Slashdot Mirror


User: Conspiracy_Of_Doves

Conspiracy_Of_Doves's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,639
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,639

  1. Re:My prediction... on Why Sony is Ready to Self Destruct · · Score: 1

    I didn't say that it would work and convince people to buy, just that they would do it.

  2. My prediction... on Why Sony is Ready to Self Destruct · · Score: 1

    Something tells me that Sony is going to be shoveling gobs of money at certain game development companies for exclusive rights to a couple of truly awesome games so that the only way to play them is to buy a PS3.

  3. Here's a thought on Ready to Test a 'SmartShirt'? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If these things can monitor your movements, how about making a set of tights that can be used for motion capture.

  4. Re:Gilligan's Professor on Favorite Film Scientists? · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you were trapped on a tropical island with Ginger and Mary Ann, would you be in a real hurry to escape?

  5. Re:Young Einstein. on Favorite Film Scientists? · · Score: 1

    The Inventor of Carbonated Beer

    Not to mention the surfboard, the electric guitar, and Rock and Roll.

  6. Re:Boring on Will Wright's E3 Spore Presentation · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but changing it and evolving it is not the same as making it. You 'make' the creature by starting the game.

  7. Re:Two words... on Shadowrun Game to Rewrite the SR Universe · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I liked the movie. They just had no business trying to associate it with Azimov. They should have stuck with the original title of the script, "Hardwired"

  8. Re:Boring on Will Wright's E3 Spore Presentation · · Score: 1

    1. Move around
    2. Make a creature


    How can you move around before you even make the creature?

  9. Two words... on Shadowrun Game to Rewrite the SR Universe · · Score: 1

    "I, Robot"

  10. Uh oh on Day of the Robotic Tentacle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Schoolgirls all over Japan just felt an icy chill of fear whip through them.

  11. How long til.. on Would You Wear Video Glasses? · · Score: 1

    How long until we can have nanites that attach themselves to the individual rods and cones of our retinas and cause the nerves to fire or not.

  12. Re:Great... on U.S. Considers Anti-Satellite Laser · · Score: 1

    Obscure? At least three other people made Real Genius jokes before I did.

  13. Great... on U.S. Considers Anti-Satellite Laser · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is to put up a satellite with a large spinning mirror.

  14. Re:Why not just keep crashing IE? on Explorer Destroyer · · Score: 1

    And how exactly are they supposed to know that switching browsers will keep the window from crashing?

  15. Re:That's retarded on Explorer Destroyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But isn't it poetic justice that we use IE's dirty little hacks to bring it down? Remember that evil always contains the seeds of its own destruction.

  16. Re:Knights of Wii on Nintendo Revolution Renamed 'Wii' · · Score: 1

    When I got to the main article page, I hit CTRL+F and searched for the word 'knight' with ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY that I would find at least one.

    The /.ers have not let me down.

  17. Re:I'd rather have... on J.J. Abrams To Direct New 'Star Trek' Film · · Score: 1

    Nemesis and Insurrection were only mostly crap.

    must... resist... ah the hell with it.

    There's a big difference between mostly crap and all crap. Mostly crap is slightly good. With all crap, well, with all crap there's usually only one thing you can do.

    What's that?

    Go through the ticket booth and look for loose change.

  18. Re:boobies on New Internet Regulation Proposed · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where have you been? Fark doesn't have a 'boobies' tag anymore. They moved all the adult stuff to a seperate URL, foobies.com.

  19. Why? on Microsoft Releases Critical IE Patch · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why the hell is anyone still using IE?

  20. Re:Queue the "Creationists are idiots!" posts on Missing Link Fossil Discovered · · Score: 1

    Whatever science comes up with, one can always back out and say that the system as a whole was created by an omnipotent external creator.

    You just hit the nail on the head. No matter what evidence appears, you can always say 'goddidit'. There is no evidence that could ever come up that might possibly damage the 'goddidit' explanation. It is inherently unfalsifiable, which make it scientifically worthless. One of the conditions that an explanation must pass in order to be considered a scientific theory is that there must be some way to disprove it. If cats suddenly started giving birth to iguanas or if we didn't find fossils in nice layers grouped by time period (excepting when the layers get shuffled around by geological activity), that would disprove evolution pretty damn fast.

  21. It's like a koala crapped a rainbow in my brain on Slashdot Design Changes for Wider Appeal · · Score: 1

    :D

  22. Wait a minute on Google Accused of Bio-piracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are these guys worried about genes of individual people being searched, or privately owned, corperate made|discovered genes?

    If it is the latter, I don't see a problem.

  23. Re:Halle-frickin-lujah on Maryland Votes To Ban Diebold Voting Machines · · Score: 1

    Hmm... interesting. This was Baltimore County.

    btw, love the name. Discworld rocks (no pun intended).

  24. Halle-frickin-lujah on Maryland Votes To Ban Diebold Voting Machines · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a Marylander, I am SO happy they they are getting rid of those damn things.

    The dumb thing is that the system that we had before wasn't even confusing at all. Each candidate's name had a arrow with a gap in it. You simply used a pencil to complete the arrow for the candidate you wanted to vote for.

    You just turn this:

    - ->

    into this

    --->

    No one was even complaining about it.

    I assume that they just wanted to jump on the electronic voting bandwagon, no matter how much the entire IT community railed against the machines.

  25. Re:They look so fake on The Simpsons Come to Life · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that the kids' hair isn't just the shape of thier heads.