popular, I don't remember too many kids playing "post-apocalypse Ape world", wanting to be a gorilla/soldier or the horribly doomed Heston character. Lucas definitely hit on something at the right time, there is no doubt about that.

      As far as the Blair Witch Project, I thought it was complete crap as well, but I meant that the ferocious marketing techniques these guys used are reminiscent of the ones Lucas used on TPM and previous movies.

      And okay, true, American Graffiti was a good flick, but Lucas had not directed or written a movie in twenty years when he did TPM, and it showed, and I don't remember him making billions off of American Graffiti

      Obi-wan and the gang didn't have to stop at Taco Bell because they were their OWN product placement. The whole thing was the equivalent of a Taco Bell Movie!

      TPM will never be as big as SW for a couple of reasons.

      • when Star Wars was released, very, very few people (if any) had VCRs, so there was no watching movies at home. Now people can get any movie they want and watch it over and over again and pick it apart in the privacy of their own home. It is difficult for a film to develop a truly legendary status in this environment. And movies that don't go to VHS are sometimes forgotten.
      • No movie had yet been made with anything even close to the special effects of SW. When TPM came out, the effects were cool and there was more of them, but they really didn't break any new ground. (except the first ever all digital character in a live action film: Jar Jar Binks!) The audiences of today are young and jaded to the special effects.

      I don't think that TPM is going to produce in this current generation of kids the kind of effect it had in mine because of these reasons. It has just become another mass-marketed, simplistic good-guy/bad-guy plot, big special effects film among many.

      Look at the posts, too. When Empire came out, the argument wasn't whether the movie sucked or didn't or whether Lucas was greedy or not, it was whether it was better or worse than Star Wars (but still great) and whether Darth Vader actually was Luke's father or not. Look at how fast the little kids changed their allegiance to all things Pokemon (a half-hour QVC collectors' commercial if I ever saw one).

  143. Very simple solution by squarooticus · · Score: 1

    Do not buy the VHS version. I have not bought a VHS tape since I got my DVD player 1-1/2 years ago, and I will not, no matter how good (or hyped, in the case of TPM) it is. Lucas is just delaying his profit in my case.
    --
    Kyle R. Rose, MIT LCS

    --
    [ home ]
  144. George Lucas/Bill Gates - Same Person? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie wasn't very good to begin with, so I'm not loosing out on much. I don't buy VHS anymore, and I know scores of others that are doing the same. If you buy it on VHS, you're a fool. If he isn't going to put it out on DVD, I don't want it in my collection.

    Also, is it just me, or is George Lucas acting alot like Bill Gates with his I have all the toys so you have to play by my rules attitude. I don't support Gates and I won't support Lucas with that attitude. If they want my money, they have to deliever what I want, how I want, when I want. Period.

  145. Star Trek too? by Sethb · · Score: 2

    Okay, so Star Trek is a little off-topic, but I almost wonder if Paramount isn't doing the same thing with the Star Trek DVD's. I've been buying them slowly, for they're fairly expensive, and they have basically zero extra features! They've got the trailers and scene access, well, to quote Crow T. Robot, whoop-de-shit! I'm betting that Paramount wanted to cash in on the newness of the DVD format and all the geeks that are getting the DVD's, then a year from now, they'll release the 35th anniversary editions or somesuch, complete with commentaries, deleted scenes, making-of featurettes, etc. Will I buy those too? Yup, cuz I'm a fan, and I'll want that stuff, but I don't have to be happy about it. I got a Laserdisc player for free, and I'm having a good time collecting Laserdiscs of movies that aren't available on DVD (or are edited, like Roger Rabbit) they're available fairly cheaply on eBay too. Now what I'd really like, is for Paramount to release big sets of the ST:TNG episodes for DVD, much like Fox is doing with the X-Files Season One box set. As it is, I'm collecting the ST:TNG and Deep Space Nine laserdiscs, slowly but surely, having them on DVD would be a mixed blessing, as I'd then have to sell of my Laserdisc versions!
    ---

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  146. The Matrix works fine in my POS DVD by IMZombie · · Score: 1
    I've heard of problems with the Matrix DVD but have not experienced any of them. I've tried it in my el-cheapo DVD I got on sale at Fry's Electronics ($150 DVD!) and it plays fine. Plays fine on my DVD ROM, my laptop, and two other Toshiba Players. Maybe it was a bad run. I pre-ordered mine and got it right when it was released so I'm pretty sure I got one of the first runs....

    SQ

    1. Re:The Matrix works fine in my POS DVD by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      I did experience a few skips with Blockbuster's DVD of Matrix...

      I'd say they were MAJOR scenes...

      No skips on my personal copy :-)

      First release was basically buggy and it was recalled. But Blockbuster couldn't care less and kept defective CD in stock.
      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Network Administrator

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
  147. what THX is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THX is not an audio-encoding standard. While I'm not sure that's what the poster meant, the replies seem to think it is a sort of "file format" for the audio track on a disc. Rather, it is a certain set of criteria equipment must meet to be certified. THX-approved DVDs just mean that THX gives it a seal of quality that says the disc has a high-quality transfer from its original source.

    -Justin Maurer, Former Slashdot Author

  148. Get Over It... by network51.com · · Score: 0

    The first 3 movies were about money too. That's what Showbusiness is all about. Without the BU$INE$$, there's no SHOW!

    You must not have seen the CG characters! Watto is tight as hell! TPM 4ever!

    --


    A decent Network is finally here.
  149. Re:Matrix DVD by Indomitus · · Score: 2

    You should have returned your disc because I've never seen any problems on any of the Matrix discs I've seen.

    And anyway, the Matrix is far from the first DVD to have special content on it. The only special content problems I've seen is the MST3K-like commentary on Ghostbusters, which only worked sometimes.

  150. Um- That's great, except for copyguard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most DVDs have the same copyguard crap that has been on VHS tapes for years. You can feed it through a stabilizer, just like VHS, but the results are usually not all that good.

  151. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping that would be out on DVD soon, so I could walk past it and buy a quality film, like "Pink noise test and stereo balancing".

  152. Important to remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way back at the dawn of the 80's Spielberg's E.T. the ExtraTerrestrial was a bit hit in the theaters. It took about 10 years for the movie to come out in it's first video release. Besides, if Lucas waits a few years before his DVD release, we can only hope that he uses the time wisely and follows the example of his remastering the original trilogy, episodes 4-6... In other words: I want a TPM special edition, one that has a good story and a removal of anything that looks and sounds anything like a jar jar binks.

    1. Re:Important to remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock Jar Jar dude.

    2. Re:Important to remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I hate Jar Jar as much as the next guy.

      Second, I think remaking the original trilogy was a huge mistake. For me, watching the remade films took away some of the nostalgia of the originals. On some level it seems to be fundamentally wrong, like overpainting the Mona Lisa.

  153. Me is confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if Gouge Lucu$ dosn't want to release TPM on DVD because of quality concerns, is he saying that he believes VHS lives up to quality of his legacy?!?

  154. Slashdot: News for Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Geez, slashdot. Can we go a day without your little adolescent Star Wars updates on the front page?

    Seriously. Three guys hand pick all the damn stories. Why even have a submissions box? You ought to just have a bot that automatically scours the web for new Star Wars gossip and automatically posts it to the front page.

    Anyone else getting sick of the "editorial content" here at Slashdot? Something like wideopen will eventually squash you guys if you don't start doing a little bit better job.

    I've been reading /. for three years. I love Linux and Free Software. Yet I am increasingly saddened the /. is the "face" of Linux, especially with the poor journalism.

    At least I like the discussion area.

    Thanks

    1. Re:Slashdot: News for Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf? You have to be kidding me.

  155. Re:You suck, Lucas by treat · · Score: 1
    You're an idoit and a techno-snob. Strange isn't it how the two seem to go hand-in-hand.

    I posted my observation that pre-recorded audio tapes are not commonly sold or played. Before posting, I asked two co-workers and they agreed with my observation. Nobody here has disagreed with that, not even you.

    Go to Wal-mart and see just how fast a shipment of those $79.00 4-head stereo VCR's vanish from the sales floor.

    That's not even relevant, I was talking about audio cassette tapes.

    Movies released on VHS tapes aren't going to disappear anytime soon, no matter how losers like yourself scream,moan and bitch about it.

    I didn't say anything at all about VHS tapes.

  156. Obviously the quality is too good. by heroine · · Score: 2

    The same thing happened with CDs at one point. They wanted to support 24 bit 192khz sampling. The quality was so good that it would give consumers just a little too much control over what they did with it. So CDs are still 16 bit 44100. George is just a little to control freakish.

    1. Re:Obviously the quality is too good. by adolf · · Score: 1

      Whoever moderated up the above post should be publicly flogged. That said:

      Back in the day, the only readily available digital tape recorder was an old (nowadays) Sony unit that used video tape. The format they chose was 44.1KHz 16-bit stereo linear PCM, because it was convenient. It happened to coincide with the capabilities of the video recorder they built the beast on (head switching, and whatnot), and it didn't sound terrible, on paper or in practice. The Nyquist frequency is 22.05KHz, plenty far above the range of almost any adult's hearing, with dynamic range of 96dB, which is vastly more than is easily discernable above the normal ambient noise of the average household without immediate pain and deafness.

      Some time after that, Sony and Philips came up with a grand idea: make shiney discs with digital audio, sell them for twice as much, and make everyone buy new equipment and music to take advantage of it. Make it in such a way that a plant can be converted from pressing vinyl to stamping CDs relatively cheaply so that it's somewhat convenient for them to produce.

      Sounds good, right? Sure! But they needed temporary medium on which to master the discs; 600 meg hard drives were scarce. Thus, they decided that the easiest way (for them, and the studios) to do what they wanted was to use the aforementioned Sony deck, which was considered the standard (proprietary) format for digital masters for a number of years.

      Besides, even if they did want to, there just wouldn't be room on a CD to put 74 minutes of 24-bit 196KHz audio. The capacity of a CD is limited by the wavelength of the infrared lasers used, the available tracking mechanisms, and size constrants (all of which, again, are based on convenience).

      It'd be nice if CDs sounded better, but it's a damned miracle that the format took off at all, let alone as well as it did. And if it were any less convenient to implement, it probably wouldn't have.

      So, we're left with an imperfect universal format. Which is OK - if perfectionists were always succesful, we'd all live in a perfect world. Thing is, George Lucas has enough money that he doesn't need to care about whether or not he succeeds, which gives him the benefit of being a perfectionistic prick to the grave, who probably just wants to wait until the HDTV mess is sorted out before he does any new digital releases.

  157. Re:You suck, Lucas by C.Lee · · Score: 0

    >I posted my observation that pre-recorded audio tapes are not commonly
    >sold or played. Before posting, I asked two co-workers and they agreed
    >with my observation. Nobody here has disagreed with that, not even you.

    Why bother? Go to the audio section of Wal-mart or K-mart and you'll still see plenty of people buying pre-recorded audio tapes. Your problem is that your posting is just full of hot air.

  158. Re:Lucas and Disney by monstermagnet · · Score: 2

    >60 days only on each DVD Disney animated film. If
    >you're a Disney fan, you've only got a few weeks
    >left to get the first batch... can you say
    >"feeding frenzy"?).

    I don't doubt that Disney has done extensive
    cost/benefit analysis on this one, but let's take
    a step back. What happens when a manufacturer
    generates a scarcity of product (intentionally or not)?

    Piracy. Someone will step in to fill the void; I
    think this approach will actually foster the very
    same DVD piracy that the consortium is so vewy
    vewy scared of, and at both the commercial and
    private level.

  159. DVD Obsolescence and Lucas Films by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For what it is worth, I had seen an interview with Lucas that basically said he'd wait for all 6 movies before releasing it on DVD. He'll likely change his mind (as he does from time to time). It would be off the mark to attribute the decision to greed on Lucas' part, however. The movie would sell (regardless of whether you think it is a good one or not), and the profit margin on DVDs is much higher that VHS tapes (enough so that one can expect to make at least as much money off a DVD release as a VHS release, often more). In either event, however, I suspect part of the incentive of not releasing the movies on DVD is the federally mandated switchover to digital TV standards that is looming, and the fact that the broadcast industry is trying hard to switch the standard away from that which had been decided on. If you want to make a half-way decent looking DVD for digital TV, you'll want to make sure that you have an idea of what the ultimate format is going to be. Additionally, higher capacity and higher resolution DVDs are also on their way. In 6 years time, it's quite likely that current generation DVD will be more or less obsolete (the form factor will be the same, and players will be backwards compatible with current disks, but current DVD formats will certainly not be standard at that time).

  160. Re:This is true.. for NOW. CDR burners were once $ by C.Lee · · Score: 0

    >Your argument is a fleeting one.

    And your argument is a stupid one. It's still going to take one hell of a long time to download the movie, and that's assuming perfect conditions. Throw in the real-world status of the typical cable modem connection to the internet and you still got something that not really workable in the real world.

  161. it's Fox and Lucasfilm - conspiracy? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    SW fans are gonna often be techies with DVD players
    and Linux.
    /. as The Voice of Linux hasn't been Fox / DVD Consortium / "old" industry favourites.
    The decision making process of these places isn't always as short sighted and rational as you might think.
    Don't forget there's the future to fight for in every buying decision you make.
    Politics is life. Vote with your self.
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  162. Re:This is true.. for NOW. CDR burners were once $ by Kelson · · Score: 1

    And people are still buying CDs from Wherehouse and Tower and CD-Now and such.

  163. Re:What ever happened to stolen 70mm TPM film reel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm, sorry but i belive that is india.. research your sources next time

  164. Simple solution by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

    If Lucas is really afraid of pirating, then let's hit him where it'll hurt most: by showing that pirating VHS casettes is MUCH easier than pirating DVD's.

    If I'm gonna buy the movie when it comes out, it's gonna be to make *gasp* illegal copies. I'll pass them out to my friends at the price of a blank VHS tape -- which is what? $2.00? Hell, I'll sell them on the 'net. I'll make it known that because of Lucas's poor decision, they're gonna lose money from more VHS pirates then they would have ever from DVD pirates (who are at the moment, virtually inexistant..)

    The cost to pirate DVD's runs into the thousands -- a DVD copier, a powerful computer, blank DVD's. All I need to pirate a VHS tape is an extra VCR. If anything, Lucas should release the movie on DVD only.

    Oh well. They'll learn.

  165. I'll go one further by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll definately never buy another VHS movie again, no matter who makes it. However, I will never go to a theatre again to see another Lucas movie, nor will I ever buy any of his games or merchandise, until he starts releasing DVDs.

  166. It's because of the Standards by Jasa · · Score: 1

    I can rember hearing some interview with Lucas asking when Star Wars would be released in on DVD and he said not until the the standards of what Video/Audio formats to use for DVD are clear.
    He wanted to make sure that everyone who owns a DVD could watch Star Wars and at this time not all DVD players suported all formats.

    --
    -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
  167. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    Boy, that really hurt. You know, I could stoop down to your level, and start calling you a fuckhead or a jackass. But I won't do that. No, I am going to thank you for what is going to be my new rad-bad-ass sig:

    I personally don't give a rat's ass about Slash. The code to duplicate this rathole would be trivial.
    -- mochaone, commenting on Slash, the code which runs slashdot.

    Thank you very much.

    Now, for more of my "moronic" comments...

    You are comparing apples and oranges. CmdrTaco has made a good faith gesture to make slash (the code that makes this "rathole" so special) available to the public. Secondly, do you think he has alot of freetime to go and make a new version available? Have you ever done software engineering? Have you ever had to do a release?

    So, I'll reverse the switcheroo, and challenge you: How's 'bout you come up with the code to duplicate this so-called "rathole" ?

    Game, Set, Match.

    --
    Ungh
  168. TPM on DVD by johnnyboy30 · · Score: 1

    I am not shocked at this move on Lucas' part, but I am disappointed. I have also been a VERY loyal fan including getting my kids involved with this thing that was so great for me as a kid. I think we should all go out of our way to boycott the VHS sales!! GET REAL - Most of his fans will PAY for the DVD anthology when it is released...we won't copy it!

  169. DVD maybe in like 4 years by jakeylow · · Score: 1

    I was at the Star Wars panel at the San Diego comic con. One of the head Lucas guys was there (I think he was the head Lucas guy) He stated that DVD would not even be considered as a format until after the next film was released and then probably only when Lucas felt he had produced a complete set suitable for release (all films). If you track someone else down who was there they should be able to confirm. This isn't rumor it is fact (he wouldn't have annouced it to a couple thousand people include many important print media people if it wasn't the 100% truth, and he had to repeat it several time because people were upset). This was mid summer though so plans could have changed since then but I doubt it. Considering how picky Lucas seems to be about this stuff don't hold your breath.

  170. I'll be happy to buy it on Laser Disc by anthonyjhicks.com · · Score: 1

    I've had Laser Disc for over 6 years now.. very happy with the format. I don't have a DVD player yet, but I'll get one soon - only because the movies on DVD are slightly cheaper than LD. Funny, I also have that collectors pack, with all the Original movies and the book in the Black Case. Cost me heaps!

  171. This certainly ain't what Brian Boitano would do by outlier · · Score: 1

    I'm facing the opposite dilemma, the South Park movie is available on DVD for a list price of $30, but on VHS for $103. They apparently do this so that people will rent the tape rather than buy it. But the herds of holiday consumers who bought DVD players can enjoy Cartman, Stan and the gang now.

    Damn, if I can't afford a good DVD player (and I won't buy a lame one), how the heck am I going to justify dropping $100 on a tape... Lord, why do you mock me so...

  172. Re:Some things to consider: (offtopic) by gwalla · · Score: 1

    Good luck on that Buckaroo Banzai DVD. It's been out of print on VHS since forever (thank God my dad has a copy I can watch!). However, if they do release it on DVD, I hope it has the deleted director's cut scenes.

    Speaking of director's cuts, is the Army of Darkness 2 disc set still for sale anywhere?
    ---

    --
    Oper on the Nightstar
  173. 4$$#0L3 by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

    seems to me Lucus is the biggest in the world. he wants SW fans to get a life though we pay his bills.

  174. AC3 / THX, apples / oranges by gwalla · · Score: 1

    IIRC, THX isn't a media format, it's a group that checks the acoustics of theaters for things like sound bleed and reverberation, and approves ones that meet their minimum requirements. That's why you sometimes see both "THX" and "Dolby Digital" trailers before the same movie.
    ---

    --
    Oper on the Nightstar
  175. Too little, too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was impressed with the re-release of SW, ROTJ, and ESB.. But not wanting a crappy VHS copy (I have one player - for the kids to watch Blue's Clues on) I waited for DVD.. But it's not out, and the films *are* kind of dated now.. So I don't think I'd bother buying DVD if it did come out.

    Lucas is going to make the same mistake with TPM.

    There's a simple lesson: Price it too cheap to make pirating worthwhile, and you'll sell so many copies you won't know what to do.

  176. AC3/Dolby Digital vs. THX by DrSbaitso · · Score: 1

    Actually, i've done a fair amount of reading on this in the past, and i seem to recall the reason lucas wouldn't convert the original movies to DVD was because of the fact they used a different surround sound standard (AC3/Dolby Digital) instead of his preferred (and ILM-owned, I believe) THX surround standard. I remember how they used to have receivers at Circuit City that would decode THX but now it's all DD so this seems like a dumb reason. But, Lucas can afford to not make as much money for an ideal (sorta like Carmack in that way, i guess :).

    --
    beware the jabberwock, my son! the jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
    1. Re:AC3/Dolby Digital vs. THX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, THX is a standard for the conditions the sound is created in and what creates it (speakers, theater enviroment). AC3/DD and DTS (the other competing format) is the format the sound is stored in. To put into computer terms: THX = Cat 5 cable AC3/DD, DTS = TCP/IP, IPX/SPX

    2. Re:AC3/Dolby Digital vs. THX by THX113895 · · Score: 1

      Thank you i was tired of hearing people say that THX is a sound format such as DTS. Much appreciated.

  177. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 1

    hey, it's my little buddy razzmatazz. I will cut to the chase and eschew the tired holier-than-thou cliche that you so skillfully use.

    Rob Malda in an earlier article (the useless interview with his partner) made some disparaging remarks about his "customers" who have made demands on him by repeatedly requesting that Rob release the latest and greatest Slash code. Now mind you, Rob Malda has previously released code and has made a firm committment to continue releasing his code. Rob Malda, by virtue of his words and actions, has indicated that he is a firm proponent of Open Source initiatives.

    Rob Malda, in posting this article, has attempted to criticize Lucas for not releasing The Phantom Menace on DVD. Mind you, Lucas has never made a committment to releasing TPM on DVD. In fact, Lucas is reported to have concerns about the DVD platform and has made plans to release his Star Wars series as one complete set when all six movies have been made and released.

    Rob Malda has attributed his lack of committment to releasing the Code to Slash to it not being his primary concern...his primary concern being the day to day rigors of supporting the website. This of course flies in the face of hundreds of other Open Source endeavors that are much bigger than Slashdot, manned by individuals with full-time jobs, yet these projects seem able to release code often. Robs excuse seems weak at best.

    Rob's insistence that Lucas owes him something by virtue of the fact that he has been a customer of Lucas's previous works, in spite of the fact that Lucas has never promised to release a DVD of TPM, is highly hypocritical when contraposed against his inability to fullfill his own obligations, made willingly by Rob himsself, to his own customers.


    You can have fun with your newfound signature. I am more than happy to have my opinions spread by you. At least I know my time spent debating you hasn't been fully wasted.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  178. Re:Excuse me by kupolu · · Score: 1

    Just wondering... if you hate slash so much... do you you come on here and bitch about something you have no control over? And also your comparing two entirely different things... A Movie being released on DVD and source code for a website...

    --
    -- We should kill all the intolerant people in the world.
  179. $$$ by Zaphod+B. · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm...screw your fans you will not.

  180. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 1

    Actually, what I'm doing is pointing out what a hypocritical bastard Rob Malda is. Nothing more. Nothing less. I have no interest in TPM or Rob's code. I just can't stand hypocrites and will jump and yell to point them out, regardless of whose house I'm in.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  181. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    Rob Malda in an earlier article (the useless interview with his partner) made some disparaging
    remarks about his "customers" who have made demands on him by repeatedly requesting that Rob
    release the latest and greatest Slash code. Now mind you, Rob Malda has previously released code
    and has made a firm committment to continue releasing his code. Rob Malda, by virtue of his words and actions, has indicated that he is a firm proponent of Open Source initiatives.


    We aren't customers. We haven't purchased anything from him. He provides a free forum for us to have wonderful little discussions like this, but I digress...

    If people constantly harrassed you about code you wrote, constantly asking for the latest version, you would be annoyed too.

    Rob Malda has attributed his lack of committment to releasing the Code to Slash to it not being his
    primary concern...his primary concern being the day to day rigors of supporting the website. This of course flies in the face of hundreds of other Open Source endeavors that are much bigger than
    Slashdot, manned by individuals with full-time jobs, yet these projects seem able to release code
    often. Robs excuse seems weak at best.


    His primary concern is maintaining this site. If he can package up Slash in a tarball, all the better. If he can put up a public CVS server, all the better. Though, the work to put up a CVS server for public use is quite a bit. The work to secure it is even more...

    Lucas on the other hand has a small legion of people who could put TPM on a DVD at the snap of his fingers. Given that Malda probably didn't know that Lucas was waiting until he could put all six movies on DVD, I can't fault his attitude. It certainly doesn't smack of hypocracy.

    And I'm happy to know that you feel your time hasn't been wasted.

    --
    Ungh
  182. Re:what THX ***REALLY*** is... by Animixer · · Score: 1
    "THX" stands for the Tom Holmann Crossover. (name spelling may be slightly off)

    Note: I have never found even the slightest mention of Tom's name on Lucasfilm's THX.com. Lots of thanks he gets.

    Tom developed the Crossover as a method for converting movie theaters over to a system for reproducing sound, which had to adhere to specific standards. This was done to ensure that the recorded audio on a movie soundtrack would sound reasonably the same (to a degree of accuracy) from theatre to theatre. This may not sound like such a big deal now, but back in the 70's and before anything was free game. The vast majority were using monophonic reproduction, with the most emphasis being on cheaply reproducing midrange (human voice range) frequencies. Tom Hollman (and others, I can't remember exactly who) realized this extreme deficiency of theatre sound systems when they tried to incorporate advanced noise-reduction techniques into the recording process of movie sountracks, only to find out nobody noticed the difference when played back in the theatres!

    Anyways, after this Tom laid down the specs for properly reproducing sound in theatres, and designed the THX for this purpose. It is my belief that he also designed audio reproduction systems as well as set standards for them.

    "thx.com" gives all the credit to.....that's right. George Lucas. What a genius. =P

    (Guess this blows my chances at working for ILM) hehe =)

    I just feel that credit should be given where credit is due. And Lucasfilm isn't giving it.

    There was a really great documentary about this (they even dragged out Julian Hirsch and Henry Kloss!) about a year ago on cable. Wish I could remember the name of the program, it was quite good.

    --
    man tunefs | grep fish
  183. Call 'em by scjody · · Score: 1

    Their website doesn't give any email addresses (as far as I can see), but there's always their 1-800 number, shown on just about all Star Wars merchandise: 1-800-TRUE-FAN. I know I'll be calling them tomorrow morning to ask why they're doing this!

    --

    "...Is this world not a call I can screen out" --

  184. Are you a moderator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't figure out how comments like yours get rated (3).

  185. Lucas was planning on DIVX instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lucas was a strong supporter of DIVX. He is probably still mad that that's gone now.

    or do people forget so quickly?

  186. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 2

    We aren't customers. We haven't purchased anything from him

    I enlcosed the word customer in quotes precisely because I was aware of the semantic hoops that we can go through in debating the definiton of customer. Regardless of whether we pay money to Rob Malda directly, Malda does benefit financially by our visits to his site. I'm sure that those ad dollars would dry up if we all stopped using his nice forum. The traditional models of patronage are changing quickly but that discussion is best left for another day.

    If people constantly harrassed you about code you wrote, constantly asking for the latest version, you would be annoyed too.

    Interesting choice of words. I am not privy to the emails sent Rob's way but just as you can sympathize with Rob getting annoyed, I can sympathize with people getting annoyed at Rob not living up to his promises. No matter what Rob attributes his delays to, he has not fulfilled his promises.

    His primary concern is maintaining this site. If he can package up Slash in a tarball, all the better. If he can put up a public CVS server, all the better. Though, the work to put up a CVS server for public use is quite a bit. The work to secure it is even more..

    No one has asked Rob to go to all the trouble of setting up a CVS server. Rob is the one who mentioned that he is looking into that aspect. What does it take to tar up the directories to the code, the data model for his database and dump that on a FTP server? I don't think it would take much. He doesn't have to gussy it up. There are some smart people out there who can figure out what his code is doing. He needs to stop underestimating people or hiding behind excuses.

    Lucas on the other hand has a small legion of people who could put TPM on a DVD at the snap of his fingers. Given that Malda probably didn't know that Lucas was waiting until he could put all six movies on DVD, I can't fault his attitude. It certainly doesn't smack of hypocracy.

    Ok, you allude to Rob being too busy to release the code. I don't buy it. Linus and everyone else working on Linux are working full time jobs and still hacking on Linux and releasing the code. If they need help, why don't they ask for it? Why don't they utilize the Open Source community that they are so quick to laud? You also refer to the fact that Lucas can whip out DVD's without problem. Of course he can. He doesn't want to, however, and has never promised to do so. He can do with his property as he pleases and as long as he doesn't lie to his fans and contradict himself, I cannot complain about his actions.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  187. Here's what happened: by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    The people that stole them (they also ruined a print in the process, apparently) gave themselves up to police and surrendered the film.

    here's the link.

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  188. star wars DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard Lucas is staying away from a DVD release for the Star Wars movies because he wants to release them in a 6 movie set when they're done. I can't say I agree with that (after all, who would buy the packaged set if they had some nice bonuses, as well as the original DVD release? We did it with Special Edition and the previous releases).

  189. Re:already bootlegged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the fact that this movie was on some FTP severs 2 days atfer being released nothing to do with this...

    The fact that some idiot decided that it would be a "good idea"TM to make a WINODZE application to strip away the encryption on DVDS making high quality bootlegs available has nothing to do with this..

    The fact that music piracy is rampant with mp3s has nothing to do with this...(I have nothing against the mp3 format)

    I think that its regretable that its not on DVD. I also think many slashdotters should relize more than the average shmuck that data is valuable and should be paid for. Many do but apparently many don't either.



    THINK!


  190. What Difference? by Chasuk · · Score: 1

    I don't want this post to be interpreted as a troll or flamebait, but I do have to ask the following question:

    What difference does it make when TPM is released on DVD? If the movie were absolutely the best film in the history of cinema (and this would be arguable, to say the least), it will still be just as good in two years. Why is this story any more newsworthy than "Party of Five Not Aired in Poland?" Not all geeks are enamored of Star Wars - count this geek/SF fan as a hardcore Star Wars hater - and, even if we were, I don't see that this non-event merits any more than two lines on the back page of a Star Wars fanzine.

  191. Why would 'fans' want pirated VHS instead of DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if these 'diehard fans' who 'want better' copied a DVD to S-VHS, there would probably be some loss of quality .. it would be better for them just to buy the factory DVD. Many DVDs feature extras - theatrical trailers, subtitles, foreign language soundtracks, biographies, "the making of FOO" documentaries, special effects/animation illustrations, bios, etc. These are difficult at best to copy onto VHS; another incentive for 'diehard fans' to buy instead of to pirate.

  192. Re:This is true.. for NOW. CDR burners were once $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And your argument is a stupid one. It's still going to take one hell of a long time to download the movie, and that's assuming perfect conditions. Throw in the real-world status of the typical cable modem connection to the internet and you still got something that not really workable in the real world.

    "640K ought to be enough for anyone."

    My my my, what would engineers in the early 80s using cutting edge tech 300bps modems have said if the boss walked in and said, "Guys, we gotta design a modem that will do 33.6kbps over standard POTS lines, and find a way to get at least 512mbps over the cable TV line. They'd have said you're fucking crazy and to come back when you're not on a coke buzz.

    I guess some people will always think that the present is as good as it'll ever be. Some people are really fucking stupid.

  193. So what? by ErikZ · · Score: 1


    I mean, it wasn't that good of a movie. I've had no urge to see it again in ANY format. If you have DVD money burning a hole in your pocket how about
    'Thin Red Line'
    'Iron Giant' (so good it even surprised me)
    'Stargate'

    Ok, I might get a copy of the light saber battle scene for my computer.

    Later
    Erik Z

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  194. my heart bleeds for you and your big problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *vomit*

  195. It was a good movie! by LafinJack · · Score: 1

    First off, I liked the movie, and I would like to let out a rant that has been festering for a while (like since the movie came out).

    Have you ever watched the first Star Wars movie with the same 'discerning' eye you've turned towards Episode One? If you did, you would notice bad acting (Harrison Ford being the only half-decent actor at the time) annoying characters, and all the stuff you hated from Episode One.

    In all the time we were waiting for Episode One to come out, I only saw one actual commercial/ad for the movie that wasn't pushing another product. Pepsi, TriCon (Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and KFC) and all the other people using Star Wars as a crutch in their advertising.

    So, kwitcherbitchin, and enjoy the frickin movie!

    The one and (thankfully) only,

    LafinJack

    --
    we are building a religion
    a limited edition
    we are now accepting callers
    for these pendant key chains
    1. Re:It was a good movie! by Reid · · Score: 1

      You raise a good point. I admit that I haven't seen the originals in years. (I did catch a few minutes of Star Wars on TV the other day.) I was just a tiny tot when the originals came out, so they were better for me at the time, and there's probably some sentimentality at work. This may not be the answer you were expecting, but I thought the original three were over-rated, too. They aren't exactly thought-provoking science fiction. But there's no question in my mind that the new one is worse in terms of story and characters than the originals.

      I would have enjoyed the frickin movie more if it wasn't hyped to death, it hadn't taken years to create, and had such big shoes to fill! It was an utter disappointment, with about the only saving grace being some interesting special effects. You'd think with all the time and money spent on the movie, a good science fiction story would come out.... Ah well, that wasn't the goal, apparently.

  196. Re:[OT]What's the holdup with Back to the Future D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually there was an article at www.cinescape.com a week or so ago about the possibility of another Back to the Future....

  197. Why don't YOU think? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    You actually want us to believe that a few Windows users copying DVDs (blanks of which cost $20!) are what the piracy scene is? How clueless can you possibly be? Here's a free one for you: the real pirates that the movie and music industry are truly scared of live in China and have warehouses full of high-tech equipment. They're able to copy thousands of discs per day, not one or two like the average home PC user might be able to crank out.

    THINK!

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  198. Lucas wont see my $19.95 for a long while then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tough shit for George "I need more money" Lucas. I prolly would have bought "The Phantom Marketing Gimmick" on DVD just to watch the pretty scenes on one PC while I work on the other, but I am NOT paying for a VHS tape that will be almost shot after I watch it ten times. George Lucas is a greedy bastard, and after seeing him do this, I will have a hard time convincing myself to see Episode 2... (not that I won't be there day one... but I will prolly be like 1/2 way back in the presale ticketline this time around...)

  199. Re: yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it really cost $100million and take 100 people to make a dvd menu?

    Most menus are so simple that tehy can be done in 1 day. Gee, Lucas, hire ILM to do the 3d menus , pay em $2m, im sure you can afford it.

    If Lucas was smart , they would have been making the menus/content+extras while the main film would be being made, not as an after thought.

    Its obvious to lucas, DVDs are a 2% market.

  200. Laser Disc? by Slayback · · Score: 1

    Maybe he'll release on Laser Disc? I dunno, but I'd probably buy it even though I haven't bought one in years. I love the original trilogy on laser. Maybe someone knows if he will or not.

  201. I like the original better, still waiting... by Etam · · Score: 1

    Patiently... So far many good movies aren't being released. Indiana Jones, Starwars, etc. No matter how long they waited, I'll get them when they come.

    --

    - Etam

  202. Re: then buy the HK pirate copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are so desperate, byu the HK pirate copies

    Lucas is FUELING the pirate scene, he alone isprobly responsible for the biggest earner for pirates.

    By 2005, there probably will be 10 million pirate copies out there than the official one wont even sell.

  203. TPM sucked compared to trilogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TPM was the WORST SW movie so far. WHile i would HAPPILY pay $$$ for the trilogy i would not spent a cent for TPM. SO lucas can shove it up his a***s.

  204. But the Quality would still suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VCDs arent nearly as good quality as DVD, plus you have to switch them, blabblahblah,

  205. I can't enjoy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hated it. I never liked the original movies much either, but TPM took badness to new levels. George Lucas hadn't directed in 20 years, and he's only gotten worse.

  206. Swift turnaround... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    from the time people called for a boycott of DIVX and Circuit City, rejoice it's dead and now the DVD consortium tries on some brass knuckles. Video CDs (or is it CD Video, whatever was also called CD-i movie) never was as good as VHS, presently the minimum video standard.

    A boycott really isn't all that effective unless there is a reasonable alternative. I've gotten used to the quality, features and convenience of DVD. I have an 26 episode set of four dual layer DVDs in which the fancy packaging is about as large as a VHS cassette.

    There really isn't a partially viable alternative to the DVD format anymore, DIVX is dead (which should not resurrect as the standard should NOT be US centric), everyone's abandoned the LaserDisc which didn't take off much in the US, was quickly abandoned by the users and companies in favor of DVD.

    I already have a DVD player, and have a small collection of discs. I still have more LDs than DVDs but that will probably be reversed with in a year. It appears the mastering work gets more attention on DVD now than many LDs recieved, and usually the quality of the video is limited by the quality of the master work.

    The Star Wars trilogy looks AWESOME on laserdisc, even version just before the 'Special Edition'. Lucasfilm had a standard called 'THX Laserdisc' which did very well in keeping the standards high. Several DVDs have THX certification, but I have yet to see a set of standards developed for DVD in mind.


    Boy, this post wandered!

  207. Just rent it 'til DVD arrives & stick it 2 d'MAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No DVD. No purchase. It's pretty simple. I'll rent it when I get the itch to see it again, until I gets me DVD.

  208. Re:He said this is in an interview a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats bullshit, why release it on VHS?

    if that story of an excuise is real, he wouldnt even release a copy on VHS

  209. To Late by DoctorWho813 · · Score: 1

    You know I am really getting sick of Lucas and his Anti-DVD stance. There are 2 trilogies I would kill for on DVD the Indiana Jones movies and the Star Wars movies. As far as the piracy issue well there isn't one for to simple facts. One is that he will make so much money from the DVDs that realistically the little piracy of a DVD that will occur (given how easy it is to copy DVDs...NOT) won't phase him. Second most of the computer literate world has had TPM on they're hardisks since the day it came out.

  210. THANK GOD Star Wars TPM IS THE WORST!!! by Wolfpack+Commander · · Score: 1

    Star Wars TPM is not going to be out on DVD??? THANK GOD!!! This movie was one of the worst movies of 1999, the worst Star Wars movie, and just plain sucks! I hope it is never released on DVD!!

  211. Lucas is long past his prime and has no right by Feoh · · Score: 1

    To be dictating terms and strutting around like an over-stuffed over-hyped under-powered Messiah - god's gift to media-kind.

    Get his surround technology and associated extremely expensive theatre equipment - theatres may do this and that and may not blah blah blah.

    Frankly I think it's getting kinda old - I almost feel like his 15 minutes are maybe coming to a close.

  212. No Phantom Menace DVD...old news? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

    I seem to recall hearing months ago that Lucas had no plans to release Phantom Menace or, indeed, any of the Star Wars films on DVD yet. He planned, so sources said, to wait several years until the rest of the First Trilogy was in the can, then sell the set as sort of a Star Wars Ultimate Collector's Edition thing.

    Has any of this changed? The only thing I saw that might have portended a change--that website crowing that Phantom Menace was going to be released on DVD--turned out to be a red herring.

    Frankly, Lucas has always been a bit of an oddball about things like this...going back and CGIing and reshooting the original trilogy just because he wanted to, for instance. I'm not at all surprised by this. Saddened a bit, but not surprised.

    I will be surprised if Lucas changes his mind any time soon. Despite what all the people have been saying about him, I don't think Lucas does what he does out of greed or commercialism. For him to turn around and release the films in time for Christmas of this year because they'll sell more copies just doesn't strike me as likely.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:No Phantom Menace DVD...old news? by DeekGeek · · Score: 1
      I can corroborate this (for what that's worth).

      Lucas and Spielberg both have said that they are "waiting for the format to mature" (whatever that means) before they release their movies on DVD.

      I seem to remember that the first Spielberg movie on DVD was Twister, and that Spielberg had a cow when Warner Bros. released it. He's since released a few more, including Private Ryan, but where are Schindler's List and the Indiana Jones series? Exactly.

      Lucas has done the same thing, releasing some of his "smaller" films on DVD but holding the big ones up his sleeve.

      Personally, I think this makes since, because I think a lot of these guys got burned by the whole LaserDisc thing when it flopped, and are waiting to see if DVD is going to stick around for the long haul.

      --

      How can the eyes be the Windows of the soul when they never blue screen?

  213. no dvd for me by arielb · · Score: 1

    I have to admit that the main reason why I don't have a DVD player is because unless the star wars trilogy is on it there's really no point. So I guess I'll have to wait until all the movies come out or play any rented dvds on my PC

    --
    ---
  214. re-read your article before you post please!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit man, re-read your post before you submit, I'm no Englishmen or American but your English really sucks beyond all reason.

  215. STAR WARS is BORING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STAR WARS is BORING

  216. The horror of lucas and his 6movie "special ed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember how Lucas made episodes 4-6 "better" with the special editions; Greedo shot first. Or how EP1 made the force "better" by showing it to be a manifestation of a physical condition. By the time I can buy Empire on DVD it will feature a cast of 3foot jar-jar midgets and the force will be a spray you can buy in a can. I can't even buy an original or cleaned up version of Empire anymore because he views them as "inferior" to his true and now just realised vision. I hates the nasty old lucases... Dameon Russell

  217. copyguard/macrovision disablers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Copyguard/Macrovision is not really an issue, as many hacks for disabling region protection also turn the macrovision off. Turning the signal off before its added not only give a better picture than the external boxes that can remove a previously inserted signal, but better than the picture with one in place.

    And thank goodness they do; not because I want to copy them, but simply because macrovision causes the very top of the picture to pinch inwards on my TV.

    iain the lazy non-account owner.

    1. Re:copyguard/macrovision disablers by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      Also, Macrovision apparently screws some projectors up as well. Anyway, I got my Pioneer 717 with region coding and macrovision disabled from Techtronics.

  218. Remember, the consumer controls the industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The simple thing to do is if you have a DVD player and a VCR , DONT BUY THE MOVIE on VHS!!! They will soon change their tune when they realise they are losing out on money. So spread the word to every one you know who was DVD, DO NOT BUY THE PHANTOM MENACE ON VHS!!!!!!! 'WE will prevail'!!!!

  219. DVD hasn't caught on???? by sydj · · Score: 1

    When every new VHS movie it seems has a DVD release as well?

    When major film companies are releasing big chunks of their back catalogue?

    What more do you want? Distributors giving you free DVD's to persuade you about the format?

    Oh, and the argument that something is not going to catch on because there's "something better round the corner" is almost always hokum.

  220. Worldwide Release (Not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They shout about it being a worldwide release, but it excludes France.

    Sorry George, that means it isn't the world's first simultaneous release.

    Personally I didn't bother to see it at the cinema as I was waiting for the DVD. Now it appears it is coming out on VHS and not to DVD for quite some time.

    So sorry George, you won't be getting any of my money 'for the forseeable future'.

  221. No VHS here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I was really anxious to see the movie last year because I remember watching the old episodes as a kid. Then I got a pirated VCD...

    I haven't bothered to go see it on the big screen. (for the same reasons I hated episodes of Star Trek with kids in them [esp. Young Crusher]) It was simply too adorable to bear.

    BTW: Where do the bottomless ventilation shafts always come from...?

    I don't think the VHS tape going to be that better a quality than the VCD and if I REALLY want to see the movie again, I'd rather watch that one (and instantly skip the adorable kiddie scenes).

  222. what about people who don�t own a vhs player ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats really odd. i do not own a vhs-player, but i orderer a dvd-drive last week. i am a SW fan, but that really pisses me off. lucas is an idiot, all the money he looses by not publishing it on dvd...bastard

  223. I'd rather buy a taiwanese DVD... by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    Well, we can always count on our taiwanese friends for a DVD transfer; in the end, its no longer Mr. Big who decides stubbornly on it. I'd rather buy a taiwanese DVD; even if is just a simple "analog reel film to DVD transfer" it will certainly worth more than an overpriced VHS that will look plain ugly and will self-destruct in less time than you may think. Keep the stubborn Mr. Big; it won't matter. After all; we may now produce our own DVDs, right? No need to pay special royalties anymore. It was their fault in the first place if they loose sales for this decision.

    Now everyone in the movie industry has to decide: They may take opportunity of the techologies that are available and make profit for it; or they may go retro and be against it, staying in the past. Who will win? Us. In the end; its ourselves and our demand. Take advantage of new techologies or swim against the river flow; you decide...

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  224. Copyright: a right without responsibilty by listen · · Score: 1

    I see this as abuse of copyright.

    Lucas has been granted a monopoly over this work, with the aim of promoting the creation of other works of a creative nature. He is now abusing that monopoly, by trying to get people to buy the VHS and DVD. If this was a monopoly he had created himself, rather than created by the idiocy of copyright, he would surely be brought up on antitrust charges.

    Copyright is a very strange thing. It is granted to give people "protection", yet it is almost always used as an extortion device. It is a right granted without responsiblity. This is unlike most other other rights we have in our societies:

    • Freedom : revoked if you break criminal law
    • Free speech: revoked if you slander, libel, or attempt to induce a disruption of the peace
    • etc
  225. Looking Back is.... by Loopback · · Score: 1

    ..the first sign of decay...

    Seriously, I think that old-timers like Lucas had their fun and cranked out some memorable films, but how about the unknown guy(s) in a garage with an avid editing system and some 3D graphics talent? Who knows, the next major film could be put out for free by some committed film/art students for all we know.

    Don't get me wrong, I LIKED Star Wars and all, (I have a die-cast Millenium Falcon on my computer as I speak..original from 1979) but comon...DVD, VHS...are you kidding? The whole damn thing is getting pretty TIRED..

    I used to be interested, but now I'm just looking for the next unknowns to put out a true net-distributed hit. You may roll your eyes and invoke the curse of "no bandwidth, idiot" but that can change radically in a few years..

    Sorry, I have this annoying habit of looking towards the future...

    LoopBack

    http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dungeon/547 6

  226. Re:what about people who don�t own a DVD player? by chrischow · · Score: 1

    and what about people who don't own an LD player? blah blah

  227. Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By allowing this movie to fail to gross the large sums of cash it could by being released on DVD, the public can make an example out of George Lucas. He'll look like a fool, and that would be nice.

  228. Rob's feelings are hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see... Rob & Co. sell /. for a tidy retirement sum, joining the ranks of other free software generated multimillionairs.

    Now, instead of using his clout to beg the industry for a new Palm Pilot (or whatever gadget he's lusting for these days), Rob uses his wealthy, spoiled rich-kid arrogance to whine because, in his perspective, VHS is passe.

    Ya know something, Rob... some of your readership still can't afford DVD hardware, let alone the disks to go in them for every new movie that comes out.

    You did some sick shit before you got absorbed by corporate greed, but this pretty much tops the cake -- a personal, petty whine about Lucasfilms not being 'rich enough to run with you'. Hey, Rob. Fuck off.

  229. Re:Excuse me by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    What promises that Rob has made are you refering to?

    --
    Ungh
  230. Re:This is true.. for NOW. CDR burners were once $ by C.Lee · · Score: 0

    > My my my, what would engineers in the early 80s using cutting edge
    >tech 300bps modems have said if the boss walked in and said, "Guys, we
    >gotta design a modem that will do 33.6kbps over standard POTS lines,
    >and find a way to get at least 512mbps over the cable TV line. They'd
    >have said you're fucking crazy and to come back when you're not on a
    >coke buzz.

    >I guess some people will always think that the present is as good as
    >it'll ever be. Some people are really fucking stupid.

    And you're one of them. Just how many of those people who bought those 33.6kbps modems actually got a 33.6kbps transfer rate when they got the modem home and connected it to their home POTS lines intested of some rigged phone line setup by some benchmarking lab? In fact didn't 3con,er 3Com/USR lose a lawsuit over this very issue concerning their 56k modems and their advertising of them?

  231. Is it a plot to make more money? by bjb · · Score: 2
    Here are two theories, pick on them if you will..

    Theory #1 comes from my housemate who claims that Lucasfilm hasn't released any DVDs because they own a particular movie production company that isn't licensed to produce DVDs. Sorry for the ambiguous statement, but the general idea is that they won't produce DVDs because of some corporate license or dreamworks had no hand in the DVD technology. Very speculative statement, but I'd like to hear otherwise if you get what I am trying to convey.

    Theory #2 was thought up by myself during one of these discussions with my housemate, and it's a bit more 'conspiracy theory'. Basically, I think it is possible that Lucasfilm is going to sell everything on VHS until the market is saturated. Take for example the fact that they released all sorts of versions of the original Star Wars episodes in the older unmodified versions. After they made a pretty penny there, they re-released the whole shebang with the new computer enhanced versions. So, everyone who is a big Star Wars fan goes out and buys all these newer copies on VHS since it is the only format available and they really want it. Once the sales drop off, then they release it on DVD since the people who really wanted it on DVD in the first place but couldn't get it will now go out and buy it. The only reason for not doing it YET is that they still have time to cash in on Episodes 2 and 3 on VHS before doing DVD; if they did a partial release of the 6 episodes on DVD, then it would be a noticable scam that they only release (say) episode 2 on VHS but not DVD. Once they release DVD, then they will always have to.

    I like my theory (#2), but then again I probably watch X-files too much. Interesting thought if anything, though...

    --

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  232. Matrix is THE MOVIE for the thinking nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matrix is THE NUMBER ONE DVD releade ever!!! For good reason, it's been pointed out here this summer that The Matrix was a much better movie than TPM for several reasons, more mature, more sophisticated, better special effects, more intelligent and NO FUCKIN JAMAICAN TALKING MERCHANDISE, just an amazing movie by the Wachowski Brothers. Check out the movie "Bound" which is the Wachowski Brothers independent film effort. The slow bullet effects were first used in this movie.

  233. Next Friday "SouthPark" is on for Free on 96. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Media One in New Hampshire, ppv channel 96 has been showing free movies for over a month. You need to have the cable directly hooked into your TV with no cable box. The movies change once a week. I got "The Matrix" for free the other week. Its Court Tv during the day then switches to free movie after 10:30 pm.

  234. Read the article! by jaraxle · · Score: 1

    Slashdot posters, do you even thoroughly read the article? It doesn't say that SW: TPM WON'T be released on DVD, it just says it WILL be released on VHS. It just says that a DVD version will not be released in 2000 or the forseeable future, which typically means a few years. Given that Lucas has stated (IIRC) that he wants to release a DVD boxed set after all 3 prequels are done, and Episode 3 won't be out for a few years, then this isn't really news. Perhaps Slashdot should check more into stories before posting such blatant statements.

    Jaraxle

  235. THX stands for THX by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    One of Lucas's films, THX-1138, was done before 1970.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  236. Re:Excuse me by mochaone · · Score: 1

    The promises to stand behind his Open Source convictions to release the code and release it often

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  237. yes how did this get 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean you obviously havent read any articles above this about lucas waiting till all films are finished before releasing a huge boxed set. I mean I'd wait until this happens before buying them too. I'll be awaiting a boxed set of DVD's before im ready to purchase. Lucas doesn't hate DVD, i doubt any director hates DVD. The quality is much better for one thing and I think most directors would like to have the public see their films in the best possible format and quality. 3 points for a knee jerk reaction? Good grief.

  238. you can copy it from a Hotel Room! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw TPM in my hotel room,....simply take the Composite inputs of the movie...hook them up to a Composite input on a pc or whatever, and RECORD. Looked pretty nice too...this was just a few months ago i saw this...

  239. as silly as this is... by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    I am a female. and in case you wanted to know, I've.. well, nevermind that.

    --

    Insert mind here.
  240. So don't watch it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbfucker.

    -cow

  241. TPM and Dolby Digital - Surround EX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How come Dolby Laboratories say that their new format Dolby Digital - Surround EX (which Lucasfilm THX helped develop) will be launched with the release of The Phantom Menace in May 29? If I'm not wrong a VHS tape can't have a Dolby Digital soundtrack. And if this isn't true it must be false advertising when they try to sell their new surround adapter SA10 with the help of TPM?

    http://www.dolby.com/press/m.pr.9812.lucasfilm.htm l

    The Dolby (http://www.dolby.com) site contains lots of other pressreleases that mention the release of TPM.