Slashdot Mirror


User: spongman

spongman's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,450
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,450

  1. Re:two nice XP features: on UCSB Bans Windows NT/2000 in the Dorms · · Score: 2
    the remote desktop stuff tht comes with 2k/messenger is NOT the same as that built into xp. the xp stuff uses domain authentication and doesn't require someone sitting at the server to allow you to connect - you can use a regular terminal services client to connect.

    some more key features (for me):
    TAPI 3.1
    wireless networking support
    as for cleartype, for me the difference between it and regular antialiasing is night and day, and since my C drive is 210Gb, I'm not concerned with the space...

  2. two nice XP features: on UCSB Bans Windows NT/2000 in the Dorms · · Score: 2
    ClearType.

    Remote Desktop.

  3. Re:Gripe on Mozilla Jumps on 'Lean Browser' Bandwagon · · Score: 2

    use the keypad enter key - you should be able to hit it with your right thumb without taking your hand off the mouse...

  4. Re:Differences in media. on Directors Counter-Sue Movie Bowdlerizing Company · · Score: 2
    you could just use a pair of scissors and some tape.

    since the end result is the same, does the process actually matter?

  5. Re:While I'm not generally a fan of copyright law. on Directors Counter-Sue Movie Bowdlerizing Company · · Score: 5, Insightful
    i think what he's saying is that if I buy your book then I should have the right to rip a page out. And I believe that under current copyright law I am alowed to do that. Further, I should be able to pay someone to do that for me: perhaps I'm disabled, or as is the case here, I'm not an expert in ripping pages out of books.

    If the director's case is uphelpd, then wouldn't it also be a breach of copyright to sell any book that didn't contain each and every letter it originally contained?

  6. Re:I second that review on Review: Spirited Away · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not surprised that the /. crowd likes it. More significantly is the fact that the mainstream press are all over it: Rotten Tomatoes shows not a single bad review, that's pretty impressive.

  7. Re: boxen. . . on Running 100,000 Parallel Threads · · Score: 2
    Non-words used as words is like, so 1999, man.
    And so is using time as an adjective.
  8. sensible weights and measures on Speed Of Light Broken With Off Shelf Components · · Score: 5, Funny

    c ~ 1802617528320.3 furlongs/fortnight

  9. The latest in IP circumvention on Fighting Music Piracy with Glue · · Score: 4, Funny
    wire-stippers.

    what is the world coming to?

  10. Re:Buy JUST BEFORE January MacWorld on When to Buy Technology Goods? · · Score: 2

    that my not be such good advice. usually when apple release a new range of machines they drop the MSRP on the older machines at the same time.

  11. Re:DUH on If You Port It, They Will Come · · Score: 2

    Most programs that use the Win32, Win-16 or DOS APIs will run fine on XP/2K. The apps that have problems are those that step outside the bounds of those APIs: writing directly to hardware on DOS/Win16, using undocumented/kernel APIs, drivers, VxDs, etc...

  12. Re:Yippee on If You Port It, They Will Come · · Score: 2
    He makes some valid points, but I find it rather funny that in the same breath he berates Microsoft for poor standards support and then bitches about how pooly the 'standard' software packages run on Linux.

    Maybe Microsoft doesn't support all the open standards (w3c, rfc, et al) 100%, but one thing it does do well is support its developers (developers, developers...) Most windows applications I have (including some 16-bit and DOS apps) still run on XP. Obvisouly there are exceptions: apps that make use of OS-specific features (either by necessity, or accident). But on the whole they just work. I remember one of the win95 developers telling me that in one particular win3.1 app that was using a very unorthodox method for finding the address of some system data-structure (instead of just calling the approved API), they had to add code to the kernel to patch the app to 'do the right thing' when it loaded.

    On the other hand, binary compatiblity on Linux just sucks ass. Library interfaces are constantly changing without recourse to backwards compatibility (libc is a prime example, as is the gcc3 debacle). This doesn't matter if all you have to do is './configure && make install', but for software vendors shipping binary-only installs it's a nightmare, and you end up having to support different versions for all the different, incompatible configurations that people have on their machines. It doesn't help that many distros have different ideas about where things should go and how to put them there.

  13. Re:...so? on Linux Worm Spreading, Many Systems Vulnerable · · Score: 2
    indeed, and in reply to this I posted:
    7/18: CodeRed hits, those of us who installed the MS01-33 patch laugh.
    and in turn some poor AC replied:
    Yeah, but those of us running Apache laughed even harder.
    I wonder how hard he's laughing now...
  14. Re:A single strand of hair on HP Labs Creates Densest Memory Chips To Date · · Score: 2

    EETimes has a much better article with actual measurements and more technical info.

  15. Well, of course! on New Closed Source Voting Systems Malfunction · · Score: 2

    They should have used the new system they're testing for the 2004 presidential elections in Florida.

  16. Re:Instead of bitching about double posts on Original Quake using Doom 3 Technology · · Score: 2
    yeah, no shit:

    "Wohoo! Look at me. I noticed a repost. Aren't I clever?"
    STFU, fools.
  17. Re:Hey on Palm Offers Refund to m130 Owners · · Score: 3, Interesting
    (not trying to be palm advocte here, but...) that's technically true. most displays today (including regular CRTs) can only display 768 colors (256 red, 256 green and 256 blue), it's the 'merging' of those colors that gives the 2^24 combinations. it all comes down to what constitues 'pixel'.

    I guess the real problem is that it can't display 50K+ colors at the advertised resolution, since it needs to use several real pixels to make a high-color pixel.

    A pathalogical example: a 1024x768x24-bit display can display 1024x768x24 or 1x1x(the total number of different permutations of 24-bit pixels on a 1024x768 display). of course, you'd have to look at the 1x1 display from a long way off for the dithering take effect.

  18. Re:Power supply adapters and plugs... on Connectors: A History of Their Technology? · · Score: 2

    thanks, that's a much better article ;-) so i guessed right, the 'common' pin is connected to the ground. so that begs the question: why the need for the 'ground' pin on a 3-pin plug at all? why not just attach the common pin to the case inside the device?

  19. Re:Microsoft press has some good titles. on C# for Java Developers · · Score: 2

    yup, and pretty much anything by J.Richter.

  20. Re:Power supply adapters and plugs... on Connectors: A History of Their Technology? · · Score: 2

    so, apart from the bullshit about "electricity comes into the appliance, goes through all the appliance, comes up to the switch and can't get out" what's he saying, that the 'common' pin is connected to ground? As far as I can tell, that's the only way current wouldn't flow through you if there was a short.

  21. Re:Power supply adapters and plugs... on Connectors: A History of Their Technology? · · Score: 2

    i gotta ask: what good is a polarized plug?

  22. Re:Then compile the code lazy bast.... on Red Hat Desktop Edition · · Score: 1, Troll

    dude, not all linux distros are the same, get a clue. loctions of config files/libraries are different, all sorts of shit.

  23. Re:ObDebian on Red Hat Desktop Edition · · Score: 2

    yeah, no fucking shit. why is it that developers always release RPMs for fuck-knows whatever RPM-based distros out there but never bother to include us debian-types? Debian my not be the #1 linux desktop, but it is definitely the #1 linux developer OS. if you want devs to support your shit, get it in debain, quick!

  24. Re:What's the point? on Real-Time Testing of China's Internet Filters · · Score: 2

    the problem is that if you're intelligent enough to set up such a tunnel, are you willing to rish being shot in the back of the head for doing so?

  25. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked on Real-Time Testing of China's Internet Filters · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have thought that a country that has a 1-child-per-family law would want to encourage the male population to jack off as often as possible.