Slashdot Mirror


Dusty Disc May Mean Other Earths

DoraLives writes "According to the BBC, astronomers say they have evidence for Earth-like planets orbiting a nearby star. The star in question is Vega, which is nice and close (as stars go), quite young (also as stars go), and one of the brightest stars in the sky. Apparently, 'Vega has a disc of dust circling it, and at least one large planet which could sweep debris aside allowing smaller worlds like Earth to exist.' Should be interesting to keep an eye on it as the years roll by as the disk rotates and our optical powers keep growing."

289 comments

  1. three-two-one---contact by ChrisTower · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it does have an Earth-type planet, it'll probably be inhabited by a bunch of beings that look like my late father... that's barely worth the trip out there, or an hour and half.

  2. to bad we're looking in the past by 2057 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i hate the fact that we cannot see the planets right now and can only see its past. for all we know they are looking back at us on earth back in 5000bc going nope no life.

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
    1. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by crymeph0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Vega is only 25 light years away, so they'd be looking at the 70's. Of course, once they hear Disco, they'll probably decide nothing of value could have ever come from our system.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    2. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by macshune · · Score: 2, Funny

      "i hate the fact that we cannot see the planets right now and can only see its past. for all we know they are looking back at us on earth back in 5000bc going nope no life."

      no, actually, they'd be looking at us in 1978 and saying "dude, check out the shitty clothes."

    3. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Stradenko · · Score: 0, Redundant

      given that the star in question is ~25 light-years away, I doubt they're seeing the 5000bc-age earth....but they are seeing the late seventies, which may be even more disturbing to them.

    4. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You shouldn't use the bible to construct the human timeline.

    5. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by (startx) · · Score: 1
      ...for all we know they are looking back at us on earth back in 5000bc going nope no life.

      Except, if you read the article, it states that Vega is 25 light-years away. This means we're each only looking at 1978. Say what you will about Earth at that time, but there were definately signs of advanced life.

    6. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except, Vega isn't 7000 light years away. It's only 25 light years away. They're seeing the seventies. This is an even more frightening thought.

    7. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I kind of doubt anyone there is looking at us right now. From the (somewhat fuzzy) description in the article, it sounds like what we're observing is a disc of dust surrounding Vega with proto-planets forming within it. It was probably several hundred million years after the Solar System passed through that phase before life even got started on Earth. According to currently accepted models of planetary formation, those proto-planets would be pretty hellish places right now; their surfaces will be blazing hot and suffering constant bombardment by other, slightly smaller bodies. Being anywhere on the surface of one would be like being at Ground Zero of a massive nuclear strike.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    8. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by darkweasel · · Score: 0

      +1 funny

      --
      .sig.
    9. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by inteller · · Score: 1

      damn and I thought reruns HERE were bad.....not only do they have to suffer through the same shit we already have seen, but they haven't even seen the Reagan Years (TM) yet!

    10. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 3, Funny

      [...] their surfaces will be blazing hot and suffering constant bombardment by other, slightly smaller bodies.

      So...not unlike my ex-girlfriend, then.

    11. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "i hate the fact that we cannot see the planets right now and can only see its past. for all we know they are looking back at us on earth back in 5000bc going nope no life."

      Nar aliens have tachyon telescopes. They can see us in real time. They're watching us sitting around Slashdot and going "nope, no life."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Vega is only 25 light years away, so they'd be looking at the 70's. Of course, once they hear Disco, they'll probably decide nothing of value could have ever come from our system.

      They would probably be more interested in the political situation. They would be watching the throes of the Nixon impeachment crisis in the West, China would still be in the middle of the cultural revolution, Vietnam would have ended but only just. The USSR would be in mid collapse. Latin America is run by cliques of corrupt generals who murder tens of thousands (Pinochet) or hundreds of thousands (Argentina).

      There has just been a war in the middle east. The Iranians are about to kick out the Shah (a brutal thug on a par with Saddam Hussein) and the Ayatolah would appear soon after to pervert the democratic revolution the same way Lenin appeared on the scene in Russia after the Tzar was deposed.

      Things don't get any better for quite a while and they get worse before they get better. The nuclear arms race accelerates, the US and the USSR are engaged in a series of proxy wars that appear likely to turn nuclear. If you look at the situation from the outside even the events of 1989 might be considered evidence of further instability rather than a good sign.

      On the whole I don't think that they are going to be avoiding talking to us just because of the disco music...

      I think we should get our act together globally before we start to try to join extra-terrestrial clubs. If there is anyone out there worth talking to they already know about us.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    13. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      better than now when people are walking billboards with all the logos they wear.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    14. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being anywhere on the surface of one would be like being at Ground Zero of a massive nuclear strike.

      As opposed to the garden-variety, non-massive nuclear strike?

    15. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

      They would be watching the throes of the Nixon impeachment crisis in the West....

      No they wouldn't, they'd be looking at Jane Fondas tits!

    16. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      As opposed to the garden-variety, non-massive nuclear strike?

      Well, yeah, actually. Like what would have happened to Washington and Moscow if the Cold War had gone hot, as opposed to what happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Not just one big boom, but a whole lot of them, one after another, until absolutely nothing is left.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    17. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shitty clothes, maybe. But we had "Disco Inferno," and if that's not proof of intelligent life, nothing is:

      Disco Inferno - The Trammps
      (Green/Kersey)

      Burn baby burn! Burn baby burn! Burn baby burn! Burn baby burn!
      Burnin'!

      To my surprise, yes! One hundred stories high
      People gettin' loose y'all gettin' down on the roof - Do you hear?
      (the folks are flaming)Folks were screamin' - out of control
      It was so entertainin' - when the boogie started to explode
      I heard somebody say

      Burn baby burn! - Disco inferno!
      Burn baby burn! - Burn that mother down
      Burn baby burn! - Disco inferno!
      Burn baby burn! - Burn that mother down
      Burnin'!

      Satisfaction (uhu hu hu) came in the chain reaction
      (burnin') I couldn't get enough, (till I had to self-destroy)
      so I had to
      self destruct, (uhu hu hu)
      The heat was on (burnin'), rising to the top, huh!
      Everybody's goin' strong (uhu hu hu)
      And that is when my spark got hot
      I heard somebody say

      Burn baby burn! - Disco inferno!
      Burn baby burn! - Burn that mother down, yoh!
      Burn baby burn! - Disco inferno!
      Burn baby burn! - Burn that mother down
      Burnin'!

      Up above my head I hear music in the air - I hear music!
      That makes me know there's (somebody) a promise somewhere

      Satisfaction came in a chain reaction - Do you hear?
      I couldn't get enough, so I had to self destruct,
      The heat was on, rising to the top
      Everybody's goin' strong
      That is when my spark got hot
      I heard somebody say

      Burn baby burn! - Disco inferno! (Aah yeah!)
      Burn baby burn! - Burn that mother down
      Burn baby burn! - Disco inferno!, yeah!
      Burn baby burn! - Burn that mother down x2 Burnin'!

      MUSIC TURN AROUND (12 bars)

      I just can't stop
      When (till) my spark gets hot
      Just can't stop
      When my spark gets hot

      MUSIC TURN AROUND (24 bars)

      Burning, burning, burning, burning 6X (24 bars)

      Oh, and Brick House!

    18. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by macshune · · Score: 1

      "...Satisfaction (uhu hu hu) came in the chain reaction (burnin') I couldn't get enough, (till I had to self-destroy) so I had to self destruct, (uhu hu hu) The heat was on (burnin'), rising to the top, huh! Everybody's goin' strong (uhu hu hu) And that is when my spark got hot..."

      You're correct. Disco inferno is indeed proof of technologically advanced lifeforms. If that song isn't strong evidence for an understanding nuclear reactions, I don't know what is!

    19. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, where's the mod points when you need them? :-)

    20. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, the Vegans are looking at nothing. The Earth wasn't even created until 4004 BC.

    21. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by naasking · · Score: 2, Funny

      So...not unlike my ex-girlfriend, then.

      You sir, truly live up to your name. :-)

    22. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Remember, we're talking Vegans here...

      Their only interest in us is in how to get the meat eaters to stop, and whether we know of any way to make tofu actually palatable...

      Posted anonymously as I'm already on the run from the Food Police.

    23. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty hellish places right now; their surfaces will be blazing hot and suffering constant bombardment by other, slightly smaller bodies.

      Sounds a lot like my home life.
      *rimshot*

    24. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by slashnull · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good thing, because I don't want to have to remember any new kings. (ref., Futurama)

    25. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      or, more likely, they might think 'hey, look at that dusty disk around that star. I bet it looks a lot like our system' or, if they're really advanced something like 'ooh, some of them are blue.' Really, if the average American can't tell a Moi-Moi from a Paw-paw, why the hell do you think something 25 light years away would care about politics, assuming the concept has any meaning beyond humans in the first place?

  3. Soon... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
    Soon we'll be able to use amazingly powerful telescopes to stare out across the light years and see some one on Vegas planets staring back.

    Then the arms race starts.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Soon... by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is a high likelihood that one species is at a much more advanced stage than the other. Most likely, we'd be the more advanced ones (primarily due to the age of Sun and earth).

      It would be like the pilgrims landing in the US. Complete colonization one way or other. Not much scope for an arms race...

      S

    2. Re:Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Then the arms race starts."

      I don't dude, all those movies with aliens in them, they seem to have pretty big arms, we might be in trouble...

    3. Re:Soon... by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 1

      But what we see there is the past...
      So, the arms race has already began.

    4. Re:Soon... by jafac · · Score: 1

      Most likely, we'd be the more advanced ones (primarily due to the age of Sun and earth).

      not necessarily. Any one of a number of different events in earth's past could have slowed us down, and absence of other events could have sped things up - when you're talking about evolution of life - and then once intelligent life evolved, evolution of culture/technology. I'd say it's a toss-up, either way - with the PRIMARY indicator that they're more advanced being: they have not yet come to contact us.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:Soon... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Vegas planets

      Was I the only person to see this phrase and to immediately think Las Vegas Planet? Can you imagine a whole planet filled with Casino's, Elvis Impersonators and Hookers?

      Homer: mmmmmmmmm....Elvis Impersonators

    6. Re:Soon... by maliabu · · Score: 1

      Most likely, we'd be the more advanced ones

      that is if we assumed we are the one and only generation of life on Earth.

      if we're not the first generation (ie those before us had gone to extinction), then maybe this 'younger' plant is more advanced simply because their accumuldated technology hasn't been 'rebooted'.

    7. Re:Soon... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well it can actually be ether way. So yea it took 5 billion years to create "Intelligent" life, on earth, But the speed of evolution (or culture) isn't a constant. Yea there is probably a period of a billion years to evolve past a single cell more or less. So on vega if conditions are right there could be a culture more advanced then us. Or it could just be filled with slime.
      This is the same with cultures the burning of the Library of Alexandria was said to set man kind back a thousands years. So it could have been possible for columbus to travel to the moon except for north america.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Soon... by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      I immediately thought of Jody Foster going "Good..To..Go" while sitting in the machine we built from the plans the Vegans sent us.

      --
      ymmv
    9. Re:Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id be afriad of a native american with a gun just as much as an american. the pilgrams conquered america with chemical warfare: smallpox.

      we'll probably end up getting a very nasty case of vega-ebola or they will get earth measles or something.

      i just hope no one gives them aids :)

    10. Re:Soon... by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      "It would be like the pilgrims landing in the US. Complete colonization one way or other."

      Yeah, and in complete violation of the prime directive.

      Damn pilgrims.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    11. Re:Soon... by EvilNTUser · · Score: 4, Funny

      "i just hope no one gives them aids :)"

      Don't worry. James T. Kirk was a fictional character.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    12. Re:Soon... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      True, but it's a reasonable assumption to make, as it's the only one we have evidence for.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    13. Re:Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be like the pilgrims landing in the US. Complete colonization one way or other."

      Yeah, and in complete violation of the prime directive.


      It's okay, they discussed the importance of the prime directive for several minutes before concluding that this was one of those times where they felt like ignoring it. So they were in full compliance with accepted practice.

    14. Re:Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their mighty intellect is no match for our puny weapons.

      (And soon, we'll build a board with a nail SO BIG...)

    15. Re:Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Any one of a number of different events in earth's past could have slowed us down

      You mean, like religions? People who still believe in mythical fairy tales and pray to all-powerful overlords? Hello, this is the 14th century calling...would you religious types please join the 21st century? Last one out, hit the lights on your way out.

    16. Re:Soon... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Viruses tend to not cross species lines very often. I'm pretty sure any being from vega is genetically different enough to not be subseptible to any of our viruses. Now bacteria on the other hand, possibly.

  4. Someone Get Jodie Foster on This ASAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    She's the Expert on going to Vega....

    1. Re:Someone Get Jodie Foster on This ASAP! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      s/Jodie Foster/Shirley MacLaine/

      (That is, only one of them believed it off-set.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  5. So... by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vegans really ARE aliens from another solar system!

    I'm off to eat some meat.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:So... by pavon · · Score: 1

      Well since they made it here before we made it to Vega that would make them a more civilization, no? :)

    2. Re:So... by pavon · · Score: 1

      Well since they made it here before we made it to Vega that would make them a more advanced civilization, no? :)

      PS. sorry about the bad version of this post. I even previewed it, grr.

    3. Re:So... by emil.ede · · Score: 1

      Yes we are. And now that you've discovered our "little secret" we have to kill you. err. wait. would that be against the vegan ethics? A punishment WORSE then death then! muhahahahahahahhahh

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are going to turn him into a vegan as well?

  6. Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by garyrich · · Score: 3, Funny

    not all that earthlike

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by garyrich · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eh? offtopic? the mods probably don't remember that Dune was a satellite of Vega...

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    2. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      the mods probably don't remember that Dune was a satellite of Vega

      Slashdot Rule 1: Don't assume that the mods remember anything

    3. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don' t be sad, dude. These days nobody gives a damn to ACs like me and moderators mod "offtopic", "troll" or "flamebait", just for the sheer joy of doing it...

    4. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by rifter · · Score: 4, Funny

      "the mods probably don't remember that Dune was a satellite of Vega"

      Slashdot Rule 1: Don't assume that the mods remember anything

      No, Rule number one is we don't talk about moderation club outside of moderation club

    5. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the gimp would be jealous.

  7. woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Vega is where the message was relayed to earth from in Contact, perhaps rather than just relayed, it will actually be FROM Vega :-)

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you remember the book, it pointed out that Vega was a giant star, with a lifetime of only a few million years. If the Vegans are going to avoid getting supernova'ed to death, they'll have to evolve like hell.

      Hear me, Vega? The clock is ticking.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? Uh, a star going nova at that distance would wipe us out.

  8. Another thing to consider: by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The more Earth-type planets we find in our tiny observable radius of the Universe, the greater the statistical probability that others exist where we can't see them.

    The likelihood of other meaningful life in the Universe just got better. And I for one welcome the possibility.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with your observations. You yourself state in your post "it is very unlikely that little green men would insist in placing a probe in any of my cavities". Then why do you feel that there is intelligent life outside of God's blue Earth? God only gave the gift of life to us and not some silicon-based life-forms.

      Don't you agree?

    2. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't. That means we can be invaded at any moment by an advanced race. If we are alone, we can't be invaded. Of course we might not be alone, but we might be the most advanced race in the universe.

    3. Re:Another thing to consider: by bravehamster · · Score: 1

      The likelihood of other meaningful life in the Universe just got better

      I've always considered the likelihood of other meaningful life in the Univers to be a statistical certainty. The problem lies in having that life exist close to us, both in space _and_ time. What's the use in having dozens of close neighbors that all killed themselves off 2000 years ago? Sure, it would give us some interesting ruins to poke around, and archaeology would be cool again, just like in the early 80's. My point is that other life does exist out there. I'm 100% certain. I just hope that it's close enough and alive enough for us to talk to it and sell it stuff.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    4. Re:Another thing to consider: by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The likelihood of other meaningful life in the Universe just got better. And I for one welcome the possibility.

      I, for one, welcome our new Drake Equation overlords.

    5. Re:Another thing to consider: by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 1

      But why should all other life be like us? Isn't it quite possible that life has evolved on some planets totally unlike the Earth, or that no life has developed on some Earth-like planets?

    6. Re:Another thing to consider: by jafac · · Score: 1

      I just hope that it's close enough and alive enough for us to talk to it and sell it stuff.

      Or download their pr0n. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:Another thing to consider: by NETHED · · Score: 1

      That frightens the bejezzes out of me. I certainly hope there is something out THERE that is better than us, if not, the universe really is a waste of space.

      Not saying Humanity isn't great, I'm saying that there is a lot of room for improvement.

      --
      --sig fault--
    8. Re:Another thing to consider: by NETHED · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the whole premise for StarTrek? Sex with Aliens??

      Man, thehun.com would get really wierd....

      --
      --sig fault--
    9. Re:Another thing to consider: by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The likelyhood of life elsewhere remains the same whether humans will ever be able to observe it or not. The likelihood of finding life is a different thing.

    10. Re:Another thing to consider: by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      Yes possible, but it seems more likely, since life is proven to exist on earth, that looking for conditions similiar to ours would bear more results. I mean, look at the dataset, where would you begin - on the Jupiter-like planets or the Earth-like planets - considering what we know to true?

      You wouldn't fish in the woods would you?

      --
      ymmv
    11. Re:Another thing to consider: by rifter · · Score: 1

      I don't. That means we can be invaded at any moment by an advanced race. If we are alone, we can't be invaded. Of course we might not be alone, but we might be the most advanced race in the universe.

      If they are truly advanced they would not bother invading us. Firstly because they would have given up on war which is only destructive to civilization and secondly because there is nothing for us to offer an advanced race. Even warlike aliens would probably see little point in attacking a backwater planet in the middle of nowhere which holds no colonies and is in fact not even united on its own surface. Beings with advanced technology could obtain all the resources we have on earth without resorting to warfare, so why would they bother us?

      Really, we probably aren't that important to anyone but ourselves.

    12. Re:Another thing to consider: by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 1

      You last sentence is actually a great example. Looking for fish, I really won't find any in the woods. But if what I'm looking for is food, then I could find mushrooms (which is food, but very different from fish) in the woods, and there are some seas where I couldn't find fish.

    13. Re:Another thing to consider: by rking · · Score: 4, Funny

      Beings with advanced technology could obtain all the resources we have on earth without resorting to warfare, so why would they bother us?

      Well, if they've been around longer than us and are more technologically advanced than us... odds are we're going to be infringing on some of their IP. Just ask Jack Valenti whether that's worth going to war over.

    14. Re:Another thing to consider: by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Life is probably very common, but, IMO, most technologically advanced civilizations don't make it past The Great Filter.

      Those that *do* make it past that mass extinction filter (nuclear? bio? nano?), to Singularity, are probably so far advanced as to be unrecognizable and uninterested in us primitive biological ants.

      It's a pity humans still have all their eggs in one basket; until we've got self-sustaining offworld populations, we're a ticking time bomb.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    15. Re:Another thing to consider: by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      Sure it is a great example for your point - when you take it out context and change the words.

      I'm not looking for food, I'm looking for FISH, and I have seen FISH in the water. Since I have seen FISH in the water, I would certainly look for FISH in the water first - not the woods. Obviously not all water has fish, but in my experience, there is not fish in the woods.

      Now I am not particular about what kind of FISH, just FISH.

      Your example, concerning food is more applicable if I was looking for planets, not life. There are plenty of planets (food) around, why look for the Earth-like ones?
      I will digress, since I addressed that in my first post.

      --
      ymmv
    16. Re:Another thing to consider: by G00F · · Score: 1

      No this I love!!!

      Finding an advance race, that has prior art to all those bogas/over reaching/long lasting patents!

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    17. Re:Another thing to consider: by David+Gould · · Score: 1


      if not, the universe really is a waste of space.

      And what else were you going to use that space for?

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    18. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    19. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's at least one resource they couldn't get without resorting to warfare...

      Human slaves! :)

    20. Re:Another thing to consider: by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your point of looking for fish seems more analagous to looking for humans. Sure if you're looking for humans then you are best to look for earth like planets, since we know that's the environment humans live in - if you look for fish, look in the ocean, if you look for humans look on an earth like planet.

      But the search for ET life is just that, a search for life, not humans - we cannot say that life can only be found on earth like planets, we can't even say that in our solar system life can only be found on earth, it's entirely possible that there is life on other celestial bodies in our neighbourhood.

      Even if we take the search for intelligent ET life, it's still a search for an unknown life in an unknown environment, so the fixation on earth-like planets is silly.

      Far to often I think we assume that ET life must be like earth life, IMHO it's fairly unlikely, considering the (as far as is known) small percentage of planets that are earth like.

      Same as if we were looking for "any" life on earth, where do you look, well, everywhere you don't limit yourself to anything in particular because life can't exist there - it can, life can exist (almost) anywhere on earth, so why not anywhere in the universe?

      There is one advantage in looking for earth like planets, they could become useful to our distant descendants in the future, probably as a destination for a many-generational ship.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    21. Re:Another thing to consider: by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't clear, I meant fish as earth-like life, and food as life in general.

      If you only want to look for earth-like life, then it's ok, but I want to look for life in general, even of types we are not aware of.

    22. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, to search for M class planets, if you like STrek terminology, we need money. To have money, we need public opinion. I don't see a big problem if the media excite people a little to support this planet-wide enterprise, rather than tell them how improbable it is for Vega to have any aminoacid at all for the next tens of millions of years.

    23. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The very latest in tentacle porn :)

    24. Re:Another thing to consider: by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      You can do this today!

      It's called Japanese Tentacle Pr0n Anime!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    25. Re:Another thing to consider: by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      The likelyhood of life elsewhere remains the same whether humans will ever be able to observe it or not. The likelihood of finding life is a different thing.

      No that's not true. By "likelihood" of life elsewhere what we really mean is our best estimates of that likelihood. Those estimates really do change with the data.

      In fact it is already a foregone conclusion whether life exists in the universe, but we don't know, so we can only speak probabilistically about it.

    26. Re:Another thing to consider: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Beings with advanced technology could obtain all the resources we have on earth without resorting to warfare, so why would they bother us?

      Slavery perhaps? Since they are an advanced race they would probably need workers to keep themselves at such an advanced state.

    27. Re:Another thing to consider: by j3110 · · Score: 1

      If matter cannot be created nor destroyed, then there is a finite amount of matter. Most scientific beliefs also say that the universe extends on in every direction infinitely. Therefore the probability of something existing at any point in the universe is m/(x*y*z)=m/inf=0. So any place you look in the universe, there is a 0% chance of finding life in it.

      (I hope DNA forgives me for not being able to explain it properly.)

      --
      Karma Clown
    28. Re:Another thing to consider: by rifter · · Score: 1

      "Beings with advanced technology could obtain all the resources we have on earth without resorting to warfare, so why would they bother us?"

      Slavery perhaps? Since they are an advanced race they would probably need workers to keep themselves at such an advanced state.

      Already covered. We are currently advanced to the state that machines do far better work than slaves. Look at cotton production in the South now compared to what it was in the 19th century. We are almost advanced to the point where we can genetically engineer workers if we so chose, so a more advanced civilization would likely be capable of doing so as well.

      Then there is the question of philosophical sophistication, which of course is a question for philosophers to answer; that is, since our civilization has advanced to the stage where slavery and warfare are in themselves philosophically and morally abhorent to us, and our philosophy has therefore sought an end to these things, is a more advanced civilization likely to have these problems? That of course relies on whether some areas of progress are absolute and whether alien philosophy is akin in some ways therefore to ours.

      The only reason I can think of for an alien race to enslave our planet is not a reason at all because it is illogical, though this doe snot make it unreasonable. This reason being, of course, the simple satisfaction of subjugation itself. The feeling of enjoyment some would derive from placing sentient beings under their boot and/or torturing/enslaving them. There are certainly humans who enjoy this and act on it even in situations where it is not logical to do so (for instance even when it was proven that it was less economically viable to use slave labour than it was to use paid labour, and that slaves were more expensive, slavery continued). If a more advanced civilization is sadistic in nature, we are screwed. :P

    29. Re:Another thing to consider: by yourmom16 · · Score: 1
      If matter cannot be created nor destroyed, then there is a finite amount of matter.

      How exactly does that follow? Local conservation laws are more fundamental. The reason the amount of matter in the universe is constant is that the rate of change of the amount of matter in a small region is equal to the rate at which matter is flowing in, i.e. d/dt(p)=div (pv), where p is the density, v is the velocity, and d/dt is the partial derivative. The global conservation law may be obtained by integrating it over the entire universe, and assuming the right-side is zero(since no matter is flowing in or out at the edge of the universe). The resulting equation is dM/dt=0, where M is the mass of the universe.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    30. Re:Another thing to consider: by j3110 · · Score: 1

      Well, if we assume that there is an infinite amount of matter, then likewise there is probably an infinite amount of energy too. Since we have infinite matter and infinite energy and infinite places to dump what we don't want, I don't think entropy poses much of a threat. If there was a big bang, and that's all the mass in the universe, then there is a finite amount.

      I guess it just seems obvious to me that there probably isn't an ends to the universe, and that if there was infinite mass, we would be torn apart by the gravitational pulls. In any case, I very much believe there is a finite mass to the universe. If there is a finite mass in an infinite space, the chances of finding said mass is 0.

      This is only a joke anyhow. The problem with the logic isn't the amount of mass or the size of the universe. It's just the fact that we exist kind of places a restriction on us to be made of something. If we have mass, it's quite likely that we are going to be around other things with mass. If these conditions are suitable for life, it's quite likely that we aren't the only life forms. Douglas Adams liked to use the size of the universe to confuse smart people. In fact, the ultimate punishment in his series is a device that shows the person just how insignificant they are with relation to the infinite depths of the universe. If a butterfly flaps it's wings and causes a storm, that shuts off power, that makes the president think we are under attack and destroy the world, our good neighbors over at Vega could care less (and 100% of the universe is still intact with previous reasoning). It's impossible to effect any portion of the universe, because your effect is finite, the universe is infinite.

      --
      Karma Clown
  9. Not the first, by ActionPlant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But this certainly seems to be the most promising.

    I'm still all about developing a means of getting us out there to explore these places.

    Plus, it would certainly be nice to finally find a backup for our planet. You can't tell me there aren't at least a few people out there who have been rather alarmed at all of our recent unexpected solar activity.

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
    1. Re:Not the first, by Tripster · · Score: 1

      I think the issue with the recent solar activity is we haven't charted the sun's activities long enough to know if this is abnormal behaviour or just some random burping.

      I definitely agree with you that we need to start developing our long-range space transport systems, we are advanced enough to at least do some deep explorations of our solar system within a hundred years. By that point we'd likely be ready to start sending sub-light speed probes out that can get to nearby stars within a few decades.

      Now the thing I find interesting in all this, IF we are close to this level of technology it means there is a chance other beings have reached this level and beyond, I have trouble believing we are the only intelligence in the universe just by looking at the sheer diversity and longevity of life on this planet.

      There are also "hints" in our history that are interesting in themselves, unexplained relics, the age of the Sphynx, ancient Greek records of wars in the heavens, etc. Surely any outside intelligence would be seen as "Gods" to our ancestors.

      If life on our own planet is as pervasive as it seems to be then I get a feeling life may be a universal norm where DNA seeding is a constant event throughout the universe. If life can spring up wherever the conditions are right and those conditions are plentiful (doesn't always have to be Earth like either) then the universe will be a very interesting place indeed.

      OTOH, there really is a case for lack of evidence as well, most of the relics could very well be Earth originated or just fables entirely. With us being quite close to creating machine intelligence ourselves it should really only take one or two other races to do the same before it is released on the galaxy and machines could definintely spread themselves far and wide much easier than us meat based organisms.

      We haven't searched our own solar system enough yet, the Mars face is an area that needs investigating even if to just debunk the whole thing but if there's even the slightest possibility it needs to be checked out thoroughly.

      My gut feeling, we're not alone and they've probably been here, might not have been recently but it only takes one race to figure out interstellar travel, even if it is by machines at sub-light speed. Any race that does figure it out will have had to survive long enough to not blow themselves up, so a better chance they are benevolent and may act more as observers than interacting/interfering with alien lifeforms.

    2. Re:Not the first, by ggwood · · Score: 1

      ActionPlant Says:
      "it would certainly be nice to finally find a backup for our planet. You can't tell me there aren't at least a few people out there who have been rather alarmed at all of our recent unexpected solar activity"

      I think the real threat to our planet is ourselves, not our sun.
      Thus, I hope we do not find a backup planet.
      I hope this is it. If we foul our planet to the point it is unlivable, we deserve our fate.
      Another planet would be a convenient way out.

      Not, of course, that I am in any position to affect change on this issue. Either a habitable planet is in range or not. Either we find it, or not. Certainly we should try. It would be amazing. I just hope it is not too easy to leave Earth for the rich and powerful. Living in the USA, recent news does not affirm faith in such leaders.

      Honestly, I'd sooner trust the average person I meet on the street, even if they are raving aloud, over the average American corporate executive.
      ______________________________________ __________

      --
      a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  10. Contact by Necro+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will everyone else now belive me that Carl Sagan may know more than he is letting on?

    --
    120 chars of filth!
    1. Re:Contact by Mosasaurus_Maximus · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Will everyone else now belive me that Carl Sagan may know more than he is letting on?


      Eh, you meant knew and was, right?

      /fatality nazi

    2. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Will everyone else now belive me that Carl Sagan may know more than he is letting on?

      He may well, but it's not likely that we're going to find out about it now, since he's dead.

      http://www.planetary.org/society/tributes/

    3. Re:Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you meant "have known", right?

    4. Re:Contact by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      Maybe he knew we were all descended from a lost colony of Pak Breeders. There are all sorts of aliens in Known Space...

  11. Terrestrial Planet Finder Links by js7a · · Score: 5, Informative
    Until we get good stellar-occluding interferometers and coronagraphs, we can't be sure. Once we get those in place, it becomes possible to determine the atmospheric composition (i.e., O2, H2O, N2, etc.)

    Here are Terrestrial Planet Finder links at:

    1. Re:Terrestrial Planet Finder Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we could hack into God's computer, we could do a "locate" or a "find"... hmm, maybe He uses Debian? :-)

      Well, it's not FreeBSD, for sure...

    2. Re:Terrestrial Planet Finder Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "stellar-occluding interferometers and coronagraphs"

      stop making up words this isnt star trek

  12. Umm... by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This should be modded "funny", not "interesting". It's a joke -- get it? 5000 BC? Sigh...

  13. Life imitates art by lildogie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Vega was the source of the extraterrestrial signal in Carl Sagan's "Cosmos."

    1. Re:Life imitates art by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vega was the source of the extraterrestrial signal in Carl Sagan's "Cosmos."

      You mean "Contact," surely. And unfortunately, although it was the source of the signal, the system itself contained no life. So I don't think we can draw any parallels here.

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
    2. Re:Life imitates art by Bagels · · Score: 1

      Not "Cosmos," "Contact," as everyone else on Slashdot has been quick to point out. "Cosmos" was his excellent little science-education show on public television, as well as the book that accompanied it. PBS here in the US still airs it occasionally.

      --
      --- Bwah?
    3. Re:Life imitates art by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the first relay that had the city on the near by planet, not the second. if it was the first, Vega had life.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Life imitates art by drivelikejehu · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the movie when they first started getting the signal, when one of the characters asked which system it was from, and the reply was vega, he said something like "that's impossible! vega's full of cosmic debris, they'd get clobbered!" "not if they destroyed it with their <sarcasm>laser blasters</sarcasm>".

      So, if this article proves to be true, Carl Sagan wasn't THAT correct.

  14. Hmmm by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    Sounds like somebody just got the "Contact" DVD on sale.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sat through that whole movie to see the alien, and it was her god-damn father.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's better than the crying alien in Mission to Mars or whatever that fucking piece of turd was called.

  15. Cliche by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one, welcome our new Vegan overlords...

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    1. Re:Cliche by EverDense · · Score: 1

      I for one, welcome our new Vegan overlords...

      I, for one, don't. If they're as dusty as the story suggests, its going to be a
      bitch to get the carpets clean after they visit.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    2. Re:Cliche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our new Vegan overlords...

      Yeah. Viva Dust Vegans.

  16. Oh by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    > Dusty Disc May Mean Other Earths

    I thought this referred to my pr0n collection on CD.. It's been gathering dust. Never realized it may mean other Earths!

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  17. we should get Seti to begin transmiting directly by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    at vega for a few days, then in 50 years or so, we will know if some one heard us.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  18. Well, I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...welcome our new Vegan overlords.

  19. If astronomy was any other field of science... by bigHairyDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... they'd be laughed off the stage.

    Seriously, there's a chance that a big planet might have cleared enough space so as to not preclude the existence of a planet the same size as ours

    CALL THE PRESIDENT! THE ALIENS ARE COMING!!

    --

    foo mane padme hum

  20. Dusty Disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A dusty disc may result in skipping or failed reads... but I don't think that even all the dust on all the discs in the universe could make an entire Earth...

    1. Re:Dusty Disc by NETHED · · Score: 1

      AOL is trying to change that....

      --
      --sig fault--
  21. Stunning by CausticWindow · · Score: 0, Redundant

    allowing smaller worlds like Earth to exist

    It's certainly a relief to learn that our planet actually can exist.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  22. Liberate Vega by notcreative · · Score: 1

    That will teach those Vegan terrorists.

    1. Re:Liberate Vega by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegan terrorists? The PETA? :P

    2. Re:Liberate Vega by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, ALF, the Animal Liberation Front. True US bred terrorists...

    3. Re:Liberate Vega by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      That will teach those Vegan terrorists.

      you just know this joie was coming....

    4. Re:Liberate Vega by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      I thought ALF was from Melmac...

    5. Re:Liberate Vega by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Really, they're terrorists? Oh well, I wanted to join them without catching the attention of Big Brother Ashcroft... -sigh- so much for joining People for the Eating of Tasty Animals...

      Oh wait, that's NOT what it stands for?

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  23. more likely... by Insightfill · · Score: 1

    by the time we can see anything appreciable in the system, we'll actually BE there. These changes take place REALLY slowly, and we'll all have evolved into "pure energy" beings by the time anything firmer than a large dust-bunny is in place.

    1. Re:more likely... by Gewis · · Score: 1

      I assume by "pure energy" beings you're referring to the heat-death of the universe. Pure kinetic energy? Pure potential energy? Pure mass energy? Oh, wait, we already are mostly that, with a bit of kinetic (thermal) energy tacked on. Can we please, PLEASE, knock this stupid idea out of the sci-fi circles? Thank you.

    2. Re:more likely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Can we please, PLEASE, knock this stupid idea out of the sci-fi circles? Thank you.

      Until someone knocks off Rick Berman, we're stuck with that AND 'chroniton particles' for good.

    3. Re:more likely... by rabel · · Score: 1

      Hey, then maybe WE can send THEM the blueprints to the super wormhole machine.

  24. Ok, ok people, no Aliens... by JamesP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apparently everybody is thinking of earth-like planets and stuff. Sorry, but NO.

    1 - Vega is 25 light-years away. That's around the corner and "today" in astronomical terms

    2 - Carl Sagan picked Vega not because of planets, but because there were none, just a bunch of dust... There was a RELAY there, not aliens...

    3 - The news actually said about process that could happen; a balance between a dusty ring and an outer planet...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  25. Contact Smontact! I have my space suit, will trave by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am SO depressed that all the /. crowd can come up with are lame Contact references.

    YOU CALL YOURSELVES GEEKS! DROP AND GIVE ME TWENTY!

    Vega, as ALL REAL GEEKS know, was the home of Mother Thing of Robert Heinlein's "Have Space Suit, Will Travel".

    And if they are watching Earth circa 1978, we'd better be damn thankful they don't rotate us 90 degrees just on general principles!

  26. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no scientific theory that disproves it, so why not?

    What makes you believe that you/we are the most intelligent and important civillisation in the universe? The universe is pretty big, and that's a very arrogant assumption to make.

  27. Dusty Disk Man May Mean Other Earth by DoorFrame · · Score: 1

    This is what I read the title as, and was very confused when this story wasn't the least bit about how a dusty diskman could somehow be the cause of parallel dimensions. Let me tell, I was excited about this research, and now am quite disappointed.

    1. Re:Dusty Disk Man May Mean Other Earth by Soko · · Score: 1

      I agree - the title is confusing. I first thought that maybe someone found an old Hamm CD and thought Debian Planet was, erm, "Out-of-this-world".

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  28. Vega by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all we need is Jodie Foster to point all of her radio telescopes toward it, and we'll be having corporate sponsored alien space travel devices in no time.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  29. Vega is too big and to young by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article suggests that Vega is only 350 million years old. Moreover, at about 3 times the mass of the Sun, the lifespan of Vega will only be about 1 billion years. Given that it took about 3.5 billion years for life to get going, it seems unlikely that planets around Vega have (or ever could have) interesting lifeforms, even if an Earth-like planet is present.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Vega is too big and to young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. Maybe not. Earth alone is a pretty small sample size to base inferences from. (It's all we have, of course, but still.) Theoretically, it doesn't necessarily take 3.5 billion years for life to get going.

    2. Re:Vega is too big and to young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought that life started 3.5 billion years before now, not that it took 3.5 billion to instantiate. Am I wrong? (actually, I think it's 3.8 billion)

    3. Re:Vega is too big and to young by jafac · · Score: 1

      Given that it took about 3.5 billion years for life to get going, it seems unlikely that planets around Vega have (or ever could have) interesting lifeforms,

      Define "interesting" -
      Some scientists are still finding "interesting" the life-like chemical reactions detected by Viking on Mars. "interesting" enough to keep sending more probes.

      As long as there are human beings, there will be people looking under every rock in the universe for something "interesting" - even if it's a guessed-at fossil of a shred of DNA from 3 billion years ago.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Vega is too big and to young by Birger+Johansson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume you mean *multicellular* life, or possibly *intelligent* life. The Vega system should be just old enough for the first primitive life forms to have emerged
      -This could mean an opportunity to observe the very transition from a "pre-DNA world" (based om RNA or even more primitive genetic substrates) to a "DNA world" -this is itself probably even more interesting than watching the planet-forming process around Vega.

    5. Re:Vega is too big and to young by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Maybe. Maybe not. Earth alone is a pretty small sample size to base inferences from. (It's all we have, of course, but still.) Theoretically, it doesn't necessarily take 3.5 billion years for life to get going.

      Exactly; life might have even started around there [relatively] immediately. All we have to go on is the Earth, and maybe we were just really, really slow.

      (ObDisclaimer: IANAScientist and am presently talking out of my ass.)
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    6. Re:Vega is too big and to young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that means in 1 billion years all life on earth and any other planet in the solor system at that time will be cooked when vega goes super nova...not that any human would care by that stage since we would all be living in EMP proof computers with no biological links as far back as the year 2100...Hey I might be around to see it go boom...and you'll be there and you and you....granted I'll probably still be living in the crappiest neighborhood concieved of by man kind even then...probably some old mid 22nd eon memmory core...I'll probably have to rebuild my virtual house every 75 years or so on newly formated ground because of the degregation of that crappy 22nd eon photonic memmory core...man life will suck then too...I probably won't even get to see the data stream of the boom till 5 nanoseconds after everyone else did...and by then what would be the point? It would be like going back in time to watch the first A-bomb being dropped on japan...

  30. Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet... by Birger+Johansson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    -Since the Vega system is very young, any terrestrial planets will probably not yet be in a "finished" state, but will still be busy accreting smaller planetesimals- for the Earth, this initial process might have taken 30 million years. Also, any such planets will not have finished differentiating into a core, a mantle and a crust.
    If you send a probe there, it will not be able to find a cool surface on any of the larger planetesimals (growing proto-planets).
    The Vega system is interesting because it provides a snapshot of the early phase of planet formation.
    If you want to make a "Star Trek" style tour of a system, landing on the planets and checking for the presence of life, you need to find a more "mature" system, where the planetary crusts have had time to cool off, and where most of the orbiting debris has alredy been swept up by planets.

    One other interesting point about the Vega system though: It is bound to have an amazing number of large, highly visible comets ! In mature systems, most comets have either been kicked out to the Oort cloud or crashed into a planet.

    Yours Birger Johansson Sweden

  31. I'd really be a hardcore vegan... by Princess+Firefly · · Score: 0

    If there's a habitable planet in Vega and I manage to get myself there, I'd be the most veganist vegan around.

    Some of my ovo-lacto vegetarian friends could come with and thereby gain "vegan" status without giving up cheese pizzas.

  32. Thanks for your trying: +1 for Effort, 0 Substance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no scientific theory that disproves it, so why not?

    I am following standard statistical reasoning by assuming the null hypothesis: There is no intelligent life.

    -- You provide statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

    What makes you believe that you/we are the most intelligent and important civillisation in the universe?

    -- Where in my statement did I state that we are?

    The universe is pretty big, and that's a very arrogant assumption to make.

    -- The same applies to your presumptions.

  33. oh no... they were right! by physicsboy500 · · Score: 0

    Be prepared for the attack of the prime numbers.

    --
    The original generic sig.
    1. Re:oh no... they were right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Wow... by i_am_syco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought I'd be the first one with a Contact joke. Seems I'm one of the last.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      YouFailIt++

  35. and as the action unfolds... by baneblackblade · · Score: 1

    be interesting to keep an eye on it as the years roll by as the disk rotates and our optical powers keep growing. Oh, okay. I'll just go grab my telescope, and a bottle of root beer. oh wait... better make that an ocean of root beer...this could take a few thousand years.

  36. Movie Contact by attobyte · · Score: 0, Redundant

    WOW, they found life on Vega in Contact. :)

    --
    I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

    Mike

    1. Re:Movie Contact by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      WHAT YOU SAY!!

      I've never read about that in this thread!

      Cool discovery! Yay! Now I need to change the pants I peed in! :-O :-O

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Movie Contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a movie "Contact". They metion Vega in the story and in the "movie" they make contact with another life on Vega in the movie "Contact"

  37. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Prove me wrong! I dare you!"

    If we were created through evolution, then the same conditions would very easily exist elsewhere in the universe. If we were created by God, then God is an intelligent lifeform elsewhere in the universe, maybe even outside of it.

    You are wrong.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  38. What's interesting may not be answerable by (void*) · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    The previous poster made a valid argument, but yours is just opinion. Opinions are like anuses, everyone has one.


    Furthermore whatever the chances of there being life, the chance that there being interesting, contactable life surely must be a more difficult calculation that can only be answered by our descendents. Scientists prefer a valid hypothesis, teatable in our lifetime, compared to whatever interesting questions one can pose. Thus, on this grounds of science, the interesting scenario that you mention cannot be that interesting.

    1. Re:What's interesting may not be answerable by bravehamster · · Score: 1

      Oh geez, I'm sorry, I didn't realize opinions weren't allowed on /. My most humble apologies. Asswipe.

      I wasn't arguing with the parent, so I don't know what the hell you're going off about. I was simply adding my two bits to his comment. Since you have trouble reading properly, I'll spell out what my points were:

      1. Given the infinite (probably) nature of the Universe, other life is a statistical certainty
      2. Again, given the infinite nature of the Universe, intelligent life may be seperated from us by great distances in both space and time.
      3. My hope is that intelligent life is _so_ common we could communicate with it some day.
      4. I say nothing about the likelihood of such a thing occurring.
      5. Please remove that bug from your ass and give it a decent burial.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:What's interesting may not be answerable by (void*) · · Score: 1
      Opinions are allowed, but EVERYONE HAS ONE. One way to distinguish oneself is to make a logically sound argument?


      You sir are too blinded by your own personal agenda to see what the flaws in your argument are.


      The universe is not infinite.


      The probability of life may be very small.


      The probability of intelligent life may be smaller still.


      The certain conclusion you can come too, is that the chances of life is just became greater.


      Eveyrthing you've said, is unsubstantiated opinion. It may sound likely to you, but we have no evidence either way.

    3. Re:What's interesting may not be answerable by yourmom16 · · Score: 1
      1. Given the infinite (probably) nature of the Universe, other life is a statistical certainty

      We have no reason to assume its infinite. It of course is unbounded, since if you could fly a spacecraft out of it, it wouldn't be the universe. However that does not mean it is infinite. You can't walk off the edge of the earth, yet it is not infinite. Why should the universe have a Euclidean topology?

      Of course the obvious way of testing, would be to look, to see if we can see the earth, or some other recognised landmark. Of course as we would be seeing it billions of lightyears away, even with good enough equipment to see it in detail, we may not recognize it.

      There is one other way of testing. The wave function takes on only value at a point. If we let k equal planks constant over 2*pi, and let D represent the distance traveled in a straight line before getting back where we started, this condition(in one dimension) is e^(ipx/k)=e^(ip(x+D)/k). Dividing by the left side gives 1=e^(ipD/k), and thus pD/k is equal to some integer, n, times 2*pi, and p=nh/D. This means momentum is quantised, and the larger the universe the smaller the quantum of momentum. If we let D equal 6 meters(which is rediculously small), we find the quantum of momentum is approximately 1*10^-34 kg*m/s^2, which is too small to measure accurately. If the universe is billions of lightyears across, the quantum of momentum will be much smaller.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    4. Re:What's interesting may not be answerable by bravehamster · · Score: 1

      You really can't read worth a shit, can you? Failed reading comprehension, did we? This is just getting silly. You just restated several of my points with slightly different wording. We don't know whether or not the universe is infinite, but for all practical purposes, we can consider it to be.

      I have no personal agenda as far as extra terrestrial life is concerned. I have no clue where you get the idea that I'm some fucking whacked out UFO nutcase hoping to be picked up off this miserable planet on their next flyby. You couldn't be further from the truth.

      I know there are flaws in my "argument". Except I was not making an argument. Just stating possiblities. But apparently you can't handle anything except substantiated facts. So here are some facts for you:

      The chances for external life in this universe are exactly the same as they have always been. Rather, we should say that our *understanding* of those chances has been changed by the possible existance of earth-similar worlds. Reality has not changed. We have.

      The entire reason I replied to the original poster was because of his use of the term "Universe". Having life exist in the Universe is completely useless. Now, finding intelligent life in our local *galactic* neighborhood, that would be interesting. That was my entire point, for the THIRD FUCKING TIME. Learn to read dipshit.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    5. Re:What's interesting may not be answerable by (void*) · · Score: 1
      You sir are an idiot. The poster you are answering to said, very clearly and firmly, "probability of life just got better". That was a firm, logical conclusion. You however, just presented me with a bunch of hunches and guesses.


      If you were stating possibilities, then you will not say it was "infinite". That is very definite conclusion.


      Why is having the knowledge that life, but not intelligent life is common in the universe useless? It would at least stop us from making the arrogant claim that God life on earth for man.


      And yes I agree reality has not changed. However, nothing you said about how likely or how interesting, whether it is close enough to be detected, is grounded in reality. Very clearly those are your preferences and prejudices. Thank you.

  39. Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This article is a little misleading.

    By Earthlike I believe they mean terrestrial; a rocky world, as opposed to a gas giant.

    Other known terrestrial worlds include baked-out Mercury, greenhouse-wracked Venus, and dry, cold Mars. Most people would not consider these "Earthlike" in the Star Trek Class M sense of the word.

    That said: Even given the existence of terrestrial planets, Vega isn't a great place to go looking for a habitable, life-bearing world. It's a bright, hot star, which also means that it is a short-lived star. In a few hundred million years, when its potential planets begin to cool to the point where water would condense, Vega would be getting ready to wander off the main sequence and get way unpleasant to be near.

    Another strike against life developing on Vega worlds: a greater percentage of its energy output would be in "bluer" wavelengths, including UV. Once it got started, life might adapt to UV, but to get started in the first place it needs some stability. I can see a influx of UV ripping apart delicate chemical chains in Vega Prime's oceans, greatly reducing the chance that life would get a foothold.

    All this said, this is hopeful news, because the existence of one planet-forming debris field means there are probably others . . . some around more genial F and G and K class stars.

    Stefan

    1. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by iggymanz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Since you had to bring up Star Trek classification, what about silicon based, hydroflouric acid oozing creatures like the Horta? Maybe they wouldn't mind the UV so much, tunneling through the bedrock

      DON'T MINE THE HORTA EGGS - THE HORTA'S GOT A MEAN STREAK A MILE WIDE

    2. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by StefanJ · · Score: 1
      Good question.


      Hortas would live on (in) terrestrial planets, but not Earthlike terrestrial planets.


      Silicon life is a toughy. You need really special conditions and there are lots of design constraints. (I don't have the references on hand, but as I recall the silicon-life metabolic equivalent of CO2 would be a solid, so your hortas would be breathing out powder.) But Vega's planets might offer as good a place as any.


      Stefan "No Kill I!" Jones

    3. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Sloppy definition of "Earthlike"

      You can't expect all planets roughly 10000 miles in diameter to be just like Earth. Hopefully the Vegans have much better television.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also it would be awesome if all they ate was meat.

    5. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by khallow · · Score: 1

      Actually Mercury is too close to the Sun to be an "Earth-like" planet. But Venus and Mars certainly qualify. As I recall, the key component of the current definition of "Earth-like" is that a planet needs to be the right distance from a star so that liquid water can form (under suitable atmospheric conditions). For example, swapping Venus and Mars would probably make the temperature range of each planet fairly close to liquid water temperatures.

    6. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      For example, swapping Venus and Mars would probably make the temperature range of each planet fairly close to liquid water temperatures.

      I would really love to see NASA undertake this. That'd be awesome.

    7. Re:Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by khallow · · Score: 1
      I would really love to see NASA undertake this. That'd be awesome.

      While I often bash NASA, this project would be too long term IMHO for any sort of current human organization.

  40. 1970's signal from vega ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall, for some reason, that there may have been some radio signals that were recieved from vega in the 70's. Maybe that was just the end of Neuromancer though...ack.

  41. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >There is NO scientific theory that supports intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

    By assuming it isn't true, you are being willfully ignorant. Whether you are proven right or wrong, your journey there is by no means admirable.

    >Prove me wrong! I dare you!

    You cannot possibly be proven right. Your battle is never ending, unless you lose.

  42. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by FL180 · · Score: 1

    Arrogant? How so? Where is the empirical evidence that we're not the most intelligent and important civilization(s) in the universe? Big != populated.

    So far, we're it. Unless something else is actually found. But, oh, that hasn't happened. All that exists on the subjet is speculation and hypotheses.

    That's hardly grounds to call someone else arrogant. Bring some facts to the table to support your assertion.

  43. Thanks for a timely reply: Better luck next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we were created through evolution, then the same conditions would very easily exist elsewhere in the universe.

    -- Do you have any evidence to support your allegation?

    If we were created by God, then God is
    an intelligent lifeform elsewhere in the universe, maybe even outside of it.

    ---Only "If"

    Again, Thanks for trying.

    You are wrong.
    [ Reply to This ]

  44. I for one welcome our new Vegan overlords by TheHornedOne · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they'd like to come to my house for some burgers and dogs...

  45. Earth is a proper noun.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Earth is a proper noun, no amount of dust is going to result in other earth's. Maybe earth-like or m-class or whatever you want to call them, but other earth's doesn't make sense in the same way other solar systems doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:Earth is a proper noun.. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Earth is a proper noun, no amount of dust is going to result in other earth's. Maybe earth-like or m-class or whatever you want to call them, but other earth's doesn't make sense in the same way other solar systems doesn't make sense.

      I agree regarding Earth, unless you're referring to the generic "earth", meaning dirt. But saying other solar systems does make sense. Sol is the proper name of our solar system, just as Alpha Centauri is the proper name for that particular solar system.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Earth is a proper noun.. by freeweed · · Score: 1

      other earth's doesn't make sense in the same way other solar systems doesn't make sense

      Doesn't make sense in the same way we descrive the "moons of Jupiter"?

      Language changes when our perspective changes.

      And oh yeah, there's no need for an apostrophe when you pluralize words. Earths :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Earth is a proper noun.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sol is the proper name of our solar system, just as Alpha Centauri is the proper name for that particular solar system.


      No, Sol is the name of our sun. The system of our sun is the Solar System.

  46. That's really not very funny by SaraSmith · · Score: 1

    Simply mentioning porn and spelling it wrong on purpose is not humorous at all. I'm sure you have plenty of porn though, good for you.

    Come up with something funny to say along with your porn that has almost nothing to do with the subject at hand next time.

    Personally, I don't keep porn around. Just download some more from newsgroups or something.. why look at the same stuff over and over again? It's not like there's any real content to porn, just pretty pictures. Move on to new stuff... Keep things with content, like books and movies.

    1. Re:That's really not very funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...you do realize that your post also had absolutely nothing to do with the subject either, right?

      Just checking...

    2. Re:That's really not very funny by MasTRE · · Score: 1

      > Personally, I don't keep porn around. Just download some more from newsgroups or something.. why look at the same stuff over and over again? It's not like there's any real content to porn, just pretty pictures. Move on to new stuff...

      That's why I said it was gathering dust. I guess I'll make a charitable donation come XMas time.

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
    3. Re:That's really not very funny by vpetersen · · Score: 1

      quote -

      Simply mentioning porn and spelling it wrong on purpose is not humorous at all. I'm sure you have plenty of porn though, good for you.

      - quote

      FYI: It's an old tradition to call that 'pr0n' and its variants. I first encoutered this spelling on Usenet long time ago, in a totally unrelated context.

  47. Another One? by hao2lian · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, there's been at least a couple of articles discussing Earth-like planets already. So who's keeping an archive on these? And should they really generate anything besides human interest news? Much of the planets in our solar system still has not been explored thoroughly.

    --
    Pelé!
  48. And later at 11... by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    ... more information regarding the Vegan Orbital Fort discovered in the dusty disk, including a panel discussion on whether it is heading our way, and what we're going to do if it is.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  49. Re:Thanks for a timely reply: Better luck next tim by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "-- Do you have any evidence to support your allegation?"

    Life here on Earth has evolved in virtually every nook and cranny of this planet, even in places where we thought life could not be sustained. Even the coldest darkest places of the planet (like the sea floor) are teaming with life. Life isn't so delicate that it'll only occur under a very precise roll of the dice.

    "---Only "If""

    You were either created by the big bang or by God. If there's a 3rd option, I'd like to hear it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  50. Re:too bad we're looking in the past by isomeme · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, there was plenty of life in 5000 BC. In fact, there was plenty of life in 1000000000 BC.

    Second, Vega is only 25 lightyears away, meaning that the horrid bug-eyed Vegans are peering through their observoscopes and lusting after Farrah Fawcett.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  51. Nice try: Flawed reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wrote:

    >>By assuming it isn't true, you are being willfully ignorant.

    -- Would you please elaborate on your assertion that I am being "willfully ignorant". You are being willfully optimistic AND just simply wishing.

    >>Whether you are proven right or wrong, your journey there is by no means admirable.

    -- You are entitled to an opinion. However, your personalistic labelling of my journey should not detract from my challenge. I could say the same thing about your "journey" or whatever floats your boat or UFO.

    Thanks for playing.

    1. Re:Nice try: Flawed reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-- Would you please elaborate on your assertion that I am being "willfully ignorant". You are being willfully optimistic AND just simply wishing."

      I never stated my personal beliefs on the topic. You, again, are working from the assumption that because I challenged you, I must have the opposite opinion. Since you did not take the time to discover my true beliefs, you cheated yourself out of growth. You are optimistically and willfully hoping you're right, as opposed to setting out to prove that you are. You don't see the problem with that?

      " However, your personalistic labelling of my journey should not detract from my challenge."

      It does, though. You are basing your own 'rightness' on the challenge.

      "I could say the same thing about your "journey" or whatever floats your boat or UFO."

      Again, you know nothing of my interests, or even if I'm actively pursuing any of it. Let's pretend that I am trying to prove life exists elsewhere. If I'm actually doing something to learn, then the journey is taking me somewhere fruitful. Even if I prove, disprove, or don't prove anything, at least I've explored. In your case, you are sitting back, blasting out an opinion, and hoping like hell you are right.

  52. Nothing like watching planets form by strictnein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should be interesting to keep an eye on it as the years roll by

    Yes, because the 1st billion years (or so, give or take a couple hundred million) of Earth's existance were oh so exciting. And don't even get me started about the 2nd billion! Wow!
    And the third billion... oh, my, god!

    As the years roll by? What is that supposed to mean? That maybe, we might be lucky enough to see a planet form over the next 100 million generations or so? Wooppee!

    I'll be excited when someone turns that slideshow into an animated GIF, ok?

    1. Re:Nothing like watching planets form by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      Heh--I was thinking the same thing. Perhaps we could send some samples of DNA and a handful of various protazoans to seed them? Ya know..."Primordial Soup Starter"

      ...I think our sun will burn out by the time those Vegans come around.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  53. Re:Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet by Birger+Johansson · · Score: 1

    Addendum: I misunderstood the age, the system is 350 million years, not 30.
    However, at that age, giant impacts will still hit any planets with "dinosaur-killer" asteroids at a rate hundreds of times more often than our Earth. Some of those rocks will even be big enough to vaporize the oceans, after it will take thousands of years for a planet to recover from the thermal shock.

    Also, planets need time to create a differentiated crust, and if water is present in large amounts on a planet (on a scale compareable with Earth) tectonic processes need hundreds of milions of years to start differentiating "continental" crust that rises above the ocean. There will be plenty of volcanic islands in such an Ur-ocean, but initially there will be no large land masses at all. Everything will be pelted by giant impacts over and over again, some of them big enough to cause tsunami that completely drench smaller islands, a few big enough to boil the seas and the biosphere.
    Nevertheless, there could well be life at the bottom of the oceans, protected from the violence of impacts by living in rock fissures very deep under the ocean floor.

  54. Re:woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! tsarkon reports by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    I was being silly stupid.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  55. Again, O: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wrote:

    >>Life here on Earth has evolved in virtually every nook and cranny of this planet, even in places where we thought life could not be sustained.

    -- The above observation does nothing to sustain a view about evolution on worlds other than Earth.

    Your turn.

    1. Re:Again, O: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does, though you are right in a sense. It means that life isn't that picky about it's environment. A planet would not have to be perfectly Earth like to breed life. You are right in the sense that we don't know how Earth-like life has to be to get jumpstarted. I wouldn't pretend to know the answer on that.

      Your turn. Prove to me that life cannot exist elsewhere.

  56. Vega by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    If there is life on a planet revolving around Vega, could that life consist of slashdot trolls? Just imagine the aliense.cx links!

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  57. Re:Thanks for a timely reply: Better luck next tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time as a troll? I can tell.

  58. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Okay I can prove that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.
    1. Pick up a phone.
    2. Call 411 or what ever number you have for information.
    3. When a person answers look around. Are they in they in the room with you? If not they are elsewhere in the universe.

    You may have meant that there is no proof of life on planets obiting other starts. You are right but if you do not look you will never know for sure.
    As too your statment "There is NO scientific theory that supports intelligent life elsewhere in the universe." Yes there are many theories that support the idea non have been proven but again if you do not look you will never know. It is possible that there are millions of worlds with intelligent life that have yet to develop any form of detectable tech. It is only in the last 100 years that we have developed radio.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  59. they should outlaw jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one person's offtopic is another's funny

  60. Oh man... by Querty · · Score: 1

    I must be getting dyslectic, after having read about the Swedish Student Party solving the 16th Hilbert Problem, now I was reading

    "Dusty Disc Man Means Other Earths".

    And I'm thinking, "How can they tell all that from a DiscMan? Way to go Sony!"

  61. Congrats... On playing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Please stay on topic. The topic is Scientific Theory NOT Carl Sagan's "Pipe"dreams.

  62. I wonder... by barton · · Score: 1

    If the Vega system has a planet, is it left of center, off of the strip, in the outskirts, in the fringes, in the corner, out of the grip?

  63. No problem! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    All we need to do is build a big spinny machine, and send Jodie Foster to find out if they are really there.

    Suprised nobody thought of it before ... sheesh ;)

  64. INVASION - THEY are coming..... by northwind · · Score: 1

    He -he...
    Cmon guys. You must remember the old bw sci-fi: Invasion
    They came from...... Vega.

    So this is kind of old news. Not exactly lightspeed :-)

  65. Audible spectrum by nacturation · · Score: 1

    The study also mentioned that they processed the radiotelescope signal to extract the audio component. Click here to listen to the extracted audible spectrum.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  66. Can this improve SETI's guessitude? by plainvanilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's got to to be lots more where this came from. This particular sample was a lucky find, being a mere 25 light-years away. Could this lead to predicting similar (or better) environments beyond such easy eyeshot?

  67. Re:decode message for important announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic? No, redundant. It's just the article blurb in binary.

  68. Re:Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet by mindriot · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you send a probe there, it will not be able to find a cool surface on any of the larger planetesimals (growing proto-planets).

    Hm, given that Vega is 2.3935E14 km away and that Voyager I is travelling at 62500 km/h, a probe sent there will be travelling for about 437169 years. So maybe, by the time it gets there the planet will be ready :-)

  69. Or "Mercury-like", or "Venus-like", or "Mars-like" by popo · · Score: 1


    This article jumps straight to the rosy suggestion that just because a planet is small and dense (ie: non-gaseous) that it is "Earthlike".

    This is extremely poor journalism.

    It would be like saying, "Human-like life found at the bottom of the sea!", when what you found in fact was a carbon-based multi-cellular organism.

    Don't believe the hype.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  70. You are changing the topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks, but thanks for your reply. My challenge still stands.

    1. Re:You are changing the topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in other words, you cannot backup your own position. Typical. For a second there, I thought you were an interesting troll.

  71. optical powers by Free_Lard · · Score: 1

    >>our optical powers keep growing.

    thats right, we're not going to worry about other planets till our 1337 0p7i(41 p0\/\/3rZ have progressed to the point where we shoot green and red laser beams out of our eyes.

    or not.

    --
    --daniel

    pushing is the answer.
    pushing will protect you from the terrible secret of space.
  72. So I guess the answer is No. by corebreech · · Score: 1

    no text, just sig

  73. do they do that? by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    if they did, why wouldnt they just point the thing everywhere. spam the sky with signals to all the stars!

    whats the harm or problem with doing that?

    accuracy by volume!

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:do they do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me sir, but it's a big ass sky!

    2. Re:do they do that? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > spam the sky with signals to all the stars! Whats the harm or problem with doing that?

      Power. As an AC said, it's a big-ass sky. Once you get a very short distance away from Earth, I think a radio signal has to be pretty focused to be received, or if not focused, very powerful. To send a signal 100 light years in 360x360 degrees would take immense amounts of power.

  74. This probably means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...theres dirt in Uranus.

  75. Get yer terminology right by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't they mean a 'Class M' planet?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  76. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by Quino · · Score: 1

    You are correct in that, until we make first contact, this will all be speculation.

    The fact is, though, the universe could be teeming with life (intelligent, space-faring aliens) and we'd still likely not know it -- it's a damn big place.

    However, it's just as innacurate, and speculative, to state that we are *it*, because we also definitely do *not* know that either -- and if we're taking about speculation, I actually think it's safer to bet on life already existing in some form elsewhere (again, just based on the sheer size of what we're talking about here).

    Put it another way, the fact that we haven't yet met little green guys in no way proves that they aren't there. But, assuming that we have to be the best thing this universe has yet created (all based on "hey, the Martians haven't yet come to my house") is assuming a lot, and can be viewed as simple arrogance (since you have no other reason to think so -- certainly there's no proof for that claim either).

  77. Re:Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Recent simulations suggest that planets form in hundreds instead of millions of years.

  78. who knows by ShadowRage · · Score: 2, Funny

    with these new planets forming, one day (assuming we're still alive and havent killed each other off like morons) we'll be receiving radio signals asking if they're alone or not in the universe.. :P

  79. Main importance of Earthlike planets is scientific by randall_burns · · Score: 1

    Space settlement is the major activity of immediate practical importance.

  80. Re:too bad we're looking in the past by gid13 · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to be healthier, so I'm experimenting with a new diet: I'm eating nothing but vegans.

    Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week.

  81. Re:Contact Smontact! I have my space suit, will tr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and what about Agent of Vega by James H. Schmitz?

  82. No One's Found Earth-Like Planets at Vega...Yet by reallocate · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is an all-too-common example of sloppy BBC reporting. Evidence of Earth-like planets at Vega has not been found. What's been found is a dust disk that conforms to theories that very large planets ormed early in a system's development will migrate to larger orbits, dragging a lot of debris that would otherwise crash on small planets and inhibit life there. (Still a lot of rocks left over to crash and burn, though. Take a look at all those craters on the Moon. Earth would look the same, if not for erosion.)

    Good news, though, but not as good as imaging a small planet and getting positive results for water, oxygen and methane.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:No One's Found Earth-Like Planets at Vega...Yet by Yazeran · · Score: 1

      (Still a lot of rocks left over to crash and burn, though. Take a look at all those craters on the Moon. Earth would look the same, if not for erosion.)

      Actually it is not erosion which has destroyed all the craters left ower from the formation of the earth but plate tectonics instead. If you take a look at Mars, the souther hemisphere still has a lot of the original craters left over even though there is wind erosion on Mars. Granted the erosion on Mars is not so severe as the combined erosion of wind and water is here on Earth, but still, erosion can only level a surface, not erase the subteranean features of a impact (magmatic activity, high pressure polymorphs of normal minerals etc.).

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan to go to Mars one day with a hammer.

  83. Re:Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet by sapgau · · Score: 1

    The sun has 5 billion years more to live, so that in theory would allow some time for a planet similar to earth to develop.

    The problem is if humans survive for that long, by current trends in our history I suspect they won't. Probably another type of lifeform would evolve and attempt to reach Vega (i.e. cockroaches).

  84. Re:too bad we're looking in the past by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Funny

    the horrid bug-eyed Vegans ...and that's why meat and dairy are important parts of a well balanced diet.
    =Smidge=

  85. Contact? by Divx · · Score: 1

    If I remember right - vega is the planet they visited in Contact with Jody Foster - yes?

  86. Hmmmm by halepark · · Score: 1

    Should be interesting to keep an eye on it as the years roll by as the disk rotates and our optical powers keep growing.
    When was the last time a BILLION years rolled by?

  87. Yeah, by chadjg · · Score: 1

    if God likes me even a little bit!

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  88. Re:woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IM SORRY. ALLRIGHT. JESUS CHRIST.

    I didnt fucking know. No need to viscously lambast, chastize and castigate me. I mean, now I FEEL HORRIBLE. Its like .. Im sad now.

  89. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by FL180 · · Score: 1

    And the fact that we haven't yet seen unicorns in no way proves that they aren't there. Of course, that's the difficulty of proving a negative.

    The universe could be "teeming with life", or it could just be a vast lifeless mass (other than on earth, of course). But again, I'll point out, that vast, big, huge, whatever, does not mean that it is populated.

    And I say that believing that we are *it* is not speculative, it actually has a firm foundation in experience. Granted, that experience could change, but, for now, we're all that anyone has ever seen that we know of. That is not speculation, that's based on experience. I don't see how making a statement based on experience is arrogant. Nieve, maybe. Subject to change, possibly. Arrogant? No. Based in known reality? Yes.

  90. ah, yes, this makes sense by msouth · · Score: 1

    I was just moving some furniture around, and I found some dusty discs that could only reasonably have come from an Earth-like planet. So I would support this new "dusty disc implies Earth-like planet" idea. I wonder if they would like hi-res photos of the discs I located?

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  91. No. by thelizman · · Score: 1

    They never actually say what planet she visits, or if she even visits any planet at all. The signal appeared to originate from Vega, but as she rode in the pod, she appeared to have stopped and then restarted again a few times.

  92. Wega Vega offtopic I know by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1
    "...one of the brightest stars in the sky"(Vega)


    Maybe that's why Sony named their TV Vega and not Wega as some people insist.
  93. Re:Contact Smontact! I have my space suit, will tr by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    Ooh, that one was called "Invasion of the Worm-Faces" when I read it. (Only in German.) Why publishers attempt to make you feel guilty about your bookshelf I don't claim to know..

  94. Don't harp on this one too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Ahem. If you don't get it, read up on the constellation Lyra.

  95. Ha...Ha...Ha... my optical powers are growing by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

    This is interesting and all, but maybe we shoule note we found this,
    take a photo every hundred years and in a million we'll have this cool movie of disk accretion in action,
    until then let's continue to search for the little green men, and occasionally announce we may have found them so the paranoid leap from windows

  96. It better get hurrying ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause if this "dust-ball" doesn't form a planet soon, I'll lose interest ...

  97. Dusty? by breon.halling · · Score: 1

    Dusty, eh? Guess those other Earth haven't yet invented this.

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  98. Nah, they're VEGANS! by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    Those better be soy-dogs!

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  99. Re:Contact Smontact! I have my space suit, will tr by eeyore · · Score: 1

    Just as long as they're not the ants
    with the attitute problem from "Spaceship Troopers"
    --
    Eeyore

  100. What do you call someone from Vega? by smart.id · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A Vegan?

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
    1. Re:What do you call someone from Vega? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vegans (pronounced 'vee-gan') don't eat meat.

      Vegans (pronounced 'vay-gan') love nothing more than the mouthwatering taste of human flesh.

  101. TV Signals from Them? by Cragen · · Score: 1

    Is Seti actively monitoring AM, FM, RF, VHF, and/or UHF signals from space? Can they do that? We could be receiving Vegan TV, by golly! If there are good reasons for not being able to receive them here, those reasons are probably the same on the other end. Ok, I just confused myself. Carry on. *cragen.

  102. you may be wrong on several accounts by guybarr · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I think the real threat to our planet is ourselves, not our sun.

    I think you ment biosphere, not planet ...

    Thus, I hope we do not find a backup planet. I hope this is it.
    If we foul our planet to the point it is unlivable, we deserve our fate.


    First, IMHO this is utterly wrong factually: once a society colonizes
    space, all it'll need is energy and materials. I suggest that actually
    there may be few solar systems which are completely uninhabitable.

    Second, from the pragmatic POV, this sounds to me like morality gone
    completely insane: are you truly sugesting that you'd willfully risk
    total genocide for humanity (and its surrounding biological system, BTW)
    just because you think we "deserve it" ?

    That's the largest-scale suicidal philosophy I have ever seen.

    Not, of course, that I am in any position to affect change on this issue. Either a habitable planet is in range or not. Either we find it, or not.

    Wrong. In fact, for a single individual, a researcher may be in one
    of the best positions to affect humanity's future course.

    Certainly we should try.

    To this I agree ;-)

    I just hope it is not too easy to leave Earth for the rich and powerful.

    Why not ? if it'll easy for them in several decades, it'll probably
    be easy for others later.

    And anyway, don't worry. Space travel is going to be risky buisness
    for a long time. If a rich and powerful person is willing to take on
    personal risks to explore a new fronteer, he/she'll probably be
    exactly the kind of person needed up there.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
    1. Re:you may be wrong on several accounts by ggwood · · Score: 1

      I wrote:
      Thus, I hope we do not find a backup planet. I hope this is it.
      If we foul our planet to the point it is unlivable, we deserve our fate.

      And then guybarr wrote:

      First, IMHO this is utterly wrong factually: once a society colonizes
      space, all it'll need is energy and materials. I suggest that actually
      there may be few solar systems which are completely uninhabitable.

      Second, from the pragmatic POV, this sounds to me like morality gone
      completely insane: are you truly sugesting that you'd willfully risk
      total genocide for humanity (and its surrounding biological system, BTW)
      just because you think we "deserve it" ?


      I hope we don't find a backup planet - one just like Earth - if we foul Earth to the point that it is uninhabitable. We will be forced to live in less habitable places, such as Mars, Earth's Moon, etc, as Guybarr indicates. It would be a fate we deserve.

      If we just move on to another, identical, planet after destroying all life on a whole planet, it seems to set a really bad precedence. There is no word for it.

      I hope it is not too easy for anyone to leave. It would promote environmental degredation. Already, poor countries manufacture products using environmentally unsound technology. And we all still live here. Dumping mercury into the bay of Japan will have an effect on the health of the population, worldwide. (No, not every person, but it's effects would have reach beyond the region). Yet what consequence would it have for those on another planet?

      The level of pollution now should be warning enough that a second planet probably won't be the last. Imagine meeting an alien race with a string of uninhabitable planets behind us. I hope it is not too easy for the decisionmakers to escape the consequences. If so, those left behind will have a far greater reason to worry.

      --
      a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  103. Yes, but did they shatter their crystal sphere? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    You know, the one past the Oort cloud...

    (Between listening to this on the plane ride home, reading Greg Bear's Blood Music, Terry Pratchett's The Amazing Maurice and his Educated Rodents, and finishing Jonathan Lethem's Gun, with Occasional Music, it's been a pretty interesting vacation...)

  104. What not a single.... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    ... insensitive clod! I am a Vegan Vegan! comment?

    Well, there you go.

  105. Re:too bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's not possible. According to Christians, the earth is only 6000 years old.

  106. Re:No i replaced an indian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, but indian only needs to get payed 2 bucks a day while sitting on his dumb ass in india.

  107. Re:Contact Smontact! I have my space suit, will tr by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Vega, as ALL REAL GEEKS know, was

    The solar system of origin of UFO Robot Grendizer, also known as Goldorak.

    He was then modified after being captured by an alien civilisation and used by its prince to escape to earth, where it was further modified until it became the ultimate giant war robot used to fend off the Vegans attacking earth.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  108. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

    The problem is that you're making a statement about the rest of the universe when we haven't seen 99.99999999% of it (understatement). The "firm foundation in experience" that you speak of is meaningless, as your experience is only of this tiny part of the universe that you live in. Without seeing the rest of it you have no basis for your belief.

  109. His Very Own OS by bettiwettiwoo · · Score: 1
    maybe He uses Debian? :-)
    No, He has his very own OS ... which is why His ways sometimes seem so mysterious.
    --
    The liver is evil and must be punished.
  110. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by FL180 · · Score: 1

    The sword cuts both ways. You say that "Without seeing the rest of it, you have no basis for your belief." Yet, without seeing the rest of the universe, you have no basis for your belief. Both are "beliefs", but only one is supported by experience.

    The cold hard fact of the matter is that we are all that we know to exist. No amount of "you haven't seen it all" or "the universe is soooo huge" is going to change that, and any conclusion based outside of the information at hand is based on faith in an unknown not known reality.

    For all of the talk of "science" on Slashdot, there's an amazing amount of blind faith here...what is this, the Church of the Potential Existance of Aliens?

  111. New Resort Hotel/Casino by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Vega Las Vegas.

    'nuff said.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.