Slashdot Mirror


User: d6

d6's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
72
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 72

  1. Re:good riddance on VoIP Now Technically Illegal In China · · Score: 1

    >> One major failure in 8 years is crap?

    two actually

    uptime wise, I would say it is acceptable, tho. The number of times I get busy signals when calling a non busy phone is not. I've had "skype in" for a couple years now and doubt very much i will renew it, as the availability is unacceptable, at least in my area.

    I like skype. I don't mind sharing a bit of bandwidth peer to peer wise to make it work. it isn't quite up to speed, tho

  2. Speaking of anticipation on Most Anticipated Tech Products of 2011 · · Score: 1

    I know it doesn't qualify as 'tech', but I thought of this immediately.

    "with an expected release date of 2011" :]

  3. Re:Talk about a vague patent... on Paul Allen Amends Lawsuit Against Facebook, Apple · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the first patent troll? probably not, but an interesting read that sent me off looking for more info on Selden

    thanks for that link.

  4. Re:Paul Allen patents the Internet on Paul Allen Amends Lawsuit Against Facebook, Apple · · Score: 2

    Al Gore is gonna be pissed...

  5. Has anyone tried voxox? on Skype Slowly Restores Service To Users · · Score: 1

    Anyone have opinions on voxox?

  6. Re:Call me paranoid... on Skype Outage Hits Users Worldwide · · Score: 1

    Mod that up someone.

    >>'For a communications system this large to go down, it's almost unheard of,'
    except it is not. Skype has failed before I've had a skype in number at home for two years. I do not use it any longer owing to lack of reliability. Often (way too often) I get busy signals on numbers that are not busy. I can hold my cell in on had my skype phone in the other and get a busy signal. I assume when the peer-to-peer network saturates in my area, I get a busy signal.

    I won't use it for my home phone, who in their right mind would use it for a business? I wish it did work. I like the idea and I like the price, but stuff like this can't "mostly" work.

  7. Re:Market cap.. on Kodak's Patent Spat Threatens Photo Web Sites · · Score: 1

    >>Can you imagine I once had stock options at $100?

    that comment made me curious enough to hit google finance. not pretty

  8. Re:*slaps head* on The Clock Is Ticking On Encryption · · Score: 1

    >>Then you get stupid password systems which state your password must be "at least 6 letters, including 1 upper case and 1 number", about 38 bits. Or even worse "between 6 and 8 characters".

    One system I dealt with recently at a largish company (multi-billions revenue) introduced tougher new password guidelines:

    The tough new standard? Must contain upper and lower case. Must contain at least one number. Must be EIGHT characters long.

    gah...

  9. Re:But... on 'Reading Level' Filter Added To Google Search · · Score: 1

    Curious as to whether that will help for very long. I'm thinking that scam sites could spider high ranking "advanced" pages, paste a few paragraphs from each hit and then pile the ads up top.

  10. Re:Further Lessons on Gawker Source Code and Databases Compromised · · Score: 1

    >>One benefit of having a domain is having forward all for %.com@domain.com.

    That is what I've done for years. The "catchall" mail is close to 100% spam and most of the rest is crap I don't want to read. I filter out anything of interest (IE account signup emails) and delete the inbox periodically.

    Possibly the best 8 bucks a year I have ever spent.

  11. Re:For all of us? on The Woman Who's Making Your Privacy Her Business · · Score: 5, Informative

    All of us in Canada at least. She seems to take her mandate seriously.

  12. Re:Google already tracks you more than Facebook. on Google +1: Screenshot and Details · · Score: 1

    Don't forget DNS too.

    Google has access to a great deal more information than most people realize.

  13. Re:great on Single Software Licence Shared 774,651 Times · · Score: 1

    I use several O/S. The ones from Redmond need a little help in the virus department :]

    And you are right - The fire department ought to have been considered funded by the taxes that family had been paying for how many? years.
    I guess what I was trying convey was that despite being something we shouldn't have to pay for (like that fire levy), the cost of AV is nothing compared to the potential inconvenience of not having it.

    Might not be fair, or reasonable, but it's truth.

  14. Re:No mention of a PDF version on Beginning Blender · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link. Not buying it at $35 tho. The price is fine for a physical textbook, but way out of line for an electronic copy IMHO.

    Which leaves me still wanting a book. Total newb with regards to Blender and 3D modeling of any sort.
    Anyone knowledgeable here (I know this is /. silly me) with recommendations on this book or others? Textbook/online course/ebook, whatever.

  15. Re:great on Single Software Licence Shared 774,651 Times · · Score: 1

    >>Precisely. I'd go without virus software rather than pay for it

    That made me think of the dude who lost a house because he didn't pay a $75 fire department levy.

    If A-V keeps you from having to rebuild a machine + restore everything on it even once, it's a pretty much paid for itself.
    I would have no issue paying a reasonable fee for antivirus if there weren't adequate free options available.

  16. Re:This is only temporary on GM Loses Money On Every Volt Built · · Score: 1

    >> they can make it up in volume.

    No offense, but I think this is the road to bankruptcy. "Old" GM thought that way too. Pre-bailout, they figure losing large per unit was "OK" if it brought more units sold. Profit (at some later date) would follow market share.

    If GM was better at math, they would have understood the trailing obligations incurred every time they threw money at the unions (and considered the built in cost penalty per vehicle.) It isn't just now, its' later you need to worry about when negotiating contracts.. for that matter, once they had placed themselves in a position where some models became unprofitable due to overhead, they ought to have quit building them. If you're losing $amount on an already mass produced vehicle, it's a damn neat trick to sell more of them and at a discount and suddenly become profitable.

    These guys (GM) are lucky they were "too big to fail".

  17. Re:Just in time for christmas .... on Dolly the Sheep Alive Again · · Score: 1

    Glad I'm not the only one that thought "how does it taste"? :P

  18. Re:If the race is on on Race On To Fingerprint Phones, PCs · · Score: 1

    I expect the company is getting attention due to a sudden influx of cash

    >> There's already a few people doing similar things

    Yep. My hosts file is full of them (and I am sure nowhere near being complete).

  19. Re:Hope It Helps End the Fighting on US Army Unveils 'Revolutionary' $35,000 Rifle · · Score: 1

    >>so I'm sure we'll shortly find out whether it's the exceptionally useful tool it appears to promise to be.

    The M79 has been around for nearly 50 years and (per Wikipedia) is still in use.
    This weapon would seem to fill the same role, presumably with less required skill and greater effect.

  20. If the netbook is still running Windows on What To Load On a 4-Year-Old's Netbook? · · Score: 1

    Timon and Pumbaa's typing game. It's a good typing tutor and fun enough to fit in the "game" headspace.

  21. Hexen on FPS Games That Need a Remake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hexen was a lot of fun. I'd love to see it updated

  22. Re:Don't buy any servers. Use the cloud. on Best IT-infrastructure For a Small Company? · · Score: 2, Informative

    >> And when Joe Farmer runs his backhoe through your Fiber line? Send everyone home for the day? Tell your clients that their media is stuck on Amazon?

    Dual connections with different topologies and hardware fail over. It isn't that expensive.
    Having said that, I still would hesitate to put core assets (or even email) in the cloud.