Slashdot Mirror


Andromeda On Collision Course With the Milky Way

ananyo writes "From the Nature story: 'The Andromeda galaxy will collide with the Milky Way about 4 billion years from now, astronomers announced today. Although the Sun and other stars will remain intact, the titanic tumult is likely to shove the Solar System to the outskirts of the merged galaxies. Researchers came to that conclusion after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to painstakingly track the motion of Andromeda as it inched along the sky. Andromeda, roughly 770,000 parsecs (2.5 million light years) away, is the nearest large spiral galaxy to the Milky Way.'"

217 comments

  1. And this is news how? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1, Informative

    Oh, you got me to click on the story. Got me again, you ad-whoring editors!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well here's a better story about Andromeda... The 2 Guys from Andromeda! http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/spaceventure/two-guys-spaceventure-by-the-creators-of-space-que ...don't hurt me >_>

    2. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This may not be news to you, but I'm thankful to know so I could cancel my tickets to The Book Of Mormon while they're still refundable.

    3. Re:And this is news how? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, just in time to warn our Great^12 Grandchildren.

      Maybe we could embed the message in some giant, black humming monolith, or something...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      It's news because we didn't know if Andromeda and the Milky Way were orbiting each other or on a collision course without the transverse velocity of Andromeda. Now we know. Well, we think we know. It's going to be a little while until we can actually observe the outcome.

    5. Re:And this is news how? by auhsor · · Score: 2

      Like this submission?

    6. Re:And this is news how? by Surt · · Score: 1

      4 billion years is somewhat more than 14 generations, at least assuming that life expectancy gains don't snowball.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    7. Re:And this is news how? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Why? The text you can read on the home page (and RSS summary!) tells you the time scale involved here. The only reason you clicked the story is because of your impatience or the stupidity of jumping because of a scary headline.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:And this is news how? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      They probably will. Also, don't forget all that relativistic travel we'll get to eventually ;)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:And this is news how? by Extremus · · Score: 4, Informative
    10. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's news because we didn't know if Andromeda and the Milky Way were orbiting each other or on a collision course without the transverse velocity of Andromeda. Now we know. Well, we think we know. It's going to be a little while until we can actually observe the outcome.

      No, it's not news. I heard it 10-15 years ago. (Could be more, hard to keep track.)

    11. Re:And this is news how? by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

      This. I read this in an astronomy book a long time ago. Maybe now it's more certain, but really, this isn't big news.

    12. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Until now we did not know what kind of collision it would be.
      It could be a partial collision or even a near-collision.

      Now we know for sure it will be a head-on collision..

      That's news as far as me concerns...

    13. Re:And this is news how? by Certhas · · Score: 2

      At the level of pop culture maybe it's not news. On the level of science it was not known 10-15 years ago. It was known that Andromeda was approaching the Milky way but there was no information on whether it would actually hit or whether we'd sling shot past each other and (potentially) go into orbit. A detail often glossed over in pop science books, and even some science books.

    14. Re:And this is news how? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I missed that article.... So, the AC pointed me to something I am interested in... That said, Kickstarter will ruin me in the long run.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    15. Re:And this is news how? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 4, Informative

      The point is, people knew Andromeda was coming towards us at x km/s. But that is only the tangential component (towards us). It might have also flown at x km/s to the right at the same time, going 45 past us.

      Now people observed the speed of Andromeda on the sky (a painstaking measurement). As it turns out, Andromeda will not miss our Galaxy. That was kind of expected from the masses of galaxies in our local group -- Andromeda and the Milky Way have the same mass and are much larger than all the others, so they should attract each other most.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    16. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here comes the space tax. The sky is falling!

    17. Re:And this is news how? by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      obligatory Penny Arcade: http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2012/05/25

    18. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This collision stuff is because of global warming damn it!

    19. Re:And this is news how? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I hope we also get a new version of Astro Chicken!

    20. Re:And this is news how? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

      ^14 is a power, not a multiple.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    21. Re:And this is news how? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      For decades, scientists have known that Andromeda is falling towards our home Galaxy at a rate of 110 kilometres per second and that the two might eventually collide as a result of their mutual gravity. But because astronomers could easily measure Andromeda’s velocity only along the line of sight to Earth, no one could be sure whether the future encounter would constitute a major merger, a near-miss or a glancing blow.

      RTFAFY

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    22. Re:And this is news how? by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1

      You plan on being around in 4 Billion years? I doubt even Humans will be around in 4 billion years.

    23. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard somewhere (I can't remember where) that Andromeda is larger than the Milky Way galaxy.

    24. Re:And this is news how? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Even if that's what the OP meant (and I doubt it) they came up short, even if lifespans jump to 1000 years.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    25. Re:And this is news how? by PDX · · Score: 1

      Mutual Attraction= Black Holes

      The best way to describe this collision is a blind date that will never end.

      (It doesn't prevent you from seeing other people though.) There are 63 galaxies in the LOCAL Virgo Cluster. 61 other partners whoo hoo!

    26. Re:And this is news how? by zlives · · Score: 1

      found wasteland 2 and xenonauts... i am ruined :)

    27. Re:And this is news how? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      You! I'll have to explain my monthly credit card statements to my wife now...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    28. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great^14 Grandchildren = Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandchildren, which happens to be 14 gene rations.

    29. Re:And this is news how? by zlives · · Score: 1

      haha your obfuscation skills need sharpening. I am backing xenonauts and told my wife that I'll add her name for the soilders... she seemed happy enough lol

    30. Re:And this is news how? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      The best way to describe this collision is a blind date that will never end.

      I feel sick

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    31. Re:And this is news how? by gryllotalpa · · Score: 0

      This is really an announced old projection of the far-off time event by the Discovery cable program and of some cleaner program of Dirty Jobs Mike Rowe himself about the universe. He and us won't be around to enjoy him announce the initial itchy and chocking dust and 'maybe' the have the final series ender of his "Dirty Jobs" leading to our passing to face-off Andromeda's lock of snaky hair.

      Take your time, Earthlings!!

    32. Re:And this is news how? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      i understand you are math challenged. Here's the fact: one generation (20 years) raised to the 14th power is: 1.6384e+18 years, basically several orders of magnitude longer than the universe has existed.

      20^14 is:
      20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20x20

      play with your calculator - you'll be surprised.

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    33. Re:And this is news how? by Surt · · Score: 1

      LOL. That's an entertaining way to read it. Unfortunately, that seems even more doubtful as a way for the OP to have intended it, and the really tough part is the units of course. ;-)

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    34. Re:And this is news how? by ananyo · · Score: 1

      From the source story:
      "For decades, scientists have known that Andromeda is falling towards our home Galaxy at a rate of 110 kilometres per second and that the two might eventually collide as a result of their mutual gravity. But because astronomers could easily measure Andromeda’s velocity only along the line of sight to Earth, no one could be sure whether the future encounter would constitute a major merger, a near-miss or a glancing blow.
      Hubble’s visual acuity in recording the transverse or sideways motion of 15,000 stars in different parts of Andromeda has now provided the missing components of the galaxy’s motion. In determining that the overall sideways velocity of Andromeda is much smaller than its line-of-sight speed, van der Marel and his colleagues have shown that a merger of Andromeda and the Milky Way is inevitable."

      Wow. It's almost like Slashdot links to sources for a reason.

  2. 770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought parsecs was a unit of time though? So 770,000 parsecs is about 4 billion years?

    So 12 parsecs is about 20 hours?

    1. Re:770,000 parsecs? by The_One_Ring · · Score: 0

      From Wikipedia: The parsec (symbol: pc) is a unit of length used in astronomy. It is about 3.26 light-years, which is equal to just under 31 trillion (3.1×1013) kilometres or just over 19 trillion (1.9×1013) miles.

      --
      ---- Now, where did I put that knife.....
    2. Re:770,000 parsecs? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      parsec is space.

      take 1 astronomical unit as the opposite side length on a right-angled-triangle, one arc-second as the angle, and the length of the adjacent side will be 1 parsec.

    3. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jonathan+A · · Score: 2

      I thought parsecs was a unit of time though? So 770,000 parsecs is about 4 billion years?

      So 12 parsecs is about 20 hours?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsec

      The parsec (symbol: pc) is a unit of length used in astronomy. It is about 3.26 light-years, which is equal to just under 31 trillion (3.1×1013) kilometres or just over 19 trillion (1.9×1013) miles.

    4. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, George, loved the trilogy, could you perhaps stop remaking them every few years? Thanks the internet.

    5. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Just remember that distance and time are interchangeable thanks to the speed of light.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:770,000 parsecs? by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      aaah, i totally whooshed on the GP post. thank you for reminding me that this was a pop culture reference and not just a weird misconception (well, it's both i suppose, but the latter is on mr lucas).

    7. Re:770,000 parsecs? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      So. A measure of both distance and time, depending on your context.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close. That's how long it normally takes to do the Kessel run. However, if you know the shortcut, it only takes 12.

    9. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Nope, I don't see a unit of time in there, sorry.

      P.S. you're all being trolled.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jappus · · Score: 4, Informative

      So. A measure of both distance and time, depending on your context.

      No. A parsec is "a distance corresponding to a parallax of one second". But here, "second" does not refer to the unit of time "second" but to an "arc-second", a specific angular value. If you have a circle, and you divide it into 360 parts, a single slice covers an angle of exactly one "degree" (do note that this in turn also does not refer to temperature). If you divide that slice into 60 parts, each slice covers an angle of 1 arc-minute. If you divide such a slice into another 60 parts, you get an angle that covers 1 arc-second.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcsecond#Symbols_and_abbreviations

      As for what a parallax is, please read the link provided by the grandparent.

      But even if you had used a unit of time to define the parsec -- like in the light-year -- what you actually define is a pure length. Do note that you can define a light-year as both "the distance light crosses in an absolute vacuum in one solar year" or "9.4605284 x 10^15 meters". See how the latter does not include any reference to time? You could even express the light-year as the distance you can drive an object of a certain mass and shape when you accelerate it with a certain energy through a perfectly uniform medium of a certain density (thus slowing down the object eventually to a standstill).

      You can define a length with the help of a unit of time, but you don't need to. That is also why the 1 astronomical unit distance used in the parsec is also not a unit of time; as the fact that it derives from the rotation of the earth around the sun is unimportant as long as the ultimately defined value remains a pure time.

    11. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jappus · · Score: 2

      [...] the ultimately defined value remains a pure time.

      Please mentally replace that part with "the ultimately defined value remains a pure unit of distance."

    12. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, anyway, how many parsecs you figure it will take to make the Kessel Run?

    13. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shortcut is really risky, though....

    14. Re:770,000 parsecs? by witherstaff · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was explained in a later SW expanded universe book that Kessle is surrounded by black holes so the shortest route is also the most dangerous. All things considered I thought it was a pretty good explanation.

    15. Re:770,000 parsecs? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      The sec in parsec refers to a angle on the circle (what is the radius when one arc second is 1 AU?).

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    16. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The WHOOSH is strong with this one.

    17. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only think that because Han made the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs.

      Without knowing more about the Kessel Run, it is hard to make sense of this statement as 12 parsecs is a distance, but maybe it was some sort of fly out to a fleeing object, fly back, catching it in 6 parsecs is really good sort of thing... I don't know.

    18. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 3, Funny

      A bigger question is where will the /. editors find room to store all of these geek cards?

    19. Re:770,000 parsecs? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      Another possibility, it's not a speed challenge but a navigational one. Find the shortest flight path between two points in a asteroid field.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    20. Re:770,000 parsecs? by almitydave · · Score: 2

      The way George Lucas explained it is, hyperspace is the same speed for everyone, but travelling through hyperspace requires complicated navigational computations to avoid gravity wells, and the Millennium Falcon's computer was so powerful that it could quickly compute a more complex, shorter route through space than the average smuggler's ship. Han was a hacker/overclocker, you see, as well as a mechanic. There are a couple references in the movies to "calculating the jump to lightspeed" and whatnot. Lucas claims of course he knew that parsecs were distance; this is how he always meant it from the beginning.

      DISCLAIMER: I'm not defending Lucas' explanation, although his explanation is plausible, I always thought the term was just misused. I don't buy that he meant it that way from the start, although it adds an interesting element to that method of FTL travel.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    21. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another possibility: George Lucas didn't know what the hell he was talking about.

    22. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you mean is you don't know.

    23. Re:770,000 parsecs? by tftp · · Score: 1

      distance and time are interchangeable thanks to the speed of light.

      Speed of light is a constant only in vacuum (and even that is challenged by some.) On top of that, gravitation bends the light, so the path from A to B "as photon flies" is not a straight line.

      These may be only small deviations, but you don't want to replace distance with time in fundamental formulas. It would be like replacing ten miles of perfectly measurable distance from your home to your school with time that it takes you to get there in a car. And to what purpose?

    24. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Jappus · · Score: 1

      I would have given you a +1 funny, if I had not already posted here; AC or not. :)

      The fact that such prime opportunities for jokes always escape my attention probably says a lot about me. Now, of course, whether it's saying something good or bad lies, as always, in the eye of the beholder. :D

    25. Re:770,000 parsecs? by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

      That one went so far over your head, it's nearing LEO. :)

    26. Re:770,000 parsecs? by LastDawnOfMan · · Score: 1

      Really? Sounds like the sort of mistake some ignorant Hollywood movie-maker would do, and say later that "nobody except a few scientists would know the difference any way."

    27. Re:770,000 parsecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have to be influenced by star wars (same misunderstanding in the script!)

    28. Re:770,000 parsecs? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      SW expanded universe writers are like die-hard Apple fans - they'll find a way to justify even the most ridiculous goofs.

  3. oh noews! by j-stroy · · Score: 4, Funny

    can't we launch a mission to deflect it ? !

    1. Re:oh noews! by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      Nope, this event is clearly unavoidable. There is no way we have enough time to relocate or divert it.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLlUgilKqms

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    2. Re:oh noews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Eh, the Sun itself only has about 4.5 billion years left in it...So Andromeda slamming into us might be a welcome change by then.

    3. Re:oh noews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope, this event is clearly unavoidable. There is no way we have enough time to relocate or divert it.

      What if we used a crack team of roughnecks?

    4. Re:oh noews! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It might work, but only if the boffins get it hopelessly wrong first despite all their fancy-pants book larnin'.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:oh noews! by gshegosh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the USA will send nukes and save the day.

    6. Re:oh noews! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Duh. The US will have better weapons in 4 billion years than just nukes. We will send *super nukes* to save the day. They're super!

    7. Re:oh noews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't we launch a mission to deflect it ? !

      Just announced... "The War On Andromeda"

  4. Don't Panic by stms · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stop Panicking!!! This is no time to panic... Though if you do panic try to hold on to that feeling because it is the proper response to being told that your galaxy is on a collision course with another galaxy.

    1. Re:Don't Panic by mcavic · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to call Zaphod for help, or start stocking bottled water.

    2. Re:Don't Panic by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      770,000 Parsecs!?! Ha the Millennium Falcon could do it in less.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Don't Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just got off the "phone" with the Asgard. They say it's nothing to worry about.

      -Jack O'Neill (two "L"s)

    4. Re:Don't Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to call Zaphod for help, or start stocking towels

      FTFY

    5. Re:Don't Panic by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      I'm not panicking at all, for 2 reasons:
      1. By then, I'll be long dead. At worst, some sort of crazy intergalactic radiation will have me back as some sort of zombie.
      2. By then, it's quite possible the sun will be a red giant, which means that whatever we've evolved to over 4 billion years is either dead or capable of moving very very far away.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:Don't Panic by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      capable of moving very very far away.

      Why? When galaxies collide, they don't actually hit anything. Their stars just orbit the new centre of gravity (variable until the merger settles). Entire civilisations could rise and fall during the collision, and not notice it happening.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    7. Re:Don't Panic by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the Vogons are behind this...

    8. Re:Don't Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The chance of any stars hitting earth are (pun alert) astronomically small. There is plenty of room between solar systems so that only a few will interact in a bad way. On the other hand, given the state of our sun by then (old, red, expanded, arthritic), we will welcome the opportunity to find a nice hospitable star passing by with a planet or two in the right temperature area. This is an opportunity!

  5. Watch video of simulation of this collision by gupg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NVIDIA showed a simulation of this collision running on their latest Tesla GPGPU based on the "Kepler" architecture

    Starts at around 1:00 on this video with a great explanation of the collision itself.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aByz-mxOXJM&feature=relmfu

    Sumit
    (NVIDIA employee)

    1. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Andromeda-Milky Way collision starts at 2:54, before that is a recap of the Fermi architecture.

    2. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good stuff really gets going at http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=aByz-mxOXJM#t=173s

    3. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Less talking more animation.

      Seriously they stop the thing like 20 times to talk.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      You don't have to convert to seconds. You can use "...#t=2m53s" (or & instead of #).

    5. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused. In the video they themselves note that around 90% of the matter in the universe is dark matter, and as far as I'm aware its configuration around our galaxies isn't well known, so... isn't the simulation basically worthless? The article doesn't clear this up either, though perhaps the papers would.

    6. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by flimflammer · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can right click a video at any time and select "Copy link at current time"

      When you do that, which he likely did, it uses seconds.

    7. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      Ah cool, thanks.

    8. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Well, I was really digging the demonstration because it was a cool little piece showing Kepler and I do rather like watching these sort of simulations, but I had to sigh when the man claimed a "full scale simulation". Andromeda and the Milky Way are a far sight more than just 10 million bodies.

      "Oh, look! A pedant on Slashdot!"

      Still want a Kepler, however. Unfortunately finances say that my 580 is nowhere near obsolete enough to even come close to justifying it.

    9. Re:Watch video of simulation of this collision by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      That's typical of visual media. Because they have no content they will forever repeat little snippets of what they have already told you to try to pad the whole thing and make it longer. Of course saving the actual reason you are watching the whole thing for for last is part of the "carrot and stick" model that's been used ever since communication media existed.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  6. Interesting timing by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    It's an odd coincidence that it starts to happen around the time our sun goes red giant. Not that anything resembling Homo Sapiens would be around. 5 billion years ago we hadn't made it up to the level of bacteria yet. Impossible to say what Earth life would be like by then if it survived that long. Odds are all life would be wiped out well before we go red giant. Even another billion years from now conditions will be quite harsh. Too bad because in 7 billion years we'd have a very interesting sky.

    1. Re:Interesting timing by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      It really brings home an appreciation for the human race. For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about environmental damage we really are the only chance for earth based biodiversity to survive.

    2. Re:Interesting timing by Coisiche · · Score: 1

      5 billion years ago we hadn't made it up to the level of bacteria yet.

      I was under the impression that the Earth was only 4.5 billion years old.

      Although I suppose you could go with panspermia and adopt the position that life here started 5 billion years ago; it just started somewhere else.

    3. Re:Interesting timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All life on earth will be extinguished in about a billion years anyway, as the sun is heating up and in 800million-1billion years time it'll be so hot that liquid water wont exist at sea level on earth.

    4. Re:Interesting timing by mbone · · Score: 1

      It really brings home an appreciation for the human race. For all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about environmental damage we really are the only chance for earth based biodiversity to survive.

      Don't be so sure.

    5. Re:Interesting timing by mbone · · Score: 1

      A half billion years here, a half billion years there, pretty soon you've added up to some real time.

    6. Re:Interesting timing by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Earlier if the hypotesis that our magnetic field is necessary for holding our athmosphere is right. If so, we have something about 200 or 300 milion years.

      It is interesting that our planet may have less time holding life in the future than the dinosaurs stayed here... It makes the rare Earth hypotesis easier to belive.

    7. Re:Interesting timing by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 1

      Life is only going to be able to exist on earth for another 800 millions years at most anyway. After that, it will be 1. too hot to support liquid water, and 2. have so little atmospheric CO2 that photosynthesis is not possible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_the_Earth

  7. OMG! Return your library books1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before it;s too late...

  8. don't panic, it's just the end of the world by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been known for a long time that Andromeda had a velocity towards the Milky Way (easily measured by its blue-shift), but no one could tell what its lateral velocity was, therefore whether it was going to actually collide or whether it was in an eccentric orbit. Actually measuring such a tiny side-shift, against more distant galaxies, of a source which is not actually a single defined object, where every part of it is in separate motion, in just 8 years, is pretty fucking impressive.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:don't panic, it's just the end of the world by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      I think you miss the part where that simulation was done in real-time. They didn't compute it for 8 years ;)

      These GPU (is it really right to call them just GPUs anymore?) are seriously getting powerful.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:don't panic, it's just the end of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      In real-time?

      Did the computation really take 4 billion years?

    3. Re:don't panic, it's just the end of the world by toruonu · · Score: 1

      I guess my irony detector is malfunctioning or you really misunderstood the post you responded to. The impressive part is measuring the actual Andromeda galaxy lateral motion that is so tiny form our perspective and timescale that doing that accurately enough in 8 years is the impressive part. The fact that NVIDIA made an animation of it realtime or not is fully besides the point.

      Though on a side note I agree that GPU's are becoming crazy fast...

    4. Re:don't panic, it's just the end of the world by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, it was written in Java.

      The first billion went while they were waiting for Eclipse to open.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. Oh no! Not the Galaxy! by Cyberllama · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's where I keep all my stuff!

    1. Re:Oh no! Not the Galaxy! by rvw · · Score: 1

      That's where I keep all my stuff!

      I keep the Galaxy in my pocket. And in case it crashes, I just reboot it. What's all the fuss about?

    2. Re:Oh no! Not the Galaxy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm cool, I keep my stuff in the cloud. The Oort Cloud.

  10. Interesting by mdenham · · Score: 1

    The approach velocity is pretty low as astronomical speeds go - 187.5 m/s or 675 km/h (a bit under 420mph, for people who want non-metric numbers).

    So is it actually a collision that we're headed for, or is someone with horrible depth perception trying to dock? :-)

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The approach velocity is pretty low as astronomical speeds go - 187.5 m/s or 675 km/h (a bit under 420mph, for people who want non-metric numbers).

      OMG! That's almost 2.5*10^6 footballfields/fortnight!

  11. Time stands still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Andomeda will be on collision corse with the Milky Way throughout the whole history of mankind. It's just a blink of an eye for the universe.

    1. Re:Time stands still by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      We've always been on a collision course with Andromeda.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Time stands still by isorox · · Score: 1

      Andomeda will be on collision corse with the Milky Way throughout the whole history of mankind. It's just a blink of an eye for the universe.

      Well the universe is about 13 billion years old, so 4 billion years is fairly impressive.

      Of course, by the time stars stop being made in 100,000 billion years, then yes 4 billion is a blink in the eye.

  12. By the time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this will happen, this article, whatever paper is made and whatever simulations that been done will be forgotten.

    Heck I can go so far and say that in probably 100 years all the stuff mentioned above will be forgotten.

  13. The outskirts, huh? by MsWhich · · Score: 1

    Typical. Some riffraff shows up in the neighborhood and instantly everyone panics and moves to the suburbs.

    Anyone have the number for those SpaceX guys? I'm thinking of going early to avoid the rush.

  14. Andromeda is coming HERE? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    You think maybe the Kelvans are behind this?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Andromeda is coming HERE? by maroberts · · Score: 1

      You think maybe the Kelvans are behind this?

      No but someone should warn Kevin (Sorbo) that his ship is about to collide with a Galaxy.....

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    2. Re:Andromeda is coming HERE? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind colliding with THAT Andromeda!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  15. Expanding universe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the universe was created in a big bang, and everything expands from there on, how can two galaxies collide? Did one of them turn around or something?

    1. Re:Expanding universe? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      They gravitate towards each other. If their "ejection angle" was close enough for them to be flying mostly-parallel they would eventually pull into each other.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Expanding universe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! Makes sense. Just remembered I asked this question, and came back to it now.

  16. AAAHHHHHH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    AAAAHHHHHHHHHH! *pause for breath* AAAAHHHHHHHHHH!

    1. Re:AAAHHHHHH! by rvw · · Score: 1

      AAAAHHHHHHHHHH!
      *pause for breath*
      AAAAHHHHHHHHHH!

      Yeah and that for the next 4 billion years!

  17. Fear not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But don't worry!!! Like all good movies only the USA will be affected...

  18. Imma take out an insurance, rite? by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Where do I get discount coupon?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Imma take out an insurance, rite? by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Ok, I feel dirty posting on one of dumbass samzenpus stories. Mea maxima culpa.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  19. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'll make exploring it easier sooner. 10 million years sooner!

  20. The worst danger.... by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

    ...is that it will attract the Eddorians.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:The worst danger.... by aiht · · Score: 1

      ...is that it will attract the Eddorians.

      Don't worry, in another 4 billion years, surely we will have met the Arisians. Right?

    2. Re:The worst danger.... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      And in the meantime, we will have developed incredible technologies which are able to output enormous amounts of power, allowing our ships to move at stupendous velocities so we can undertake the titanic struggle against the forces of Boskone!

      Am I doing it right?

    3. Re:The worst danger.... by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      Bigger busbars!

    4. Re:The worst danger.... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      And ejectable, magazine-fed primary beam projectors.

      That one always blew my mind. "Here's one of our primary batteries. Everything you see here except the barbette is ejected after firing once and replaced from an automatic feed."

      That and inerted planets. And the Lens.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:The worst danger.... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Correction: Meant to type 'inertialess" planets. Inert planets are so mainstream.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:The worst danger.... by tftp · · Score: 1

      is that it will attract the Eddorians

      It's far more likely that humans become Eddorians. Morality-wise we are already there.

  21. Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...time to grab my towel.

    1. Re:Well then... by stderr_dk · · Score: 1

      ...time to grab my towel.

      You're late. Towel Day was last Friday.

      --
      alias sudo="echo make it yourself #" ; # https://pipedot.org/~stderr & http://soylentnews.org/~stderr
  22. Better stock up now by reovirus1 · · Score: 1

    Make sure you have at least 4 days of food and water on hand.

  23. Red Giant Sol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't our sun expected to turn into a red giant in around the same timeframe? 4 billion years or so from now doesn't seem like it's going to be a good time for us!

    1. Re:Red Giant Sol? by toruonu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If after 3-4 billion years we're still stuck on this rock we deserve to burn up...

    2. Re:Red Giant Sol? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      500M years isn't going to be good for us either. Long before the sun begins to turn into a red giant, the increase in solar output will have made life as we know it impossible on Earth (certainly less than 1bn years)

    3. Re:Red Giant Sol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deserve - I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    4. Re:Red Giant Sol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deserve/dzrv/
      Verb:
      Do something or have or show qualities worthy of (reward or punishment)

    5. Re:Red Giant Sol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe at that time our dying sun will get bumped or pulled out of the way by the collision, with another younger, yellow dwarf star, miraculously taking it's exact place, before Sol has a chance to fry all of the inner planets. Earth wins.

    6. Re:Red Giant Sol? by toruonu · · Score: 1

      So the word means perfectly what I meant. We DESERVE to die if we're still stuck only on this rock... Actually I think that's true even if we reduce the timeframe to say 1000 years.

  24. whew! by swell · · Score: 2

    (wiping sweat from brow)
    I thought for a moment that TFA said 4 million years.
    Hey, 4 billion is a long time. No need to panic.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  25. Crikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a second there, I thought you said four MILLION years. Phew!

  26. not a collislion course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As any pilot knows, if it inches along the sky, you are not on a collission course.
    Only if it remains at exactly the same spot, you are in trouble.

    1. Re:not a collislion course by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      That's only true if it can't change course.

  27. well.... by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can kill myself now?

    --
    "That's right...I said it."
    1. Re:well.... by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      I mean, I have nothing else to live for and this will take too damn long...so can I?

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    2. Re:well.... by aiht · · Score: 1

      No. You have to wait for the galaxy collision.

    3. Re:well.... by kermidge · · Score: 1

      I figure that getting drunk and committing suicide are similar - if you need an excuse you're doing it wrong.

  28. "collision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it will be more like the two galaxies will pass through each other and some physical objects will have their orbits disturbed. Actual collisions - like a solid object hitting another solid object are quite rare when galaxies interact simply because a galaxy is mostly empty space. What you DO see is a lot of new star formation because regions of dust are large and changes in gravity or objects passing through dust clouds can trigger a collapse and star formation etc.

    Of course, if you happen to be close to either galactic core during the event then your chances of having a bad day go up quite a bit.

  29. We're already dead in 4 billion years by KarlIsNotMyName · · Score: 1

    If we still depend on the Sun in 4 billion years, we're screwed anyway. Maybe we could've burried deep underground or something, shielded from the heat and toxic atmosphere, but we need to become a lot more mobile if we intend to live on as a species (not that it's likely to be the same species as it is today).

    --
    We are all God's parents.
  30. Crossover by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

    Andromeda / Star Trek crossover, about time.

  31. Duck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heads up!

  32. It's coming straight at us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yellow alert! Polarise the hullplating! Evasive maneuver pattern delta!

  33. Damn it! another trip to Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to stock up on pasta and beans... better to be prepared hey?!

  34. The Perseus Galaxy by neoshroom · · Score: 1

    Wow, so we live in the Perseus galaxy and Andromeda really does have a rock chained to her (the M33 galaxy). Oh yeah, and for those who think I'm speaking nonsense:

    Andromeda is an Ethiopian princess from Greek mythology who, as divine punishment for her mother's bragging, the Boast of Cassiopeia, was chained to a rock as a sacrifice to a sea monster. She was saved from death by Perseus, her future husband (Wikipedia).

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  35. Paging Bruce Willis.... by jolyonr · · Score: 0

    What size bomb will we need?

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  36. Imagine by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine how awesome the sky would look once Andromeda is near enough to dominate the view.

    Imagine how awesome the sky would look with two galaxies, one of them much larger than our own, sprawling around it.

    Imagine how such a view might affect the belief systems and cultures of all the advanced life forms that might be able to perceive it.

    Hopefully, I will be there, billions of years in the future, and be able to experience it.

    1. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      The closer Andromeda gets, the more diffuse its structure will appear. It will just be a change in the shape of the Milky Way. I hope you will be reincarnated into a form that has no internet access. Soon.

    2. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know.
      We're *right inside* a galaxy right now and it doesn't look all that impressive. Not that I'm putting down the night sky... I just don't think it will look very differrent!

    3. Re:Imagine by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Informative

      Imagine how awesome the sky would look once Andromeda is near enough to dominate the view.

      Andromeda is already that big in the sky - it's over four times the size of the full Moon as seen from Earth right now. It's *extremely* diffuse though (and will continue to get more diffuse as it gets closer), so it's quite dim and generally isn't visible except from relatively dark sites.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:Imagine by RabidReindeer · · Score: 0

      My God! It's full of stars!

    5. Re:Imagine by dupup · · Score: 1

      Before we start making plans for Andromeda-crash watching parties, let's not forget that at about the same time our sun will become a red giant and expand to beyond the orbit of Mars.

      Sizzle

      Poof

    6. Re:Imagine by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Andromeda is already that big in the sky - it's over four times the size of the full Moon as seen from Earth right now. It's *extremely* diffuse though (and will continue to get more diffuse as it gets closer), so it's quite dim and generally isn't visible except from relatively dark sites.

      Why will Andromeda get more diffuse?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    7. Re:Imagine by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      It doesn't look that impressive because you are probably in the northern hemisphere, looking away from the galaxy, in the midst of civilization and artificial lights.
      If you are in the southern hemisphere, looking towards the galaxy, on a clear night in the middle of nowhere, it actually does look quite impressive.

    8. Re:Imagine by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 2

      Wow, I really didn't know that. I found this site showing an image with a nice size.

      It's quite amazing to think about how huge and close it is, to occupy such a relatively large portion of the sky. Too bad we can't appreciate it's splendor. I wonder if the view will improve as it gets closer. A poster above mentioned that it will get diffuser the closer it gets, but I wonder why.

    9. Re:Imagine by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      It will get difuser because it will be nearer, and thus spreaded in a bigger area of the sky.

      It will also get brighter. In the end, it will look like some extra stars and gas clouds, some gas clouds with stars forming inside, and a random nova once in a while... Or, in other words, quite similar to what we have now.

    10. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming it'd be similar to near/far-sight with the human eye... Take a piece of paper with text on it that you can read at a reasonable distance. Now bring it right up to your eye, you'll notice the text diffuses to an unreadable state.

    11. Re:Imagine by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      This is due to the human eye's inability to focus on objects closer than ~25cm. I should imagine that when Andromeda galaxy is 25cm from us, that the collision will be considered to have already occured!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  37. Not an unexpected result by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Isolated clusters of galaxies (such as the local group) are expected to have low total angular momentum (basically because the initial condition has low angular momentum, and in the absence of large mass anisotropy nearby, there is nothing to change this.) The mass of the local group is dominated by Andromeda and us, and hence so is the angular momentum. If the us/Andromeda pair has low angular momentum about their centre of mass (and given the pair is gravitationally bound), they will both pass close to that centre of mass - i.e., they will collide.

    Of course, having an actual measurment is much more satisfying than having a theory.

    Also - although they can be spectacular from outside, galactic collisions aren't expected to have bad results for life living on their planets. The biggest effect is that colliding dust clouds trigger a burst of star formation, so the night sky will be pretty.

    It has been a few decades since I studied this, so I hope this is all accurate.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Not an unexpected result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome back, Michael.

    2. Re:Not an unexpected result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you kidding?

      "galactic collisions aren't expected to have bad results for life living on their planets"

      oh look mom! that star is getting bigger, really quickly! uhhh, mom? uhhh.............x

    3. Re:Not an unexpected result by KarlIsNotMyName · · Score: 1

      Pretty, and radioactive.

      --
      We are all God's parents.
    4. Re:Not an unexpected result by dkf · · Score: 2

      "galactic collisions aren't expected to have bad results for life living on their planets"

      oh look mom! that star is getting bigger, really quickly! uhhh, mom? uhhh.............x

      You underestimate just how big space is. You'd have to be very unlucky (astronomically so!) to be hit by a star passing through, or even to have one come close enough to significantly change the orbit of your planet. More likely is that some gas clouds will collide, which will trigger star formation from the increased density and shockwaves. That in turn is likely to increase the UV/X-Ray output of stars in the galaxy (because the formed stars are more likely to be big ones) and that might make things more hazardous. (It depends on how close we are to a star-forming region. Did I mention that space is big yet?)

      But its billions of years away. I think I'll recommend to skip the worrying for at least the duration of our civilization...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  38. Do not worry - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to be concerned until I see the Pierson's Puppeteer fleet going by in the other direction.

  39. order of magnitude by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    The diameter of the sun is 1e9 meters. The distance to the closest star, Alpha Centauri, is about 4e16m (40 lightyears)...Let's put that in context:
    Suppose the sun is the size of a grain of sand, say 1mm (1e-3mm), the distance to the nearest grain of sand is 40 kilometer. So a collision between galaxies is basically collision between empty spaces...

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    1. Re:order of magnitude by pokerdad · · Score: 1

      Ironically, your example was off by an order of magnitude. Alpha Centauri is 4 light years or 4e15m away.

    2. Re:order of magnitude by BeardedChimp · · Score: 1

      Ironically, your example was off by an order of magnitude. Alpha Centauri is 4 light years or 4e15m away.

      And Alpha Centauri isn't even the closest star, Proxima Centauri is.

    3. Re:order of magnitude by codemaster2b · · Score: 2

      I was going to challenge your assumptions about the nature of empty space in regards to collisions between large bodies. I was told in school that all matter consists largely of empty space. So I examined the common element iron:

      The diameter of the nucleus of an iron atom is 1.26e-8 cm. The standard atomic weight of iron is 55.845 (which is equivalent to 55.845 gm/6.022e23 atoms or 1gm/1.0783e22 atoms). The density of iron at room temperature is 7.874 gm/cm^3. So 1 cubic centimeter of iron weighs 7.874 grams, and contains 8.49e22 atoms. Assuming a cubed nucleus, and ignoring the relatively tiny electrons, each atom has a volume of 2.00e-24. Multiply by the number of atoms above and we should have a volume of 0.17cm^3. Note that a sphere occupies 52% of the volume of its enclosing cube, which would bring the estimate down to 0.089cm^3. So ultimately, solid iron is 9-17% protons and neutrons.

      It appears that while matter is more empty space than it is solid, the "emptiness" is only 1 order of magnitude, whereas your example was about 7. I retract any objections.

      --
      And over there we have the labyrinth guards. One always lies, one always tells the truth, and one stabs people who ask t
  40. The Inhibitors already knew... by Coisiche · · Score: 2

    How come nobody's mentioned Alastair Reynold's Revelation Space series yet? Doesn't anyone here read SF?

    The fact that the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies will eventually collide is the motivation of the Inhibitors.

    1. Re:The Inhibitors already knew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler alert mate, I don't think that even comes up until halfway through the second book. You're lucky I'm on Absolution Gap at the moment or you'd have ruined my day.

      Good books though, enjoyable indeed.

    2. Re:The Inhibitors already knew... by dwye · · Score: 1

      E.E. "Doc" Smith's Lensmen Series, Hitchhiker's Guide, and Star Trek have both been referenced, already. Just because we haven't referred to your favorite, yet, doesn't mean that we don't read SF, just not Alastair Reynold.

  41. Finally! by CyberK · · Score: 2

    At last, mankind will have a convenient and cheap way of intergalactic travel: Wait for it to come to us.

  42. Drastic action required now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to prevent this collision, we must instantiate a tax on momentum vectors in the direction of Andromeda. Or the sea level and temperature could rise uncontrollably!

  43. Damn it! by cynop · · Score: 0

    That's just about after i settle my mortages

  44. I say gents! by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    I find the whole concept of Andromeda colliding with the Milkyway smashing!

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  45. Oh Great! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Oh Yay, more bad Sci-Fi with Kevin Sorbo....

    Why cant they let that whole show just die?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  46. note from the future by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    Note from the future: Ironically that was the same year the members of the United States Congress finally stopped their partisan political bickering.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  47. It s'OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both galaxies are insured.

  48. Reminds me of the scene from Austin Powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Get out of the way! You're going to get Crushed!"

    "Nooooooo! Arrrgghh!"

    With the steam roller.

    Whatever.

  49. Bollucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is going to make standing in line at Walmart pure hell..

  50. OMG by lcam · · Score: 1

    Everyone PANIC!

  51. Oh great, and I have a haircut that day. by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    I hate having to re-arrange my schedule like this.

  52. And about a Billion years from now... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    The photos we get from our space telescopes will be so much sharper as things get closer!

    Unfortunately, we won't even be here as a species in a million years. We'll either have died out, or long since left the planet, Earth won't even be remembered as a story told to children. And that's assuming we could even recognize ourselves after some period of evolution.

    Personally, I'm betting on the died-out version. Our civilization has limited energy resources, and limited vision for the future. Once the oil runs out, enough chaos ensues to assure destruction of the species.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:And about a Billion years from now... by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think it's fairly likely that the knowledge that we came form Earth will still be available in a million years (assuming we don't go the died-out way).

      I say that mostly because we don't seem to be losing much history these days, everything (no matter how trivial and stupid) is recorded somewhere. I definitely would agree that it would be considered special in any way, but I feel like it'll still be knowledge that's available to be had easily.

  53. This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been speculated/known for decades, since the time of Edwin Hubble's discoveries in the 1920s-30s.

    http://www.galaxydynamics.org/papers/GreatMilkyWayAndromedaCollision.pdf

  54. No surprise by a90Tj2P7 · · Score: 1

    Andromeda on Collision Course With the Milky Way

    I knew Kevin Sorbo couldn't drive.

  55. Don't worry by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Under the Republicans we are turning so far to the right that we could easily miss it.

  56. New glaxay name? by Zharr · · Score: 1

    So will the name of the new conglomoration be the Milky Andromeda?

  57. Just get urself a noob Kestrel fitted with a MWD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or if your richer get yourself a tech 2 ship and just warp to Jita , i heard the scammers there will be throwing a free party sponsored by Quafe !

  58. Corporate Mergers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    These corporate mergers are getting too big and out of hand! This must stop. Pretty soon there will be no competition and Milkomeda will be the only game in town. Travel outside of Milkomeda and your iPhone will be a dead brick.

  59. Great. Just what we needed. by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    Well, that's great. Like we didn't already have enough trouble with our economy. It's going to be a hard sell keeping business in the US when all of the Milky Way and possibly humanity is doomed in 4 billion years. What does President Obama intend to do about this?

  60. I thought we were expanding??? by spiedrazer · · Score: 2

    OK, so if all matter came into being 14 Billion years ago in the big bang, and all space and the matter in it has been expanding since then, and new research shows that the universe will likely keep expanding as opposed to collapsing back in upon itself, how are two galaxies with the same approximate mass supposed to collide? Shouldn't we be getting further apart? I guess relatively close bodies of matter will continue to migrate towards each other even as the larger body of matter continues to expand, so matter will eventually be in larger clumps with more open space between them, but it still seems a bit counter-intuitive.

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...
    1. Re:I thought we were expanding??? by pclminion · · Score: 1

      To use the old inflating balloon analogy, it's like ants on the surface of an inflating balloon. If two ants are close to each other (like Milky Way and Andromeda), they can walk fast enough to close the distance between them. If they are far from each other there is so much expanding balloon in between that they can't reach each other (analogy, the galaxies would have to go faster than light to reach each other)

    2. Re:I thought we were expanding??? by mikael · · Score: 1

      The BBC did an animation of the motion of all the galaxies in the universe. All of the galaxies would be travelling in straight lines unless they became within range of each other. Then they would either orbit each other or partially collide, where one galaxy would be stretched out. Originally most galaxies would be spherical, but the effect of collisions was to turn them into spiral arm galaxies.

      Full star collisions were extremely rare.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  61. Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this possible if we are in an expanding universe caused by a big bang?

  62. Han Solo lead to this confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect the confusion of the GGP, is due to Han Solo doing the Kessel run in less than 13 parsecs. If you didn't know what a parsec is, you would assume that it is a unit of time. After all, the statement doesn't really make a lot of sense as is.

    1. Re:Han Solo lead to this confusion by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      That's because the propulsion unit in the Millenium Falcon folded space

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  63. Save us Keanu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict another sequel to "Speed" coming on...

  64. Survival Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what are people adding to their bug-out bag to handle this apocalyptic event?
    Going to store anything different in your bomb shelter?

  65. But what will we call the end result? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Galaxy A is the Milky Way, galaxy B is the Andromeda, if the two combine, what will the combination be called?
    Also, can we consider this an invasion rather than a collision? Furthermore, if there is life in the Andromeda galaxy, what if they have already colonized a large portion of it? By the time this happens the political and territorial disputes could be huge.

  66. all da sheldons of the world collide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    o o oh o ho oh hoo o o oh, put a ring on if you see a nerd you put a ring on it