Um, yes, it does. Access control is not just denial, it's also logging. If you don't have any idea who's accessing what, you can't possibly have any oversight.
No. If you just bolted on a door to something built without other consideration of security, it's not going to do very well. In fact, a house *is* security--the door is your access point. A door as just "bolt-on" security would be a door sitting there without any walls.
No, that's risk. The car is enormously dangerous whether you can see well or not. If you intend to use it to harm, having good eyesight makes it *more* dangerous. It is indeed the most dangerous thing most people own, with the possible exception of a gun (if they own one).
McCain's undoing was that the economy spectacularly tanked in the year before the election; combined with the impression Bush left, it made it certain that no Republican could win.
The rule can't apply to Assange in any case, as it isn't the US requesting his extradition--it's Sweden, as stated in the summary. His lawyers are trying to argue that if he's extradited to Sweden, Sweden might render him over to the US.
A $50, 1 TB hard drive could hold 3 kilobytes of information for every citizen in the US.
...if you didn't count the computer that would be needed to access it, if you didn't mind waiting a several minutes for *every single piece* of information you needed, and if you didn't care at all if the data was still going to be there when you needed it.
"The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter--'tis the difference between the lightning-bug and the lightning."
The same way you prove anything saves money: you sit down and work out the figures. Estimate how much money (Largely staff salaries, but don't forget to estimate how much business you're losing because of buggy software) is spent in fixing things. Estimate how much of that would be saved if you test your software properly. Estimate how much the testing will cost (don't forget to include testing hardware and also delay to release time). If A > B, then it saves you money. If you have a convincing analysis and you work for rational bosses (always a concern), you should be able to talk them into it.
Candles aren't cheap. You only think they're cheap because you never use them. To adequately light a room takes several candles at least, and you need to replace them every few days at best. One of the biggest draws of electric lighting, once it had been fully developed (and before that, gas lighting), was how much *cheaper* it was than using candles.
Wow, I can see you learned math at a public school. If tickets used to be $1000 and are now $450 in dollars that are worth a third as much then prices are only *fifteen percent* of what they once were. That's less than *one-sixth* the former price.
Slashdot Mirror
That depends on your definition of "is".
Once the rockets go up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department.
Um, yes, it does. Access control is not just denial, it's also logging. If you don't have any idea who's accessing what, you can't possibly have any oversight.
No. If you just bolted on a door to something built without other consideration of security, it's not going to do very well. In fact, a house *is* security--the door is your access point. A door as just "bolt-on" security would be a door sitting there without any walls.
No, that's risk. The car is enormously dangerous whether you can see well or not. If you intend to use it to harm, having good eyesight makes it *more* dangerous. It is indeed the most dangerous thing most people own, with the possible exception of a gun (if they own one).
Well, yes. Nations are free to sign or refuse to sign treaties as they see fit. Breaking signed treaties is another matter.
...they actually didn't report that. But we all *know* who did it, so that makes it okay to say they did, right?
"My ilk"? I'll have you know, sir, that I don't even *own* an ilk!
McCain's undoing was that the economy spectacularly tanked in the year before the election; combined with the impression Bush left, it made it certain that no Republican could win.
That line is much, much older than COD4.
"That little Clampett got his own cement pond;
That little Clampett, he's a millionaire..."
...on the entire world, when that's OUR job!"
So, to prove you won't just buy another machine...you bought another machine. How's that again?
The rule can't apply to Assange in any case, as it isn't the US requesting his extradition--it's Sweden, as stated in the summary. His lawyers are trying to argue that if he's extradited to Sweden, Sweden might render him over to the US.
As a sysadmin by profession, one of my favorite terms is "too stupid to break".
...and will be issued nationally, but it's NOT a National ID Card. Trust us!
You ugly bag, you.
"The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter--'tis the difference between the lightning-bug and the lightning."
Because if you do, the coppers will get you.
The same way you prove anything saves money: you sit down and work out the figures. Estimate how much money (Largely staff salaries, but don't forget to estimate how much business you're losing because of buggy software) is spent in fixing things. Estimate how much of that would be saved if you test your software properly. Estimate how much the testing will cost (don't forget to include testing hardware and also delay to release time). If A > B, then it saves you money. If you have a convincing analysis and you work for rational bosses (always a concern), you should be able to talk them into it.
Which is trivially broken by the jailbreak simply telling the firmware that it's one of the "genuine" games.
Poland was our ally and secretly supported us in the Vietnam War (1965-1975)? Wait, what?
Candles aren't cheap. You only think they're cheap because you never use them. To adequately light a room takes several candles at least, and you need to replace them every few days at best. One of the biggest draws of electric lighting, once it had been fully developed (and before that, gas lighting), was how much *cheaper* it was than using candles.
Wow, I can see you learned math at a public school. If tickets used to be $1000 and are now $450 in dollars that are worth a third as much then prices are only *fifteen percent* of what they once were. That's less than *one-sixth* the former price.