Pelosi was not speaking to Congress when she said that. It is hardly supporting evidence of Democrats passing the PPACA without reading it. Sloppy thinking.
Interesting that you omitted the fact that after Zimmerman told the dispatcher he'd meet police at the mailboxes, he changed his mind and asked that the officers call him so he could tell them where he was.
Zimmerman: Um, if they come in through the gate, tell them to go straight past the clubhouse and, uh, straight past the clubhouse and make a left and then they go past the mailboxes you’ll see my truck. [3:10]
Dispatcher: Alright, what address are you parked in front of? [3:21]
Zimmerman: Um, I don’t know. It’s a cut-through so I don’t know the address. [3:25]
Dispatcher: OK, do you live in the area?
Zimmerman: Yeah, yeah, I live here.
Dispatcher: OK, what’s your apartment number?
Zimmerman: It’s a home. It’s 1950 – oh, crap, I don’t want to give it out – I don’t know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40]
Dispatcher: OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then? [3:42]
Zimmerman: Yeah, that’s fine. [3:43]
Dispatcher: Alright, George, I’ll let them know you’ll meet them at
Zimmerman: Could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at? [3:49]
Dispatcher: OK, yeah that’s no problem.
Zimmerman:My number you’ve got it?
Why would he need to tell police in the future (when they arrived) where he was, if he just told the dispatcher to tell the police he'd meet them at the mailboxes? Because he wasn't going to be back at his vehicle by the mailboxes. He was going to lead them straight to Martin, and to do that, he needed to find Martin and possibly detain him until police arrived.
Again, please explain this: If I tell your friend to tell you I'll be waiting for you at the mailboxes, why then would I later ask you to tell your friend to call me when he arrived in the general vicinity, so I could tell him where I was? Don't they know I'm at the mailboxes, since I already said I'd be there?
This is in reference to the IRS actions regarding Tea Party organizations' tax-exempt applications, not the healthcare record story. The 501C4 imbroglio is what Coward referred to in comment about Pfeiffer's "the law is irrelevant" remark.
He stated the law was irrelevant in judging whether the actions were wrong or not. Illegal? Actions wrong. Legal? Actions wrong. He also said, “The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed to ensure it never happens again.”
Agreed. If a guy joked, "that's a big dongle!", where is the harm? It's juvenile, but so what. On the other hand, saying to a woman, "want to see my big dongle?" can be harassment.
I've kept my Apple boxes (Mini, keyboard, MacBook, iPod Touch plastic case, iPad). I don't have them on display nor do I lovingly gaze upon them, they are in my garage. I recognize their superior yet simple functionality and keep them for the day I move and need to pack up the gear. I'd rather use the original packaging since it's obviously designed for its purpose, instead of grabbing some random shoe box. I can't say that for most other product packaging. I especially despise heat-sealed plastic packaging.
Only if said warner was actually a Microsoft proponent, which is a trap of its own.
I was around/. during Java discussions before, during, and after Sun opened it up, and I wouldn't say the push-back from Java proponents was as you claim.
Why limit it to the "field" of intelligent design? If a chemistry teacher rejects the accepted science of what happens in a chemical reaction, and instead teaches the class that magic is responsible for chemical synthethis, who are we to discriminate against him, right? Rust = fairy mischief!
Perhaps the functionality should be retained, but entered via a function key or a two-key combination that requires pressing to enter that mode.
This way, people who need to type extended all-caps can still do so, but it won't be mistakenly keyed by dolts who hit it as a shift key and then flail away without returning it to lower case. Of course, people who want to be annoying and "shout" will still be able to do so, but it might cut down on the inadvertant clueless shouting.
I've gotten rid of most of mine over the years, or else they don't get played. And I'm talking about vinyl. After having listened to the Beatles' tunes thousands of times I really don't see much point in hearing them again, especially since there's so much other great music to listen to. They were, overall, a good pop band for the time, but by no means the pinnacle of rock music (hardly) or even pop music.
From the Life in Hell questions kids ask: which would you rather do, slide down a 50-foot long razor blade, or suck all the snot out of a dog's hose until his head collapses?
Native language: the language one has learned from birth. Native: having to do with birth (natal). A native born American isn't necessarily a Native American (Indian).
"Native language" has nothing whatsoever to do with original inhabitants of the land one is born in, unless coincidentally the indigenous language is still the dominant or de facto official language.
I could be wrong, but I think drive-by-wire systems are engine management and throttle systems only - not total car systems. Many lay people are accusing a malfunctioning "car computer" of failing to brake, shift into neutral, or stop the engine, but I believe none of those systems have "inputs" to the same electronics that govern engine speed.
My personal cars have been manuals, but my wife's cars (the family car) have been automatic. I use cruise control on both, on the highway. One thing I noticed with one car we used to own, a V6 Hyundai, was that the cruise control would often suddenly downshift in order to maintain speed - when it was merely starting up a rolling hill. In non-cruise control, the AT would not downshift. When it did under cruise control, it was quite abrupt and startling, with the engine rpms suddenly surging and the car accelerating. I've wondered if some of the reports of Toyota unintended acceleration are due to drivers experiencing this and being unfamiliar with how cars work.
I think cruise controls should only have 'set' and 'cancel' buttons. The accelerate feature on a button is just asking for trouble, in my opinion.
Car and Driver magazine tested the brakes vs throttle question recently. They tested a V6 Camry, an Infiniti G37, and, as they put it, just for the "why not?" factor, a 540-horsepower Roush Ford Mustang. The Infiniti had the feature wherein applying the brake will cause the electronics to cut the throttle. But the Camry and Mustang didn't.
All cars could be brought to a stop from both 70mph and 100mph with the throttle wide open. The Camry stopped shorter at 70mph full throttle than a 2010 Ford Taurus at 70mph with closed throttle.
The Roush Mustang took 903 feet to come to rest from 100mph while throttle was full-on - but it did stop.
Kids are tech-savvy and tech-comfortable so that they use electronics and computers for all the things you mention, but it's still all about using tech, not hacking it. The people who want to get into the guts of a computer (whether hardware, software, or both) are still a minority, just as such people 20 years ago were. These younger people you speak of aren't (by and large) interested in "how it works" -- they are interested in editing their videos, uploading content to websites, keeping in touch with friends, playing computer games.
Hardcore geeks seriously overrate their importance in the marketplace.
Slashdot Mirror
Agreed. I rarely stop by any more but thought I'd see what Slashdotters had to say on this story.
It's disgraceful, and I barely recognize the place.
Pelosi was not speaking to Congress when she said that. It is hardly supporting evidence of Democrats passing the PPACA without reading it. Sloppy thinking.
Interesting that you omitted the fact that after Zimmerman told the dispatcher he'd meet police at the mailboxes, he changed his mind and asked that the officers call him so he could tell them where he was.
Zimmerman: Um, if they come in through the gate, tell them to go straight past the clubhouse and, uh, straight past the clubhouse and make a left and then they go past the mailboxes you’ll see my truck. [3:10]
Dispatcher: Alright, what address are you parked in front of? [3:21]
Zimmerman: Um, I don’t know. It’s a cut-through so I don’t know the address. [3:25]
Dispatcher: OK, do you live in the area?
Zimmerman: Yeah, yeah, I live here.
Dispatcher: OK, what’s your apartment number?
Zimmerman: It’s a home. It’s 1950 – oh, crap, I don’t want to give it out – I don’t know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40]
Dispatcher: OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then? [3:42]
Zimmerman: Yeah, that’s fine. [3:43]
Dispatcher: Alright, George, I’ll let them know you’ll meet them at
Zimmerman: Could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at? [3:49]
Dispatcher: OK, yeah that’s no problem.
Zimmerman:My number you’ve got it?
Why would he need to tell police in the future (when they arrived) where he was, if he just told the dispatcher to tell the police he'd meet them at the mailboxes? Because he wasn't going to be back at his vehicle by the mailboxes. He was going to lead them straight to Martin, and to do that, he needed to find Martin and possibly detain him until police arrived.
Again, please explain this: If I tell your friend to tell you I'll be waiting for you at the mailboxes, why then would I later ask you to tell your friend to call me when he arrived in the general vicinity, so I could tell him where I was? Don't they know I'm at the mailboxes, since I already said I'd be there?
This is in reference to the IRS actions regarding Tea Party organizations' tax-exempt applications, not the healthcare record story. The 501C4 imbroglio is what Coward referred to in comment about Pfeiffer's "the law is irrelevant" remark.
He stated the law was irrelevant in judging whether the actions were wrong or not. Illegal? Actions wrong. Legal? Actions wrong. He also said, “The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed to ensure it never happens again.”
Understand now?
Agreed. If a guy joked, "that's a big dongle!", where is the harm? It's juvenile, but so what. On the other hand, saying to a woman, "want to see my big dongle?" can be harassment.
I've kept my Apple boxes (Mini, keyboard, MacBook, iPod Touch plastic case, iPad). I don't have them on display nor do I lovingly gaze upon them, they are in my garage. I recognize their superior yet simple functionality and keep them for the day I move and need to pack up the gear. I'd rather use the original packaging since it's obviously designed for its purpose, instead of grabbing some random shoe box. I can't say that for most other product packaging. I especially despise heat-sealed plastic packaging.
Only if said warner was actually a Microsoft proponent, which is a trap of its own.
I was around /. during Java discussions before, during, and after Sun opened it up, and I wouldn't say the push-back from Java proponents was as you claim.
Why limit it to the "field" of intelligent design? If a chemistry teacher rejects the accepted science of what happens in a chemical reaction, and instead teaches the class that magic is responsible for chemical synthethis, who are we to discriminate against him, right? Rust = fairy mischief!
Submitter should of drug his dictionary out of hiding.
Screw 'em. Maybe that's a good time they seek education on the matter (user manual, support desk).
Perhaps the functionality should be retained, but entered via a function key or a two-key combination that requires pressing to enter that mode.
This way, people who need to type extended all-caps can still do so, but it won't be mistakenly keyed by dolts who hit it as a shift key and then flail away without returning it to lower case. Of course, people who want to be annoying and "shout" will still be able to do so, but it might cut down on the inadvertant clueless shouting.
I haven't.
Found on a Kentucky forum, about the already-existing creation museum.
Poster One: There's a caveman riding a dinosaur. I went as a joke. I recommend it to others if they're in for a good laugh.
Poster Two: You recommend it to others if they're in for a good laugh? Why?
Poster One: There's a caveman riding a dinosaur.
"May refer to" does not mean "perfectly valid substitute".
It could mean "enough dumbasses search for laser using the word lazer so we'd better disambiguate it to help them out."
I've gotten rid of most of mine over the years, or else they don't get played. And I'm talking about vinyl. After having listened to the Beatles' tunes thousands of times I really don't see much point in hearing them again, especially since there's so much other great music to listen to. They were, overall, a good pop band for the time, but by no means the pinnacle of rock music (hardly) or even pop music.
I knew that.
From the Life in Hell questions kids ask: which would you rather do, slide down a 50-foot long razor blade, or suck all the snot out of a dog's hose until his head collapses?
Native does not mean indigenous.
Native language: the language one has learned from birth. Native: having to do with birth (natal). A native born American isn't necessarily a Native American (Indian).
"Native language" has nothing whatsoever to do with original inhabitants of the land one is born in, unless coincidentally the indigenous language is still the dominant or de facto official language.
Right behind you.
I could be wrong, but I think drive-by-wire systems are engine management and throttle systems only - not total car systems. Many lay people are accusing a malfunctioning "car computer" of failing to brake, shift into neutral, or stop the engine, but I believe none of those systems have "inputs" to the same electronics that govern engine speed.
My personal cars have been manuals, but my wife's cars (the family car) have been automatic. I use cruise control on both, on the highway. One thing I noticed with one car we used to own, a V6 Hyundai, was that the cruise control would often suddenly downshift in order to maintain speed - when it was merely starting up a rolling hill. In non-cruise control, the AT would not downshift. When it did under cruise control, it was quite abrupt and startling, with the engine rpms suddenly surging and the car accelerating. I've wondered if some of the reports of Toyota unintended acceleration are due to drivers experiencing this and being unfamiliar with how cars work.
I think cruise controls should only have 'set' and 'cancel' buttons. The accelerate feature on a button is just asking for trouble, in my opinion.
Car and Driver magazine tested the brakes vs throttle question recently. They tested a V6 Camry, an Infiniti G37, and, as they put it, just for the "why not?" factor, a 540-horsepower Roush Ford Mustang. The Infiniti had the feature wherein applying the brake will cause the electronics to cut the throttle. But the Camry and Mustang didn't.
All cars could be brought to a stop from both 70mph and 100mph with the throttle wide open. The Camry stopped shorter at 70mph full throttle than a 2010 Ford Taurus at 70mph with closed throttle.
The Roush Mustang took 903 feet to come to rest from 100mph while throttle was full-on - but it did stop.
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/09q4/how_to_deal_with_unintended_acceleration-tech_dept
Sounds like this update would prevent using heel and toeing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heel-and-toe
But I don't suppose there are many owners taking manual transmission Toyotas to the track.
And to address the question: yes, take the update.
What are you talking about?
Kids are tech-savvy and tech-comfortable so that they use electronics and computers for all the things you mention, but it's still all about using tech, not hacking it. The people who want to get into the guts of a computer (whether hardware, software, or both) are still a minority, just as such people 20 years ago were. These younger people you speak of aren't (by and large) interested in "how it works" -- they are interested in editing their videos, uploading content to websites, keeping in touch with friends, playing computer games.
Hardcore geeks seriously overrate their importance in the marketplace.