There is an old proverb of two heads being better than one I wonder if we could do something about that missing head that so many of us need, this way one head could be doing one thing and another head something else entirely.... I guess the male portion of the population knows a thing or two about this topic already and the females don't really have a problem with doing 10 things at once.
(same commenter, posting from my second account, otherwise I couldn't post here right now).
Civilization is organization, I disagree that civilization requires oppression to organize. We are perfectly capable of organizing without oppressive ideas, such as nation states, countries, territories and governments. We voluntarily trade what we produce for what others produce, that's what the most important and the only needed level of organization is. Yes, it is anarcho capitalism, AFAIC it is the system that would most benefit individual freedoms, which is the idea.
Slow? start time is not a problem that needs to be solved in a server environment. My server systems are all java, they start in a second or two, then more time is taken by various application initialization (loading data from databases, from property files, from the network).
The real problem with Java AFAIC is memory 'management' and slow Garbage Collection. Wish I could mark objects to be released with source code instructions rather than relying on the intelligent garbage collector.
Yes, once again: I wish I could tell the JVM that a particular object is no longer in use and its underlying memory can be reclaimed. I wish I could do that for a simple shallow data structure and also for deeply nested structures.
This would be much more appreciated than ALL of the syntax sugar additions since version 5.
Hmm, I taught people who I hire to work for me, that is over 30 people that I needed to teach. I also taught some kids. But that's irrelevant, the only relevant part is that today we have more resources to provide extremely cheap education to people because of the technology that we built and yet due to government intervention with all the money flowing into the system the prices are extremely high and will only increase over time *because* of the money.
The more money that is betting for a service the more expensive the service will be and it has nothing to do with how cheaply and universally the service can be provided without all that unnecessary money.
There is maybe a 5% chance that if Trump is elected he would nominate Peter Thiel into SCOTUS, based on that tiny probability of having a libertarian in SCOTUS I think Trump should win.
Yeah, sure, and if a guy calls himself an ostrich then we must 'keep up'. Now, it's none of my business what the guy thinks he is, a female or anything else, that's his business. I do mind calling a person with a dick and balls a female though. I think he is a male, he'll have his physical surgery and will become a former physical male, fake physical female from my perspective, fine, then I'll concede that's not a he any longer.
Objectivism is a much more valid construct than any religion, as to Twitter and bad people, that's funny. How about ISIS? How about almost every war on this planet with vast majority of the people participating being religious (vast majority of all people are religious).
Torture, murder, genocide, theft, destruction of all types, burning people at the stake... best people, ha?
You simply don't understand what money is. A productive day of work can be expressed in dollars and cents but just as well it can be expressed in something else. A farmer grows some crop, a construction worker builds a house, etc. That was NOT produced by anybody else but private entities that are providing the capital, land, labour and management required to do this work.
As to money, actual money is gold, the Federal reserve notes are only medium of exchange and unit of account, not any form of store of value. Government is stealing money, it is stealing a dollar equivalent of the money that is made by the individual or a company.
You can choose to pretend not to understand that, that's your business.
I agree with you on one thing: there shouldn't be *any* State or federal funding for any university. The same should be true of any funding, none should be coming at the expense of people, whose money is stolen via the violence of the State to provide anybody with any benefit.
'Democracy' is a collectivist system that puts the power of the majority over minority, allowing the majority to vote themselves a nice subsidy by taxing the minority and using government violence to achieve that.
A dictator would notice a competitor to his own way of controlling and stealing from the entire population pool and he would know that in competition like that he is likely to lose politically so of-course a dictator will censor.
Maybe the competitor will bring me their generator instead of connecting me with power lines, maybe they'll set up their own underground lines, I don't care as long as it is not government involved in any of it.
Well, John Galt sells power he generates, you don't like the price don't buy it from him. I am sure others would be happy to sell you the power they generate at lower prices.
If Apple thinks the laws are unfair then they should be actively working to get them changed to something that is fair.
- the law is theft and the entire system is built around that theft. AFAIC Apple shouldn't pay a cent and instead hire a private army to go after every single politician involved in this racketeering and I mean to go with full force of every shady tool available to people when that sort of money is involved, up to and including blackmail, kidnapping, extermination and regime change.
The best part of Java 8 AFAIC is that it is still possible to write and run the code with it that doesn't use any of the new 'features' starting with java 5.
Correct, there is no way to claim that taxes are 'moral' since they are extracted through the violent means of the State.
This is 'legal' racketeering by the State, the State is the organized crime syndicate, nothing else at all.
Also I must say, for Apple it makes sense to strike back in a completely immoral way as well, by hiring special forces at a fraction of the 14.5 Billion USD (14 and a half billion USD, not 1.1 as is stated in the/. headline), digging every possible piece of dirt on every politician involved in this racketeering, blackmailing most, taking out some others. It's just cheaper and it sends the correct signal.
I owe you absolutely nothing and unless I am buying something from you or you are buying something from me I have no interest in you. If you want want government to stealcfrom me to subsidise you somehow and then call me a 'sociopath' or a 'moron' for not accepting that, then you are not only a thief, but some kind of a sick psycho thief.
One has to do more than your average bear to build a business from the ground up, how is that a surprise in any way? If it were easy, everybody would be doing it and it wouldn't be discussed here right now. I started up my own businesses but always self funded / got a client for the product. To do that I put 10 years of savings and years of work on the line, that is not an easy thing to do. But if I were unwilling to do it myself, how could I ever expect somebody else to do it on my behalf?
This ruling doesn't just cover Java and really Java has nothing to do with this. This is about the entire field of computing but probably even worse. Do you want to build a house? So are you going to make doors rectangular shaped passages with opening/closing covers? You are violating something there.
This actually proves my point on copyrights (and patents for that matter). Government should not be given any authority to provide any sort of protection for any of it.
So the problem is cross contamination between fiber channels due to frequency differentials, I think they equalized all frequencies somehow but I don't fully get it. Red is longer than blue for example and if separate strands of fiber carry different 'colour' and frequencies 'bleed' from strand to strand how do you equalize that exactly? Have wave peaks correspond? How? Are they proportionate to remain synchronized? If this is a serious problem, why not add more isolation between strands?
Wrong, you are a joke, I am being 100% serious about everything I say on the issue of economics and individual freedoms. Your ideology leads to the outcomes that you are supposedly horrified of, the reality is that you should be inspecting your own judgement and motivation and be horrified with yourself once you realise that your own ideology causes the massive suffering as the end result. Your ideology is ideology of destruction of individual freedoms which inexorably leads to destruction of the economy and thus society and then the people who you pretend to care about suffer the most. The solution is of-course actual individual freedoms, but it goes against your idiotic notion of social justice that negates individual freedom both as general concept and as specific implementation.
Exactly, officially inflation is low but the reality shows otherwise and the vast majority of the lemming population believes the official propaganda and not their own eyes.
It's as if the official propaganda was that the sky is bright green colour and everybody bought it even though all they had to do is raise their eyes up and see the colour.... they won't do it, even when they do it, they still remain convinced that they are wrong and the official propaganda is right.
Jesus fucking christ, precisely, I hire people who satisfy my requirements and I pay money to those people. Amazing! That's just amazing.
Am I doing it out of 'nepotism' or 'fraud'? No, I am building products and services that I am HOPING to sell and I am also doing some custom work for clients that I found already.
The money that I pay as salaries did not have to be paid for those products that I decided to build before having a single client outside of myself. So I am the employer and I created the jobs by hiring people and training them and giving them tasks to do and paying them money out of my own fucking pocket. Out of MY bank account into THEIR bank account for things I want them to do.
Whether or not I sell my products and services further to somebody else does NOT concern the people that I am paying to work for me, as far as they are concerned when the month is over they get paid. It doesn't matter to them if I burn the product or sell it or do whatever with it, they get paid either way.
I wish I could buy a yacht for 10,000USD but I can not. I have the 10,000USD to spend on a yacht but nobody is supplying yachts at 10,000USD. There is no fucking supply of yachts at 10,000USD.
If somebody can come up with a way to sell me a yacht at 10,000USD, guess what: they got themselves a customer, a market that otherwise doesn't exist because there are no yachts at 10,000USD.
In fact I would love to buy a yacht at 500USD. Even a more complicated question: where are these fucking yachts at 500USD? There are none, there is no supplier that can do it. The problem is lack of supply, never lack of demand.
You (or somebody) asked earlier: how come the companies are looking at 'customer confidence' numbers in the USA to figure out what to do with their stock? Well, the fact is that USA is an unproductive country and the unproductive country that it is, people in it have very limited ability to buy things. The word conman comes from confidence. The confidence trick is what is being at play here, it's not whether people have jobs and productive jobs at that to buy what they want, the question is: will they go into more debt to buy what they cannot afford?
Now, when your economy is built on confidence and specifically on confidence of consumers to go into more debt rather than on productivity - you have yourself a problem. In a productive economy it is not about confidence of a consumer, it is about employment rate. REAL employment rate, not fictitious bullshit pushed by the government propagandists. Real price of money, real inflation, real employment, real productive output.
Without a real economy all that we can talk about is confidence tricks.
Back to the question at hand, who creates jobs. Jobs are created by people who hire other people for money. Not by some ephemeral down the line client who may or may never materialise, but by the person who puts his own money on the table.
Learn something useful in your life rather than listening to garbage political propaganda of the collectivist state.
Finally, you are realising that every employee is provided by a job by the employer. EMPLOYER - the person who decided that the job is necessary (for whatever reason at all) and figured out where to get the money to hire the EMPLOYEE.
Cause and effect, basics of reasoning. Cause: person A wants to do something, finds the money and as a result hires person B. Effect: person B has the job, the job was created by person A.
What the job is and what is produced is secondary. It may or may not end up being paid for by somebody else LATER.....
There was no life in the Universe, not even planets or stars existed until there was a SUPPLY of material that allowed those to be created. Was there a demand or market for material to create stars before material existed? No. But once there was SUPPLY the market was FORMED.
Cause and effect. Not the other way around, no matter what liberal idiotic agenda wants to present, the agenda of people with political ideas that go directly against logic, reasoning, reality.
Slashdot Mirror
There is an old proverb of two heads being better than one I wonder if we could do something about that missing head that so many of us need, this way one head could be doing one thing and another head something else entirely.... I guess the male portion of the population knows a thing or two about this topic already and the females don't really have a problem with doing 10 things at once.
Ha ha, I just thought what would it look like if a local lemonade stand (when was the last time you've seen one) did this?
Receipt:
a glass of lemonade: 5 cents.
----
cost of doing business with all the rules, regulations, taxes, laws: 2.50
----
total: 2.55
I mean, that would be the cheapest glass of lemonade in decades for me but those regulation and tax costs are outrageous
(same commenter, posting from my second account, otherwise I couldn't post here right now).
Civilization is organization, I disagree that civilization requires oppression to organize. We are perfectly capable of organizing without oppressive ideas, such as nation states, countries, territories and governments. We voluntarily trade what we produce for what others produce, that's what the most important and the only needed level of organization is. Yes, it is anarcho capitalism, AFAIC it is the system that would most benefit individual freedoms, which is the idea.
Slow? start time is not a problem that needs to be solved in a server environment. My server systems are all java, they start in a second or two, then more time is taken by various application initialization (loading data from databases, from property files, from the network).
The real problem with Java AFAIC is memory 'management' and slow Garbage Collection. Wish I could mark objects to be released with source code instructions rather than relying on the intelligent garbage collector.
Yes, once again: I wish I could tell the JVM that a particular object is no longer in use and its underlying memory can be reclaimed. I wish I could do that for a simple shallow data structure and also for deeply nested structures.
This would be much more appreciated than ALL of the syntax sugar additions since version 5.
Hmm, I taught people who I hire to work for me, that is over 30 people that I needed to teach. I also taught some kids. But that's irrelevant, the only relevant part is that today we have more resources to provide extremely cheap education to people because of the technology that we built and yet due to government intervention with all the money flowing into the system the prices are extremely high and will only increase over time *because* of the money.
The more money that is betting for a service the more expensive the service will be and it has nothing to do with how cheaply and universally the service can be provided without all that unnecessary money.
There is maybe a 5% chance that if Trump is elected he would nominate Peter Thiel into SCOTUS, based on that tiny probability of having a libertarian in SCOTUS I think Trump should win.
Yeah, sure, and if a guy calls himself an ostrich then we must 'keep up'. Now, it's none of my business what the guy thinks he is, a female or anything else, that's his business. I do mind calling a person with a dick and balls a female though. I think he is a male, he'll have his physical surgery and will become a former physical male, fake physical female from my perspective, fine, then I'll concede that's not a he any longer.
Objectivism is a much more valid construct than any religion, as to Twitter and bad people, that's funny. How about ISIS? How about almost every war on this planet with vast majority of the people participating being religious (vast majority of all people are religious).
Torture, murder, genocide, theft, destruction of all types, burning people at the stake... best people, ha?
And what the hell is 'faux-Lbertarianism'?
You simply don't understand what money is. A productive day of work can be expressed in dollars and cents but just as well it can be expressed in something else. A farmer grows some crop, a construction worker builds a house, etc. That was NOT produced by anybody else but private entities that are providing the capital, land, labour and management required to do this work.
As to money, actual money is gold, the Federal reserve notes are only medium of exchange and unit of account, not any form of store of value. Government is stealing money, it is stealing a dollar equivalent of the money that is made by the individual or a company.
You can choose to pretend not to understand that, that's your business.
I agree with you on one thing: there shouldn't be *any* State or federal funding for any university. The same should be true of any funding, none should be coming at the expense of people, whose money is stolen via the violence of the State to provide anybody with any benefit.
'Democracy' is a collectivist system that puts the power of the majority over minority, allowing the majority to vote themselves a nice subsidy by taxing the minority and using government violence to achieve that.
A dictator would notice a competitor to his own way of controlling and stealing from the entire population pool and he would know that in competition like that he is likely to lose politically so of-course a dictator will censor.
You have to replace 'civilized' with a thieving, gangster, racketeering society for your statement to make some sense.
Maybe the competitor will bring me their generator instead of connecting me with power lines, maybe they'll set up their own underground lines, I don't care as long as it is not government involved in any of it.
Well, John Galt sells power he generates, you don't like the price don't buy it from him. I am sure others would be happy to sell you the power they generate at lower prices.
If Apple thinks the laws are unfair then they should be actively working to get them changed to something that is fair.
- the law is theft and the entire system is built around that theft. AFAIC Apple shouldn't pay a cent and instead hire a private army to go after every single politician involved in this racketeering and I mean to go with full force of every shady tool available to people when that sort of money is involved, up to and including blackmail, kidnapping, extermination and regime change.
The best part of Java 8 AFAIC is that it is still possible to write and run the code with it that doesn't use any of the new 'features' starting with java 5.
Correct, there is no way to claim that taxes are 'moral' since they are extracted through the violent means of the State.
This is 'legal' racketeering by the State, the State is the organized crime syndicate, nothing else at all.
Also I must say, for Apple it makes sense to strike back in a completely immoral way as well, by hiring special forces at a fraction of the 14.5 Billion USD (14 and a half billion USD, not 1.1 as is stated in the /. headline), digging every possible piece of dirt on every politician involved in this racketeering, blackmailing most, taking out some others. It's just cheaper and it sends the correct signal.
I owe you absolutely nothing and unless I am buying something from you or you are buying something from me I have no interest in you. If you want want government to stealcfrom me to subsidise you somehow and then call me a 'sociopath' or a 'moron' for not accepting that, then you are not only a thief, but some kind of a sick psycho thief.
One has to do more than your average bear to build a business from the ground up, how is that a surprise in any way? If it were easy, everybody would be doing it and it wouldn't be discussed here right now. I started up my own businesses but always self funded / got a client for the product. To do that I put 10 years of savings and years of work on the line, that is not an easy thing to do. But if I were unwilling to do it myself, how could I ever expect somebody else to do it on my behalf?
This ruling doesn't just cover Java and really Java has nothing to do with this. This is about the entire field of computing but probably even worse. Do you want to build a house? So are you going to make doors rectangular shaped passages with opening/closing covers? You are violating something there.
This actually proves my point on copyrights (and patents for that matter). Government should not be given any authority to provide any sort of protection for any of it.
So the problem is cross contamination between fiber channels due to frequency differentials, I think they equalized all frequencies somehow but I don't fully get it. Red is longer than blue for example and if separate strands of fiber carry different 'colour' and frequencies 'bleed' from strand to strand how do you equalize that exactly? Have wave peaks correspond? How? Are they proportionate to remain synchronized? If this is a serious problem, why not add more isolation between strands?
Wrong, you are a joke, I am being 100% serious about everything I say on the issue of economics and individual freedoms. Your ideology leads to the outcomes that you are supposedly horrified of, the reality is that you should be inspecting your own judgement and motivation and be horrified with yourself once you realise that your own ideology causes the massive suffering as the end result. Your ideology is ideology of destruction of individual freedoms which inexorably leads to destruction of the economy and thus society and then the people who you pretend to care about suffer the most. The solution is of-course actual individual freedoms, but it goes against your idiotic notion of social justice that negates individual freedom both as general concept and as specific implementation.
Exactly, officially inflation is low but the reality shows otherwise and the vast majority of the lemming population believes the official propaganda and not their own eyes.
It's as if the official propaganda was that the sky is bright green colour and everybody bought it even though all they had to do is raise their eyes up and see the colour.... they won't do it, even when they do it, they still remain convinced that they are wrong and the official propaganda is right.
This is real life twilight zone.
Jesus fucking christ, precisely, I hire people who satisfy my requirements and I pay money to those people. Amazing! That's just amazing.
Am I doing it out of 'nepotism' or 'fraud'? No, I am building products and services that I am HOPING to sell and I am also doing some custom work for clients that I found already.
The money that I pay as salaries did not have to be paid for those products that I decided to build before having a single client outside of myself. So I am the employer and I created the jobs by hiring people and training them and giving them tasks to do and paying them money out of my own fucking pocket. Out of MY bank account into THEIR bank account for things I want them to do.
Whether or not I sell my products and services further to somebody else does NOT concern the people that I am paying to work for me, as far as they are concerned when the month is over they get paid. It doesn't matter to them if I burn the product or sell it or do whatever with it, they get paid either way.
I wish I could buy a yacht for 10,000USD but I can not. I have the 10,000USD to spend on a yacht but nobody is supplying yachts at 10,000USD. There is no fucking supply of yachts at 10,000USD.
If somebody can come up with a way to sell me a yacht at 10,000USD, guess what: they got themselves a customer, a market that otherwise doesn't exist because there are no yachts at 10,000USD.
In fact I would love to buy a yacht at 500USD. Even a more complicated question: where are these fucking yachts at 500USD? There are none, there is no supplier that can do it. The problem is lack of supply, never lack of demand.
You (or somebody) asked earlier: how come the companies are looking at 'customer confidence' numbers in the USA to figure out what to do with their stock? Well, the fact is that USA is an unproductive country and the unproductive country that it is, people in it have very limited ability to buy things. The word conman comes from confidence. The confidence trick is what is being at play here, it's not whether people have jobs and productive jobs at that to buy what they want, the question is: will they go into more debt to buy what they cannot afford?
Now, when your economy is built on confidence and specifically on confidence of consumers to go into more debt rather than on productivity - you have yourself a problem. In a productive economy it is not about confidence of a consumer, it is about employment rate. REAL employment rate, not fictitious bullshit pushed by the government propagandists. Real price of money, real inflation, real employment, real productive output.
Without a real economy all that we can talk about is confidence tricks.
Back to the question at hand, who creates jobs. Jobs are created by people who hire other people for money. Not by some ephemeral down the line client who may or may never materialise, but by the person who puts his own money on the table.
Learn something useful in your life rather than listening to garbage political propaganda of the collectivist state.
Finally, you are realising that every employee is provided by a job by the employer. EMPLOYER - the person who decided that the job is necessary (for whatever reason at all) and figured out where to get the money to hire the EMPLOYEE.
Cause and effect, basics of reasoning. Cause: person A wants to do something, finds the money and as a result hires person B. Effect: person B has the job, the job was created by person A.
What the job is and what is produced is secondary. It may or may not end up being paid for by somebody else LATER. ....
There was no life in the Universe, not even planets or stars existed until there was a SUPPLY of material that allowed those to be created. Was there a demand or market for material to create stars before material existed? No. But once there was SUPPLY the market was FORMED.
Cause and effect. Not the other way around, no matter what liberal idiotic agenda wants to present, the agenda of people with political ideas that go directly against logic, reasoning, reality.