As Customers Continue to Buy Computers Whose Vendors Focus On Making Their Laptops Thinner and Lighter, They Are Increasingly Neglecting Their Own Performance Needs
If after 20 years of ubiquitous text messaging some senders haven't left behind the expectation of immediacy, that's their problem. Pandering to them by giving them presence information won't help.
If you replaced the brain a bit at a time I believe you would not be the same person afterwards because your memories would be lost. These are not maintained as a response to inputs.
I came to say the same, but what’s confusing to me is that ST canon suggests transporters actually move the atoms rather than converting them to energy/information and reconstituting it at the other end. I’m no physicist but I’m pretty sure this would not violate the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Of course this would make things like Kirk and Riker being doubled impossible, but I suppose some disblief can be suspended;)
I usually use image search to find an image to hotlink in Slack or a web forum. The View Image button would show you whether the image had hotlink protection. Viewing the image by right-clicking does not.
I agree entirely, but also believe that this move by Salon is a good one. At least now people will have the choice to have ads, to mine, or to leave. Choices are good. Maybe some of the people who would have just closed the page will now mine instead. Win-win.
So the solution to the problem of being outhacked by adversaries is to “secure US crypto and networks”. Sounds easy, I wonder why they didn’t think of that?
Slashdot Mirror
Who cares what the White House says? What does Taiwan have to say about it?
As Customers Continue to Buy Computers Whose Vendors Focus On Making Their Laptops Thinner and Lighter, They Are Increasingly Neglecting Their Own Performance Needs
If after 20 years of ubiquitous text messaging some senders haven't left behind the expectation of immediacy, that's their problem. Pandering to them by giving them presence information won't help.
I say it’s technically correct because clearly he’s not smart enough to glean the correct answer (or at least a minimum)
Great summary, thanks for this.
I knew that if Musk calls you a bonehead then you're a bonehead, but it's handy to have the details.
What could possibly go wrong?
Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.
Came here to say same. There’s no way he just decided to be nice.
no one told them it’s bezels OR a notch, not both.
If you replaced the brain a bit at a time I believe you would not be the same person afterwards because your memories would be lost. These are not maintained as a response to inputs.
It worked out alright for Picard...
I came to say the same, but what’s confusing to me is that ST canon suggests transporters actually move the atoms rather than converting them to energy/information and reconstituting it at the other end. I’m no physicist but I’m pretty sure this would not violate the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Of course this would make things like Kirk and Riker being doubled impossible, but I suppose some disblief can be suspended ;)
I’m curious how loss of power would destroy already-fabbed wafers. Do they need to be kept in conditions that require power to maintain or something?
Great explanation, thank you!
I haven’t seen it described but I assume the kill switch would be to point the servers at themselves or other open servers?
It’s hard to believe this isn’t an Onion link.
Why do this?
I don’t see the connection between the duration of the non-compete and the likelihood of secrets being revealed.
If she had waited longer before accepting the new position she would then not be using these precious secrets? That makes no sense.
I usually use image search to find an image to hotlink in Slack or a web forum. The View Image button would show you whether the image had hotlink protection. Viewing the image by right-clicking does not.
I guess you’re too adult to have thought of that.
By reading the site you’re using their resources for their gain. Sounds fair?
Both CPU and GPU are inefficient for Bitcoin. That’s why they’re not mining Bitcoin.
I agree, except that I think an obvious switch is necessary for those running on batteries.
I’ve never seen an online ad for toilet paper.
I agree entirely, but also believe that this move by Salon is a good one. At least now people will have the choice to have ads, to mine, or to leave. Choices are good. Maybe some of the people who would have just closed the page will now mine instead. Win-win.
So the solution to the problem of being outhacked by adversaries is to “secure US crypto and networks”. Sounds easy, I wonder why they didn’t think of that?
I like how they have to dumb down the number. No one will know what a trillion is!