Slashdot Mirror


Defending Self In a Case of On-Line Identity Theft?

SoccerDad41 writes "I am a systems administrator for an Indiana-based bricks-n-clicks retailer currently suspended because an unscrupulous typosquatter stole my name and registration information for his/her fraudulent domain registration. My company hired a third party service to protect their trademark by identifying and terminating infringing web sites. The third party identified a domain name, performed a WhoIs lookup & issued a complaint in compliance within ICANN's rules. This was presumably all reported back to our Legal department and it was noticed that the name on the domain registration matched mine. I have a locally uncommon ethnic last name so an immediate connection to me was made & although I protested my absolute innocence in the matter, I have been suspended on grounds of violating non-compete policies pending proof that it isn't me. The fraudulent domain registration was made with a different registrar (let's call them Registrar B) than the one my company uses (let's call them Registrar A). The public parts of the registration information at Registrar B match pretty exactly those of my legitimate domain registrations at Registrar A, including Registrar A's mailing address and phone number. The only things left out in the mailing address are the reference to a domain name and ATTN: Registrar A. Of course the anonymized email address differs as well. Surely I'm not the first in the Slashdot community to find myself in this situation. I'd like to avoid incurring the cost of a lawyer but I am intent on maintaining my good name and continued employment. What are my rights and responsibilities in this matter? What is my best course of action? How did you resolve this issue? How can I prove it's not me?"

390 comments

  1. Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See a lawyer.

    1. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And ask them what?

    2. Re:Uh, what? by Xiph · · Score: 5, Insightful

      as many will presumably say: See a lawyer.

      While slashdot can give you eggcelent legal advice, It'll hit you in the face that you don't play dice with the important parts of your life.

      So please mods, don't put redundant to the people who say "Get a lawyer"

      --
      Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
    3. Re:Uh, what? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 0, Troll

      Something like: "I am a systems administrator for an Indiana-based....... What is my best course of action? How did you resolve this issue? How can I prove it's not me?"; Just cut and paste the question above; substitute real names and feed it to the lawyer.

      Being serious; they need to prove it was you. Once you've identified a good lawyer to handle it, enjoy a free holiday as long as you possibly can; simply deny any connection but try to avoid helping them in any way.

      The type of lawyer you want to see, incidentally, is "effective and brutal libel".

      It's a bit late, now you've posted it on slashdot, I hope you lied about the details, but if you had any sense you would have started acting terribly emotionally damaged. Fake a suicide attempt. Find a friendly doctor to certify you depressed. Disappear into the wilderness on camping expeditions (so that you can have fun in an environment where it will be difficult to trace you) etc. etc.

      Now that you have posted this on slashdot, probably your lawyer will advise you to prostrate yourself before the HR department; apoloigise for screwing up an internal investigation and offer to pay the company for the damage you've done. If he does that then just do what he says. He clearly knows beter than you do.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    4. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You already have some good legal advice. First though is get an attorney. An attorney isn't just an advocate but an officer of the court. They have particular powers that you as an individual won't have. Finding a good technology attorney in Indiana is going to be difficult but you should be able to do it. Second the company is just protecting it's assets. Try not and pit the company against you, but you and the company against the infringing entity. That is how I would talk to your bosses and if their attorney is present yours should be too. You can take on the infringing party from a few avenues and I'd start using them all. The infringing party is likely to hide but a best effort or good faith effort on your part should make for a better legal case if the company does not realize how the attack is being perpetrated. If as you discussed the incident is in the pattern suggested the attack and response by the company are disjointed due to their misunderstanding of the situation. This leaves them vulnerable. You're suspended not fired try to make them see that you can assist them. Then for gosh sakes protect your domain information registration from now on.

    5. Re:Uh, what? by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Although a lawyer is obviously a good idea, I think slashdot is the place to find people who will understand the technical sides of this, such as how ICANN works, etc. So I think its a great idea to solicit input from this community first.

      Lawyers are expensive, and many of them are less than perfectly competent. With a complex technical issue like this, you could end up spending a ton of money if you don't do as much research as you can first.

    6. Re:Uh, what? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      "effective and brutal libel"

      Google turned up nothing. Did you just make this up? Oh and yes I agree that hiring a lawyer is the best thing to do. The problem with dealing with employers is they can invent the most flimsy excuses (or just flat-out lies) to remove an employee, and there's little you can do to self-defend yourself. You really need the full weight of government and a court of law if you expect to win an unjustified termination lawsuit.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if you had any sense you would have started acting terribly emotionally damaged. Fake a suicide attempt. Find a friendly doctor to certify you depressed. Disappear into the wilderness on camping expeditions (so that you can have fun in an environment where it will be difficult to trace you) etc. etc.

      You are an asshole. It is people saying shit like you do that make people so cynical about people who have real mental health problems. Many people do not help friends, family, etc., because they assume people are faking and are trying to be manipulative when they talk about suicide or make suicide attempts. And the reason they think that way is because when non-depressed people talk about suicide, they typically talk about how they can use it to game the system.

      So screw you. People die because of your cynicism.

    8. Re:Uh, what? by russ1337 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think this IS his lawyer. A lawyer who has no idea about domain registrations so asked slashdot.... by pretending to be the client...

    9. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There hardly is a technical side. If the person who registered the domain did a good job, there is no way to prove who it was or wasn't. There isn't really any authentication required before you register a domain. All the registrars care about is that they get paid. Normally that would prompt the usual "follow the money", but we're looking at a single payment and it's in the "wrong" direction. You could find the IP addresses from which the domain (or the web space) was registered, but if those addresses turn out to be some random person's home IP addresses where the wireless LAN is wide open or if it's a public hotspot, that's the end of that trace. That's it. Your only hope is that the domain was registered from home or paid with a credit card that isn't stolen. Not unlikely, the average criminal isn't known for smarts. On the other hand, there is a chance that Mr. Innocent here did in fact do it, possibly not thinking much about it, got caught and looks for a way out.

    10. Re:Uh, what? by NoTheory · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a case of following the money. ICANN info isn't going to be helpful, so get back to the root of who paid for the domain registration, and make it clear that it is different from the listed registerer.

      I am however somewhat surprised by/skeptical about this story. How did the poster's name and info get associated w/ this? This sounds like an inside job or there's additional info missing from this story (which may be due to just trying to remain anonymous-ish).

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    11. Re:Uh, what? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      The problem with dealing with employers is they can invent the most flimsy excuses (or just flat-out lies) to remove an employee, and there's little you can do to self-defend yourself. You really need the full weight of government and a court of law if you expect to win an unjustified termination lawsuit.

      Why should they invent an excuse or lie? In the U.S., they can fire you for any reason at all, or no reason.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment

      (The exceptions are for government employees, employees with an employment contract, and union members. They can't fire you for reasons that are protected by discrimination law, like race, religion or gender.)

    12. Re:Uh, what? by nbauman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      as many will presumably say: See a lawyer.

      While slashdot can give you eggcelent legal advice, It'll hit you in the face that you don't play dice with the important parts of your life.

      When you do see a lawyer, you need to know two things: The law and the facts.

      The facts include the details of how domain registration works. The lawyer may not know that. Readers of Slashdot may well know important information about domain registration that the lawyer can't easily get and would need to make the best decision about this situation.

    13. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just kidding.

    14. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need an experienced employment specialist in the UK id suggest Matrix Chambers or Russell Jones and Walker.

    15. Re:Uh, what? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      ***as many will presumably say: See a lawyer.***

      Well, yes -- obviously. ... assuming that no IT genius has a clever answer unknown to most of us.

      The real question here, is how do you find a lawyer who is not going to end up billing one for a zillion hours while they learn the laws and customary practices applicable to this complex, narrow, and rather obscure situation?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    16. Re:Uh, what? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 0, Troll

      Mod parent up.

      Though, it seems like sensible advice for a European situation where you have some chance of justice. If you are in the UK it will be much cheaper to start with your local Citizens advice bureau and then work onto lawyers when you know more.

      Indiana, it seems, is an at will state so basically you don't get anything back for being fired as such. The only thing you can sue about is if they did something wrong to you whist firing you. For full details you will, indeed, want to consult an "experienced employment specialist" but a little reading on wikipedia will help you realise that posting to slashdot may not be sufficient to rescue you.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    17. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

    18. Re:Uh, what? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you do see a lawyer, you need to know two things: The law and the facts

      Incorrect - This is like saying when you go see the doctor, you need to know your symptoms and how to perform surgery.

      All you need to know are the facts. The laywer will know the law. S/he'll likely have to go away and do some homework, but s/he'll come back to you with 'the law.'

    19. Re:Uh, what? by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >>>Why should they invent an excuse or lie?

      They did it to me. I was signed to a 6-month contract, but the company suddenly decided to cut costs by getting rid of half the staff. Since I was only 1 month into the 6 month contract, they invented a bunch of lies: "You eat too much food at lunch time," and "You showed up late for the 11 o'clock meeting [even though I was there at 10:55]," and "You charged 45 hours when you were not given permission [even though just one week earlier the boss said we could go upto 50]."

      They had to Lie to make it appear I had broken the terms.
      Otherwise my termination would have been a breach of contract.
      (BTW don't ever work for Rockwell Collins in Iowa; they treat you poorly.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    20. Re:Uh, what? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bullshit. *Every* time I've seen a lawyer (4 or 5 times), I've had to explain in detail not only the situation but fairly explicit descriptions of how I think that the law or contract was broken and how I'd like to proceed. One incredibly lame-ass IP lawyer couldn't understand the difference between a copyright action and a trademark issue. Now he was the exception, but a good example of why you damn sure want to know where you're going with this before you start spending $300 hours at the lawyer.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    21. Re:Uh, what? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      P.S.

      Rockwell also refused to pay me for my last day of work. They told me to come-in Monday to empty my desk which I did, then I met with my manager for about an hour, then sat doing nothing for an hour, then met security for 30 minutes, and finally left 4 hours after I had originally come-in. I submitted my hours via timecard (per usual) but the boss refused to sign it, and I never got paid.

      Bastards

      Fucking, fucking bastards.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    22. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you are clearly not a lawyer because you are clearly making things up. I *am* a lawyer and I have no idea what an "effective and brutal libel" attorney is. And I'm pretty versed in defamation law. In fact, I'm published on it.

      so please take your advice somewhere else b/c you are not providing any actual help to the poor guy above.

      my advice, of course, is go to talk to a lawyer. if this ends up being a wrongful termination thing, you could try to convince him to take it on contingency.

    23. Re:Uh, what? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Oh, you had an employment contract. That's one of the fine-print exceptions to employment at will. You have my sympathy.

      The free market is great if you have a skill that is critical to a business in which they make a lot of money. It's not so great when they don't need you any more.

    24. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a domain squatter who was feeling pissy after getting caught tried to start some shit

    25. Re:Uh, what? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      This does not hold in every state, or even a majority of states. The article you link to points out the various exceptions. Many places will make sure they have a valid reason for letting a person go to avoid lawsuits, regardless; especially in the many states that have exceptions to this general rule.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    26. Re:Uh, what? by Toonol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I *am* a lawyer and I have no idea what an "effective and brutal libel" attorney is. And I'm pretty versed in defamation law. In fact, I'm published on it.

      You're being deliberately obtuse, which may be a good skill for you to possess in the courtroom, but not on slashdot. An "effective and brutal libel" attorney is a libel attorney that is effective and brutal. This isn't a legal term; this is English. You need to be able to read and parse both.

      You're completely correct that the OP needs to go talk to a lawyer. Slashdot, at most, might provide some technical clues to tracking down the real culprit.

    27. Re:Uh, what? by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      Even lawyers with knowledge of domain don't really know what you want if you don't tell it to the lawyer. Drafting contracts and other legal matters are pretty co-operative situations where lawyer will point you to the right direction while covering his/her ass in the process. The person hiring a lawyer will make decisions on any and all even remotely suspicious details of the case or contract.

      To continue the doctor example, if you are sick you go to see a doctor with some domain knowledge. With that knowledge he/she will discuss with you to figure out the actual issue, ultimately he will tell you benefits and disadvantages of each treatment while you make the decision on how to proceed. Doctor covers his/her ass with signed piece of paper and you take the risks of the treatment.

    28. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You suck at picking lawyers.

    29. Re:Uh, what? by ncgnu08 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The only thing you can sue about is if they did something wrong to you whist firing you.

      Since we are in a technical legal discussion, I'm going to ask if you really meant "whist" (a card game, an early form of bridge, but without bidding) or "whilst" in your reply. I was not sure it was a word until I looked it up....

      Also from wiki it seems "No U.S. state but Montana has chosen to statutorily modify the employment at-will rule"; I was under the impression it was mainly southern states....

      --
      Member of American Sarcasm Society - Motto: "Like we need your help!"
    30. Re:Uh, what? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      And look for another job. I wouldn't want to work there any longer even if i did win the case.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    31. Re:Uh, what? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You suck at picking lawyers.

      Exactly right. Unless you live in Mayberry, you need to ensure your lawyer is familiar with your part of law. If they're not, you need to go talk to a different laywer.

    32. Re:Uh, what? by javamann · · Score: 1

      My wife is an HR Director and I 'pity the fool who tries to mess with me'. Seriously, even though California is an 'At Will' state you would be surprised the number of way you can legally protect yourself if a company tries to screw you. Such as not pay for services rendered.

    33. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the local attorney will know their past cases and the local legal 'weather patterns'. If you are aware of specific legal elements that pertain to your case, you will be best served bringing that to the lawyers' attention.

      This is like saying when you go to see the doctor, you need to know your symptoms and have some idea of what treatment options exist. The doctor can help you focus on overlooked or ignored elements, and bring other information to light, then can recommend the better of the local hospitals.

    34. Re:Uh, what? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      After which point you start planning your lawsuit for:

        - Lost wages
        - Emotional suffering and punitive damages
        - Libel
        - When they fire you in retaliation: wrongful termination and harassment

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    35. Re:Uh, what? by McNally · · Score: 1

      I am however somewhat surprised by/skeptical about this story. How did the poster's name and info get associated w/ this?

      Perhaps the malfeasor(s) "borrowed" his name from the contact information in his company's bona fide domain registration?

    36. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative

      my advice, of course, is go to talk to a lawyer.

      You claim to be a lawyer, and your advice is:

      1. self-serving
      2. expensive
      3. stupid as sh*t
      4. not a solution

      He "owns" the domain. Since it has his contact info, he can get the domain into his boss's hands in 1 day. Since he is the official owner of record, all he has to do is tell them he wants the domain transferred to the company, and that the email address is inaccurate. They will ask him for proof of identity. He sends them, either by email or by FedEx, a copy of his drivers license, which has the right name and address on it, and they initiate the transfer.

      Since he's also the official "owner", he can also ask for "his" billing info and what the email address on record was. It's not like the scammer will sue for identity theft.

      End result? The employer has the domain, the scammer is out a domain, and he gets the billing info and email address quickly, all for the cost of a pizza. If the email address is for some place in China, and the cc info is stolen, then the only people unhappy are the scammer and the lawyer who didn't get a 4-figure retainer and manage to churn it into a 5-figure lawsuit.

      That's 2 scams for the price of one. Stupid lawyers, trying to make everything into a lawsuit. Shakespeare had it right.

    37. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .I am the LAW!

    38. Re:Uh, what? by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When hiring any professional, it helps to know enough to decide if they know enough.

    39. Re:Uh, what? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Easy, Let's say I want to set up a legitimate looking typo site to try and grab a few online sales from a popular site (let's say, amizone.com) One way is to make my site look like theirs, and register my site with their whois information (but my anonymized contact email). It's not like the registrars do any sort of fact checking whatsoever other than mail out a pestering email once a year telling you to verify that it's all correct.

      If someone is dumb as a brick and doesn't bother to check in to it at all, they might think that the listed contacts must necessarily have actually registered the typo site.

    40. Re:Uh, what? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      He "owns" the domain. Since it has his contact info, he can get the domain into his boss's hands in 1 day. Since he is the official owner of record, all he has to do is tell them he wants the domain transferred to the company, and that the email address is inaccurate. They will ask him for proof of identity. He sends them, either by email or by FedEx, a copy of his drivers license, which has the right name and address on it, and they initiate the transfer.

      ... and as sure as he has control of the domain, his boss's accusations become right, and he's fired for good.

      Be sure to first talk this through with a lawyer, and then with your boss, before taking any step of acquiring control over the domain.

    41. Re:Uh, what? by iivel · · Score: 1

      Not to be nitpicky, but there is a huge swath of reasons for claim of wrongful termination. Also included are: whistleblowing statutes, wage and hour statues (depending on your state), EEOC (which you note), ADA (even pregnancy [and most medical problems] can classify as a de-facto disability), FMLA, etc. I know employers like to think that they can just up and terminate an employee "just because" ... but it isn't always necessarily true & can cause direct exposure to various types of lawsuits if there was no reasonable cause for termination.

    42. Re:Uh, what? by iivel · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up as this is good general advice for life. If you go into a situation clueless it's 1.) easy to be taken advantage of (throw your favorite auto mechanic story in here) and 2.) difficult to make a rational determination on whether or not to hire one person over another.

      I'm reassured, when doing consulting work, that my potential clients (usually small business owners) have educated themselves just enough on IT to have a reasonable conversation with me regarding their plans prior to offering me a contract. I'm also wary of those that have no idea of what they want ... blindly trusting me and my opinions.

    43. Re:Uh, what? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Most people do. Unless you're very unlucky you don't get much practice.

    44. Re:Uh, what? by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the case. The public whois info of the typo domain matches exactly that of the legit domain. In fact, the legit domain is in Network Solutions. The typo domain is in another registrar & the info includes NS's PO box address & NS's phone number. My IT department is all behind me, all the way up, but Legal doesn't understand the nuances of domain registration - they are used to working with above-board companies. I'm hopeful my internal allies can educate the lawyers post-haste and remove this veil of suspicion.

    45. Re:Uh, what? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Employment at will has a big footnote full of exceptions.

      It's complicated, with federal, state and sometimes city regulations.

      I do know of a case in which a woman was either not hired, or fired, because she was pregnant. She took it to court, and her case was rejected. (I can't find the citation, sorry.) I talked to the lawyer, and she thought they had a slam-dunk case, but they lost in court.

    46. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Please read what I wrote. He cc's the boss on everything. And don't forget, once the registrar confirms his identity, they can send him a copy of the billing records attached to the account. And the email address. If it was paid for with a stolen credit card from the Ukraine, and the email address was for some gmail account that google traces to a user in Zagreb, he's in the clear.

      Right now, the working assumption is that he is in control of the domain. The damage is done. And yes, he is the legal owner of the domain, thanks to the lax way that domain registrations are carried out. He has the opportunity to get the domain under his boss's control within a few hours. Now think for a moment - what happens if he doesn't do this?

      The real danger for him, as of today

      If I were his boss or a co-worker, and I read this thread next week, I would be really p*ssed off that he didn't take these simple and obvious steps, steps that could resolve everything in a day or two at no, or minimal, expense. I would draw one of two negative inferences:

      1. That this appeal for help is just posturing, he really did register the domain, and that doing this would reveal that he paid for it, or
      2. That he is a gutless wonder with no common sense, and I would pray he goes to work for my biggest competitor.

      Either way, he would no longer be just suspended - he'd be fired, since his inaction jeopardized both the company and his position in it. And they'd be right. Someone gives you an easy way to clear everything up in 24 hours, and you don't at least bring it to their attention ASAP after a very public appeal for help? It wouldn't pass the smell test. All he has to do is forward a link to this thread, and ask the boss what information they want in the updated dns record. Problem solved.

      Unless, of course, this request for help was a sham.

      Steal it back!

      Someone stole your identity, and you have a chance to steal it back, then you steal it back ... And hope they're stupid enough to file a complaint, like the crackhead who went to the police to complain that they got cheated on a drug deal.

      Not that he's really stealing it back - he is the owner of record already. If he weren't he wouldn't be in hot water up to his neck.

      "Run it by a lawyer" - like a lawyer has a clue as to how these things work. Know any retired judges or lawyers? Ask their opinion of lawyers, off the record. Even lawyers who aren't retired admit that most lawyers (7 out of 8 by one measure) are liars who routinely cheat their clients.

    47. Re:Uh, what? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      If it was paid for with a stolen credit card from the Ukraine, and the email address was for some gmail account that google traces to a user in Zagreb, he's in the clear.

      Actually that doesn't really help his case as far as his employer is concerned. It doesn't prove that he wasn't the responsible party. In the mind of his employer he's already guilty, and needs to prove his innocence to them, and merely transferring the domain to them and producing some untraceable billing information doesn't accomplish this. With the billing information in hand (assuming it's fraudulent), the employer might then decide to engage the police.

      Probably the best thing he can do is talk to his employer, ask them what action in their mind he can take to absolve himself of the issue. They will either give him a path to redemption which if reasonable he can follow, or they won't, in which case he really should talk to a lawyer - even if just to pay the guy a couple hundred bucks to talk over the situation for an hour and get an idea of best course of action.

    48. Re:Uh, what? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      CCing your boss on everything will not save your ass (it can help, but only if your boss has not made up his/her mind already).
      Your solution is technically possible, but is not a guarantee to work, as he doesn't have all the log in information for the domain registrar, and/or the registrar likely could give (<) a shit.

      Anyway, I am in the lawyer camp. I was in a totally different aside from employment related issue (I was looking to sue my employer for hostile environment) I was able to meet with a competent lawyer for about 30 min, lay out my case, and get sound advice, totally free... Advice that cost the lawyer money to give me:

      Don't sue. If you do you will win (and I'll take it on contingency), but you will also need to find a new line of work. If you love what you do then file a formal complaint with HR and let it die on the vine in the office, because once this goes to court your name will be known as a litigant in your industry and no one is required to give you a job.

      My point to tomhudson being that not all lawyers are self serving greedy assholes (though the ones that are give everyone else the bad name).

      Now in the OP situation he is trying to mount a defense of his good name, I would expect that a lawyer would charge you, but I would find one that would charge a reasonable amount, and would be capable of mounting a counter suit for slander/libel/unfair dismissal should things go sideways.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    49. Re:Uh, what? by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BEST WAY TO FIND A LAWYER:

      Call your local (or closest) law school. They will be able to refer you to an (alumni likely) expert/specialist in the area of law you need help.

      The two times I needed a lawyer I asked a lawyer for a referral to a specialist in the area.

      As a bonus, when going through the law school, depending on your case, you might find pro-bono help.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    50. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      "Probably the best thing he can do is talk to his employer, ask them what action in their mind he can take to absolve himself of the issue."

      If they had a clue, they would have already told him. The sad fact is that most slashdotters, despite claiming all sorts of technical expertise, aren't aware of the basic procedure to recover a domain when the email info is screwed up. Everyone screaming "get a lawyer." You send them a copy of government photo id, and you get control of the domain. It's the same procedure as when you change email addresses and forget to update the registration info before the old email account lapses. You need to validate your identity with some photo id. You don't need a lawyer (and you don't have to be terribly competent) to figure that out.

      What's talking to a lawyer going to do? A $1000 retainer, several hours of talking, and the lawyer will say that he'll contact the employer to suggest that the guy establish his identity as the one in the contact info, and transfer the domain to his boss.

      Oh, and by now the retainer is all gone, and by the time the boss gets back to him (he's going to have to lawyer up as well) through HIS lawyer, and everyone jaw-jaws, the bill is $3,000, to do the exact same thing he can do now for free - email the boss with a link to this thread and say "I can try to steal the domain back and put whatever contact info you want into it. I can also try to get them to send us the billing and email address for the squatter."

      The police? You are kidding, aren't you?

      "With the billing information in hand (assuming it's fraudulent), the employer might then decide to engage the police."

      They don't care. Was it more than $25,000? Was anyone injured physically? Is anyone pointing a gun at someone, or dealing drugs or molesting children? No? Sorry, we've got more important cases to deal with.

      This doesn't even register on their radar - "We're talking about a $10 domain? You called us over a f***ing $10 domain? And they even paid the $10? They didn't steal your identity to siphon your bank account or charge stuff to you? GTFO! This is a civil matter. We don't do civil cases."

      I can't believe how many people want to make a simple thing complicated. I guess that explains Java.

      And if they don't like the idea ...

      ... then they're screwing themselves. He's offered them a legal, quick way to resolve the outstanding issues. If they say "don't do this" then he should email back and say "Why? Is this a Joe job? Did YOU register it in my name as a pretext to fire me?" It's a logical question to ask, but it won't come to that. If he proposes to steal the domain back and get both the domain and the billing and email info into their hands, they'll jump on the opportunity.

      Lawyer up, and they're going to be mighty p*ssed that he made them spend thousands of dollars and waste days when it could have been fixed with a couple of emails.

      How many slashdotters does it take to take a dump? One, but he has to ask slashdot and then run the whole procedure by a lawyer first.

    51. Re:Uh, what? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I don't know how big your company is, but if you have the IT dept behind you on this, can you arrange a meeting of your IT director, you, and the legal manager? Your role will be to sit silently unless there is a specific point of fact that the director is in error on, at which point you quietly tell him the correction.
      Your goal should only be to say: I want to help you guys get the bad guys because: 1) I love it here and don't want to leave. & 2) These guys are hurting me as much as they are hurting the company by using my name fraudulently, much like they are typo squatting on the company's name.

      Also, I posted earlier to get a lawyer, the best way to do this is to ask the local law school for a referral, they will get you in touch with a specialist in this area of law, likely an alumni, who very well make take the case on a pro-bono or at least a reduced cost if all your looking to do is defend yourself and your good name (as opposed to a countersuit, at which point if there is money to be made they will want a cut).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    52. Re:Uh, what? by Xacid · · Score: 1

      In an ideal world this would work out the best. I don't know what kind of relationship this guy has with his employer; if they're willing to work with him and believe him, but are just by the balls due to corporate policy then it might be worth a shot to work with the company to get this domain out of false hands. However, it does seem pretty fishy. Or phishy. As one posted commented - this could be a ploy to get rid of him anyway. I think a lawyer might be worth at least consulting with to show they're serious about this matter and that they're willing to work with them on this issue and be taken seriously.

    53. Re:Uh, what? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Just a piece of advice - the local town lawyer, you know, the guy who advertises on billboards and bus stops, is probably useless for anything but the simplest and most common legal issues. Based on your description of your experiences, that's probably who you are seeing. Or you just had exceptionally bad luck or suck at picking lawyers as others have suggested.

      When you have an IP issue, you really can't talk to a non-IP-lawyer about it, it's a waste of time. If an IP lawyer didn't understand the difference between copyright and trademark, you are probably talking about a local podunk lawyer who hung a shingle on his office door that said "IP lawyer". That's not a real IP lawyer.

      If you have a labor law issue as the original poster does, you go to a labor/employment lawyer, explain your case, and if they can't tell you about the applicable laws in your state that protect you and how you can use those laws in this situation, move on to the next labor lawyer.

      Having a good relationship with one smart lawyer in a large enough firm, who can refer you to specialists in other areas of the law, either within their firm or within other firms, is always a good thing.

    54. Re:Uh, what? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>End result?

      The guy just proved his guilt by demonstrating he had an infringing website under his name, and he gets terminated. Your advice was marked +5 but it's actually incredibly stupid advice. Like walking up to a cop and handing him a bloody knife with your fingerprints and saying, "It wasn't me but here's the evidence you're looking for. I hope you'll find me innocent."

      Hire. A. Lawyer.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    55. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      He doesn't need any "login information." This is the same procedure you use when you accidentally change email accounts and forget to update the dns info. It's called a manual update. You send them an email, they ask for proof of identity (government photo id) and you fax it to them, along with the form, and you get control of the domain and they'll send you the authCode to transfer it elsewhere.

      He can propose this to his boss, meet at work to fax the info from there and get the confirming fax back, do the transfer, and everyone can breathe a bit easier because at least ONE problem is resolved.

      Then they can ask for the billing and contact details that were on record for the original registration, please fax to the same fax #.

      What happens after that is between the parties. If they're not satisfied, say "Thank you very much, have a nice life, call me if you have any more problems" and leave, because it's hopeless, and a lawyer isn't going to change that.

    56. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I was in a contract dispute and provided all the documentation to the lawyer. He had very little good advice until I told him what I thought. Then he agreed that we should go with my suggestion. (We won)

    57. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      He already has the infringing site under his name. Or did you not realize that's why he's in sh*t in the first place? The site is 100% legally his. No lawyer can change that fact.

      This way, he can at least undo some of the damage, and possibly get the billing and bogus email address information.

      The guy asked for a solution. Running to a lawyer, who cannot possibly solve this as quickly, is not a solution.

      Shakespeare was wrong. Don't shoot the lawyers. Shoot the people who recommend the lawyers as a solution. Most lawyers are crooks - 7 out of 8 admit to overbilling their clients. The other one is either dirt poor or a liar.

    58. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that many posters are jumping to the worst case scenario for conflict resolution (lawyers). Right or wrong, being suspended, is standard procedure if an employee is suspected of breaking contracts.

      It may be entirely possible to salvage the situation. Convincing the employer, someone else did it, should be the primary objective. Financial records from the DNS registrar, may be the most sure way and certainly unique.

      Where is the domain actually hosted? Who's paying those bills?

      Instead of repeated recommendations for a lawyer, try the easier steps first.

    59. Re:Uh, what? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      More than once I've had domains where the holding company has gone tits-up and I was unable to get through to anyone. It went so far as I had to start doing chargebacks because the automated systems kept billing me, in spite of my attempted cancellations. My concern is that the domain could be in such a registrar that doesn't give 2c about support, in which case it has to go through ICANN does it not?
      Now I learned my lesson from the previous incidents, so now my registrations are with a slightly more reputable company, but I doubt a typo squatter is going to use a better registrar.

      That said, your idea is sound, and in any event his inability to retrieve info even when in front of his company lawyers may still help his case that it's not him.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    60. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the often referenced Shakespeare quotation was made by during an exchange between characters fomenting a tyranny, right?

      Thought not.

    61. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      So what? If people aren't willing to defend themselves, maybe they deserve tyrants.

      And Shakespeare was only echoing Jesus' attitude about lawyers ...

      Funny the custom of swearing on a bible whose main character denounces the legal "profession".

    62. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what does Santa, the Easter Bunny, Zeus, and the man-friendly dyke have to say about it, not what we're talking about imaginary characters?

    63. Re:Uh, what? by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but if they have a reason for firing you, it needs to be a legitimate one. Firing someone b/c you can't afford the position or you don't want the person on your staff is ok. But there are some protected classes of firing, like gender, age, handicapped and ethnicity.

      Regarding legitimate firing reasons, if they fire you because you were illegally competing with them and it turns out that in fact you were not, I suspect there might be possibilities for claiming damages, or getting a court to reinstate you. Usually that's why companies pretend that there is no reason at all for firing someone ("just not working out"). If this company fired him for violation of his non-compete clause then he's got grounds to challenge that reason. Most likely if this guy can prove he's innocent (sounds difficult from the fact pattern he presented), he can settle with the company, but he'll still probably need a lawyer to accomplish that.

    64. Re:Uh, what? by Bovarchist · · Score: 1

      Just register a similar typo-squatting type domain in the name of the 3rd party service and bring that to your employer's attention.

      --
      Hell is other people's code.
    65. Re:Uh, what? by iivel · · Score: 1

      If you happen to think of the case (or know where it was decided I can look it up) that would be an interesting read for me. I'd operated under the assumption that pregnancy was always protected either under the ADA or the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ... that was until I started reading some case law on the subject. Usually rejections seem to fall by the wayside due to the size of the employer (less than 15 people for example have a much smaller requirement for "reasonable accomodation") or unreasonable demands.

      I have to agree with the "it's complicated" sentiment ... really the only answer for the OP though I think is to talk to a qualified employment lawyer in his/her jurisdiction.

    66. Re:Uh, what? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      It sounds as if they're more upset that in their mind, he violated a noncompete agreement. The fact that they suspended him already means they have basically decided his fate and are giving him a chance to evidence collect on his own behalf before they terminate him permanently (maybe with a nice lawsuit for breach of contract to follow).

      They came to him and said, "You broke your agreement, and are competing directly with us," managing to produce the domain within 24 hours and hand it over sure looks like someone trying to make amends for wrongdoing, no matter what means was used to acquire the domain.

      Chances are that the lost wages he's looking at greatly outnumber the cost of employing a lawyer for a few hours (I doubt most people who could have acquired this position are making little enough that a week's salary is less than a few hours of lawyer time).

      And yes, the police. If they're feeling vindictive, and it turns out the domain was acquired with a stolen credit card, and presumably the transaction crosses state lines. So some small town cops might have a shot at working a federal level case. Maybe it goes nowhere, but even so, the damage to OP is substantial. I've witnessed first hand the kind of bored injustice which can be served up by small time cops looking for something interesting to work on for once.

    67. Re:Uh, what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      They came to him and said, "You broke your agreement, and are competing directly with us," managing to produce the domain within 24 hours and hand it over sure looks like someone trying to make amends for wrongdoing, no matter what means was used to acquire the domain.

      Riiiight .... suggesting they use a well-established, pretty much universal, simple, and quick procedure that even has downloadable forms to expedite the process is suddenly suspicious. Gee whiz, he should take a month to suggest it - then it won't look at all suspicious! There's the ticket!

      No, delaying it will look both suspicious and incompetent.

      Besides, he's not responsible for their actions, only his own. How they react is entirely up to them, and entirely beyond his control. All he can do is do what's right, and if they're not satisfied, then they weren't going to be satisfied anyway. He can suggest it, and if they refuse it, he'll know there's no going back and he should not waste any more time or brain cells on the matter. If they accept it, then what happens depends on what's in the billing and email info.

      Now I'm convinced that slashdotters would take 9 minutes to boil three 3-minute eggs.

    68. Re:Uh, what? by nbauman · · Score: 1

      You are in luck. I managed to find the reference.

      "Work & Family," by Sue Shellenbarger, Wall Street Journal, 6 Sepember 1991, "New hire loses her job because of pregnancy."

      Margaret Ahmad reported for work as medical claims examiner for Loyal American Life Insurance, Mobile, Alabama, told her boss she was 4 months pregnant, and was fired.

      Ahmad intended to take only a week off, and the company never asked her how long she planned to be gone, said her attorney, Melissa Posey.

      Kirk C. Shaw, attorney for Loyal American, said the company allows 90-day maternity leaves.

      Loyal American argued that they would have to train her for five or six months, and then give her a 90-day maternity leave just when she was ready to start working on the job. So Loyal American felt she couldn't do the job. It was a "business necessity" defense.

      Federal judge Richard W. Vollmer, Jr., ruled in July that Loyal American had a legitimate business reason for withdrawing its offer.

      Ahmad won't appeal because of the cost of further litigation.

      Posey said this was a close case. Other judges in other jurisdictions had decided similar cases the other way.

    69. Re:Uh, what? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      How they react is entirely up to them, and entirely beyond his control.

      I only agree with the first half of this. He can influence their actions with his own, and if he intends to keep his job, he needs to be very careful how he responds. For someone who has already decided you're guilty, very few actions will prove otherwise.

      I'm not saying it's hard for him to claim a domain name which has him listed as the registrant (as you have repeatedly suggested). I'm saying that doing so is not necessarily in his best interests, and to a skeptical employer doesn't actually prove anything except maybe that he was smart enough to use untraceable billing.

    70. Re:Uh, what? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      I think that you're right; most of the charges you could bring are civil matters. (Libel, defamation, interference with (employment) contract, yadda yadda.)

      Identity Theft itself, though, is fraud where it isn't its own variety of crime (sometimes felony, sometimes misdemeanor). And fraud you CAN bring police in on. You might not get a lot of enthusiasm on their part, especially if you can't hand them a crook and a pile of evidence, because - let's face it - investigation is work. You're personally motivated, they're not.

      In the end, though, we don't have enough information. He's been suspended "pending proof", but we don't know if it's a "protective suspension" by a sympathetic manager, or a hostile one. If he's had a good working relationship with the company and management, then he can probably get away with bringing them on the inside of "find out who really did it". If a hostile one, lawyering up before anything else happens IS the right action; evidence presented by a lawyer is almost certain to be better considered than from someone they're already hostile to. A consultation with a lawyer about what to do isn't going to cost a lot, and won't involve a retainer unless/until you feel you actually need one.

      However, if you're bringing a lawyer in on things, you want to do every single bit as much of the leg-work as you possibly can. Anything your lawyer does, he'll bill you for, and that includes listening to you describe what you want him to do, by phone or in person.

    71. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is great advice for fixing things for the employer, but the problem is that this doesn't clear his good name. Playing devil's advocate, if he had done what he is accused of, using a different e-mail address, then a guilty party could still do precisely what you advise. From the employer's perspective, it would simply be a case of a guilty party getting caught, denying it, and then trying to buy himself some good will by trading in the stolen domain name, which is probably useless now anyway thanks to all the attention and the likelihood that the employer would be able to take it back by injunction anyway.

      Depending on how good the scammer is, the billing info may lead to a dead end, or maybe even to the victim's own credit card. There's enough of a chance that this line of investigation does lead somewhere that it's worth pursuing, but if it were my reputation at stake, I'd want to have some sort of legal advice before doing anything else, rather than waiting to see what the investigation turns up.

    72. Re:Uh, what? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      err. no. I meant "whilst". Funny that it got modded a troll when it was one of my more positive / factual posts...

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    73. Re:Uh, what? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1
      When you discuss this thinking about CCing the boss, I think you are really moving in the right direction. However, I still don't think you are thinking about dynamics in a big company.

      The first part of the dynamic is that the accusation has been made. If something was wrong, someone is probably going to want to cover their ass. If these people were reasonable, they would ask first and suspend later. No decent boss does what they've done, so probably you've had experiences with completely different situations.

      The second part is that the company cares more about the people than the domain. Please note from the story that this isn't a domain they are using; this isn't doing them any harm; they would never have noticed if they didn't hire a special service that checked for such domains. The fact that he returns it doesn't matter at all if they believe that he had it maliciously. They want rid of him not because they want his domain, but because they believe he cheated them.

      When the domain is updated, his information will be deleted from the record. It is likely that they will interpret this as evidence of an attempted cover up.

      He can get several bits of value from a lawyer at this point (an important thing to remember, even with lawyers, is that you are the customer; they will to some extent do what you ask them to do).

      • A person who can make offers without it being possible to safely accuse him of extortion / blackmail or deception.
      • An "independent" person where all correspondence goes through, making it more difficult to deny or twist
      • Some leverage to force the situation to be considered higher up or at least seriously.

      He should tell his lawyer he wants to make the offer you have suggested and ask for a quick verification of the letter he's written. This should be possible in a free 1/2 hour advice session. The lawyer will either be able to write it in his own name, in which case it can't be used as evidence of blackmail or alternatively be able to verify the wording to limit the possibility of it being used against him. The reaction to the company from the offer should be sufficient to tell him if he has a chance of working with them; if he should just walk away or, which I think is possible, they may decide to persue him no matter what he does now.

      Having said that, the difference between my interpretation and yours rests largely on understanding of facts that are implied rather than stated. What is the domain being used for? If nothing, then they clearly won't care about what he does and the only useful thing is to convince them it's not him. If it holds libelous material against the company then they might like your suggestion more. What exactly matches in the record? He only lists his name and the registrar. Registrars often have millions of customers so if that's the only similarity then it really can be coincidence. He can really get into trouble for trying to steal a domain. If on the other hand it has his home address as well, there's no question of anything other than identity fraud.

      So, in the absence of any more comment from the man himself, I'll agree with your other post that this was a troll and leave this at that.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  2. tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were you, I'd hire a lawyer.

    1. Re:tl;dr by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0

      I would hire a team of crack ninjas, as well as a lawyer or two. Plus advertise for the A-team.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the hookers

    3. Re:tl;dr by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      pfft. good luck finding them. that mr. lee hasn't been to his laundry in ages.

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  3. Retain Shaggy as Counsel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Say it wasn't you.

    1. Re:Retain Shaggy as Counsel by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You missed the important part.

      "It wasn't me, man!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  4. IANAL but you should... by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Contact a lawyer.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:IANAL but you should... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      You forgot the important part: Consult a lawyer and listen to what he says when you ask him what the probability of success is (ie. the single most important question you should ask a lawyer). If you get the feeling he's pulling numbers out of his ass when you ask that question, get a different lawyer. All lawyers aren't equal and you need to find one who's had practice in the type of things you're interested in (though I imagine most will know the basics of employment law as people get fired every day).

      Whatever happens, start looking for another job. Even if you "win" this you're going to need another job.

      --
      No sig today...
  5. Don't talk to anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    See subject, and also get a lawyer. A good lawyer is worth their weight in gold and you really do want this case to end up in court where the company you work for has to demonstrate that, despite your loyalty, you really did violate their non-compete clause. The moment they make accusations against you is the moment you should stop working for them.

    1. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by sdnoob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A good lawyer is worth their weight in gold

      better check your calculations....

      weight of lawyer: 200 lbs
      weight of lawyer: 2,916.67 troy ounces
      price of gold : $1,246.72 USD per troy ounce
      worth of lawyer : $3,636,270.82 USD

    2. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The moment they make accusations against you is the moment you should stop working for them.

      Hell yeah. Instead of "Oh dear, it looks like someone stole your identity! Let our legal dept. help you clean that up." they instead went right to: "You're suspended. Oh, and we'll likely be firing you too, because we're obviously too stupid to do some fact-checking and common sense." My name happens to be ethnically-unique in this area too, but in its country of origin it's as common as "smith" or "jones". A "unique" name is often less unique than people think. I happen to know three of "me" (first and last name) that live in this state alone, and several more out of state. If a non-government-security-paranoid company decides to suspend you because a name matches (whether or not ID theft occurred), then they'll screw you over in other ways because they've proven that they're not employee-focused.

    3. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      You have to factor in how rare a "Good" lawyer is in the USA. Note: You also have to define "Good". Tim S.

    4. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A good lawyer is worth their weight in gold

      better check your calculations....

      weight of lawyer: 200 lbs
      weight of lawyer: 2,916.67 troy ounces
      price of gold : $1,246.72 USD per troy ounce
      worth of lawyer : $3,636,270.82 USD

      His calculations aren't off. A merely average lawyer is worth well over $3 million over their career, a good one presumably quite a bit more.

    5. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually that's about right according to the tables used by insurance companies.

    6. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      Clearly, he will need to find a skinny lawyer.

    7. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You'd be surprised how many banks, businesses, etc, just go by the name and never stop to think that just because your name ain't Joe smith that it might still be common as dirt. I had to switch banks because they had three of "me" (one of which actually had the same FML, same names for parents, and same name for sister! I actually met them, it was weird, but when you're Irish certain names are as common as Maria is to a Latina) and they would never bother to look at anything except a name. Hell in this digital age there must be thousands of "you" splattered out all over the place, and even if you think your name is unique it probably ain't. Hell my mother made up my late sister's name and when she went to high school there was no less than 4 with the SAME name! It turned out by tracing it back 2 girls had been born a few days after my sis, and when their mothers heard my mom and the nurses talking about the name thought "Hey, that's cute!" and named their girls that and it spread from there.

      So if their FIRST reaction is to automatically assume that you did it and use it as an excuse to suspend you? Yeah that is a shithole company and I'd be talking to a lawyer while I hunted for another job. Life is too short to be treated like shit by a company that obviously don't give a shit about their employees.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets take some modest numbers for a good lawyer.

      Billing rate: $600/hour.
      Number of hours billed per year: 2000
      Number of years in legal career: 30
      Fees generated over career: $36,000,000.

      A good lawyer is worth much more than their weight in gold.

    9. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      weight of lawyer: 200 lbs

      Does that include the golf clubs?

      --
      FGD 135
    10. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by muphin · · Score: 1

      i'm curious, what was her name?

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    11. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be surprised how many banks, businesses, etc, just go by the name and never stop to think that just because your name ain't Joe smith...

      I worked with Joe Smith, I know Joe Smith, Joe Smith is a friend of mine. Depositor, you're no Joe Smith.

    12. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The funny part is you may know someone with the same name, as it was in 72 and spread quickly out of state thanks to one of the girl's cousins going "that's cute!" and naming hers the same. My sister's name was Scherinda, so named because my mother had two half sisters named Sheryl and Linda and knew if she named after one the other would be pissed, and neither would equal both pissed, so she just split the difference. Sadly she passed June last year from a rare nerve disorder, would have been nice to have let her see her oldest son start medical school.

      But at least I know that at last count there was over a dozen Scherindas running around, and all could be traced to those two girls overhearing my mom in that little southern hospital in 72.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Don't talk to anyone. by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      I don't know any Scherinda, but I do know my Sharona.

  6. call your home insurance insurer by AmazinglySmooth · · Score: 1

    My insurer offers identity theft coverage. If your identity was stolen, call the police, file a report, and get your insurer to cough up the dough to fix it.

    1. Re:call your home insurance insurer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix it? Interesting concept.

  7. Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am sorry you are in this unfortunate situation. However, you have begged the question, and ACCEPTED AS FACT that they presume you guilty and that YOU MUST PROVE YOUR INNOCENCE.

    That's not how it works.

    Please in writing request a meeting with your boss and the corporate counsel.

    Explain simply these NONTECHNICAL FACTS:
    1. You have done nothing to violate your terms of employment, your noncompete, or other agreements.
    2. If the company has PROOF that YOU did it, it is THEIR responsibility to show it.
    3. Until they do so, you want your job and pay FULLY reinstated.

    Offer them a concession:
    If they fear you MIGHT be a risk, they can PAY YOU, put you on a PAID BREAK until it is resolved.
    Additionally ONCE they do so, you ARE WILLING to help them figure it out.

    If they ask you a bunch of stupid questions like:
    1. Why wouldn't you want to clear your name?
    2. Why won't you volunteer information?
    3. Can we search your home/hard drive/etc?
    4. When did you stop beating your wife?

    BE POLITE, BE RESPECTFUL, and tell them you ARE willing to be cooperative, but FIRST they must
    restore the rights of yours they have trampled (job, pay, respect), and after that you will help them but
    you will not give up your CIVIL or CONSTITUTIONALLY or LEGALLY protected rights to do so.

    You don't need a lawyer for this unless they insist on not giving you job/pay back.

    In that case, hire a lawyer and you'll be happy to find many who will take a case like this on contingency.

    Innocent until proven guilty.

    Never give up your right to be innocent by begging the question of "But why am I suddenly guilty."

    E

    1. Re:Begging the question by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      or get a lawyer.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Begging the question by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 0

      or get a lawyer.

      More like "AND get a lawyer".

      Your company has harmed you, and you'll need a lawyer for counteract that. They crossed a fine line when they suspended you. Of course, they might want to settle and that would be just fine, but it's not a matter of proving your innocence, your company has made a legally dubious move against you. The details, I wouldn't know, as I don't live in Indiana and I'm not a lawyer.

      Seriously, you wouldn't hire a lawyer to administer your systems, so why would you get a system administrator for legal work?

      In case I'm not clear enough: GET A LAWYER.

    3. Re:Begging the question by cptdondo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Get a lawyer first. There's all sorts of things you can say that will screw you. Don't go talking to your employer without talking to a lawyer first.

      I say this as a former business owner; the first thing I would have done as your employer is consult our attorney about the situation. If you request a meeting, chances are they will have corporate counsel there. I would have been acting on legal advice; so should you.

      GET A LAWYER!

    4. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would first try to talk to my company management before hiring a lawyer. Simply explain that was not you who did it. They simply not sure it was you or not and to protect the company they had to suspend you. If it was really you, they don't want to risk more damage. Offer to help them clean up the mess and since the registration is in your name offer to transfer it to the company's name. I assume you contested the charges to the credit card used or whatever payment method used to pay for the domain. If the domain payment was not charge to you, I bet it was charged to a stolen credit card.

    5. Re:Begging the question by dougmc · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Innocent until proven guilty." ... only in criminal cases, and even then it's only "*presumed* innocent until proven guilty".

      Fair or not, the best possible advice for this situation is to get a lawyer.

    6. Re:Begging the question by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No "ands" about it. Get a lawyer, make no moves that he or she has not advised you on. The company has already found you guilty, for all intents and purposes. Sometimes the mere fact that you let management know you have retained counsel will be enough to convince them to back off. If they let this go to a court of law, they're crazy. The flimsy way in which a lot of registrars allow domain registrations ought to be enough to convince a judge that the company needs more than same names to create a convincing chain of evidence.

      But the first step is the lawyer. You need one. It sucks and will cost money, but to try to battle this on your own is to invite disaster.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Begging the question by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      This is terrible advice. The first thing you need to do is consult a lawyer- the consultation will almost always be free- and the first thing they will tell you is not to do exactly this kind of shit. It can only make things worse.

    8. Re:Begging the question by rcamans · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This sounds logical, but it is not true or even relevant in states like Texas, where a company can terminate you for any reason.
      However, when you apply for unemployment, things can get tricky for the abusive company, and they can wind up paying unemployment.
      This I am certain of, because it happened to me.

      It is not the right to be innocent, like he stated above, but right to work, which does not actually exist in Texas.

      Innocent is only applicable when the government comes after you whith officers of the law, not your employer. Unless your employer is the government. Then it gets worse, not better. Just ask that federal employee recently fired because some outsider distorted her remarks.

      By the way, exactly how long has the anonymous coward replier above been living in his fantasy world?

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    9. Re:Begging the question by Tom_Yardley · · Score: 1

      In the United States, employment is terminable at will. This means either party can end the employment for any reason, or no reason at all. In the words of the poet, “you can take this job and shove it, I ain’t working here no more.” This poster comments on the “rights of yours they have trampled (job, pay, respect).” There is no right to a job, no right to pay not earned and certainly no right to respect. Find a corporation which respects those it employs! There is no good lawyer who would take a case like this on a contingency; contingency fees are for dead-bang winners. If you lost a leg, you’d get a lawyer to work on a contingency; not when you loose a job. Oh, “innocent until proven guilty,” that’s when the government tries to send you to prison; in the world of employment, this guy is guilty.

    10. Re:Begging the question by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      What color are the sunsets on your planet?

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    11. Re:Begging the question by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds to me like the US system is totally and utterly fucked up.

    12. Re:Begging the question by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Firstly, labor laws on the Fed level are what they are, but state's codes may vary. Check your state's rules regarding lawful termination.

      While I respect AC's statement, I am not entirely sure that the "rights" AC is referring to would apply. (even though they probably should)
      You may be bound to an "arbitration" clause, in which case your rights would vary even further.

      Contractual law is complicated, that's why they have lawyers who specialize in this type of law.
      If you signed a contract with your company, you DO have legal recourse, but your employer's rights and responsibilities should be thoroughly explained in said contract.

      If you can't afford a lawyer, get a pre-paid legal plan. Mine includes unlimited phone calls. The best representation I ever had came from a law student, though.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    13. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new around here...

    14. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is EXCELLENT advice. You've done nothing wrong, and the burden of proof is on your company's hands. Fight the disciplinary action, sign NOTHING and ADMIT NO WRONGDOING. If it comes to courts, it is up to your company to prove that you own the domain through Registrar B. Polite nad respectful are a must, don't burn the bridge unless you're getting the hell out of things for good, but without proof they have no right to discipline you. Dispute it through whatever channels and make clear that you expect to be paid and will take eventual legal action against the wages you would otherwise receive. If you have signed a document already, get a copy of it and look closely at what you have signed, that sort of thing can make or break it if it does come down to law.

    15. Re:Begging the question by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      2. If the company has PROOF that YOU did it, it is THEIR responsibility to show it.

      The company has presented the evidence that the contact info on the domain registration has his name and information. Obviously they don't understand its not 100% reliable proof is another question. Who has the burden to refute this evidence? Since the company is satisfied, its becomes his burden to refute it.

      Go to the registrar and ask for the history or other evidence that would clear your name. At no point should you get hostile, angry, or sic a lawyer on them. Even if a lawyer gets you rehired, you'll end up getting fired later down the road for some another excuse.

    16. Re:Begging the question by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i'm going to guess AC was a troll trying to get OP fired

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    17. Re:Begging the question by Jerslan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Compared to which other country's system?

      Last I check the US System works better than most.

    18. Re:Begging the question by WilliamX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indiana is an employment at will state.

      Absent an agreement to the contrary, specifically stating otherwise, they can fire him at will, for any reason, provided the reason is not prohibited by law (i.e. discrimination laws).

      Suspicion alone IS grounds for dismissal in almost any employment at will state.

    19. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innocent until proven guilty works out to this. When someone is accused of a wrongdoing, then the burden of proof is upon the accuser. That is the moral principle. It's not the legal principle, except in criminal cases, as you say. Most of us do not live by the moral principle despite claiming to.

    20. Re:Begging the question by Nightwraith · · Score: 1

      Since we cannot determine your place of residence, I'll assume you do not know of 'At-Will-Employment'.

      In Indiana (and many other States), employment is 'At Will' which basically boils down to this: You or your employer may terminate the employee/employer relationship at will, with no notice, for any reason OR NO REASON AT ALL.

      Legally, they can terminate your employment at anytime.

      Only if you can PROVE that you were terminate due to a federally protected status (race/sex/religion/etc...) do you have any legal ground whatsoever.

      Personally, I'd have to REALLY LOVE that company and the job to put up with accusations and a lack of trust that's being displayed.
      This is definitely not the type of behavior that they would accept from you...

    21. Re:Begging the question by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      Yes, freedom is bad!

    22. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, especially as the advice is to seek a meeting including a company lawyer. Their lawyer may well try to bully you into backing down (and will probably succeed) - they won't even try to bully your lawyer into backing down, because they know that if he backs down, he doesn't get paid.

      --
      FGD 135
    23. Re:Begging the question by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If I suspected someone of something and they acted like you, I'd fire them. Either they are guilty, or they are a prick.

      Please in writing request a meeting with your boss and the corporate counsel.

      Oh, and not having a lawyer and asking for a meeting with a lawyer is a great way to lose. Your advice would likely open him up to losing a civic suit for something he didn't even do. If you are the person in question and reading this, do not do what he said. If you ever "request a meting with counsel" bring your own. To suggest otherwise is negligence.

    24. Re:Begging the question by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Going into a meeting like this without a lawyer is like painting a sign on your face saying "Kick the shit out of me." Bring your lawyer and the message is very clear "I ain't a football."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    25. Re:Begging the question by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      To add to the above: If they have anything to say to you in a meeting you want it witnessed, on paper, or recorded from this point on.

    26. Re:Begging the question by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      If you show the same sort of attitude in the process that the above anonymous coward is advising, you will be fired within months if not days for wasting the company's time and money and not being a "team player". Like being fired for being smarter than your boss, or for not being willing to work 80 hour weeks, it will be subtly transformed into grounds on which you can be fired with little legal risk to any employer with an HR department with a clue. And many HR departments are trained to find ways to get people fired, or hired, outside the clear boundaries of the law. Given the description, this workplace is a place to get out of in any case, becase the original poster has already been judged guilty.

      In a situation like this, I'd recommend laying a clear paper trail to protect your references. Getting fired for identity theft like this is nasty: it can be a "he said, she said" scenario that leaves people discouraged from hiring you just from hearing about it. And yes, you absolutely _do_ need a lawyer to help you stay abreast of the rules about wrongful termination, your contract, your NDA (which may restruct you from discussing your firing with your next employer if it would affect your current employer's reputation), unemployment benefit issues, etc. These vary tremendously from state to state and from country to country.

    27. Re:Begging the question by pacinpm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Based on what criterion? Number of Negros in prisons?

    28. Re:Begging the question by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I think this is the way most countries work...

      --
      No sig today...
    29. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the United States, employment is terminable at will.

      Bullshit. In certain states it is. In certain others it isn't.

    30. Re:Begging the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the first person I can see making myself a "fan" of, but you're anonymous.
      P

  8. Seek a Specialized Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Research a lawyer who specializes in these types of cases. The American justice system requires effective legal counsel, which requires money (assuming this is where you live, but I am sure it holds true elsewhere); there's no way around it.

  9. legal counsel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one isn't even close. Ignore every advice in this thread except the ones that tell you to get a lawyer. That's what they're for. Both you and your employer will be thankful your did.

    1. Re:legal counsel by gavron · · Score: 1

      > This one isn't even close.
      > Ignore every advice in this thread except the ones that tell you to get a lawyer.

      Use your judgment. Don't "ignore every advice" because someone on slashdot said so.

      > That's what they're for.

      When there is a legal conflict requiring expert representation -- THAT is what lawyers are for. If you can avoid the issue, you can avoid the lawyer. Sorry, lawyers.

      > Both you and your employer will be thankful your did.

      Your employer will NEVER be thankful you got a lawyer. Talk to your supervisor. Talk to your in-house counsel. Admit nothing, but offer to help. Make it clear you refuse to accept the presumption of guilt.

      Best regards,

      E

    2. Re:legal counsel by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's a very good way of hanging yourself. Talking to any of those people without representation is a very serious mistake to make. Of course they're not going to be happy that you've got an attorney, all of a sudden you're not completely helpless.

      At this point, even with help, he's in serious trouble. Without help, I can pretty much predict that it's not going to go well.

      I used to be in security and it's extremely easy to get people to say stupid things and an attorney can at least make the process a bit more challenging. A skilled individual can usually get all of the information piece by piece. Helping is most likely going to result in the OP screwing himself guilty or not.

  10. Dude, you need a lawyer by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    Thread closed.

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
    1. Re:Dude, you need a lawyer by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Dude, you need a lawyer

      Thread closed.

      It's OK, I got him a lawyer.

      Wound opened.

  11. If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by crankyspice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Grab a Nolo book or two (check your library, or www.nolo.com), file a "pro se" lawsuit against John Does 1-20, and via that lawsuit subpoena the domain name registrar. Get everything they have, IP address(es) used to register the domain (i.e., load the website), etc. Get records from wherever the site was hosted. Get ISP records corresponding to the IP addresses in use by the person/people who registere the domain name / set up the website. Etc. Document, document, document. Then summarize it in a memo to your employer, citing to the documents you've uncovered (include them as labeled exhibits, e.g., "As you can see from the Billing Information Statement ("Billing"), attached hereto as Exhibit A...")

    And then, as long as you're already wet, go swimming. If you can come close to identifying these asshats, amend the complaint and sue 'em. (Service might be tricky, but if you can satisfy the diligence requirement, most jurisdictions will allow substitute service by publication. Then go for the default judgment... Satisfying it will likely be impossible, but having a civil judgment in your favor can't hurt your attempts to remain employed and clear your name.)

    Disclaimer, I am a lawyer, but I am not licensed in Indiana, this is not legal advice, this does not create an attorney-client relationship.

    --
    geek. lawyer.
    1. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

      Trouble is if is is in an "at will" employment state, they have every right to fire him without cause anyway, so all he could do is soil their reputation as unreasonable... if his employment contract does not forbid him from making disparaging remarks. About the only thing they probably can't make him do is honor non-compete agreements if he is fired -- courts frown on that.

      Like I say, You can't be fired for the color of your skin, but you can be fired for the color of your eyes.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    2. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... this is not legal advice, this does not create an attorney-client relationship.

      And these are not the droids you are looking for.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Kuo-Cheng · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not legal advice? By virtue of what -- not advising any particular action? Not being about legal matters? It makes you wonder. (This is not sarcastic rejoinder.)

    4. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by rakuen · · Score: 1

      He's offering information and his opinion as an individual in the legal profession, as opposed to being the OPs actual counsel in a legal case. At least, that's how I would understand the difference.

    5. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Hey. Good legal advice? Man, this is slashdot. You know good legal advice is not allowed here.
      We only permit crap legal advice that will further screw you, like what some anonymous cowards above posted.
      We will be suing your backside immediately. Violation of the implied slashdot posting rulesf and all that that you agreed to sight unseen by posting on slashdot..
      You are out of work, man.
      Sayonara dude.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    6. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they CANNOT fire him for unlawful or false (made-up) reasons. What might or might not be 'unlawful' depends on location.

      Lawyer is the best bet.

    7. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... this is not legal advice, this does not create an attorney-client relationship.

      And these are not the droids you are looking for.

      And hire a lawyer.

    8. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you send them a huge bill for doing their legal work??

      Based on what I have seen, a simple call from an attorney that you are represented will restore the pay and benefits while they build proof that you have done some wrong for which you can be terminated. It sure worked twice while I was at EDS.

    9. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

      Sure, but in an at will state they CAN fire him because someone with a moniker the same has his disparaged the company. At-will employment makes firing trivial. They can simply say, "We don't like you."

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    10. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Informative

      A lawyer has responsibilities to anyone they provide legal advice to. A hypothetical "If I were in your situation" answer is, de facto, legal advice. However, stating "this is not legal advice" makes it not meet the legal standard of being official legal advice, and thus he doesn't have the same responsibilities to the person asking the question as if he was an actual lawyer. That and giving actual legal advice in a jurisdiction one is not licensed to practice in could be illegal. And a non-lawyer giving legal advice is not actual legal advice, as they aren't a lawyer and unless they present themselves as one, it is not considered legal advice.

    11. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he gave bad legal advice, he could be sued for it. So it's a "please don't sue me" disclaimer.

      Also, I believe there are regulations about giving legal advice: He'd have to check where everyone reading Slashdot is located, and make sure you're all in places he's licensed to practise. (Hint: You're not). He'd probably have to ask a bunch of questions that aren't answered in the article, to make certain the advice was correct. And he'd probably have to recommend getting a lawyer rather than suing pro se, just in case SoccerDad messes up the case and decides to sue him.

      Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, this is not legal advice.

    12. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You totally miss the point.
      If they fire him _withount_cause_ he is eligible for unemployment, and the employer's unemployment insurance rate goes up.
      If they fire him _with_cause_ he is _not_ eligible for unemployment, and the employer's unemployment insurance rate stays the same.

      So there is a distinct difference.
      If he gets a lawyer and gets his job back, then they can fire him without cause, sure, but he can look for a job without worrying about the specter showing up again.

    13. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      "We don't like you" is okay because it's true. In this case they've already admitted that the reason they are considering firing him is because they think he stole their domain.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    14. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit nebulous but I think your first guess is probably right. GP is not trying to apply the specific facts of the case to any specific law. His "advice" is general and could apply to the hypothetical situation.

      Of course, GP's disclaimer is boiler plate written by anyone who's an attorney and wants to avoid prosecution for the unauthorized practice of law where they aren't qualified or a member of the bar--tricky how those monopolies work. It'll work as long as a reasonable person can look at his entire post and reasonably say that GP isn't the article submitter's attorney. In other words, GP doesn't want to be sued for malpractice because someone reads his advice and assumes that GP is now that person's lawyer.

    15. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet it was an inside-job. If his contact information was on facebook, it likely was another employee who doesn't like him... and tada, easy way to get rid of him.

    16. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      if he has an employment contract, he's not 'at-will'. Unless it's some bizarre contract which specifies that with the exception of not badmouthing the company it operates like he's 'at-will'.

      --
      FGD 135
    17. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      I've never understood that - is someone fired 'for cause' not still unemployed and in need of food & stuff?

      --
      FGD 135
    18. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is not legal advice

      That's the best not legal advice anyone has given yet.

    19. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer, I am a lawyer, but I am not licensed in Indiana, this is not legal advice, this does not create an attorney-client relationship.
       
      It seems you used the wrong posting method. I'd love to tell my employer to refer all questions to my attorney, Anonymous Coward, Esq.

    20. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      So....was that legal advice?

    21. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is not incense.

    22. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely incorrect. If you quit, you don't get unemployment benefits. If you are fired, more than likely you get unemployment benefits. Only if you take a shat on the bosses desk, or any other illegal act that caused the firing (and even then it a gray area depending on how you explain it to unemployment), will you not receive unemployment benefits.

      I've been fired for several reasons, one of which was directly my fault (don't use bittorrent on the company bandwidth), and I still got the crappy pay that unemployment gets you.

    23. Re:If you absolutely cannot hire an attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah the USA, where you must state "This is not legal advice" if you ever give any legal advice!

  12. There's obviously more to this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like a perfect example of a situation where there's lots more information that what we are given. It may be completely unrelated to the actual event, but is still relevant.

    This falls under the category of "something weird". If a company really likes the employee involved with "something weird" they will probably believe the employee's story and not waste their time with legalities. If said employee is a nuisance (bad work ethic, loud mouth, does not get along well with others, causing problems, worthless at the job, superfluous) then this is a perfect chance to remove said employee without the hassle of unemployment, severance, back-pay, etc.

    Basically, if the company wanted to keep the employee, this wouldn't be an issue. What's wrong is that the employee has been marked as unwanted, for whatever reason, and is currently being removed. The company chose this method because it looks legit on paper, but the real reason is probably completely unrelated.

    The employee clearly doesn't realize this and is in complete shock as to why such a thing would interfere with his employment. The employee is looking for sympathy as, given the limited facts, this seems completely unfair. The employee should be looking outside the box to figure out why they were marked for removal.

    1. Re:There's obviously more to this story by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Actually, lots of companies in this economically downturned climate are just jumping at any reason to layoff or fire an employee. They don't care whether you are good, liked, essential, etc. Tis already happened to me and friends at a small company that had venture cap tired of losing money. And after they got rid of all the people they could, including several they could not do without, they went belly-up. So just try suing them.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    2. Re:There's obviously more to this story by Iskender · · Score: 1

      You're giving a lot of room for employee incompetence but none for employer incompetence.

      Really, all it takes is one lawyer they consulted to be ignorant about computer matters and saying that he's 100% sure the guy is running the server.

      To make this impossible the entire workforce anywhere would have to be in on how identity theft works. This of course isn't the case.

    3. Re:There's obviously more to this story by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      If said employee is a nuisance (bad work ethic, loud mouth, does not get along well with others, causing problems, worthless at the job, superfluous) [...]

      Hi, boss.

    4. Re:There's obviously more to this story by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      Absoluetly right, if their legal dept. / lawyer knows nothing about domain registration and sees this guy's name on it then they can be forgiven for thinking that it of itself is proof it was their guy.

      For example in the UK there are legal documents required to own a car, and if your car is spotted speeding and your name is in the "owner" box in the car database you get the speeding ticket. It's up to you to prove if you weren't the one driving, or even if the car belongs to you at all, or someone copied your plates and put them on a car the same make and model as yours. This is a government controlled database and due to the bureaucracy involved nobody would expect the information to be fake.

      So his company/lawyers can almost be forgiven for seeing his name in black and white on the "database" of owners. This guy has to prove that this database is a joke and not a bureaucracy.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  13. "How can I prove it's not me?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A.: You can't. Steal yourself a new identity, preferrably a rich one, and then move to a country with no extradition treaties. Problem solved.

  14. Legal department of company? by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get in contact with a lawyer and check what your options are, but try to find a lawyer that knows what internet is about. Evidence on the net is always a tricky thing. If the registrar is in the country where you live you may have some legal options to use to get evidence behind who did the fraudulent registration.

    If the domain points to a web server somewhere it's also possible to check who is owning that server and is behind the web page.

    But if your address is on the registration you may actually be able to contact Registrar B and ask them to snail-mail you sufficient data to take control over the domain and then transfer it to the company that employs you. Go in and specify something like that you no longer is able to access the email account for the registration or something. When you are in control of it you may have a possibility to go back and ask them for logs about when it was registered and payment process. It's a case of following the money. However try the lawyer path first because if you find the money behind it then you can also find the culprit.

    However placing you on suspension seems to be a bit hard, and you may have a case here too.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Legal department of company? by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those are all steps that the company should make. If he does it, he is "generating evidence" that may not count as proof of his innocence. But I seriously doubt that the company is interested in hiring anyone to do any fact finding to disprove what they already believe to be the case. We have seen it all a thousand times: Belief is stronger than proof. They will feel no need to collect proof of this innocence as they already believe they have sufficient proof of his guilt. And if you present proof of innocence, they will not even look at it. They have made up their minds.

      I say, give us the details. There are ample sleuths on Slashdot to uncover the whole truth of details. If you want proof that doesn't come from you, let it come from us... and better, let us get the proof and let YOUR LAWYER sue the company that you will no longer work for (because let's face it, you can't work there any longer) for damages so that you can live well until you find another job.

    2. Re:Legal department of company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indiana is an employment-at-will state. Unless some sort of civil right was violated (gender, race, etc) there is no case to be had at all, simple as that.

  15. You can't prove a negative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but you can't prove it wasn't you, because everything you say can logically be countered with "Well you WOULD do that, do avoid detection". Domain registered in China at the exact time you were in a meeting with the CEO? "Well you arranged to do that with an online contact to make it look like someone else".

    The onus should be on your company to prove it was you, not on you to prove it wasn't, but since you're *already* suspended you may not want to suggest this and antagonise your employer further.

    Aside from going to a lawyer, I think the only argument you really have is that you'd have to be incredibly stupid to do this under your own name. You could appeal to the registrar to get it transferred into your company's account which might raise protests from the faker, supporting your argument, but the company may accuse you of offering to do that simply because 'you got caught'.

    1. Re:You can't prove a negative. by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      He doesn't need to prove it wasn't him. The employer needs to prove it was him.

    2. Re:You can't prove a negative. by topham · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely the employer has to prove anything at all.
      Firing a system administrator is often easier than most employees.

    3. Re:You can't prove a negative. by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      In criminal court, that's right. But for better or worse, at-will employment means employers can fire us whenever they feel like it. There is no requirement for them to convince a jury we violated something in the employee manual.

    4. Re:You can't prove a negative. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      No, they don't. The employer is not a criminal court of law. Rational suspicion of wrongdoing is enough to can someone.

      And if he can't afford a lawyer to defend against this, what are the odds he can come up with one for a wrongful dismissal action?

    5. Re:You can't prove a negative. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      At this point though, they would have to prove it. They've gone the extra mile to make an accusation, and as such they damn well better be able to back it up. If the OP is innocent it shouldn't be too hard to show that none of his credit cards or accounts were used to pay for the registration.

      But really, lawyering up is the only reasonable response regardless of planned response.

    6. Re:You can't prove a negative. by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. They've made an accusation of criminal misconduct, and as such, they've shown their hand and now have to prove it. If they try to fire him for another bullshit reason now, a lawyer, or indeed even a government labour board representative (not sure what the American equivalent is) will find serious wrongdoing here. At the very least, he should file a complaint for wrongful dismissal.

  16. 2 Aspects To Consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do a search online for your name. If you can prove others have the name, it might help prove part of your case. The other obvious aspect here....Get a lawyer.

  17. no lawyer ???? by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you do need a lawyer! Also sounds like it's urgent. Good luck! - Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  18. Give it Back by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0

    Since the registration record lists you as the owner, transfer it immediately over to your company as the starting gesture of good faith. Then consider the advice already given here.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Give it Back by ascari · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be conterproductive? "It ain't mine but I'm giving it back to you" For gods sake see a lawyer before you do that!!!!

    2. Re:Give it Back by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. Anyway, registrar B probably wouldn't let him without access to the creator's account. And his inability to login probably won't be enough to prove he's not the domain owner. I see no upside with this approach.

    3. Re:Give it Back by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, no, no, and... NO. Do not do this.

    4. Re:Give it Back by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be a telltale sign of someone caught with their hand in the cookie jar? To the company, that could be seen as even clearer proof that you have been in control of this domain all along and trying to avoid a lawsuit on your ass. I would not touch that domain with a ten foot pole, if you're suspended with pay I'd say wait it out. If you're suspended without pay, dispute it and demand full compensation with interest from day one. Go see a lawyer to hear how long they can keep you suspended, I doubt it's long before being construed as a dismissal. On that note, you probably might want to brush up your resume just in case...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  19. Employment "at will"? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However, you have begged the question, and ACCEPTED AS FACT that they presume you guilty and that YOU MUST PROVE YOUR INNOCENCE.

    Isn't that how it works in the US where you have (at least in some states) employment "at will" and it is very easy for a company to fire someone? The innocent until proven guilty only works for criminal cases. This sort of thing is exactly why you need laws protecting employees....of course he really needs to talk to a lawyer to see whether there are any such laws applicable here.

    1. Re:Employment "at will"? by DragonMantis · · Score: 1
      But, in general, "at will" employment means they do not need to give a reason for termination. Once they start down a path with specified reasons, then they have other rules which come into play.

      That said, to the OP: get a lawyer. The lawyer can spell out what specifically applies in local law.

    2. Re:Employment "at will"? by Aquitaine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, parent is correct. It is very difficult to protect employees with laws for this kind of thing, at least not without also protecting employees who are simply inept, have a rotten attitude, or are just plain old lazy. If a company decides you've done something that's perfectly legal but contrary to their policy, then in many states you can indeed be fired. Personally, as a business owner in an at-will state, I would say that any business who fires somebody over something like this without even a cursory investigation doesn't deserve a good employee, and if I were the employee, I'd go to the local news outlet with a story about how 'identity theft can cost you YOUR JOB' and not exactly tear apart my previous employee, but indicate that they just didn't care to dedicate the resources to uncover what went on.

      In fact, while this doesn't happen in my line of work (thankfully), what you'll see in states with these legal protections is that, when your company decides they want to fire you for any reason at all, they just start the very long paper trail of documenting your 'poor performance and attitude' and xyz other legal requirements to fire you, so that when you do finally lose your job, you're a) completely unprepared and b) now have a paper trail of BS performance reviews and poor references. You might say 'well that's a dishonest company,' and indeed you'd be correct, but that's what happens when the government doesn't let two private parties resolve their differences through a more natural means: resentment builds up and the work environment tanks. I'd sooner work in an at-will state than one where I'm 'protected.'

    3. Re:Employment "at will"? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      they just start the very long paper trail of documenting your 'poor performance and attitude' and xyz other legal requirements to fire you, so that when you do finally lose your job, you're a) completely unprepared and b) now have a paper trail of BS performance reviews and poor references.

      I don't see how you can have both (a) and (b). If you get (b) then surely you can see the writing on the wall? However it is an interesting point of view. I grew up in the UK which has frankly insane employment protection laws that make it extremely hard to fire anyone even for appalling performance. But I still think that some level of protection is required. In this case the OP could get fired AND get poor references simply because the company can't be bothered to do its homework.

    4. Re:Employment "at will"? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Or sue the registrar for not verifying the identity of the person doing the domain registration.

      It's time we ended both unverified registrations and "privacy protection" for domain registrations.

      Not only will it make this sort of crime harder, but it will also reduce spam, since it will be a lot easier to track down the spammer (most of whom hide behind a bogus or "private" registration).

      The other route is to simply have all dns servers return a "not found" when a domain registration is not confirmed or is "private". I'd love to see a firefox plugin that does that.

    5. Re:Employment "at will"? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      In fact, while this doesn't happen in my line of work (thankfully), what you'll see in states with these legal protections is that, when your company decides they want to fire you for any reason at all, they just start the very long paper trail of documenting your 'poor performance and attitude' and xyz other legal requirements to fire you, so that when you do finally lose your job, you're a) completely unprepared and b) now have a paper trail of BS performance reviews and poor references. You might say 'well that's a dishonest company,' and indeed you'd be correct, but that's what happens when the government doesn't let two private parties resolve their differences through a more natural means: resentment builds up and the work environment tanks. I'd sooner work in an at-will state than one where I'm 'protected.'

      I work in pretty much the exact opposite of an at-will state, around here typical termination notice is one month in first six months of employment, then three months. They have to give a reason for termination, either their situation (e.g. downsizing ,restructuring, relocation, lack of work etc.) or your situation (performance, attitude, breach of rules etc.).

      Around here a significant part of the process is that the employee is informed that the job performance is so poor it may result in termination, and be given time to correct it. That's plenty warning if you're really doing good work. The paper trail might be bullshit but it's not like they list it on your reference, you were normally simply laid off (unless you took the clue and got a new job first).

      They can use downsizing as a legitimate reason, but if they put up job listings for your job or hire people with similar skills then that can be found untrue by the courts and it gets very expensive as people have been awarded full pay from their termination to the end of the trial with interest and their job back or a compensation for that too.

      That said, we have termination for cause (avskjed) as opposed to regular termination (oppsigelse), which can be almost on the spot. However, that is never used for poor work performance, but rather e.g. if you discover they've been embezzling money from the company or something like that. Or if you don't show up at all or refuse to work, and I don't mean oversleeping once or twice.

      Sure the process is long but those that end in termination aren't so bad, the real downside are the people that are poor workers but not poor enough to fire. I know a lot of these people were let go during the financial crisis, I've heard some various rumors about companies that weren't that bad off but were "preparing" for bad times through layoffs. It probably had some personal vendettas and good people caught in a bad department, but a lot of dead weight was shed...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Employment "at will"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what happens when the government doesn't let two private parties resolve their differences through a more natural means: resentment builds up and the work environment tanks. I'd sooner work in an at-will state than one where I'm 'protected.'

      Yeah - because that's exactly how it happens in the rest of world where workers have rights. I'd rather work in anywhere other than the US TBH.

    7. Re:Employment "at will"? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      It is not hard to fire someone in the UK, you just have to have a procedure for doing so in the first place, which must be fair and follow the law and then you MUST FOLLOW IT.

      The problem is that HR departments don't like following the procedure. I know of cases where the HR department have rung their solicitors, had them write out a procedure on how to get rid of someone and stay the right side of the law, to promptly ignore it and just fire them. Consequently they loose in the employment tribunal.

      If you follow the proper procedure it is easy enough to get rid of someone even in the UK.

    8. Re:Employment "at will"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they have fired him where they stated in an official way that this was the reason they fired him he has a chance - in that a lawyer can get them to back off of that claim, get his job back, and give him time to look for another job. Because you are correct - they will immediately start looking for documentable "proof" as to why he needed to be fired, and such proof can include not following one of two conflicting orders (a law firm did this to my wife, except they "reprimanded her" so she would quit).

    9. Re:Employment "at will"? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Isn't that how it works in the US where you have (at least in some states) employment "at will" and it is very easy for a company to fire someone? The innocent until proven guilty only works for criminal cases. This sort of thing is exactly why you need laws protecting employees....

      Only if you feel you have a right to a certain job. It's much simpler to just see it as an arrangement of services for a fee until either side feels the arrangement is no longer mutually beneficial.

      And save up some money for when that happens. I've heard the most jump for government action from folks who lost their jobs and have no savings and fully extended their credit, and have much nicer things than I do as a result.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Employment "at will"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yes, but not instantly. You don't get to decide on the basis of one slip.

      You need a verbal warning, a period to improve, a written warning, a period to improve, and finally a notice of termination.

      No "You suck! don't come in on Monday."

    11. Re:Employment "at will"? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > Yes, parent is correct. It is very difficult to protect employees with laws for this kind of thing, at least not without also protecting employees who are simply inept, have a rotten attitude, or are just plain old lazy.

      Oh, my. I see you've worked with members of the teacher's union.

      It's important in a long career to notice the signs of someone starting such a paper trail on you. It's occurred in my career: I was able to identify the manager responsible for it, who was actually in another department that I dealt with, and outlast him. But I was very fortunate. The fool had his secretary printing up all the notices to submit in my annual evaluation, and that secretary asked me for help with some printer issues, and I had the opportunity to read the documents in advance. I was quite surprised, and able to lay my own paper trail to trace his precise claims as quite false.

      I was quite fortunate, and I've outlasted that manager. But he might have caused a lot more damage if I hadn't caught on.

    12. Re:Employment "at will"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my first job where I had an annual performance review I was surprised to find myself with a basically very positive review that was marred by a couple of glaring low marks -- each involving things that either 1) weren't actually an issue, 2) no one had ever raised with me to correct, or 3) were obviously bs.

      It bugged me and sorta ate at me. Until I started comparing notes with co-workers, when I found that everyone -- from those who management thought walked on water through the most slovenly and incompetent wastes of cubicle space -- got similarly low ratings in some BS area of the review. And it gradually dawned on me that our bosses were doing this deliberately -- setting up the background needed in case they wanted to fire someone at a later date. In most (maybe all) cases it was people they had no intention of firing, people whose absence would destroy the company even, but because of some contractual rules involving for cause vs at will employment, that was what management felt was necessary as a back up plan.

      Needless to say, it's not the most effective management technique, and it does make a strong argument for laws that allow you to just say "look it's not working out... so you're fired." I'm still not a convert to the joys of lasiez-faire employment law, but I'd rather have that than laws that don't protect me anyway but also poison the workplace environment like in that situation.

    13. Re:Employment "at will"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I grew up in the UK which has frankly insane employment protection laws that make it extremely hard to fire anyone even for appalling performance.

      Sorry, but you have no idea what insane employment laws are. Take a look across the channel - especially at the public sector.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  20. Gain control and terminate by Bitmanhome · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm unclear on the problem. If the info at registrar B matches your info, then you can gain control of the account and terminate it. If it doesn't, then you'll have proof the lawsuit is baseless. If you can't get control, the denial letter from the registrar will serve as proof the lawsuit is baseless.

    Of course, to use this proof in court, you'll need a lawyer. But hopefully just getting a lawyer will encourage your company to cool down and talk sense.

    But once all this is over, you need to scrub your info from the registration and replace it with the company's info, since it's their domain. You'll then want to quit this job, since this company is more interested in lawsuits than business.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    1. Re:Gain control and terminate by echucker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If he terminates, that is proof in the company's eyes that he registered it in the first place. Then he'll be handed a little box to put his stuff in, and get walked to the door.

    2. Re:Gain control and terminate by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have control of the email address used at Registrar B, or the signin information to Registrar B's control panel, to kill or redirect the DNS entries. About the only thing he could do is contact one of those unscrupulous registrar companies that tries to get you to renew your DNS by mail with them, and ask them to send a renew request to the address on file at Registar B (which is his mailing address). Then he could maybe use that to gain control of the DNS entry if it isn't locked by Registrar B.

    3. Re:Gain control and terminate by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      The "matching registration information" is the dropbox at Registrar A, as well as Registrar A's phone number. Anything sent with my name to that mailbox won't get delivered to me unless a domain name associated with my NIC handle is included in the mailing address. Imagine my name is John Smith - too many try to select the right one. Registrar A opens the mail, scans and emails it - if there isn't a domain under their control in the mail, it gets dumped. The best bet may be getting information behind the email address (not related to me) but how likely is it that the registration info for the Yahoo address is legit?

    4. Re:Gain control and terminate by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your point is. Is it your dropbox? Prove this to B and have them terminate the account. If any of the info at B is yours, prove it to B and terminate the account. If they refuse, then you'll be able to show your employer that you don't control the account. If they accept, you'll be able to find out who opened the account, and show your employer that it wasn't you.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    5. Re:Gain control and terminate by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      The dropbox is the bulk po box used by all private registrations with that registrar. Any communication to the po box must be tagged with a domain name, and presumably one that is handled by that registrar. The registrar will open the first class mail, scan it and email it to the contact email address on the account, also not mine. I've explained to my employer's legal & HR departments how the registration process works, how the fraud was accomplished, how easy it is, and how prevalent. This was all verified by IT management. They've presumably run a fresh and clean background and financial check on me and I'll be back at work tomorrow. All done with no lawyer, open & honest communication, and a cooperative attitude.

  21. Tough one by ascari · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow. Two thoughts immediately come to mind:

    1 - Seek some competent legal advice. Don't be a fucking moron: You're about to lose your job and reputation and maybe be sued out of existence and your biggest worry is to "avoid incurring the cost of a lawyer"? So you come to slashdot instead? Mindboggling. Maybe some other competent professional advice as well?

    2 - Sounds like too many coincidences to convince a jury. To prove you've been framed you would have to find out who did it and how they benefited doing it or you'll just sound like your garden variety disgruntled employee / asshole too clever for is own good or something like that. If I were you I'd start looking for another job.

    1. Re:Tough one by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, if the cost were a couple grand, that's one thing, but even if the OP doesn't get sued, the damage to his professional reputation right now is enough to justify the attorney. The reality is that a single meeting with an attorney is not that expensive, and at least then the OP will have some idea what he's dealing with. And will probably make arrangements for further assistance.

    2. Re:Tough one by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Sounds like too many coincidences to convince a jury.

      Too many coincidences? I don't see a single one. Someone wanted to impersonate company so they copied the details out of whois to next registrar. I don't get why there's a lot of posts saying this is complicated, seems pretty simple to me.

      The real problem is the third party contractor passed off the whois info like it was definitive information so the legal department treated it like it was. They're not technical so they will treat it like expert testimony. Likely the contractor provided a report and has moved on, with no communication remaining. If it was an in-house investigation there could be an easy followup. You're screwed, you have to impeach that report, but you won't see it.

      Did you place your information in the original domain registration or did the company? If the company did they'd be responsible for the leak of personal information that led to identity theft. The best I can see is trying to turn it into the company's fault. You could also try looking at historical data on the site, archive.org or historical whois data to see if it reveals more info.

      Talk to a lawyer but I don't think legal action would help at all. If you're worth something the company they'll keep you, if you're easily replaceable you'll be replaced. The truth won't change that.

    3. Re:Tough one by obarel · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's never received an e-mail from "his account" offering cheap Viagra.

      I have thousands of those in my gmail account. "What? I didn't send this... how could it be?!" was ok in 1995 (maybe), not today.

    4. Re:Tough one by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      You seem to have missed; his company uses Registrar B. His personal sites use registrar A. This site is also registered on registrar A. Either someone is succeeding in framing him or he's lying. Since he asked us, we offer advice for the first situation. This is not just accidental / random copying of his data. Since he asked us, we offer advice for the first situation.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:Tough one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension fail. Hey, rtfa-troll, why don't you RTFA? Oh wait, you're a troll. Never mind.

    6. Re:Tough one by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Well, if registrar A is one of the really enormous ones, it could still be a coincidence.

  22. If I were you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd talk to a lawyer, and one of the first things I'd ask him is:

    If the domain name is registered in my name, can't I force Registrar B to hand over account details to me?

  23. Contact the registrar. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the whois information identifies you are the registrant, then contact the registrar. Identify yourself and take control of the domain name.

    If the registrar refuses, include them in the lawsuit.

    1. Re:Contact the registrar. by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Identify yourself and take control of the domain name.

      This seems rather risky without legal consultation. It could be used to further incriminate you.

    2. Re:Contact the registrar. by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      And if they comply, you would be proving you are indeed the squatter.

      In other words, don't do it and contact a lawyer first. Once you're cleared, you could do it as a token gesture for your company.

      The only thing the squatters can do to prevent you from doing the transfer at a later time would be to change the registration. Considering the situation, that would add evidence pointing to the real culprits.

    3. Re:Contact the registrar. by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      I don't think so if he retains all information about his contact with Registrar B to gain control of the DNS record.

  24. STOP. GET A LAWYER. by topham · · Score: 4, Informative

    GET A LAWYER.

    Any further action on your part may be detrimental otherwise.

    1. Re:STOP. GET A LAWYER. by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Correction:

      Get GOOD representation!

      Just any lawyer will not do.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  25. Lawyers. by Essequemodeia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All lawyers are assholes until you need one.

    1. Re:Lawyers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are still assholes if you need one. Lawyers are a cancer that eats away at society. However, in our broken system if somebody threatens you, it's the only legal way to respond. "getting a lawyer" is the lesser evil compared to "getting fucked by the other guy's lawyer".

    2. Re:Lawyers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All lawyers are assholes until you need one.

      Or as I like to say to my boss, All lawyers are assholes, but my asshole is better than your asshole.

      You can't imagine how much time you don't spend in court when you pick your asshole carefully.

    3. Re:Lawyers. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And you only ever need one because the other guy got one first (or, the corollary for these days is that you need one because the law was written by lawyers).

    4. Re:Lawyers. by Confusador · · Score: 1

      I see no reason they can't still be assholes when I need them. I don't have to like it, but I recognize the shape of the world in which I live.

    5. Re:Lawyers. by Dravik · · Score: 1

      They are still assholes after you need one. You just have to pray that it will cost less to pay your asshole than to get screwed by the other guy's dick.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    6. Re:Lawyers. by aug24 · · Score: 1

      When and if I need a lawyer, I only intend to hire one who actively claims to be an asshole.

      So all lawyers are assholes. Even Shakespeare knew that.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    7. Re:Lawyers. by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      No, they remain "assholes" even then.

      Maybe if we didn't need a lawyer so often and for such little things (not saying that the original poster is in a 'small' situation) we wouldn't hate them so much.

  26. Really odd circumstances by BufferArea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your id was stolen by someone to create a website that infringes on the trademark for a company that you work for? First, it's odd that somebody would steal your identity for the purpose of creating a website. But secondly, the website is one that infringes on the trademark for your company. And then your company actively looks for violations on this stuff? I think somebody wanted you fired. Possibly it is your own company - after all, they didn't need much 'proof' to suspend you, did they? If your company is big enough to have a legal dept, it seems they can afford to be (and should be) a little more thorough. Hire a lawyer.

    1. Re:Really odd circumstances by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indiana is an at-will state. They could have fired him for nothing, literally. If he's being "framed" then it's likely that it's someone not in HR at the company, and not his superiors either. It's more likely that someone not affiliated with the company just said "I want to run a scam in XYZ industry. Who's the head sysadmin for ABC, the local leaders in XYZ? Ah, got his email, now a few quick internet searches... perfect. Now my website looks totally legit. Cyber-Scam go!" They probably never thought the sysadmin would get in trouble for it.

    2. Re:Really odd circumstances by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I was thinking it was a very interesting coincidence too.

      Another scenario:

      Poster was trying to pull something on his employer, gets caught, posts on /. pleading innocent for help on how to dig himself out of the shit he's in.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    3. Re:Really odd circumstances by BufferArea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thought about this too but I thought it unlikely for the following reason: Most people wouldn't bother to check the registration of a site. Of those who would, it seems like if they went to the bother of finding out the sysadmin of the company they would go to the trouble of further investigation. This seems like it would defeat only superficial checking and therefore not much use to the scammer. Then again, maybe I'm over thinking it, since the company says it is sufficient to suspend him.

    4. Re:Really odd circumstances by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Your id was stolen by someone to create a website that infringes on the trademark for a company that you work for? First, it's odd that somebody would steal your identity for the purpose of creating a website.

      I think it's great. If I were to steal the trademark on someone, I'd use the same name and address as the real person, use a throwaway email address, and they'd never track it to me. Make what I could and disappear when it looked like someone was going to catch me. If I were doing something blatantly illegal like that, what would I care if some administrator somewhere got in trouble for it?

    5. Re:Really odd circumstances by fafaforza · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, because the most convoluted explanation is the most probable one.

      As someone already said, for someone who wants to run some scam on a company with a fake domain, it's trivial to look up the admin/tech contact for their real domain. Why? I don't know, maybe to make it seem to whatever victim that would be bothered to run a whoisthat the domain was registered by the same representative of the actual company.

      And even if this were a question from a scammer, given the facts that answers are based on, the info would apply to someone else in a similar situation. The situation being, in my view, a bunch of office types without the faintest idea of the triviality of the registration process, threatening a job that the OP wants to keep. Just ask any email admin, for example, about all the times they had to explain how easily the CEO's email address can be forged and that they don't need to call in the local detectives.

    6. Re:Really odd circumstances by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Oy.. obviously responded to the wrong thread. Meant to reply to 'erroneous' (how ironic) in "How do we know..."

      Note to /., how about returning a user to the reply page after logging in, instead of the front page.

  27. How do we know... by pongo000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that it wasn't you? Seriously, folks: Maybe this individual is guilty as charged, and he's asking us about ways to defend his actions, or how to create a web of plausible deniability. Think about it: If this situation really happened to a truly innocent party, with looming consequences of job loss (especially in the current economy), don't you think said party would seek the advice of counsel before airing out his laundry on /.?

    I know some of us are always willing to lend a hand to a fellow geek, but sometimes I have to shake my head at how quickly some of you jump to defend an individual who claims to be innocent, framed, whatever.

    1. Re:How do we know... by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking in the same direction. Why/How would someone out there know to use a particular trademarked name and to also use a particular person's name who is associated with the company as an IT person to register a domain name?!

      I have a feeling that there's a bit more to know than we are being told. I would not discount the possibility that this guy actually did register the domain hoping his company would buy it from him for a tidy profit and it backfired... badly.

      I think we are short on facts here and it would be good to be able to find them. Come forward with ALL the information such as the domain name in question and maybe, just MAYBE some smart geek here can actually track down the fraudster and determine whether or not it is the OP or not... and if not, find the proof that OP is requesting.

    2. Re:How do we know... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I was thinking in the same direction. Why/How would someone out there know to use a particular trademarked name and to also use a particular person's name who is associated with the company as an IT person to register a domain name?!

      Well now, let's say I wanted to run a scam involving infringement of Acme Incorporated's website, www.acmeinc.com. My first step would be to pick a similar-sounding domain name, then I would open up a terminal and type in "whois www.acmeinc.com". Boom. Now I just use the information in the whois record when registering my own domain name, anyone who wonders why there is both a "www.acmeinc.com" website (the legit one) and a "www.acmeincfreestuffinexchangeforyourcreditcardnumber.com" (my fake website) and decides to do a little digging will find that the websites seem to have identical whois records. Now of course, if the actual Acme Inc. was to discover this and the people who discover it don't quite understand how easy it is to make up fake whois records (no effort at all) they may just think their sysadmin (who is in the contact info) is trying to scam their customers...

      Really, it is a fairly plausible scenario if you consider that most people outside of a company's IT department know absolutely nothing about how domain names are managed, most likely they just got a report from the outside company they hired which said "the fake website is registered by $NAME", $NAME being pulled straight from the whois info of course.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:How do we know... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Somewhat plausible with the exception of how trivial it would be, then, for the party(ies) whose ID information was misused to simply take over the domain without much fuss or muss. Most parties who wish to secure and maintain a domain will have to ensure that someone else will not steal it out from under them. There are plenty of ways to make it LOOK similar without being similar enough to lose it outright.

    4. Re:How do we know... by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      but sometimes I have to shake my head at how quickly some of you jump to defend an individual who claims to be innocent, framed, whatever

      Since "a fellow geek" on slashdot to a point believes that "information wants to be free", and that "knowlege is power" and so on, it doesn't matter if our advise is used for good or evil.

      Availability of information alone would not make a guilty party innocent, would it? Let the courts decide that, and not us.

    5. Re:How do we know... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      True. However, if the person performing the scam was doing this as just another scam rather than a targeted attack then this wouldn't be much of an issue, it could probably even be automated to a certain degree. In that case it doesn't really matter if the scam websites go down after a few days or weeks, by then they've made some money from it and they can just create a few new websites for other companies (or even the same company).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:How do we know... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      I have long had a standing policy at places where I have worked always to register things like software and domain names to my "ROLE" and not to my name. I have been continually annoyed when I see previous admin's names on software licenses and warranties and the like and constantly having to explain "he is no longer with the company." It's annoying. So, in effort to not be annoying, I have typically registered things to " IT Manager" or something similar. If it's mine, my name goes on it. If it's not, the company's does. Can't imagine why that would be hard to figure out.

      But given this slightly plausible story line (I have never heard this scenario in the past and would be interested to see if this happens to anyone else but this guy) I now have yet another good reason for maintaining my policy as it is. It protects my personal identity. If something like that were to happen to me and someone used my actual name, I know know it was a personal attack, and not one that was automated or otherwise done as part as operating procedure.

    7. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the post was written like a letter from Nigeria.

      It was so bad I quit reading it half way through.

    8. Re:How do we know... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I was thinking in the same direction. Why/How would someone out there know to use a particular trademarked name and to also use a particular person's name who is associated with the company as an IT person to register a domain name?!

      His info was on the legitimate domains, the typosquatter just reused the information in order to make their domain seem even more legitimate - whenever I have a question about a domain I do a whois lookup and I gotta admit, this would have probably fooled me.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why/How would someone out there know to use a particular trademarked name and to also use a particular person's name who is associated with the company as an IT person to register a domain name?!

      Trivially. Here's how (from the post):
      "The public parts of the registration information at Registrar B match pretty exactly those of my legitimate domain registrations at Registrar A,"

      Ok, I want to set up a company that pretends to be BigCompany for some scam-related reason. As part of my scam, I go do a whois on BigComany and get contact information. When registering my scam site, I crib as much of that information as I can get away with. This will help lend an air of legitimacy to my scam.

    10. Re:How do we know... by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      how do we know...

      It wasn't you? ;)

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    11. Re:How do we know... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If it was him, then nothing given to defend the innocent will work. This wasn't a claim of "I'm innocent, how do I get out of it," but "I'm innocent, how do I prove it."

      If he were guilty, then suing the person that registered the domain name (as a John Doe, or even under his own name, so Bob Jones is suing Bob Jones) would be a worthless waste of time. But he has to sue to get the non-public registration details from registrar B. His way of proving his innocence is to provide proof it was someone else. You can't easily set up someone after the fact, but you can before. So unless he was guilty and already started the smear campaign (unlikely, since he's asking for help) then there's almost nothing that can be said now that would help unframe the guilty man.

      Think about it: If this situation really happened to a truly innocent party, with looming consequences of job loss (especially in the current economy), don't you think said party would seek the advice of counsel before airing out his laundry on /.?

      Yes. After all, there's nothing we could say that's going to be better than what a lawyer could say. If he's guilty, our advice would be no better or worse than he'd get as a guilty man asking a lawyer the same thing. In fact, if he were guilty, I imagine he'd be more likely to get a lawyer than ask here. Ask the police, the guilty "lawyer up" much more quickly than those who are innocent.

      I know some of us are always willing to lend a hand to a fellow geek, but sometimes I have to shake my head at how quickly some of you jump to defend an individual who claims to be innocent, framed, whatever.

      I've seen more comments on here assuming he's guilty than not. Perhaps it's the moderators, rather than the posters, but the response seems to be "shut up, you got caught" rather than "wow, that sucks, let me help." The answer is simple, he needs to find out who registered it and give that to his employer. There are a variety of ways to go about that, but that advice wouldn't help a guilty person one bit. If he's guilty, I'd recommend he lie on his resume and start seeking a new job. That's 100% unrelated to the advice to give an innocent person, so a guilty person asking for help as if he's innocent wouldn't get a useful response from me, but the innocent person asking for help as an innocent person would get a useful response. So he'd have to be guilty and stupid to ask the question he did, and there's almost nothing in response that would actually help him, so no reason to not just assume him innocent and respond as such.

    12. Re:How do we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too damned right. If you've already been fired for the actions which you didn't commit, why not air out the laundry? Who are the registrars? Who was the employer? What are the domain(s)? Which is the infringed trademark?

      The OP is very guarded leading me to believe this individual is being cautious for a reason, and I seriously doubt that it's because he was forced to sign an NDA before getting fired. And I've known employees who *did* do this in the past ... register domains with their company's trademarks in hopes of getting money from the company is response. The fact that this individual actually had the company's domains registered under his own name also stinks to high heaven.

      IANAL but the first thing I'd do if improperly dismissed in this fashion is immediately hire a legal firm to sue the company for unfair dismissal.. in AUS these lawyers work on a percentage of the settlement, so there's really nothing to lose.

  28. Paper trail by flaming+error · · Score: 1

    Somebody paid to register that domain. Find out who it was. Maybe that means subpoenaing Registrar B for a credit card number or bank account, and subpoenaing the bank for the account holder's name.

    "Identity theft" is just fraud, twisted around to make the impersonated customer the victim rather than the business that allowed it to happen. Fraud is a crime, and law enforcement should be involved. Of course, IANAL.

    1. Re:Paper trail by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Fraud is a crime, and law enforcement should be involved. Of course, IANAL.

      I've been through this myself in the past. You don't need to be a laywer or anything to know that identity theft is a crime. Duh.

      But what's really going on here isn't identity theft so much as hijacking a website. Since it's not actually identity theft in terms that the police understand, and is a more a civil dispute, don't bother with them right now.

      Let me tell you something I learned early in life:

      Lawyers and lots of detailed paperwork are awesome in their ability to kick someone's ass for you. It's not just "get a lawyer". It's "If you want to crush this punk like the bug he is, use a two ton hammer." A Lawyer is just the means to do so in this case. And this also applies to the case itself. Go in prepared to crush the competition into a thin paste. Anything else will be seen as weakness and exploited. In short, grow a pair and put on your Alpha-male pants.
      (though the story does sound fishy and more akin to fishing for "how do I save my ass" than anything else, I'll give the guy the benefit of the doubt as I know money is tight for many people now)

  29. register a domain name using your boss's details by kae_verens · · Score: 1

    If you can do this, then it proves how simple it is, and the onus is then on them to either /prove/ that you were the person that registered the domain name you're accused of, or accept that your boss has been registering domain-names without his/her own knowledge.

  30. Get A Lawyer! STAT!! by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Consulting a lawyer is the only sensible thing to do at this point. Of course if you really want to go out in a blaze of irony, you could also register another domain in the head of HR's name or the CEO's name just as was done to you. :D

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re:Get A Lawyer! STAT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you could also register another domain in the head of HR's name or the CEO's name just as was done to you."

      See if zooporn.xxx is available. . . .

  31. "uncommon ethnic last name" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the parlance of our times, "the thing speaks for itself"

  32. You kidding with us, right? by pongo000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to avoid incurring the cost of a lawyer but I am intent on maintaining my good name and continued employment.

    Right...so let me get this straight: You stand a good chance of losing your job, affecting your life and your family's well-being, and you're too cheap to hire a lawyer? I'm sorry, but you really have your priorities out of whack if you think posting your woes on /. is time well spent.

    1. Re:You kidding with us, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, back in reality, hiring a lawyer is not a simple process, and it's not just not cheap but *very expensive*, and many times they will screw you over worse than the person they are supposed to be defending you from.

      So yeah, hiring a lawyer is something one should want to avoid.

    2. Re:You kidding with us, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stand a good chance of losing your job, affecting your life and your family's well-being, and you're too cheap to hire a lawyer?

      Please, keep in mind that lawyers can be very expensive and it's quite possible that someone can be too POOR to hire a lawyer rather than too CHEAP.

  33. Enemy Action dude... by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    Way too many coincidental details to be a random ID thief, this is someone who knows you and who is out to bury you.

    Hire a lawyer AND a PI.

    Then sit back, STFU and let them do the work.

    good luck.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    1. Re:Enemy Action dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. If he takes your advice, I'd give it about 1-3 months before the asshat who did this is brought before the court. Even though what has happened is extremely childish and screams of a juvenile's actions, this kid still needs to learn his lesson. What is the sentence for ID theft? 5 years?

    2. Re:Enemy Action dude... by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't so much ID theft in the common current parlance. This was fraudulent misuse of my name. The mailing address isn't specifically mine - it is the postal dropbox for my Registrar, and the account with my name on it is only used for company business. The fraudster even included the answering service phone number for Registrar A in their registration with Registrar B.

  34. it's too complicated, you must be guilty by fkx · · Score: 0

    it's too complicated, you must be guilty

    No one else would be able to set this up.

    Know what I mean?

  35. Who was the registrar? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Was it GoDaddy?

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  36. Ironically... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    This is a perfect example of why the RIAA's recent win on getting ISP users' identities with a subpoena can be a good thing. He is the victim of a civil offense, just as the RIAA's members technically were. He only knows that some asshole John Doe has maligned his name by doing this. I'm actually glad the RIAA won that victory because it might help him clear his name.

    And I say this as someone who normally thinks the RIAA should be thrown through a legal chipper shredder that begins with RICO, takes an intermission at Gitmo and ends in rendition to Syria...

  37. You actually need two lawyers... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how it works in the US where you have (at least in some states) employment "at will" and it is very easy for a company to fire someone? The innocent until proven guilty only works for criminal cases. This sort of thing is exactly why you need laws protecting employees....of course he really needs to talk to a lawyer to see whether there are any such laws applicable here.

    The question you pose, again, reinforces the reason why you need to speak with a labor attorney in your state, and probably another attorney that deals with identity theft.

    There are two things going on here, folks. One, his identity was stolen and used fraudulently. That's a criminal matter and you need to call the police and/or FBI. The outcome of that investigation then needs to flow into the civil labor case where you were unduly suspended from your job for something that is clearly out of character for you, and could cause additional undue damage to your career and reputation.

    The identity theft is separate from the labor case, but one must be dealt with first in order to clear your name in the second.

  38. um.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can X please take the stand? Interesting argument. Can the other X take the stand? Huh. Fascinating. Which one is real, I mean, the second one certainly has all the credentials. And a cute smile.

    Identity theft: sucks.

  39. Go to your Union Rep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, right, you don't have a Union Rep. My bad.

  40. Scorched Earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw it you are already suspended, might as well go out in a blaze of glory. Transfer the domain immediately and point it at one of the goatse mirror sites.

  41. Are you stupid? by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Get a lawyer. OF COURSE get a lawyer.

    Here's the thing with the legal system in the United States-

    It's not if THE LAW is on your side, it's if THE JUDGE is on your side. The major benefit of hiring a lawyer, especially a "local" lawyer, is that he likely knows the judge personally. You likely don't. A lawyer will get things done that you can't, simply because he is part of the local "old boys club".

    Basically, you have to hire a lawyer, because it shows that you are willing to "play ball", as they say. When you defend yourself, most judges think you are just being obnoxious, and aren't going to be very cooperative.

  42. Get another job elsewhere. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    You are working for assholes who are assuming that the registration is yours even though you explained the situation.

    Who would be dumb enough to register a domain which infringes on his employer's trademark somehow, and using his real name?

    What for?

  43. Billing Info / ISP Info by huzur79 · · Score: 1

    Sadly most advice from people here wont apply. We dont know Indian work place laws or legal system. But as many had said a lawyer is prob a good thing to get. The only thing that you could do to prove it was not you is obtain the billing information from the other company to show it was paid for by some one else. While they can put anything they want in the register information they would have had to use there own billing name to make the domain purchase. Now where I am in Canada a company cant just give out information like that due to privacy laws. Here it would require a lawyer to obtain that information. If the register is any decent and for there own protection from fraud they should maintain records of the IP address which registered it to. That can then be checked against the ISP and the identity for the owner of that account should be obtainable too.

    1. Re:Billing Info / ISP Info by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      We dont know Indian work place laws or legal system.

      It's Indiana, the U.S. City, not the country of India.

    2. Re:Billing Info / ISP Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We dont know Indian work place laws or legal system.

      It's Indiana, the U.S. City, not the country of India.

      Indiana is a state you idiot.

    3. Re:Billing Info / ISP Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indiana is a state you idiot.

      Some folks in Pennsylvania and Brazil might disagree.

  44. Is Indiana employment under "at will" clause? by ClamChowder · · Score: 1

    I know in California your employment is considered "at will" if you're a regular employee, which basically means they can terminate your employment at any time, with or without a reason given. Since you're in Indiana, I don't believe you'd be employed under such statute, therefore you should have a full menu to legal recourse at your disposal. I would say - go sit down with a Lawyer and take them up on their free consolation at a minimum.

    1. Re:Is Indiana employment under "at will" clause? by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      Indiana is an "at will" state. Mmmm - chowder. Lunch time.

    2. Re:Is Indiana employment under "at will" clause? by ClamChowder · · Score: 1

      Indiana is an "at will" state. Mmmm - chowder. Lunch time.

      Wow -- if in fact Indiana is an "at will" state, then Lawyer or not, if they want him gone they will "make it so" and he will have very little recourse. Almost sounds as if this is a coup to ouster him from his position there, perpetrated by -- his company none-the-less and in the end they shield themselves behind the "at will employment" clause.

  45. In texas at least.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The employer can fire you for any reason at all.
    So, it would be up to you to prove that this person is not you.

    Employment rights are not the same as legal rights.

    Guilty unless proven innocent.

  46. think by danwesnor · · Score: 1

    If they're going to fire you over something like this, consider the possibility that they were going to fire you anyway. If you're sure you're clean all around, hire a lawyer, but don't sic 'em on the company until you've been fired or want to get fired.

  47. Before this happens get Identity Theft protection by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

    I've used Identity Theft Shield for the last few years and it's helpful for taking care of this kind of thing. Tied to a legal plan, you have access to the legal representation you need as well. It's little money well spent:
    http://bit.ly/aKbg6V

  48. registration in your name by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    First off, if the registration is in your name with your address, phone number and email address then you should have a very easy time taking control of it. Write a letter (on paper) to your employer requesting permission to do so with the intent of collecting all information contained in the account and turning it over to the company. Take no action unless they grant permission in writing.

    Second, hire a lawyer to write you a letter to the effect of, "Mr. You's name was forged on the system in question. The company's reaction is unacceptable. You expect to be reinstated by date X after which you will avail yourself of all legal recourse." The lawyer can help you with the exact wording and concepts. Composing and sending the letter will cost you around $200 but it sends a message to your employer that you consider their behavior in the matter to be unacceptable.

    Third, they can't "suspend" you. This isn't grade school. They can pay you, fire you or lay you off. Those are their only unilateral options and you have specific legal rights in each case. They can ask you to take leave without pay, but you have to agree and you shouldn't agree without giving them a hard deadline for reinstating you.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:registration in your name by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Where I live (And I'm guessing where the OP is from) They can 'Suspend from work without pay', this was done to me once to 'teach me a lesson' by the dictator in charge of the company for supposedly 'not staying in communication well enough' even when sending weekly issue notices via email and having him decline to see me in person each week to discuss the same (ie he just had a stick up his ass)... The don't ask you to take a leave without pay, if you step on their property during the time they state they will call the police and escort you out (and probably fire you). You get no choice in suspension from work.

      Their is also a variant with pay, but unless your a 'C' level employee you can't usually get that... Even as 'Director of Technology' I was suspended without pay.

      Btw said dictator died suddenly of cancer a month or so later, so I really right it up to mental instability due to illness as the real cause of my 'incident'.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    2. Re:registration in your name by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. According to the Department of Labor, an employer can suspend a salaried employee without pay for up to 12 days but only pursuant to a written policy applicable to all employees and only when imposed in "good faith" for infractions of workplace rules.

      I doubt it can be imposed in good faith when the employee reasonably disputes the facts and no hearing is performed. I highly doubt his workplace has a written rule against registering domain names.

      http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ESA/Title_29/Part_541/29CFR541.602.htm

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  49. first get a copy of your contract etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plus also get a copy of any grievance and discipline procedure. I would also get in touch with an employment lawyer (not just any lawyer) for your jurisdiction.

    It’s a moot point if the alleged misconduct is serious enough offence to warrant precautionary suspension - did you have any hearing at all. Precautionary suspension is only to stop people accused of serious crimes from fiddling with the evidence, which in this case I don’t see how that would be possible

    How ever an “off the record” chat with your boss before getting lawyers involved might be worth pursuing. – Pointing out that if you prove your innocence you will be filing a grievance/lawsuit against the company as this will reflect very badly on the mangers involved and that legal and hr may wish to question the mangers concerned and this may well have a negative effect on them. BTW in the UK it looks like you would automatically win as it looks like the procedures haven’t been followed. The “ethnic” name also sets off some alarm bells as well.

    IANL but I am a senior lay TMT union activist in the UK.

  50. Failing resolution with this good advice... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... contact the NLRB, National Labor Relations Board, as a next step. They may in effect do any necessary lawyering for you.

  51. That's one asshat company by Krahar · · Score: 1

    A typosquatter wants to create a domain using a trademark illegally. So then he doesn't want it in his own name because it is illegal. So he looks up the whois information of a related website and uses the same information in order not to have to put in his own name. Someone at the company discovers the typosquat website, runs whois on the typosquat domain and is enough of a moron to just assume that the name label associated to an illegal activity is actually genuine, and then proceeds to impugn the good name of an employee. This based on the equivalent of a bank robber putting a note with a name on his forehead and everyone just assuming that the name on the note is his actual name.

    Obviously what the company should have done is to help the guy prove that it wasn't him, rather than just throwing him overboard to see if he floats. At least every other employee at that company now knows what kind of organization they work for, if they didn't already. I know I would be racking my brain to see if I couldn't find a better place to work if I was an employee there and saw something like this going on to someone else. I would be doing that even if it turns out that the guy actually did do it, because the company attacked him before they could know that, so if I ever got in trouble through no fault of my own I would know to expect the same thing - not the kind of place that I want to be if I have any choice in the matter.

  52. How About Criminal Charges Against the ID Thief? by EWillieL · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but in Arizona, at least, and probably many other states, the act of domain hijacking is a felony (it's considered unauthorized computer access, or some such language). So is ID theft. There may be federal statutes at work here as well. You should see if you can get the proper authorities involved -- they'd at least be able to subpoena the registrar's records to track down the attacker.

    Granted, you'll have to get the authorities interested first -- usually they need to see significant monetary damages with criminal intent. But it's another avenue to explore if you're challenged by the legal fees (and who isn't these days?)

    --
    Ask your doctor if getting up off your ass is right for you! -- Bill Maher
  53. Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is civil - not criminal. All the lawyer will end up doing is costing you more money to tell you something you already know - U == Screwed!

    The lawyer will tell you basically that, unlike criminal cases, where you have to be shown to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, that in civil matters, the indicators of your innocence have to be more than the indicators of your guilt.

    It's called "the balance of probabilities." So far, the balance of the probabilities, based on the "evidence", is all in their favour.

    You've already told them you didn't do it. Your best option now, unless you live in a jurisdiction that isn't "at will", is to conserve your resources while you look for another job. If this were a small enough business that the people around you would find it totally out of character for you to do this, you wouldn't be in this situation right now - they would have believed you. As it is, they don't, and worse, they can't afford to back down at this point.

    Pick your fights. You've told them you didn't do it - now tell them you're not comfortable working for a place that calls you a liar and you want to discuss a severance package that includes an agreement that you were RIF'ed if anyone should ask for references. Because even if you prove you didn't do it, your job there is history, and at some level you know this is true. Besides, do you want to work for a place that calls you a liar and a crook?

    I'm not being mean here, even though the tone might come across as such - it's because you really need a bucket of water (or a brick) to the face to make you realize that you're in a no-win situation. It's the same "wake up and smell the coffee" advice I'd give to my closest friends if they were in the same situation. It sucks, but so does life in general. We can't change that, but we can change how we react to it. We can either stew on it, and let it turn into acid that eats through our guts and permeates our life and our personality, or we can move on.

    We all know people who, a decade later, still won't stop talking about someone who screwed them over at EVERY occasion. Try it - go on a dinner date with someone who's divorced - sometimes it's like their ex is sitting at the table with you ... you want to say "you're obviously not over them. Maybe you two should get back together if you like arguing about each others actions so much. Call me when you're really single."

    This is the same situation. Nobody, not a lawyer, not anyone on slashdot, can change what's happened. What we can do is give you the encouragement to help you deal with the situation in the most efficient, least destructive, way, both professionally and personally, and help you rebuild. The lawyer won't do that - their first interest is $$$. Before it's finished, this case will cost you a minimum of $20k, and probably a lot more.

    If you can handle the legal stuff yourself, my advice would be a bit different, but not by much. Some things it's just best to agree to disagree, tell them that you've thought about it, and when they find the culprit, you'd like to be kept in the loop, that you won't use that info to hold them responsible, and if there's anything you can do to help, just call, and that you understand they're only trying to protect their business and the other employees, and then move on. You'll keep your respect and earn theirs. It's a small world. You never know, they may call back in a few years with good news - you should keep that door open.

    I've had bosses who are dicks - even after I've quit, I tell them that if there's a problem, call me. They might be too proud to admit they made a mistake, but the smarter ones are not too proud to take my advice when they're stuck, and I'm not too proud to refuse to help them.

    1. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and I'm not too proud to refuse to help them.

      I don't think that means what you think it means.

    2. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What you are forgetting is the downside. You are assuming that, at this stage, all he has to lose is his job. There have been several suggestions above which could be interpreted as / twisted to sound like he was trying to blackmail his employer. Even non cooperation and disappearance can be used against him. He wants to get a lawyer now so that he knows what his legal duties are and his legal protections. Preferably he wants a lawyer who can show that he's been wronged so that, if it comes to it, he has some bargaining chips. In any case, if he has a legal duty still to his employer, he wants to be very careful to make sure that it is seen clearly to be fulfilled.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    3. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If he is under suspension, and not getting paid, he is free to look for work elsewhere, provided he respects any non-compete. He might as well start his job search as soon as possible, because with the current economy, it's going to be a long one.

      Now is also the best time to negotiate - the longer this is not addressed, the more set in stone everything becomes.

      A lawyer cannot show him he was wronged by the company - the company has acted legally. The party who wronged him was the scammer. The company has no legal liability for the acts of any 3rd party they don't have a business or contractual relationship with.

      Eventually, either the domain is going to be used, or abandoned.

      The public parts of the registration information at Registrar B match pretty exactly those of my legitimate domain registrations at Registrar A, including Registrar A's mailing address and phone number. The only things left out in the mailing address are the reference to a domain name and ATTN: Registrar A. Of course the anonymized email address differs as well.

      So he sends, by snail mail, a notice to the registrar telling them that the email address information is not valid, and to please transfer it to his soon-to-be former employer, along with a copy to his former employer. The registrar will ask for government photo id confirming his mailing address and name, and transfer the domain. What's the big deal? No need for a lawyer.

      What happens after that is anyone's guess, but the employer doesn't have to take him back, since this doesn't prove that someone else registered the domain. My advice stands - cut your losses, because there will always be suspicion, and the next time something happens, guess who the #1 suspect is going to be.

      None of this requires a lawyer, just common sense, and the cost of a couple of registered letters and a few photocopies. The well is poisoned. If he does what I suggest, he will be seen as acting in good faith, but that is all that can be done. No lawyer will be able to "prove" anything - that's simply not their job, and in this case, probably not possible anyways, so he'll be blowing between $20k and $50k for nothing.

      It's like a bad marriage - who cares who's right? The relationship is over, it's too poisoned to recover from. Sure, you can spend a ton of money "proving" you're right. All that will get you is more debts. Lawyers love this - people spending hundreds of dollars an hour arguing who gets custody of a half-empty bottle of dish-washing detergent (true case that finally caused one lawyer to decide to quit family law altogether).

      Like I said, pick your battles. It's not YOUR $20k-$50k to prove nothing. My way, at least the domain confusion is ended. A lawyer wouldn't think of that, and would charge a 4-figure retainer before even sending the registered mail.

      Pick up the biography of any famous retired lawyer who can speak honestly - they'll tell you that lawyers are for the most part lazy, stupid, unprepared, and greedy. Or search for "lawyer billable minutes scam".

    4. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure I agree with this.

      Often HR and legal perceive their role as following the letter of the law exactly - i.e. acting like dicks. It could well be that the guys colleagues and bosses think he's innocent. It could even be that the people in HR / legal haven't stopped to form an opinion, and would be equally happy sharing a drink with him on Friday evening.

      Getting a lawyer to write a letter in your support explaining that you believe you are innocent and sitting through a meeting with the company to the same effect is pretty cheap. If they really don't believe him then yeah, I'd drop it at that point but you're not out much money and if they were just following the procedure it could well save him his job.

      I guess I'm saying that you need to check whether the suspension etc. is a matter of following procedure of them genuinely disbelieving you.

    5. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      My suggestion elsewhere is cheaper, quicker, and simpler. It also solves the immediate "thorn under the skin".

      Since the snail-mail address info matches, all he has to do is send an email to the registrar (cc to his bosses) saying that the email address is bogus, and that he wants the domain transferred to his employer. They will ask for proof of identity (government photo id like a drivers license) and then transfer the domain. How hard is that? the process can be started tonight, the snail mail sent tomorrow by registered mail or FedEx, and the whole thing resolved by the end of the week for less than the cost of a pizza.

      No lawyer needed (people get their backs up when you involve a lawyer, and any lawyer is going to want a 4-figure retainer, and will end up costing in the 5 figures).

      Do this, cut your loses, negotiate a severance agreement, and move on. The company has acted legally - the only party the poster has a claim against is the original scammer, and good luck with that.

      I can't believe that this place, which is supposed to be a net-aware tech forum, falls on the "hire a lawyer" approach every time. The company doesn't want to know Jack Sh*t about a lawyer. They want a solution. So does the poster.

      To the original poster - if you want to thank me, I accept chocolate L-)

    6. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Impeccable advice. I would also add that a legal action against his employer might poorly affect his chances of getting hired onto another company. Employers are reluctant to hire anyone who has shown they are willing to file suit against an employer.

    7. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best advice I have seen so far in this thread. Forget about the lawyers. Start sending out resumes.

      You cannot come out ahead against your own employer in an adversarial process.

    8. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      I think you misjudge. The guy denied he was responsible. If the company wanted solutions, what they would do at that stage is say "right, we'd like you to work on fixing this". Instead they suspended him. The people doing this are the legal department in the company. I think that offering to do what you suggest is amost certainly a good idea (though maybe you could end up with this being used to prove you "could have done something if you wanted") but going ahead and actually trying to do the transfer could be a risk. E.g. "he then interfered with our attempt to transfer the name to the company IPR pool by trying to get it transferred to his own division".

      Maybe, on the other hand, they really still are in the reasonable stage. I can't judge that without more information, so I'll just say that you could be right, but be careful.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    9. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Impeccable advice.

      Except as has been pointed out by others below, this can be used as evidence that he had control of the registration. So you'd want to talk to a lawyer before doing it.

      I would also add that a legal action against his employer might poorly affect his chances of getting hired onto another company. Employers are reluctant to hire anyone who has shown they are willing to file suit against an employer.

      Most such things settle out of court with sealed records. You probably sacrifice part of the settlement for a good reference.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    10. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      No - it proves nothing either way. If he could prove who was using the bogus email address, that would be another story. At this point, he can't. Maybe once he gets control of the domain into his boss's hands ...

      You seem to forget that he in fact already DOES have legal, though not physical, control the domain. That's why all he has to do is establish his identity and effect the transfer.

      Heck, with a bit of luck he could even send the first email to the registrar tonight (cc to bosses, along with asking them what they want the info changed to, along with a link to this thread to put it into context), a color pdf with his drivers license to the registrar tomorrow morning when they ask for proof of identity, and have the domain in his boss's name in time for supper tomorrow night.

      What it does is it addresses the problem of the scammer using the domain, for example, to send out a bogus solicitation. It also shows that the admin is on the ball, able to come up with a solution that fixes the company's problem, rather than concentrating on the personal aspects.

      Hundreds of people shouting "get a lawyer". Me saying "fix the problem." If you were the boss, who would you want working for you? Who would you be more likely to believe? Someone who lawyers up, or someone who says "look, I have a fix to your main concern, and we can sort the rest of the stuff out later."

    11. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      As I pointed out elsewhere, you cc the company and ask them what info they want in the record when it's transferred.

      Yes, people might think "you could have done something if you had wanted", but look at what people are posting here. Hundreds of comments saying "get a lawyer." Me saying "here's how you address the company's primary concern."

      In other words, most people are automatically on the defensive and they go blank as far as thinking about the solution - their personal situation understandably overwhelms them and makes them think defensively - "fight or flight". The technical solution is obvious, and yet, here, one of the biggest tech sites in the world, and everyone goes "lawyer up."

      Rule # 1: The problem is never a technical problem.
      Rule # 2: The problem is always a people problem.

      This is what's happened here - from the company and him not thinking clear-headedly and saying "let's solve the immediate problem of the bogus domain", to him focusing on his personal situation ("clearing my name"), to everyone else going down the same path. If the vast majority here didn't see the obvious way of addressing the company's immediate concerns, then he can't really be faulted for not seeing it either.

      Then again, in many cases women tend to be better at this sort of thing - looking for a people-type solution rather than a technical one (and sometimes it really bugs the guys). He's looking at his personal situation and how to "fix" it, whereas he should be asking "what's really bugging them, and how can I address that?" by solving their problem, he has a fighting chance of solving his own.

      See the difference? The second one is focused on the feelings of the employer - their feeling that they have been betrayed and that there's a bogus domain out there that can send a legit-looking email blast any time. Fix that, and they'll feel better, and certainly a LOT better than him walking into a meeting with a lawyer and no solution.

    12. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      If the domain is hosted by anyone, chances are that there is a creditcard # attached to it. THAT credit card number and the person's name attached can be sued for in a civil court fraud proceedings.

      In addition, there is libel charges that can be made (civil) and possibly fraud (criminal) charges. All of this is relatively easy info to get a hold of. It isn't hard to prove lack of guilt here. The problems are the legal system is in the way of getting that information. The registrar, the hosting company aren't going to give up that information without a court order. AND that is where the problem is. A court will not take action until there is a complaint before it. Get the complaint filed ASAP, file the requests for subpoena for all relevant billing/contact information at the same time.

      Someone had to pay for this, find out who.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Why do slashdotters insist on making things more complicated than they are? A court won't do anything for weeks, maybe months. My way, the domain name is in his boss's hands by supper tomorrow - AND he can request a copy of "his" billing records, since he IS the official owner of the domain. Ditto for the email. No need for a subpoena.

      They stole his identity? Steal it back! What are they going to do - sue him for identity theft?

      I swear, you guys would probably take 9 minutes to boil three 3-minute eggs.

      The guy asked for solutions. I'm offering a solution that is quick, easy to understand, cheap, and may also provide proof to actually exonerate him. Delay will just make things worse.

    14. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just say fuck it, in for a penny in for a pound, and register a trademark-infringing domain in your boss's name. And register another one in the CEO's name, and for good measure, register one in the HR Director's dog's name. Of course your company will fire you into outer space, but you will have demonstrated beyond any doubt that anyone can register a domain using anyone else's name, address, and phone number... and making that point is all that really matters now that their legal department is sending you letters.

    15. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      If he had published the company name, you can be pretty sure a few people would have done that by now :-)

      And I can imagine what would be hosted ... "Top 10 goatse hits", "Tubgirl the magnificent", "Martini dick", screen scrapes of the original site turned into parodies, you name it.

      The worst part is that, even if everyone turned the sites over to the company for free, the company is then stuck maintaining the registrations forever, so that "domainers" don't register them if they drop. CompanyXSucks.com, F*ckCompanyX.com MyBossAtCompanyXIsIntoKiddyPorn.com ...

    16. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lawyer cannot show him he was wronged by the company - the company has acted legally. The party who wronged him was the scammer.

      THIS....

      Everybody in this thread so far is trying to give advice about how to restore his job. However, I think the FIRST thing this guy has to do is to contact the registrar and notify them that said domain registration is fraudulent.

      Parent should also contact the authorities (in the USA I am sure there *are* government bodies dealing with internet/identity fraud). Because, registering a domain using your name is the *least* of things the scammer can pull... Wonder what he will do with such domain after that.

      To the question of why you should do it, because it is YOUR identity the one that was stolen.

      If as they said, you live in one of those "at will" stats, do not worry about your job as you actually do not have one... just look for another job ASAP too.

    17. Re:Forget the lawyer - you're hosed. by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1
      If the company are being reasonable, then offering to help is as good as actually solving the problem. If they are not being reasonable, and there's quite a bit of evidence for that, then this is likely not about the domain.

      You are assuming that this is simply a matter of solving the problem. That's not the point; they believe he's been cheating them. In their view he's been caught walking out with rolls of cash, just saying "sorry; here you are" is not solving the problem when the problem is him. Writing a letter directly to the ISP is going to increase the difficulty of their investigation. It is likely to be understood as attempting to destroy evidence. This is not a good idea.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  54. Re:register a domain name using your boss's detail by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    This isn't a bad idea if the company is willing to be reasonable - but you want to have permission to do it first.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  55. follow the money. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    get a subpoena for the billing information to give to the registrar. That will show it's not you.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  56. Too cheap? by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Geeze man. Lawyers are expensive. Maybe the answer is "too poor" rather than "too cheap", especially depending on the circumstances.
    I make a decent wage and a long court case would stretch my budget, I'd imagine that if the author of TFA is working at Best Buy or somewhere similar then a lawyer would be similarly expensive.

    Winning one's job back isn't much of a victory if it costs more than a year's wage was worth... unless he makes big bucks suing the company or domain registrants (and it's more likely he'll just bleed cash whilst the company strings out the lawsuit).

    1. Re:Too cheap? by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you happen to live, but where I'm at, many attorneys (especially in smaller towns) are more than willing to confer with you about options for $50-$100. If you ask the right questions, a half an hour with an attorney can result in some rather useful strategies. Plus, it's nice to have the client-attorney privilege that isn't afforded one who posts on /.

      A $50 consultation with an employment attorney when I was laid of from an IT position several years ago was enough to get me several extra weeks of severance pay. He told me in 1/2 hour everything I needed to do to make sure I got what what mine. Not a bad ROI...

    2. Re:Too cheap? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Geeze man. Lawyers are expensive.

      And not having a lawyer is even more expensive.
       

      Winning one's job back isn't much of a victory if it costs more than a year's wage was worth...

      Balanced against the potential of a lifetime of not being employed in one's field because one was fired for cause... A years wages seem pretty cheap.

    3. Re:Too cheap? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      It can't be cheap if you literally do not have it.

      Where I live their are no employment lawyers, when I wanted to consult one I found the closest lived 128 miles away (2nd largest city in the state, while I live in the fifth). So that's a 128 mile drive, and then however much such a lawyer costs for a consultation.

      Five years ago when I wanted to use one I found a phone number and was told their consultation rate was $400/hour and it was suggested that unless I seriously thought I had something serious to level against them (harassment before being fired wasn't serious FYI) I shouldn't bother. This wasn't helped by a clause in the employment paperwork you are required to sign by 90% of employers stating employment issues go to an arbiter.

      Most of the lawyer's time I talked to was not dealing with severance or any such thing, but acting as a consultant to HR for companies. The jist however being "Your fucking screwed in this state, deal." If his is like mine, it's doubtful he can win anything without it costing several times more to 'win', then to lose... even looking at a lifetime's employment... I mean taking out loans you can't afford to pay to get the lawyer into the courtroom isn't going to do him any good in the long run either unless he can get money from his former employers.

      He also won't be collecting any money until the case is over and it could go on years (usually costing the company very little extra and far less than ever paying him anything). This includes unemployment. So he'll have zero income with which to settle this and will most likely have to try to find a new job ASAP.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  57. Lawyer Up by greatcelerystalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You need to retain competent counsel. Do not file a pro se suit against anyone. Do not try to go it alone. Unfortunately, with the primitive protections provided in most At-Will states, you will be hung out to dry in short order. Your reputation will be damaged, possibly beyond repair, and you will have difficulty working as a sysadmin. Posting as much detail as you did on Slashdot was probably not the brightest idea you've ever had.

  58. currently suspended because an unscrupulous typosq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. -- Leo Kessler

  59. Hire a lawyer. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > What is my best course of action?

    Hire a lawyer. Yes, it will cost money. Do it.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  60. Inside job? by NimbleSquirrel · · Score: 1

    So, this stolen identity was used to create a website in the same business area as the company you work for? You have an unusual name, and someone has managed to find out and use detailed information about you to buy the domain? This sounds like an inside job. Is there someone at your workplace that really doesn't like you and is making grabs for your job? I'd call the police (if they haven't been called before now), and get myself a lawyer. This sounds a little more calculating than some spammer ripping off your ID. At the very least this sounds like some serious fraud.

    1. Re:Inside job? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Most likely a fellow disgruntled (at the sysadmin) employee, or his boss looking for a way to get rid of him.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Inside job? by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      The OP here. Sorry if I was unclear. Not the current common use of Identity Theft, really just my name. However, they also used the PO dropbox & answering service phone number owned by my registrar (A) when registering with Registrar B. No inside job, just simple copy-and-paste by a fraudster. I have no idea what hidden information is held in the registration.

  61. They're signing you free stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If its yours and you have tried everything so far, find the nearest hammer and get to work? If your not willing to deal with it then take ownership of that property and hand it to someone else.

  62. GET.A.LAWYER.NOW. by Steeltoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Problem: His company now sees him as a liability. Anything he does with this domain can backfire ten times. He claims nothing to do with the domain, so he should have nothing to do with it at all.

    DO NOT DO ANYTHING RIGHT NOW BUT GET A LAWYER!

  63. Forget a lawyer, get a new EMPLOYER! (NOW) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So someone (maybe you) set up a website, whoopdee.
    Domain names and squatting are ridiculous claims, which is what this case sounds like.
    Any legit companies (yours) use of anonymization services is unnecessary. And if you used a decent one, your 'name and registration information' 'parts' wouldn't show up at all for comparison.
    And for an employer to suspend you over something that lame and as yet unproven is completely unwarranted and in fact, evil.
    The fact that they did it means you are nothing to them, they do not care, your name is mud.

    1. Re:Forget a lawyer, get a new EMPLOYER! (NOW) by Skapare · · Score: 1
      1. get new job
      2. sue former employer
      3. profit!
      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  64. What company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking for employment and in Indiana up by Chicago, and as your IT company seems to be in need of a new system administrator, which company is it?

  65. Go for all the logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a chunk of cash on hand simply contact the Registrar and get the log data for that transaction. It will cost you. At least you will have an IP (possibly spoofed), times ....

  66. Contact the ICANN ombudsman by FranckMartin · · Score: 1

    This is also a matter with ICANN, they let a fraudulent registration happen. Contact the ICANN ombudsman Tho, not sure they can do much, but more people involved more fun it will be...

    --
    Franck Martin
    Avonsys
  67. Get the payment info by ff1324 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless the registrant paid cash, which is almost impossible online, they likely paid with a credit card. Check with your local prosecuting attorney about filing a fraud case against John Doe and see if they'll file subpoenas to the registrar and credit issuer for identification purposes.

  68. and looks bad by nomadic · · Score: 1

    "Defendant claimed it was a case of mistaken identity, but refused to cooperate until he was restored to his salaried job."

    1. Re:and looks bad by Jerslan · · Score: 1

      In cases of ID Theft, that is a totally unfair misrepresentation of circumstances (possibly enough to sue for defamation of character). If he says it wasn't him and can explain why in a reasonable way, than he is entitled to some due process before losing his salary. The least they could do is put on on reduced salary (enough to pay bills and eat) while they work together to figure it out. Flat out firing someone or putting them on suspension without pay is a cowardly act by a company that is afraid they might be sued, so they make sure the employee can't afford a very good lawyer to defend himself.

      Still suggest getting real legal counsel. There are even lawyers who specialize in IP registration law, so you may want to try getting your lawyer to consult with another in that specialty to find out how that all works.

    2. Re:and looks bad by nomadic · · Score: 1

      In cases of ID Theft, that is a totally unfair misrepresentation of circumstances (possibly enough to sue for defamation of character).

      That's my point; the poster I was responding to had this grand plan of how to deal with their employer, and you see that a lot on slashdot: that you can be smart enough to outwit your employer and their lawyers if you say something. My quoted language was what a lawyer could say in a trial situation, and it was completely accurate, not defamatory (because it was the truth, and anyway litigants have qualified immunity from defamation claims for what they say in the course of a lawsuit).

  69. Get a hold of L & I in your state by Nyder · · Score: 1

    When I got fired and the employer withheld my wages, I took it to labor & Industries and filed a complaint.

    They are who you talk to.

    They are setup for this sort of stuff.

    Providing what the employers did was illegal. If it's not, then you might need a lawyer.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  70. I want to know what the scumbag company name is by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... not because I might look for a system administrator job (I have one), but because I want to be sure to not ever buy anything from a dishonest and evil company. Not all companies are evil. You have to figure it out by how they act (not what they say).

    You will NEVER have a job there, now. You clearly have enemies, and they were not honest enough to say it to your face and say "this is employment at will and we don't will it anymore". Move on. And tell people where NOT to shop (because there is a risk they will get screwed by this company ... they have already shown their colors).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:I want to know what the scumbag company name is by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You clearly have enemies, and they were not honest enough to say it to your face and say "this is employment at will and we don't will it anymore". Move on.

      If he gets control of the accounts, most have an IP audit trail. Talk to a lawyer, but if this is a set-up job, it's probably qualified under libel or some other torts, perhaps even crimes. With IP logs clearly not his, he might have enough for a judge to issue a subpoena.

      If I were set up this way, I'd want to make sure the offending party didn't see it as a profitable tactic.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  71. This story seems fishy... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This story doesn't seem to add up. Why wouldn't a competent SysAdmin just contact Registrar B either by an Abuse, or a Support resolution process? Worst case scenario, a competent registrar will want a letter on the victim company's official letterhead, or some notarized document, to prove identity. Best case scenario, you could take over the domain (registered in YOUR name), and shut the site down by lunch-time on Tuesday.

    If it were me and I WANTED to keep my job, then I'd lawyer up, if that didn't work.

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    1. Re:This story seems fishy... by SoccerDad41 · · Score: 1

      The OP here. After being suspended with no warning about the situation, filing a complaint with Registrar B was the first thing I did.

  72. anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you get something from the FBI sort of like a police report when you are burgularized. They are supposed to investigate, and prosecute these cases.

  73. Sue them by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    I'd say that suing them would be enough to prove your good faith. I mean, if you had registered both domains, you'd probably refrain from suing anybody, as you could get into trouble when the truth came out. It's the same principle as insurance companies asking you for a police report before paying for damages to an stolen car. The police won't even see your car usually, but most people won't risk a problem with the police for the repair money.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  74. at will state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you live in an "At Will" state. They can basically get rid of you for any reason.

  75. Can It Go Federal? by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    You need serious legal help. Every state is different in matters of employment law and some offer much better protection than others. If your lawyer has experience in the federal court system and there is a foothold that might be a better path. And it is not just your current employment that is at risk. Your future may suffer as well. Do not attempt to speak or find help until you see that lawyer. Anything you do can be seen as hurting your cause.
                          Also do not assume that this dismissal is not a pretense. Your company may be behind the entire affair. Dirty tricks take place and who is to say that they don't have a cheaper replacement waiting in the wings.

    1. Re: Can It Go Federal? by optikos · · Score: 1

      If the typosquatter is in another state or nation, then the fraud crosses state or international boundaries; hence, prosecuting the fraud against the typosquatter would be a federal matter of criminal fraud law.

      Conversely, if the typosquatter is in Indiana, then there are two likelihoods: 1) Original-poster sys-admin might in fact be the typosquatter without any identity theft. OR 2) The typosquatter may be a fellow employee who seeks to gain in their own career by eliminating original-poster sys-admin from the company. Indeed, if it is #2 and if it were to turn out that the typosquatter is an officer of the employer's corporation, then the employer's corporation can be argued to have framed the employee. If the typosquatter-framer is a nonofficer that is, say, another sys-admin, then the employer is terminating the wrong employee as it stands right now, while retaining the guilty party in this hypothetical scenario.

      Finding out whose credit card was utilized to purchase the domain name and whose credit card (or ACH identifiers to which the advertising revenue that is earned by the typosquatter domain is deposited) is the key to determining all future plans of attack on your defense. Regarding your employment per se, that is a matter of civil law. But the fraudulent use of your identity to frame you is a matter of either Indiana criminal code (if all parties are within Indiana) or United States federal code (if at least one party is outside of Indiana). If you, original poster, are innocent as you claim, then the typosquatter may be guilty of wire fraud in the use of typosquatter's credit card as a material part of typosquatter's commission of the fraud against you.

      Think about it, you might be able to charge one of your fellow coworkers with criminal charges if they framed you to "help you find a new job". Once all of that dirty laundry is hung out on the clothesline, then the employer might see matters in an entirely different light. Your entire future hinges on ascertaining the credit-card billing info that was utilized to pay for the typosquatter domain and/or how payments are made regarding the advertising revenue earned by the typosquatter domain. Once you find out the billing info on credit cards or ACH info on other financial accounts and if any party (including the bank) is outside of Indiana, then go to the nearest FBI office and file a report of fraud. The main FBI office that serves Indiana is in Indianapolis, although there exist branches in several of Indiana's larger cities too.

      To get this credit-card billing info, you should hire a lawyer on a pay-by-the-hour basis, without retainer fee beyond having a credit card on file and perhaps prepaying the first 2 hours or so and a contract that doesn't have too many terms beyond: original poster promises to pay for the billable-hours incurred. Lawyers with sizable retainer fees (and lengthy retainer contracts) are usually pursuant to litigation against an adversary, but litigation against a known adversary is not what you want right now. You need to find your adversary (the typosquatter), then convince a government prosecutor to pursue the litigation against the typosquatter, if the typosquatter is within the USA. You want to convert this purely civil matter into a criminal matter ASAP. Hourly lawyers that do not require multithousand-dollar retainer fees up front are the kind of lawyer that you need: filing the magical paperwork to get accomplished the things that you need right now, such as subpeonaing the typosquatter's financial information from the domain registrar or from the hosting service at which the typosquatter domain is parked. Still, you are going to spend at least a four-digit sum for the no-retainer lawyer to file the magical paperwork for you. You can save money by being the investigator yourself, doing all the leg-work; you would delegate only the filing of legal paperwork in courts to the lawyer (instead of utilizing the lawyer as an expensive private investi

  76. Assertion Error by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Assertion Error: lawDegreesHeldBySlashdotReplier:0

    But my advice is simple. You have all the rights you can afford to defend.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  77. Unfortunately this is fraud by davidwr · · Score: 1

    So he sends, by snail mail, a notice to the registrar telling them that the email address information is not valid, and to please transfer it to his soon-to-be former employer, along with a copy to his former employer. The registrar will ask for government photo id confirming his mailing address and name, and transfer the domain. What's the big deal? No need for a lawyer

    If someone registered a domain in my name without my permission, they don't have a right to the fraudulently obtained domain but neither do I unless I'm up-front and make a claim based on the fraudulent previous registration. Even then my claim may not hold water - the "rightful" owner may be "nobody, the domain goes back into the hopper of unclaimed domain names."

    Of course, the trademark claim by my employer may moot the above. However, I should never pretend to be the person who actually registered it. That's fraud.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Unfortunately this is fraud by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      If someone registered a domain in my name without my permission, they don't have a right to the fraudulently obtained domain but neither do I unless I'm up-front and make a claim based on the fraudulent previous registration. Even then my claim may not hold water - the "rightful" owner may be "nobody, the domain goes back into the hopper of unclaimed domain names."
      I should never pretend to be the person who actually registered it. That's fraud.

      That is total nonsense. First, you are not claiming to be the person who actually registered it. You are claiming to be the person of record in the DNS records. That is not a lie. The person has put YOUR name and address there. Consider it a gift free and clear if you must. If they want to contest it later, let them come forward. There are plenty of DNS records that are registered by some clerk in a business using the contact info of the person responsible. It's normal. Your boss says "register domains x, y, and z, and put in the same contact info as our main site".

      This is one reason never to use an anonymous registration service. This makes it very easy to "steal back" your own identity (though by definition you can't "steal" what is already legally in your name). If the company had used an anonymous service, the con artist would have registered it using a made-up identity. That squat would be a lot harder to rectify, and that is what the employer wants fixed asap.

      Example

      Someone registers a hate site soliciting donations using your contact info. Are you really going to wait a year for the domain to lapse, or are you going to send a pdf with proof of identity, take over the web site, and change the site so that it's a repudiation of everything and details what really happened, and the steps you took?

      The scammer will never contest it - they'd be going to jail for identity theft and fraud (they took money using your name) - and they'd still not have a legal claim to the site, same as if someone bought a newspaper subscription in your name as a gift.

    2. Re:Unfortunately this is fraud by davidwr · · Score: 1

      If I were a registrar and I later found out that the person had discussed this on Slashdot admitting that he wasn't the person who made the original registration, AND he later implied to me that he was that person, I would immediately put the domain on hold on pending resolution, assuming my lawyers would let me.

      Since there would likely be no challenge, the domain would eventually lapse and be up for grabs.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    3. Re:Unfortunately this is fraud by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Then I, as the legal owner of record, would sue the registrar for damages, in this case provable ones. They are clearly aiding and abetting identity theft, it has cost me a job, and the Streisand Effect would be a joy to watch. The monetary settlement would also be nice. I'd invite the employer to join in as a co-plaintiff. He can explain the potential damage to business, how handling this situation has disrupted his company and caused him to suspend and possibly fire someone, and that the registrar should verify identities before allowing a domain to be registered, instead of allowing people to use gmail or hotmail addresses and no follow-up verification - not even an sms to a cell phone. If google for business and facebook can do it, so can they. They are clearly negligent.

      BTW - Putting the domain in lock means it's still up and resolves to a bogus domain.

    4. Re:Unfortunately this is fraud by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1
      BTW. It's good to see you would lawyer up with the rest of us, if it came to a case you thought you could win.

      Just trolling; Just trolling... ;-P

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:Unfortunately this is fraud by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I know - anyone who's followed me knows that I almost always end up firing the lawyers and doing the dirty work myself. (Good help is *so* hard to find! :-)

  78. Consultation VS court time by phorm · · Score: 1

    Still, despite the bad rep that the profession often has, there are many lawyers out there who are truly decent people and are willing to offer advice for a reasonable fee. I've dealt with some who are pretty reasonable, and the fee is probably as useful at dissuading the "oh, you're a lawyer, can I ask you about ..." types as it would be with the "oh, you work with computers, my home computer has been ..." types :-)

    I agree that a consultation is likely worth it... I'd just caution against the "both guns blazing" approach that some people recommend when it comes to an actual lawsuit, those cam get nasty - and expensive - quite quick.

  79. Follow the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you not follow the money. The domain registration and the hosting will be paid for somehow, probably not in your name. Maybe you can use your real identity as leverage with a bit of social engineering to attempt to recover payment and account information, if anything you can at least rule out any futher (potentially criminal) activity associated with your name. Lets presume someone you know has done this as a malicious act, it is unlikely they have also been involved in the criminal aspects of fraudlenty setting up a payment account in your name. Even if they did setup something like paypal in your name (semi-anonymously / no id checks) at an email of the domain itself; it must have been originally funded somehow.

    There have been cases in the world when some high level political figures have been appointed to the position of director of companies they were not aware of, I guess the paperwork in those countries doesn't require any signature or confirmation of ID by the person themselves.

    Maybe you can consider demonstrating to your superiors how the process of domain registration works, and under their complete observation register another domain using your superiors personal details (as held from public record), use your own me legal payment mechanism and then take your own companies website and mirror/copy it.

    Alternatively (if they are not willing to observe) assosiate the domain with less savory content (this might make you feel good, but might not help your future references).

  80. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > All lawyers are assholes until you need one.

    We actually need assholes with surprising regularity.

  81. Register more domains in the boss' name... by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...to show them how easily it is done.

  82. Silly and a waste of time by Zecheus · · Score: 1
    All employment is at the favor of the employer. If you check your employment contract, you'll likely find that the employer can discharge you for no reason at any time. You're gone.

    Lets say you can prove you did not register the domain. You're still gone.

    Lets say you can get your lawyer to convince your lawyer that it is the employer's burden to prove you did it. You're still gone.

    Lets say your employer gets proof you did not do it. You're still gone.

    Later.

  83. Get it in writing by jonfr · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do. Get everything in writing and signed. Don't tell them anything (might be a too late now, just don't tell them anything more).

    But whatever else you do. Don't talk to the police! See youtube video.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

  84. You have decisions that I don't envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to be clear, and please correct me if I'm wrong: You registered one or more legitimate domains on behalf of your employer. Since this was a business registration you presumably filled in the "Registrant:" field with your name and your business address at the employer's premises? These details were copied and your employer now believes that you are typo-squatting from your work address? I'm no lawyer (and Irish law wouldn't do you much good anyway) but that surely stretches credibility a little?

    I'm absolutely not qualified to give advice, but I do feel sympathy for your position so I'm going to suggest what I would do in your place from my limited (and potentially irrelevant) experience working with a patent lawyer.

    I would hire a lawyer and help him/her understand the technical details of domain registration, what is public, how easily it is available to the general public in non-technical terms that he/she understands and help on use of the technical terms in constructing an argument for your clear or likely innocence. They should provide understanding of the nuances of the law in relation to this case, advise you on the implications of your local law and your employment contract and what action best protects your livelihood and support you in any legal action that you may decide to bring against your employer, or assist in working with your employer to seek a mutually agreeable solution.

    I understand that in Europe we have significantly more legal protection as employees and the concept of "at will" employment would be laughed out of court but I think that just emphasizes the need for local legal knowledge.

    I completely understand that you would like to get a result that's good for you while avoiding the expense of a lawyer (everyone who uses one would) but if you want to be anything other than a passenger in what happens in your life at this point you probably need the assistance of a good legal professional. If you go to court and get the right result then your employer is paying his/her fees anyway.

    If you absolutely insist on going it alone then I would suggest having an explicit meeting to make sure that your employer understands how easy it is to both get existing whois information and how easy it is to use inaccurate registration information in a domain registration but only if you're sure that you don't want to pursue the legal route later, or you may just be giving them prior notice to prepare answers for awkward questions that they may be asked in court.

    I'm in no way a legal professional, this is not legal advice, and the majority of this post is the opinion that you seek some elsewhere.

  85. Hmmmm... by Mullen · · Score: 1

    This is something I am scratching my head over; you have a domain typo squatter using your information for a typo domain name for a company you work for? If I did not know any better, I suspect one of your co-workers is trying to get you fired.

    How would a domain squatter know you worked at this company?
    Why would they even investigate who works there and used their name?
    Why don't you simply take take possession of the domain? If they used your information, just contact the registrar and do the whole "I forgot my password and I don't have control of that email address anymore" routine.

    Again, one of your co-workers is trying to get you fired.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:Hmmmm... by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't necessarily agree. It may be that the guy in question already had his name on the *legitimate* domain name as an administrative or technical contact. Someone looking to register the fraud domain might just go out and suck down the info for the real domain, the submit the same info for his/her registration. I don't know this for sure, but I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that this is necessarily an inside job. If they didn't get the info from the 'real' domain, it might be that whoever did this did some other research, or social engineering.

  86. Fuck them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read every single comment, so forgive me if someone already suggested this...

    Doesn't "Registrar B" have a billing history? Most of the registrars I've used have a link to view billing history, including the method of payment. A credit card shouldn't have authorized with incorrect billing information.

    You should be able to go to your local police station and file a report. The police or a lawyer should be able to issue a subpeona to the registrar for the information. At the very least there should be an IP address on file somewhere (management console login, ftp login, etc..). Even viewing the web site traffic logs might give you the IP address of the person that put up the web site. Just check the very first few visitors to the site. The offender would have visited the web site after he published it.

    In America you are innocent until proven guilty (well - supposed to be). If the person covered up their tracks good enough to hide their identity, then it can't be proved that you did it either. From what I understand the prosecution needs to provide the proof they have against you. If all they can provide are access logs from china or fraudulant billing information, I would turn around and say "thanks for proving im innocent".

    If the only evidence they have is the contact info used for the domain registration, and it actually looks like it may hold up... Use that against them by performing trademark infringment on yourself using the prosecutions contact info. If they win the case against you, turn around and win a case against them.

    But I'm no lawyer... Just a smart ass that doesn't like people taking advantage of the system.

  87. File a report of identity theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    File a report of identity theft with the law enforcement agency having jurisidiction over your residence. It is very unlikely that they will actually investigate it, but you can obtain a copy of that report that you filed under penalty of perjury to help clear your name. Consider the John Doe Lawsuit advice previously given.

  88. Do you really want to work for a pack of morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who aren't smart enough to see through an obvious joe-job? Or did you witness the CEO banging his secretary or some other reason they might just want to frame you and make you go away?

  89. Re:legal advice by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Wow, "the right guy to ask the followup is not the guy who asked the original, so someone tell AK Marc to look here.

    Without descending into total pretzel-logic:

    Given this quote from below:

    "And a non-lawyer giving legal advice is not actual legal advice, as they aren't a lawyer and unless they present themselves as one, it is not considered legal advice."

    Can we go one further and say that all slashdot posts are assumed NOT to be legal advice, unless someone says they are in fact a lawyer? (And even then assuming it's not a prank.) I would REALLY like "IANAL" to go away.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  90. Unless he wants a clearance by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Okay, I understand your point about cutting your losses, moving on, etc.

    But on a security clearance, they ask if you've every left a job under unfavorable circumstances, and everything in between (fired, quit after being told you would be fired, quit after allegations of misconduct, etc...) If he really is innocent, and he doesn't clear this up now, he may very well be forced out of his career.

    In the first place, there's a killer depression going on right now, so his hopes of finding another job, even with a stellar job record, are abysmal. So getting another job may not be an option.

    In the second place, security clearances are typically run *after* you accept the position. He's going to have to restrict himself to only jobs which don't require clearances (i.e. no government work, which probably won't be hiring right now), or gamble on being able to explain his innocence to a clearance investigator. Should he fail, he'll then be in the even worse position of having been fired by his last two employers in a row.

    His best bet is to fight it tooth and nail. The damage to his reputation will cost him far more than the legal fees. To simply walk away gives others the impression that he had to leave after "getting caught".

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Unless he wants a clearance by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      A lawyer can't "fix" this problem. I'm sorry, but anyone who believes otherwise is engaging in wishful thinking. Any deal a lawyer will negotiate will not prevent them from telling a government investigator that he left under bad circumstances, and after dragging a lawyer into it, you can believe they're going to want to bad-mouth him. If you believe otherwise, you're VERY naive.

      His hopes for a security clearance if he goes that route drop from next to none down to zero.

      Priority # 1

      His best bet is to tell the employer that there's a way to get the domain into their hands ASAP, and that they'll sort out the mess later. He can always bring a lawyer into the loop after. But doing so now does two things: it just delays any resolution (making people harden their positions), and it will put the employer on the defensive. NOT the place anyone wants to be - unless you're the lawyer milking it.

      Yes, there's a killer depression going on. This may have already ruined his chance for future employment in his field - but a lawyer isn't to change that. Sh*t happens. The world is not fair. There is no money-back guarantee to life. Doing what I suggest will not give the impression that he had to leave after "getting caught."

      How to fix the problem within 24 hours

      It costs nothing to contact the registrar and cc his employer, stating that since HE is the one listed as the domain admin, that he wants the domain transferred to his employer, and to send them a pdf or fedex them a photocopy of his driver's license as proof of identity. First problem solved in 24 hours for less than the cost of a pizza.

      After the domain is transferred, then either they sit down and work something out, or he's free to lawyer up. But until the domain is in someone other than the scammer's hands, nothing good is going to happen. The employer wants it in their hands. He can do it for them by suppertime tomorrow. Why not take that first step instead of whining "oh woe is me"?

      The guy asked for a solution - why not give him one?

      That everyone else is calling for lawyers instead of trying to solve the problem - this is pitiful. He came to slashdot looking for a solution. Instead, everyone else is turning it into an adversarial battlefield.

      A lawyer doesn't know enough to even begin to suggest how to fix this. He'd have to educate the lawyer first. Good luck with that - most of them have a hard enough time understanding that the from: address on email can be faked. Imagine trying to explain how the registration system works?

  91. Insert Glenn Beck 1990 Meme Here by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    How do we know that it wasn't you? Seriously, folks: Maybe this individual is guilty as charged, and he's asking us about ways to defend his actions,

    You might be right. It might be a complete and total scam. He could be laughing at us... right. this. very. second. :D

    But in this country, he's 100% innocent until it's proven that he isn't.

    And fuck you or anyone else for going against that.

  92. Two things... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    1. How was the registration paid for? If it looks like you, get the payment details, probably a credit card etc. Shouldn't be too hard, since it was 'your' registation. If the registrar refuses, as they might, well is this because the payment wasn't by you? Time to find out who.

    2. After a discussion with your employer, you might want to shut down any site - move DNS to some other server. If this weren't so sticky, I would offer to hold your A record, and point it to a nonexistant host for you. Though I doubt you will win any points there.

    You do need a lawyer, sadly. But I would love, as you might also, to know how the registration was paid for...

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  93. your company's lawyer, Subpoena, ask registrar B by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    Lawyer is the best option. A fallback is to see the company's lawyer. You can tell your employer/their lawyer that they need to subpoena the records of the registrar B to determine who filed it. If it truly is a third party, they are losing time by not getting the true story. If it actually isn't you, they are not fulfilling their obligations to the company, instead handling this ineptly.

    If they want to pursue legal action against you, they need to start it, and it will involve getting proof from the other registrar. So they might as well go ahead and do that part. If it is an anonymizing registrar they will have proof neither for nor against you. But the party used your contact details, so that's not the case. The registrar should have more information. Lawsuit and discovery might find the real culprit, or at elast get the right documentation for you to prove innocence.

    Or just ask the registrar for details, preferably printed and mailed to you. Date of registration, payment records, any other contact information. Since you seem to be the contact, you should be able to get all the information a subpoena would provide. If registrar B refuses to provide this information since they don't think you are the rightful owner, have them sign and mail/fax that refusal to your employer.

    Of course, there is no incentive for you to do so while suspended. So either they can reinstate you and you can work with them. Or you wait for them to sue you, which is the only way they will get proof. Then you meet with the company's laywers and explain to them how DNS registration works, and that they need to get more information from Registrar B. Back to the first plan. Or sue John Doe using the alternate anon address, but you seem to want to avoid that. Most likely you will have to request the information, though, since your employer shoots first and asks questions later.

    If you explain the options like that, hopefully with more clarity, they should see reinstating you and having you assist as the cheaper option. Especially since you are seeming to make it easier to gather evidence against you.

    Someone paid for the registration - if it was a credit card you have your third party. If it was cash or prepaid card it might end up as a dead end. But if you are as innocent as they say, at most they will find what they already know. But then you will be able to say there is no proof, or you provided what you could.

  94. My lawyer girlfriend says.... by uniqueme · · Score: 1

    1) she not certified to practice law in Indiana, but does practice employment law. 2) These are the obvious questions any lawyer would tell you to ask yourself: Do you have a written employment agreement? Read it now. Are you an "at will employee" (terminable at any time for any reason) or employee terminable only for "good cause" or on some kind of fixed term contract or what? 3) This is not really a "legal" matter, this is really a "does your employer want to keep" you matter. Unless you work for government or have some other intricately regulatior bound process, in that case call your union represntative and your lawyer right now ($$$$). 4) It all depends on whether your employer likes you. If you can only be terminated for good caues and your employer likes you, throwing significant resources at this including hiring an atterney to subeana everything from the domain name register is reasonable. On the other extreme if your employer doesn't like you and you are and "at will employee" then, well, they reasonable suspect you of a faud and do you really think you can put anything togeather that will get rid of that reasonable suspicion? Only you know your financial resources and how much your employer likes you and what the terms of you contract are. Practical advice: 1) Tell the employer you don't own the domain. 2) Tell the employer that ICANN thinks you own the domain, and you are willing to empower your employer to take down the domain. 3) If you and/or employer can't convince ICANN you own the domain, then you have evidence to your employer that you don't own the domain.!

  95. The Best Offense by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    > How can I prove it's not me?

    You don't. You can't without producing the culprit and proof they did it.

    You sue for wrongful termination. Then it's up to them to go on the defense and try to prove that you did it. They can't, they lose, you gain, they pay your lawyer.

    You say you're not terminated yet? If you are, your reputation is shot, so you do it pre-emptively, based on suspension and the fact that you're facing a shiny new right-to-work law (actually, a right-to-fire-for-no-reason) in Indiana with the assumption THEY will use it to finish the termination. Check out badforindiana.org and see if they have recommendations for a lawyer.

    Don't defend yourself, don't just fight back. They're firing a warning shot so fire back point blank with both barrels.

    Worried about the job should you win? Or whether you'd even want to stay? An untenable employment situation after an action like this is common. So you make your settlement be that they continue to pay you or else accept an injunction preventing them from firing you (even after r-t-w passes) without going before the judge and justifying it. And, make their continuing to pay you apply to termination by either party. Thus, they'll want to keep you happy (and you'd have to show just cause to leave without foregoing the settlement money).

    Kick ass, or they will walk all over you.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  96. my take... by itmo · · Score: 1

    1.document everything
    2.get legal consultation
    3.tell them that you are innocent and blaablaa, whatever that one guy said about severance etc.
    4.get info from the registrar _when_ it was registered and how it was paid
    4.1 prove that you were with someone or somehow that you could have not registered it
    4.2 or prove that you could have not paid it (reasonably, ie. it doesnt show on your credit card.)

    You will not get your job back, but you might get a better severance, and besides you really dont want to work in that company anyways.

  97. Came here to say the same thing by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Sometimes you need to face the facts: If subby was valuable to the company they wouldn't be doing this (or maybe they aren't seeing it, he didn't kiss the right posteriors, whatever...)

    There *might* be a case for unfair dismissal but proving it won't be easy, let's say 5% chance of success.

    Life isn't fair, people are fired every day. Best thing is to move on as quickly as possible.

    --
    No sig today...
  98. don't use your own name by alizard · · Score: 1

    when registering a business domain. Use a role ID like "Network Operating Center - [company name]" instead and use network_operating_center@domain.tld or other role-related userID as an e-mail address.

    Identity theft aside, when the domain name user ID information is pointed at a specific person, that person might leave the company or die or go to jail, leaving domain renewal warnings or other messages relating specifically to the domain at an address accessible to nobody at the company or even to a disgruntled ex-employee.

    1. Re:don't use your own name by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Use a role ID like "Network Operating Center - [company name]" instead and use network_operating_center@domain.tld or other role-related userID as an e-mail address.

      Often, items such as Registrations, Certificates etc have to be named to an individual, not a corporate title, so you cannot necessarily do this.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

  99. OT : Until by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    "Until" has always had a sinister ring to it. Surely it should be "Unless"...

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:OT : Until by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      I think you're splitting hairs when the phrase is used in this context.

      He's presumed innocent until proven guilty, at which point he's not innocent, but instead guilty.

      I could come up with something more detailed using cars or bitwise operators, but I have not had enough coffee to think.

  100. Re:your company's lawyer, Subpoena, ask registrar by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    Or just ask the registrar for details, preferably printed and mailed to you. Date of registration, payment records, any other contact information. Since you seem to be the contact, you should be able to get all the information a subpoena would provide. If registrar B refuses to provide this information since they don't think you are the rightful owner, have them sign and mail/fax that refusal to your employer.

    Pretty dangerous game. Once the subpoena from the company will roll in, the registrar can now (truthfully) testifiy that the SoccerDad41 is indeed in control of the domain.

  101. enemies? by jaggeh · · Score: 1

    could someone be trying to get you fired?

    --
    I would give everything i own for a little bit more.
  102. I think its a Duck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry, but I have to say. If it looks like a duck, smells like a duck and quacks like a duck, its probably a duck. Unless you were smart enough to drive half way acrossed the country to a coffee shop to use their internet when you registered the domain name, it will be fairly easy to prove it WAS you that did it. Rather than going to all of the expense of getting a lawyer to try to defend against something that we both know you did, just admit it to the company. I would be willing to bet that all they originally wanted was for you to take down the site and you claimed "Oh, it wasn't me", which just caused them to say "Fine, hit the bricks then". There will be plenty of evidence available for the company. Credit card information for the registration is just the beginning. Even if you went to WalMart and bought one of those prepaid credit cards, that can still be tracked. You can't hide from this. Admit you did wrong and move on.

  103. Fight Fire with FIRE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send a bogus email from your boss to you and CC his boss saying it's OK to show up to work on Monday (from a local library computer or something). Show up, and when they ask, produce for them the printout of the email with his name in the FROM line. When he says he didn't write it, you have perfect proof that someone is targeting the business because his boss got the same bogus email. Let him prove that he didn't write it!

    If you want to keep the job, DON'T get a lawyer. Once you DO, you might as well start looking for a new job.

    If you don't care about the job and want to clear your name realizing you'll need a new job anyway, get a lawyer.

  104. at-will employment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this innocent til proven guilty stuff? Assuming that this is in the United States, and there's no "employment contract" (which there almost never is), and in almost all states, the OP is "employed at will", and can be terminated for any reason. The boss doesn't like the color of your sneakers? You're history. Unless you were terminated as part of some discrimination against a protected class (unlikely here) there's not much you can do.

    Employers can and do terminate employees, perfectly legally, on mere suspicion of doing something undesirable, and in today's economy, there is the proverbial line of people waiting to take your job.

    The only cases where it's a big no-no is where you get term'd in retaliation for reporting a fairly limited set of things (e.g. if you aren't getting your paycheck on time, and you complain, and they fire you, you probably DO have a case)

  105. Depression???? by FarleySC · · Score: 1

    There's a depression on right now? It's a manufacturing slow down. There are tons of sectors making money hand over fist.

  106. The registrar was defrauded... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...due to their negligently lax identity verification measures causing irreparable damage to his reputation and livelihood.
    Could registrar B printing an untruth that causes him harm be considered libel?
    Find out the IP and date/time it was registered FROM and prove that you were at work at that time.(or not in Russia)

    I never understood why a company being defrauded by someone using my name is called "identity theft". It's got nothing to do with MY identity. They could have defrauded that institution with ANY name. Everyone screams and hollers on here when the MAFIAA tries to term copyright infringement "theft", but we can go an entire thread and somehow not seem to care that "identity theft" is just P.R. Speak for "We F'd Up and Want You To Pay For It". (yes, i know...he didn't pay for anything, but he IS being forced to "pay" for falsely listing him as the owner)

    Registrar B should be liable for making sure that you're you. In any sane world this would be equivalent to slander or libel.

    Since it's apparently YOU who messed up and went and got that silly identity of yours stolen you basically have to call Capital One every day and make sure that they know that you didn't order any credit cards today; Call paypal today to make sure they don't have your name on any other accounts. Call...Call...
    The way Identity Theft is handled in the US I should start handing out loans to anyone who gives me a name. Then I can go around insisting on collecting that money from whoever's name I was given. "Oh, prove that wasn't you... it says your name right here."

    -Citizen of the United States of One Big Corporate Joke

  107. Payment Info???? by sdh · · Score: 1

    Can't the courts subpoena the payment info for the fraudulent request?

    Maybe you as an individual can contact them as well. Without some social engineereing they should only be willing to tell you it doesn't match info you provide.

    Chances are, whoever did it wasn't that bright and used their own paypal or credit card info.

  108. This isn't a civil case by whitroth · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but have you spoken to the feds? This is fraud and identity theft, which is a criminal offence, I believe. Someone asked "who paid for the registration" - unless they've stolen your credit cards, that's a backtrace... and if they're not in the same US state, that's interstate wire fraud, and gee, that's within the purview of the FBI.

                  mark

  109. Call the police by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Call the police and tell them you've had something stolen.

  110. Use Your Good Name by jman.org · · Score: 1

    If the stolen domain's whois info does match your own, just use the registrar's admin contact reset procedure.

    Faxing your letterhead, a utility bill & a gov't photo ID with name & address matching on all three should allow you to reclaim the domain.

    Then change the info to your company's & it's all good.

  111. the company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whomever they are, what a dick way to handle an issue with an employee...

  112. if suspended == no pay... by FirstOne · · Score: 1

    Then file for unemployment with Indiana Department of workforce development. That will get you $390/week for upwards of a year. P.S. You'll need to look for new gainful employment.

    If the company contests your claim. Be sure to file an answer.

    State that in the normal coarse of business, your name was used for the technical contact the companies domain registration(requires a real person).

    If this is not the case, then insider info was likely used to frame you (former coworker, HR, supervisor, outsourcer, etc). Either way the doctrine of Respondeat superior applies (Employer is responsible for paying your legal costs if your prevail).

      A domain typo squatter has used a portion of that information in setting up a fake website for criminal purposes. Employer has instead terminated your employment for another unknown person(s) suspected criminal activity.

    P.S. Even if you can't track the domain registration. One should be able to track the money trail of the fake/typo website. Obviously they're in this business for profit.

    Don't forget to file a criminal complaint with the U.S. Secret service.
     

  113. It's 95% probably a troll or a lie anyway. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    Some things you won't know unless you try. The genie is out of the bottle. He's asked for a solution in a very public forum, and been given the obvious one. Eventually someone where he works is going to come across this thread and smack themselves on the forehead - "why didn't we just do that and SEE what the billing info was!"

    Obviously the poster is monitoring the threads if they're really looking for a solution. If he doesn't suggest it as an option, it's going to look very suspicious. I would draw the inference that maybe there's something in the billing or email info he doesn't want me to see.

    Like I said, the genie is out of the bottle. He asked for solutions, and this is practical, non-technical, easy for anyone to understand - even the PHB types.

    So, either:

    1. the original post is a well-done troll, which I give about a 70% probability
    2. the original post is an attempt to misdirect, 25%
    3. the original post is genuine, 5%

    Why so low a genuine probability? Because the guy has had a lot longer to think about it than you or I, is supposedly a systems admin, and didn't come up with the obvious solution.

    We also don't see any evidence of him participating in the discussion (even anonymously) to try to refine ideas into something workable.

    I'm not buying it, and not just because it's Troll Tuesday - the whole thing simply doesn't hang together.

    1. Re:It's 95% probably a troll or a lie anyway. by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      I still don't believe that the reasons to be hesitant to recover the bogus domain have anything to do with technical competence.

      The employer is acting extremely hostile toward him, in my experience, that suggests they've already made up their mind, and are just doing "due diligence" in terms of giving him a chance to redeem himself (when they have no intention of that being possible).

      Interacting with a hostile second party does not mean capitulating on their every whim. As I said early in this conversation, if they ask him to do so, he should, given that it's established as a means of redemption. If he gives it right over, he has no remaining bargaining chips. Though he should also not be seen as using this as a bargaining chip in a proactive sense (and thus should hand it over only as a condition of returning to his job).

      He should ask them what proof would satisfy them it wasn't him. If they tell him that no such proof is possible, then I see no reason for him to help them recover the rogue domain. If they are going to treat him unfairly like that, he shouldn't return that with assistance while he's not even drawing a paycheck any longer.

      Regardless, at this point, trust is broken on both sides, and he should be working on cleaning up his resume. Even if he gets his job back, it's likely they will view him with suspicion, and for his part, he won't know what innocuous action will be interpreted as hostile and get him fired again. He should start the job hunt right away, and hope he can recover this position long enough to bridge the gap.

    2. Re:It's 95% probably a troll or a lie anyway. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      If they tell him that no such proof is possible, then I see no reason for him to help them recover the rogue domain.

      It's called doing the right thing. Even if they don't see it as such, you will. So will others, including anyone who is looking to hire him. That he takes the high road counts down the line, because past performance gives an insight into future behaviour.

      In this case, the question is "How will this person react to a misunderstanding? Will they try to identify and rectify the underlying problem, or is it 'all about me?'".

    3. Re:It's 95% probably a troll or a lie anyway. by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      If they terminate his employment, he retains no obligation, either morally, legally, or ethically toward helping them recover the rogue domain. His obligations toward them in this regard ended the same moment his employment did.

      He shouldn't talk about this situation with prospective new employers, it's extremely unlikely to help him in an interview, and very likely to make the interview go badly for him. His former employer is furthermore prohibited by libel laws from accusing him of anything overtly to a prospective new employer. Unless they are very stupid, the worst possible response from a former employer is, "We have no comment on his tenure here." Don't get me wrong, that's the same as shouting, "Don't hire this guy if you can help it!" but they won't be able to go into specifics without substantial legal risk.

      So there's no reason a new employer should ever hear any of the details of this situation, regardless of how blameless he is or is not.

    4. Re:It's 95% probably a troll or a lie anyway. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      There's legal obligation, and then there's "doing the right thing." Yes, doing the right thing can backfire, but at least you get to sleep knowing you did the right thing, and if anyone asks, you can always say "I didn't have to help them, but I did, and it's not my fault it went pear-shaped."