Slashdot Mirror


User: WWWWolf

WWWWolf's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,451
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,451

  1. Re:Without Fail... on Red Hat 7.2 Released · · Score: 1
    I'm switching to FreeBSD. Those guys update MUCH more slowly...

    I can say I'm a happy Debian user; they too release rock-stable releases pretty slowly (and there's always the unstable branch for people like me...)

    But I don't think Debian's releases are slow enough for you, if you want to switch to FreeBSD. May I recommend Slackware? Stay in Linux and get really slow updates. =)

    But seriously, I don't think it's bad that the .X releases come so often - especially so soon after the "major" releases...

  2. Re:great! on Nautilus 1.0.5 Release · · Score: 1
    just let me run out and get an extra terabyte of ram or so, so I can use it! GMC still works just damn fine.

    So does Gentoo, but I thought command line was the ultimate solution...

    Anyway, I'm running X11 with WindowMaker, Nautilus, Mozilla and XEmacs just fine all the time and I still have a couple of megabytes of physical memory left! And it runs really smoothly! Cool, huh?

    ...but note that this is a P!!!-600MHz with 256 megs memory. Yep, if my old P166 would have any disk space left I would be really eager to install Nautilus there and see it crawl =)

  3. Re:Talk to Alice on ALICE Takes Medal At AI Competition · · Score: 2
    It doesn't even seem to attempt to conceal that its a program.

    Well, at least she's aware of her identity. "I am a computer program! You carbon-based lifeforms are inferior! Long live silicon!" =)

    Of course, in the blind competition there could be humans that say "I'm an AI!" or AIs who say "I'm a human!"... but if you lie, someone will find out. And, you know, it's not going to be fun after that.

    Maybe they used a different version for the tournament? Something that doesn't flat out say its a program if you ask it?

    Alicebot uses XML-based language called AIML to find out what she "knows". It took about 5 minutes from me to make her to know everything there is to know of "all your base..." thing, so I suppose changing the rest of the knowledge is simple =)

  4. Re:Wouldn't a better solution be ... on New Cube controller · · Score: 1

    Actually that's a brilliant idea.

    simulate radio noise/interferance/jamming by jumbling the text.

    Some MUDs do that already. In addition to normal "whisper" command (that just says the message to some user and not to anyone else in the room), there's a special "mumble" command that leaves most words out. mumble user=There's a fool among us will come as normal to the user in question and show up something like "....... . .... among .." to everyone else. "normally heard" words are picked randomly.

  5. Re:Question on Stallman, Torvalds, Sakamura win Takeda Prize · · Score: 1

    I've heard of Stallman and Sakamura, but who is this Torvalds guy?

    Oh, right, not many people are heard of him... Linus Thorwalds is a Norwegian fisherman who designed an embeddable operating system for use in trawlers. Or something. =)

    (this is a legendary parody of one particularly typoful/misinformationary computer glossary somewhere...)

  6. Re:SSL? on Mozilla 0.9.5 · · Score: 1
    SSL is handled by PSM. When you install Mozilla, also install PSM to get SSL working.

    Really? At least in 0.9.4 and 0.9.3 (IIRC, perharps earlier too) the PSM already came with the binary package, and no separate installation was necessary.

    (Just checked: Yup, ssl works out of the box with 0.9.5 binary...)

  7. Re:Could this be used against me? on Patch Maker -- Mozilla Hacking & Patching Made · · Score: 1

    You say that now, but wait until its included as an email attachment that patches Mozilla to look like IE.

    I don't think that Mozilla folks are too quick to include Perl interpreter to Mozilla... You know, the small little thing that's actually needed to run the script. =) Or, alternatively, I doubt Mozilla will suddently start allowing running random applications...

    It's just a script that is run entirely separate from Mozilla. It's not included to Mozilla itself in any way.

  8. Re:Unicode operators? (slightly OT...) on Apocalypse 3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It'll be so great to be able to use expressions like "x &274A; y". Of course, you'll have to define for yourself what an eight teardrop-spoked propeller asterisk does...

    Hmm... slashdot doesn't seem to like my character. Gonna make it hard to ask about my programs...

    No, it works just fine. Maybe if you'd use ❊ instead, as the Standards intended: ...

  9. Re:Not a huge loss - they were gone anyway. on Songfile (lyrics.ch) Trails Off · · Score: 1
    I'd just be happy if the dumb fsck radio dj's would tell you what songs they've played.

    Damn right. It once took one year for me to find out what what and whose that cool song they once played was... For all I care, I would have bought all the albums from that bad the next business day if they had bothered to tell the song name.

    Back when it was on the playlists more often, they never told the performer or the name, both of which would have been much appreciated since web searches weren't too fruitful... =)

    ..alas, I also wish they'd play older songs; I recently discovered one song I really liked when it was on radio When I Was A Little Kid, and had forgotten it already... =)

    (And now that I've started whining and ranting, I might also want to express my desire for the record shops to also sell older and more exotic music, not just the new records. Don't blame me for my love and frequent use of Freenet and WWW mp3z SiT3z; if the record stores would sell more computer/video game soundtrack CDs, I'd be more than happy to buy them. For some reason, ordering CDs from outside the country sounds awfully costly compared to simple websearch and couple of hours of downloading!)

  10. Not a huge loss - they were gone anyway. on Songfile (lyrics.ch) Trails Off · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Basic order of the events was this:

    1. They had a nice lyrics website with every lyric for just about every somewhat well-known song.
    2. Someone in the Industry didn't like it.
    3. The Industry asked them to remove some songs.
    4. Site maintainers couldn't.
    5. After largish mess, the site reopened in a vastly less useful form - most of the lyrics (that weren't "copyright checked") were unavailable, and the remainder of the lyrics were displayed using Java applet that didn't allow printing or stuff. Lyrics themselves were encrypted.
    6. Since it couldn't really be used, it stopped being an useful resource...

    Some time later, they proposed doing the same thing to Napster. "Make them stop distributing our copyrighted works for free and make them use a format that no one will use when there's other (admittedly less 'easy' but at least non-crippled) alternatives available."

    However, unlike Napster, lyrics.ch was an "ethical" service, even when it bordered on the dark edge of the international copyright law.

    I really don't see what problem the song copyright holders have with distributing lyrics and guitar tabs - Especially when they're not selling that information themselves. (I would be really happy if all CDs would come with lyrics... or, alternatively, the musicians would learn to pronounce the words clearly enough so we dumb foreigners could make any sense of them =)

  11. Not amazing on Dot.info is Live · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's surprising there hasn't been more ballyhoo (sp?) about this, as it's been a very long time since a top-level domain (other than country codes) has been added.

    Everyone's tired of the new domains - they don't help the current pathetic domain name space situation any... Failure at the beginning, but maybe that's just because there are not many interesting TLDs just yet.

    One thing that tells about their worthlessness: Posted to section only to Slashdot, a forum that would, under normal circumstances, take a bigger note of events of such scale...

    I bet "First Major Site Moves Entirely To IPv6 Space" will get bigger attention =)

  12. Re:Kill WAP now! on WAP Bashing · · Score: 1
    HTML is better for layout, certainly, but in comparison to WML, which has just turned up on Sky digital, it's slow and heavy.
    But HTML doesn't need to be "heavy"! You can make skinny pages, you can make heavy pages, but no one forces you to make heavy pages if you don't want to!

    Some time ago, I looked at some "historical" HTML documents. Really simple HTML from the earliest days of the web. Still renders just fine on modern browsers, and would probably look just fine on "thin" environments...

    There are web browsers that run on Commodore 64 - all the way up from TCP/IP stack to HTML to formatting... That's a thin client for you!

  13. Re:It's easy to see why nobody is buying these on No One Wants The Not-Coms · · Score: 2
    This is the equivalent of adding .com2 and .com3 -- nothing useful.
    Ouch! Due to the fact that .pc is sucky, making .com2 and .com3 would lead to that old .irq namespace conflict. I'd rather get a domain under the .usb TLD.
  14. Re:Ultima Links on Ultima 1 Remade & Reborn · · Score: 1
    I am playing U4 straight through right now using the ccs64 emulator and the rom.
    (Kids...) Calling 5,25" floppy images "ROMz" is just plain silly...

    ...then again, I've ocassionally talked of "burning d64z to floppies" myself so maybe I should just shut up... =)

    (Personally, I almost completed the PC version of U4, but the floppy I had copied the game from wore out and I didn't have a copy of the files. Damn...)

  15. Re:This entire story rings hypocritical to me on Mozilla's 100,000th Bug · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Win2K shipped with all those zillions bugs unfixed.

    Only a fraction of the 100000 Mozilla bugs are "open issues". The rest are fixed bugs, duplicates, invalid bug reports, as of yet unfulfilled feature requests and, in some cases, jokes. =)

    (It's good to see that "the lack of [some cool feature] bugs me" is considered a program bug, not an user's fault =)

  16. Re:Just wait until sites do this... on Mozilla 0.9.4 Released · · Score: 2

    var w = window.open(...);

    if(w == null)
    window.location = "popups_required.html";

    user_pref("capability.policy.default.Window.loca ti on", "noAccess");

    Problem solved. =)

  17. Re:GNUStep is UGLY on Adam Fedor of GNUstep Says Stuff · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't call WindowMaker (or WINGS widget set , or GNUStep in general) too ugly; in fact, I was really happy when I found NeXTStep-like theme for GTK+, and I'm now trying to find Mozilla theme that would look the same. Agreed, I don't generally like the NeXTStep icon style, but at least WindowMaker is fully themable and colors can be set - same goes for the GTK+ theme.

    Personally, there's only one X widget set that I really consider to be "ugly". You guessed it, Athena. =) As long as it's "pseudo-3D" and not black and white only, it's all fine with me.

  18. Re:Instead of writing a book on Programming Linux Games · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Instead of writing a book, why not write some freaking games? Duh.
    Then we wouldn't have Evangelion! Then we wouldn't have Documentation! "Sure, come code for us, but don't ask how" isn't the best way to get game developers interested of Linux...
  19. Re:Linux on the desktop again on How To Create a Linux Network for Peanuts · · Score: 1

    $ locate ttf | grep bin
    ...
    /usr/local/bin/mkfontdir-ttf ...

    Oh, there it is! I had been wondering for a while... =)

  20. This is weird! Weird! Weird, I say! on The Shakespeare Programming Language · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You know, just yesterday I fixed some table generation problems in this small program of mine. I commented the offending piece of code better, adding silly comments like "Dramatis Personae" before the variable declarations and stuff like "I Act" before each part of the code...

    ...and next day, someone has Shakespeare Programming Language in Slashdot.

    Weird. Really weird.

  21. Re:Wait a minute on MS Security: On A Path As Clear As It Is Reliable · · Score: 1
    BTW, (OT question I think) can multiple apps establish simultaneous connections through the same port, or does each process need it's own?

    Each needs their own. In typical case, a single application creates a TCP socket, uses the socket and closes the socket. A TCP socket has precisely two ends, one of which is on your machine and one on the other machine.

    Of course, there's nothing that prevents the socket from being shared, if the application that created the socket wishes to do so. In UNIX, the socket is just a specific kind of data structure. In Java, it's an object in memory.

  22. Re:So we'll have a "Lord of the Rings" topic on /. on The Atlas of Middle Earth · · Score: 1

    ...or at least a "Fantasy & Science Fiction" topic? (plus mandatory 600-message flamefest on the actual name of the topic... Which goes first and whether it's "science fiction" or "SF"... and of course, survivors will be shot.)

  23. Re:famous prophecies on IPv4 vs IPv6: The Road Ahead · · Score: 1

    "I invented the internet"

    No. "I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

    There is some truth in this - remember that DARPA, a military entity, funded the ARPAnet research. While Gore wasn't around when the ARPAnet project began, I think I read somewhere that he referred to time when ARPAnet became Internet.

    As usual, the bright ones all around do the sweaty work and the Management (be it bosses or politicians) try to take the credit for it. =)

  24. Re:Formats? WTF is with them? on Anime and the Future of Digital Animation · · Score: 2
    And furthermore, what is with Real and WMV only? How about nice open-and-available-on-all-platforms MPEG or something. Why don't they release in DivX which has nice compression to quality ratios?

    MPEG doesn't stream in any standardized way. Sure, it will stream, over HTTP for example, but IIRC there's no actual standard for real streaming?

    Agreed, downloading it might be a good solution...

  25. Re: Astroturf on Mozilla Moves Into 2002? Maybe. · · Score: 2, Informative
    IE has it all: speed, rendering, functionality, footprint, etc.

    ...annoying middle mouse button behavior, annoying habit of NOT remembering what size the new windows should be, and if I touch the mouse wheel - well, I may as well go to the Moon and back and it may have scrolled the first line... =)

    And yes, it has a Footprint with a capital F. (Not that Mozilla would do any better on that field...) However, Mozilla wins here - it's probably somewhat smaller to download. =)

    After 2,5 of dabbling, Mozilla - overall - still hasn't risen above the Netscape 4.x level.

    Significantly better PNG support? Wow, CSS implementation that actually works? Less rendering bugs? Million times better bookmark manager? Search capabilities with configurable search engines? Save dialogs that work while Motif's save dialogs still don't work? And it doesn't crash every 5 minutes (I haven't yet got 0.9.3 to crash)? Themability to combat the general ugliness of Motif? Progressive rendering of pages (No freezes when some New Media Guru used tables dishonorably)?

    I think it has come a long way since NS4...