Who pays for the news broadcasts on NBC, ABC, and CBS?! Who pays the anchors, the journalists, and the cameramen? Who pays for your local news broadcasts?
Despite their claims to the contrary, NBC, ABC and CBS and your local station don't have news broadcasts. Just celebrity information services occasionally broken up by a few pictures of people shooting at each other.
I like my job, but preserving it comes pretty damned far behind "my freedom" in order of my priorities. Jail vs giving out the keys to the kingdom? "Would you like the portcullis up or down when you arrive, Mr. Barbarian?"
Only use root when you have to, and never, EVER log into a desktop as root. If you do this, and there's no problem in doing it in Linux, the vulnerability can't hack your box, it can only hack your account.
Do you want to risk that company tanking and your work going away? I don't.
It's a serious risk. So serious that TFA listed it first in their list of 10 obstacles to cloud computing. Their suggested solution: common APIs and interfaces so that you can actually do your cloud computing on two providers with each providing full failover capability.
1) Vaccines are never 100% effective. But if every one is immunized, the chances the bug will get to someone whose vaccine fails is very low.
2) Like any other species--in fact, *more* than just about any other species--bacteria and viruses evolve. Give them a reservoir to evolve in, and the vaccine can become useless.
Sooo the court is saying that putting Mercury (used as a preservative), a known toxin, into vaccines, didn't cause autism?
Yes, that's correct. There has never been evidence that thimerosal has ever harmed anybody. The amount in any given dose is incredibly tiny.
Even though now they no longer do that and there is still risk that maybe some shady or ignorant vaccine makers still do that?
They no longer do that mainly to placate paranoid know-nothings like yourself, since it was simpler to just remove it then to try to convince people with no interest in actual evidence.
Sure there is no 100% correlation but if a vaccine changes your risk from 0.006% to 2% then that is something I doubt scientific evidence nor professional experts are going to be able to prove.
That huge of an increase would have been screamingly obvious to the first person to glance at the statistics.
My girlfriend while studying to become a nurse met an instructor...
"I'm not a researcher, but my girlfriend who's a student met somebody who, well, isn't a trained researcher either..."
...if is not the vaccine its something environmental that wasn't around that much 100 years ago.
Possibly. They haven't been able to pin anything down yet, and a lot of people think it's just that we successfully diagnose autism a lot more now (100 years ago, your average GP had never even *heard* of autism--effect of no autism, or cause of no autism being found?). The one thing we do know is that it isn't the freaking vaccines, because they've studied them to death.
Unlike the republicans, the democratic party has a lot of people with their own views. --snip-- I hate feinstein and always considered her a wolf in sheep clothing.
"Unlike the Republicans, we have true diversity. Of course, I despise all the ones who don't think like I do."
Because there are no rules at all as to how the conference committee should go about formulating the compromise bill.
Note that the compromise bill *does* have to be voted up or down (but no amendments) by both the House and the Senate afterwards. That is in fact the purpose of the conference committee--it resolves the paradox that the House and the Senate amend bills *separately* while they are on the floor, but must both vote in favor of an *identical* bill in order for that bill to advance to the President for his signing or veto. If the conference committee gets too cute in abusing their powers to write whatever they want, the chambers can vote not to pass it. It doesn't happen often, but it *does* happen, and almost the only time it happens is when the conference committee strays too far from making an actual compromise between the House and Senate versions of the bill.
What happens when somebody loses their password or keyfile? Or you get an subpoena for a laptop or usb key's content?
You appear to be complaining that TrueCrypt doesn't have a backdoor to allow access by someone without the passphrase. If it had one, it would need to be taken out back and shot.
Everquest: Online Adventures came out for the PS2 less than a year after FFXI's JP release (and before the NA release). FFXI is perfectly well supported on the PS3. And as far as supported only by Japanese--not hardly. The past several Vana'diel Censuses have shown that the big peak for log-ins is during NA prime time. At JP prime time, there is a distinct spike, but a much smaller one. This has been true for years.
Slashdot Mirror
Not really. Porn is often one of the first major uses of a new media. Videotape built its success on porn.
...hold out for an exhumer, man!
Um. No, there wasn't. The major daily papers *always* charged for a copy.
Despite their claims to the contrary, NBC, ABC and CBS and your local station don't have news broadcasts. Just celebrity information services occasionally broken up by a few pictures of people shooting at each other.
So Microsoft is monkeying around?
Perhaps you meant *guerilla* marketing...
They tried, but it had a bad effect on reliability. The system would come and go, would come and go-oo-oo...
"I have no gate key."
"Fezzik, tear his arms off."
"Oh, you mean THIS gate key!"
Third base!
Which you have backed up, RIGHT?
And moral of the story is:
Only use root when you have to, and never, EVER log into a desktop as root. If you do this, and there's no problem in doing it in Linux, the vulnerability can't hack your box, it can only hack your account.
I don't even HAVE a little dog Toto!
It's the Comet Empire! Where the Argo when we need her?
Well, that depends on how computers I need to install it on, doesn't it?
Who lives in a pineapple under the sea?
Antibiotic and yellow and porous is he!
It's a serious risk. So serious that TFA listed it first in their list of 10 obstacles to cloud computing. Their suggested solution: common APIs and interfaces so that you can actually do your cloud computing on two providers with each providing full failover capability.
Wrong.
1) Vaccines are never 100% effective. But if every one is immunized, the chances the bug will get to someone whose vaccine fails is very low.
2) Like any other species--in fact, *more* than just about any other species--bacteria and viruses evolve. Give them a reservoir to evolve in, and the vaccine can become useless.
No, they don't, because unimmunized kids are a health risk for the entire community.
Yes, that's correct. There has never been evidence that thimerosal has ever harmed anybody. The amount in any given dose is incredibly tiny.
They no longer do that mainly to placate paranoid know-nothings like yourself, since it was simpler to just remove it then to try to convince people with no interest in actual evidence.
That huge of an increase would have been screamingly obvious to the first person to glance at the statistics.
"I'm not a researcher, but my girlfriend who's a student met somebody who, well, isn't a trained researcher either..."
Possibly. They haven't been able to pin anything down yet, and a lot of people think it's just that we successfully diagnose autism a lot more now (100 years ago, your average GP had never even *heard* of autism--effect of no autism, or cause of no autism being found?). The one thing we do know is that it isn't the freaking vaccines, because they've studied them to death.
"Unlike the Republicans, we have true diversity. Of course, I despise all the ones who don't think like I do."
Because there are no rules at all as to how the conference committee should go about formulating the compromise bill.
Note that the compromise bill *does* have to be voted up or down (but no amendments) by both the House and the Senate afterwards. That is in fact the purpose of the conference committee--it resolves the paradox that the House and the Senate amend bills *separately* while they are on the floor, but must both vote in favor of an
*identical* bill in order for that bill to advance to the President for his signing or veto. If the conference committee gets too cute in abusing their powers to write whatever they want, the chambers can vote not to pass it. It doesn't happen often, but it *does* happen, and almost the only time it happens is when the conference committee strays too far from making an actual compromise between the House and Senate versions of the bill.
Given that that phrase isn't in the Constitution to begin with, it'd be pretty hard for an Amendment to change it. (hint: Gettysburg Address)
But in the West, it's the other way around!
You appear to be complaining that TrueCrypt doesn't have a backdoor to allow access by someone without the passphrase. If it had one, it would need to be taken out back and shot.
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
Everquest: Online Adventures came out for the PS2 less than a year after FFXI's JP release (and before the NA release). FFXI is perfectly well supported on the PS3. And as far as supported only by Japanese--not hardly. The past several Vana'diel Censuses have shown that the big peak for log-ins is during NA prime time. At JP prime time, there is a distinct spike, but a much smaller one. This has been true for years.
Do you want the Stahlhelm or the Pickelhaube?