Politically motivated cyber attack reports are spun into support for new laws bringing the US up to speed with the most draconian technology laws in the world - provide your password or go to jail forever, prove that the drawing is of an adult, and even prove that you have never interacted with anyone who has committed these cyber-crimes or go to jail by association!
Don't worry, when they order all the "Darknets of Evil" to be removed, the horror will come to you. As will heavily armed people in the employ of the US Government.
until the *AA's can buy enough congressional support to give them the effective right to decide the content of the internet. Don't worry, they'll have enough votes bought soon.
Not according to the *AA groups. They will tell you that each pirate causes them to lose more money than each song/movie/program costs in the store. I don't know how, but their argument seems to be persuasive.
Except for when overly broad copyright means you are potentially infringing regardless of what you create. If three notes are enough to infringe upon a song, it is functionally impossible to make new, non-infringing songs. Similar arguments can be made about other fields.
CIA Predator drone misses assassination target, hits US diplomat in area for deniability purposes. IISi blamed despite the fact that the drone is still using buggy, inferior code.
There is a simple way to tell - take the possible monetary ruling in your favor, multiply it by your odds of success and then compare it to predicted lawyer fees.
If fees >> payout, don't even think of it. If fees > payout, you should not sue for the money. If fees = payout, do it if it matches your principles. If payout > fees, suing looks good. If payout >> fees, why aren't you suing?
Tell that to Serebii.net. Nintendo does not like images of Pokemon Black and White, and they have more lawyers and lawyer money than any individual ever will.
Slashdot Mirror
Unfortunately, that doesn't apply to sufficiently large corporations, at least not without a lot more stuff to actually get the ball rolling.
Companies patent widely implemented ideas and sue everyone. Oh wait, that's not new.
Politically motivated cyber attack reports are spun into support for new laws bringing the US up to speed with the most draconian technology laws in the world - provide your password or go to jail forever, prove that the drawing is of an adult, and even prove that you have never interacted with anyone who has committed these cyber-crimes or go to jail by association!
Forum spammer sues vigilante, gets both arrested. Vigilante does more time.
It has no data on my MAC, but here I am posting away. I wonder what sort of app I'm using to post without a computer.
Except for the unfortunate fact that other laws say you can't own that automatic weapon, and a large number of other people can't own any at all.
Don't worry, when they order all the "Darknets of Evil" to be removed, the horror will come to you. As will heavily armed people in the employ of the US Government.
until the *AA's can buy enough congressional support to give them the effective right to decide the content of the internet. Don't worry, they'll have enough votes bought soon.
Or will the Russians have the first Spaceport in SPAAAAACE?
Citation Needles? Are those more like knitting needles or hypodermic needles?
Not according to the *AA groups. They will tell you that each pirate causes them to lose more money than each song/movie/program costs in the store. I don't know how, but their argument seems to be persuasive.
Only if you post screenshots.
How do I shot Web?
How much are you willing to pay them? There's your answer.
Don't give people ideas. They might use them.
People would tell you that the blocks are being bought out so the companies can have a more healthy economy. People might be right.
Except for when overly broad copyright means you are potentially infringing regardless of what you create.
If three notes are enough to infringe upon a song, it is functionally impossible to make new, non-infringing songs. Similar arguments can be made about other fields.
And I'm still not as bad as the Twit-head who lets scripts like that gets Twitted in the first place.
Twit.
And then the Quantum Police in their Quantum Speedtrap give us a ticket for violating the speed limit.
I wonder what they take payment in...
CIA Predator drone misses assassination target, hits US diplomat in area for deniability purposes. IISi blamed despite the fact that the drone is still using buggy, inferior code.
Well, as this case illustrates, they can do that, so goodbye now!
There is a simple way to tell - take the possible monetary ruling in your favor, multiply it by your odds of success and then compare it to predicted lawyer fees.
If fees >> payout, don't even think of it.
If fees > payout, you should not sue for the money.
If fees = payout, do it if it matches your principles.
If payout > fees, suing looks good.
If payout >> fees, why aren't you suing?
Tell that to Serebii.net. Nintendo does not like images of Pokemon Black and White, and they have more lawyers and lawyer money than any individual ever will.
No, your mom's eBra does not count. Or eBras still in the packaging.
The ability to brute force the other guys crypto better.