The only robots mentioned spread the sauce and put it in the oven. Like you mention humans add the toppings. Nothing is mentioned about the dough so that's probably a person and the same thing about cutting the pizza after it's in the box.
The referendum may not be legally binding but you basically told your roommates to f*ck off and that you want to move out. They are currently packing your stuff into boxes. You're just negotiating if they place them gently on the front curb or throw them from the roof into the pool. Either way expect at least a few things to get broken.
Except there is a European Parliament and every country in the European Union votes on sending people to be MEPs who vote on the laws of the EU. Farage who was one of the ones leading the charge for the UK to leave the EU was an MEP.
While it wouldn't happen it would be fun to see the EU say to an independent Scotland that they wouldn't have to re-apply as they voted to stay in and they only left because England made them so they would be fast tracked in under the current agreement. Just a big middle finger to London.
I hardly think that a CEO of one of the biggest companies in the US is even going to see, let alone care, about a fraud complaint about $1700. In an environment where CEOs of the largest financial were responsible for the biggest recession in generations and their punishment was the government bailing out their corporations just what about this case would cause the CEO of Comcast to light some fires?
A good lawyer will explain the case in terms that a judge illiterate in technology can understand or else provide enough information in their case to bring the judge up to speed.
The big thing that I can't understand with judges in the US is that they are allowed to interpret the laws through the lens of their political beliefs. For example today was the announcement of the result from the Supreme Court concerning changes impacting immigrants being able to work in the US. The result was a tie split along party lines. Many cases going before the courts are usually predicted by knowing the party affiliation of the judge. In Canada judgments are much less biased and the judges make their decisions based on the intent of the law instead of what they want the law to mean.
Supposedly the Republicans don't want anyone who is innocent ending up on a list and being denied their right to own a gun with no process to find out how they got on the list or to get off it. Funny how they have no qualms about putting innocent people on a list that prevents them from flying on a plane.
They would have had to find and do background checks on the people attempting the hacking. They wouldn't want someone with the wrong background getting into their systems. Some of the people probably had security clearance before entering the competition. The article talks about a person who did it while they were in high school so a background check would have had to be performed. Additional security checking would have also been places on the five domains that were part of the testing. Plus any setup-costs and money to go through the servers after to make sure that nothing was left behind. They also had to have people go through all of the submissions to verify which ones were valid. And there is the cost to build whatever site to co-ordinate everyone. $150k for all that isn't too bad considering they can roll out checks for all of those vulnerabilities to the rest of their servers. Better than finding them after someone abuses a vulnerability.
Shouldn't the government be held more responsible for people driving irresponsibly as it was the organization that tested and permitted the person to drive in the first place.
I just thought that they brought out a new version of Windows out with all of the settings moved around. That way they make a few billion from everyone having to re-certify.
The next person that loses against the MPAA/RIAA should then bring this document out. Since only profits should be repaid then the person should owe them nothing as it is commonly known that due to creative accounting techniques music and movies don't make money.
It's the only time that I have wished for a 3D printer but I don't know how the plastic in a standard 3D printer would stand up to the hot water and steam (during the sanitize cycle) in a dishwasher. Ideally the service shop would have one to print off whatever parts they needed instead of having a large inventory and then they would just pay a royalty to the manufacturers.
In my Maytag dishwasher one of the wheels for the upper rack broke. A plastic wheel that probably costs less that $0.10 to make. But because Maytag stopped selling the wheels for that model the only way that I could get a replacement would be to buy a whole new rack at $200. I managed to rig something up for a couple of years until another part on the now 10 year old dishwasher broke and then I decided to buy a new one for $500. I gave the old one away to someone who would use it for parts so at least it wasn't going to the landfill.
It would have to be a source of power available whenever the original plant is running because the only time to capture the CO2 is when it is being sent through the exhaust system. Once it's in the atmosphere it's too diluted to capture efficiently. The energy requirements are around 25% to 40% (I know a couple of years ago it was 40% so I'm assuming it's coming down). The easiest way to get this power is to run the current plant at a higher rate or accept that you have a lower amount of output. Building clean energy sources so that you can filter the CO2 out of the exhaust of fossil fuel plants is just silly. Better to just sell the clean electricity to the grid where you can get a higher price for it. If the original plant doesn't produce electricity then you are better off buying the electricity from someone since producing electricity probably isn't one of your core businesses.
And it's legal for the FBI to write some nonsense down on an application, take it to a judge who rubber-stamps a warrant, and then grab all of the information they can about you. Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's right. There has to be checks and balances on the system. I would say that even seizure should automatically go before a judge within 48 hours to allow the person to get their items back but I'm afraid the judges would probably just give a default ruling to the police.
Slashdot Mirror
The only robots mentioned spread the sauce and put it in the oven. Like you mention humans add the toppings. Nothing is mentioned about the dough so that's probably a person and the same thing about cutting the pizza after it's in the box.
The referendum may not be legally binding but you basically told your roommates to f*ck off and that you want to move out. They are currently packing your stuff into boxes. You're just negotiating if they place them gently on the front curb or throw them from the roof into the pool. Either way expect at least a few things to get broken.
Except there is a European Parliament and every country in the European Union votes on sending people to be MEPs who vote on the laws of the EU. Farage who was one of the ones leading the charge for the UK to leave the EU was an MEP.
While it wouldn't happen it would be fun to see the EU say to an independent Scotland that they wouldn't have to re-apply as they voted to stay in and they only left because England made them so they would be fast tracked in under the current agreement. Just a big middle finger to London.
I hardly think that a CEO of one of the biggest companies in the US is even going to see, let alone care, about a fraud complaint about $1700. In an environment where CEOs of the largest financial were responsible for the biggest recession in generations and their punishment was the government bailing out their corporations just what about this case would cause the CEO of Comcast to light some fires?
So according to you then the police would need a warrant if the person is running Linux, BSD, Mac, etc?
A good lawyer will explain the case in terms that a judge illiterate in technology can understand or else provide enough information in their case to bring the judge up to speed.
The big thing that I can't understand with judges in the US is that they are allowed to interpret the laws through the lens of their political beliefs. For example today was the announcement of the result from the Supreme Court concerning changes impacting immigrants being able to work in the US. The result was a tie split along party lines. Many cases going before the courts are usually predicted by knowing the party affiliation of the judge. In Canada judgments are much less biased and the judges make their decisions based on the intent of the law instead of what they want the law to mean.
Supposedly the Republicans don't want anyone who is innocent ending up on a list and being denied their right to own a gun with no process to find out how they got on the list or to get off it. Funny how they have no qualms about putting innocent people on a list that prevents them from flying on a plane.
Yes, but they took into account the vacuum where your brain is supposed to be so it's more than balanced out.
Because finding the thousands of exoplanets isn't interesting enough?
They would have had to find and do background checks on the people attempting the hacking. They wouldn't want someone with the wrong background getting into their systems. Some of the people probably had security clearance before entering the competition. The article talks about a person who did it while they were in high school so a background check would have had to be performed. Additional security checking would have also been places on the five domains that were part of the testing. Plus any setup-costs and money to go through the servers after to make sure that nothing was left behind. They also had to have people go through all of the submissions to verify which ones were valid. And there is the cost to build whatever site to co-ordinate everyone. $150k for all that isn't too bad considering they can roll out checks for all of those vulnerabilities to the rest of their servers. Better than finding them after someone abuses a vulnerability.
Or he's smart because he's telling the Senators exactly what they want to hear.
With that lack of clearance it's literally going to be hitting the streets.
Sure looks like one in that second picture! Or is that a scroll wheel because it's too far away for a touch screen?
And that's still one too many.
Shouldn't the government be held more responsible for people driving irresponsibly as it was the organization that tested and permitted the person to drive in the first place.
I see that you have been to the CBC website recently.
But you have to become President of the US in order to get rid of all of the crap that Samsung and Google load onto the phone.
I just thought that they brought out a new version of Windows out with all of the settings moved around. That way they make a few billion from everyone having to re-certify.
The next person that loses against the MPAA/RIAA should then bring this document out. Since only profits should be repaid then the person should owe them nothing as it is commonly known that due to creative accounting techniques music and movies don't make money.
It's the only time that I have wished for a 3D printer but I don't know how the plastic in a standard 3D printer would stand up to the hot water and steam (during the sanitize cycle) in a dishwasher. Ideally the service shop would have one to print off whatever parts they needed instead of having a large inventory and then they would just pay a royalty to the manufacturers.
In my Maytag dishwasher one of the wheels for the upper rack broke. A plastic wheel that probably costs less that $0.10 to make. But because Maytag stopped selling the wheels for that model the only way that I could get a replacement would be to buy a whole new rack at $200. I managed to rig something up for a couple of years until another part on the now 10 year old dishwasher broke and then I decided to buy a new one for $500. I gave the old one away to someone who would use it for parts so at least it wasn't going to the landfill.
It would have to be a source of power available whenever the original plant is running because the only time to capture the CO2 is when it is being sent through the exhaust system. Once it's in the atmosphere it's too diluted to capture efficiently. The energy requirements are around 25% to 40% (I know a couple of years ago it was 40% so I'm assuming it's coming down). The easiest way to get this power is to run the current plant at a higher rate or accept that you have a lower amount of output. Building clean energy sources so that you can filter the CO2 out of the exhaust of fossil fuel plants is just silly. Better to just sell the clean electricity to the grid where you can get a higher price for it. If the original plant doesn't produce electricity then you are better off buying the electricity from someone since producing electricity probably isn't one of your core businesses.
And it's legal for the FBI to write some nonsense down on an application, take it to a judge who rubber-stamps a warrant, and then grab all of the information they can about you. Just because something is legal doesn't mean it's right. There has to be checks and balances on the system. I would say that even seizure should automatically go before a judge within 48 hours to allow the person to get their items back but I'm afraid the judges would probably just give a default ruling to the police.
Why would she fix it? She can then say that she'll fix it next time she runs.