In fact, it could be cover for the fact that since Qwest did not cooperate, and Redmond is in that territory, that future events hatched in Redmond will not be linked.
Jury Instruction #15: The act of making copyrighted sound recordings available for electronic distribution on a peer-to-peer network, without license from the copyright owners, violates the copyright owners' exclusive right of distribution, regardless of whether actual distribution has been shown.
Spot on. And your example boss speaking is exactly the type of thinking that goes on at Microsoft. They think that because they have so much money, they can game the system.
Of course, it's all part of the conspiracy, what
with a large convicted monopoly based there.
Why has the bush administration kept pressing so hard
for the retroactive immunity for the telcos, but has
not expended the effort to get Qwest involved?
Maybe it's because they don't want the NSA to actually
figure out that the terrorists are based in Redmond.
Note for astromods: Before you mod this down, ask yourself
if you really are thinking outside the box, or if you are
just part of the problem.
Slashdot Mirror
Apparently, such a program is still in use.
Is there a patch in the works?
Jeb, is that you Jeb?
Bass not biting? So, you been fish'n online, eh?
So you allege. You have only regurgitated the same story
that the bush administration has been spinning for years.
Since you provide no evidence, one can only assume that you
are a right-wing brainwashed idiot talking out your ass.
As the U.S. Congress has actually no idea what the NSA is up to,
why should anyone believe you?
And since your uid is seven digits, the odds are even better
that you are just an right-wing astroturfer trying to hide facts.
In fact, it could be cover for the fact that since Qwest did
not cooperate, and Redmond is in that territory, that future
events hatched in Redmond will not be linked.
It's fuck that, suck this, screw that.
Verbs, verbs, verbs, that's all anyone thinks about.
Link
make: *** No rule to make target 'Godzilla!'. Stop.
Remember, it works both ways.
Link
Cool. Does it run Linux?
The 'or later' is decided by the issuer/distributor.
Being a receiver/end-user has no bearing on 'or later'
at the time your receive it, you get it with the license
being set at [L]GPLvX or later.
Example: GPLv3 or later.
But unless and until you re-distribute it, the 'or later' can't kick in.
It's just what it is when you received it. It's GPlv3 in this example.
Now assume GPLv4 does not exist yet.
You could only redistribute under 'GPLv3' or under 'GPLv3 or later'.
But, if GPLv4 does exist, you could re-distribute it as 'GPLv4 or later',
'GPLv4 only', 'GPLv3 or later' (same as orginal), or 'GPLv3 only'.
But, if you don't re-distribute, the 'or later' means nothing.
No. But it may make a future acquisition by Google more attractive.
Patenting business methods that are nothing more
that what used to be called 'management'.
My how management has gotten messed up over the last 30 years.
Not every life form is carbon based, and we
refuse to use any Microsoft generated products.
Even the mice are not edible.
So, they may *outlast* Vista.
And, for a fraction of the cost.
Spot on. And your example boss speaking is exactly the type
of thinking that goes on at Microsoft. They think that because
they have so much money, they can game the system.
Man, that is one slow machine.
Who was getting the sexual favours here?
Is she that ugly and desperate?
And now, does Assistant Deputy Minister Jean-Pierre Blais
got the hots for her?
She should flat out be fired.
Of course, it's all part of the conspiracy, what with a large convicted monopoly based there.
Why has the bush administration kept pressing so hard for the retroactive immunity for the telcos, but has not expended the effort to get Qwest involved?
Maybe it's because they don't want the NSA to actually figure out that the terrorists are based in Redmond.
Note for astromods: Before you mod this down, ask yourself if you really are thinking outside the box, or if you are just part of the problem.
Nor would you as a user want to reply upon an upstream source
as the 'product' may contain binaries with back doors that
you can not see.
I want the source that goes into the 'product', I'm not
going to trust someone to say that the 'product' was built
using version x.y.z of some code.
The point is Gartner getting their name out there.
Otherwise, they might as well be dead and useless.
Oh, wait.
Final word *from* Ars's Ryan Paul.
Sheesh.
Ken Thompson
Link
Translation: Nearly half resigned, and nearly half were fired.
They have no one left to cook.