Slashdot Mirror


Fighting Music Piracy with Glue

Scott Granneman writes: "The New York Times (Free Blah-di-blah) is reporting that Epic Records, in an effort to prevent reviewers from creating mp3s or even playing the preview CD in anything they don't control, is not disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut. Oh yeah ... the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any authorized output. A low-tech answer to a high-tech issue."

590 comments

  1. From the article by alnapp · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I brought this discman home with me, and I found a way you could go in the back of the CD and, like, pop it open. So I got the actual disc out."

    So, they can't even use glue properly, its not wonder everything else has failed.

    1. Re:From the article by madprof · · Score: 3

      I'm sure some solvent applied in the right place would sort the glue out anyway.
      As long as it didnt' get on the CD I guess.

    2. Re:From the article by Oggust · · Score: 2, Funny
      Not if they used proper glue. (Well, maybe you can dissolve it, but not without melting the player around it.)

      Seriously (no really!) though, isn't this a textbook example of a DMCA violation? Isn't this just what that law was written for? How come this menace of a reviewer is still walking the streets?

      /August.

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    3. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, is that a violation of the DMCA?

    4. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely this guy would have to be worried about the DMCA now right? :)

      A screwdriver seems like a perfectly good circumvention device to me...

    5. Re:From the article by gabec · · Score: 1, Redundant
      "...is not disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut"

      Shouldn't that say:

      "...is disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut"

      ;)

    6. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figure it was meant to be "is now"

    7. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was supposed to be now, not not

    8. Re:From the article by msheppard · · Score: 2

      So can you email me a copy of the cd? Or just post it somewhere.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    9. Re:From the article by Virtex · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, it is a violation of the DMCA. It means that humans can now be declared as circumvention devices. In other words, being human is now illegal, and you can be thrown in jail for 20 years for it.

      If anyone asks, I'm not human. But I think my coworkers already knew that.

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    10. Re:From the article by r33per · · Score: 1
      So, they can't even use glue properly, its not wonder everything else has failed.

      Well, you see, that is what they get for not using Pritt-Stik(TM) to shut the stupid lid...

    11. Re:From the article by thefalconer · · Score: 1

      When are these guys going to learn. If they don't want their music stolen, they need to produce good quality that people will flock to the stores to buy. Not this cookiecutter garbage noise they're trying to pass off as music these days. What sucks even more is the really good music is being opressed.

    12. Re:From the article by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems you are already in the "World Jail" where freedoms (what's that) don't exist anymore.

      Actually we are serfs to non-human entities who are nevertheless granted legal status, are techically immortal, and can never go to jail.

      Can you guess?

      Bingo, the Corporation.

      You are not free to move about the world, so Where Do You Want To Go Today is misleading at best.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    13. Re:From the article by ScoLgo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please see the 'Corporate Agenda - Volume 14, Section VII, Sub-section Eight, Paragraph 2'...

      ..."An alleged human should never be considered as a 'Circumvention Device' under the DMCA as long as said alleged human is a member of the 'Consumer' class. However, should an individual stop being a member of the 'Consumer' class, they can then be considered to be a 'Circumvention Device' under the DMCA as well as a 'Dirty Communist Hippie' under the McCarthy Act. Said individual should, at that time, be prosecuted to the full extent of our^H^H^Hthe law(s)."

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    14. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... or you could just pop them open, take the CD and when you're done copying it, glue the thing back together.

    15. Re:From the article by DeleteYourself · · Score: 1

      haha..this is too funny...not as funny as the black marker fix to copy-proof cds though

    16. Re:From the article by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      "Mr. Smith. We understand that you popped a CD out of a player that was glued shut. This is a violation of the DMCA. We are authorized to confiscate all equipment used to violate this law. Which hand did you use to pop the device open?"

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    17. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If anyone asks, I'm not human. But I think my coworkers already knew that.

      Not Human, I have one eye. Count them... One!

    18. Re:From the article by ripewithdecay · · Score: 0

      You know, that's what I've been saying for the past three years.

      How many CDs that have been released in the past year have really impressed you?

      Yeah, same here.

    19. Re:From the article by redstamen · · Score: 1

      i just have to say that tori amos is much much better than the chaff the record companies normally distribute.

    20. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking pointless in the end , use the aux out or headphone jack, and into your pc soundcard. rip the album analog. , fix it up in pro tools if you really need to.

  2. Ed. by dr_strang · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let me edit this to make it actually make some sense :

    "The New York Times (Free Blah-di-blah) is reporting that Epic Records, in an effort to prevent reviewers from creating mp3s or even playing the preview CD in anything they don't control, is now disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut. Oh yeah ... the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any unauthorized output. A low-tech answer to a high-tech issue."

    --
    This is a sig. It is like every other sig in the world, except that it is mine, and it is different.
    1. Re:Ed. by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, you don't understand. All Slashdot [posts/drivels]* are [reviewed/skimmed over]* by a group of [editors/blind chimps]* before appearing on the site - so they're all [high quality/riddled with mistakes]*, and guaranteed to be [of interest/reposts]* by the time they reach your [desktop/wastepaper basket]*

      *Delete as applicable

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    2. Re:Ed. by lyonsden · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was apropos that the origional posting came from the morons-morons-morons department.

    3. Re:Ed. by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      It should also be: "Fighting Music Piracy With A Clue".

      Oh, wait...

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    4. Re:Ed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, the /. editors weren't walking around putting guns to peoples heads, and forcing them to read the articles.

      If you dislike the contents so much then STOP VISITING THE SIGHT!

    5. Re:Ed. by linuxelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, since they are not disseminating music on devices designed to prevent authorized output, the original post was correct, no?

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
    6. Re:Ed. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      OR... we could provide justifiable criticism and feedback, by complaining about the countless appalling mistakes in an attempt to improve things, because we generally like this place, instead of just running away.

      I mean COME ON!!! This blurb had two mistakes that completely REVERSED THE MEANING! That's completely irresponsible. And this isn't some complex essay, it's just a few lines of text! I don't see how anybody of even average intelligence could possibly let mistakes like this get through, and yet they happen EVERY DAY here on Slashdot. It's pure haphazard laziness. It's just disgusting sometimes. Maybe if enough people complain, they'll get some decent editors. I think it's totally reasonable to expect a certain level of quality. You know, some people PAY for this place.

      Oh, and by the way, Slashdot is a web SITE. Geez. No wonder you don't have a problem with Slashdot's mistakes.. you probably don't even see them when they're in plain SIGHT.

      </RANT DAY="Monday" TIME="AM">

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    7. Re:Ed. by dpu · · Score: 1

      if you read the post very carefully, you'll find that it's very badly written. the grammer corrections are indeed proper since they are in seperate sentences. if the double-positive occured in the same sentence, no correction would have been required. true, they are not distributing music on devices designed to prevent authorized output, but that's not what the original post says. unless english is your second language too. i'd also like to point out that "disseminating," while an interesting choice of words for what Epic is doing, is still a poor choice. "distributing" would have been a much better choice, especially since it doesn't have any of the overtones of saturation that "disseminate" has (look it up). if you find this overly picky, i've got 1 word for ya - bite my ass.

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
    8. Re:Ed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      by a group of [editors/blind chimps]*

      I don't know what slashdot says to you, but it tells me that is was generated by a cadre of elite bruins, whatever those are.

    9. Re:Ed. by Gutzalpus · · Score: 1

      What's really sad is that it's been over 12 hours since this article was posted, your comment was at the top of the page on the "list highest rated comments first" mode, and yet the typos have not been fixed yet...

  3. Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Froobly · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They went to all this trouble to remove the analog loophole, going so far as to permanently attach the headphones...

    But what's to prevent somebody from just cutting off the headphones and splicing another cable onto the end? It's trivial work for anyone with even the slightest bit of electrical ability.

    1. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by mjpaci · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nothing. However, then they would know that there was an attempt at access. To them, clipping the wires is the same as breaking the case to get to the CD. Think about it. If Sony gets the Walkman back with any kind of damage, then they have a good idea where to look when the CD shows up online before it is released.

      --Mike

    2. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Salsaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sorry, your post is in violation of the DMCA. Please turn yourself in to the authorities immediately.

    3. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      why bother when you can just crack the case, rip the disc and then reglue? you're obviousy not very sneaky.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's to prevent someone from buying a bottle of acetone and unsealing the thing, then gluing it back together when they are done?

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    5. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 2, Funny

      A deep feeling of sympathy for the battered and bruised music industry?

      No one's gonna mess with the "little guy" who's just protecting what meager possession he has, right? ::cough::

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    6. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      So don't break the case or clip the wires -- use those telephone induction pickups from Radio Shack (one on each headphone).

      Of course, I haven't shopped at Radio Shack in years. Odds are, someone has declared them to be terrorist tools or something...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Arcturax · · Score: 2

      You can actually get the full telephone test/wiretap kits from Home Depot in the Electrical section. Don't know how well it would work on this system as I imagine it has lower voltages.

      I'll have to get some alligator clips and try it out on a standard pair of headphones some weekend when I'm bored.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    8. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want to use a wiretap. You would
      totally lose stereo sound!

    9. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's why I said one induction coil on each headphone. You did read my comment right? Ah, I forgot, this is Slashdot.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about these headphones, but most, you can just take the foam padding off, and pop the speakers out, they're usually just sittisg in there, or very weakly attached, an the back, there should be open contacts, attach some wires, record, pop the speakers back in, put the ear pads back over, and you have a copy, leaving no noticable trace,,, unless they covered the foam pads in glue too,, lol :) Reece,

    11. Re:Wire cutters and some speaker wire... by Froobly · · Score: 1

      To whomever modded my post as redundant, please read the timestamps before doing so in the future. I started writing that before the flurry of other "snip the wires" posts; it just so happened that somebody else hit he "Submit" button first. The "redundant" tag is meant to discourage people from posting without reading, not to punish people for their bad timing.

  4. nothing new by malus · · Score: 2, Funny

    according to my girlfriend, a RABID Tori Amos fan, this is nothing new. She's apparently always done this.

    Not that it matters, though, as I've had 7 tracks from Scarlet's Walk for well over two months now...

    1. Re:nothing new by malus · · Score: 2, Informative

      i guess i forgot to mention, too, that the Reviewers have to send the walkman back, undamagaed, unmolested, if they want to get interviews, etc.

    2. Re:nothing new by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Epic Records: What happened to the walkman?
      Reviewer: I didn't want to meet Tori Amos.

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    3. Re:nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me all you're saying is that you've pirated the tracks in spite of their obvious efforts to keep the honest people honest... you apparently are not one of those.

    4. Re:nothing new by SubtleNuance · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.

      isnt this a good idea?

      i mean, really, having something dependable/stable/reliable is much more important than extravigance...

      am i missing your point..?

    5. Re:nothing new by Golias · · Score: 1

      One problem with this scheme is that magazine journalists (and music reviewers in particular) are very seldom well-paid. One of the few perks of the job: free albums. Take that away, and you create a bitter little reviewer who will go out of his way to savage your album.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think your missing his point. It's simply an observation worth filing away for future use.

    7. Re:nothing new by budgenator · · Score: 2

      Actualy you would expect that the lables would only send pre-release copies to reviewers that had signed some kind of non-redistribution agreement with them, or at least a shrinkwrap agreement break seal only if you agree, call for a pick-up tag if you don't type of a thing.

      If it were me running the lables, there would be a watermark or something on the disk so if we found it on the internet before the release date you'd be on the outs with us like Nixon did with some bothersome reporters. That way they'd be an underpaid reveiwer getting scooped all of the time, and getting ready to savage our album from the unemployment line.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:nothing new by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
      i mean, really, having something dependable/stable/reliable is much more important than extravigance...
      I think you're looking at it the wrong way...

      Would you rather spend 3 years with "the love of your life", or an entire life in a "nothing special" relationship?

      Quality over quantity. That's what I get out of that quote.
      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    9. Re:nothing new by Golias · · Score: 1
      Actualy you would expect that the lables would only send pre-release copies to reviewers that had signed some kind of non-redistribution agreement with them, or at least a shrinkwrap agreement break seal only if you agree, call for a pick-up tag if you don't type of a thing.

      You would be correct to expect that, becuase that's pretty much what they do. They don't enforce it very much, or at least they didn't in the pre-Napster era, because a few more copies on the used bins wouldn't really impact sales that much.

      My point remains that a lot of reviewers and radio people consider access to those demp's to be among the few perks of their otherwise shitty jobs.

      Were I reviewer, and received one of these goofy headphone thingies, I would be tempted to not write about the album if it's good, or write a bile-filled screed about how dull it is if it's less than excelent.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  5. Oh yeah right by Salsaman · · Score: 0, Interesting

    People are really gonna buy a new Walkman every time they buy a CD. Great idea guys !

    1. Re:Oh yeah right by Fuzzums · · Score: 3, Funny

      then you can take a look at each others walkman collection ;)

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:Oh yeah right by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Kids. Reality Check. These are review copies. Not final versions. Read the fscking summary, never mind the article.

      --

      jh

    3. Re:Oh yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's just for reviewers. The point is to prevent digital copies from circulating on the Net before the official release date. Reviewers get their copies early, because it takes some time for the review to be written, published and distributed, and the record companies want the reviews to be read around the time the album comes out for maximum promotional value. Now, in the P2P era, some albums have been shared early -- either by reviewers, or others on the short list of those who get advance copies. For example, I got a copy of Madonna's Music off Napster a month before the official release. And last year, I got Cyndi Lauper's Shine -- an album for which reviews were published, but which was never actually released; the record company dropped it in between the time they sent out the review copies and the scheduled release date. (This was the full album, not the EP version that finally did come out this year, on a different label.)

    4. Re:Oh yeah right by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      People are really gonna buy a new Walkman every time they buy a CD. Great idea guys !

      You know, if they can affort to ship a CD player with every CD, then don't you get the feeling that they are making CDs very very cheap, infact I don't see how they can justify charge $15-$30 for a CD the doesn't come with a CD player.

      I have bought a CD since Napster got stopped the first time....

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  6. Not a Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before long, some hacker will write a program to....

    oh crap.

  7. duh. by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    Just clip the headphones' cables and input it to your soundcard...(yeah, i know the quality won't be perfect, but it will be ok)

    this is really stupid... trying to "prevent"...

    since they know they are losers from first hand, why do they just keep giving us these (stupid) challenges?

    (what if we dissassemble the player and get the goddamn cd out of there, anyway)

    i'm counting minutes until these songs appear on p2p

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:duh. by spitzak · · Score: 2

      Yea, this seems incredibly stupid and expensive. Why not go to each city, get the reviewers in a room, make sure they don't have any recording devices, and play the music for them? While they are at it, give them a lot of free food and liquor. It's got to be less expensive and is guaranteed to prevent piracy.

  8. In other news... by andyt · · Score: 1

    Slashot editors are not checking submissions to make sure they don't make sense.

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in yet other news, people who complain about spelling errors while mispelling Slashdot are thought to have absoletely no credibility whatsoever.

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget all those posters misspelling "misspelling", either.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're wrong. They ARE checking them to make sure they don't make sense. They're doing a fine job too!

  9. a tad too carried away... by koldcuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    this had me scared for a moment before i read and realize this is being done to albums that are being reviewed, not purchased by consumers. and what's to stop a critic from throwing the cd player on the floor in a violent manner to miraculously break it and reveal the precious intellectual property within?

    --
    Holiday in Cambodia!
    1. Re:a tad too carried away... by majestynine · · Score: 1

      Probably the fact that the reviewers would have to return the discman and CD to Sony once they were done reviewing it. It would probably have tamperproof seals on the screws etc.

      There would certainly be a clause in the big legal document they had to sign saying that if they broke or dissassembled the unit, they realise they would be sued into the ground.

    2. Re:a tad too carried away... by Detritus · · Score: 2
      Most reviewers, unless they work for a publication that has to review the recording, are going to toss the NDA and the CD player in the nearest trash can.

      Reviewers get far more material than they can ever hope to review in print. If they don't review the <foo> CD, there are plenty of other good CDs to write about, from record companies that don't make inane demands on reviewers.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  10. not new... by apidya · · Score: 2, Informative

    why is this remarkable? record companies have been doing this for years?

    if i recall correctly, emi distributed walkmans with copies of Radiohead's OK Computer album glued into them, back in 1997. and i belive this was by no means the first time the idea had been used.

    the cost of several hundred (or even thousand) cheap cd walkmans is hardly going to eat into a multinational record companies bottom line.

    1. Re:not new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, especially when consumers are the ones who pay for those few thousand cheap Walkmans(TM) anyway...

    2. Re:not new... by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      And if it will prevent just one 12 year old from downloading music they would never buy anyway, then it will all have been worth it.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:not new... by Quixote · · Score: 2
      why is this remarkable? record companies have been doing this for years?

      I wonder what they did with LPs ?

    4. Re:not new... by paiute · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially since the cost of those walkmans will be billed to the artist as promotional expenses.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    5. Re:not new... by Nick+Number · · Score: 2, Funny

      They introduced a high-tech protection scheme that prevented any duplication. The new discs were extremely unpopular among computer users of the day since they wouldn't play in LP-ROM drives.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    6. Re:not new... by Lethyos · · Score: 2

      the cost of several hundred (or even thousand) cheap cd walkmans is hardly going to eat into a multinational record companies bottom line.

      Interestingly enough, you're absolutely correct. Funny how, with this in mind, P2P file-sharing services do.

      --
      Why bother.
  11. Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    If applied with some care, the walkman could just as easily be broken off the disc. "oops, it fell ten stories down when the reviewer was listening to it while leaning out is office window having a smoke". Or am I missing something here?? Otherwise, just clip the headphone wire.. hook them up to plain old audio plugs, or a mini jack and off you go into a decent sound card.
    I'd say the digital part has to be done differently by providing a player with the album stored in some sort of encrypted ROM chip, but even then.. sound is still sound and must be made audible at some point to be appreciated. That's where you can tap it, and make a plain MP3 out of it.
    Sony are just making themselve impopular with this kind of practice. When will the big companies learn that the genie is out, it's unstoppable, and their business models just need adjustment???

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    1. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by actiondan · · Score: 2

      The record company most probably demands that the players are returned to them intact after the review period. If one has been tampered with, broken or had the earphones cut off, they will know never to send a review copy to that reviewer again.

    2. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the solution is even easier.

      Put the volume to the max and put the earphones next to a microphone; tape it/save it on your HD.

      Presto; you've got a copy of the song. If done with care; it can be of a surprizing quality.

    3. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by pediddle · · Score: 1

      More than that, I'm sure the reviewers would have to have signed a contract stipulating that they did not tamper with the unit or extract the music, and they would get sued for all they're worth. After all, nothing is worse than a pirate/terrorist.

    4. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2

      Most music reviewers asked for such an agreement would tell the label to just fuck off. The goal is to be one of the few albums making it into the limited space for reviews; it's a reviewer's market.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    5. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by actiondan · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with you when talking about smaller releases but with big album releases from big artists, the reviewers are generally pretty desperate to make sure that they get a review copy. This is especiallytrue if there has been a lot of hype surrounding an impending release and the reviewers know that the public is hungry for information about the release.

    6. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

      By describing a method for bypassing a copyright protection mechanism, you are in violation of the DMCA. Hillary Rosen will be leading an angry horde of superintelligent police chimps to smash in your door immediately. If you know what's good for you, you will not try to leave your house.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    7. Re:Nothing a low-tech smashing won't cure.. by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

      Luckily I have nothing to do with the DMCA since I'm not a citizen of the US. However, you shouldn't be reading any of my subversive comments.. You government might think you're being pushed into terrorism and flagrant subversion of American corporate business models.

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
  12. Roll up, roll up ... by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2
    .... see the daring Pogue Mahone violate the DMCA (again) ...

    the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any authorized output

    Why not cut the headphone lead and solder a suitable connector onto the Walkman end?

    --
    Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    1. Re:Roll up, roll up ... by egghat · · Score: 2

      If they are not totally weird (which I'm not that sure ...) they want the diskman back after a few weeks. And then they will see who has 'manipulated' the device and who has not.

      The NY times story doesn't mention, if Epic wants the deivces back, so my comment is just wild guessing.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    2. Re:Roll up, roll up ... by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      Have you missed the entire point of digital audio?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Roll up, roll up ... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Why not cut the headphone lead and solder a suitable connector onto the Walkman end?

      I thought of this too, but then I figured it wouldn't be impossible for DRM-enabled headphones to be developed that would prevent this exploit. It's only a matter of time...

  13. Wire cutting by nick255 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ummmmm. I guess they must be assuming journalists are not engineers, as otherwise they could just cut the headphone wires and them connect them to their favourite input.

    1. Re:Wire cutting by ChrisJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then when reviewer returns the walkman with cut wires, Epic Records can ream them for being naughty pirates.

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
    2. Re:Wire cutting by mpe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess they must be assuming journalists are not engineers, as otherwise they could just cut the headphone wires and them connect them to their favourite input.

      Thus making wire cutters illegal under the DMCA :)

    3. Re:Wire cutting by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      True... I'd probably melt the glue, or use a solvent... and then re-glue it afterwards, as it's unlikely they're going to examine it and go "HA! THIS IS DIFFERENT GLUE!".

    4. Re:Wire cutting by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thus making wire cutters illegal under the DMCA :)


      I always use my teeth to strim wires - are they illegal too?

    5. Re:Wire cutting by dietz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then when reviewer returns the walkman with cut wires, Epic Records can ream them for being naughty pirates.

      Uhm, generally you don't return promo copies of CDs. That's why can almost always find them (marked "NOT FOR RESALE") at your favorite used CD store. (Not the national chains, who often won't buy them, but at smaller local stores).

      I doubt they'd make them return a CD player that had been glue shut, either. What good would it be to Sony if you can't even get it open? It would just be a lot of work for the reviewers and the label.

    6. Re:Wire cutting by ChrisJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well if they don't want them returned, wtf is the point of glueing the player shut? you could easily just cut it open and take the CD out. I would have thought it would actually make more sense, and be cheaper, to put the single onto a tiny device with a $10 mp3 decoder in it, so there physically isn't anything to remove, or any way to remove the track without some serious hardware debugging.
      Of course sanity and media companies are rarely found together ;)

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
    7. Re:Wire cutting by NeMon'ess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're kidding right? If the player doesn't have to be returned, than the reviewer can just break open the player carefully and get to the CD. The point of gluing them is to keep the tracks from going up on the net before the album hits the retail shelves. I'm betting the glue doesn't have a strength of infinity+1 and the players do have to be returned unmolested if the reviewer wants to preview any future albums from that company.

    8. Re:Wire cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your teeth, yes.

    9. Re:Wire cutting by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes.

      Only, your mouth is already illegal since you can speak copyrighted IP outloud.

      We'll expect you to say goodbye to your loved ones and turn yourself in immediately.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:Wire cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the good old magnetic pickup on headphones would work...

    11. Re:Wire cutting by Wedge1024 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe I have ever seen such redundant posting. After having read many posts saying this same "cut the headphone wires" thing here's another one... but this one is marked +5 insightful?!?!? WTF? Welcome to the collective.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
    12. Re:Wire cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "...they must be assuming journalists are not engineers..."

      Hey, here on Slashdot journalists aren't even journalists.

    13. Re:Wire cutting by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I used to use my teeth to strip wire.

      A good wire stripper is a lot better, and more replacable, than your teeth. Get one of the Paladin strippers. You'll not regret it.

    14. Re:Wire cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wire cutters don't steal music; people steal music.

    15. Re:Wire cutting by dbitter1 · · Score: 1

      Nail polish remover disolves most cyocrylanate (sp?) glues nicely as well...

      --
      For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
    16. Re:Wire cutting by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      ...strength of infinity+1

      They don't need a strength of infinity+1. All they need is a strength of infinity! ;)

    17. Re:Wire cutting by Fred+IV · · Score: 1

      My Bic always does the trick...just don't breathe too deeply afterwards. ;)

    18. Re:Wire cutting by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 1
      Yes, and furthermore the RIAA is currently buying legislation that will authorize them to send an electrical charge through the wire if they detect that you are illegally stripping it with your teeth.

      Be careful out there, folks... you can never quite tell which wires are real, and which ones have been carefully placed by the RIAA to catch nefarious evildoers in the act of wire stripping.

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    19. Re:Wire cutting by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Well if they don't want them returned, wtf is the point of glueing the player shut?

      Like most low-cost security solutions, it's to keep honest people honest. Serves the same purpose as a cheap bike lock. No serious [MusicWarezD00d/BikeThief] is bothered by [Glue/a$2Padlock]. It just keeps those with no expertise in such things as [CDplayerBreaking/WireCutters] from doing Bad Things.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    20. Re:Wire cutting by Skapare · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't even need to cut the wires. You can just put a coil around the earpieces or the wires leading to the earpieces and pick up the content inductively. Most journalists won't know that, but it only takes one leak :-)

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    21. Re:Wire cutting by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Funny


      In fact the act of strimming wires has been illegal for years -- regardless of what body part you use to do it.

      You pervert.

    22. Re:Wire cutting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, I think they might even settle for infinity-1, for what it's worth.

    23. Re:Wire cutting by xlation · · Score: 1

      As my shop teacher always said "It's important to use the right hammer for the job."

    24. Re:Wire cutting by bbtom · · Score: 1

      [i]"I would have thought it would actually make more sense, and be cheaer, to put the single onto a tiny device with a $10 mp3 decoder in it"[/i]

      Two problems...

      1. Record companies rarely have an IQ larger than that of a failed sports teacher, and that's why their idea of security mainly revolves around glue.

      2. MP3's are bad, and if you use MP3's your an evil communist. ;)

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    25. Re:Wire cutting by ChrisJones · · Score: 2

      I think I already addressed the sanity of media companies :)

      As for the mp3's, you write me a program that will convert all my albums to ogg without losing huge amounts of quality, then I'll consider it ;)

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
    26. Re:Wire cutting by ChrisJones · · Score: 2

      Isn't that a little unfair to music journos?
      What exact expertise do you need to force open the lid of a discman? ;)

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
    27. Re:Wire cutting by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Seriously.

      How hard would it be for the record-store owner to peel that "not for resale" sticker off the packaging?

      So why is it there? Because the cachet of having a review copy is worth at least 50c pure cash profit.

      I could sell those stickers for a dime apiece, but the music industry is slimy, so I won't.

      --Blair

    28. Re:Wire cutting by abdulla · · Score: 1

      Great, now it'll be illegal to practically apply high school physics, I always wanted an excuse to destroy those text books. ;)

    29. Re:Wire cutting by dietz · · Score: 2

      How hard would it be for the record-store owner to peel that "not for resale" sticker off the packaging?

      Uhm, have you ever seen them? The words "promotional copy not for resale" are almost always ON the package, as in printed on the artwork, usually in place of the barcode (that's right... no barcode).

      And every place I see them, they sell for the exact same price as any other used CD of the same title.

  14. Typo...? by schepers · · Score: 1

    "...is not disseminating..."
    I think you mean "...is now disseminating...". Wouldn't be very big news if the industry was failing to conform to a practice that they had never done before... like charging reasonable prices or paying the artist fairly.

    In other news, several major book publishers are distributing reviewer copies of their books with the pages glued together. And paying Oprah to rave about it, so there's no fear that it won't do well.

  15. Is it so hard to proofread these blurbs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "The New York Times (Free Blah-di-blah) is reporting that Epic Records, in an effort to prevent reviewers from creating mp3s or even playing the preview CD in anything they don't control,is not disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut."

    Oh is if they are NOT disseminating music in walkmen that are glued shut, then nothing to worry about, right?

  16. Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Brento · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use those greeting cards that play a tune when you open them.

    Pay Tori to personally visit each reviewer with a guitar and play her songs.

    Distribute the songs in Ogg Vorbis format. (rimshot)

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by DominiqueChanet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pay Tori to personally visit each reviewer with a guitar and play her songs.
      mmmh... maybe you haven't thought about this, but Tori plays the piano, _not_ the guitar! It would be quite funny seeing her carrying around a whole piano though...

    2. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're missing the point, the idea is that if she plays the songs on a guitar instead of a piano, nobody can record the real version on a concealed pocket dictation machine, and then distribute them on the internet after she's left.

    3. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by jeremyp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better idea: she uses a different instrument for each reviewer. That way, when a ripped off mp3 appears of her playing her new album accompanied by a trombone you can figure out which reviewer leaked the song.

      (Don't ask me how Tori Amos plays a trombone and sings at the same time - I'm an ideas man).

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    4. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by AGMW · · Score: 1
      (Don't ask me how Tori Amos plays a trombone and sings at the same time - I'm an ideas man).

      Some sort of special mouthpiece to allow the required forced air, although mouthpiece might be a bit of a misnomer.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    5. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Oh sure, and what's to stop someone from cutting off her head, sticking it in a jar, and connecting it to a bunch of MIDI instruments?

      What? They want Tori back afterwards and they'll check for tampering? Bastards!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by photonic · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I have always been wondering why they don't use this kind of technique for sensitive information. For example if you have a top secret memo on the Iraqi army, insert some tiny differences in each version of the memo. If the story leaks to the press, just look up the number of soldiers (scuds, secret wives of Saddam, etc.) it cites and kill the appropriate congres member.

      --
      karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    7. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just heard a guy who "sings" through his trombone while he's playing it, producing some really neat harmonies and overtones.

    8. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by essaunders · · Score: 1

      ok. Offtopic, I know.
      I play the trombone and have been able to do this (very poorly) for a while. It is an interesting study in how sound waves work and interact (and a quick way to get a head rush)
      Using the same intereference technique, some pipe organs make it sound like they have lower notes by playing the correct combination of two higher notes.

    9. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how do you know that they don't already do this?

    10. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was already used by Tom Clancy in one of his novels that involved Jack Ryan.

    11. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

      If Tori actually visited the reviewer, wouldn't that actually be a private performance, and the reviewer could do whatever he/she wanted with a recording of that? Unless you you signed a contract of course.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    12. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Interrobang · · Score: 2

      Since it's Tori Amos, we don't really have to worry about that...

      (wince) ...or are there actually people out there who will listen to Tori Amos while not under duress?

      Along those same lines, this shouldn't be the RIAA's problem at all. It should fall under the EPA's guidelines for "noise pollution."

    13. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Brento · · Score: 2

      Since it's Tori Amos, we don't really have to worry about that...

      That was my other guess - that they glued the CD player closed to make sure the CD didn't escape. Could be construed as a terrorist activity, letting those CDs loose into the wild.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    14. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by r33per · · Score: 1
      (Don't ask me how Tori Amos plays a trombone and sings at the same time - I'm an ideas man).

      Chances are that she can, matey.

    15. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by ucblockhead · · Score: 2

      Given that she's a piano player, that will likely make for poor reviews.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    16. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What? They want Tori back afterwards and they'll check for tampering? Bastards!

      Heh, heh, you said tampering with Tori Amos ;)

    17. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      Well, just so you know, there's at least two people in the world who thinks Tori Amos is the best musical artist of all time.

      No accounting for taste, right?

    18. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll likely play her tunes to the next batch of branch davidians they hope to drive totally insane to the point where they'll run out into machine gun fire.

    19. Re:Other ideas to ensure they're not distributed by alexburke · · Score: 2

      Pay Tori

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

      [/me wipes the tears from my eyes after laughing so hard]

      That was a good one! Paying the artist!!!

      *sigh*...

  17. The whole point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that the reviewers will be forced to sniff that glue while writing their pieces. Possibly the only way to get a positive comment out of them ;-)

  18. That's gotta be a joke... by RealUlli · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Already April 1st ?!?

    Shit. Missed Christmas... ;-)

    Cheers, Ulli

    --
    Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
  19. Wow! by morie · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm gonna start reviewing CD's. Can't make a living with my reviews, but sure can use the extra income from the unglued diskmans I sell.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  20. Uhd by fUllstAr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Their walkmans are scrap now. No wonder they need some money, eheh hu hoof.eef

    --
    THis is my signature bah: That's ridiculous, someone registered 'fullstar' so I had to choose 'fullstarplus'!!!
  21. And of course the headphones... by leomekenkamp · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...would just have to be glued to your ears to prevent someone else from listening to it.

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    1. Re:And of course the headphones... by machine+of+god · · Score: 1
      ...the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any authorized output.


      At first that what what I thought they were talking about. Kind of makes sense doesn't it? (The semantics, not the actual act)

  22. Read the story!!! by vidnet · · Score: 2
    ...in an effort to prevent reviewers from creating mp3s...

    Reviewers don't even buy the cd, they usually get them from the record companies. The problem is rouge reviewers putting the music on the internet before the cd is released! This way, the reviewers can listen to the music and write their reviews as they otherwise would, but there's less of a chance that they'll put it on kaaza or whatever before the CD is available to the public.

    1. Re:Read the story!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are they going to build these walkmans out of? Titanium? I don't think so. How hard do you really think it will be to crack this thing open?

    2. Re:Read the story!!! by xigxag · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem is rouge reviewers putting the music on the internet

      I hear ya brother! Those damn ladies' makeup magazine writers are the worst! Freaking Cosmo!!

      Oh.

      Never mind.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    3. Re:Read the story!!! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      How hard do you really think it will be to crack this thing open?

      Sure, crack it open if you want. Don't expect Sony to send any further preview copies after you've returned the remains of the first player.

      Ironically, at that point, said reviewer would then have to got to Kazaa/Winmx to get further CDs for review!

    4. Re:Read the story!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those crazy red/pinkish colored guys!

    5. Re:Read the story!!! by sympleko · · Score: 1

      The problem is rouge reviewers...

      That's why I only trust reviews written by blanc and bleu reviewers.

      Nothing like some good french-bashing to start your day.

    6. Re:Read the story!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could just say: "Sony won't send me a review copy, I'll just assume it's because the Cd sucks."

    7. Re:Read the story!!! by Isle · · Score: 1

      Which ofcouse gived the real answer to what they should have done instead: Release when ready!/B

      This problem only exists because they try to hype the market with a product that they cant have, but can hear bits of on the radio and see reviews of.

    8. Re:Read the story!!! by aronc · · Score: 1

      This problem only exists because they try to hype the market with a product that they cant have, but can hear bits of on the radio and see reviews of.

      No, not always. Real world publishing doesn't work like the net. Magazines often go to press 2-3 months head of when they'll hit stores. So, if you want a magazine to have a review of your album in it when the album comes out that means you'll probably need to have the CD in the reviewers hand at least 2 1/2 months ahead of the release date and probably more like 4 months. Giving copies two days before works great for online music reviews, but not for print mags.

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
  23. low-tech could work ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    Not having read the linked article, in pure /. tradition ...

    Make the players pretty colors, with about 400 slightly different models to compare and collect. Make them super cheap and flimsy; it's not like your going use one of them anywhere near as much as a general purpose player.

    And best of all, just use a crippled format or something. Tech support problems solved! "Um, sir, you're not allowed to open it up and put the CD in your computer ...

    1. Re:low-tech could work ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord! Would you shut up! The record execs might be reading ./ and then you might have a point...

      Wow, it would be like those poke-whatevers, teenagers the world over would be like, "'oh my god, do you have the new Tori player?' 'No! Is it cool?!' 'Oh my god, yes! It's, like red with the cover art actually on the top of it...and then the lyrics are printed on the bottom!' 'Wow, I love Sony Records, I want to marry them when I'm old enough and have a secure job!' ... or something like that...yeah, it'd be great!

  24. Re:Bad Idea by lovebyte · · Score: 2

    It seems like a waste of money to have to buy an ENTIRE PLAYER just to listen to a CD

    Did you skip your reading lessons at school? This is for journalists only! Journalists don't buy anything, they receive CDs and in this case a walkman for free so that they can write reviews. Like for all reviews, be it music or software, you are not suppose to use the item in question for anything else than testing.

    I think it is a neat idea to avoid journalists abusing their privileges.

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  25. Environment by buzy+buzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know they are only releasing a limited supply of these to journalists, but seams to me this is very environmentally unfriendly.

    Don't think a Sting preview will be released this way.

    Are there plans to reuse or recycle the returned CD walkmans?

    --
    If you get modded down for a first post... What do you get for a last post?
    1. Re:Environment by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 2

      That would be the same Sting who featured in an ad (in the UK at least) for a Jaguar car (probably around 5 miles to the gallon) that had leather seats and a rare wood (mahogany?) dashboard... Yeah, right on, Sting :)

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    2. Re:Environment by sirius_bbr · · Score: 0

      Are there plans to reuse or recycle the returned CD walkmans?

      How? They're glued shut ;)

      --
      this sig has intentionally been left blank
    3. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this "environmentally unfriendly?"

      Reviewer gets CD player, listens, sends back, Epic throws it in dumpster for any dumpster diver passing along to snatch every one of them and eBay them all.

      Worst case, it goes to a landfill (hint: that is a big hole that gets filled with trash and covered with dirt).

    4. Re:Environment by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you don't know much about cars, or Sting. The Jag in question (S-type) will probably do 25-35mpg without much trouble, the wood in question is almost certainly walnut, and Sting - of course - is the world's most pretentious twat, who sold out his musical gifts many years ago for a dumptruck full of cocaine and a rather nice Tuscan estate.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Environment by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      That would be the same Sting who featured in an ad (in the UK at least) for a Jaguar car (probably around 5 miles to the gallon) that had leather seats and a rare wood (mahogany?) dashboard... Yeah, right on, Sting :)

      The ads were shown in the US. I can't imagine that particular car getting less than 15 mpg.

    6. Re:Environment by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      ...it's funny you should write that - their is a skip behind Sony Music (in Great Marlborough Street, Soho lovers) that is often overflowing with dumped CDs. They seem to scratch them to try and render them useless, but we all know just how well the ancient CD Reed Solomon code deals with scratches. A guy I used to work with has nicked PLENTY of discs out of that bin...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bottom line is: if you can't afford the gas you probably can't afford the payments either.

      "Environmentalism" should be according to one's concience and not through the overwhealming power of the state.

    8. Re:Environment by operagost · · Score: 2

      And he doesn't even drive, so his view of the car is entirely from the back seat.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Driving is for the lower classes.'

      '*I* am Sting!'

    10. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someones jealous.... I think someones jealous!!!!

    11. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S-type 3.0L V6
      MPG City/Hwy 18/25

      S-type 4.2L v8
      MPG City/Hwy 17/24

      But, of course, YMMV

    12. Re:Environment by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      what, of Sting's good looks and enormous fortune? not me...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    13. Re:Environment by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Urban : 21.1 - 15.3mpg

      Extra Urban : 38.7 - 30.5mpg

      Combined : 29.6 - 22.5mpg

      These are the UK published figures, so I wasn't far off (looks like the American system gives shitty figures, too).

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    14. Re:Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt the artists have any say in the matter. Pearl Jam may not have the sales they used to, but they still have some clout. Their last 3-4 albums have all been released in cardboard-only packages (with shrinkwrap).

  26. really hard to circumvent? by sdflkgfljdqshgjkqsfg · · Score: 1

    Well I'm not an electronics engineer, but how hrd would it be to cut the headphone cord down the middle and hook up those two (left and right I assume) cables manually to a microphone, line it, noral stereo jack... well just about anything usefull to copy this cd?

    Ok, so your headphones are [partly] useless but you get to copy the cd right?

    Can someone in the know tell me if this doable? IS there a big loss? Is it just plain dumb?

    --
    how does one change his /. id?
    1. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it is "just plain dumb." How, exactly, would the reviewer explain the snipped headphone lines when returning the unit to the record company?

    2. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, cutting the wires and joining them to a connector is just about the simplest electronical operation there is. People all over the world figure out how to do it. You don't really need any tools except scissors to do it. 6-year-old kids can do it. And you're asking for electronics engineers to tell you if it's possible?!

    3. Re:really hard to circumvent? by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      Bad engineering; since cutting the headphone cord will tell Sony that the device has been tampered with, then breaking the walkman open and extracting the CD will give you a much better quality rip with an equal violation of the NDA.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    4. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      a.) It's for reviewers, not the general public.

      b.) You really have to worry about people that seriously thought this was for the general public, even after all the crap the industry has been pulling.

      c.) Cutting wires, etc would be obvious when the player is returned to the record company.

      Though with c, (and yes I know the back can be opened and the CD removed, as per the article)

      what type of glue is it? Can it be pulled off, and replaced (eg super glue remover). What about inductive pickups over the headphone wires, etc.

      Obviously not a foolproof method.

      These players are intended to be given to radio jocks, etc as a preview, the players are just to stop them from trying to play it early, because, if they play it early, the player can be seen to be tampered with, and the record company will never give them a preview again (While those that played by the rules will get them).

      Serious reviewers with strong ties with the industry, or who are well respected by the industry, will get a plain CD to listen in their personal sound setups. They get this treatment, because they have demonstrated that they will not leak the music, but will give a review/opinion on the piece that will help generate hype and/or broaden the market.

    5. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Soporific · · Score: 1

      Seems to me you could do it with a device that would just barely bite into the wire, similar to an RJ-45 plug. Do it at two different locations and I doubt it would be noticed. Cords get frayed, split and nicked all the time.

      ~S

    6. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well I'm not an electronics engineer, but how hrd would it be to cut the headphone cord down the middle and hook up those two (left and right I assume) cables manually to a microphone, line it, noral stereo jack... well just about anything usefull to copy this cd?

      Very easy! just cut the wire, pull the two individual wires apart a little and strip off the insulation either with a knife if you're good, or with a $2 tool available at any radio shack. Get a short Stereo miniplug estension cord, cut and stip that in a similar fasion and hook in the male side to the phones by twisting the wires together, then twist in the wires from the now disembodied headphones, tape the indivitual wires and the whole splice with electrical tape and Voila! you have the option of using the phones or the "tap" to connect to the line input of your sound card.

      Ok, so your headphones are [partly] useless but you get to copy the cd right?

      Headphones still work (see above). Only problem is if they collect up the players again, you can't hide what you did.

    7. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Samari711 · · Score: 1
      except i doubt the headphones are anything but cheap ass sony ones, easily replaceable. it'd probably be just as easy to rip them out of the socket and then reglue an identical pair in there, good as new.

      of course no matter what they do, someone somewhere is going to be able to record it. if you can hear it, it can be picked up by a microphone and can be digitally encoded. just set up a mic to each ear piece one at a time and record the chanels as wave seperately then combine them, may not be the best quality rip, but if done properly it'd be good enough

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    8. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      a pair of pins(possibly fine sewing needles, but the diameter of those may be too big for this application) could probably be used to discreetly touch the conductors through the wire jacket, with nothing more than a couple tiny pinholes as proof of anything, which could probably be covered up relatively easily. Doing it either at the top, where the headphone meets the wire, or at the bottom, where the holes could be covered by the plugs jacket, could make the holes nearly invisible to detection, except by a more than summary inspection(ie. something more expensive than it's worth). With a little strategically placed insulation, you could even cut it down to one hole, but it would be somewhat more visible than the two smaller ones.

      This would only get you one channel of stereo, but with one more hole(and somewhat more risk), you could get fairly good quality stereo, ripe for the ripping.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:really hard to circumvent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just get an attachment at radioshack and plug it into a microphone jack in a sound card, and presto.

  27. So don't review it by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Return the thing unreviewed then, siting 'technical difficulties'.

    Presumably other artists' CDs are put through the reviewers' own systems, set up the way they like them. Just say a fair comparison is impossible without putting these new CDs through that same system.

    Of course, if you're feeling vindictive, you could always slate them instead...

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:So don't review it by Sonicated · · Score: 1

      Return the thing unreviewed then, siting 'technical difficulties'.

      That takes to much effort. Use a medium sized hammer to chip away at the CD player to reveal the CD. When they ask for the CD player back just reply "Oh. I thought it was a new type of case and threw it away".

      Ignorance can be bliss.

    2. Re:So don't review it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. No doubt the headphones are a pair of stock in-ear jobbies that sound make the audio sound like you're listening to a viola underwater. I can't stand those shitty things, personally, and I'm not an audiophille, let alone someone who spends all day listening to music.

      Personally I'd find it quite funny to read a review along the lines of "Well it might have been a good CD, but the sound quality was so shit I couldn't hear anything. Tori Amos apparently has a fetish for screeching white noise and no bass. If thats your cup of tea, then you'll love this. Otherwise, try listening to a car with a loose fanbelt, you'll have more fun."

      Yeah yeah, I'm feeling bitter today.

    3. Re:So don't review it by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      If you do not review it then a competitor will and write a review.

    4. Re:So don't review it by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Record companies can only get away with this sort of thing in extremely few cases. Have you SEEN the piles and piles of CDs a reviewer typically gets? Do you know how little annoyance it takes to put a CD in the 'too much effort' pile?

      Record companies are filled with drooling fuckwits.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    5. Re:So don't review it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is "citing" not "siting". Not to be a spelling nazi, but the mispelling of this this word is increasing in frequency on Slashdot.

      Use www.m-w.com.

    6. Re:So don't review it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The word is "citing" not "siting".

      You're absolutely right, and I realised I'd done it wrong the moment I hit submit...

      Not to be a spelling nazi...

      Can't say I'm much bothered by the correction - I agree that better standards would be welcome round here. Ah well, just sit back and marvel at my correct use of apostrophes instead...

      Cheers,
      Ian

    7. Re:So don't review it by tmark · · Score: 2

      That presumes that the reviewers are advocates first, reviewers second. I, for one, would fire the ass of any reviwer on my staff who puts his/or her politics or agenda in the way of my putting out a review that lots of my readers might be interested in.

    8. Re:So don't review it by mccalli · · Score: 2
      That presumes that the reviewers are advocates first, reviewers second.

      Not at all - it presumes they are reviewers first, advocates nowhere. To review one must make accurate comparisons. To make accurate comparisons you must listen on the same equipment.

      Additionally, a record company is now trying to impose its process into your business. You can either accept this, or make a statement that you control your business' methods and reject their attempt.

      No l33t 0p3n s0Vrc3 advocacy required. And not even the merest whisper of Ogg Vorbis...

      Cheers,
      Ian

    9. Re:So don't review it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      l33t 0p3n s0Vrc3


      Why do you children persist in typing that line noise of mixed fucking numbers and letters?

    10. Re:So don't review it by mbourgon · · Score: 2

      Naw, review it, but bitch about the how the quality of the sound, the mix, the production, all suck. Since I'm sure the headphones are pieces of crap, seems like a legit review to me.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    11. Re:So don't review it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do you children persist in typing that line noise of mixed fucking numbers and letters?

      Go back and reread the thread. Then see why I typed it like that...

      Out of interest, child, what did you score in your English Comprehension classes...?

    12. Re:So don't review it by infinite9 · · Score: 2

      Return the thing unreviewed then, siting 'technical difficulties'.

      This is actually a good point, since many CD reviewers like to play CDs in their reference systems to judge things like production quality. I'm sure that glued shut Koss cd player sounds just as good as those $500 headphones. :-)

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  28. Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was walking along minding my business, when out of an orange colored sky
    Flash, bam, alakazam, wonderful you came by, I was humming a tune,
    drinking in sunshine, when out of that orange colored view
    Wham, bam, alakazam, I got a look at you
    One look and I yelled timber, watch out for flying glass
    'Cause the ceiling fell in and the bottom fell out, I went into a spin
    And I started to shout, I've been hit, this is it, this is it
    I was walking along minding my business, when love came and hit me in the eye
    Flash, bam, alakazam, out of an orange colored sky
    Well, one look and I yelled timber, watch out for flying glass
    'Cause the ceiling fell in and the bottom fell out, I went into a spin
    And I started to shout I've been hit, this is it, this is it
    I was walking along, minding my business, when love came and hit me in the eye
    Flash, bam, alakazam, out of an orange, colored, purple stripes
    Pretty green polka dot sky, flash, bam, alakazam, went the sky

    WOW! I THOUGHT LOVE WAS MUCH SOFTER THAN THAT! (What a most disturbing sound)

  29. tinny sound by nath_o_brien · · Score: 2, Informative

    How can a music reviewer be expected to give a favourable review solely by listening to the said CDs on a Walkman?

    All the Walkmans I've owned have given the music a really tinny sound - even the supposedly decent quality ones.

    Even if they hooked up the output to a proper speakers, they still probably wouldn't get the quality you would get from a good stereo set up - which these guys would be used to.

    --
    - Welcome the coming of the New World Odour
    1. Re:tinny sound by SaraSmith · · Score: 0

      That doesn't matter, do you think they even listen to them?

      Actually giving the cds to reviewers is just a formality, they're paid to give certain reviews well in advance.

  30. Will these be collectors' items? by erik_fredricks · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    This is not the first time prerelease music has received the glue treatment. Gil Kaufman, a freelance journalist in Cincinnati, said he owns a prerelease copy of Radiohead's 1997 album "OK Computer" that is glued into an Aiwa player -- an Aiwa analog cassette deck. That makes MP3 conversions a bit more difficult.

    I'm surprised I haven't seen this on Ebay. Some diehard Radiohead fan would love it, even if just for the kitsch value...

    --
    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

  31. This idea should be taken to it's logical end ... by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... by glueing the earphones to the ears of the reviewers. Disposable reviewers will be needed, though.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  32. Sue the record industry by bunaminenu · · Score: 1

    if i were a musician, i would sue the record industry for preventing fans from hearing my music and for making that bad publicity. it's unbelieveble, no other industry is treating it's customers like pirats and criminals ...

    1. Re:Sue the record industry by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      no other industry is treating it's customers like pirats and criminals.

      Well, another one springs to mind: the software industry.
      But then I really am a pirate, arrr, matie!

    2. Re:Sue the record industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The airline industry?

    3. Re:Sue the record industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong, the underground criminal industry treats their customers as criminals and untrust worthy people.

    4. Re:Sue the record industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can you sue over something you dont own. the record company owns the artists music. they can tell the artist they are no longer allowed to play xyz song on days beginning with "T" if they wanted to, and there is zero the artist can do. the artist gave up that right when they sold their soul and their rights to the music by signing that contract.

    5. Re:Sue the record industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      automobile industry treats all drivers like their idiots.

      whats worse?

    6. Re:Sue the record industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you stupid ignorant ponce. the cd's belong to the record company, not the musician...holy shit, you people are actually starting to scare me...is everyone this dumb?

  33. Reminds me of Nintendo's tactics... by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the day of the original NES (and even today, I presume), Nintendo used to send a rep to the magazine reviewing the game, and he carried a system with the game bolted inside and sat there while the game was being reviewed, and the whole package was whisked away when the their time was up. Sounds like the record companies are taking a page from the gaming industry's playbook.

    --

    "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Reminds me of Nintendo's tactics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he didn't have a choice but to carry the system: The decks with the final beta of Mario 3 were handcuffed to the rep while the reviewer played the game.

    2. Re:Reminds me of Nintendo's tactics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, even today, new games are distributed to various parties in GameCubes with large metal brackets and padlocks on them. No way is anyone going to get into them without doing some serious damage...

  34. An even better idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not put all of the walkmans in a safe, lock it, throw away the key, put the safe in a rocket, fire it in to deep space, and then nobody will ever be able to listen to the music.

  35. Glue... shmoo by fruey · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just the sort of reviewer that is going to rip to MP3 and share these CDs is going to have enough clue to break open the case / rewire those headphone connectors. This is all a publicity stunt to get the press to talk more about the two albums in question, and to get more "filesharing is bad" vibe into the press. Poor poor music industry losing to filesharing. They have to understand WHY we have no sympathy first.

    They've done pretty well here though. How many of you vague Tori Amos fans knew she had a new album out before this article?

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Glue... shmoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we've been reading about it for months... and seven songs of the 18 songs from this album have been circulating the net for three months...

      Though she may be owned by Epic now, both Tori and Pearl Jam are well-known for respecting their fans. For instance Pearl Jam allows bootleggers at their concerts. Counting Crows go one step further and let you stand in a good place at the show if you're recording! And on their official, Geffen Records website, CC have a fan trader network. I think all three of these (who happen to be my favourite artists anyway) are pretty much "woken up" already. Let them glue whatever, who cares. They give free mp3s all the time anyway.

    2. Re:Glue... shmoo by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2


      Even worse, that might read:

      How many of you /. readers knew she played music before this article?

      Not me!

  36. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...A Mosix cluster of these?

  37. Hammer = Copyright Circumvention Device = Banned by femto · · Score: 5, Funny

    So is hitting the walkman with a hammer an offence under the DMCA...?

  38. Re:This idea should be taken to it's logical end . by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but they already DO that.

  39. Not the first time this has been done. by Andy+Smith · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been done before. In 1998, preview copies of Radiohead's album "OK Computer" were sent out in sealed cassette players. And in 2000, preview copies of "Kid A" were sent out in an encrypted format on Sony VAIO digital players.

    More info: http://www.followmearound.com/press/083.html

    1. Re:Not the first time this has been done. by pvera · · Score: 2

      I was thinking along the lines of an encrypted format. What about a magic gate memory stick? Is magic gate just a copy protection or can it be tied up to a certain device?

      --
      Pedro
      ----
      The Insomniac Coder
    2. Re:Not the first time this has been done. by turgid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kid A was sent out encrypted? Ah, that explains it then.

    3. Re:Not the first time this has been done. by Swaffs · · Score: 2

      Cassette players? In 1998? Are you serious? Why didn't they just play the song over the phone for the reviewer?

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    4. Re:Not the first time this has been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you send out preview copies of 'OK Computer' in 1998 ? The album was released in 1997. You probably meant 'Amnesiac' or something.

  40. So simple by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    You dont even need to cut the wires and risk being discovered, you can use a pick-up coil to get the signal, or at the worst you could stick mics to the headphones. Ohh, and i hope they remembered to glue the screws on the back of the player, otherwise you could just take it apart, copy the disk and put it back together again.

    I never really understood how you could review a song by britney spears any way. "Oops, I did it again, i crapped some music out my ass."?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  41. Digital outputs? by majestynine · · Score: 1
    I'd laugh my ass off if the discmans that Epic were giving out had a digital output on the side that hadn't been plugged or covered up. Making digitally perfect copies would be even easier and would sound just as good as a CD rip.

    However, as a second thought, those sorts of features only appear on the more pricey units, I have no idea if Epic would use them. Its a funny thought though.

    1. Re:Digital outputs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not.

  42. You gotta wonder by TheGreatInsomniac · · Score: 1

    Why do they think that spending alot of money on cd players and then gluing them shut(ineffectivly at that), eliminating any chance of using them again, just to send to journalists is worth whatever they think they are losing just because the public hears it before they want them to? This is insanity!

  43. Re:Bad Idea Actually I skipped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    registering. I seem to be allergic to javascript.

  44. Great!!! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    Now alcohol will be illegal under the DMCA, due to it now being a circumvention device. That should get the proles attention.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News just in under the DCMA the Universe has been taken to court for providing gravity.

  45. self destruct mechanism by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, they just need to develop something that destroys the disc, if you happen to force the cover open or remove the Headphone jack.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:self destruct mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried. But when they glued the disc to the drive it doesn't seem to work anymore.

      They are still trying to find out why.

    2. Re:self destruct mechanism by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      I'm thinking EXPLOSIVE BOLTS.

      This will mandate a sticker similar to those found on tools; "Wear eye protection while using."

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:self destruct mechanism by tahpot · · Score: 1

      yeah... could make it scratch the disc as you take it out

  46. Re:Hammer = Copyright Circumvention Device = Banne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "So is hitting the walkman with a hammer an offence under the DMCA...? "

    Not if the disk inside is Tori Bush..er, Amos.

  47. This is the stupidest thing I ever heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    When are these people going to learn? As long as it can be heard by the human ear, it can be recorded. It's that simple. I KNOW IT'S NOT A DIGITAL COPY!! (The analog to digital conversion will cause loss of quality to a degree. The degree of loss depends on the equipment and skill of the person doing the conversion.) But honestly, do you really think someone who is downloading an MP3 quality file off the Internet using P2P software is going to care? I'd bet my bottom dollar 95% of the population wouldn't know the difference even if you told them.

    1. Re:This is the stupidest thing I ever heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you understand what is going on here? it's just the record companies making a statement that they really don't want this music to be copied, especially before the cd is released. just cause you fucking brilliant slashdotters can figure out elite methods to copy the music (ie. smash the cd player, cut the headphones, etc...) doesn't make a difference...i guarantee they didn't research copy protection methods and come up with glue as the best method...it's just a statement...but you fuckin slashdotters are too stupid to understand that......why do i bother...

  48. Reviewing these CDs... by hattig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they are expected to review the CD's through headphones from a walkman?

    Doesn't that just strike people as being stupid? How will they get a subjective review of the audio quality? Are the music companies trying to hide poor audio quality from the reviewers by making them review the music through sub-optimal equipment?

    This is just a sad example of how paranoid the music companies have become...

    1. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by Beautyon · · Score: 2

      How will they get a subjective review of the audio quality?

      Monopoly companies stopped worrying about this twenty years ago.

      This is an extremely dumb idea obviously; the smarter (though not by much) companies are putting on special listening rooms for journalists to come and sit in to previw new recordings.

      Probably, all monopoly companys are going to get themselvs "screening rooms" so that they can control who has access to what before its released.

      --
      ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
    2. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

      Of course this is stupid. It is mandated by MBAs.

      Seriously - poor audio quality hides all the nuances that make a lot of great music great. Precise timing, complex harmonics, musician interaction. Those are musical qualitities that we lose when we listen to our records on a pair of shitty monitor-mounted speakers, or flabby headphones. You simply cannot get a proper gitar roar out of a tin can.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    3. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by jafuser · · Score: 2

      I wonder if they get a pat-down for any binaural recording equipment?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    4. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You simply cannot get a proper gitar roar out of a tin can.
      Or proper spelling out of a Slashdot poster!
    5. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by tmark · · Score: 2

      This is just a sad example of how paranoid the music companies have become...

      That, or it's a sad example of how bad the piracy issue can be...

    6. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a lot of great music great....a proper gitar roar "

      Now you've gone and contradicted yourself.

      You're rambling on about pop musick, boy. Stop worrying about quality.

    7. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      You don't actually believe music reviewers are going to appreciate the difference between a high end audio setup and a discman do you?

      You must be confusing music reviewers with audio equipment reviewers.

      Movie reviewers watch movies in theatres, not in private viewing rooms with top of the line home-theatre-nerd equipment. They're there to review the _content_, not the platform.

      I don't think a review on a Pearl Jam CD is going to hinge on whether or not you can hear the idividual pieces of phlem in Eddie's throat when he's singing .. and for the most part, since people buying these CDs will be listening on discmen instead of a Dolby Pro Logic 5.1 whatever channel setup, shouldn't the reviewer base his review on how most consumers will listen to the music anyway?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    8. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by truesaer · · Score: 2

      Why is this stupid? Most highly anticipated CDs leak out completely before they are released. I realize this is sometimes good, but marketing is a funny thing and you have to give them the chance to try to create a big buildup if they want. This is seperate from DVD region encoding, they could just release at the same time everywhere. But the initial release week is very important, and they should be allowed to do whatever they want (even if it shoots themselves in the foot.)

    9. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      I'm nit-picky. A pair of great speakers are hardly tin cans. They are usually made from some sort of hard wood, with cables, circuitry, cable shoes and speakers being the only metal components.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    10. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by TGK · · Score: 2

      This is true. But the movie reviewers generaly aren't forced to wear someone elses prescription glasses.

      The point is that when the music sounds tinny and strained and the mixing sounds generaly poor it changes the feel of the peice.

      Consider the soundtrack from Crimson Tide (ideal for this example). Crimson Tide has a thunderous bass line which is a running theme in the soundtrack. Listening to this on a walkman with cheep "came with the damn thing" ear phones is an injustice. You simply can not appreciate the texture of the kettle drums used, the rough sound of the real animal hide drum heads and the subtleties of the choral segments.

      Truely great music, especialy music relying on polyphonic textures (which is pretty much the norm now that we've passed the midpoint of the second millenia AD) relies on complexity and depth to produce movement and resolution. Without the ability to hear the subtleties in the music the experiance is lessened.

      They might as well call the reviewers and play the music over the phone.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    11. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by ceej · · Score: 1

      > but marketing is a funny thing and you have to
      > give them the chance to try to create a big
      > buildup if they want.

      I don't *have* to give marketers anything.

    12. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by truesaer · · Score: 2

      Well you don't have to. Only the reviewers who signed binding NDAs have to.

    13. Re:Reviewing these CDs... by Belgand · · Score: 2

      This was, admittedly, one of my first thoughts on the matter. I was concerned that the low quality of the equipment (especially since it was sent out for free I presume we're dealing with the bottom of the line) and how this would color the review. The more I think about it though, the more I like it. Presuming that the quality is merely "acceptable" it creates a baseline to review against. All the reviewers listening to these cds will be hearing them in the same way.

      The fact that Joe College Paper Reviewer is using a decade-old Aiwa shelf system compared to a top of the line $10k+ hi-fi in an acoustically balanced listening room is nullified. Even subtle differences in personal set-ups and coloration from speakers are removed so that the album will be reviewed based on the music entirely.

      I can't say I wouldn't prefer to hear it on a quality stereo system, but perhaps this will help to create a better way to review the actual content.

  49. No coincidence about the artists by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    I don't think it is a coincidence that Tori Amos and Pearl Jam were targeted. Look at their past. Both have strong opinions about the recording industry. I bet they have pissed off enough executives, that this is the punishment.

    The executives are probably hoping that the reviewers will be pissed off by the stupid restriction, and vent their anger in the reviews. That way, the executives can push more cooperative bands more effectively, since Tori Amos and Pearl Jam will be sidelined.

    Whenever I hear about such acts of stupidity, I get more convinced that I should donate funds directly to the artists, and just get the music online.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nod, that definetly makes sense. They're trying to cut into their own bottom line. They get a much better cut than the artist, so by helping them get a bad review they cut their own nose off dispite their face. As greedy as the music industry is, i'd say its a reasonable assumption to say, "Not Likely." More likely is that the music companies simply are trying to prevent illegal mp3s from showing up (not that this method is effective in any way shape or form.)

      Shads - To lazy to login.

    2. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      If they are stupid enough to put on such non-sensical copy protection, wouldn't they be dumb enough to snub their own artists?

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    3. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... Having read several earlier Slashdot articles, you would notice who makes money off these records - and no, it's not the artist.

      So, according to your theory, these executives would be punishing Pearl Jam and Tori Amos by... cutting their own revenue?

      I doubt it, but hey, I could be wrong!

      This is Pearl Jam's last album with Epic records, so that could be an issue, but I don't think the economics works this way...

    4. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed out my main point. Especially after grunge, the record industry has been paranoid about keeping a tight control of the market.

      My theory is that Pearl Jam and Tori Amos promote the kind of music that the industry hates - music they intend to sell on its own merits. By punishing Pearl Jam and Tori Amos, they are trying to hold back a possible new wave of rebellious acts that don't cooperate with their agenda. So, by losing a few million dollars now, they are preventing the loss of many more dollars later. But, I might be giving the industry too much credit or misjudging my favorites.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    5. Re:No coincidence about the artists by crosbie · · Score: 1
      Whenever I hear about such acts of stupidity, I get more convinced that I should donate funds directly to the artists, and just get the music online.

      So do I!

      Sounds to me like you'll agree with the following: The Digital Art Auction

    6. Re:No coincidence about the artists by nrc · · Score: 1
      I don't think it is a coincidence that Tori Amos and Pearl Jam were targeted. Look at their past. Both have strong opinions about the recording industry. I bet they have pissed off enough executives, that this is the punishment.
      Epic just signed Tori Amos last year. Sign an artist and then deliberately undermine their first release on your label? What a wonderfully Evil thing to do.

      If Amos and Perl Jam were specifically targeted for any particular reason it's probably because they have strong internet followings. Their fans will instantly distribute any music that they can get their hands on. A six track sampler of Tori's new release was available on the net within a day or two of being released to reviewers.

      These fans are going to buy the CD anyway, but record companies rely on first week sales from these diehards to get these artists far enough up the charts to get some attention. If all the diehards have heard the music already the urgency to go out and buy the CD that first week is gone.

    7. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1
      My theory is that Pearl Jam and Tori Amos promote the kind of music that the industry hates - music they intend to sell on its own merits.

      A good theory, but flawed by time. Pearl Jam has recorded nothing listenable since "Ten." Tori's best work was on "Little Earthquakes." Both CDs/records were released a decade ago.

      By punishing Pearl Jam and Tori Amos, they are trying to hold back a possible new wave of rebellious acts that don't cooperate with their agenda.

      Not hardly. "Their" agenda is to make money for their shareholders. Do you think the Evil Five will shunt aside the next Nirvana because the band might not behave?

      Jack

    8. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't speak to Pearl Jam since you don't find their music listenable at all, but Tori Amos fans are certainly not convinced that her best music was on Little Earthquakes. Most of them seem to believe it was on either Boys for Pele or From the Choirgirl Hotel. Actually, though, having heard the 6 songs which were leaked, I'd say her best music in on Scarlet's Walk. Perhaps that's why Sony/Epic is so determined to either protect or undermine it...depending on your point of view. In any case, their efforts to defeat online music downloads are counterproductive to sales in general but probably have a net positive effect on sales when the repression is conducted only well in advance of the album release. This is due to the first week sales effect on the charts, which is a perceptual matter.

      Interestingly, Epic/Sony has also made every effort to stringently control any comments about the new music. An article on Sony's site about Tori's Scarlet's Walk was leaked online a couple of weeks ago and then immediately quashed, only to be published today on their site. They seem to believe they have CD promotion down to a science. It's pretty clear that they don't have a clue, but they certainly believe they're rocket scientists.

    9. Re:No coincidence about the artists by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1
      I won't speak to Pearl Jam since you don't find their music listenable at all


      BZZT! That's not what I said. Try reading the whole post next time. I said Pearl Jam has recorded nothing listenable since Ten, which I still love. I stood in line at midnight waiting for Versus along with a lot of people, and there were a lot of pissed-off PJ fans the next morning on campus after listening to that dreck. And I've seen Tori live a couple of times over the years, in addition to having all the recordings. She's very good, and still is, but she's lost a bit of her game too, not nearly as much as Eddie Vedder. Hands down, songs from "Little Earthquakes" were much better.


      Of course, music is a subjective taste, like any other art form. YMMV.

      Jack

  50. Re:Bad Idea by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here goes my piddling little amount of karma, but this has to be said:

    Did any of the moderators who modded this up and thought to mark it "Insightful" actually read the article?

    Not getting at the poster, but the comment does completely miss the point - I thought the whole idea of moderation was to keep things on track. Too often it seems to be a mechanism for ensuring that scum floats to the top, as moderators just "follow the herd"...

  51. Re:Bad Idea by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Put it on something that can't be digitally extracted."

    8-tracks, baby!

  52. NYT: Epic Records Takes Steps to Seal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    September 16, 2002
    Epic Records Takes Steps to Seal Its Newest Music
    By CHRIS NELSON

    The Epic Records Group, a unit of Sony Music, is approaching the sticky problem of prerelease music's being traded online with an even stickier solution.

    Writers receiving review copies of two soon-to-be-released albums -- Tori Amos's "Scarlet's Walk" and Pearl Jam's "Riot Act" -- are finding the CD's already inside Sony Walkman players that have been glued shut. Headphones are also glued into the players, to prevent connecting the Walkman to a recording device.

    By locking up the discs, Epic hopes to keep writers from converting the music to MP3's that can then be traded over the Net. But even a "glueman" player is unlikely to deter a diehard critic.

    "I'm a pretty big Pearl Jam fan," said Bart Blasengame, a staff writer at Details magazine who was sent one of the contraptions with "Riot Act" inside. "I brought this discman home with me, and I found a way you could go in the back of the CD and, like, pop it open. So I got the actual disc out."

    Mr. Blasengame said he had no intention of making MP3's . "At the same time, if I want to give it a proper review, I'm going to listen to it how I want to listen to it -- and in my stereo is where it sounds best," he said.

    For several years, prerelease music has turned up online before it reaches stores, distributed without permission by journalists, radio employees, record company employees or other sources. This July, for example, a six-song sampler from Ms. Amos's upcoming album was shipped to writers the old-fashioned way. The songs soon appeared on file-sharing services like WinMX.

    The Recording Industry Association of America blames Internet music-sharing for declines in CD sales, though proponents of MP3 trading dispute the group's arguments.

    A Sony spokeswoman confirmed that the glued players were being used to combat piracy, but would not talk about their effectiveness or responses from writers.

    This is not the first time prerelease music has received the glue treatment. Gil Kaufman, a freelance journalist in Cincinnati, said he owns a prerelease copy of Radiohead's 1997 album "OK Computer" that is glued into an Aiwa player -- an Aiwa analog cassette deck. That makes MP3 conversions a bit more difficult.

  53. You nerds are missing the point! by tundog · · Score: 0

    Its not a technical problem to be solved here, rather a litigious one. Sony distributes these walkmans to reviewers and makes them sign a release that they won't tamper with the cd player. When they collect the CD player, they know if the wires have been cut, smashed with a hammer, etc. If its broke, its a breach of contract and an open and shut legal dispute. Effective answer to a (potentially) pervasive problem.

    --
    All your base are belong to us!
  54. Even better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make vinyl records out of chocolate, that way they would only play about 3 times before wearing out. At least you could eat them afterwards, though.

  55. The future of music reviewing... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 4, Funny

    "In an effort to prevent reviewers from creating MP3s or even playing the preview CD in anything they don't control, music labels are now disseminating a prewritten review of the CD, along with a bill for $17.99."

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  56. Re:Bad Idea by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    My above post should be modded back down, most likely due to it partly missing the point. (brainfart)

    But not entirely. The main point of my post was that this is a Brittle system. When it fails, it fails miserably.

    Having a CD that will work in ANY player being glued shut seems to be like having treasure in a treasure chest. When everyone knows where the treasure chest is, it's only a matter of time before it's picked open.

    That's why I think it'd be better having it kept on some kind of memory medium. When you crack open the device, how many of the journalists are going to pop the CD directly into a CDrom and start ripping. On the other hand, how many of them are going to try to hardwire the memory to another device to try and digitally extract it :).

    As funny as the thought of Music Journalists going to all those guys who rip ROMS might seem, the chances are pretty low.

    Yes, yes, yes, blah blah *cough* wire cutters, etc.

    Umm, umm, you could always make headphones with a chip on each earpiece that somehow modulate the receiving signal and feed it back to the player. Without the modulated feedback signal, it stops playing.

    Yeah, yeah, it's killing a fly with an atom bomb. But if you're going to attempt to solve a problem, do it RIGHT.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  57. Reminds me of Johny Mnemonic... by JPZ · · Score: 1

    "If they think you're crude, go technical; if they think you're technical, go crude. I'm a very technical boy. So I decided to get as crude as possible. These days, though, you have to be pretty technical before you can even aspire to crudeness."

    - from Johny Mnemonic by William Gibson

  58. What's the problem? by wiredog · · Score: 2
    The article said the company is not disseminating the diskman glued shut. So if they're not doing it, why are people so upset? Seems that allowing the review copies to be freely disseminated is something Good.

    What's that? You mean he meant is now disseminating? Oh, well, in that case, Flame On!

  59. Ears, by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    So, if I'm a reviewer and I let someone else listen to the CD, they are violating the DMCA.

    Therefore, their ears must be chopped off.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  60. One question (was Bad Idea) by zoccav · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is, by far, one of the worst ideas I've heard of in a long time.

    How does the resource/effect ratio compares to say DRM?

    Epic invested $3.99 and covered 95% of their area. DRM would be more like $3.99G / 97%.

    Most geeks would love to crack this mom-and-pop security. Just for the fun of it. My first try would probably involve of three tiny needles. A second, a couple of mikes. A third,...

    Most reviewers would just do the review and return the player afterwards.

    IMHO Epic plays quite fair.

    1. Re:One question (was Bad Idea) by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      The problem with this strategy is that in a digital era even 97% still means total failure.

      I wonder if this is not just a ploy to find out who the bad apples of the bunch are. Maybe the record industry knows this is futile battle and hence wants to combat it somehow.

      I even wonder if downloading previews are a bad idea. Consider the following. The record industry makes tons of money with new releases. Likewise with the fashion industry, where being first with a trend is where you make money. Now if the reviewers take that income away the record industry can make no money.

      So maybe as an informal truce people should stay away from downloading the new material, wait a few weeks and either buy or "look".

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:One question (was Bad Idea) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be assuming that if we minimize the damage, they'll minimize their response. But I no longer believe that. They've proven time and again that they're my enemy.

      I have to echo the words of another Slashdot poster, who said that, at this point, pirating a CD is not only an act of civil disobedience, but a blow struck for freedom. Undercut their revenue, and they lose their ability to buy the legislature, as well as to pay for lawsuits. So I say, yes, pirate new releases; pirate MORE; pirate as much as you can... and let the record companies die.

  61. Why not digital? by gvonk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want to know why a solid-state mp3 player couldn't be used? They could just build their own and put the songs in ROM and just have no input. Kinda like those little "tiger beat" or whatever players that just play Britney Spears and you can get them at McDonald's.

    I imagine building a custom player with built-in earbuds and only one album on it would be cheaper than this dumb glue thing.

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    1. Re:Why not digital? by imadork · · Score: 2
      I want to know why a solid-state mp3 player couldn't be used? ...
      I imagine building a custom player with built-in earbuds and only one album on it would be cheaper than this dumb glue thing.

      But that would be admitting that the MP3 format has other uses besides Piracy, which is obviously false and blasphemes the god of Media. Next thing you know, there will be other Heresies making the Internet rounds, like the Sun is the cneter of the Universe, and not Kelly from American Idol!

    2. Re:Why not digital? by tony_gardner · · Score: 2

      The answer to any question,
      "Why wouldn't a custom *** be cheaper than a kludged job?"
      is: The rule of thumb is custom jobs cost 10-100 times per unit what a mass production product costs. Do you think they can make walkmans for 1/10 to 1/100 of the current prices?

    3. Re:Why not digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it would sound like crap, as far as an audiophile is concerned - I imagine most music reviewers are audiophiles...

    4. Re:Why not digital? by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      It's crazy that they are still using such low-tech methods for delivering music for review. Get with the new millenium already! Why don't they just email the MP3's to the reviewers? Is it because they think that would be making it easy for anyone who would break their trust and distribute it? Anyone who would do that, is going to find a way no matter what they do. They should be able to trust their reviewers not to spread the music.

      Think of all the shipping and handling they could save. Or they could have a secure FTP site where reviewers can download the music in whatever format(SHN, Ogg, etc)they deem appropriate. Or here's one - they could (GASP!) use their own version of P2P where only approved, contracted personnel have access and either stream or download the secure music.

    5. Re:Why not digital? by Nameles · · Score: 1

      And playing it out of a walkman wouldn't?

    6. Re:Why not digital? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      little "tiger beat" or whatever players that just play Britney Spears and you can get them at McDonald's.

      anyone have more info on these..?

    7. Re:Why not digital? by ReadParse · · Score: 2

      I swear to God I would moderate you up if I could. That's exactly what they should have done, and they're absolute morons if they think this is going to make a dent in MP3 availability of their music.

      I love the example of Celine Dion's latest CD, that was apparently rip-proof because it would CRASH any computer that tried to use it. But I have seen MP3s from that CD on Gnutella. When will they realize that they cannot stop it?

      My latest pet peeve (and this is almost offtopic) is that I'm having real difficulty ripping audio from my DVDs into MP3 format. I stress: my DVDs that I paid for. I do not intend to burn DVDs and sell them on the black market. I do not intend to burn CDs of the music from my DVDs and sell them on the black market. But I fully intend to rip MP3s from my James Taylor Live DVD and listen to them in my car or on my computer. This is just barely possible, by going through a two or three step process, on Windows only as far as I can tell (my DVD player on my Windows machine broke, so my only DVD drive right now is on my Mac and I don't know if it's even possible on a Mac).

      I'm getting really, really pissed off about how the recording industries are trying to control how I use my copies of the recordings that I bought. Ain't it cute how you can fast forward through the FBI warning on VHS, but now with the latest technology you have to watch it.

      OK, I think I'm done with my rant now.

    8. Re:Why not digital? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      They could just build their own and put the songs in ROM and just have no input.

      Why even go that far? That means having to produce a bunch of ROMs, which takes a few weeks lead time. Make the cheap disposable players with RAM inside, with trip switch to cut battery power when opened. Another benefit is it's a lot faster to write to RAM than to flash.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    9. Re:Why not digital? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      An MP3 player would be the wrong thing to use; They'd use their own ATRAC3 (3? I forget) format which has been billed as being basically halfway between MPEG 1 Layer 2 and MPEG 1 Layer 3. It's the MPEG-based compression used on Minidisc. That way they could push their format and their music at the same time.

      Putting the songs in EEPROM or a windowless PROM is probably more expensive than putting them in some cheap-ass flash.

      On the other hand, having enough flash for an album at a reasonable quality level (96mb?) is considerably more expensive than just gluing shut a discman. They make so many discmans in a week that they could give them out with every box of captain crunch sold and still lose less than they do selling PS2s.

      In any case this looks like a perfect use for all this DRM shit that microsoft is pushing. Of course someone will come along with a sound card with digital out, or something like totalrecorder, and siphon the audio off and slap it on USENET immediately. Kind of makes palladium look like a big fat joke; Even if it WAS here already it would be insufficient to protect this content.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Why not digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. They're called Hit Clips, and they're made by Tiger. They hold 1-2 minutes of music on a chip.

    11. Re:Why not digital? by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Well, to be technical, I just meant [memory] but that since there is no input on our theoretical box, it's more like ROM.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    12. Re:Why not digital? by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Because it would sound like crap, as far as an audiophile is concerned - I imagine most music reviewers are audiophiles...

      Riiiight... Uh, I never said what compression rate. If you think that the reviewers are gonna notice the difference between a 320kbps mp3 and a cd, I believe you are wrong. Especially if the player (and the discman) has cheap consumer headphones.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    13. Re:Why not digital? by atrus · · Score: 1

      It is possible on a Mac. DVD Extractor is one program that comes to mind. Of course you'll probably need an AC3 decoder as well, but those are around too.

  62. Gravity by LinuxGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    In this case, I'm sure that a decent lawyer could successfully argue that gravity could be used to circumvent the 'glue lock'. My reading of the DMCA text leads me to think that any device or method used for circumvention is illegal. Dropping the unit would be a method. Hmm, guilty of dropping the unit? Then jail time for you. I would not want to accept such a liability for a simple review.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, would be amusing to see the RIAA try to sue God or something to outlaw gravity.

    2. Re:Gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if God truly existed, it would be nessecary to abolish him.

    3. Re:Gravity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very interesting; If that is the case, then it should be possible to drive some sort of legal wedge along the lines of "tool not illegal, but rather illegal use".

    4. Re:Gravity by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm.....so if the Law of Gravity is illegal (it has no practical use other than being a circumvention device....we would be much better of without anyways - cheaper construction, etc.) then these CD players + DMCA = Antigravity device! Hmmmm.....so why isn't the RIAA headquarters flying off the planet as we speak?

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  63. Circumventing at any cost? by goldspider · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Just about every day I see the latest attempt by the media/software industries to prevent the theft of their product, and usually soon after see a circumvention of that attempt. Sometimes this involves some rather convoluted and really bizarre ways of getting at that tasty morsel.

    A lot of times these methods result in getting a much lower quality piece of software/media than if it were simply bought. A lot of times (mostly with software) the result barely works at all.

    So is it really worth it to copy some of this stuff at any cost? I can't help but think that sometimes it would cost less time and aggravation to just go out and buy the damn software/music CD/DVD. And don't give me that "information wants to be free" crap either. There comes a point when it's just not worth the time or effort to circumvent copy protection just because you can.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by mat.h · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A lot of times these methods result in getting a much lower quality piece of software/media than if it were simply bought. A lot of times (mostly with software) the result barely works at all.

      Not so. Not in general. Back in the Amiga days, quite a few cracked games could be installed on hard disk, while the "simply bought" game couldn't. Sometimes the crackers did actual bug fixing. Today, in the copy-protected CD days, any CD-R can be played by the disc changer in my car, while there are "simply bought" CDs that can't. The industry has reached that point were the copy is not only cheaper, but also more useful than the original.

    2. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      There will always be _someone_ who has the inclination - and when that 1person has circumvented whatever controls are in place, _everyone_ can get it with very little effort.

      It just takes one person.

    3. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the issue isn't to download or to mp3. Most people will sample albums through mp3, or discover new artists through it, not just leech their favorite artists latest album and burn it. I know if i like a band i will buy the album.

      You sound like an industry plant anyway.

    4. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by goldspider · · Score: 2
      I'm not sure what world you're living in, but my experience has been that people will often download every song they want from a particular album because they don't feel like paying for the songs they don't want.

      Now if the recording industry was smart, they'd offer an easy, convenient way to offer a pay-per-download service where people didn't have to buy the entire album, it may be received warmly by alot of music fans.

      However that kind of business model is not yet feasible because of rampant piracy on P2P networks. Why pay for it when you can get it for free? You can almost surmise that P2P is preventing fair per-download music sales from becoming economically viable.

      Now I'm not saying that the music undustry has been reasonable, by any means. But I think anyone can understand their hostility towards people who they percieve as a threat to their industry.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    5. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      The "information wants to be free" crap isn't crap, it's just a misnomer. Information sometimes behaves as if it wants to be free, because there are so many people who want it to be free.

      And free in this case doesn't mean without cost; If nothing else we pay for the information we get from the internet by paying our ISP. Free means "in the wild". You know, like putting your cat out to bring you eviscerated presents. Mostly, (good) music "wants" to be heard by as many people as possible. Music "created" the RIAA to make sure that it would get stuck down people's throats, but it also "created" 31337 h@x0rz to make sure that people who didn't play the RIAA "I will only listen to this shit on licensed devices" games get to hear it too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Just about every day I see the latest attempt by the media/software industries to prevent the theft of their product, and usually soon after see a circumvention of that attempt.

      By your title I thought we were talking about the media inside the player, but after reading the word theft I see you are talking about the discman itself.

      I don't think the reviewers are interesting in stealing another discman. I'm sure they have had more than enough of their fill of $30 WalMart portable CD players.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      So is it really worth it to copy some of this stuff at any cost? I can't help but think that sometimes it would cost less time and aggravation to just go out and buy the damn software/music CD/DVD.

      Yeah, but then how do I copy it onto my computer to play it? Or do you think that I really want to sort through my entire CD collection for one song?

      I mean with this case specifically, you're right. There's no real reason to copy these "reviewer" CDs, but that's not a general rule. (and I think in this case most of the "this can be easily circumvented by..." things are just to point out how stupid it is.)

    8. Re:Circumventing at any cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First I download the Movie that I've never seen and can't afford to rent. Then I watch it. Then, I go buy it as soon as I can.
      I'm not going to buy something I've never seen or heard of just because critics, radio, and friends say so. I'm going to buy what i enjoy. If I don't enjoy what I dl, well, that only hurts my hard disk space.

  64. Now They're Going To Sue Netwon? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
    Since gravity is now a method of defeating an "effective" copy-protection mechanism?

    <tap><tap>RIAA? That word you keep using? I don't think it means what you think it means.

    --
    You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
    -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  65. Been done before by spakka · · Score: 5, Funny

    I noticed that certain pages in my friend's twat magazines were glued together, presumably to prevent unauthorised copying.

    1. Re:Been done before by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Reminds me... Once, at my grandmother's, I run accross a kiddy religious book which stated that masturbating is bad. So I zipped out my penis, and masturbated until I've got a nice head of whipped cream (sperm, for the metaphor-challenged), with which I promptly smeared the two pages together in order to glue them shut...

      No, I don't feel any shame in doing that. I still find it hilarious 25 years later...

    2. Re:Been done before by general_re · · Score: 2

      And how old were you when your parents unchained you from the toilet and released you on an unsuspecting world?

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    3. Re:Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird, but funny.

  66. Wow... by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2

    Y'know... I bet this is some smart-alec's way of getting back at us for the 'magic marker defeats copy protection' thing.

  67. If they'd wanted to do it properly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd have put it on a ROM of sorts as MP3 or some proprietry format and had encryption/decryption between the headphone socket and speakers. What's to stop you using a pair of side cutters and soldering a 3.5in male stereo jack onto their headphone wire, then plugging that into your sound card and recording the audio ? Want to use the speakers... put a female 3.5in stereo jack socket on the headphone side and plug in . Glue indeed!

  68. Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    organic solvent...

  69. Oh wait by PovRayMan · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah...

    Who would ever buy this?

    NO ONE!

    It seems that once again they think they can stop backing up music. Well... It's just not going to happen.

    1. Re:Oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have reached a new low my friend. Not only did you not read the article, you didn't read the post either.

      Congratulation.

  70. Horrible editing (as is often the case) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between this article and the one just before it, the 'editing' is just atrocious:
    " is not disseminating the new..."
    and
    "Last year Australian authorities tapped more phones all United States authorities combined. "

    Huh? "...more phones *than*" perhaps???

  71. Re:Bad Idea by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    well, seeing as this IS the networked age (err... isn't it?) why not do it online with DRM - in the TV business we do this kind of thing ALL the time with work in progress and sensitive advertisements. Just send the person the appropriate download or access key, backed up by a cast iron NDA for them to sign and voila! Media security achieved!

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  72. Re:Bad Idea by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    It doesn't really matter much, all it's doing is making the reviewers listen to the albums on what might be an inferior player. A quick search on most file sharing programs will turn up 128K mp3s of most of the songs from the Tori album, they've been up for at least a week.

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  73. Pearl Jam?? by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Is that the same band that went to war with Ticketmaster for overcharging fans on ticket prices? Amazing. You would think they would........aw hell, you never can tell with these guys.

    Especially since Pearl Jam became the Neil Young backup band.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:Pearl Jam?? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2

      Is that the same band that went to war with Ticketmaster for overcharging fans on ticket prices?

      They did, but it was later proven that the overcharging was not due to TicketMaster, but rather due to Pearl Jam wanting a very large cut of the ticket sales.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    2. Re:Pearl Jam?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      WRONG, do your research tool

      that's totally BS

      do a search online and read for yourself, it had NOTHING to do w/ Pearl Jam wanting a larger cut of ticket sales, jesus that's the biggest BS thign i've heard

  74. The latest in IP circumvention by spongman · · Score: 4, Funny
    wire-stippers.

    what is the world coming to?

    1. Re:The latest in IP circumvention by orangesquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't even need wire strippers. Remember, electricity and magnetism have this nifty inter-relation. It may be possible (although maybe non-trivial) to use coils to record the sound without modifying the apparatus they distribute.

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    2. Re:The latest in IP circumvention by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      A hammer would be better. A couple of good whacks should free up the IP.

  75. Not too bright by gila_monster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If these people don't trust the reviewers, why give them the music at all? Don't give them the chance to make copies.

    For that matter, if reviewers are that untrustworthy, why allow them to review the music? They might lie, if only just for spite. Especially if you torque them off by showing them what you think of their ethics.

    I wonder if the RIAA will launch a DOS attack against anyone who talks about artists without being authorized to use their names. "We're sorry, New York Times, but we didn't want you to talk about Tori(c)...."

    --
    Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
  76. Audio Fingerprinting by Bocaj · · Score: 1

    This is where those audio fingerprinting techniques should come in. You don't have to worry about copies if you add a unique fingerprint to each disk. Make the reviewer sign an agreement that says they will be held resposible if copies are found with that same fingerprint. The only thing the reviewer could complain about is that the fingerprinting alters the original. It sure beats listening to it on a walkman though.

  77. Re:Hey, yo! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    I think the problem's up your end

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  78. April Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it April 1 already???

  79. Soon we will realize.. by Perdo · · Score: 2

    That music from the RIAA is not as good as we thought it was.

    Been to a concert lately? It beats the hell out of buying a cd.

    You can't get laid listening to cd's anyway.

    Stop buying music. Go out and listen to some instead.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Soon we will realize.. by Joutsa · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm still waiting for The Doors to have a show near my town.

    2. Re:Soon we will realize.. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You can't get laid listening to cd's anyway.


      You can get syphilis from the skanks who hang out at rawk concerts, though.

    3. Re:Soon we will realize.. by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Well, there's no accounting for bad taste...

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    4. Re:Soon we will realize.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often does the general population of /. get laid regardless?

    5. Re:Soon we will realize.. by Perdo · · Score: 2

      "General Population" of /.

      "General Population" of San Quentin.

      Being a geek is like being in prison.

      Plenty of self help sex.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  80. This is good! by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    It drives the cost of production up and will kill itself eventually.

    We should encourage record companies to use this sort of stuff!

    Proletariat of the world, unite to kill the RIAA

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  81. How can ythey afford to do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they charging more for these CDs? If not, it shows you just how much money they usually make off a CD sale.
    If they simply lowered the price of a new CD to around $4-5, there would be no piracy..

  82. Maybe I'm missing the point... by chegosaurus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But if you number each player, send them out, and expect them to be returned, then by identifying the missing or broken players you could pretty much work out who it was that smashed their player open and put the music on P2P.

    Isn't that why they do it?

    1. Re:Maybe I'm missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, maybe not. Walkmans bought in bulk are dirt cheap. They likely would not be worth the cost of postage to send back.

  83. Nothing really matters.... by mosch · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think that's a risk the record company is willing to take. After all, Tori Amos and Pearl Jam are both bands whose cds are generally bought by rabid fans who'd buy a cd of /dev/random, as long as it says Pearl Jam, or Tori Amos on the cover.

    I can't help but wonder if the publicity around the stunt won't generate more press than the releases alone, after all, they just successfully told half a million slashdot readers that there's a new Tori Amos and Pearl Jam album coming out.

    1. Re:Nothing really matters.... by killmenow · · Score: 1
      After all, Tori Amos and Pearl Jam are both bands whose cds are generally bought by rabid fans who'd buy a cd of /dev/random, as long as it says Pearl Jam, or Tori Amos on the cover.
      Yeah...once. I used to like Tori. Now she's just too fscking stupid. Takes herself way too seriously if you know what I mean.

      Now, I realize I'm getting off-topic, so mod away...but, it seems to me a lot of artists are good when they have a struggle in their life...you know, like before they're famous. Then they get bazillions of people telling them how wonderful they are and (as I'm sure anyone would) they start believing it...well, they probably thought they were to begin with and now they really accept it.

      Then of course, they have nothing really impressive to write about because...well, they've got it made. So they start inventing stupid shit to write about and their music generally starts sucking.

      Tori is a good example of this effect.
    2. Re:Nothing really matters.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah...once. I used to like Tori. Now she's just too fscking stupid. Takes herself way too seriously if you know what I mean.
      Hasn't she always? Except for that first album she did that's only available on bootleg/P2P?
    3. Re:Nothing really matters.... by jamie · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      "I used to like Tori. Now she's just too fscking stupid. Takes herself way too seriously if you know what I mean...

      ...it seems to me a lot of artists are good when they have a struggle in their life...you know, like before they're famous. Then they get bazillions of people telling them how wonderful they are and (as I'm sure anyone would) they start believing it...well, they probably thought they were to begin with and now they really accept it."

      For some, that's true. Some of that is the "sophomore slump," which is probably largely statistical. (If a band's quality of output varies up and down, and if only the best work will get a band signed, it makes sense that most bands' quality, immediately after their first on-label effort, will go down. It's the same reasons sports figures have this superstition about slumping after appearing on the cover of Sports Illustrated -- if you did something cover-worthy, chances are whatever you do next week won't be.)

      But for many musical artists, I think it's the opposite. Tori Amos's early work was good, don't get me wrong - I like Little Earthquakes and Under the Pink.

      But once she broke away from the traditional song format, and didn't try to do radio-friendly, market-listenable stuff, her work just got amazing. Boys For Pele is one of the greatest albums of all time.

      I'm not totally in love with From the Choirgirl Hotel, and I haven't listened to Strange Little Girls more than once, but... she'll hit her stride again. Genius recurs.

      Real artists, I think, can always find that struggle and draw from it. In fact it kind of cheapens the idea of internal struggle to say that it can only be about "oh, my life is so hard, I'm on the road all the time" or "woe is me, I have to play in clubs by day and write music by night, and I eat cruddy food." If that's the worst thing that's ever happened to you, I can tell you, your well of inspiration to draw from is pretty shallow.

    4. Re:Nothing really matters.... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Looking through my collection (such as it is), I'm always struck by how many first albums there are. My theory is that the first album is the result of several years of work in front of small, vocal audiences and with friends who don't mind telling you what sucks.

      The second album, on the other hand, is done under pressure and under contract, and usually written a lot faster.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    5. Re:Nothing really matters.... by octalc0de · · Score: 1

      ... buy a cd of /dev/random ...

      Hey! You stole my idea! but I wouldn't buy one.

      cat /dev/kmem > /dev/dsp
      works wonders for me :) sometimes you can actually get a tune going.

      nitpickers: the reason i'm not using /dev/random is because it outputs too slow :)

    6. Re:Nothing really matters.... by ZeroLogic7 · · Score: 1

      hmmm... I'll kind of agree with the statement in a very general sense. I used to be a rabid Tori fan, often recognizing the same people on the second or third day she'd play at the same venue. Even named my domain after a hash of her name. My taste in music has significantly changed since Little Earthquakes and she's moved in a couple directions since then. I really did like some of her electronica remixes, but they were often too highly repetitive (unlike trance...). (though there were some good remixes that BT did that were VERY kick-ass!) I haven't purchased a single Tori CD in several years, yet my collection is still dominated by her music.

      But I'm segue-ing from our off-topic discussion. Just because an artist isn't going through a hard time, doesn't necessarily mean their music will suck. Tori has some awesome songs about getting-off. (unless you couldn't, in which, YEAH, I could see how life would really blow.) Of course, Tori did experience something tragic that helped propell her into the world stage. Later on, she miscarriaged.

      --
      THIS SPACE FOR RENT
    7. Re:Nothing really matters.... by sulli · · Score: 1
      they just successfully told half a million slashdot readers that there's a new Tori Amos and Pearl Jam album coming out

      Much good that does!

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    8. Re:Nothing really matters.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been said you have your whole life to make your first album. That being said, the first album you hear is very rarely somebody's first album.

  84. Now come on people... by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    they're trying really hard here! I mean let's give them the benefit of the doubt here. They must have a very good reason for investing [read: wasting] money on anti-piracy devices like this. :) Although I wish if companies were gonna waste so much money on useless things like this, I wish they'd at least send some my way so I can pay my tuition bills without needing a student loan! ;)

  85. This will definitely be 100% effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glueing a CD inside a walkman will make it very difficult to listen to, as those devices only play cassettes. I would suggest glueing them inside discmans instead.

    Oh, for the record, (no pun intended :-) ), I think Tori Amos is brilliant.

  86. Already on WinMX by xjerky · · Score: 1

    I just checked at 8am, out of curiosity, and I found several tracks for Tori Amos' Scarlet's Walk, and one track from Pearl Jam's Riot Act just waiting for download on WinMX.

    I guess they need to use a stronger glue.....

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    1. Re:Already on WinMX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you thought it might actually be "secure"? :-)

  87. they're just going to hurt their own business by Vesuvius_2 · · Score: 1

    they're just going to hurt their own business, after all a CD will not sound as good to reviewers when played on a tinny headset as it would in a full stereo system with subwoofers. And if it's the sort of music that sounds better very loud, the reviewer will have to hurt their ears a lot more if he wants to give it a fair shake.

  88. Sony exec watch too much Mission:Impossible by jonr · · Score: 2

    What next? "This CD will self-destruct in 70 Minutes".

  89. Not a high-tech issue, not even a tech question by v2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is just one case where record companies are trying hard to fight a real problem. Before flaming please read:

    How would you like it if you would get thousands of complaints on your work before you published it, or before you even finished it? Record companies have a very hard time keeping music from leaking into the public before the release date. The music in these walkmans may not even be finished. It is sent in to the critics because it has become a habit in the industry. Not sending a copy could even result in getting no review because the critic missed the release.

    More on the too-much-discussed topic: Record companies have a very hard time keeping people from stealing their products. Whether you like it or not, people are allowed to ask a price on what they do for a living. This is something that seems to be forgotten on /. You speak highly about customers rights and the legality of P2P networks, but we've forgetten something: these 'poor' bastards need to make a living. Don't like it? Don't support it: don't buy it and don't rip them off - that's what it is, don't try to sugarcoat it.

    Some bands have said that they don't mind their music being copied. So be it, but they might have given the power to make that decision to the record company. Evil or not, that is how it is. If a band wants their music to be free, they can do it, no sweat, but the music in these Walkmans is made by bands selling their music and trying to make a living. Even a hugely successful band is allowed to sell their music. Don't like giving money to the rich? Then don't, but don't rip them off.

    I don't like the rich getting richer, but people are allowed to choose the license they produce under. Some like it GPL and some like it M$ -style. We might like it GPL but we are not the ones to make that decision for others.

    1. Re:Not a high-tech issue, not even a tech question by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree...to a certain point. Certainly, in both software, music, and other products, there is no right to simply take someone elses creation without compensation. If they want no compensation, fine, but I agree with your sentiment - you can't force people to agree with your license, they have the right to distribute their art any way they see fit.

      I also notice how most slashdotters, instead of talking about how stupid it is to restrict the ability to listen to music, jump in with suggestions on how to circumvent the copy protection.

      For me the problem is that we are being asked to pay more and more to buy products that restrict what we can do with them. Like you said, it's their perogative to release music that way. And it's my perogative not to buy it. Perhaps there are more people with this mindset than you think. Personally, I haven't bought a CD in a couple of years (and no, it's not due to downloading). It's not rocket science to figure out there's more to declining sales than online swapping.

      On the other hand (and I've already mentioned this elsewhere so won't go into detail), do you really have a problem with me buying a crippled CD and circumventing the copy protection to make my own mp3s or a copy of the CD for my car or something?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Not a high-tech issue, not even a tech question by janda · · Score: 1
      Don't support it: don't buy it and don't rip them off - that's what it is, don't try to sugarcoat it.

      I don't. My beef is with the fact that they want to prevent me from using material I have purchased legally on the systems I want to use it on.

      Until they decide to stop that, the only place I'll buy CD's is at a second-hand store. The last movie I saw was in an independent theatre, before that, "The Matrix". I haven't bought a DVD (new or used) in over two years.

      The only way the common people can fight big business is with their wallets.

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
    3. Re:Not a high-tech issue, not even a tech question by aronc · · Score: 1

      The only way the common people can fight big business is with their wallets.
      .. at which point the RIAA & MPAA point to their decreasing sales and say "Look, see! We [b]told[/b] you the DMCA wasn't enough!" and buy even more restrictive laws.

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
  90. It would be funny by ttyp0 · · Score: 2

    if the CD player had a digital optical output.

    1. Re:It would be funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would also be funny if they distributed the CD in a desktop computer, but that's just plain stupid. (like your post!)

  91. not an acoustic piano, duh by yerricde · · Score: 1

    It would be quite funny seeing her carrying around a whole piano though

    An 88-key MIDI controller plus a synth module isn't all that heavy.

    Carry this!

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:not an acoustic piano, duh by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      An 88-key MIDI controller plus a synth module isn't all that heavy.

      Except this is an electronic device that can easily be reverse engineered and copied.

      They should seal up Tori in the piano and send it around, then make sure the piano comes back still sealed.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
  92. What the fuck has the DMCA got to do with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most reviewers have some sort of NDA Agreement. Standard Contract Law, and nothing to do with the DMC-Fucking-A.

    1. Re:What the fuck has the DMCA got to do with it... by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
      Record reviewers generally have nothing of the sort. Procedure: labels drop off waaaay too many CDs; reviewer reviews some of them. Any label trying to get a reviewer to sign an NDA or equivalent will be told to fuck off and given no cooperation whatsoever in short order.

      It's the labels vying for the attention of the reviewers, not the reviewers vying for the favour of the labels.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    2. Re:What the fuck has the DMCA got to do with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NDA Agreement is rudundant, as NDA stands for Non-Disclosure Agreement.

  93. Re:Ed. --- What we need is smart dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need smart dot, instead of slashdot. I submit good stories that are spell checked, easy to read, and the links even work, which never make it to distribution, but submit a lame story about an Apple Mac case mod and "whoa" that's news.

    I want to be an editor!

  94. When I said they could stick their CDs, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... they obviously misunderstood.

  95. -1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the article says that about radiohead you idiot, what moron modded this loser up?

  96. The only way they'd get my money then... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

    ... is if it was safely contained in a glued-shut box. Not that I'd buy that crud anyway.

  97. IMO by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They reached that point a long time ago. The software industry wised up and changed their policies, although some companies with short memories are starting this crap again.

    Remember off-disk copy protection? Enter word three from paragraph five on page twelve of the manual after looking up a secret code on a code wheel?

    I remember cracking most of the games I bought just because I didn't want to deal with that crap. I remember buying Battle Chess and Rail Road Tycoon form my dad, and subsequently breaking both of them so he didn't have to enter codes.

    The software industry, though, for the most part, learned it's lesson. Unfortunately, the RIAA thinks it's beyond the reproach of us regular joes. I said it before in a similar discussion, and I keep picturing Princess Leia saying to Darth Vadar "The more you tighten your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers."

    I feel the same way about this stuff. You want to know why CD sales are down? Maybe people are realizing what crap CDs are being put out. Maybe people don't care about the pop bullshit record companies are putting out. Maybe some have realized (like me) that every time a new format comes out you feel pressured to "upgrade". I have over 200 vinyl records and over 200 more CDs, and I simply stopped buying. It's just not worth it. I have a big video collection that I feel is worthless after getting a DVD player - but I'm not going to build a DVD collection, I'm going to rent. I look at my current collections and see thousands of dollars that could have been used much more wisely.

    Just my opinion.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:IMO by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      but I'm not going to build a DVD collection, I'm going to rent. I look at my current collections and see thousands of dollars that could have been used much more wisely.


      One Word: Library

      I have sworn off buying books, movies and cds. I borrow ALL media -- for free -- at my Local Library

      Where Information is free.

    2. Re:IMO by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Where Information is free.
      And where it is LEGAL to copy stuff you borrow for your own use.
    3. Re:IMO by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ...and if you live in Canada, you can legally copy music CDs to CDR(W)s for yourself..

      you pay a duty on the blank media* already, you might as well take advantage of that.

      *personally, i dont agree with that, but it is the present case.

    4. Re:IMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no free things.
      You know that, don't you ?
      The only reason this stuff is available at all is because somebody somewhere is paying for this.
      Keep that in mind.

  98. Another tool down the drain... by dnight · · Score: 1

    Since I could probably crack that player open with my leatherman, does that make it a circumvention device under the DMCA?

  99. Don't CUT the wires, just use an inductive pickup. by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

    Why cut the headphone wires? Even if you solder them back and shrinkwrap them, it will be obvious to the record company that they've been compromised.

    I think you can still buy them at Radio Shack... little suction-cup gadgets that are basically just coils. If not, just find or wind a decent-sized coil. Put it near the headphone. Quality will be very good, quite possibly better than what you hear through the headphones if they're not using good-quality headphones. For best results it may be necessary to run the output through a graphic EQ.

  100. Torn what? by silvaran · · Score: 0, Troll

    I swear on my mother's grave (which hasn't been dug yet), the first time I read her name I thought Torn Anus. You know you love it.

  101. Then give away walkmans with every album... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    So, why not do this all the time? If they are willing to do it for the reviewers, then dispense with the Audio Cassette and CD formats entirely, and just sell self-running albums in stores, complete with headphones.

    The RIAA could put the Audio Equipment manufacturers out of business, leaving only Sony, who's a record company and Audio Equipment maker all in one.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  102. Easier solution by mightbeadog · · Score: 1

    These are CDs, they're digital. Why not just make a small, unique change to the bytes they give each reviewer, and sue his ass off the planet if his version leaks?

    1. Re:Easier solution by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      MP3 conversion would remove inaudiable data. Thus the bytes would be dropped. Unless he's stupid enough to share a .wav (I've seen this happen).

  103. Any publicity is good publicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just like that 'fake buzz' crap with the Sony T68i phone. Would we normally ever discuss Tori Amos or Pearl Jam? I'd say Sony (Epic) is using the same promotional people that they used for their phone a month or two ago.

    1. Re:Any publicity is good publicity by AdamD1 · · Score: 1

      Radiohead did this with their Kid A CD in 2000. I worked at a radio station in Vancouver and heard how many stations across Europe heard a preview of the album via a sealed (and I mean hermetically, melted, gaf taped, etc.) cassette walkman. That was sort of a double-edged attempt because the assumption was that nobody would bother to copy a cassette version of the album.

      And even with that: the songs *still* showed up online. :)

      But the album still debuted at #1 anyway. I don't get the music industry suits.... Just bewilders me.

      ad

      --
      Because I can! [Brainrub.com]
  104. Fight Back!! (I did last night) by dpilot · · Score: 2

    My birthday is coming up, and I delivered my list to my wife. In addition to several books, it included several Indie titles with links to some relevant pages at "www.cdbaby.com".

    There is no shortage of musicians or music. Nor is there a shortage of good musicians or good music. It's simply a matter of finding it, and if you look a little harder you can find good stuff that doesn't grant any money to the RIAA.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  105. Low tech solution for a low tech solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who builds plastic scale models can probably make short work of a glued-together freebie (read: cheap plastic) walkman. Mr. Walkman, meet Mr. Xacto Knife!

    But reviewers are not known for their willingness to tick off record companies. Doing so would be bad for their ability to obtain pre-release albums. And I certainly don't see anything wrong with trying to protect a pre-release sample.

  106. Be vewwy quiet!! I'm hunting Weviewers! by nojayuk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wonder if this is not just a ploy to find out who the bad apples of the bunch are. Maybe the record industry knows this is futile battle and hence wants to combat it somehow.

    If they wanted to find out which reviewers were releasing previews, the easiest way would be to send out a few hundred gold CD-Rs with each one individually steganographically encoded. When the album appears on KaZaa or wherever, look for the codes and backtrack the gold disc. Bad reviewer! No freebie cruises for you!

    1. Re:Be vewwy quiet!! I'm hunting Weviewers! by Qrlx · · Score: 2

      If they wanted to find out which reviewers were releasing previews, the easiest way would be to send out a few hundred gold CD-Rs with each one individually steganographically encoded.

      I don't think that would work. The steganographic information would probably be lost during the conversion to MP3. And it would mutate differently depending on the bit rate chosen to encode at. Aphex Twin has that song where an image of his face shows up in Winamp, but only if you're playing the actual CD. The subtle noise added to create the effect is lost when you convert to MP3.

      It might be possible to insert "noise" that will respond in a known way to the MP3 conversion process but as someone mentioned earlier, this just prevents another roadblock that can be easily routed against -- maybe by taking the data track from the CD and adding a second of empty space at the end, and then converting to MP3.

      I'm not really shocked or horrified that the record labels are doing this. It makes a lot of sense, actually, it's easy and I think it might achieve the goal of keeping the new product hidden from the mass market until they want to release it. Well, actually there is a problem. If it only takes one "rotten apple" to post the album on Napster, then the labels will be very selective in choosing reviewers. They may only send out five or six CDs (to Rolling Stone, Spin, and a few others) since that covers most of the market. Ultimately I think this process will backfire; as someone else pointed out "They wouldn't send me an advance of the CD to review, I guess it must suck." But with the increasing consolidation of media ventures, and the willingness of the masses to eat from Hollywood's feed bag, it doesn't really matter anymore if the music on the CD sucks or not -- it's all about image and lifestyle now. Limp Bizkit anyone?

  107. have a wiff while you're at it by PegQuin · · Score: 1

    Record execs have been sniffing glue for years. It's about time they gave the brown nose a rest and injected it elsewhere.

    --
    PegQuin--I've got a sneakin' suspicion
  108. I hope they mean DISCman!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they truely DID stick the CD into a sony walkman and glue it shut.. well I must admit glueing those peices of the CD back together and then ripping the songs would be darn near impossible!

  109. Hacking the player... by CokoBWare · · Score: 1

    Once quick thing to do... cut the headphones off and splice in a line out jack... easy as PIE.

  110. New York TImes Registration by karlmiller · · Score: 1

    Try

    false / false

    Enjoy the article. ;)

  111. They should make it like a magically protected D& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should make it like a magically protected D&D treasure chest.

    Maybe it could be Fire Trap :) makeby Sepia's Snake Sigil...

    Maybe it could just release a posionous cloud, or shot a posioned arrow at you when opened. Maybeif the disc is removed it would call fourth a giant fire elemental to strike you down.

  112. They'll never see under our kilts! by paiute · · Score: 1

    Great - now Hollings and Disney have a reason to make acetone illegal.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  113. Compare this to secure document transmission. by altgrr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have recently been looking into the problems associated with secure document transmission. What this ultimately comes down to is the following: There comes a point where you have to define your level of trust. If you don't want anyone to copy a document, you can't distribute it in electronic format - after all, once it's on a screen, it's not safe. You have to have a controlled number of paper copies which you don't let out of your sight.

    When applied to music, if you don't trust the reviewers at all, you make them come to a hotel room where you've set up a hi-fi, give them a comfy chair to sit in, and let them listen. You don't ever give them the CD. The best they can manage is smuggling a Minidisc recorder in, and the quality won't be great.

    Glued-together Walkmans? I'd only settle for _that_ if they supplied quality headphones. You can't possibly review music properly on anything less than proper hi-fi equipment. Walkmans, micro systems and the like just don't have sufficient quality.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
  114. Re:Hammer = Copyright Circumvention Device = Banne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even that:

    slip = Copyright Circumvention Device (technique) = Banned

    Now you can't even slip without being jailed.

  115. Are pets illegal under the DMCA? by janda · · Score: 1

    Let's pretend that I'm a reviewer. I have a cat. I put my "secure (BAWAHAHAHA)" walkman down on my desk so I can go get some more coffee.

    Sparky, my tabby, realizes that the walkman is in her desktop sleeping spot.

    Push, crash, bang, break.

    Do they even have prisons for cats?

    --
    Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  116. In other news... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    Sony's recent marketing studies show that too much information about upcoming albums is being leaked by their sales staff.

    In order to curtail this problem they have instituted a new policy of placing a large amount of glue on top of each salesman's head. Having them drop their pants. Bend over...

    Well, I guess we could hope that this was true.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  117. wire cutters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, it's pretty easy to figure out the damned impedence of a set of headphones... cut the wires run them into an appropropriate RC network, pick off the signal and shove that into your amp or audio input. Or has been pointed out, crack open the glue. :)

  118. Major labels can keep their stinking CD's. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've had enough of this RIAA bs. Let's look at all the recent articles and common sense facts about pirating.

    1. organized pirates: no matter what you do they are always going to be there.
    2. young kids don't have much money and really only buy 0-10 CD's a year. Plus they change their minds very quickly. What was hot and in fashion one year is quickly old hat
    3. hardcore music lovers always perfer to sample first before buying. Once they like a band, they buy more frequently and in larger quantities
    4. trying to pass these laws absolutly alienates the consumer I hope the RIAA gets exactly what it wants. Full proof copy protection and kills itself in the process. God knows I sure a hell ain't going to buy another CD ever again. It's time to get rid of the dead wood, slash and burn. There are plenty of people and musicians waiting for a chance that are otherwise being kept down by the record industry.
  119. Spell check not needed. All words spelled fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just that the GRAMMAR was incorrect.

    1. Re:Spell check not needed. All words spelled fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, not even grammar. The words were spelled right, the sentences were grammatically correct, they were just the wrong words.

  120. Re:Bad Idea by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    Journalists don't buy anything

    Taco and friends may be cheap, but I'd hardly call them 'journalists'.

  121. Is this April Fools or something? by fz00 · · Score: 0

    This is a joke right?

  122. I wish I could be a reviewer... by neoshmengi · · Score: 1

    What a sweet gravy train that would be. I would never have to listen to another MP3 again because the record companies would give me CD's for free.

    A perfect solution to combat the rampant "piracy" of music. Give everyone free CD's.

  123. The next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should just send the music score/lyrics for review on paper... that way the reviewer wouldn't even need to hear the music other than in their heads as they read it. It would solve a big pirating problem and would sort good reviewers from the wanna be's.

    General Midi.

  124. What about controlling the artists? by ader · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should glue Tori's mouth shut so she can't sing outside her contract. 'Course, her husband will lose out...

    Or glue her mouth to a microphone glued to the console of a soundboard nailed down in a recording studio owned by Epic.

    Ade_
    /

    --
    Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
  125. what's next? by ElQuesoEsViejo · · Score: 1

    So what do they think is going to happen after they release the album to the public? Are they going to glue all the jewel cases shut? And what about the peons who work at the CD pressing plants, there are always leaks from them.

    --

    "...more and more of our imports come from overseas." - G.W. Bush

  126. Re:Are they sure it'll be enough? by BeyondALL · · Score: 1

    So, how long before RIAA-people gets glued to the ground by mp3-entusiasts :)

    --
    "If you keep an open mind people will throw a lot of garbage in it."
  127. Re:Reviewing these CDs... (Here's the catch) by iggly_iguana · · Score: 1

    If you don't review the CD under their terms, then NEXT time they send a CD out for review, you won't be invited to the party.

    The solution can be fairly low-tech because you only get to break their trust once.

  128. Wave of Future by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, my TiVo has recordings of copyrighted media inside of it, and it's likewise pretty hard, though not impossible, to get it out in perfect digital fidelity for archiving on other devices or to play on different players.

    I expect to see more of this in the future as hardware prices continue to slide. Media will become more and more locked into a particular device one way or another. Your next CD player could well require an Access card in it to enable it to play the latest CDs.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  129. Fighting Music Piracy with Glue by fireweaver · · Score: 1

    If the poor babies at RIAA are so fucking concerned that thier pre-release music might get out on the 'net, why not herd all the music reviewers into a controlled area and let them listen to it there? The CD never need leave the grubby hands of the music producers until it is ready for release.

  130. great way to prevent art by f00zbll · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is this yet another attempt by the record industry to produce only crap? Take david bowie's Outside album for example. A lot of people love bowie, but that album was dense and complex. It took me several months to really appreciate the album. The first I played it, I was honestly confused and a bit unsure about how it made me feel. If the music industry insists that all new music be "catchy" and grab the listener within the first 10 seconds, it leaves little room for art and exploration.

    Only superficial pop dance tunes have the instant effect. It's kinda like sugar. You get a rush, but afterwards you feel thirsty and want something more substantial. Any great work of art will require time to absorb, so preventing listeners from hearing only ensure the quality of the music degenerates. No wonder the current crop of corporate engineered bands aren't selling as well as they would like. They bitch about how they've invested in an artist, but they are the ones forcing those bands to rehash the last album. Plenty of musicians have been bullied and pushed away from exploration.

    Or as U2 said it. Crap music kills the music industry. Not listeners.

  131. Sniff -- They *are* using glue properly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > So, they can't even use glue properly, its not
    > wonder everything else has failed.

    Actually, they *are* using glue properly, and that's the problem!

    Of course, that explains the RIAA's policies towards their own customers. Valenti must have been drunk or doped up when he compared using a VCR to rape. Go figure.

    1. Re:Sniff -- They *are* using glue properly. by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      Not that it is terribly important, but Jack Valenti is with the MPAA, not the RIAA.

    2. Re:Sniff -- They *are* using glue properly. by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Not that you're terribly observant, but he was referring to Valenti's quote regarding VCRs. It just wasn't particularly cogent.

  132. Re:Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who the hell cares about your karma. call your mom and tell her all about it.

  133. Even better... by dark-nl · · Score: 1

    Not pirating the CD, and not buying it either, undercuts them even more. Simply playing and having the CD will have the effect of promoting it to your friends, and promoting the artists that are in bed with RIAA. Boycott them all, I say.

    1. Re:Even better... by malfunct · · Score: 1
      I echo the parent post's sentiment completely and take it one step further. Not only boycott the big 5 (or is it 7?) but promote the small record companies that are about making good music and paying the artists that do so.

      When you pirate a CD you prove that the music is worth listening to and that validates the RIAA's quest to recieve revenue for it. That just causes them to lobby for more stupid laws that mess up the whole free market system. If instead those record companies lost revenue and saw piracy dwindling at the same time they would be less able to con the congress into stupid laws, thier power would be gone.

      The final blow in my vision is promoting the small record companies, fill the industry back up with good companies again, and do even more the force the crap down the drain.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  134. Why just cut the wires? by alispguru · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Open player with your favorite screwdriver/utility knife.

    2. Remove CD. Rip, mix, burn.

    3. Replace CD in player.

    4. Back over player and headphones with your car.

    5. Return electronic crumbs to Epic Records in plastic bag, claiming you "dropped it".

    Problem solved...

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Why just cut the wires? by dafozzee · · Score: 0

      Better yet:

      1. Open player with your favorite screwdriver/utility knife.

      2. Remove CD. Rip, mix, burn.

      3. Replace CD in player.

      4. Glue lid back shut.

      5. Return to Epic Records, who is none the wiser.

    2. Re:Why just cut the wires? by ChrisJones · · Score: 2

      That's not the kind of excuse that's going to work more than once though ;)

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
  135. left hand, right hand... by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    For every journalist getting the throw-away walkman, there are 200 radio station PO Boxes that get a copy of the CD. What happens to the CD (in the case of Tori who only gets played on college stations and maybe NPR), is it gets thrown either in the trash, or sold in bulk with all the other CD's they throw away every day.

    Somebody down the road gets a CD from a used record store that says "promotional copy not for sale" and they think they're elite.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  136. Why go through all the trouble? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    It would be much easier to just download the pre-release song of a P2P network and review it that way...

    ;)

  137. Has nothing to do with copy protection by nhavar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's pearl jam and tori amos, the record companies are just admitting that with a walkman that's as good as it's ever going to sound. Plus they're sending a nice little signal that if you listen to such music don't bother the people around you with it (use headphones). :)

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  138. Actually... by Derkec · · Score: 2
    This seems like a step in the right direction to me. The industry needs to realize that technological solutions are not the way. They have instead a social problem. Glueing something shut communicates that it shouldn't be opened much more clearly than legalease and might be more effective. True, a dedicated person could still probably find a way around this solution, but seeing a label try something that is simple and sane is something of a relief.


    Still, they might try and look at it as a problem with individuals who are flaunting agreements. It may well be within their abilities to create a special version for each reviewer and imbed some extra tones someplace within the tracks. Then, when mp3s are out, they just download them and check out which tones they are finding. Don't send that reviewer any more discs for a while. Anyway, I find their use of glue refreshing and need to get to work.

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... a problem with individuals who are flaunting agreements.

      I just hate it when individuals flaunt [1] agreements. It's just so tacky when they wave them about and show them off. Flouting [2] agreements, of course, is immoral as well as tacky.

      [1] To flaunt is to show off, or ostentatiously display.

      [2] To flout something is to publicly defy its authority.

  139. What about Quality? by asv108 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm no music reviewer, but it seems to me if I were to review a new album, I would want to listen to the CD on the best stereo I have access to, not a little crappy discman with $5 headphones.

    1. Re:What about Quality? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2
      I'm no music reviewer, but it seems to me if I were to review a new album, I would want to listen to the CD on the best stereo I have access to, not a little crappy discman with $5 headphones.

      That may be why they have reserved this tactic for Pearl Jam and Tori Amos. You can get GG Allin albums on 44kHz digital CDs, too, but I don't think anyone's looking for the little "DDD" designation on them.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    2. Re:What about Quality? by Smeg}{ead · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, if they want to listen to it on a better system so they can review it, all they need to do is go to Kazaa, download it, burn it and put it in their own audio system :)

      Now if the record companies were really serious about this, they would glue their employees to their desks (without internet access of course). That's where most of the pre-release stuff comes from.

  140. Re:Are they sure it'll be enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to burst your bubble, but she is a female, not a male.

  141. Easy... by dark-nl · · Score: 1

    Ship the disc in a sealed nitrogen/helium atmosphere, and make it out of a material that rapidly degrades in an oxygen atmosphere.

  142. Karaoke circumvention device by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    Now the reviewers only need to sing the song into their mic as they listen to it and release that as a mp3 on P2P. Instant crack!

    Of course I'm sure it won't do too much for the record companies sales when people download and wonder what the hell happened to their favorite artists voice.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  143. Re:Hammer = Copyright Circumvention Device = Banne by RottenDeadite · · Score: 1

    By extension, because the hammer is a tool used to circumvent the DMCA, all hammers must be outlawed.

    --

    ***JUMP PAD ACTIVATION INITIATION START***
    ***TRANSPORT WHEN READY***

  144. and in other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i saw the full pearl jam album on a friend's ftp server last night..

  145. Concerts by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Except this is an electronic device that can easily be reverse engineered and copied.

    But Tori Amos herself can't be copied as easily. So in effect, this thread suggests that performers should use live concerts more often to promote record sales.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Concerts by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 2

      I'd like to help her make a copy...*rowwl!*

    2. Re:Concerts by certron · · Score: 1

      "But Tori Amos herself can't be copied as easily. So in effect, this thread suggests that performers should use live concerts more often to promote record sales."

      Or they should use live concerts to actually get paid... :-) OK, so I'm going forward in time here, but http://www.usatoday.com/life/music/news/2002-09-15 -artists-rights_x.htm / http://slashdot.org/articles/02/09/16/1214231.shtm l?tid=98

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    3. Re:Concerts by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Right on! I LIKE Tori!

      Too bad they picked her to do this stupid stuff with...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  146. Re: Chemical means vs. Mechanical means by redfenix · · Score: 1

    Um, isn't that what they make Dremel tools for?

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
  147. In one word... by telstar · · Score: 2

    YES. Because you could be using your teeth to transmit the sound to somebody's MP3 phone ... thus, violation the DMCA. Run villain, run!

  148. circumvent ee style... by byrd77 · · Score: 1

    wrap the headphone cord around an iron core and extract the signal from the inducted current...

    viola

    --
    - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
  149. So what's the problem? by HardCase · · Score: 2
    "The New York Times (Free Blah-di-blah) is reporting that Epic Records, in an effort to prevent reviewers from creating mp3s or even playing the preview CD in anything they don't control, is not disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut. Oh yeah ... the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any authorized output. A low-tech answer to a high-tech issue."


    I think I read somewhere that they're also not going to seal them in a block of concrete and embed the headphones in plutonium to prevent authorized output. At least that's what I think it said...


    -h-

  150. This is not realistically a DMCA issue... by Tom7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You should read the DMCA more carefully. The device has to be primarily designed for circumvention, and must not have any other commercially significant uses. Also, it would probably be hard to argue that glue is a "technological measure" as defined in the DMCA.

    The DMCA is a bad law, and I know you guys are half joking, but blowing it out of proportion like this I think does our cause disservice. Actually understanding what it makes illegal, and being able to hold intelligent conversations about it's implications -- that's what helps us.

    1. Re:This is not realistically a DMCA issue... by andcal · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the poster has read the DMCA very carefully, but decided to be safe by deferring to the court's interperetation of the law, since the court is the one who will determine if he/she goes to jail or not.
      The CSS scheme used to "encrypt" movies on DVD is about as strong a "technological measure" as this glue, yet the DMCA still seems to apply, according to the courts, and that is the whole point.
      DeCSS, which was written in order to allow people to do many things besides pirate movies was not primarily designed for circumvention, yet the DMCA still seems to apply, according to the courts, and that is the whole point.

      --
      --something witty
    2. Re:This is not realistically a DMCA issue... by Tom7 · · Score: 2
      > The CSS scheme used to "encrypt" movies on DVD is about as strong a "technological
      > measure" as this glue, yet the DMCA still seems to apply, according to the courts, and
      > that is the whole point.

      Really, you should look at the definition of technological measure in the context of the DMCA. Here it is:

      A technological measure ''effectively controls access to a work'' if the measure, in the ordinary course of its operation, requires the application of information, or a process or a treatment, with the authority of the copyright owner, to gain access to the work.


      Does glue require the application of information (??), or a process or a treatment (??) to gain access to the copyrighted work? No. They are talking about encoding schemes. Also, the strength of the encoding essentially has no bearing -- as long as it meets the definition then it doesn't matter how strong or weak it is.

      > DeCSS, which was written in order to allow people to do many things besides pirate movies
      > was not primarily designed for circumvention, yet the DMCA still seems to apply, according
      > to the courts, and that is the whole point.

      I don't agree with this. The purpose of DeCSS was indeed to circumvent the CSS system.
      (Whether CSS is a "technological measure" and DeCSS a "device" is somewhat less obvious, though I don't think the court was unreasonable here.) One might have any number of reasons to want to circumvent CSS, some of which are legal and many of which are moral; however, what you do after circumvention is not addressed at all in the DMCA. (This is one of the biggest problems with the law.)

      The question to ask is, "What other uses does DeCSS have other than to decrypt CSS-encoded data?" Not: "Why might someone use DeCSS other than to pirate movies?"

    3. Re:This is not realistically a DMCA issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you used a hammer to break the player in order to access the cd it would be a violation of the DMCA. That is what the law says. Could you really argue in front of a judge that this walkman was not glued shut to control access to copyrighted material?

      You are correct that the DMCA's criteria for a circumvention device requires a "primarily designed" and "commercial use" test, but you a leaving out the third criteria.

      (C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing protection afforded by a technological measure that effectively protects a right of a copyright owner under this title in a work or a portion thereof.

      In other words if I sold hammers and advertised one of the uses as breaking glued walkmans then it would be a violation of the DMCA.

      I agree with you, we should do our best to accurately describe the DMCA.

    4. Re:This is not realistically a DMCA issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you don't greet every halfwitted joke about the DMCA with honking laughter? I know I do.

    5. Re:This is not realistically a DMCA issue... by andcal · · Score: 1

      Good Points, thanks for the education.

      --
      --something witty
  151. Mission Impossible IV -- The Review by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    Your mission, Jim, should you chose to accept it, is to review a CD by Pearl Jam. If your or any of your IM force be killed or captured the RIAA will disavow any knowledge of your actions. Good luck Jim.

    The review CDs will self-destruct in five seconds...

  152. Uh by Kanasta · · Score: 2
    Epic Records, ... , is not disseminating the new Pearl Jam and Tori Amos CDs inside Sony Walkman players that are glued shut

    Hrm. Doesn't anyone proofread what they post? I just got stunned for a few seconds wondering why you were telling me what someone was NOT doing

    1. Re:Uh by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      And in other news, the RIAA is NOT backing off their stance to shut down P2P networks. Microsoft is NOT going to support previous versions of windows, nor will it issue patches to old security flaws.

      In an unsuprising move by Apple Computer, Steve Jobs stated that Apple was NOT going to scuttle OS/X in favor of TurboLinux. Anonymous sources did, however, say that Steve Jobs was most definitely NOT going to hire Wozniak back to work on OS/X++. Also quoted was Mr. Jobs stating that Apple would NOT be reverting to GS/OS as it's next viable operating system. However, ProDOS 1.2 was NOT a possiblity if enough users requested it.

  153. License to Whine by StormyMonday · · Score: 2

    Epic is doing this so they can say, when they get back the bashed-open CD players, "Look at how Evil all those reviewers are!" Then they can blame the reviewers for the music "escaping". Since the ones probably putting the music on the P2P nets are the guys who mixed it it the first place, it lets Epic shove responsibility off onto someone else.

    Or maybe they're just saying that these albums don't deserve anything better.

    The ideal solution would be for the reviewers to not review them at all. See what that does to sales.

    --
    Welcome to the Turing Tarpit, where everything is possible but nothing interesting is easy.
    1. Re:License to Whine by Greg+W. · · Score: 2

      The ideal solution would be for the reviewers to not review them at all. See what that does to sales.



      I can't speak for Pearl Jam, but in the case of Tori Amos, it won't do a damn thing. She's got a solid core of fans who will buy this album, unheard, unreviewed, period. I should know; I'm one of them.

    2. Re:License to Whine by StormyMonday · · Score: 2

      I think Pearl Jam also has a solid core of fans who will buy the album, reviews or no.

      So why mess around with reviewers at all?

      --
      Welcome to the Turing Tarpit, where everything is possible but nothing interesting is easy.
  154. Oh the Irony by Lonath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's gotta be irony somewhere in having two articles on /. about the record industry in one day.

    Article 1: Record companies are sending expensive sealed players to reviewers instead of just CD's.

    Article 2: Artists are fed up with being screwed over by the record industry, but the industry keeps bleating about how expensive it is to handle their artists.

    I see a nice cycle here: They have to spend more money to keep their music controlled because they need to make more money to spend more money to keep their music controlled because they need to make more money to spend more money to...

  155. What a waste by kireK · · Score: 1

    After you dremmel out the CD, you now have destroyed the CD player... wouldn't it be easier for the record companies to just release the songs on MP3... Those that have the money will still buy the CDs, espically is they contain MP3 and the normal audio tracks. Now that would be cool, CDs with both audio and MP3.

  156. They are not distributing them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I sure am glad that slashdot is reporting to me that the RIAA is NOT distributing the preview CDs in a discman that is glued shut. I don't know what I would do if I thought the RIAA would actualy do that sort of thing.

  157. waste of money by danimrich · · Score: 1

    Another reason for CDs being waaay to expensive. I mean, if the record company can afford sending entire CD players to possibly hundreds of critics every time they release a mayor CD, why couldn't they make CDs a few bucks cheaper?

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  158. Who's side is she on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time I saw Tori Amos live as at the alanis/tori MP3.COM TOUR! YES EEEM PEE THREEE! I think someone should hand her some glue so she can put her integrity back together.

    1. Re:Who's side is she on? by dpu · · Score: 1

      you're still allowed to respect her. she (and Pearl Jam) are the artists, and therefore have no say whatsoever about who listens to their music, who reviews their music, how people get copies of their albums, or what colour the glued-shut cd players are. it's not like the record company would actually care enough to change anything if they don't care enough to ask about it.

      Amos and Jam did not say to someone "Well glue the fucking things shut then!" i'd be surprised if it has even been mentioned in their presence. the first they'll probably hear of it is if they read Slashdot or the NYTimes.

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
  159. Then record it analog! by azav · · Score: 1

    For god's sake, all this copy protection is idiotic.

    Plug the unit into the sound in input of your computer, record each song and enter the MP3 tags yourself.

    Use a tape recorder.

    These people are beyond braindead.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Then record it analog! by azav · · Score: 1

      So the headphones are glued on? Cut and splice tha cables or dissolve the glue with solvent. Start with nailpolish remover.

      That's my low tech solution to their low tech solution.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    2. Re:Then record it analog! by mozkill · · Score: 1

      better, yet, why not downsample the album to 8-bit mono, record it to cassette tape, and send it to reviewers...

      they cant do much with low quality samples. reviewers rarely care about the sound quality anyways, always harping on lyrics, artistic expression and musical content instead...

      --

      -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  160. Canary Trap by PMuse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could it be that the company wants to ID those reviewers who may be leaking/ripping the stuff before release? If the units must be returned in original condition, untampered, after they're reviewed, then this may be meant to identify leaks. The way the company figures it, if the leakers refuse to review the stuff, no big loss.

    Perhaps the company also thinks that most of what it considers "legitimate" reviewers will acquiesce.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  161. Mmmphgh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yrggh rmph rrgh. srghh....

  162. Ooops! Sorry, I dropped it. by Skapare · · Score: 2

    Ooops! Sorry, I dropped it. But don't worry, I didn't lose any parts. I glued it all back together. Ignore those minor cosmetic blemishes. And it might skip tracks occaisionally.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  163. Back in my day.... by newestbob · · Score: 0
    ...when a new "Tin Pan Alley" composer came out with a new tune, it hit the sheet music stores first.

    Why not release the music score to the reviewer and let them review it from that?

    Of course, modern pop songs probably read like the crap they are.

    1. Re:Back in my day.... by dpu · · Score: 1

      ...and how many so-called "music reviewers" do you think can actually play music? i don't know the answer to that, but enough complete-and-total-shit music has gotten 5 star reviews to make it hard to believe that many of them have any kind of clue how to play something besides their undoubtedly (and thankfully) sub-compact peni (or is it actually "penises"?). or, like movie reviewers, they get paid to give good reviews to crap. either way....

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
  164. Re:sticky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the way the guy glues himself in American Pie 2 lol.

  165. Re: Chemical means vs. Mechanical means by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 2, Funny
    Um, isn't that what they make Dremel tools for

    IANAL, but I think that under the DMCA, wouldn't the Dremel tool would be considered a circumvention device (the same goes for sledgehammers and big rocks) and therefore illegal? Stores like Home Depot would pull them off the shelves for fear of being ruled contributory infringers.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  166. UPS and FedEx are illegal now too by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

    Dropping the unit would be a method. Hmm, guilty of dropping the unit?

    Chances are pretty good that the DMCA will have already been violated by the time the package arrives at your door.
    "Fra-gi-le... that must be Italian!"

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    1. Re:UPS and FedEx are illegal now too by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      Close. A friend that worked at UPS while in college said that during his training, he was told that Fra-gi-le was french for 'throw against a wall as hard as you can'. No, I am not kidding. His tour guide then proceeded to demonstrate with the package he was holding and its contents audibly shattered. The package was then tossed onto the conveyor and on its merry way it went.

      Another friend that later worked at the same facility as a supervisor said he wouldn't be surprised if the story was true considering many of the folks that worked there. Even though a relative works at UPS, I won't use them anymore unless there is no alternative. If I absolutely wanted the glue broken on the CD players, UPS could probably take good care of that for me though. :)

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  167. Looks pretty easy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, my TiVo has recordings of copyrighted media inside of it, and it's likewise pretty hard, though not impossible, to get it out in perfect digital fidelity for archiving on other devices or to play on different players."

    All the FAQs and How-Tos for EASY stream extraction are right here:

    http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/forumdisplay.p hp ?s=b6f603ec80780ae802af1f8e3a59840e&forumid=24

    and for general TiVo hacks, trim a little:

    http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/

  168. That would be HELL! by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine listening to Tori Amos shriek for the rest of your life? AAAAAAAAAAAAAIIEEEEEEE!

    1. Re:That would be HELL! by unicron · · Score: 2

      WTF are you talking about? Tori Amos doesn't shreik. Listen to "A man with a gun".

      Besides, anyone that Maynard will duet with is alright in my book.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:That would be HELL! by Greg+W. · · Score: 2

      Listen to "A man with a gun".



      Obligatory nitpick: "Me and a Gun", from her first album Little Earthquakes.

    3. Re:That would be HELL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "She doesn't shriek at all! Listen to one song where she doesn't!"

      Personally I would rather just hear her play the piano or harpsichord.

  169. Re:This idea should be taken to it's logical end . by DDX_2002 · · Score: 1

    Reviewers *are* disposable. Ever worked for a college newspaper or radio station? Quickest way to get dozens of new volunteers is to shout "free review CDs" in the cafeteria.

    --
    MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
  170. Pearl Jam Allowed This? by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    Interesting, a group that fought for a decade to break Ticketmaster (in the name of the fan), that allows taping of their live shows, and in response to piracy: released their own live shows on cd (just as Dylan did almost 2 decades ago) would allow such a hokey marketing thing...

    I wonder if there will be any back-lash from the radio or retail industry?

    1. Re:Pearl Jam Allowed This? by eclectric · · Score: 2

      Doubtful. Bands have little control over an album once it has gone to market. How Sony/Epic chooses to send out copies to review is really not up to them. Though, some members of the band have problems with file trading of copyrighted works. They encourage trading of live material, but have asked websites to stop trading commercially available tracks.

  171. workaround by lo_fye · · Score: 2, Funny

    cut headphone cord
    expose the 2 wires
    attach standard line-out connector
    plug into line-in on soundcard
    Voila!

    --
    geeks are cats who dig a certain kind of cool
    1. Re:workaround by Tiado · · Score: 1
      cut headphone cord expose the 2 wires attach standard line-out connector plug into line-in on soundcard Voila!

      Isn't in violation of the DMCA?

  172. Re:Don't CUT the wires, just use an inductive pick by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    Don't even need to bother with that. Just unscrew that puppy and put a couple bare wires on the headphone jack leads into your sound card. Viola ... instant MP3!

    Screw the thing back together and you're done.

  173. Show of Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, seriously now, how many people read the title of the artical and thought "Hmmm, 'Glue' must be the title of some new program that tracks mp3 distribution" or somthing along those lines? :)

  174. Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Music is a luxury not worth paying for. Because $15 a CD is ridiculous and now you have to buy the cd with a walkman glued onto it? I say forget the music industry. I havent bought a new cd in 2 years and not because of Kazaa. With my 56k Kazaa is just to slow and painful to use. I just do without music because as a student I cant afford it period. Oh how I wish I dormed, but I live with my parents.

  175. Re:That's really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why the fuck would you do that as opposed to just pulling the top off the cd player and removing the disc... fucktard..

  176. Neither was DeCSS by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    Whose algorithm now forms the core of (or more often, an anonymously-distributed module for) every Linux program capable of playing encrypted DVDs. Nobody seemed to care then.

  177. Typo: Re:Oh yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I havn't bought a CD since Napster got stopped the first time....

  178. Scarlet's Walk by Thorgal · · Score: 1

    Speaking of Tori's new CD: I am looking for mp3/ogg version. Obviously, I intend to buy the album when it's finally released, but I'd love to hear it earlier. Anyone with URL?

    --
    "Man in the Moon and other weird things" - wfmh.org.pl/thorgal/Moon/
  179. Except they wouldn't do that. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Because they want reviewers to hear a 100% non-lossy encoded copy for review, not some MP3.

    Now, if they had a small FLAC supporting device, that idea might work out better. But again, if I can hear it, I can copy it. The headphone jack connects easily to any recorder, digital or otherwise.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Except they wouldn't do that. by atrus · · Score: 2

      And they expect them to listen to it on a Sony Walkman with stock headphones? Thats not exactly Hi-Fi equipment there :)

    2. Re:Except they wouldn't do that. by ichimunki · · Score: 1
      Because they want reviewers to hear a 100% non-lossy encoded copy for review, not some MP3.

      So how is mp3 that much worse than the quality of some Sony Discman with cheap walkman headphones?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    3. Re:Except they wouldn't do that. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      A CD player with cheap headphones, or an MP3 device with cheap headphones... think about it.

      Plus, the lossy encoding looms large in the mind of audiophiles. That's why FLAC is being developed.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    4. Re:Except they wouldn't do that. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about it... and I'm thinking that maybe my slight hearing impairment is playing a role here-- I don't think I can tell the difference between CDs and mp3s on my combo device (or at home on my stereo)... but what audiofile is going to give a rave review to something he/she could only listen to on some cheap device, when they are accustomed to a serious system tuned to their preferences and so forth? Hearing impairment or no, I *can* hear the difference between a walkman and a stereo.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  180. Worked for Perl Jam, not Amos by doublem · · Score: 2

    The Perl Jam album didn't show up on Kazaa Lite, but the Amos album did.

    I guess there was less motivation to share Perl Jam than Amos.

    Damn, what a time to blank on all the possible sexual puns that the situation promises.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  181. Re:oh really, fuckwad? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    No you listen to me you dumb fucking redard Bush voting red-neck. At one point the cable has to split to go to the 2 different ears for the headphones, so you tap the f-ing wires separately on those 2 branches, or you fucking tap the speaker coils themselves. Hey, why not listen in mono, the FBI does on your phone. Go stick a coil up your ass, im sure it will pick up loads of crap.

    ROFL :)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  182. It's just a deterrent.. by monotone · · Score: 0

    It's not meant to be the end all solution, but I bet it will stop the casual reviewer/pirate. The great thing about ripping cds is that it is SO simple that all it takes is popping the cd in the drive. Sure it can be circumvented, but this will be effective against average person who doesn't want to mess with clipping the wires, or breaking the glue. It's also interesting to note that the price of the cd will undoubtedly include all the free walkmans that are given away.

  183. Was the headphone cable made of armored cable? by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    Just cut the cable, solder in a pair of RCA jacks and presto! Analog output! Feed into your favorite sound card and BAM! Captured audio!

    -ted

  184. Sounds Firmiliar by Malicious · · Score: 1

    Just have Ethan Hunt and crew do all the reviewing... Haven't they had Self-destructing messages since the 60's? Set that system up.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  185. Oh lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo somewhere in Idaho a reviewer with a scratched CD now has a free CD?

    That'll last a woping 5 nanoseconds when they do simple math cal | ab 50*x + 5*x +5*100reviewers is
    6,500....and this is suposed to be covered by who? Oh boy a free CD walkman and copies of Toni Nonamerson on my hard drive...thank you RIAA for setting yet another moral, legal, and ethical president, you're the pimadora of virtue.

  186. Teeth on wires by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    I always use my teeth to strim wires - are they illegal too?

    So does my SO. He's got notches in his teeth in a variety of gauges -- handy, but only good for the dentist's wallet in the long run.

    Also, he is a journalist, and has spent so much time messing with hardware over the last 30 years or so, he might as well be an engineer...

    In any case, they're not likely to haul people with wire-stripping tooth notches away to jail anytime soon -- a lot of wrongfully-arrested tailors/seamstresses/costumers (ever heard of a "tailor's notch"?) could make a pretty big stink. :)

  187. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Autorun.inf can have an fdisk type program to eradicate the hard drive of anyone who inserts it into their computer. Also eliminating the entire mp3 collection of the poor person who tried it and doesn't have a utility to restore partition ;)

    Mean - yes, warning on label - required, cheaper than giving away useless walkmans - hell yeah. Will it work every time? No...autorun can be disabled.

    Or better yet...distribute it on mp3 in some really crappy sounding quality along with random "sample only" oversamples.

    Or...how about just making it a proprietary file format that can only be listened to X # times on a specific system with their proprietary player?

    Who thinks of this crap & still keeps their jobs?

  188. Lower Tech Answer to Low Tech Solution: by Invidious · · Score: 0

    Bash it with a rock until the discman comes apart.

  189. Re:This idea should be taken to it's logical end . by nytes · · Score: 1

    The problem with glue is that it's subject to deterioration due to sun, persperation, etc.

    I think they should use staples.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  190. New patent by Lxy · · Score: 2

    Maybe I should just patent a method of cutting open the case with a razor blade. Then I can sell something similar to those CD opener tools.

    Since they're already wast^H^H^H^H^H investing money on these CD players that are glued shut, it seems odd that they wouldn't use either a non-standard format/size CD and an odd heaphone connector. Once in a long time ago, I was flying a Northwest Airlines flight and the headphone was similar to a stethoscope.. the connector was actually a VERY small speaker, if you cranked up the volume you could actually hear the audio (barely) from the connector. The tubing on the headphones amplified it, so the listenr heard the quality sound, but only the listener. Forget copying it.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  191. cut n paste by newr00tic · · Score: 0

    Just cut the wires on the headphones, and splice it with another cable going to the recording equipment =)

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    1. Re:cut n paste by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2

      That looks good on paper, but a headphone output will be amplified in order to drive the headphone speakers and an amplified signal is not going to be the best thing for recording. OTOH, it doesn't take too much to power headphones.

      --
      /*drunk.. fix later*/
  192. It's okay by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    The primary purpose of a human is not as a circumvention device, so the DMCA is cool with it.

    The problem is that "primary purpose" is a little ill-defined. Is the "primary purpose" of Napster distributing music from free artists? Is the "primary purpose" of glue remover to get at CDs?

    1. Re:It's okay by Rakarra · · Score: 2
      Is the "primary purpose" of Napster distributing music from free artists?

      Nope. Never was. Especially when you take the damaging internal memos that were released during the trial into account.

  193. For those who don't want to register NYT... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2
  194. apologies to "The Fifth Element" by thePfhitz · · Score: 1
    Are you classified as human?

    No, I am a meat popsicle!

    1. Re:apologies to "The Fifth Element" by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 2

      Please place your hands inside the yellow circles.

  195. Re: here's an idea by 56ker · · Score: 1

    How about Mission Impossible style melting CDs? When the CDs been played once the whole device fuses - making the CD unreadable. Or have I just been watching too much TV? ;o)

  196. Even easier... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    Solder wires to some straight pins, and push them through the headphone cable. That way, when you have to give the set back, they probably won't notice.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  197. Lid or CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the walkman's lid or the CD glued.

    If its just the lid, get a hammer. If its the cd glued to the little round metal thing the cd spins on, then you will have a harder time.

    I know you can get super glue remover too so :-P

  198. RIAA lives in the stone age by pjt48108 · · Score: 1

    I am stumpified as to why the RIAA is so caught up with trying to control old-time media. I am surprised they haven't gone to a subscription-based music distribution system. The technology exists, after all. In the face of existing technology, it just doesn't make sense for them to send out hard copies of recordings. They could easily start up their own network (riaa-reviewnet.com or some such creature) and allow reviewers to download (or otherwise hear) music in a controlled environment. Have the client software be some bastardized thing with copy-protection and they would be all set.

    Hell, if I were a stockholder in a record company, I'd expect no less. By continuing as they do, they really are begging for a diagnosis of insanity.

    --
    Mmmmmm... Bold, yet refreshing!
    1. Re:RIAA lives in the stone age by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Getting rid of physical media takes away one of the greatest advantages of actually paying for music (I mean, other then doing the right thing).

      People want a physical disc. Personally, I used to buy CDs all the time, despite the fact that I often downloaded music online, because I wanted something I could hold on to, take in the car, leave on my shelf, etc. I don't buy them any more because I just can't support that industry, and have plenty of CDs to keep my busy.

      If the RIAA wants to get CD sales back up, their best bet would be to stop treating all of their potential customers like criminals.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  199. Snip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you snip the ear buds off the headphones and directly wire the leads to another cable that has a useful jack on it. Problem solved.

  200. Yeah, but I'm pissed at all the landfill fodder... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    ...that this "anti-piracy" measure will produce.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  201. Why not induction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you pick up the music signal just by measuring the changes in current to the headphones. You avoid the error introduce by the speaker. No cut wires or broken open players required.

  202. Well, yes, it was. by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    The court was convinced that DeCSS was in violation of the DMCA, and that's a pretty reasonable reading of the existing law. (The law itself is NOT reasonable, and I think that's the main problem with the DeCSS fiasco.)

    The DMCA does not make general purpose tools illegal. If that's what you fear about the DMCA, then don't worry, you are safe! (That is, until we get Digital Rights Management legislation...) On the other hand, if you hate the DMCA because it makes bona fide circumvention devices (that enable both illegal and legal uses of copyrighted content) illegal, then carry on. But really, to argue that the DMCA outlaws gravity just makes us look like a bunch of paranoid whiners.

  203. Re:Hammer = Copyright Circumvention Device = Banne by paroxysm · · Score: 1

    Crap, I guess I better find a copy of "The karate kid" .. I'm remodeling, and it's going to be hell driving all those nails with the palm of my hand.. Sorry mr. miyage..

  204. Best copy protection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep releaseing Pearl Jam and Tori Amos records. Who the hell would want to copy that anyway?

    1. Re:Best copy protection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I've never listened to Pearl Jam, but Tori Amos is a brilliant singer.

    2. Re:Best copy protection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A ha ha haaa ha ha haa.. Thanks, I needed that..

  205. That's illegal! by marcus · · Score: 1

    You have decrypted protected material.

    You and your grammar teacher are now circumvention devices!

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  206. Re:Yeah, but I'm pissed at all the landfill fodder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I heard, there were a fairly limited number of the Tori Amos discs-in-a-player distributed. Once the reviewer had it for a specified amount of time, they were expected to send it back, and it would be sent out again.
    So, at least they weren't sending out hundreds or thousands of these, as they would with a normal promo CD.

  207. Re: Big Rocks? by redfenix · · Score: 1

    Okay, so God's in violation of the DMCA for creating big rocks, right?

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
  208. TREE HUGGING HIPPE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a hyporcrit too! all environmentalists are hipocrits! Lets save the planet as long as it doesn't inconvienence me! fucking pathetic. If you're not riding a bike and using solar power for all your transportation and power consumtion needs then ur full of shit.

  209. Wait a minute by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    Let me get this streight. They are selling a CD with a CD player included? I mean, a whole, fully functioning CD player?

    Has the world gone insane? This has to be the most assinine thing I've heard of. And this is done to prevent piracy?

    Now, I'm going to guess that even if they get huge discounts and have figured out how to really make them cheap, a CD player and headphones has to cost them around $7 to make, and my first guess is that cost will be passed on to the consumer.

    So the consumer will have to pay extra money for a CD that can only be played on a cheap discman and listened to with cheap headphones... no listining on a computer, through a home stereo, or in the car.

    And this is all being done to prevent piracy, which can be gotten around with a hammer or a screwdriver.

    Seriously, what are these people smoking? It appears they are going out of their way to make it tougher on the consumer. I'm trying to find a single shred of logic here, and the best thing I can come up with is that they really want CD sales to go down further to encourage lawmakers to get tougher on online pirates.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Wait a minute by dpu · · Score: 1

      holy shit, did you even bother reading the posting here? they are talking solely about advance copies of albums sent to reviewers - NOT the copies that are actually distributed to stores and sold.

      seriously, what are you smoking? little bits trigger happy, no?

      --
      Dammit, I meant to post that anonymously!
    2. Re:Wait a minute by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      I guess I jumped the gun their.

      heh.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  210. just smash it... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    If you really wanted to get the CD out, you could just break open the case of the CD-player and get the disk out.

    --
    SIGFAULT
  211. Glue the door shut?! by MetalMorph · · Score: 1

    Idiots.

    Glue the CD to the spindle itself, that way you risk breaking the actual CD when attempting to pry it off. There's nothing stopping people from pulling out a friggin' CROWBAR and cracking the player in half to get to the disc, if they want it that badly. Though unfortunately, the player itself might be worth more than the crap music inside. ;)

    --
    My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
  212. this ought to be simple enough by jadedlogic · · Score: 1

    scissors....hot glue gun or electrical tape... run of the mill line in patch cable or similar constituent... viola! if they want it back (highly unlikely, the cd's i review for the zine i write for never have to go back..), just cut below your mod, and tell them somoene cut your headphone wires after seeing what you were listening to.

  213. Re:I'm a bit confused... by el+stevo · · Score: 1

    actually, this is pretty on-topic. in the article's description, the writer says "is not disseminating" when the word "now" would be far more appropriate. (read: correct)

    this confused me a bit at first until i did a double take and realized how the sentence was supposed to read.

    --
    i'm sorry, i'm just sleep deprived... but bitter. yes. very bitter.
  214. why not by tezzery · · Score: 1

    why not just ship them a pre-written review for the damn album2.

    like we care about their crappy music anyway.

  215. One thing to be thankful for by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness they are coming up with solutions like this for the recording industry instead of,say, Planned Parenthood.

  216. You and *I* can have such an intelligent. . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    converstion, but it's being able to hold such a discussion with a *judge* that will help us.

    Have *you* been able to hold an intelligent conversation about the DMCA with a judge lately?

    Neither has anyone else.

    KFG

    1. Re:You and *I* can have such an intelligent. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh?

  217. Re:Bad Idea by glk572 · · Score: 1

    The only way to really prevent music piracy is to either publish really bad music that no one wants, or just come up with a format that can't be played at all.

    --
    Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  218. RIAA biting the hand that feeds it by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1
    Music reviewers are a part of the RIAA's marketing. If the reviewers choose not to review "Disc A", then a certain portion of Disc A's revenue is likely to be lost. If a lot of reviewers are angry about the way they are being treated, they may choose not to review that disc, and the RIAA will lose money.

    Who will lose more here? -the RIAA, for not having as much market exposure? -or Jon Doe, music reviewer, for not getting a personal copy of the music?

  219. When the actual CDs go on sale... by payndz · · Score: 1

    ...will the cases be glued shut to prevent piracy as well?

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  220. Re:This idea should be taken to it's logical end . by tfoss · · Score: 1
    Disposable reviewers


    *Ahem* redundant

    -Ted

    --
    -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
  221. Why don't they take MiniDisc Players? by Gnutzel · · Score: 1

    Why don't they take the so cool&fancy NetMD-Players? They are the best choose then it comes to handcuffware. If you read NetMD FAQ on minidisc.org, you will see that you can't even delete the songs you put on your own recorder. I think there is even some build-in feature for `close player&disc for the paying owner forever` called *Open*MD. ;-)

    `Digital Restrictions Management - restricted to everyone, everywhere, all the time.`

    Can somebody please start building MD like ogg-Vorbis Players? And mircopayment for all...

  222. AFAIK, the RIAA fears no-one ... by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1

    and their lawyers would probably make the case for contributory infringement if a big rock is used the circumvent the aforementioned copy protection scheme. What do lawyers and the recording industry have to lose - they're are all going to hell anyway, aren't they? ;-}

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  223. apologies in advance but I need to. by RestiffBard · · Score: 2


    I'm so fucking over this shit. I fucking can't stand it anymore. All I want to do is listen to the music I purchase in the manner I choose.

    I understand they want to make sure I'm not stealing the music. Thats fine. I'm not. I own all the oggs I've encoded. I don't share em. I don't make copies on discs. I just listen to them. Thats it. Thats what the majority of us do. quit treating your customers like criminals. fucking pissing me off. god damn it!

    sorry folks I needed to do that. mod me down. doesn't hurt me.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  224. Some prevention by Ominous+Armed+Cow · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "...the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any authorized output. A low-tech answer to a high-tech issue..."

    Does the glued in stereo-jack magically prevent you from splicing a jack onto the other end?

  225. Glue shut CD cases? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    If they glued shut the CD cases then there would be no music piracy :)

  226. Re:Wire cutting - or "how to read 510 comments" by bbqdeath · · Score: 1

    I just do a random sampling around the comments page until I've read about 5 different thoughts, 3 of which I developed myself when I read the article headline. Once I've seen 5 different thoughts, I go on to the next article because that's about all the insight one can expect to filter through slashdot mob rule. FWIW, I wouldn't bother with the glue personally; I'd have those wires stripped, soldered, and heatshrunk to a stereo headphone jack in the back of my PC in five minutes.

  227. Violations of DMCA by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    So wirecutters, glue-disolving solvents, and wire splicers are now illegal ;)

    (yah yah, I know, their *primary purpose* is not access control circumvention, but nether is ROT-13).

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  228. proper use and restricted use. by flyneye · · Score: 1

    keeping in mind these are just more forgettable pop artists the proper use of glue wouldve been to affix the disk in their buttcracks.however this does not restrict use to just the artist but also their publishing company and all the lawyers and every exec right up to hillary rosen.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  229. DON'T GIVE IT OUT BEFORE RELEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want it to appear on the net before it's released, then don't give out copies of the music beforehand!

    Like reveiwer's can't review the CD once it's released or something. Who reads that crap anyway?

    Oh wait, nevermind -- I forgot that this is just another play to justify $17.99 a CD.

  230. CD glued just for reviewers, silly! by jennygerbi · · Score: 1

    Okay.

    The cd's were glued inside only to keep mp3's from leaking before the release date. They are NOT going to be sold that way for the actual album! Sillies!

    There is a Tori article where she mentions her husband was at home, gluing them together. He did it himself! I don't think this is an actual record label Policy. And they did it because she didn't want certain aspects of the album to be released before she was ready- which I can understand- but a simply worded request to her fans to wait and now dowload it would be more effective. Obviously, it got out anyway. And the more you do to KEEP it from going out, the more determined people are going to be to put it out.

    This is more a question of the artist not wanting their material out until a certain date, rather than mp3 "piracy", since obviously everyone is going to put it out on mp3 once they buy the album. They are NOT copy-protecting these cd's, which is therefore, just fine! The artist (and, well, record company) is allowed to decide when their work is shown, and Tori did not want her album coming out so close to Sept 11th. And that's her right.

    Just as a note: people had to RETURN the players when they were done, so if someone did splice into the headphones, they'd know who did it. I personally think that her actual crew leaks this stuff- they're net enabled, and I really don't know who else would do it if they are keeping such a tight rein on it. Of course, the single is a different matter- radio stations everywhere have it, and it's around. But the entire album has not been widely disseminated, so that is more interesting.

    Anyway, as a Tori fan, I wanted to put that out there.

  231. Who can figure out away to remove glue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like people can't remove glue, either by dissolving it with chemicals or breaking it.

  232. Re:Glue shut CD cases? by Trepalium · · Score: 1

    Yes, then utility knives and razor blades would become circumvision devices under the DMCA.

    --
    I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  233. Why can't the RIAA (bastards) by 43PercentBurnt · · Score: 1

    Place a different barely audible tone on each copy distributed. Then when it leaks they can pinpoint the source. Bad me, I hope they don't read this.

    --
    There will be plenty of time for smoking doobies when your living in a VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER.
  234. Just one question. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    With the world going to shit in a handbasket in more fascinating and varied ways that I can currently count, when somebody tells me that ass-wipe record executives are glue-gunning CD players closed with cheesey music stuffed inside the, I have but one question to ask. . .

    How is this in any way important, interesting, vital, relevant or worthy of consideration on any level whatsoever which is not petty, braindead, boring and totally fucking Prozacked up the wahzoo?

    This question has been brought to you by the ever-present, effervescent,


    -Fantastic Lad

  235. Even Better by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Funny

    3. Replace CD with crappy Kenny G. CD
    4. Write review about PJ's new stuff being really "mellow".
    5. Return CD player to company.

    It'd take them months to connect the review to the player. The look on their faces, as they opened the player, would be classic.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  236. Re:Glue shut CD cases? by susano_otter · · Score: 2
    ... circumvision...

    Sorry, did you mean circumcision or circumvention? It makes a big difference, you know.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  237. Fighting Music Piracy With Clue by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    "It was the music critic, in the den, with the screwdriver!"

    Mmmm... Clue: DMCA Edition... :9

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  238. Advocate v. Reviewer by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2
    Nobody lives in a vacuum and it's ludicrous to demand that they do. There is no such thing as objectivity; those who say otherwise are full of shit. The best you can do is to represent both (or more) sides of an issue as accurately as possible from the point of view of each side. But you have to take a stand, THAT is good journalism.

    In "firing the ass" of any reviewer who states an opinion, political, artistic, or otherwise that "gets in the way" of your well-oiled corporate machine makes you little different from press-release "news" organizations like Fox News and CNN.

    If you don't think that your reviewers would be interested in the fact that Sony (or whoever) is sealing new releases in glued Walkmans to "prevent piracy" (and prevent a reviewer from doing their job by reviewing it on a hi-fi) then you're sadly mistaken.

    Were I a reviewer, I would do exactly what the parent poster suggested. I'd send the damned thing back to Sony and write up my review of those who send me a CD, making a note as to why Perl Jam :-) didn't make the review and rant about how stupid "anti-piracy" has become. Anyone who fires me for doing my job (reviewing things FOR CONSUMERS) isn't doing THEIR JOB.

  239. UPS by Dareth · · Score: 0

    How bout having them slide your ASN's and Gigabit switches down the stairs of their brown truck door. I don't want to be on hold trying to get them replaced!!!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  240. they should take a clue from movie industry by geekoid · · Score: 2

    and tell the music reviewers what to write...

    or,

    press and album, or send a cassette.
    I know both could be ripped to digital media, but its been my experiece that those extra steps are enough to deter most people.

    One of the biggest boosts to emmnemms record sales was do to the fact that a few people played it before it was available, and that drove up peoples desire for it, which drove up sales.

    OTOH look at my sig.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  241. The True Logical End... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The opinions of most reviewers are the ultimate disposable end product of the process!!

  242. Oh yeah ... inductance is your leak tool now! by aisnota · · Score: 1


    Oh yeah ... the headphones are glued to the players too, to prevent any authorized output. A low-tech answer to a high-tech issue."

    Inductance, if done with better than typical equipment could tap the audio from the headphone cable glued on... Also, a small drill could be used to go into the speaker(s) for the head phones and suck out the sound...

    Reply with your thoughts!

    --
    http://www.aisnota.com/slashdot/ Welcome to Logic and the Future
  243. digital watermark by jdkane · · Score: 1

    Epic Records should also place a distinct digital watermark inside the music of each CD that is distributed.
    Then they can know beyond a shadow of a doubt from which device the music gets copied from.

  244. You misunderstood. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 2

    If you use the utility knife to cut off your eyelids, you get great circumvision capabilities./p

  245. GO BACK TO BOULDER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    waits twenty seconds...

  246. GO BACK TO BOULDER YOU TWAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    waits twentyone seconds...

    1. Re:GO BACK TO BOULDER YOU TWAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh??

  247. EPIC Stole My Idea (Includes proof!) by Astronomyteacher · · Score: 1

    I invented this idea back in MARCH. I'm surprised it took someone this long to implement it. Don't believe me? Read the link! http://www.lowendmac.com/lite/02/0311.html

  248. closer to the truth: by twitter · · Score: 1
    And of course the headphones..would just have to be glued to your ears to prevent someone else from listening to it.

    Or to prevent you from listening to anything else. That's the point and perpetuator of media monopoly, isn't it?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  249. Re: here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in the works. The next gen DIVX discs (That's the disposable DVD thing, not the MPEG4 codec) are supposed to be like this. The dye will be light sensitive and decay a little with each play until it's unreadable.

    Of course, then you'd have to check the expiry date on your music and movies.

  250. The analog hole, is a blackhole, never ending by Reece400 · · Score: 1

    NEWSFLASH: The analog hole, is a blackhole, never ending,, when one part is blocked, the hole simply gets bigger... I'm not sure about these headphones, but most, you can just take the foam padding off, and pop the speakers out, they're usually just sittisg in there, or very weakly attached, an the back, there should be open contacts, attach some wires, record, pop the speakers back in, put the ear pads back over, and you have a copy, leaving no noticable trace,,, unless they covered the foam pads in glue too,, lol :) Reece,

  251. Re:I'm a bit confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Further proving that a Swarm of Albino Geese would actually do a better job of running Slashdot than the current crew.

  252. So, cut the headphone cable; attach a connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (or two of them). Once ripped, cut the cable, again, and reattach the headphones, maybe. This is colossally stupid in more than one way. Headphone level is probably quite happy to go into line input.

    Enby in Waltham