On the other hand, the *lack* of a standard WIMP GUI toolkit for web pages has also let loose a few creative ideas for what a UI could be. The standard desktop GUI toolkits make it easy to write mediocre and somewhat boring UI's that get the job done but not very elegantly or ergonomically, and which all look exactly the same.
Web apps are not really a blank slate... but they could be close once you decide what parts of the HTML/browser framework you intentionally *don't* want to use and step around.
(HTML5's Canvas is also more literally a blank slate... so will be interesting to see what happens with that.)
Want to give a clue as to what "Drumbeat" is, and maybe some kind of link that looks like it might explain what you're talking about? (A Computerworld article about "the threats have changed" doesn't help.)
Thank you, this is very insightul. We really do need to be careful about what we are claiming an online virtual world (VW) can and cannot do.
One role I do see VWs being good at is simulation of *processes*, if not specific physical skills -- processes of communication, sequences of action, decision making, etc. A high level simulation like this can present students with a set of circumstances on a more abstract level, to let them figure out how they might deal with it in RL. When it comes to learning how to actually do exams, surgery, whatever, you then certainly need to get into a real hospital.
This is how the armed forces have been using "games" of various kinds (just recently using computer games) for a long time-- to try out and practice strategic and tactical possabilities.
In a large scale world (like SL), you can even try to model lots of aspects of a complex system like a hospital, everything from scheduling of shifts and personel assignment, to how supplies and medications are stored, ordered, transported, and delivered, to physical layout of the rooms and placement of machines, phones, whatever, and more, and see how they interact.
But we need to remember always SL is *not* Virtual Reality.
Only if the user has correctly configured his system to know the correct physical resolution (dpi) of the screen, or the OS was able to get correct information from the screen automatically (DDC); this will only be true for some users.
The only real valid arguments I've ever heard for using metric are that (a) it's easy to learn the conversions, and (b) everyone else uses it for all science and egineering.
(b) is the reason that NASA should just use metric... And anyone else in the world doing any kind of science or engineering.
But for everyday life, imperial or American units turn out to have a lot of utility that most people aren't aware of, because most of us of the younger generation have just relied on calculators doing decimal calculations for us most of the time. If instead you picture fractions in your head, imerial or American units are quite handy. They also often match real world objects a bit closer. If you're dividing meters into centimeters, you can really only talk about tenths, hundreds, etc. If you're dividing yards into feet and inches, or pounds into ounces, etc. you have thirds, 16ths, 12ths, and all kinds of other useful fractions to use to think about the divisions. Find a carpenter who is good at this to see what I mean. Same with volume and weight; if you do a lot of cooking and modifying quantities in recipes you can get good at those conversions.
The number one slowdown I see on pages is linking to all kinds of external resources: images, flash movies, iframes, CSS, bits of javascript. Each of these requires at least another DNS lookup and a new HTTP connection, and often those external servers take a really long time to respond (because they're busy doing the same for all those other websites using them). Why is this going on in each users browser? It should all be done behind the scenes on the web server. Why would you put the basic user experience of your users or customers in the hands of random partners who are also doing the same for competing sites? It takes some load off your server, but I think the real reason that people just link in external resources as images, objects, etc is just that it's easier than implementing it in the back end. If you really want to offload work, then design a mechanism that addresses that need specifically.
We've ended up with a broken idea of what a web server is. Because it was the easiest way to get started, we now seem to be stuck with the basic idea that a web server is something that maps request URLs directly to files on the server's hard disk that are either returned as is or executed as scripts. This needs to change (and it is a little bit, as those "CGI scripts" have now evolved into scripts which are using real web app frameworks.)
The "Entertainment Industry" seems to think that the Internet was created just for them. It happens to be useful as a user-friendly distribution channel for media. That doesn't mean that you guys get to suddenly control it! Sorry!
Well it's not so much that AJAX is a web only thing, it's just that outside the restrictions of the browser's Javascript environment, i.e. in any general purpose programming language with networking libraries, it's just nothing special... just another use of networking. It's special in the web world because anything requiring that you make a request was just impossible until the ability to do so was added to the main browsers' Javascript APIs, and because the application is narrowly defined to showing HTML pages.
Two reasons, one is that some of us would like to have a chance of not being completely crushed during a high speed collision with some SUV. And second, occasionally you do need some passenger or cargo space, though since most households own at least two cars, you should be able to make do with a subcompact like a CRX plus a larger wagon or hatchback.
It goes the other way. I am a fairly competent programmer. I have no real systems administration ability, just enough to muddle through setting up a web server or something. Most programmers I know are like that. We know all about programming, they know all about networks and servers and how to maintain them. Different skill sets.
http://www.costofwar.com/ and various other sources estimate something like $400 to $700 billion total since the beginning of the war, which is more than all of those things except the tunnel combined. If you factor in some possible indirect costs, maybe we could have built that tunnel.
Yes, but the elecricity to charge batteries can come from any number of generation sources, it's not locked in to one source and one (not very competitive) industry, the way gas powered vehicles are. Over time we can shift electrical generation, if there's demand and political will of course. And if you are rich enough to afford a Tesla, why not also put some solar panels and/or a windmill and/or microhydro turbine on your house, and change from that?
There's a big problem with ethanol fuel that I have yet to see discussed in any news about ethanol-- it might turn the problem of peak oil into a problem of PEAK SOIL. By digging up fossil fuels, we really take nothing away from the earth that we otherwise need. By growing crops and essentially burning them to run vehicles or generate power, we are directly wasting the nutrients in the soil. And guess what? We need to eat, too. Much of our farmland soil is already in such a poor state that it can only be used to grow crops when fed with large quantities of artificial fertilizer.
And if fuel from ethanol ends up costing *less* than fossil fuels, there will be no economic incentive to actually change our ways of living and working to make more efficient use of our resources, thus preserving them for our children.
Also, *all* of the candidates have a chance at being elected! I depends on how many people vote for them, you know, *not* what the damn TV news stations and pollsters say!!
There are a lot of great places to put datacenters, not just for novelty reasons but because of the natural advantages of the site. Where I live there are lots of old brick mill buildings that would be easy to cool, and could be powered at least partially by water power. The problem is that they're all many miles from any kind of existing backbone link.
Antibacterial "soap" is not like antibiotic drugs, the main active ingredient is some form of alchohol. But good handwashing with real soap (not detergent or alcholhol) is still often better than that other stuff. Water and mechanical action gets dirt off the hands, which is where bacteria might be living.
(Though I do keep a little bottle of alchohol based hand sanitizer around, for when I really need it's sterilization properties, e.g. to use after handling truly insanitary stuff.)
Slashdot Mirror
On the other hand, the *lack* of a standard WIMP GUI toolkit for web pages has also let loose a few creative ideas for what a UI could be. The standard desktop GUI toolkits make it easy to write mediocre and somewhat boring UI's that get the job done but not very elegantly or ergonomically, and which all look exactly the same.
Web apps are not really a blank slate... but they could be close once you decide what parts of the HTML/browser framework you intentionally *don't* want to use and step around.
(HTML5's Canvas is also more literally a blank slate... so will be interesting to see what happens with that.)
Check out Google Web Toolkit or Pyjamas.
Want to give a clue as to what "Drumbeat" is, and maybe some kind of link that looks like it might explain what you're talking about? (A Computerworld article about "the threats have changed" doesn't help.)
Here's one: http://www.interreality.org/about ; http://interreality.org/wiki/VipDocumentation . Project is dormant for the past couple of years but could pick up again if there was interest.
Thank you, this is very insightul. We really do need to be careful about what we are claiming an online virtual world (VW) can and cannot do.
One role I do see VWs being good at is simulation of *processes*, if not specific physical skills -- processes of communication, sequences of action, decision making, etc. A high level simulation like this can present students with a set of circumstances on a more abstract level, to let them figure out how they might deal with it in RL. When it comes to learning how to actually do exams, surgery, whatever, you then certainly need to get into a real hospital.
This is how the armed forces have been using "games" of various kinds (just recently using computer games) for a long time-- to try out and practice strategic and tactical possabilities.
In a large scale world (like SL), you can even try to model lots of aspects of a complex system like a hospital, everything from scheduling of shifts and personel assignment, to how supplies and medications are stored, ordered, transported, and delivered, to physical layout of the rooms and placement of machines, phones, whatever, and more, and see how they interact.
But we need to remember always SL is *not* Virtual Reality.
Only if the user has correctly configured his system to know the correct physical resolution (dpi) of the screen, or the OS was able to get correct information from the screen automatically (DDC); this will only be true for some users.
The only real valid arguments I've ever heard for using metric are that (a) it's easy to learn the conversions, and (b) everyone else uses it for all science and egineering.
(b) is the reason that NASA should just use metric... And anyone else in the world doing any kind of science or engineering.
But for everyday life, imperial or American units turn out to have a lot of utility that most people aren't aware of, because most of us of the younger generation have just relied on calculators doing decimal calculations for us most of the time. If instead you picture fractions in your head, imerial or American units are quite handy. They also often match real world objects a bit closer. If you're dividing meters into centimeters, you can really only talk about tenths, hundreds, etc. If you're dividing yards into feet and inches, or pounds into ounces, etc. you have thirds, 16ths, 12ths, and all kinds of other useful fractions to use to think about the divisions. Find a carpenter who is good at this to see what I mean. Same with volume and weight; if you do a lot of cooking and modifying quantities in recipes you can get good at those conversions.
The number one slowdown I see on pages is linking to all kinds of external resources: images, flash movies, iframes, CSS, bits of javascript. Each of these requires at least another DNS lookup and a new HTTP connection, and often those external servers take a really long time to respond (because they're busy doing the same for all those other websites using them). Why is this going on in each users browser? It should all be done behind the scenes on the web server. Why would you put the basic user experience of your users or customers in the hands of random partners who are also doing the same for competing sites? It takes some load off your server, but I think the real reason that people just link in external resources as images, objects, etc is just that it's easier than implementing it in the back end. If you really want to offload work, then design a mechanism that addresses that need specifically.
We've ended up with a broken idea of what a web server is. Because it was the easiest way to get started, we now seem to be stuck with the basic idea that a web server is something that maps request URLs directly to files on the server's hard disk that are either returned as is or executed as scripts. This needs to change (and it is a little bit, as those "CGI scripts" have now evolved into scripts which are using real web app frameworks.)
The "Entertainment Industry" seems to think that the Internet was created just for them. It happens to be useful as a user-friendly distribution channel for media. That doesn't mean that you guys get to suddenly control it! Sorry!
Note that just because correlation is not causation, doesn't mean that correlation is not important...
In Communist Cuba, *you* control operating system!
Well it's not so much that AJAX is a web only thing, it's just that outside the restrictions of the browser's Javascript environment, i.e. in any general purpose programming language with networking libraries, it's just nothing special... just another use of networking. It's special in the web world because anything requiring that you make a request was just impossible until the ability to do so was added to the main browsers' Javascript APIs, and because the application is narrowly defined to showing HTML pages.
Two reasons, one is that some of us would like to have a chance of not being completely crushed during a high speed collision with some SUV. And second, occasionally you do need some passenger or cargo space, though since most households own at least two cars, you should be able to make do with a subcompact like a CRX plus a larger wagon or hatchback.
It goes the other way. I am a fairly competent programmer. I have no real systems administration ability, just enough to muddle through setting up a web server or something. Most programmers I know are like that. We know all about programming, they know all about networks and servers and how to maintain them. Different skill sets.
"The reason we light up the street is because it prevents accidents."
This is not neccesarily true. Nor are many streetlights helpful at deterring crime.
It depends on exactly how and where and what kind of light is used.
"Rants before facts seems to be the motto."
You're new here right?
I wouldn't mind if Yahoo ran MySpace. Maybe they could actually fix^H^H^Hcompletely rewrite it.
http://www.costofwar.com/ and various other sources estimate something like $400 to $700 billion total since the beginning of the war, which is more than all of those things except the tunnel combined. If you factor in some possible indirect costs, maybe we could have built that tunnel.
It costs $300 million PER DAY.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cost+of+iraq+war
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/17/business/17leonhardt.html
Yes, but the elecricity to charge batteries can come from any number of generation sources, it's not locked in to one source and one (not very competitive) industry, the way gas powered vehicles are. Over time we can shift electrical generation, if there's demand and political will of course. And if you are rich enough to afford a Tesla, why not also put some solar panels and/or a windmill and/or microhydro turbine on your house, and change from that?
There's a big problem with ethanol fuel that I have yet to see discussed in any news about ethanol-- it might turn the problem of peak oil into a problem of PEAK SOIL. By digging up fossil fuels, we really take nothing away from the earth that we otherwise need. By growing crops and essentially burning them to run vehicles or generate power, we are directly wasting the nutrients in the soil. And guess what? We need to eat, too. Much of our farmland soil is already in such a poor state that it can only be used to grow crops when fed with large quantities of artificial fertilizer.
And if fuel from ethanol ends up costing *less* than fossil fuels, there will be no economic incentive to actually change our ways of living and working to make more efficient use of our resources, thus preserving them for our children.
Anyway, just something to think about...
Thanks again for the free marketing slashdot!
I don't get the news here. This is the standard sensor for all robots, and they've been using "lidar" for years.
Romney currently has more convention delegates than McCain.
Also, *all* of the candidates have a chance at being elected! I depends on how many people vote for them, you know, *not* what the damn TV news stations and pollsters say!!
There are a lot of great places to put datacenters, not just for novelty reasons but because of the natural advantages of the site. Where I live there are lots of old brick mill buildings that would be easy to cool, and could be powered at least partially by water power. The problem is that they're all many miles from any kind of existing backbone link.
Antibacterial "soap" is not like antibiotic drugs, the main active ingredient is some form of alchohol. But good handwashing with real soap (not detergent or alcholhol) is still often better than that other stuff. Water and mechanical action gets dirt off the hands, which is where bacteria might be living.
(Though I do keep a little bottle of alchohol based hand sanitizer around, for when I really need it's sterilization properties, e.g. to use after handling truly insanitary stuff.)