These are the things that should be brought up in the 2004 election. The US should put heavy tariffs on countries that do not have the same open markets we have, PERIOD!!!!!. Politics is easy, finding a smart politician is hard.
This should be the main topic for this coming election. But I think America is to wrapped up in other politics to worry about the future of thier jobs. We are so wrapped up in BS we don't see that far into the future. I bet the average american doesn't know where they will be in 2 years let alone how America will be.
Well the only point I can make is that not a lot of people read the comments. The proof I have is groklaw was fine until this story was posted and now it is slashdotted. I am sure the slashdot crew could tell us the % of people that go and read the comments but I would guess less the 20%.
If you read the article they explain how they came to thier conclusions. Same subnet other hosts not effected, Syn is protected against in most OSes, and Intranet effected if they had a DMZ how the hell would it effect inside traffic.
Another thing you don't know is when they registered the trademark. I read that they registered it the same day the people who write Linux Gazette decided to host thier own web site. If the SSC did it on the same day you can be sure what thier intensions were.
Don't read more into what I said. I know the problems with proprietary technology that is why I prefer open standards. I am not making excusses for the idiots that used the FAT file system. I was saying M$ could have done this years ago when they started instead of waiting until the other companies didn't have a choice.
They let it go for years and let a ton of companies adopt it then decided that they wanted licenses for it. That is BS and that is using their monoply to further profit. It is wrong and probably even criminal.
But I am sure you will come up with an excuss for my point too. Some people can justify anything.
I would have to say that not knowing the IP was in Linux before installing it does not make you at fault. Just because you buy a paper that someone plagerised does not mean you're at fault. I agree you would have to get rid of the product ASAP but I dont think you can be held liable for past use.
I think the pictures between chapter 2 and 3 should be switched. You don't even see chapter's 2 picture in chapter 2. I guess I need to email webmaster@pbs.org.
Good come back. The question I ask everyone is what technology was Microsoft not behind on? Like the web browsing Netscape was out way before IE. Database they had to buy Sybase to compete with Oracle. NOS, Novell was killing them. iTunes is the lastest one. There are a ton I thought of more then 20 one day.
Well if this was true there are alot of open ideas that could be pantented. I am sure no one has ever pantented e-mail, Internet chat. I am sure prior art means more then just pantented prior art or that swing pantent would have stayed on the books.
What pointing out that companies that make over 100 billion dollars use blacklist prove you're right, then WOW!!!!, you want a job? I have an opening for a Unix Admin that needs to be open minded like you. Please fax me your resume.
Well most of the corporate world doesn't agree with you but thats alright. Just becuase you had a bad experience with a blacklist doesn't make them all bad.
Slashdot Mirror
These are the things that should be brought up in the 2004 election. The US should put heavy tariffs on countries that do not have the same open markets we have, PERIOD!!!!!. Politics is easy, finding a smart politician is hard.
This should be the main topic for this coming election. But I think America is to wrapped up in other politics to worry about the future of thier jobs. We are so wrapped up in BS we don't see that far into the future. I bet the average american doesn't know where they will be in 2 years let alone how America will be.
Lets file a class action law suit agains SCO. They are threating us with no proof. I would guess the EFF might be intrested in this.
Well the only point I can make is that not a lot of people read the comments. The proof I have is groklaw was fine until this story was posted and now it is slashdotted. I am sure the slashdot crew could tell us the % of people that go and read the comments but I would guess less the 20%.
If you read the article they explain how they came to thier conclusions. Same subnet other hosts not effected, Syn is protected against in most OSes, and Intranet effected if they had a DMZ how the hell would it effect inside traffic.
Sco will think of a way!!
I wasn't finished reading it and had to go back. There it was, a PHP error, then I knew /. had to post the store and yup I was right. :)
Mike
Another thing you don't know is when they registered the trademark. I read that they registered it the same day the people who write Linux Gazette decided to host thier own web site. If the SSC did it on the same day you can be sure what thier intensions were.
I think if they filed for the trademark right after the fighting started it should not be that hard to win a court case.
Don't read more into what I said. I know the problems with proprietary technology that is why I prefer open standards. I am not making excusses for the idiots that used the FAT file system. I was saying M$ could have done this years ago when they started instead of waiting until the other companies didn't have a choice.
Crack dealers work on the same concept.
They let it go for years and let a ton of companies adopt it then decided that they wanted licenses for it. That is BS and that is using their monoply to further profit. It is wrong and probably even criminal.
But I am sure you will come up with an excuss for my point too. Some people can justify anything.
Just come up with a better name announce it on Slashdot with the URL and all is good. SSC can rot in hell with the "Linux Gazette" name.
WOW, they found life on Vega in Contact. :)
If you read it you have to add a zone so it is not forcing anyone to do anything.
I would have to say that not knowing the IP was in Linux before installing it does not make you at fault. Just because you buy a paper that someone plagerised does not mean you're at fault. I agree you would have to get rid of the product ASAP but I dont think you can be held liable for past use.
They might run 2.2.x. God do I hate SCO.
Please tell me they didn't patent e-sex....
:)
PLEEEEEEEASE Please please NOOOOOOooooooo.....
So what does this mean for the String Theory?
Got to love them.
I think the pictures between chapter 2 and 3 should be switched. You don't even see chapter's 2 picture in chapter 2. I guess I need to email webmaster@pbs.org.
Well there is one more idiot, the one that modded you funny. :)
Good come back. The question I ask everyone is what technology was Microsoft not behind on? Like the web browsing Netscape was out way before IE. Database they had to buy Sybase to compete with Oracle. NOS, Novell was killing them. iTunes is the lastest one. There are a ton I thought of more then 20 one day.
Well if this was true there are alot of open ideas that could be pantented. I am sure no one has ever pantented e-mail, Internet chat. I am sure prior art means more then just pantented prior art or that swing pantent would have stayed on the books.
What pointing out that companies that make over 100 billion dollars use blacklist prove you're right, then WOW!!!!, you want a job? I have an opening for a Unix Admin that needs to be open minded like you. Please fax me your resume.
Well most of the corporate world doesn't agree with you but thats alright. Just becuase you had a bad experience with a blacklist doesn't make them all bad.