Slashdot Mirror


IBM Seeks US Patents For Offshoring US Jobs

theodp writes "IBM and other corporations are seeking patents for inventions covering the offshoring of US jobs. The USPTO is considering IBM's patent application for Outsourcing of Services, a 'method for identifying human-resource work content to outsource offshore of an organization' to 'countries where cheaper labor prices and/or cheaper materials are available.' Then there's Big Blue's Electronic Marketplace for Identifying, Assessing, Reserving and Engaging Knowledge-Workers for an Assignment Using Trade-Off Analysis, which provides a handy-dandy IBM calculator that drives home the point that you'll pay less for IGS India workers, whether onshore or offshore. And with its System and Method of Using Speech Recognition at Call Centers to Improve Their Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction, IBM describes how to operate in 'low cost foreign countries' with 'support people not having good English language skills, or having an accent that makes it difficult to understand them' by exploiting technology developed for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as other accent reduction techniques."

203 comments

  1. Go for it by josquint · · Score: 2

    I'm sick of calling Dell, etc. and getting an "engrish is my 3rd language" call center representative. If they way to increase the cost of outsourcing, thereby decreasing feasibility, works for me.

    1. Re:Go for it by fymidos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IBM is portrayed as the bad guy, but some jobs will be outsourced -like it or not- and they *are* doing this for their customers.

      That said, i'm not quite certain how "exploiting technology developed for students who are deaf or hard of hearing" can possibly be patented ... i mean could the "usage of wheels to help aeroplanes take off" ever be granted a patent?

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    2. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love the way you criticize the English skills of call center reps, then follow that criticism with one of the more ungrammatical sentences I've read all day. Very nice, indeed.

    3. Re:Go for it by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It doesnt bother me anymore, but it used to greatly.

      Now, i just demand to talk to an American supervisor right off the bat.. If they refuse, i take my business elsewhere and be sure corporate knows why.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Go for it by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      Your post was so ironic I wish I could mod it +1, Ferric.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    5. Re:Go for it by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

      NOBODY forces you to give Dell your money. So stop your complaining.

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    6. Re:Go for it by foobsr · · Score: 1

      could the "usage of wheels to help aeroplanes take off" ever be granted a patent?

      I bet, given that a wheel topologically is not very far from a sling, for which you for instance may find (among a plethora of other innovations) ...:
      "Accordingly, it is a general object of the present invention to provide an improved and simplified breast support. It is a particular object of the present invention to provide a sling-type breast support. It is another particular object of the present invention to provide an improved sling-type breast support, which may be incorporated in an article of clothing. It is still another particular object of the present invention to provide an improved breast support, which provides women with enhanced support to their breasts, while reducing the discomfort occurring when wearing a bra. It is still yet another particular object of the present invention to provide an improved breast support of a sling-type, which is a single piece and supports a woman's breast from the lower portion thereof. And, it is a still further particular object of the present invention to provide a sling-type breast support which is incorporated in a garment so as to provide a wearer with a freer braless-type of appearance, while providing adequate support to the breasts of the wearer to prevent sagging."
      http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6113460-description.html , US Patent Issued on September 5, 2000

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    7. Re:Go for it by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, people who are not very skilled in English will have even more trouble communicating with someone else who has different deficiencies. So even though he or she isn't making the point very well, that inadvertently makes the point.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:Go for it by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      but some jobs will be outsourced -like it or not- and they *are* doing this to their customers.

      there I fxed that for you.

      lets not kid ourselves. They are not doing this FOR us they are doing this TO us.
      they are cutting back on services and trying to save wages.
      maybe you wold like to give back 75% of you wages. you know, to help us out.

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    9. Re:Go for it by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      That said, i'm not quite certain how "exploiting technology developed for students who are deaf or hard of hearing" can possibly be patented ... i mean could the "usage of wheels to help aeroplanes take off" ever be granted a patent?

      Web transcription services for podcasts - you extract the audio channel from a podcast as an MP3 file, upload the file to the transcription services server. The file is chopped up into separate pieces, with each piece transcribed separately. Each piece is re-edited until it is up to scratch. Then the pieces are spliced together with the splices removed. The resulting transcription is returned to the submitter.

      It is a complicated process, so it could possibly patented.

      Really, it's much like the pre-1950's accounting services in large corporations. Before they had mainframes to do batch processing, they would employ huge halls of clerks to do the accounting manually. Everything was tallied and cross-checked at each stage to make sure

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Go for it by mikael · · Score: 1

      that there weren't any mistaked carried through to the final results. Today, this would be the equivalent of parallel processing techniques.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Go for it by fymidos · · Score: 2, Informative

      My point was that the technology is already developed, they want to patent a different usage of it....

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    12. Re:Go for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So what? Nobody forces you to read posts on /. and yet you clearly feel that you're entitled to criticize them.

    13. Re:Go for it by mikael · · Score: 1

      It's still being developed - the transcription service could very well eat into IBM's voice recognition markets.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:Go for it by pokerdad · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of calling Dell, etc. and getting an "engrish is my 3rd language" call center representative. If they way to increase the cost of outsourcing, thereby decreasing feasibility, works for me.

      Many larger companies (and I can say with certainty that Dell is amoungst these) have higher tiered warranties that you can purchase which guarentee support from an English speaking country.

      But the reality is that most consumers only care about what language tech support speaks when they have to call them, and aren't willing to shell out the extra bucks at the time of purchase. In general, society rewards tech companies that keep prices low, regardless of how they do it. So it should be no surprise that tech companies cut every corner they can get away with.

    15. Re:Go for it by Scamwise · · Score: 3, Funny

      A call center representative is paid to have the ability to communicate effectively, if your customers are from an English speaking country that means speaking clear and understandable English.
      A poster on the internet however is not...

      --
      Sam "to lazy to register" Look
    16. Re:Go for it by jrminter · · Score: 1

      So use chat. Most non native speakers read and write English better than they speak it. Worked for me.

    17. Re:Go for it by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 1

      You must be new around here :D

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    18. Re:Go for it by ultranova · · Score: 1

      A call center representative is paid to have the ability to communicate effectively

      I was under the impression that a call center representative is paid to confuse and delay callers long enough that the warranty runs out. Effective communication would seem contrary to this goal, unless of course the particular company is pursuing the alternative strategy of convincing the caller that he has to buy lots of extra stuff to make things work.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    19. Re:Go for it by jack455 · · Score: 1

      Call 1.
      Eu falo Portugese. Eu sou de Brasil.
      Hang up.
      Call 2.
      Hablo español. Soy de Venezuela.

  2. MY patent by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    IBM describes how to operate in 'low cost foreign countries' with 'support people not having good English language skills, or having an accent that makes it difficult to understand them' by exploiting

    I have patented a method for cutting sentences short to make them more clear.

    1. Re:MY patent by fymidos · · Score: 1

      and did you actually use it on the patent application ?

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    2. Re:MY patent by garry_g · · Score: 1

      Wonder if I should put in for a patent on identifying the urge for critical bodily relief and subsequent acting on the urge.

      When is the USPO finally going to kick the big players in their behinds for even thinking of patenting such obvious things?

    3. Re:MY patent by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Then please don't litigate.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    4. Re:MY patent by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      (don't sue)

    5. Re:MY patent by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Thats whats puzzling me. I was always under the impression your not supposed to patent business practices. These are not INVENTIONS.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  3. I will apply for a patent of India style English. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1: Apply for a patent of India style English
    2: ???
    3: ???
    4: Profit!

  4. oh boy by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

    for a second, I thought they were patenting offshoring/outsourcing. Now that would have been wacky...

    1. Re:oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was what i thought, too. that would have been rich

    2. Re:oh boy by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      not offshoring- just outsourcing- you will still be able to offshore work- but if you "outsource it" you will owe a licensing fee to IBM

  5. At least Windows is made in the USA by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    See, now we see what IBM is really all about, using free software to make it easier to throw more people out of work in the states. At least with Microsoft, there's developers actually working in the USA....

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by similar_name · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/322652_msftvancouver06.html
      I wouldn't show MS as an example of Made in the USA.
      lookup the xbox production sometime too. http://www.google.com/search?q=xbox+production+international

    2. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nice to see you're proud Windows is made in your country. I'm proud it's not made in mine.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    3. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Did I say X-Box? I thought I said -Windows-.

      --
      This is my sig.
    4. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by similar_name · · Score: 1
    5. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by tjstork · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nice to see you're proud Windows is made in your country. I'm proud it's not made in mine.

      That's a good comeback, but we both know your country can't make anything even remotely as good as Windows, and therefor doesn't even try.

      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by pchan- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, now we see what IBM is really all about, using free software to make it easier to throw more people out of work in the states. At least with Microsoft, there's developers actually working in the USA.... Funny you should say that. I've been interviewing for new jobs recently. I've been contacted about a dozen times in the past two weeks for jobs at Microsoft. However, I wasn't contacted my Microsoft. I was contacted by nice ladies and gentlemen with heavy Indian accents who work at companies that place consultants at MS. They were quick to tell me that they sponsor H1Bs. Now, I have nothing against foreign developers and worked with several very talented ones, but it's become apparent to me that MS is turning into an H1B farm, and as an American developer, I don't particularly want to work in that kind of company. But at least you're proud that their products are made in the USA. Now how about we get it made by (mostly) Americans?
    7. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where people work may be important to specific requirements of some job, but there is no global concern for location across problem domains. It isn't important to coddle one of the highest-paid professions within the U.S. that doesn't require graduate or professional education. There are intelligent people capable of solving some subset of labor demands outside of the U.S. willing to work for less. This is good for them, as they naturally would enjoy a higher standard of living, and good for the owners of businesses and their customers, who wish to also make a living and have affordable products.

      The only people that whine about it of course are those that aren't worth what they are paid and want to continue bottom-feeding at the upper quintile, even if the market determines that they aren't as precious and valuable as they think they are.

      So yes, IBM is about ruthless business. That's what it was about in the '80s and the '40s, too. That is in fact what Microsoft is about also, which as we all know, lives fat off of the tit of Office and Windows taxes. Microsoft has been investing in India and China for many years, and you can be sure that it will continue to do so as their respective economies develop.

    8. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by mcneely.mike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      rah rah, USA... pathetic.

      If you consider Windows good, I've got some swamp land in Florida for you.

      GOOD? GOOD? Wow. Some people never learn, do they.

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    9. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      IBM is really all about, using free software to make it easier to throw more people out of work in the states. At least with Microsoft, there's developers actually working in the USA....

      But lots are H1B's and MS is lobbying for more.

    10. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      H1B's pay taxes just like you do. The problem with outsourcing is that people in other countries pay taxes overseas and not here, which will eventually cause a lot of problems.

      Also, H1B's live "here", so their cost of living is comparable to yours, which means they can't settle for a fraction of your salary like an outsourced IT worker will.

      IF you're good at what you do, you don't have to fear H1B's. You should however fear outsourcing jobs overseas, which is bad for the economy and workers here.

      Just my 2 cents.

    11. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Did they pay the same amount for college, too?

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    12. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by pchan- · · Score: 1

      You make good points, AC. However, it's not the taxes I'm worried about, it's the salaries. Perhaps their cost of living is comparable to mine _for as long as they're in the country_. But their families are in their home countries, where they spend much less. When they return home, they will buy houses at their local rates and they will retire at their country's cost of living level, so they need to save far less than I do (since I will live in the US for the rest of my life). The rates the MS contractors were offering were well below market rates for my experience level. There was audible stammering when I told them what my salary requirements were, they were hoping for something around 60% of that. The fact that they expect to be able to hire someone that matches my experience at that price tells me that there is downward price pressure. I do not fear the H1Bs. I want them to be paid *more* so that companies like MS don't have an excuse to low-ball local software developers.

      As for outsourcing, I've been part of it. I agree that it's bad. But it's not terminal. The reality is that anything that is marginalized will transfer offshore, but high quality stuff will stay here. Compare it to the manufacturing industries where all the low paying jobs moved moved to China, but advanced development and design and high precision manufacturing stayed in the U.S. China doesn't come up with anything new, they just copy. India doesn't create new software, they implement specs for something that is well-understood. I come up with something new. I am given a high level description of "make a product that does this," and I think it through. If you're writing marginalized software, reimplementing the same tired stuff or just coding to a spec you had no part in, you should be very worried about outsourcing.

    13. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "China doesn't come up with anything new, they just copy"

      People in the West said that about Japan until the mid 1970s.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    14. Re:At least Windows is made in the USA by SuhlScroll · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Uncle Bill's not making enough money.

  6. Exploit this... by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...by exploiting technology developed for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as other accent reduction techniques."

    Speaking as a guy that's 70% deaf, these "techniques" could suck the chrome off a Harley. I have to ask accented people to repeat themselves, speak slower, and have YET to find one that knows the meaning of the word 'enunciate'. Heck, I had to get transferred 3-4 times one call to find someone who knew the definition of either "deaf" OR "hearing-impaired".

    I won't argue that these patents might make some cash in the short term, but I'm curious if they've factored in the value of consumer good will...

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    1. Re:Exploit this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't argue that these patents might make some cash in the short term, but I'm curious if they've factored in the value of consumer good will...

      ZERO. Where else are you going to go? India is where everyone answers the phone, everyone.

    2. Re:Exploit this... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      At my last "real" job, providing support for Linux/Windows2K on Stinkpads and servers/desktops there were several young women (very typical IMHO) who would speak so softly that I continually asked, please speak up I can't hear you, over and over again. Finally at the end of the "meeting" with the young ladies (young American, Anglo ladies) I would say "I'm sorry but I just cant make out what you said, please send me an email.

      It must be noted that other people, men in particular, were perfectly understandable even the Russian and Indian engineers.

      Many young women just think its genteel to speak softly and refuse to speak up to someone who is hard of hearing, and even get mad when you don't understand them!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    3. Re:Exploit this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't argue that these patents might make some cash in the short term, but I'm curious if they've factored in the value of consumer good will...

      Actually, having experienced this myself:
      You'll listen to questions (pre-recorded by a native english speaker) and Apu or whoever at the other end of the phone will listen for you answer, then push a button which branches to the next question. (Or the button which says "I'm sorry, I didn't understand your answer. Would you like me to repeat the question?") If you have a problem for which they have an answer, it will be perfectly clear. Otherwise, watch out. But the same thing applies to, for example, any Windows help file.

    4. Re:Exploit this... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if they've factored in the value of consumer good will... I will argue the same point I argued when we were discussing Microsoft's targeted advertising in the basic O/S patent. Isn't it a good thing to make outsourcing more expensive for US companies?

      I hope they make the patent licensing prohibitively expensive, but even if they make licensing cheap, it will still raise the cost of outsourcing and I view that as generally a good thing.
    5. Re:Exploit this... by F4_W_weasel · · Score: 1

      ..could suck the chrome off a Harley...

      Harley also outsource, they have a plant in Brazil.
      They're not in Kansas (alone) anymore.

    6. Re:Exploit this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you figured out that customer good will doesn't mean $hit these days?

  7. Yet more stupid patents by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Patenting business methods that are nothing more
    that what used to be called 'management'.

    My how management has gotten messed up over the last 30 years.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  8. Isn't this a good thing? by Kainaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If a few companies patent the entire outsourcing process, they will make it difficult for others to outsource. Then, there will be more domestic jobs and they'll have to work with immigration to outsource the labor here at home (where they will at least pump a little of their pay back into the economy).

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    1. Re:Isn't this a good thing? by patmandu · · Score: 1

      Everyone except IBM, who could use their patent as much as they like. Ducky...

      Patents are often used like trading cards. One company will put up N of their patents for use by another company who supplies M of theirs in exchange. It's just another card in the deck.

  9. Wow. by similar_name · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm going to patent the process for getting patents.

    That'll show 'em.

    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to patent the process for getting patents.

      That'll show 'em.
      If you succeed in getting that patent accepted it would be a great boon to the GDP if you would sue a member of the RIAA for violating the patent. Their lawyers would want to file prior art. Greenpeace however, would be highly upset over the number of trees this would take out etc. Production of "Santa Claus letters" when the judge said "put them right here" in Miracle on 34th Street would have nothing on this delivery.
    2. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll going to patent One-Click! Patenting.

    3. Re:Wow. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm going to patent the process for getting patents.
      I think IBM patented that in the Seventiest
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  10. anyone else notice this? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they're sucessful in holding up that first patent, that means no other companies could do it!!!! I hope they win when someone sues them or they sue someone over it. Then you'll only get cheap foreigners that don't speak english well when you call IBM support. I'm all for this one!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:anyone else notice this? by rlds · · Score: 1

      It will be pretty interesting if IBM gets this patent. That would be just another blow to the economics of offshoring. I find it hard to believe, however, how they could litigate this patent application successfully as prior art is quite evident. But, hey, let them have so the corporate lawyers of HP, IBM, etc., etc. fight it out.

    2. Re:anyone else notice this? by sanman2 · · Score: 1

      Next they need a patent on firing people, or patents on certain soft phrases used for firing. How about patenting "downsizing", "rightsizing", etc?

    3. Re:anyone else notice this? by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      - Hello Sir. My name is Sanjeeb. How may I help you?
      Hi, I have trouble logging in to...
      - Can you give me your employee number, Sir?
      Sure, it's 0052975
      - Thank, you. Now, how are you doing, Sir?
      I'm fine, thank you
      - Did you have a nice weekend, Sir?
      Yes, thank you. Listen, I have trouble...
      - Hmm... let me see. I will make a trouble ticket for you, Sir. Is that alright with you?
      Yeah, I assume...
      - Thank you, Sir. Is there anything else I can do for you, Sir
      No, that will be all, thank you.
      - Have a nice day, Sir

  11. ibm watcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another problem for IBM....

    get
    a test

  12. Hey don't worry by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Be happy.

    In a couple of years the dollar will have fallen so far that the Indians will be off shoring to you!

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Hey don't worry by corychristison · · Score: 0

      In the infamous words of Micheal Kelso:
      BURN!

    2. Re:Hey don't worry by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Be happy.

      In a couple of years the dollar will have fallen so far that the Indians will be off shoring to you! Then we'll see if your Hindi is better than their English! :-)
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. Can they do this? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Specifically, can you patent a business practice, or a business model?

    I can understand patenting technologies that lead up to it, but patenting the whole thing? I have no idea if that's within the scope of a patent...

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Can they do this? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      That's fairly irrelevant. What matters is whether the patent office will grant the patent. After that, it's simply a matter of waving the patent around and threatening people with expensive litigation.

      This is why patents suck these days: the vast majority do nothing to improve society, and are merely giant clubs in lawsuit wars.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re: Can they do this? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Specifically, can you patent a business practice, or a business model? Yes. The US Congress streamlined patent litigation by setting up a special court to cover it, and that court immediately set about ruling that everything under the sun is patentable.
      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Can they do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Specifically, can you patent a business practice, or a business model? It depends. In the sane world that most people inhabit, no of course you can't. In the US, yes you can.
    4. Re: Can they do this? by ls+-la · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. The US Congress streamlined patent litigation by setting up a special court to cover it, and that court immediately set about ruling that everything under the sun is patentable.
      That gives me a great idea. Hold on while I patent sunlight.
    5. Re:Can they do this? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Hey, IBM might require astronomical sums to license the patent, making outsourcing no longer feasible. It's their master plan to save the US labor market while being able to outsource themselves!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    6. Re:Can they do this? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Specifically, what you can patent is a business Process.
      IANAL, YMMV, etc.

    7. Re:Can they do this? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I have no idea if that's within the scope of a patent...

      That hasn't stopped other bullshit patents. (Hmmm, can I patent bullshit?)

    8. Re:Can they do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's fairly irrelevant. What matters is whether the patent office will grant the patent. After that, it's simply a matter of waving the patent
      > around and threatening people with expensive litigation.

      You don't need patents for that. 3DFX sued Videologic (who?) when the latter won the Dreamcast 3d chip contract. It was settled, eventually, out of court with Videologic paying 3DFX's legal fees, even though it was a baseless, laughable lawsuit. But it didn't cost 3DFX anything, so why not try it. (This is supposedly secret, so don't tell anyone. It was a few years ago now, though, so I doubt anyone's bothered. I'm sure these `it was settled out of court` cases often end up this way).

    9. Re:Can they do this? by kansas1051 · · Score: 1

      The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the Court that hears patent appeals) recently addressed this issue (in the context of arbitration) and determined that you can't patent a method that can be performed mentally (e.g., all in a person's head). So, to answer you question, you can't patent a business method if it isn't limited to use of a particular machine (like a processor that executes an arbitration algorithm).

    10. Re:Can they do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to patent making a profit.

    11. Re:Can they do this? by Abattoir · · Score: 1

      Yes they certainly can, and IBM holds thousands of patents on business methods and processes. In fact, this is one of the ways they achieve the record number of patents filed/awarded every year. I used to work for IBM, and one of the best ways to rise the technical career ladder, rather than the management ladder, is to file and be awarded more patents. IBM has a whole process for how they create patents, reward employees who create patents that earn revenue, and a whole other host of patent-related methods. I'm sure that is all patented as well.

      For more on business method patents, see wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_method_patent

    12. Re: Can they do this? by Hollinger · · Score: 1
      Sunlight simulator

      A sunlight simulator includes an elongated, cylindrical housing, an artifical light source disposed along the longitudinal axis thereof, and a plurality of light collecting subassemblies equidistantly spaced radially from and around the light source. The light source is of a type that emits a substantial amount of radiation in the UV portion of the spectrum. The light collecting subassemblies provide a plurality of individually and selectively adjustable beams of UV radiation. A plurality of light guides are provided for directing the radiation to desired locations.


      Too late.
  14. Nope. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    I checked the link, and this isn't coming from The Onion.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. Time for the Revolution! by gbutler69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My ancestors fought in order to have equitable pay for work, decent working conditions, and something approaching a society where there is a reasonable middle-class.

    This is the kind of thing that seeks to have the U.S. be like a third-world nation. A small group of people who control most of the wealth and everyone else not much more than slaves.

    I for one, will not stand for it. I WILL rise up. I WILL start the fucking revolution. It is time for us American citizens to wake up from our slumber. We need to hang these fuckers. Every last one of them.

    They have no loyalty to anything but the money in their own pockets. The rest of the worlds people should do the same in their countries. If they won't, then that is up to them to live in squalor.

    I say, No Way! Not here! My ancestors didn't die in Steel Mills and Coal Mines etc. in order for the few to be permitted to take everything away from the many.

    It is time to rise up! Time to start the revolution. This MUST NOT be permitted.

    Only cowards will rest on their laurels while everything is stolen away from us like this. This is MY COUNTRY and I WILL FIGHT for it.

    WAKE UP PEOPLE! THIS IS PURE EVIL!

    Tear it down. Tear it all down. Time for a house cleaning. Time to teach the moneyed elite that we will not stand for it.

    Don't give me any crappy economic arguments about comparative advantage and such. If the only comparative advantage is that one workforce has rights to decent working condition and decent wages and one doesn't, then fuck economics.

    Take these people in their fancy business suits that care not one shit for you and other American Citizens. Hang them!

    Rise up! Rise up! Don't be a coward! Don't sit idly by while you are robbed of everything your forebears fought and died for.

    Wake up people of America! Wake up!

    Fight for your rights! Fight to death if necessary! Do not allow this wholesale theft of the American Dream!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, God forbid that the living conditions of some poor soul in a third world country are improved because they get paid for what in America would be a minimum wage job that would not put an American in the middle class that you are planning to fight for.

    2. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ancestors fought in order to have equitable pay for work, decent working conditions, and something approaching a society where there is a reasonable middle-class.

      The people in the developing world of China, India, and Latin America are merely doing now what our ancestors did back then. They are taking their rightful piece of the world pie. And as they get richer they will fight for equitable pay, decent working conditions, and a middle class. In doing so they will become more expensive labor. And they won't listen to your revolution talk, because they see that the worst of the worst of American poverty would be considered well off in their part of the world.

      If you want to fight a revolution, fight against that sense of American entitlement you have. Fight for educational opportunities, and open your mind to be flexible in a world without borders. You will never be able to build a wall around us or go back to an industrial past. That aint ever gonna happen.

    3. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relax,

      They won't get the patent. The politics of granting it would cause the revolution you advocate and most of us agree.

    4. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AMEN! I live in a somewhat poor country, and here we have TONS of outsourced jobs. I tried taking one, but turned it down because: workers get paid 75 dollars a week on 10 work days (which is a lot, compared to the $45 dlls. a week average salary. They get fooled into thinking they're in a clean business, doing an honorable job, but in reality it's nothing but learning to bow down to new overlords. All so that some corporate swine can fill hi pockets.

      Also, they purposefully get the kids fresh out of school: the ones whose English is the most horrible! The less experienced, which can be payed the least amount of money! It's creating a lot of wealth, but it's also cheapening the lifestyle, so that the ones who were poor are becoming poorer, the wealthy wealthier, and the middle class are nothing but corporate slaves. And in the meantime, the workers keep getting fired when they have sometime in the business, to prevent raises in salary, and yet more incompetent kids take those jobs.

      Not just the USA, but the whole world needs to come up with proper arrangements so that we all can benefit from international trade, not be pawns for big companies. This is screwing up the whole world.

    5. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Kamineko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lazlow: "Let's go over here to line 4, hello caller, what's your name?"
      Jeff: "Jeff from Rockford."
      Lazlow: "Hello Jeff, what's up?"
      Jeff: "I want to tell you and your listeners about a once-in-a-lifetime
                  chance to make a difference. There's a rally tomorrow evening at
                  the park. Starting at 7. Although we'll be painting banners and
                  singing songs and all day to prepare for it. Then, when tens-of-
                  thousands have gathered in the park, we're gonna march onto Town
                  Hall. Lazlow, the people have spoken! And they have said 'no, not
                  in my town!' So folks, if you're listening, and want to make a
                  difference, get yourself down to the park, and prepare to bring
                  democracy back to the people."
      Lazlow: "So...what's this rally about, Jeff?"
      Jeff: "It's about people standing up and being counted. It's about the
                  future. It's about telling those morons in the suits 'no thanks!
                  Not in my town! Not while I have a breath in my body and hope in
                  my soul! I will not, I cannot let this pass!'"
      Lazlow: "Let what pass?"
      Jeff: "It's about grabbing the town by the balls and saying 'listen son,
                  either put-up, or shut up! No more Mr. Nice-guy. No more easy
                  solutions for difficult problems!' It's about what it means to be
                  an American. It's about giving something back."
      Lazlow: "Giving what back, Jeff?"
      Jeff: "Hope! Dreams! Belief!"
      Lazlow: "Belief in what, I mean, look Jeff, I..I admire your passion,
                      really I do, but...what will people be marching for? Wh..what's
                      your rally about!?"
      Jeff: "It's about justice, Mr. Low! A chance to shine and make a
                  difference! About thousands of people walking side-by-side as
                  brother marchers. Only one thing on their minds - the chance to
                  make a difference! Bring your friends! Nothing shows a man how
                  much you mean to him more than the chance to walk together for
                  justice! Bring your kids! They can paint signs, and we'll even
                  have a face-painter, and a vegen bar-be-que. Bring your parents,
                  dude, even the elderly care about tomorrow!"
      Lazlow: "I understand that, it sounds like a great rally, but w..we're
                      not a political station and you haven't really told us why
                      people should do this...what is it about?!?"
      Jeff: "Look..look, do you wanna help or not??"
      Lazlow: "I don't know what I'm helping!"
      Jeff: "You're helping America! What kind of patriot are you? It's a
                  rally!!"
      Lazlow: "You don't know what it's for, do you!?!"
      Jeff: "It's for hope. Please come, everybody! It'll be real good!"
      Lazlow: "Alright, you fight the power, brother!"
    6. Re:Time for the Revolution! by ThePawArmy · · Score: 1

      It's not wholesale theft, it's a fire sale!

    7. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. The only good CEO is a dead CEO.

      Fight for your rights! Fight to death if necessary!

      This is why calls for revolt fail. Because unlike our ancestors, we are no longer willing to die to secure a better life for someone else. Even calls to make things better for our children don't work when so many middle class folks haven't bothered to have any children.

      Would you gather arms and march on Washington, knowing that you will be slain by the Army, in the hope that your sacrifice will encourage even more to march and revolt, so that eventually things will be better for your neighbors and your neighbor's children?

      Nah, I wouldn't either. And I'm one of the few that agree with you.

    8. Re:Time for the Revolution! by HexaByte · · Score: 1
      Sergeant HexaByte reporting for duty, Colonel!

      --
      HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
    9. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of thing that seeks to have the U.S. be like a third-world nation. A small group of people who control most of the wealth and everyone else not much more than slaves.

      I would like to point out that the laws of economics (Adam Smith, Ricardo, etc.) do not guarantee a vibrant middle class. Right-wing economists imply it does, but it simply does not. They fib.

    10. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and yet I bet the most the parent will ever do to "fight the powers that be" is post on a freakin message board or blog about it. Its like the dude that got tazered at the john kerry speech and everybody stood and watched.

    11. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! Keep it down, I'm tryin to watch Idol dammit! Can't you wait for the break before talking to me? .... Some people.

    12. Re:Time for the Revolution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you gather arms and march on Washington, knowing that you will be slain by the Army, in the hope that your sacrifice will encourage even more to march and revolt, so that eventually things will be better for your neighbors and your neighbor's children?
      Nah, I wouldn't either. And I'm one of the few that agree with you. You might not. Unless things got a lot worse, I wouldn't either, and not until I was pretty damn confident that it was the only way to get things done. But for many people, there is a tipping point - a time when things have grown to such a critical mass where we will do whatever is necessary to punish the crimes (perhaps not in the legal sense, but certainly morally criminal) that have been perpetrated upon us. This point is certainly different for everyone. I can't even say what that point is for myself, and I sincerely hope that I never find out.

      That said, a good old fashioned revolution may be in order. I certainly know there are people preparing for it - some who are ready to fight when the day comes, some looking for ways to escape the conflict, and I'm sure many other scenarios. And these are people who cover the entire gamut of society in the US - from the staunchest of conservatives to the most nonviolent vegan dirty hippies you can imagine (okay, I admit it - I'm vegan, but I still know how to take a shower).

      One particular person I'm thinking of is extremely liberal, gay, nonviolent... Was friends with Ken Kesey, is still in touch with some of the people who were on the bus, helped sneak people into Canada to avoid the draft - I could go on and on. He's the last person you'd ever take for a fighter - but if things get much worse, he's made peace with the fact that he might have to fight and die to prevent an even worse future - not just for America, but for the world.

      As for me? I'm not much of a fighter. I'm a pretty good shot, but when I think "revolution" I'm imagining tanks rolling down the streets. Those brave enough to fight against that are likely to be giving their life to take just a few, snipers, people with access to or the ability to produce explosives, and... Well, that's really about all I've got. I don't really want to fall into any of those categories, so my backup plan has been learning to survive in the wild - and if need be, offer that knowledge and possibly shelter to those staging for the front lines. One thing is clear though, if this revolution does ever come, I know what side I'll be on.

      P.S. Hello there Homeland Security Drone #347. Please simply include this in my file, there's no need to torture mH(&FTa7J98h*
      *NO CARRIER*
    13. Re:Time for the Revolution! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I WILL start the fucking revolution.
      By POSTING on an internet FORUM!
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. Laugh, its funny by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This is a joke, right?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  17. Buy Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time I've called AppleCare I've spoken to someone who spoke English as their first language (or good enough that I couldn't tell).

    1. Re:Buy Apple? by LEgregius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I called apple the other day for a technical problem on a machine, and the person I spoke to did not speak English as his first language. He also didn't speak it very well or understand me very well. We managed to communicate well enough in the end, but I was not very happy with my experience. Either way, Apple does hire people who don't speak "perfect" English. Incidently, English is very complicated, and it takes constant effort to speak or write it clearly.

    2. Re:Buy Apple? by jack455 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but I'd like the person supporting the product to at least be in the country where it's made. Call me crazy.

  18. That was filed from India! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    What is more galling is that the entire patent application was punched up by grunts in Bangalore. Would very much like to see a headline like, "IBM replaces CEO with Muniyandi Appannakaruppandi Joshi, a graduate of Aiyyappa Institute of Mangagement Sciences (second class, registered with Govt of India), for one tenth of the salary."

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:That was filed from India! by Lengyel · · Score: 1

      My coauthor Larry Orlowski and I wrote about outsourcing CEOs in The Corner Office in Bangalore. I hope that our NY Times Op-Ed was cited in the patent application.

    2. Re:That was filed from India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great article. I see horseshit about "outsourcing" all the time. And I see people try to justify, or excuse, it by saying, "Well, the people in those foreign countries are much, much better off. They were starving before." Absolute horse shit. I've seen so many instances of sweatshops full of slaves, cities in china where they are dedicated to producing specific products. A sock city. A mattress city. A pillow city, and on, and on. It is insane. They are people too. They don't deserve to be treated like shit anymore than anyone else does. If a company wants to take jobs to another country, that's quite alright with me, but they absolutely must treat those people with dignity. No 18 hour work days. No forcing the employees to make a choice between going home and eating. No "company dormitories", i.e. slave quarters.

      It is unbelievable to me. If I was a manager who made a decision to outsource some jobs, I would not be able to live with myself. Money is the WEAKEST justification for being an asshole, which is what these people are. People can say "Living standards over there are different", and once again, I would respond horseshit. There is no "process" by which people "attain" dignified living conditions. These people are OWED these conditions because they are human beings, there needs to be no other justification.

      It seems to me that the current corporate "culture" forces people to become "narrow". It makes them become less and less human, more like robots or statistics. Maybe its the way that companies are structured. The majority of employees ultimately have no control over their work, and therefore, no real freedom. Perhaps they have creative freedom, and can do their job as they please, but it really isn't "their" job. It is work they are doing for their boss. I think this is an interesting dynamic because I get the feeling that as people lose control over their work, they seem to be losing control over other things that happen in their lives as well, since the majority of their lives are spent at work. They become used to losing control over their work so that when it happens outside work, they become less resistent to it.

    3. Re:That was filed from India! by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      Would very much like to see a headline like, "IBM replaces CEO with Muniyandi Appannakaruppandi Joshi, a graduate of Aiyyappa Institute of Mangagement Sciences (second class, registered with Govt of India), for one tenth of the salary."

      I too would like to see this. Would have big bang for the buck. For just one CEO @ 12M USD you could have 120 North Americas finest, or 1200 overseas help desk people. Do the CFO and other VPs and you could have an army of talent. And if you actually hire real technical talent and focus on the products value it would not be so hard and expensive to sell the product.

    4. Re:That was filed from India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, already prior art, if you dwell on the word slavery, bondage, child labour, exploitation, minimum pay, inter-stating, and now off shoring. Ask Bog*Mart equivalent service/product but cheaper has been their motto.

      Much has been published about 'Left Hemisphere' process jobs all going offshore, while creative 'Right Hemisphere' design/creative jobs remain in the home country. Frankly the risk assessments have been shocking, and many firms are getting out, having already damaged customer perceptions and their reputations.

      Sure, there is a push to make us consumers 'take it or nothing' - but the studies of say Sth American Vs Bangalore never gets published. Minimal acceptable compromises vary over time, purported 'savings' lower than expected. In a nutshell, patents should only be given for 'right hemisphering'.

  19. Prior Art? by haus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nothing here (on the surface) seems to breaking new ground here, even in combination. Now if the system worked as it should, this patent would not be granted. Or, it were to be granted, it would be set-aside in a challenge due to prior art.

    But with the Patent Office in its usual dysfunctional form and with IBM sitting on top of a team of patent lawyers that would not blush at arguing about IBM being the inventor of the wheel. It should be yet another step towards maintaining the status quo.

    1. Re:Prior Art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to 'countries where cheaper labor prices and/or cheaper materials are available.'

      I too call for Prior Art. This guy used to grow sugar canes on that island where workers actually worked for FREE! Only cost the price to catch them and bring them to the island!
      Similar prior art can be found throughout history for mining, growing all kinds of stuff (spices, fruits) or making all kinds of goods (potteries, glasses, carpets, DVD players).

  20. You miss the point! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    That's the kind of argument they want you to believe. Well, if we pay these people over here this low-wage that no one in America would take, then we're making their life better without hurting anyone.

    BULLSHIT!

    It's a freakin' race to the bottom!

    Let's do this. Make there be a world-wide minimum wage. World-wide standards for working conditions. World-wide standards for working hours. World-wide standards for medical care. World-wide standards for retirement programs.

    Now, you can move the jobs to where there is a "Comparative Advantage"! Oh wait, there it none now is there?

    Race to the bottom. That's all it is.

    How much can you line your own pockets whilst forcing everyone else to live in squalor.

    Maybe you accept that in India or wherever the fuck you live, but, we're not going to accept it here.

    We're not going to sit idly by while a "Caste" system is created whereby only the few have any decent sort of living conditions and everyone else lives in the sewer.

    I say againg. RISE UP! RISE UP! RISE UP!

    Stand and be counted! Be a true American. Be brave. Be strong.

    Do not let the few steal everything away from the many and force you to live like an animal.

    Don't stand for it. EVER!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:You miss the point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want to organize a "Caste" system where the US has all the money and everyone else lives in squalor? The irony in your post... In the end, whoever is more competitive and more committed will win, that's how it always works. Advocating the killing of people who keep the US on top is hardly helping your case though.

  21. Neat Calculator by PPH · · Score: 1

    I entered "Samuel Palmisano" and it suggested several million Dalits that would be suitable as replacements.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  22. Organize. by headkase · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with your sentiment but without the wholesale slaughter. What you really want is transparency so you can ridicule or sue those in power into compliance with your wishes. Things like pervasive decentralized video recording (as in everyone has a mini-camcorder that they don't even think about woven into their clothes until they - and their camera - witness something like police brutality) with the emphasis on decentralized meaning you don't share your footage unless you want to. Also the World Wide Web is truly one of the most disruptive technologies to emerge in all of history. Use it. Organize around sites like Open Secrets and pursue all the Information you can through Freedom of Information Acts to root out corruption. Expose those who are bought off by special interest groups. Basically, exercise the freedoms you currently enjoy and truly participate in democracy now to prevent those freedoms from becoming a relic of history. And if you are unfairly curtailed then shoot the bastards.

    --
    Shh.
  23. Accent reduction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something I've noticed - sometimes I call tech support, and the person on the other end sounds American at first, but then I can hardly understand them and nothing they say makes sense. So, accent reduction + gibberish = gibberish.

    1. Re:Accent reduction by Taxman415a · · Score: 1

      I read the last link out of curiosity and saw this: "...a specialized computer program which allows you to immediately see, hear, and compare your accent to that of a native Canadian speaker."

      I beg of you, is that what we really want, people from developing countries who can perfectly pronounce "hello sir, are you having a chance to get oowt and aboowt of your hoowse today, eh?" Just imagine an accent half Apu and half Saskatchewan and you'll get my drift.

      Seriously though, using speech recognition technology to aid in accent reduction is a pretty interesting idea. And as a disclaimer, I'm ethnically Canadian, so doon't get too mad at me. :)

    2. Re:Accent reduction by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      sometimes I call tech support, and the person on the other end sounds American at first, but then I can hardly understand them and nothing they say makes sense.

      That's because they've moved their tech support to Washington DC.

  24. in mother russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    engineering exploits you!

  25. No wholesale slaughter. by gbutler69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't intend to imply there should be wholesale slaughter. What I meant to convey is that these actions are meant to undermine everything valuable about a civil society where people have a right to dignity, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    Those who would work to deprive us of these rights, must be stopped. With complete and utter finality!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:No wholesale slaughter. by headkase · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      --
      Shh.
  26. BUZZ off. morons by unity100 · · Score: 1

    10.000 year old "trade" concept is being tried to patent.

    prior art ? a few here :

    - ANY trade that buys finished goods from some source and sells to other.

    - SLAVERY

    - ANY action that you buy intermediate parts from somewhere and produce a finished product somewhere else.

    ibm, you really, really suffered a great deal of credibility and charisma in many circles. you shouldnt employ such morons with such 'innovative ideas'.

  27. Too late - try on-shoring by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    With the fall in the US Dollar, off-shoring is dead. They should try patenting on-shoring. That involves hiring Mexicans to do the work in San Diego...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  28. Why Microsoft is in Vancouver by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    Microsoft open a development center in Vancouver because of Visa problems for foreign workers. I know an European (Danish) guy who successfully interviewed for Microsoft, and then couldn't get a visa (in that "lottery" style programme). Microsoft then decided to get him working in Vancouver, and he'll go to Seattle every once in a while to meet up with the rest of the team.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Why Microsoft is in Vancouver by pravuil · · Score: 1

      IANAL: Yeah, but where does he get taxed? Even then, what will your friend do with his savings? I'm not trying to be critical but he earned his money and he can do what he wants with it. The center he works at is located outside of the US which means that branch should be subject to foreign law. While the products that Microsoft produced are governed by State and Federal law to limit liability as stated in their EULA and other agreements, when it comes to labor practices, it would have to be negotiated with the corporation and the governing body in order to come up with a reasonable compromise for that company to operate on foreign soil. Or I'm thinking it's just a filing practice in order to do it. I'm not to sure, that needs to be cited. One person isn't a problem but a whole bunch of them absorbing at least 50k+ Euro/Pound/Dollar per person is. The companies supporting them will say that they are producing profits only to fund new foreign ventures indirectly. These new ventures will not negotiate with the companies that made it happen. They would have no reason to especially when it comes to their national solidarity. Competition is never fair and no corporation will ever be above it. Saying all of this, I think that life should be improved for all within reason. We do what we can by how much we can afford to do.

    2. Re:Why Microsoft is in Vancouver by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      I don't get your point. Do you mean that USA won't win anything from this employee? I guess that's entirely by choice, no one forces the H-1B visa program to work as it does...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Why Microsoft is in Vancouver by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft open a development center in Vancouver because of Visa problems for foreign workers

      One wonders why Microsoft would even bother. The USA is awash in illegal immigrants, and your Danish friend, Microsoft, and the United States at large would have been better off had your Danish friend just blown off the H1-B process and just got a job as an illegal alien.

      --
      This is my sig.
  29. System and method by Foerstner · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't argue that these patents might make some cash in the short term, but I'm curious if they've factored in the value of consumer good will...

    For placing a projectile travelling at high velocity into the foot of person holding the projectile launcher, or metaphorically performing the same function on a company.

    One can only hope that if IBM is granted these patents, their rigourous enforcement will make offshoring less attractive.

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
  30. EXACTLY! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    This is the point I'm trying to make. With all my militant talk what I'm trying to say is that ALL PEOPLE OF THE WORLD must not allow everything to be a race to the bottom where only the few benefit.

    I feel a great compassion for those who must live in such conditions. I want to help them. I want them to have decent jobs with a living wage.

    But, turning the U.S. into another country where the few control all the wealth and power isn't going to accomplish that.

    That's why, if necessary, I will fight. Hopefully, my vote and my words can prevent such from becoming necessary. But, I want the "powerful" and "wealthy" to know, that if you back us against the wall, we will take it all away. We will not let you turn us into slaves.

    We need to work to have a strong middle-class where the dignity of human beings is respected. We need to work to extend that dignity to all citizens of the world. Those, in any country, who would enrich themselves at the expense of their fellow humans, who would treat their countrymen and fellow human beings as cattle, must be held accountable at ANY cost.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:EXACTLY! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      Nice to see ANONYMOUS COWARD posting telling someone else how they will never fight!

      What I say, I say under my REAL NAME. Not under some pseudonym or, worse yet, ANONYMOUS COWARD.

      If you don't like what I have to say, look me up and tell me ANONYMOUS COWARD!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  31. Didn't RTFA by torkus · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I didn't RTFA and mainly read just the headline. /trollbait probably

    Anyhow...how is this a patentable idea? Does IBM think they're the first company to open a campus somewhere that has cheaper labor than their main campus?

    I think this will get thrown out for "obvious" or "prior art" ... art...meh.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    1. Re:Didn't RTFA by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      Errm, didn't the UK cotton industry outsource a lot of work to India in 17-1800s? And anyway, isn't this some kind of dirivative to the entire Adam Smith "open market" thing?

  32. What must not be permitted? by Infonaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is time to rise up! Time to start the revolution. This MUST NOT be permitted.

    If you're upset that these big companies are seeking business method patents for processes that may or may not even pan out in the marketplace, I'm puzzled. The method patents will only allow certain companies to use certain methods to perform some of their business functions offshore. This will allow them to keep others from using the same carefully defined methods, or will force other companies to license those methods. Either way, outsourcing is no longer the Soup-to-Nuts-Slam-Dunk Solution many companies thought it would be.

    If you're upset about outsourcing, I wonder how you run your Open Source consulting firm. After all, a huge chunk of the software you're dealing with was created by people in countries other than the United States, and I'd hazard a guess that most of the work done on those programs wasn't done in North-East Ohio. In essence, you've outsourced millions of hours worth of work to the people who developed the software you're using. You, as a provider of technical services, are able to compete more effectively because of their labor.

    If you were truly serious about being a mercantist, you wouldn't be leveraging so much labor from outside the US in your own business.

    Finally, this statement is bizarre:

    If the only comparative advantage is that one workforce has rights to decent working condition and decent wages and one doesn't, then fuck economics.

    The Indian economy has taken off after decades in the doldrums. There is a rapidly developing middle class in China for the first time. The United States has a tremendously powerful economy that is extremely efficient at creating new markets. Do you seriously contend that the world would be better off without global trade? Or is it just that you feel entitled, as an American, to live in a world free of competition? We got rich first, so screw everyone else?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  33. Yeah, right! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    The people who came up with this patent ARE NOT the people who keep America on top.

    In fact, the point is not to "keep America on top".

    What keeps America Great, is the fact that we strive for a society where everyone has a reasonable standard of living and can live with a modicum of dignity.

    All other nations could be like this too! Their people can insist upon it. If a lot of people must die, then so be it.

    Chains find only willing wrists.

    I for one will not allow myself to be enslaved. I will die first...taking as many of the fuckers with me as I can. At least then there will be a few less greedy fuckers in the world and everyone else just might have a chance.

    If everyone felt like this, wouldn't tolerate this shit, it would end.

    If all you can do is think of yourself then you deserve not the respect, support and protection of the many.

    I grew up in inner-city Canton, Ohio in the '70's and '80's when all the factories closed and the manufacturing jobs were "outsourced". There was better than 30% unemployment. That city has never recovered.

    People lost all hope. They lost all dignity.

    I bought the line. Educate yourself. Be a "knowledge worker". Move into the information age.

    I worked hard to teach myself software development, amongst other skills. I worked a full-time job from the time I was 15. I served my country and my people in the armed forces. I've been productive. I've made a lot of money for every employer I've had (millions).

    What do I have to show for it? A country increasingly racing to the bottom. Treating it's own citizens (they don't even call them citizens anymore...they call them "consumers" and "tax payers") with a total lack of dignity and respect.

    I've got nothing against the people of other nations. In fact, I have the utmost respect for them. I want them to be treated with dignity and respect too!

    Don't you get it! There are a small segment of the world's population who think it's their right to control everything. To control our lives. To be the sole beneficiaries of all our efforts!

    I say, "NO"! Not now! Not Ever!

    I, for one WILL NOT ALLOW IT!

    Maybe they'll put a bullet in my brain for standing up to them. So be it!

    I've fought for everything in this life and I'll continue to fight.

    You should too!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Yeah, right! by giorgiofr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Listen kid, if you want to stand up for your rights, then by all means vote with your wallet and effect change in society. But the moment you raise your hands against someone else, and that includes not only all the people you wish to kill but also the ones you would coax into helping you, then that is when you lose all rights, credibility, and possibly your life too. In case you want to answer, please avoid all those meaningless one-liners.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:Yeah, right! by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      The Star Spangled Banner pales in comparison to this sound of the shredding of Brandenburg!

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    3. Re:Yeah, right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one will not allow myself to be enslaved. I will die first...taking as many of the fuckers with me as I can. At least then there will be a few less greedy fuckers in the world and everyone else just might have a chance.

      If everyone felt like this, wouldn't tolerate this shit, it would end.
      Yes, look at how well it worked for the Taliban, and how well it's working for Iraqi insurgents.
      The US armed forces are nowhere to be found in Afghanistan or Iraq these days.

      So, seriously, did you study under bin Laden or what?
  34. Explain to me... by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    ...what does moving jobs to places with little to no protection for the dignity of workers funded by the demand in an economy where there are such protections lead?

    Tell me, where does it lead?

    It devalues those protections and undermines them until they become meaningless.

    Who wins? Who loses?

    Does the Indian or Chinese worker win? I think not.

    Does the American worker win? I think not.

    Does the International Capitalist with no loyalty to anyone or anything win? You Bet!

    Yeah, I'm all for supporting that!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Explain to me... by Shihar · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that you can ask your average Chinese factory worker who has gone from a protection economy that was literally starving him to death, or an Indian white collard worker who now lives something that would be considered middle class by American standards if they are 'winning', and they will say hell yes. India doesn't long for the 'good old days' of their protectionist economy that kept everyone equally poor. China sure as hell doesn't long for the glorious days of the people's revolution where over 20 million people died to starvation.

      So yes, you can rattle on 'the revolution, man'... or you could actually go visit one of these places and ask the people if they have gone from accepting that life will be miserable until they day they die early, or if they are now hopeful for a better future. God forbid Americans maybe slow down their rapid wealth creation as 2 billion other poor people get a tiny taste of the pie. Yeah, what we REALLY need is global trade tarrifs. That way, we can wall off those poor suckers in the developing world back into their shit hole, and watch as our own economy rapidly collapses under the realization that building .2 cent widgets can't be done at $12 / hour. You really sing of a bright future. History has pretty well taught that nation that go down the protectionist rout see nothing be abject misery at worst, and a stalling of living standards at best.

  35. Believe what you want. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    You're a fat Internet tough guy. You're too much of a listless wanker to "fight." You'll just continue posting violent diatribes to the Internet, espousing your own ignorance of elementary subjects.

    Keep telling yourself that!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Believe what you want. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      You truly are a moron, ANONYMOUS COWARD!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  36. What's next - patenting suicide methods? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    Devices for shooting oneself in the foot? "A Method for Removal of the Nose as an Expression of Disdain for the Face?"

    --
    This space available.
  37. Exploitation? by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    by exploiting technology developed for students who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as other accent reduction techniques


    Call it what you will, but know this; if you live in a 3rd world nation and have a hearing and/or speech handicap, your economic chances for a quality life are next to none! This technology will provide employment opportunities that they would otherwise not have. In a 3rd world nation, this could mean the difference between being malnourished and having a comfortable place to sleep at night.

    I really wish would some people would stop looking at employment as a form of exploitation. Why not look at the positive aspects of a developing nation. In other words, you should compare their quality of life before, and after. While working in a factory may be slave labor and beneath us, ask your self why they still work there. I'm willing to bet it's because they hate working in the farm plowing fields for even less money.

    Maybe it's just me, but I've always placed value on any system or method that helps people raise their standard of living. I don't compare my standard of living with someone else. What I *do* look for is if *their* standard of living has improved. That is what's important. Too look at it differently would be ignorance and class-guilt.
    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  38. Rah rah USA by tjstork · · Score: 1, Insightful

    rah rah, USA... pathetic.

    No, rah rah, USA, pilgrim. USA is awesome!

    If you consider Windows good, I've got some swamp land in Florida for you. GOOD? GOOD? Wow. Some people never learn, do they.

    Hey, I can put Windows on a machine, and watch a movie after it is installed. Can't do that with Linux, now, can you? As a developer, I have a choice of APIs for sound on Windows, and amazingly, they all work. By contrast, Linux sound is pretty rough. You've got a sound api for KDE, a sound api for Gnome, some other legacy sound apis, and none of them are as good as DirectSound and there's nothing as elegant and comprehensive as DirectMusic.

    If we look at what the kernel offers, well, sure, Linux has a pretty elegant file model. But I'm aggravated that the Linux kernel lacks something basic like CopyFile, and Linux's asynch model doesn't quite stack up to the power offered by I/O completion ports.

    From a user level - Linux's wireless networking is a mess compared to Windows, and even digital camera support is bad. Sure, Canon has finally upgraded to a newer standard, but older and perfectly workable cameras remain a void, but, they run ok on Windows. Linux support for Camera RAW format sucks, making it useless for any real digital photography. Of course, all of this just works on Windows.

    You can go and blame manufacturers, and driver writers and whatever consumer conspiracy you want, but at the end of the day, consumers don't care. An operating system is an ecosystem, and either that ecosystem does what you want, or it doesn't, and under Linux, it doesn't, and for a lot of people.

    Linux does have some advantages over Windows, I'll give you that. But, Windows has a lot of advantages of its own, as well, so many that, you can't really say that Windows is empirically bad, and in fact, for many applications, Windows is better.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Rah rah USA by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      > :Hey, I can put Windows on a machine, and watch a movie after it is installed. Can't do that with Linux, now, can you?

      Sure you can ... as long as you don't live in the USA, or (if you do) you know which repositories to add ...

      > : As a developer, I have a choice of APIs for sound on Windows, and amazingly, they all work.

      You also have a choice of .doc formats for Windows, also. Word for Windows 2.0, Word 6, Word 97, Word 2000, Word whatever_the_flavor_of_the_day ... but nothing open to sharing with others using other OSes or hardware ...

      Back on topic - let IBM patent this - its not like the patent will hold up except in the US, so watch how quickly everyone else uses it ...

    2. Re:Rah rah USA by tjstork · · Score: 1

      You also have a choice of .doc formats for Windows, also. Word for Windows 2.0, Word 6, Word 97, Word 2000, Word whatever_the_flavor_of_the_day ... but nothing open to sharing with others using other OSes or hardware

      The version argument is lame. Everything has a version on it. Look at Java, for example. And, people generally don't care too much about sharing with other OSes. That's more of a political argument that open source people make.

      --
      This is my sig.
    3. Re:Rah rah USA by ciggieposeur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, I can put Windows on a machine, and watch a movie after it is installed.

      Oh cool! So which version of Windows did they finally put DVD playback in out of the box?

      Becuase I've installed up to XP sp2 and it never worked, I always had to install some 3rd-party DVD playback software before WMP would finally play the movie...

    4. Re:Rah rah USA by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      Hey, I can put Windows on a machine, and watch a movie after it is installed. Can't do that with Linux, now, can you?
      Unless the movie you speak of is in WMV format or similar you're out of luck in Windows, you have to hunt down codecs on the internet for most popular video formats. DVD decryption doesn't come with Windows either.
      On pretty much any Linux distribution, Free codecs such as OGG and Theora are enabled out of the box, and Ubuntu will prompt you to install the correct codec for your video from the repositories if you try playing a file with an unsupported codec, far easier than downloading and installing codecs from some random website, which you are forced to do in Windows.

    5. Re:Rah rah USA by Ajehals · · Score: 2, Insightful


      People generally don't care too much about sharing with other OSes

      Monoculture's are bad - you just pointed out part of the catch 22 that stops us getting away from 95% market dominance by Microsoft, even if you prefer windows and would stick to MS products, you would benefit by the fact that there would be real competition in the OS sector, affecting prices and with luck spurring innovation, lock ins prevent you from benefiting from competition because, well you are a captive audience.

    6. Re:Rah rah USA by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

      I know... Windows isn't completely useless, but no, you can't play Battlestar Galactica the series on DVD on an untouched windows xp... doesn't have the codecs. It is good for games, but so are game consoles.

      I've never had 'bad' sound on a recent linux distro. BSG sounds fantastic on my Ubuntu system.

      I bought a linux compatible hp printer for my box and it was auto detected and a wizard walked me through it all. No reboot and bob's your uncle, up and printing. On my win xp machine, a reboot was necessary for the print capability, the scan capability, the fax capability, etc.
      The printer is supposed to be windows 98 capable, but i had to spend an hour downloading an update for internet explorer for my wifes computer just to install the dang printer device, then reboot, reboot. (why you need to update a browser in order to print is beyond me).

      Wireless... i don't know, because i'm on dial-up and totally wired unfortunately.

      Digital cameras need to be linux capable, but that it is easy to do and works well (but sorry, never used RAW format).

      You can go and blame manufacturers, and driver writers and whatever consumer conspiracy you want, but at the end of the day, consumers don't care. An operating system is an ecosystem, and either that ecosystem does what you want, or it doesn't, and under Linux, it doesn't, and for a lot of people.

      I guess this is why no one wants Vista, cause nothing works in it and you can't blame the manufacturers and driver writers (and conspiracists).
      And no, i don't hate the U.S. I just think some policies need to be re-thought... not quite the land of the free alot of Americans think it is.

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    7. Re:Rah rah USA by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Back on topic - let IBM patent this - its not like the patent will hold up except in the US, so watch how quickly everyone else uses it ...

      Mind you no one other than the U.S. needs to use it. Everyone else are 'offshore'. Americans are the ones who are offshoring.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    8. Re:Rah rah USA by Aleksej · · Score: 1

      Hey, I can put Windows on a machine, and watch a movie after it is installed. Can't do that with Linux, now, can you?
      Of course not -- you have to install more than just the kernel!
    9. Re:Rah rah USA by marcello_dl · · Score: 1


      > Hey, I can put Windows on a machine, and watch a movie after it is installed.

      Even better, You can go watch a movie while windows is installing.

      > Can't do that with Linux, now, can you?

      I guess that either ubuntu studio or other multimedia oriented distros offer proprietary codecs playback out of the box, so the short answer is "you can".
      The long answer is: getting a completely free OS and application stack and then deciding if/what proprietary stuff to add is quite educative. If you want a blissfully easy desktop pc experience why are you on windows? get a mac.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    10. Re:Rah rah USA by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      > "Mind you no one other than the U.S. needs to use it. Everyone else are 'offshore'. Americans are the ones who are offshoring."

      Last I looked, Canada (and Mexico) aren't "off shore" to most Americans (apologies to Hawaii). And yes, Canadian business is looking at off-shoring as well.

  39. Odd. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    I find your belief that one should not be willing to stand up and fight for what is right odd. It is what this country was founded upon.

    You're saying, that no matter what, I have no right to arm myself and defend myself against those who would enslave me.

    You are wrong. All humans reserve that right for themselves.

    I would prefer things not come to that. Unfortunately, it seems more and more lately like that is where things are headed. There is an incredible lack of respect for basic human rights and dignity arising in this nation.

    We have fascists in power who would question the very meaning of our constitutional rights and attempt to claim that we do not have the rights it explicitly reserves for us.

    I hope that we can vote these people out. I hope that we can return to a direction that keeps the dignity of human endeavor above the profits of the few.

    Should this not be the case, I will be will willing to fight and die to attempt to ensure these rights for my children (and yours).

    Does that mean I would like this to happen? Absolutely not! But, I WILL NOT rule it out. I will not simply say, "Oh, well, there is nothing I can do."

    People don't like this kind of talk because they want to be able to cheat and steal and repress and oppress with impunity and have there be no consequences except for perhaps, "Bad Press" (or maybe they'll need to change their corporate image/name).

    Don't forget, the sole purpose for the existence of a corporation is to deny personal responsibility.

    I understand that this is necessary in order to allow people to pull capital for the creation of businesses that benefit society whilst turning a profit for the investors.

    Don't forget though, that it must be a two-way street. In order for investors to deserve the protection of the people that allows them to invest without risking personal ruin, they have a duty to create and environment conducive to dignified living for the citizens of said society.

    I'm always taken aback by those who complain endlessly about the taxes they must pay, but, then forget about the "Law Enforcement" you speak of (and military, etc).

    You have no problem inflicting violence on others as long as it is done by proxy (law enforcement, military, etc). You feel that because you've "made it" everyone else should piss off and be thankful to wallow in the sewage.

    I don't think of things that way.

    Call me an idealist. Call me a zealot. Whatever.

    I believe in something besides lining my pockets.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Odd. by giorgiofr · · Score: 1
      LOL! You couldn't be further from the truth about what I have "no problem with".

      You're saying, that no matter what, I have no right to arm myself and defend myself against those who would enslave me. Idiocy. Put a .45ACP in the brain of the first who tries to take your life (or property). But you must not BE THE ONE that takes away other people's life (or property). What's so hard to get? Anyway I see I am feeding a troll, so goodbye.
      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:Odd. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      Your dismissal by insult remains unconvincing.

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    3. Re:Odd. by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      "I find your belief that one should not be willing to stand up and fight for what is right odd. It is what this country was founded upon."
      nd
      This country was founded ON the principle of freedom and equality. Its founding INVOLVED fighting and killing people. In those times, the populace had a good chance of overthrowing a corrupt government. In these times, the populace will be slaughtered if it tries that.

      Getting slaughtered accomplishes nothing. Take a gander at the effectiveness of violent change that the insurgents in Iraq are implementing. They kill some people, and manage to make the entire country a shithole, but they aren't going to make any progress...even if the US pulls out.

      Slacking starves the beast. If the populace won't work, there is nothing for the rich to steal.

      If you want to kill/get killed so you can have your share of consumer goods, that's your business, but you will lose your life, your vote, and your ability to have any influence on the situation. Slacking on the other hand allows you to continue to influence others and live a simple, stress free life. It's the only practical option we have left.

    4. Re:Odd. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      Slacking on the other hand allows you to continue to influence others and live a simple, stress free life. It's the only practical option we have left.

      Until the "Powers that Be" decide to put a bullet in the brain of all the slackers!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    5. Re:Odd. by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      At that point, armed resistance becomes the only option. I don't see it happening though...and in any case, a bunch of disorganized loons with pitchforks and assault rifles are going to get a bullet way before the slackers do. Our government is so clueless it will probably never figure out the damage being done to it by slackers.

    6. Re:Odd. by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      First the cellphones of the poor must be deactivated with the remaining payphones, household landlines and internet service. Denial of communication is a must for mass disappearances. Then they will liquidate those in affordable housing by either false flag biological and/or chemical accidents that will be blamed on 'terrorists' (nuclear boom & shroom would be couterproductive). With the removal of the 'human waste' these properties will be converted into more 'luxury condos' or 'cultural attractions' for the oligarkhy.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  40. I think you misunderstand me. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    I think you misunderstand my purposefully inflammatory rhetoric. I am saying what I am saying in order to arouse a reaction. To point out how everything can't just be about greed! You mistake it as hatred or anger towards Chinese or Indian people. That is not the case.

    Let's grant that some jobs moving to lower-paid workers in India, China or whatever is good for the world, for everyone. Now, if that is the case, we want to make that move, that transition as free from artificial obstacles as possible. Right?

    OK, along comes these greedy bastard who want to PATENT a method of effecting that transition thereby collecting a royalty (a tax in essence) on that transition. They then "steal" a little bit of wealth from the Chinese or Indian worker as well as from the person who will purchase the products of those same workers.

    They do it under a government granted monopoly enforced by the world's largest and most powerful military force in history with a law enforcement infrastructure more advanced than any in history as well.

    Why do they get to do that? Where is the justice in that?

    Patenting this kind of thing and having it enforced effectively at gun-point is the utmost injustice. It should not be permitted.

    If corporations continue to pursue this kind of unjust ways of acquiring more and more wealth, and continue to get away with, and the electorate is unable to put a stop to it, then we, as the beneficiaries of the freedom that our ancestors fought so hard for, are compelled to stand up and put an end to it by the only means left at our disposal.

    It's about being a good corporate citizen of the nation and of the world.

    Saying, well a corporation exists to make a profit is a cop-out. Of course they do. But, because they have been granted certain privileges by the citizenry, they owe that citizenry certain respect in return.

    All of us, each an every one of us, owe dignity and respect to one another in exchange for the same.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  41. WWII Nazis identifying human-resource work content by zbuckholz · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something they did during WWII helping the Germans track their "human resources".

    Read about it at wikipedia
    "In 2001, author Edwin Black published IBM and the Holocaust (ISBN 0-609-80899-0), a book that documented how IBM's New York headquarters and CEO Thomas J. Watson acted through its overseas subsidiaries to provide the Third Reich with punch card machines that could help the Nazis to track down the European Jewry (especially in newly conquered territory). "

    History of IBM. (2007, September 26). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 21:52, September 29, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_IBM&oldid=160489448

  42. You'll have to pay me. by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    if I patent the process for patenting the process for getting patents, first!

    1. Re:You'll have to pay me. by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      You're very clever, young man, but it's no use--it's patents all the way down!

  43. You don't need to fight anyone by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    You (everyone) just have to realise that they stole all your money from you and are now leasing it to you at 5% a year.

    Money is power, by allowing them to lend your money to you they have taken all the money and all the power.

    --
    Deleted
  44. You are correct! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    Economics has very little to say about justice and equality. It speaks to how to maximize the wealth, not how it is distributed.

    It is up to the people, via their government, to decide what is a fair an equitable distribution while attempting to maximize the overall wealth via economic theory.

    Sometimes, this means that balances must be struck such that, perhaps we didn't squeeze every last drop of wealth out of the system. For example, let us say we have something like this:

            10% of population controls 30% of wealth (roughly evenly distributed amongst this 10%)
            80% of population controls 68% of wealth (roughly evenly distributed amongst the 80%)
            10% of population controls 2% of wealth (roughly evenly distributed)

    Let us call the overall wealth level of the above 100 units of wealth. Now, we make a change in policy to now have 200 units (double the wealth) with the following ending distribution.

            10% controls 69% of wealth (138 units as opposed to 30 units)
            80% controls 30% of wealth (60 units total/before 68 units total)
            10% controls 1% of wealth (2 units total/was 5 units)

    Now, there is in total way more wealth. We've maximized wealth. But, is it a better society?

    That is the difference (maybe not so extreme, but you get the idea) between pure economic theory and society tempered by respect and dignity for all its members.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  45. IBM'S patent doesn't matter by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Back on topic - let IBM patent this - its not like the patent will hold up except in the US, so watch how quickly everyone else uses it ...

    Let IBM patent it, have them get some sort of exclusive right to offshore business processes, and, then, offshoring will gradually grind to a halt for 20 years because only IBM will be allowed to do it and IBM will screw it up.

    --
    This is my sig.
  46. Now...here's a concept... by NoobHunter · · Score: 1

    I have this idea...how about I patent the act of peeing or taking a crap. OOOHH...this one is better! I patent Idiocy! Every time someone does something stupid, they have to pay me...

    I'll make a fortune! All I have to do is call the USPTO, they'd patent breathing if it was applied for.

    --
    So Jesus, Mohammed and Abraham walk into a Bar....
  47. Because IBM is a giver by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    IBM will license this patent for free to the open source community.

  48. There is a way to win without firing a shot... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...starve them. They make their money off us, off of what we buy, off of what we earn. If we cut our earning and spending to the bone, it cuts their food supply.

    Work as little as possible, buy as little as possible.

    This requires no organization.

    This requires no violence.

    This requires no breaking of laws.

    This requires no political power.

    The only sacrifice is being poor, and we are going to end up that way anyway.

    In return, you get ample free time.

  49. I like the way you think! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think you might have something there. It truly is an elegant solution to the problem.

    Sometimes, I think those "Bums" who sit around and do nothing (play video games, hang out on the beach, play guitar on street corner) have the best solution to life.

    Do the bare minimum. Subsist on the bare minimum.

    I have only one problem with this concept. It is better to work hard and produce as much as you can while minimizing your consumption. This is hard. It tends to enrich those who don't deserve it.

    What is needed, is to work hard, produce more than you need, and ensure the surplus is fairly used for the benefit of all.

    Idealistic you say? I agree.

    I would like us to aspire to a higher ideal. Myself included.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:I like the way you think! by damburger · · Score: 1

      Why must work be economic work? Why can't one subsist on the bare minimum whilst writing code/poetry/music/novels. Give yourself a lot of free time, and then use that time to do voluntary work that you enjoy.

      *Passes bong on to the next poster*

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    2. Re:I like the way you think! by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean by economic...I meant pretty much what you describe...writing code and music, growing some veggies or livestock. No cash involved, just give what you don't need to people you like.

  50. patent application by Humorless+Coward. · · Score: 0

    I'm in the process of applying for a patent on "A Process for Identifying Products and Services which Fail to Meet Acceptable Standards of Customer Satisfaction, Service, and Communication", and creating a document for presentation to the ISO outlining standards for service. I've also already applied for the process patent on applying for these process patents.

  51. Re:WWII Nazis identifying human-resource work cont by dbIII · · Score: 1

    And somebody else provided the telephones to transmit the orders. There are plenty of other people to get angry with that actually knew what was going on instead of getting cranky with the actions of a company more than fifty years ago - there is not a single IBM employee from thoise days still with the company.

  52. Re:I will apply for a patent of India style Englis by iknowcss · · Score: 1

    You can't do that! I've already patented the double "???" method!

    I SUE YOU!

    --
    Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
  53. I've got the secret formula! by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

    Here's the formaula that the geniuses at IBM / etc are using for outsourcing jobs:

    if ((body-temperature-A == body-temperature-B) && (salary-A salary-B)) {
        outsource(B, A);
    }

    Sadly subtlties like the typical 10-1 (or more) productivity ratios between entry-level fucks and experienced people noticed by anyone actually at all involved in the software industry don't enter into the equation.

    Then they wonder why their outsourced projects have such piss-poor productivity and would have been cheaper to do at home. Or, at least they wonder this after a few yars of having been BS'd about how great the outsourcing is working by corporate ass-kissers too weak to tell them the truth.

    1. Re:I've got the secret formula! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that.

      The business processes covered by these patents will be ideal for companies that wish to screw up the good rep of their company by fragmenting their valuable skill base, hemorrhaging knowledge and experience, destroying effective teams and at the end of it providing a fragile, non-innovative and inflexible service to their customers. Oh, and maybe saving some cash in the short term.

      Meh.

  54. Prior Art by freedomseven · · Score: 1

    I think that GM has prior art for sending US jobs to foreign shores.

  55. Offshoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft does this, IBM does this, almost every American corporation does this, so why do they do this. You really have to ask yourself that question. The way I look at it is that people have their own mind. There are some people who have a sense of entitlement but don't do much with it. Then there are others out there that are overworked but don't want to broaden their responsibility. Then there are those that take the blame for others mistakes and companies end up losing a valuable resource because of it. The list goes on and on of all the different types of people out there that don't understand what risk is about. Risk isn't about jumping blindly into something only to come out of it saying, "I told you it wouldn't work." It's commitment to having something done that wouldn't have normally been done. People do it all the time but right now we need more of it within the US. People will look towards diversity when what's comfortable fails them. Even leaders of men are not gods. If they don't know how to communicate effectively then that's there problem. We have other things to worry about now. ie to monitor Patent trolls, create patents only to close out and to isolate other industries in the market by revealing their activities and to develop an understanding from a broader range of information within reason. Money can be very tempting but diversifying where that money goes and to what level can complicate things quite a bit. And for all the people who talk about revolution. Well, you know we all want to change the world.

  56. Well, if it doesn't play Galactica! :-) by tjstork · · Score: 1

    If Windows doesn't play Galactica out of the box, then it is pretty frigging useless. I mean, it's Galactica we're talking about.

    Counting the seconds until season 4.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Well, if it doesn't play Galactica! :-) by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

      Wow! Consensus between a linux user and a windows user!

      Now there's a Slashdot headline! ;-)

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  57. I'm all for doing useful work... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...so long as it isn't taxable, and I have complete control over who benefits, which is tricky, as you say. Probably more work making sure your labor doesn't get misappropriated than the labor itself.

    For this tactic to work, I have to get lots of people doing it, though, and they want a payoff for the stuff they wont be able to buy...hence the free time angle.

    I'm proud to say, by slacking, I've cut the government out of 40k in taxes this year. Not too shabby for doing as I damn well please for the most part.

  58. Doesn't Meet Required Non-Obvious Standard by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Someone else mentioned that there is too much prior art. Another point is that this is an obvious process, given the current state of the art. A patent is only supposed to be awarded if it si something that is "non-obvious" to someone else in the industry.

  59. Camera RAW support is in Bibble for Linux, dude. . by AntrygRevok.net · · Score: 1

    http://www.bibblelabs.com/
    and if you need to fix-up photos,
    and are fed-up with the process-sabotage ( for this kind of work ) that The GIMP is,
    then TRY the free demo
    ( which stops working after a few days,
    so only install it when you're serious about trying it ).

    It is DRASTICALLY quicker than The GIMP for working-with,
    it includes a cut-down version of Noise Ninja
    ( at-least the demo I tried a couple of years ago included a cut-down version. . .
    maybe the full-version is in it now. . .
    but irregardless, I'm buying the full Pro version in a couple of weeks
    to get-at my Canon G9 images camera-RAW ( .CR2 ) images. . . :)

    Bibble rocks.

      : )

    --
    Try also my gallery: http://photo.net/photos/AntrygRevo
  60. This made me mad by jflo · · Score: 1

    I understand the drive for a business to want to cut down its overhead spending, but reading this was just a reminder about how painful it is to contact the majority of the larger corporations who do provide services in this country to Americans that have Indian or elseware based phone support. But at the same time, when a call center is here in the states, its usually run int he ghetto by the ignorants. Its hard to get the middle class working in a call center in this country but at the same time, Indians are all about earning a little for a lot. Atleast theyre trying.

    --
    WWPD - What Would Picard Do?
  61. Re:WWII Nazis identifying human-resource work cont by polyex · · Score: 1

    Telephones? C'mon now, you know that is a lousy analogy compared to a company actively participating in the actual act of tracking people down to be "arrested". With the same silly logic you can blame the guys who made the Nazi's boots. As far as no IBM employee from those days being around....this very same policy is still around in IBM. Individual IBM divisions are expected to comply with the legal requests and desires of the nation in which they are based, without protest, AS LONG AS these do not conflict with the best interests of shareholders. You really have to understand that the allegiance of a public company is to shareholders (by law). IBM Germany did exactly this and would do this tomorrow. They have no allegiance above shareholder profit. IBM Global Services is an umbrella organization run from the United States (sort of), but it is highly fragmented (and actually less centrally controlled due to some policy changes in the last couple of years). IBM has zero allegiance to United States or any country for that matter other than paying the minimum amount of taxes to still be considered a U.S. company and qualify for U.S. Government research grants and contracts. If selling your DNA was legal in some country and IBM did business there, it will happen. If turning over rolls of lists of Jews meant a big payout to IBM shareholders, its done. Why do people think that PUBLICLY TRADED companies are not dangerous to trust in these regards and forget so easily the terrible history many of these companies have when it came to what seems to be an inhumane act VS profit? If you did a psychological workup on a publicly traded company as if it was a person, you would not let it babysit your kids for sure.

  62. Absolute Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies from all over the developed world are offshoring.
    India, China and now Vietnam are favorite places for offshoring of manufacturing, IT development and almost everything else.

    I have been working for a large IT supplier in the UK and their next big system will almost completely be developed in Vietnam. Sure a few brits will write the specs but over 90% of the development will be done in the Hanoi region.

    Another project I worked on involved outsourcing to an Indian company. They sent a team of 20 over here for a year. They were still being paid Indian Salaries and they all lived in one 4 bedroom house. These guys were the onsite hackers and the physical systems were located in London. All the 2nd & 3rd level support was done in Bangalore.
    I trained one guy to take over my job for 6 months. After I was downsized things went from bad to worse and less than 3 months after I was let go, I was called up by my ex boss. He pleaded for help as several key (and business critical) systems had been down for a week. The Indian guys were totally unable to keep them going. The problem was simple. It had been covered in the handover process but the guy who had been trained was back in India and his replacement was a complete jerk who knew nowt about the systems.
    I sorted them out for a decent fee but refused all offers to go back to work there.

    I now get less than 50% of my income from IT Dev etc. I have returned to teaching Maths at a local school. How long befoe that gets outsourced?

  63. Re:WWII Nazis identifying human-resource work cont by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Blame the people that did the deed not the ones that sold them the filing cabinets. There is plenty of evil in the world without going after the heirs to the contractors that don't know what is going on. Why do you think Iran plays the holocaust denial card as war propaganda? They can do it because of the trivialisation of it as people extend the holocaust blame furthur and furthur afeild and stetching it out to people that had not even been born at the time instead of limiting it to the thousands of people that carried it out.

    Please keep Nazis and genocide out of discussions that have nothing to do with the topics. You get a cheap victory in an argument by spitting on the grave of millions - please show some respect instead.

  64. Re:Camera RAW support is in Bibble for Linux, dude by AntrygRevok.net · · Score: 1

    Update:

    Bibble Labs does 2.5 or so updates / year, so

    I may have to wait 3 more months before getting killer photo-editing of my RAW format files.

    Also, I just checked, and the Noise Ninja in the current version ( 4.9.8e ) is a cut-down version,
    but if one gets a full-version of Noise Ninja ( which IS available for Linux ),
    that full-version gets integrated into your Bibble copy.

    Doubly-also, the demo-mode works for 14 days.

    The only downside, other-than no current support for the ultimate pocket camera for manual-control freaks
    ( the G9: http://www.powershot.com/ . . . trustworthy camera-joint fer buyin' stuff: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ ),
    is that there isn't any JPEG2000 support.
    Tiff ( 16 or 8 bit ), PNG ( 16 or 8 bit ), 8-bit-JPEG, for output. . .

    Cheerses ( & yeah, this is offtopic, but this information does inform, and the perceived hole in Linux ability isn't an actual gap!! :)

    --
    Try also my gallery: http://photo.net/photos/AntrygRevo
  65. Re:I will apply for a patent of India style Englis by TechnicalFool · · Score: 1

    You can't do that. I've patented the use of simple bold statements for the purpose of a humorous reply!

    I SUE YOU!

    --
    09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
  66. What the fuck, Patent office? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Grant a company a patent for TAKING JOBS AWAY from US citizens? Every last one of you should be shot in the head for even CONSIDERING the patent!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  67. You seem to be shifting your argument by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    I think you misunderstand my purposefully inflammatory rhetoric. I am saying what I am saying in order to arouse a reaction.

    Is it surprising that your purposefully inflammatory rhetoric has been misunderstood?

    Originally you wrote:

    My ancestors fought in order to have equitable pay for work, decent working conditions, and something approaching a society where there is a reasonable middle-class. This is the kind of thing that seeks to have the U.S. be like a third-world nation.

    It's rather clear that you're talking about the United States and the effect offshoring has on American workers.

    But now you say:

    They then "steal" a little bit of wealth from the Chinese or Indian worker as well as from the person who will purchase the products of those same workers.

    So now it's no longer about protecting American workers. It's about protecting overseas workers and American consumers?

    Your assessment of the sought after patents in question values them far too highly. The fact that IBM has patents on certain methods of conducting offshoring won't deny other companies the ability to offshore, given that the patents *if granted* are going to be narrowly tailored. There is a tremendous amount of prior art in the offshoring business, and there are are already plenty of companies engaged in the practice. Plus, business method claims aren't easy to patent. The USPTO scrutinizes them very carefully, and even if granted it can take four years or more, by which time the claimed methods may not even be of much use to IBM or anyone else. An application for a patent like this is really low on the list of things to be freaked out about.

    Then again, based on your earlier comments, I'm not sure if you actually support offshoring or are opposed to it. You seem to be opposed to large corporations making money, regardless of whether they're offshoring or not. Maybe you should be directing your fervor at corporate personhood instead of patent claims.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  68. You are correct by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    I have a real problem with the idea that Corporations are beholden to nothing more than profit. I don't wish to deny them the ability to make a profit, but, I find it reprehensible that so often, corporations have no sense of "citizenship" yet want to have "rights" like a person.

    They seem to lack a sense of responsibility. I guess many people are the same as well.

    You're right, my reaction is probably an overreaction, but, the concept implied in this patent just seems like such a case of stabbing the "People" in the back.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  69. this will probably happen by alizard · · Score: 1

    except for the 1/10 salary part.

    I expect a large number of the Fortune 1000 to be run out of India and China in the next decade and the majority in the next generation.

    With enough "core" business processes offshored, just what is the value-add of US management?

  70. I think MS is filing that one by alizard · · Score: 1

    with Vista and ME as examples of prior art.

  71. Moron, you will do nothing. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And even if you did, you can't fight economic realities, these will bite you one way or another.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  72. Yeah, sure, nice try buddy. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Economics is a race to the bottom. Deal with it.

    People are always trying to save money, this includes buyers voting with their dollars buying cheap stuff made in China or corporations outsourcing elsewhere.

    You talk nonsense numbers about Ohio or whatever small spot in the US you are referring to, but anybody that has been to both the US and India knows which country is in more desperate need of those jobs, and given the economic disparities between both countries these jobs are flowing naturally to where they make the global economic system more efficient. No bullshit trolling about terrorism will change all this, even if they are not idle treaths, and even in the completely ludicrous scenario in which your "revolution" wins.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Yeah, sure, nice try buddy. by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      It's thinking like yours that leaves people no choice but to revolt. Check your history. Find out how long a huge underclass will tolerate a privileged class. Find out how long everyone else will stand for you saying, "Hey, that's just economic reality".

      Well, some of those people are going to put a cap in your ass eventually and they'll say, "Hey, that's just economic reality".

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  73. You can't have it both ways buddy. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If you don't want US companies to offshore jobs (note, they are not US's jobs, US's citizens haven't got a birth right to jobs created by *multinational* corporations incorporated in the US) then I am pretty sure you neither want those same companies stablishing offices in other countries and transferring profits (and thus paying taxes) in the US.

    Want capitalism? Then it is time we all embrace the full package and cut the bullshit.

    You don't like capitalism? Look at the old USSR, old China or North Korea for guidance and get ready to starve to death.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  74. Re:WWII Nazis identifying human-resource work cont by polyex · · Score: 1

    Thousands? German population during WWII was not in the thousands and the German people have rightfully accepted responsibility to this day. Who is trivializing here? I did not bring up the subject of IBM's collusion with the Nazi regime, so I am not sure why you are accusing me of doing so. In either event, reminding people of the Holocaust and all the parties that played a roll is not spitting on peoples graves but warns people that such any event could happen again and must never be allowed to do so. You minimizing the numbers of people responsible to a relative small number of madmen is a holocaust deniers trademark. The average German citizen at that time was well aware of Jewish prosecution by Germany and the numbers were far higher than a few thousand. IBM did not sell Nazis filing cabinets. They sold them lists of Jewish citizens, singled out because of the fact they were Jewish. IBM did this. IBM was aware of how the information they provided would be used and the ultimate fate of the men women and children - CHILDREN on this list, they simply did not care as money was involved. This is a key point, I think we actually agree that its silly to blame the folks who make a telephone that a Nazi may have inadvertently used in a war crime. But I am not sure your aware of just how much IBM was in cahoots with what the Nazis were doing with the information and what they wanted it for, as well as how ruthlessly efficient IBM was in gathering this information for them. This information provided would be clearly used, even to a moron, in a criminal act. I would urge your to read the book and draw your conclusions based on this.

  75. Re:WWII Nazis identifying human-resource work cont by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I did not bring up the subject of IBM's collusion with the Nazi regime, so I am not sure why you are accusing me of doing so

    I replied to what I beleive is the idiot that did and you picked up on the irrelevant discussion - probably dragged in due to the emotive nature. There really is no way to go but down - invoking the spirits of dead children on an irrelevant issue and calling me a moron is most likely not the way you behave offline. Misunderstanding what I meant about thousands of actual vicious murderers is fair enough I suppose - equally blaming the murderers and the unaware that provide them with a filing system is really an insult to the dead.