Slashdot Mirror


User: jo42

jo42's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,120
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,120

  1. WAG on Hubble's 'Pillars of Non-Creation' · · Score: 2

    Goes to show that most science is still a lot of WAG... What I want to know, is what is missing from the top right corner? Proof of Alien life (outside of /.) once and for all?

  2. SATA RAID on Serial ATA vs. SCSI - Will it Compete? · · Score: 1

    You could do some nice kick butt SATA RAID controllers. Each drive having its own channel, very fast RAID processor. Yum.

  3. Re:How is $6,341 better than $4000? on Apple Introduces Xserve Rackmount Servers · · Score: 1

    Yes, but is anyone shipping Pentium 4 based 1U servers yet?

  4. Re:Something has been lost here... on r* Programs Being Removed from OpenBSD -current · · Score: 1
    From: owner-freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.ORG
    [mailto:owner- freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of Mark Murray
    Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:44 AM
    To: announce@freebsd.org
    Subject: Perl5 is leaving the base system for 5.0 and after!

    Hello folks!

    It has been decided after some debate to remove Perl5 from the "Base FreeBSD" sources. This decision was not taken lightly, and was taken in consultation with (but not seeking the approval of) the perl5 developer community.

    There are 2 main reasons for this:

    1) Perl5 is getting larger very fast, and FreeBSD cannot afford the time and space to build and maintain it.

    2) Upgrading the "base perl" is a nightmare that regularly breaks upgrades and cross-builds, to the intense annoyance of the FreeBSD developer community.

    Speaking as the "Perl5 guy", keeping FreeBSD's "base perl" up to date was hellish, and folks who wish a return to that state should please consider doing this work in my place. BEWARE! This job is not trivial!

    PERL IS NOT BEING OSTRACISED! FreeBSD is not taking this action because of any dispute between the FreeBSD community and the Perl community - such a dispute DOES NOT EXIST! In fact, the Perl community have been exemplary in their attempts to understand the problem, and in their proposals to deal with it. FreeBSD DOES NOT HATE PERL!

    Some time in the future, perl may be split in half, such that the core language and the standard libraries may be separately installed. In such a case, FreeBSD might be in a position to better deal with the problem of the very large perl libraries. Such splitting will be done by the perl community, NOT by us, although we will be taking note.

    In the meanwhile, the Perl5 Port will continue to be available, and continued discussion indicates that there is very substantial support for it to be installed by default (or near-default) by sysinstall.

    This will result in a FreeBSD that has effectively the same Perl5 that is kept up-to-date in ports, rather than the one that is left to rot in STABLE.

    This update will _NOT_ be MFCed. The first FreeBSD that has no perl in the default sources will be 5.0-RELEASE, when that is released at the end of this year. FreeBSD-4.n will continue with the perl that it currently has.

    The ports system will continue to support Perl5.

    M
    --
    o Mark Murray
    \_
    O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

    This is the moderated mailing list freebsd-announce.
    The list contains announcements of new FreeBSD capabilities,
    important events and project milestones.
    See also the FreeBSD Web pages at http://www.freebsd.org

  5. Re:The obvious question remains on FreeBSD: Perl to be removed · · Score: 3, Informative
    From: owner-freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.ORG
    [mailto:owner- freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of Mark Murray
    Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:44 AM
    To: announce@freebsd.org
    Subject: Perl5 is leaving the base system for 5.0 and after!

    Hello folks!

    It has been decided after some debate to remove Perl5 from the "Base FreeBSD" sources. This decision was not taken lightly, and was taken in consultation with (but not seeking the approval of) the perl5 developer community.

    There are 2 main reasons for this:

    1) Perl5 is getting larger very fast, and FreeBSD cannot afford the time and space to build and maintain it.

    2) Upgrading the "base perl" is a nightmare that regularly breaks upgrades and cross-builds, to the intense annoyance of the FreeBSD developer community.

    Speaking as the "Perl5 guy", keeping FreeBSD's "base perl" up to date was hellish, and folks who wish a return to that state should please consider doing this work in my place. BEWARE! This job is not trivial!

    PERL IS NOT BEING OSTRACISED! FreeBSD is not taking this action because of any dispute between the FreeBSD community and the Perl community - such a dispute DOES NOT EXIST! In fact, the Perl community have been exemplary in their attempts to understand the problem, and in their proposals to deal with it. FreeBSD DOES NOT HATE PERL!

    Some time in the future, perl may be split in half, such that the core language and the standard libraries may be separately installed. In such a case, FreeBSD might be in a position to better deal with the problem of the very large perl libraries. Such splitting will be done by the perl community, NOT by us, although we will be taking note.

    In the meanwhile, the Perl5 Port will continue to be available, and continued discussion indicates that there is very substantial support for it to be installed by default (or near-default) by sysinstall.

    This will result in a FreeBSD that has effectively the same Perl5 that is kept up-to-date in ports, rather than the one that is left to rot in STABLE.

    This update will _NOT_ be MFCed. The first FreeBSD that has no perl in the default sources will be 5.0-RELEASE, when that is released at the end of this year. FreeBSD-4.n will continue with the perl that it currently has.

    The ports system will continue to support Perl5.

    M
    --
    o Mark Murray
    \_
    O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

    This is the moderated mailing list freebsd-announce.
    The list contains announcements of new FreeBSD capabilities,
    important events and project milestones.
    See also the FreeBSD Web pages at http://www.freebsd.org

  6. Re:Why would they do this? on Sun Works to Converge Linux and Solaris · · Score: 0, Troll
    Dear Jon,

    That is the most intelligent thing that you have ever posted on /.

    Linux Bad, FreeBSD Good, Beer Good, Pussy Better

  7. Re:I'll lick my space bar if you lick your toilet on Workstations 'Dirtier Than Toilets' · · Score: 1

    Remember, that which does not kill you, makes you stronger.

  8. Re:One Step in the Right Direction on r* Programs Being Removed from OpenBSD -current · · Score: 1
    Yeah, note the trend of Linux emulating Windows in the bloatware aspect of things.

    FreeBSD Good, Beer Good, Pussy Better.

  9. Hmmmm... on Bomb-Detecting Bees · · Score: 1

    What do they do, buzz out the chemical structure of the molecules or just buzz in Morse code?

  10. Re:Security risk? on User Naming Practices? · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once we had a guy named Bob O. I didn't set him up as "bobo@"...

  11. Re:But what about heat? on Arprotek e-Cube/gBox Barebones Review · · Score: 1
    It looks real dorky. Needs more design work...

    Linux Bad, FreeBSD Good, Beer Good, Pussy Better.

  12. Re:Ugh.... on Can 802.11 Become A Viable Last-Mile Alternative? · · Score: 1
    What I want to know, is who do I sue when there is too much electromagnetic radiation leaking through my copper foil hat and cod piece?!

    Wireless needs to die, just like Linux and Java.

  13. Re:FP? on Swiss ISPs Must Archive E-mail For 6 Months · · Score: 1

    Imagine: 95.42% of the archived e-mail will be spam!

  14. Re:Oh no... on Navi-Like Network Predicted · · Score: 1
    Q: What does the ZDNET article, Navi-Like Network[s] and the SE Lain link have to do with each other?

    A: Nothing!!!

  15. Re:Deutsch UberAuto on Computers and Cars: A Maddening Experience? · · Score: 1
    But what's with that flower on all the Beetles?

    It's for all the girlymen!

  16. Re:But You're Missing The Main Objective on Using the USPTO Against Itself · · Score: 1
    The US Patent Office doesn't run Leenux!!!

    Thank God!

  17. Re:The Ultimate Goal on UK Home Office plan: ID Chips in Everything · · Score: 1
    Imagine what it would be like if a copy of The Anarchist's Cookbook was tracked

    Anyone with half a brain would already have it in ASCII or PDF format. Yet another forkin' stupid idea that is way behind the technological curve.

  18. Re:Run your smtp server on RoadRunner Co-Opting "Organization" Headers · · Score: 1

    What the fork does SMTP have to do with NNTP - the subject of this /. wank-off?

  19. Re:Why? on RoadRunner Co-Opting "Organization" Headers · · Score: 1

    A bit easier to backtrack low lifes posting child p0rn.

  20. Re:Also here on Matrox's New Three-Head Video Card · · Score: 1

    Longhorn produce Bullshit - and lots of it.

  21. Re:LCD? We don't need no steenkin' LCD! on Matrox's New Three-Head Video Card · · Score: 1
    Ah, pffht! I had three [3] SGI 1600SW's running at one time off of one machine. 4800x1024 in (still) state-of-the-art LCD glory.

    CRT's Bad, LCD's Good.
    Linux Bad, FreeBSD Good.

  22. Re:Looks nice on Matrox's New Three-Head Video Card · · Score: 1
    http://www.digit-life.com/articles/matroxparhelia5 12/index.html

    HTTP 404 - File not found

  23. Re:The real question on How bnetd Developers Reverse Engineered Battle.net · · Score: 0, Troll
    The Real Question is, who the fork cares. Too many /dev/nul articles on bnetd and battle.net

    Linux Bad, FreeBSD Good.

  24. Re:100 million dollars?!?! on RealNames Closing Shop · · Score: 1
    $100,000,000

    Fork! D00D, that $100 Very Large could have been put to lots of good use outside of this truly stupid idea...

  25. Re:yawn on When Shipping the Big Iron...? · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why don't you go fdisk yourself.