But don't forget the Cause Overload on Naughty Stuff Often Leading to Explosion (CONSOLE) extension to OPP. The OPP CONSOLE extension has been widely implemented in Federation starships, leading to the deaths of many file sharing redshirts.
But if the evil nations use pointed sticks, should we have a lever to release the Bengal Tiger just in case they attack? Heck, what if they attack us with a banana?
I originally had a "using namespace std;" in there, but yanked it. According to the c.l.c++ guys, "int main()" is valid. It's EXIT_SUCCESS, not EXIT_SUCESS. Guess you're not perfect either.
I was working for a large defense contractor, which shall remain nameless (even though it no longer exists as an independent entity). There was this project where some idiot had agreed that the PDL/pseudocode would be deliverable... for a system written in about 80,000 lines UYK-20 assembly language. Of course, there was no documentation. They had about 8 heads reverse engineering the code, writing up MIL-STD-1679 documentation for it.
Finally, somebody gets the idea that it can be automated. I get called in to write a PDL generator. In Pascal. On a TOPS-20 system. It generates pseudocode on the order of:
SET REGISTER-1 TO the contents of REGISTER-2 IF REGISTER-1 IS > 0 THEN GOTO LABEL-3
It generated a stack of listings about 8 feet high... The Army loved it. So, I didn't have the suck job, but those 8 guys who spent 2 months trying to reverse engineer it probably did.
#include <ostream> #include <iterator> #include <algorithm> using namespace std;
int main() {
fill_n(ostream_iterator<string>(cout),
ostream_iterator<string>(),
1000,
string("I will observe the spirit of the law and not the letter\n"));
cout << flush;
return 0; }
Slashdot Mirror
Wasn't it Ford or GM who got caught with this sort of logic? Something about the payouts in lawsuits being less than the cost of a recall?
There are quite a few bosses out there which are either thoughtful or well informed.
You know, today's not April Fools' Day. That was yesterday (just ask michael).
No, it's $39.95 PLUS the $15-20 for basic cable, thereby costing more.
Read the "from the"... department
A funny April Fools story! It took a while. Thanks, timothy.
Just tell people to call you... Betty.
I worked for 10 years with a guy named "Dick Bender".
I thought names with two consecutive underscores were reserved?
But don't forget the Cause Overload on Naughty Stuff Often Leading to Explosion (CONSOLE) extension to OPP. The OPP CONSOLE extension has been widely implemented in Federation starships, leading to the deaths of many file sharing redshirts.
But if the evil nations use pointed sticks, should we have a lever to release the Bengal Tiger just in case they attack? Heck, what if they attack us with a banana?
Surely CowboyNeal should be on there...
Of course, he might qualify as a WMD, or be banned under the Helsinki convention.
You forgot the finger quotes around lazers</FINGERQUOTES>
I originally had a "using namespace std;" in there, but yanked it.
According to the c.l.c++ guys, "int main()" is valid.
It's EXIT_SUCCESS, not EXIT_SUCESS. Guess you're not perfect either.
Ooh! Oooh! I've got one....
I was working for a large defense contractor, which shall remain nameless (even though it no longer exists as an independent entity). There was this project where some idiot had agreed that the PDL/pseudocode would be deliverable... for a system written in about 80,000 lines UYK-20 assembly language. Of course, there was no documentation. They had about 8 heads reverse engineering the code, writing up MIL-STD-1679 documentation for it.
Finally, somebody gets the idea that it can be automated. I get called in to write a PDL generator. In Pascal. On a TOPS-20 system. It generates pseudocode on the order of:
SET REGISTER-1 TO the contents of REGISTER-2
IF REGISTER-1 IS > 0 THEN GOTO LABEL-3
It generated a stack of listings about 8 feet high... The Army loved it. So, I didn't have the suck job, but those 8 guys who spent 2 months trying to reverse engineer it probably did.
You know, there's a reason it's called "Thermogoddamics".
#include <cstring>
#include <ostream>
int main()
{
std::cout << (std::strcmp("Java","VB") < 0 ? "Java" : "VB")
<< "is the lesser evil" << endl;
return 0;
}
No, PJ is Princess Leia.
A woodchuck would chuck all the wood it could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
#include <ostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
fill_n(ostream_iterator<string>(cout),
ostream_iterator<string>(),
1000,
string("I will observe the spirit of the law and not the letter\n"));
cout << flush;
return 0;
}
Expect snowballs in hell first.
So called "Reality" shows are the *most* unreal thing on TV.
Thanks. Couldn't remember exactly who.
Wasn't it a Fox exec who commented that not watching the commercials was theft?
Obviously we must ban video games and the Internet because they are stealing potential revenue from the media companies!
That can be particularily difficult if an application has priority 10+ years back.
Except RFC1034 (aka STD0013) was approved 1 Nov 1987.
Sure, we all know about domains, but we're computer nerds.
Well, isn't that the bar.... (note: exact phrase may be wrong): "Non-obvious to a skilled practitioner in the art"?