Slashdot Mirror


User: Linux_ho

Linux_ho's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
541
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 541

  1. More details needed on Some Birds Can See Magnetic Fields · · Score: 1

    Were these European swallows, or African swallows?

  2. Re:md5? on Crack the Code In US Cyber Command's Logo · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am reading too much into it, but my experience show that this would be typical double meaning often used by covert operations.

    That and the fact that they chose MD5 (which seems odd... unless they're trying for a collision) would seem to suggest that there might be another, possibly more naturally worded, phrase with the same MD5 sum. This phrase could have been carefully crafted as 'cover.'

  3. Re:So far, I'm not impressed on Quantum Physics For Everybody · · Score: 3, Informative

    for example, what do they mean when they say that the only macroscopic force is electromagnetic? In fact, all the forces you do experience in everyday life actually are electromagnetic in nature...

    With the exception of gravity, of course

  4. Re:Aside from the lack of a common language... on Do Scientists Understand the Public? · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they could stop assuming that different viewpoints imply "lower standards".

    So far all I see are strawman arguments. Maybe you could be a little more specific?

  5. Re:Aside from the lack of a common language... on Do Scientists Understand the Public? · · Score: 1

    Many scientists need to realize that their goals, ideals, and ethical standards may not be universal.

    Is that insightful? I think most scientists are acutely aware that their perspectives are not universal. I don't know what you expect them to do about it. Lower their standards?

  6. Re:what could possibly go wrong ? :) on Building a Homemade Nuclear Reactor In NYC · · Score: 1

    I could be wrong about this, but I think the fast neutrons generated by Farnsworth-type devices will go right through anything this guy is likely to have in his apartment. They won't hang around long enough to create significant amounts of heavy (i.e. radioactive) isotopes,

    I would agree with this part.

    and the flux won't be intense enough to do any damage while the machine is turned on.

    This part might be an unwarranted assumption. Neutron radiation can cause adverse biological effects at much lower levels than alpha or beta radiation.

  7. Re:openFOAM on Best OSS CFD Package For High School Physics? · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't see the vendor lock in, care to clue me in?

    That wasn't an actual person you were responding to, it was one of the mindless "commercial software BAAAD" bots that inhabits Slashdot.

  8. What does Pentaho mean? on Pentaho 3.2 Data Integration · · Score: 1

    "What I'd do if I had 2.5 million dollars"
    -Lawrence, Office Space

  9. Re:It's called "The Internet" on Modern Day Equivalent of Byte/Compute! Magazine? · · Score: 1

    I remember the ones that start with a BASIC one-liner that loaded the rest of the code into RAM.

    10 FOR A = 828 TO 2249 : READ B : POKE A, B : NEXT
    20 DATA 32, 155, 220, 165, 100, 133, 252, 165
    30 DATA 101, 133, 251, 160, 0, 177, 251, 168

    And I remember making a typo at about line 345. And line 502... then after hours of mind-numbing data entry and error hunting, the sweet reward of playing... Snake.

    This taught me attention to detail, stubbornness, and being satisfied with low expectations, all of which have served me well in the field of system administration.

  10. B&W = Not an iPad killer on Hands-On Demo Shows Asus E-Reader Tablet In Action · · Score: 1

    But this will definitely put the last nail in the Apple Newton's coffin.

  11. Re:Can the iPad beat the Kindle? on Amazon Kindle Fails First College Test · · Score: 1

    I only looked at the top link: the lightweight multitouch netbook. So I'm really sorry if I've offended your sensibilities. Here, maybe this will help.

  12. Can the iPad beat the Kindle? on Amazon Kindle Fails First College Test · · Score: 1

    That's like asking whether a sloth can outrun a tortoise. It probably can, but what does it take to convince people that there are a lot of other, probably better, options?

  13. Re:towelie says... on Happy Towel Day · · Score: 1

    So, you're saying you'd support a towelie ban?

  14. Re:hang on slashdot on Scientists Question Safety of New Airport Scanners · · Score: 1

    Microwave ovens are at 2.4 GHz, the oscillating frequency of a water molecule. That's why they heat things.

    ??? That's simply not true. Dielectric heating will work at any frequency, on any polar molecule. Water is an example of a molecule with a strong dipolar moment, which is why it heats more than other molecules with weaker dipole moments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric_heating

  15. Re:hang on slashdot on Scientists Question Safety of New Airport Scanners · · Score: 1

    There are a number of scientists who disagree with you. Either way, this is the sort of thing that should have been studied further BEFORE rolling out these things to hundreds of airports.

    If you're concerned about your exposure to terahertz radiation, you'd better hide in a cave because it's everywhere. Don't go anywhere near a microwave oven. It's less energetic than visible light radiation, so keep all the lights off. Watch out for that high energy TV remote too, that thing's spitting out infrared, for God's sake. Won't somebody think of the children?

    The only studies I've seen which showed any medical effect at all from radiation at frequencies lower than UV was if the intensity was high enough to actually heat the tissue (like in a microwave oven). It is POSSIBLE to damage tissue with low frequency radiation if the intensity is high enough (through heating), but you're not going to see that kind of intensity from a terahertz airport scanner.

    Now, X-rays are a whole different kettle of fish. There is some risk of DNA damage from X-rays at any intensity. Sure, the X-ray scanners are putting out far less radiation than the average person gets from even just background radiation, but people get cancer from background radiation too.

  16. Re:Nobody cares on Scientists Question Safety of New Airport Scanners · · Score: 1

    I strongly doubt millimeter wavelength radiation (somewhere around microwave/low IR) is going to cause any problems unless it's at such high magnitude that it actually causes tissue heating. These scanners probably operate at 1-10nm. Very high energy. Even at very low intensity, X-ray radiation imposes some risk of DNA damage. But I'd probably be more concerned about cataracts in frequent flyers and airport security employees. http://lowdose.energy.gov/abstracts/kleiman_cataract.aspx

  17. Re:Come to Verizon! on Verizon CEO Says "We Will Hunt Heavy Users Down" · · Score: 1

    Summary and title are misleading; article refers to the smartphone data service explicitly, not DSL/FiOS internet users.

    Mod parent up. Corporation bashing is fun and all, but get your goddamn bashing right.

    No, no, no. Slashdot gets more page views, and thus more revenue, from posting inflammatory headlines and writeups. Besides, actually reading the article is so unfashionable. We should be able to count on knee-jerk responses, and responses to those responses cycling out of control with no basis in reality. It's the economic engine behind every successful news aggregator.

  18. Re:GM's eyes are bigger than its stomach ... on GM Unveils Networked Electric Mini Cars · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gosh, if only new automotive technologies could be prototyped and existing ones could be improved.

    [citation needed]

  19. Re:I totally agree on Microsoft VP Suggests 'Net Tax To Clean Computers · · Score: 1

    Just like their profits have been? Newsflash: prices have almost nothing to do with costs. If Microsoft thinks consumers will accept a price increase without reducing purchase volume, we will get a price increase whether there's a new tax or not.

  20. Re:Just like porn "conclusively" creates rapists on Another Study Attacks Violent Video Games, Claims To Be "Conclusive" · · Score: 1

    isn't something like gravity conclusively proven?

    No.

  21. Re:Just like porn "conclusively" creates rapists on Another Study Attacks Violent Video Games, Claims To Be "Conclusive" · · Score: 1

    Yeah, if video games actually influenced real-life behavior, all of us from the Pac-Man generation would be sitting in dark rooms, listening to rhythmic music and popping pills.

  22. Re:Not Contradictory on Gates and MS Don't See Eye-To-Eye On CO2 · · Score: 1

    Cool story, bro. Leaves out the minor details like people in those neighborhoods needing to actually use 520 themselves once in a while, and the fact that on one side of the bridge it's already three lanes right up to the bridge, and on the other side it's up on pillars almost right up to I-5.... but it's a cool story anyway.

  23. Had to pull developers away on Apple Discontinues ZFS Project · · Score: -1, Troll

    Needed more help fixing all the problems with the iPhone 3.1 upgrade.

  24. A public, SEO optimized website? on Legal War For WA State Sunshine Law · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, the story will be picked up by the Mainstream MSM Media.

  25. Re:Misleading on Lockheed Snags $31 Million To Reinvent the Internet, Microsoft To Help · · Score: 1

    Totally misleading. When I saw that "reinventing the internet" phrase, for a minute there I thought they were gonna start changing my tubes around.