Quite. But the "pluck a number out of our asses" so-called analysts won't get any blowback from this.
"We forecast this much growth, see, here's the math. That reality doesn't match up is entirely the fault of someone paid less than us and they should be fired."
As there was no misspelling nor error in conversational grammar it can either be attributed to an editor attempting and failing to appear clever, or that the journalist is misusing it for an equally incorrect reason, such as the one GP opined.
So, either a dumb editor or a reporter imposing bias. How can I get into this journalism lark and get paid to write crap?
Unidan's (note the 'a', unidens are not native to US mainland) real downfall was that he fed the trolls who were getting tired of his holier-than-thou attitude. Then he created sock puppet accounts to feed them further. People got suspicious and in delicious irony it was him that ended up eating crow.
No need to resort to arson. Just rock up with some friends in hi-viz jackets and some pneumatic drills and "accidentally" cut through the cables when digging up the street...
I don't see how it can be an honest appraisal of a server when they have been reduced to a skivvy: "computer says table 10, seat 4 wants a Cherry Coke; check for table 7; clear table 12 and join to table 8".
The computer is more highly regarded than them, and God help them if they aren't all smiles and fawning effusiveness during their brief interactions with the customers as they perform their menial job of doing what a machine tells them to do.
The thing is, he _did_ know when his contract was up. He also knew that his manager knew that as well and that in the normal course of events, would click the button labelled "Renew" and everything would carry on as before.
What he _didn't_ know was that his manager had become an ex-manager at the time the 6 numbers should have been typed in to advance the plot and hadn't bothered to do so from his lawnchair. Nor did the ex-manager bother to tell anybody else that this was now their job.
Along with "some results have been removed due to privacy concerns" we can have "most results have been removed due to licensing issues. Specifically, we're not going to pay for them"
You could argue it was, ironically, the correct spelling. What gets passed off as journalism on social media puts professional journalism in a more positive light, thus it is complimentary.
The law is pretty clear, so specialist lawyers aren't required, along with their overinflated hourly charges, no matter how much they say they are. It's only when the big companies try to sidestep it that they might be needed. There's onerous bookkeeping, but that's been the case for a few years with DPA, only now there has to be more emphasis.
What gets me is the sudden flurry of activity. It has been known this was coming into force for nearly two years and the amount of burying heads in sand with a "this won't affect me" attitude to only now be doing anything is staggering.
Slashdot Mirror
Quite. But the "pluck a number out of our asses" so-called analysts won't get any blowback from this.
"We forecast this much growth, see, here's the math. That reality doesn't match up is entirely the fault of someone paid less than us and they should be fired."
As there was no misspelling nor error in conversational grammar it can either be attributed to an editor attempting and failing to appear clever, or that the journalist is misusing it for an equally incorrect reason, such as the one GP opined.
So, either a dumb editor or a reporter imposing bias. How can I get into this journalism lark and get paid to write crap?
Many machines at CERN. New machines...
Why is your special apostrophe different to GP’s?
"Report that driver who cut you off. Fabulous prizes to be won!"
This would become UK law one day before the official leaving date. No doubt that was intentional.
Unidan's (note the 'a', unidens are not native to US mainland) real downfall was that he fed the trolls who were getting tired of his holier-than-thou attitude. Then he created sock puppet accounts to feed them further. People got suspicious and in delicious irony it was him that ended up eating crow.
I'll swear with my dying breath that I SEE 7 DIGITS!
What isn't news is that they could admit to having lied through their teeth because they know there will be no legal repercussions in US.
That might not be true in EU, but at this point they just don't care.
You mean when Google translated it, instead of an actual person who speaks German.
I don't speak much, but on reading TFA I understood the colloquialism.
Is there IVR as well to confirm you are actually saying the phrase as well as the repetition to confirm it is the same person saying it?
What if you said (in response to "please repeat the phrase" prompt) "Go fuck yourself" each time? Would that become the passphrase?
No need to resort to arson. Just rock up with some friends in hi-viz jackets and some pneumatic drills and "accidentally" cut through the cables when digging up the street...
Instructions unclear, have just given my bank details to a Nigerian cauliflower mogul who needs to move his assets out the country.
I don't see how it can be an honest appraisal of a server when they have been reduced to a skivvy: "computer says table 10, seat 4 wants a Cherry Coke; check for table 7; clear table 12 and join to table 8".
The computer is more highly regarded than them, and God help them if they aren't all smiles and fawning effusiveness during their brief interactions with the customers as they perform their menial job of doing what a machine tells them to do.
The thing is, he _did_ know when his contract was up. He also knew that his manager knew that as well and that in the normal course of events, would click the button labelled "Renew" and everything would carry on as before.
What he _didn't_ know was that his manager had become an ex-manager at the time the 6 numbers should have been typed in to advance the plot and hadn't bothered to do so from his lawnchair. Nor did the ex-manager bother to tell anybody else that this was now their job.
Along with "some results have been removed due to privacy concerns" we can have "most results have been removed due to licensing issues. Specifically, we're not going to pay for them"
And in more recent times, I remember Pushbullet on Android being able to send / receive SMS until that service got shut down.
Oh goody. Wie can have both Goldeneye and Icarus built in America. That's his best friends sorted.
Really? I'd like to know more...
As someone pointed out on Twitter, this isn't AI but an if statement.
I was surprised how low my ICQ number was and thought it would have been higher as I wasn't an early adopter. Same thing with my id here.
So... RustyChain? Not the most secure and robust sounding name.
You could argue it was, ironically, the correct spelling. What gets passed off as journalism on social media puts professional journalism in a more positive light, thus it is complimentary.
So you're saying that GDPR is retroactive? It might be shonky in many ways, but that isn't one of them.
The law is pretty clear, so specialist lawyers aren't required, along with their overinflated hourly charges, no matter how much they say they are. It's only when the big companies try to sidestep it that they might be needed. There's onerous bookkeeping, but that's been the case for a few years with DPA, only now there has to be more emphasis.
What gets me is the sudden flurry of activity. It has been known this was coming into force for nearly two years and the amount of burying heads in sand with a "this won't affect me" attitude to only now be doing anything is staggering.