Excellent, a picture of a Samsung product that only looks like an iPad in one single picture, which happens to be the picture you used, of course, which came out in 2006 which was two years after Apple registered their design, which Samsung then went on to help them build. People didn't buy the iPad based on the Samsung Frame, but people did buy the Tab because of the iPad, or so Apples filling says, your mistake is thinking that I give a shit either way, simply because I can see the comedy and fact in what both sides are trying to say.
I don't like vague patents but I also think it's pretty clear that Samsung was trying to cash in on Apples success and that the Tab looks like an iPad, more so than I can say for any other tablet on the market.
Which Samsung claims is so obvoius it was being used in the flim 2001, which must also explain why it was so generic that they had to wait until they were working with Apple to build Apple products before they suddenly started making tablets that looked like iPads, almost 45 years after 2001 came out. Interestingly other Android tablet builders (who didn't have access to Apple designs) seem perfectly capable of making tablets that don't look like iPads.
In fact, almost all of the people I know who own anything by Apple are at least 40, have worked in tech for at least 10-15 years, and typically have at least an undergraduate degree in computer science.
I have to agree, it cracks me up when I hear people yap on about Apple products being status symbols, I know Computer Science professors, members of the IEEE using iPhones and MacBooks to do their work. I know people in many different technical environments using MacBooks and iPhones, I myself have a masters degree in computer science and I can say with no lie that my iPhone 4 and MacBook Air are the best phone and laptop I've ever owned.
I know someone a few months back, who whined that an Apple laptop could never be a real nerds toy because you need a "special Apple screwdriver" to open it up, I think the reality of that is that if you don't already own or know about torx screwdriver's (in a common size no less) then you are not much of a nerd
How about this, how about everyone that uses an Android phone like to THINK they are crackers, like's to pretend when they "hack" their phones WITH SOMEONE ELSES firmware, they are being hardcore. I think it was shown in the past that most of the whiners on here use Windows PCs anyway, I likely use *nix and Linux more often than most of them.
Sure sure. I mean, it didn't have as many features, right? That's what makes something better, features. Gotta get more and more of those features, that'll make it better.
Why don't you head on over to google, do a little looking around at cooperate developed apps developed for your own company, then come back and say sorry for bothering everyone with your "omg apple r evil an own u an ur ipad" post.
As I said above, there is no surprise, but not for the reasons you've suggested. To make this work, a user is required to enter an admin password, If you're a Admin and you let your users have admin rights, you shouldn't be in your job and as I understand it, the same vulnerability used on Microsofts AD, doesn't need an admin password. So, how does that make any sense that Macs in enterprise are more vulnerable?
No, you got it, this is a load of rubbish and is being presented as some sort of reason to bash Macs. If you're a Admin and you let your users have admin rights, you shouldn't be in your job. Interestingly, as I understand it, the same vulnerability used on Microsofts AD, doesn't need an admin password.
So... how does that make any sense that Macs in enterprise are more vulnerable...?
Cap hunted communist's actually, I'm glad that comics have grown a little past that, knee jerk to the latest enemy type of thinking. Although, we still have " Crazy Old Frank" Miller. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Terror_(graphic_novel)
I'm sorry, can we just clear this up. You're saying that the reason Microsoft sells that software you've listed is simply because of the amount they spend on usability studies? And your logic is that just because they are selling, means that it must be down to the money spent on usability studies?
Jeesh, all that time spent locking people in and down and all they had to do was throw some money year after year for a guy to tell them the only thing people want is constant unnecessary UI changes that totally change how you do the same thing.
I'll be honest, this is one good reason why I love using Apple products so much. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fanboy and I love me some Linux on my servers, I'll use and support open source all I can but there is always this feeling behind Apple products that a department actually talks with every other department.
The page looks like one of those "scientific consensus was wrong at some point, therefore the Bible is the way to go" arguments they love so much.
Brilliant isn't it? They basically show how scientists, however strongly they might believe something, are willing to change their views when evidence is given, unlike the religious fruit loops that right garbage like that. The last part made me laugh out loud, "This emerging view depicts Neandertals as having a capacity for creative, flexible behavior somewhat like that of modern people’. Thus, the evidence increasingly supports the biblical position".
There is something very important missing in anyone can do such a thing, whether they have a 50 or 150 IQ. There is a point at which the crime is so heinous, insanity or retardation is not a sufficient excuse for ones actions.
In a comment thread about retards, this just became the most retarded thing I've read all year.
You can't blame Apple or any company for playing this game, they are attempting to do business in 2011 and it's become a fundamental part of the technology business. It's the system that has forced this tit for tat like crap and it needs fixing.
*shrug*, then don't get involved with the competition. I've used Myspace, Facebook and Twitter and I think if anything, I like that I have small friends lists. I don't think I've ever felt like I should have more friends so I can be cool.
Ooh noes, the millions upon millions upon millions of people in the world that well never ever want or need to develop for and Apple platform will never ever catch on to their evil evil scam, when will those millions upon millions upon millions of people ever wake up to evil that is Apple requiring an Apple platform to be used in Apple development.
Slashdot Mirror
...I was pretty moody, impulsive and unfriendly as a kid. Does this mean I can't play MW3 now? :(
Dude If it's THAT much of a problem for you use Firefox on your Mac. Jessh.
No, Chrome was still exposed.
You are an idiot.
Excellent, a picture of a Samsung product that only looks like an iPad in one single picture, which happens to be the picture you used, of course, which came out in 2006 which was two years after Apple registered their design, which Samsung then went on to help them build. People didn't buy the iPad based on the Samsung Frame, but people did buy the Tab because of the iPad, or so Apples filling says, your mistake is thinking that I give a shit either way, simply because I can see the comedy and fact in what both sides are trying to say.
I don't like vague patents but I also think it's pretty clear that Samsung was trying to cash in on Apples success and that the Tab looks like an iPad, more so than I can say for any other tablet on the market.
And as much as Samsung want to protest otherwise, this looks nothing like an iPad.
Which Samsung claims is so obvoius it was being used in the flim 2001, which must also explain why it was so generic that they had to wait until they were working with Apple to build Apple products before they suddenly started making tablets that looked like iPads, almost 45 years after 2001 came out. Interestingly other Android tablet builders (who didn't have access to Apple designs) seem perfectly capable of making tablets that don't look like iPads.
We have an unwritten rule in the UK, never ever use the Daily Mail as your source/citation.
Because Microsoft gave them features that the customers wanted.
It's just a shame they didn't work very well.
In fact, almost all of the people I know who own anything by Apple are at least 40, have worked in tech for at least 10-15 years, and typically have at least an undergraduate degree in computer science.
I have to agree, it cracks me up when I hear people yap on about Apple products being status symbols, I know Computer Science professors, members of the IEEE using iPhones and MacBooks to do their work. I know people in many different technical environments using MacBooks and iPhones, I myself have a masters degree in computer science and I can say with no lie that my iPhone 4 and MacBook Air are the best phone and laptop I've ever owned.
I know someone a few months back, who whined that an Apple laptop could never be a real nerds toy because you need a "special Apple screwdriver" to open it up, I think the reality of that is that if you don't already own or know about torx screwdriver's (in a common size no less) then you are not much of a nerd
How about this, how about everyone that uses an Android phone like to THINK they are crackers, like's to pretend when they "hack" their phones WITH SOMEONE ELSES firmware, they are being hardcore. I think it was shown in the past that most of the whiners on here use Windows PCs anyway, I likely use *nix and Linux more often than most of them.
Also, don't kill cats because you think they are the devils creatures, they are killing the rats. Poor 'puds.
DRM that Apple made totally removable, once you'd downloaded something you wanted.
Except Apple didn't in any way improve them.
Sure sure. I mean, it didn't have as many features, right? That's what makes something better, features. Gotta get more and more of those features, that'll make it better.
Why don't you head on over to google, do a little looking around at cooperate developed apps developed for your own company, then come back and say sorry for bothering everyone with your "omg apple r evil an own u an ur ipad" post.
As I said above, there is no surprise, but not for the reasons you've suggested. To make this work, a user is required to enter an admin password, If you're a Admin and you let your users have admin rights, you shouldn't be in your job and as I understand it, the same vulnerability used on Microsofts AD, doesn't need an admin password. So, how does that make any sense that Macs in enterprise are more vulnerable?
No, you got it, this is a load of rubbish and is being presented as some sort of reason to bash Macs. If you're a Admin and you let your users have admin rights, you shouldn't be in your job. Interestingly, as I understand it, the same vulnerability used on Microsofts AD, doesn't need an admin password. So... how does that make any sense that Macs in enterprise are more vulnerable...?
If things carry on like this for much longer, we won't have houses, let along outhouses.
Cap hunted communist's actually, I'm glad that comics have grown a little past that, knee jerk to the latest enemy type of thinking. Although, we still have " Crazy Old Frank" Miller. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Terror_(graphic_novel)
I'm sorry, can we just clear this up. You're saying that the reason Microsoft sells that software you've listed is simply because of the amount they spend on usability studies? And your logic is that just because they are selling, means that it must be down to the money spent on usability studies? Jeesh, all that time spent locking people in and down and all they had to do was throw some money year after year for a guy to tell them the only thing people want is constant unnecessary UI changes that totally change how you do the same thing.
Okay.
...er, yes it was.
I'll be honest, this is one good reason why I love using Apple products so much. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fanboy and I love me some Linux on my servers, I'll use and support open source all I can but there is always this feeling behind Apple products that a department actually talks with every other department.
The page looks like one of those "scientific consensus was wrong at some point, therefore the Bible is the way to go" arguments they love so much.
Brilliant isn't it? They basically show how scientists, however strongly they might believe something, are willing to change their views when evidence is given, unlike the religious fruit loops that right garbage like that. The last part made me laugh out loud, "This emerging view depicts Neandertals as having a capacity for creative, flexible behavior somewhat like that of modern people’. Thus, the evidence increasingly supports the biblical position".
There is something very important missing in anyone can do such a thing, whether they have a 50 or 150 IQ. There is a point at which the crime is so heinous, insanity or retardation is not a sufficient excuse for ones actions.
In a comment thread about retards, this just became the most retarded thing I've read all year.
You can't blame Apple or any company for playing this game, they are attempting to do business in 2011 and it's become a fundamental part of the technology business. It's the system that has forced this tit for tat like crap and it needs fixing.
*shrug*, then don't get involved with the competition. I've used Myspace, Facebook and Twitter and I think if anything, I like that I have small friends lists. I don't think I've ever felt like I should have more friends so I can be cool.
Ooh noes, the millions upon millions upon millions of people in the world that well never ever want or need to develop for and Apple platform will never ever catch on to their evil evil scam, when will those millions upon millions upon millions of people ever wake up to evil that is Apple requiring an Apple platform to be used in Apple development.