It's not inserted into the stomach. Whoever wrote that doesn't know what the hell he's talking about, or is listening to someone who doesn't know what he's talking about. It's inserted into the small bowel via the colon using the same equipment used in colonoscopies.
And it's not controversial. If you have C. diff, you are suffering so horribly that grossness of the procedure just doesn't enter the equation. And the fecal transplant method is incredibly effective, and incredibly quick to solve the problem. People who have been in agony for weeks get so much better in a few hours they can be discharged from the hospital. The only issue is that fecal transplants aren't yet covered by insurance. But they aren't that expensive, less than a grand out of pocket.
Came here to say something like this. This is akin to reading something from the 1880s saying we should be looking for signs of giant steam engines on other worlds. It is a nice thought experiment, and it's harmless enough to look for these things, but we should be shocked if anyone was actually silly enough to do it.
Frustratingly, it seems there've been a lot of reports that point to lack of parasites (and exposure to other things as well) as being behind a lot of Americans' immunological deficiencies. But then of course as this article points out, having big cysts in your brain isn't all parades and root beer floats, either. We really need more research on how to trigger our immune systems properly without being endangered by actual meat-eating, egg-laying worms in our systems.
Here's a link to one bit of research that mentions this. Apologies that I don't have the patience to learn how Slashdot wants me to alias it:
http://www.msrc.co.uk/index.cfm/fuseaction/show/pageid/2474
We might have to have a couple of breakthroughs first. Like exceeding the current 6-second flight time. Or the problem of burning off your legs occasionally.
Also, my ideal transportation includes some sort of protection from the weather. I live in Colorado, where it can be 90 degrees and sunny and ten minutes later 50 degrees and hailing.
With that resolution it would be so realistic that my enemy, the Coyote, will think the picture of a train tunnel I print with it is real and smash into it at full speed.
I think the government went out of its way to prosecute this ridiculous case because they want to strengthen the government's ability to monitor and intrude on anything anyone does electronically or otherwise. It's all in the interest of creating totalitarian power, not serving the public in any way, shape or form.
At the last job I had where they even had them, the HR manager conducting it was visibly not even paying any attention whatsoever to the answers. She clearly couldn't have given less of a shit, it was just an item on a checklist she was required to perform. Two jobs I've had since then didn't even have exit interviews, since employees are all just a faceless, interchangeable commodity now. So I think if you manage to work somewhere that they even do this any more, they won't remember you in any way whatsoever no matter how good you were, how critical your work was, or how many decades you worked there, unless you manage to piss them off completely. So as with most things in the modern world, you can only affect yourself negatively with the interview. Especially if HR people are the contacts. They, as a group, are more worthless than Aquaman's toenail clippings. Though one co-worker did say they serve the function of being the chaff that gets fired whenever a major employee lawsuit occurs.
Really? Sounds like the sort of mistake some ignorant Hollywood movie-maker would do, and say later that "nobody except a few scientists would know the difference any way."
It seems that life, intelligence, and civilization are the things that we find most interesting, in ascending order, when discussing exobiology. And, in ascending order, much, much more difficult to achieve. In other words, simple life is almost common, complex life is rare, intelligence even rarer, and civilization the rarest of all. Each step requires more time, stability, and opportunities for differentiation, than the last.
A lot of the uniqueness of the Earth, according to the article, has to do with its suitability for developing land-based life. I wonder if achieving a land-based civilization is rarer than a liquid-based one. If there are aliens sending probes over here to investigate us, maybe it's to study this weird, land-based civilization.
I admit that one advantage to land-based life development is that it's much easier to form divided ecosystems on land than it is in an ocean. This could create more opportunities for divergent evolution, speeding things up if you want to see a particular result, like intelligent life. However, it seems to me that there could be situations on other planets that can create a similar effect in a liquid environment. Perhaps not common, but possible. My point is, it might be chauvinistic to focus so much on conditions that allow the development of land-based life. The other, hidden chauvinism is towards carbon-based life, but it's hard to blame ourselves for that since it's so difficult to figure out how other kinds of life could work.
I worked at a newspaper and would see journalists and editors doing things like searching for words completely manually. I would say, "hey I have a very quick tip for you that will save you hours every single day for the rest of your career. In fact, it'll save much, much more time TODAY than it takes to teach it to you." and they would say "I don't have time!!! I have too much work to do!!!." Often I would just jump in and show someone how to do it, doing search and replaces in less than 10 seconds that would take them well over 30 minutes. That impressed a few people enough for them to start using it. But I found that many of them would persist in doing it manually anyway because it was just "easier."
So what I discovered is that there are a lot of people who will work their fingers to the bone, unnecessarily spend hours working instead of enjoying life (these people were all salaried), even injure themselves with repetitive stress disorder, osteoarthritis, and so forth, to save the slightest mental effort involved in learning something very slightly new.
Wasn't Everybody who said this, just dumb-asses who couldn't take one look at the size of Japan and notice that it is going to always be highly limited by its living space. There's only so much a relatively tiny country can accomplish, no matter how well they adopt rational management methods and aggressively export their products. Whereas China, not so much limited, they are fully large enough to grow the infrastructure required to overpower us all. And with a government that, unlike most countries, actually plans ahead, it's a pretty scary scenario for the rest of the world. Think we're gonna get to learn what it's like being on the receiving end of what we've been giving the Brown countries all these decades.
I didn't bother to read the article, but I imagine it says a bunch of laser beams come out around a circle and then magically combine into a big beam that goes straight out from the circle. So give the credit to George Lucas' production artists.
I've been wondering for months what's with the onslaught of "new" ideas and inventions being touted on Slashdot that anyone half-conscious would see have known have been around for decades. Secretly, I figured it was ignorant 19-year-olds who had simply never seen the technology develop. Now I see even CmdrTaco doing this and it's not even April Fools' Day. and he's GOT to be older than 19. So WTH?????
You plugged a strange USB device into a machine with you logged in as an admin? Why would you do that?
Have you ever heard of logging in as a standard user and running admin tasks using admin commands? Can even be done in Windows using the "Run As..." command.
"Security expert" is probably about the same level of expertise as Jen of The IT Crowd. It seems to me that anyone with any technical expertise has been run out of every corporation and government position. That's how it was in the company that laid me off, anyway. By the end, you couldn't even say the word "network" or "computer" in a management meeting without peoples' eyes glazing over, because the only people left after the massive layoffs were all incompetent butt-kissers who were so technically challenged they thought those were Hard Words to Understand. Thus the talk about a "sophisticated attack" which is only sophisticated if you're completely ignorant of anything technology-related. And, of course, there's this scramble to make the attack sound really unfair and It's Not Citibank's Fault At All That Such Clever Bad Guys Attacked Them.
Score 4 insightful, wow... the case was in CANADA. Which, believe it or not, is a different country from the United States of America, and even has its own legal system!
Notice the several posters who came before you, not to mention the article, talking about the case being in CANADA?
BTW, the world contains 194-or-so countries. So not everything you read about on the World Wide Web is going to be about the United States of America or based on the legal precedents thereof.
You know what's really cool. Being stuck in jail for weeks on end because they can't put a jury together because our society is full if irresponsible, narcissistic bastards who think jury duty is something someone else should do because of the minor inconvenience it represents. Just hope you don't get to find out about that first-hand.
The story confuses me because I swear we learned about the body's use of perforin in my anatomy and physiology class over two years ago. Maybe that lady in the Charlie Chaplin film wrote our textbooks.
I remember this from a few months ago... the models were horrifying, grossly misshapen for the most part. Only the skinny ones with longer arms even looked like female humans. Leading to their inevitable conclusion. I figured at the time they simply were too incompetent or cheap to hire somebody who could create the reasonable human figures needed for a real study of attractiveness. I doubt such a shit study actually discovered anything at all.
I spent two years explaining to users how pass phrases would be easier to remember and much, much, much more secure. I don't think we had even one person take me up on the idea. Almost every single person told me it was "too much work" to type in a pass phrase. The place I worked in was a newspaper, and nearly all of these people were required to type 70 wpm or better!
I tried to use password generators then, and no one would accept any password-generator-made passwords. They were "too hard to remember."
I tried to get them to at least keep their passwords in their wallets instead of posted up on their cubicle. But it was "too much trouble to remember where the password is and too much work to get it out of the wallet to look at it."
The only way computer systems will ever be secure is if they are designed to work well with completely stupid and lazy people using them. We kept looking into biometrics but last I knew they were just as insecure as bad passwords and too unreliable. The first time one wouldn't let somebody into his computer would be the last time the system was ever used.
And don't bother saying the "management should do" this or that. Our management was far dumber and lazier than any normal user ever was, and the biggest roadblock to any sort of progress. One day I was expressing my frustration with trying to help save people from themselves with their stupid behavior. My own boss angrily told me there was NO WAY he would ever remember a password unless it was HIS OWN NAME.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not inserted into the stomach. Whoever wrote that doesn't know what the hell he's talking about, or is listening to someone who doesn't know what he's talking about. It's inserted into the small bowel via the colon using the same equipment used in colonoscopies. And it's not controversial. If you have C. diff, you are suffering so horribly that grossness of the procedure just doesn't enter the equation. And the fecal transplant method is incredibly effective, and incredibly quick to solve the problem. People who have been in agony for weeks get so much better in a few hours they can be discharged from the hospital. The only issue is that fecal transplants aren't yet covered by insurance. But they aren't that expensive, less than a grand out of pocket.
Thank god you told me this...now I'll vote for Romney and the days of our country being the bully-boy enforcer for corporations will vanish!
Came here to say something like this. This is akin to reading something from the 1880s saying we should be looking for signs of giant steam engines on other worlds. It is a nice thought experiment, and it's harmless enough to look for these things, but we should be shocked if anyone was actually silly enough to do it.
Frustratingly, it seems there've been a lot of reports that point to lack of parasites (and exposure to other things as well) as being behind a lot of Americans' immunological deficiencies. But then of course as this article points out, having big cysts in your brain isn't all parades and root beer floats, either. We really need more research on how to trigger our immune systems properly without being endangered by actual meat-eating, egg-laying worms in our systems. Here's a link to one bit of research that mentions this. Apologies that I don't have the patience to learn how Slashdot wants me to alias it: http://www.msrc.co.uk/index.cfm/fuseaction/show/pageid/2474
We might have to have a couple of breakthroughs first. Like exceeding the current 6-second flight time. Or the problem of burning off your legs occasionally. Also, my ideal transportation includes some sort of protection from the weather. I live in Colorado, where it can be 90 degrees and sunny and ten minutes later 50 degrees and hailing.
With that resolution it would be so realistic that my enemy, the Coyote, will think the picture of a train tunnel I print with it is real and smash into it at full speed.
I think the government went out of its way to prosecute this ridiculous case because they want to strengthen the government's ability to monitor and intrude on anything anyone does electronically or otherwise. It's all in the interest of creating totalitarian power, not serving the public in any way, shape or form.
At the last job I had where they even had them, the HR manager conducting it was visibly not even paying any attention whatsoever to the answers. She clearly couldn't have given less of a shit, it was just an item on a checklist she was required to perform. Two jobs I've had since then didn't even have exit interviews, since employees are all just a faceless, interchangeable commodity now. So I think if you manage to work somewhere that they even do this any more, they won't remember you in any way whatsoever no matter how good you were, how critical your work was, or how many decades you worked there, unless you manage to piss them off completely. So as with most things in the modern world, you can only affect yourself negatively with the interview. Especially if HR people are the contacts. They, as a group, are more worthless than Aquaman's toenail clippings. Though one co-worker did say they serve the function of being the chaff that gets fired whenever a major employee lawsuit occurs.
Really? Sounds like the sort of mistake some ignorant Hollywood movie-maker would do, and say later that "nobody except a few scientists would know the difference any way."
It seems that life, intelligence, and civilization are the things that we find most interesting, in ascending order, when discussing exobiology. And, in ascending order, much, much more difficult to achieve. In other words, simple life is almost common, complex life is rare, intelligence even rarer, and civilization the rarest of all. Each step requires more time, stability, and opportunities for differentiation, than the last. A lot of the uniqueness of the Earth, according to the article, has to do with its suitability for developing land-based life. I wonder if achieving a land-based civilization is rarer than a liquid-based one. If there are aliens sending probes over here to investigate us, maybe it's to study this weird, land-based civilization. I admit that one advantage to land-based life development is that it's much easier to form divided ecosystems on land than it is in an ocean. This could create more opportunities for divergent evolution, speeding things up if you want to see a particular result, like intelligent life. However, it seems to me that there could be situations on other planets that can create a similar effect in a liquid environment. Perhaps not common, but possible. My point is, it might be chauvinistic to focus so much on conditions that allow the development of land-based life. The other, hidden chauvinism is towards carbon-based life, but it's hard to blame ourselves for that since it's so difficult to figure out how other kinds of life could work.
Somebody mod that post up for funny!! Politicians caring about the U.S.! Invading countries to remove tyrants! LOL Good stuff...
I worked at a newspaper and would see journalists and editors doing things like searching for words completely manually. I would say, "hey I have a very quick tip for you that will save you hours every single day for the rest of your career. In fact, it'll save much, much more time TODAY than it takes to teach it to you." and they would say "I don't have time!!! I have too much work to do!!!." Often I would just jump in and show someone how to do it, doing search and replaces in less than 10 seconds that would take them well over 30 minutes. That impressed a few people enough for them to start using it. But I found that many of them would persist in doing it manually anyway because it was just "easier." So what I discovered is that there are a lot of people who will work their fingers to the bone, unnecessarily spend hours working instead of enjoying life (these people were all salaried), even injure themselves with repetitive stress disorder, osteoarthritis, and so forth, to save the slightest mental effort involved in learning something very slightly new.
Wasn't Everybody who said this, just dumb-asses who couldn't take one look at the size of Japan and notice that it is going to always be highly limited by its living space. There's only so much a relatively tiny country can accomplish, no matter how well they adopt rational management methods and aggressively export their products. Whereas China, not so much limited, they are fully large enough to grow the infrastructure required to overpower us all. And with a government that, unlike most countries, actually plans ahead, it's a pretty scary scenario for the rest of the world. Think we're gonna get to learn what it's like being on the receiving end of what we've been giving the Brown countries all these decades.
Well, we're doomed to become their slaves regardless, but it will gratify Master greatly that we learned to speak his tongue.
I didn't bother to read the article, but I imagine it says a bunch of laser beams come out around a circle and then magically combine into a big beam that goes straight out from the circle. So give the credit to George Lucas' production artists.
I've been wondering for months what's with the onslaught of "new" ideas and inventions being touted on Slashdot that anyone half-conscious would see have known have been around for decades. Secretly, I figured it was ignorant 19-year-olds who had simply never seen the technology develop. Now I see even CmdrTaco doing this and it's not even April Fools' Day. and he's GOT to be older than 19. So WTH?????
You plugged a strange USB device into a machine with you logged in as an admin? Why would you do that? Have you ever heard of logging in as a standard user and running admin tasks using admin commands? Can even be done in Windows using the "Run As..." command.
"Security expert" is probably about the same level of expertise as Jen of The IT Crowd. It seems to me that anyone with any technical expertise has been run out of every corporation and government position. That's how it was in the company that laid me off, anyway. By the end, you couldn't even say the word "network" or "computer" in a management meeting without peoples' eyes glazing over, because the only people left after the massive layoffs were all incompetent butt-kissers who were so technically challenged they thought those were Hard Words to Understand. Thus the talk about a "sophisticated attack" which is only sophisticated if you're completely ignorant of anything technology-related. And, of course, there's this scramble to make the attack sound really unfair and It's Not Citibank's Fault At All That Such Clever Bad Guys Attacked Them.
Score 4 insightful, wow ... the case was in CANADA. Which, believe it or not, is a different country from the United States of America, and even has its own legal system!
Notice the several posters who came before you, not to mention the article, talking about the case being in CANADA?
BTW, the world contains 194-or-so countries. So not everything you read about on the World Wide Web is going to be about the United States of America or based on the legal precedents thereof.
You know what's really cool. Being stuck in jail for weeks on end because they can't put a jury together because our society is full if irresponsible, narcissistic bastards who think jury duty is something someone else should do because of the minor inconvenience it represents. Just hope you don't get to find out about that first-hand.
The story confuses me because I swear we learned about the body's use of perforin in my anatomy and physiology class over two years ago. Maybe that lady in the Charlie Chaplin film wrote our textbooks.
Which is why it's a good idea to forego buying food that advertises itself as having "0% trans fats."
I remember this from a few months ago ... the models were horrifying, grossly misshapen for the most part. Only the skinny ones with longer arms even looked like female humans. Leading to their inevitable conclusion. I figured at the time they simply were too incompetent or cheap to hire somebody who could create the reasonable human figures needed for a real study of attractiveness. I doubt such a shit study actually discovered anything at all.
I spent two years explaining to users how pass phrases would be easier to remember and much, much, much more secure. I don't think we had even one person take me up on the idea. Almost every single person told me it was "too much work" to type in a pass phrase. The place I worked in was a newspaper, and nearly all of these people were required to type 70 wpm or better! I tried to use password generators then, and no one would accept any password-generator-made passwords. They were "too hard to remember." I tried to get them to at least keep their passwords in their wallets instead of posted up on their cubicle. But it was "too much trouble to remember where the password is and too much work to get it out of the wallet to look at it." The only way computer systems will ever be secure is if they are designed to work well with completely stupid and lazy people using them. We kept looking into biometrics but last I knew they were just as insecure as bad passwords and too unreliable. The first time one wouldn't let somebody into his computer would be the last time the system was ever used. And don't bother saying the "management should do" this or that. Our management was far dumber and lazier than any normal user ever was, and the biggest roadblock to any sort of progress. One day I was expressing my frustration with trying to help save people from themselves with their stupid behavior. My own boss angrily told me there was NO WAY he would ever remember a password unless it was HIS OWN NAME.