I guess this would make up for all the people having to by PCs with Windows preinstalled and formatting over with a free OS.
Re:I want to help the beatles
on
Beatles vs Apple
·
· Score: 2, Informative
I'm not exactly sure, but I believe you have it backwards, protiens are easier to digest then carbs. Animals that can break down carbs and complex-carbs are most likely more evolved digestivly... That's how the evolutionary trend looks anyway.
It's a technical problem with XFree86, and X.org(as of right now), however it is not a technical problem with X, those are implementation problems, X(the protocol) does not define how to configure hardware, and as for fonts; server side(the application) fonts(which permit antialiasing, but take up more bandwidth) are better then the old method(client side; fonts in the X server), which was un-natural and was only that way because at the time of the creation of the protocol networks did not have much bandwidth.
Re:Hope that compatability is retained
on
The Power of X
·
· Score: 1
That's not a problem, X can not not be network transparent, X communicates via networking protocol, and if they changed the protocol it would still be networkable, and the other clients would just have to adapt slightly.
Rendezvous is very weird for English speakers, but makes a lot of sense. (ron day voo), consonants are generally silent in French unless proceeding a vowel, even the n in the word is very quiet.
Unlikely, one of the things about Linux that is most attractive to IBM is that they don't have to maintain an OS to sell on their systems, they would change distros before making their own.
I like Einstein and all, but the truth is, his ideas lead to the creation of the atom bomb, which has killed far more people then the ideas of Carmack will ever...
Laws do *not* define ethics, they only represent justice, and it is not copyright theft, there is no such thing, it is *copyright infringment* which is *very* different.
I think it has to do with the US Department of Transportation, there are regulations about having batteries in devices while transporting them, that's why if a device comes with batteries they don't come in the device, or have a piece of paper/plastic keeping them away from the terminal.
Why we have this law I have no clue.
I assume most company use it as an excuse for not including batteries, but my guess is they are cheap and want to maximize profit.
Simple, prior to copyright laws, everything was public domain, the only way to have an idea what was your's and your's alone was to not tell anyone about it. The US invented copyrights to convince possible inventors/writers/artists to share their works with the rest of the people, and that the US if someone was to take their works as their own would protect it. Some of the people of the time (being that copyrights at the time did not exist) felt that an idea is a naturally free concept, so restrained the copyright/patent to being a *limited* monopoly.
You forget, you still need a libc to run applications on Linux. GNU libc does this, is used for this, and most likely AOL software and stuff will have to link to it, so it is STILL a GNU/Linux machine. =)
Slashdot Mirror
I guess this would make up for all the people having to by PCs with Windows preinstalled and formatting over with a free OS.
I'm not exactly sure, but I believe you have it backwards, protiens are easier to digest then carbs. Animals that can break down carbs and complex-carbs are most likely more evolved digestivly... That's how the evolutionary trend looks anyway.
If a broken implementation of ps/2 keyboard and touch pad is what makes HP laptops a winner, then all of HP's recent laptops are awsome:
l e/ 2004-June/004073.html
4 /2 004-June/001642.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobi
http://www.plausible.org/r3000z/
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd6
This message brought to you by my desktop, because my laptop fails to boot any respectable OS.
It's a technical problem with XFree86, and X.org(as of right now), however it is not a technical problem with X, those are implementation problems, X(the protocol) does not define how to configure hardware, and as for fonts; server side(the application) fonts(which permit antialiasing, but take up more bandwidth) are better then the old method(client side; fonts in the X server), which was un-natural and was only that way because at the time of the creation of the protocol networks did not have much bandwidth.
That's not a problem, X can not not be network transparent, X communicates via networking protocol, and if they changed the protocol it would still be networkable, and the other clients would just have to adapt slightly.
Rendezvous is very weird for English speakers, but makes a lot of sense. (ron day voo), consonants are generally silent in French unless proceeding a vowel, even the n in the word is very quiet.
Unlikely, one of the things about Linux that is most attractive to IBM is that they don't have to maintain an OS to sell on their systems, they would change distros before making their own.
Great, IBM's next commercial.
Or buy a SCO linux license...
I like Einstein and all, but the truth is, his ideas lead to the creation of the atom bomb, which has killed far more people then the ideas of Carmack will ever...
Just putting it into perspective.
That loser fucked Paris Hilton?
Hmmm... Maybe I should sue Linux...
Apple paid Xerox PARC for use of the GUI idea with Apple stock.
Laws do *not* define ethics, they only represent justice, and it is not copyright theft, there is no such thing, it is *copyright infringment* which is *very* different.
The Xbox is too large for the smallest bedroom.
(Not a troll, just a joke)
I think it has to do with the US Department of Transportation, there are regulations about having batteries in devices while transporting them, that's why if a device comes with batteries they don't come in the device, or have a piece of paper/plastic keeping them away from the terminal.
Why we have this law I have no clue.
I assume most company use it as an excuse for not including batteries, but my guess is they are cheap and want to maximize profit.
They actually started with software then went on to OS development.
What's wrong with not wanting to hurt animals, not everyone's ego requires the killing of inocent animals.
That's not true, these are extensions, you can disable an extension if you want.
SCO does own libc, the original implementation of it anyways, they however do not own glibc, the GNU implementation of the library.
Simple, prior to copyright laws, everything was public domain, the only way to have an idea what was your's and your's alone was to not tell anyone about it. The US invented copyrights to convince possible inventors/writers/artists to share their works with the rest of the people, and that the US if someone was to take their works as their own would protect it. Some of the people of the time (being that copyrights at the time did not exist) felt that an idea is a naturally free concept, so restrained the copyright/patent to being a *limited* monopoly.
Hmm, I wonder what this will do to dialup users. TCP/IP over PPP over VOIP.
I don't know if Google is God, but I do know that I accepted him as my personal savior.
You forget, you still need a libc to run applications on Linux. GNU libc does this, is used for this, and most likely AOL software and stuff will have to link to it, so it is STILL a GNU/Linux machine. =)