Maybe it's the skin your phone has, but I've never had this problem on a Google Pixel XL. When apps go full screen it's always either tap anywhere or swipe down from the top as if you were opening the notification shade.
Then again I don't play a lot of games, maybe they are worse for full screen stuff.
Indeed, the UK is one of the worst in the world for family visas.
Several years ago the government made a most unwise promise to reduce immigration to the "tens of thousands" (net). At the moment it's about +230,000 net which is actually down quite a bit from a peak of around +330,000 due to Brexit.
There are about 85,000 family reunions a year. The rest is skilled workers, foreign students who keep the university system going and fees for British students down, and EU workers exercising their freedom of movement rights.
The government could have stopped about 60% of immigration any time it liked (40% is EU freedom of movement), but obviously didn't because it would be economic suicide. So the squeeze is being put on families, particularly British people with foreign spouses and children. They don't have commercial interests backing them, and they don't have money to pay the ever increasing fees or fight decisions in court.
This will probably only get worse after Brexit, as the demand for falling immigration increases. Some Brexiteers like Rees-Mogg promised that it would get easier, but they were lying. The worst part is that most people don't realize. Literally every single person, 100% no exceptions, that I told I was getting married followed up with something like "oh, and then she is coming here?" Most people assume that if you are married and a British citizen you have a right to unite your family here, but in reality it's extremely difficult and the Home Office will resist in every way possible.
When people talk about having a guest worker system that doesn't allow families to come they are being delusional. No skilled worker who isn't fresh out of university and free from all attachments is going to want to move to another country by themselves and abandon their spouse and children. If you want skilled labour you have to accept the family of skilled labour. Most countries are fine with this, except for the ones in the grip of populism and anti-immigrant scaremongering/scapegoating.
I get redirected when I try to read bbc.com but I can check the international version of.co.uk. Seems to me you are being selective.
Top story: High turnout in first post-Mugabe poll (photo of mixed line of voters) India strips four million of citizenship (photo of woman) Germany gripped by #MeToo racism debate* (photo of man) Trapped hiker descend quake volcano Deadly California wildfire growing Foreign cyclists killed in Tajik 'attack'
Video sidebar: Georgia's rave revolution (photo of mixed ravers) Evidence of torture in Russian prison (photo of two men) Nailing it: Art right on your fingertips (photo of female hand) A Nicaraguan spring? (photo of male doll) Ahed Tamimi release from prison (photo of her) Weaving a livelihood in Kenya (photo of woman)
* This is a story about racism, not sexism.
Seems like coverage a wide range of news with photos appropriate to the story. And this is a year where the BBC is supposed to be making a conscious effort to cover more women's stories. Seems like they got the balance about right.
Don't see any man hating in there, but if it exists provide a link and I'll happily report this misuse of my licence fee and demand an explanation.
FaceID is classic Apple bullshit. They wanted to get rid of the home button, which is fine. Android moved to soft buttons years ago, they work great. But where to put the fingerprint reader?
Through glass fingerprint readers weren't working very well at the time. Many Android phones already started putting the reader on the back, so can't do that because it wouldn't be special and unique to Apple. So they invented FaceID. Throw an expensive camera system at the problem, and it's still slower than a high end fingerprint reader.
By the way, it only requires eyes open if you have the "require attention" box ticked.
It's not just memory access that is an issue for Intel, although that is the most severe one and not as easy as you make out to solve (memory from other processes and the kernel can be read using Meltdown). By exploiting the branch prediction and hyperthreading it is possible to infer secrets from other processes as well.
Chromium is open source. It's a pretty good browser, basically Chrome without any Google services.
Googleâ"a known participant in international mass surveillance (per Edward Snowden's leaks)
That's now how you spell "victim".
Seriously, this nonsense about Google being part of some NSA programme needs to stop. There is no evidence, in fact the evidence we have from Snowden shows that the NSA had actually intercepted data from Google from outside their network. And in the wake of that Google has done more than anyone to encrypt communications by default.
When the Snowden leaks happened we had hardly any crypto between mail servers, for example. HTTPS for reserved for secure sites. Now both are common, because Google pushed them hard.
What about iOS? That is a games platform that is pretty popular now.
Don't get me wrong, I still think they will fail miserably, but from the perspective of making MacOS more like iOS and locking in developers it kinda makes sense. They probably dislike the idea that you can write OpenGL games/apps and have them run on both iOS and Android and Windows and console.
You are just playing top trumps, selecting one specific metric that "proves" your choice of CPU is better.
AMD give you more cores for the money. You get advanced features like encrypted RAM. More PCIe lanes. ECC memory support even on the base models.
Unless single core performance being 10% better is all that matters, you don't care at all about any other features or cost or lifespan of the mobo, then Intel is better. Otherwise Ryzen/Threadripper wins.
Quit being a zealot. Use the right tool for the job at hand.
No, the battery is covered by a standard 8 year warranty but the rest of the car only has 4. A lot of people have been buying extended warranties because the cost of repairs is astronomical.
I interviewed with Snap-On who make car diagnostic equipment once. They have to reverse engineer everything, they don't get any help from the manufacturers.
Unlike S and X, this car was clearly designed with keeping maintenance labour costs down as a high priority.
Considering how many S and X motor units they have replaced, the fact that they made the 3 one easy to replace doesn't inspire confidence. How old are the oldest 3s out there now? Maybe they are just being careful, if they had to do mass warranty replacements it would destroy them if it was as much work as the S/X.
It's worse than that. Tesla's official policy is that uncertified cars can't use service centres and don't get over-the-air updates, as well as no supercharging. Re-certification is north of $10,000.
In fact they recently got told by the NTSB that they have to do recalls for salvaged vehicles. Previously they didn't even give salvaged cars safety recalls.
At this point it looks like Intel needs a major re-design of its CPUs to mitigate all the Spectre variants and associated issues. Since they are not doing that (cheaper to spread FUD about the competition and downplay the problems, not enough people suing them) the best thing you can do now is buy AMD.
Giving developing nations more leeway is a centrist policy. Rather than demand everyone stops emitting CO2 a more realistic plan is to get developing nations on board with targets and low carbon tech.
China is demonstrating that it's possible. Exceeding its ambitious targets, passed peak coal years ago...
Seriously, this "has been linked" nonsense has to end.
This is called a "summary". It's a short description of the more detailed findings. If you want to know the exact nature of the link, you should read the reports.
Do you have any idea how many times Nigel Farage has been on Question Time? It's more than his fair share.
Actually your comment reminds me of an audience member on QT, who was complaining that the BBC only shows dumb people supporting leave and it makes them all look like delusional idiots. Once he heard himself say it out loud even he couldn't help laughing.
Some people regard not fully supporting Brexit and whatever half baked, competent mess the government is doing this week as literal treason for which people should be prosecuted.
Given that, merely reporting factual information or offering a balanced view on Brexit equates to far leftist bias from the BBC.
The funny thing is that there is actually a lot of criticism of the BBC from the left, particularly certain interviewers who don't really hold government ministers to account, e.g. John Humphries.
Many of the ads were not identified properly as ads, and didn't give an indication who paid for them.
They used deceptive competitions that users had no chance of winning (5 trillion to 1 odds) but which harvested their personal data. As you should know by now AggregateIQ is the same people as Cambridge Analytica.
The various Leave campaign groups colluded and over-spent, which is illegal and some of the key people have been referred to the police by the Electoral Omission.
Social media ads are not well regulated. For example, if the same ads had been shown on TV or on billboards they would likely have been blocked on the grounds that they were deceptive or outright lies. In the UK advertising must be truthful and not misleading, and there are additional requirements for political ads.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe it's the skin your phone has, but I've never had this problem on a Google Pixel XL. When apps go full screen it's always either tap anywhere or swipe down from the top as if you were opening the notification shade.
Then again I don't play a lot of games, maybe they are worse for full screen stuff.
Indeed, the UK is one of the worst in the world for family visas.
Several years ago the government made a most unwise promise to reduce immigration to the "tens of thousands" (net). At the moment it's about +230,000 net which is actually down quite a bit from a peak of around +330,000 due to Brexit.
There are about 85,000 family reunions a year. The rest is skilled workers, foreign students who keep the university system going and fees for British students down, and EU workers exercising their freedom of movement rights.
The government could have stopped about 60% of immigration any time it liked (40% is EU freedom of movement), but obviously didn't because it would be economic suicide. So the squeeze is being put on families, particularly British people with foreign spouses and children. They don't have commercial interests backing them, and they don't have money to pay the ever increasing fees or fight decisions in court.
This will probably only get worse after Brexit, as the demand for falling immigration increases. Some Brexiteers like Rees-Mogg promised that it would get easier, but they were lying. The worst part is that most people don't realize. Literally every single person, 100% no exceptions, that I told I was getting married followed up with something like "oh, and then she is coming here?" Most people assume that if you are married and a British citizen you have a right to unite your family here, but in reality it's extremely difficult and the Home Office will resist in every way possible.
When people talk about having a guest worker system that doesn't allow families to come they are being delusional. No skilled worker who isn't fresh out of university and free from all attachments is going to want to move to another country by themselves and abandon their spouse and children. If you want skilled labour you have to accept the family of skilled labour. Most countries are fine with this, except for the ones in the grip of populism and anti-immigrant scaremongering/scapegoating.
Couldn't get a visa for my wife, so took my skills and tax contributions and left.
A bad immigration policy not only deprives the country of the immigrants it needs, it drives the natives out too.
I get redirected when I try to read bbc.com but I can check the international version of .co.uk. Seems to me you are being selective.
Top story: High turnout in first post-Mugabe poll (photo of mixed line of voters)
India strips four million of citizenship (photo of woman)
Germany gripped by #MeToo racism debate* (photo of man)
Trapped hiker descend quake volcano
Deadly California wildfire growing
Foreign cyclists killed in Tajik 'attack'
Video sidebar:
Georgia's rave revolution (photo of mixed ravers)
Evidence of torture in Russian prison (photo of two men)
Nailing it: Art right on your fingertips (photo of female hand)
A Nicaraguan spring? (photo of male doll)
Ahed Tamimi release from prison (photo of her)
Weaving a livelihood in Kenya (photo of woman)
* This is a story about racism, not sexism.
Seems like coverage a wide range of news with photos appropriate to the story. And this is a year where the BBC is supposed to be making a conscious effort to cover more women's stories. Seems like they got the balance about right.
Don't see any man hating in there, but if it exists provide a link and I'll happily report this misuse of my licence fee and demand an explanation.
FaceID is classic Apple bullshit. They wanted to get rid of the home button, which is fine. Android moved to soft buttons years ago, they work great. But where to put the fingerprint reader?
Through glass fingerprint readers weren't working very well at the time. Many Android phones already started putting the reader on the back, so can't do that because it wouldn't be special and unique to Apple. So they invented FaceID. Throw an expensive camera system at the problem, and it's still slower than a high end fingerprint reader.
By the way, it only requires eyes open if you have the "require attention" box ticked.
I'd definitely sign a safety wavier if they could just put me in a coma for 12 hours while we fly and wake me up at the other end.
It's not just memory access that is an issue for Intel, although that is the most severe one and not as easy as you make out to solve (memory from other processes and the kernel can be read using Meltdown). By exploiting the branch prediction and hyperthreading it is possible to infer secrets from other processes as well.
Chromium is open source. It's a pretty good browser, basically Chrome without any Google services.
Googleâ"a known participant in international mass surveillance (per Edward Snowden's leaks)
That's now how you spell "victim".
Seriously, this nonsense about Google being part of some NSA programme needs to stop. There is no evidence, in fact the evidence we have from Snowden shows that the NSA had actually intercepted data from Google from outside their network. And in the wake of that Google has done more than anyone to encrypt communications by default.
When the Snowden leaks happened we had hardly any crypto between mail servers, for example. HTTPS for reserved for secure sites. Now both are common, because Google pushed them hard.
What about iOS? That is a games platform that is pretty popular now.
Don't get me wrong, I still think they will fail miserably, but from the perspective of making MacOS more like iOS and locking in developers it kinda makes sense. They probably dislike the idea that you can write OpenGL games/apps and have them run on both iOS and Android and Windows and console.
CHAdeMO to Tesla adapter provides 50kW DC. Do they get disabled too on non-certified cars?
You are just playing top trumps, selecting one specific metric that "proves" your choice of CPU is better.
AMD give you more cores for the money. You get advanced features like encrypted RAM. More PCIe lanes. ECC memory support even on the base models.
Unless single core performance being 10% better is all that matters, you don't care at all about any other features or cost or lifespan of the mobo, then Intel is better. Otherwise Ryzen/Threadripper wins.
Quit being a zealot. Use the right tool for the job at hand.
I don't buy it. If the Tesla chargers are at risk then the 50/100/175kW third party changers are going to be too.
The charging system already has plenty of safety tech built in to it. Tesla are just being dicks.
No, the battery is covered by a standard 8 year warranty but the rest of the car only has 4. A lot of people have been buying extended warranties because the cost of repairs is astronomical.
I interviewed with Snap-On who make car diagnostic equipment once. They have to reverse engineer everything, they don't get any help from the manufacturers.
Unlike S and X, this car was clearly designed with keeping maintenance labour costs down as a high priority.
Considering how many S and X motor units they have replaced, the fact that they made the 3 one easy to replace doesn't inspire confidence. How old are the oldest 3s out there now? Maybe they are just being careful, if they had to do mass warranty replacements it would destroy them if it was as much work as the S/X.
It's worse than that. Tesla's official policy is that uncertified cars can't use service centres and don't get over-the-air updates, as well as no supercharging. Re-certification is north of $10,000.
In fact they recently got told by the NTSB that they have to do recalls for salvaged vehicles. Previously they didn't even give salvaged cars safety recalls.
At this point it looks like Intel needs a major re-design of its CPUs to mitigate all the Spectre variants and associated issues. Since they are not doing that (cheaper to spread FUD about the competition and downplay the problems, not enough people suing them) the best thing you can do now is buy AMD.
AMD CPUs are better for many reasons anyway.
Would have been okay if it had actually been Trump. It's the fact that Russia was campaigning on his behalf that is the problem.
Giving developing nations more leeway is a centrist policy. Rather than demand everyone stops emitting CO2 a more realistic plan is to get developing nations on board with targets and low carbon tech.
China is demonstrating that it's possible. Exceeding its ambitious targets, passed peak coal years ago...
We can't afford nuclear power, it's too expensive. We need cheap, clean energy and that means wind, hydro, solar, pumped storage, battery.
Seriously, this "has been linked" nonsense has to end.
This is called a "summary". It's a short description of the more detailed findings. If you want to know the exact nature of the link, you should read the reports.
Do you have any idea how many times Nigel Farage has been on Question Time? It's more than his fair share.
Actually your comment reminds me of an audience member on QT, who was complaining that the BBC only shows dumb people supporting leave and it makes them all look like delusional idiots. Once he heard himself say it out loud even he couldn't help laughing.
Some people regard not fully supporting Brexit and whatever half baked, competent mess the government is doing this week as literal treason for which people should be prosecuted.
Given that, merely reporting factual information or offering a balanced view on Brexit equates to far leftist bias from the BBC.
The funny thing is that there is actually a lot of criticism of the BBC from the left, particularly certain interviewers who don't really hold government ministers to account, e.g. John Humphries.
Numerous problems.
Many of the ads were not identified properly as ads, and didn't give an indication who paid for them.
They used deceptive competitions that users had no chance of winning (5 trillion to 1 odds) but which harvested their personal data. As you should know by now AggregateIQ is the same people as Cambridge Analytica.
The various Leave campaign groups colluded and over-spent, which is illegal and some of the key people have been referred to the police by the Electoral Omission.
Social media ads are not well regulated. For example, if the same ads had been shown on TV or on billboards they would likely have been blocked on the grounds that they were deceptive or outright lies. In the UK advertising must be truthful and not misleading, and there are additional requirements for political ads.
I wonder what the penalty is for defaulting.