Slashdot Mirror


User: DaneelGiskard

DaneelGiskard's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
269
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 269

  1. This is gold :)) on Red Hat Cornering SCO in Delaware · · Score: -1, Redundant

    The GrokLaw site has been slashdotted and is cooling off. Please check again in a few minutes or try the "old" site at Radio or the Google cache.
    Our apologies for this interruption of service, the Webmaster.


    :-))

  2. Re:the ACCC... on ACCC Asks SCO To Explain Themselves · · Score: 1

    Woah...time for a "I for one welcome ... them to manage stuff elsewhere as well" ;)

  3. Re:Infinite Chess on Man Vs Machine In Chess - Who Is Winning? · · Score: 1

    So when we are there, they would just flip a coin at the start of the match and the one who wins also automatically wins the game?

  4. Re:What I need even more on IBM Introduces 'Air Bags' For Laptop Hard Drives · · Score: 1

    So you kick yourself into the mouth often? ;)

  5. Congratulations! on 3G Waves Causes Headaches, Sharpens Memory · · Score: 1

    Looks like they finally found their "killer application"

  6. Re:The Future For Technology on Virtual Grid Supercomputer Goes (Partly) Online · · Score: 1

    You really should not start an insightful comment with "I for one", you will not get the target audience you wish to reach... ;)

  7. Re:Is October 1st in Australia like our April 1st? on Snail Mail As E-Mail · · Score: 1

    Oh come on, time difference is not _that_ high... ;)

  8. Yummy... on China Prepares To Examine MS Windows Code · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has announced GSP agreements with Russia, NATO and the United Kingdom.

    I predict the appearance of the windows source code on some .da.ru site very soon ... or at least in some of the more popular p2p networks :)

  9. The solution ;) on SCO's Roadshow Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    1:30pm The SCO Solution for Identity Management

    'nuff said...

  10. 838 takers ... on Few Takers For RIAA's "Clean Slate" · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... so, how many employees does the RIAA have again? ;-)

  11. 1/1000th of one percent on Few Takers For RIAA's "Clean Slate" · · Score: 1

    ... so...how much is that in elephants please?

  12. Re:A possible spoiler... on The Matrix: Revolutions Theatrical Trailer · · Score: 1

    Of course there is no spoon. Everybody saying so is told to check uppon the spoon in Bush's ass and quickly starts pretending that there is no spoon as well ;-)

  13. Overclocking... on Paper Capable Of Playing Videos Developed · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if I overclock one of these, "burned out" will finally become a whole new meaning...? :)

  14. Amazing... on Google Adds Location Targeted Searching · · Score: 1

    Try "Google LBS Server" as address and you should get a picture of a dust cloud which once has been just that server... ;)

  15. Re:Wi-Fi jargon on Wi-Fi World Record · · Score: 1

    err..messup..other way around (carrier signal = base frequency, base frequency = signal carrying the information)..sorry

    can you also take a look at my revised calculations, where I got to 2k something mbit/s? can you detect my mistake there?

  16. Re:Wi-Fi jargon on Wi-Fi World Record · · Score: 1

    Wow, how does that work? Does the carrier signal which is mapped onto the "base frequency" use a higher frequency than the "base frequency" itself?

  17. Re:Wi-Fi jargon on Wi-Fi World Record · · Score: 1

    Okay, actually speed of light is 300.000km / s of course and the wavelength is not a complete up/down wave, but only the up or down part of the wave and can therefore only present 1 bit of information.

    So, revised calculations:
    300.000km/s --> 2 500 000 000 waves/Bit per s --> 2384 MBit per second "raw" capacity.

    This somehow looks too high, or is that much lost in error correction & stuff?

  18. Re:Wi-Fi jargon on Wi-Fi World Record · · Score: 1

    Just to check if I get this right, the wavelength is 12 cm, which means the signal goes up & down every 12 cm and can therefore represent 2 Bit every 12 cm.

    The speed is 300km/s (speed of light, not accurate). Which means that we have 2500000 waves / second (300 * 1000 * 100 / 12) which translates to 5000000 Bit / s which would be ~4.7 MBit / second "raw" capacity.

    Can anyone please point out any mistakes I might have done? Cheers.

  19. Re:Nice... on Tech Rich Get Richer · · Score: 1

    Oh well, on second view I realized that I really messed up with that, please ignore my posts ;)

  20. Re:Nice... on Tech Rich Get Richer · · Score: 1

    oops...I mean 157 Bil Gates' ;-) my fault, please flame me now :)

  21. Nice... on Tech Rich Get Richer · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...another 23 Bill Gates's and they could throw together and build a space elevator :))

    --> click! ;)

  22. An idea... on Has P2P Become a Passing Fad? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey guys!

    This is just an idea which I'm not more able to think through tonight (it's very later here), but what about a UDP approach to a file sharing system. Everybody sending something to you could definitely be anonymous (UDP does not require a valid source IP). The tricky thing would be how to actually _find_ stuff, because that would need the IP of the potential source to be known. Hmmm...

    Any bright ideas?

  23. Devil... on Mandrake Linux 9.2, Adware Version · · Score: 1

    Ohh...If I were Bill Gates, I would _so_ buy my face into every Mandrake installation for 7k... ;-P

  24. Devastating on Linus to SCO: 'Please Grow Up' · · Score: 1

    Linus to SCO: 'Please Grow Up'

    Oh yeah, that will show them...I can see them shiver already... ;)

  25. Re:Won the law suit? on Register.com Loses Class action Lawsuit · · Score: 1, Funny

    *uh* ... *thinks* ... that's a catch question ... right? *sweats* ..errr

    *ducks*

    both?

    Now if you would have included register.com into that question, it would have been _really_ tricky...