Slashdot Mirror


Transparent Aluminum Is Here

Alien54 writes "Scientists in the US have developed a novel technique to make bulk quantities of glass from alumina for the first time. (link includes a picture of samples) Anatoly Rosenflanz and colleagues at 3M in Minnesota used a "flame-spray" technique to alloy alumina (aluminium oxide) with rare-earth metal oxides to produce strong glass with good optical properties. The method avoids many of the problems encountered in conventional glass forming and could, say the team, be extended to other oxides (see also: A Rosenflanz et al. 2004 Nature 430 761). Scotty would be pleased."

625 comments

  1. Scotty would be pleased. by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes. It seems that he didn't pollute the time-line after all.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by zackeller · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course he did. It just took 28 years for them to figure out the formula.

    2. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you kidding? Where do you think these bozos got the idea from in the first place?

      I'll lay odds a burly guy with a dodgy scottish brogue was around their head office trying to use a mouse as a dictaphone not too long ago....

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    3. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Picass0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Double Dumb-ass on you!

    4. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by essreenim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Computer. Hello computer.
      Oh, a keyboard, how quaint.

      !

    5. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by fitten · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you sure this isn't a time for a colorful metaphor?

    6. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Excuse me! Can you direct me to d'he nearest nuclear wessel in Alameda?

      (The amusing part about that statement is that the Russian language has no 'W' sound!)

    7. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just goes to show how many ideas mentioned in StarTrek actually come about. I guess we still have to work on that warp drive, dilithium crystal regeneration and photon torpedoes...and replicators. "Earl Gray. Hot."

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    8. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by screwballicus · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was his doing. You just won't hear about it. And he didn't have trouble with the keyboard, either. It was a misinterpretation: he was later understood to have remarked,

      "A Windows Key. How quaint!"

    9. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      he was later understood to have remarked,

      "A Windows Key. How quaint!"


      A Windows Key? On a Mac?!?

    10. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by jettoblack · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suggest you say "Tea." before "Earl Gray. Hot," otherwise you might end up with a flaming Duke. ;-)

    11. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "A Windows Key. How quaint!" How strange, since he was using a Mac.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    12. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by pomakis · · Score: 5, Funny
      It just took 28 years for them to figure out the formula.

      You mean 18! (or are you posting to Slashdot... from the future! (*GASP!*))

    13. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      N'yet, N'yet, but it vill, I tell you, it VEEL!

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    14. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by screwballicus · · Score: 1

      You'll also notice that, with reference to this little joke,

      1) Scotty did not in fact just recently invent transparent aluminum.
      2) Nor did Scotty invent transparent aluminum in The Voyage Home.
      3) We are not presently living in the 1980s.
      4) Scotty is a fictional character.
      5) If we are indeed currently living in the 1980s, the Windows Key does not exist, nor does Windows 9X.

      and

      6) Jokes are often based on fictional assertions.

    15. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, last time i heard moscow prononounced in russian it sounded like moskwa.

    16. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "Vulcan in a cat suit. Hot."

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    17. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by sharkey · · Score: 1
      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    18. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scotty would be pleased."

      And the SuperFriends will be pretty darn happy too. I always wondered how Wonder Woman's transparant plane was built...

      Now for a SuperFriends movie, in the spirit of all the cartoon-to-movies trend. Who should play Wonder Woman? Janet Jackson, with her invisible bra powers? (Actually I think she'd make a pretty convincing Wonder Woman).

    19. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a 'V', not a 'W'. Moscow is really "Moskvá'. "Moscow" is sort of an incorrect transliteration we use. The reason for the name is that Moscow is next to the "Moskva" river. Wikipedia has more info.

    20. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to whoever modded this guy troll, it's a quote from Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (where all these Scotty/Transparent Aluminum jokes are coming from), so it's perfectly relevant, and not trolling, so give the guy a break. And no, I'm not the abovementioned poster before you ask.

    21. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by zackeller · · Score: 1

      They can figure out transparent aluminum, I forget to preview.

    22. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Ixitar · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The problem with that statement, is that he was using a Mac.

    23. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...and if you do say it in english please say moscow "moss co." as opposed to "moss cow"... for me that and the pronounciation of "route" and "leisure" are the most irritating americanisms ("route" is said root as opposed to ra-oot (unless an army is routed... but thats a different word) and "leisure" is leh zhure as opposed to lee zhure... i dont mind american accents but i just want to slap anyone saying any of those 3 words *that* way...

      i guess this is flamebait but... what can i do, im russian and ive lived in london for the last 13 years... shit bothers me

    24. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by em0te · · Score: 1

      Can't wait till they combine this with other oxides (like maybe those found in the translucent metal in another slashdot story?)

    25. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot:

      7) Jokes usually need a grain of truth or a plausible premise in order to be funny.

      e.g. "3 girls jumped off a building. Which one hits last? The one who stopped to ask for directions!"

      That's not funny because it's a ridiculous situation with no roots in reality. On the other hand,

      "A Blonde, a Brunette, and a Red Head all jump off a building. Which one hits last? The Blond! She had to stop and ask for directions!"

      That is funny because the premise for the joke is a commonly held belief that blonds are dumb. Of course, such suppositions are often flawed and allow for an equally amusing joke that makes the exact counter point:

      "So a Blond walks into a bank and asks for a two week loan of $10,000. Dubious of the Blond's motives, the bank manager asks for collateral. The Blond replies that she could always put her Mercedes up as collateral, since it was worth far more than her loan. The bank manager agrees, and drives her car into the bank garage after loaning her the money.

      "In two weeks the Blonde returns with the $10,000, plus the $5.00 interest on the loan. As the manager returns the keys to her car, he asks, 'I did some checking while you were away. It seems you're loaded with money! Why did you need a loan for two weeks?' To which the Blonde replies, 'Where else in New York can I park my car for two weeks and only pay $5.00!'"

    26. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by JargonScott · · Score: 1

      Then I guess this article on transparent ah-loo-men-ium is right up your alley? :)

      --
      Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
    27. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Now, the real question is, will clevernickname contact scotty and let him know that he is famous?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    28. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by MouseR · · Score: 1

      All it took to figure out the matrix was 18 years for that Mac 512 they used to model the molecular structure of the transparent alumni.

      I think that's pretty good for that ol' beige box. Imagine what a G5 could do. Hypersace travel any time soon now.

    29. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm thinking that it's the fact you live in Britain. My wife is also Russian, and she has no issue with using the bovine pronunciation. Guess the world really does need more cow bell! ;-)

      BTW:

      "Envelope" with a short 'e' vs. "envelope" ("On ve lope")

      "Coupon" like a "cucumber" vs. "coupon" (Coo-pon)

      "Pronounce" vs. "Pronunciate" (which isn't even a word!) :-D

    30. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't believe that no one bit on the opening! The obvious response is, "I think they're in Alameda"!

    31. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by eyepeepackets · · Score: 1

      Fooking Microsoft gets in everything -- worse than sand!

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    32. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you are sending this from the future please send me the specs on how to send messages back in time. I have some interesting algorhitms I want to test.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    33. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until we have a chance to use decontamination gel on a hot sexy Vulcan.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    34. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Give me the holodeck, some real food, and seal me in there for eternity and I will be happy living the Cmdr Barcly (Broccoli) lifestyle....except instead of stupid fights between me and shortened versions of Riker, I will just be having mad sex with playmates, driving lamborghinis, and being rich and famous :0

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    35. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      > (The amusing part about that statement is that the Russian language has no 'W' sound!)

      That's actually why they'd say wessel - they don't distinguish the two sounds, and their "v" sound is between our w and v.

    36. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Funny

      replicators. "Earl Gray. Hot."

      You would think with all that technology, and thousands of terrabytes of hard drive space that the retarded ass computer would remember Picards drink. He always gets his Earl Gray hot!. If I was him I would say "Give me my damn tea you stupid excuse for a computer. Hell even Windows remembers my preferences!" :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    37. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Send message back in time. (PowerBall numbers might prove interesting)
      2. Receive message last week
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

    38. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Slap?
      You sure you aren't french?

      Route depends on the area; I grew up saying "root" in Illinois, but on the other hand, I'll spell or pronounce things however I want, and if you don't like it, don't read or listen to it.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    39. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's actually why they'd say wessel - they don't distinguish the two sounds, and their "v" sound is between our w and v.

      Ah, no. Their 'V' is just like our 'V', but generally pronounced harshly. 'W' is a very different sound that they lack. They would have said "nuclear vessel", but pronounced "where" as "vhere". The problem during the cold war is that the public heard very little Russian spoken. Thus it somehow entered into common usage that the V's and W's get switched with a Russian accent. This simply isn't the case.

      A more likely reason for the confusion is that Russian has several sounds which English does not. (For example, they have a 'zsa' sound as in the name Zsa Zsa Gabor. They transliterate all J's into zsa's.) Since these sounds often serve as replacements for english sounds, many people have difficulty in distinguishing exactly what sounds were used. Thus silliness like W's instead of V's entered as a common idea of a Russian accent. No real Russian sounds like Mr. Chekov (who's name we absolutely murder in pronunciation).

    40. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by torstenvl · · Score: 1

      It's [an.v/\.lop]. This is because it comes from French, where it's pronounced [~E] which is closer phonetically to [an] than to [En] -- [~E] and [a] are both made toward the rear of the oral cavity whereas [E] is a front vowel.

      The "c" in "coupon" is a [k] -- an unvoiced VELAR stop. There's no reason to palatize it (ask your Russian wife about soft vowels and palatization of consonants). So lacking a high front vowel after it, there's no reason it should be anything but [ku.pan]

      I somehow suspect I'll be modded Off-Topic. I don't see why interesting scientific discussions should be modded down just because nobody happens to submit linguistics pieces to Slashdot. *sigh* Phonetics is very relevant to the computer industry (speech synthesis/processing...) !

    41. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the name of The Great Bird, go thou and buy this month's Maxim magazine (US version). Thy wishes are fulfilled. Jolene wants us to take a peek.

    42. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Don't you wish we could use Unicode characters on Slashdot? Then I could actually spell out Cyrillic characters, and you could use proper accenting to make your point.

    43. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you are sending this from the future please send me the specs on how to send messages back in time. I have some interesting algorhitms I want to test.

      Yes, I too have some questions regarding probability theory that I wish to test.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    44. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I too would like to know some questions from my future probabilities test...

    45. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Jorkapp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, a keyboard, how quaint.
      We solved this problem with voice recognition software some years ago. The trouble is, we can't tell if the person is addressing the computer, or is simply talking about a computer. For example:

      "Computer run a level 3 diagnostic on the transporter assembly" ...would trigger the computer to run a level 3 diagnostic on the transporter assembly.

      or

      "Damn machines, I did not tell my computer to self destruct." ...would trigger the computer to initiate the self-destruct mechanism. Kaboom.

      Hopefully this problem will be fixed before Zefram Cochrane takes off in a few years.

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    46. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is indeed posting from the future, /. will change, since I figure that this discussion will most likely be archived in ten years, and thus closed for posting. Then again, who knows, maybe they'll extend the "mysterious future" and not only allow people to view articles that are going to be published in the future, but also to post from the future.



      AC .
    47. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a tribute to Scotty, everyone shoule now pick up their mouse and talk into it.

      "Beam me up, Scotty, there isn't any intelligent life down here."

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    48. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tests??? To heck with that. I have some prices on stocks I wish to check.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    49. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was young, I was taught "Leeshur" and "root." Another thing I was taught was to "look it up" when unsure.

      "lehshur" and "leeshur" are both correct
      http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Diction ary&va=leisure
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=leisure

      "rout" and "root" are also both correct
      http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Diction ary&va=route&x=23&y=14
      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=route

      For the record, no one I've met has pronounced it "ra-oot" (two syllables). It's more like "rowt" ("ow" as in "how").

      I don't think I've ever heard "pronunciate" but I've certainly heard "enunciate", which IS a word and means exactly what I presume "pronunciate" would be intended to mean. Are you sure you heard it correctly?

      I know about the "Mosco" - "Moscow" thing, but admit to getting is wrong every one in a while, regardless. You can't take the american out of the boy, I guess...

      Language changes over time. What was once wrong is right (and vice versa). And there ain't nothing we can do about it. ;-)

    50. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Odat · · Score: 1

      Transparent alumni? Which school was that? I have many devious plans in which being transparent would play a key part.

      --
      This signature would be seven words long if it were six words shorter.
    51. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't that be

      1. Recieve message from future self.
      2. ???
      3. Profit!
      4. Send message to past self.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    52. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      know about the "Mosco" - "Moscow" thing,

      You think that one's hard, try the capital of Burkina Faso. Ouagadougou.

      I thought it was pronounced Ow-ah-gah-dow-gow, but someone from the country said it was Wah-guh-Doo-Goo.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    53. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by essreenim · · Score: 2

      Damn machines, I did not tell my computer to self destruct." ...would trigger the computer to initiate the self-destruct mechanism
      You're foregetting the password protection
      Piccard : "Computer initiate self-destruct sequence Piccard delta-phi-omicron-beta" Then Rikard would verify using his code, then I would say. "haha losers I recored that, then I would take out my voice sysntheiser. Synthesizing Piccards voiuce I would say. Computer override self-destruct-sequence, transfer all command protocols over to Ensign *blep* using their (now recorded) passwords. Once the ship is pwned I would change my password, then take the propulsion, long-range sensors and weapons systems off line using my new priveledges. All kinds of other devious sabotage would be carried out. Then I would escape in a shuttle.

    54. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, here's one stock tip from the future for you. SCOX 0.0000 from about 3 days after IBM kicks their ass.

    55. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, living in a complete fantasy world would indeed be Better Than Life!

    56. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by gphinch · · Score: 1

      Sorry but i disagree, theres no way I'm going to start calling my router a 'Rooter'. Sounds Canadian to me.

      --
      in bed.
    57. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 4, Informative

      A more likely reason for the confusion is that Russian has several sounds which English does not.

      I think you meant English has several sounds not present in Russian, based upon the example given.

      Russian has no consonants to depict the sounds presented by the English letters "j", "qu", "x" and "w". English does in fact have the "zh" sounds. It's just not represented by a single letter. Pronounce "vision".

      Russian can approximate all three of these letter using their own alphabet.
      x = ks (ax = aks)
      j = dzh (jeans = dzheens)
      qu = koo + vowel (queer = kooeer)
      w = oo + vowel (whale = ooayl)

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    58. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by dfn_deux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of a Cisco Cert class I was in once upon a time. The instructor was telling us about how when he was teaching the CCIE course in Britain that one of his students kept correcting his pronounciation of the word route (rah - out) saying that the proper pronounciation was route (root). My instructor finally lost his patience and replied "WE [Americans] invented the damn thing and we will call it whatever the hell we want."
      Cracks me up everytime I think about it.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    59. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I think you meant English has several sounds not present in Russian, based upon the example given.

      I suppose you're right about this. Although the sounds we're discussing are actually stolen from other languages, thus the lack of proper glyphs. (I still think "rendezvous" is seriously screwed up.)

      Russian has no consonants to depict the sounds presented by the English letters "j", "qu", "x" and "w".

      You're correct about everything except the 'X'. My wife's name is Ksenia (often incorrectly transliterated into Xenia), and the first two letters are indeed pronounced with a "ks" sound. The only difference is that they spell out the 'k' and 's'. (Looks something like 'KCEHHR', but the second H has a slanted midsection, and the R is backwards. Literally sounds out as 'K S Ye N Ee Ya'. Man do I wish Slashdot had Unicode support.)

    60. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by tenton · · Score: 1

      No, actually I'm with the parent; I have some...ummm...tests on probability theory I'd like to try out, involving lotteries and sporting events, or something like that.

    61. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what would happen if they asked for a present-day drink?

      "Computer, buttery nipple, please." or
      "Computer, sex on the beach." (And make it a double!)

      Then again, those requests may be better served on the holodeck...

    62. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Izmunuti · · Score: 3, Funny

      bah, Picard wasn't a gadget guy. He couldn't be bothered to fiddle with the presets to his replicator. If you look close, it has a blinking "12:00" on one of the displays.

    63. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think the self-destruct authentication would allow you access to command and control?

    64. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just goes to show how many ideas mentioned in StarTrek actually come about.

      No kidding, what's next, a flip-open portable communications device? A portable tablet device?

    65. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Of course, Scotty then demonstrated remarkable typing ability despite having little exposure to such a backwards device.

    66. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got a problem with my Pro nun ski ation?

    67. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If neither Mosco or Moscow is the correct Russian word, does it really matter what we Americans call it?

    68. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So all these so called Russian accents are really just Pottsylvanian ones?

    69. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by jasontwarnock · · Score: 1

      Rendezvous is very weird for English speakers, but makes a lot of sense. (ron day voo), consonants are generally silent in French unless proceeding a vowel, even the n in the word is very quiet.

      --
      :wq
    70. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by pclminion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ah, no. Their 'V' is just like our 'V', but generally pronounced harshly. 'W' is a very different sound that they lack. They would have said "nuclear vessel", but pronounced "where" as "vhere".

      Well, it really depends how long the Russian has been speaking English. I know many Russian immigrants to the US, and they invariably confuse the 'v' and 'w' sounds, and what's more, it seems like the ones who speak English better are more likely to get them confused!

      It is true that in Russian there is no 'w' sound, but a Russian speaking English does have the tendency to transpose the two sounds. Why this is, I'm not exactly sure, but as I said, there seems to be a correlation with how long they've been speaking English.

      Thus silliness like W's instead of V's entered as a common idea of a Russian accent.

      It's a common idea because it's correct. You must listen to different Russians than I do, because they confuse 'v' in 'w', in both directions, all the time. My girlfriend, whose accent is so slight as to be barely noticeable, often substitutes 'w' for 'v', and 'v' for 'w' as well. Interestingly, she only confuses the sounds for words that she isn't familiar with. For example, she would never pronounce "very" as "wery," since it is such a common word, but she might pronounce "voluptuous" as "woluptuous" since she doesn't use that word very often. The confusion goes both ways: once she asked me if I would like to go "vale vatching" this weekend. How do you defend against cuteness like that?

      I agree that the Russians have no 'w' sound but for some reason they do sometimes pronounce English 'v' as 'w'. I've heard it a thousand times, at least.

      No real Russian sounds like Mr. Chekov

      According to several Russians, his accent, although fake, is much better than some of the crap that is passed off as "Russian" in modern movies. According to the Russians I know, the Russian speech in The Hunt For Red October was particularly atrocious to the point of not being comprehensible.

    71. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ron day voo", you say?

      Christ. It's not even close! That's just the idea americans have how it's pronounced, it doesn't actually mean it's correct. "Ren" is closer to "Ran" than to "Ron", just for starters, with a throaty "r" instead of a tongue one; "Day" is also WAY off target, there's no way "dez" can have an "ay" sound to it; "Voo" is also mildly inaccurate, but close enough sounding to be acceptable.

    72. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm happy for the French, I really am. But you know what? I'm not French, nor do I speak it. Therefore, "rendezvous" is seriously screwed up in the English language.

      The core of the problem is that French nearly supplanted the entire Anglo-Saxon language at some point. Thus they tried to get us to adopt their idiosyncrasies rather than taking five minutes to rewrite "rendezvous" as "rondevoo". Or even better, break the word down into Latin roots and rebuild it as an English word. But noooo, it's easier to saddle the unsuspecting English with words like "attache" instead of allowing them to simply use "attachment".

    73. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Ooh-Aah-Gah-Doo-Goo.

    74. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must listen to different Russians than I do, because they confuse 'v' in 'w', in both directions, all the time.

      Indeed. My wife has quite a few Russian family members and friends that we often correspond with. I have *never* heard a 'W' misused. OTOH, it may be a different class of Russians we're talking about. My wife is from a Moscow family of scientists (primarily biology). Pretty much all of them speak more than one language fluently, although quite a few have pretty heavy accents when speaking English.

      It's possible that the Russians you know are from some other area of Russia, where their accents differ anyway. Not to mention that they're likely to know less about other languages and therefore more likely to confuse proper sounds.

      The confusion goes both ways: once she asked me if I would like to go "vale vatching" this weekend. How do you defend against cuteness like that?

      Don't you love that? :-) When I was dating my wife, I used to love how she pronounced my name. Since it starts with a 'J', she'd pronounce it with a 'zsa' (you know, draw a vertical line through an X and you've got the glyph). Cutest thing ever. Sadly, her accent is now nonexistent. Seems I taught her English a little too well. :-(

    75. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading people's posts around here is hard enough as it is without adding a bunch of funky looking characters into the mix.

    76. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I meant the sound is not represented as an individual character, to the best of my knowledge.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    77. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmn. A pyramid scheme involving all termporal iterations of me...

      Why, think of the compound interest alone!

    78. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. I stand corrected, then. He must have blurred the two distinct vowel syllables into a diphthong.

      If you say ooh-aah quickly, it sort of sounds like wah.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    79. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      So basically, you'd be living in one of Quark's Holosuites.

      --
      End of Line.
    80. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      my boss says the same thing about our receptionist. "I order the same thing every day for lunch, why can't I just ask for the 'Regular' and get it."

    81. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Alyks · · Score: 0

      Maybe he still did, since "we" just invented it.

    82. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by pHatidic · · Score: 1

      but Scotty doesn't know.

    83. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      As long as its mine, as long as its permenant, and as long as it doesn't fail (that would really screw with my psche after about 20 years when i wouldnt know reality from virtual reality) :)
      My family can make appointments to see me, and they can walk in the door :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    84. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Pigbot · · Score: 1

      You have to understand that America is as large as half of Europe as it is, so things will be pronounced differently in different parts of the US anyway.

      Crappie (a fish) can be "crap-E" or "craw-pee"
      Vehicle = "vee-hickle" or "ve-hi-cle"(softer)

      and thousands of other examples. Its a great big ole country, and each state is like its own little country here. (literally, read the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution) And its more than just North versus South. People in Colorado pronounce stuff different than people in Maryland.

      Compare that to The United Kingdom, where you are. Holy cow, you get radically different accents from Scotland, Ireland and England, and even within different areas of each country. You get different accents from people who live 100km or LESS from each other.

      The main difference, I suppose, is here in America, the fact that UK'ers speak with different accents from us and each other is considered charming, not offensive.

      --
      print "Oink!\n" if ( $tail =~ "pull" );
    85. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From that, I think you might be thinking that when british people say "it's rooter, blast it!" it is a long oo sound, like "boot".

      But it's not: "router" rhymes with "computer" in British English, as would "shooter".

    86. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Tongo · · Score: 1

      I would much rather see Jennifer Love Hewitt play Wonder Woman. I would easily pay 8 bucks to see her in that skimpy outfit.

    87. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Nutria · · Score: 1

      You have to understand that America is as large as half of Europe as it is

      Huh? Did you drop a word or two?

      Specifically, though, it is a thousand crow-flies miles further from Los Angeles to Boston than it is from London to Moscow. (2605 vs. 1559)

      The US is a really, really big country...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    88. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
      The amusing part about that statement is that the Russian language has no 'W' sound!

      You mean contemporary Russian has no "W" sound. Future Russian obviously does.

    89. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably he was concerned about privacy so he orders "anonymously".

    90. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by falzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know this has been said before, but...

      1. Post tales of the future back in time to Slashdot in the form of 'predictions'.
      2. ???
      3. Prophet!

    91. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Well, since the Russian word for "water" is "vada", I'm thinking that they'll just stick with changing those W's to V's and forget that W's even exist. :-)

    92. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      "In two weeks the Blonde returns with the $10,000, plus the $5.00 interest on the loan. As the manager returns the keys to her car, he asks, 'I did some checking while you were away. It seems you're loaded with money! Why did you need a loan for two weeks?' To which the Blonde replies, 'Where else in New York can I park my car for two weeks and only pay $5.00!'"

      Banks generally don't take possession of cars as collateral, unless it's a re-possession because you aren't making payments as agreed. On the other hand, pawn shops DO take possession of the collateral until repayment of the loan.

      And, I remember reading an article long ago about some unconventional uses of pawn shops by people that needed cash in a hurry (a contractor pawned his truck for cash to meet a weekend payroll, until he got paid by a customer the next week).

      But, the unusual one was the guy that pawned his Rolls Royce. The pawn shop operator took possession of the car and put it in secure storage. A week or so later, the owner shows up and pays off the loan and a (relatively small) amount of interest. It turned out that he was away from his usual home and had to go out of the country on short notice. The interest he paid was far less than he would have paid for parking the car in a safe place.

    93. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    94. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      OTOH, it may be a different class of Russians we're talking about.

      The ones I'm familiar with are all Russian Jews, most of whom spent significant time in Israel. Her immediate family was in Uzbekistan when she was born, and according to her her accent is somewhat "country" and very different than the way a person from Moscow would speak.

      They are also highly educated, mostly PhD's in physical sciences. Heavy accents but huge vocabularies.

      Something else interesting to note: sometimes I kid with her about the confusion with 'v' and 'w', and she swears she can't tell the difference between the sounds! I say, "So, you're telling me you can't tell the difference between 'vuh' and 'wuh'" and she looks at me like I'm crazy... "What difference?"

      The 'w' sound is so foreign to Russian speakers that apparently they conflate it with 'v' and interchange them on some subconscious level. I can only guess at what it must be like for her.

    95. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From that, I think you might be thinking that when british people say "it's rooter, blast it!" it is a long oo sound, like "boot".

      But it's not: "router" rhymes with "computer" in British English, as would "shooter".

      Um... boot and shoot have the same OO sound. If computer had it right after the "p", people would be saying com-POO-ter rather than com-PEW-ter, at least people besides just the Yuppers.

    96. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Koenig: When we woke up, we had these bodies.

      Fry: Ohhh! Say it in Russian!

      Koenig: sigh... Ven - ve - voke - up - ve - had - dese - wodies.

      Fry: Now say nuclear vessel!

      Koenig: No.

    97. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Xaria · · Score: 1

      Well, he did say that the keyboard was "quaint". Maybe he had a hobby that we don't know about :)

    98. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Note what it says under "usage".

    99. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well some parts of russia have close proximity to scandenavian countries. In norway at least, the W and V sounds are interchangeable between different dialects. So its possible that due to the way languages tend to flow from region to region some aspects have transfered around.

      I mean two countries with different languages, in border regions they pick up more from the other language than those areas farther away.

    100. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by shift8key · · Score: 1

      This strange thing happened to me back in '86 in San Francisco. I went jogging in a park and suddenly, I saw a helicopter transporting some giant something I could not identify only for it to disappear in a middle of a field and I saw a man walking in the air. I kicked my drug habit that same day for good.

    101. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by severoon · · Score: 1

      Except that you're forgetting that the computer tracks individuals through their individual biorhythms, other life signs, and transponder locations and cross-check that data with the voice data vector coordinates. So a recording would easily be found out by the computer, and it would definitely reject the password.

      Besides, don't Star Trek computers use voice fingerprinting that can tell the difference between recordings anyway? (Maybe not 30th Century recordings, I'll grant you.)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    102. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by severoon · · Score: 1

      This is truly a great leap forward. I've always had trouble deciding when to use aluminum foil and when to use plastic wrap. Now I don't have to decide!

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    103. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      The ones I'm familiar with are all Russian Jews, most of whom spent significant time in Israel. Her immediate family was in Uzbekistan when she was born, and according to her her accent is somewhat "country" and very different than the way a person from Moscow would speak.

      That explains it. (Not the Jew part. My wife is 1/4 Jewish herself.) Moscow residents have a much more business like accent, whereas the country people have a very different sort of drawl. Much like our northern accents to southern accents.

      It's of particular interest that she's not from Russia itself, Some satellite countries actually speak their own variant of Russian that's really not Russian. For example, Ukrainians speak their own language, and Polish is a derivative of the Russian language. (Although Polish is a bit more like Japanese to Chinese.)

    104. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1

      Too late for me. My SCO investment is in the tank.

    105. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      it's ironic that you should mention Data in your sig.. because Data pwned the Enterprise using the method mentioned in the grandparrent

      *runs away screaming, refusing to acknowledge that he is a Star[Trek | Wars | Gate] fan*

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    106. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1

      $5 interest on a $10,000 loan is 1.3% per annum, not likely. At 21% (comparable to a high credit card rate), that "parking fee" would be closer to $81, still not bad for two weeks. A pawn shop will charge much more than a bank.

    107. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by russotto · · Score: 1
      According to the Russians I know, the Russian speech in The Hunt For Red October was particularly atrocious to the point of not being comprehensible.

      Yeah, but people said that about Nikita Khruschev's Russian as well.

      (and of course Ramius spoke English with a Scottish accent)

    108. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? How does a rare usage mean something is not a word?

    109. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's very close.

    110. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      charming? no... most accents are far from charming... some are sickening, others are nearly impossible to understand... i swear theres as much variation in london as there is in the uk or even the world... in university there are endless "debates" over the correct pronounciation of certain words... then again i get that with my best mate and weve been living less than a mile apart for over a decade...

      i guess it is out of order for me to be pissed off with the way people speak... but dont be offended... i actually quite like the american accent... especially on a certain petite brunette, but those 3 words (and aluminium come to think of it) frustrate me no end... a pet peeve i guess

    111. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      i was going to say "bitch slap" but... hey... what can you do... and your latter comment, i agree with you... its my problem, not anyone elses

    112. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      1. obscure Dogma reference
      2. ???
      3. Karma

      Good joke ;)

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    113. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      If 6 words where the limit for replicator commands, I'd prefer 'female' to 'hot'.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    114. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno where you come from, but where I'm from tea is supposed to be served cold. It's the only true way.

    115. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you didn't invent the language...

    116. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by halowolf · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget that the boy wonder Wesley Crusher also did some voice recording work to take over Enterprise systems... in Season 1 Episode 2 - The Naked Now.

    117. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Simple. It means that *this* dictionary has adopted it as a word, even though it wasn't. It does happen on occasion, like with words like "ain't". Here's a page that confirms the "non-wordness" (ha, ha) of the word.

    118. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's only funny until you think about.

      Once he cracks his knuckes and uses the keyboard, he becomes a wiz at an application he acted like he had never seen before, using JUST the keyboard, on a MAC.

      COME on, PUH-leaze ;)

      If I tried using an old punch-card mainframe, I would at least have to spend an hour or two fiddling with the beast or something, ya know?? - Maybe scanning some manuals, looking up some FAQs, etc.

    119. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by mnewton32 · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian, and pronounce route the British way, unless I'm talking about a network router. That I say the American way. Strange...

    120. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      See now, that's what I get for not having the latest and greatest tech, it didn't work :D

      Does anyone else foresee someone in marketing somewhere putting a microphone in USB mice? I mean, why not?

      Oh, shit!, did I just give away a great patent idea?

      damn damn damn

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    121. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      "Gotta remember!" - Bill & Ted

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    122. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by Alyks · · Score: 0

      No, because they gave him the formula so they could have it. And if it took 8 years to figure it out, how did they get it and put the whales in it.

    123. Re:Scotty would be pleased. by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, assuming that all the extra letters in 'rendezvous' were silent in Norman times.

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  2. woohho by obli · · Score: 5, Funny

    The whales will have a safe journey home!

    1. Re:woohho by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I don't get is, why did they need it to be transparent for the journey home?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    2. Re:woohho by jayhawk88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because otherwise all that footage taken at Sea World would have been for nothing!

    3. Re:woohho by dave1791 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you know what happens to people who ask such questions?

    4. Re:woohho by basics · · Score: 5, Informative

      If I remember correctly, they did not need the clear aluminum but they did need something to store the whale in. Since they did not have any money they traded the formula for clear aluminum for the whale tank.

    5. Re:woohho by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      Transparency wasn't the attribute he asked for. The strength to hold all that water was.

    6. Re:woohho by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You make that joke, but I started thinking about my reef tank as soon as I read this article. When you go over 36" tall you have to use 5/8-3/4 inch low iron (so your fish and corals are not green) glass. If this is really that much stronger, larget tanks could be made cheaper, becuase the glass could be thinner. I wonder what the optical and strength properties really are? Anyone have more information on the testing?

    7. Re:woohho by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to build a fish tank that is only a foot or so in diameter but goes from the floor to the ceiling.

      Of course, one that is six feet in diameter and twenty feet tall would be more interesting. But I'd have to put one like that out in the barn.

    8. Re:woohho by ncc74656 · · Score: 0
      I've always wanted to build a fish tank that is only a foot or so in diameter but goes from the floor to the ceiling.

      The problem with that idea is that you'd end up with a mostly empty tank. The safe load limit for the number & size of fishes you can put in an aquarium is determined in part by the surface area of the top of the aquarium (oxygen & carbon dioxide are exchanged between air & water here). With only about 1.5 ft^2 of surface area, your hypothetical 1-foot cylinder would safely hold no more than the average 10-gallon aquarium...probably less.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:woohho by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      How about the fact that the metal needed to hold that kind of water would have been a lot heavier compared to the plexiglass they used?

      Plus it'd really suck to get back to the 24th century and figure out you beamed up a bunch of salt water instead of a couple of whales..

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    10. Re:woohho by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you use an aerator of some sort?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    11. Re:woohho by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Answer: yes. Unassisted gas exchange is only one method of caring for fish and in fact it doesn't support very many fish, as the previous comment suggests. Of course part of the carrying limit issue for a fish tank is simply the number of fish which can coexist. I have three angelfish and a plecostemus in a [traditional rectangular] 20 gallon tank and they use pretty much all the available space.

      If you have a pump that cascades into your water source, you get more aeration. If you use air pumps, you get more aeration. Bubbling air through the water is an effective method of increasing the effective surface area for gas exchange.

      However, I heartily suggest a 2' diameter tube, because 1' is pretty dinky and a stream of air bubbles in such a tube will probably cause your fish no end of consternation :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:woohho by big_groo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're partially correct. They needed something *light* and *strong* to compensate for the mass of the whales and water. Transparent aluminum was the only material that would satisfy those requirements. I think they said that to use steel or glass, the tank walls would have been far too thick.

    13. Re:woohho by eric76 · · Score: 1

      So if I have a hole in the bottom and a garden hose pouring a compensating amount of water from the top, say a foot between the nozzle and the top of the water, that would do it?

      Of course, that means I'm going to have to get a good outdoor carpet, plastic lawn furniture, and shower slippers in the living room.

      It might just be easier to get some plastic fish and not worry about how much oxygen is in the water.

    14. Re:woohho by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, you want to recycle the same water through the aquarium, it's best for the fish. You just use a powerhead pump with enough head (ability to push water up vertically) to do the job. You can put an undergravel filter in the bottom which will spread the suction out across the entire bottom of the tank and pull the fish shit down into the gravel. You're going to need one hell of a long tube on the end of your siphon to clean it though :) Anyway if the water is splashing at the top it will probably mix enough air in, but I think you'd be better off with an aerator too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:woohho by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, I'm going to play Star Trek nerd here and correct you.

      Scotty and McCoy went to a plant that manufactored plexiglass because plexiglass was strong enough to hold the water and whales they needed if it were thick enough. (There's one part of the movie where Scotty calculates how thick the plexiglass needs to be to finish building their tank.) Since they had no money, they couldn't pay for the plexiglass needed so instead Scotty drew up a formula for transparent aluminum in exchange for the plexiglass. Even with the formula, it would take that plant years and years to be reconfigured to produce transparent aluminum, and they say so in the movie.

      So... yes. Grandparent is right; they traded the formula for the plexiglass.

    16. Re:woohho by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      Why didn't they just replicate some money, or hack into some bank's computer system and create a new account or something?

    17. Re:woohho by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the Dept of Treasury is reissuing all the large denomiation bills. To combat the effect of Time Travellers with replicators ruining the economy.

      or

      It was a Kilngon ship, correct? Why would a Kilngon ship have information on long outdated Earth currency?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    18. Re:woohho by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      glass = MOHS 5 transparent Alumina (aka "white saphhire" when crystalline, aka carborundum (when used generically) = MOHS 9. MOHS 5 transparent Alumina glass (RTFA) MOHS 9 (They don't say how hard it is only that it is almost as hard as saphhire ["crystallized alumina ..."].) I haven't any references handy and wouldn't trust any refs on the 'net to do the calculations to get the appropriate thickness needed to duplicate the strength of a glass aquarium. But It could be significantly thinner. Optically it looks like glass, atleast white saphhire does.

    19. Re:woohho by klui · · Score: 1

      It didn't need to be transparent if there were no restrictions; but the dimensions of each wall (in particular their thickness) used to house the whales warranted the use of transparent aluminum.

    20. Re:woohho by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      They get banned from the script meetings?

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    21. Re:woohho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the real reason they took the whales into the future was a marketing gimmick "whale blubber, better tasting that soy"

    22. Re:woohho by EvilBuu · · Score: 1

      Obviously, because that would have been WRONG. Or against the prime directive or some other nonsense. Much better to disrupt the space-time continuum, steal some whales, bring a human back, neck-pinch some punk on a bus, etc.

      I makes for better theater I suppose.

      --

      Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
    23. Re:woohho by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      I have three angelfish and a plecostemus in a [traditional rectangular] 20 gallon tank and they use pretty much all the available space.

      A 25 gallon or more is recommended for plecos, IIRC. They can get pretty big, and can be aggressive, so you might have to move him at some point.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    24. Re:woohho by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm expecting to give him to the owner of the pet store at which my girlfriend works when he gets too big, so he can live in a pond. Then, I'll get another plecostemus to clean the tank :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Transparent aluminum foil by SammysIsland · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can watch as the food in the fridge turns green... Ye-hah!

    1. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I was thinking more about transparent airplanes - no need for dangerous windows & people will get a decent view

    2. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by noidentity · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now I can watch as the food in the fridge turns green

      More importantly, I can wear my improved tinfoil hat in public without getting weird looks.

    3. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by NoData · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tinfoill hat are made of tin.
      Like, duh!

      Paranoid kook n00b :)

    4. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Food?!?

      I want a cylinder head for my car made out of this stuff...

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    5. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      That should be a "fun" ride for people with vertigo...

    6. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Well, they did say that it might work with other oxides.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    7. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      dee-dee-dit-dit-dit-dit-dew-dooo-dew-dooooo, Wundur WHuu-mon... Wundur WHuu-mon...

      Send Uhura to Paradise Island and see if she can exchange some nubian nuptual goods for a transparent plane.

      Say, wasn't THAT Princes Di wearing a "new dress" (Red, White and Blue undies and her lasso? I guess it was to make Major Trevor TRIMBLE...)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    8. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by iabervon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, the transparent stuff isn't very good for blocking EM radiation in the critical petahertz range...

    9. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by julesh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tinfoill hat are made of tin.
      Like, duh!


      Unfortunately, you're overlooking the fact that tinfoil is made from alumin[i]um.

      This is largely because it is frequently used in food storage and preparation, and tin is poisonous, so isn't a good choice.

    10. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Better yet...transparent cockpit doors.

    11. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by NoData · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately, you're overlooking the fact that tinfoil is made from alumin[i]um.

      Oh yeah? Well only real tin effectively blocks the barquathian mind-control rays from the planet Booftar, that they're co-developed with the CIA and Nabisco to control the populace.

      This is largely because it is frequently used in food storage and preparation, and tin is poisonous, so isn't a good choice.


      And you believe that?! Looks like they've already gotten to you, bub.

    12. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Transparent machinery should be great as a teaching tool...I hope to see this sort of thing show up in tech-teaching museums.

    13. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      IIRC tin oxide is a fair conductor and moderately transparent. Consequently it is used where those properties are important, such as some displays where a conductive layer is placed on glass.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    14. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Is it poisonous? I always thought it was the fact that tin cans had to be sealed with something else, which at one time was lead, which most certainly was bad.

      --
      No Comment.
    15. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      And if this conducts heat as well as ordinary aluminum, you can be sure that it will turn green. That, or you'll have a heart attack when you get the next electric bill...

    16. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be ironic? If all the tinfoil hat people were killed by the very thing they thought would protect them?

      Wait, ironic isn't the word I am looking for.. Oh yeah, funny.

    17. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe it would also be ironic. Don't let "Alanis sux0rs" folks fool you there -- there is definitely irony in getting killed by something you used to protect yourself.

    18. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      Where's my "OMFG I just shit myself +5 Funny" mod point when I need it?

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    19. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear NoData,

      Shhhh!

      Sincerely,

      Your friends at that place with the three-letter acronym.

      PS: Not the one you're thinking of now, the other one.

    20. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called tin foil if it's made from tin (Sn) It's called aluminum foil if it's made from aluminum (Al). AL foil is called tin foil by the clueless.

      Many foods are packaged in tin plated steel containers. 'tin' cans shortened from 'tinned' cans.

      Poisonous? Give me a break. Grandpa smoked two packs of unfiltered PallMall a day. He also knocked of a fifth of scotch a day. Until he was 92! He also ate many of his meals out of tinned cans. None of these killed him!

    21. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by sydres · · Score: 1

      since when is tin poisonous after all they use it in potable water systems as tin/silver solder?

    22. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Improved foil hats have made great bounds in public acceptance, and asthetics in recent years, due in part to my work.

      See my homepage for instance.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    23. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Transparent != invisible; you'll look like you've got a condom on your head.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by ManxStef · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember watching a TV documentary that said it was much more likely that the lead solder used to hold very early (1800's) tin cans together was the toxin. A quick search on Google reveals some more details on this: it was the Franklin Expedition:-
      http://www.mysteriesofcanada.com/Nun avut/franklin_ expedition.htm

      Modern "tin cans" are actually made of steel with a thin continous coating of tin, as it's cheaper to make them this way and steel is stronger. Also, I'm pretty sure various acidic contents, such as fruit & tuna, aren't particularly good candidates for tins once they've been opened, which is why these products say "once opened please transfer from the tin to a suitable container" (or words to that effect). This is because the acid will react with the tin and impart a metallic taste to the food; I'm not sure if it's actually toxic, but I'd imagine not.

    25. Re:Transparent aluminum foil by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Guess my ancient beer can collection is worth something then :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  4. Article text, for the slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Glass breakthrough
    11 August 2004

    Scientists in the US have developed a novel technique to make bulk quantities of glass from alumina for the first time. Anatoly Rosenflanz and colleagues at 3M in Minnesota used a "flame-spray" technique to alloy alumina (aluminium oxide) with rare-earth metal oxides to produce strong glass with good optical properties. The method avoids many of the problems encountered in conventional glass forming and could, say the team, be extended to other oxides (A Rosenflanz et al. 2004 Nature 430 761).

    Glass is formed when a molten material is cooled so quickly that its constituent atoms do not have time to align themselves into an ordered lattice. However, it is difficult to make glasses from most materials because they need to be cooled -- or quenched -- at rates of up to 10 million degrees per second.

    Silica is widely used in glass-making because the quenching rates are much lower, but researchers would like to make glass from alumina as well because of its superior mechanical and optical properties. Alumina can form glass if it is alloyed with calcium or rare-earth oxides, but the required quenching rate can be as high as 1000 degrees per second, which makes it difficult to produce bulk quantities.

    Rosenflanz and colleagues started by mixing around 80 mole % of powdered alumina with various rare-earth oxide powders -- including lanthanum, gadolinium and yttrium oxides. Next, they fed the powders into a high-temperature hydrogen-oxygen flame to produce molten particles that were then quenched in water. The resulting glass beads, which were less than 140 microns across, were then heat-treated -- or sintered -- at around 1000C. This produced bulk glass samples in which nanocrystalline alumina-rich phases were dispersed throughout a glassy matrix. The new method avoids the need to apply pressures of 1 gigapascal or more, as is required in existing techniques.

    Click to enlarge
    Aluminate glasses

    The 3M scientists characterised the glasses using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and thermal analysis, and tested the strength of the materials with hardness and fracture toughness tests. They found that their samples were much harder than conventional silica-based glasses and were almost as hard as pure polycrystalline alumina.

    Moreover, over 95% of the glasses were transparent (see figure) and had attractive optical properties. For example, fully crystallized alumina-rare earth oxide ceramics showed high refractive indices if the grains were kept below a certain size.

    Author
    Belle Dumé is Science Writer at PhysicsWeb

    1. Re:Article text, for the slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Attention Americans!

      Learn to spell correctly -- it is Aluminium. Please fix... we'll get onto sulphur and the -our travesty later.

    2. Re:Article text, for the slashdotted by teiresias · · Score: 1

      read "rare-earth metal oxides" = higher price.

      --
      -Teiresias
    3. Re:Article text, for the slashdotted by !Freeky2BGeeky · · Score: 2

      Ok so they talk about the fact that the material is "much harder than silica-based glasses" but what is the tensil (sp?) strength. Can it keep an edge? (maybe for use in blades)

      --

      Visualize Whirled Peas

    4. Re:Article text, for the slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention Asshole!

      Not all Americans our idiots... er, are idiots.

    5. Re:Article text, for the slashdotted by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Never mind the article being slashdotted.

      Who has logins for The United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology?

      Also quite cool: Nature has "Members of Slashdot login here". What would it take for us to get a subscription?

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  5. Future echoes by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am beginning to suspect that the whole idea of sci-fi is in fact a future society time-travelling back every now and then to make a new 'Star Trek' film to nudge society onto a slightly different path :-)

    The number of Star-Trek-driven ideas that have become reality is astounding -
    • phasers. We have wireless tasers that use a laser to ionise the air then an electric current jumps towards the victim from a battery. The battery is currently an issue)
    • communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators
    • voice recognition - lots available these days
    • transporters - well we've done with an entangled photon. One down, seventeen quadrillion to go. Hey, it's a start!
    • now, transparent aluminium.. someone's having a laugh!


    Ok, we're missing the big one, warp drive, but apparently we have to have a war that more or less wipes out humanity first, so I'll be happy to give it a miss in my lifetime...

    Oh yeah, FOR [insert deity]'s SAKE, STOP THE WHALING!!!

    Simon
    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Future echoes by abb3w · · Score: 4, Funny
      Don't forget the Mark I Tricorder.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    2. Re:Future echoes by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I can agree with everything except the communication. No way are mobile phones better than the communicators. Look, they could always use their communicators (barring some interference) even though the Enterprise was rarely in a geosynchronous orbit. The cut seens rarely showed the enterprise orbiting at even close to a geosynchronous orbit. We need cell towers, and even if yo go to Sat phones, we still require geosynchronous satellites to bounce our calls off of.

    3. Re:Future echoes by DrCash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators

      Satellite phones are pretty darn close to Captain Kirk's communicator (although they're a bit pricey - I guess we still need to eliminate money before getting to the 23rd century.

      A HypoSpray for drug delivery without a needle has already been developed and used clinically during the late 1990s.

      It is a bit unusual that flat panel computer display technology did not hit the Star Trek universe until the late Next Generation series - Captain Kirk's Enterprise was equipped with CRTs and flashing and buzzing lights. But Captain Archer's Enterprise has LCD flat panels up the wazzoo,... ;-)

    4. Re:Future echoes by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      We have wireless tasers that use a laser to ionise the air then an electric current jumps towards the victim from a battery.

      I guess this is one of those in action.

      But I'm not jumping in joy until we have portable tesla coils. Mwahaha! :-)

      Just imagine all the uses...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Future echoes by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Ok, we're missing the big one, warp drive,

      Whatch'you talkin' 'bout foo'?

      Ok, so we have no idea where we're going to get the energy from. But at the moment, it's looking more realistic than Wormholes.

    6. Re:Future echoes by Togan · · Score: 1
      actually, communicators are more like radio communication ... you don't dial any number ...

      and beaming will probably remain with photons (they didn't actually beam a photon, they just transmitted it's information), beaming matter is not possible

    7. Re:Future echoes by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      THe big problem with most communications isn't the distance these days.. it's the fact that there's lots of stuff in the way. We've had commercial hand-held space communications for at least 10 years..

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    8. Re:Future echoes by dave1791 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Ok, we're missing the big one, warp drive,"

      OK, I am not sure how Star Trek warp drives are supposed to work, but I remember a RPC circa 1990 called Traveller 2300 had something called "stutterwarp". The idea was this, take a starship and do the transporter trick to jump a few meters, or a couple of kilometers. Now do this at a few Mhz and you have near lightspeed with very little velocity.

    9. Re:Future echoes by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Doh! You missed one!

      The -- dum-di-dum -- intelligent computers!
      You know, those installed in all spaceships.

      Well, we have those chatterbots.

      I guess you could call that a start too. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    10. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      medical hypospray, too. no needles, just air!

    11. Re:Future echoes by black+mariah · · Score: 3, Funny

      They work by literally warping the spacetime around the vessel. This decreases the apparent distance the ship has to travel. Theoretically, warp drives are possible but if Hawking hasn't invented them yet I don't think we're going to see any for a while.

      See, that's the kind of shit you learn reading Slashdot. I'm going to go shoot myself for being a massive fucking dork now.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    12. Re:Future echoes by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Kirk's Enterprise was built during a 'retro'-style period... they *could* have had flat screens, but thought the flashing lights looked better. ;)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    13. Re:Future echoes by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      There's nothing astounding about it. Science fiction is still part science. Without a plausible explanation for how things work, it merely becomes fantasy.

      Fuck, I'm a dork for making that statement. I'm gonna go outside and visit the Big Blue Room with People for a while...

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    14. Re:Future echoes by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Umm, hello transporters don't exist, well the type your talking about that is.

    15. Re:Future echoes by Cecil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since the NCC-1701(A) was a Battlecruiser, unlike all the other Enterprises, it is possible they just felt that CRTs were a more battle-hardened technology than LCDs.

      Welp, I guess that's it, I'm officially a Star Trek Continuity Apologist. *sigh*

    16. Re:Future echoes by clifyt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "actually, communicators are more like radio communication ... you don't dial any number ..."

      Why more like radio?

      My email is smart enough that if I start typing the first 2 or 3 letters of an email, it can guess at who I want to send it to and be accurate most of the time. I don't need to know the email addresses of anyone involved these days unless I don't have them in my address book which is sync'd between my phone, 2 PCs and 3 Macs. All work about the same.

      So you don't dial a number, but you do say "Sulu, Can We Get A Fix On..." and the internal processing realizes that since he didn't refer to a specific Sulu, he must mean the default one and routes it appropriately.

      My Cell is smart enough that if I hold a button on the side and say the name it can dial about a dozen numbers. Battery life and processing speeds preclude it from listening all the time.

      So, are you saying that because our technology isn't very sufficient today, theirs too must be as unadvanced. I've seen attainable advancements in 10 years that make 20 years ago look like the stone ages. In another 10 years, maybe we will just speak into a phone, and it will wait until it figures out who we are talking too and route accordingly. Who knows. Maybe we will all be back to fighting wars with sticks and stones.

    17. Re:Future echoes by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's called an Alcubierre Drive. You can finish yourself off now.

    18. Re:Future echoes by justanyone · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like your list. But, what about the things we haven't invented yet?
      • Defensive shields (no, Mark Shields doesn't count)
      • Andorian Brandy
      • Warp drive
      • subspace communicators
      • reliable space probes
      • orbiting dry docks
      • artificial gravity
      • cheap fusion power
      • drugs that combat radiation sickness
      • a 'sterile field' for doing operations
      • funny little plasma torches they're always using
      • antimatter containment
      • Theme music that plays when something bad is about to happen
      • Doors that swish open when you walk towards them
      • Computers that play __3-D chess__ !
      • (People that play 3-D chess)
      • Food dispensers that assemble the food from component molecules as needed
      • Shuttlecraft that go into orbit without dropping any parts off during the ascent
      • Spacesuits that don't look like medieval suits of armor
      • Deflector shields that work on uncharged objects
      • Glasses (or contacts) that automatically fog up when looking at a beautiful foreign woman that you're destined to seduce and abandon

      Of course, I'm probably forgetting lots of stuff. Anyone have further things I've missed??
    19. Re:Future echoes by ALeavitt · · Score: 1

      Another thing that I think is really cool is the convergence of cell phone/PDA technology to make something bordering on tricorder functionality. Cell phones are no longer used only as communicators. We have high-res color screens on which we can surf the internet, send e-mail, play games, and take photos. Granted, we don't have all of the functionality of a tricorder, but we're getting there a lot faster than the Star Trek universe had predicted.
      Also, take a look at the monitors in Next Generation-era ships. They look a lot like the flatscreen monitors we're using today, don't they?

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    20. Re:Future echoes by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators

      When a cell phone can punch a signal up to orbit without the benefit of relay stations, then it will be better than the communicators. Until then, no dice -- it depends on too large an infrastructure.

      People don't seem to appreciate the inverse-square law effect for radio transmission...
    21. Re:Future echoes by Cyno · · Score: 1

      My favorites are wireless networks and webpads. These technologies will help us make our world portable and seamlessly integrate it with the rest of our lives, if we could ever come to the conclusion that people are more valueable as inventors, creators, writers, programmers, etc. Instead of the cheap labor robots we currently use them for. But I doubt we'll change anytime soon as long as so many of us think so highly of capitalism.

      But at least we have the opportunity to start a business and make enough money to never have to work again AND have a huge pool of cheap maids to choose from to clean up after us, take our calls and keep our schedules clear so we have plenty of time to golf.

      If I was exceptionally wealthy I'd sit at home (I'd own a home) and write code while tokin my Cannabis. But I'll probably never be wealthy cuz I don't want to use people to get there.

    22. Re:Future echoes by Cerebus · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The inside of an Alcubierre bubble is causually decoupled from the negative energy shell. So once you turn it on, you can't turn it off...

      --
      -- Cerebus
    23. Re:Future echoes by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny
      reliable space probes
      Now how long are the voyager probes doing their thing? Quite long IIRC. I'd call that reliable.
      Doors that swish open when you walk towards them
      Never been to a supermarket I presume?
    24. Re:Future echoes by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Funny

      communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators

      I hate to think what interstellar roaming charges are like though :)

    25. Re:Future echoes by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Doors that swish open when you walk towards them
      Computers that play __3-D chess__ !
      (People that play 3-D chess)


      Actually, 3-D chess has been invented, you can buy sets and rulebooks from companies that specialize in Star Trek merchandise. I'm sure some people (in theory) play it. And I've been in airports where the doors swish open pretty much like those in Star Trek, and at about the same speed.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    26. Re:Future echoes by bsartist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A HypoSpray for drug delivery without a needle has already been developed and used clinically during the late 1990s.

      Earlier than that. The military had airguns for drug delivery at least in '87, when I went through basic training. The trick was to hold perfectly still. If you did that, it was painless - but if you didn't, the compressed-air "needle" could leave quite a gash in your arm.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    27. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... what about the things we haven't invented yet?

      • Doors that swish open when you walk towards them



      Most grocery stores around these parts have had them for ages (well, without the cool 'swish' sound, but instead a motorized whirring sound.)

      Though, the ones in Trek arguably work better. They could stand *near* the door without it opening ... it seemed to not base its decision on just distance, but intent.

      Theirs also had no visible apparatus for sensing your approach either.

    28. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communicators need no base towers, and can connect directly to a satellite on the other side of the planet. Not quite there yet.

    29. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the PADD devices (PDAs), turbolifts (there are elevators is some buildings than can go sideways as well as up and down), computer-controlled living environments, on-demand video, video conferencing, biobeds, hyposprays, and probably more that I'm missing...

    30. Re:Future echoes by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      There's a simple reason for that - sci-fi writers look at the cutting edge of current tech and research, extrapolate towards the logical conclusion, and write about it. Meanwhile, scientists and other geeky/techy types read sci-fi, are inspired by the ideas, and so work towards them, either officially (if it's not too far-fetched), or in their spare time.

    31. Re:Future echoes by tommyboyprime · · Score: 1

      Computer...computer?

      --
      This parrot has ceased to be!
    32. Re:Future echoes by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      Well unless you want to stretch the defintiion of transporters to include transporting only quantum states, that would be true.

    33. Re:Future echoes by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      You forgot the recently discovered sub-atomic tractor beam...

      and when I read your close I thought it said

      "For Sake Sake, STOP THE WHALING"

      (man...imagine if all the rice wine just went poof if the Japanese did not stop whaling....I think you are on to something here. STOP WHALING or SAKE DIES!!!)

    34. Re:Future echoes by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      even if you beam matter beaming life will be impossible... wouldnt be the same consciousness... the same "soul" as such...

    35. Re:Future echoes by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Actually, they've been around at least since the late 60's when my father went through the Marines. I can remember him telling me about them.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    36. Re:Future echoes by julesh · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Alcubierre drive is that it requires large quantities of negative mass. As far as we know, negative mass is probably impossible.

    37. Re:Future echoes by julesh · · Score: 1

      Doors that swish open when you walk towards them

      Err.. I know we haven't got that to work reliably yet (they usually don't open fast enough, so you walk into them if you try to treat them like Trek actors do...), but we're at least taking steps toward that one.

      # Computers that play __3-D chess__ !
      # (People that play 3-D chess)


      See here

      Glasses (or contacts) that automatically fog up when looking at a beautiful foreign woman that you're destined to seduce and abandon

      Huh?

    38. Re:Future echoes by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

      Defensive shields (no, Mark Shields doesn't count)

      maybe could have.

      btw i know that link looks awful and all but theres actually shield concepts introduced by Tesla there. honest.

    39. Re:Future echoes by Oddster · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Doors that swish open when you walk towards them

      Haven't you been to a supermarket lately?

    40. Re:Future echoes by OS24Ever · · Score: 1
      communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators


      I don't remember Kirk or Spock going 'can you hear me now? Good' every 10 feet.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    41. Re:Future echoes by Veldcath · · Score: 1

      Doors that swish open when you walk toward them - Haven't visted a grocery store recently have you? People that play 3-D chess - Hey, I've got the rules around here somewhere. Printed them out with a 9-pin dot-matrix printer ages ago. You could learn it, if you wanted. http://www.chessvariants.com/3d.dir/startrek.html Defensive/Deflector Shields - In the works? http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology /cold_plasma_000724.html Radiation Sickness Treatment - http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 93745 perhaps? -V

      --


      ... "I read part of it all the way through." -- Movie Mogul Sam Goldwyn (and some slashdot readers)
    42. Re:Future echoes by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Of course, I'm probably forgetting lots of stuff. Anyone have further things I've missed??

      Um. Duke Nukem Forever?

      There, I've made a Duke Nukem joke. Can I join the /. loser club now?

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    43. Re:Future echoes by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      But if you're massive, you warp space, and therefor you're an essential part of a warp drive.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    44. Re:Future echoes by elea · · Score: 1

      for the warp drive: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/0009013 just build it!

    45. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, we do have anti-matter containment in magnetic fields.

    46. Re:Future echoes by Kreigaffe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "antimatter containment"

      magnetic jars.. got that one

      "Computers that play __3-D chess__ !

      (People that play 3-D chess)"

      Actually I *DO* have a 3d chess board, but it's not like the ones on star trek (you can buy them, but they're expensive sorta things).. mine's just got 3 chess boards, stacked on top of eachother.

      "Doors that swish open when you walk towards them"

      Grocery stores have those ;)

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    47. Re:Future echoes by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      # orbiting dry docks

      The shuttle for satellites

      # drugs that combat radiation sickness

      Vitamin C

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    48. Re:Future echoes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Defensive shields are coming, we now have ways to create large volumes of cold plasma cheaply (in terms of energy consumption) but the magnetic bottling is still the kicker. Our space probes are more reliable than specified in most cases and are getting better with time as one might expect. Doors that swish open when you walk towards them have been around for a long time but pneumatic systems are less efficient than just using a geared electric motor. We have spacesuits that don't look like medieval armor - actually, none of our space suits look anything like medieval armor. But, we DO have hardsuits, and have since the sixties. Why we don't use them is beyond me.

      And finally, when I look at a beautiful foreign woman, if I'm wearing glasses, they DO fog up :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:Future echoes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The only intelligent computer I can remember was the hacked-up v'ger. Otherwise the computers are just really good at interpreting requests in english - something that you can achieve now with sufficiently complicated scanning rules, although the time necessary to program such a system is astounding and generally considered to be not worth it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:Future echoes by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      No, that is a standard Taser with a laser red-dot sighting system. The yellow box at the front contains the compresed air charge and the electrodes that fire out.

      The cartridge is disposed of after use and another one fitted.

      Here is a link.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    51. Re:Future echoes by suso · · Score: 1

      Defensive shields

      What about this

      I guess the original article is gone. But this technology came up on Slashdot a few years ago. Maybe this is it

    52. Re:Future echoes by Striikerr · · Score: 1

      "See, that's the kind of shit you learn reading Slashdot. I'm going to go shoot myself for being a massive fucking dork now."

      You will not have to shoot yourself because you have become such a massive dork that you will now collapse into yourself. Eventually, not even your nerdiness will be able to escape the dork hole (created primarily from dork matter (and Mountain Dew) of course).

    53. Re:Future echoes by Davoid · · Score: 1

      medical hypospray, too.

      Been around since at least the mid seventies. Ever been in the military? The US military has used them for innoculation for a long time.

      no needles, just air!

      Injecting air into the bloodstream is a pretty sure way to kill someone.

      -DU-...etc...

      --
      "Don't sweat the technique."
    54. Re:Future echoes by linuxcoder · · Score: 0

      If we stop the whaling, doesn't that mean that Scotty will have no reason to go back in time and give us the formula for transparent aluminum?

      Since we now have the aluminum, that must mean we never stopped killing the whales.

    55. Re:Future echoes by mwood · · Score: 1

      Yup, Federation communicators can reach orbit without relays. Try that with your cell phone.

      Not to mention that a pair of communicators held close together make enough feedback to collapse a rocky ledge onto your advancing enemies.

    56. Re:Future echoes by mwood · · Score: 1

      Point to your consciousness and then maybe I'll believe you.

    57. Re:Future echoes by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Glasses (or contacts) that automatically fog up when looking at a beautiful foreign woman that you're destined to seduce and abandon

      Huh


      I believe I can answer this one. The original poster is referring to the cinematic style of the original series.

      The feature women of an episode would get that "soft" and "fuzzy" treatment. When the camera zoomed in for a closeup, you got an extremely bright-lit face with fuzziness around the edges of the screen.

      That's not to say the bright lights were resevered entirely for women...I can recall many floodlights highlighting Kirk's face at "command" moments, but never a bit of fuzziness. It was all part of the dramatic lighting style back then, probably inherited from theatre lighting.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    58. Re:Future echoes by mwood · · Score: 1

      Watch the outtakes reel. Our power doors work better (or anyway, more reliably) than the Federation's.

    59. Re:Future echoes by PMuse · · Score: 1

      With my eyes traing by Slashdot to skip the bracketted link, I read,

      FOR SAKE, STOP THE WHALING!!!

      Actually, it's a pretty good plan: let's hang up the harpoons and break out the booze!

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    60. Re:Future echoes by Sinistar2k · · Score: 1
      communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators

      Not when you're trying to communicate with orbiting spacecraft.

    61. Re:Future echoes by Davoid · · Score: 1

      transporters - well we've done with an entangled photon. One down, seventeen quadrillion to go. Hey, it's a start!

      This one is going to be MUCH more difficult than it is to imagine. If you are using the "quadrillion" that is 10^24 then yes... 1 gram of hydrogen (H2 gas) will be about 3X10^23 molecules. A photon is MUCH simpler than a single hydrogen atom. A mass (you?) of aproximately 80Kg will be about 2.4x10^28 molecules of H2 (if you were only a gas). But you aren't a cloud of random hydrogen molecules. You are mostly carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and a some other stuff.... but in a VERY complex configuration.

      With any presently conceivable current or future technology it would be far simpler, quicker, and safer to just walk from where you are to where you want to be "transported" to.

      Google for "The Physics of Star Trek" if you want a more detailed explanatin.

      -DU-...etc...

      --
      "Don't sweat the technique."
    62. Re:Future echoes by criordan · · Score: 1

      No, we just need Shatner to donate his penis to the cause.

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    63. Re:Future echoes by Frostalicious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, I'm probably forgetting lots of stuff. Anyone have further things I've missed??

      Computer terminals that, when shot at, give off a massive electrical discharge, killing the operator.

      The terminal, however, continues to function. Apparently the secret is to use the operator as the electrical ground for the system.

    64. Re:Future echoes by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Okay I'll take the bait...

      Doors that swish open when you walk towards them

      Computers that play __3-D chess__ !

      (People that play 3-D chess)

      Glasses (or contacts) that automatically fog up when looking at a beautiful foreign woman that you're destined to seduce and abandon


      These are all reality today. Of course, the 3D chess is based and inspired by the show itself so you could call that one self-fulfilling prophecy.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    65. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um don't you mean V'ger?

    66. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny little plasma torches they're always using

      How about this:

      http://www.millerwelds.com/products/plasma/spectru m_125c/

      Ok, so it weighs 23kg and runs off of 110V. We're maybe a generation away from making a hand-held version.

    67. Re:Future echoes by cpghost · · Score: 1

      artificial gravity

      You can use centrifugal force instead. Just live inside a rotating cylinder. Of course, "gravity" will decrease as you move towards the center.

      It must be kinda funny to climb a "mountain", just to discover that gravity decreases the higher you come.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    68. Re:Future echoes by X86Daddy · · Score: 1
      • Doors that swish open when you walk towards them
      • (People that play 3-D chess)


      Although they just don't seem as cool, most grocery stores have the doors. Also, Google for "Star Trek" and chess, and you'll find that people have come up with the rule set and built their own boards for the 3D chess game seen on the series... now for the other 19 items... :-)
    69. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never been to a supermarket I presume?


      Maybe "justanyone (308934)" is presidential material.
    70. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      transporters - well we've done with an entangled photon. One down, seventeen quadrillion to go. Hey, it's a start!

      With any presently conceivable current or future technology it would be far simpler, quicker, and safer to just walk from where you are to where you want to be "transported" to.

      Let me expand on this, just a little.

      Sometime in the late 80's, a friend of mine tried to calculate what this would require. He started with the assumption that transporting something like a human would certainly require a computer to disassemble you, atom by atom, and put you back together. He then made the very generous assumption that each atom would require 1 cycle of computer time.

      Doing the math, we discovered there had not been enough cycles in the entire history of computers to transport a single human being. More importantly, I do the calculation again every few years and, to this day, there still haven't been enough. However, we're finally getting close.

      I'm guessing any real transporter technology is going to be more like a Stargate (tm).

    71. Re:Future echoes by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      So how does Warp protect travelers from experiencing the massive time differential predicted by Einstein? That's one thing I've never understood about Star Trek. They travel all over the universe at faster-than-light speed, yet they stay the same relative age as everyone back on Earth. Shouldn't the rest of the universe age much faster relative to people traveling on a faster-than-light ship?

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    72. Re:Future echoes by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      Never mind, the Alcubierre Drive post below answered my question.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    73. Re:Future echoes by jimmyfergus · · Score: 1
      • transporters - well we've done with an entangled photon. One down, seventeen quadrillion to go. Hey, it's a start!


      continuing the OT, assuming the ridiculous idea existed, who on earth would actually get in one?

      I mean, they take all your molecules, convert them to energy or radio waves or whatever the supposed explanation is, and then reconstruct them at the other end. That's not transportation, that's creating a copy and destroying the original. Not for me, no matter how illusory my current existence is! I don't care how many copies of me you make, or where you make them, I want to keep this copy functioning.

      "Transport" me by all means, but don't destroy the one at this end. Transporters should remain simply the plot-accelerators they were designed to be.
    74. Re:Future echoes by Erbo · · Score: 1

      I think he's confused Star Trek with The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Specifically, the Joo Janta 200 Superchromatic Peril Sensitive Sunglasses, which turn totally black at the first sign of danger.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    75. Re:Future echoes by LakeSolon · · Score: 1
      Anyone else amused that he goes and uses the HTML for an unordered list... but then being a true geek he reverts to surrounding "3-d chess" with __underscores__ instead of using the HTML code for underline?

      Huh... I guess Slashdot strips underline codes. I never knew that. I guess it's to prevent stupid crap like Click Here.

      ~lake

    76. Re:Future echoes by CTalkobt · · Score: 1

      >> Doors that swish open when you walk towards them

      >Never been to a supermarket I presume?

      They don't swish, they swoosh.

      --
      There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
    77. Re:Future echoes by mikesmind · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, they would actually use petrolium jelly on the outer portion of the camera lense. This would create the fuzzy appearance for the closeup of the lady's face.

      --
      www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
    78. Re:Future echoes by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      Of course, I'm probably forgetting lots of stuff. Anyone have further things I've missed??

      Only the most important one of all: Synthahol

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    79. Re:Future echoes by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Plasma torches exist in the real world.

      Do a Google search.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    80. Re:Future echoes by Davoid · · Score: 1

      That is a good example... another one would be...

      Say we are very VERY generous and allow each molecule to be represented by a single bit... so 2.4x10^28 bits. Now start dividing that by 8 to get bytes and then by 10^12 to get terrabytes. I get about 3x10^15 TBytes of data. Now just for fun we imagine that we can store a TB of data on a disk 3/1000 of an inch thick and the diameter of, say, a thumbnail. We will end up with a stack of these hypothetical disks 10^12 inches high. Do some more dividing to get miles... I get about a 16 million mile high stack. It is 1/4 million miles to the moon. So that gives one a size perspective on the problem... an unrealistic one but unrealistic in that it favors the possibility.

      Then there is the problem of actually sending that much data over any distance.

      Then there is the problem of are you going to be scanned in destructively or non-destructively... and how would one actually do the scan? With a some sort of super-duper MRI machine that could scan down to the individual molecular level? The wavelengths used would have to be really short. The scanning would take a really LONG time.

      Like I said... it would be far far safer and quicker to just walk to the moon.

      There are a lot of other problems with teleportation that I haven't mentioned. The major problem I see is that it doesn't take a great deal of math or scientific skill to comprehend how incomprehensible the problem is... yet people are so unwilling to think about it a little bit and think it through.

      -DU-...etc...

      --
      "Don't sweat the technique."
    81. Re:Future echoes by sydres · · Score: 1

      actually the technique involves grabbing a piece of DeSitter space (Omniverse) where the speed of light is irelevant then then travelling within that space by means of the interaction between the higher dimensional fields of dilithium and the antimatter/matter reaction regulated by it. this has the effect of generating counter repulsive fields of real (our universe) and DeSitter space so get it right huh!

    82. Re:Future echoes by raahul_da_man · · Score: 1

      * Defensive shields (no, Mark Shields doesn't count)

      It's quite clear that you're new here. This was covered by Slashdot, and considering that Slashdot replicates stories, there is no real excuse for ignorance.

      http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technolo gy /cold_plasma_000724.html

      * Andorian Brandy

      * Warp drive

      Yeah, they're working on it.

      * subspace communicators

      * reliable space probes

      We already have reliable space probes. Voyager not good enough?

      * orbiting dry docks

      * artificial gravity

      Set a hub spinning. Artificial gravity is only as difficult as you make it.

      * cheap fusion power

      http://www.iter.org/

      In progress.

      * antimatter containment

      http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/antima tt er.asp

      We have that too.

      * Theme music that plays when something bad is about to happen

      I suppose you could write software to do this easily.

      * (People that play 3-D chess)
      http://www.3dchessfederation.com/index.htm

      * Deflector shields that work on uncharged objects

      I don't know if this is possible.

      * Glasses (or contacts) that automatically fog up when looking at a beautiful foreign woman that you're destined to seduce and abandon

      Yours don't? ; )

    83. Re:Future echoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a region of space with negative energy density should achieve the same effect. You could potentially do this by preventing virtual particles from annihilating and extracting them. However, the chances of anyone finding a practical way of doing this before the heat death of the universe is fairly slim.

    84. Re:Future echoes by Togan · · Score: 1

      it's more like radio, since it's not tied to an infrastructure network but creates its own network.
      while cellphones need stationary senders/receivers to log on to the network, radio transmitters just send out their waves, which can be picked up by any receiver ...

    85. Re:Future echoes by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      take note how wireless networks and webpads are noticely absent in non-capitalitic countries, along with jobs that would be suitable for home work. Or indeed, any jobs at all that don't treat humans as 'cheap labor robot'. Technology, abundance of wealth and leisure requires capital formation, a concept only possible in, guess what, capitalistic society. All the other models, socialism/communism/monarchy etc. are to busy keeping 'the people' from starving to archive any meaningful level of savings and therefore advance.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    86. Re:Future echoes by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Care to name a few? I know of at least one socialist country that has more net access per capita than the US.

      Just because capitalism worked to amass wealth in countries with slavery is no excuse that there aren't better solutions to be acknowledged and considered. People, human beings, are worth more than the money we pay them. Its time to recognise the value of each individual and provide them the proper environment to explore their potential. Capitalism doesn't always do this, though it often gets closer than, say, a monarchy.

      I consider farming out labor to countries where their minimum wage and working conditions are lower than legally acceptable levels in the US is similar to slavery.

    87. Re:Future echoes by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kirk: Scty bme^

      Scotty: What?

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    88. Re:Future echoes by DerWulf · · Score: 1
      which country do you mean? To my knowledge there are only a few socialist countrys left, most notably cuba and north korea. Maybe most of the middle african countries as well. None of them have widespread internet access. A desk in itself is probably a luxury there. Capitalism worked not with slavery but against it. Do a little research and you will find that slavery is less profitable than just employing people the regular way. Also, I'd pick being owned by a private individual over being owned by the state or indeed the public any time. At least for the private individual I am an asset and my death would be a financial loss to him. In a commune, I could be just sacrificed to the 'higher good' anytime someone comes up with a reasonable explaination how my death could help the 'public'.

      Its time to recognise the value of each individual and provide them the proper environment to explore their potential.

      Its time to recognize that, in this reality, resources are scare. Time is scare. Energy is scare. Order (as opposed to chaos) requires energy. Commodities are certainly scare. Which is easily proven by their absence within say the rain forests. Natural life is a bitch and you die quickly. You are constantly underfed and therefore on the quest for food. There is no leisure and no time to explore your potential because the courses open to you are only: die or survive the day. This is the yard stick for an society. How much it can improve over *that*. Not having a large part of the population starving or the edge of it is a major achievement of the late 19th century. And only in countries that recognized the freedom of the indivual as the supreme good, ie. capitalistic societies. And only there has the standard of living so continually risen while at the same time the necessary work hours have fallen. Over the course of 'only' a hundred years, common wealth has at least quadrupled while the average hours spend working a week has been decreased by 50%. The situation has become so that an american bum that wont accept welfare for reasons of pride can do better by begging than an north korean working their 15 hours a day.

      To quote an article http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?control=1590
      that in turn quotes the Austrian economist Ludwig van Mises thusly:

      "In the capitalist society there prevails a tendency toward a steady increase in the per capita quota of capital invested . . . . Consequently, the marginal productivity of labor, wage rates, and the wager earners' standard of living tend to rise continually."

      consider farming out labor to countries where their minimum wage and working conditions are lower than legally acceptable levels in the US is similar to slavery.

      You can consider everything you want to be everything else. It doesn't make it so. The only meaningful definition of slavery is:
      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
      1. The condition of a slave; the state of entire subjection
      of one person to the will of another.
      2. A condition of subjection or submission characterized by
      lack of freedom of action or of will.


      I am quite certain that nike didn't make those vietnamise work at gun point. Also, compared to the 'rural' life there, which is struggling with the soil for your bare survival and without the aid of any machinery that can be, by a reasonable standard, be described aa 'modern', working for nike seems like a bliss. Which is exactly why people work there.
      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
  6. Silly submitter by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who doesn't know the difference between Alumina and Aluminum.

    What next, suggesting people use the silicon in their computers as a breast implant?

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Silly submitter by Epistax · · Score: 0

      Hey, many nerds keep their silicon and silicone quite close.

    2. Re:Silly submitter by criordan · · Score: 2, Funny

      What next, suggesting people use the silicon in their computers as a breast implant?

      You mean like Seven of Nine?

      --
      http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
    3. Re:Silly submitter by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      In Star Trek IV when Scotty visits the glass factory and gives the owner the formula for "transparent aluminum" he uses a computer and creates an atomic model.

      The implication of that is that other atoms that are not aluminium are involved.

      Whilst the name might not be technically accurate it's not all that inaccurate. Calling it "transparent alumina" isn't much more accurate than "transparent alumium" since this substance is an alloy of alumina with other rare-earth metal oxides.

    4. Re:Silly submitter by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      Transparent aluminum makes me think it can still conduct electricity. Can transparent alumium conduct electricity?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    5. Re:Silly submitter by gowen · · Score: 1
      The implication of that is that other atoms that are not aluminium are involved.
      Thats an inference, not an implication.

      He could easily be showing a revolutionary new lattice structure into which aluminium atoms could be arranged, or showing how doping aluminium with trace amounts of other atoms produce a lattice with the desired properties.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    6. Re:Silly submitter by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      He could easily be showing a revolutionary new lattice structure into which aluminium atoms could be arranged
      ... or he could just be pulling stuff out of his butt. It's not like the technical consultants who work for the Star Trek shows and movies are known for taking great care to make sure that the stuff in the show fits in, even to the smallest degree, with the science that we know today :)
    7. Re:Silly submitter by gowen · · Score: 1

      Aye, but he cannae change the Laws of Physics, Jim!

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    8. Re:Silly submitter by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      >>What next, suggesting people use the silicon in their computers as a breast implant?

      >You mean like Seven of Nine?

      Hey, Jeri Ryan does not have breast implants!

    9. Re:Silly submitter by goldmeer · · Score: 1

      I always figured that "Transparant Aluminum" really should be "Transparant Aluminum(r)" as it is a trademarked brand name that a company used to describe the product that it makes. sort of like "Lexian(r)" is a trademark of GE.

    10. Re:Silly submitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the whole point of this article is not what we call it:
      Transpartent Alumin(i)um vs. Alimina.

      Star Trek predicted a metal based very-strong-for-the volume transparent material (at least good enough for human observation capabilities). I.e. that you can have a structural wall you can see through.

      Also that it was "shown" to have a "formula" (displayed on a Mac no less). I.e. that it was not just a specific arrangement of the atoms of a single element (al la a carbon nanotube, diamonds, graphite, etc.). Instead it is a chemical formula with potentially many different elements involved.

      Other than the suitability for structural use (i.e. pressurized hulls) we already seem to be seeing all of this.

    11. Re:Silly submitter by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      And the wikipedia entry has already been updated. Cool

    12. Re:Silly submitter by mattACK · · Score: 1
      I work for a semiconductor company. I for one have a great time referring to "Silicone" in meetings. The funny thing is that no one has ever corrected me.

      In summation: meetings are boring.

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
  7. Transparent alumuinum is here... by hal2814 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...but I still can't do something primitive like use my mouse to talk to the computer.

    1. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by salzbrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well you have to take LDS first, than it might work...



      Get a free iPod. Here is how it works.
    2. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by nosaj72 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you saying only Mormons get to talk to their computer?

    3. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      I still can't do something primitive like use my mouse to talk to the computer.
      Heh (OT, I know unless you count Star Trek related jokes under this topic...) a few years ago our mr Kok, our prime minister at the time, tried just that when confronted with a computer in public. He picked up the mouse, looked at it as if uncertain what to do with it, then spoke into it. To cover his mistake he stated: "Normally I have people to handle this [computers] for me". Pretty sad for someone who claims to have both feet planted firmly in modern day's society.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by sploo22 · · Score: 1

      You didn't watch the movie, did you?

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    5. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by jeffasselin · · Score: 2, Informative

      LDS = Latter-Day Saints, or Mormons.

      LSD = lysergic acid diethylamide, a well-known psychotropic drug.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    6. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didn't watch the movie, did you?

    7. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by jaybird144 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we know this, but Kirk doesn't in the movie...

    8. Re:Transparent alumuinum is here... by syukton · · Score: 1

      I don't really see why nobody has thought of this yet.

      In-ear noise-cancelling microphones. The greatest problem with voice recognition is background noise. If the only thing transmitted to the computer were the vibrations of your skull, then only your voice would be transmitted, greatly improving the ability for voice recognition in day-to-day computer use.

      Also, brainwaves? If we can train ourselves to move dots onscreen (google it) with our brains, and play simple games (again, google it) with our brains, then surely we could train our brains to interface with a system proximally. You'd be trained to move a dot in your mind up, down, left, right, center, or none. And this simple configuration could be used to turn your lights on and off, your alarm clock on and off, channel surf, etc. If every device in your house was wirelessly communicating proximity data relating your position to various networked devices, the device nearest you would respond to your brain-commands.

      Seriously, either of these ideas is technologically viable. Why aren't they being done? People are willing to wear hearing aids to enhance the way they hear, why not wear a microphone to enhance how other [machines/people] hear you?

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  8. Re:now we can finally save the whales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing that came to my mind as well...

  9. Begin Star Trek comments in.... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh who am I kidding, there are already a bunch of them by now...

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  10. well then there are rubies and stuff by LucidBeast · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aren't many jewels aluminum compounds?
    google search of rubies and aluminum:
    http://pearl1.lanl.gov/periodic/element s/13.html

    1. Re:well then there are rubies and stuff by Vacuum+Sux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Certainly. Sapphire is a crystal form of aluminum oxide and it is quite transparent. For example it doesn't absorb ultraviolet photons close to the visible spectrum which make it a suitable material to have in the windows to my vacuum chamber when I want to shoot UV laser light in to it.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the profit overlords welcome you!
    2. Re:well then there are rubies and stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and synthetic corundum ( rubies saphires ) has been made via this same method for over a century. Check Verneuil flame-fusion process for prior art.

  11. It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Alumina (aluminium oxide) is not the same as aluminium, that's like saying that water ice(hydrogen oxide) is 'Transparent Hydrogen'.

    Alumina or corundum as the natural material is known, is found in nature as a clear mineral - different colour variations give you Ruby and Sapphire.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by gowen · · Score: 1

      Transparent Hydrogen: now there's a breakthrough we could all benefit from...

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Isn't hydrogen already transparent?

    3. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      Not when it's a solid. That's why this magical 'Transparent Hydrogen' stuff I speak about is so important!

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    4. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by adavies42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      So basically, alumina glass is to corundum as silica glass is to quartz?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    5. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by Ba3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      woah! transparent hydrogen! Maybe they can make superstrong containers to transport toxic dihydrogen oxide.

      I mean, after the tiger-repelling rock, I thought i learned not to misunderestimate science!

    6. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Lisa, I want to buy your rock.

    7. Re:It's not aluminum, it's alumina. by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      isnt hydrogen already transparent? ;-)

      --

  12. in other news... by DrCash · · Score: 2, Funny
    And in a seemingly unrelated story released today in the year 2367, humpback whales are being re-released in the wild after over 350 years of extinction. Starfleet Captain James T. Kirk saved the planet from the clutches of an unknown alien probe by travelling back in time to retrieve two humpback whales to repopulate the species!

    And the rest of the story,... is available on DVD!

    1. Re:in other news... by sploo22 · · Score: 1
      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    2. Re:in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ack, should have hit preview. Oh well.

    3. Re:in other news... by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
      Sausalito, CA (AP) - The Sausalito Cetacean Institute is sad to report the disappearance of Gillian Taylor, staff biologist at the Institute. Dr. Taylor was involved in a recent controversy over the release of George and Gracie, two of the Institute's humpback whales. She was last seen with two friends, one of which was also involved in a small incident at the whale aquarium.

      Sausalito Police is treating this as a cult-related abduction. Anyone knowing the whereabouts of Dr. Taylor and her friends, a male caucasian, approx 45 years of age and an asian man also in the forties, dressed in ceremonial robes, is invited to contact the tip line.

    4. Re:in other news... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      You'd think that they'd mention that he was busted from Admiral the same day.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. glassish properties by basics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As glass itself is technically not a solid but a slow-moving liquid would glass not made from silica have the same general properites as "normal" glass?

    I generally think of glass as being very inert for example. Anyone know if this would be the case if the glass was composed of differant substances?

    (chemistry maybe?)

    1. Re:glassish properties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would glass not made from silica have the same general properites as "normal" glass?

      Yes.

    2. Re:glassish properties by nagora · · Score: 5, Informative
      glass itself is technically not a solid but a slow-moving liquid

      A common misconception caused by the old "spun" method of making glass which makes sheets which are thicker at the bottom than the top. People have often assumed that old glass has "flowed" into that shape. It hasn't: it was made that way. Glass does not in fact flow, not even slowly.

      Search on Google for "glass flow" for lots and lots of stuff about this.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    3. Re:glassish properties by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      As glass itself is technically not a solid but a slow-moving liquid...

      Furrfu!

      (Or have I just been trolled?)

    4. Re:glassish properties by Isca · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you waited long enough, it would. Of course, it might be many many many times more than the universe's age before it happens. :) http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/gmis9844. htm

    5. Re:glassish properties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After writing this article Zanotti coauthored an article with pk Gupta. In this article they corrected zanottis estimates of the temperature dependence of the viscousity. See the link elsewhere in this thread. (YIAAGP)

  14. Feeling stupid by alta · · Score: 1

    Ok, I have a college degree, but not in science. After reading the article, my head's swiming in gigapascals and moles. Here's my idiot's summary: They mix it with some stuff, get it really hot, and cool it down really fast (in water), but not as fast as some other stuff, and you can kinda see through it, but looking at the pics, not very well. I was feeling pretty stupid until I noticed this was on physicsweb.com. That made me feel better. At least I understand the stuff posted on devshed and onlamp...

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:Feeling stupid by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      A mol is like 6.023 * 10^23 atoms of a substance and is the basis of measure for elements and elemental compounds. IE...the molar mass of water is 18g.

      Gigapascals - One billion Pascals....Pascal = What?

    2. Re:Feeling stupid by Elminst · · Score: 1

      The pascal (symbol Pa) is the SI unit of pressure.

      It is equivalent to one newton per square metre. The unit is named after Blaise Pascal, a French mathematician, physicist and philosopher.

      http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Pascal-(u nit)

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    3. Re:Feeling stupid by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      A Pascal is a unit of pressure. units gives:

      you have: pascal
      you want: atmosphere
      * 9.869233e-06
      / 1.013250e+05

    4. Re:Feeling stupid by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 3, Informative
      This may help. Pascals are a unit of pressure equal to one newton per square meter. This is roughly equal to the weight of 100g spread over one square meter.

      One atmosphere = 1 bar = 780 torr/mm mercury = 101.3 kilopascals.

      Hence 1GPa is about 10000 atmospheres.

      These kinds of pressures are not (too) difficult for research labs but industry goes all queasy above about 500 as these pressures don't scale well.

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
    5. Re:Feeling stupid by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Not necesary atoms. Could as well be molecules, crystals or bicycles. The mol is a simulare concept as a 'dozen'.

    6. Re:Feeling stupid by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Could as well be molecules, crystals or bicycles.

      I would like to caution you about the storage price of one mole of average 10 speed bicycles.

    7. Re:Feeling stupid by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      I don't have a college degree, but I am a chemistry major, so I'll try and put this out in simple terms; if anybody with an actual BS/MS/PhD in Chem wants to correct my undergraduate mistakes, please do:

      Glasses are compounds nominally formed when a metal is cooled too fast to form some sort of regular, rigid structure. When you look at solid metals, like steel, at a molecular level, they have a very regular, crystalline-like structure, which is what gives them their unique strength (this is also why diamonds are so tough; crystalline carbon). Problem is, these metallic crystals are very good at absorbing energy in certain wavelengths, and make a really bad conductor for light, although they do conduct electricity quite well (with a smaller amount of absorption).

      If you can get a metal cooled quickly enough, it doesn't have time to form a lattice, and you get (nominally) glass, transparent to light. This is easily done with Silica, but cooling other metals fast enough is incredibly impractical. The 3M guys have found a way around this, and as such, have managed to produce a glass out of Alumina, which has a number of advantages over Silica-based glass; namely, it's stronger per unit weight, good refractive qualities, and better thermal response.

      Hope that helped. :)

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    8. Re:Feeling stupid by alta · · Score: 1

      Ahh, that really makes a lot more sense...

      Here's my longterm solution to this problem.


      echo physicsweb.com 1270.0.0.1 >> /etc/hosts

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  15. Yes but... by condour75 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're so far behind on launching ubermenchen into deep space on the Botany Bay. And where's Voyager VII?

  16. Re:I graduated! by hanssprudel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's great!

    But in August? Not so much...

  17. Bullet Proof Glass ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With that technology, we can create Alumina Bullet Proof Glass... That's great.

    How about building with alumina windows ? Beter Resistance to fire and EarthQuake ?

    It's a good discovery. Realy.

    1. Re:Bullet Proof Glass ? by muskr · · Score: 1

      Well, also hardness does generally does not relate to a material's ability to stand up to an impact. Steel can be made harder by incorporating more impurities, but the material quickly becomes brittle and snaps under pressure.
      That's how diamonds are cut. They are very hard, but also brittle, so they can fracture along cleavage (huh huh. He said cleavage.) planes.

  18. Capt Kirk by Dharkfiber · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Scotty: How do we know he didn't event the damn stuff?

  19. Submitter - Not Silly by tonywestonuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't Aluminum a major constituant part of Alumina? (along with Oxygen)... Seams to me that that makes the term 'Transparant Aluminum' valid.

    1. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by gowen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, alumina has almost none of the same properties as aluminium (since you're from the UK too, I'll spell that word correctly from now on). It's extremely tough (used in drilling bits), non-conductive and non-reactive. One would expect something described as "Transparent Aluminium" to behave a bit like Aluminium. Alumina doesn't.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by sploo22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pure aluminum is a metal. Aluminum oxide is not - it's like the difference between hydrogen and water.

      As I understand it, pure metals can't be transparent because light is an electromagnetic wave which gets "short-circuited" by conductive materials. Presumably the oxides disrupt this conductivity. And anyway, the alumina is combined with other oxides before being used to form glass.

      --
      Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
    3. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Aluminum a major constituant part of Alumina? (along with Oxygen)... Seams to me that that makes the term 'Transparant Aluminum' valid.

      Well in that case I'll get started on 'Transparent Oxygen' right away and it won't matter! :D

    4. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by rco3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it makes the term "transparent alumina" valid. The term 'Aluminum' refers to an element, whereas alumina refers to a compound of aluminum. If you refer to the properties of aluminum (or aluminium, if it makes this easier for you), you are (or at least will be understood by others to be) referring to the properties of a quantity of essentially pure aluminum, which is transparent under no condition.

      Therefore, the term "transparent aluminum" is incorrect. Sorry.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    5. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by PatrickThomson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and that reminds me, there's this horrific new danger-chemical being given to children, it's made from hydrogen, the most flammable gas in existence, and oxygen, the pure essense of burning, I mean the safety implications are enormous! stop DHMO now!

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    6. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by kcelery · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I remember, the first laser was made from a ruby rod, which is a form of aluminum oxide.

    7. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by dhovis · · Score: 5, Informative
      As I understand it, pure metals can't be transparent because light is an electromagnetic wave which gets "short-circuited" by conductive materials. Presumably the oxides disrupt this conductivity. And anyway, the alumina is combined with other oxides before being used to form glass.

      Sort of....

      A better way of explaining it would be that for a photon to be absorbed by an electron, there must be an empty higher energy state for the electron to move to (E = Eo + hv, where Eo is the energy state of the electron and hv is the energy of the photon). In solids with metallic bonding, there are many electrons floating around and many free electronic states for them to move to, so any photon that enters the solid can be absorbed by an electron that will then jump to a higher energy state (which will be free, because there are so many free energy states).

      In the case of insulating and semiconducting materials, there is a gap in the energy states, so some transitions are not allowed. For pure, single crystal Al2O3, (aka white sapphire), there are (essentially) no transitions available that correspond to the energy of photons of visible light. If you start substituting in Cr3+ ions for the Al3+ ions, your sapphire will turn red and we call it "ruby". In this case, the Cr impurities provide transitions that can absorb wide ranges of visible light, but not red light. What is more is (if this is fairly pure), the ruby will not only absorb light of other wavelengths, but it will emit red light as well. Try putting a synthetic ruby under a UV light, it will glow red.

      However, it should be noted that other defects can scatter and absorb light as well. Grain boundaries, voids, inclusions, etc. will affect your light transmittance. It has been possible for some time now to make polycrystalline alumina that is translucent (Lucalox), but polycrystalline alumina can never be transparant, so there are two ways to make alumina transparant: make it single crystal (only one grain, so no grain boundaries) or amorphous (no grain boundaries, because there is no long range crystal order).

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    8. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by aonaran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a term doesn't need to be accurate to come into common use.

      Think of these examples:
      Pensylvania Dutch (not dutch)
      Mountain ash (not an ash)
      mountian lion (not a lion)
      american buffalo (not a buffalo)

      Just because a name is born of ignorance doen't prevent it from becoming the common name for something.

      I could see how the Transparent Aluminum of Star Trek is a mislabeled transparent alumina rather than a physics defying metal.

    9. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Of all the days not to have mod points... I guess gratitude will have to do. Nice explanation. Thanks.

    10. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by WaltFrench · · Score: 1

      Well, the same way that Sodium and Chlorine are the two constituents (US spelling) of table salt. "Is contained in" doesn't mean the properties are the same. Sodium and Chlorine are both still poisonous.

      --
      "Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"
    11. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny
      Isn't Aluminum a major constituant part of Alumina? (along with Oxygen)... Seams to me that that makes the term 'Transparant Aluminum' valid.

      I tend to agree: I prefer to say that the cars I had in high school were built largely out of "Brown Steel".

    12. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by kbahey · · Score: 1

      No, not the same.

      Sodium is a metal that reacts vigorously with water releasing hydrogen. Chlorine is a toxic gas with a distinct smell and chemically active too.

      Sodium Chloride is table salt.

      See?

    13. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why not say "solid oxygen is here" ... it's just as silly.

    14. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1
      Thank you for the first truly informative post.

      The headline title use of "aluminum" was a slip as inexcusable as the use of "silicone" in reference to semiconductor substrates, and "silicon" in reference to adhesives and breast implants.

      Punishment for the original poster: oxygen deprivation.

    15. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember seeing a demonstration on conductive polymers, and I immediately took notice of the fact that they had a metallic sheen to them. The same properties that lead to conduction also lead to the reflective properties of metal.

      If you just want something transparent that is very durable, you can use something like this alumina technology, or even something crazy like panes of diamond glass or something like that (I'm not sure how strong diamond glass would be, but I'm guessing pretty strong).

      On the other hand, a true transparent metal would have lots of desirable properties that none of these materials have. Metals are malleable and ductile, conduct heat well, can withstand stress by deforming, and conduct electricity. All of these properties have to do with the metallic bonds between metal atoms, and consequently they are incompatible with being transparent. That isn't to say that you can't make a nonmetallic material that can transfer heat, or which can bend - but it wouldn't be by the same mechamism as how a metal works.

      I always loved metallic bonds simply because they are such an elegant demonstration of how a microscopic property such as chemical bonding leads to macroscopic properties like conductivity and malleability.

      For those who want to know more, almost any general chemistry textbook will have a short section on metallic bonding which describes how they work and why they lead to these properties.

    16. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by nine-times · · Score: 1
      No, it makes the term "transparent alumina" valid. The term 'Aluminum' refers to an element, whereas alumina refers to a compound of aluminum. If you refer to the properties of aluminum (or aluminium, if it makes this easier for you), you are (or at least will be understood by others to be) referring to the properties of a quantity of essentially pure aluminum, which is transparent under no condition.

      I can't believe I'm even getting into this argument, but the person who posted this story was obviously referring to Star Trek IV, The Voyage Home, where Scotty shares the chemical formula for what he refers to as "Transparent Aluminum". Now, obviously, this material isn't just aluminum (in the ficticious world we're talking about). I don't recall exactly, but you even see that he's entering some complicated chemical formulas and you see models of molicules and whatever- of course it's all fake, but you see some things like this on the computer screen. So anyway, it's some kind of a crystaline compound, containing aluminum, that's supposed to be transparent, but far stronger than any form of conventional glass.

      If somebody has managed to make something even close to this, can't you let some geeks have some fun and make the reference? Or is it really so important to prove that you know chemistry better that you can't allow geeks to use loose terminology for the sake of Star Trek fun?

    17. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by CapnGib · · Score: 1

      Of course! Now I'm off to drink some liquid hydrogen!

      --
      Beauty is truly in the eye of the tiger
    18. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by dhovis · · Score: 1
      I remember seeing a demonstration on conductive polymers, and I immediately took notice of the fact that they had a metallic sheen to them. The same properties that lead to conduction also lead to the reflective properties of metal.

      Actually, I think most of the "conductive polymers" have a significant amount of metal particles in them.

      If you just want something transparent that is very durable, you can use something like this alumina technology, or even something crazy like panes of diamond glass or something like that (I'm not sure how strong diamond glass would be, but I'm guessing pretty strong). On the other hand, a true transparent metal would have lots of desirable properties that none of these materials have. Metals are malleable and ductile, conduct heat well, can withstand stress by deforming, and conduct electricity. All of these properties have to do with the metallic bonds between metal atoms, and consequently they are incompatible with being transparent. That isn't to say that you can't make a nonmetallic material that can transfer heat, or which can bend - but it wouldn't be by the same mechamism as how a metal works.

      A couple of things here. Diamond "glass" would be amorphous carbon and would be (and is) very weak. As far as "transparent metal" goes, you've pretty much hit it on the head, it is an oxymoron, but you can combine some properties in other materials. For example, beryllium oxide has roughly the same thermal conductivity as copper (!), yet is an electrical insulator. Cobalt oxide is surprisingly ductile. You are correct, though, the mechanisms are different.

      The other thing worth pointing out is that there are transparent conductors, though they don't quite have the conductivity of copper. Indium Tin Oxide is one example, though I have to admit, I'm not entirely clear on why this works. I do know that you have to have a pretty thin layer of ITO, otherwise is ceases being transparent.

      Anyway, one of the things you said reminded me of a story told to me by one of my ceramics professors. He was talking to a metallurgist who told him that "You know, ceramics wouldn't be such bad materials, if you could just make them a little bit ductile", to which my prof replied "I will, just as soon as you make your metals just a little bit transparent".

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    19. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by dwhitman · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think most of the "conductive polymers" have a significant amount of metal particles in them.

      No. Well, sure, you can make a conductive composite by filling a polymer with metal particles, but that's not what is meant by "conductive polymers".

      The prototypical conductive polymer is polyacetylene. In its conductive state, it is shiny and looks like a metal.

    20. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      Just because a name is born of ignorance doen't prevent it from becoming the common name for something.

      And then there's mountain oysters. Sometimes, ignorance *is* bliss.

    21. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by rco3 · · Score: 1

      And your point is what, exactly? This isn't *common* use, it's a bunch of ignorant yahoos on Slashdot getting two dissimilar substances confused. And that's just the stupid editors! The only reason ANYBODY cares about this story is because Hemos and crew keep (deliberately, I suspect) posting stories which refer to alumina, but use aluminum in the headlines to make the dipshits who think Star Trek science has any connection to reality all excited and make people like you goad people like me into pointing out how ignorant the whole thing is.

      It's like saying, "Hey! I just discovered bread which can transmit signals over long distances! It's called 'whole wheat' bread, and it's got this stuff called 'fiber' which channels and conducts light!"

      I mean, let's face it: there's nothing new about transparent alumina. It's called sapphire, unless it's full of chromium and turns red, in which case it's called ruby. It's not metallic; it's not a conductor, nor is it strong, or flexible like aluminum. Sapphire is much harder than aluminum, and *much* more transparent (hence the difference). It's useful for almost exactly none of the things that aluminum is useful for, and vice versa.

      Bison are at least edible like buffalo, and look like buffalo, and probably smell like buffalo. The difference only matters to other bison, and a few nitpicky biologists. All of your examples are typified by things which are similar, and in each case the difference is truly academic. This case matters to people here on Slashdot, because it means some dumbass has gotten them all worked up about the transparent aluminum case they're gonna get Mommy to buy 'em for their next birthday. Or, in reality, not.

      And no, I'm not a chemist or a metallurgist. I'm a lightning researcher, ffs. This isn't specialized minutiae. It should be especially clear to those who read the article the first two times it was posted.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    22. Re:Submitter - Not Silly by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Just to add more - what makes something a conductive polymer is the presence of very long strings of conjugated bonds.

      In polyacetylene you have alternating single and triple bonds. Or at least, that is how you'd draw it if you didn't under stand resonance. In reality, you have long molecular orbitals that run the whole length of a molecule. And a molecule could have macroscopic length. Essentially you have a tunnel that electrons occupy which runs the length of the molecule - leading to conductivity. If you put an electron into the orbital at one end you can then pull it out at the other end. All those parallel orbitals have probably near-identical energies, so electrons can basically move across them at will. This leads to the metallic look. However, it is still a polymer and it bends more like plastic than like metal.

      A conductive polymer in theory could probably have much higher conductivity than metal dust embedded in plastic. The one has metal-like orbitals that run the length of the piece of plastic. The other has pieces of metal separated by an insulator.

      This has me thinking about how conductivity works. I've always thought of orbitals as basically being occupied or unoccupied. However, in real life it does take finite time for an electron to get from one end of a wire to another. In theory a transmission wire going between two cities is a single molecule, and there are orbitals that run the full length of it due to metallic bonding. Why does an electron inserted at one end behave clasically, instead of being instantly available at the other end to be removed from the same orbital?

  20. science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the great things about sci-fi as a thematic backdrop (be it literature or movies/tv) is that it alone of all the genres has the possibility of inspiring a tangible effect upon the real world.

    I remember an interview with James Doohan where he said his greatest pride that came from his career was that he inspired other people to pursue careers where they could make a difference to the world. How many engineers became engineers or went into sciences because of Star Trek?

    I'm familiar with the Arthur C Clarke suggesting satellites; I doubt a similar cause/effect with Star Trek IV happened here. However, the similarities are cool, and at least with this genre there is the POSSIBILITY of changing the world for the better.

    PS Fortunately such transitions from sci-fi fantasy to real world are few and far between. 90%+ of tv SF and pulp SF is dreck, and I myself and not looking forward to a Brave New World...

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The movie Galaxy Quest illustrated what you're talking about.

      A recent example is the Alcubierre warp drive. A general relativist took a break from computing the gravity fields of real objects to ask himself whether there was any way to create a field with the property of allowing faster-than-light travel.

      Heinlein gave another example when he testified to Congress about space program funding. He got his stroke surgery from a surgeon who excelled at having patients survive. The surgeon did so well because he'd invested in good equipment. Heinlein (engineer at heart) studied all the equipment that was saving his life and found that he could trace it all to space program spinoffs. And what do you think the 1960's NASA engineers read when they were growing up?

      >it alone of all the genres has the possibility of inspiring a tangible effect upon the real world.

      I'm sorry to quibble with an insightful post but that's too absolute a statement. "Uncle Tom's Cabin" influenced history.

    2. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody think that religious literature might have inspired tangible effects on the world? Nah.
      How about autobiography (Mein Kampf)?
      Economic theory (Das Kapital)?
      Philosphy? Surely you jest.
      Solzhenitsyn? Rousseau? Tom Paine?
      Just writers blowing hot air.
      Now Sci-Fi, that's IMPORTANT!

      Oh, you mean something that YOU have read and
      was written in the last 30 years or so (i.e
      only 'relevant' stuff need apply).

    3. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 1

      One of the great things about sci-fi as a thematic backdrop (be it literature or movies/tv) is that it alone of all the genres has the possibility of inspiring a tangible effect upon the real world.

      I think that is a very narrow view of literature. I doubt anyone would claim religous literature has not had a tangible effect upon the real world. In fact this extends to almost any 'classic' literature. It is difficult to bring to mind much literature deemed to be 'classical' which has NOT had a tangible effect upon the real world. George Orwell, Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde, all non sc-fi authors who's works have had an arguably much larger impact on the real world than any sci-fi.

    4. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      ok ok ok, i got a bit excited with my hyperbole...

      My point was that sci-fi writers write on the basis of 'what if'.

      Alot of, most of, the writers and works you identified are communications vehicles for social commentary. People analysing the environment around them and asking "why is this the way it is?". they use literature or the printed word to communicate ideas and to gradually evolve soceity. Also, the concepts discussed are not HARD CONCEPTS or PHYSICAL OBJECTS. They are discussing social trends, abstract theories that are not definitively 'right' or 'wrong'. they're contributing to a shared dialogue about the society they live in.

      Sci-fi writers, on the other hand, invent concepts or devices that don't exist, then extrapolate what they can do. They're INVENTING. The objects they conceive of change society merely by being. SF includes trends about social engineering too, but in this way they're more in common with the previous works you identified.

      I'm an english lit/history major, so I'm well aware of the works you've cited. I just see SF as a unique experience in literature that doesn't get the credit its due.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    5. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1984 was science fiction, unless you are a literature snob who believes otherwise.

    6. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by jafac · · Score: 1

      The guy from the RObot Suit article yesterday said he was inspired by watching Giant Robot shows on Japanese TV.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:science inspiring sci-fi inspiring science... by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 1

      1984 was science fiction, unless you are a literature snob who believes otherwise.

      You must be referring to George Orwell. 1984 may be sci-fi but his non sci-fi work has been equally influential(Animal Farm?).

  21. and Bones and Scotty can look for a whale tank by evil-osm · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. oh... joy.

    --


    E.

    Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
  22. 10 bucks to the first company.... by d3ity · · Score: 2, Funny

    10 bucks goes to the first company/person to make me a case out of this stuff.

    1. Re:10 bucks to the first company.... by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

      sure, i'll make you a case out of this. but for a case of solid sapphire, it'll cost you more than $10.

      --
      09
  23. Dammit, i wanted to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 20 comments and the server is toast...anyone have a mirror?

    1. Re:Dammit, i wanted to RTFA by gwizah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scotty (speaking to server): Computer...Hello Computer!

      Capt. Kirk: Scotty...We need more usr req's!

      McCoy: It's dead Jim.

      --

      There is no spork.
    2. Re:Dammit, i wanted to RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no spork

      I take it you havent seen "The Search for Spork?"

  24. Neat by jesuspower · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Thats really neat. I geuss many inventors get ideas from Sci-Fi and try to work out solutions like that. Kinda cool. http://jesuspower.spymac.net

    --
    __ Jesus Loves you! He died in your place so you would not have to die and go to Hell.
  25. Communicator by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Yea, but I want the cool thing to wear on my shirt.... hey that's a good idea for a cellphone company :)

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Communicator by jaredmauch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't remember where i read about it, but it must've been here.. there are actually IP Phones made by one company that are wearable. Their primary market is hospitals. Ah yes, a quick google found me the product link.

  26. He didn't use Transparent Aluminum for the tank. by AzrealAO · · Score: 2, Informative

    He traded the formula of Transparent Aluminum for sufficiently strong plexiglass for the tank.

  27. The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by kamelkev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wonder woman would be all over this... this is the missing ingredient for the ever elusive "invisible plane".

    Seriously though, this has crazy applications. Imagine all the things you could make with this stuff:

    Windshields that bend instead of crack, providing protection during an accident

    Pairs of glasses that won't break

    No more broken windows because the kid down the street hits a baseball at your house.

    There seem to be virtually limitless applications, assuming the optical properties are similar to that of glass, which the article alludes to.

    1. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by dykofone · · Score: 3, Informative
      It has similar optical properties, but probably not similar mechanical properties. It's Alumina first off, which is a ceramic I believe, but thinking of the way it's formed, you can see where it would have similar properties to current glass.

      Take a metal, and cool it off very rapidly, and it becomes very hard but also very brittle. Cool if off fast enough apparantly, before the atoms have a chance to properly align themselves, and it becomes transparent, which is what happens with Silica to make glass. They just found a way to cool off Alumina fast enough. Problem is, what gives metal its characteristics are the very nice, orderly arrangement of atoms bonded in sheets, so that it can remain strong while also bending before breaking.

      I don't think this is anything other than a cool way to make glass out of something else, perhaps something stronger, but nowhere near as cool as a material resulting in clear body panels on a car, or clear coke cans.

    2. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by tgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are falling for the assumption that transarent alumina compounds are, in fact, transparent aluminum metal. Lots of gemstones are transparent alumina compounds, too. Rubies, emeralds, etc. They do not bend.

      I am not a chemist, but I believe the condition of the material to allow shifting of bonds that allows metals to bend without breaking is nearly the opposite of the condition present in glass. Ie, alumina glass may be stronger, but it will not bend.

    3. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by buro9 · · Score: 1

      "No more broken windows because the kid down the street hits a baseball at your house."

      Delightful.

      Just imagine that you have a fire in your house blocking access to your exit, now you could go for the window... but your window locks do their job quite well.

      Don't you wish your window could break now?

    4. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by dmadole · · Score: 1

      Just imagine that you have a fire in your house blocking access to your exit, now you could go for the window... but your window locks do their job quite well.

      Wouldn't you just unlock it? You are on the inside, after all.

      Probably a heck of a lot safer than breaking it, anyway.

    5. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmmm.... Beavis?

      So they can make a windows out of transparent aluminum, but they couldn't make the lock mechanism work well?

    6. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Windshields that bend instead of crack, providing protection during an accident

      My friend buys a lot of cars from the salvage yard, mostly from accidents so I've seen a fair ammount of wrecks, and I don't think making the windsheild harder is what you would want. Safty glass is already pretty effective, and even in the worst accidents, the windsheild stays together very well. What you do tend to see in bad accidents is one big spiderweb in front of the steering wheel, where often someones head impacted (probably not wearing a seatbelt).

    7. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by Auger+Duval · · Score: 1

      How about sextoys?!?!? Imagine a falice made of transparent aluminia. Better than the pyrex ones LOL

      --
      --AD
    8. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by Enthrash · · Score: 1

      Well, I totally agree that this new form of glass won't "bend", however the article mentions this material is stronger that glass. No mention of the degree to which the strength is increased, but this itself is promising.

      I think the fact that this stuff doesn't bend doesn't reduce its impact that much, possible uses might still include:

      - Larger/thinner portals in underwater/space faring craft
      - Stronger windows (who cares if it doesn't bend, last I checked glass doesn't either and we still use it)
      - Large aquarium tanks with thin paned walls (hmmm sound familiar? :) )

      etc etc. etc.

      Rich...

    9. Re:The missing ingredient for an invisible plane! by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Take a metal, and cool it off very rapidly, and it becomes very hard but also very brittle. Cool if off fast enough apparantly, before the atoms have a chance to properly align themselves, and it becomes transparent, which is what happens with Silica to make glass. They just found a way to cool off Alumina fast enough.

      I'm a jeweler and metalworker. Metal phase transitions are my speciality.

      First off let me say that neither silica nor alumina is a metal; they are (respectively) the oxides of silicon and aluminum. Metals have mostly empty outer shells which is what causes their impressive conductivity, hardness, and quite a few other properties.

      The oxide of a metal has its outer electron shells completely filled; it is no longer metallic in any way.

      However you are right in that the quenching is key. The important part is to cool it off quicker than crystals form. A crystal structure is like an electromagnetic net, allowing the material to catch photons. No crystals, no net.

      Actually, each crystal is more like a filter; crystals typically are polarized in special ways. If you have lots of small crystals throughout a material (star rubies are like this), then each one only lets some of the light through; the more layers you have, the less light gets through. Enough of them and absolutely zero photons can make it through the set of polarization filters.

      Oh and regards metal heating...

      Metals form grains in their solid state; small areas of material that are atomically aligned, similarly to a crystal. When a metal splits or bends, it tends to split or bend on grain boundaries.

      A material with large grains tends to be hard but brittle; a force large enough to break the grain boundaries tends to cleave it straight through. We call this state "tempered" A material with small grains tends to be soft and flexible; it can bend without breaking. We call this state "annealed"

      Most materials will work harden; as you bend and flex the material, grains tend to aggregate together as the opportunity arises. Take a sheet of dead soft copper and start bending it back and forth; it'll quickly become hard on the bend line, then snap in two. You could probably do the same with a paper clip if you have one handy.

      When you heat up a material, you add kinetic energy and dissolve the grains. If you quench it rapidly, it'll stay in this small-grained state. If you quench before it gets that hot, you'll lock it into a large-grained state... the grains actually grow as you heat it, because you're adding kinetic energy enabling the atoms to adhere to the grains. Most metals have a particular temperature where the grains are the largest, after which they rapidly dissolve.

      Jewelers know not the temperatures but the colors. If I make a steel tool and I want to temper it I heat it until straw-yellow, then quench it. If I want to anneal it, I hold it at cherry red for ten minutes then quench it. With silver, the temper heat is in the infrared and the anneal heat is dull red.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  28. Why not link to... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why not link to the article on transparent alumina as well? Though it needs a slight update, mind you.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Why not link to... by moby · · Score: 1

      ... or go for the kill and link directly to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparent_aluminum/

    2. Re:Why not link to... by moby · · Score: 1

      but do it without the trailing slash ... like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparent_aluminum

  29. Computer mods? by CodeMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where are all the crazy modders?

    - Transparent aluminum case
    - Transparent hard drives
    - Transparent power supplies
    All without voiding your warranty ;-)

    And for military uses - the sky is the limit (really - think about it...)

    Get a free ipod [it really works - my buddy just got his... should have believed it earlier ;-( ]

  30. Transparent ALUMINA by caffeineboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is nothing new - it's called corundum or as you more probably know it, sapphire (or ruby when it is red).

    And hard is only one part of the story. Glass is hard, yet I wouldn't want to make structural elements of an aircraft from large hunks of glass... Aluminum is light and Tough (high energy to break). It is also ductile (deforms before breaking) something that no ceramic is...

    So, while this is cool, and will probably be used for super scratch proof layers on spyplane camera transparencies or something like that where they can afford something like this, it isn't what you think it is.

    As an aside, translucent alumina is used in something you see everyday - sodium vapor lamps use alumina to encapsulate the sodium metal that they use as their filament.

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
    1. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      And hard is only one part of the story. Glass is hard, yet I wouldn't want to make structural elements of an aircraft from large hunks of glass... Aluminum is light and Tough (high energy to break). It is also ductile (deforms before breaking) something that no ceramic is...

      Just out of curiosity, what kind of properties do you look for if you want to build a submarine?

      I think it would be pretty cool to have a submarine with a transparent hull, or with at least a few bay windows.

    2. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a nice screen door.

    3. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by swb · · Score: 1

      They had a submarine with huge windows in "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea". It's a pretty dumb movie, but it would be really cool. Wouldn't you need major lights, though, to see anything? I'd guess that surface light is useless at about 100'.

    4. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by bigpat · · Score: 1

      My watch has a sapphire face (generous gift). I have had it for about 5 years now and it will not scratch no matter how many times I put it into my pocket with loose change or toss it aside. Translucent alumina is not the same thing, but if it or something with similar properties could be made more economical to produce and in larger sizes, then it would be good for more common uses where durability, strength and optical clarity are needed.

    5. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by Alioth · · Score: 1

      On a point of pedantry, sodium discharge lamps do not have a filament - they are discharge tubes. The sodium vaporizes in the inner translucent ceramic tube (in high pressure sodium lamps) or in the glass inner tube in low pressure sodium lamps. The light is from a flourescent discharge through the tube. (HP lamps are much 'whiter' because they also include mercury - the mercury vaporizes first, heating the inner tube and raising the pressure in this inner tube until the sodium begins to evaporate. The reason this inner tube is ceramic is that sodium vapour at high pressure would very rapidly corrode through a glass inner tube). Low pressure sodium lamps (which have a monochromatic orange colour) are the most efficient lamps that we've ever made.

    6. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "It's nothing new - it's called corundum or as you more probably know it, sapphire"

      Not exactly true. The chemical compound is the same but the crystaline structure is different. We can't call all forms of silicon dioxide quartz just like we can't call this corrundum. (graphite isn't diamond)

      I agree on the rest though. This will be a much stronger "glass" that will allow for thinner windows and therefore lighter replacements for glass objects. Plus they won't scratch as easily: Mohs hardness of 9. Diamond of course is 10 and glass is about 5.5

    7. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      Is nothing new - it's called corundum or as you more probably know it, sapphire (or ruby when it is red).

      Actually, it is new. You are thinking of crystalline alumina, which is not a glass. Now, they have developed a way to make amorphous alumina (alumina glass), which is much easier to process for manufacture of everyday objects. Furthermore, the alumina glass is truly transparent when sintered or thermoformed, not merely translucent like sintered alumina. This means it can be used for demanding optical applications without going through the expensive and difficult crystal growth process.

      Aluminum is light and Tough (high energy to break). It is also ductile (deforms before breaking) something that no ceramic is...

      This isn't a ceramic -- that's the cool new part. It's a glass, and glasses can be far tougher and more impact resistant than ceramics.

      As an aside, translucent alumina is used in something you see everyday - sodium vapor lamps use alumina to encapsulate the sodium metal that they use as their filament.

      Those arc capsules are sintered crystalline alumina. Good stuff, but not a glass. With the new technique developed here, it should be possible to make stronger, cheaper arc capsules that perform better. Note that the sintered ceramic is transulcent (allows some light to pass through) while the glass is transparent (optical-quality material with no inherent scattering). Nitpick: high pressure sodium lamps don't have a filament -- they use an electrical discharge through vaporized sodium and argon to produce light.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    8. Re:Transparent Alumina by Forbman · · Score: 1

      cast iron pipe breaks just fine with a sledge hammer, too. So what's your point?

    9. Re:Transparent ALUMINA by Forbman · · Score: 1

      ...they still have two cadmium-coated tungsten wires wound up like filaments at each end, except they are called "cathode" and "anode".

      (cadmium emits a lot of free electrons...)

  31. Not Liquid by Benm78 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is some debate, the scientific consensus at the moment is that (ordinary) glass is NOT a liquid. Wikipedia has some interesting background info on this discussion.

    In general, the composition of glass makes a huge different in properties such as hardness, inertness, transparancy and color. In ordinary glass, CaO is added to lower solubility in water and various other solvents.

    1. Re:Not Liquid by djfray · · Score: 1

      That link does not quote or link to any scientists, and does not say that glass is not a liquid, merely that glass blowers believe that glass does not flow at room temperature.

      --
      This sig is o Unfunny o Funny
    2. Re:Not Liquid by djfray · · Score: 1

      http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Glas s/glass.html

      --
      This sig is o Unfunny o Funny
  32. 1 kilometer is less than half a light year by BoxedFlame · · Score: 1

    The communicators in star trek go over subspace and can carry instantanious signals over huge distances, right through planets and stars. A mobile phone has a range of something like a kilometer and is easily blocked by something as trivial as a mountain.

  33. You are such a geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...only a die-hard trekkie would bother to point that out.

    1. Re:You are such a geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a die-hard would remember the name of the Plexiglass company, the computer Scotty was working on and the dimensions of plexiglass that was bargained for.
      I dont know any of those things but I did remember right away that tranparent aluminum was not built, but just provided as a formula to be worked out later.

      Ass.

    2. Re:You are such a geek... by deimtee · · Score: 1

      He asked for one inch tranparent aluminum, when they didn't know what he was talking about he traded the formula for six inch thick plexiglass.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    3. Re:You are such a geek... by jameskojiro · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Answer is:

      Plexicorp

      I wanna cookie now!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    4. Re:You are such a geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZZTTT! Looks like you need to watch it again. And pay attention this time! ;)

    5. Re:You are such a geek... by KlomDark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even weirder, back in the early 1900's, a man named Harold Warp (Now somewhat famous for starting a huge museum called Pioneer Village in the middle of Nebraska) invented a way of heat bending of plastic glass (Called Flex-O-Glass. The more commonly known 'Plexiglass' is a copy by a later competitor once the patent expired.) that retained its optical properties. This process became known as "Warping". At about the same time, mathmaticians were stumbling across the basics of the time-space continuum, and borrowed the term to refer to bending time/space.

      The main street in Minden, Nebraska has now been renamed from "Brown Avenue" to "Harold Warp Memorial Drive" (Which most people refer to now as "Warp Drive"). A friend of mine lives on Warp Drive, which is kinda cool to a geek like me.

      So they did the original creator of "Warping" a disservice when they wanted to obtain Plexiglass instead of Flex-O-Glass.

      (Yah, I went to high school in Minden... :) )

    6. Re:You are such a geek... by Wehesheit · · Score: 2, Informative
      Plexicorp

      scotty asked for plexiglass that was 60 feet by ten feet and able to withstand the pressure of 18,000 cubic feet of water. To which the plexicorp guy replied "thats easy, 6 inches"

      I'd like my super geek medal now please.

      --
      This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
    7. Re:You are such a geek... by canajin56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not quite true. Harold Warp did invent Flex-O-Glass, and there is a Harold Warp Memorial Drive. But his last name is a coincidence. Warp has meant to twist or bend something for hundreds of years. It originates from the old english word "weorpan". In 1346 it was used as a weaving term. (When weaving, you start with lengthwise threads, the "Warp" and weave the "Woof" perpendicularly across it). In 1440 the word Warp was first recorded as meaning to twist out of shape.

      This is not the only coincidental last name. I'm sure many are familar with the inventor of the ball and suction device, still used in toilets today. His name was Thomas Crapper, but "crap", meaning defication, had been slang for at least 50 years before he invented the toilet. And it has meant general refuse for a great deal longer than that. The sirname Crapper originats in the 13th century, and is a variation of "Cropper", an occupation sirname, like Cartwright, Smith, and so on.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    8. Re:You are such a geek... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Didn't a guy named Otto Titsling invent the bra? Or is that an urban legend?

    9. Re:You are such a geek... by duffahtolla · · Score: 1

      My apologies sir,

      I knew a super geek.
      I worked with a super geek,
      A super geek was my friend.
      You're no super geek.

      Such an individual would not only quote the movie but also point out that the amount of water pressure generated against a tank wall is not dependent upon its volume.

    10. Re:You are such a geek... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      The twists and turns of reality never cease to astound.

      Thanks, both of you. I'll store that in the Miscellaneous Trivia section of my mind (assuming there is a few kb left there, might have to gzip it :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  34. Very, very, very slow by dexter+riley · · Score: 4, Informative

    Glass may flow, but it does so very very very slowly. As in "age of the entire universe" slowly.

  35. yes, but... by dyfet · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it region coded? In 2367 can one finally get a region free dvd?! And, finally, what everyone wants to know is, did the copyright on mickey finally expire?!

    1. Re:yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you don't see any cartoon mice anywhere in the series, do you?

      My theory is that, after the invention of time travel, they decided that people might have the incentive to abuse it, travelling back in time to register things first, and thus polluting the timeline. Therefore, they made all copyrights eternal. I mean, given the pathetic security (give me 5 minutes and I'll hack ) it's safe to say that a certain software monopoly's code is still being used...

  36. 3M by scottennis · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that we'll soon be getting more durable Post-it Notes?

    1. Re:3M by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that we'll soon be getting more durable Post-it Notes?

      No, it means we are getting invisible Post-it Notes...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  37. Humm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Alumina is the same stuff that's naturally occuring in gems like rubies, does that mean they'll be able to create rubies synthetically?

    1. Re:Humm by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      Actually, artificial rubies have been around since 1902 when Auguste Verneuil developed the flame-fusion process that now carries his name.

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    2. Re:Humm by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, except for tense. We have already been making synthetic rubies and blue sapphires under laboratory conditions for at least 50 years now. Google for "synthetic ruby" if you dare.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    3. Re:Humm by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      Pretty much any ruby you buy now will be synthetic. The world's supply of natural rubies are virtually exhausted with all the remaining natural rubies being produced only being a light pink colored instead of the traditional deep red.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    4. Re:Humm by jnaujok · · Score: 1, Troll

      Sorry, I can buy real, natural, pigeon-blood red ruby (highest grade) by the bag fulls if I want (or if I had the $$$$$). The only recent problems with ruby production is the perpetual civil war on Ceylon, er, Sri Lanka, er Asimov's Island...

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
    5. Re:Humm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      afaik they been able to create synthetic rubies a long time.

      i think the difference here is that they can now make glass our of alumina without using high pressure...not to mention rubies may be transparent/translucent but they aren't really a "glass"

    6. Re:Humm by bluyonder · · Score: 1

      ...Ceylon, er, Sri Lanka, er Asimov's Island...

      I think you mean Arthur C. Clarke.

  38. impeccable timing by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Star Trek IV was on CBS on Saturday night. I stayed up to watch the transparent aluminum scene -- who knew the real thing was coming just 2 days later?

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:impeccable timing by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Star Trek IV was ... on Saturday night

      Looks like they know their target audience! ;)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re: impeccable timing by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      well it was on at 2 AM I think, not 8 PM "evening going out time" :)

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
  39. Oh YEAH! Wonder Woman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can build myself that Wonder Woman jet I always wanted!

    1. Re:Oh YEAH! Wonder Woman! by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1

      Wonder Woman jet AND costume? Please tell me you're a female geek on slashdot?

      --

      ---
      We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

  40. Tin-foil hat by craigmarshall · · Score: 2, Funny

    Woohoo! This means I can build myself a covert tinfoil hat!

    1. Re:Tin-foil hat by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      holy crap, we posted about the same topic at the same moment! you know what that means... they're on to us! damn their electronic beams!

  41. forget about tinfoil hats! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna be upgrading to a transparent aluminium HELMET!

    (complete with transparent aluminium visor, batteries not included, some assembly required)

  42. Voyager VII? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    While we're at it, where's Voyager III? I guess we can file this under late-1970's-NASA-plans-that-got-scrapped...

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  43. purdy pieces! by nanimo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Attractive optical properties" must be nerd talk for "pretty"...

    1. Re:purdy pieces! by Bahumat · · Score: 1

      Of course it is.

      Me (in my best Half-Life Scientist voice): "My, your optical properties are particularly attractive today. I'd delight in measuring the refractive index of your optical inputs and follicle-produced protein chains."

      Her (in her best Mutual of Omaha Wild Kingdom narrator voice): "The female... is receptive."

      This is why having a geek girlfriend is awesome... I can actually get away with conversations like this. :D

      --
      "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
    2. Re:purdy pieces! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why having a geek girlfriend is awesome... I can actually get away with conversations like this. :D

      So why must you torment the rest of us so?:P

  44. No, it's an amorphous solid. by Cadre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems a couple other people beat me to rebuking this, but I figured I'd throw another link in just in case there is any lingering doubt.

    Glass is not a liquid. Glass is an amorphous solid.

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    1. Re:No, it's an amorphous solid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      We often use the word glass to describe the substance that is used to produce windows (mostly siliciumoxide). However in physics the word glass is often used to describe any liquid that does not flow within an experimental timescale, or alternatively any liquid with a viscousity larger than 10^14 poise. These three definitions of the word are very different, and you link to a page that mixes them up.

      However I agree that windows glass does not flow within a timescale of a thousand years. If you like physics and you have access to a scientific library, then I recommend the following article, which is coauthored by PK Gupta who is a master in the field: American Journal of Physics -- March 1999 -- Volume 67, Issue 3, pp. 260-262

    2. Re:No, it's an amorphous solid. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, and I have to debunk you as well.

      That article you link to is nearly complete nonsense. Yes, the DEFINITION might be amorph.

      But the definition is completely arbitrary, like I can say String s, int s or long s. The s and its "value" or better behaviour is what matters.

      So, you never have seen a glass where the part at the bottom is twice as thick than the upper edge? As the author in your "urban legend" "paper" claims it would not happen?

      In wich part of the world do you live then? How old is your oldest window? I have seen windows about 800 years old. The bottem edge is thicker, and the upper edge is often "molten away". Erm, flown away.

      Don't mix up modern glasses with ancient glasses. Both are amorph, of course. And if you just take teh definition of minimum viscosity both are not liquid, of course.

      But: glass flows. If you place a sheet of simple glass over the edge of a table and fix it with some old books and wait, about 15 years, you see that it bends at the edge of the table.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:No, it's an amorphous solid. by Dahan · · Score: 1
      In wich part of the world do you live then? How old is your oldest window? I have seen windows about 800 years old. The bottem edge is thicker, and the upper edge is often "molten away". Erm, flown away.

      The bottom edge is (sometimes) thicker. However, you have not explained why you think that's because the glass has flowed to the bottom. Maybe it was like that when the glass was made? Because it was--800 years ago, glass windows were made using "the crown glass process. Crown glass is thicker on one end than the other. You'll also note that some old windows have the thick end on top.

      But: glass flows. If you place a sheet of simple glass over the edge of a table and fix it with some old books and wait, about 15 years, you see that it bends at the edge of the table.

      No, you will not.

  45. What we really want to know by tazanator · · Score: 1

    okay is this stuff better than what eye doctors use for glasses now. I'm sick of my 8 year old always breaking his glasses or scratching them so will this stuff survive a growing kid for reading glasses?

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    1. Re:What we really want to know by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eyeglasses are an obvious application. This stuff should be both harder and stronger than silica glass.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  46. At last... by m0RpHeus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Now I can make a transparent tinfoil^H^H^H^H^H^H^Haluminum foil hat!

    --
    Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
  47. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glass breakthrough
    11 August 2004

    Scientists in the US have developed a novel technique to make bulk quantities of glass from alumina for the first time. Anatoly Rosenflanz and colleagues at 3M in Minnesota used a "flame-spray" technique to alloy alumina (aluminium oxide) with rare-earth metal oxides to produce strong glass with good optical properties. The method avoids many of the problems encountered in conventional glass forming and could, say the team, be extended to other oxides (A Rosenflanz et al. 2004 Nature 430 761).

    Glass is formed when a molten material is cooled so quickly that its constituent atoms do not have time to align themselves into an ordered lattice. However, it is difficult to make glasses from most materials because they need to be cooled -- or quenched -- at rates of up to 10 million degrees per second.

    Silica is widely used in glass-making because the quenching rates are much lower, but researchers would like to make glass from alumina as well because of its superior mechanical and optical properties. Alumina can form glass if it is alloyed with calcium or rare-earth oxides, but the required quenching rate can be as high as 1000 degrees per second, which makes it difficult to produce bulk quantities.

    Rosenflanz and colleagues started by mixing around 80 mole % of powdered alumina with various rare-earth oxide powders -- including lanthanum, gadolinium and yttrium oxides. Next, they fed the powders into a high-temperature hydrogen-oxygen flame to produce molten particles that were then quenched in water. The resulting glass beads, which were less than 140 microns across, were then heat-treated -- or sintered -- at around 1000C. This produced bulk glass samples in which nanocrystalline alumina-rich phases were dispersed throughout a glassy matrix. The new method avoids the need to apply pressures of 1 gigapascal or more, as is required in existing techniques.

    Aluminate glasses

    The 3M scientists characterised the glasses using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and thermal analysis, and tested the strength of the materials with hardness and fracture toughness tests. They found that their samples were much harder than conventional silica-based glasses and were almost as hard as pure polycrystalline alumina.

    Moreover, over 95% of the glasses were transparent (see figure) and had attractive optical properties. For example, fully crystallized alumina-rare earth oxide ceramics showed high refractive indices if the grains were kept below a certain size.

    Author
    Belle Dumé is Science Writer at PhysicsWeb

  48. RTFA Editors by pertinax18 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Transparent Aluminum Is Here

    NO IT ISN'T! Commercially developed transparent Alumina (think clear ruby/sapphire) is here, HUGE difference. Sorry Trek fans, you will have to wait longer. There will be no clear planes, no clear cases made of Alumina. If cases were transparent Alumina then they would have the same properties as silica glass and you would have a nice greenhouse effect going on slowly (or not so slowly) frying your computer.

    Alumina is a mineral/glass/ceramic, Aluminum is a metal!

    1. Re:RTFA Editors by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Computers vent most of their heat through airflow (Feel the exhaust in the back of your case, then feel the side). The case radiates relatively little heat. Witness the Macintosh G4 Cube which has no fans, is mostly encased in plexiglass, and is cooled entirely through convection and a well-placed heatsink. The only exception are laptops, which radiate quite a bit of heat through the case.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    2. Re:RTFA Editors by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      The only exception are laptops, which radiate quite a bit of heat through the case.

      Actually, laptops conduct heat through the case. The case itself cools by convection. Radiative transport is not significant at the temperatures at which computers operate.

    3. Re:RTFA Editors by Luk+Fugl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Transparent Aluminum Is Here

      NO IT ISN'T! Commercially developed transparent Alumina (think clear ruby/sapphire) is here, HUGE difference...

      Alumina is a mineral/glass/ceramic, Aluminum is a metal!

      Well, technically,
      Alumina = Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3)

      Although aluminum oxide is a main component of ruby and sapphire that's not what alumina is, primarily. If you have something made of aluminum, just expose it to air and you'll soon have a coating of alumina on the surface.

      The alloy the article talks about is 80 mole % (that's 80% by quantity of atoms, not by weight) alumina, so it is mostly alumina, or oxidized aluminum.

      Yes, it's not a transparent metal, but I'd say that calling it "Transparent Aluminum" would be within reason.

      Jacob Fugal

    4. Re:RTFA Editors by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the clarification.

      However, those heat pipe cooling-fin jobbies behind the little fans in my Dell *look* like a radiator :)

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    5. Re:RTFA Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, it's not a transparent metal, but I'd say that calling it "Transparent Aluminum" would be within reason.

      Then instead of water, I'll call it liquid oxygen, since that's mostly what it's made of.

    6. Re:RTFA Editors by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's not a transparent metal, but I'd say that calling it "Transparent Aluminum" would be within reason.

      No it would not be within reason. Aluminum is a metal and that's it.

      And as you stated, it's Al2O3, it has more another element in it than aluminum, and neither does it have any of the properties that everyone associates with aluminum. Wouldn't it be more "within reason" to call it "Transparent Solid Oxygen"?

      Do you also tend to call rust red iron and water liquid hydrogen? All just as reasonable... let's just forget what the stuff is made of and call it what it is, we all know chemical properties of molecules often do not resemble those of their participating atoms at all, and naming like that suggest that they do.

    7. Re:RTFA Editors by Forbman · · Score: 1

      ...but we tend to not really get pure aluminum in products anyways, but still call them "aluminum". It's usually alloyed with other metals, just like iron is, to improve on some of the qualities that pure aluminum has.

      Look at newer Easton bike tubes that have scandium in them. Not a lot of it, but enough that it changes some of the mechanical properties of aluminum to the advantage for the bicycle.

      Or "titanium". Usually it's 3/2.5 Ti (Ti+vanadium+something else). Much better for most things than pure Ti. Then Lightspeed and Merlin got ahold of 6/4 Ti, which is MUCH harder and stiffer than pure Ti or 3/2.5 Ti. Of course, they can't mandrel-form the tubes (they're rolled-and-welded from sheets...) because 6/4 Ti is just too hard. But it works wonders for bike frames, and they're still called "titanium".

      We don't call glass "silica", it's just glass. Unless you're talking to a physicist, microbiologist or camera poseur...er, professional. Then they start worrying about things like "flint" glass, "fluorite" glass, etc.
      But their core material is still melted down silica, Si04. And the varieties are still called "glass", not silica.

      So if we can ignore one pedantic use of a chemical term for a different common term, then it seems equally as feasible to misappropriate another term for a different material, violating the pedantic spirit of the language once again.

      Besides, look at a bag of fertilizer. N-P-K. N is Nitrogen. OK. Truth-in-labeling momentum is conserved.

      P is for phosphorus, but the percentage listed is really the equivalant percentage of a phosphate. K is for potassium, of course, but the number is really the percent equivalance of potash, which is definitely not pure potassium, either.

      But this little violation of truth-in-advertising has been going on for, oh, at least 100 years. In fact, it's set up by law these days.

    8. Re:RTFA Editors by sparkywonderchicken · · Score: 0

      You are so correct. The importance of this is that aluminum oxide glasses are much stronger and harder than silicon oxide glasses. So being able to manufacture them commercially would have lots of implications such as scratch free lenses for eye glasses and optical equipment like telescopes. Remember all glasses are liquids with a very high viscosity and flow with time. Aluminum oxide glass is more stable than most other glasses in that respect as well.

  49. No he wouldn't! by geeber · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rosenflanz and Gildenflurn are dead!

    sorry, go ahead mod me down. I couldn't help it!

  50. Dont forget the Ion drive by darth_zeth · · Score: 1

    Remember, an Ion Drive powered the Deep Space 1.

    --
    "Nobody writes jokes in base 13." - Douglas Adams
  51. PowerBook by "Zow" · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow, I get the feeling that Apple is going to use this for the next gen of PowerBooks.

    (It's a joke -- all the materials scientists don't need to correct me.)

    -"Zow"

  52. Metallic Hydrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, Hydrogen in gaseous and liquid forms already is transparent... but there's another form of hydrogen that is silvery and opaque: Metallic Hydrogen which can exist under extreme pressures such as the core of Jupiter and Saturn. It is theorized that metallic hydrogen would look a lot like molten lithium, perhaps even a lighter silver, almost white, if you could view it.

    1. Re:Metallic Hydrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Thanks for that link.

  53. I sence a great disterbence in the force.. by sjwt · · Score: 5, Funny

    As If a million Startrek geeks cryed out in joy.

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    1. Re:I sence a great disterbence in the force.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a very bad feeling about this.

    2. Re:I sence a great disterbence in the force.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ man! Get a spellchecker!

  54. Refraction index by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the article in Nature:

    Similarly, when the grain size is maintained below the scattering limit, the fully crystallized Al[2]O[3] REO ceramics exhibit attractive optical characteristics including high refractive index (1.8 and higher) and transparency through the mid-infrared range.

    Cool. Finally something to tackle the 1.8 barrier, and smaller glasses for me. 8-)

    1. Re:Refraction index by sharp_blue · · Score: 1

      Cool. Finally something to tackle the 1.8 barrier, and smaller glasses for me. 8-)

      Perhaps these lenses are made of it? They say their "lumicera" material has Nd=2.08 and superior strength, so it might be based on Alumina.

      See the link for the lens photo. Relevant paragraph of the press-release text:

      LUMICERA has the same light transmitting qualities as optical glass commonly used in today?s conventional camera lenses, however it has two very important properties that caught CASIO?s attention. Not only is LUMICERA?s refractive index (nd = 2.08) much greater than that of optical glass (nd = 1.5 ? 1.85 *2), it also offers superior strength. CASIO has been able to create a ceramic lens with extremely high levels of precision thanks to several factors. Under recommendations from CASIO the material itself has been refined for use in digital camera optical lenses by endowing it with improved transmission of short wavelength light and eliminating pores (air bubbles) that reduce transparency. CASIO has also established a complete process involving the perfect combination of polishing material, time and pressure, and by treating the lens with a special coating compatible with a high refractive index.

      By incorporating this lens into the construction of the zoom lenses developed by CASIO, a reduction in profile of approximately 20% has been made possible.

    2. Re:Refraction index by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, ruby glasses aren't just for Elton John anymore!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  55. Clear BEER CANS!!!! by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    That would be coolest thing since stubbies!

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
    1. Re:Clear BEER CANS!!!! by pcardno · · Score: 1

      I believe that clear beer cans are also known as bottles... :-)

      --
      --- Band: Joey Ultra
  56. Transparent Alumina by dl107227 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure it's been said but bears repeating.

    If you have a high quality watch it is likely that the crystal is made from polycrystalline alumina (i.e. corundum...in this case synthetic corundum). The alumina glass is different however in the fact that it is a glass and therefore lacks crystal structure.

    Since it doesn't have to be crystallized it is likely that it will be able to be produced in large sizes. However, being a glass it is not going to have the malleable properties of aluminum metal and will probably shatter if hit hard enough.

  57. Or the blue flashlight that cures all ills by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

    I love the way they can "resequence your DNA", or reconstruct the cell damage from nano parasites...whatever... all while you are alert and aware...by waving a blue flashlight over you.

    --
    When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  58. "Making large sheets of ruby and sapphires" by anactofgod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now that's a headline I'd get excited about.

    I'd love a pair of sapphire-lensed sunglasses.

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    1. Re:"Making large sheets of ruby and sapphires" by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "I'd love a pair of sapphire-lensed sunglasses."

      Hell, I'd just love the large sheets of ruby and sapphires. I'd sell them and never have to work again!

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:"Making large sheets of ruby and sapphires" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is fine, as long as you don't do gem quality diamonds - that will win you visit from the boys from De Beers and they answer to no one...

  59. Sounds like a good plan for optical disks by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I once knew a guy who had this great idea to use aluminum oxide on DVDs and CDs to prevent scratching. He said the disks could be bulletproof, scratchproof, and unbreakable, although I think he was exagerating...

    If that was the case, that would be an AWESOME application for this. Although the MP/RIAA would see that as a reason for preventing backup copies of your media. I mean, if the disk can't be damaged, why would you need a backup? Although you could still lose it or have it stolen...

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
    1. Re:Sounds like a good plan for optical disks by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

      I once knew a guy who had this great idea to use aluminum oxide on DVDs and CDs to prevent scratching. He said the disks could be bulletproof, scratchproof, and unbreakable, although I think he was exagerating...

      I could just imagine the crime scene:

      Police Officer: Can you describe the person who attempted to raid the bank?

      Witness #1: Yes, he was covered in head to toe with CD's glued to his clothes.

      Police Officer: Can you give me any further details?

      Witness #1: I think the CD's had words on them "AOL trial account - 14 days free service".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Sounds like a good plan for optical disks by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      Although the MP/RIAA would see that as a reason for preventing backup copies of your media. I mean, if the disk can't be damaged, why would you need a backup?

      An indestructible CD? The *AAs would hate that, and would never use them. People buying replacements for scratched and broken discs are a big market for them!

      Oh, and no, you're still not entitled to make a backup, peasant!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Sounds like a good plan for optical disks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a reasonable idea, but I don't think it would be the advantage you think. The reflective paint, which the lasers actually etch, is the most vulerable part of the disc. When you get a tiny microscratch in the paint, oxidation begins to eat the paint away. The reason commercially released albums are so much more durable than CD-Rs is that they have nicer paint jobs.

    4. Re:Sounds like a good plan for optical disks by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      but DVDs are made by sandwiching the etching surface between two pieces of plastic which is one thing that makes them so durable...

      as long as the plastic surfaces are coated with the aluminum oxide, there would be virtually no chance of damaging that surface of the disk. right?

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    5. Re:Sounds like a good plan for optical disks by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      Aluminum oxide is a very tough, very abrasive matterial, it is what is used in sandpaper. When it is ground very fine and mixed with acrylics or urethanes it is being applied as a finish to flooring which is guaranteed for up to fifty years by some companies.

      I'm not sure that it is transparent enough to apply as a coating on a DVD or CD though. Maybe this "transparent aluminum" can cross that barrier though? I dunno. Sounds cool though.

      I think what is coolest about this story is that something that was science fiction a couple of years ago is now (as in already) something that is real.

  60. Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May I be the first to welcome our new light-weight, translucent overlords!!!

  61. An alumina case would actually work by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    "If cases were transparent Alumina then they would have the same properties as silica glass and you would have a nice greenhouse effect going on slowly (or not so slowly) frying your computer."

    No they wouldn't, unless you leave your computer out in the sun or something.

    We're way past the point where the heat inside a computer would simply be dissipated through the case. We now rely on fans to push warm air out and suck colder air in.

    We've been past that point for over a decade. Even in an old 286 you likely had ar least the PSU fan.

    Nowadays, it can get even more extreme. My case has 7 fans on the case alone, plus two more on the PSU. That's a lot of air circulated through the case.

    So basically it REALLY doesn't matter what material you make your case of. There are already wooden cases, leather covered cases, or literally styrofoam cases. Yes, literally, some people put their computer in a styrofoam statue, thermally insulated by almost one foot of styrofoam in all directions.

    As long as you pump enough air through it, you really won't see any difference in temperature.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  62. Computer... by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

    How do we know he didn't invent the stuff in the first place?

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  63. Should we leave all of the Star Trek jokes... by Myrmi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...or shall I just punch up clear?"

    --
    "I think everyone is an agnostic but just doesn't know" - Frazz
  64. Colorful by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After all sapphires are basically alluminum oxide too....

    Are these windows amorphous like glass or crystaline like sapphires? (Assuming amorphous, but not sure).

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Colorful by Vincent+Galliard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article refers to them as alumina glasses, so, uh, "amorphouse". A glass is by definition not a crystal.

      --
      Vincent Galliard, Precinct 9 -- "Minding the gap since 1996"
    2. Re:Colorful by Vincent+Galliard · · Score: 1

      -_- By which I mean "amorphous". Spelling-- ...

      --
      Vincent Galliard, Precinct 9 -- "Minding the gap since 1996"
    3. Re:Colorful by sydres · · Score: 1

      actualy the way I read this is that it is almost a cryptocrystaline ceramic made up of semi glassine particles sintering would definately lead to crystallization great breakthrough though

  65. Shouldn't we be doing something... constructive? by Riff6809 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Rosenflanz and colleagues at 3M in Minnesota" One of those colleagues wouldn't happen to be named Guildenstein, would they?

  66. Better? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    communicators - hell mobile phones are far better than communicators

    Huh? I somehow doubt my mobile would still work when I stand let's say on board the ISS.

  67. This is a scary coincidence by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

    Why? Because what movie did I watch last night, the first time I've ever heard of Transparent alumminum? Star Trek IV. Coincidence or conspiracy?

    Coincidence. But a hell of one.

  68. Never understood that. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's *TEA*, it's *supposed* to be hot! Why the un-necessary "Hot" at the end of Picard's request?


    Presumably he had a run of bad tea-machine experiences like this:

    "Tea, Earl Grey." <sip> "Awww fuck my old boots, it's half-cold and stewed you fucker"

    1. Re:Never understood that. by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the south, tea is supposed to be cold and sweetened. I don't drink tea, but everyone else here drinks the hell out of it.

      -B

    2. Re:Never understood that. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you don't use Earl Grey for that, it would taste vile.

    3. Re:Never understood that. by bestguruever · · Score: 1

      With the amount of sugar we use, you could use earl gray or cow patties and nobody would know the difference

      --
      if you think this is bad, you should have seen my last sig
    4. Re:Never understood that. by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Tea, Earl Grey." "Awww fuck my old boots, it's half-cold and stewed you fucker"

      Oh man, what I wouldn't give to actually hear Jonathan Stewert proclaim that!

      MAKE IT SO BITCH!

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    5. Re:Never understood that. by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ--earl grey iced tea, with a touch of sugar and lemon, is interesting in a good way.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    6. Re:Never understood that. by Xentor · · Score: 5, Funny
      Oh man, what I wouldn't give to actually hear Jonathan Stewert proclaim that!
      *cough*Patrick Stewart*cough*

      Come on, what kind of geek are you? :)
      --
      "The amount of intelligence on this planet is a constant. The population is growing." -Cole's Axiom
    7. Re:Never understood that. by Wehesheit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Patrick Stewart you stewed fucker

      --
      This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
    8. Re:Never understood that. by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 2, Funny
      I always assumed that at some point, somebody spilled their tea on their crotch, got a nasty burn, and sued the bejeesus out of McDonalds^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H the replicator manufacturing company.

      And so, after that, all replicators were programmed to only serve warm tea, unless the user specifically asked for "hot".

    9. Re:Never understood that. by T-Kir · · Score: 1

      I drink a lot of green tea instead of regular tea (it's odd being a Brit how doesn't drink the national favourite, although I make up for that with beer)... but Twinings now do a Earl Grey Green Tea and it is really good.

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    10. Re:Never understood that. by TheGavster · · Score: 3, Informative

      At some point in the first season, there's a whole scene about Picard trying to get a decent cup of tea from the replicator. The 'hot' bit is *very* critical.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    11. Re:Never understood that. by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jonathan Stewart? Is this some freaky future episode where Jonathan Frakes (Riker) and Patrick Stewart (Picard) have a son together?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:Never understood that. by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      ACK I actually said Jonathan Stewart!

      Sigh, I accept full responsibility and punishment...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    13. Re:Never understood that. by Gondola · · Score: 1

      My interpretation was that Picard had likely defined his own custom temperature settings in the database. When he said "hot," the computer would refer to Picard's personal preferences for "hot" versus the standard generic "hot", which might be much cooler (ie, a safety feature of the replicator) than the hot that I would predict Picard to prefer, just based on his personality.

    14. Re:Never understood that. by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      Youve never heard of Ice Tea? Presumably you can make Ice tea with any type of tea, including earl grey, so the Hot request is not superflous.

      --

    15. Re:Never understood that. by youritadvisor.com · · Score: 1

      what about ice tea

    16. Re:Never understood that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ice Tea. Hot".

      Sure. That makes a lot of sense.

    17. Re:Never understood that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tea is best cold, but I prefer it unsweetened. (Northerner here so iced tea is not just a southern thing)

    18. Re:Never understood that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy?

    19. Re:Never understood that. by SDF-7 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately he gets left back in the 1970's as a child during yet another time jaunt.

      Everything works out though -- they showed Data doing some research that showed he had a successful career hosting a pseudo-news show on a comedy "television" network, though he only went by Jon at that point.

    20. Re:Never understood that. by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      I may have missed that one.

      So, after asking for "tea", the machine analysed his tastes, and came up with something almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

      share and enjoy!

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    21. Re:Never understood that. by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      There was also an ongoing gag between Arthur and the computer to get a cup of tea that actually tasted like tea, yes.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    22. Re:Never understood that. by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      Agreed! I use at least 1 cup of sugar to a gallon of tea, and I'm in Jersey. Not just a southern thing at all! You do the conversions.

    23. Re:Never understood that. by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

      Arthur? Are we talking about DentArthurDent (like Slartibartfast calls him)?

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    24. Re:Never understood that. by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend insists that I set you straight. A cup of sugar per gallon isn't even close to sufficient.

      You should use at least 2 cups per gallon, with 3 per gallon as a preferred sweetning level.

      As I'm in Tennessee, I'd imagine that 3 would be more of a minimum further south.

    25. Re:Never understood that. by iLeader · · Score: 1

      green lantern doesn't drink tea.

    26. Re:Never understood that. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      A second from Alabama.

      The tea should be capable of holding a straw up... without ice! ^_^

    27. Re:Never understood that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The act of creating the lovechild probably got Frakes the job of directing the new turd of a film called Thunderbirds.

  69. First Product : Cans for Pepsi Clear v2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clear so you can see the amazing low carb beverage!

  70. Time-line by dodongo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, at least we can have comfort that here in a couple hundred years when they go back and introduce transparent aluminum to some guy in San Francisco in the mid-80s, they're not going to disrupt the timeline too terribly much.

  71. Hello, Computarrr ... by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Guess there are more places on the net but this was the first site I found which hosts the famous scene from StarTrek IV:

    http://www.theapplecollection.com/Collection/ AppleMovies/mov/scotty.html

    Be patient, QuickTime movie takes a while to load.

    1. Re:Hello, Computarrr ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conclusive proof that Macs are Sh*t compared with Star trek computers!!!

  72. PC mod by 5m477m4n · · Score: 0

    Medical uses and saving whales are all fine and good, but when are they going to do something important and make a computer case out of it?

    --

    ---
    Those who can, do
    Those who can't, teach
    Those who don't know how, supervise
  73. Finally... by NIN1385 · · Score: 0

    Now I can ram people with my radiator of my car and they wont even see it coming!

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  74. 3M still uses a MacPlus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the KEY to the discover of transparent alluminum was a MacPlus with a keyboard and a mouse (only because the speech recognition A.I. was under repair).

  75. Another /. dupe! by lscotte · · Score: 3, Informative

    This news should not be surprising to anyone, since it's essentially a dupe! http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/02/2 0/0358206&tid=126&tid=14

    The amusing thing, is that American scientists are given credit here, but if you look at the original article from 2+1/2 years ago, it was the Germans who discovered it. Hmmm...

    You could argue that this article is just a 'refinement' of the previous article. I could believe that only if a link had been provided to the original article. Ah well... Odd that the article itself doesn't mention previous work by the Germans either...

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
    1. Re:Another /. dupe! by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      The amusing thing, is that American scientists are given credit here, but if you look at the original article from 2+1/2 years ago, it was the Germans who discovered it. Hmmm...

      Well, you see, the creator of transparent aluminum is fated to be forgotten. The best these fellows can hope for is that they are remembered long enough to improve their own lives.

    2. Re:Another /. dupe! by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      The article talks about making bulk quantities of the alumina glass. The researchers aren't given credit for discovering transparent metals, they are given credit for coming up with a means of manufacturing the materials in a more cost-effective manner.

    3. Re:Another /. dupe! by bedessen · · Score: 1

      How about an actual fucking link that you can click on.

      It's funny, you neglected to make your URL into a link (and hence it had a stray space inserted into it by slashcode, making it invalid for lazy copy-and-pasters) yet for some reason you felt the need to manually add "[slashdot.org]" in your post, which is automatically added by slashcode for all links, not something that you need to type. If it were user-supplied data it would completely defeat the purpose, which is to identify the domain of the link for all the idiots that can't hover over the link and look in the status bar and are ultra-paranoid about clicking on goatse.cx man accidently.

  76. That's great, but... by ZipR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still can't talk to my mouse. How long do I have to wait for that?

    1. Re:That's great, but... by TheDigitalOne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Go ahead, you can talk to your mouse all you want, you only need to get worried when it starts answering you... more so when it starts winning the arguments.

  77. Re:woohho-- whoopee by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could it be that Krik wanted the transparent view... because he wanted to watch Gracie and the male whale procreate? Maybe he was going nutty and figured the time travel would provide the longest union of all, aquatic and space time continuum.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  78. Another /. dupe! by lscotte · · Score: 5, Informative

    This news should not be surprising to anyone, since it's essentially a dupe! http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/02/2 0/0358206&tid=126&tid=14 [slashdot.org]

    The amusing thing, is that American scientists are given credit here, but if you look at the original article from 2+1/2 years ago, it was the Germans who discovered it. Hmmm...

    You could argue that this article is just a 'refinement' of the previous article. I could believe that only if a link had been provided to the original article. Ah well... Odd that the article itself doesn't mention previous work by the Germans either...

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  79. You people baffle me .... by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    An excellent opportunity for quality low brow comments about wonder woman (like Lynda Carter look alikes) and everyone spends time discussing whether you could acutally build the plane.

    Is anyone here interested in girls? For pete's sake, some step up.

  80. Alzheimer, anyone? by bareminimum · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Great, all we needed was yet another common source of aluminium. Although the Aluminum-Alzheimer link has not been scientifically established, so can be said about cigarettes and cancer, if you ask the tobacco companies..

    http://www.alzscot.org/info/aluminium.html

    1. Re:Alzheimer, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are more likely to ingest small bits of aluminium partical from your tin foil, coke/beer cans, cookware etc. It is also used in some antiacid, Deodorant etc.

    2. Re:Alzheimer, anyone? by bareminimum · · Score: 1

      Whatever, Mr. Moderator.. how can you -1 Overrated when the comment hasn't been moderated at all before you came along?

    3. Re:Alzheimer, anyone? by bareminimum · · Score: 1

      True. But I am amazed that the Aluminum/Alzheimer connection is not being made in the mainstream media when 1) the "disease" is endemic and 2) it currently is the only link between people dying from the disease and human generated by products.

      Probably too much money at stake.

      People barbecuing their veggies in tinfoil simply freak me out..

  81. Is there a Klingon ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Could anyone please check if there is a Klingon ship cloacked somewhere over SF park? Like, can you please go around a throw arrows every now and then upwards?

    Thank you.

    Oh, and don't forget the 'Beam Me Up' sign! It could help!

  82. "transparent concrete" by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read some comprehensive article on "transparent concrete", probably the NY Times Sunday Magazine, but cant locate the reference. There are several related articles on Google. Concrete is seeing a resurgence as a decorative material, i.e. wall and floor coverings. Theres many ways to modify it to have more attractive decorative properties if you willing to sacrifice some structural strength. Concrete is inexpensive and easy to manipulate.

    A more accurate term is translucent concrete. One guy embeds perpendicular optical fibers so some external sunlight gets through. There are other techniques too.

    1. Re:"transparent concrete" by GrumpyGeek · · Score: 1

      I think I saw the article in popular science a few months back. Since I don't have the magazine with me, here is a link to a similar article http://optics.org/articles/news/10/3/10/1

  83. Remote sensing by Anders+Andersson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remote sensing technologies, used to indicate the presence of living bodies onboard an approaching spaceship, as well as the composition of their alien atmosphere. What do we have? X-rays and spectroscopy, both dependent on electromagnetic radiation and a clear line of vision, and we still wrap christmas presents in paper for a surprise effect... Give the kid a tricorder, and there will be no point in wrapping any more gifts for him!

    Also, I love the work they have done on galactic standardization, allowing instant video and audio communication between species that have hardly ever met before. What protocol do they use to agree on frame rate, aspect ratio and colour coding? Not to mention their translation and interpretation services. Someone ought to explain their identification of weapons signatures too; do different munitions have some kind of encoding or does the identification rely on their physical properties only?

    1. Re:Remote sensing by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Also, I love the work they have done on galactic standardization, allowing instant video and audio communication between species that have hardly ever met before. What protocol do they use to agree on frame rate, aspect ratio and colour coding? Not to mention their translation and interpretation services.
      They don't have standardized communication. What they do have is extremely skilled communications officers and a computer with AI to figure that stuff out.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  84. hopeless by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Finally a chance for Slashdotters to score with Wonder Woman, and you're all drooling over Scotty.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  85. Real medical Tricorder, with Paramount approval by fibonacci2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    phhtbtb - I had an add-on for my Palm that did weather.

    These guys (IGEN, now Bioveris) even licensed the name from Paramount.

    http://www.biospace.com/news_story.cfm?StoryID=379 5304&full=1

    "IGEN's TRICORDER is a self-contained diagnostic detection module ideally suited for hospital POC testing. It is based on IGEN's proprietary ORIGEN(R) technology, which enables high-value clinical testing, including immunodiagnostic and nucleic acid probe-based measurements."

  86. alumina windows by andrewagill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Changing the material of the windows is unlikely to help unless you incorporate the material into the design of the building. The windows are likely going to be designed for easy access and replacement, so it's unlikely to add to the structural integrity of the building unless they are actually designed to do so.

    As to fires, the problem is that if alumina is stronger, it'll be harder for the firefighters to break the windows to let smoke out, gain access to portions of the building, or rescue people (I can't imagine watching people clawing at the windows from inside as they slowly burn to death, while you're helpless to stop it--or maybe I can, but just don't want to).

  87. Ruby and Sapphire.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Technically they are transparent aluminum.. just with a bit of natural tint to make them pretty..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Ruby and Sapphire.. by Entropy2016 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like how, "technically", ice is transparent frozen-hydrogen with a bit of natural oxygen "tint" added to make it pretty.

      Sure buddy, whatever you say.

    2. Re:Ruby and Sapphire.. by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Umm no "buddy". In water ice the oxygen is part of
      the molecule which makes up the lattice. In gemstones the impurities are lattice defects
      (I include inclusion shere).

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  88. Don't you mean... by webgit · · Score: 1

    Aluminium not Aluminum?

    Since that is how it is internationally known.

  89. YAY! by Gundampilotspaz · · Score: 0

    As Captain Scott's name sake, I feel very proud that his work had finaly been finished! Here's one for you, Captain!

  90. Thats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al-U-minium

  91. Scotty would be puzzled by mwood · · Score: 1

    I imagine he knows very well that aluminum != alumina.

    Transparent glass. Wow.

  92. Transporter by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn that they stated it was just information in one of the episodes. Something along the lines of that Riker had gotten stuck in the system. They'd transmitted his info, vaporized the one at the other pad, and then couldn't retrieve him on the other side. All I really remember about the episode though was that they occasionally showed Riker's viewpoint, and there were some funky eel-like things swimming through the air. *shrug* Or it could be I'm conflating episodes.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Transporter by parksie · · Score: 1
  93. ... what about ... by ninjagin · · Score: 1
    ... the "Ion Drive"?

    I seem to recall that this was mentioned in The Original Series, and there is a satellite/probe using it to propel itself away from Earth to the moon.

    I thought it was this one, but I could swear there was another probe, too, bound for some outer planet:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3136004. stm

    Hopefully I wasn't hallucianting that other one. I'm sure someone around here will gently correct me if I'm wrong... this is slashdot, after all.

    I'm not a scientist, but I think the idea was that you have ionized xenon gas that's accelerated with an electron gun to produce the thrust.

    NASA has this description, but it's still kinda confusing to me:

    http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Sionrock.ht m

    Anyhooo, just figured I'd tack another one onto the list. Will it stick? I dunno.

    Cheers!

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  94. I'm surprised... by saddino · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Anatoly Rosenflanz was still able to get Scotty's formula off his original Macintosh after all these years.

  95. soooo last week by hooqqa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I wanted to talk about it while it was still cool.Don't you ppl read newscientist, physicsweb, etc. ?

  96. Remember the Pitch Drop Experiment.. by Striikerr · · Score: 1

    http://science.slashdot.org/science/02/09/03/18262 22.shtml?tid=134

    I remembered this link on /. a while back and dug it up. It's regarding the viscosity of pitch. I thought it was relevant given that people were speculating on the long times one would have to wait to see glass flow (which it does not) The article also has a link to the whole Glass is not a liquid fact as well...

  97. What I love about Slashdot..... by ericlakin · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....is the fact that a reference to Scotty at the end of a post about transparent aluminum is understood with a group "nod and smile".

  98. AFDB to the rescue by camusflage · · Score: 1

    This is why, in the modern age, we have the Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    1. Re:AFDB to the rescue by saskboy · · Score: 1

      But don't forget to protect your pets too. After all, it's like locking the front door, and leaving the back wide open [goatse pun not intended].

      Use the PFHT as seen on my homepage link, and may the foil be with you.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  99. Alumina! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    OK, so it's really corundum. But you know, that's pretty fricking hard stuff anyway - last I checked, only a diamond could cut that stuff.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  100. MOD THIS FUCTARD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is a fucktard, it isn't even funny.

    1. Re:MOD THIS FUCTARD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucktard who can't even spell fucktard. How sad is that?

    2. Re:MOD THIS FUCTARD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the assist.

  101. Don't worry about the greenhouse effect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sun won't reach your parent's basement.

  102. Re:woohho-- whoopee by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Hah-hah...

    Tell that to the women who had pseudonyms as men, and who wrote those homo-erotic Kirk-Spock novels. I saw one in the "Adult Section" at an ST convention in San Jose back 'round 1990. I was shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

    I'll posit this then: Kirk wanted the tank for himself and Spock, but he didn't figure on battling clingy Klingons doing aquas interruptus.

    Anyway, the passage I saw when I fanned thru the novel at the convention went something like this:

    Kirk rushes to the Transporter Room and dismisses the technician.

    "Spock, can't you let someone else beam down?"

    "Jim," Spock said, "You know I am the most qualified. This mission is dangerous, and I am capable of breathing the atmosphere..."

    "But, let someone else do it... I love you, Spock."

    "Jim..."

    "I'll be waiting in your quarters for you upon your return. Be careful. I love you..."

    =========

    I was SHOCKED! SHOCKED!!! I mean, I MIGHT have subconsciously, as a kid MAYBE wondered, but it never came to the surface of my mind. But, as I read the passaged, I didn't know whether to laugh aloud, scream, or blow it off...

    I was also shocked that women had to write under pseudonyms to be taken seriously as Star Trek or fiction authors. But, I guess the homo-erotic yarns of Kirk and Spock came from better-brained/erotic-yarn-spinning authors in that regard...

    David Syes

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  103. *I* sense a great disturbance in... by whats_a_zip · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your spell checker!

  104. At least Hemos should know the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly submitter, who doesn't know the difference between Alumina and Aluminum.

    Well I don't know about the submitter (Alien54), but certainly the poster Hemos should know the difference because he hangs around the nanotech crowd, and knowing elementary chemistry is a prerequisite there.

    I think it's just another symptom of the same problem that gives us dups ... editors no longer care what they post.

  105. You're confusing episodes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riker had a twin created in once episode (actually 10 years prior, but they found him), when an atmospheric distrubance created an echo back on the planet.

    The episode with the eel like things in the Transport Stream revolved around Ensign Barclay and his fear of Transporters. They were investigating some ship where all the crew had disappeared, ended up they were the eel like things in the transport stream, and they were able to rescue most of them.

  106. Not exactally by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You forget water is more then just hydrogen..

    And the idea of a ruby being transparent aluminum + some coloring also fits the bill for the sought after properties.. Its one of the hardest known substances known to man..

    its also reproducible in the lab.. perhaps not in 'sheet' form, but it would have been a good starting point for research into a practical method of mass production.

    Even if you were correct, and water was just hydrogen, that's still a far stretch, while my example is pretty damned close to the desired material..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Not exactally by Entropy2016 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've completely missed my point.

      "You forget water is more then just hydrogen.."

      That is my point!
      Aluminum-oxide is more than just aluminum.

      Twice now you've referred to this material as a transparent-aluminum.

      My point is that it's not aluminum.
      It is aluminum-oxide (aka, Alumina).
      This isn't about color additives.
      One is a metal, the other is a ceramic!

      Knowing this, go back and re-read my first post and then you'll understand what I said a little better.

  107. IBM GLass Platter drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I recall hearing something about IBM making a glass platter hard drive with massive storage capabilities, but due to the nature of glass they abandoned the project, they failed to achieve a product that could survive shipping.

    Could this be the answer to their problem?

  108. Sure, and cell phones have a range of 4x10^7 m by Myrrh · · Score: 1

    Mobile phones are better than communicators? Since when?

    The range of the transporters -- at least on The Next Generation -- is 40,000 km. Communicators work at least as far as the range of the transporters, since otherwise they wouldn't be very useful.

    You ever seen a cell phone that could transmit and receive from a tower that was 40,000 klicks away? Me either.

  109. This will KILL IE by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

    Now that even aluminum has better transparency support than IE.

    Doh!

    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
  110. transparent al by damned_in_davis · · Score: 2, Funny

    hurray! now noone will be able to see my aluminum hat!

    --


    "why you tattoring fan sucked doo belly - i have to go buy something to strike you with... excuse me."
  111. Hmm... is this really "new"? by digital+photo · · Score: 1

    The Vurneil inverted flame fusion process already dealt with such a concept. Granted, it was a more crude process than theirs with post sintering, but the concept of alumina or aluminum oxide powder being heated by a torch and formed into a "glass like product" isn't new.

    The fact that 3M has it produce a product which incorporates other oxides and rare metals isn't all that new either.

    The only "Facet" of this technique which is new is the fact that the "glass" isn't peppered with air bubbles like Vurneil's method. There is also the interesting lack of mention that these "glass-like" objects are actually what most people would call "Sythetic gems". Rubys and Sapphires, I would think, since the base is Alumina.

    So the produced "glass" is as hard as a ruby, huh? Great. Bring out the new class of hand weapons!

    Maybe those old AD&D items like Ruby sword, Ruby Shield, Ruby helmet, etc are going to be a reality now...

    The ruby dagger... completely undetectable in most security systems... blah blah blah...

    Guess those whales from the future will have a nice holding tank now. (startrek)

    1. Re:Hmm... is this really "new"? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      How is a ruby dagger any different from an obsidian knife? That is one of the oldest weapon implements ever made by mankind, so if you are talking about something new, this is not it. And one of those knifes could clearly be deadly in a cockpit situation. With a leather body, handle, and sheath, it could go totally undetected in that regard.

      Still, having something with the strength of aluminum but with high transparency would be useful for many applications. Ships hulls (portals), including in submarines as well as in space would be quite useful. The holding tanks (aka Star Trek IV) might be interesting as well, although how this fits with transporter technology is yet another subject of discussion.

  112. Not a Dupe by orulz · · Score: 1

    Gosh. Why do posts on slashdot pointing out a dupe (whether they're right or wrong!) automatically get moderated up to +5?

    Although I can't read the article from the 2.5year old post, that slashdot post is merely pointing out that German scientists have devised a method for making glass from aluminum oxides. This new post, however, points out that researchers at 3M have developed a process for making large quantities of said glass, bringing aluminum glass much closer to market.

    This is just as newsworthy, if not more so, than the article that this is supposedly a "dupe" of. Quit jumping the gun like that.

    1. Re:Not a Dupe by kettch · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not where I can get it, but I have the images from the original article, and the stuff they made back then was not very good optically. Not only have they figured out how to make lots of it, but their technique is better.

      The picture in this article is kind of small but it looks like, even though some of the glass isn't perfectly transparent, it is still clear. Rather than being cloudy it is just colored. One looks like it would be great for tinted windows.

      The old images are very cloudy and rough looking.

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  113. Wonder Woman's Invisible Jet a possibility?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, since we dont have silicate fuels yet, it may be a stretch, but considering the large amounts of aluminum in aircraft skin...

    Or a transparent aluminum siding house?

    ~Scourge

  114. What's next? by feidaykin · · Score: 1

    How about they work on inventing laser-based weapons that people can dodge. ;)

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  115. They invented??? Sure...... by ninji · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember reading about this years ago....

    Heres an article that has a link to one of the original article i read http://www.rense.com/general20/transparentalum.htm

    Did zi germans invent first?

  116. Obligatory Futurama Quote by ultramk · · Score: 1

    It's called an Alcubierre Drive. You can finish yourself off now.

    {hawking} "I call it a Hawking Drive." {/hawking}

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  117. My New Line of Fashion Armor by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    Giving new meaning to the word bombshell

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  118. Not Canadian, just British by scruffyMark · · Score: 1
    In Canada, we still pronounce the IP-packet-shuffling gizmo a 'rowter', even though it sorts out the correct 'root' to use.

    In the UK, now, I understand they do call them 'rooters'. Sounds to me like those things plumbers use to clear tree roots from the drains.

    --

    What is the robbing of a bank, compared to the founding of a bank? -- Bertolt Brecht

    1. Re:Not Canadian, just British by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      all the techies i know in the uk call them rowters...

    2. Re:Not Canadian, just British by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you don't like the way that the English pronounce an English word in England?

      You people crack me up... :-)

    3. Re:Not Canadian, just British by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Odd. All the ones I know call them "rooters". Here, let me ask the hundred or so I can contact over the next few minutes.

      #I get my kicks
      #On rowt sixty-six ...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    4. Re:Not Canadian, just British by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      i only know two techies... bound to be exclusions then... my bad

  119. What's in a name? by gu10tag · · Score: 1

    So if 3M owns it, would it be:

    ScotchGlass(tm) ???

    (Scotty would indeed be proud!)

  120. We have clear coke cans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called plastic. Common sizes are 600ml, 1L, and 2L. And guess what? It's not just for Coke, Pepsi has it too!

  121. So, no well-lit Faraday cages for us... by scruffyMark · · Score: 1
    Hm, I was wondering - would this mean we can make reasonable affordable glass that still blocks RF signals? I guess you've answered me, and it's right out.

    Just think if it did work though - we could sit in a nice restaurant with plenty of big windows, and where cellphones wouldn't work... And no need for signal jammers (illegal in most places, although Canada was considering allowing them for some uses).

    Of course, I also have no idea if this stuff qualifies as "reasonably affordable" only as compared to gigantic diamonds...

    --

    What is the robbing of a bank, compared to the founding of a bank? -- Bertolt Brecht

    1. Re:So, no well-lit Faraday cages for us... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      " Hm, I was wondering - would this mean we can make reasonable affordable glass that still blocks RF signals?"

      Not glass but a think conductive film on the glass like window tinting would work. The USAF uses a thin layer of gold I belive on stealth aircraft canopies to make them conductive. All that you would really need is a thin donductive mesh with holes smaller than the wavelength you want to block. Ground the mesh in the windows and put mesh in the walls and you would have a Fariday Cage that would block RF.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  122. Yeah, Marx had no impact, really... by scruffyMark · · Score: 1
    Das Kapital, the Manifesto of the Communist Party. Whatever. If he wanted to have a real effect on the world, he clearly should have gone into SF - look at his contemporaries:

    H.G. Wells, now there was someone who really changed history...

    No, really - I know what you mean - as a fiction genre, not non-fiction...

    --

    What is the robbing of a bank, compared to the founding of a bank? -- Bertolt Brecht

  123. TA IS NOT FROM 'STAR TREK'! by demi · · Score: 1

    I can't believe nobody's pointed out that transparent aluminum was referenced in Neuromancer long before Star Trek IV.

    --
    demi
  124. Communication protocols by Anders+Andersson · · Score: 1

    Using AI to "figure that stuff out" is also a form of protocol, albeit on a higher level than simply encoding the video using PAL or NTSC (I doubt the communication officers ever need to get involved with such mundane tasks as selecting a false-colour palette to represent the signals from a ship designed by aliens using infrared as their primary means of vision, but it has to be done of course).

    Problem is, both ships may have equally sophisticated technology (and skilled officers), only their default modes are mutually incompatible. If both systems try simultaneously to adapt to the default mode of the other party, they may easily enter a deadlock state. They may agree that the party initiating contact is also responsible for adapting their communication mode, or that the receivers are adapted at each end, but either way, such an agreement itself constitutes a form of protocol.

    We have already made attempts to communicate with alien life forms, without knowing the capabilities of the recipients, when transmitting signals from the Arecibo radio telescope and encoding images on the Voyager discs. The protocol is described along with the message itself, using a language based on what we believe to be universal knowledge (mathematics and the laws of physics). We can only hope the recipients will understand that language (if they can receive the radio signals, or recover the Voyager probe intact from space, I think they stand a good chance of success). It remains to be seen whether they will respond using our suggested format, or encode their message according to their own preferences, to be figured out by us.

    I hope they will use plain text rather than HTML, but it may be a good idea if they include a copy of what they received from us, just in case our 641st-century descendants manage to delete the copies we have saved, or the response is picked up by the Interstellar Wiretapping Agency.

    1. Re:Communication protocols by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      not to mention the difficulty of identifiying a message as a message. That's probably the really hard part.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
  125. Clueless posters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It never ceases to amuse me at how clueless people are on this board. Geez, I thought geeks were meant to be smart? Your post is the same word for word as one posted hours ago. If there was a moderator option for '-1 Smack with the serious cluebat', you'd earn it. Not only is your post a repeat, but it's also DUMB. Sure hydrogen is transparent as a gas, so are most gasses, the original post was comparing with SOLID ICE. And even then... Oh I give up. There's no hope for the future. Humanity is doomed.

  126. Alumina == sapphire/ruby/etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So anyway, it's some kind of a crystaline compound, containing aluminum, that's supposed to be transparent, but far stronger than any form of conventional glass."

    But there's nothing new about that, either.

    Sapphire and ruby are alumina-based, also.

    Sapphires (and synthetic sapphires) are used as scratch-resistant, shatter-resistant alternative to glass or plastic for watch crystals (the clear part over the numbers).

    So what this story seems to be is that they have a new kind of glass which incorporates or has some of the properties of sapphire-type substances.

  127. The joke is in Start Trek IV; go watch it (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The joke is in Start Trek IV; go watch it (n/t)

  128. Translucent! by Kaldaien · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between transparent and translucent. Those pictures clearly show the color of light passing through the matrial being changed.

  129. Article Topic by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

    Why is there no topic? Oh yeah, it's transparent.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  130. Rare earth materials, huh? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I just wonder what's the point of making bulk quantities of something that depends on RARE (read: Very, VERY hard to find) materials.

    Beam us up, Scotty, we have to find more rare materials for the production.

  131. extended to other oxides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I look forward to transparent rust.

  132. Scotty missed a great oppertunity. by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just think, he could have patented this in the 80's, then turned up 300 years to file for damages and 3 centuries of back dated licensing.

    --
    "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
  133. Cars by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    I wonder if this could be used on cars to help deal with the ancient blindspot problem. Suddenly you'd have a lot more visibility if you could make the pylons of the car transparent or even semi-transparent.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  134. Clippy: The Next Generation by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    "It looks like you are asking for a drink! Would you like help with that?"

  135. message from future; patent!; profit!; ... by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Recieve message from future self.
    2. Patent Everything!
    3. Profit!
    4. Send message to past self.

    You see, it's really not that hard to get rich.

  136. *beep* insert old boots, please by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1


    Please insert your old boots for processing.

  137. ARGH!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeat after me:

    AL-YOO-MIN-EE-UM
    Aluminium

    Don't profess to be an English-speaking nation until you can speak ENGLISH.

  138. link includes a picture of samples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's *transparent*.

    Hello, McFly anybody home!

  139. Alumina is not aluminum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alumina (aluminum oxide) is not aluminum, any more than table salt (sodium chloride) is sodium or chlorine.

  140. Re:Shouldn't we be doing something... constructive by 2cv · · Score: 1

    Haven't you heard? Guidenstein is dead!

  141. In all seriousness by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Data mentioned TV would become unpolular as the Earth interplanatory network took over the entertainment medium sometime in first decade of the 21st century.

    Today the FCC is phasing out TV signals on antenna by 2006 and this interplanatary network is called the internet and world wide web. Hmm?

    If you have a digital cable box today you may see the technicians from the cable company setup each units IP address. Its an intranet and if you pay for high speed access you can be routed to the internet. In other news its part of this interplanatary network even though its a private network routed to it.

    My guess over the next decade digital boxes will become more like Tivo's or smart PVR devices. It may become more of a mini-computer so to speak that can be used for games, IM, or just watching video streams. Hmmm it looks alot like Lcars terminals on the enteprise that could do all of that. In another decade it will be less of standard television as we know it kind of like a gradual revolution.

    Also replication and teleportation is already happening. Particles and photons already have been teleported or replicated depending on how you look at it through entagglement. Its mentioned in past slashdot stories.

    Star Trek use to hire consultants in all sorts of fields as future specialists, to physcists, to even nasa engineers, to help their writers. It showed.

    Man do I miss those days. Bearman SUCKS!

    1. Re:In all seriousness by QangMartoq · · Score: 1
      Data mentioned TV would become unpolular as the Earth interplanatory network took over the entertainment medium sometime in first decade of the 21st century.

      Today the FCC is phasing out TV signals on antenna by 2006 and this interplanatary network is called the internet and world wide web. Hmm?

      If you have a digital cable box today you may see the technicians from the cable company setup each units IP address. Its an intranet and if you pay for high speed access you can be routed to the internet. In other news its part of this interplanatary network even though its a private network routed to it.

      My guess over the next decade digital boxes will become more like Tivo's or smart PVR devices. It may become more of a mini-computer so to speak that can be used for games, IM, or just watching video streams. Hmmm it looks alot like Lcars terminals on the enteprise that could do all of that. In another decade it will be less of standard television as we know it kind of like a gradual revolution.

      Also replication and teleportation is already happening. Particles and photons already have been teleported or replicated depending on how you look at it through entagglement. Its mentioned in past slashdot stories.

      Star Trek use to hire consultants in all sorts of fields as future specialists, to physcists, to even nasa engineers, to help their writers. It showed.

      Man do I miss those days. [Berman] SUCKS!

      Here, here, I second that entire sentiment!

      TNG's devotion to scientific correctness showed. And that made it all the easier to 'suspend my disbelief' for about an hour and just sit back and watch!

      Oh sure, there are LOTS of errors in TNG eps (Many pages have been written on them) but then - That means that people were watching the show with their heads, which is a good thing.

      But the fact that they made a valiant attempt to keep it as close to correct as possible, on the grueling schedule of a weekly television series, for seven years - Was amazing!

      Some day, in the not too distant future, we will have computers (and other technology) that will meet and even surpass Trek's vision, I think.

    2. Re:In all seriousness by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I am waiting for a talking computer.

      To be honest I got into computers after watching TNG. I was hoping to some day work on a voice activated computer that would be a virtual encyclopedia.

      But my point was there is alot of star in the older treks that have happened and were quite visionary. Translucent Aluminium and the internet aside.

  142. I found some pictures of it. by Mike+McCune · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here are the scientist creating tranparent aluminum -
    Creating Tranparent Aluminum

    and here is the final product -
    Tranparent Aluminum

    --

    In a world that is Free and Open, who needs Windows and Gates?

  143. Mr. Doohan should get a piece of the stuff by Slorg · · Score: 1

    His last public appearance is this weekend, at the The James Doohan Farewell Star Trek Convention & Tribute, August 27th-30th 2004 - at the Renaissance Hollywood Hotel.

    It would be terrific if a geek conspiracy could be implemented to get a piece of the material to him in a nice display. Alumina/aluminum difference aside, he'd be thrilled, I'm sure.

    ---
    Statistically, real threats are rare, but ambition and corruption are common. - Seth Finkelstein

  144. No Federation Insignia by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    But there's no Federation (or other) Insignia that you hit, and it doesn't make the cool StarTrek sound...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com