Could the software ignore _gestures_ near the edges of a small-bezeled device? Just a thought. I'm sure it would be more difficult than just making the bezel bigger. but if you are always having to move your fingers out of the way, you may crave a bigger bezel.
--voice of Stewie-- You are going to name the Rhoads Baby Dusty? I say! Why in the Devil would you do that? Oh, I get it: Dusty refers to Rhoads (or should I say Roads [but when I say it, it is the same word! Marvellous!]). That is so clever! It makes one think of an unpaved lane in the summertime. D-u-s-t-y...Why, yes, I quite like it. You have two incompatible thoughts that when put together form an entirely new and different idea. D-u-s-t-y.... --end Stewie--
I don't know what you are trying to say. I guess you are positing poverty and religion as evidence of the inverse of intelligence?
Now I don't know what I'm saying.
After reading David Goodstein's take on the Millikan affair, I find it hard to consider him a scientific forger: pdf of his American Scientist essay Perhaps you will explain what Millikan should have done differently.
They just took the number 3.14159 and added a load of random digits to the end - let's face it, nobody's going to check!
Reminds me of the MAX light rail station in the zoo tunnel in Portland, Oregon. Apparently there is the first 100 (1000?) digits of pi chiseled into one of the walls. A writer noticed that the first digits were correct, but quickly went astray. But later in the sequence, there was a recognizable early string of digits. The writer sleuthed that the sculptor had used the Book of Pi, which has the numbers in blocks of ten digits in five (or so) columns. In the book, you read the first row and then the next row.* The sculptor had read the first column, then the next column...
Presumably a government tells the really good secrets to the smallest number of people necessary. If they don't want to see the secret on the front page of the {{whatever newspapers and tv become}}, they won't spread it around.
I wouldn't question the political motives of the person who prints the secrets as much as question the agencies that hire the people to keep the secrets.
I would expect that the number of people with access to good secrets AND are leakers is much smaller than the number of people with access to not-so-secret secrets AND are leakers. In both cases, the political motives of the publisher should be presumed to be the opposite of the motives of the secret-keepers.
There are double crosses, triple crosses, and probably triangular crosses. What if the Taliban were easier to penetrate via Pakistanis than via Afghans.
In that case, because of publicizing the leak, there may be a purge that kills some people who trusted U.S.
I'm not saying that applies in this case. I would like to think that information of such nature would be in the hands of a few people and that those people would not leak such information.
If someone were to upload some Taliban documents, and he could read them, maybe he would post them.
My question, is, if your sources are anonymous, would it be easy for someone to use you as a propaganda conduit?
Probably covered in some of the 300+ posts, but I still had to ask.
The squirrel-suit altitude record is 30,000 feet. I wonder if a squirrel-suit could be designed to work for the other 90,000 feet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yJzTwgsz4s
I don't think that is the answer the OP is looking for. What he wants is for someone to mention the site somewhere that has classifieds where open source project maintainers post 'job' listings that was mentioned on slashdot not so long ago.
Slashdot Mirror
Ditto. Mark me redundant, but thanks all the same for the work.
Could the software ignore _gestures_ near the edges of a small-bezeled device? Just a thought. I'm sure it would be more difficult than just making the bezel bigger. but if you are always having to move your fingers out of the way, you may crave a bigger bezel.
7 inches should be enough for anybody.
--voice of Stewie-- You are going to name the Rhoads Baby Dusty? I say! Why in the Devil would you do that? Oh, I get it: Dusty refers to Rhoads (or should I say Roads [but when I say it, it is the same word! Marvellous!]). That is so clever! It makes one think of an unpaved lane in the summertime. D-u-s-t-y...Why, yes, I quite like it. You have two incompatible thoughts that when put together form an entirely new and different idea. D-u-s-t-y.... --end Stewie--
...'mythantropes'...
Google has three hits for this word, and one of the hits is the parent posting.
Thread closed.
I don't know what you are trying to say. I guess you are positing poverty and religion as evidence of the inverse of intelligence? Now I don't know what I'm saying.
...existence. Call it Second Existence. Maybe there is something more more catchy you could call it.
FreeBSD appears to be in decline as a project.
Has Netcraft confirmed it?
After reading David Goodstein's take on the Millikan affair, I find it hard to consider him a scientific forger: pdf of his American Scientist essay Perhaps you will explain what Millikan should have done differently.
Should fit, right?
And isn't an SUV _trunk_ about 1 m x 1 m x 1 m, anyway?
They just took the number 3.14159 and added a load of random digits to the end - let's face it, nobody's going to check!
Reminds me of the MAX light rail station in the zoo tunnel in Portland, Oregon. Apparently there is the first 100 (1000?) digits of pi chiseled into one of the walls. A writer noticed that the first digits were correct, but quickly went astray. But later in the sequence, there was a recognizable early string of digits. The writer sleuthed that the sculptor had used the Book of Pi, which has the numbers in blocks of ten digits in five (or so) columns. In the book, you read the first row and then the next row.* The sculptor had read the first column, then the next column...
* or the other way around
Here is a typical such article from Newsweek in 1995:
And today that publication was sold for $1.00.
...will Perl 6 be ready?
...to put a high-def camera and an 802.11o wifi transmitter on the asteroid.
Presumably a government tells the really good secrets to the smallest number of people necessary. If they don't want to see the secret on the front page of the {{whatever newspapers and tv become}}, they won't spread it around.
I wouldn't question the political motives of the person who prints the secrets as much as question the agencies that hire the people to keep the secrets.
I would expect that the number of people with access to good secrets AND are leakers is much smaller than the number of people with access to not-so-secret secrets AND are leakers. In both cases, the political motives of the publisher should be presumed to be the opposite of the motives of the secret-keepers.
There are double crosses, triple crosses, and probably triangular crosses. What if the Taliban were easier to penetrate via Pakistanis than via Afghans.
In that case, because of publicizing the leak, there may be a purge that kills some people who trusted U.S.
I'm not saying that applies in this case. I would like to think that information of such nature would be in the hands of a few people and that those people would not leak such information.
If someone were to upload some Taliban documents, and he could read them, maybe he would post them. My question, is, if your sources are anonymous, would it be easy for someone to use you as a propaganda conduit? Probably covered in some of the 300+ posts, but I still had to ask.
The squirrel-suit altitude record is 30,000 feet. I wonder if a squirrel-suit could be designed to work for the other 90,000 feet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yJzTwgsz4s
From the summary I cannot determine the name of the asteroid or the two spaceships. I can guess, but then why would I need a summary?
Just the opposite of how a Right Hand Drive country's roads work.
Excuse justinlee37, he's getting old and forgets.
Now get off my lawn!
I don't think that is the answer the OP is looking for. What he wants is for someone to mention the site somewhere that has classifieds where open source project maintainers post 'job' listings that was mentioned on slashdot not so long ago.