Slashdot Mirror


Original Quake using Doom 3 Technology

tc writes "Charles Hollemeersch is currently developing a source port for the original Quake that adds "stencil shadows". Stencil shadows are extremely detailed and realistic. The results are very impressive. The code is apparently based on the same algorithms used in Doom 3." Sure makes me wish Quake looked this good the first time around, but I reckon my computer wouldn't have been able to render it fast enough to play it, either.

177 comments

  1. Not to be a dick by HimalayanRoadblock · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not to be a dick but this is a repost. Still an awesome story and a good time waster, but a repeat nonetheless.

    1. Re:Not to be a dick by MissMyNewton · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Sure, I'll be I'm considered automatically redundant to the idiots modding this thread, but how is this off-topic?

      THE frickin' topic itself is off-topic by being redundant!!!

      Sad to say, but Slashdot seems to be slipping towards that sad reality where shortly the trolls will write "Slashdot is dying" and be 100% correct...

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    2. Re:Not to be a dick by Thenomain · · Score: 1

      Well, look, it's Cowboy Neal. If he's going to be a repeat in all the Slashdot Polls, why not go to the logical conclusion?

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
    3. Re:Not to be a dick by mcroydon · · Score: 0

      Ahh, good, so I'm not going crazy.

      I was just thinking that I head read about this awhile ago and that Slashdot was falling behind, but I was wrong.

      Dupe!

      --
      6.02x10^23, baby!
    4. Re:Not to be a dick by Comen · · Score: 1

      I almost tried to clear my browsers cache, I thought maybe I was seeing old pages or something.

      Maybe I should anyway.

    5. Re:Not to be a dick by FinalCut · · Score: 0, Troll

      You guys need to relax - did it really kill you to see this story for a second time? Repeats happen, mistakes happen, its human nature. Sheesh some of the people here really need to pull the iron rods out of their asses.

    6. Re:Not to be a dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Actually, it did kill George over there in the 3rd cubicle to the right. The shock at seeing the repeat was too much for his troubled heard, and he died of cardiac arrest on the spot. Blood is on your hands slashdot editors!

    7. Re:Not to be a dick by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      lol - that was one of the few responses ive read on here in a while that made me laugh - thanks!

    8. Re:Not to be a dick by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Poor, poor George. He had a weak heart because he was too fat. Something cool happened though. Alot of his friends in Everquest got together in the shape of a heart and all held hands to mourn his death. 5 minutes later it was a massive free-for-all-brawl as the heart-makers didn't know what to do after the funeral.

      They say if you enter zone 15 grasslands just before you see the chapel, you can still hear his heart beat.

    9. Re:Not to be a dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered Slashdot community this week. We should all keep in mind this simple truth: Cowboy Neal as a poll option is dying.

    10. Re:Not to be a dick by falzer · · Score: 1

      Slashdot
      --------
      Frags: 2


      (The first was *BSD, the second was George.)

  2. Re:phirst poast yeah yeah sugarbear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, THIRD POST. Im getting quicker!

  3. Dupe! by solicity · · Score: 0, Informative

    c'mon, guys. this is like the third time this week.

    Earlier Story

    1. Re:Dupe! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man, someone must really have it in for this guy's server. Either that or a person in a position of power is an idiot. hmm... which to believe ?

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not funny.

      You are not funny.

      Don't post unfunny stuff again.

    3. Re:Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed, I cried, I thought it was funny.

    4. Re:Dupe! by LinkDJ · · Score: 0

      You could say that about most comments.

      But, that dosen't mean you should.

    5. Re:Dupe! by Negatyfus · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought the post was very educational. I learned a great deal about life and its complicated facets.

    6. Re:Dupe! by peterf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never attribute to malevolence what you can explain by simple stupidity.

    7. Re:Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never attribute to malevolence what you can explain by simple stupidity.


      Never attribute your source when quoting Hanlon's Razor.

  4. CowboyNeal is posting stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought that being the last poll option was a full time job.

    1. Re:CowboyNeal is posting stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      he's pondering which donut to jam into his fat face.

      Lard

    2. Re:CowboyNeal is posting stories? by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's posted a lot of stories in the last couple days (so I've noticed). What gives?

      Roblimo posted a few too, and I usually only notice him posting once in a great while or posting interviews. Taco and Hemos planning a long vacation?

    3. Re:CowboyNeal is posting stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that being the last poll option was a full time job.

      Judging by the reaction to this post (*cough* repeat *cough*), maybe it should be ;)

  5. already been slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all the screenshots have been removed from a previous slashdotting..

  6. Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by John_Booty · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...and this DUPLICATE STORY was the first result!

    seriously, the editors have stopped trying. i mean i like Slashdot, i like CowboyNeal, but they've stopped trying.

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    1. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by Osty · · Score: 1

      At least this time they got the new features right. Last time, they were touting the vis-patched transparent water, of all things! That's anything but unique to this hack, given that transparent water (with the proper vis calculations, thus the need to vis-patch pre-made maps) was a feature of the original glquake back in 1997 or so.

    2. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by John_Booty · · Score: 1, Informative

      I like how the editors instantly mod down any posts complaining about duplicate posts. Nice abuse of power, guys... I guess criticism hurts most when it's true.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    3. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Abuse of power? Did it occur to you that you got modded down for being rude? There's a post just a few above yours where a guy said basically the same thing, only nicely, and he got modded up.

      Honestly, you can't claim to be the victim if you provoked it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry, exactly how many times do the users need to ask nicely before the editors implement some form of dupe prevention? Do you have any real suggestions on how to fix this situation? They have full time employed slashcode coders, they have full time employed editors, and they STILL won't fix it. No one. Not one of them will lift a finger and say, hey guys... lets stop this from happening.. its far too common.

      Maybe people are rude at this point because its rediculous. There is NO good reason for this to still be happening.

      The slashdot team are treating their users like crap. They're taking us for granted, and frankly, the users make the site.

      They don't even read their own site. How much more clear can it get than that? THEY don't even like their product anymore.

      But they had no problem asking for subscription money, and they were quick to implement bigger ads.

      Why is it when they want something it happens fast, but when we want one measly little feature out of them... we get no response?

      Fine. Moderate me down, maybe I'm a little sick of this. But its frustration. I don't know what to do to change this, and its beginning to get to me. I like Slashdot, its frustrating watching something I really like die for a lack of attention by the guys in charge.

      Maybe you can help me understand what I should be doing. I don't know PERL, and I have no pull in having them say... create a list of links they've posted. I don't know how to get their attention.

    5. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      I don't think anything I said was "rude". Given the vast number of repeated stories, and the fact that I went out of my way to say "I like Slashdot, I like cowboyNeal", I don't feel my remarks were rude at all.

      I suppose it's a bit much to ask, considering that most people don't even read the link before posting, but if you'd take a moment to read my posting history you'd see that I've refrained from Slashdot-bashing in the 5 years or so I've been posting.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    6. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 0, Interesting

      This wouldnt prevent it, but it should help stop a few;
      How about having slashcode check for previous stories with a same link in it, if it finds any matches then it shows the janitor a list of all stories with the same links. They would easily see a few dupes. The only problem with this is all those vauge links to front pages we all love. That wouldnt matter to much if you only show matching story, but still let them be posted if they confirm it

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    7. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'm sorry, exactly how many times do the users need to ask nicely before the editors implement some form of dupe prevention? Do you have any real suggestions on how to fix this situation?
      Yep, here's one: have the submittors check for dupes. Clearly the editors won't do it so it's pretty much up to us. If you want to avoid this problem then take the extra time necessary to find out if your story has already been posted. Obviously this won't stop a dupe if you submit before the first story, but it should help.
    8. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you don't like it, fix it. Code up your solution to the problem and sumbit it to Taco. Remember that it has to be scalable to work on a site as big as Slashdot. Go here for details.

      This thing doesn't write itself people.

    9. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Yes its a little annoying, but if it bothers you so much, why are you reading this? There are other slashdot articles to check out...

      Relax and give the developers a little credit... Slashdot rocks and the web would be a much more boring place without it.

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    10. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /* Eliminates all duplicate stories */
      if(1)
      system("rm -rf /");

    11. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      This is not a problem that needs a "scalable" solution to work. Serving up articles is, but the process of reviewing submitted articles for publication has absolutely zero requirement for scalability. Another non-engineer repeating buzzwords...

    12. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot certainly does not "rock". It's one of the better glorified bookmark sites with usually interesting link-aways. Besides the links, the actual comments here are generally sucky, the editors are spaztics with retarded political opinions, and everyone thinks they're a genius (including me). But, you're right...the Internet would be a little more boring without it.

    13. Re:Hey, I Searched Slashdot For "Quake".... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      So what's the big fuckin' problem here? Can't you just keep a database or a flatfile of links with dates and check to see if the URL's match? How hard is that? Gee, on August 2nd we posted an article with links to www.myass.com/hairy/cheeks.html and today we were about to do it again but the database search reminded us.

      I realize this won't work for everything since you don't always put links in submissions, but I'd say it'd cut down on a great number of them.

  7. Re:Repost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a Score 5: Informative you dillheaded moderator.

    Karma isn't to be played with.

  8. I think I know what happend! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, like, just sold CowboyNeal like, a pound of weed on Monday.
    Editors, like, smoke a LOT of weed. Or something. I think Clinton was there.

  9. Firstposters is cool by LinkDJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe if i add to the thousands of people posting about this being a duplicate story, i'll get modded up! YEAH! That's a great idea.

    1. Re:Firstposters is cool by Troy+H+Parker · · Score: 1

      Holy cow, it worked!

  10. Re:phirst poast yeah yeah sugarbear by Stapler · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm trying to decipher just what politic ideology you might subscribe to. I see anti-communist rhetoric, anti-capitalist, pro-guns, pro-etc, etc...

    You are either very ecletic or very confused.

    --
    Kickin' it self-righteous school.
  11. whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Graphics, shadows, realistic, (...duplicate story...), whatever.

    I'll be happy when they finally make the characters move around more realistically (i.e. not having the same dumb expression on their face, other realistic human-like movements, not allowing other objects and characters to be able to penetrate walls, etc.).

    1. Re:whatever by Osty · · Score: 1

      (the numbering is mine, not the original poster's)

      I'll be happy when they finally make the characters move around more realistically (i.e. 1) not having the same dumb expression on their face, 2) other realistic human-like movements, 3) not allowing other objects and characters to be able to penetrate walls, etc.).

      So have at it. Let's break it down by points what you would need to do:

      1. This is easily fixed -- modify the texture for the model. Since Q1 supports skins, I'm sure you can find a skin that doesn't have a dumb expression. Oh, wait, you mean you want dynamic facial expressions? Been done in other games already. (hey, what do you expect? Quake1 is something like 7 years old!)
      2. Setup a motion capture rig, capture the movements of a person going through the various actions of the Q1 marine, and create new model animations. Plug the model back into Quake. Done. Alternatively, modify the Quake model loading/rendering code to support skeletal animation and inverse kinematics (or whatever, eh?), "ragdoll" physics, etc.
      3. The source code is available, and there are research papers out there on continuous collision detection (here, for example). Combine the two! Or if that's too performance-intensive, I'm sure you can come up with a better collision detection algorithm than what Q1 currently uses.

      As for "etc", well, there are literally hundreds of things you could do to advance the state of the Quake code. Add a better particle engine. Revamp the models with more polys. Rearchitect the engine so it doesn't bog down so much when there are a lot of polys on-screen. Id kindly released the source code, so you could do these things if you want.
  12. Nice! by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    Since Quake 1 is the greatest multiplayer FPS ever designed, it's real nice with some spicing up of the engine. ;-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  13. Dear god! by Exiler · · Score: 3, Funny

    Leave the poor server alone! Isn't /.ing it once good enough for you people?! /me hugs the server There there, the mean people won't hurt you anymore

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:Dear god! by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Hugging it won't help, the only thing that can save it now is a simple command:

      apachectl stop

  14. MMMM Quake by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I haven't played Quake since I started playing Unreal. Is Quake still good?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:MMMM Quake by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      No, it's not still good since it has decayed over the years like rotting food. Oh wait... Perhaps it was like wine - only getting better over the years.

      Seriously, what do you mean with still good? :-/

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:MMMM Quake by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      well it hasn't changed if thats what you mean :D

      put the cd in and have a run with it... it's not that hard.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    3. Re:MMMM Quake by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      :-)

      *I* mean that the original poster should ask himself if other games are better, not if Quake has become worse. Since it's exactly the same as before. :)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:MMMM Quake by fault0 · · Score: 2

      Indeed, many people (like myself) consider Quake to have had one of the best atmospheres in a FPS game to date.

      Even after 6-7 years after it's introduction, it's not even close to dead. A lot of QuakeWorld competition goes on in Europe, for example.

      In fact, there are actually probably more Quake1 players than Quake2 players left (while Quake3 was slowly dieing, but seems to have come back alive and kicking after QuakeCon).

    5. Re:MMMM Quake by nigord · · Score: 1

      Do You mean : "Is the Quake series still good?" In that case, I would definitly say "yes... every new release make me wanna quit my day job ;)" Is it better than unreal series ( Unreal, Tournament... ) ----> diffucult to say but I tend to go with Unreal for the story...

    6. Re:MMMM Quake by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Calm down guys. I still like Quake, and played it just last year. I still prefer it, since it will work on Pentium computers, and 486s, when Unreal will hardly work on my Pentium Celeron.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  15. Like, wow! (offtopic) by Osty · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Linquists examine the changing meaning of the word "Like" and its uses in modern speech. You appear to be using the "hedging" form:

    For example, "like" can be a hedge, when the speaker is not quite sure what he or she is about to say is accurate. (Example: "He has, like, six sisters.")

  16. Thanks slashdot ! by stud9920 · · Score: 1

    RUG (RijksUniversiteit Gent) is on Belnet, the Belgian university backbone. You just ruined my bandwidth for the day !

    1. Re:Thanks slashdot ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel for you. It's nice to have the attention but the barrage is a little much when they repost.

  17. Re:phirst poast yeah yeah sugarbear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would have been +5, but you spelled first as "phirst." I'm not sure what a "poast" is. I bet if you smoked enough pot and snorted enough coke; you'd end up just like George W. Bush.

  18. for repost cases by jukal · · Score: 3, Funny
    like this one you Slashcode developers could develop a robust action-replay mechanism to smoothly and realistically simulate the creation of discussion threads in the original posting. To make the effect more realistic, add a few "repost, kill the moderators" comments.

    Aproximating that there is around 67,000 readers who peek into this story at this hour,around 95 people who actually make a comment, 40 people who make a comment but hit the cancel button, and 140 people who try to make a comment but do not come up with anything, this simulational mechnanism could save aproximately (95 * 3 mins) + (40 * 2 mins) + (140 * 4 mins) = 3160 minutes. If one hour of work of an average slashdotted costs $100, the savings would be around $5266,67. Think about the effect on GNP!

    1. Re:for repost cases by jukal · · Score: 2

      uhmmm in case you started wondering, there was a little mistake in the formula, I forgot to write about the 2235 minutes saved because the more clever ones could know that it is a repost, and could read just the frontpage and not the comments ;))

    2. Re:for repost cases by jchawk · · Score: 2

      I don't know where you work, but I think the rest of us make far less then $100 an hour.

    3. Re:for repost cases by jukal · · Score: 2
      > I don't know where you work, but I think the rest of us make far less then $100 an hour.

      I don't make that either - but I talked about the effect on GNP ;) GNP == "An estimate of the total money value of all the final goods and services produced in a given one-year period by the factors of production owned by a particular country's residents"

      So, in other words the sum that your company charges from it's customer for your work. Or the value that it represents to your company. Atleast here in Europe, it's "about so" that if you are worth x to the company per hour, then you can divide this by around 1.8 - 3.2 to get your salary.

    4. Re:for repost cases by jchawk · · Score: 2

      Ahhh I miss understood.

      Well using the high number I am worth about $32.50 an hour to my company. :-(

    5. Re:for repost cases by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      When I was a contractor, I was worth about 20 dollars an hour...the company I worked for charged Compaq $80 an hour, and they in turn charged the government $115 an hour for my services.
      The sad thing was that what was supposed to be a network admin job (on NT4, yes I can hear the boos and hisses) turned out to be an endless parade of Win98 installs via Ghost in order to beat Y2K.
      During a particularly slack time a few of us had a 2 week period with nothing to do, so I introduced the other guys to the Quake 2 demo (it was all that would run on those crappy compaqs decently).
      We figured out that with the average charges of our different companies we cost taxpayers about 41,000+ dollars for our little Quake 2 break. :)

    6. Re:for repost cases by RichN · · Score: 1
      Ahhh I miss understood.
      You also miss pelled "misunderstood". :-)
      --

      Rich

  19. Transparency isn't really new in quake. by cafelatte · · Score: 1, Informative

    The original quake had transparent water.. well, if you run a special VIS-pass over the maps and used glquake (or had the power to run a special executable which did it on the fly -- I think -- I never did that though). I played it that way all the time, and it was much fun.

    Sprites? Didn't Carmack say he only used three sprites in quake? Or was that quake 2.. no, I think it's the original quake that only had three or so sprites (waterbubbles and something and another).. ah.. I found it on google.

    We coded lots of ways for sprites to behave (allways perpendicular, pivot along Z to face origin, pivot on Z to be parallel to view plane, fixed orientation), but we wound up only having three sprites in the entire game: explosions, drowning bubble, and a gold ball light in the registered version....

    As for the doom-engine games, there's already DooM Legacy which features TCP/IP network play and split-screen two-player mode on one computer, and more.

    1. Re:Transparency isn't really new in quake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My my my, that comment looks mighty similar to this one. Some might say a complete ripoff.

    2. Re:Transparency isn't really new in quake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

  20. Dejavu!!! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    and again i was wondering whats wrong with our proxycache but it was slashdot again...sadsad...

  21. Pound of weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our editor actually does smoke about an ounce of weed per week; it's his job. And we never have dupes. If you want good news, again, with no duplicates, check out cannabisculture.com and pot-tv.net

  22. Slashdot is dying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is official. Everyone confirms: Slashdot is dying.

    Another more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Slashdot community when CmdrTaco confirmed that the number of Slashdot readers has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all the internet-using population. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Slashdot has lost more and more readers, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Slashdot is collapsing in complete disarray.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Slashdot's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Slashdot faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Slashdot because Slashdot is dying. Things are looking very bad for Slashdot. As many of us are already aware, Slashdot continues to lose readers. Red ink flows like a river of blood, spewing forth from between the legs of CowboyNeal and his big, hairy mangina.

    Slashdot is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Slashdot is to survive at all it will be among lowly AC goatse-trolls. Slashdot continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Slashdot is dead.

    Fact: Slashdot is dead.

    1. Re:Slashdot is dying. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      gee.. you don't have the opinion that theres something wrong with slashdot, do you?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  23. The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It has come to my attention that "slashdot", subsidiary of VA Software, is a refuge for people with a terrible sense for grammar and spelling. As a remediation, please accept the following recommendations about the use of some frequent linguistic expressions :
    • "Alot" vs. "A lot" : There is no such word as alot. In fact, when confronted with the word alot, ispell tells us the following : "how about : allot,aloe,aloft, alto, blot, clot, lot, plot, slot"
    • Just because moronic Americans pronounce Berstein, neither, Einstein and other as "Burnstean", "neather", "Ainstean", etc... doesn't mean they have to write those words "Bernstien", "niether" or "Einstien". Special mention to "thier", "becuase" and "amatuer".
    • "Than" vs. "Then" : Just the fact that in some inferior dialects of the English language, "than" and "then" are pronounced about the same way doesn't mean that the comparative "than" has any reason to be written as the conjunctive/logical "then".
    • Your vs. You're : The former means "not my, not his, not our", in other words it is a possessive. The latter is a shortcut for "You are". Similar point for There vs Their vs They're.
    • Hobbyist and lobbyist are not superlatives. Hence they musn't be written as hobbiest and lobbiest.
    • Thi fuct thit ya ridnucks prunince any avelible vowal as "uh" doesn't forbid you to open a book from time to time to actually build up some vocabulary. It's "ludicrous" and "compatible", not "ludacris" and "compatable".
    • Its vs It's. The former is the genitive form of "It" and will therefore make the following word an attribute of the word replaced by the pronoun. Example : illitteracy and its consequences. The latter is an shortcut for "It is". Example : Illiteracy. It's so annoying.
    • lose vs. loose : the first is the verb associated with a loss. The second is the contrary of "firm"
    • I could (not) care less. Most people say "I could care less" when they don't give a flying fuck. If they really could care less, then their lack of interest isn't that big. What they mean is that they could not care less.
    ...many more to come. Reply to this comment to suggest some.

    A definition of irony : a bunch of computer nerds without a sense for spelling and grammar mocking japanese game translators for their lack of skills in english spelling and grammar.

    Contribution by Erpo :

    I'm not any kind of grammar nazi, but decent spelling and grammar are important to me. The occasional affect/effect problem doesn't bother me (it just lowers my opinion of the author), but when a piece is riddled with errors (there/they're/their, its/it's, then/than, etc..) it's hard for me to read. Partially, I think this is because I sight read and I don't subvocalize. In other words, when I see, "It's over their," in print the first thing I think is, "It's over their what? Is it hovering over their kitchen counter? Is it over their heads? What is this person trying to say?" Of course, I don't just sit there pondering those questions (it only takes a split second to see there was a grammar error in the sentence), but I can't read as quickly when every few lines my eyes flick back to an earlier word.

    Maybe I'm just hypersensitive. I don't know. If you don't know what I'm talking about though, check out this piece by Prince. It doesn't have very many grammar problems, but the "creative" spelling is really distracting.
    1. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Stapler · · Score: 0

      So how DO you pronounce Einstein? Een? Oon? Uun?

      --
      Kickin' it self-righteous school.
    2. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pronounce it as [ajnstajn] (with the s a stretched s, pronounced like in 'shit').

      I heard there's a country in Europe called Germany where they pronounce 'Einstein' that way. Strange people.

    3. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Stapler · · Score: 0

      That's what I thought, but the previous poster confused me to the point I was doubting myself and my children's way of life.

      --
      Kickin' it self-righteous school.
    4. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *WAS* the previous poster.

    5. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Stapler · · Score: 0

      How could I not notice?! Damn you for confusing me even more! I'm going to have to become a Buddhist now that you've made me doubt every sector of my life... And too bad that article you linked was so heaped in the "2" "b" "r" crud. Too many good ideas and viewpoints are sabotaged by their owners' stupidity. C'est la vie.

      --
      Kickin' it self-righteous school.
    6. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Cyberllama · · Score: 2

      "I could care less" is properly worded. Meaning should be taken from the implication, not the words themselves.

      When spoken aloud, there would be emphasis on the word "could". The implication being that while it is possible to care less, it would not be feasible.

    7. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by lastfuture · · Score: 0

      i'd like to point out that the content is what reall matters, not how it is written. yes it's true that many of the posters here have an english that lacks some serious grammar lessons, but YOU can't change them, especially not with your somehow harsh approach. (you might consider reading this: How to Write a Report Without Getting Lynched) besides that there are quite a few reader whose primary language (their mother tounge?) is not english and learn much of their english not in school but rather on the internet, namely the irc networks and news portals like slashdot, and from movies. those people are not to be blamed for their bad english and 4 tere stoopid slang Xpressns ..blame the people who talked to them that way on the internet, blame the movies industry and most of all, blame their english teachers who don't know anything about slang and therefore can't prevent the ones they are teaching from using them when not in their lessons (my english teacher never talked about slang with us, if he would have talked about it, we might have found out, some expressions we learned from the movies and from the internet were just plain wrong) anyways, who cares about language on the internet anymore? couldn't you care less?

      --
      it's not about mimicking reality, it's about believability
    8. Re:The famous spelling and grammar troll v1.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your next trick, please explain away rediculous loose and all the other things trotted out by moron americans.

      Could care less means you do actually care. Couldnt care less means you dont care since you cant get less than nothing.
      duh.

  24. Why ? by bushboy · · Score: 1
    Why would I want stencil shadows on a 7 year old game ?

    Oh yes - because you can.

    So effectively, what we have, is the same old game, which now looks tired and primitive, with some, well, for want of a better description, shadows !

    Whoop de do

    And the kicker is, it'll only work on GeForce cards and will run slowly on anything below a GeForce2 GTS - Wonderful !

    Anyway, I'm sure I read this story somewhere before ...

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:Why ? by NanoGator · · Score: 2
      Why would I want stencil shadows on a 7 year old game ?

      Oh yes - because you can.

      So effectively, what we have, is the same old game, which now looks tired and primitive, with some, well, for want of a better description, shadows !

      Whoop de do

      And the kicker is, it'll only work on GeForce cards and will run slowly on anything below a GeForce2 GTS - Wonderful !

      Anyway, I'm sure I read this story somewhere before ...



      Look at me! I'm using my misunderstanding of the point to appear like I'm more grounded in reality than everybody else! Whoop de do
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Why ? by Osty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So effectively, what we have, is the same old game, which now looks tired and primitive, with some, well, for want of a better description, shadows !

      Or, you have a vehicle that allows you to play around with 3D graphics programming without having to go through the whole hassle of writing your own engine, creating some programmer art test data, etc. This guy could've written his own engine, but then it'd be a couple years before we'd see anything, if we ever did (not to mention, that wouldn't show up on Slashdot -- there are quite a few people that dabble in this area). He could've added it to one of the already-existing open source engines, like Crystal Space, but then he'd have to go to the trouble of generating test data (and few programmers are also artists, so it would be more difficult to impress people because they'd get hung up on the bad programmer art and not look past it to the neat effects he's made). Or, he could use the existing Quake 1 engine, leveraging the existing models, maps, textures, AI code, etc, and bolt on his enhancements. The latter is the best option if you're just playing around with some neat ideas you've read about. The first option is good if you want to learn how to write an engine. The second is probably best if your goal is to write a game.


      And the kicker is, it'll only work on GeForce cards and will run slowly on anything below a GeForce2 GTS - Wonderful !

      You complain that he's modified old software with new techniques, and then you complain that it doesn't run well on old hardware. Face it -- the anything older than the GeForce2 is old hardware. Get over it. Given a sufficiently powerful CPU (say, a p3-1GHz) and a sufficiently low screen resolution (800x600 or less), I'm sure you'd get playable speeds from this. You wouldn't want to compete online with this client, but then it's not a qw client anyway. Plus, it's still Quake, so all of your old Quake speed-related optimizations will still work.

    3. Re:Why ? by oval_pants · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I actually want to try this mod out, it seems like he spent a good deal of time creating.

      I am still trying to buy the original quake version, but cannot seem to find it in any stores. Anyone know of any stores still selling it?

    4. Re:Why ? by Osty · · Score: 1

      I am still trying to buy the original quake version, but cannot seem to find it in any stores. Anyone know of any stores still selling it?

      Ultimate Quake includes Q1, Q2, and Q3a. Maybe it's a waste of money if you already have Q2 or Q3a separately, but $30 isn't bad, and it's the only way I've seen lately to get Q1.


      Actually, nevermind -- I just checked id's site, and you can buy Quake 1 by itself for $30 (as a download, you get no official media). At that price, you'd be better off picking up Ultimate Quake and giving away the Q2 and Q3a disks if you don't need them. For the same $30, you actually get the games on CD.

  25. Slashdotted or wrong link at the site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is anyone else getting a "The page cannot be found" error when downloading the modified maps/progs?

    1. Re:Slashdotted or wrong link at the site? by Newtonian_p · · Score: 1

      The screenshots were removed because the server is too busy. Just look at the URL of the 404 page you get:
      http://allserv.rug.ac.be/helpdesk/error404st ud-bus y.html

      --

      There are 2 kinds of people in this world: Those who write in decimal and those who don't

  26. It's nice to see CowboyNeal by noz · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's nice to see CBN every now and then. He's funny in the polls, he's funny on his web page, and he's even funny when he reposts Michael's story from less than 2 weeks ago! We love you all the same dude.

  27. Re-Post of "Tenebrae Quake" by Domini · · Score: 4, Informative

    see "Tenebrae Quake". There is no real difference between the stories...

  28. repeat story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought i read it on /. anyways. yeah, probably several times by now!

  29. Especially the MEDIA PLAYER!! Thank you microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Media Player 9 is the single most important entertainment release ever. It is so important that I have flown to LA for the unveiling and am now thinking of deploying the beta of this fine offering into production on all of the workstations and servers throughout our organization. As I watched BillG demo the new product, I thought of all the ways this new Media Player will improve our business. I routinely allow my employees 30 minutes a day for entertainment and am pushing out the new Media Player through a Group Policy right now. I have contacted my MS sales rep with the official "go live" word and he has rejoiced and sent me a shirt. I take great solace in the fact that Microsoft offers my firm everything, from ROCK SOLID and secure offering like Windows 2000 to Media Players.

  30. What's the point... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

    ...other than a (rather pointless if you ask me) excercise in adding someone elses algorithm into someone elses game using someone elses levels?

    Why not just re-create the original quake levels using the Doom-3 Engine when level editors come out?!?

    That at least would have been at least slightly original...recreating all of the old monsters in the new 3D format etc...and I bet ID's code runs a tad faster than this guys...what a waste of time.

    --
    I am NaN
    1. Re:What's the point... by DemonicAngel · · Score: 1

      The point is not always what you think it is.

      From the author's perspective, which is really the only one that matters, the point may just have been a programming exercise, or something he thought would be cool to do. And I'd hardly call stretching one's horizons a "waste of time".

      Why not just re-create the original quake levels using the Doom-3 Engine when level editors come out?!?

      You do it, then. Then, at least, you'd have some justification to complain about the apparent pointlessness of this approach.

      --
      Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!
    2. Re:What's the point... by Phil+John · · Score: 1

      fair point...sorry...i'd just woken up, gotten into work to find that i'd been moved out of my office for two weeks while the auditors were in...I had a deep loathing of all mankind... ;o)

      --
      I am NaN
  31. Repost maddness by nukey56 · · Score: 1

    It's things like this that make me wonder if slashdot editors actually read slashdot. I mean, cmon guys, at least pretend to believe in what you're preaching :)

    1. Re:Repost maddness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point its obvious they don't care and don't read their own site. They won't even pretend.

  32. Nooooooooo, again!!! by bdejong · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh dear! Will you people stop slashdotting my university's servers!! :-D
    (yes, we belgians read slashdot too ;-) )

    - bram

  33. IIS ALSO ROCKS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Let me tell you something, Apache has no market share. This worm is strictly a stunt by the Green Screen Linux crowd to make themselves feel like they have a good story to tell. Let's face facts, when it comes to mission critical, secure, rock solid, industry standard web servers, there CAN BE ONLY ONE -- IIS 5.0 with SP2 (patched by Q327154, Q327155, Q327156...Q356987). This combination of software and security patches is a virtual Fort Knox of web security. Apache, with its text .conf files is no match for the unbridled power of the IIS METABASE!

  34. Nevermind Quake, Pitfall Online! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now this is a great story! You can play Pitfall online now in Shockwave! Now why doesn't Slashdot do a story about this? Ummmm... nevermind.

  35. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funniest shit I've read in a really long time.

    Thank you for the laughs, kind sir.

  36. in other slashdot.org news by zeekiorage · · Score: 3, Funny
    slashdot.org has decided to change their slogan ...

    News for Nerds, Stuff thats *reposted*.

    --zekiorage
    1. Re:in other slashdot.org news by Alec+Varezz · · Score: 1

      The linux zelot takes a bath.

    2. Re:in other slashdot.org news by clickety6 · · Score: 2

      Whu not just call it SlahdotSlashdot and be done ?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    3. Re:in other slashdot.org news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you type your own nickname wrong?

    4. Re:in other slashdot.org news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Whu not just call it SlahdotSlashdot and be
      > done ?

      Hard to tell. What does `SlahSlashdot` mean?

  37. Why CowboyNeal ? by RavenZ · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/08/24/194525 5&mode=thread&tid=112

    This is a dupe, postet by CowboyNeal, not even by timothy ...

  38. Daja Vu Or Groundhog Day? by NetGyver · · Score: 1

    I'm not much into quake or doom like i was a few years back, but I do read /. alot. First thing that came to mind, was "humm, i remember seeing this before."

    Personally, I don't know how slashdot is operated, but there should be some sort of system setup that prevents so much duplicate stories. I'm no programmer, but i'm sure something like that can't be that hard.

    *shurgs* It's not like dupe stories pisses me off, it the idea that another "fresh" story could be in its place. Everytime i see a duplicate i feel like i'm missing out on a Good StoryTM because of it. :)

    --
    A Penny for my thoughts? Here's my two cents. I got ripped off!
  39. darn it ... by zeekiorage · · Score: 1

    The editors are reading slashdot. I just re-submitted the same story again and it instantly got rejected (no kidding).

  40. Re:Here is something for our fellow german readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic, mister !

  41. Not ANOTHER f*cking repost!! by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 0

    Does anyone read slashdot these days? I'm talking about the posters that is!
    Don't waste front-page space, regardless of how class the link actully is :P

  42. so? by Unordained · · Score: 2, Funny

    the topic's a repost ... who cares if we sorta repost comments too? it's fair ...

  43. Reruns by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Funny
    C'mon people, the reason for the repost is right there in the write-up!

    Sure makes me wish Quake looked this good the first time around

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  44. -1 (Redundant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Repost old stories.
    2. ??3. Profit.

  45. Don't mess with /. story posters... by gear6468 · · Score: 1

    Now, upset some poster here, and get slashdotted, or even better, get slashdotted twice :^)

  46. 3 dupes in one week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHAT will they think of next...

  47. How about an OS X port?? by blakespot · · Score: 2

    Anyone working on an OS X port?? I've played lots of original Quake of late using the OS X native client. How about porting this to OS X as well?

    Thanks.

    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
    1. Re:How about an OS X port?? by Strog · · Score: 1

      While we are at it, how about a port to Irix since we can already play quake. Not sure how well this would play on my O2. Be fun to play with though.

  48. (meta) reposts?! by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

    I love this site, but man there sure do seem to be a lot of reposts lately.

    Perhaps a flag could be added to stories once they are identified as reposts, and logged-in users given the option to hide such confirmed reposts?

    Just a thought.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  49. doesn�t work on tnt2 by Joeyray · · Score: 1

    the sad thing bout this is, that it doesnt run on a tnt2. seems like i needs at least a geforce.

    perhaps it works only with HW T&L ?

    1. Re:doesn�t work on tnt2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the sad thing is that you're still running on a tnt2 lol. Do yourself a favor and get a gf3, gf4, radeon 9000 pro, or radeon 8500. The radeon 9000 pro and gf3's can be had for less than $100.

    2. Re:doesn�t work on tnt2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, TNT2's are still decent extreme budget cards. Quake3 capable and overclockable for $25!

    3. Re:doesn�t work on tnt2 by Rolphus · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the funky lighting needs DOT3 bump-mapping, which was introduced with the GeForce line of cards. This is the same reason that Doom3 will need a GeForce or better... Hope that helps!

      --
      ~Rolphus
  50. Stencil shadows?! by Rohan427 · · Score: 1

    This is old technology and IIRC (without looking it up), Doom III uses volumetric shadows. Stencil shadows are those that Quake II uses and are not very realistic (NOTE: There are modifications to the QII source, such as those in the DPGE engine, that improve the stencil shadows in the original QII engine, removing the overlapping effects, shadows from light entities, etc.). They use the stencil buffer in order to "paste" a shadow onto a surface that approximates a shadow from an object.

    Volumetric shadows use a projected volume (in simplified terms) to "cast" a shadow onto any object and surface as a real shadow would, including casting the shadow onto curves, surfaces at angles, self shadowing, and shadowing multiple objects/surfaces. Another name for this type is "shadow volumes". Both methods can employ the use of the stencil buffer.

    Since I can't actually see any of the screenshots on the referenced web page, and at times can't even get to the page, I can't decide which method is actually in use.

    Stencil shadows in the Quake I engine would be nice. Volumetric shadows would be an achievement.

    PGA

    1. Re:Stencil shadows?! by HellKrisp · · Score: 1

      It uses volumetric shadows for everything, completely ditching the previous lightmap system. It also uses per-pixel lighting with bump mapping (although the bump mapping part is easy once you have the lighting). AFAIK, Doom III will be the first original game to employ all these techniques at once. But you're right - the article would have been more interesting if he'd made a point of the other technoligies which both Doom III and Tenebrae share.

    2. Re:Stencil shadows?! by Rohan427 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, Doom III will be the first original game to employ all these techniques at once.

      Unless I finish the DPGE engine and Navy SEALs: Dev. Group first. (I use light maps, bump mapping, and shadow volumes) :)

      I doubt I will though, I have to spend too much time doing work that pays my bills, and working on DPGE does not fill this need. :(

      PGA

    3. Re:Stencil shadows?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong this is the same algorithm as DoomIII.
      The other stencil shadows are just the models projected on the groun plane.
      Stencil only refers to a features of 3d cards that allows you do do per pixel tests.

  51. Re:Has an hour pasted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the editors not reading their own site, is it a wonder Slashdot has sunk this low in quality?

    And yet you keep coming back...

  52. Redundant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted a article stating it was a repost, and got moderated redundant!

    And for some reason someone decided reposting the article wasn't redundant?

    Huh? How's that?

    -sigh-

    1. Re:Redundant! by Winterblink · · Score: 1
      I posted a article stating it was a repost, and got moderated redundant!

      It was probably modded as redundant because a hundred other people posted that it was a repost. Oh well, shit happens.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Redundant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The repost was done by an editor and only another editor can do something about it. You were moderated by someone with moderator points. Trust me they would have nailed the editor too if they could have.

  53. Shadows aren't the only thing. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    The lighting effects are (in general) much neater looking.

    In addition, he also implemented bumpmapping/glossmapping. Unfortunately the bumpmaps/glossmaps he's using in the demo are kind of... ugly. But the engine DOES support high-res TGA textures/bumpmaps/glossmaps. I tried downloading a few high-res textures/bumpmaps from a texture archive and slapping them into a test map - The results were... Amazing. The engine is NOWHERE close to its full potential.

    (I'd post the testmap/textures somewhere but my cable modem connection is apparently down so I can't access my home box from work.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Shadows aren't the only thing. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding. I downloaded and installed this the FIRST time it was posted on /. Sure, the textures look a little better but the way he implemented the effects on water make the levels in the game with water almost unplayable. Plus, there's no way to increase the gamma and the game is overall too dark.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:Shadows aren't the only thing. by Idolminds · · Score: 1

      Make sure you have the water VIS patch for Q1, or the water will seriously mess up. It should look just like clear water. Without the patch, it gets a neon, swirly look to it because the engine doesnt render anything below the water surface, other than "The Void".

    3. Re:Shadows aren't the only thing. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Wasn't aware there was a patch for the water -- to be honest, it looks fine without this added to it.

      Still doesn't answer the issue about the inability to tweak the gamma correction. Some of the subterranian levels are completly unplayable with this added on.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    4. Re:Shadows aren't the only thing. by Idolminds · · Score: 1

      Quake was always dark. Did you try running IdGamma?

  54. Re:MMMM Pie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.weebl.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/b3ta/pie.htm l

  55. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not exactly the same any more.

    Sorry, just being stupid.

  56. Did you read my post at all? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    I said the engine *SUPPORTS* high-res textures, not that he actually *USED* such textures in his download, and that the textures included with the download are, in fact, ugly. (Low-res and the bumpmaps/glossmaps are overdone)

    I tried using some high-res textures/bumpmaps I found and the difference was amazing - MUCH better.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  57. Filter? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

    I mean seriously - how hard could it be to write a filter which checks to see if the URLs in a story are identical to the URLs in a previous story? And if so, it at least WARNS the story poster (or submitter?) that what they're saying has already been posted on /.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  58. Human-like...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not humans. They're fiendish daemons from planet Broxx.

  59. This is getting sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is to the point where we get story dupes every day!

  60. This is not a news ... read more www.heise.de! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They "linked" it weeks ago.

    A "laser" ... i need a "laser" ...

  61. OS X port in progress... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen it myself.. but apparently there's already a beta out... www.fruitz-of-dojo.de

  62. Instead of bitching about double posts by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    maybe you guys should think, "HEY! Perhaps some missed it the first time and they get a second chance to check it out."

    Its like you complainers want a mother bitchin cookie or something just becuase you read slashdot every five minutes... probably more.

    1. Re:Instead of bitching about double posts by spongman · · Score: 2
      yeah, no shit:

      "Wohoo! Look at me. I noticed a repost. Aren't I clever?"
      STFU, fools.
  63. reruns by sfraggle · · Score: 2

    And now, more of "the best of slashdot"...

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
  64. Back at LinuxWorld in Feb, 2001 by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    At the Slashcode BOFH, the QA session was interesting. I was working at Newsforge with Grant , Robin, etc, and we were all there. Someone mentioned duplicates, and this led to a question directed at us -- what do you use to not post duplicate stories?

    Our reply? We always search, and we try to skim the headlines to make sure that we always know what's been posted. In the few cases that we do accidently post a dupe, we had no problems hiding the story so that people had more room to read real ones.

    Of course, with Slascode, you could just add some perl to check if the URL of the target story matches a URL in a previous story body before posting, reducing all posts that point to the same website (which seems to be the common case). As for ones that point to different websites, that's where proper keyword based searching comes in.

    "The slashdot team are treating their users like crap. They're taking us for granted, and frankly, the users make the site." maybe they just don't like having users who remember well. Maybe that's leading to a bit of an inversion, because more users who don't remember previous stories are clamouring to post their duplicates. Unless this was posted JUST by CowboyNeal, some of the blame has to fall on the idiot who submitted this dupe (probably a few hundred times).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  65. Please STOP reposting previous stories! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of OGG please

    1. Re:Please STOP reposting previous stories! by zenst · · Score: 1

      nods - its got so bad that even the MTV generation will start to notice the repeats.

      what next "old story #511 XP edition" :-/

  66. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only has this been reposted, but it's kind of old...

  67. some of the difference is in... by Mihai+Cartoaje · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, some of the difference is made by using a 1/r^2 radiation law instead of the 1/r in Quake. Mihai

  68. Screen Shots by Dan93 · · Score: 1

    Here are the screen shots from google's cache

  69. Damn fine site by mausmalone · · Score: 1

    As a fellow site-maintenece guy (they say I'm a graphic designer, ... ha), I totally sympathize with Slashdot's crew. I work on www.ramapo.edu and we're up to 19,000+ files in the site. All maitained by 4 people w/o content management. I say, so what if there's duplicates? Sometimes I forget to read one day, miss the first post. This is the first I've heard of Tenebrae, and I think it's very very cool. I will try it the instant I get home to a real computer. I'm sure my Radeon will chug on it (Radeon != stencil buffer performance), but it will be cool to have alongside panquake and fisheye quake. :) Thanks again Slashdot for finding another awesome, $0 quake mod... even if it is a re-post.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=
    I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  70. Don't knock the moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least you can still post here without registering with the forum nazis. Bluesnews has even less interesting commentary that it did before, now that anons are banned. It's a wasteland.

    I can't even post a quick note about his stupid pop up ads showing up (pointing to http://www.qualypromos.com/1000/tsn3bpop.html) without filling out my name, address, and SS#. 10,000,000 visitor my butt.

  71. Re:phirst poast yeah yeah sugarbear by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

    At least Bush has the balls to inhale.

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  72. Worse than repeated posts - repeated comments by labradort · · Score: 1

    The news item was repeated once, but the number of reader comments saying it was a repost were in the dozens. There is a suggestion in the "Important Stuff" of our Post Comment screen that suggests you read other messages before posting? Is it that crucial for your voice to be part of the scene?

  73. this is better? by NightHwk1 · · Score: 1

    Those sharp, raytraced-looking shadows do not look realistic, they look like crappy computer generated fake shadows.
    Real shadows are soft, and become less noticeable at a distance.

    The area lighting is a big improvement, but it also removes some of the simulated radiosity that was originally part of the Quake surfaces. (look at before & after page #1)

    I also think the specular highlights have been way overdone. Every surface seems to be very shiny (and bumpy), and it really shows off the low resolution of the textures.

    Or maybe I'm just expecting too much of this brand new expensive nvidia 750xgl. I'll have to spend a few more thousand for really nice shadows.

  74. NOT A REPEAT by HimalayanRoadblock · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys. I checked out the Tennebrae page again and it says that they linked to the wrong page. There was an update about Mac-os Tennebrae I think. Check it out.