Slashdot Mirror


Omniscience Protocol

solidox writes "There is a new RFC discussing the Omniscience Protocol. It proposes that every computer be installed with an OP Client which would allow law enforcement ('Good guys.') and copyright holders (RIAA, MPAA) to remotely destroy the computer of any user who has been involved in copyright infringement ('evil-doer'). The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker. It also must be able to report to the server at any time. 'The OP must be able to communicate through uncooperative firewalls, NATs, and when the computer is disconnected from the Internet.' So if your computer randomly blows up in the next while, you can put the blame on this."

356 comments

  1. Old News! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    C'mon, Slashdot. The alpha version of this has been avaliable since, like, the dawn of time.

    (Call me before they go gold with the omega release, though...)

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Old News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry man, it was funny. I got it.

    2. Re:Old News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !New Violator Detected. Initiating Trojans.

    3. Re:Old News! by sglines · · Score: 1

      isn't it called MS Windows?

      Now I know why my Windows system always crash at wierd moments - It's all that polka music I downloaded.

  2. Scariest thing I have every read by panxerox · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the scariest thing I have every read. Basically what is being said is that since you the consumer have abused your freedom (in the implied words of Hatch et.al) you now loose that freedom and will be punished at the will and whim of the Corporate (tm). In the minds (and I use that term loosely) of these people the freedoms that we have enjoyed as a people were never really ours but were theirs to dole out as they saw fit, to their benefit to their profit. The veil has been lifted and we now see the true face of our would be oppressors.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by madfgurtbn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I agree totally. Vigilance is the cost of freedom. Maybe we should start a OPSux website or something.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    2. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think that's scary, G.W. Bush just signed a law, that effectively bans YOUR MOTHER!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    3. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by BLAG-blast · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You think that's scary, G.W. Bush just signed a law, that effectively bans YOUR MOTHER!


      Come on, It's doesn't ban YOUR MOTHER, it
      just makes it illegal for her to make her own decisions about her body. Why do you hate
      America like this?

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    4. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by straponego · · Score: 1

      Three years and this is the first thing he's done I can agree with.

    5. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      You think that's scary, G.W. Bush just signed a law, that effectively bans YOUR MOTHER!

      No! First an RIAA spy program on my computer in clear violation of the 3rd Amendment, and now MY MOTHER? Sick, sick world...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean decisions about her own body like not pretending she's a parent and having sex if she can't deal with the aftermath?

    7. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by nate1138 · · Score: 0, Funny

      you now loose that freedom

      AAAAARRRGH! Goddamnit! It's LOSE, not LOOSE, LOSE, not LOOSE!

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      Lose

      lose

      /me puts gun to head......

      BANG!

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    8. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're laughing at you, not with you.

      Cheers!

    9. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by TXH-88 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh boy, I think ye've loosed it now.

    10. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by mboos · · Score: 0, Informative

      Did it occur to you that today is April Fool's Day?

      In previous years other spoof RFCs have come out, such as RFC 1149, A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers.

      --
      --Mike Boos
    11. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lose, it really isn't hard. Say it with me, LOSE not LOOSE.

    12. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you knew my mother you would agree with that ban.

    13. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, april fools? Or just really bad news.

    14. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is scary is that the Honorable Mr. Hatch may even believe that this is technically feasible. However, there would be a considerable market potential for "software" that can convert my old 486 into a cell phone without any additional hardware ;} .

    15. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sure, shitlock.

    16. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by penginkun · · Score: 1

      Well, that's not so bad, because YOUR MOTHER really needs some Ban.

    17. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does a RIAA spy program have to do with quartering soldiers at your house when the country isn't at war?

    18. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Opie812 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Relax dude, don't loose your mind over spelling.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    19. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by RLW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes it did, but this is obvioulsy such an important issue that I could not possibly be a joke. An intent aware protocol is vitally important in order to maintane our rights, freedoms, and security. In fact when the 'net develops awareness then all crimes which involve network traffic will be detected, solved, and ajudicated in 30ms or less or it's free.

      Hail the computer! The computer is our friend!

    20. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by gregorsamsa11 · · Score: 1

      This must be an April 1st prank. I know it's far from amusing for us, but surely the poster got a hoot.

    21. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The real scary thing is that you used "loose" incorrectly in a post where you used "loosely" correctly.

    22. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by colonslashslash · · Score: 1

      /gline +*!April@Fools.day.com * 99999999999999999999999999999: This kind of "news" is starting to tick me off today

      --
      She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    23. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by talaphid · · Score: 1

      In other news, I hear the Brooklyn Bridge is for sale, a printing flub resulted in 'gullible' missing from most common dictionaries for the past decade, and that *BSD is dying.

    24. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      /me puts gun to head......

      BANG!


      Cool, thanks!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    25. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by DrQu+xum · · Score: 1

      Yes, but RFC 1149 was eventually implemented.

      --
      DrQu+xum: Proof that the lameness filter doesn't work.
    26. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > An intent aware protocol is vitally important

      A self-aware protocol, OTOH, is extremely dangerous, ala Terminator, Matrix, et al.

    27. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by wtrmute · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's the much-awaited 1st April, 2004 RFC to go along with such worthies as the Evil Bit and the Telnet Subliminal Message options. Lookie here for a list of them, sans this newest one.

    28. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      What does a RIAA spy program have to do with quartering soldiers at your house when the country isn't at war?

      Well, government-mandated software that kills your computer isn't quite the same as a soldier, but the 3rd doesn't get nearly as much attention as the other amendments so I thought I'd give it a little public attention.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    29. Re:Scariest thing I have every read by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      It could be argued as a violation of the 5th ammendment.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  3. Remote Destruction by dolo666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker."

    This statement reminded me of the "hacker" from the movie The Core, who asked for an unlimited supply of hotpockets and Xena tapes. But I've seen this post before, or is it deja vu? Fact is, any system that can be built, can be bypassed, so I don't know what the hell he's talking about.

    1. Re:Remote Destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shall we introduce a new class of troll into the troll taxonomy? Its name- April Fool's Troll. The key symptom- an exaggerated agreement with something that is a painfully obvious joke!

    2. Re:Remote Destruction by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      Fact is, any system that can be built, can be bypassed, so I don't know what the hell he's talking about.

      But if it's not undetectable, it can't be removed. Pretty scary stuff, if you ask me. Undetectable software should be illegal.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    3. Re:Remote Destruction by DanielJH · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a friend who told me the Coal Mines would be shut down by Y2K because the air supply fan were run by computer and would turn off and couldn't be turned on the months it would take to get the computer running? (She was working as a Y2K consultant.)

      I scratch my head going: but can't you just connect the fan directly to the power?

      There is a new generation that forgot that people lived and lived well without computers. It is simply that many tasks can be handled better with them.

    4. Re:Remote Destruction by ultranova · · Score: 1
      But if it's not undetectable, it can't be removed. Pretty scary stuff, if you ask me. Undetectable software should be illegal.

      You can always detect if extra software is running. Even if it doesn't show up in lists of running programs, it must consume some CPU power to actually do anything, resulting in a slowdown. And if it's smart enough to only run when the CPU is otherwise idle, well, just run distributed.net, setiathome or the ever popular while(1) {} -loop at just-above-idle -priority at all times.

      Or you could buy a 486sx/16MB, and every extra running program should be *very* noticeable :).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Remote Destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is today's date? It's April 1, so that explains it all. First of all this is not really possible, even less if you run unix\linux. There would either have to be code in the kernel or code added to something that would run by default. If you can get to the source, then it can be detected or removed. There would also have to be something listening on a network port to be able to receive the signal. So then firewalls and routes would need to be altered or compromised from the start. You could write your own everything from scratch, then there is no chance of anything happening.

    6. Re:Remote Destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact is, any system that can be built, can be bypassed, so I don't know what the hell he's talking about.
      The authors expected you to notice that the date on the RFC is April 1st.

    7. Re:Remote Destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's undetectable... I'd be all up for making it illegal, but how the hell do you prosecute. this must be that dang quantum computing i keep hearing about..

      april fool

  4. I smell shenanigans by revolvement · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Sounds like an april fools joke

    1. Re:I smell shenanigans by n1ywb · · Score: 0, Redundant

      An extremely poignant april fools joke at that.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:I smell shenanigans by millahtime · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This violates to many laws to be true. Must be an april fools joke.

      Although, I bet there is someone over at M$ freaking out that someone will discover that this is a hidden secret already in windows.

    3. Re:I smell shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You have an amazing grasp of the obvious...

    4. Re:I smell shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shenanigans, eh?

      'The OP must be able to communicate through uncooperative firewalls, NATs, and when the computer is disconnected from the Internet.'

      So, what was your first clue?

    5. Re:I smell shenanigans by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      Gee, ya think so?

      We've got a quick one here, fellas!

    6. Re:I smell shenanigans by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

      Ah, I love the smell of shenanigans in the morning.

      Smells like...victory.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    7. Re:I smell shenanigans by ischorr · · Score: 1

      Can't get anything past you...

    8. Re:I smell shenanigans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...someday, this slashdot is going to end.

    9. Re:I smell shenanigans by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      This is already the purpose of windows.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  5. Hello? Check the date by Theatetus · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's the first day of April. Ring any bells?

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:Hello? Check the date by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did it ever occur to any of you humor impaired folks that some of us actually like to *gasp*

      go along with the joke?

      Or, as a certain AC around here is fond of saying:

      No shit, sherlock! ;)

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:Hello? Check the date by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just because an protocol is proposed on 1 April doesn't mean someone won't try to implement it. Consider RFC 2549.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Hello? Check the date by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Just because an protocol is proposed on 1 April doesn't mean someone won't try to implement it.

      Google for "Magic Lantern". RFC3751 is as close to a spec as we're cleared to see :)

  6. Who cares about the RFC.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real thing I want to know is how many times are we going to see this posted today?

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  7. April blah blah blah by HomeGroove · · Score: 0, Funny

    April fools...yeah *yawn*.

    --

    ----
    Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  8. Finally! by BlackLeader · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now the world will be free from pirates forever! No more swabbin' the deck and leerin' at young lasses at ports of call! Today is a great victory for democracy!

    1. Re:Finally! by Flashbck · · Score: 1

      Damn! and I really liked "leerin' at young lasses at ports of call"

    2. Re:Finally! by larkost · · Score: 1

      What? You have to be pirate to do that? Is there a union requirement?

      *shucks*....

    3. Re:Finally! by cshark · · Score: 1

      What's next, thought crime?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  9. Right... by TXH-88 · · Score: 1

    Good luck on that.

  10. communicate disconnected from the internet? by eljasbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if putting tinfoil around my computer would circumvent this?

    1. Re:communicate disconnected from the internet? by Manfre · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tin foil may not do the trick...try really strong magnets. :)

    2. Re:communicate disconnected from the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this would only affect Windows users. If you are downloading stuff from p2p without an IRC client, this will most likely affect you.

      Or you could have pigeons deliver your warez.

    3. Re:communicate disconnected from the internet? by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      Magnets aren't enough! You also have to scramble the electrical field. Here's what I use:

      Set up a repeating fire tesla coil device, such as a stun gun or camera flash with the leads exposed, and place if very near your computer case. It must arc constantly to be effective. I have a friend who uses a jacob's ladder for this purpose, but I haven't tested that solution. You may have to provide additional ventilation to prevent ozone buildup.

      Conspiracy alert! - the feds are on to this idea and have worked in collusion with the FCC to put embed technology in your computer to prevent electic field disruption. You can find out if your computer is affected by looking for an FCC label. If your machine has a "tested to comply with FCC standards" label, you are IN TROUBLE!

      In order to work around this insidious attempt to prevent you from disrupting the electrical emissions of your own property, you must operate your computer with the case open, and with the electric field disruptor as close as possible to the internal components. Only then can you truly be safe.

      SPREAD THE WORD

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    4. Re:communicate disconnected from the internet? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Tin foil may not do the trick...try really strong magnets. :)

      I found the most effective way of keeping the RIAA and evil government officials out of your computer is to wrap the whole thing in about 1000 to 3000 turns of insulated copper wire the more the better. then take both bare ends and tie it to a modulated voltage source, the MAINS voltage that the PC runs off of will do best as it's the same frequency that the Evil doers will be using so effectively cancelling out what they do. now powering up this coil and leave it on all the time .

      You might notice a slight side effect of spoons and other metallic items now stick to your computer or be drawn to it rapidly. remember thicker gague wire is best and the more turns you can use the better.

      Oh and pressing Alt-F4 will give you instant moderation points on slashdot.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:communicate disconnected from the internet? by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I think you've just helpped me invent my next eBay Foil related item. Thanks for your help.

      On another note, this story had me fooled, but I was thinking, "What's next, the Evil Bit?" Then I remembered that it was April 1st, and the Evil Bit was last year's main gag. My goodness I've been reading /. a lot.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  11. Why? by vurg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why did the author write this RFC? Is he sucking up to the feds/RIAA?

    1. Re:Why? by FenwayFrank · · Score: 1
      Once again: check the date. Really.

      There is a long, long tradition for RFCs to be issued on 1-April which are not to be taken so seriously (e.g.: Telnet Randomly Lose (748) and Subliminal Message (1097) options). They've occasionally shown up on implementation checklists: this can been interpreted by the vendor's support departments that a potential client may need additional support.

      Some are intended to be taken seriously, but authors have been known to request pubilication to be held for a few days to prevent confusion (not that there aren't some that need this distinction).

    2. Re:Why? by FenwayFrank · · Score: 1
      Bah! Hit Submit too soon.

      The material in the intro, yeah: that's for real. The proposal itself is not.

    3. Re:Why? by rutledjw · · Score: 2, Funny
      Mod parent down.

      Happy April Fool's Day. D@mn I'm dumb...

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    4. Re:Why? by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's a difficult challenge, but in this day and age, is it really impossible? Especially if it becomes an election issue. I think this is the year that the presidential election could turn on technical issues such as this.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    5. Re:Why? by ultranova · · Score: 1
      I agree that it's a difficult challenge, but in this day and age, is it really impossible?

      Of course it is. It's known as DRM (Digital Rights Management).

      DRM ciphers the files on your computer and requires remote authorization (via the Internet) before deciphering them. It requires hardware support to prevent running unauthorized programs which could possibly save the file in unciphered format.

      Sure, the computer isn't blown up, but it's just as useless when you can't open any files (or websites or whatever)...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Why? by mridley · · Score: 1
      Scott Bradner at Harvard (who wrote this RFC) does indeed have a pretty good grasp of the technical aspects of the Internet :-)

      -m

    7. Re:Why? by madfgurtbn · · Score: 2, Funny

      DRM ciphers the files on your computer and requires remote authorization (via the Internet) before deciphering them. It requires hardware support to prevent running unauthorized programs which could possibly save the file in unciphered format.

      The government would never allow this. No way.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that he wrote it in order to demonstrate the complete impossibility of DRM, by pointing out that the requirements for it cannot conceivably be met.

      Am I the only one who thinks there's a subtext here?

    9. Re:Why? by Eggplant62 · · Score: 1

      Fished in!! Fished in!!! Here fishy fishy fisy!!

      Tug harder, I think the hook is caught in yer gullet.

    10. Re:Why? by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Omniscience Protocol
      Posted by michael on 01:43 AM -- Friday April 02 2004
      from the axis-of-evil dept.


      It's so 14 hours ago! :)

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
  12. Misprint by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 5, Funny

    "to remotely destroy the computer of any user who has been involved in copyright infringement"

    I think they actually meant:
    "to remotely destroy the user of any computer who has been involved in copyright infringement"

    1. Re:Misprint by BlackLeader · · Score: 1

      Exellent plan. No doubt next year we'll all be required by law to go in for RIAA-branded nanobots that will explode us on command... ah, the wonders of modern technology; think where the poor musicians would be without it.

    2. Re:Misprint by nearlygod · · Score: 1

      AD Skinner has had this problem for a few years now. Damn Krycek!

      --
      The Tools Of Ignorance wanna be a tool?
    3. Re:Misprint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all seriousness, I have previously been asked if I thought it would be possible to fabricate an (admittedly illegal) telephony device which would render permanently inoperable the other party's telephone...

    4. Re:Misprint by TXH-88 · · Score: 0

      There's a dead give away that it is an April fools joke. If it had really been put out by the RIAA it would have read: "to remotely destroy the computer of any user who could be involved in copyright infringement"

    5. Re:Misprint by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I think they actually meant: "to remotely destroy the user of any computer who has been involved in copyright infringement"

      Heh. But it's not just a clever April 1st joke. The technology to do this has been prototyped in the Middle East. We've probably all read about the assassination of Yahya Ayyah by the Israeli government by installing a bomblet in his cell phone while it was being repaired, then calling him and transmitting the trigger signal.

      Less well-known is the growing use of cell phones as remote-control triggers by the Palestinian radicals to set off larger bombs. That's probably a lot easier, since all you have to do is cut the wires to the speaker and attach them to the bomb mechanism, then call the phone. The cell-phone bomb couldn't have been too powerful, so you'd want to talk to the person and verify that they're holding the phone next to their head before transmitting the trigger signal.

      In any case, the technology to remotely trigger a real bomb in your computer isn't all that different from what's done with a cell phone.

      If they're running Windows and Outlook, the trigger command could even be sent via email, and would thus be run only when someone is sitting there using the mouse.

      And we should note that the RIAA has tried to get Congress to pass laws that would legalize remote sabotage of computers.

      So this April 1st RFC is based on reality.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  13. Lame... by Starji · · Score: 1

    You think they'd at least try when they're making an april fools post.

    1. Re:Lame... by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1
      Agreed. It doesn't even read like it could be real. It's so unbelievably transparent.

      I second the "lame" charge.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    2. Re:Lame... by Rallion · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I like it that way. It means you can laugh so much harder at the idiots who get all scared.

    3. Re:Lame... by m0nk3ym1nd · · Score: 1

      If I second the second, would my post be a "third" (trolls are additive) or a "fourth" (trolls are multiplicative)?
      Also, can lame-itude recurse? In other words, is the act of calling your post lame itself lame? Or am I saved from laminosity by virtue of my posture of superior perception?

      Fortunately, there is an answer to these questions: "Yes, but 0nly until some insensitive clod lames me with a reply to this reply to this reply."

      eh wot? Anybody still here?

  14. Oh purlease by Bugster · · Score: 1

    You're going to have to try harder than that, Slashdot.

    1. Re:Oh purlease by curiosity · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can't decide what's funnier - the people who don't realize it's an april fools thing, or the people who just barely realize it, to the point where they feel the need to point it out to others.

    2. Re:Oh purlease by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can't decide what's funnier - the people who don't realize it's an april fools thing, or the people who just barely realize it, to the point where they feel the need to point it out to others.

      I think it's the people who feel a need to comment on Slashdot on such a thing ... oh wait ...

    3. Re:Oh purlease by Bearpaw · · Score: 0
      I can't decide what's funnier - the people who don't realize it's an april fools thing, or the people who just barely realize it, to the point where they feel the need to point it out to others.

      The funniest thing is the people who criticize it for being a not very good April Fool's joke ... after someone else has pointed out that it probably is one. Sounds an awful lot like saying, "Oh, um, yeah, that's so obviously an April Fool's joke. Didn't fool me at all."

      Yeah, okay, whatever you say.

  15. The penguin on top of your TV is set to explode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your computer is broadcasting your OP address TO THE WORLD!

  16. Me Scared? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Well not much to worry about.
    1. In a free market force everyone (100% of all people) to use a protocol. Um I will make and OS that doesn't use it.
    2. Make a protocol where only the good guys can do damage. Um I am a bad guy working for the good guys, now what.
    3. Undetectable and Unremovable if someone can install it, it can be removed. Its is only magnetic bits.
    4. Goes threw any firewall. Ummm it is still bits I can still block any that I don't expect.
    5. When the computer is disconnected from the internet? Huh.
    6. This is posted on April First (aka April Fools day)

    If you have done 6 impossible things this morning why not round it off with breakfast a Millyways the restaurant at the end of the universe.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Me Scared? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      1 is already under work by MS and the music industry, with help of the hardware manufacturer. It is called DRM and Trusted Computing.

      2 is simple: If you have access to a destruction server, you are by definition good guy.

      3 is possible with help of 1, if by "uninstallable" you mean "cannot be uninstalled without rendering the complete machine inoperable, except by changing hardware".

      4 is possible if you control the firewall. See 1.

      5 is avoidable through 1 again: Just have your DRM bios render the machine inoperable if no connection to the destruction server can be established.

      6 is no problem. After all, the next calendar reform is over-due; make March 32 days, and let April start with day 2. Then we'll have March 32 today, therefore no April Fools' Day. Ok, we might get some problems with software that expected months never to have more than 31 days, or always start with day 1, but that will just help in implementing point 1.

      See you at Milliways! :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Me Scared? by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1

      What?!?!? You've never seen that X-Files episode where, um, y'know, these dudes hack into da 'puter in Mulder's apartment and, and, and it's not switched on and it, like, goes on and everything!

      Dude, YOU KNOW NOTHIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
    3. Re:Me Scared? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well thats Mulder's fault for not turning off wake on lan and wake on modem.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:Me Scared? by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1

      But, like, dude! Ti wasnt conected!

      Waaaaay spooky!

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
  17. Cow Doodo by thebra · · Score: 1

    Something smells and for once its not me. Here are some articles by the person that is supposed to have written this.

    1. Re:Cow Doodo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, it seems much of /.'s audience these days just isn't aware of the great tradition of April Fools RFCs. Kids today, eh?

  18. Worst prank ever. by idlemind · · Score: 0

    Of all time even.

  19. What they don't mention by egad_man · · Score: 1

    Is that this has been around for three years, and anyone with a Dell, Gateway, or Compaq PC will already have it installed

    --
    Hmmm, I have 5 mod pts, its time to metamod, and on top of that I have to meta-metamod? When do I get to read slashdot?
    1. Re:What they don't mention by Aielman · · Score: 1

      Is that why Dell, Gateway, and Compaq computers crap out all of a sudden? And here I thought it was just shoddy merchandise.

  20. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    The only news on /. I'll believe on April 1 are stories about SCO being scum or Microsoft being evil monopolists.

    1. Re:sigh by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      The only news on /. I'll believe on April 1 are stories about SCO being scum or Microsoft being evil monopolists.

      OK, Here you go!

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    2. Re:sigh by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the "SCO changes mind, makes up with IBM, GPLs Unixware" story to be released. It's only a matter of time...

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  21. Will this be based on RFC 3514? by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will this be based on RFC 3514? The RIAA could easily scan for systems with the 'evil bit' set to reduce the risk of accidentally hitting an innocent system.

    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html

    1. Re:Will this be based on RFC 3514? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FiRsT rEpLy!

      The blood of the innocent shall flow freely from the steps of the new-found corporate justice.

      PROPS TO XML/ATS!

    2. Re:Will this be based on RFC 3514? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The evil-bit gag was sooo 2003.

    3. Re:Will this be based on RFC 3514? by gxv · · Score: 1

      And will it work when it's tunneled over the avian carriers?
      www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2549.html

  22. i say go for it! by qcubed · · Score: 1

    wait until the script kiddies get a hold of it... it might be fun.

  23. It's going to be a loooong day. by SysPig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll just come back tomorrow.

    1. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The only day in the year when this can be modded up.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen to that

    3. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Yes, /. has done the same thing every April 1st for the past several years. I think it's nice to have a break from the all the seriousness on here.

      The trick is trying to figure out when they start posting real stories again. Usually around midnight tonight depending on what time zone you're in.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, /. has done the same thing every April 1st for the past several years. I think it's nice to have a break from the all the seriousness on here. .

      The WHAT?!

    5. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by hottoh · · Score: 1

      No kidding

      The first dumb/fake story waw more than enough. They need to stop posting this crap.

    6. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      If you browse comments at minimum score of 3 or 4 /. isn't that bad to read on a regular day.

      I was referring more to the seriousness of the responses of some people; how so many posters seem to take everything so seriously and take strong offense to comments posted by others.

      I think that was obvious.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...how so many posters seem to take everything so seriously...

      Sort of like, you just did?

    8. Re:It's going to be a loooong day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was sort of my point....

  24. Simply patheticc. by juuri · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    This is it?

    This is the most imaginative idea someone could come up with for an April fools joke?

    You are kidding, right?

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:Simply patheticc. by hanssprudel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since when is this an April Fool's joke?

      It's actually called Palladium, and Microsoft is rolling it out together with Longhorn. The necessary hardware modification, in the form of TCPA or the Phoenix DRM bios, are already around the corner.

    2. Re:Simply patheticc. by isorox · · Score: 1

      This aint a joke

    3. Re:Simply patheticc. by k3v0 · · Score: 1

      Suprnova got creative, they went Japanese...

    4. Re:Simply patheticc. by surfacearea · · Score: 1
      Seriously. It's already pretty bad this year. One of my favorites from the yesteryear, however, was the LZIP codec.

      Though it wasn't believable, it was at least very humorous.

    5. Re:Simply patheticc. by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the evil bit last year... Althought it was funny that they kept posting the same story reworded a bunch of times...

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    6. Re:Simply patheticc. by HepCatA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but there is NO way in the world that this can happ****POOF***

    7. Re:Simply patheticc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the best joke will be when a virus uses these features to kill off every Windows box in one day.

    8. Re:Simply patheticc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually called Palladium
      Wow! You mean Palladium will allow computers to connect to a server even "when the computer is disconnected from the Internet"? I know some Comcast user's who are going to want to upgrade to that!

    9. Re:Simply patheticc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur and I suggest a new poll:

      Worst Slashdot April Fools Joke:
      1-yes

    10. Re:Simply patheticc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's actually called Palladium, and Microsoft is rolling it out together with Longhorn. The necessary hardware modification, in the form of TCPA or the Phoenix DRM bios, are already around the corner.
      Do you really think you are helping your cause by spreading FUD? There are plenty of things wrong with Palladium, but it can't remotely destroy your computer.

      Leave the FUD to the Microsoft PR lackeys, we should be above it.

    11. Re:Simply patheticc. by ComputatusMaximus · · Score: 1

      It would have taken an infinite number of monkeys to come up with the something better

    12. Re:Simply patheticc. by nilenico · · Score: 1
      Also, check out the Astronomy Picture of the Day, which deals with the strange phenomenon of the "increased intensity" of April Fools-ishness on Mars...

      Elin

      --
      .sig? No.
    13. Re:Simply patheticc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Haha, no kidding. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) thinks this is a great idea

    14. Re:Simply patheticc. by skidde · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, everyone knows that Microsoft wouldn't be involved in an April Fool's joke until May.

      --
      For every karma whore there are four more people with mod points to kill.
  25. oh please by queen+of+everything · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe its just me, but this sounds like a pile of crap. Aside from the fact that its just a ridiculous concept...name something that can be installed that even a skilled "hacker" can't edit, work around, or completely remove.

    --
    "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:oh please by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thank you Captain Obvious :D

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:oh please by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 0, Troll

      A brain.

      Also, its a pitiful attempt at an April Fool's Joke. Of course, its slashdot, so the author probably thought they were being hilarious.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  26. Evil Bit by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    Couple this with the evil bit, and what will happen?

    1. Re:Evil Bit by gid · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but what would happen if you added in the evil bit?

    2. Re:Evil Bit by lnjasdpppun · · Score: 1

      I'd really like to know what would happen if you mix in the Evil Bit.

  27. /. lameness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it me or is the lameness of /. just grows by leaps and bounds.

    fuck you mr. moderator

  28. Oh crap!!! by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

    OMFG!!! it's time for me to delete the old MP3/w4r3z/pr0n on the HD!!!

    Wait, April Fool's? *phew* I got scared there, now I can take care of some business to kick off the day :D

    Now I trust that the federales won't REALLY go after me today, cause that would be evil :)

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  29. SPAM Mails are more believable by bdigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The emails claiming to add 3 inches to my wang are more believable then /.'s april fools jokes.

    1. Re:SPAM Mails are more believable by cjpez · · Score: 1

      Well, technically this one's not a *slashdot* april fool's joke, as the RFC linked to actually *is* an RFC...

    2. Re:SPAM Mails are more believable by defsdoor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Time to upgrade your computer Sir! Wang haven't been making machines now for donkey's years.

    3. Re:SPAM Mails are more believable by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      So the wang extender cream didn't work for you either? That's the last time I trust spam from Y04373373M0173R!!!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    4. Re:SPAM Mails are more believable by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Wang... Donkeys... F'nar f'nar f'nar!!!

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
  30. Infringing Copyright by term8or · · Score: 1

    ... I created DesTozzer last year. I'll have to blow up the "Good Guys" for infringing my ViralWarz.

    --



    "As a writer / novelist you might want to spellcheck your sig. :) " - AC
  31. Power lines and other shortcomings by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 5, Funny
    I find this RFC a bit limited because it does not seem to cover power lines. The protocol could easily include a provision to control devices that are merely plugged-in to the power outlet. A later version could extend this support to TCP capable nano-devices that could, for example, infiltrate common appliances (e.g. phones, fridges, tv's) and report back over powerlines on their status.

    So I doubt this RFC would gain adoption without those things.

    1. Re:Power lines and other shortcomings by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would be the Omniscient Power Protocol (O.P.P.), which was developed a decade ago by Naughty by Nature.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Power lines and other shortcomings by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I'm down with that...

    3. Re:Power lines and other shortcomings by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      But don't forget the Cause Overload on Naughty Stuff Often Leading to Explosion (CONSOLE) extension to OPP. The OPP CONSOLE extension has been widely implemented in Federation starships, leading to the deaths of many file sharing redshirts.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  32. NEVER. by baudilus · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only way I see this happening is law enforcement forcing ISPs to check for this protocol on connected computers before allowing internet access. Those that refuse, don't have internet access. I wonder what that would do to internet retailers such as amazon.com when their sales drop through the floor because people refuse to install this garbage. It wouldn't take long to bury this "OP".

    1. Re:NEVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More info about this technology can be found here.

    2. Re:NEVER. by baudilus · · Score: 1

      I'm not getting to that site, has it been /.ed? (Score:5 Sarcasm)

  33. ultimate interoperability by Hekatchu · · Score: 1

    I know a Company that would call this interoperability :) Boom, there goes one again, because of a virus that puts something copyrighted in your computer.

  34. Oh, just stop by PonyHome · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows computer geeks don't approve of silliness.

    Now, where's my rubber chicken?

  35. Hah! by Himring · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just another April fools jo.... (connection reset by peer)

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  36. wow by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

    it's already 10am and i'm already sick of the april fools jokes...

    it has to be believable for it to work, maybe next year everyone will try harder.

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  37. The April Fools jokes need to be a litter better by phr0st_e · · Score: 1

    Come on guys...as believable as some of this stuff is, why don't you just post "Government hax0red by aliens, George Bush really from Mars!"...geesh...

  38. This is horrible by markfive · · Score: 1

    This is horrible. They will never get away with this. How can they even think that this will pass through congress. I'm going to write a stern letter.

  39. I preferred this when it was called the Evil Bit. by iainl · · Score: 1

    Somehow its just not as funny this way.

    But you could easily combine the two RFCs, causing any machine detecting abuse to simply silently set the evil bit - that way the user is announcing their wrongdoing to the world without realising, and valuable PC resources don't need to be rebuilt. We all read the article on recycling our components, yes?

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  40. Redundant... by Doches · · Score: 1

    ...I mean, won't we all have Fritz chips soon, anyway?

  41. Oh dear.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the funniest thing about this is that there are quite a few posts above from people that **actually** seem to have been taken in by this.

  42. Good And Bad by amigoro · · Score: 1
    Who's going to decide whose good and whose bad? What is the criteria? And what about the due process of the law? What about someone being innocent until provent guilty?

    This 1984, only 20 years later, but much more real, and much more sinister. In terms of protection of civil liberties, the world is heading south so far, it won't be long before it emerges back from north.

    And there are other issues too. What if this falls into the hands of the "Bad Guys" they seek to destroy. What if it malicious crackers exploit a hole in the security and hold millions of PC users to hostage?

    And what about the *BOOOOOOOM* *SPLASH*

    Moderate this comment
    Negative: Offtopic Flamebait Troll Redundant
    Positive: Insightful Interesting Informative Funny

    --


    Nothing to see here
  43. OMG! NO, REALLY?! WTF! GENIOUS! [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This to fool /.'s lameness filter.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Re: Omniscience Protocol by ScurvyDawg · · Score: 1

    LOL

  46. It is Time... by WhiskerTheMad · · Score: 0

    BREAK OUT THE TINFOIL HATS AND THE BRAINRAY DESCRAMBLERS!!!! THEY ARE COMING AFTER US NOW!!!

    Seriously, does this scare the piss out of anyone else besides me? I can't trust the government to figure out what my CORRECT FREAKIN' ADDRESS is after I send it to the IRS FOUR FREAKIN' TIMES. And now they want to blow up my PC if they think I'm a criminal?

    "Git the kids in the bunker maw! The revenoors 'r comin'!"

    --
    Love your country always, but respect your government only when it deserves it. -- Mark Twain
  47. Could've been done better... :-( by Zweistein_42 · · Score: 1

    ... it needs to be more believable & official - some techno-babble on how the protocol works and how it disables the computer - rather then just "there's this really big & bad thingie out there". Perhaps version 1.1 of this April-1st scare will be slightly improved:)

    --
    - To err is human; but to really screw up, you need a computer
  48. RFC Trolling by KrackerJax · · Score: 0

    Ha, what a farce.

    The requested comments shall be quite impassioned in nature, I'm sure.

    --
    Sauer
  49. Heh. by ivern76 · · Score: 1

    Quick suggestion: don't believe anything you read on April 1st.

  50. Cool! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    I just downloaded it off Kazaa *Lite*!

  51. Good Luck by TenPin22 · · Score: 1

    "The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker"

    May take a while to invent this. Forever ?

  52. Someone Mod Me Offtopic by sethadam1 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm sorry, but does anyone else think Slashdot April Fools jokes have just been lame the last two years.

    Everyone take a clue: if your joke isn't believable, subtle, or even remotely funny, don't submit it.

    This stuff is just plain stupid.

  53. Oh really by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

    "The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker. "

    If you believe that is doable I have some oceanfront property in Colorado I'd love to sell you...

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  54. Splort by LooseChanj · · Score: 1

    So not believing *anything* I see or hear for another 13 hours.

    --
    Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
  55. We've already got that! by spamnix · · Score: 1

    It's called Windows with DRM.

    --
    I have a BS in BS.
  56. You are even boring the ACs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is as good as April 1 gets?

  57. C'mon, get more creative than that by syntap · · Score: 1

    I expect higher quality April Fools jokes from the /. crowd... oh well, day ain't over yet.

  58. Solving the Internet connection problem by chefren · · Score: 1

    You can solve the constant connection requirement by using CPIP to connect to the Internet.

  59. That Blamed Evil Bit by Hettch · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I had an odd feeling that the evil bit I heard so much about last year might in some way not be used for the good of the public.

  60. Quit posting these april fools jokes. by Eudial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Quit posting these april fools jokes otherwise RIAA and MPAA might read this and actually implement it.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  61. Just the boring news by ev1lcanuck · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure this one ain't an april fools thing. I mean this is what they'd do. Next thing you know, SCO will be using these things.

  62. Yeah right by recrudesce · · Score: 1

    Communicate when disconnected from the Internet ? Does it send data to them via Pigeons or something ? April fools is a definate. Even if it DID exist, blocking the ports would not be very hard using a sniffer... :]

    --
    Rgds, rec-
  63. Slashdot Readers: (-5: Idiots) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, the response to this certainly changes my impression of the Slashdot Readership.

  64. April Fool by zenmojodaddy · · Score: 1

    I circulated this email in the office where I work. Some people got pretty pissed when the found out it was a hoax... "It has come to my attention that a particularly nasty email virus, going by the name of Flair Loop, has recently been released into the wild. The virus, which has been traced back to a college campus in Avignon, appears as an email with an attachment marked "Funky" - when opened, the attachment executes a small program which writes batches of pseudo-random data onto pre-determined sectors of your hard drive. The program will then remain inactive until 4:00pm on April 15th, when it will attempt to access the data it has previously written to your hard drive. The data is arranged in such a way that the drive repeatedly has to access data on physically remote areas of each disk in quick succession, which will damage the drive heads irreparably. The drive sectors have been allocated such that the noise made by the drive as it attempts to access each sector will vary in pitch and play "Word Up" by Cameo over and over until it breaks. According to my sources, the virus is particularly hard to detect while dormant, though in some cases a glitch in the program has been known to randomly display strings of text using characteristically French accent marks such as circonflexes or sedillas while typing documents in Word or Notepad. Can you all please create a new document in Word or Notepad, type some random text and let me know immediately if you spot any French letters. This will help me determine if we have already been infected. Thanks."

  65. Mod parent UP! Dumbass got fooled. by fname · · Score: 0

    Mod this thing thing up! Isn't the whole point of the April 1 stories is to give us a chance to laugh at the guy who doesn't realize it's a joke. His post should be +5, Funny.

  66. blame the RIAA? by Murf_E · · Score: 1

    Wow according to this we can blame somebody other than microsoft yay!!

    Happy April 1st everybody

    --
    this sig intentionally left blank
  67. Way too obvious by JoeF · · Score: 1

    Way too obvious for April 1...

  68. New year's resolution by masouds · · Score: 1

    ...
    23: Do not read slashdot on April 1st., even if you are bored as hell. ...

    --
    This .sig was intentionaly left blank.
  69. You down with OPP? by The+Gline · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you know me!

    --
    Honorary Member of Jackie Chan's Kung Fu Process Servers
  70. Omniscience Protocol by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

    It will never work because everyone will think it sucks.Thats how things work in the tech sector.If it sucks it dies.

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
  71. Hey, Malda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a fucking hint. Slashdot hasn't had any good April Fool's jokes for years. They're all shit, none of them are funny. Give it a fucking break, try and actually have some respect for the people that are providing you banner hits every day.

  72. Good April Fools----sorta by jedi_odin · · Score: 1

    that was a decent april fools joke, should fool the nontechnical for a little while, hey someone should send it to CNN to see if it'll make TV announcement lol... however, you're gonna have to do better to fool the technies and gurus.

    --
    may the source be with you
  73. Let's hope by lazy_arabica · · Score: 1

    I hope nothing serious will happen and be reported on /. today, or everybody will find it very funny...

    Now, I am going to drink another hundredth of coffee cups. ---

  74. Re:Reporting while offline by Nhojwolfe · · Score: 1

    my question excatly guess i will chalk it up to a an april fools prank

  75. April by GSPatton · · Score: 0
    Well it's 10:50 AM and I'm already tired of these jokes. How about a noontime cease fire on the April fools jokes?

    I understand that in England, tricks can only be played in the morning.

    April Fools History


  76. Mod on April Fools Day by millahtime · · Score: 1

    /. should add to the mod system for april fools day. -1 gullable.

    1. Re:Mod on April Fools Day by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gullable: adj, susceptible to attacks by seabirds.

      Gullible: adj, easily fooled.

      (And they told me "gullible" wasn't in my dictionary)

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  77. I used to have an alpha of this on my system by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

    That version mostly only scrambled harddrives though. In the end I uninstalled it. I believe the early development name of the alpha version was 'Windows 95'.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  78. Please shut up! by lovebyte · · Score: 1

    I understand this is april 1st, but could you please not give any ideas to the RIAA et al.?

    Thank you

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  79. goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, it was posted by michael, figures.

    Jeeze, April 1 would be a good day for you to actually post a important story like, a YRO about the collusion to take down goatse.

    In Soviet Russia, *BSD is dying!

    1. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Slashdot will never bother posting a story about goatse, because they don't give a rat's ass about freedom of speech. All they care about is getting people to read the site and click on the banners, and goatse hurts that. No April fools joke, just the truth.

      Perhaps. Perhaps goatse is a lame site featuring a man prying his ...

      Get my drift?

      Pun absolutely intended.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to understand what it means to protect freedom of speech. As soon as you say "well, it's ok that goatse.cx was censored, since it only has a gross picture", you have opened the flood gates. Now you have to ask yourself, what else is it ok to censor?

    3. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't seem to understand what it means to protect freedom of speech. As soon as you say "well, it's ok that goatse.cx was censored, since it only has a gross picture", you have opened the flood gates. Now you have to ask yourself, what else is it ok to censor?

      That's an example of the "slippery slope" fallacy. You have no evidence that the suppression of goatse will lead to a repressive online regime. So you can't use that as an excuse to mourn its passing; it is only legitimate to mourn the passing of goatse if you seriously believe that every form of expression should be protected.

      Let's try an analogy - if I raped your daughter, and posted pictures of the crime on the web, would you say it's okay for me to be prosecuted for the rape, but my right to free speech means nobody should have the power to take the pictures down?

    4. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by hesiod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > would you say it's okay for me to be prosecuted for the rape, but my right to free speech means nobody should have the power to take the pictures down?

      Except that a picture isn't speech. Even if you don't believe that line, the pictures would be of the commission of a felonious assault, and I believe, illegal. Since that is a stretch, let's step away from the actual subject. Photographers, to use their pictures, must have the consent of everyone in the picture to distribute it. Unless the rape victim did not consent to sex, but did consent to the pictures of it, the photos are illegal to distribute, AFAIK.

      Yes, I know it was a troll, but it's still an interesting thought (the speech, not the rape).

    5. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Photographers, to use their pictures, must have the consent of everyone in the picture to distribute it.

      Hmm, I forgot that they could just blur the face to hide the identity, causing it to be legitimate... oh well, doesn't matter to me, as (I'm no psychic, but I think I can speak with assurance on this one) I'll never be raping anyone, let alone photographing it.

    6. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Repeat after me: Privately owned websites do not have to uphold the freedom of speech--only the government.

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      How could that possibly mean that Slashdot has to let you say whatever you want?

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    7. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by jon787 · · Score: 1

      Actually wasn't there a story when the Christmas Island domain registry pulled their domain?

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    8. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well you see, Slashdot has a YRO (Your Rights Online) section, and the editors love to talk about how they support freedom of speech.

      The censorship of a web site by a domain registrar is without a doubt something that belongs in the YRO section. Slashdot is free to post what they want, but don't pretend for a second that the editors aren't secretly happy that goatse.cx was censored. If it happened to anybody else, they would be all over it. That is the problem.

    9. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, on Kuro5hin.

    10. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      I believe that legally, photo's are free speech. Not that they would be protected given this senario, of course.

      Photographers do no have to have consent of people in pictures to distribute them. If you walk down the street, and your local newspaper (or TV station) takes your picture, they can publish it.

    11. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I believe that legally, photo's are free speech

      Depends on the subject.

      > If you walk down the street, and your local newspaper (or TV station) takes your picture, they can publish it.

      But don't they have to blur out your face if you did not give them consent? And I'm not talking about some random person in the background, the person in question is the subject of the photo.

    12. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      IANAL. 20 or so years ago, I did a lot of photography, including work for a couple of newspapers. I had lots of pictures published, and I don't recall having *ever* asking them to sign a release - or having the paper tell me that I should get one. I'm pretty sure that if it were a requirement, the newspaper would have asked me to have them sign a form.

    13. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > don't recall having *ever* asking them to sign a release

      Okay, I was mostly mistaken. I found some answers A HREF="http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetc h-msg.tcl?msg_id=002TgW">Here, although some may only pertain to Vermont.

      It seems you are fair game if you are in a public place, the photo is not used for any editorial/opinion purposes, and not used for advertising. Interesting.

    14. Re:goddamn, this isn't FUNNY, it's STUPID! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Link. Stupid HTML... More like stupid me for not previewing.

  80. I'll bet Orin Hatch is the only one fooled by this by koa · · Score: 1

    He's probably popping open the champagne right now, since this is what he was lobbying for some time ago.. Too bad for him its just a joke.

    But anyhow, even if this were true- could you imagine the fireworks when the 'destructo' bit is piggybacked onto an email worm? That would be the best thing that could ever happen to the linux movement- since people would be running from windows like rats from a sinking ship.

    --
    ....move along....nothing to see here....
  81. Refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Can I get a refund of 1/366th of my annual /. subscription? This website is next to useless on April 1st, and the so-called jokes are increasingly pathetic.

    To /.'s editors: IT ISN'T FUNNY ANY MORE, GIVE IT A REST

  82. The best part has to be... by juggleme · · Score: 1

    the email address.

    sob@harvard.edu?

    Yeah...

    1. Re:The best part has to be... by decsnake · · Score: 1

      except that is scott bradners email address, and has been for something like 20 years.

    2. Re:The best part has to be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah - try google

  83. Windows by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    has been doing this for years.

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  84. 4/1 TCPA Relabeling by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Great!

    Let's go for it, just as soon as the levels of trustworthiness and responsibility become equal to the level of power.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  85. Not funny by nuggz · · Score: 1

    The funny or not funny thing is that the RIAA and other groups HAVE been pressuring the US gov to legislate such features.
    I think a senator even supported this idea.

  86. BOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boo! Bad joke - it totally rips off the "evil bit" from last year.

    Come up with something new, RFC!

    --Stephen

  87. Would be a classic april fools' joke... by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    if we didn't have legislators who've proposed allowing law enforcement to hack into people's computers "just 'cos" and that it would be ok to destroy them.

    It'll be funny, and I'll laugh when things reach a point where this would be absurd

  88. SETI is to part of the project! by qualico · · Score: 0

    Hey this is no joke.

    Check out your SETI@Home client.
    Its actually running an algorithm on your data instead of some telescope packet.

    Bastards!

  89. Two-thirds done with communications problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    'The OP must be able to communicate through uncooperative firewalls, NATs, and when the computer is disconnected from the Internet.'

    I've solved the first two by reducing them to the third case.

  90. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    /. should add to the mod system for april fools day. -1 gullable.
    He got the "joke", his point is that it wasn't funny (and he is right).
  91. april fools day isnt even funny anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about fooling people on a random day that ISNT april fools day. now THATS funny!

  92. Thank you, Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  93. Missing the Point by SlipJig · · Score: 1

    All you guys complaining that /. should try harder on their April Fools' jokes are missing the point. The funny part isn't the posting - it's laughing at the folks who still didn't get it. By that logic, the more obvious you make the joke, the better :)

    --
    Read my keyboard review.
  94. A Little Slow by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1


    ...unremovable by even the most skilled hacker

    Have we learned nothing?

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:A Little Slow by eddeye · · Score: 1
      ...unremovable by even the most skilled hacker

      Have we learned nothing?

      Apparently not

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
  95. My God by fizban · · Score: 2

    It's only 11 AM Eastern time. That means we have 13 hours left of this stupid ass shit. I just may have to kick my ./ addiction for the day. Must resist... no click link... stop insanity...

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  96. the scary thing.. by holzp · · Score: 1

    given whats going on nowadays, I'm not sure this is an april fools joke!

  97. Boring! by M.+Piedlourd · · Score: 1

    How much time to people spend coming up with these dull April Fool's submissions?

    All I did was a "net send" to a coworker saying she performed an illegal operation and the police were on their way...

  98. hostile servers by evenprime · · Score: 1
    The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker.
    I am *SO* glad this is an april fool's day joke. Imagine how much fun blackhats would have with hostile OP servers: "I'll destroy all your computers if you don't wire money to this swiss bank account..."
    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  99. Now THAT was a prank by Ridgelift · · Score: 1

    It proposes that every computer be installed with an OP Client which would allow law enforcement ('Good guys.') and copyright holders (RIAA, MPAA) to remotely destroy the computer of any user who has been involved in copyright infringement ('evil-doer').

    For those of you new to slashdot, April 1st is normally a "non-stuff that matters" day around here. Today is all about nerds playing jokes on the uninformed.

    My favorite joke was the Parrot Prank which involved everyone's favourite publisher O'Reilly. That one even took me in for about a day. Anyone else have a favourite?

  100. Good one by photon317 · · Score: 1


    While they make a good case about how impossible it is to determine legal jurisdiction and determine the existance and nature of legal violations, the technical issues that they raise with this RFC would mostly be solved by pervasive DRM. Eventually, every PC, every NAT/router box, etc will have embedded DRM, and you won't be able to stop the deployment and invisibility of something like OP with DRM (with keys controlled by all the wrong people) in your way.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  101. You're so goddamn clever it hurts by Dalroth · · Score: 1

    I hate this fucking day. Every damn year we have to sit through this BS. It's not funny. It's not clever. It's not original. Please just give us the damn news!

    Bryan

  102. April Fools by SilentSheep · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or are there a LOT of april fools on /. this year?? I'm sure there hasn't been this many in previous years. Is the internet developing a better sense of humour?

    --
    .
  103. Not Funny by tljohnsn · · Score: 1

    These are the lamest april fools stories I have ever seen.

  104. A little like what Orrin Hatch proposed by Poor+College+Student · · Score: 1
    here

    Obviously its an April Fools joke, but it sounds a lot like what Sen Hatch proposed last year.

  105. If this weren't an April Fool's Joke... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    ..I'd nuke my XP Pro installation and slap the copy of Lindows 4.5 I downloaded from their site (for free!) on my box.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  106. The funny thing is ... by hiero · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... that as absurd as the requirements of this RFC are, they would have to actually be implemented for DRM to be non-hackable.

  107. It isn't an April Fools joke... by Eshock · · Score: 1

    until it gets posted 8 more times.

  108. Yeah, So What? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

    The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker.

    So what? You're describing Longhorn. It's been posted about 4 million times on Slashdot. Big deal, by then Linux will rule the desktop. And as long as Microsoft has their greedy little incompetent fingers in there, my mamma could hack it using only her Palm Pilot and Froogle.

    I'm not worried.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:Yeah, So What? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Longhorn will be completely undetectable?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Yeah, So What? by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'll never see it on my computer. ;-)

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  109. let's not exagerate by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1
    "Also, since the evil-doer might try to hide his or her evil-doing by disconnecting the computer from the network, the OP must be able to continue to communicate, even under these circumstances. Meeting this requirement may require that the OP client be able to reconfigure the user's machine into a cell phone"

    Isn't one phony-1st april-joke-post on slashdot enough for one day?

    How would a computer be able to contact anyone (if the connection to the internet is broken), if it wasn't - a rather costly - hardware implemented? And why, then, couldn't you just disable that?

    Besides, even if it were true, it's impossible to implement. even his first step would fail: who has ever heard of something that worked on ALL computers, regardless of configuration, type or OS?

    And who would want such a thing? Certainly not government working agencies. And not even ordinary consumers. And FORCE it? By whome? Since when can the RIAA make the law for souvereign states? (ok, one begins to doubt sometimes, but still).

    And then: being completely invisble and undetectable by any hacker? Big chance! The security record of the RIAA and any other commercial instances do not speak well in this respect.

    Conclusion: the article is an aprils' fool, or just plain hoghwash.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    1. Re:let's not exagerate by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      who has ever heard of something that worked on ALL computers, regardless of configuration, type or OS?

      One word: BIOS

      If it were non-flashable firmware, you'd be hard-pressed to remove it. More to the point, it could be built into a dedicated microcontroller monitoring the system, or maybe into the north/south bridge chips.

      Before you scoff, just think how the hell you'd know if "they" did do that, until the day your motherboard mysteriously overheats...

  110. hmmm by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    (swims up from the deep)

    (examines garish bait)

    (swims away)

    Modded -1, too extreme to be convincing.

    --
    -Styopa
  111. Good Thinking by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, we know there are terrorists who want to destroy America/the West. We've invested billions trying to slow them down and beat them to the punch. Now somebody wants to install an auto-destruct on every computer so that if (when) an exploit is discovered, someone could take down the entire electronic infrastructure of the country and parts of the rest of the world without even putting in the work to write an email virus?

    BAD IDEA

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Good Thinking by radish · · Score: 1


      You really should investigate NTP. Then your PC clock would be correct and you'd know what day it is.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Good Thinking by eddeye · · Score: 1
      Now somebody wants to install an auto-destruct on every computer so that if (when) an exploit is discovered, someone could take down the entire electronic infrastructure of the country and parts of the rest of the world without even putting in the work to write an email virus?

      Why are we worrying about an Omniscience Protocol when some machines still lack a working calendar? Priorities people!

      --
      Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
  112. Scare tactic by gothrus · · Score: 1

    This is something that we will never see come to fruition. It is simply another scare tactic by the powers that be (RIAA, Republicans, etc.) to keep people from abusing copyrights. They know they can't possibly prosecute everyone so they prosecute a few people and try to make a big deal out of it in the media to scare people. Blowing up your Pc is meant to scare those who aren't technically savvy enough to realize that there are too many variables out there that make this impracticle. Hackers would disable this thing the day it came out and I would place money on that.

    1. Re:Scare tactic by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > It is simply another scare tactic by the powers that be (RIAA, Republicans, etc.) to keep people from abusing copyrights.

      Good to see the tinfoil hats aren't susceptible to the April Fools problem.

      Carry on.

      Virg

  113. Scariest? Do you not mean funniest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is so absurd, it does not even have the slightest chance of ever happening. It also would take a skilled cracker less then 5 minutes to circumvent, the trojan they want preinstalled on all PCs.

  114. Read the RFC (date) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1
    FR6: The OP client must be able to discern the motives of the operator of the OP server and not run if those motives are not pure.

    Discussion: Since it cannot be assumed that the operators of the OP server will always have the best motives, the OP client must be able to reject requests from the OP server if the operator of the server has an evil (or illegal) intent.
    Um, isn't this a functional impass in the protocol?
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Read the RFC (date) by curiosity · · Score: 3, Funny

      No - they can use the Evil Bit. RFC 3514.

    2. Re:Read the RFC (date) by RLW · · Score: 1

      Evil bits are always on the left side. Just look for the scar on the right side of the bit. Oh, that's twins.

      Ok, ok, the evil bit is when the RIAA says anything. Oh, that's lying.

      Hm, I can't really find an evil bit. I guess the OP should assume everyone is a lying evil scum bag and trash the whole world and let the courts sort it out.

  115. I smell awkward believabilty by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
    Left to it's initial first several sentances, I was thinking that instead of a Pedahertz processor (available sometime in 2020) I'd have to make a Beowulf cluster of *gasp* pre-O.P. computers.

    Then I start reading further down, and find - oh my - it will destroy your computer. And I thought - ah, April First - just like Fresh-Meat's ROT-13 front-page.

    Then I thought to myself, my god - this is actually the same as the "trusted computing initiative". Trusted computing wouldn't break your system, per se, but would prevent it from playing with other trusted computers Then I thought to myself, it's supposed to be funny, laugh. Then I modded myself down for rambling on about all of my thought process to the first post I could find that noticed that the joke actually touches a nerve.

    Thank god I'm getting a new shipment of irradiated aliuminum foil, straight from Reynolds.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  116. Here's the entire thing graphicly explained by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1
  117. Anyone else find it odd/humorous... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 1

    That the initials for the author (at the bottom of the document) are S.O.B.?

    Of course, only S.O.B.s would try to write this protocol, but...

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  118. Internet creator: responsible? by ubeans · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the creator if the Internet has something to do with this?

  119. No kidding by donmiguel42 · · Score: 1
    EMail: sob@harvard.edu

    True or April Fools, the e-mail address is fitting...

  120. oh I see... by nsebban · · Score: 1

    "It also must be able to report to the server at any time"

    Oh yes, you must be talking of that kind of protocols that can report data to a distant server, even without any network connection.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
    1. Re:oh I see... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Probably using gravity waves from the captive black hole that will eventually be used to destroy the computer when the Powers That Be finally decide they have enough evidence...

  121. It just describes a SUPER virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This defines whats in the mind of a virus creator. every virus wants to be able to install itself everywhere(computer,pda etc) without being stopped by the user and then destroy the client computer. Also whos going to pay for this virus communicating with the server ?
    I am very interested in how this virus would communicate if it was physically disconnected from the internet.any ideas?

  122. has anyone actually red the document referenced? by exodist-Admin-Ra · · Score: 1

    If anyone that actually knew about data storage/networking/programming all at once to at least some degree read this they (I) could tell you. This is a wish, it is impossible to do "all of the above" how is a computer supposed to know (using only a hidden software program) who is physically sitting at a computer? yes if it had a fingerprinter on every key and mouse button, but u can't do that with a software program alone, u need the special keyboard and mouse. This is nothing but a dream layed out by a moron.

  123. Bad. by Elpacoloco · · Score: 1

    Bad, naughty, evil, RIAA!

    Now if my computer explodes, I plan to sue you for not only hacking, but vandalism and terrorism.

    Had you not done this, I would have just assumed that exploding computers were due to freak environmental conditions!

  124. Yep.. by shiftless · · Score: 1

    ... until you get sued for violating the DMCA. ;)

  125. Last year's Evil bit is now a protocol! Peh-leaze! by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    Last year's only memorable April Fool joke is now a Protocol.
    And we complain about hollywood having no imagination.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  126. Bad idea by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    It's worse than opening a beef steakhouse in India or a kiddie store in the pedophile ward of a maximum security prison. It can open up a can of worms that you don't want; mainly for lawyers. I can already see this system being abused. Hackers being able to exploit it and take down computers of ppl or corporations that they don't like. Hell, I can only imagine the backlash from those false positive victims. What's next? Watch p0rn and you're not the only thing to fizzle and blow? What about those "trade secrets" that turned out to be otherwise (DeCSS issue)? Or gay issues? Will the government institute computer self-destruct orders for those looking for certain information that IT not us deems "not right"?

    And this will be hard to do in Canada or in some other nations; the judge in Canada effectively ruled that sharing (not selling) personal copies of copyright music files is perfectly legal.

    What happened to "Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law"? More and more, it looks as though moths have gotten into our Constitution and started eating it up.

  127. disclaimer: i know the date! by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1

    ... but this must be the biggest flamebait, ever.

    please let me uber-moderate!

    --
    the computer is online
    i am not at it
    what a waste of ressources
  128. April Fools by SpaceKow · · Score: 1

    This must be a April Fools joke.

    The RFC also says "The attitude of some of the copyright holders may be that it's OK fora few honest people to have their computers or networks executed as long as the machines and networks of the dishonest are killed. Butit is not likely that any measurable error rate would be acceptable
    to the public. "

  129. Please... by Shadow2097 · · Score: 2, Funny
    C'mon now, we all know that just by looking for the evil bit at the start of OP packets we can filter them out. In fact, I'm pretty sure there were SEVERAL stories about this just about a year ago...

    -Shadow

    1. Re:Please... by Junta · · Score: 3, Funny

      And of course, when we note the evil bit being set, we just shoot the avian carrier out of the sky to drop the packet...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  130. Imagine hacking these... by ManikSurtani · · Score: 1

    This is probably a stupid April fool's gag, and I don't know why I bother responding, but ... ... if it weren't, and something like this does get put into practise, imagine the fun to be had by sniffing the internet for such programs running on remote machines and hacking them - and subsequently blowing up random computers on the 'net!

    --
    -- Manik Surtani
  131. OT:RIAA, MPAA are Cartels not "Copyright holders" by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    look it up
    "a group of similar independent companies who join together to control prices and limit competition"
    Do they control prices?
    Do they limit competition?
    Of course they do! Then it's a Cartel!

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  132. Due process by mumwahead · · Score: 0

    Damaging property with no due process and being guilty until proven innocent (if they even give you the chance). Let's just face it, with this administration corporations can get away with murder.

  133. April 1st RFCs by Arathrael · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a long tradition of April 1st RFCs - see Wikipedia's entry.

    I thought this one was quite funny - note, by the way, that it doesn't propose that every computer be installed with an OP client, it just proposes the requirements for a protocol enabling that. The requirements are impossible. That's kind of the point, I thought. I suppose you'd have to RTFA to get that though... :-)

    1. Re:April 1st RFCs by spood · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there's a spike in the distribution of RFC's this time of year, or if everyone who is busy submitting normal RFC's just takes a break and works on fake RFC's for a few days. Anyone have enough free time to plot out the submission dates?

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
  134. OP Over Avai Carrier? by Your+Anus · · Score: 1

    Will this be implemented over avain carrier? The pigeon would fly over your house and poop on your computer.

    --

    In the USA, we like stuff watered down, like beer, television, and freedom.
    1. Re:OP Over Avai Carrier? by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

      I like those pigeons :-)

  135. Evil Bit? by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    Will this protocol also use the "Evil Bit"?

    --
    I hate sigs.
  136. Re:MOD GRANDPARENT UP: +5, TINFOIL ARCHIVED FOREVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low moderated posts actually get deleted before the archiving process? PLEASE show some proof of this. If it is true, I have 0 respect for slashdot. If it is false, well no surprises, you are an AC after all.

  137. Full list of april fools jokes by Urgo · · Score: 4, Informative

    For a full updated list of sites pulling april fools jokes see here

    Some highlites:
    livejournal.com - on userinfo pages, "Friend"/"Friend Of" -> "Stalking"/"Stalked By"
    www.gpf-comics.com - Comic mirrored.
    smh.com.au - Yum-cha trolleys with "L" plates
    www.clutchfans.com - Patrick Ewing returning to NBA
    www.freeciv.org - Freeciv ANSI client
    www.rav4world.com - Closed? Should have announced that TOMORROW!
    www.retrocrush.com - Nude pics of Jaclyn Smith
    westcoaster.net - Roller coaster site turned into teen girl site
    www.meowpawjects.com - Sock people forced webmaster to take website down.
    miceage.com - Disney merges with Walmart
    www.badgerbadgerbadger.com - Badgers replaces with zombies
    skepdic.com - Skeptic's Dictionary closing
    fool.com - Buffett buys Krispy Cream
    launch.com - Britney Spears & Jason Alexander To Renew Wedding Vows
    MetaFilter.com - Turned in to a Wiki for the day
    www.ddrkc.com - owner sold site to a user that is unpopular
    brownpau.com - March for Web Standards
    www.beyondunreal.com - ut2k4 production suspended
    globetechnology.com - Microsoft Solitaire
    www.modernwiccan.com - Randomized Color Scheme
    bbs.fuckedcompany.com - Site shutting down
    www.diary-x.com - looks like diaryland!
    theprp.com - Music site to "Previously Ridden Ponies"
    mpx200.org - Pocket PC with 2Gb system memory/Smart Drunk Pocket PC application
    www.macosxhints.com - triple G5 Powermacs
    www.slyfx.com - AOL buys slyfx
    palminfocenter.com - Palms for toddlers.
    www.carniola.org - fake news story
    eikenes.alvestrand.no - Considering porn spam to be in a separate dialect to everything else
    defunctgames.com - Pimps At Sea fox xbox

    --
    Belive in Technology and AMAZE yourself. -- RIP ZDTV/TechTV
    1. Re:Full list of april fools jokes by British · · Score: 1

      www.badgerbadgerbadger.com [badgerbadgerbadger.com] - Badgers replaces with zombies

      Looks more like the robots from Kraftwerk's video, only with circular instead of mannequin heads.

  138. Scott Bradner's email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is EMail: sob@harvard.edu The article also cites the History of English Law 680-683 (1938).

  139. This is not a joke! It's old news! by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

    Some dumb Utah senator proposed this kind of 'law' enforcement last year and this was also covered here

    Here's the BBC blurb

  140. No way this is real by hookooekoo · · Score: 1

    Everything can be hacked! HACK THE PLANET!!!! besides http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc3700.htm wtf is a RFC 3751

  141. Excellent by jefu · · Score: 1
    Most excellent suggestion.

    Radios could benefit by being set to turn off if they are receiving (perhaps from overseas or off-planet) propaganda that is inimical to the government.

    TV's could explode (or the penguin on top of it could - achieving more or less the same effect) at the barest hint of a nipple (female, naturally).

    Refrigerators could collapse or turn into ovens when illicit substances are placed in them (but they'd have to be set to check (RFID?) for the presence of a valid prescription).

    Yes, this is just what is needed.

  142. LOL! by StarfishOne · · Score: 0
    "The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker"

    Format C:

    echo "pwned"

    (this is all the time I'd like to 'invest' in claims like these)

    1. Re:LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite: del /q c:\%windir%\*.*

  143. Longhorn is on the way by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    I already run the beta of the OC... Windows XP.

  144. Oh boy by grimdel · · Score: 1

    >So if your computer randomly blows up in the next while, you can put the blame on this. Thank god its April Fools: I can see it now: Microsoft jumps on the bandwagon - Its not our software/OS - it was the OP client! Some script kiddie in Timbucktoo decides to release a VB hack that infects everyones computer that tricks the OP client to blow up at the same time. It maybe April Fools, but Im going to start wearing my bullet proof vest and welding mask...

  145. April Fools....Sigh.... by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    Such a lame joke. I mean it might be an intresting, good april fools... IF IT WERE ANYWHERE REMOTELY NEAR POSSIBLE.

    I have an idea, if the users machine is diconnected from the internet, we'll turn the machine into a cell phone (somehow)...and oh yea, we forgot about what happens if there is no cell serivece.

    This is just lame...why cant we just link to thinkgeek, at least their stuff is amusing.

  146. You don't need the hardware to do it... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    if it's built into the OS.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  147. Here's a great April Fools Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your victim must be running Windows

    1) Take a screen shot of his desktop ("Print Screen").

    2) Paste into Paint

    3) Save it in the Windows directory

    4) Minimize all his apps

    5) Set the screen shot as his wallpaper.

    6) "Recycle" his icons so as to make for a clean desktop and an unobstructed view of the screen shot (wallpaper)

    7) Drag the task bar down so it is in 'pop up mode'

    8) Let the hilarity ensue!

    Here's another good one.

    Launch "Word". Go into "Tools" then "Auto Correct". Set it up so that whenever he types his name, the word "Asshole" comes up. Other possibilities include company names, names of cow-orkers, the possibilities are endless!

    Enjoy!

  148. Who wrote this article? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    It sounds like it's from A.F. Ools.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Who wrote this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well obviously you must be below average, since you do not know what's the difference between an average. and a median.

  149. yoke's on me by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    This is a very funny april fools joke, but i think some people have been fool inot thinking it is real. it is easy to believe thos story because there is so much truth built into it. The fact that a senator actually did express the wish to be able to destroy someone computer at will, the fact that the operating system of choice for most people is a closed source one with rumor that if microsoft found out you were pirating it, they could disable it.

    The scary part isn't the actual story, if it was true then the constituion would kick in and prevent users from being punished/convicted without due process and override this law. What is scary is that society and those controling it have presented a situation were this story is actually believable. I think it is a sad time for america when this is believable to the point some cannot tell if it is a joke. On the other hand,if it isn't a joke it is just that much worse.

  150. You know, April Fools jokes are... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...a lot funnier if you make them actually convincing enough to fool some people. Otherwise they're just pointless crap.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  151. The problems is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could see the government trying to pull this off. A joke true, here. But someone in the 'ment might actually want to try this out. And with the resources of the 'ment, could it really happen?

    Scary.

  152. OB Star Wars quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's impossible! Even for a computer!"

  153. This does not exist by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
    The RFC requires the following to operate:

    Omniscience (the protocol)

    Omnipotence (OR1-OR5)

    Omnibenevolence (FR1, 2, 5-9)

    The existence of evil ("bad buy", "evil-doer")

    Therefore, the RFC has defined g-d, and does not exist.

    /Augustine

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  154. Just plain stupid. by Taicho · · Score: 0

    Man o man glad i'm a dual citizen because if this stuff starts happening no way in hell I will be staying in the US lol.

  155. So something like windows then? by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

    But seriously...

    How about project LOCKSMITH. Its a requirement that all door locks can be opened with a special master key, owned only by law enforcement, the riaa and governemnt registerd maid services.

    How come the most outrageous afronts to personal liberty always sound plausable when applied to the world of computers?

  156. Subtlety by Cranx · · Score: 1

    Try some subtlety, people might have fallen for this.

  157. Is this a joke? by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    coz if it is, it isn't funny.

    Seriously.

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  158. Standards are important by deblau · · Score: 1

    This protocol is RFC 3514 compliant.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  159. So *that's* what did in my power supply by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

    Just built up a new computer. The power supply worked once, then turned into a doorstop on the second cold boot. I think the company who made it was a little too agressive in their implementation of the OP spec. 8-)

  160. April Fools by Dharkfiber · · Score: 1

    And there will be many. Too bad it won't be as true as the "Evil Bit" in AMD processors

  161. Didn't anyone notice his e-mail address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOB@harvard.edu

    Perfect!

  162. Next step... by Patlag · · Score: 0

    Next step will be to put a wi-fi implant in the brain of every baby born after 2010 so if in the futur they turn into criminal, sexual predator or even worst; democrate suporter! The homeland security departement will be able to destroy their brain remotely!

  163. They don't need Palladium for that by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, all they need to do is send out a "security update" -- which they are allowed to install on your computer without notice from you -- wich accidently-on-purpose destroys it. They can't be held liable -- after all, didn't you read the license agreement which says there's no warrenty? It was a bug, which they are not liable for...

    And btw, Palladium is all they need to force the issue, because Palladium prevents you from installing the kind of software that would counteract that -- because it might cause problems with copyright. This includes Linux, afaik -- you honestly can't expect me to ask Microsoft to sign every kernel build I make?

    Unless these "features" can be turned off, for the record, I will use this machine until it rusts before I buy something which will not let me run Linux.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  164. This will be sweet... by decepty · · Score: 1

    ...can I get it to run on Linux?

    *happy 4/1*

    --
    Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
  165. Duh people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at all the stories on SD today - do you think ANY of them are real?

    Dude wants to name his kid some alph-numeric name, CD's that send subliminal messages, RFC's for Oren's pipe dream, etc ?!?

    Looks like the April Fools gag really got some people scared, eh?

    Me, I will use common sense

    AC

  166. ns by ronchie02 · · Score: 1

    Not like I think this would actually happen do to it's unrealistic needs, but, don't forget, for every new security measure there is eventually something to get around it.

  167. Sad thing by TejWC · · Score: 1

    The sad thing is that I know a few senators who are actually trying to work on this...

  168. Damn!! by citizenklaw · · Score: 1

    No more pr0n for me....

    --
    the future is but past forgotten
  169. Lame... So obvious by glenebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What fun is it reading April fools jokes when they are so blatantly obvious before getting to the second sentence? Come on guys, where is the believability? Leave the obvious bull-shit to George Lucas, please?

  170. author's email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't anyone realize the author's email address was sob@harvard.com. I smell a joke.

    1. Re:author's email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops, nevermind here's his webpage:
      http://www.sobco.com/sob/sob.html

      Poor SOB

  171. You're smoking what? by rastin · · Score: 1

    Get real. I'm no hacker but for every $5 million spent in developing this pipe dream tack 30 minutes on to the time it will take the hacker community to undo it. Or worse yet this is the making for the best back door ever. Well greedy bastards can dream can't they?

  172. ermm...I still have to see by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    the first bios that is universally applicable to ALL sort of computers.

    In fact, not to long ago I flashed my bios: it was a pain in the ass to actually get the right one. While there are few brandname-bioses left, to actually get it working... Bios differs from motherboard to motherboard, let alone it could work on IBM boxes, Macs, etc.

    And besides: how long would it take before ppl would find out, and how long before that vendor could close its business? There is no way to universally implement and force this legally; in fact, in some countries it would be downright illegal.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    1. Re:ermm...I still have to see by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      It wouldn't necessarily need to be in the BIOS that wakes your system up when you turn the power on. What about that little chip that controls your onboard ethernet, for example? It could sneak a tracking packet out in the form of, say, a DNS lookup. You wouldn't block outgoing DNS, now would you?

      Your point about the bios being different from motherboard to motherboard is true enough, but if the hardware was subverted at a lower level, as in my ethernet chip example, it wouldn't matter if the chip was in a Mac or a PC. An ethernet chip must be some kind of microcontroller - the device driver hands it packets to send and lets the chip worry about voltages on the wire. So the program in the chip will be independant of the host CPU.

      Anyway, we're probably both overreacting to an April Fool joke, though it could still happen for real...

  173. Social Engineering anyone? by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    "The client will be completely undetectable and unremovable by even the most skilled hacker."

    That's a crock of shit. Even that quote makes the software a bigger target that it already is. Even if it's impossible to find out if you have it or not, to disable it, who's to say that a Hacker or a Social Engineer couldn't get their hands on it before hand? With it, they wouldn't have to disable it because they would have enough information about it as if they actually wrote it.

    "So if your computer randomly blows up in the next while, you can put the blame on this."

    I guess that'll take away some of the Microsoft Windows critics, eh?

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  174. It's called Windows Longhorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Longhorn will feature this capability... that's why they're taking their time in perfecting it before release. Now is the time to start converting your friends and family to Linux to avoid this digital form of tyranny.

  175. isnt April 1st fun! by tkjtkj · · Score: 1

    yes it is

    --
    "There are 11 kinds of people: those who know binary, those who don't, and those who could not care less!"
  176. 1984 by Sparcler · · Score: 1

    Can anyone say George Orwell. You might as well call it "The Big Brother Protocol". Before anyone asks, I do know what day it is.

  177. Freedom... by dot_borg · · Score: 1

    Don't laugh to hard y'all. "Trusted computing" isn't that far off.

  178. The Star Trek console design by suitti · · Score: 1
    It's inevitable. 7 of 9 was able to overload the console of an alien across the galaxy, and I think, "whoa. I'm glad my PC keyboard is too stupid to have an overload function!".

    But hey, I'm set. I've got more than a dozen 486's, which, deployed serially, will last me decades - as long as I replace the little clock batteries.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  179. NEVER NEVER NEVER by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    I swear, they'll never get this into my machine. I have over 3 GB of W4REZ and they'll never take it away from #@F@3f23T32]gp} [NO CARRIER]

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  180. Due Process by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

    Let us be honest here, even if this RFC seems to have the BS_FLAG enabled, it is a real theat due to the fact that many of the actions of these organisations lact due process.

    Sincerely,
    Nathan

    I understand six languages. They are English, L33t, Hex, Binary, ASCII Code, and Dumbass.

    ! |_||\||)3+ 5!)( |_4|\|9|_|4935. +|-|3% 4.3 3|\|9|_!5|-|, |_33+, |-|3)(0., _!|\|4.%, 45(!! (0|)3, 4|\||) |)|_||\/|_455.

    4920756E6465727374616E6420736978206C616E67756167 65732E20546865792061726520456E676C6973682C204C3333 742C204865782C2042696E6172792C20415343494920436F64 652C20616E642044746D626173732E

    1001001001000000111010101101110
    1100100011001010111001001110011
    1110100011000010110111001100100
    100000011100110110100101111000
    100000011011000110000101101110
    1100111011101010110000101100111
    1100101011100110010111000100000
    1010100011010000110010101111001
    100000011000010111001001100101
    100000010001010110111001100111
    11011000110100101110011011010000010
    110000100000010011000011001100110011
    11101000010110000100000010010000110
    10101111000001011000010000001000010
    11010010110111001100001011100100111
    100100101100001000000100000101010011
    10000110100100101001001001000000100
    1101101111011001000110010100101100
    1000000110000101101110011001000010
    1000100011101000110110101100010
    1100001011100110111001100101110

    ! |_||\||)3+ 5!)( |_4|\|9|_|4935. +|-|3% 4.3 3|\|9|_!5|-|, |_33+, |-|3)(0., _!|\|4.%, 45(!! (0|)3, 4|\||) |)|_||\/|_455.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  181. Evil Bit? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Does this interoperate properly with the evil bit?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  182. Don't be daft, this is an April Fools Joke. by JebusTheImpaler · · Score: 1

    Of course this is an April Fool's joke.
    Why?

    1) His email adress is SOB
    2) It's dated April 1st
    3) It's absurd and impossible
    4) Harvard, come on... Everyone knows that's a school for idiots who couldn't get into CalTech. They couldn't cook something like this up.
    5) Restatement of Torts (1934) does not allow (even in its most obtuse interpretation) this type of punitive measure.
    6) HIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS SOB@HARVARD!