Nonsense propaganda, ancaps and libertarians most certainly have reasoned positioned, the collectivists of all colours have emotion based positions. Young earth creationists and e collectivists today.
AFAIC tax avoidance and tax evasion are virtues. Governments should get nothing, they should be drowned in a bucket, the mob should go fuck itself, welfare shouldn't exist, no form of any kind of bailout should exist. There shouldn't be any government oppressing anybody anywhere. Stop paying taxes, do not pay taxes, avoid and evade taxes, it is your civic responsibility and absolutely a virtue.
You are staring right into it and seeing nothing. It is not companies destroying minimum wage jobs with automation, the mob and its government goons are doing it by raising the ridiculous minimum wage level.
Minimum wage is minimum ability, capital and labour are always competing and the artificial price increase of labour due to government oppression through laws like ninimum wage is what is destroying the lowest runs of the ladder for the minimally skilled and/or capable.
I agree that many data models out there are outrageous and do not warrant using Otacle, etc., but just a number of tables doesn't mean anything. My smallest projects have tens of tables, large ones start from about 150, a large project I am running has about 380 but by themselves these numbers don't say much.
Society is economy, it can either grow or shrink, it cannot be stable, stability is in the equilibrium, by stopping the growth, shrinking factors take over and then the system falls apart
Nonsense, there are no conflicts between rights at all because rights are only protections of an individual against government oppression. Rights cannot be given, they can only be taken away by government oppression. One individual cannot take rights of another individual away, an individual has no legal framework to do that. Now, a collective can destroy the rights of an individual, for example by imposing an obligation upon an individual to serve people that the individual does not want to associate with and wants to discriminate against. This is how government destroys rights and gives out entitlements.
As to black/white bathrooms, that is up to an individual and/or his business. My position stays, if you want your business to only cater to white people you have the right to do that. You may lose business of colored customers and of many white customers who disagree with you, but that is a free market consequence of your choices.
hidden feature that requires a specific series of gestures to unlock - let me guess, one has to cup his hand and quickly move it up and down as if polishing the barell of a gun for this feature to be unocked? Also you can flip a birdy for the car to enter a more advanced and more aggressive self driving mode, which includes features like cutting others off and forcing them to break suddenly, driving in on two lanes at once, taking over on either, left or right sides. Doing a both hands birdy salute will remove the electronic speed limiter.
Nobody, nobody and I mean nobody should model anything after Canada and this includes healthcare or infrastructure or utilities or communications or transportation or education, etc. That would be extremely counterproductive. You want to model your healthcare after somebody (if you have no brain of your own to recognize it shouldn't be modelled but should be left after completely free market, free from all government), model it after Switzerland or Singapore maybe, but after Canada????? Ouch, that would be horrendous mistake.
Hoping against hope that this will happen. Shut down the Fed, IRS, FHA, EPA, departments of energy, small business, education, get rid of all departments that are unconstitutional. Get libertarians, objectivists, ancaps into positions in SCOTUS and other powerful positions. Shut down everything public, get rid of SS, Medicare, labour laws and regulations, income and wealth taxes. This planet needs individual freedoms on that level at least in one country.
Restructure the debts, allow the economy to rebuild itself by removing government from it.
I don't think Trump will do much of that, but that is what is needed.
I consider that to be a good thing, an honor not to give in against government oppression. There shouldn't be any income or wealth taxes. Not paying oneself a salary is not cheating on taxes though unfortunately, wish it was, I would have been proud if it was.
Ideology is everything, without ideology there is only populism and expedience.
As to minimum wage and people who are hired, a company makes X dollars from its sales and that is everything it can spend. Hiring people is much easier if there are no artificial barriers and costs added to them by some government. If it costs more money then fewer people will be hired, that is all. I hire people that I can afford, if they are made less affordable fewer will be hired and as to ability, the higher is the cost of a person the more competition there is for that job (more people apply), so people with fewer skills stay behind forever.
There is no greater good, there are only gradations of evil interference that can come out of government.
And you still didn't understand anything. There are people I hire who are more experienced and capable than others and then there are people I hire who have 0 experience and no skills, we train them.
If forced to some specific minimum by some government the second type of people will no longer be hired by me, I guess it is still too hard for you to grasp that if forced to hire everybody at some wage level I will no longer be hiring anybody at all below that level and people below that level will not be employed at all.
Guess what, working is what increases the employability of people, not sitting idly.
A year after a person starts from 0 level, they are now much more employable. The now are making more either with me or they may find more money elsewhere. As to my business being viable, I make decisions every day to ensure it is viable. And one decision I would make given some artificial minimum wage is to hire only people with skills and experience above that level and nobody below it.
Maybe the math is hard for you, I don't know, but if I get X dollars from all income sources, I cannot spend X +1 dollars, does that help you or do I need to explain why some numbers are greater than others? So given X dollars I can hire Y number of people, and it is a mix of different skill and experience people. By forcing the employees into some minimum wage all that the government does is it reduces the number of people I can hire and ensures none of them are beginners.
Government is completely in the wrobg with all of this. Government officials and policies must not discriminate against groups of people or against specific individuals because that would be different application of the law, government does this all the time. War on drugs, stop and frisk, civil forfeiture, war on terror are just a few examples my sleepy brain came up with in a second.
When government starts telling ab individual or his business that they cannot discriminate against groups of people the government immediately steps over it's authority.
To tell a homeowner he must not discriminate based on his prejudices or to tell a company it must have this or that worker ratio or policies is to create legal entitlements for some at the expense if another. This is not about providing rights, this is about taking rights from some to provide entitlements to others at the expense of the former to buy political support of the latter and AFAIC it is illegal (unconstitutional) government behaviour and it is abhorrent.
OK, but.... But most people alive today will not see that happening and almost all current/. readers will not see that. Maybe it will happen and maybe not, then again what does it matter to those who will not be there? Doesn't matter 1 bit, regardless of what you believe you think, once you are personally dead the entire universe may as well cease to exist, 0 difference to you.
Legality is not morality, I am not talking about morality of a driverless truck, I am only pointing out that what is legal or illegal and what is right and what is wrong are very often independent from each other and should not be confused.
It's interesting to see that for all of the talk about money not being end all be all by the left (I am not saying that you are necessarily on the 'left', but I have seen many similar comments from people who clearly are) the moment a story like this comes out so many people bash the person who decided not to sell out on his ideas and dreams for admittedly an enormous amount of cash.
Good for her I suppose, but you missed the point, what was your other (non-penis head, do you have one of those?) doing at the time? Were you thinking about something, maybe you were thinking about the reasons for your sad sad sexual encounter with a woman who is probably at least twice as old as you are. Were you able to concentrate or were you distracted by the fact that you can't get a girl who maybe is closer to your age?
Slashdot Mirror
Expect lawsuits related to your free use of DNS. Now everybody who uses DNS owes Oracle 1 dollar per DNS lookup.
Nonsense propaganda, ancaps and libertarians most certainly have reasoned positioned, the collectivists of all colours have emotion based positions. Young earth creationists and e collectivists today.
AFAIC tax avoidance and tax evasion are virtues. Governments should get nothing, they should be drowned in a bucket, the mob should go fuck itself, welfare shouldn't exist, no form of any kind of bailout should exist. There shouldn't be any government oppressing anybody anywhere. Stop paying taxes, do not pay taxes, avoid and evade taxes, it is your civic responsibility and absolutely a virtue.
You are staring right into it and seeing nothing. It is not companies destroying minimum wage jobs with automation, the mob and its government goons are doing it by raising the ridiculous minimum wage level.
Minimum wage is minimum ability, capital and labour are always competing and the artificial price increase of labour due to government oppression through laws like ninimum wage is what is destroying the lowest runs of the ladder for the minimally skilled and/or capable.
I agree that many data models out there are outrageous and do not warrant using Otacle, etc., but just a number of tables doesn't mean anything. My smallest projects have tens of tables, large ones start from about 150, a large project I am running has about 380 but by themselves these numbers don't say much.
Market does correct, it is government intervention that inflates bubbles, collapses are corrections.
Society is economy, it can either grow or shrink, it cannot be stable, stability is in the equilibrium, by stopping the growth, shrinking factors take over and then the system falls apart
Nonsense, there are no conflicts between rights at all because rights are only protections of an individual against government oppression. Rights cannot be given, they can only be taken away by government oppression. One individual cannot take rights of another individual away, an individual has no legal framework to do that. Now, a collective can destroy the rights of an individual, for example by imposing an obligation upon an individual to serve people that the individual does not want to associate with and wants to discriminate against. This is how government destroys rights and gives out entitlements.
As to black/white bathrooms, that is up to an individual and/or his business. My position stays, if you want your business to only cater to white people you have the right to do that. You may lose business of colored customers and of many white customers who disagree with you, but that is a free market consequence of your choices.
hidden feature that requires a specific series of gestures to unlock - let me guess, one has to cup his hand and quickly move it up and down as if polishing the barell of a gun for this feature to be unocked? Also you can flip a birdy for the car to enter a more advanced and more aggressive self driving mode, which includes features like cutting others off and forcing them to break suddenly, driving in on two lanes at once, taking over on either, left or right sides. Doing a both hands birdy salute will remove the electronic speed limiter.
Nobody, nobody and I mean nobody should model anything after Canada and this includes healthcare or infrastructure or utilities or communications or transportation or education, etc. That would be extremely counterproductive. You want to model your healthcare after somebody (if you have no brain of your own to recognize it shouldn't be modelled but should be left after completely free market, free from all government), model it after Switzerland or Singapore maybe, but after Canada????? Ouch, that would be horrendous mistake.
If the only thing that Trump does that of what he mused to do is put Thiel into SCOTUS then his presidency is already better than Clinton's.
Hillary likeable? :)))))) hahahahhajahahaaaaaaaaa!!!!
I dislike the Clinton's more than the plague.
Hoping that trump will reduce the power of the collectivists, not holding my breath, but still.
Nonsense propaganda. It hasn't been done, it needs to be done and it is not a movie.
Hoping against hope that this will happen. Shut down the Fed, IRS, FHA, EPA, departments of energy, small business, education, get rid of all departments that are unconstitutional. Get libertarians, objectivists, ancaps into positions in SCOTUS and other powerful positions. Shut down everything public, get rid of SS, Medicare, labour laws and regulations, income and wealth taxes. This planet needs individual freedoms on that level at least in one country.
Restructure the debts, allow the economy to rebuild itself by removing government from it.
I don't think Trump will do much of that, but that is what is needed.
I consider that to be a good thing, an honor not to give in against government oppression. There shouldn't be any income or wealth taxes. Not paying oneself a salary is not cheating on taxes though unfortunately, wish it was, I would have been proud if it was.
Do you ever switch your carrier on the grounds of cost? Are you or should you be bashed for that?
Do you ever shop around for the least expensive place to buy the item you are looking to buy? Are you or should you be bashed for this?
Employers are purchasing labour and bashing them for shopping around for cheaper labour is the same as bashing somebody for buying a TV on sale.
Ideology is everything, without ideology there is only populism and expedience.
As to minimum wage and people who are hired, a company makes X dollars from its sales and that is everything it can spend. Hiring people is much easier if there are no artificial barriers and costs added to them by some government. If it costs more money then fewer people will be hired, that is all. I hire people that I can afford, if they are made less affordable fewer will be hired and as to ability, the higher is the cost of a person the more competition there is for that job (more people apply), so people with fewer skills stay behind forever.
There is no greater good, there are only gradations of evil interference that can come out of government.
And you still didn't understand anything. There are people I hire who are more experienced and capable than others and then there are people I hire who have 0 experience and no skills, we train them.
If forced to some specific minimum by some government the second type of people will no longer be hired by me, I guess it is still too hard for you to grasp that if forced to hire everybody at some wage level I will no longer be hiring anybody at all below that level and people below that level will not be employed at all.
Guess what, working is what increases the employability of people, not sitting idly.
A year after a person starts from 0 level, they are now much more employable. The now are making more either with me or they may find more money elsewhere. As to my business being viable, I make decisions every day to ensure it is viable. And one decision I would make given some artificial minimum wage is to hire only people with skills and experience above that level and nobody below it.
Maybe the math is hard for you, I don't know, but if I get X dollars from all income sources, I cannot spend X +1 dollars, does that help you or do I need to explain why some numbers are greater than others? So given X dollars I can hire Y number of people, and it is a mix of different skill and experience people. By forcing the employees into some minimum wage all that the government does is it reduces the number of people I can hire and ensures none of them are beginners.
At least he didn't accidentally start a Global Thermonuclear War.
Government is completely in the wrobg with all of this. Government officials and policies must not discriminate against groups of people or against specific individuals because that would be different application of the law, government does this all the time. War on drugs, stop and frisk, civil forfeiture, war on terror are just a few examples my sleepy brain came up with in a second.
When government starts telling ab individual or his business that they cannot discriminate against groups of people the government immediately steps over it's authority.
To tell a homeowner he must not discriminate based on his prejudices or to tell a company it must have this or that worker ratio or policies is to create legal entitlements for some at the expense if another. This is not about providing rights, this is about taking rights from some to provide entitlements to others at the expense of the former to buy political support of the latter and AFAIC it is illegal (unconstitutional) government behaviour and it is abhorrent.
OK, but.... But most people alive today will not see that happening and almost all current /. readers will not see that. Maybe it will happen and maybe not, then again what does it matter to those who will not be there? Doesn't matter 1 bit, regardless of what you believe you think, once you are personally dead the entire universe may as well cease to exist, 0 difference to you.
Nashville could Use It to take over the poles
- the last time somebody tried taking over the poles like that the entire world went to war for 5 years or so, not the greatest idea...
Legality is not morality, I am not talking about morality of a driverless truck, I am only pointing out that what is legal or illegal and what is right and what is wrong are very often independent from each other and should not be confused.
It's interesting to see that for all of the talk about money not being end all be all by the left (I am not saying that you are necessarily on the 'left', but I have seen many similar comments from people who clearly are) the moment a story like this comes out so many people bash the person who decided not to sell out on his ideas and dreams for admittedly an enormous amount of cash.
Why are people so enormously hypocritical?
Good for her I suppose, but you missed the point, what was your other (non-penis head, do you have one of those?) doing at the time? Were you thinking about something, maybe you were thinking about the reasons for your sad sad sexual encounter with a woman who is probably at least twice as old as you are. Were you able to concentrate or were you distracted by the fact that you can't get a girl who maybe is closer to your age?